Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

85K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read together with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, and in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company’s business, operations and financial performance. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements whenever they appear in this Form 10-Q. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those that are discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The Company has a disclosure committee consisting of members of senior management and other key employees involved in the preparation of the Company’s SEC reports. The disclosure committee is actively involved in the review and discussion of the Company’s SEC filings.

Overview

American Water is the largest and most geographically diverse, publicly traded water and wastewater utility company in the United States, as measured by both operating revenues and population served. The Company’s primary business involves the ownership of utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential, commercial, industrial, public authority, fire service and sale for resale customers, collectively presented as the “Regulated Businesses.” Services provided by the Company’s utilities are subject to regulation by multiple state utility commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation, collectively referred to as public utility commissions (“PUCs”). The Company also operates market-based businesses that provide water, wastewater and other services to residential and smaller commercial customers, the U.S. government on military installations, as well as municipalities and utility customers, collectively presented as the “Market-Based Businesses.” These Market-Based Businesses are not subject to economic regulation by state PUCs. See Part I, Item 1—Business in the Company’s Form 10-K for additional information.

COVID-19 Pandemic Update

American Water continues to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken steps since the beginning of the pandemic to mitigate adverse impacts to the Company. The Company has three main areas of focus as part of its response to COVID-19: the care and safety of its employees; the safety of its customers and the communities it serves; and the execution of its business continuity plan. American Water continues to work with its vendors to prevent disruptions in its supply chain, and, at this time, has not experienced, and does not anticipate, any material negative impacts. The Company also continues to monitor the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the capital markets, including impacts that could increase its cost of capital.

The Company has experienced financial impacts since the beginning of the pandemic resulting from lower revenues from the suspension of late fees and foregone reconnect fees in certain states, certain incremental operation and maintenance (“O&M”) expenses, an increase in uncollectible accounts expense and additional debt costs. These impacts are collectively referred to as “financial impacts.” See Note 3—Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may further impact American Water, including without limitation, its liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations, will depend on future developments, which presently cannot be predicted.

Table of Contents

As of November 2, 2021, American Water has commission orders authorizing deferred accounting or cost recovery for COVID-19 financial impacts in 11 of 14 jurisdictions, with proceedings in New York and Tennessee pending. One jurisdiction, Kentucky, issued an order denying a request to defer to a regulatory asset the financial impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Other regulatory actions to date are presented in the table below:

Commission ActionsDescriptionStates
Orders issued with deferred accountingAllows the Company to establish regulatory assets to record certain financial impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic.HI, IN, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV
Orders issued with cost recoveryCalifornia’s Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account allows the Company’s California subsidiary to track certain financial impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic for future recovery requests. Iowa issued a base rate case order on June 28, 2021, authorizing recovery in rates of the COVID-19 financial impacts deferred within its annual non-recurring expense rider. Illinois has authorized cost recovery of the COVID-19 financial impacts through a special purpose rider over a 24-month period, which was implemented effective October 1, 2020. Additionally, Illinois approved a bad debt rider tariff on December 16, 2020, allowing collection of actual bad debt expense over last authorized beginning April 2021 through February 2023. Illinois approved a stipulation in March 2021 to allow the rider to be extended through the end of 2023. Missouri issued a base rate case order on April 7, 2021, authorizing recovery in rates of the COVID-19 financial impacts deferred through March 31, 2021 over a three-year period.CA, IA, IL, MO
Proceedings pendingPending proceedings considering deferred accounting authorization for the future recovery of COVID-19 financial impacts.NY, TN

The Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary filed for a request with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the “PaPUC”) to defer as a regulatory asset all identified COVID-19 financial impacts. On September 15, 2021, the PaPUC issued an order approving the request to defer, with carrying costs, incremental uncollectible expense and other incremental costs net of savings attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. The PaPUC order denied the request to include lost revenues attributed to the waiver of late fees and reconnect fees and expenses associated with additional interest costs. Additionally, the PaPUC order approved the request to allow for the continuation of the deferral of financial impacts, rejecting proposals from the intervening parties to define an end date to the deferral in 2021. As a result of the order discussed above, the Company recorded a net $7 million reduction to its regulatory assets and corresponding impacts to revenue, interest expense and uncollectible expense during the third quarter of 2021. The Company continues to evaluate options within its next base rate case to address these denied items and the resulting financial impact.

On July 28, 2021, the Company’s Tennessee subsidiary filed a stipulation and settlement agreement with the Consumer Advocate Unit in the Financial Division of the Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, which reflected agreement on the deferral of COVID-19-related financial impacts through April 30, 2021. On August 9, 2021, the Tennessee Public Utility Commission denied the stipulation and settlement agreement and moved to address the Company’s Tennessee subsidiary’s petition to defer the COVID-19 financial impacts in a future hearing. On August 26, 2021, the Company’s Tennessee subsidiary filed a motion to withdraw its pending petition, preserving its right to seek recovery of the COVID-19 financial impacts in a future proceeding.

Consistent with these regulatory orders, the Company has recorded $39 million in regulatory assets and $6 million of regulatory liabilities for the financial impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021.

As of November 2, 2021, three states continue moratoria on the suspension of service disconnections due to non-payment. The moratoria on disconnects have expired in 11 states. The Company continues to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to comply with the current ordered moratoria and any future moratoria implemented.

Table of Contents

Sale of Homeowner Services Group

On October 28, 2021, the Company and the subsidiaries comprising HOS entered into a purchase agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of funds advised by Apax Partners LLP (the “Buyer”), to sell all of the equity interests of the HOS subsidiaries to the Buyer for total estimated consideration of approximately $1.275 billion (an estimated $1.0 billion net of tax). Apax Partners LLP is a global private equity advisory firm. The consideration is comprised of $480 million in cash (subject to customary closing and post-closing adjustments and tax withholdings), a seller promissory note to be issued by the Buyer at closing in the principal amount of $720 million, and a contingent cash payment of $75 million payable upon satisfaction of certain conditions on or before December 31, 2023. Closing of the sale is subject to certain customary conditions, including, among others, the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act. The Company and/or the Buyer may terminate the purchase agreement under certain circumstances, including if the closing does not occur by December 27, 2021, subject to an extension by either the Company or the Buyer for up to an additional nine months in the event of any law or order preventing the closing or if the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act has not occurred. The Company expects the closing to occur in the fourth quarter of 2021. The structure of the transaction enables the initial cash proceeds to be redeployed into the Regulated Businesses to fund near-term incremental capital investments, while interest on the seller note will provide a stream of earnings during its term. Upon maturity, the proceeds from the repayment of the seller note are expected to be used to fund capital investment in the Regulated Businesses. This proposed sale further narrows the focus of the Company’s Market-Based Businesses primarily to its Military Services Group (“MSG”).

