A Dark Vector Cognition product

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

91K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

INTRODUCTION

This section provides management’s discussion of the financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations of Atmos Energy Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries with specific information on results of operations and liquidity and capital resources. It includes management’s interpretation of our financial results, the factors affecting these results, the major factors expected to affect future operating results and future investment and financing plans. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Several factors exist that could influence our future financial performance, some of which are described in Item 1A above, “Risk Factors”. They should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-looking statements contained in this report or otherwise made by or on behalf of us since these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those set out in such forward-looking statements.

Cautionary Statement for the Purposes of the Safe Harbor under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Report are forward-looking statements made in good faith by us and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, or any other of our documents or oral presentations, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goal”, “intend”, “objective”, “plan”, “projection”, “seek”, “strategy” or similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements relating to our strategy, operations, markets, services, rates, recovery of costs, availability of gas supply and other factors. These risks and uncertainties include the following: our ability to continue to access the credit markets to satisfy our liquidity requirements; regulatory trends and decisions, including the impact of rate proceedings before various state regulatory commissions; the impact of adverse economic conditions on our customers; the effects of inflation and changes in the availability and price of natural gas; market risks beyond our control affecting our risk management activities, including commodity price volatility, counterparty creditworthiness or performance and interest rate risk; the concentration of our distribution, pipeline and storage operations in Texas; increased competition from energy suppliers and alternative forms of energy; adverse weather conditions; the capital-intensive nature of our regulated distribution business; increased costs of providing health care benefits along with pension and postretirement health care benefits and increased funding requirements; the inability to continue to hire, train and retain appropriate personnel; possible increased federal, state and local regulation of the safety of our operations; increased federal regulatory oversight and potential penalties; the impact of environmental regulations on our business; the impact of climate changes or related additional legislation or regulation in the future; the inherent hazards and risks involved in operating our distribution and pipeline and storage businesses; the threat of cyber-attacks or acts of cyber-terrorism that could disrupt our business operations and information technology systems; natural disasters, terrorist activities or other events and other risks and uncertainties discussed herein, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, while we believe these forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate actual experience or that the expectations derived from them will be realized. Further, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from estimates.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies discussed below are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, subjective or complex accounting estimates. Accordingly, these critical accounting policies are reviewed periodically by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Critical Accounting PolicySummary of PolicyFactors Influencing Application of the Policy
RegulationOur regulated distribution and pipeline operations meet the criteria of a cost-based, rate-regulated entity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Accordingly, the financial results for these operations reflect the effects of the ratemaking and accounting practices and policies of the various regulatory commissions to which we are subject. As a result, certain costs that would normally be expensed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are permitted to be capitalized or deferred on the balance sheet because it is probable they can be recovered through rates. Further, regulation may impact the period in which revenues or expenses are recognized. The amounts to be recovered or recognized are based upon historical experience and our understanding of the regulations. Discontinuing the application of this method of accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities or changes in the accounting for our various regulatory mechanisms could significantly increase our operating expenses as fewer costs would likely be capitalized or deferred on the balance sheet, which could reduce our net income.Decisions of regulatory authorities Issuance of new regulations or regulatory mechanisms Assessing the probability of the recoverability of deferred costs
Unbilled RevenueWe follow the revenue accrual method of accounting for regulated distribution segment revenues whereby revenues attributable to gas delivered to customers, but not yet billed under the cycle billing method, are estimated and accrued and the related costs are charged to expense. On occasion, we are permitted to implement new rates that have not been formally approved by our regulatory authorities, which are subject to refund. We recognize this revenue and establish a reserve for amounts that could be refunded based on our experience for the jurisdiction in which the rates were implemented.Estimates of delivered sales volumes based on actual tariff information and weather information and estimates of customer consumption and/or behavior Estimates of purchased gas costs related to estimated deliveries Estimates of uncollectible amounts billed subject to refund
Critical Accounting PolicySummary of PolicyFactors Influencing Application of the Policy
Pension and other postretirement plansPension and other postretirement plan costs and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis using a September 30 measurement date and are affected by numerous assumptions and estimates including the market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets, assumed discount rates and current demographic and actuarial mortality data. The assumed discount rate and the expected return are the assumptions that generally have the most significant impact on our pension costs and liabilities. The assumed discount rate, the assumed health care cost trend rate and assumed rates of retirement generally have the most significant impact on our postretirement plan costs and liabilities. The discount rate is utilized principally in calculating the actuarial present value of our pension and postretirement obligations and net periodic pension and postretirement benefit plan costs. When establishing our discount rate, we consider high quality corporate bond rates based on bonds available in the marketplace that are suitable for settling the obligations, changes in those rates from the prior year and the implied discount rate that is derived from matching our projected benefit disbursements with currently available high quality corporate bonds. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is utilized in calculating the expected return on plan assets component of our annual pension and postretirement plan costs. We estimate the expected return on plan assets by evaluating expected bond returns, equity risk premiums, asset allocations, the effects of active plan management, the impact of periodic plan asset rebalancing and historical performance. We also consider the guidance from our investment advisors in making a final determination of our expected rate of return on assets. To the extent the actual rate of return on assets realized over the course of a year is greater than or less than the assumed rate, that year’s annual pension or postretirement plan costs are not affected. Rather, this gain or loss reduces or increases future pension or postretirement plan costs over a period of approximately ten to twelve years. The market-related value of our plan assets represents the fair market value of the plan assets, adjusted to smooth out short-term market fluctuations over a five-year period. The use of this methodology will delay the impact of current market fluctuations on the pension expense for the period. We estimate the assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining our postretirement net expense based upon our actual health care cost experience, the effects of recently enacted legislation and general economic conditions. Our assumed rate of retirement is estimated based upon our annual review of our participant census information as of the measurement date.General economic and market conditions Assumed investment returns by asset class Assumed future salary increases Assumed discount rate Projected timing of future cash disbursements Health care cost experience trends Participant demographic information Actuarial mortality assumptions Impact of legislation Impact of regulation
ContingenciesIn the normal course of business, we are confronted with issues or events that may result in a contingent liability. These generally relate to uncollectible receivables, lawsuits, claims made by third parties or the action of various regulatory agencies. We recognize these contingencies in our consolidated financial statements when we determine, based on currently available facts and circumstances it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset will not be recovered, and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Actual results may differ from estimates, depending on actual outcomes or changes in the facts or expectations surrounding each potential exposure. Changes in the estimates related to contingencies could have a negative impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Our contingencies are further discussed in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.Currently available facts Management’s estimate of future resolution
Critical Accounting PolicySummary of PolicyFactors Influencing Application of the Policy
Financial instruments and hedging activitiesWe use financial instruments to mitigate commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The objectives for using financial instruments have been tailored to meet the needs of our regulated and nonregulated businesses. These objectives are more fully described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. We record all of our financial instruments on the balance sheet at fair value as required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with changes in fair value ultimately recorded in the income statement. The recognition of the changes in fair value of these financial instruments recorded in the income statement is contingent upon whether the financial instrument has been designated and qualifies as a part of a hedging relationship or if regulatory rulings require a different accounting treatment. Our accounting elections for financial instruments and hedging activities utilized are more fully described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. The criteria used to determine if a financial instrument meets the definition of a derivative and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment are complex and require management to exercise professional judgment. Further, as more fully discussed below, significant changes in the fair value of these financial instruments could materially impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Finally, changes in the effectiveness of the hedge relationship could impact the accounting treatment.Designation of contracts under the hedge accounting rules Judgment in the application of accounting guidance Assessment of the probability that future hedged transactions will occur Changes in market conditions and the related impact on the fair value of the hedged item and the associated designated financial instrument Changes in the effectiveness of the hedge relationship
Fair Value MeasurementsWe report certain assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The assets and liabilities we recognize at fair value are subject to potentially significant volatility based on numerous considerations including, but not limited to changes in commodity prices, interest rates, maturity and timing of settlement. Prices actively quoted on national exchanges are used to determine the fair value of most of our assets and liabilities recorded on our balance sheet at fair value. Within our nonregulated operations, we utilize a mid-market pricing convention (the mid-point between the bid and ask prices) for determining fair value measurement, as permitted under current accounting standards. Values derived from these sources reflect the market in which transactions involving these financial instruments are executed. We utilize models and other valuation methods to determine fair value when external sources are not available. Values are adjusted to reflect the potential impact of an orderly liquidation of our positions over a reasonable period of time under then-current market conditions. We believe the market prices and models used to value these financial instruments represent the best information available with respect to the market in which transactions involving these financial instruments are executed, the closing exchange and over-the-counter quotations, time value and volatility factors underlying the contracts. Fair-value estimates also consider our own creditworthiness and the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved. Our counterparties consist primarily of financial institutions and major energy companies. This concentration of counterparties may materially impact our exposure to credit risk resulting from market, economic or regulatory conditions. We seek to minimize counterparty credit risk through an evaluation of their financial condition and credit ratings and the use of collateral requirements under certain circumstances.General economic and market conditions Volatility in underlying market conditions Maturity dates of financial instruments Creditworthiness of our counterparties Creditworthiness of Atmos Energy Impact of credit risk mitigation activities on the assessment of the creditworthiness of Atmos Energy and its counterparties
Critical Accounting PolicySummary of PolicyFactors Influencing Application of the Policy
Impairment assessmentsWe review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including goodwill and identifiable intangibles, whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually for goodwill, as required by U.S. accounting standards. The evaluation of our goodwill balances and other long-lived assets or identifiable assets for which uncertainty exists regarding the recoverability of the carrying value of such assets involves the assessment of future cash flows and external market conditions and other subjective factors that could impact the estimation of future cash flows including, but not limited to the commodity prices, the amount and timing of future cash flows, future growth rates and the discount rate. Unforeseen events and changes in circumstances or market conditions could adversely affect these estimates, which could result in an impairment charge.General economic and market conditions Projected timing and amount of future discounted cash flows Judgment in the evaluation of relevant data

