Align Technology 10-K 2013-12-31
Filed 2014-02-28. 21 sections, 419K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
10-K 1 algn-20131231x10k.htm 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
Or
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-32259
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 94-3267295 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
2560 Orchard Parkway
San Jose, California 95131
(Address of principal executive offices)
(408) 470-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common Stock, $0.0001 par value (Including associated Preferred Stock Purchase Rights) | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Market) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | |
| Non-accelerated filer o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,908,140,447 as of June 30, 2013 based on the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on such date. Shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
On February 21, 2014, 81,480,919 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2013 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year end of December 31, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||
| PART I | 3 | |
| Item 1. | Business | 3 |
| Executive Officers of the Registrant | 13 | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 14 |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 28 |
| Item 2. | Properties | 28 |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 28 |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 29 |
| PART II | 30 | |
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 30 |
| Item 6. | Selected Consolidated Financial Data | 31 |
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 33 |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 50 |
| Item 8. | Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 51 |
| Item 9. | Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 93 |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 93 |
| Item 9B. | Other Information | 93 |
| PART III | 94 | |
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 94 |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 94 |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 94 |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 95 |
| Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 95 |
| PART IV | 96 | |
| Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 96 |
| Signatures | 100 |
Invisalign, Align, ClinCheck, Invisalign Assist, Invisalign Teen, Vivera, SmartForce, SmartTrack, Power Ridge, iTero, Orthocad, iCast and iRecord, among others, are trademarks and/or service marks of Align Technology, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries or affiliated companies and may be registered in the United States and/or other countries.
In addition to historical information, this annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include, among other things, our expectations regarding the anticipated impact of our new products and product enhancements including Invisalign G5 and ClinCheck Pro will have on doctor utilization and our market share, our expectations regarding product mix and product adoption, our expectations regarding the existence and impact of seasonality, our expectations regarding the financial and strategic benefits of our iTero scanner, our expectations regarding the continued expansion of our international markets the level of our operating expenses and gross margins, and other factors beyond our control, as well as other statements regarding our future operations, financial condition and prospects and business strategies. These statements may contain words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” or other words indicating future results. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and in particular, the risks discussed below in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”. We undertake no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Our Company
Align Technology, Inc (“We”, “Our”, “Align”) designs, manufactures and markets a system of clear aligner therapy, intra-oral scanners and CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) digital services used in dentistry, orthodontics, and dental records storage. Align Technology was founded in March 1997 and incorporated in Delaware in April 1997. Our headquarters are located at 2560 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95131, and our telephone number is 408-470-1000. Our internet address is www.aligntech.com. Our international headquarters are located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
We have two operating segments: (1) Clear Aligner, known as the Invisalign System; and (2) Scanners and CAD/CAM Services ("SCCS"), known as the iTero intra-oral scanner and OrthoCAD services. For the year ended December 31, 2013, Clear Aligner revenues represent approximately 93 percent of worldwide revenue, while Scanners and CAD/CAM Services represent the remaining 7 percent of worldwide revenues. We distribute the vast majority of our products directly to our customers: orthodontists and general practitioner dentists ("GPs"), as well as to restorative dentists, including prosthodontists, periodontists, and oral surgeons.
We received 510(k) clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to market the Invisalign System in 1998. The Invisalign System is regulated by the FDA as a Class II medical device. In order to provide Invisalign treatment to their patients, orthodontists and GPs must initially complete an Invisalign training course. The Invisalign System is primarily sold through a direct sales force in the United States ("U.S."), Canada, Europe, and certain Asia-Pacific countries including Australia, New Zealand, China and Japan. We use a distributor model for the sale of our products in non-core country markets in the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East and Africa ("EMEA"), and Latin America regions.
We acquired the iTero digital intra-oral scanner and CAD/CAM services business, our SCCS segment, in April 2011. Our iTero scanner is used by dental professionals and/or labs and services for restorative and orthodontic digital procedures as well as Invisalign digital impression submission. We received 501(k) clearance from the FDA to market iTero software for expanded indications in 2013. Scanners and CAD/CAM Services are primarily sold through our direct sales force in North America and in select international markets primarily through distribution partners.
Clear Aligner Segment
Malocclusion and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment
Malocclusion, or the misalignment of teeth, is one of the most prevalent clinical dental conditions, affecting nearly a billion people, or approximately 50% to 75% of the population of major developed countries. Approximately 6.8 million people annually elect treatment by orthodontists worldwide, of which approximately 2.6 million have mild to moderate malocclusion and are applicable to Invisalign treatment - our served market.
In the U.S., orthodontists and GPs treat malocclusion primarily with metal arch wires and brackets, referred to as braces, and augment braces with elastics, metal bands, headgear and other ancillary devices as needed. Available options for improving treatment aesthetics include the use of ceramic, tooth-colored brackets or bonding brackets on the inside, or lingual
surface, of the patient’s teeth. The average treatment takes approximately 12 to 24 months to complete and requires several hours of direct dental professional involvement, known in the industry as “chair time,” including the initial diagnosis, creation of an appropriate treatment plan and bonding of the brackets to the patient’s teeth, and attachment of arch wires to the brackets. Subsequent visits involve tightening or otherwise adjusting the braces approximately every six weeks until the final visit when the dental professional removes each bracket and residual bonding agent from the patient’s teeth. Upon completion of the treatment, the dental professional may, at his or her discretion, have the patient use a retainer.
The Invisalign System
The Invisalign System is a proprietary method for treating malocclusion based on a series of doctor-prescribed, custom manufactured, clear plastic removable orthodontic aligners. The Invisalign System offers a range of treatment options, specialized services, and proprietary software for treatment visualization and is comprised of the following phases:
Orthodontic diagnosis and transmission of treatment data to us. The dental professional prepares and sends us a patient’s treatment data package which consists of a prescription form, a polyvinyl-siloxane, (or "PVS") impression of the relevant dental arches, photographs of the patient and, at the dental professional’s election, x-rays of the patient’s dentition. The dental professional can also submit an intra-oral scan or “digital impression” instead of a physical PVS impression through either iTero or 3M True Definition, currently the only other Invisalign qualified intra-oral scanner.
Preparation of 3D computer models of the patient’s initial malocclusion. Upon receipt, we use the treatment data package to construct digital models of the patient’s dentition. In cases where a PVS impression has been submitted, we use computed tomography, known as CT scanning to develop a digital, three-dimensional computer model of the patient’s current dentition. In cases where the dental professional submits a digital impression, this step in the process is eliminated.
Preparation of computer-simulated treatment and viewing of treatment using ClinCheck software. We transform this initial digital model into a proposed custom, three-dimensional treatment plan, called a ClinCheck treatment plan. The ClinCheck plan simulates appropriate tooth movement broken down into a series of two-week increments, and details timing and placement of any attachments that will be used during treatment. Attachments are tooth-colored “buttons” that are sometimes used to increase the biomechanical force on a specific tooth or teeth in order to effect the desired movement. The patient’s ClinCheck treatment plan is then made available to the prescribing dental professional via the Invisalign Doctor Site which enables the dental professional to project tooth movement with a level of accuracy not previously possible with metal arch wires and brackets. By reviewing and amending the treatment simulation, the dental professional retains control over the treatment plan. ClinCheck Pro is the next generation Invisalign treatment software tool, designed to provide more precise control over final tooth position and to help Invisalign providers achieve their treatment goals. This latest software innovation features interactive 3D controls that, for the first time, allow Invisalign providers to make adjustments to the position of individual teeth directly on the 3D model and to visualize the effects on the whole dentition in real time.
Construction of molds corresponding to each step of treatment. Upon the dental professional’s approval of the ClinCheck treatment plan, we use the data underlying the simulation, in conjunction with stereolithography technology, to construct a series of molds depicting the future position of the patient’s teeth. Each mold is a replica of the patient’s teeth at each two-week stage of the simulated course of treatment.
Manufacture of aligners and shipment to the dental professional. From these molds, aligners are fabricated by pressure-forming polymeric sheets over each mold. Aligners are thin, clear plastic, removable dental appliances that are custom manufactured in a series to correspond to each two-week stage of the ClinCheck animation. Aligners are generally worn for consecutive two-week periods which correspond to the approved ClinCheck treatment plan. After two weeks of use, the patient replaces them with the next pair in the series, advancing tooth movement with each aligner stage. Throughout treatment, the doctor may place attachments or use other auxiliaries to achieve desired tooth movements, per the doctor’s original prescription and resulting ClinCheck treatment plan.
Retention. Upon completion of the treatment, the patient may be prescribed our single clear retainer product or our Vivera Retainer product.
Scanners and CAD/CAM Services Segment
Although advancements have been made in materials used for taking dental impressions since their introduction one hundred years ago, the overall impression process has remained relatively unchanged. Shortcomings such as voids, pulls, and the general margin for error have remained inherent in conventional impressions, and subsequent retakes create unnecessary costs for a clinical practice. Intra-oral scanning is an emerging technology that we believe will have substantial impact on the future of dentistry. By enabling the dental practitioner to create a 3D image of the patient’s teeth using a handheld intra-oral
scanner inside the mouth, intra-oral scanning is more efficient and precise and more comfortable for patients, compared to the mess, discomfort, and subjective nature of taking physical impressions. The digital model created with an intra-oral scanner is more accurate than a physical impression and substantially reduces the rate of restoration “remakes” so patients are recalled less often and the appointment time for the restoration is shorter because of fewer adjustments, which results in greater overall patient satisfaction.
As the only intra-oral scanner in the market based on parallel confocal imaging, the iTero intra-oral scanner utilizes laser and optical scanning to capture the contours of the patient’s dentition, gingival structures and the bite. iTero captures 100,000 points of laser light in perfect focus without the use of powder to coat the teeth, allowing for contact of the wand and tooth. The benefit of contact scanning for the clinician is that it eliminates the challenge of hovering over the teeth at a specific distance which can be complicated. For the patient, they enjoy a more comfortable powder free experience which allows the clinician to provide a very comfortable patient centric experience. Within minutes, an accurate 3D digital impression can be viewed on the screen. The 3D digital model file can be used for various procedures and services including fabrication of physical dental models for use by labs to create restorative units such as veneers, inlays, onlays, crowns, bridges and implant abutments; Invisalign digital impression submission; digital records storage; orthodontic diagnosis; and orthodontic retainers and appliances.
