Atmos Energy 10-K 2024-09-30
Filed 2024-11-18. 24 sections, 448K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10042
Atmos Energy Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas and Virginia 75-1743247
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS employer
incorporation or organization) identification no.)
1800 Three Lincoln Centre
5430 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75240
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(972) 934-9227
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Table of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered | |||||||||
| Common stock | No Par Value | ATO | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | ☑ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No þ
The aggregate market value of the common voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, March 31, 2024, was $17,825,800,856.
As of November 14, 2024, the registrant had 155,399,533 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS
| AEK | Atmos Energy Kansas Securitization I, LLC | ||||
| AFUDC | Allowance for funds used during construction | ||||
| AOCI | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | ||||
| ARM | Annual Rate Mechanism | ||||
| ATO | Trading symbol for Atmos Energy Corporation common stock on the NYSE | ||||
| Bcf | Billion cubic feet | ||||
| COSO | Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission | ||||
| DARR | Dallas Annual Rate Review | ||||
| EDIT | Excess Deferred Income Taxes | ||||
| ERISA | Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 | ||||
| FERC | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | ||||
| GAAP | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles | ||||
| GRIP | Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program | ||||
| GSRS | Gas System Reliability Surcharge | ||||
| LTIP | 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | ||||
| Mcf | Thousand cubic feet | ||||
| MDWQ | Maximum daily withdrawal quantity | ||||
| Mid-Tex ATM Cities | Represents a coalition of 47 incorporated cities or approximately 10 percent of the Mid-Tex Division's customers. | ||||
| Mid-Tex Cities | Represents all incorporated cities other than Dallas and Mid-Tex ATM Cities, or approximately 72 percent of the Mid-Tex Division’s customers. | ||||
| MMcf | Million cubic feet | ||||
| Moody’s | Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. | ||||
| NGPA | Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 | ||||
| NYSE | New York Stock Exchange | ||||
| PHMSA | Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration | ||||
| PPA | Pension Protection Act of 2006 | ||||
| PRP | Pipeline Replacement Program | ||||
| RRC | Railroad Commission of Texas | ||||
| RRM | Rate Review Mechanism | ||||
| RSC | Rate Stabilization Clause | ||||
| S&P | Standard & Poor’s Corporation | ||||
| SAVE | Steps to Advance Virginia Energy | ||||
| SEC | United States Securities and Exchange Commission | ||||
| Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds | Series 2023-A Senior Secured Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds | ||||
| Securitized Utility Tariff Property | As defined in the financing order issued by the KCC in October 2022 | ||||
| SIP | System Integrity Program | ||||
| SIR | System Integrity Rider | ||||
| SOFR | Secured Overnight Financing Rate | ||||
| SRF | Stable Rate Filing | ||||
| SSIR | System Safety and Integrity Rider | ||||
| TCJA | Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 | ||||
| WNA | Weather Normalization Adjustment |
PART I
The terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Atmos Energy,” and the “Company” refer to Atmos Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests otherwise.
Item 1. Business.
Overview and Strategy
Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and incorporated in Texas and Virginia, is the country’s largest natural-gas-only distributor based on number of customers. We safely deliver reliable, efficient, and abundant natural gas through regulated sales and transportation arrangements to over 3.3 million residential, commercial, public authority, and industrial customers in eight states located primarily in the South. We also operate one of the largest intrastate pipelines in Texas based on miles of pipe.
Atmos Energy's vision is to be the safest provider of natural gas services. We will be recognized for exceptional customer service, for being a great employer, and for achieving superior financial results.
Our operating strategy is focused on modernizing our business and infrastructure while reducing regulatory lag. This operating strategy supports continued investment in safety, innovation, environmental sustainability, and our communities.
Operating Segments
We manage and review our consolidated operations through the following reportable segments:
-
The distribution segment is comprised of our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations in eight states.
-
The pipeline and storage segment is comprised primarily of the regulated pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline-Texas division and our natural gas transmission operations in Louisiana.
Distribution Segment Overview
The following table summarizes key information about our six regulated natural gas distribution divisions, presented in order of total rate base.
| Division | Service Areas | Communities Served | Customer Meters | |||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Texas, including the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex | 550 | 1,804,265 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky | 220 | 176,903 | |||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee | 161,193 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia | 23,777 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | 270 | 360,870 | |||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Amarillo, Lubbock, Midland | 80 | 314,503 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi | 110 | 251,147 | |||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado | 170 | 129,727 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kansas | 139,435 |
We operate in our service areas under terms of non-exclusive franchise agreements granted by the various cities and towns that we serve. At September 30, 2024, we held 1,026 franchises having terms generally ranging from five to 35 years. A number of our franchises expire each year, which require renewal prior to the end of their terms. Historically, we have successfully renewed these franchises and believe that we will continue to be able to renew our franchises as they expire.
Revenues in this operating segment are established by regulatory authorities in the states in which we operate. These rates are intended to be sufficient to cover the costs of conducting business, including a reasonable return on invested capital. In addition, we transport natural gas for others through our distribution systems.
Rates established by regulatory authorities often include cost adjustment mechanisms for costs that (i) are subject to significant price fluctuations compared to our other costs, (ii) represent a large component of our cost of service, and (iii) are generally outside our control.
Purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms represent a traditional and common form of cost adjustment mechanism. Purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms provide a method of recovering purchased gas costs on an ongoing basis without filing a rate case because they provide a dollar-for-dollar offset to increases or decreases in the cost of natural gas. Therefore, although substantially all of our distribution operating revenues fluctuate with the cost of gas that we purchase, distribution operating income is generally not affected by fluctuations in the cost of gas.
Additionally, some jurisdictions have performance-based ratemaking adjustments to provide incentives to minimize purchased gas costs through improved storage management and use of financial instruments to reduce volatility in gas costs. Under the performance-based ratemaking adjustments, purchased gas costs savings are shared between the Company and its customers.
Our supply of natural gas is provided by a variety of suppliers, including independent producers, and marketers. The gas is delivered into our systems by various pipeline companies, withdrawals of gas from proprietary and contracted storage assets, and base load and peaking arrangements, as needed.
Supply arrangements consist of both base load and peaking quantities and are contracted from our suppliers on a firm basis with various terms at market prices. Base load quantities are those that flow at a constant level throughout the month and peaking quantities provide the flexibility to change daily quantities to match increases or decreases in requirements related to weather conditions.
Except for local production purchases, we select our natural gas suppliers through a competitive bidding process by periodically requesting proposals from suppliers. We select these suppliers based on their ability to reliably deliver gas supply to our designated firm pipeline receipt points at the lowest reasonable cost. Major suppliers during fiscal 2024 were Cima Energy, LP, ConocoPhillips Company, EnLink Gas Marketing LP, Enterprise Navitas Midstream Midland Basin LLC, Hartree Partners, L.P., Sequent Energy Management LLC, Symmetry Energy Solutions, LLC, Targa Gas Marketing LLC, Tenaska Marking Ventures, and Texla Energy Management, Inc.
The combination of base load and peaking agreements, coupled with the withdrawal of gas held in storage, allows us the flexibility to adjust to changes in weather, which minimizes our need to enter into long-term firm commitments. We estimate our peak-day availability of natural gas supply to be approximately 5.3 Bcf. The peak-day demand for our distribution operations in fiscal 2024 was on January 15, 2024, when sales to customers reached approximately 4.3 Bcf.
Currently, our distribution divisions utilize 34 pipeline transportation companies, both interstate and intrastate, to transport our natural gas. The pipeline transportation agreements are firm and many of them have “pipeline no-notice” storage service, which provides for daily balancing between system requirements and nominated flowing supplies. These agreements have been negotiated with the shortest term necessary while still maintaining our right of first refusal. The natural gas supply for our Mid-Tex Division is delivered primarily by our APT Division.
To maintain our deliveries to high priority customers, we have the ability, and have exercised our right, to interrupt or curtail service to certain customers pursuant to contracts and applicable state regulations or statutes. Our customers’ demand on our system is not necessarily indicative of our ability to meet current or anticipated market demands or immediate delivery requirements because of factors such as the physical limitations of gathering, storage and transmission systems, the duration and severity of cold weather, the availability of gas reserves from our suppliers, the ability to purchase additional supplies on a short-term basis, and actions by federal and state regulatory authorities. Interruption and curtailment rights provide us the flexibility to meet the human-needs requirements of our customers on a reliable basis. Priority allocations imposed by federal and state regulatory agencies, as well as other factors beyond our control, may affect our ability to meet the demands of some of our customers.
Pipeline and Storage Segment Overview
Our pipeline and storage segment consists of the regulated pipeline and storage operations of APT and our natural gas transmission operations in Louisiana. APT is one of the largest intrastate pipeline operations in Texas with a heavy concentration in the established natural gas-producing areas of central, northern, and eastern Texas, extending into or near the major producing areas of the Barnett Shale, the Texas Gulf Coast, and the Permian Basin of West Texas. Through its system, APT provides transportation and storage services to our Mid-Tex Division, other third party local distribution companies, industrial and electric generation customers, marketers, and producers. As part of its pipeline operations, APT owns and operates five underground storage facilities in Texas.
Revenues earned from transportation and storage services for APT are subject to traditional ratemaking governed by the RRC. Rates are updated through periodic filings made under Texas’ GRIP. GRIP allows us to include in our rate base annually approved capital costs incurred in the prior calendar year provided that we file a complete rate case at least once every five
years; the most recent of which was completed in December 2023. APT’s existing regulatory mechanisms allow certain transportation and storage services to be provided under market-based rates.
Our natural gas transmission operations in Louisiana are comprised of a 21-mile pipeline located in the New Orleans, Louisiana area that is primarily used to aggregate gas supply for our distribution division in Louisiana under a long-term contract and, on a more limited basis, to third parties. The demand fee charged to our Louisiana distribution division for these services is subject to regulatory approval by the Louisiana Public Service Commission. We also manage two asset management plans that serve distribution affiliates of the Company, which have been approved by applicable state regulatory commissions. Generally, these asset management plans require us to share with our distribution customers a significant portion of the cost savings earned from these arrangements.
Ratemaking Activity
Overview
The method of determining regulated rates varies among the states in which our regulated businesses operate. The regulatory authorities have the responsibility of ensuring that utilities in their jurisdictions operate in the best interests of customers while providing utility companies the opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment. Generally, each regulatory authority reviews rate requests and establishes a rate structure intended to generate revenue sufficient to cover the costs of conducting business, including a reasonable return on invested capital.
Our rate strategy focuses on reducing or eliminating regulatory lag, obtaining adequate returns, and providing stable, predictable margins, which benefit both our customers and the Company. As a result of our ratemaking efforts in recent years, Atmos Energy has:
-
Formula rate mechanisms in place in four states that provide for an annual rate review and adjustment to rates.
-
Infrastructure programs in place in all of our states that provide for an annual adjustment to rates for qualifying capital expenditures. Through our annual formula rate mechanisms and infrastructure programs, we have the ability to begin recovering approximately 90 percent of our capital expenditures within six months and substantially all of our capital expenditures within twelve months.
-
Authorization in tariffs, statute or commission rules that allows us to defer certain elements of our cost of service such as depreciation, ad valorem taxes, pension costs, and certain safety related expenses, until they are included in rates.
-
WNA mechanisms in seven states that serve to minimize the effects of weather on approximately 97 percent of our distribution residential and commercial revenues.
-
The ability to recover the gas cost portion of bad debts in six states which represents approximately 89 percent of our distribution residential and commercial revenues.