The seller note will have a five-year term, will be payable in cash, and will bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year during the term. The repayment obligations of the Buyer under the seller note will be secured by a first priority security interest in certain property of the Buyer and the HOS subsidiaries, including their cash and securities accounts, as well as a pledge of the equity interests in each of those subsidiaries, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. The seller note will require compliance with affirmative and negative covenants (subject to certain conditions, limitations and exceptions), including a covenant limiting the incurrence by the Buyer and certain affiliates of additional indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds, but will not include any financial maintenance covenants.

Beginning on the 36th month after closing, the Company has a put right pursuant to which it may require the seller note to be repaid in full at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, except that upon the occurrence of a disruption event in the broadly syndicated term loan “B” debt financing market, repayment by the Buyer pursuant to the Company’s exercise of the put right will be delayed until the market disruption event ends.

The seller note may not be prepaid at the Buyer’s election except in certain limited circumstances before the fourth anniversary of the closing date. If the Buyer seeks to repay the seller note in breach of this non-call provision, an event of default will occur under the seller note and the Company may, among other actions, demand repayment in full together with a premium ranging from 105.5% to 107.5% of the outstanding principal amount of the loan and a customary “make-whole” payment.

The Company and the Buyer will enter into, at closing, a revenue share agreement, pursuant to which the Company will receive 10% of the revenue generated from customers who are billed for home warranty services through an applicable Company subsidiary (an “on-bill” arrangement), and 15% of the revenue generated from any future on-bill arrangements entered into after the closing. Unless earlier terminated, this agreement has a term of up to 15 years, which may be renewed for up to two five-year periods.

Financing Activities

On May 10, 2021, American Water Capital Corp. (“AWCC”) completed a $1.1 billion debt offering, which included the sale of $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.30% senior notes due 2031 and $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.25% senior notes due 2051. Net proceeds of this offering were used to lend funds to parent company and its regulated subsidiaries, to prepay $327 million in aggregate principal amount of AWCC’s outstanding senior notes, to repay AWCC’s commercial paper obligations and for general corporate purposes. See Note 8—Long-Term Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

As a result of AWCC’s prepayment of the various senior notes, a make-whole premium of $15 million was paid to the holders thereof on June 14, 2021. Substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the Company’s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets, as the Company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates.

Table of Contents

Financial Results

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, diluted earnings per share, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), were $1.53 and $3.40, respectively, an increase of $0.07 and $0.29 per diluted share, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. These increases were primarily driven by continued growth in the Regulated Businesses from infrastructure investment, acquisitions and organic growth. These increases were offset somewhat by the impacts from weather in both 2021 and 2020, which decreased revenue by an estimated $17 million and $11 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.

The Company expects to continue to grow its businesses, with the majority of its growth to be achieved in the Regulated Businesses through (i) continued capital investment in the Company’s infrastructure to provide safe, clean, reliable and affordable water and wastewater services to its customers, and (ii) regulated acquisitions to expand the Company’s services to new customers. The Company plans to invest approximately $1.9 billion across its footprint in 2021. During the first nine months of 2021, the Company invested $1.3 billion, primarily in the Regulated Businesses, as discussed below:

Regulated Businesses - Growth and Optimization

  • $1.2 billion capital investment in the Regulated Businesses, the majority for infrastructure improvements and replacements; and

  • $78 million to fund acquisitions, including deposits discussed below, in the Regulated Businesses, which added approximately 6,900 water and wastewater customers through the nine months ended September 30, 2021, in addition to approximately 12,600 customers added through organic growth through the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

On April 6, 2021, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the wastewater assets of the York City Sewer Authority for $235 million, plus an amount of average daily revenue calculated for the period between the final meter reading and the date of closing. This system, directly and indirectly through bulk contracts, serves more than 45,000 customers. In connection with the execution of the acquisition agreement, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary paid a $20 million deposit to the seller on April 30, 2021, which is refundable in the event the agreement is terminated prior to closing of the acquisition. The Company expects to close this acquisition in the first half of 2022, pending regulatory approval.

On March 29, 2021, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the water and wastewater assets of Egg Harbor City for $22 million. The water and wastewater systems currently serve approximately 1,500 customers each, or 3,000 combined, and are being sold through the New Jersey Water Infrastructure Protection Act process. The Company expects to close this acquisition in the first half of 2022, pending regulatory approval.

As of November 2, 2021, the Company has entered into agreements for pending acquisitions in the Regulated Businesses to add approximately 82,700 additional customers.

Sale of New York American Water Company, Inc.

On November 20, 2019, the Company and the Company’s New York subsidiary entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Liberty Utilities Co., which it subsequently assigned to its indirect, wholly owned subsidiary Liberty Utilities (Eastern Water Holdings) Corp. (“Liberty”), pursuant to which Liberty will purchase all of the capital stock of the New York subsidiary (the “Stock Purchase”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $608 million in cash, subject to adjustment as provided in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company’s regulated New York operations have approximately 125,000 customers in the State of New York. Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., Liberty’s ultimate parent company, executed and delivered an absolute and unconditional guaranty of the performance of all of the obligations of Liberty under the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Stock Purchase is subject to various conditions, including obtaining approvals and satisfying or waiving other closing conditions. The Stock Purchase Agreement as originally executed provided for an initial termination date of June 30, 2021 (the “Closing End Date”). On June 29, 2021, the parties mutually agreed to extend the Closing End Date to December 31, 2021 in accordance with the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, and agreed to extend further the Closing End Date to January 3, 2022 as December 31, 2021 is a federal holiday. No other provision of the Stock Purchase Agreement was modified by this mutual agreement. Liberty may also terminate the Stock Purchase Agreement if any governmental authority initiates a condemnation or eminent domain proceeding against a majority of the consolidated properties of the Company’s New York subsidiary, taken as a whole.