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Atmos Energy Corporation strives to operate its businesses safely and reliably while delivering superior shareholder value. In recent years we have implemented rate designs that reduce or eliminate regulatory lag and separate the recovery of our approved rate from customer usage patterns. In addition, recent pipeline safety rulemaking has impacted the level of operating and maintenance expense and capital spending in our regulated business, which we expect to continue. Accordingly, we have significantly increased investments in the safety and reliability of our natural gas distribution and transmission infrastructure. This increased level of investment and timely recovery of these investments through our various regulatory mechanisms has resulted in increased earnings and operating cash flow in recent years.

This trend continued during fiscal 2015. Net income increased 9 percent to $315.1 million, or $3.09 per diluted share. The year-over-year increase largely reflects positive rate outcomes, which more than offset weather that was 10 percent warmer than the prior year, particularly in our nonregulated segment. Additionally, operating cash flow increased $96.5 million to $836.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2015 totaled $975.1 million. Approximately 80 percent was invested to improve the safety and reliability of our distribution and transportation systems, with a significant portion of this investment incurred under regulatory mechanisms that reduce lag to six months or less. Fiscal 2014 spending under these and other mechanisms enabled the Company to complete 17 regulatory filings during fiscal 2015 that should increase annual operating income from regulated operations by $114.5 million. We plan to continue to fund our growth through the use of operating cash flows and debt and equity securities, to maintain a balanced capital structure.

On July 1, 2015, Fitch Ratings (Fitch) upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to A from A- with a ratings outlook of stable. Fitch cited its expectation of continued strong financial performance driven primarily by organic growth in our regulated distribution and regulated pipeline segments.

On October 29, 2015, S&P affirmed our senior unsecured debt rating as A- and issued a revised outlook from stable to positive, citing the potential for an upgraded rating in the future if we maintain our current level of financial performance as capital spending levels remain elevated.

As a result of the continued contribution and stability of our regulated earnings, cash flows and capital structure, our Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by 7.7 percent for fiscal 2016.

Consolidated Results

The following table presents our consolidated financial highlights for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
201520142013
(In thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenues$4,142,136$4,940,916$3,875,460
Gross profit1,680,0171,582,4261,412,050
Operating expenses1,048,622971,077910,171
Operating income631,395611,349501,879
Miscellaneous expense(4,389)(5,235)(197)
Interest charges116,241129,295128,385
Income from continuing operations before income taxes510,765476,819373,297
Income tax expense195,690187,002142,599
Income from continuing operations315,075289,817230,698
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax——7,202
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax——5,294
Net income$315,075$289,817$243,194
Diluted net income per share from continuing operations$3.09$2.96$2.50
Diluted net income per share from discontinued operations$—$—$0.14
Diluted net income per share$3.09$2.96$2.64

Regulated operations contributed 95 percent, 89 percent and 95 percent to our consolidated net income from continuing operations for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013. Our consolidated net income during the last three fiscal years was earned across our business segments as follows:

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
201520142013
(In thousands)
Regulated distribution segment$204,813$171,585$150,856
Regulated pipeline segment94,66286,19168,260
Nonregulated segment15,60032,04111,582
Net income from continuing operations315,075289,817230,698
Net income from discontinued operations——12,496
Net income$315,075$289,817$243,194

The following table segregates our consolidated net income and diluted earnings per share between our regulated and nonregulated operations:

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
201520142013
(In thousands, except per share data)
Regulated operations$299,475$257,776$219,116
Nonregulated operations15,60032,04111,582
Net income from continuing operations315,075289,817230,698
Net income from discontinued operations——12,496
Net income$315,075$289,817$243,194
Diluted EPS from continuing regulated operations$2.93$2.63$2.38
Diluted EPS from nonregulated operations0.160.330.12
Diluted EPS from continuing operations3.092.962.50
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations——0.14
Consolidated diluted EPS$3.09$2.96$2.64

We reported net income of $315.1 million, or $3.09 per diluted share for the year ended September 30, 2015, compared with net income of $289.8 million or $2.96 per diluted share in the prior year. Unrealized losses in our nonregulated operations during the current year decreased net income by $1.5 million or $0.01 per diluted share compared with net gains recorded in the prior year of $5.8 million or $0.06 per diluted share.