The following tables provides a jurisdictional rate summary for our regulated operations as of September 30, 2024. This information is for regulatory purposes only and may not be representative of our actual financial position.
| Division | Jurisdiction | Effective Date of Last Rate/GRIP Action | Rate Base (thousands)****(1) | Authorized Rate of Return**(1)** | Authorized Debt/ Equity Ratio**(1)** | Authorized Return on Equity**(1)** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline — Texas | Texas | 05/14/2024 | $4,773,699 | 8.49% | 40/60 | 11.45% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado | 05/14/2023 | 229,565 | 7.00% | 42-45/55-58 | 9.3% - 9.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado SSIR | 01/01/2024 | 52,820 | 7.00% / 3.97% | 42/58 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas | 05/09/2023 | 295,070 | (4) | (4) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas GSRS | 11/02/2023 | 16,546 | (4) | (4) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas SIP | 04/01/2024 | 19,908 | (4) | (4) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky | 05/20/2022 | 568,506 | 6.82% | 45/55 | 9.23% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky-PRP | 10/01/2023 | 40,504 | 6.94% | 45/55 | 9.45% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee | 06/01/2024 | 554,053 | 7.64% | 38/62 | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia | 12/01/2023 | 71,450 | 7.57% | 39/61 | 9.90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia-SAVE | 10/01/2023 | 16,422 | 7.43% | 42/58 | 9.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | 07/01/2024 | 1,227,842 | 7.43% | 42/58 | 9.80% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Mid-Tex Cities(5) | 10/01/2023 | 6,070,321(6) | 7.35% | 42/58 | 9.80% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex ATM Cities | 06/07/2024 | 7,009,146(6) | 7.97% | 40/60 | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex Environs | 06/01/2024 | 7,009,154(6) | 7.97% | 40/60 | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex — Dallas | 06/01/2024 | 6,844,772(6) | 7.47% | 40/60 | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi(7) | 12/01/2023 | 591,882 | 7.82% | 39/61 | 10.34% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi - SIR(7) | 12/01/2023 | 472,676 | 7.82% | 39/61 | 10.34% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | West Texas Cities(8) (10) | 10/01/2023 | 965,289(9) | 7.35% | 42/58 | 9.80% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas - ALDC | 06/07/2024 | 1,062,054(9) | 7.35% | 41/59 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas - Environs | 06/01/2024 | 1,059,604(9) | 7.97% | 40/60 | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas - Triangle | 06/01/2024 | 65,124 | 7.71% | 40/60 | 9.80% |
| Division | Jurisdiction | Bad Debt Rider**(2)** | Formula Rate | Infrastructure Mechanism | Performance Based Rate Program**(3)** | WNA Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline — Texas | Texas | No | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado | No | No | Yes | No | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | October-May | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | November-April | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | October-April | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia | Yes | No | Yes | No | January-December | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | No | Yes | Yes | No | December-March | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex Cities | Texas | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | November-April | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex — Dallas | Texas | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | November-April | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | November-April | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Texas | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | October-May |
(1)The rate base, authorized rate of return, authorized debt/equity ratio, and authorized return on equity presented in this table are those from the most recent approved regulatory filing for each jurisdiction. These rate bases, rates of return, debt/equity ratios, and returns on equity are not necessarily indicative of current or future rate bases, rates of return or returns on equity.
(2)The bad debt rider allows us to recover from customers the gas cost portion of customer accounts that have been written off.
(3)The performance-based rate program provides incentives to distribution companies to minimize purchased gas costs by allowing the companies and their customers to share the purchased gas costs savings.
(4)A rate base, rate of return, return on equity, or debt/equity ratio was not included in the respective state commission’s final decision.
(5)The Mid-Tex Cities approved the Formula Rate Mechanism filing with rates effective October 1, 2024, which included a rate base of $7.1 billion, an authorized return of 7.41%, a debt/equity ratio of 42/58 and an authorized ROE of 9.80%.
(6)The Mid-Tex rate base represents a “system-wide,” or 100 percent, of the Mid-Tex Division’s rate base.
(7)The Mississippi Public Service Commission approved a settlement at its meeting on November 4, 2024, which included a rate base of $1.2 billion and an authorized return of 7.80%. No debt/equity ratio or an authorized ROE was included in the commissions final order.
(8)The West Texas Cities includes all West Texas Division cities except Amarillo, Lubbock, Dalhart and Channing (ALDC).
(9)The West Texas rate base represents a "system-wide," or 100 percent, of the West Texas Division's rate base.
(10)The West Texas Cities approved the Formula Rate Mechanism filing with rates effective October 1, 2024, which included a rate base of $1.1 billion, an authorized return of 7.41%, a debt/equity ratio of 42/58 and an authorized ROE of 9.80%.
Although substantial progress has been made in recent years to improve rate design and recovery of investment across our service areas, we are continuing to seek improvements in rate design to address cost variations and pursue tariffs that reduce regulatory lag associated with investments. Further, potential changes in federal energy policy, federal safety regulations, and changing economic conditions will necessitate continued vigilance by the Company and our regulators in meeting the challenges presented by these external factors.
Recent Ratemaking Activity
The amounts described in the following sections represent the annual operating income that was requested or received in each rate filing, which may not necessarily reflect the stated amount referenced in the final order, as certain operating costs may have changed as a result of the commission's or other governmental authority's final ruling. Our ratemaking outcomes include the refund (return) of excess deferred income taxes (EDIT) resulting from previously enacted tax reform legislation and do not reflect the true economic benefit of the outcomes because they do not include the corresponding income tax benefit. The following tables summarize the annualized ratemaking outcomes we implemented in each of the last three fiscal years.
| Rate Action | Annual Increase (Decrease) in Operating Income | EDIT Impact | Annual Increase (Decrease) in Operating Income Excluding EDIT | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual formula rate mechanisms | $ | 347,763 | $ | (31,314) | $ | 316,449 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate case filings | 29,458 | (37,860) | (8,402) | |||||||||||||||||
| Other ratemaking activity | (971) | — | (971) | |||||||||||||||||
| Total 2024 Filings | $ | 376,250 | $ | (69,174) | $ | 307,076 | ||||||||||||||
| 2023 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual formula rate mechanisms | $ | 258,824 | $ | (1,099) | $ | 257,725 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate case filings | 2,940 | 6,791 | 9,731 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other ratemaking activity | 1,320 | — | 1,320 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total 2023 Filings | $ | 263,084 | $ | 5,692 | $ | 268,776 | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual formula rate mechanisms | $ | 169,354 | $ | 33,249 | $ | 202,603 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate case filings | 5,938 | 7,379 | 13,317 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other ratemaking activity | (370) | — | (370) | |||||||||||||||||
| Total 2022 Filings | $ | 174,922 | $ | 40,628 | $ | 215,550 |
The following ratemaking efforts seeking $218.0 million in annual operating income were initiated during fiscal 2024 but had not been completed or implemented as of September 30, 2024:
| Division | Rate Action | Jurisdiction | Operating Income Requested | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Infrastructure Mechanism | Kansas (1) | $ | 1,998 | ||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Infrastructure Mechanism | Virginia (2) | 748 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Infrastructure Mechanism | Kentucky (3) | 3,441 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Rate Case | Kentucky | 33,654 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Formula Rate Mechanism | Mid-Tex Cities (4) | 133,414 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Infrastructure Mechanism | Mississippi (5) | 21,830 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Formula Rate Mechanism | Mississippi (5) | 16,244 | |||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Formula Rate Mechanism | West Texas Cities (6) | 6,709 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 218,038 |
(1) The staff of the Kansas Corporation Commission recommended approval of the GSRS filing on October 17, 2024, subject to commission approval.
(2) On September 4, 2024, the State Corporation Commission of Virginia approved a rate increase of $0.7 million effective October 1, 2024.
(3) On September 27, 2024, the Kentucky Public Service Commission approved a rate increase of $3.4 million effective October 2, 2024, subject to refund.
(4) The Mid-Tex Cities approved a rate increase of $112.1 million. New rates were implemented October 1, 2024.
(5) On November 4, 2024, the Mississippi Public Service Commission (MPSC) approved an increase in operating income of $24.0 million for the SIR filing and an increase in operating income of $3.8 million for the SRF filing.
(6) The West Texas Cities approved a rate increase of $4.4 million. New rates were implemented on October 1, 2024.
Our recent ratemaking activity is discussed in greater detail below.
Annual Formula Rate Mechanisms
As an instrument to reduce regulatory lag, formula rate mechanisms allow us to refresh our rates on an annual basis without filing a formal rate case. However, these filings still involve discovery by the appropriate regulatory authorities prior to the final determination of rates under these mechanisms. We currently have specific infrastructure programs in all of our distribution divisions with tariffs in place to permit the investment associated with these programs to have their surcharge rate adjusted annually to recover approved capital costs incurred in a prior test-year period. The following table summarizes our annual formula rate mechanisms by state.
| Annual Formula Rate Mechanisms | ||||||||||||||
| State | Infrastructure Programs | Formula Rate Mechanisms | ||||||||||||
| Colorado | System Safety and Integrity Rider (SSIR) | — | ||||||||||||
| Kansas | Gas System Reliability Surcharge (GSRS), System Integrity Program (SIP) | — | ||||||||||||
| Kentucky | Pipeline Replacement Program (PRP) | — | ||||||||||||
| Louisiana | (1) | Rate Stabilization Clause (RSC) | ||||||||||||
| Mississippi | System Integrity Rider (SIR) | Stable Rate Filing (SRF) | ||||||||||||
| Tennessee | (1) | Annual Rate Mechanism (ARM) | ||||||||||||
| Texas | Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP), (1) | Dallas Annual Rate Review (DARR), Rate Review Mechanism (RRM) | ||||||||||||
| Virginia | Steps to Advance Virginia Energy (SAVE) | — |
(1) Infrastructure mechanisms in Texas, Louisiana, and Tennessee allow for the deferral of all expenses associated with capital expenditures incurred pursuant to these rules, which primarily consists of interest, depreciation, and other taxes (Texas only), until the next rate proceeding (rate case or annual rate filing), at which time investment and costs would be recoverable through base rates.
The following table summarizes our annual formula rate mechanisms with effective dates during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022:
| Division | Jurisdiction | Test Year Ended | Increase (Decrease) in Annual Operating Income | EDIT Impact | Increase (Decrease) in Annual Operating Income Excluding EDIT | Effective Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | 12/2023 | $ | 35,645 | $ | (11,785) | $ | 23,860 | 07/01/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | ATM Cities | 12/2023 | 17,104 | — | 17,104 | 06/07/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Amarillo, Lubbock, Dalhart and Channing | 12/2023 | 7,344 | — | 7,344 | 06/07/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Tennessee ARM | 09/2023 | 18,570 | (4,348) | 14,222 | 06/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | DARR | 09/2023 | 37,809 | (14,782) | 23,027 | 06/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Triangle | 12/2023 | 1,300 | — | 1,300 | 06/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Environs | 12/2023 | 1,379 | — | 1,379 | 06/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Environs | 12/2023 | 8,529 | — | 8,529 | 06/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline - Texas | Texas | 12/2023 | 82,440 | — | 82,440 | 05/14/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas SIP | 12/2023 | 708 | — | 708 | 04/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado SSIR | 12/2024 | 2,017 | — | 2,017 | 01/01/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SIR | 10/2024 | 10,969 | — | 10,969 | 12/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SRF | 10/2024 | 11,539 | (472) | 11,067 | 12/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas GSRS | 09/2023 | 1,752 | — | 1,752 | 11/02/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky PRP | 09/2024 | 2,906 | — | 2,906 | 10/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Mid-Tex Cities RRM | 12/2022 | 98,585 | 185 | 98,770 | 10/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | West Texas Cities RRM | 12/2022 | 8,594 | (112) | 8,482 | 10/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Virginia - SAVE | 09/2024 | 573 | — | 573 | 10/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2024 Filings | $ | 347,763 | $ | (31,314) | $ | 316,449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | 12/2022 | $ | 14,466 | $ | 17 | $ | 14,483 | 07/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | DARR (1) | 09/2022 | 17,345 | 51 | 17,396 | 06/14/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | ATM Cities | 12/2022 | 12,825 | — | 12,825 | 06/09/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Amarillo, Lubbock, Dalhart and Channing | 12/2022 | 6,938 | — | 6,938 | 06/09/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Triangle | 12/2022 | 717 | — | 717 | 06/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Environs | 12/2022 | 1,332 | — | 1,332 | 06/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Environs | 12/2022 | 5,983 | — | 5,983 | 06/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Tennessee ARM | 09/2022 | 14 | (1,509) | (1,495) | 06/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline - Texas | Texas | 12/2022 | 84,931 | — | 84,931 | 05/17/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas SIP | 12/2022 | 772 | — | 772 | 04/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado SSIR | 12/2023 | 1,971 | — | 1,971 | 01/01/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SIR | 10/2023 | 8,560 | — | 8,560 | 11/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SRF | 10/2023 | 12,188 | 778 | 12,966 | 11/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky PRP | 09/2023 | 1,588 | — | 1,588 | 10/02/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Mid-Tex Cities RRM | 12/2021 | 81,402 | (395) | 81,007 | 10/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | West Texas Cities RRM | 12/2021 | 7,315 | (41) | 7,274 | 10/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Virginia - SAVE | 09/2023 | 477 | — | 477 | 10/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2023 Filings | $ | 258,824 | $ | (1,099) | $ | 257,725 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Tennessee ARM | 09/2021 | $ | 2,466 | $ | — | $ | 2,466 | 07/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | Louisiana | 12/2021 | 17,650 | (10,389) | 7,261 | 07/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Amarillo, Lubbock, Dalhart and Channing | 12/2021 | 6,122 | — | 6,122 | 06/11/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Triangle | 12/2021 | 1,549 | — | 1,549 | 06/11/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | Environs | 12/2021 | 1,221 | — | 1,221 | 06/11/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | ATM Cities | 12/2021 | 12,815 | — | 12,815 | 06/10/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Environs | 12/2021 | 5,646 | — | 5,646 | 06/10/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | DARR (2) | 09/2021 | 13,201 | — | 13,201 | 05/25/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline - Texas | Texas | 12/2021 | 78,750 | — | 78,750 | 05/18/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas SIP | 12/2021 | 623 | — | 623 | 04/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas GSRS | 09/2021 | 1,820 | — | 1,820 | 02/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado SSIR | 12/2022 | 2,610 | — | 2,610 | 01/01/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | Mid-Tex Cities RRM | 12/2020 | 21,673 | 33,851 | 55,524 | 12/01/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | West Texas Cities RRM | 12/2020 | 151 | 3,347 | 3,498 | 12/01/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SIR | 10/2022 | 8,354 | 2,123 | 10,477 | 11/01/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | Mississippi - SRF | 10/2022 | (5,624) | 4,317 | (1,307) | 11/01/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Virginia - SAVE | 09/2022 | 327 | — | 327 | 10/01/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2022 Filings | $ | 169,354 | $ | 33,249 | $ | 202,603 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The rate increase for this filing was approved based on the effective date herein; however, the new rates were implemented beginning September 1, 2023.