Table of Contents

In 2020, the Governor of New York proposed legislation that, among other things, required the New York State Department of Public Service (“NYSDPS”) to study whether private water suppliers should be placed under municipal control. On February 3, 2021, the Governor issued a press release announcing that he directed the NYSDPS Special Counsel to commence and lead a municipalization feasibility study (the “Study”). The Study was released on March 29, 2021 finding that municipalization was feasible and in the public interest. The Study focused primarily on the imminent need for tax relief for the Company’s New York subsidiary’s customers and included recommendations to eliminate the Special Franchise Tax and create a new public authority to potentially acquire all or a portion of the system. Despite the Study’s findings, the legislative session ended without passage of legislation to eliminate the Special Franchise Tax. However, the New York State Senate and New York State Assembly passed legislation creating the North Shore Water Authority (“NSWA”) and the South Shore Water Authority (“SSWA”). The NSWA relates to a small portion of the New York subsidiary’s service area (about 4,700 customers) while the SSWA relates to the largest portion of its service territory (about 120,000 customers). Both bills were delivered to the Governor but have not yet been signed into law. The Company’s New York subsidiary continues to work constructively with the NYSDPS, including through ongoing settlement discussions among all parties to the proceeding, and to take all actions necessary to facilitate the completion of the Stock Purchase. Subject to satisfying or waiving the various conditions to closing, and assuming no prior termination of the Stock Purchase Agreement by Liberty as described above, the Company remains confident that the Stock Purchase will be completed.

The assets and related liabilities of the Company’s New York subsidiary were classified as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021. See Note 6—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Operational Excellence

The Company’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio, which is used as a measure of the operating performance of the Regulated Businesses, was 33.9% for the twelve months ended September 30, 2021, as compared to 34.2% for the twelve months ended September 30, 2020. The improvement in this ratio reflects the continued focus on operating costs, as well as an increase in operating revenues for the Regulated Businesses after considering the adjustment for the amortization of the excess accumulated deferred income taxes (“EADIT”) shown in the table below.

The Company’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure, and is defined by the Company as its operation and maintenance expenses from the Regulated Businesses, divided by the operating revenues from the Regulated Businesses, where both operation and maintenance expenses and operating revenues were adjusted to eliminate purchased water expense. Operating revenues were further adjusted to exclude reductions for the amortization of EADIT. Also excluded from operation and maintenance expenses is the allocable portion of non-O&M support services costs, mainly depreciation and general taxes, which is reflected in the Regulated Businesses segment as operation and maintenance expenses, but for consolidated financial reporting purposes, is categorized within other line items in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The items discussed above were excluded from the O&M efficiency ratio calculation as they are not reflective of management’s ability to increase the efficiency of the Regulated Businesses.

The Company evaluates its operating performance using this ratio, and believes it is useful to investors because it directly measures improvement in the operating performance and efficiency of the Regulated Businesses. This information is derived from the Company’s consolidated financial information but is not presented in its financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. This information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s GAAP disclosures, and should be considered as an addition to, and not a substitute for, any GAAP measure. The Company’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio (i) is not an accounting measure that is based on GAAP; (ii) is not based on a standard, objective industry definition or method of calculation; (iii) may not be comparable to other companies’ operating measures; and (iv) should not be used in place of the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Presented in the table below is the calculation of the Company’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio and a reconciliation that compares operation and maintenance expenses and operating revenues, each as determined in accordance with GAAP, to those amounts utilized in the calculation of its adjusted O&M efficiency ratio:

For the Twelve Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)20212020
Total operation and maintenance expenses$1,715$1,605
Less:
Operation and maintenance expenses—Market-Based Businesses436386
Operation and maintenance expenses—Other(30)(20)
Total operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses1,3091,239
Less:
Regulated purchased water expenses154146
Allocation of non-operation and maintenance expenses4134
Adjusted operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses (i)$1,114$1,059
Total operating revenues$3,902$3,756
Less:
Operating revenues—Market-Based Businesses575536
Operating revenues—Other(16)(18)
Total operating revenues—Regulated Businesses3,3433,238
Less:
Regulated purchased water revenues (a)154146
Revenue reductions for the amortization of EADIT(93)—
Adjusted operating revenues—Regulated Businesses (ii)$3,282$3,092
Adjusted O&M efficiency ratio—Regulated Businesses (i) / (ii)33.9%34.2%

(a)The calculation assumes regulated purchased water revenues approximate regulated purchased water expenses.

Table of Contents

Regulatory Matters

General Rate Cases and Infrastructure Surcharges

Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, excluding reductions for the amortization of EADIT that are generally offset in income tax expense, assuming a constant water sales volume, resulting from general rate case authorizations and infrastructure surcharge authorizations that became effective in the current period:

During the Three Months Ended September 30,During the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)2021202020212020
General rate cases by state:
Missouri (effective May 28, 2021)$—$—$22$—
New York (effective May 1, 2021)——7—
Pennsylvania (effective January 28, 2021)——70—
Indiana (effective May 1, 2020)———13
California (effective January 1, 2020)———5
Total general rate cases$—$—$99$18
Infrastructure surcharges by state:
Kentucky (effective July 1, 2021 and July 1, 2020)$1$1$1$1
New Jersey (effective June 28, 2021, June 29, 2020 and January 1, 2020)——1420
Indiana (effective March 17, 2021)——8—
Pennsylvania (effective January 1, 2021, July 1, 2020, April 1, 2020 and January 1, 2020)—4819
Illinois (effective January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2020)——77
West Virginia (effective January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2020)——53
Tennessee (effective January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2020)——32
Missouri (effective June 27, 2020)———10
Total infrastructure surcharges$1$5$46$62

Effective October 7, 2021, the Company’s Missouri subsidiary implemented infrastructure surcharges for annualized incremental revenues of $7 million.