We reported net income of $289.8 million, or $2.96 per diluted share for the year ended September 30, 2014, compared with net income of $243.2 million or $2.64 per diluted share in fiscal 2013. Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2013 was $230.7 million, or $2.50 per diluted share. Income from discontinued operations was $12.5 million or $0.14 per diluted share for the year ended September 30, 2013, which includes the gain on sale of substantially all our assets in Georgia of $5.3 million. Unrealized gains in our nonregulated operations during fiscal 2014 increased net income by $5.8 million or $0.06 per diluted share compared with net gains recorded in fiscal 2013 of $5.3 million, or $0.05 per diluted share.

See the following discussion regarding the results of operations for each of our business operating segments.

Regulated Distribution Segment

The primary factors that impact the results of our regulated distribution operations are our ability to earn our authorized rates of return, the cost of natural gas, competitive factors in the energy industry and economic conditions in our service areas.

Our ability to earn our authorized rates is based primarily on our ability to improve the rate design in our various ratemaking jurisdictions by reducing or eliminating regulatory lag and, ultimately, separating the recovery of our approved margins from customer usage patterns. Improving rate design is a long-term process and is further complicated by the fact that we operate in multiple rate jurisdictions. The “Ratemaking Activity” section of this Form 10-K describes our current rate strategy, progress towards implementing that strategy and recent ratemaking initiatives in more detail.

We are generally able to pass the cost of gas through to our customers without markup under purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms; therefore the cost of gas typically does not have an impact on our gross profit as increases in the cost of gas are offset by a corresponding increase in revenues. Accordingly, we believe gross profit is a better indicator of our financial performance than revenues. However, gross profit in our Texas and Mississippi service areas include franchise fees and gross receipt taxes, which are calculated as a percentage of revenue (inclusive of gas costs). Therefore, the amount of these taxes included in revenue is influenced by the cost of gas and the level of gas sales volumes. We record the tax expense as a component of taxes, other than income. Although changes in revenue related taxes arising from changes in gas costs affect gross profit, over time the impact is offset within operating income.

Although the cost of gas typically does not have a direct impact on our gross profit, higher gas costs may adversely impact our accounts receivable collections, resulting in higher bad debt expense, and may require us to increase borrowings under our credit facilities resulting in higher interest expense. In addition, higher gas costs, as well as competitive factors in the industry and general economic conditions may cause customers to conserve or, in the case of industrial consumers, to use alternative energy sources. Currently, gas cost risk has been mitigated by rate design that allows us to collect from our customers the gas cost portion of our bad debt expense on approximately 76 percent of our residential and commercial margins.

During fiscal 2015, we completed 16 regulatory proceedings in our regulated distribution segment, which should result in a $77.3 million increase in annual operating income.

In April 2013, we completed the sale of our Georgia regulated distribution operations, representing approximately 64,000 customers.

Review of Financial and Operating Results

Financial and operational highlights for our regulated distribution segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented below.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
2015201420132015 vs. 20142014 vs. 2013
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
Gross profit$1,237,577$1,176,515$1,081,236$61,062$95,279
Operating expenses817,428791,947738,14325,48153,804
Operating income420,149384,568343,09335,58141,475
Miscellaneous income (expense)(377)(381)2,5354(2,916)
Interest charges84,13294,91898,296(10,786)(3,378)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes335,640289,269247,33246,37141,937
Income tax expense130,827117,68496,47613,14321,208
Income from continuing operations204,813171,585150,85633,22820,729
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax——7,202—(7,202)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax——5,649—(5,649)
Net Income$204,813$171,585$163,707$33,228$7,878
Consolidated regulated distribution sales volumes from continuing operations — MMcf293,350317,320269,162(23,970)48,158
Consolidated regulated distribution transportation volumes from continuing operations — MMcf135,972134,483123,1441,48911,339
Consolidated regulated distribution throughput from continuing operations — MMcf429,322451,803392,306(22,481)59,497
Consolidated regulated distribution throughput from discontinued operations — MMcf——4,731—(4,731)
Total consolidated regulated distribution throughput — MMcf429,322451,803397,037(22,481)54,766
Consolidated regulated distribution average transportation revenue per Mcf$0.50$0.48$0.46$0.02$0.02
Consolidated regulated distribution average cost of gas per Mcf sold$5.20$5.94$4.91$(0.74)$1.03

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2014

Income from continuing operations for our regulated distribution segment increased 19 percent, primarily due to a $61.1 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by a $25.5 million increase in operating expenses. The year-to-date increase in gross profit primarily reflects:

•a $70.6 million net increase in rate adjustments, primarily in our Mid-Tex, West Texas, Kentucky/Mid-States and Colorado-Kansas Divisions.
•a $4.5 million increase in transportation revenue. Transportation volumes increased one percent due to increased economic activity experienced in our Kentucky/Mid-States Division and increased consumption in our West Texas Division due to colder than normal weather.
•a $10.5 million decrease in consumption associated with an eight percent decrease in sales volumes. Current period weather was ten percent warmer compared to the prior-year period, before adjusting for weather normalization mechanisms.
•a $2.5 million decrease in revenue-related taxes primarily in our Mid-Tex Division.

The increase in operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance expense, bad debt expense, depreciation and amortization expense and taxes, other than income, was primarily due to increased depreciation expense associated with increased capital investments and increased ad valorem and franchise taxes.

Interest charges decreased by $10.8 million, primarily due to replacing our $500 million unsecured 4.95% senior notes with $500 million of 4.125% 30-year unsecured senior notes on October 15, 2014 and higher interest expense deferrals under our infrastructure mechanisms.

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

Income from continuing operations for our regulated distribution segment increased 14 percent, primarily due to a $95.3 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by a $53.8 million increase in operating expenses. The year-to-date increase in gross profit primarily reflects:

•a $35.3 million net increase in rate adjustments, primarily in our Mid-Tex, Kentucky, West Texas and Louisiana service areas.
•a $14.3 million increase due to increased customer consumption resulting from colder weather, primarily experienced in our Mid-Tex and West Texas Divisions.
•a $27.5 million increase in revenue-related taxes, primarily in our Mid-Tex and West Texas Divisions, offset by a corresponding $28.4 million increase in the related tax expense.
•a $13.8 million increase related to increased customer count, higher transportation, late payment and installment plan revenues.