(2) The rate increase for this filing was approved based on the effective date herein; however, the new rates were implemented beginning September 1, 2022.
Rate Case Filings
A rate case is a formal request from Atmos Energy to a regulatory authority to increase rates that are charged to customers. Rate cases may also be initiated when the regulatory authorities request us to justify our rates. This process is referred to as a “show cause” action. Adequate rates are intended to provide for recovery of the Company’s costs as well as a reasonable rate of return to our shareholders and ensure that we continue to safely deliver reliable, reasonably priced natural gas service to our customers.
The following table summarizes our recent rate case activity during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022:
| Division | State | Increase in Annual Operating Income | EDIT Impact | Increase (Decrease) in Annual Operating Income Excluding EDIT | Effective Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Rate Case Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Pipeline - Texas | Texas | $ | 27,024 | $ | (36,921) | $ | (9,897) | 12/13/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Virginia | 2,434 | (939) | 1,495 | 12/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2024 Rate Case Filings | $ | 29,458 | $ | (37,860) | $ | (8,402) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 Rate Case Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Colorado | $ | 913 | $ | (54) | $ | 859 | 05/14/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas | 2,027 | 6,845 | 8,872 | 05/09/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2023 Rate Case Filings | $ | 2,940 | $ | 6,791 | $ | 9,731 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 Rate Case Filings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | Kentucky (1) | $ | 5,938 | $ | 7,379 | $ | 13,317 | 05/20/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2022 Rate Case Filings | $ | 5,938 | $ | 7,379 | $ | 13,317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The rate case outcome for Kentucky is inclusive of the fiscal 2022 pipeline replacement program.
Other Ratemaking Activity
The following table summarizes other ratemaking activity during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022:
| Division | Jurisdiction | Rate Activity | Increase (Decrease) in Annual Operating Income | Effective Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Other Rate Activity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas | Ad Valorem (1) | $ | (971) | 02/01/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2024 Other Rate Activity | $ | (971) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 Other Rate Activity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas | Ad Valorem (1) | $ | 1,320 | 02/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2023 Other Rate Activity | $ | 1,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 Other Rate Activity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | Kansas | Ad-Valorem (1) | $ | (370) | 02/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2022 Other Rate Activity | $ | (370) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)The Ad Valorem filing relates to property taxes that are either over or undercollected compared to the amount included in our Kansas service area's base rates.
Other Regulation
We are regulated by various state or local public utility authorities. We are also subject to regulation by the United States Department of Transportation with respect to safety requirements in the operation and maintenance of our transmission and distribution facilities. In addition, our operations are also subject to various state and federal laws regulating environmental matters. From time to time, we receive inquiries regarding various environmental matters. We believe that our properties and operations comply with, and are operated in conformity with, applicable safety and environmental statutes and regulations.
There are no administrative or judicial proceedings arising under environmental quality statutes pending or known to be contemplated by governmental agencies which would have a material adverse effect on us or our operations. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), within the U.S. Department of Transportation, develops and enforces regulations for the safe, reliable, and environmentally sound operation of the pipeline transportation system. The PHMSA pipeline safety statutes provide for states to assume safety authority over intrastate natural transmission and distribution gas pipelines. State pipeline safety programs are responsible for adopting and enforcing the federal and state pipeline safety regulations for intrastate natural gas transmission and distribution pipelines.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) allows, pursuant to Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA), gas transportation services through our APT assets “on behalf of” interstate pipelines or local distribution companies served by interstate pipelines, without subjecting these assets to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the NGPA. Additionally, the FERC has regulatory authority over the use and release of interstate pipeline and storage capacity. The FERC also has authority to detect and prevent market manipulation and to enforce compliance with FERC’s other rules, policies, and orders by companies engaged in the sale, purchase, transportation, or storage of natural gas in interstate commerce. We have taken what we believe are the necessary and appropriate steps to comply with these regulations.
The SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, pursuant to the Dodd–Frank Act, established numerous regulations relating to U.S. financial markets. We enacted procedures and modified existing business practices and contractual arrangements to comply with such regulations.
Competition
Although our regulated distribution operations are not currently in significant direct competition with any other distributors of natural gas to residential and commercial customers within our service areas, we do compete with other natural gas suppliers and suppliers of alternative fuels for sales to industrial customers. We compete in all aspects of our business with alternative energy sources, including, in particular, electricity. Electric utilities offer electricity as a rival energy source and compete for the space heating, water heating, and cooking markets. Promotional incentives, improved equipment efficiencies, and promotional rates all contribute to the acceptability of electrical equipment. The principal means to compete against alternative fuels is lower prices, and natural gas historically has maintained its price advantage in the residential, commercial, and industrial markets.
Our pipeline and storage operations have historically faced competition from other existing intrastate pipelines seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage, and other services for customers. In the last few years, several new pipelines have been completed, which has increased the level of competition in this segment of our business.
Employees
The Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, and Safety Committee of the Board of Directors oversees matters relating to equal employment opportunities, diversity, and inclusion; human workplace rights; employee health and safety; and the Company’s vision, values, and culture. It oversees the Company's policies, practices, and procedures relating to sustainability to support the alignment of the Company's sustainability strategy with the Company's corporate strategy.
Part of our vision is to create a culture that respects and appreciates diversity. For this reason, we strive to have a workforce that reflects the communities we serve. At September 30, 2024, we had 5,260 employees. We monitor our workforce data on a calendar year basis. As of December 31, 2023, the last date for which information is available, 61 percent of our employees worked in field roles and 39 percent worked in support/shared services roles. None of our employees have chosen to work under a collective bargaining agreement.

To recruit and hire individuals with a variety of skills, talents, backgrounds, and experiences, we value and cultivate our strong relationships with various community and diversity outreach sources. We also target jobs fairs including those focused on minority, veteran, and women candidates and partner with local colleges and universities to identify and recruit qualified
applicants in each of the cities and towns we serve. Finally, we believe we offer a competitive benefits program to help retain our employees.

We perform succession planning annually to ensure that we develop and sustain a strong bench of talent capable of performing at the highest levels. Not only is talent identified, but potential paths of development are discussed to ensure that employees have an opportunity to build their skills and are well-prepared for future roles. The strength of our succession planning process is evident through our long history of promoting most of our leaders from within the organization.
Available Information
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other reports, and amendments to those reports, and other forms that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at their website, www.sec.gov, are also available free of charge at our website, www.atmosenergy.com/company/publications-and-sec-filings, as soon as reasonably practicable, after we electronically file these reports with, or furnish these reports to, the SEC. We will also provide copies of these reports free of charge upon request to Shareholder Relations at the address and telephone number appearing below:
Shareholder Relations
Atmos Energy Corporation
P.O. Box 650205
Dallas, Texas 75265-0205
972-855-3729
Corporate Governance
In accordance with and pursuant to relevant related rules and regulations of the SEC as well as corporate governance-related listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the Board of Directors of the Company has established and periodically updated our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company. In addition, in accordance with and pursuant to such NYSE listing standards, our Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 2024, John K. Akers, certified to the New York Stock Exchange that he was not aware of any violations by the Company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards. The Board of Directors also annually reviews and updates, if necessary, the charters for each of its Audit, Human Resources, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, and Safety Committees. All of the foregoing documents are posted on our website at www.atmosenergy.com/company/corporate-responsiblity-reports. We will also provide copies of all corporate governance documents free of charge upon request to Shareholder Relations at the address listed above.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our financial and operating results are subject to a number of risk factors, many of which are not within our control. Investors should carefully consider the following discussion of risk factors as well as other information appearing in this report. These factors include the following, which are organized by category:
Regulatory and Legislative Risks
We are subject to federal, state, and local regulations that affect our operations and financial results.
We are subject to safety and financial regulatory oversight from various federal, state, and local regulatory authorities in the eight states that we serve. Therefore, our returns are continuously monitored and are subject to challenge for their reasonableness by the appropriate regulatory authorities or other third-party intervenors. In the normal course of business, as a regulated entity, we often need to place assets in service and establish historical test periods before rate cases that seek to adjust
our allowed returns to recover that investment can be filed. Further, the regulatory review process can be lengthy in the context of traditional ratemaking. Because of this process, we could suffer the negative financial effects of having placed assets in service without the benefit of rate relief, which is commonly referred to as “regulatory lag.”
Regulatory authorities in the states we serve have approved various infrastructure and annual rate adjustment mechanisms to effectively reduce the regulatory lag inherent in the ratemaking process. Regulatory lag could significantly increase if the regulatory authorities modify or terminate these rate mechanisms. The regulatory process also involves the risk that regulatory authorities may (i) review our purchases of natural gas and adjust the amount of our gas costs that we pass through to our customers or (ii) limit or disallow the costs we may have incurred from our cost of service that can be recovered from customers.
We are also subject to laws, regulations, and other legal requirements enacted or adopted by federal, state, and local governmental authorities relating to protection of the environment and health and safety matters, including those that govern discharges of substances into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and waste, the clean-up of contaminated sites, groundwater quality and availability, plant and wildlife protection, as well as work practices related to employee health and safety. Environmental legislation also requires that our facilities, sites, and other properties associated with our operations be operated, maintained, abandoned, and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations, permits, and licenses may expose us to fines, penalties, or interruptions in our operations that could be significant to our financial results. In addition, existing environmental regulations may be revised or our operations may become subject to new regulations.
Some of our operations are subject to increased federal regulatory oversight that could affect our operations and financial results.
FERC has regulatory authority over some of our operations, including the use and release of interstate pipeline and storage capacity. FERC has adopted rules designed to prevent market power abuse and market manipulation and to promote compliance with FERC’s other rules, policies, and orders by companies engaged in the sale, purchase, transportation, or storage of natural gas in interstate commerce. These rules carry increased penalties for violations. Although we have taken steps to structure current and future transactions to comply with applicable current FERC regulations, changes in FERC regulations or their interpretation by FERC or additional regulations issued by FERC in the future could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, or financial results.
We may experience increased federal, state, and local regulation of the safety of our operations.
The safety and protection of the public, our customers, and our employees is our top priority. We constantly monitor and maintain our pipeline and distribution systems to ensure that natural gas is delivered safely, reliably, and efficiently through our network of more than 80,000 miles of distribution and transmission lines. As in recent years, natural gas distribution and pipeline companies are continuing to encounter increasing federal, state, and local oversight of the safety of their operations. Although we believe these are costs ultimately recoverable through our rates, the costs of complying with new laws and regulations may have at least a short-term adverse impact on our operating costs and financial results.
Operational Risks
We may incur significant costs and liabilities resulting from pipeline integrity and other similar programs and related repairs.
PHMSA requires pipeline operators to develop integrity management programs to comprehensively evaluate certain areas along their pipelines and to take additional measures to protect pipeline segments located in “high consequence areas” where a leak or rupture could potentially do the most harm. As a pipeline operator, the Company is required to:
-
perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity;
-
identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a “high consequence area”;
-
improve data collection, integration, and analysis;
-
repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary; and
-
implement preventative and mitigating actions.
The Company incurs significant costs to comply with existing PHMSA and comparable state regulations. Although we believe these costs are ultimately recoverable through our rates, the costs of complying with new laws and regulations may have at least a short-term adverse impact on our operating costs and financial results. For example, the adoption of new regulations requiring more comprehensive or stringent safety standards could require installation of new or modified safety controls, new capital projects, or accelerated maintenance programs, all of which could require a potentially significant increase in operating costs.
Distributing, transporting, and storing natural gas involve risks that may result in accidents and additional operating costs.
Our operations involve a number of hazards and operating risks inherent in storing and transporting natural gas that could affect the public safety and reliability of our distribution system. While Atmos Energy, with the support from each of its regulatory commissions, is accelerating the replacement of pipeline infrastructure, operating issues such as leaks, accidents, equipment problems, and incidents, including explosions and fire, could result in legal liability, repair, and remediation costs, increased operating costs, significant increased capital expenditures, regulatory fines and penalties, and other costs and a loss of customer confidence. We maintain liability and property insurance coverage in place for many of these hazards and risks. However, because some of our transmission pipeline and storage facilities are near or are in populated areas, any loss of human life or adverse financial results resulting from such events could be large. If these events were not fully covered by our general liability and property insurance, which policies are subject to certain limits and deductibles, our operations or financial results could be adversely affected.
If contracted gas supplies, interstate pipeline, and/or storage services are not available or delivered in a timely manner, our ability to meet our customers’ natural gas requirements may be impaired and our financial condition may be adversely affected.