On August 28, 2020, the Company’s Iowa subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $3 million in annualized incremental revenues. An order was issued on June 28, 2021 authorizing an increase of $1 million. On July 9, 2021, the Company’s Iowa subsidiary filed a Motion for Clarification with respect to the required accelerated flow back of unprotected EADIT over a three-year period to recognize the increase to rate base and incremental revenues as the unprotected EADIT is amortized. On September 21, 2021, that motion was denied. The Company’s Iowa subsidiary filed tariffs consistent with the order on September 23, 2021. Effective October 11, 2021, the Iowa Utilities Board approved the tariffs and implemented the new rates.

On April 7, 2021, the Company’s Missouri subsidiary was authorized additional annualized revenues of $22 million, effective May 28, 2021, excluding agreed to reductions for EADIT as a result of the TCJA. The EADIT reduction in revenues is $25 million and is offset by a like reduction in income tax expense. The protected EADIT balance of $72 million is being returned to customers using the average rate assumption method (“ARAM”), and the unprotected EADIT balance of $74 million is being returned to customers over 10 years. The $25 million EADIT reduction includes both the protected and unprotected catch-up period EADIT of $13 million. The catch-up period of January 1, 2018 through May 31, 2021 covers the period from when the lower federal corporate income tax rate went into effect until new base rates went into effect and will be amortized over 2.5 years.

Table of Contents

On March 2, 2021, an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in the Office of Administrative Law of New Jersey filed an initial decision with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (the “NJBPU”) that recommended denial of a petition filed by the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary, which sought approval of acquisition adjustments in rate base of $29 million associated with the acquisitions of Shorelands Water Company, Inc. in 2017 and the Borough of Haddonfield’s water and wastewater systems in 2015. On July 29, 2021, the NJBPU issued an order adopting the ALJ’s initial decision without modification. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary filed a Notice of Appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division on September 10, 2021. A scheduling order was issued on October 18, 2021 establishing a briefing schedule through January 2022. There is no financial impact to the Company as a result of the NJBPU’s order, since the acquisition adjustments are currently recorded as goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On February 25, 2021, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary was authorized additional annualized revenues of $90 million, effective January 28, 2021, excluding agreed to reductions for EADIT as a result of the TCJA, over two steps. The EADIT reduction in revenues is $19 million. The overall increase, net of TCJA reductions, is $71 million in revenues combined over two steps. The first step was effective January 28, 2021 in the amount of $70 million ($51 million including TCJA reductions) and the second step will be effective January 1, 2022 in the amount of $20 million. The protected EADIT balance of $200 million is being returned to customers using the ARAM, and the unprotected EADIT balance of $116 million is being returned to customers over 20 years. The $19 million annually includes both the protected and unprotected EADIT amortizations and a portion of catch-up period EADIT. A bill credit of $11 million annually for two years returns to customers the remainder of the EADIT catch-up period amortization. The catch-up period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 covers the period from when the lower federal corporate income tax rate went into effect until new base rates went into effect and will be amortized over two years.

Pending General Rate Case Filings

On August 18, 2021, the Company’s Hawaii subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $2 million in additional annualized revenues.

On April 30, 2021, the Company’s West Virginia subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $32 million in annualized incremental revenues excluding proposed reductions for EADIT as a result of TCJA and infrastructure surcharges. The proposed EADIT reduction in revenues is $1 million and the exclusion for infrastructure surcharges is $10 million. Intervenor testimony was received on September 20, 2021. The Company’s rebuttal testimony was filed on October 5, 2021. Hearings are scheduled to start November 3, 2021.

On July 1, 2019, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $29 million in annualized incremental revenues for 2021, and increases of $10 million and $11 million in the escalation year of 2022 and the attrition year of 2023, respectively. On October 11, 2019, the Company filed its 100-day update for the same proceeding and updated the request to $27 million in annualized incremental revenues for 2021, and increases of $10 million in both the escalation year of 2022 and the attrition year of 2023, respectively. On September 10, 2020, the California Public Utilities Commission (the “CPUC”) approved the Company’s California subsidiary’s motion for interim rates, establishing a memorandum account to track the difference between interim and final rates adopted by the CPUC in this proceeding, which were effective on January 1, 2021. Following settlement discussions among all parties to the proceeding, on January 22, 2021, January 25, 2021, and February 11, 2021, the Company’s California subsidiary filed with the CPUC comprehensive settlements entered into among the Company’s California subsidiary, the Public Advocates Office, and other intervenors. These settlement agreements resolved all matters in dispute among the parties to the settlements, with the exception of a few disputed items between the Company’s California subsidiary and the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (the “MPWMD”). On October 19, 2021, the CPUC issued a proposed decision in the general rate case proceeding for rates effective January 1, 2021. With minor exceptions, the proposed decision would adopt the comprehensive settlements reached with the Public Advocates Office, and other intervenors. Comments on the proposed decision are due November 8, 2021 and reply comments are due November 15, 2021. The earliest the decision could be adopted is November 18, 2021 at the CPUC’s voting meeting. The Company expects a final decision by December 31, 2021.

On January 5, 2021, the Company’s California subsidiary submitted a request to delay by one year its cost of capital filing and maintain the authorized cost of capital through 2022. On February 22, 2021, the CPUC denied the request to further delay the cost of capital filing. The Company’s California subsidiary submitted its cost of capital application on May 3, 2021. Once approved by the CPUC, the new authorized cost of capital will be effective January 1, 2022.

Pending Infrastructure Surcharge Filings

On September 3, 2021, the Company’s Missouri subsidiary filed for an infrastructure surcharge requesting $11 million in additional annualized revenues.

On June 30, 2021, the Company’s West Virginia subsidiary filed for an infrastructure surcharge requesting $3 million in additional annualized revenues.

Table of Contents

Legislative Updates

During 2021, the Company’s regulatory jurisdictions enacted the following legislation that has been approved and is effective as of November 2, 2021:

  • The Kentucky General Assembly adopted House Bill 465 relating to the acquisition of water and wastewater utilities. The legislation affirms a method in valuing water and wastewater systems above net book value and establishes a timeline of 60 days for Public Service Commission approval of an acquisition.