The $53.8 million increase in operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance expense, bad debt expense, depreciation and amortization expense and taxes, other than income, was primarily due to the following:

•a $28.4 million increase due to the aforementioned increase in revenue-related taxes.
•a $12.8 million increase in depreciation expense.
•a $12.7 million net increase in employee-related expenses, due to lower labor capitalization rates, increased benefit costs and increased variable compensation expense.
•a $4.2 million increase in the provision for doubtful accounts.

The $21.2 million increase in income tax expense was primarily due to increased income from continuing operations before income taxes as well as an increase of approximately $7.0 million in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to the uncertainty in the company's ability to utilize certain charitable contribution carryforwards before they expire.

The following table shows our operating income from continuing operations by regulated distribution division, in order of total rate base, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The presentation of our regulated distribution operating income is included for financial reporting purposes and may not be appropriate for ratemaking purposes.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
2015201420132015 vs. 20142014 vs. 2013
(In thousands)
Mid-Tex$197,559$187,265$158,900$10,294$28,365
Kentucky/Mid-States59,23355,96846,1643,2659,804
Louisiana51,00156,64852,125(5,647)4,523
West Texas37,18029,25028,0857,9301,165
Mississippi34,33328,47329,1125,860(639)
Colorado-Kansas28,72028,07725,4786432,599
Other12,123(1,113)3,22913,236(4,342)
Total$420,149$384,568$343,093$35,581$41,475

Regulated Pipeline Segment

Our regulated pipeline segment consists of the pipeline and storage operations of the Atmos Pipeline - Texas Division (APT). APT is one of the largest intrastate pipeline operations in Texas with a heavy concentration in the established natural gas-producing areas of central, northern and eastern Texas, extending into or near the major producing areas of the Barnett Shale, the Texas Gulf Coast and the Permian Basin of West Texas. APT’s primary business is providing firm transportation and storage services for our Mid-Tex Division and other LDC customers. APT also provides interruptible transportation, storage and ancillary services for third parties including, industrial and electric generation customers as well as producers, marketers and other shippers..

Our regulated pipeline segment is impacted by seasonal weather patterns, competitive factors in the energy industry and economic conditions in APT's service area. Natural gas prices do not directly impact the results of this segment as revenues are derived from the transportation of natural gas. However, natural gas prices and demand for natural gas could influence the level of drilling activity in the markets that we serve, which may influence the level of throughput we may be able to transport on our pipeline. Further, natural gas price differences between the various hubs that we serve impact the market value for transportation services between those geographic areas.

The results of the Atmos Pipeline - Texas Division are also significantly impacted by the natural gas requirements of the Mid-Tex Division because it is the primary transporter of natural gas for our Mid-Tex Division.

Finally, as a regulated pipeline, the operations of the Atmos Pipeline - Texas Division may be impacted by the timing of when costs and expenses are incurred and when these costs and expenses are recovered through its tariffs.

Review of Financial and Operating Results

Financial and operational highlights for our regulated pipeline segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented below.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
2015201420132015 vs. 20142014 vs. 2013
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
Mid-Tex Division transportation$264,059$227,230$179,628$36,829$47,602
Third-party transportation94,89376,10966,93918,7849,170
Storage and park and lend services3,5755,3445,985(1,769)(641)
Other7,5859,77616,348(2,191)(6,572)
Gross profit370,112318,459268,90051,65349,559
Operating expenses188,845145,640129,04743,20516,593
Operating income181,267172,819139,8538,44832,966
Miscellaneous expense(1,243)(3,181)(2,285)1,938(896)
Interest charges33,15136,28030,678(3,129)5,602
Income before income taxes146,873133,358106,89013,51526,468
Income tax expense52,21147,16738,6305,0448,537
Net income$94,662$86,191$68,260$8,471$17,931
Gross pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf738,532714,464649,74024,06864,724
Consolidated pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf528,068493,360467,17834,70826,182

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2014

Net income for our regulated pipeline segment increased 10 percent, primarily due to a $51.7 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by a $43.2 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in gross profit primarily reflects a $47.0 million increase in rates from the approved 2014 and 2015 Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) filings. Additionally, gross profit reflects increased pipeline demand fees and through-system transportation volumes and rates that were offset by lower storage and other fees and the absence of a $1.8 million increase recorded in the prior-year associated with an annual adjustment mechanism.

Operating expenses increased $43.2 million, primarily due to increased levels of pipeline and right-of-way maintenance activities to improve the safety and reliability of our system and increased depreciation expense associated with increased capital investments, along with the absence of a $6.7 million refund received in the prior year as a result of the completion of a state use tax audit.

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

Net income for our regulated pipeline segment increased 26 percent in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to a $49.6 million increase in gross profit. The increase in gross profit primarily reflects a $38.5 million increase in rates from the GRIP filings approved by the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) in fiscal 2014 and 2013 coupled with a $4.7 million increase associated with higher transportation volumes and basis spreads driven by colder weather.

The Atmos Pipeline — Texas rate case approved by the RRC on April 18, 2011 contained an annual adjustment mechanism, approved for a three-year pilot program, that adjusted regulated rates up or down by 75 percent of the difference between the non-regulated annual revenue of Atmos Pipeline — Texas and a pre-defined base credit. The annual adjustment

mechanism expired on June 30, 2013. On January 1, 2014, the RRC approved the extension of the annual adjustment mechanism retroactive to July 1, 2013, which will stay in place until the completion of the next Atmos Pipeline — Texas rate case. As a result of this decision, during fiscal 2014, we recognized a $1.8 million increase in gross profit for the application of the annual adjustment mechanism, for the period July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013.

Operating expenses increased $16.6 million primarily due to the following:

  • a $10.1 million increase in pipeline and right-of-way maintenance activities.

  • a $5.7 million increase in depreciation expense associated with increased capital investments.

  • a $2.4 million increase due to higher employee-related expenses, partially offset by

  • a $6.7 million refund received as a result of the completion of a state use tax audit.

Nonregulated Segment

Our nonregulated operations are conducted through Atmos Energy Holdings, Inc. (AEH), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Atmos Energy Corporation and typically represents approximately five percent of our consolidated net income.

AEH's primary business is to buy, sell and deliver natural gas at competitive prices to approximately 1,000 customers located primarily in the Midwest and Southeast areas of the United States. AEH accomplishes this objective by aggregating and purchasing gas supply, arranging transportation and storage logistics and effectively managing commodity price risk.