In order to meet our customers’ annual and seasonal natural gas demands, we must obtain a sufficient supply of natural gas, interstate pipeline capacity, and storage capacity. If we are unable to obtain these, either from our suppliers’ inability to deliver the contracted commodity or the inability to secure replacement quantities, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. If a substantial disruption to or reduction in interstate natural gas pipelines’ transmission and storage capacity occurred due to operational failures or disruptions, legislative or regulatory actions, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, extreme cold weather, terrorist or cyber-attacks, or acts of war, our operations or financial results could be adversely affected.
Our operations are subject to increased competition.
In residential and commercial customer markets, our distribution operations compete with other energy products, such as electricity and propane. Our primary product competition is with electricity for heating, water heating, and cooking. If customer growth slows or existing customers choose to conserve their use of gas or choose another energy product, reduced gas purchases and customer billings could adversely impact our business.
In the case of industrial customers, such as manufacturing plants, adverse economic conditions, including higher gas costs, could cause these customers to use alternative sources of energy, such as electricity, or bypass our systems in favor of special competitive contracts with lower per-unit costs. Our pipeline and storage operations historically have faced limited competition from other existing intrastate pipelines and gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage, and other services for customers. The completion of new pipelines in our service area may increase the competition in this segment of our business.
Failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce could adversely affect our results of operations.
The competition for talent has become increasingly intense and we may experience increased employee turnover due to a tightening labor market. If we are unable to recruit and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, the Company could encounter operating challenges primarily due to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, errors due to inexperience, or the lengthy time period typically required to adequately train replacement personnel. In addition, higher costs could result from loss of productivity, increased safety compliance issues, or cost of contract labor.
Additionally, our ability to operate is contingent on maintaining a healthy workforce and a safe working environment. As a provider of essential services, we have an obligation to provide natural gas services to customers. Incidents that impact the health and availability of our workforce could threaten the continuity of our business operations.
Natural disasters, adverse weather, terrorist activities, or other significant events could adversely affect our operations or financial results.
Natural disasters and adverse weather are always a threat to our assets and operations. In addition, the threat of terrorist activities could lead to increased economic instability and volatility in the price of natural gas that could affect our operations. Also, companies in our industry may face a heightened risk of exposure to actual acts of terrorism, which could subject our operations to increased risks. As a result, the Company's contractors, suppliers, and other business partners may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations or the availability of insurance covering such risks may become more limited, which could increase the risk that an event could adversely affect our operations or financial results.
Technology and Cybersecurity Risks
The failure of technology may hinder the Company’s business operations and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
The Company uses Company-owned information technology and technology hosted by third parties to support critical functions including scheduling and dispatching of service technicians, automated meter reading systems, customer care and billing, operational plant logistics, management reporting, and external financial reporting. The failure of these or other similarly important technologies, or the Company’s inability to have these technologies supported, updated, expanded, or integrated into other technologies, could hinder its business operations and adversely impact its financial condition and results of operations.
Although the Company has, when possible, developed alternative sources of technology and built redundancy into its computer networks and tools, there can be no assurance that these efforts would protect against all potential issues related to the loss of any such technologies.
Cyber-attacks or acts of cyber-terrorism could disrupt our business operations and information technology systems or result in the loss or exposure of confidential or sensitive customer, employee or Company information.
Our business operations and information technology systems may be vulnerable to an attack by individuals or organizations intending to disrupt our business operations and information technology systems. Disruption of those systems could adversely impact our ability to safely deliver natural gas to our customers, operate our pipeline and storage systems, or serve our customers timely. Further, any attack on our technology systems that would result in the unauthorized release of confidential or sensitive data could have a material adverse effect on our business reputation, increase our costs, and expose us to material legal claims and liability. The Company has implemented policies, procedures, and controls to identify, protect, detect, and respond to cyberattacks or acts of terrorism. However, these measures may be insufficient or become ineffective, and there are no assurances that cybersecurity breaches or acts of terrorism will not impact our business operations and strategy, results of operations, and financial condition in the future. Even though we have insurance coverage in place for many of these cyber-related risks, if such an attack or act of terrorism were to occur, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected to the extent not fully covered by such insurance coverage.
Compliance with and changes in cybersecurity requirements have a cost and operational impact on our business, and failure to comply with such laws and regulations could adversely impact our reputation, results of operations, financial condition, and/or cash flows.
As cyber-attacks are becoming more sophisticated, U.S. government warnings have indicated that critical infrastructure assets, including pipeline infrastructure, may be specifically targeted by certain groups. In recent years, the U.S. government has issued directives that require critical pipeline owners to comply with mandatory reporting measures, designate a cybersecurity coordinator, provide vulnerability assessments, and ensure compliance with certain cybersecurity requirements. Such directives or other requirements may require expenditure of significant additional resources to respond to cyber-attacks, to continue to modify or enhance protective measures, or to assess, investigate, and remediate any critical infrastructure security vulnerabilities. Any failure to comply with such government regulations or failure in our cybersecurity protective measures may result in enforcement actions that may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, there is no certainty that costs incurred related to securing against threats will be recovered through rates.
Climate Risks
Adverse weather conditions could affect our operations or financial results.
We have weather-normalized rates for approximately 97 percent of our residential and commercial revenues in our distribution operations, which substantially mitigates the adverse effects of warmer-than-normal weather for meters in those service areas. However, there is no assurance that we will continue to receive such regulatory protection from adverse weather in our rates in the future. The loss of such weather-normalized rates could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results. In addition, our operating results may continue to vary somewhat with the actual temperatures during the winter heating season. Additionally, sustained cold weather could challenge our ability to adequately meet customer demand in our operations.
Legislation to reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions or fossil fuels could increase our operating costs, adversely affecting our financial results, growth, cash flows, and results of operations.
Six of the eight states in which we operate have passed legislation to prevent local governments from limiting the types of energy available to customers. However, federal, regional, and/or state legislative and/or regulatory initiatives may attempt to control or limit greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane, by requiring the adoption of new infrastructure or technology to limit greenhouse gas emissions, limiting our ability to serve new or existing customers, imposing costs or restrictions on end users of natural gas, or assessing additional charges to fund energy efficiency activities. Such laws or regulations could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and cash flows if the costs we incur to comply with these laws or regulations are not recovered or if the cost of providing natural gas services becomes prohibitively expensive, leading to a reduction in the demand for natural gas or fuel-switching to alternate sources of energy.
The operations and financial results of the Company could be adversely impacted as a result of climate change.
Climate change may result in a reduction in the demand for natural gas or cause shifts in the population of our service territories which could adversely impact the economic outlook for our service territories. These occurrences could adversely impact our financial results, growth, cash flows, and results of operations.
It could also result in more frequent and more severe weather events, such as hurricanes and tornadoes, which could increase our costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to our customers or impact the cost of gas. If we were unable to deliver natural gas to our customers, our financial results would be impacted by lost revenues, and we generally would have to seek approval from regulators to recover restoration costs. To the extent we would be unable to recover those costs, or if higher rates resulting from our recovery of such costs would result in reduced demand for our services, our future business, financial condition, or financial results could be adversely impacted.
Financial, Economic, and Market Risks
Our growth in the future may be limited by the nature of our business, which requires extensive capital spending.
Our operations are capital-intensive. We must make significant capital expenditures on a long-term basis to modernize our distribution and transmission system and to comply with the safety rules and regulations issued by the regulatory authorities responsible for the service areas we operate. In addition, we must continually build new capacity to serve the growing needs of the communities we serve. The magnitude of these expenditures may be affected by a number of factors, including new policy and regulations, and the general state of the economy.
The liquidity required to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, and other cash needs is provided from a combination of internally generated cash flows and external debt and equity financing. The cost and availability of borrowing funds from third party lenders or issuing equity is dependent on the liquidity of the credit markets, interest rates and other market conditions. This in turn may limit the amount of funds we can invest in our infrastructure.
The Company is dependent on continued access to the credit and capital markets to execute our business strategy.
Our long-term debt is currently rated as “investment grade” by Standard & Poor’s Corporation and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Similar to most companies, we rely upon access to both short-term and long-term credit and capital markets to satisfy our liquidity requirements. If adverse credit conditions were to cause a significant limitation on our access to the private credit and public capital markets, we could see a reduction in our liquidity. A significant reduction in our liquidity could in turn trigger a negative change in our ratings outlook or even a reduction in our credit ratings by one or more of the credit rating agencies. Such a downgrade could further limit our access to private credit and/or public capital markets and increase our costs of borrowing.
While we believe we can meet our capital requirements from our operations and the sources of financing available to us, we can provide no assurance that we will continue to be able to do so in the future. The future effects on our business, liquidity, and financial results of a deterioration of current conditions in the credit and capital markets could be material and adverse to us, both in the ways described above or in other ways that we do not currently anticipate.
We are exposed to market risks that are beyond our control, which could adversely affect our financial results.
We are subject to market risks beyond our control, including (i) commodity price volatility caused by market supply and demand dynamics, counterparty performance, or counterparty creditworthiness and (ii) interest rate risk. We are generally insulated from commodity price risk through our purchased gas cost mechanisms. With respect to interest rate risk, increases in interest rates could adversely affect our future financial results to the extent that we do not recover our actual interest expense in our rates.
The concentration of our operations in the State of Texas exposes our operations and financial results to economic conditions, weather patterns, and regulatory decisions in Texas.
Approximately 75 percent of our consolidated operations are located in the State of Texas. This concentration of our business in Texas means that our operations and financial results may be significantly affected by changes in the Texas economy in general, weather patterns, and regulatory decisions by state and local regulatory authorities in Texas.
A deterioration in economic conditions could adversely affect our customers and negatively impact our financial results.
Any adverse changes in economic conditions in the states in which we operate could adversely affect the financial resources of many domestic households. As a result, our customers could seek to use less gas and it may be more difficult for them to pay their gas bills. This would likely lead to slower collections and higher than normal levels of accounts receivable. This, in turn, could increase our financing requirements. Additionally, should economic conditions deteriorate, our industrial customers could seek alternative energy sources, which could result in lower transportation volumes.
Increased gas costs could adversely impact our customer base and customer collections and increase our level of indebtedness.
Rapid increases in the costs of purchased gas would cause us to experience a significant increase in short-term or long-term debt. We must pay suppliers for gas when it is purchased, which can be significantly in advance of when these costs may be recovered through the collection of monthly customer bills for gas delivered. Increases in purchased gas costs also slow our natural gas distribution collections as customers may delay the payment of their gas bills, leading to higher than normal accounts receivable. This could result in higher short-term debt levels, greater collection efforts, and increased bad debt expense.
Our pension and other postretirement benefit plans are subject to investment and interest rate risk that could negatively impact our financial condition.
We have pension and other postretirement benefit plans that provide benefits to many of our employees and retirees. Costs of providing benefits and related- funding requirements of these plans are subject to changes in the market value of the assets that fund the plans. The funded status of the plans and the related costs reflected in the Company’s financial statements are affected by various factors, which are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty, including economic conditions, financial market performance, interest rates, life expectancies, and demographics. Poor investment returns or lower interest rates may necessitate accelerated funding of the plans to meet minimum federal government requirements, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations if such costs are not ultimately recoverable.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
We continuously assess our risk of cyber threats to adapt quickly to the ever-changing challenges and risks surrounding cybersecurity. Atmos Energy has implemented policies, procedures, and controls to identify, protect, detect, and respond to cyberattacks or acts of online terrorism. Atmos Energy is also subject to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration (TSA) security directive for our natural gas pipeline monitoring and control systems.
The potential impact of cybersecurity risks on our business operations, results of operations, or financial condition is discussed in the “Technology and Cybersecurity Risks” section of Item 1A “Risk Factors.” We have not had any material cybersecurity breaches or incidents and have not incurred any material expenses, penalties, or settlement costs related to any cybersecurity breaches or incidents. However, measures that we take to identify, protect, detect, and respond from cybersecurity breaches or incidents may be insufficient or become ineffective, and there are no assurances that cybersecurity breaches or incidents will not impact our business operations and strategy, results of operations, and financial condition in the future.
The following describes our risk management and strategy and corporate governance as it pertains to cybersecurity.
Risk Management and Strategy
Atmos Energy’s cybersecurity program leverages the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) in its design of controls intended to reduce the risk and potential impact of cybersecurity incidents. This comprehensive approach encompasses continuous monitoring, risk assessments, a cybersecurity incident response plan, and regular evaluations to align our practices with industry standards. Additionally, we actively engage in cybersecurity risk management practices and continually improve procedures and practices to support the continued safe and reliable delivery of natural gas to our customers.
The identification and management of cybersecurity risk is a component of our Integrated Risk Management process, which applies adaptive process improvement to help us respond to the changing cybersecurity landscape. Additionally, we use third parties to enhance our collective capability to monitor, detect, and respond to cybersecurity incidents. Further, we maintain collaborative relationships with government officials, law enforcement, and industry peers to keep informed of trends and potential cyber tactics. Finally, we maintain cybersecurity insurance coverage that we believe is appropriate for the size and complexity of our business.