  • Indiana House Enrolled Act 1287 creates a mechanism that reduces the required upfront cost to new customers for a water or wastewater utility to extend service to underserved areas.

  • Indiana House Enrolled Act 349 establishes a tax rider for water and wastewater utilities based upon a change in state or federal income tax law. The legislation also requires the Indiana Finance Authority to prioritize loans that secure long-term benefits over shorter term projects.

  • New Jersey passed Lead Service Line Replacement Bill, Senate Bill 3398/Assembly Bill 5343, which provides for the replacement of lead service lines within 10 years of the effective date of the bill and authorizes cost recovery of customer-owned lead service lines as an O&M expense plus interest through a semi-annual surcharge.

  • Missouri passed the Water and Sewer Infrastructure Act, Senate Bill 44/House Bill 397, to establish a new statewide surcharge mechanism program which covers replacement of aging water distribution and sewer collection infrastructure. This legislation broadens the eligible projects covered by the current Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge mechanism and expands its applicability to projects across the state.

  • Illinois passed House Bill 414, Low Income Water & Sewer Financial Assistance Program, which authorizes the state’s Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to institute a water and sewer assistance program for customers of privately and publicly owned systems. The program is modeled off the existing energy supplemental state Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

During 2021, the Company’s regulatory jurisdictions enacted the following legislation that has been approved but is not yet effective as of November 2, 2021:

  • New Jersey passed Senate Bill 647/House Bill 4825, which strengthens the state’s existing Water Quality Accountability Act (“WQAA”) by requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to adopt regulations to implement the WQAA, enhancing asset management plans and reporting, upgrading cyber security standards and adding criminal penalties for falsifying reports. Legislation is awaiting the Governor’s signature.

  • California passed electronic payment legislation, Assembly Bill 1058, which permanently changes state law to allow investor-owned water and wastewater utilities to accept electronic payments, including credit and debit cards, without charging processing fees to customers. Legislation was signed by the Governor with an effective date of January 1, 2022.

  • California passed CPUC consolidation timeline legislation, Assembly Bill 1250, which requires the CPUC to make timely decisions on applications to acquire systems. Consolidations of less than $5 million are to be processed within 180 days and those more than $5 million are required to be processed within 12 months. Legislation was signed by the Governor with an effective date of January 1, 2022.

Condemnation and Eminent Domain

All or portions of the Regulated Businesses’ utility assets could be acquired by state, municipal or other government entities through one or more of the following methods: (i) eminent domain (also known as condemnation); (ii) the right of purchase given or reserved by a municipality or political subdivision when the original certificate of public convenience and necessity (a “CPCN”) was granted; and (iii) the right of purchase given or reserved under the law of the state in which the utility subsidiary was incorporated or from which it received its CPCN. The acquisition consideration related to such a proceeding initiated by a local government may be determined consistent with applicable eminent domain law, or may be negotiated or fixed by appraisers as prescribed by the law of the state or in the particular CPCN.

As such, the Regulated Businesses are periodically subject to condemnation proceedings in the ordinary course of business. For example, a citizens group in Monterey, California successfully added “Measure J” to the November 2018 election ballot asking voters to decide whether the MPWMD should conduct a feasibility study concerning the potential purchase of the Monterey water service system assets (the “Monterey system assets”) of the Company’s California subsidiary, and, if feasible, to proceed with a purchase of those assets without an additional public vote. This service territory represents approximately 40,000 customers. In November 2018, Measure J was certified to have passed.

Table of Contents

In August 2019, the MPWMD’s General Manager issued a report that recommends that the MPWMD board (1) develop criteria to determine which water systems should be considered for acquisition; (2) examine the feasibility of acquiring the Monterey system assets and consider public ownership of smaller systems only if the MPWMD becomes the owner of a larger system; (3) evaluate whether the acquisition of the Monterey system assets by the MPWMD is in the public interest and sufficiently satisfies the criterion of “feasible” as provided in Measure J; (4) ensure there is significant potential for cost savings before agreeing to commence an acquisition; and (5) develop more fully alternate operating plans before deciding whether to consider a Resolution of Necessity.

In November 2019, the MPWMD issued a preliminary valuation and cost of service analysis report, finding in part that (1) an estimate of the Monterey system assets’ total value plus adjustments would be approximately $513 million, (2) the cost of service modeling results indicate significant annual reductions in revenue requirements and projected monthly water bills, and (3) the acquisition of the Monterey system assets by the MPWMD would be economically feasible. On June 12, 2020, the MPWMD issued a draft environmental impact report for the potential acquisition of the Monterey system assets and a related district boundary adjustment that would be required if the MPWMD were to acquire and operate certain of the Monterey system assets located outside the MPWMD’s boundaries. On September 15, 2020, the MPWMD gave notice of its intention to appraise the Monterey system assets and related property interests. On September 29, 2020, the Company’s California subsidiary declined to make the Monterey system assets and related property interests available for inspection or to comply with any of the other requests contained in the MPWMD’s notice. On October 7, 2020, the MPWMD issued a final environmental impact report (“FEIR”), and on November 4, 2020, the MPWMD certified the FEIR, which purports to analyze the environmental impacts of the MPWMD’s project to (1) acquire the Monterey system assets through the power of eminent domain, if necessary, and (2) expand its geographic boundaries to include all parts of this system. On November 25, 2020, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a petition challenging this certification in court. A hearing on the matter was held on August 30, 2021, and a decision from the court remains pending. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Challenge of Certification — Proposed Monterey System Final Environmental Impact Report in the Company’s Form 10-K, and Part II, Item 1—Legal Proceedings in this Form 10-Q.