AEH also earns storage and transportation demand fees primarily from our regulated distribution operations in Louisiana and Kentucky. These demand fees are subject to regulatory oversight and are renewed periodically.

Our nonregulated activities are significantly influenced by competitive factors in the industry and general economic conditions. Therefore, the margins earned from these activities are dependent upon our ability to attract and retain customers and to minimize the cost of buying, selling and delivering natural gas to offer more competitive pricing to those customers.

Further, natural gas market conditions, most notably the price of natural gas and the level of price volatility affect our nonregulated businesses. Natural gas prices and the level of volatility are influenced by a number of factors including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, the demand for natural gas in different parts of the country, the level of domestic natural gas production and the level of natural gas inventory levels.

Natural gas prices can influence:

•The demand for natural gas. Higher prices may cause customers to conserve or use alternative energy sources. Conversely, lower prices could cause customers such as electric power generators to switch from alternative energy sources to natural gas.
•Collection of accounts receivable from customers, which could affect the level of bad debt expense recognized by this segment.
•The level of borrowings under our credit facilities, which affects the level of interest expense recognized by this segment.

Natural gas price volatility can also influence our nonregulated business in the following ways:

•Price volatility influences basis differentials, which provide opportunities to profit from identifying the lowest cost alternative among the natural gas supplies, transportation and markets to which we have access.
•Increased or decreased volatility impacts the amounts of unrealized margins recorded in our gross profit and could impact the amount of cash required to collateralize our risk management liabilities.

Our nonregulated segment manages its exposure to natural gas commodity price risk through a combination of physical storage and financial instruments. Therefore, results for this segment include unrealized gains or losses on its net physical gas position and the related financial instruments used to manage commodity price risk. These margins fluctuate based upon changes in the spreads between the physical and forward natural gas prices. The magnitude of the unrealized gains and losses is also contingent upon the levels of our net physical position at the end of the reporting period.

Review of Financial and Operating Results

Financial and operational highlights for our nonregulated segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented below.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
2015201420132015 vs. 20142014 vs. 2013
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
Realized margins
Gas delivery and related services$48,930$39,529$39,839$9,401$(310)
Storage and transportation services13,57514,69614,641(1,121)55
Other12,75524,170(103)(11,415)24,273
Total realized margins75,26078,39554,377(3,135)24,018
Unrealized margins(2,400)9,5608,954(11,960)606
Gross profit72,86087,95563,331(15,095)24,624
Operating expenses42,88133,99344,4048,888(10,411)
Operating income29,97953,96218,927(23,983)35,035
Miscellaneous income (expense)(760)2,2162,316(2,976)(100)
Interest charges9671,9862,168(1,019)(182)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes28,25254,19219,075(25,940)35,117
Income tax expense12,65222,1517,493(9,499)14,658
Income from continuing operations15,60032,04111,582(16,441)20,459
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax——(355)—355
Net income$15,600$32,041$11,227$(16,441)$20,814
Gross nonregulated delivered gas sales volumes — MMcf410,044439,014396,561(28,970)42,453
Consolidated nonregulated delivered gas sales volumes — MMcf351,427377,441343,669(26,014)33,772
Net physical position (Bcf)14.69.312.05.3(2.7)

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2014

Net income for our nonregulated segment decreased 51 percent from the prior year due to lower gross profit and higher operating expenses.

The $15.1 million period-over-period decrease in gross profit was primarily due to a $12.0 million decrease in unrealized margins combined with a $3.1 million decrease in realized margins. The decrease in realized margins reflects:

•An $11.4 million decrease in other realized margins primarily due to lower natural gas price volatility. In the prior-year period, strong market demand caused by significantly colder-than-normal weather resulted in increased market volatility. These market conditions created the opportunity to accelerate physical withdrawals that had been planned for future periods into the fiscal 2014 second quarter to capture incremental gross profit margin. Market conditions in the current-year period were less volatile than the prior-year period, which provided fewer opportunities to capture incremental gross profit.
•A $9.4 million increase in gas delivery and related services margins, primarily due to an increase in per-unit margins from 9 cents to 12 cents per Mcf, partially offset by a seven percent decrease in consolidated sales volumes. AEH elected not to renew excess transportation capacity in certain markets in late fiscal 2014 and early 2015. As a result, AEH has experienced fewer deliveries to low-margin marketing and power generation customers, which is the primary driver for the decrease in consolidated sales volumes and higher per-unit margins.

Operating expenses increased $8.9 million, primarily due to higher legal expenses as a result of the favorable settlement in the prior year of the Kentucky litigation and the resolution of the Tennessee Business License Tax matter.

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

Net income for our nonregulated segment increased 185 percent in fiscal year 2014 compared to the year ended September 30, 2013 due to higher gross profit and decreased operating expenses.

The period-over-period increase in gross profit was primarily due to a $24.0 million increase in realized margins. The increase in realized margins reflects:

•A $24.3 million increase in other realized margins due to the acceleration of physical withdrawals into the second quarter from future periods to capture gross profit margin during periods of increased natural gas price volatility caused by strong market demand as a result of significantly colder weather during the second quarter. This modification in the execution strategy resulted in the establishment of new positions that were expected to settle in the latter half of fiscal 2014 and beyond. The positions that settled during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were settled during a period of falling prices, which further increased realized margins during fiscal 2014. In contrast, losses were incurred from storage optimization activities in the prior year largely due to unfavorable changes in market prices relative to the execution strategy in place at that time.
•A $0.3 million decrease in gas delivery and related services margins. Consolidated sales volumes increased ten percent as a result of stronger demand from marketing, industrial and utility/municipal customers due to colder weather. However, gas delivery per-unit margins decreased from ten cents per Mcf in the prior-year period to 9 cents per Mcf due primarily to losses incurred during the second quarter to meet peaking requirements for certain customers during periods of colder weather, due to volatility between spot purchase prices and the contractual sales price to the customer.

Operating expenses decreased $10.4 million, primarily due to lower legal expenses related to the dismissal of the Kentucky litigation and the favorable resolution of the Tennessee Business License Tax matter in fiscal 2014.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The liquidity required to fund our working capital, capital expenditures and other cash needs is provided from a variety of sources, including internally generated funds and borrowings under our commercial paper program and bank credit facilities. Additionally, we have various uncommitted trade credit lines with our gas suppliers that we utilize to purchase natural gas on a monthly basis. Finally, from time to time, we raise funds from the public debt and equity capital markets to fund our liquidity needs.

We regularly evaluate our funding strategy and capital structure to ensure that we (i) have sufficient liquidity for our short-term and long-term needs in a cost-effective manner and (ii) maintain a balanced capital structure with a debt-to-capitalization ratio in a target range of 45 to 55 percent. We also evaluate the levels of committed borrowing capacity that we require. We currently have over $1 billion of capacity from our short-term facilities.