We have an information technology cybersecurity incident response plan to manage cybersecurity incidents. The plan provides guidelines for actions in response to cyber security incidents that may occur at or otherwise affect Atmos Energy. These guidelines include notification to a cross-functional management team to assess incident materiality and an escalation process to members of our senior management team and our Board of Directors. This plan, which is periodically reviewed and tested, is supported by third parties to provide guidance and support to our cybersecurity management team.
We also address cybersecurity risks associated with third-party service providers, including those in our supply chain or who have access to our data or our information technology systems. Atmos Energy currently conducts cyber assessments on potential vendors that will have access to information technology systems, data or facilities that house such systems or data. Following approval, those vendors are contractually required to manage their cybersecurity risks and provide notification in the event of a cybersecurity incident.
Governance
Our Vice President and Chief Information Officer (CIO), who has over two decades of experience in information technology, is responsible for overseeing our cybersecurity program. The CIO oversees an IT Information security team responsible for our overall cybersecurity program. This team is comprised of several IT professionals with varying degrees of cybersecurity experience and is led by our Director – Cybersecurity who has over 30 years of experience in information technology and cybersecurity. The Director – Cybersecurity reports to the CIO, who reports to the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
The CIO is a member of the Company’s Risk Management and Compliance Committee (RMCC). The RMCC is comprised of members from the senior leadership team and is responsible for overseeing enterprise-wide risk management across all categories, including cybersecurity. The RMCC is overseen by the Company’s Management Committee, which is comprised of the President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Utility Operations, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary and Senior Vice President, Human Resources. The CIO provides regular cybersecurity updates to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Management Committee. These updates address prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents, as well as risks, threats, and the threat landscape.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the company's cybersecurity risks. Additionally, our Board of Directors periodically engages with third-party advisors to provide further education about cybersecurity risks.
Item 2. Properties.
Distribution, transmission, and related assets
In our distribution segment, we owned an aggregate of 74,596 miles of underground distribution and transmission mains throughout our distribution systems. These mains are located on easements or rights-of-way. We maintain our mains through a program of continuous inspection and repair and believe that our system of mains is in good condition. Through our pipeline and storage segment we owned 5,682 miles of gas transmission lines.
Storage Assets
We own underground gas storage facilities in several states to supplement the supply of natural gas in periods of peak demand. The following table summarizes certain information regarding our underground gas storage facilities at September 30, 2024:
| State | Working Capacity (Mcf) | Base Gas (Mcf)****(1) | Total Capacity (Mcf) | Maximum Daily Delivery Capability (Mcf) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky | 7,956,991 | 9,562,283 | 17,519,274 | 146,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas | 3,239,000 | 2,300,000 | 5,539,000 | 32,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | 1,907,571 | 2,442,917 | 4,350,488 | 29,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 13,103,562 | 14,305,200 | 27,408,762 | 207,796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pipeline and Storage Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 53,083,549 | 19,678,025 | 72,761,574 | 2,460,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | 411,040 | 256,900 | 667,940 | 56,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 53,494,589 | 19,934,925 | 73,429,514 | 2,516,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 66,598,151 | 34,240,125 | 100,838,276 | 2,723,796 |
(1)Base gas represents the volume of gas that must be retained in a facility to maintain reservoir pressure.
Additionally, we contract for storage service in underground storage facilities on many of the interstate and intrastate pipelines serving us to supplement our proprietary storage capacity. The following table summarizes our contracted storage capacity at September 30, 2024:
| Segment | Division/Company | Maximum Storage Quantity (MMBtu) | Maximum Daily Withdrawal Quantity (Mcf)****(1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas Division | 6,343,728 | 147,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States Division | 8,175,103 | 226,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana Division | 2,594,875 | 177,765 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex Division | 6,000,000 | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi Division | 5,799,536 | 222,764 | ||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas Division | 6,500,000 | 246,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 35,413,242 | 1,210,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Pipeline and Storage Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Trans Louisiana Gas Pipeline, Inc. | 1,500,000 | 71,250 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Contracted Storage Capacity | 36,913,242 | 1,281,791 |
(1)Maximum daily withdrawal quantity (MDWQ) amounts will fluctuate depending upon the season and the month. Unless otherwise noted, MDWQ amounts represent the MDWQ amounts as of November 1, which is the beginning of the winter heating season.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated in this Item 3 by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ATO.” The dividends paid per share of our common stock for fiscal 2024 and 2023 are listed below.
| Fiscal 2024 | Fiscal 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Quarter ended: | ||||||||||||||
| December 31 | $ | 0.805 | $ | 0.740 | ||||||||||
| March 31 | 0.805 | 0.740 | ||||||||||||
| June 30 | 0.805 | 0.740 | ||||||||||||
| September 30 | 0.805 | 0.740 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 3.22 | $ | 2.96 |
Dividends are payable at the discretion of our Board of Directors out of legally available funds. The Board of Directors typically declares dividends in the same fiscal quarter in which they are paid. As of October 31, 2024, there were 8,968 holders of record of our common stock. Future payments of dividends, and the amounts of these dividends, will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and other factors. We sold no securities during fiscal 2024 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Performance Graph
The performance graph and table below compares the yearly percentage change in our total return to shareholders for the last five fiscal years with the total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the total return of the S&P 500 Utilities Industry Index. The graph and table below assume that $100.00 was invested on September 30, 2019 in our common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P 500 Utilities Industry Index, as well as a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the period.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
among Atmos Energy Corporation, S&P 500 Index and
S&P 500 Utilities Industry Index

| Cumulative Total Return | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9/30/2019 | 9/30/2020 | 9/30/2021 | 9/30/2022 | 9/30/2023 | 9/30/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atmos Energy Corporation | 100.00 | 85.77 | 81.21 | 96.19 | 102.59 | 138.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Stock Index | 100.00 | 115.15 | 149.70 | 126.54 | 153.89 | 209.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Utilities Stock Index | 100.00 | 95.03 | 105.49 | 111.38 | 103.56 | 146.87 |
The following table sets forth the number of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at September 30, 2024.
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | |||||||||||||||||
| 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | 737,219 | (1) | $ | — | 407,966 | ||||||||||||
| Total equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 737,219 | — | 407,966 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 737,219 | $ | — | 407,966 |
(1)Comprised of a total of 259,666 time-lapse restricted stock units, 215,515 director share units, and 262,038 performance-based restricted stock units at the target level of performance granted under our 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Item 6. Reserved.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
INTRODUCTION
This section provides management’s discussion of the financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations of Atmos Energy Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries with specific information on results of operations and liquidity and capital resources. It includes management’s interpretation of our financial results, the factors affecting these results, the major factors expected to affect future operating results, and future investment and financing plans. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Several factors exist that could influence our future financial performance, some of which are described in Item 1A above, “Risk Factors”. They should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-looking statements contained in this report or otherwise made by or on behalf of us since these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those set out in such forward-looking statements.
Cautionary Statement for the Purposes of the Safe Harbor under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Report are forward-looking statements made in good faith by us and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, or any other of our documents or oral presentations, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goal”, “intend”, “objective”, “plan”, “projection”, “seek”, “strategy”, or similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements relating to our strategy, operations, markets, services, rates, recovery of costs, availability of gas supply, and other factors. These risks and uncertainties include the following: federal, state, and local regulatory and political trends and decisions, including the impact of rate proceedings before various state regulatory commissions; increased federal regulatory oversight and potential penalties; possible increased federal, state, and local regulation of the safety of our operations; possible significant costs and liabilities resulting from pipeline integrity and other similar programs and related repairs; the inherent hazards and risks involved in distributing, transporting, and storing natural gas; the availability and accessibility of contracted gas supplies, interstate pipeline, and/or storage services; increased competition from energy suppliers and alternative forms of energy; failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce; natural disasters, adverse weather, terrorist activities, or other events and other risks and uncertainties discussed herein, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control; failure of technology that affects the Company's business operations; the threat of cyber-attacks or acts of cyber-terrorism that could disrupt our business operations and information technology systems or result in the loss or exposure of confidential or sensitive customer, employee, or Company
information; the impact of new cybersecurity compliance requirements; adverse weather conditions; the impact of legislation to reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions or fossil fuels; the impact of climate change; the capital-intensive nature of our business; our ability to continue to access the credit and capital markets to execute our business strategy; market risks beyond our control affecting our risk management activities, including commodity price volatility, counterparty performance or creditworthiness, and interest rate risk; the concentration of our operations in Texas; the impact of adverse economic conditions on our customers; changes in the availability and price of natural gas; and increased costs of providing health care benefits, along with pension and postretirement health care benefits and increased funding requirements. Accordingly, while we believe these forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate actual experience or that the expectations derived from them will be realized. Further, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from estimates.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies discussed below are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, subjective, or complex accounting estimates. Accordingly, these critical accounting policies are reviewed periodically by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
| Critical Accounting Policy | Summary of Policy | Factors Influencing Application of the Policy | ||||||
| Regulation | Our distribution and pipeline operations meet the criteria of a cost-based, rate-regulated entity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Accordingly, the financial results for these operations reflect the effects of the ratemaking and accounting practices and policies of the various regulatory commissions to which we are subject. As a result, certain costs that would normally be expensed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are permitted to be capitalized or deferred on the balance sheet because it is probable they can be recovered through rates. Further, regulation may impact the period in which revenues or expenses are recognized. The amounts expected to be recovered or recognized are based upon historical experience and our understanding of the regulations. Discontinuing the application of this method of accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities or changes in the accounting for our various regulatory mechanisms could significantly increase our operating expenses as fewer costs would likely be capitalized or deferred on the balance sheet, which could reduce our net income. | Decisions of regulatory authorities Issuance of new regulations or regulatory mechanisms Assessing that the recoverability of deferred costs and utility assets is probable Continuing to meet the criteria of a cost-based, rate regulated entity for accounting purposes |
| Critical Accounting Policy | Summary of Policy | Factors Influencing Application of the Policy | ||||||
| Pension and other postretirement plans | Pension and other postretirement plan costs and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis using a September 30 measurement date and are affected by numerous assumptions and estimates including the market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets, assumed discount rates, and current demographic and actuarial mortality data. The assumed discount rate and the expected return are the assumptions that generally have the most significant impact on our pension costs and liabilities. The assumed discount rate, the assumed health care cost trend rate, and assumed rates of retirement generally have the most significant impact on our postretirement plan costs and liabilities. The discount rate is utilized principally in calculating the actuarial present value of our pension and postretirement obligations and net periodic pension and postretirement benefit plan costs. When establishing our discount rate, we consider high quality corporate bond rates based on bonds available in the marketplace that are suitable for settling the obligations, changes in those rates from the prior year, and the implied discount rate that is derived from matching our projected benefit disbursements with currently available high quality corporate bonds. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is utilized in calculating the expected return on plan assets component of our annual pension and postretirement plan costs. We estimate the expected return on plan assets by evaluating expected bond returns, equity risk premiums, asset allocations, the effects of active plan management, the impact of periodic plan asset rebalancing, and historical performance. We also consider the guidance from our investment advisors in making a final determination of our expected rate of return on assets. To the extent the actual rate of return on assets realized over the course of a year is greater than or less than the assumed rate, that year’s annual pension or postretirement plan costs are not affected. Rather, this gain or loss reduces or increases future pension or postretirement plan costs over a period of approximately ten to twelve years. The market-related value of our plan assets represents the fair market value of the plan assets, adjusted to smooth out short-term market fluctuations over a five-year period. The use of this methodology will delay the impact of current market fluctuations on the pension expense for the period. We estimate the assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining our postretirement net expense based upon our actual health care cost experience, the effects of recently enacted legislation and general economic conditions. Our assumed rate of retirement is estimated based upon our annual review of our participant census information as of the measurement date. | General economic and market conditions Assumed investment returns by asset class Assumed future salary increases Assumed discount rate Projected timing of future cash disbursements Health care cost experience trends Participant demographic information Actuarial mortality assumptions Impact of legislation Impact of regulation |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Atmos Energy's vision is to be the safest provider of natural gas services. Our commitment to this vision requires significant levels of capital spending to modernize our natural gas distribution system and operating costs to deliver natural gas safely and reliably and in full compliance with the various safety regulations impacting our business. We have the ability to begin recovering a significant portion of our expenditures timely through rate designs and mechanisms that reduce or eliminate regulatory lag and separate the recovery of our approved rate from customer usage patterns. The execution of our capital spending program, the ability to recover these expenditures timely and our ability to access the capital markets to satisfy our financing needs are the primary drivers that affect our financial performance.
The following table details our consolidated net income by segment during the last three fiscal years:
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| Distribution segment | $ | 671,413 | $ | 580,397 | $ | 521,977 | |||||||||||
| Pipeline and storage segment | 371,482 | 305,465 | 252,421 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,042,895 | $ | 885,862 | $ | 774,398 |
During fiscal 2024, we recorded net income of $1,042.9 million, or $6.83 per diluted share, compared to net income of $885.9 million, or $6.10 per diluted share in the prior year. The year-over-year increase in net income of $157.0 million largely reflects positive rate outcomes driven by safety and reliability spending. Additionally, our fiscal 2024 results were favorably impacted by $21.1 million as a result of legislation that became effective during the first quarter of fiscal 2024 to reduce property tax expenses in Texas and $13.9 million as a result of a change to our bad debt recovery mechanism in Mississippi. These increases were partially offset by increased employee-related costs, depreciation expense, and interest expense.