The iTero intra-oral scanner consists of a mobile computer unit, display screen, control foot pedal and wand to scan and capture a patient’s dentition (full or partial dental arch). iTero software features include occlusal map, eraser tool, edge trim tool, real-time modeling and an option to submit scans for Invisalign treatment. iTero provides doctors and labs with an open choice to export generic digital files of their digital impression to use with other third party dental service providers. This allows the digital impression to integrate with cone beam CT images for implant and orthodontic treatment planning. In-office training on the system and features is provided after the unit is delivered to the practice.
Our Products and Services
Our net revenues are generated from the sale of the following product offerings.
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||
| Percentage of Net Revenues by Product | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||
| Invisalign Full | 58 | % | 61 | % | 63 | % | ||
| Invisalign Express/Lite | 11 | 9 | 9 | |||||
| Invisalign Teen | 13 | 12 | 11 | |||||
| Invisalign Assist | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||
| Invisalign Non-case* | 7 | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Scanners** | 4 | 4 | 3 | |||||
| CAD/CAM Services** | 3 | 4 | 3 | |||||
| Total net revenues | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
| * | Non-case net revenues include retainers, training revenues, and ancillary offerings under our Clear Aligner product lines |
| ** | As the acquisition of Cadent Holdings, Inc. (“Cadent”) closed on April 29, 2011, the fiscal year 2011 percentages for Scanners and CAD/CAM Services only reflect eight months of net revenues. |
Clear Aligner Products
Invisalign Full. Used for a wide range of malocclusion, Invisalign Full consists of the number of aligners necessary to achieve the doctor’s treatment goals. For Invisalign Full, aligners are manufactured and then delivered to the dental professionals in a single shipment. Invisalign Full is sold in the U.S., Canada, and our international regions.
Invisalign Express (10 and 5) and Invisalign Lite/i7. Invisalign Express, Invisalign Lite and Invisalign i7 are lower-cost solutions for less complex orthodontic cases, non-comprehensive treatment relapse cases, or straightening prior to restorative or cosmetic treatments such as veneers. Invisalign Express 10 and Invisalign Express 5, which are sold in the U.S. and Canada, uses up to 10 and 5 sets of aligners, respectively. Invisalign Lite and Invisalign i7, sold in our international regions, uses up to 14 and 7 sets of aligners, respectively. For Invisalign Express/Lite/i7, aligners are manufactured and then delivered to the dental professionals in a single shipment.
Invisalign Teen. Invisalign Teen includes all the features of Invisalign Full, plus additional features that address the orthodontic needs of teenage patients such as compliance indicators, compensation for tooth eruption and six free single arch replacement aligners. This product is predominantly marketed to orthodontists who treat the vast majority of malocclusion in teenage patients. For Invisalign Teen, aligners (other than the replacement aligners) are manufactured and then delivered to the dental professionals in a single shipment. Invisalign Teen is sold in the U.S., Canada, and our international regions.
Invisalign Assist. Used for anterior alignment and aesthetically-oriented cases, Invisalign Assist offers added support to our dental practitioners throughout the treatment process, including progress tracking that allows the dental professional to submit new impressions every nine stages. When the progress tracking feature is selected, aligners are shipped to the dental professional after every nine stages thereby helping to achieve successful treatment outcomes. Predominantly marketed to GPs, Invisalign Assist is intended to make it easier to select appropriate cases for their experience level or treatment approach, submit cases more efficiently and manage appointments with suggested tasks. Invisalign Assist is sold in the U.S. and Canada.
Retention. We offer two products for post treatment retention. The first is a single set of custom clear aligner retainers. The second is offered as a set of four custom clear aligners called Vivera Retainers made with proprietary material strong enough to maintain tooth position and correct minor relapse if necessary. Each set of Vivera Retainers is intended to be used for three consecutive months and deliver one year of retention. Doctors can prescribe Vivera Retainers for their Invisalign and their non-Invisalign patients.
Invisalign non-case revenues. Invisalign non-case revenues represent retainer products discussed above, Invisalign training fees and sales of ancillary products, such as cleaning material and adjusting tools used by dental professionals during the course of treatment.
Feature Enhancements. We have consistently introduced enhanced features across the Invisalign System over the past several years, such as Invisalign G3 (launched in October 2010), Invisalign G4 (launched in November 2011), and, most recently, Invisalign G5 (launched in February 2014). These feature enhancements are a collection of clinical innovations designed to address some of the most significant treatment challenges doctors encounter. Most recently, Invisalign G5 is our first set of innovations designed specifically as an integrated solution to enhance treatment predictability for deep bite, a specific type of malocclusion.
Invisalign G5 feature enhancements include:
| • | Precision Cuts, which are custom mesial and distal hooks used to provide anchorage for elastics and button cutouts to accommodate buttons bonded to the tooth aimed to help treat patients with Class II and Class III malocclusion; and |
| • | SmartForce features engineered to achieve more predictable tooth movements using custom optimized attachments and Power Ridges designed to provide additional force in cases where certain types of root movement are prescribed. |
| • | Precision aligner bite ramps designed to disocclude the posterior teeth for improved efficiency in deep bite treatments. |
SmartTrack™ Aligner Material. SmartTrack, the next generation of Invisalign clear aligner material is a proprietary, custom-engineered material that delivers gentle, more constant force considered ideal for orthodontic tooth movements. Conventional aligner materials relax and lose a substantial percent of energy in the initial days of aligner wear, but SmartTrack maintains more constant force over the two weeks that a patient wears the aligners. The flexible SmartTrack material also more precisely conforms to tooth morphology, attachments, and interproximal spaces to improve control of tooth movement throughout treatment. SmartTrack became the new standard clear aligner material for Invisalign products in North America beginning January 2013 and in February 2013 for Europe and other international markets where we have obtained regulatory approval.
Scanners and CAD/CAM Services Products
Scanners
iTero Scanner. In January 2013, we announced the new iTero scanner available as a single hardware platform with software options for restorative or orthodontic procedures. Previously, we sold two hardware platforms, the iTero scanner for GPs, prosthodontists, periodontists, and oral surgeons and the iOC scanner for orthodontists. The newly redesigned iTero scanner maintains our innovative powderless technology and features a modern design with enhanced wand optics for a smaller, more ergonomic fit, easy-to-use keyboard design and a larger working surface. Additionally, full color model rendering is available, enabling clinicians to show patients a life-like final model of their scanned dentition. The new iTero
delivers substantially reduced capture time through improved optics and enhanced algorithms while maintaining a high standard of digital imaging accuracy, the efficiency of open source imaging and streamlined workflow. We began marketing and selling the new iTero in North America beginning February 2013 and soon thereafter in select international markets.
Restorative software for iTero. Software designed for GPs, prosthodontists, periodontists, and oral surgeons which includes features for restorative procedures commonly performed in their practices such as veneers, inlays, onlays, crowns, bridges and implants. The iTero restorative software provides the ability to scan quadrants and full arches, and allows simple powder-free capture of digital impressions for single-unit cases as well as more complex restorative and implant treatment plans. The iTero software also contains Invisalign interoperability to support clear aligner orthodontic treatment.
Orthodontic software for iTero. Software designed for orthodontists for digital records storage, orthodontic diagnosis, Invisalign digital impression submission, and for the fabrication of printed models and retainers. The iTero orthodontic software digitally captures the contours of the dentition and the gingival structures, providing an accurate, powder-free digital orthodontic scan in just minutes. This digital impression procedure ensures a more comfortable patient experience and produces a precise scan that can be seamlessly integrated with Invisalign treatment, OrthoCAD iCast, and OrthoCAD iRecord which allows a doctor to utilize sophisticated measurement and treatment planning tools.
CAD/CAM Services
iTero Models and Dies. An accurate physical model and dies are manufactured based on the digital scan and sent to the laboratory of the dentist’s choice for completion of the needed restoration. The laboratory also has the option to export the digital file for immediate production of coping and full-contour restorations on their laboratory CAD/CAM systems. The laboratory conducts then completes the ceramic buildup or staining and glazing and delivers the end result - a precisely fitting restoration. iTero prosthetics have a near-zero remake rate.
OrthoCAD iCast. iCast provides a digital alternative to traditional stone cast models which allows for simplified storage and digital record retrieval. The iCast digital model contains a full American Board of Orthodontics ("ABO") base and is available from an iTero scan or from a traditional alginate impression.
OrthoCAD iRecord. iRecord provides a digital alternative to traditional stone cast models which allows for simplified storage and digital record retrieval. This simplified model without an ABO base is an economical option for record retention. iRecord is available exclusively from an iTero scan.
Chair Side Applications
Invisalign Outcome Simulator. In January 2013, we announced the commercial availability of the Invisalign Outcome Simulator, our first Invisalign chair-side application powered by the iTero scanner. The interactive application provides GPs and orthodontists an enhanced platform for patient education and is designed to increase treatment acceptance by helping patients visualize the benefits possible with Invisalign treatment. As the only Invisalign chair-side intra-oral scanning application on the market, the Invisalign Outcome Simulator's unique dual view layout shows a prospective patient an image of his/her own current dentition next to his/her simulated final position of how their teeth may look after Invisalign treatment. Using a full arch Invisalign scan, the Invisalign Outcome Simulator takes a few minutes to run and may be viewed chair-side, on the scanner, or from a computer using MyAlignTech.com. Intuitive tools allow doctors to make real-time adjustments to individual teeth during consultations that increase patient education and the likelihood of patient acceptance.
Our iTero scanner includes orthodontic software, restorative software, or both, and the Invisalign Outcome Simulator. The orthodontic or restorative software may also be purchased subsequently for an upgrade fee. The Invisalign Outcome Simulator is not available for sale separately.