The following table presents our capitalization as of September 30, 2015 and 2014:

September 30
20152014
(In thousands, except percentages)
Short-term debt$457,9277.5%$196,6953.4%
Long-term debt2,455,38840.2%2,455,98642.8%
Shareholders’ equity3,194,79752.3%3,086,23253.8%
Total capitalization, including short-term debt$6,108,112100.0%$5,738,913100.0%

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, including short-term debt, was 47.7 percent and 46.2 percent at September 30, 2015 and 2014.

As we continue to invest in the safety and reliability of our distribution and transportation system, we expect our capital spending will increase in future periods. We intend to fund this level of investment through available operating cash flows, the issuance of long-term debt securities and equity. We believe the liquidity provided by these sources combined with our committed credit facilities will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital expenditure program for fiscal year 2016 and beyond.

On September 25, 2015, we terminated our existing $1.25 billion credit facility and entered into a new five year $1.25 billion credit facility with substantially the same terms. The new facility also retains the $250 million accordion feature, which allows for an increase in the total committed loan amount to $1.5 billion.

Additionally, we plan to issue new unsecured senior notes to replace $250 million and $450 million of unsecured senior notes that will mature in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2019. During fiscal 2014 and 2015, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to fix the Treasury yield component associated with the anticipated fiscal 2019 issuances at 3.782%. In fiscal 2012, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to fix the Treasury yield component associated with the anticipated fiscal 2017 issuances at 3.367%.

Cash Flows

Our internally generated funds may change in the future due to a number of factors, some of which we cannot control. These factors include regulatory changes, the price for our services, the demand for such products and services, margin requirements resulting from significant changes in commodity prices, operational risks and other factors.

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented below.

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
2015201420132015 vs. 20142014 vs. 2013
(In thousands)
Total cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities$836,519$739,986$613,127$96,533$126,859
Investing activities(974,755)(837,576)(696,914)(137,179)(140,662)
Financing activities124,63173,64985,74750,982(12,098)
Change in cash and cash equivalents(13,605)(23,941)1,96010,336(25,901)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period42,25866,19964,239(23,941)1,960
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$28,653$42,258$66,199$(13,605)$(23,941)

Cash flows from operating activities

Year-over-year changes in our operating cash flows primarily are attributable to changes in net income, working capital changes, particularly within our regulated distribution segment resulting from changes in the price of natural gas and the timing of customer collections, payments for natural gas purchases and deferred gas cost recoveries.

Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2015 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2014

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, we generated operating cash flow of $836.5 million from operating activities compared with $740.0 million in the prior year. The year-over-year increase primarily reflects successful rate case outcomes in the prior year, the timing of gas cost recoveries under our purchased gas cost mechanisms and lower gas prices during the current-year storage injection season.

Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2014 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we generated operating cash flow of $740.0 million from operating activities compared with $613.1 million in fiscal 2013. The year-over-year increase reflects higher operating results from colder weather and rate increases combined with the timing of customer collections and vendor payments.

Cash flows from investing activities

In recent years, a substantial portion of our cash resources has been used to fund our ongoing construction program, which enables us to enhance the safety and reliability of the systems used to provide regulated distribution services to our existing customer base, expand our natural gas distribution services into new markets, enhance the integrity of our pipelines and, more recently, expand our intrastate pipeline network. Over the last three fiscal years, approximately 80 percent of our capital spending has been committed to improving the safety and reliability of our system.

In executing our regulatory strategy, we target our capital spending on regulatory mechanisms that permit us to earn an adequate return timely on our investment without compromising the safety or reliability of our system. Substantially all of our regulated jurisdictions have rate tariffs that provide the opportunity to include in their rate base approved capital costs on a periodic basis without being required to file a rate case.

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, we incurred $975.1 million for capital expenditures compared with $835.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and $845.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2015 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2014

The $139.8 million increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 primarily reflects:

•A $96.9 million increase in capital spending in our regulated distribution segment, which primarily reflects a planned increase in safety and reliability investment in fiscal 2015.
•A $43.4 million increase in capital spending in our regulated pipeline segment, primarily related to the enhancement and fortification of two storage fields to ensure the reliability of gas service to our Mid-Tex Division.

Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2014 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

The $9.7 million decrease in capital expenditures in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 primarily reflects:

•A $63.9 million decrease in capital spending in our regulated pipeline segment primarily associated with the completion of the Line WX expansion project, partially offset by
•A $55.5 million increase in capital spending in our regulated distribution segment due to increased spending under our infrastructure replacement programs.

Cash flows from financing activities

We generated a net $124.6 million, $73.6 million and $85.7 million in cash from financing activities for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013. Our significant financing activities for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are summarized as follows:

2015

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, our financing activities generated $124.6 million of cash compared with $73.6 million of cash generated in the prior year. The increase is primarily due to timing between short-term debt borrowings and repayments during the current year, proceeds from the issuance of $500 million unsecured 4.125% senior notes in October 2014 and the settlement of the associated forward starting interest rate swaps. Partially offsetting these increases were the repayment of $500 million 4.95% senior unsecured notes at maturity on October 15, 2014, compared with short-term debt borrowings and repayments in the prior year and proceeds generated from the equity offering completed in February 2014.

2014

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, our financing activities generated $73.6 million of cash compared with $85.7 million of cash generated in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to timing between short-term debt borrowings and repayments during fiscal 2014 partially offset by proceeds from the equity offering completed in February 2014 compared with proceeds generated from the issuance of long-term debt in fiscal 2013.

2013

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, our financing activities generated $85.7 million of cash compared with $44.8 million of cash used in fiscal 2012. Fiscal year 2013 cash flows from financing activities were significantly influenced by the issuance of $500 million 4.15% 30-year unsecured senior notes on January 11, 2013. We used a portion of the net cash proceeds of $493.8 million to repay a $260 million short-term financing facility executed in fiscal 2012, to settle, for $66.6 million, three Treasury locks associated with the issuance and to reduce short-term debt borrowings by $167.2 million.

The following table shows the number of shares issued for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013:

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30
201520142013
Shares issued:
Direct Stock Purchase Plan176,39183,150—
Retirement Savings Plan398,047——
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan664,752653,130531,672
Outside Directors Stock-For-Fee Plan—1,7352,088
February 2014 Offering—9,200,000—
Total shares issued1,239,1909,938,015533,760

The decrease in the number of shares issued in fiscal 2015 compared with the number of shares issued in fiscal 2014 primarily reflects the equity offering completed in February 2014, partially offset by the fact that we have begun issuing shares for use by the Direct Stock Purchase Plan and the Retirement Savings Plan and Trust rather than using shares purchased in the open market. At September 30, 2015, of the 8.7 million shares authorized for issuance from the LTIP, 308,582 shares remained available. For the year ended September 30, 2015, we canceled and retired 148,464 shares attributable to federal income tax withholdings on equity awards which are not included in the table above.