During the year ended September 30, 2024, we implemented ratemaking regulatory actions which resulted in an increase in annual operating income of $376.3 million. Excluding the impact of the refund of excess deferred income taxes resulting from previously enacted tax reform legislation, our total fiscal 2024 rate outcomes were $307.1 million. Additionally, we had ratemaking efforts in progress at September 30, 2024, seeking a total increase in annual operating income of $218.0 million.
During fiscal year 2024, we refunded $133.6 million in excess deferred tax liabilities to customers. These refunds also reduced our income tax expense, resulting in an immaterial impact to our fiscal 2024 and 2023 results.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2024 were $2.9 billion. Approximately 83 percent was invested to improve the safety and reliability of our distribution and transportation systems, with a significant portion of this investment incurred under regulatory mechanisms that reduce regulatory lag to six months or less.
During fiscal 2024, we completed approximately $2.0 billion of long-term debt and equity financing. As of September 30, 2024, our equity capitalization was 61.0 percent. As of September 30, 2024, we had approximately $4.8 billion in total liquidity, consisting of $307.3 million in cash and cash equivalents, $1,380.6 million in funds available through equity forward sales agreements, and $3,094.4 million in undrawn capacity under our credit facilities.
Distribution Segment
The distribution segment is comprised of our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations in eight states. The primary factors that impact the results of our distribution operations are our ability to earn our authorized rates of return, competitive factors in the energy industry, and economic conditions in our service areas.
Our ability to earn our authorized rates is based primarily on our ability to improve the rate design in our various ratemaking jurisdictions to minimize regulatory lag and, ultimately, separate the recovery of our approved rates from customer usage patterns. Improving rate design is a long-term process and is further complicated by the fact that we operate in multiple rate jurisdictions. The “Ratemaking Activity” section of this Form 10-K describes our current rate strategy, progress towards implementing that strategy, and recent ratemaking initiatives in more detail. During fiscal 2024, we completed regulatory proceedings in our distribution segment resulting in a $266.8 million increase in annual operating income. Excluding the impact of the refund of excess deferred income taxes resulting from previously enacted tax reform legislation, our total fiscal 2024 annualized rate outcomes in our distribution segment were $234.5 million.
Our distribution operations are also affected by the cost of natural gas. We are generally able to pass the cost of gas through to our customers without markup under purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms; therefore, increases in the cost of gas are offset by a corresponding increase in revenues. Revenues in our Texas and Mississippi service areas include franchise fees and gross receipts taxes, which are calculated as a percentage of revenue (inclusive of gas costs). Therefore, the amount of these taxes included in revenues is influenced by the cost of gas and the level of gas sales volumes. We record the associated tax expense as a component of taxes, other than income.
The cost of gas typically does not have a direct impact on our operating income because these costs are recovered through our purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms. However, higher gas costs may adversely impact our accounts receivable collections, resulting in higher bad debt expense. This risk is currently mitigated by rate design that allows us to collect from our customers the gas cost portion of our bad debt expense on approximately 89 percent of our residential and commercial revenues. Additionally, higher gas costs may require us to increase borrowings under our credit facilities, resulting in higher interest expense. Finally, higher gas costs, as well as competitive factors in the industry and general economic conditions may cause customers to conserve or, in the case of industrial consumers, to use alternative energy sources.
Review of Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our distribution segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022 are presented below.
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 3,915,141 | $ | 4,099,690 | $ | 4,035,194 | $ | (184,549) | $ | 64,496 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Purchased gas cost | 1,620,515 | 2,061,920 | 2,210,302 | (441,405) | (148,382) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 1,440,192 | 1,345,144 | 1,220,347 | 95,048 | 124,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income | 854,434 | 692,626 | 604,545 | 161,808 | 88,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-operating income | 30,106 | 24,988 | 6,946 | 5,118 | 18,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges | 117,086 | 77,185 | 49,921 | 39,901 | 27,264 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 767,454 | 640,429 | 561,570 | 127,025 | 78,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 96,041 | 60,032 | 39,593 | 36,009 | 20,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 671,413 | $ | 580,397 | $ | 521,977 | $ | 91,016 | $ | 58,420 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated distribution sales volumes — MMcf | 283,977 | 289,948 | 292,266 | (5,971) | (2,318) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated distribution transportation volumes — MMcf | 156,389 | 152,963 | 152,709 | 3,426 | 254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consolidated distribution throughput — MMcf | 440,366 | 442,911 | 444,975 | (2,545) | (2,064) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated distribution average cost of gas per Mcf sold | $ | 5.71 | $ | 7.11 | $ | 7.56 | $ | (1.40) | $ | (0.45) |
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2024 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2023
Operating income for our distribution segment increased 23.4 percent. Key drivers for the change in operating income include:
-
a $219.2 million increase in rate adjustments, primarily in our Mid-Tex Division.
-
a $24.8 million increase related to residential customer growth, primarily in our Mid-Tex Division, and increased industrial load.
-
a $10.6 million decrease in bad debt expense, as discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Partially offset by:
-
a $50.0 million increase in depreciation expense associated with increased capital investments.
-
a $19.9 million increase in employee-related costs primarily due to an increase in headcount to support company growth.
-
a $2.7 million increase in property taxes, which is inclusive of a $15.7 million decrease related to the Texas property tax legislation discussed above.
-
a $26.9 million increase in other operation and maintenance expense, including higher costs associated with software maintenance, compliance activities, training, and other administrative costs.
Interest charges increased $39.9 million primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt during fiscal 2024. The increase in interest charges is also due to the amortization of the Texas regulatory asset that is discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. However, this increase is offset by a corresponding increase in revenue resulting in no impact to net income.
The fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 for our distribution segment is described in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023.
The following table shows our operating income by distribution division, in order of total rate base, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022. The presentation of our distribution operating income is included for financial reporting purposes and may not be appropriate for ratemaking purposes.
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex | $ | 464,616 | $ | 345,545 | $ | 315,644 | $ | 119,071 | $ | 29,901 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky/Mid-States | 90,601 | 87,258 | 84,098 | 3,343 | 3,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | 94,362 | 80,942 | 73,486 | 13,420 | 7,456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Texas | 72,929 | 62,351 | 53,604 | 10,578 | 8,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi | 97,512 | 78,517 | 65,947 | 18,995 | 12,570 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado-Kansas | 42,816 | 40,674 | 26,000 | 2,142 | 14,674 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | (8,402) | (2,661) | (14,234) | (5,741) | 11,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 854,434 | $ | 692,626 | $ | 604,545 | $ | 161,808 | $ | 88,081 |
Pipeline and Storage Segment
Our pipeline and storage segment consists of the pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline–Texas Division (APT) and our natural gas transmission operations in Louisiana. APT is one of the largest intrastate pipeline operations in Texas with a heavy concentration in the established natural gas producing areas of central, northern, and eastern Texas, extending into or near the major producing areas of the Barnett Shale, the Texas Gulf Coast, and the Permian Basin of West Texas. APT provides transportation and storage services to our Mid-Tex Division, other third-party local distribution companies, industrial, and electric generation customers, as well as marketers and producers. Over 80 percent of this segment's revenues are derived from these APT services. These revenues are subject to traditional ratemaking governed by the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC). As part of its pipeline operations, APT owns and operates five underground storage facilities in Texas.
Our natural gas transmission operations in Louisiana are comprised of a 21-mile pipeline located in the New Orleans, Louisiana area that is primarily used to aggregate gas supply for our distribution division in Louisiana under a long-term contract and, on a more limited basis, to third parties. The demand fee charged to our Louisiana distribution division for these services is subject to regulatory approval by the Louisiana Public Service Commission. We also manage two asset management plans, which have been approved by applicable state regulatory commissions. Generally, these asset management plans require us to share with our distribution customers a significant portion of the cost savings earned from these arrangements.
Our pipeline and storage segment is impacted by seasonal weather patterns, competitive factors in the energy industry, and economic conditions in our Texas and Louisiana service areas. Natural gas prices do not directly impact the results of this segment as revenues are derived from the transportation and storage of natural gas. However, natural gas prices and demand for natural gas could influence the level of drilling activity in the supply areas that we serve, which may influence the level of throughput we may be able to transport on our pipelines. Further, natural gas price differences between the various hubs that we serve in Texas could influence the volumes of gas transported for shippers through our Texas pipeline system and rates for such transportation.
The results of APT are also significantly impacted by the natural gas requirements of its local distribution company customers. Additionally, its operations may be impacted by the timing of when costs and expenses are incurred and when these costs and expenses are recovered through its tariffs.
APT annually uses GRIP to recover capital costs incurred in the prior calendar year. On February 27, 2024, APT made a GRIP filing that covered changes in net property, plant and equipment investment from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 with a requested increase in operating income of $82.4 million. On May 14, 2024, the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) approved the Company's GRIP filing.
Additionally, GRIP requires a utility to file a statement of intent at least once every five years to review its costs and expenses, including capital costs filed for recovery under GRIP. On May 19, 2023, APT filed its statement of intent seeking $107.4 million in additional annual operating income. On December 13, 2023, the RRC approved the settlement agreement between APT and the intervening parties for an increase in annual operating income of $27.0 million, exclusive of the impact of the cessation of $36.9 million in excess deferred income tax refunds, which are substantially offset by a corresponding increase in income taxes. New rates were implemented effective December 13, 2023.
The demand fee our Louisiana natural gas transmission pipeline charges to our Louisiana distribution division increases five percent annually and has been approved by the Louisiana Public Service Commission until September 30, 2027.
Review of Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our pipeline and storage segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022 are presented below.
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mid-Tex / Affiliate transportation revenue | $ | 715,117 | $ | 621,987 | $ | 546,038 | $ | 93,130 | $ | 75,949 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Third-party transportation revenue | 210,568 | 154,018 | 136,907 | 56,550 | 17,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other revenue | 12,344 | 9,169 | 10,715 | 3,175 | (1,546) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating revenues | 938,029 | 785,174 | 693,660 | 152,855 | 91,514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total purchased gas cost | 146 | (1,220) | (1,583) | 1,366 | 363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 436,955 | 411,873 | 378,806 | 25,082 | 33,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income | 500,928 | 374,521 | 316,437 | 126,407 | 58,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-operating income | 40,940 | 44,787 | 26,791 | (3,847) | 17,996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges | 73,546 | 60,096 | 52,890 | 13,450 | 7,206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 468,322 | 359,212 | 290,338 | 109,110 | 68,874 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 96,840 | 53,747 | 37,917 | 43,093 | 15,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 371,482 | $ | 305,465 | $ | 252,421 | $ | 66,017 | $ | 53,044 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gross pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf | 831,534 | 834,847 | 776,608 | (3,313) | 58,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf | 635,728 | 635,508 | 580,488 | 220 | 55,020 |
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2024 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2023
Operating income for our pipeline and storage segment increased 33.8 percent. Key drivers for the change in operating income include:
-
a $68.4 million increase due to rate adjustments from the GRIP filings approved in May 2023 and 2024, and the rate case approved in December 2023.
-
a $39.0 million net increase in APT's through-system activities primarily associated with increased spreads.
-
a $27.8 million decrease in refunds of excess deferred taxes to customers, which is substantially offset in income tax expense.
-
a $14.5 million increase due to higher capacity contracted by tariff-based customers due to their increased peak day demand.
-
a $3.1 million decrease in property taxes, which is inclusive of a $5.4 million decrease related to the Texas property tax legislation discussed above.
Partially offset by:
-
an $8.4 million increase in depreciation expense associated with increased capital investments.
-
an $18.1 million increase in operation and maintenance expense due to increased storage and compression maintenance and other compliance-related activities.
Interest charges increased $13.5 million primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt during fiscal 2024.
The fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 for our pipeline and storage segment is described in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The liquidity required to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, and other cash needs is provided from a combination of internally generated cash flows and external debt and equity financing. Additionally, we have a $1.5 billion commercial paper program and four committed revolving credit facilities with $3.1 billion in total availability from third-party lenders. The commercial paper program and credit facilities provide cost-effective, short-term financing until it can be replaced with a balance of long-term debt and equity financing that achieves the Company's desired capital structure. Additionally, we have various uncommitted trade credit lines with our gas suppliers that we utilize to purchase natural gas on a monthly basis.
We have a shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that allows us to issue up to $5.0 billion in common stock and/or debt securities. As of the date of this report, $1.1 billion of securities remained available for issuance under the shelf registration statement, which expires March 31, 2026.
We also have an at-the-market (ATM) equity sales program that allows us to issue and sell shares of our common stock up to an aggregate offering price of $1.0 billion (including shares of common stock that may be sold pursuant to forward sale agreements entered into in connection with the ATM equity sales program), which expires March 31, 2026. As of the date of this report, $10.0 million of equity is available for issuance under this ATM equity sales program. Additionally, as of September 30, 2024, we had $1.4 billion in available proceeds from outstanding forward sale agreements issued under the ATM program.