Other proprietary software mentioned in this Annual Report on Form 10-K such as ClinCheck and ClinCheck Pro software, the Invisalign Doctor Site, and enhanced feature solutions such as Invisalign G5 are included as part of the Invisalign System and are not sold separately nor do they contribute as individual items of revenue.
Business Strategy
Our goal is to establish Invisalign clear aligners as the standard method for treating malocclusion and to establish the iTero intra-oral scanner as the preferred scanning protocol for 3D digital scans, ultimately driving increased product adoption by dental professionals. We intend to achieve this by continued focus and execution of our strategic growth drivers: Market Expansion, Doctor Preference, and Brand Strength.
| 1. | Market Expansion. We expect to continue to grow and expand our business by investing in resources, infrastructure, and initiatives that will drive growth from both a geographic and market segment standpoint. From a geographic standpoint, we focus our efforts on expanding our sales territory coverage in all of our direct sales geographies, with particular emphasis in our highest growth areas such as Europe and the Asia Pacific region. We strive to make sure that our new geographies and our expanded territories internationally have everything they need from the products, to the support, to the people, in order to successfully establish Invisalign as the treatment of choice for orthodontics in each geographic market. From a market segment standpoint, we are focused on two important markets: adults and teenagers. We believe expansion in these two markets can be achieved through product innovations that can expand the types of indications our Invisalign products can treat, as well as by expanding the overall market for orthodontics, primarily with adults who would not otherwise seek treatment with traditional wires and brackets. We believe continued market expansion can be achieved by having the right products, services, and communications worldwide to give our doctors the confidence they need to treat with Invisalign more often and attract potential patients to their practice so they ask for Invisalign by name. |
In parallel with these investments, we also engage in professional marketing, clinical support and education initiatives that support doctor practice development and facilitate the continued growth of their practices.
In our iTero scanner business, we leverage our combined sales and marketing resources to facilitate the adoption and penetration of each product into our doctors’ practices. Many of our customers recognize that having an iTero scanner at chair-side improves practice effectiveness for Invisalign as evidenced by higher Invisalign utilization rates among customers with an iTero scanner.
| 2. | Doctor Preference. We want all of our doctors to have the confidence and motivation to lead with Invisalign for every patient that walks into their practice. We strive to achieve this by investing in two areas. First, continuing to improve product predictability and applicability for more complex cases thereby expanding the types of malocclusion that our Invisalign products can treat. As an example, we recently launched Invisalign G5 in February 2014, which represented our first set of features engineered specifically to treat deep bite malocclusion. We estimate that deep bite manifests itself in approximately 30% to 40% of the orthodontic cases treated worldwide depending on geography. Secondly, enhancing the customer’s experience by making it easier to treat with and integrate Invisalign into their practices. As an example, we recently launched ClinCheck Pro in February 2014, the next generation Invisalign treatment software tool, designed to simplify the treatment process and help our doctors achieve their treatment goals. |
| 3. | Brand Strength. Our goal is to make Invisalign a highly recognized name brand worldwide by creating awareness for Invisalign treatment among consumers and motiving potential patients to seek treatment from an Invisalign provider. In support of this objective, we invest in initiatives designed to strengthen our global brand name recognition and drive consumer purchase intent. We accomplish this objective through an integrated consumer marketing strategy that includes television, media, social networking and event marketing. |
Manufacturing and Suppliers
Our manufacturing facilities are located in Juarez, Mexico, where we conduct our aligner fabrication, distribute and repair our scanners, perform our CAD/CAM services, and in Or Yehuda, Israel where we produce our handheld intra-oral scanner wand. The final assembly of our iTero scanner is performed by a third party manufacturer located in Israel. Our Invisalign digital treatment planning and interpretation for iTero restorative cases are conducted primarily at our facility located in San Jose, Costa Rica. Information regarding risks associated with our manufacturing process and foreign operations may be found in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.”
Our quality system is required to be in compliance with the Quality System regulations enforced by the FDA, and similar regulations enforced by other worldwide regulatory authorities. We are certified to EN ISO 13485:2003, an internationally recognized standard for medical device manufacturing. We have a formal, documented quality system by which quality objectives are defined, understood and achieved. Systems, processes and procedures are implemented to ensure high levels of product and service quality. We monitor the effectiveness of the quality system based on internal data and direct customer feedback and strive to continually improve our systems and processes, taking corrective action, as needed.
Since the manufacturing process of our products requires substantial and varied technical expertise, we believe that our manufacturing capabilities are important to our success. In order to produce our highly customized, highly precise, medical quality products in volume, we have developed a number of proprietary processes and technologies. These technologies
include complex software algorithms and solutions, CT scanning, stereolithography and automated aligner fabrication. To increase the efficiency of our manufacturing processes, we continue to focus our efforts on software development and the improvement of rate-limiting processes, or bottlenecks. We continuously upgrade our proprietary, three-dimensional treatment planning software to enhance computer analysis of treatment data and to reduce time spent on manual and judgmental tasks for each case, thereby increasing the efficiency of our technicians in Costa Rica. In addition, to improve efficiency and increase the scale of our operations, we continue to invest in the development of automated systems for the fabrication and packaging of aligners.
We are highly dependent on manufacturers of specialized scanning equipment, rapid prototyping machines, resin and other advanced materials for our aligners, as well as the optics, electronic and other mechanical components of our intra-oral scanners. We maintain single supply relationships for many of these machines and materials technologies. In particular, our CT scanning and stereolithography equipment used in our aligner manufacturing and many of the critical components for the optics of our intra-oral scanners are provided by single suppliers. We are also committed to purchasing all of our resin and polymer, the primary raw materials used in our manufacturing process for clear aligners, from a single source. The need to replace one of our single source suppliers could cause a disruption in our ability to timely deliver certain of our products or increase costs. See Item 1A Risk Factors — “We maintain single supply relationships for certain of our key machines and materials technologies, and our business and operating results could be harmed if supply is restricted or ends or the price of raw materials used in our manufacturing process increases.”
Sales and Marketing
Our sales efforts are focused primarily on the Invisalign System and continuing to increase adoption and utilization by orthodontists and GPs worldwide. In North America, Europe and certain Asia-Pacific country markets, we have direct sales and support organizations, which includes quota carrying sales representatives, sales management, and sales administration. Our direct sales organization in North America is comprised of a team of territory managers and to a lesser extent, territory specialists. These territory specialists are used to enhance coverage, especially with lower volume GP customers.
Currently, we have two distribution partners that sell the Invisalign System in smaller non-core country markets in the EMEA and Latin America regions. We evaluate adding distribution partners in other non-core country markets on a case-by-case basis or assess modifying our current distribution agreements, as our international business grows. Our EMEA distribution partner has been covering approximately 80 country markets and continues to make good progress in building a base of Invisalign trained doctors in those regions. Given the significant long term potential this extensive geography represents and the support we can now provide by utilizing our direct coverage model in Europe, beginning in February 2014, we will transition a small number of those countries into direct sales regions. We expect to leverage our existing infrastructure and resources to bring sales coverage and customer support to these countries, most of which are adjacent to our directly covered European countries. Due to the small volume of business from our EMEA distributor, we do not anticipate that this transition will have a material effect on our financial results in the next several years.
For our intra-oral scanners, we have a small team of direct sales representatives in North America. Our intra-oral scanner sales team leverages leads generated by our Invisalign sales and marketing resources, including customer events and industry trade-shows. In 2014, we expect to have very few scanner sales internationally as we continue to evaluate the most effective sales model in this market.
We market Invisalign by communicating the benefits of the Invisalign System to dental professionals through our training programs, online and traditional mail campaigns, trade shows, trade journals and print. We also promote the benefits of Invisalign through our integrated consumer marketing platform which combines traditional print and broadcast media with a balanced mix of public relations, event marketing, and social media. The goal of this platform is to raise awareness of Invisalign as the best options for a healthy, beautiful smile among adults and teenagers. In addition, our consumer marketing platform enables us to help prospective patients find a great Invisalign treatment practice that can meet their needs. For intra-oral scanners, in addition to leveraging Invisalign customer events and industry trade-shows to communicate the benefits of digital scanning to dental professionals, we also have training programs, educational websites and limited print advertising.
We provide training, marketing and clinical support to orthodontists and GPs. In 2013, we had approximately 38,000 active Invisalign providers.
Research and Development
We are committed to investing in world-class technology development, which we believe is critical to achieving our goal of establishing the Invisalign System as the standard method for treating malocclusion and our intra-oral scanning platform as the preferred scanning protocol for 3D digital scans. Our research and development expenses were $44.1 million, $42.9 million, and $37.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Our research and development activities are directed toward developing the technology innovations that we believe will deliver our next generation of products and platforms. Our research and development activities range from accelerating product and clinical innovation, to developing manufacturing process improvements, to researching future technologies and products.
In an effort to demonstrate Invisalign’s broad treatment capabilities, various clinical case studies and articles have been published that highlight the clinical applicability of Invisalign to malocclusion cases, including those of severe complexity. We undertake pre-commercialization trials and testing of our technological improvements to the product and manufacturing process.
Intellectual Property
We believe our intellectual property position represents a substantial business advantage. As of December 31, 2013, we had 313 issued U.S. patents, 124 pending U.S. patent applications, and 239 foreign issued patents, as well as 116 pending foreign patent applications.
We continue to pursue further intellectual property protection through U.S. and foreign patent applications and non-disclosure agreements. We also seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. We cannot be certain that patents will be issued as a result of any patent application or that patents that have been issued to us or that may be issued in the future will be found to be valid and enforceable and sufficient to protect our technology or products. Our intellectual property rights may not be successfully asserted in the future or may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. In addition, the laws of various foreign countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. Our inability to protect our proprietary information could harm our business. Information regarding risks associated with failing to protect our proprietary technology and our intellectual property rights may be found in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.”