On February 26, 2021, the MPWMD filed an application with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Monterey County (“LAFCO”) seeking approval to become a retail water provider and annex approximately 58 parcels of land into the MPWMD’s boundaries. On June 28, 2021, LAFCO’s board of directors voted to require a third-party independent financial study as to the feasibility of an acquisition by the MPWMD of the Monterey system assets. By letter dated July 30, 2021, LAFCO notified the MPWMD that its application was complete and would be considered for action at a public hearing, which will now take place on December 6, 2021. LAFCO also indicated that, in accordance with the LAFCO board of directors’ directive, a consultant was engaged to perform an independent financial review of the application, which will support LAFCO’s analysis of the application at the public hearing. Approval by LAFCO is a precondition to the MPWMD’s ability to file an eminent domain proceeding against the Company’s California subsidiary to acquire the Monterey system assets. If the MPWMD were to make a final determination that an acquisition of the Monterey system assets is feasible, it would then need to file a multi-year eminent domain proceeding against the Company’s California subsidiary. In that proceeding, it would first need to establish its right to take the Monterey system assets. If such right is established, the amount of just compensation to be paid to the California subsidiary for such assets would then need to be determined. The MPWMD has stated that it anticipates filing such an eminent domain proceeding in late 2021 or early 2022.

Also, five municipalities in the Chicago, Illinois area (approximately 30,300 customers in total) formed a water agency and filed an eminent domain lawsuit against the Company in January 2013, seeking to condemn the water pipeline that serves those five municipalities. Before filing its eminent domain lawsuit, the water agency made an offer of $38 million for the pipeline. The parties have filed with the court updated valuation reports. A valuation trial that was originally scheduled for October 2021 has been continued to June 2022.

Furthermore, the law in certain jurisdictions in which the Regulated Businesses operate provides for eminent domain rights allowing private property owners to file a lawsuit to seek just compensation against a public utility, if a public utility’s infrastructure has been determined to be a substantial cause of damage to that property. In these actions, the plaintiff would not have to prove that the public utility acted negligently. In California, lawsuits have been filed in connection with large-scale natural events such as wildfires. Some of these lawsuits have included allegations that infrastructure of certain utilities triggered the natural event that resulted in damage to the property. In some cases, the PUC has allowed certain costs or losses incurred by the utility to be recovered from customers in rates, but in other cases such recovery in rates has been disallowed. Also, the utility may have obtained insurance that could respond to some or all of such losses, although the utility would be at risk for any losses not ultimately subject to rate or insurance recovery or losses that exceed the limits of such insurance.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations

Presented in the table below are the Company’s consolidated results of operations:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(In millions)
Operating revenues$1,092$1,079$2,979$2,854
Operating expenses:
Operation and maintenance4364191,2861,193
Depreciation and amortization161154476451
General taxes7873241225
Total operating expenses, net6756462,0031,869
Operating income417433976985
Other income (expense):
Interest, net(101)(99)(300)(296)
Non-operating benefit costs, net20125937
Other, net461117
Total other income (expense)(77)(81)(230)(242)
Income before income taxes340352746743
Provision for income taxes6288128179
Net income attributable to common shareholders$278$264$618$564

Segment Results of Operations

The Company’s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its business for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions, assess performance and allocate resources. The Company operates its business primarily through one reportable segment, the Regulated Businesses segment. The Company also operates market-based businesses that, individually, do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with GAAP, and are collectively presented as the Market-Based Businesses, which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses.

Regulated Businesses Segment

Presented in the table below is financial information for the Regulated Businesses:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(In millions)
Operating revenues$944$945$2,556$2,468
Operation and maintenance338335983932
Depreciation and amortization151138449417
General taxes7469226211
(Gain) on asset dispositions and purchases———(3)
Other income (expenses)(49)(56)(146)(166)
Income before income taxes332346752744
Provision for income taxes6085130183
Net income attributable to common shareholders273261623561

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

Presented in the tables below is information regarding the main components of the Regulated Businesses’ operating revenues:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(In millions)
Water services:
Residential$545$562$1,466$1,435
Commercial197187511471
Fire service3837112110
Industrial3938105101
Public and other6860184178
Total water services8878842,3782,295
Wastewater services:
Residential383511299
Commercial1082825
Industrial1132
Public and other441211
Total wastewater services5348155137
Other (a)4132336
Total operating revenues$944$945$2,556$2,468

(a)Includes other operating revenues consisting primarily of miscellaneous utility charges, fees and rents.

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(Gallons in millions)
Billed water services volumes:
Residential53,52657,917133,282135,875
Commercial23,98123,55658,55956,434
Industrial10,4009,92526,84326,422
Fire service, public and other14,97814,78338,38537,414
Total billed water services volumes102,885106,181257,069256,145

For the three months ended September 30, 2021, operating revenues decreased $1 million, primarily due to a $56 million increase from authorized rate increases, including infrastructure surcharges, principally to fund infrastructure investment in various states, and a $6 million increase from water and wastewater acquisitions, as well as organic growth in existing systems. These increases were offset by an estimated net decrease of $17 million from weather in both 2021 and 2020, and a $24 million decrease in revenues due to the amortization of EADIT, which is generally offset with a reduction in income tax expense. There was an estimated $11 million decrease in 2021 due to higher demand in the third quarter of 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which had no estimated net impact on revenue for the full year 2020. Additionally, there was an $8 million decrease in revenue due to the denial of recovery of certain COVID-19 financial impacts based on the PaPUC order received by the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary. See Note 3—Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Table of Contents

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, operating revenues increased $88 million, primarily due to $152 million increase from authorized rate increases, including infrastructure surcharges, principally to fund infrastructure investment in various states, and a $22 million increase from water and wastewater acquisitions, as well as organic growth in existing systems. These increases were offset by an estimated net decrease of $11 million from weather in both 2021 and 2020, and a $68 million decrease in revenues due to the amortization of EADIT, which is generally offset with a reduction in income tax expense. Additionally, there was an $8 million decrease in revenue due to the denial of recovery of certain COVID-19 financial impacts based on the PaPUC order received by the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary. See Note 3—Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Operation and Maintenance

Presented in the table below is information regarding the main components of the Regulated Businesses’ operating and maintenance expense:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(In millions)
Employee-related costs$132$125$391$369
Production costs101100268253
Operating supplies and services5665171175
Maintenance materials and supplies19186656
Customer billing and accounting17144941
Other13133838
Total$338$335$983$932

For the three months ended September 30, 2021, operation and maintenance expense increased $3 million primarily due to a $7 million increase in employee-related costs from higher headcount and related compensation expense in support of the growth in the business and a $3 million increase in customer billing and accounting primarily due to higher call volumes experienced at our customer service centers. These increases were partially offset by a $9 million decrease in operating supplies and services due to timing of expenses.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, operation and maintenance expense increased $51 million, primarily due to a $22 million increase in employee-related costs from higher headcount and related compensation expense in support of the growth in the business and higher pension expense due to higher service costs. There was a $15 million increase in production costs primarily due to higher purchased water usage in the Company’s California subsidiary and increased fuel and power costs across several subsidiaries and a $10 million increase in maintenance materials and supplies due to timing of maintenance and tank painting projects in the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary and increased paving costs from a higher volume of main breaks.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, depreciation and amortization increased $13 million and $32 million, respectively, primarily due to additional utility plant placed in service from capital infrastructure investments and acquisitions.