In the first half of fiscal 2025, we anticipate filing a new $8.0 billion shelf registration statement and a prospectus supplement under this new shelf registration statement for a new $1.7 billion ATM equity sales program to replace the former arrangements.
As of September 30, 2024, we had the following forward starting interest rate swaps in place to hedge future planned debt issuances:
| Planned Debt Issuance Date | Amount Hedged | Effective Interest Rate | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Fiscal 2026 | $ | 300,000 | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||
| $ | 300,000 |
The liquidity provided by these sources is expected to be sufficient to fund the Company's working capital needs and capital expenditures program. Additionally, we expect to continue to be able to obtain financing upon reasonable terms as necessary.
The following table presents our capitalization as of September 30, 2024 and 2023:
| September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | — | — | % | $ | 241,933 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt (1) | 7,785,297 | 39.0 | % | 6,555,701 | 37.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 12,157,669 | 61.0 | % | 10,870,064 | 61.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Total capitalization, including short-term debt | $ | 19,942,966 | 100.0 | % | $ | 17,667,698 | 100.0 | % |
(1)Inclusive of our finance leases, but exclusive of AEK's securitized long-term debt.
Cash Flows
Our internally generated funds may change in the future due to a number of factors, some of which we cannot control. These factors include regulatory changes, the price for our services, the demand for such products and services, margin requirements resulting from significant changes in commodity prices, operational risks, and other factors.
Cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for the years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022 are presented below.
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 1,733,746 | $ | 3,459,743 | $ | 977,584 | $ | (1,725,997) | $ | 2,482,159 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (2,922,769) | (2,795,280) | (2,429,958) | (127,489) | (365,322) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 1,478,631 | (696,769) | 1,387,205 | 2,175,400 | (2,083,974) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents | 289,608 | (32,306) | (65,169) | 321,914 | 32,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 19,248 | 51,554 | 116,723 | (32,306) | (65,169) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 308,856 | $ | 19,248 | $ | 51,554 | $ | 289,608 | $ | (32,306) |
Cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 is described in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023.
Cash flows from operating activities
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, cash flow provided by operating activities was $1,733.7 million compared with $3,459.7 million in the prior year. Fiscal 2023 operating cash flow included $2,021.9 million of cash received as a result of the conclusion of Texas securitization proceedings. Excluding this cash inflow, operating cash flow in fiscal 2023 was $1,437.8 million, and the year-over-year increase in operating cash flow primarily reflects the positive effects of successful rate case outcomes achieved in fiscal 2024 and 2023.
Cash flows from investing activities
Our capital expenditures are primarily used to improve the safety and reliability of our distribution and transmission system through pipeline replacement and system modernization and to enhance and expand our system to meet customer needs. Over the last three fiscal years, approximately 86 percent of our capital spending has been committed to improving the safety and reliability of our system.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, we had $2.9 billion in capital expenditures compared with $2.8 billion for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023. Capital spending in our distribution segment increased $322.2 million, primarily as a result of increased system modernization and customer growth spending. Capital spending in our pipeline and storage segment decreased $191.0 million, primarily due to the timing of spending for pipeline system safety and reliability in Texas.
Cash flows from financing activities
Our financing activities provided $1,478.6 million of cash for fiscal year 2024 compared with $696.8 million of cash used by financing activities for fiscal year 2023.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, we received approximately $2.0 billion in net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and equity. We completed a public offering of $500 million of 6.20% senior notes due October 2053 and $400 million of 5.90% senior notes due October 2033, and received net proceeds from the offering, after the underwriting discount and offering expenses, of $889.4 million. We also completed a public offering of $325 million of 5.90% senior notes due October 2033, and received net proceeds from the offering, after the underwriting discount and offering expenses, of $339.0 million. Additionally, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, we settled 6,401,469 shares that had been sold on a forward basis for net proceeds of $750.0 million. The net proceeds were used primarily to support capital spending and for other general corporate purposes. We also received $231.1 million from the settlement of forward starting interest rate swaps related to a debt issuance completed in October 2024. Cash dividends increased due to an 8.8 percent increase in our dividend rate and an increase in shares outstanding.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, we repaid $2.2 billion in long-term debt, and we received approximately $1.6 billion in net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and equity. We completed a public offering of $500 million of 5.75% senior notes due October 2052 and $300 million of 5.45% senior notes due October 2032, and received net proceeds from the offering, after the underwriting discount and offering expenses, of $789.4 million. Additionally, during the year ended September 30, 2023, we settled 7,272,261 shares that had been sold on a forward basis for net proceeds of $806.9 million. The net proceeds were used primarily to support capital spending and for other general corporate purposes. We also received $171.1 million from the settlement of forward starting interest rate swaps related to a debt issuance completed in October 2023. Cash dividends increased due to an 8.8 percent increase in our dividend rate and an increase in shares
outstanding. Finally, Atmos Energy Kansas Securitization I, LLC, a special-purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary of Atmos Energy, issued $95 million in securitized long-term debt.
The following table shows the number of shares issued for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023, and 2022:
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued: | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct Stock Purchase Plan | 60,756 | 64,871 | 68,693 | ||||||||||||||
| Retirement Savings Plan and Trust | 67,134 | 69,716 | 72,339 | ||||||||||||||
| 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | 236,703 | 189,337 | 427,929 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Issuance (1) | 6,401,469 | 7,272,261 | 7,907,883 | ||||||||||||||
| Total shares issued | 6,766,062 | 7,596,185 | 8,476,844 |
(1)Share amounts do not include shares issued under forward sale agreements until the shares have been settled.
Credit Ratings
Our credit ratings directly affect our ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing, in addition to the cost of such financing. In determining our credit ratings, the rating agencies consider a number of quantitative factors, including but not limited to, debt to total capitalization, operating cash flow relative to outstanding debt, operating cash flow coverage of interest, and operating cash flow less dividends to debt. In addition, the rating agencies consider qualitative factors such as consistency of our earnings over time, the risks associated with our business, and the regulatory structures that govern our rates in the states where we operate.
Our debt is rated by two rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). On April 1, 2024, Moody's reaffirmed its long-term and short-term credit ratings and placed our ratings under negative outlook. As of September 30, 2024, our outlook and current debt ratings, which are all considered investment grade, are as follows:
| S&P | Moody’s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior unsecured long-term debt | A- | A1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term debt | A-2 | P-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Outlook | Stable | Negative |
A significant degradation in our operating performance or a significant reduction in our liquidity caused by more limited access to the private and public credit markets as a result of deteriorating global or national financial and credit conditions could trigger a negative change in our ratings outlook or even a reduction in our credit ratings by the two credit rating agencies. This would mean more limited access to the private and public credit markets and an increase in the costs of such borrowings.
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. The highest investment grade credit rating is AAA for S&P and Aaa for Moody’s. The lowest investment grade credit rating is BBB- for S&P and Baa3 for Moody’s. Our credit ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. There can be no assurance that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered, or withdrawn entirely, by a rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant.
Debt Covenants
We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of September 30, 2024. Our debt covenants are described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table provides information about contractual obligations and commercial commitments at September 30, 2024.
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt (1) | $ | 7,785,000 | $ | — | $ | 510,000 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 6,625,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitized long-term debt | 85,078 | 8,207 | 17,721 | 19,621 | 39,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (2) | 5,854,623 | 318,117 | 635,037 | 592,054 | 4,309,415 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges on securitized long-term debt | 21,071 | 4,281 | 7,255 | 5,356 | 4,179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance leases (3) | 66,506 | 3,438 | 7,070 | 7,338 | 48,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases (4) | 320,408 | 43,244 | 73,917 | 56,419 | 146,828 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial instrument obligations (5) | 7,637 | 7,324 | 313 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension and postretirement benefit plan contributions (6) | 273,428 | 27,596 | 51,411 | 65,310 | 129,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uncertain tax positions (7) | 57,797 | — | 57,797 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 14,471,548 | $ | 412,207 | $ | 1,360,521 | $ | 1,396,098 | $ | 11,302,722 |
(1)Long-term debt excludes our finance lease obligations, which are separately reported within this table. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
(2)Interest charges were calculated using the coupon rate for each debt issuance through the contractual maturity date.
(3)Finance lease payments shown above include interest totaling $17.6 million. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
(4)Operating lease payments shown above include interest totaling $61.6 million. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
(5)Represents liabilities for natural gas commodity financial instruments that were valued as of September 30, 2024. The ultimate settlement amounts of these remaining liabilities are unknown because they are subject to continuing market risk until the financial instruments are settled.
(6)Represents expected contributions to our defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans, which are discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(7)Represents liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions claimed or expected to be claimed on tax returns. The amount does not include interest and penalties that may be applied to these positions. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
We maintain supply contracts with several vendors that generally cover a period of up to one year. Commitments for estimated base gas volumes are established under these contracts on a monthly basis at contractually negotiated prices. Commitments for incremental daily purchases are made as necessary during the month in accordance with the terms of individual contracts. Our Mid-Tex Division also maintains a limited number of long-term supply contracts to ensure a reliable source of gas for our customers in its service area which obligate it to purchase specified volumes at market and fixed prices. At September 30, 2024, we were committed to purchase 25.9 Bcf within one year and 38.7 Bcf within two to three years under indexed contracts. At September 30, 2024, we were committed to purchase 6.8 Bcf within one year under fixed price contracts with a weighted average price of $3.10 per Mcf.
Risk Management Activities
In our distribution and pipeline and storage segments, we use a combination of physical storage, fixed physical contracts, and fixed financial contracts to reduce our exposure to unusually large winter-period gas price increases. Additionally, we manage interest rate risk by entering into financial instruments to effectively fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with anticipated financings.
We record our financial instruments as a component of risk management assets and liabilities, which are classified as current or noncurrent based upon the anticipated settlement date of the underlying financial instrument. Substantially all of our financial instruments are valued using external market quotes and indices.
The following table shows the components of the change in fair value of our financial instruments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024 (in thousands):
| Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2023 | $ | 370,256 | |||
| Contracts realized/settled | (264,650) | ||||
| Fair value of new contracts | 4,790 | ||||
| Other changes in value | (21,745) | ||||
| Fair value of contracts at September 30, 2024 | 88,651 | ||||
| Netting of cash collateral | — | ||||
| Cash collateral and fair value of contracts at September 30, 2024 | $ | 88,651 |
The fair value of our financial instruments at September 30, 2024, is presented below by time period and fair value source:
| Fair Value of Contracts at September 30, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maturity in years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source of Fair Value | Less than 1 | 1-3 | 4-5 | Greater than 5 | Total Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prices actively quoted | $ | (5,233) | $ | 93,884 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88,651 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Prices based on models and other valuation methods | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Fair Value | $ | (5,233) | $ | 93,884 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88,651 |
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Recent accounting developments and their impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to risks associated with commodity prices and interest rates. Commodity price risk is the potential loss that we may incur as a result of changes in the fair value of a particular instrument or commodity. Interest-rate risk is the potential increased cost we could incur when we issue debt instruments or to provide financing and liquidity for our business activities. Additionally, interest-rate risk could affect our ability to issue cost effective equity instruments.
We conduct risk management activities in our distribution and pipeline and storage segments. In our distribution segment, we use a combination of physical storage, fixed-price forward contracts, and financial instruments, primarily over-the-counter swap and option contracts, in an effort to minimize the impact of natural gas price volatility on our customers during the winter heating season. Our risk management activities and related accounting treatment are described in further detail in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, our earnings are affected by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of our issuance of short-term commercial paper and our other short-term borrowings.
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase natural gas for our distribution operations. Substantially all of the costs of gas purchased for distribution operations are recovered from our customers through purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms. Therefore, our distribution operations have limited commodity price risk exposure.
Interest Rate Risk
Our earnings are exposed to changes in short-term interest rates associated with our short-term commercial paper program and other short-term borrowings. We use a sensitivity analysis to estimate our short-term interest rate risk. For purposes of this analysis, we estimate our short-term interest rate risk as the difference between our actual interest expense for the period and estimated interest expense for the period assuming a hypothetical average one percent increase in the interest rates associated with our short-term borrowings. Had interest rates associated with our short-term borrowings increased by an average of one percent, our interest expense would not have materially increased during 2024.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Index to financial statements and financial statement schedules:
All financial statement schedules are omitted because the required information is not present, or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Atmos Energy Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atmos Energy Corporation (the Company) as of September 30, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at September 30, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated November 18, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
| Regulation | |||||
| Description of the Matter | As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s distribution and pipeline and storage operations are subject to regulation with respect to rates, service, maintenance of accounting records and various other matters by the respective regulatory authorities in the states in which they operate. The Company’s accounting policies recognize the financial effects of the ratemaking and accounting practices and policies of the various regulatory commissions and are subject to accounting principles for rate-regulated activities. As a result, certain costs are permitted to be capitalized rather than expensed because they can be recovered through rates. The Company records certain costs as regulatory assets when future recovery through customer rates is considered probable. Regulatory liabilities are recorded when it is probable that revenues will be reduced for amounts that will be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. The amounts to be recovered or recognized are based upon the Company’s historical experience and understanding of the regulations. As of September 30, 2024, there were $579.4 million of deferred costs included in regulatory assets and $1,227.9 million of regulatory liabilities awaiting cash outflow or potential refund. Auditing the effects of regulatory matters is complex as it requires specialized knowledge of rate-regulated activities and assessments as to matters that could affect the recording or updating of regulatory assets and liabilities. |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Company's accounting for regulatory assets and liabi |
Showing the first 8K of 229K characters. Open the full section
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2024 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us, including our consolidated entities, in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, including a reasonable level of assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO and applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2024, in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Ernst & Young LLP has issued its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report appears below.
| /s/ JOHN K. AKERS | /s/ CHRISTOPHER T. FORSYTHE | |||||||
| John K. Akers | Christopher T. Forsythe | |||||||
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
| November 18, 2024 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Atmos Energy Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Atmos Energy Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Atmos Energy Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2024 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated November 18, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 18, 2024
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We did not make any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act) during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
During the three months ended September 30, 2024, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement," as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025 under the heading "Proposal One - Election of Directors." Information regarding executive officers is reported below:
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information as of September 30, 2024, regarding the executive officers of the Company. It is followed by a brief description of the business experience of each executive officer.
| Name | Age | Years of Service | Office Currently Held | |||||||||||||||||
| John K. Akers | 61 | 33 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||||||||||||||||
| Christopher T. Forsythe | 53 | 21 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||||||||||||
| John S. McDill | 60 | 37 | Senior Vice President, Utility Operations | |||||||||||||||||
| Karen E. Hartsfield | 54 | 9 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | |||||||||||||||||
| John M. Robbins | 54 | 11 | Senior Vice President, Human Resources |
John K. (Kevin) Akers was named President and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed to the Board of Directors effective October 1, 2019. Mr. Akers joined the company in 1991. Mr. Akers assumed increased responsibilities over time and was named President of the Mississippi Division in 2002. He was later named President of the Kentucky/Mid-States Division in May 2007, a position he held until December 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, Mr. Akers was named Senior Vice President, Safety and Enterprise Services and was responsible for customer service, facilities management, safety and supply chain management. In November 2018, Mr. Akers was named Executive Vice President and assumed oversight responsibility for APT.
Christopher T. Forsythe was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective February 1, 2017. Mr. Forsythe joined the Company in June 2003 and prior to this promotion, served as the Company's Vice President and Controller from May 2009 through January 2017. Prior to joining Atmos Energy, Mr. Forsythe worked in public accounting for 10 years.
John S. McDill was named Senior Vice President, Utility Operations, effective October 1, 2021. In this role, Mr. McDill is responsible for the operations of Atmos Energy's six utility divisions as well as gas supply. Prior to this promotion, Mr. McDill served as Vice President, Pipeline Safety from May 2012 to September 2021. Mr. McDill also served as Vice President of Operations in our Mississippi Division. Mr. McDill's years of service include that with Mississippi Valley Gas, a company acquired by Atmos Energy in 2002.
Karen E. Hartsfield was named Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Atmos Energy, effective August 7, 2017. Ms. Hartsfield joined the Company in June 2015, after having served in private practice for 19 years,
most recently as Managing Partner of Jackson Lewis LLP in its Dallas office from July 2013 to June 2015. Prior to joining Jackson Lewis as a partner in January 2009, Ms. Hartsfield was a partner with Baker Botts LLP in Dallas.
John M. (Matt) Robbins was named Senior Vice President, Human Resources, effective January 1, 2017. Mr. Robbins joined the Company in May 2013 and prior to this promotion served as Vice President, Human Resources from February 2015 to December 2016. Before joining Atmos Energy, Mr. Robbins had over 20 years of experience in human resources.
Identification of the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as well as the Board of Directors’ determination as to whether one or more audit committee financial experts are serving on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics for its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Such code of ethics is represented by the Company’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. A copy of the Company's Code of Conduct, as well as any amendment to or waiver granted from a provision of the Company's Code of Conduct is posted on the Company's website at www.atmosenergy.com/company/corporate-responsibility-reports.
The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy that governs the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of the Company's securities by directors, officers, and employees that is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and any listing standards applicable to the Company. A copy of the Company's Insider Trading Policy is filed as Exhibit 19 to this Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Information on executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025, under the captions "Director Compensation," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Other Executive Compensation Matters," and "Named Executive Officer Compensation."
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and of management is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025, under the heading "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock." Information concerning our equity compensation plans is provided in Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities”, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Information on certain relationships and related transactions as well as director independence is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025, under the heading "Corporate Governance and Other Board Matters," and "Proposal One – Election of Directors."
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Information on our principal accountant’s fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 5, 2025, under the heading "Proposal Three – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) 1. and 2. Financial statements and financial statement schedules.
The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 are filed as part of this Form 10-K. All financial statement schedules are omitted because the required information is not present, or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto.
3*. Exhibits*
| Exhibit Number | Description | Page Number or Incorporation by Reference to | ||||||||||||
| Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws | ||||||||||||||
| 3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Atmos Energy Corporation - Texas (As Amended Effective February 3, 2010) | Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2010 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 3.2 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Atmos Energy Corporation - Virginia (As Amended Effective February 3, 2010) | Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2010 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Atmos Energy Corporation (as of August 4, 2023) | Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K dated August 1, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures | ||||||||||||||
| 4.1(a) | Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Atmos Energy Corporation) | Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.1(b) | Description of Registrant's Securities | |||||||||||||
| 4.2 | Indenture dated as of November 15, 1995 between United Cities Gas Company and Bank of America Illinois, Trustee | Exhibit 4.11(a) to Form S-3 dated August 31, 2004 (File No. 333-118706) | ||||||||||||
| 4.3 | Indenture dated as of July 15, 1998 between Atmos Energy Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Trustee | Exhibit 4.8 to Form S-3 dated August 31, 2004 (File No. 333-118706) | ||||||||||||
| 4.4 | Indenture dated as of May 22, 2001 between Atmos Energy Corporation and SunTrust Bank, Trustee | Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated May 22, 2001 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.5 | Indenture dated as of March 26, 2009 between Atmos Energy Corporation and U.S. Bank National Corporation, Trustee | Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated March 26, 2009 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.6 | Underwriting Agreement among Atmos Energy Kansas Securitization I, LLC, Atmos Energy Corporation and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, dated June 9, 2023 | Exhibit 1.1 of Form 8-K dated June 9, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.7 | Indenture by and among Atmos Energy Kansas Securitization I, LLC, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Securities Intermediary (including the form of the Bonds and the Series Supplement), dated as of June 20, 2023 | Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated June 20, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.8 | Series Supplement by and among Atmos Energy Kansas Securitization I, LLC and U. S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Securities Intermediary, dated as of June 20, 2023 | Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated June 20, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(a) | Debenture Certificate for the 6 3/4% Debentures due 2028 | Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 1998 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(b) | Global Security for the 5.95% Senior Notes due 2034 | Exhibit 10(2)(g) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(c) | Officers' Certificate dated June 10, 2011 | Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2011 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(d) | Global Security for the 5.5% Senior Notes due 2041 | Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2011 (File No. 1-10042) |
| 4.9(ee) | Officers' Certificate dated October 10, 2023 | Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated October 10, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(ff) | Global Security for the 5.900% Senior Notes due 2033 | Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated October 10, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(gg) | Global Security for the 6.200% Senior Notes due 2053 | Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K dated October 10, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(hh) | Officers' Certificate dated June 21, 2024 | Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated June 21, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(ii) | Global Security for the 5.900% Senior Notes due 2033 | Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated June 21, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(jj) | Officers' Certificate dated October 1, 2024 | Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated October 1, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(kk) | Global Security for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2054 | Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated October 1, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 4.9(ll) | Global Security for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2054 | Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K dated October 1, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| Material Contracts | ||||||||||||||
| 10.1 | Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2024, among Atmos Energy Corporation, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as the Administrative Agent, the agents, arrangers and bookrunners named therein, and the lenders named therein | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated March 28, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.2 | Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2024, among Atmos Energy Corporation, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as the Administrative Agent, the agents, arrangers and bookrunners named therein, and the lenders named therein | Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated March 28, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.3(a) | Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2023, among Atmos Energy Corporation and the Managers and Forward Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto | Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K dated March 31, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.3(b) | Form of Master Forward Sale Confirmation | Exhibit 1.2 to Form 8-K dated March 31, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.4(a) | Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2024, among Atmos Energy Corporation and the Managers and Forward Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto | Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K dated May 8, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.4(b) | Form of Master Forward Sale Confirmation | Exhibit 1.2 to Form 8-K dated May 8, 2024 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements | ||||||||||||||
| 10.5(a)* | Form of Atmos Energy Corporation Change in Control Severance Agreement - Tier I | Exhibit 10.7(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.5(b)* | Form of Atmos Energy Corporation Change in Control Severance Agreement - Tier II | Exhibit 10.7(b) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.6(a)* | Atmos Energy Corporation Executive Retiree Life Plan | Exhibit 10.31 to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 (File No. 1-10042) |
| 10.6 (b)* | Amendment No. 1 to the Atmos Energy Corporation Executive Retiree Life Plan | Exhibit 10.31(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.7* | Atmos Energy Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Management (as amended and restated August 3, 2021) | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 3, 2021 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.8(a)* | Atmos Energy Corporation Supplemental Executive Benefits Plan, Amended and Restated in its Entirety August 7, 2007 | Exhibit 10.8(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.8(b)* | Form of Individual Trust Agreement for the Supplemental Executive Benefits Plan | Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.9(a)* | Atmos Energy Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated, Effective as of January 1, 2016) | Exhibit 10.7(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.9(b)* | Atmos Energy Corporation Performance-Based Supplemental Executive Benefits Plan Trust Agreement, Effective Date December 1, 2000 | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.10* | Atmos Energy Corporation Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated, Effective as of January 1, 2022) | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q dated December 31, 2021 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.11(a)* | Mini-Med/Dental Benefit Extension Agreement dated October 1, 1994 | Exhibit 10.28(f) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.11(b)* | Amendment No. 1 to Mini-Med/Dental Benefit Extension Agreement dated August 14, 2001 | Exhibit 10.28(g) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.11(c)* | Amendment No. 2 to Mini-Med/Dental Benefit Extension Agreement dated December 31, 2002 | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.12* | Atmos Energy Corporation Equity Incentive and Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2012 | Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.13(a)* | Atmos Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated February 3, 2021) | Exhibit 10.14(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.13(b)* | Form of Award Agreement of Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units under the Atmos Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Exhibit 10.13(b) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 20, 2020 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.13(c)* | Form of Award Agreement of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units under the Atmos Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Exhibit 10.13(c) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 20, 2020 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.13(d)* | Form of Non-Employee Director Award Agreement of Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units Under the Atmos Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Exhibit 10.11(d) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| 10.13(e)* | Form of Non-Employee Director Award Agreement of Stock Unit Awards Under The Atmos Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Exhibit 10.11(e) to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| Other Exhibits, as indicated | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | Insider Trading Policy | |||||||||||||
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the registrant | |||||||||||||
| 23.1 | Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP |
| 24 | Power of Attorney | Signature page of Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 31 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications | |||||||||||||
| 32 | Section 1350 Certifications** | |||||||||||||
| Policy Relating to Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation | ||||||||||||||
| 97.1 | Atmos Energy Corporation Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy, Effective October 2, 2023 | Exhibit 97.1 to Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 (File No. 1-10042) | ||||||||||||
| Interactive Data File | ||||||||||||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document - the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document | |||||||||||||
| 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |||||||||||||
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||||||||||||
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |||||||||||||
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase | |||||||||||||
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | |||||||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document |
| * | This exhibit constitutes a "management contract or compensatory plan, contract, or arrangement." | ||||
| ** | These certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, furnished as Exhibit 32 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, will not be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such certifications by reference. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||
| (Registrant) | ||||||||||||||
| By: | /s/ CHRISTOPHER T. FORSYTHE | |||||||||||||
| Christopher T. Forsythe Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 18, 2024
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John K. Akers and Christopher T. Forsythe, or either of them acting alone or together, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power to act alone, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
| /s/ KIM R. COCKLIN | Chairman of the Board | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Kim R. Cocklin | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ JOHN K. AKERS | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| John K. Akers | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER T. FORSYTHE | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Christopher T. Forsythe | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ MICHELLE H. FAULK | Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Michelle H. Faulk | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ JOHN C. ALE | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| John C. Ale | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ KELLY H. COMPTON | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Kelly H. Compton | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ SEAN DONOHUE | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Sean Donohue | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ RAFAEL G. GARZA | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Rafael G. Garza | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ EDWARD GEISER | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Edward Geiser | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ RICHARD K. GORDON | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Richard K. Gordon | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ NANCY K. QUINN | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Nancy K. Quinn | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ RICHARD A. SAMPSON | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Richard A. Sampson | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ TELISA TOLIVER | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Telisa Toliver | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ DIANA J. WALTERS | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Diana J. Walters | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ FRANK YOHO | Director | November 18, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Frank Yoho |