The increased number of shares issued in fiscal 2014 compared with the number of shares issued in fiscal 2013 primarily reflects the equity offering completed in February 2014 as well as a higher number of performance-based awards issued in the

current year as actual performance exceeded the target. At September 30, 2014, of the 8.7 million shares authorized for issuance from the LTIP, 845,139 shares remained available. For the year ended September 30, 2014, we canceled and retired 190,134 shares attributable to federal income tax withholdings on equity awards which are not included in the table above.

Credit Facilities

Our short-term borrowing requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Changes in the price of natural gas and the amount of natural gas we need to supply to meet our customers’ needs could significantly affect our borrowing requirements.

We finance our short-term borrowing requirements through a combination of a $1.25 billion commercial paper program, which is collateralized by our $1.25 billion unsecured credit facility, as well as three additional committed revolving credit facilities and one uncommitted revolving credit facility with third-party lenders that provide approximately $1.3 billion of working capital funding. The $1.25 billion unsecured credit facility has a $250 million accordion feature which allows for an increase in the total committed loan amount to $1.5 billion. We also use intercompany credit facilities to supplement the funding provided by these third-party committed credit facilities.

Shelf Registration

We have an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits us to issue a total of $1.75 billion in common stock and/or debt securities. The shelf registration statement is effective until March 28, 2016. As of September 30, 2015, $845 million was available for issuance.

Credit Ratings

Our credit ratings directly affect our ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing, in addition to the cost of such financing. In determining our credit ratings, the rating agencies consider a number of quantitative factors, including debt to total capitalization, operating cash flow relative to outstanding debt, operating cash flow coverage of interest and pension liabilities and funding status. In addition, the rating agencies consider qualitative factors such as consistency of our earnings over time, the quality of our management and business strategy, the risks associated with our regulated and nonregulated businesses and the regulatory environment in the states where we operate.

Our debt is rated by three rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (Fitch). Our current debt ratings are all considered investment grade and are as follows:

S&PMoody’sFitch
Unsecured senior long-term debtA-A2A
Commercial paperA-2P-1F-2

On July 1, 2015, Fitch upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to A from A- with a ratings outlook of stable, citing Fitch's expectation of continued strong financial performance, which has been driven primarily by organic growth in our regulated distribution and regulated pipeline segments.

On October 29, 2015, S&P affirmed our senior unsecured debt rating as A- and issued a revised outlook from stable to positive, citing the potential for an upgraded rating in the future if we maintain our current level of financial performance as capital spending levels remain elevated.

A significant degradation in our operating performance or a significant reduction in our liquidity caused by more limited access to the private and public credit markets as a result of deteriorating global or national financial and credit conditions could trigger a negative change in our ratings outlook or even a reduction in our credit ratings by the three credit rating agencies. This would mean more limited access to the private and public credit markets and an increase in the costs of such borrowings.

A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. The highest investment grade credit rating is AAA for S&P, Aaa for Moody’s and AAA for Fitch. The lowest investment grade credit rating is BBB- for S&P, Baa3 for Moody’s and BBB- for Fitch. Our credit ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. There can be no assurance that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered, or withdrawn entirely, by a rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant.

Debt Covenants

We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of September 30, 2015. Our debt covenants are described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides information about contractual obligations and commercial commitments at September 30, 2015.

Payments Due by Period
TotalLess than 1 year1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 years
(In thousands)
Contractual Obligations
Long-term debt(1)$2,460,000$—$250,000$450,000$1,760,000
Short-term debt(1)457,927457,927———
Interest charges(2)2,252,802140,192259,835189,5591,663,216
Operating leases(3)140,71316,47533,12929,45861,651
Demand fees for contracted storage(4)8,1883,8533,97728672
Demand fees for contracted transportation(5)7,0683,9901,5115381,029
Financial instrument obligations(6)120,1079,568110,539——
Pension and postretirement benefit plan contributions(7)325,60637,35550,13860,238177,875
Uncertain tax positions(8)17,069—17,069——
Total contractual obligations$5,789,480$669,360$726,198$730,079$3,663,843
(1)See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2)Interest charges were calculated using the stated rate for each debt issuance.
(3)See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
(4)Represents third party contractual demand fees for contracted storage in our nonregulated segment. Contractual demand fees for contracted storage for our regulated distribution segment are excluded as these costs are fully recoverable through our purchase gas adjustment mechanisms.
(5)Represents third party contractual demand fees for transportation in our nonregulated segment.
(6)Represents liabilities for natural gas commodity and interest rate financial instruments that were valued as of September 30, 2015. The ultimate settlement amounts of these remaining liabilities are unknown because they are subject to continuing market risk until the financial instruments are settled.
(7)Represents expected contributions to our pension and postretirement benefit plans, which are discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
(8)Represents liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions claimed or expected to be claimed on tax returns.

Our regulated distribution segment maintains supply contracts with several vendors that generally cover a period of up to one year. Commitments for estimated base gas volumes are established under these contracts on a monthly basis at contractually negotiated prices. Commitments for incremental daily purchases are made as necessary during the month in accordance with the terms of individual contracts. Our Mid-Tex Division also maintains a limited number of long-term supply contracts to ensure a reliable source of gas for our customers in its service area which obligate it to purchase specified volumes at market and fixed prices. At September 30, 2015, we were committed to purchase 36.6 Bcf within one year and 26.8 Bcf within one to three years under indexed contracts.

AEH has commitments to purchase physical quantities of natural gas under contracts indexed to the forward NYMEX strip or fixed price contracts. At September 30, 2015, AEH was committed to purchase 101.9 Bcf within one year, 16.0 Bcf within one to three years and 0.5 Bcf after three years under indexed contracts. AEH is committed to purchase 3.0 Bcf within one year under fixed price contracts with prices ranging from $2.32 to $3.23 per Mcf.

Risk Management Activities

As discussed above in our Critical Accounting Policies, we use financial instruments to mitigate commodity price risk and, periodically, to manage interest rate risk. We conduct risk management activities through our regulated distribution and nonregulated segments. In our regulated distribution segment, we use a combination of physical storage, fixed physical contracts and fixed financial contracts to reduce our exposure to unusually large winter-period gas price increases. In our nonregulated segments, we manage our exposure to the risk of natural gas price changes and lock in our gross profit margin through a combination of storage and financial instruments, including futures, over-the-counter and exchange-traded options and swap contracts with counterparties. To the extent our inventory cost and actual sales and actual purchases do not correlate with the changes in the market indices we use in our hedges, we could experience ineffectiveness or the hedges may no longer meet the accounting requirements for hedge accounting, resulting in the financial instruments being treated as mark to market instruments through earnings.