General Taxes

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, general taxes increased $5 million and $15 million, respectively, primarily due to increased capital investments, including acquisitions and an increase in the New Jersey Gross Receipts Tax.

Other Income (Expenses)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, other income (expenses) increased $7 million and $20 million, respectively, primarily due to the reduction in the non-service cost components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense resulting from higher asset returns.

Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, the Regulated Businesses’ provision for income taxes decreased $25 million and $53 million, respectively. The Regulated Businesses’ effective income tax rate was 18.1% and 24.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and 17.3% and 24.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in the Regulated Businesses’ effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of EADIT resulting from the TCJA, pursuant to regulatory orders. The amortization of EADIT is generally offset with reductions in revenue.

Market-Based Businesses

Presented in the table below is information for the Market-Based Businesses:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2021202020212020
(In millions)
Operating revenues$152$139$435$399
Operation and maintenance11399332284
Depreciation and amortization671720
Income before income taxes31317991
Provision for income taxes872023
Net income attributable to common shareholders23235968

Operating Revenues

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, operating revenues increased $13 million and $36 million, respectively, due to an increase in capital and O&M projects in the MSG, across several of the Company’s military bases, primarily at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, Fort Hood and Joint Base San Antonio.

Operation and Maintenance

For the three months ended September 30, 2021, operation and maintenance expense increased $14 million, primarily due to costs associated with MSG from increased capital and O&M projects as discussed above and an increase in additional O&M costs related to the Contract Services Group (“CSG”).

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, operation and maintenance expense increased $48 million primarily due to costs associated with MSG from increased capital and O&M projects as discussed above; additional costs associated with an increase of claims in 2021 in HOS, including from extreme cold weather across the country during the first quarter of 2021, primarily in Texas and Illinois; and an increase in additional O&M costs related to CSG.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For a general overview of the sources and uses of capital resources, see the introductory discussion in Part II, Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources in the Company’s Form 10-K.

Liquidity needs for capital investment, working capital and other financial commitments are generally funded through cash flows from operations, public and private debt offerings, commercial paper markets, and, if and to the extent necessary, borrowings under AWCC’s revolving credit facility, and, in the future, issuances of equity. The Company’s revolving credit facility provides $2.25 billion in aggregate total commitments from a diversified group of financial institutions. The revolving credit facility is used principally to support AWCC’s commercial paper program, to provide additional liquidity support, and to provide for the issuance of up to $150 million in letters of credit. The maximum aggregate principal amount of short-term borrowings authorized for issuance under AWCC’s commercial paper program is $2.10 billion. Subject to satisfying certain conditions, the credit agreement also permits AWCC to increase the maximum commitment under the facility by up to an aggregate of $500 million. As of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The weighted-average interest rate on AWCC’s outstanding short-term borrowings, including as of December 31, 2020, $500 million of outstanding principal on the Term Loan Facility (as defined below), was approximately 0.13% and 0.53% at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

Table of Contents

To ensure adequate liquidity given the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on debt and capital markets, on March 20, 2020, AWCC entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement, by and among parent company, AWCC and the lenders party thereto (the “Term Loan Facility”). The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes of AWCC and American Water and to provide additional liquidity. As of December 31, 2020, $500 million of principal was outstanding under the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility commitments terminated at maturity on March 19, 2021 and the Term Loan Facility was repaid in full.

Presented in the tables below is the aggregate credit facility commitments, commercial paper limit and letter of credit availability under the revolving credit facility, as well as the available capacity for each:

As of September 30, 2021
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,100$150$2,250
Outstanding debt(684)(76)(760)
Remaining availability as of September 30, 2021$1,416$74$1,490

(a)Total remaining availability of $1.49 billion as of September 30, 2021 may be accessed through revolver draws.

As of December 31, 2020
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,100$150$2,250
Outstanding debt(786)(76)(862)
Remaining availability as of December 31, 2020$1,314$74$1,388

(a)Total remaining availability may be accessed through revolver draws.

Presented in the table below is the Company’s total available liquidity as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively:

Cash and Cash EquivalentsAvailability on Revolving Credit FacilityTotal Available Liquidity
(In millions)
Available liquidity as of September 30, 2021$70$1,490$1,560
Available liquidity as of December 31, 2020$547$1,388$1,935

The Company believes that existing sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet its cash requirements for the foreseeable future. Though not currently anticipated, no assurances can be provided that the lenders will meet existing commitments to AWCC under the revolving credit facility, or that AWCC will be able to access the commercial paper or loan markets in the future on acceptable terms. See Note 9—Short-Term Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

On May 10, 2021, AWCC completed a $1.1 billion debt offering, which included the sale of $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.30% senior notes due 2031 and $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.25% senior notes due 2051. At the closing of the offering, AWCC received, after deduction of underwriting discounts and before deduction of offering expenses, net proceeds of $1,086 million. AWCC used the net proceeds of this offering: (i) to lend funds to parent company and its regulated subsidiaries; (ii) to prepay $251 million aggregate principal amount of AWCC’s outstanding 5.77% Series D Senior Notes due December 21, 2021 (the “Series D Notes”) and $76 million aggregate principal amount of AWCC’s outstanding 6.55% Series H Senior Notes due May 15, 2023 (the “Series H Notes,” and together with the Series D Notes, the “Series Notes”); (iii) to repay AWCC’s commercial paper obligations; and (iv) for general corporate purposes. After the prepayments described above, none of the Series D Notes, and approximately $14 million aggregate principal amount of the Series H Notes, remain outstanding. As a result of AWCC’s prepayment of the Series Notes, a make-whole premium of $15 million was paid to the holders thereof on June 14, 2021. Substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the Company’s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets, as the Company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates.