Seasonal Fluctuations
General economic conditions impact our business and financial results, and we experience seasonal trends related to our two operating segments, customer channels and the geographic locations that we serve. For example, European sales of Invisalign treatment are often weaker in the summer months due to our customers and their patients being on holiday. In North America, summer is typically the busiest season for orthodontists with practices that have a high percentage of adolescent and teenage patients as many parents want to get their teenagers started in treatment before the start of the school year; however, many GPs are on vacation during this time and therefore tend to start fewer cases. For our SCCS segment, capital equipment sales are often stronger in the fourth calendar quarter. Consequently, these seasonal trends have caused and may continue to cause, fluctuations in our quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequential revenue growth rates.
Backlog
Due to the individualized nature of an Invisalign treatment which is prescribed by a doctor, no two cases are alike, and we maintain relatively low levels of backlog. The period from which a treatment data package (or “a case”) is received until the acceptance of the digital ClinCheck treatment plan is dependent on the dental professional’s discretion to modify, accept or cancel the treatment plan. Therefore, we consider the case a firm order to manufacture aligners once the dental professional has approved the ClinCheck treatment plan. Our Invisalign backlog consists of ClinCheck treatment plans that have been accepted but not yet shipped. Because aligners are shipped shortly after the ClinCheck treatment plan has been accepted, we believe that backlog is not a good indicator of future Invisalign sales. Our quarterly Invisalign revenues can be impacted by the timing of the ClinCheck treatment plan acceptances and our ability to ship those cases in the same quarter. We define our intra-oral scanner backlog as orders where payment is reasonably assured and credit and financing is approved but the scanner has not yet shipped. Our intra-oral scanner backlog as of December 31, 2013 was not material.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive market and we encounter a wide variety of competitors, including larger companies or divisions of larger companies with substantial sales, marketing, research and financial capabilities. We also face competition from early stage companies. Although the number of competitors varies by segment, currently our products compete directly against products manufactured and distributed by various companies, both within and outside the U.S., including Danaher Corporation, 3M, Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and Dentsply International, Inc. Information regarding risks associated with increased competition may be found in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.”
Key competitive factors include:
| • | effectiveness of treatment; |
| • | price; |
| • | software features; |
| • | aesthetic appeal of the treatment method; |
| • | customer support; |
| • | customer online interface; |
| • | brand awareness; |
| • | innovation; |
| • | distribution network; |
| • | comfort associated with the treatment method; |
| • | oral hygiene; |
| • | ease of use; and |
| • | dental professionals’ chair time. |
We believe that our products compare favorably with our competitors’ products with respect to each of these factors.
Government Regulation
In order for us to market our products, we must obtain regulatory authorization and comply with extensive product and quality system regulations. These regulations, including the requirements for approvals or clearance and the time required for regulatory review, vary from country to country. Failure to obtain regulatory approval and to meet all local requirements including language and specific safety standards in any country in which we currently market or plan to market our products could prevent us from marketing products in such countries or subject us to sanctions and fines. The approval by government authorities is unpredictable and uncertain and may not be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in receipt of, or a failure to receive, such approvals or clearances, or the loss of any previously received approvals or clearances, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We believe we are in compliance with all FDA, federal and state laws and International regulatory requirements that are applicable to our products and manufacturing operations. Country-specific regulatory framework and requirements are highlighted in the following examples:
U.S.
In the U.S., the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDA Act") and its subsequent amendments, and the regulations, provide the FDA with authority over medical devices and the research, clinical testing, manufacture, labeling, distribution, sale, and promotion of such devices. Medical devices are classified into one of three classes (Class I, II or III). The class to which the device is assigned determines, among other things, the type of pre-marketing submission/application required for market authorization. Our Invisalign aligners and intra-oral scanners are classified as Class II medical devices and we have obtained applicable 510(k) clearances for our marketed products.
The FDA Act also requires manufactured devices to comply with applicable Quality System Regulations which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon us with respect to design, development, manufacturing and quality assurance activities, including the reporting of adverse experiences with the use of the device. We are subject to unannounced inspections by regulatory authorities to determine compliance with applicable regulations, and these inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors. Labeling and promotion activities are subject to scrutiny by the FDA and, in certain instances, by the Federal Trade Commission. The FDA actively enforces regulations prohibiting marketing of products for unapproved uses. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizures of products, total or partial suspension of production, failure of the government to grant pre-market clearance or approval for devices, withdrawal of marketing approvals, and criminal prosecution. The FDA also has the authority to request repair, replacement or refund of the cost of any medical device manufactured or distributed by us.
European Union
The member states of the European Union ("EU") have adopted the European Medical Device Directives (MDD 93/42/EEC) that form a single set of medical device regulations for all EU member countries. The MDD defines the quality system, safety, and performance requirements to be met by manufacturers for their products, called the Essential Requirements. Certification to ISO 13485, an international standard for quality management systems, demonstrates compliance with the quality system requirements outlined in the MDD. Our Quality Management System is ISO 13485 certified by the British Standards Institute, an approved full scope Notified Body (as defined in the regulations).
Canada
In Canada, the system of approval for medical devices is governed by the Medical Device Regulations of the Department of Justice (SOR/98-282), including quality system requirements based on ISO 13485, facility registration, and device licensing. The scope of our Quality Management System certification includes the additional requirements defined by Health Canada.
Japan
In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW), regulates medical devices under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law ("PAL"). Manufacturers with no local presence in Japan must appoint a Marketing Authorization Holder ("MAH") to manage their device registration process and liaise with the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency ("PMDA"), Japan’s medical device market regulator. Manufacturers of Class II, III and IV devices must implement a quality system compliant with the PAL and MHLW Ordinance #169 (Japan QMS Regulation) and submit QMS Conformity Assessment Application. The scope of our Quality Management System certification includes the additional requirements defined by PAL and Invisalign has been authorized for sale.
China
In China, the China Food and Drug Administration ("CFDA") regulates medical devices. The device classification process in China differs significantly from those in the EU and the U.S., and approval of the medical device in the country of origin is required before beginning the registration process. Compliance with U.S. FDA Quality System Requirements and/or ISO 13485 will satisfy CFDA quality management system requirements. CFDA has approved our submission for Invisalign.
Other Government Oversight
We are also subject to various laws inside and outside the U.S. concerning our relationships with healthcare professionals and government officials, price reporting and regulation, the promotion, sales and marketing of our products and services, the importation and exportation of our products, the operation of our facilities and distribution of our products. As a global company, we are subject to varying degrees of government regulation in the various countries in which we do business, and the general trend is toward increasingly stringent oversight and enforcement. Initiatives sponsored by government agencies, legislative bodies, and the private sector to limit the growth of healthcare expenses generally are ongoing in markets where we do business. It is not possible to predict at this time the long-term impact of such cost containment measures on our future business.
Our customers are healthcare providers that may be reimbursed by federally funded programs such as Medicaid or a foreign national healthcare program, each of which may offer some degree of oversight. Many government agencies, both domestic and foreign, have increased their enforcement activities with respect to healthcare providers and companies in recent
years. Enforcement actions and associated defense can be expensive, and any resulting findings carry the risk of significant civil and criminal penalties. For example, the U.S. Federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act recently went into effect, which requires public transparency of transfers of value to physicians.
We are also subject to numerous data protection requirements that span from individual state and national laws in the US to multinational requirements in the EU. In the U.S., final regulations implementing amendments to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) became effective in the latter part of 2013 with the HIPAA Omnibus Rule. The EU is currently considering a proposal to enact legislation governing data protection which would transform the current mix of European countries’ laws to one overarching multinational law. Meanwhile, in the Asia-Pacific region has also seen rapid development of privacy laws, including in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australia. We believe we have designed our product and service offerings to be compliant with the requirements of applicable data protection laws and regulations. Maintaining systems that are compliant with these laws and regulations is costly and could require complex changes in the way we do business or provide services to our customers and their patients. Additionally, our success may be dependent on the success of healthcare providers in managing data protection requirements.
Employees
As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 3,420 employees, including 2,280 in manufacturing and operations, 640 in sales and marketing which includes customer care, 230 in research and development and 270 in general and administrative functions.
Available Information
Our website is located at www.aligntech.com, and our investor relations website is located at http://investor.aligntech.com. The information on or accessible through our websites is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statement on Schedule 14A for our annual stockholders’ meeting and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on our investor relations website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material with the SEC. Further, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of February 28, 2014:
| Name | Age | Position |
| Thomas M. Prescott | 58 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| David L. White | 58 | Chief Financial Officer |
| Jennifer M. Erfurth | 44 | Vice President, Global Human Resources |
| Roger E. George | 48 | Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs General Counsel |
| John P. Graham | 45 | Vice President, Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer |
| Timothy A. Mack | 55 | Vice President, Marketing and Business Development |
| Raphael Pascaud | 42 | Vice President, International |
| Christopher C. Puco | 53 | Vice President, North American Sales |
| Zelko Relic | 49 | Vice President, Research & Development |
| Emory M. Wright | 44 | Vice President, Operations |
Thomas M. Prescott has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Prescott was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cardiac Pathways, Inc., a publicly-traded medical device company, from May 1999 until its acquisition by Boston Scientific in August 2001. Mr. Prescott then worked as a consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation until January 2002. Prior to working at Cardiac Pathways, Mr. Prescott held various sales, general management and executive roles at Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. from April 1994 to May 1999.
David L. White has served as our Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") since August 2013. Prior to joining us, Mr. White was CFO of Enecsys, Ltd., a privately-held supplier of solar micro inverters and monitoring systems from June 2012. Prior to Enecsys, he was Executive Vice President and CFO at NVIDIA Corporation, a fabless semiconductor company known for its development of advanced graphics and high performance computing processors from February 2009 to June 2011. Prior to
NVIDIA, he was Executive Vice President of Finance and CFO at SANMINA-SCI Corporation, which provides contract design, supply chain, and manufacturing services from 2004 to 2009. He also served as CFO at Asyst Technologies Corporation, CEO at Candescent Technologies Corporation, and Senior Vice President of Finance at Connor Peripherals.
Jennifer M. Erfurth has served as our Vice President, Global Human Resources since October 2012. Prior to joining us, Ms. Erfurth was Senior Vice President of Shared Services at Dyno Nobel, Inc., a manufacturer and supplier of industrial explosives, from July 2011 to July 2012, and was Vice President, Human Resources for Federal Signal Corporation prior to that. From 2001 to 2010, Ms. Erfurth held positions of increasing responsibility at Schawk, Inc., most recently as Global Senior Vice President of Human Resources, a position she held from 2007 until her departure in 2010. Earlier in her career, she served as Director of Human Resources at CINTAS Corporation and World Color.
Roger E. George has served as our Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since July 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. George was the Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Legal Affairs and General Counsel of SkyStream Networks, a privately held broadband and broadcast network equipment company. Prior to SkyStream, Mr. George was a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. in Palo Alto, California.
John P. Graham has served as our Vice President, Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer since July 2013. From 2011 until he joined us, Mr. Graham was Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, a global healthcare company. Prior to GlaxoSmithKline, he was with Johnson & Johnson for 15 years in multiple marketing leadership roles, including Vice President, U.S. Marketing for Johnson & Johnson Vision Care.
Timothy A. Mack has served as our Vice President, Marketing and Business Development since May 2012. He served as Vice President, Business Development since our acquisition of Cadent Holdings, Inc. in April 2011. At Cadent, he was President and Chief Executive Officer since 2009. He joined Cadent in 2005, as Executive Vice President & General Manager where he led the introduction and adoption of Cadent’s new 3D digital imaging technology into the market. Prior to Cadent, Mr. Mack was Vice President and General Manager of DENTSPLY Ceramco, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DENTSPLY International. Prior to DENTSPLY, Mr. Mack held a series of management positions in the U.S. and Europe within Consumer Electronics and Medical Imaging Divisions at Eastman Kodak Company.
Raphael Pascaud was appointed Vice President, International in January 2014. He joined Align in 2010 as Vice President and Managing Director for the Europe, Middle East and Africa Region, ("EMEA"). Prior to Align, Mr. Pascaud spent 14 years in various management positions within DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson family of companies, including Vice President Orthopedics of EMEA and Vice President Marketing of International.
Christopher C. Puco has served as our Vice President, North America Sales since December 2012. He joined Align in 2006 as a sales director and in 2008 became senior director for the Eastern sales area. Most recently, as Vice President of Sales Strategy, he led Align's go-to-market strategy and managed the integration of the North American scanner and CAD/CAM services sales organization. Mr. Puco has more than 20 years of experience in the medical device industry, holding sales management positions in both starts-ups and established corporate environments. Prior to Align, he was with United States Surgical Corporation, General Surgical Innovations, Baxter BioSurgery and Fusion Medical Technologies.
Zelko Relic was appointed Vice President, Research & Development in December 2013. Prior to joining Align, Mr. Relic was Vice President, Engineering for Datalogic Automation, a global leader in automatic data capture and industrial automation markets from 2012. Mr. Relic was previously Vice President, Engineering at Danaher Corporation, Accu-Sort Systems business from 2010 to 2012 before it was acquired by Datalogic Automation. From 2005 to 2010, he was Vice President at Siemens Medical Solutions USA and from 2002 to 2004 he held senior management positions in engineering at Kulicke & Soffa Industries, designers and manufactures of semiconductor products. He also held management positions at KLA-Tencor, manufacturer of metrology tools from 1994 to 2000.
Emory M. Wright has served as our Vice President, Operations since December 2007. He has been with us since March 2000, predominantly in manufacturing and operations roles. Previously, Mr. Wright served as Vice President, Manufacturing and, most recently, was General Manager of New Product Development. Prior to joining us, Mr. Wright was Senior Manufacturing Manager at Metrika, Inc. a medical device manufacturer, from May 1999 to March 2000. From July 1994 to May 1999, Mr. Wright served as Manager of Manufacturing and Process Development for Metra Biosystems Inc.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
We depend on the sale of the Invisalign System for the vast majority of our net revenues, and any decline in sales of Invisalign treatment for any reason, a continued weakness in general economic conditions, or a decline in average selling prices would adversely affect net revenues, gross margin and net income.
We expect that net revenues from the sale of the Invisalign System, primarily Invisalign Full and Invisalign Teen, will continue to account for the vast majority of our total net revenues for the foreseeable future. Continued and widespread market acceptance of Invisalign by orthodontists, GPs and consumers is critical to our future success. If orthodontists and GPs experience a reduction in consumer demand for orthodontic services, if consumers prove unwilling to adopt Invisalign as rapidly as we anticipate or in the volume that we anticipate, if orthodontists or GPs choose to use a competitive product rather than Invisalign or if the average selling price of our product declines, our operating results would be harmed.
Demand for our products may not increase as rapidly as we anticipate due to a variety of factors including a continued weakness in general economic conditions.
Consumer spending habits are affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, gas prices, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. A general slowdown in the U.S. economy and certain international economies or an uncertain economic outlook would adversely affect consumer spending habits which may, among other things, result in a decrease in the number of overall orthodontic case starts, reduced patient traffic in dentists’ offices, reduction in consumer spending on higher value procedures or a reduction in the demand for dental services generally, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our sales and operating results. Continued weakness in the global economy results in a challenging environment for selling dental technologies and dentists may postpone investments in capital equipment, such as intra-oral scanners. In addition, Invisalign treatment, which currently accounts for the vast majority of our net revenues, represents a significant change from traditional orthodontic treatment, and customers and consumers may be reluctant to accept it or may not find it preferable to traditional treatment. We have generally received positive feedback from orthodontists, GPs and consumers regarding Invisalign treatment as both an alternative to braces and as a clinical method for treatment of malocclusion, but a number of dental professionals believe that Invisalign treatment is appropriate for only a limited percentage of their patients. Increased market acceptance of all of our products will depend in part upon the recommendations of dental professionals, as well as other factors including effectiveness, safety, ease of use, reliability, aesthetics, and price compared to competing products.
The frequency of use of the Invisalign System by orthodontists or GPs may not increase at the rate that we anticipate or at all.
One of our key objectives is to continue to increase utilization, or the adoption and frequency of use, of the Invisalign System by new and existing customers. If utilization of the Invisalign System by our existing and newly trained orthodontists or GPs does not occur or does not occur as quickly as we anticipate, our operating results could be harmed.
We may experience declines in average selling prices of our products which may decrease our net revenues.
In response to challenges in our business, including increased competition, we have in the past reduced the list price of our products. We also provide volume based discount programs to our doctors. In addition, we sell a number of products at different list prices. If we introduce any price reductions or consumer rebate programs; if we expand our discount programs in the future or participation in these programs increases; if our product mix shifts to lower priced products or products that have a higher percentage of deferred revenue; or if sales by our distributors grows at a faster pace than our direct sales, our average selling prices would be adversely affected and our net revenues, gross profit, gross margin and net income may be reduced. Furthermore, although the U.S. dollar is our reporting currency, a portion of our net revenues and net income are generated in foreign currencies. Net revenues and net income generated by subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S. are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates effective during the respective period and are affected by changes in exchange rates. As a result, negative movements in currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar will adversely affect our average selling price and consequently the amount of net revenues and net income in our consolidated financial statements.
As we continue to grow, we are subject to growth related risks, including risks related to excess or constrained capacity at our existing facilities.
We are subject to growth related risks, including capacity constraints and pressure on our internal systems and personnel. In order to manage current operations and future growth effectively, we will need to continue to implement and improve our operational, financial and management information systems and to hire, train, motivate, manage and retain employees. We may be unable to manage such growth effectively. Any such failure could have a material adverse impact on our business, operations and prospects.
Because we cannot always immediately adapt our production capacity and related cost structures to changing market conditions, our manufacturing capacity may at times exceed or fall short of our production requirements. In addition, if product demand decreases or we fail to forecast demand accurately, we could be required to write off inventory or record excess capacity charges, which would lower our gross margin. Any or all of these problems could result in the loss of customers, provide an opportunity for competing products to gain market acceptance and otherwise harm our business and financial results.
We may never achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions which may have an adverse effect on our business.
We acquired Cadent Holdings, Inc. in April 2011 for their people, their technology and their existing revenue streams such as, OrthoCAD iRecord and OrthoCAD iCast in addition to their intra-oral scanning technology. This acquisition is expected to strengthen our ability to drive adoption of Invisalign treatment by integrating more fully with mainstream tools and procedures in doctors’ practices. In addition, we believe that the combination of the two companies will help accelerate the use of intra-oral scanning in the dental industry by leveraging Align’s global sales reach, extensive professional and consumer marketing capabilities and large customer base. We completed the acquisition of our Asia Pacific distributor on April 30, 2013.
We may experience difficulties in achieving the anticipated financial or strategic benefits of these acquisitions. Potential risks include:
| • | slower adoption or lack of acceptance for intra-oral scanning products in general or our chairside features; |
| • | our inability to increase utilization by integrating Invisalign treatment more fully with intra-oral scanners; |
| • | difficulty in integrating the technology, operations, internal accounting controls or work force of the acquired business with our existing business; |
| • | diversion of management resources and focus from ongoing business matters; |
| • | retention of key employees following the acquisition; |
| • | continued changes in the competitive environment, including |
Showing the first 8K of 68K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
We occupy several leased and owned facilities with total office and manufacturing area of over 850,000 square feet. At December 31, 2013, the significant facilities were occupied as follows:
| Location | Lease/Own | Primary Use | Segment | Expiration of lease |
| San Jose, California | Lease | Office for headquarters, research & development, administrative personnel | Clear Aligner and SCCS | September 2017 |
| San Jose, Costa Rica | Lease | Office for administrative personnel, manufacturing personnel, and customer care | Clear Aligner and SCCS | November 2017 |
| Juarez, Mexico | Own | Manufacturing and office facility for manufacturing and administrative personnel | Clear Aligner and SCCS | N/A |
| Or Yehuda, Israel | Lease | Manufacturing and office for manufacturing, administrative personnel, and research and development | SCCS | October 2017 |
| Moscow, Russia | Lease | Office for research and development | Clear Aligner and SCCS | April 1, 2017 |
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet current requirements and that additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any expansion of operations.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Securities Class Action Lawsuit
On November 28, 2012, plaintiff City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System filed a lawsuit against Align, Thomas M. Prescott (“Mr. Prescott”), Align's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth B. Arola (“Mr. Arola”), Align's former Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of our common stock between April 23, 2012 and October 17,
2012 (the "Securities Action"). On July 11, 2013, an amended complaint was filed, which named the same defendants, on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of our common stock between January 31, 2012 and October 17, 2012. The amended complaint alleged that Align, Mr. Prescott and Mr. Arola violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and that Mr. Prescott and Mr. Arola violated Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the amended complaint alleged that during the purported class period defendants failed to take an appropriate goodwill impairment charge related to the April 29, 2011 acquisition of Cadent Holdings, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2011, the first quarter of 2012 or the second quarter of 2012, which rendered our financial statements and projections of future earnings materially false and misleading and in violation of U.S. GAAP. The amended complaint sought monetary damages in an unspecified amount, costs and attorney's fees. On December 9, 2013, the judge granted our motion to dismiss with leave for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on January 8, 2014 on behalf of the same purported class. The second amended complaint states the same claims as the first amended complaint. We filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on February 7, 2014. Align intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations. Align is currently unable to predict the outcome of this complaint and therefore cannot determine the likelihood of loss nor estimate a range of possible loss.
Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit
On February 1, 2013, plaintiff Gary Udis filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit against several of Align's current and former officers and directors in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. The complaint alleges that our reported income and earnings were materially overstated because of a failure to timely write down goodwill related to the April 29, 2011 acquisition of Cadent Holdings, Inc., and that defendants made allegedly false statements concerning our forecasts. The complaint asserts various state law causes of action, including claims of breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and insider trading, among others. The complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of Align, which is named solely as nominal defendant against whom no recovery is sought. The complaint also seeks an order directing Align to reform and improve its corporate governance and internal procedures, and seeks restitution in an unspecified amount, costs, and attorney's fees. On July 8, 2013, an Order was entered staying this derivative lawsuit until an initial ruling on our first motion to dismiss the Securities Action. On January 15, 2014, an order was entered staying this derivative lawsuit until an initial ruling on our second motion to dismiss the Securities Action discussed above. Align intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations. Align is currently unable to predict the outcome of this complaint and therefore cannot determine the likelihood of loss nor estimate a range of possible losses.
In addition, in the course of Align's operations, Align is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations, and proceedings, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, patent infringement claims, government investigations, labor and employment claims, breach of contract claims, tax, and other matters. Regardless of the outcome, these proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of defense costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors. Although the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and Align's view of these matters may change in the future as litigation and events related thereto unfold; Align currently does not believe that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will materially affect Align's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ALGN.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low per share sales prices as reported for each period indicated:
| High | Low | ||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2013: | |||||||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 60.00 | $ | 41.83 | |||
| Third quarter | $ | 49.08 | $ | 36.92 | |||
| Second quarter | $ | 38.74 | $ | 29.53 | |||
| First quarter | $ | 33.70 | $ | 25.61 | |||
| Year Ended December 31, 2012: | |||||||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 39.39 | $ | 23.45 | |||
| Third quarter | $ | 39.82 | $ | 30.02 | |||
| Second quarter | $ | 35.15 | $ | 26.06 | |||
| First quarter | $ | 28.69 | $ | 22.39 |
On February 21, 2014, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market was $52.98 per share. As of January 31, 2014 there were approximately 115 holders of record of our common stock. Because the majority of our shares of outstanding common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Performance Graph
Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary in any of our previous or future filings with the SEC, the following information relating to the price performance of our common stock shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC or “Soliciting Material” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference.
The graph below matches our cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index, and the S&P 1500 Composite Health Care Equipment & Supplies index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock, in the peer group, and the index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2013.

Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth the selected consolidated financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2013. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We have derived the statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 from the consolidated audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were derived from the consolidated audited financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues 1 | $ | 660,206 | $ | 560,041 | $ | 479,741 | $ | 387,126 | $ | 312,333 | |||||||||
| Gross profit 2 | $ | 498,106 | $ | 416,388 | $ | 361,283 | $ | 303,417 | $ | 233,492 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations 3 | 94,212 | 85,592 | 90,360 | 102,734 | (34,012 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (1,073 | ) | (1,296 | ) | (419 | ) | (731 | ) | 119 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 3 | 93,139 | 84,296 | 89,941 | 102,003 | (33,893 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 28,844 | 25,605 | 23,225 | 27,750 | (2,624 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) 3 | $ | 64,295 | $ | 58,691 | $ | 66,716 | $ | 74,253 | $ | (31,269 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) per share | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.98 | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.95 | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
| Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 80,551 | 80,529 | 77,988 | 75,825 | 69,094 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 82,589 | 83,040 | 80,294 | 78,080 | 69,094 | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Working capital 4 | $ | 369,338 | $ | 330,022 | $ | 236,699 | $ | 295,637 | $ | 180,056 | |||||||||
| Total assets | 832,147 | 756,312 | 649,264 | 476,943 | 355,240 | ||||||||||||||
| Total long-term liabilities | 22,839 | 19,224 | 10,366 | 6,222 | 961 | ||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | $ | 633,970 | $ | 581,317 | $ | 490,781 | $ | 377,747 | $ | 273,036 |
| 1 | Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 include eight months of revenues from our Scanners and CAD/CAM Services segment of approximately $28.0 million as a result of our acquisition of Cadent Holdings, Inc. on April 29, 2011. Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes a $14.3 million release of previously deferred revenue for Invisalign Teen replacement aligners. |
| 2 | Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 included an out of period adjustment of $1.7 million (See Note 1). Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012 included acquisition and integration related costs of $0.2 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.9 million, and exit costs of $0.5 million. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2011 included acquisition and integration related costs of $0.4 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.7 million, and exit costs of $0.8 million. For years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, gross profit included amortization of prepaid royalties of $0.8 million and $6.2 million, respectively, related to the litigation settlement with Ormco. In addition, 2010 gross profit also included the $14.3 million release of previously deferred revenue for Invisalign Teen replacement aligners. |
| 3 | Income (loss) from operations, net income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and net income (loss) included the following, net of taxes: |
| • | $40.7 million and $26.3 million of goodwill and long-lived asset impairment, respectively, in 2013. |
| • | $1.9 million, net of tax, out of period adjustment in 2013 (see Note 1). |
| • | $36.6 million of goodwill impairment, $1.3 million acquisition and integration related costs, $4.5 million of amortization of intangible assets, and $0.8 million of exit costs in 2012. |
| • | $14.3 million release of previously deferred revenue for Invisalign Teen replacement aligners in 2010. |
| • | $10.0 million acquisition and integration related costs, $3.2 million of amortization of intangible assets, and exit costs of $1.1 million in 2011. |
| • | $0.8 million and $6.2 million of amortization of prepaid royalties related to the litigation settlement with Ormco in 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
| • | $4.5 million related to the class action litigation settlement with Leiszler in 2010. |
| • | $8.7 million benefit related to an insurance settlement over a disputed coverage under our general liability umbrella that was not previously reimbursed by our insurer related to the OrthoClear litigation in 2010. |
| • | Litigation settlement charge of $69.7 million related to Ormco in 2009. |
| • | Restructuring charges of $1.3 million in 2009. |
| 4 | Working capital is calculated as the difference between total current assets and total current liabilities. |
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Align Technology, Inc. is a global medical device company that advanced the invisible orthodontics market with the introduction of the Invisalign System in 1999. Today, we are focused on designing, manufacturing and marketing innovative technology-rich products to help dental professionals achieve the clinical results they expect and deliver effective, convenient cutting-edge dental treatment options to their patients. Align Technology was founded in March 1997 and is headquartered in San Jose, California with offices worldwide. Our international headquarters are located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We have two operating segments: (1) Clear Aligner, known as the Invisalign System; and (2) Scanner and CAD/CAM Services ("SCCS"), known as the iTero intra-oral scanners and OrthoCAD services.
We received FDA clearance in 1998 and began our first commercial sales of Invisalign to U.S. orthodontists in 1999 followed by U.S. General Practitioner Dentists (GPs) in 2002. Over the next decade, we introduced Invisalign to the European market and Japan, added distribution partners in Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and EMEA, and introduced a full range of treatment options including Invisalign Express 10, Invisalign Teen, Invisalign Assist, and Vivera Retainers. By 2011, we launched significant new aligner and software features across all Invisalign products that make it easier for doctors to use Invisalign on more complex cases, and introduced Invisalign to the People’s Republic of China. In 2013, we launched SmartTrack, the next generation of Invisalign clear aligner material which became the new standard aligner material for Invisalign products. Most recently, we launched Invisalign G5 innovations, specifically designed for treatment of deep bite malocclusion as well as ClinCheck Pro, the next generation Invisalign treatment software tool, designed to help Invisalign providers achieve their treatment goals.
We also sell iTero intra-oral scanners and provide CAD/CAM services. Intra-oral scanners provide a dental “chair-side” platform for accessing valuable digital diagnosis and treatment tools, with potential for enhancing accuracy of records, treatment efficiency, and the overall patient experience. We believe there are numerous benefits for customers and the opportunity to accelerate the adoption of Invisalign through interoperability with our intra-oral scanners. The use of digital technologies such as CAD/CAM for restorative dentistry or in-office restorations has been growing rapidly and intra-oral scanning is a critical part of enabling these new digital technologies and procedures in dental practices. In late 2012, we commercially launched the Invisalign Outcome Simulator, the first Invisalign chair-side application powered by the iTero scanner. The interactive application provides dentists and orthodontists an enhanced platform for patient education and is designed to increase treatment acceptance by helping patients visualize the benefits possible with Invisalign treatment. In January 2014, we announced that the 3M™ True Definition scanner was qualified for use with Invisalign case submissions. This qualification enables Invisalign providers with a True Definition scanner to submit a digital impression in place of a
traditional PVS impression as part of the Invisalign case submission process. The 3M True Definition scanner is currently the only third-party scanner that has been qualified for use with Invisalign treatment. We continue to believe in an open systems approach to digital impressions, and are committed to working with other intra-oral scanning companies interested in developing interoperability for use with Invisalign treatment.
The Invisalign System is offered in more than 60 countries and has been used to treat more than 2.5 million patients. Our iTero intra-oral scanner, which is primarily sold in North America, provides dental professionals with an open choice to send digital impressions to any laboratory-based CAD/CAM system or to any of the more than 1,200 dental labs worldwide.
Our goal is to establish Invisalign clear aligners as the standard method for treating malocclusion and to establish the iTero intra-oral scanner as the preferred scanning protocol for 3D digital scans, ultimately driving increased product adoption by dental professionals. We intend to achieve this by continued focus and execution of our strategic growth drivers set forth in the Business Strategy section in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The successful execution of our business strategy and our results in 2014 and beyond may be affected by a number of other factors, which are described below:
| • | New Products, Feature Enhancements and Technology Innovation. Product innovation drives greater treatment predictability and clinical applicability, and ease of use for our customers, which supports adoption of Invisalign in their practices. Increasing applicability and treating more complex cases requires that we move away from individual features to comprehensive solutions so that Invisalign providers can more predictably treat the whole case, such as with Invisalign G5 for deep bite treatment. Launched in February 2014, Invisalign G5 was engineered to treat deep bite malocclusion in its entirety, making it easier for our customers to treat one of the most common malocclusions. In addition, in February 2014, we launched ClinCheck Pro, the next generation Invisalign treatment software tool, designed to provide more precise control over final tooth position and to help Invisalign providers achieve their treatment goals. We believe that over the long-term, clinical solutions and treatment tools will increase adoption of Invisalign; however, it is difficult to predict the rate of adoption which may vary by region and channel. |
| • | Invisalign Utilization rates. Our goal is to establish Invisalign as the treatment of choice for treating malocclusion ultimately driving increased product adoption and frequency of use by dental professionals, also known as "utilization rates". Our quarterly utilization rates for the previous 12 quarters are as follows: |
* Invisalign Utilization rates = # of cases shipped divided by # of doctors cases were shipped to
Total utilization in the fourth quarter of 2013 was 4.4 cases per doctor a slight increase from 4.3 cases in the third quarter of 2013 driven primarily by the increase in utilization by our International customers offset by a decrease
in utilization by our North American orthodontic customers from 8.4 to 8.0 cases per doctor. This decrease by our North American orthodontic customers reflects a decline in the number of teen-aged cases shipped as summer is typically the busiest season for orthodontists with practices that have a high percentage of adolescent and teenage patients as many parents want to get their teenagers started in treatment before the start of the school year. On a year-over-year basis, total utilization of 4.4 cases per doctor in the fourth quarter of 2013 increased from 4.1 cases in the fourth quarter of 2012 cases, reflecting improvements in product and technology over the past year, including Invisalign G4 and SmartTrack aligner material, which continues to strengthen our doctors’ clinical confidence in the use of Invisalign such that they now utilize Invisalign more often and on more complex cases. Although we expect that over the long-term our utilization rates will gradually improve, we expect that period over period comparisons of our utilization rates will fluctuate.
|
Showing the first 8K of 84K characters. Open the full section
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks that could impact our financial position and results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk
Changes in interest rates could impact our anticipated interest income on our cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities. Our cash equivalents and investments are fixed-rate short-term and long-term securities. Fixed-rate
securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, and as a result, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities which have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately $229.0 million invested in available-for-sale marketable securities. An immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material adverse impact on our future operating results and cash flows.
We do not have interest bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2013, and, therefore, we are not subject to risks from immediate interest rate increases.
Currency Rate Risk
We operate in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Costa Rica and Israel. As a result of our international business activities, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or economic conditions in foreign markets, and there is no assurance that exchange rate fluctuations will not harm our business in the future. We sell our products in the local currency for the respective countries. This provides some natural hedging because most of the subsidiaries’ operating expenses are denominated in their local currencies as discussed further below. Regardless of this natural hedging, our results of operations may be adversely impacted by the exchange rate fluctuation. Although we will continue to monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations, and, where appropriate, may use financial hedging techniques in the future to minimize the effect of these fluctuations, we are not currently engaged in any financial hedging transactions. The impact of an aggregate change of 10% in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar on our results of operations and financial position could be material.
Item 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Quarterly Results of Operations
| Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31-Dec | 30-Sept | 30-June | 31-Mar | 31-Dec | 30-Sept | 30-June | 31-Mar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data ) (unaudited ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues 1 | $ | 178,292 | $ | 164,506 | $ | 163,828 | $ | 153,580 | $ | 142,840 | $ | 136,496 | $ | 145,626 | $ | 135,079 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit 2 | 136,476 | 125,090 | 123,691 | 112,849 | 106,478 | 100,350 | 108,800 | 100,760 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations 3 | 52,923 | 41,464 | 37,901 | (38,075 | ) | 17,071 | 4,503 | 36,012 | 28,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) 3 4 | 42,422 | 34,537 | 29,320 | (41,983 | ) | 9,559 | (344 | ) | 28,492 | 20,984 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.52 | ) | $ | 0.12 | $ | — | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.52 | ) | $ | 0.12 | $ | — | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Shares used in computing net income per share: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 80,432 | 79,967 | 80,576 | 81,248 | 81,043 | 81,437 | 80,384 | 79,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 82,438 | 81,848 | 82,149 | 81,248 | 82,981 | 81,437 | 82,954 | 81,856 |
| 1 | In the fourth quarter of 2012, we identified an error that the actual case refinement usage rate was lower than our estimate and, as a result, we recorded a net revenue release of $4.9 million previously deferred for case refinement of which $5.2 million was a correction of an error of which $4.5 million relates to the first three quarters for the fiscal year 2012 and $0.7 million relates to the fiscal year 2011. The adjustment was not material to any quarter within 2012. The net amount of $4.9 million is not material to the results of operations for twelve months ended December 31, 2012. |
| 2 | Gross profit for the quarter ended March 2012 included acquisition and integration related costs of $0.1 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.3 million, and exit costs of $0.3 million. Gross profit for the quarter ended June 2012 included acquisition and integration related costs of $0.1 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.2 million, and exit costs of $0.1 million. Gross profit for the quarter ended September 2012 included acquisition and integration related costs of $0.1 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.2 million, and exit costs of $0.1 million. Gross profit for the quarter ended December 2012 amortization of intangible assets of $0.2 million. |
| 3 | Income (loss) from operations and net income (loss) included, net of taxes,: |
| • | $40.7 million and $26.3 million of goodwill and long-lived asset impairment, respectively, in March 2013. |
| • | Impairment of goodwill of $24.7 million for the quarter ended September 2012 and $11.9 million for the quarter ended December 2012. |
| • | Acquisition and integration related costs of $0.7 million for the quarter ended March 2012, $0.3 million for the quarter ended June 2012, and $0.2 million for the quarter ended September 2012. |
| • | Exit costs of $0.5 million for the quarter ended March 2012, $0.2 million for the quarter ended June 2012, and $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 2012. |
| 4 | In the fourth quarter of 2013, we recorded an out of period correction that resulted in decreases in cost of net revenues of approximately $1.3 million and operating expense of $1.5 million offset in part by an increase in the provision for income taxes of $0.6 million. The overall increase of $2.2 million in net income related to the out of period correction was not material to the consolidated financial statements for any quarter within 2012 or 2013. |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page | |
| Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | 54 |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 55 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations | 56 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | 57 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | 58 |
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity | 59 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 60 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 61 |
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Align is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed by, or under supervision of, our CEO and CFO, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| • | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Align; |
| • | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of Align are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Align; and |
| • | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Align's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this as
Showing the first 8K of 156K characters. Open the full section
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2013 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting.
See “Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Form 10-K because we intend to file a definitive Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and certain information to be included therein is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K concerning our directors is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Election of Directors.” The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K concerning our executive officers is set forth in Item 1—“Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” contained in the Proxy Statement. The information required by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Corporate Governance—Board of Directors & Committee Meetings—Audit Committee”.
Code of Ethics
We have a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This code of ethics is posted on our Internet website. The Internet address for our website is www.aligntech.com, and the code of ethics may be found on the “Corporate Governance” section of our “Investor Relations” webpage.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website, at the address and location specified above, or as otherwise required by the NASDAQ Global Market.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Executive Compensation”. The information required by Items 407(e)(4) and (e)(5) is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks” and “Compensation Committee Report”, respectively.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2013 about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights granted to employees, consultants or members of our Board of Directors under all existing equity compensation plans, including the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2005 Incentive Plan, each as amended, and certain individual arrangements.
| Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and restricted stock units(a) | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options(b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) | ||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,672,100 | (1)(2) | $ | 15.65 | 9,119,512 | (3) | |||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | ||||||
| Total | 3,672,100 | $ | 15.65 | 9,119,512 |
| (1) | This number reflects the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and restricted stock units under the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, and the 2005 Incentive Plan. 2,351,493 restricted stock units, including 307,250 market-performance based restricted stock units at target, are included in this number which have an exercise price of zero. |
| (2) | We are unable to ascertain with specificity the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding rights under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan or the weighted average exercise price of outstanding rights under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
| (3) | Please see Note 10 “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for description of equity compensation plans. |
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 404 and Item 407 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the sections captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance—Director Independence”, respectively.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountants.”
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| (a) | Financial Statements |
| 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements |
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 55 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 | 56 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 | 57 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 | 58 |
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 | 59 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 | 60 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 61 |
| 2. | The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
All other schedules have been omitted as they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
| Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions (reductions) to Costs and Expenses | Write offs | Charged to Other Accounts 1 | Reclass from Other Accounts | Balance at End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2011 | $ | 1,247 | $ | 2,571 | $ | (2,316 | ) | $ | — | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 1,500 | |||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 4,417 | $ | (2,735 | ) | $ | — | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 3,167 | |||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2013 | $ | 3,167 | $ | 2,116 | $ | (3,550 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,733 | ||||||||||
| Valuation Allowance for deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2011 | $ | 6,079 | $ | (680 | ) | $ | — | $ | 14,825 | $ | — | $ | 20,224 | ||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 20,224 | $ | 8,507 | $ | (1,675 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 27,056 | ||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2013 | $ | 27,056 | $ | 9,806 | $ | (1,754 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 35,108 |
| 1 | For the year ended December 31, 2011, we increased the valuation allowance in connection with acquired deferred tax assets and non-U.S. net operating losses, which resulted in a corresponding increase to goodwill, related to the Cadent acquisition. |
| (b) | The following Exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of registrant | Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 12/28/2000 | 3.1 | ||
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of registrant | Form 8-K | 2/29/2012 | 3.2 | ||
| 3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock registrant | Form 8-K | 10/27/2005 | 3.1 | ||
| 4.1 | Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate | Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 1/17/2001 | 4.1 | ||
| 4.2 | Preferred Stock Rights Agreement dated October 25 between the registrant and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. | Form 8-K | 10/27/2005 | 4.1 | ||
| 10.1† | Registrant’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan | Form S-1 as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 12/28/2000 | 10.13 | ||
| 10.2† | Form of option agreement under Align’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2004 | 10/13/2001 | ||
| 10.3† | Registrant’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Form S-8 | 2/5/2001 | 99.2 | ||
| 10.4 | Align’s 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Form 8-K | 5/25/2010 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.5† | Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between registrant and its Board of Directors and its executive officers | Form S-1 as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 1/17/2001 | 10.15 |
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 10.6† | Amended and restated 2005 Incentive Plan (as amended May 19, 2011 | Form 8-K | 5/25/2010 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.7† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan (General Form; Officer Form: Director Form) | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2007 | 10.1A, 10.1B, 10.1C | ||
| 10.8† | Form of option award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan | Form 10-Q | 8/4/2005 | 10.4 | ||
| 10.9† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan with Thomas M. Prescott | Form 10-K | 3/12/2007 | 10.14C | ||
| 10.10† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement amendment under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan with Thomas M. Prescott | Form 10-K | 3/12/2007 | 10.14D | ||
| 10.11† | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 8, 2012 between Thomas M. Prescott and registrant | Form 10-Q | 5/8/2008 | 10.3 | ||
| 10.12† | Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into by and between registrant and each of executive officer (other than CEO) | Form 10-Q | 5/8/2008 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.13 | Credit Agreement dated March 22, 2013 between registrant and Wells Fargo National Association | Form 8-K | 3/27/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.14 | Lease Agreement dated February 26, 2003 between KPMG FIDES (Costa Rica) S.A., Parque Global S.A.A. and registrant | Form 10-Q | 5/13/2003 | 10.36 | ||
| 10.15 | Omnibus Amendment to Lease and Service Agreement between KPMG FIDES (Costa Rica) S.A., Parque Global S.A. and Align dated June 24, 2008 | Form 8-K | 6/26/2008 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.16 | Lease Agreement between Align and Carr N.P. Properties, L.L.C. dated January 26, 2010 | Form 8-K | 1/29/2010 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.17 | Settlement Agreement dated as if August 16, 2009 between Align Technology, Inc. and Ormco Corporation | Form 10-Q/A | 2/24/2010 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.18 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of the 16th day of August by and between Align Technology, Inc. and Danaher Corporation | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2009 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.19†† | Joint Development, Marketing and Sales Agreement entered in as of August 16, 2009 by and between Align Technology, Inc. and Ormco Corporation | Form 10-Q/A | 2/24/2010 | 10.3 | ||
| 10.20† | Summary of 2013 Incentive Awards for Named Executive Officers. | Form 8-K | 2/8/2014 | |||
| 10.21† | Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement (officer) | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.22† | Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.23† | Description of Executive Officer Incentive Plan | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | Item 5.02 | ||
| 10.24 | Agreement of Plan Merger between Registrant and Cadent Holdings, Inc. amongst other dated March 29, 2011 | Form 8-K | 4/1/2011 | 10.1 |
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 10.25 | Credit Agreement dated March 22, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Form 8-K | 3/27/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.26 | Transition Agreement dated March 4, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and Kenneth B. Arola | Form 10-Q | 5/3/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.27 | Offer Letter dated June 12, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and David L. White | Form 8-K | 7/18/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.28 | Employment Agreement between Align Technology, Inc. and David L. White | Form 8-K | 8/5/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of Align Technology, Inc. | * | ||||
| 23.1 | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | * | ||||
| 31.1 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 31.2 | Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | * | ||||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | * | ||||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | * |
| † | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement filed as an Exhibit to this form pursuant to Items 14(a) and 14(c) of Form 10-K. |
| †† | Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The confidential portions have been filed with the SEC. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 28, 2014.
| ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC. | |
| By: | /S/ THOMAS M. PRESCOTT |
| Thomas M. Prescott | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
Know All Men By These Presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Thomas M. Prescott, his or her attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /S/ THOMAS M. PRESCOTT Thomas M. Prescott | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ DAVID L.WHITE David L. White | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ DAVID E. COLLINS David E. Collins | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ JOSEPH LACOB Joseph Lacob | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ C. RAYMOND LARKIN C. Raymond Larkin | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ GEORGE J. MORROW George J. Morrow | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ DAVID C. NAGEL David C. Nagel | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ ANDREA L. SAIA Andrea L. Saia | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ GREG J. SANTORA Greg J. Santora | Director | February 28, 2014 | ||
| /S/ WARREN S. THALER Warren S. Thaler | Director | February 28, 2014 |
Exhibit Index
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of registrant | Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 12/28/2000 | 3.1 | ||
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of registrant | Form 8-K | 2/29/2012 | 3.2 | ||
| 3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock registrant | Form 8-K | 10/27/2005 | 3.1 | ||
| 4.1 | Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate | Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 1/17/2001 | 4.1 | ||
| 4.2 | Preferred Stock Rights Agreement dated October 25 between the registrant and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. | Form 8-K | 10/27/2005 | 4.1 | ||
| 10.1† | Registrant’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan | Form S-1 as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 12/28/2000 | 10.13 | ||
| 10.2† | Form of option agreement under Align’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2004 | 10/13/2001 | ||
| 10.3† | Registrant’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Form S-8 | 2/5/2001 | 99.2 | ||
| 10.4 | Align’s 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Form 8-K | 5/25/2010 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.5† | Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between registrant and its Board of Directors and its executive officers | Form S-1 as amended (File No. 333-49932) | 1/17/2001 | 10.15 |
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 10.6† | Amended and restated 2005 Incentive Plan (as amended May 16, 2013) | DEF 14A | 4/18/2013 | Exhibit B | ||
| 10.7† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan (General Form; Officer Form: Director Form) | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2007 | 10.1A, 10.1B, 10.1C | ||
| 10.8† | Form of option award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan | Form 10-Q | 8/4/2005 | 10.4 | ||
| 10.9† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan with Thomas M. Prescott | Form 10-K | 3/12/2007 | 10.14C | ||
| 10.10† | Form of restricted stock unit award agreement amendment under registrant’s 2005 Incentive Plan with Thomas M. Prescott | Form 10-K | 3/12/2007 | 10.14D | ||
| 10.11† | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 8, 2012 between Thomas M. Prescott and registrant | Form 10-Q | 5/8/2008 | 10.3 | ||
| 10.12† | Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into by and between registrant and each of executive officer (other than CEO) | Form 10-Q | 5/8/2008 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.13 | Credit Agreement dated March 22, 2013 between registrant and Wells Fargo National Association | Form 8-K | 3/27/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.14 | Lease Agreement dated February 26, 2003 between KPMG FIDES (Costa Rica) S.A., Parque Global S.A.A. and registrant | Form 10-Q | 5/13/2003 | 10.36 | ||
| 10.15 | Omnibus Amendment to Lease and Service Agreement between KPMG FIDES (Costa Rica) S.A., Parque Global S.A. and Align dated June 24, 2008 | Form 8-K | 6/26/2008 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.16 | Lease Agreement between Align and Carr N.P. Properties, L.L.C. dated January 26, 2010 | Form 8-K | 1/29/2010 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.17 | Settlement Agreement dated as if August 16, 2009 between Align Technology, Inc. and Ormco Corporation | Form 10-Q/A | 2/24/2010 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.18 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of the 16th day of August by and between Align Technology, Inc. and Danaher Corporation | Form 10-Q | 11/5/2009 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.19†† | Joint Development, Marketing and Sales Agreement entered in as of August 16, 2009 by and between Align Technology, Inc. and Ormco Corporation | Form 10-Q/A | 2/24/2010 | 10.3 |
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | Date | Exhibit Number Incorporated by reference herein | Filed herewith | |
| 10.20† | Summary of 2013 Incentive Awards for Named Executive Officers. | Form 8-K | 2/8/2014 | |||
| 10.21† | Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement (officer) | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.22† | Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | 10.2 | ||
| 10.23† | Description of Executive Officer Incentive Plan | Form 8-K | 2/23/2011 | Item 5.02 | ||
| 10.24 | Agreement of Plan Merger between Registrant and Cadent Holdings, Inc. amongst other dated March 29, 2011 | Form 8-K | 4/1/2011 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.25 | Credit Agreement dated March 22, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Form 8-K | 3/27/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.26 | Transition Agreement dated March 4, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and Kenneth B. Arola | Form 10-Q | 5/3/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.27 | Offer Letter dated June 12, 2013 between Align Technology, Inc. and David White | Form 8-K | 7/18/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 10.28 | Employment Agreement between Align Technology, Inc. and David L. White | Form 8-K | 8/5/2013 | 10.1 | ||
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of Align Technology, Inc. | * | ||||
| 23.1 | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | * | ||||
| 31.1 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 31.2 | Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 | * | ||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | * | ||||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | * | ||||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | * | ||||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | * |
| † | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement filed as an Exhibit to this form pursuant to Items 14(a) and 14(c) of Form 10-K. |
| †† | Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The confidential portions have been filed with the SEC. |