We record our financial instruments as a component of risk management assets and liabilities, which are classified as current or noncurrent based upon the anticipated settlement date of the underlying financial instrument. Substantially all of our financial instruments are valued using external market quotes and indices.

The following table shows the components of the change in fair value of our regulated distribution segment’s financial instruments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):

Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2014$14,284
Contracts realized/settled(33,892)
Fair value of new contracts607
Other changes in value(100,360)
Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2015$(119,361)

The fair value of our regulated distribution segment’s financial instruments at September 30, 2015, is presented below by time period and fair value source:

Fair Value of Contracts at September 30, 2015
Maturity in years
Source of Fair ValueLess than 11-34-5Greater than 5Total Fair Value
(In thousands)
Prices actively quoted$(9,190)$(110,171)$—$—$(119,361)
Prices based on models and other valuation methods—————
Total Fair Value$(9,190)$(110,171)$—$—$(119,361)

The following table shows the components of the change in fair value of our nonregulated segment’s financial instruments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):

Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2014$(3,033)
Contracts realized/settled21,401
Fair value of new contracts—
Other changes in value(52,988)
Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2015(34,620)
Netting of cash collateral43,474
Cash collateral and fair value of contracts at September 30, 2015$8,854

The fair value of our nonregulated segment’s financial instruments at September 30, 2015, is presented below by time period and fair value source.

Fair Value of Contracts at September 30, 2015
Maturity in years
Source of Fair ValueLess than 11-34-5Greater than 5Total Fair Value
(In thousands)
Prices actively quoted$(24,928)$(8,925)$(767)$—$(34,620)
Prices based on models and other valuation methods—————
Total Fair Value$(24,928)$(8,925)$(767)$—$(34,620)

Employee Benefits Programs

An important element of our total compensation program, and a significant component of our operation and maintenance expense, is the offering of various benefits programs to our employees. These programs include medical and dental insurance coverage and pension and postretirement programs.

Medical and Dental Insurance

We offer medical and dental insurance programs to substantially all of our employees.We believe these programs are compliant with all current and future provisions that will be going into effect under The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and consistent with other programs in our industry. In recent years, we have strived to actively manage our health care costs through the introduction of a wellness strategy that is focused on helping employees to identify health risks and to manage these risks through improved lifestyle choices.

Over the last five fiscal years, we have experienced annual medical and prescription inflation of approximately five percent. For fiscal 2016, we anticipate the medical and prescription drug inflation rate will continue at approximately five percent, primarily due to the inflation of health care costs.

Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefit Costs

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, our total net periodic pension and other benefits costs was $58.9 million, compared with $69.8 million and $78.5 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. These costs relating to our regulated distribution operations are recoverable through our distribution rates. A portion of these costs is capitalized into our distribution rate base, and the remaining costs are recorded as a component of operation and maintenance expense.

Our fiscal 2015 costs were determined using a September 30, 2014 measurement date. At that date, interest and corporate bond rates utilized to determine our discount rates were lower than the interest and corporate bond rates as of September 30, 2013, the measurement date for our fiscal 2014 net periodic cost. Therefore, we decreased the discount rate used to measure our fiscal 2015 net periodic cost from 4.95 percent to 4.43 percent. We maintained our expected return on plan assets at 7.25 percent in the determination of our fiscal 2015 net periodic pension cost based upon expected market returns for our targeted asset allocation. As a result of the net impact of these and other assumptions, our fiscal 2015 pension and postretirement medical costs were lower than in the prior year.

Our fiscal 2014 costs were determined using a September 30, 2013 measurement date. At that date, interest and corporate bond rates utilized to determine our discount rates were higher than the interest and corporate bond rates as of September 30, 2012, the measurement date for our fiscal 2013 net periodic cost. Therefore, we increased the discount rate used to measure our fiscal 2014 net periodic cost from 4.04 percent to 4.95 percent. However, we decreased the expected return on plan assets from 7.75 percent to 7.25 percent in the determination of our fiscal 2014 net periodic pension cost based upon expected market returns for our targeted asset allocation. As a result of the net impact of these and other assumptions, our fiscal 2014 pension and postretirement medical costs were lower than in the prior year.

Pension and Postretirement Plan Funding

Generally, our funding policy is to contribute annually an amount that will at least equal the minimum amount required to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). However, additional voluntary contributions are made from time to time as considered necessary. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future.

In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), we determined the funded status of our plans as of January 1, 2015. Based on this valuation, we contributed cash of $38.0 million, $27.1 million and $32.7 million to our pension

plans during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013. Each contribution increased the level of our plan assets to achieve a desirable PPA funding threshold.

We contributed $20.0 million, $23.6 million and $26.6 million to our postretirement benefits plans for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The contributions represent the portion of the postretirement costs we are responsible for under the terms of our plan and minimum funding required by state regulatory commissions.

Outlook for Fiscal 2016 and Beyond

As of September 30, 2015, interest and corporate bond rates were higher than the rates as of September 30, 2014. Therefore, we increased the discount rate used to measure our fiscal 2016 net periodic cost from 4.43 percent to 4.55 percent. We lowered expected return on plan assets from 7.25 percent to 7.00 percent in the determination of our fiscal 2016 net periodic pension cost based upon expected market returns for our targeted asset allocation. In October 2014, the Society of Actuaries released its final report on mortality tables and the mortality improvement scale to reflect increasing life expectancies in the United States. On October 8, 2015, the Society of Actuaries issued an additional report related to mortality tables and the mortality improvement scale. As of September 30, 2015, we updated our assumed mortality rates to incorporate both new sets of mortality tables. As a result of the net impact of changes in these and other assumptions, we expect our fiscal 2016 net periodic pension cost to decrease by approximately 20 percent.

Based upon current market conditions, the current funded position of the plans and the funding requirements under the PPA, we do not anticipate a minimum required contribution for fiscal 2016. However, we may consider whether a voluntary contribution is prudent to maintain certain funding levels. With respect to our postretirement medical plans, we anticipate contributing between $30 million and $40 million during fiscal 2016.

Actual changes in the fair market value of plan assets and differences between the actual and expected return on plan assets could have a material effect on the amount of pension costs ultimately recognized. A 0.25 percent change in our discount rate would impact our pension and postretirement costs by approximately $2.7 million. A 0.25 percent change in our expected rate of return would impact our pension and postretirement costs by approximately $1.2 million.

The projected liability, future funding requirements and the amount of expense or income recognized for each of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans are subject to change, depending on the actuarial value of plan assets, and the determination of future benefit obligations as of each subsequent calculation date. These amounts are impacted by actual investment returns, changes in interest rates, changes in the demographic composition of the participants in the plans and other actuarial assumptions.

RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

Recent accounting developments and their impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Previous: Item 6. Selected Financial Data. · Next: Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.