Table of Contents

On May 6, 2021, the Company entered into two 10-year treasury lock agreements, with notional amounts of $125 million and $150 million, to reduce interest rate exposure on debt, which was subsequently issued on May 10, 2021. These treasury lock agreements had an average fixed rate of 1.58%. The Company designated these treasury lock agreements as cash flow hedges, with their fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss. On May 10, 2021, the Company terminated these two treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $275 million, realizing a net gain of less than $1 million, to be amortized through interest, net over a 10-year period, in accordance with the terms of the $1.1 billion new debt issued on May 10, 2021. No ineffectiveness was recognized on hedging instruments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities primarily result from the sale of water and wastewater services and, due to the seasonality of demand, are generally greater during the warmer months. Presented in the table below is a summary of the major items affecting the Company’s cash flows provided by operating activities:

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
20212020
(In millions)
Net income$618$564
Add (less):
Depreciation and amortization476451
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits121174
Other non-cash activities (a)(37)(25)
Changes in working capital (b)(118)(145)
Pension and postretirement healthcare contributions(31)(31)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities$1,029$988

(a)Includes provision for losses on accounts receivable, pension and non-pension postretirement benefits and other non-cash, net. Details of each component can be found on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

(b)Changes in working capital include changes to receivables and unbilled revenues, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the settlement of cash flow hedges and other current assets and liabilities, net.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, cash flows provided by operating activities increased $41 million, due to an increase in net income, an increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to additional utility plant placed in service from capital infrastructure investments and acquisitions and changes in working capital, partially offset by a decrease in deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits primarily driven by an increase in the amortization of EADIT.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Presented in the table below is a summary of the major items affecting the Company’s cash flows used in investing activities:

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
20212020
(In millions)
Net capital expenditures$(1,205)$(1,314)
Acquisitions(78)(59)
Other investing activities, net (a)(70)(73)
Net cash flows used in investing activities$(1,353)$(1,446)

(a)Includes removal costs from property, plant and equipment retirements and proceeds from sale of assets.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, cash used in investing activities decreased $93 million, primarily due to the timing of payments for capital expenditures. Partially, offsetting this decrease was an increase in acquisitions primarily due to the acquisition of the East Pasadena Water Company in California for $34 million during the third quarter of 2021. The Company plans to invest approximately $1.9 billion across its footprint in 2021.

Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Presented in the table below is a summary of the major items affecting the Company’s cash flows provided by financing activities:

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
20212020
(In millions)
Proceeds from long-term debt$1,113$1,250
Repayments of long-term debt(370)(266)
(Repayments of) proceeds from term loan(500)500
Net short-term borrowings with maturities less than three months(97)(242)
Debt issuance costs and make-whole premium on early debt redemption(26)(12)
Dividends paid(318)(290)
Other financing activities, net (a)4626
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities$(152)$966

(a)Includes proceeds from issuances of common stock under various employee stock plans and the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, net of taxes paid, and advances and contributions in aid of construction, net of refunds.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, cash flows provided by financing activities decreased $1,118 million, primarily due to the $500 million borrowed under the Term Loan Facility during the first quarter of 2020 which was repaid in full at maturity in 2021, an increase in repayments of long-term debt due to the prepayment of $327 million in aggregate principal amount of AWCC’s outstanding senior notes during the second quarter of 2021 and higher dividends paid in 2021, partially offset by lower net repayments of commercial paper borrowings.

Debt Covenants

The Company’s debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants. To the extent that the Company is not in compliance with these covenants, an event of default may occur under one or more debt agreements and the Company or its subsidiaries may be restricted in its ability to pay dividends, issue new debt or access the revolving credit facility. The long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that, among other things, prohibit or restrict the Company from issuing debt secured by the Company’s assets, subject to certain exceptions. Failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations.

Covenants in certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization (as defined in the relevant documents) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00. On September 30, 2021, the Company’s ratio was 0.62 to 1.00 and therefore the Company was in compliance with the covenants.

Security Ratings

Presented in the table below are long-term and short-term credit ratings and rating outlooks as of November 2, 2021 as issued by the following rating agencies:

SecuritiesMoody's Investors ServiceStandard & Poor's Ratings Service
Rating outlookStableStable
Senior unsecured debtBaa1A
Commercial paperP-2A-1

A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Security ratings are highly dependent upon the ability to generate cash flows in an amount sufficient to service debt and meet investment plans. The Company can provide no assurances that its ability to generate cash flows is sufficient to maintain its existing ratings. None of the Company’s borrowings are subject to default or prepayment as a result of the downgrading of these security ratings, although such a downgrading could increase fees and interest charges under its credit facility.

Table of Contents

As part of its normal course of business, the Company routinely enters into contracts for the purchase and sale of water, energy, chemicals and other services. These contracts either contain express provisions or otherwise permit the Company and its counterparties to demand adequate assurance of future performance when there are reasonable grounds for doing so. In accordance with the contracts and applicable contract law, if the Company is downgraded by a credit rating agency, especially if such downgrade is to a level below investment grade, it is possible that a counterparty would attempt to rely on such a downgrade as a basis for making a demand for adequate assurance of future performance, which could include a demand that the Company must provide collateral to secure its obligations. The Company does not expect to post any collateral which will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Access to the capital markets, including the commercial paper market, and respective financing costs in those markets, may be directly affected by the Company’s securities ratings. The Company primarily accesses the debt capital markets, including the commercial paper market, through AWCC. However, the Company has also issued debt through its regulated subsidiaries, primarily in the form of tax-exempt securities or borrowings under state revolving funds, to lower the overall cost of debt.

Dividends

For discussion of the Company’s dividends, see Note 7—Shareholders' Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Financial condition of the Company, results of operations and cash flows are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. See Part II, Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in the Company’s Form 10-K for a discussion of its critical accounting policies. Additionally, see Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for updates, if any, to the significant accounting policies previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Standards

See Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of new accounting standards recently adopted or pending adoption.

Previous: Item 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS · Next: Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK