Camden Property Trust 10-K 2011-12-31

Filed 2012-02-17. 21 sections, 424K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON

What changed since the 2010-12-31 10-KNew, removed and reworded risk factor headings, then every item sentence by sentence.

Cover and table of contents

10-K 1 d259732d10k.htm FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 1-12110

CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas76-6088377
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1300 Houston, Texas77046
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 354-2500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $.01 par valueNew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in the Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $4,418,001,069 based on a June 30, 2011 share price of $63.62.

On February 10, 2012, 78,804,181 common shares of the registrant were outstanding, net of treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012 are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PART I
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors3
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments10
Item 2.Properties10
Item 3.Legal Proceedings15
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures15
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities16
Item 6.Selected Financial Data18
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations19
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk38
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data39
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure39
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures39
Item 9B.Other Information42
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance42
Item 11.Executive Compensation42
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters42
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence43
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services43
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules44
SIGNATURES51

ii

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust (“REIT”), is primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Unless the context requires otherwise, “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to Camden Property Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as “communities,” “multifamily communities,” “properties,” or “multifamily properties” in the following discussion.

Our corporate offices are located at 3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1300, Houston, Texas 77046 and our telephone number is (713) 354-2500. Our website is located at www.camdenliving.com. On our website we make available free of charge our annual, quarterly, and current reports, and amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also make available, free of charge on our website, our Guidelines on Governance, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers, and the charters of each of our Audit, Compensation, Nominating, and Corporate Governance Committees.

Our annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information are electronically filed with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please contact the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Financial Information about Segments

We are primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. As each of our communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, amenities, and services, our operations have been aggregated into one reportable segment. See our consolidated financial statements and notes included thereto in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain information required by Item 1.

Narrative Description of Business

As of December 31, 2011, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing 206 multifamily properties comprising 69,794 apartment homes across the United States. Of these 206 properties, ten properties were under development and when completed will consist of a total of 2,797 apartment homes. In addition, we own land parcels we may develop into multifamily apartment communities.

Operating and Business Strategy

We believe producing consistent earnings growth through property operations, development and acquisitions, achieving market balance, and recycling capital are crucial factors to our success. We rely heavily on our sophisticated property management capabilities and innovative operating strategies to help us maximize the earnings potential of our communities.

Real Estate Investments and Market Balance. We believe we are well positioned in our current markets and have the expertise to take advantage of new opportunities as they arise. These capabilities, combined with what we believe is a conservative financial structure, should allow us to concentrate our growth efforts toward selective opportunities to enhance our strategy of having a geographically diverse portfolio of assets which meet the requirements of our residents.

We continue to operate in our core markets which we believe provides an advantage due to economies of scale. We believe, where possible, it is best to operate with a strong base of properties in order to benefit from the personnel allocation and the market strength associated with managing multiple properties in the same market. However, consistent with our goal of generating sustained earnings growth, we intend to selectively dispose of properties and redeploy capital for various strategic reasons, including if we determine a property cannot meet long-term earnings growth expectations.

Table of Contents

We try to maximize capital appreciation of our properties by investing in markets characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property appreciation. These markets generally feature one or more of the following:

•Strong economic growth leading to household formation and job growth, which in turn leads to high demand for our apartments; and
•High barriers to entry where, because of land scarcity or government regulation, it is difficult or costly to build new apartment properties leading to low supply;
•High single family home prices making our apartments a more economical housing choice;
•An attractive quality of life leading to high demand and retention and allowing us to more readily increase rents.

Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to look for opportunities to acquire existing communities, expand our development pipeline, and complete selective dispositions. We have two discretionary investment funds (the “Funds”), one of which is closed to future investment and the other of which will close to future investment at the earlier of April 2012 or at such time as 90% of its committed capital is invested, subject to certain exceptions.

We intend to continue to focus on strengthening our capital and liquidity positions by generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate debt levels and leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs. We intend to meet our liquidity requirements through available cash balances, the availability under our unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings, proceeds from dispositions of property and secured mortgage notes, equity issued from our 2011 at-the-market share offering program, and the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement.

Sophisticated Property Management. We believe the depth of our organization enables us to deliver quality services, promote resident satisfaction, and retain residents, thereby reducing operating expenses. We manage our properties utilizing a staff of professionals and support personnel, including certified property managers, experienced apartment managers and leasing agents, and trained apartment maintenance technicians. Our on-site personnel are trained to deliver high quality services to our residents. We strive to motivate our on-site employees through incentive compensation arrangements based upon property operational results, rental rate increases, occupancy levels, and level of lease renewals achieved.

Operations. We believe an intense focus on operations is necessary to realize consistent, sustained earnings growth. Ensuring resident satisfaction, increasing rents as market conditions allow, maximizing rent collections, maintaining property occupancy at optimal levels, and controlling operating costs comprise our principal strategies to maximize property financial results. We believe our web-based property management and revenue management systems strengthen on-site operations and allow us to quickly adjust rental rates as local market conditions change. Lease terms are generally staggered based on vacancy exposure by apartment type so lease expirations are matched to each property's seasonal rental patterns. We generally offer leases ranging from six to fifteen months with individual property marketing plans structured to respond to local market conditions. In addition, we conduct ongoing customer service surveys to ensure timely response to residents' changing needs and a high level of satisfaction.

Investments in Joint Ventures. We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures through which we own an indirect economic interest of less than 100% of the community or land owned directly by the joint venture. See Note 8, “Investments in Joint Ventures,” and Note 14, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investments in joint ventures.

Table of Contents

Competition

There are numerous housing alternatives which compete with our communities in attracting residents. Our properties compete directly with other multifamily properties as well as with condominiums and single-family homes which are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our communities are located. This competitive environment could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease apartment homes at our present communities or any newly developed or acquired community, as well as at the rents charged.

Employees

At December 31, 2011, we had approximately 1,885 employees, including executive, administrative, and community personnel. Our employee headcount does not vary significantly throughout the year.

Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust

As of December 31, 2011, we met the qualification of a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, we, with the exception of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent we continue to meet certain requirements of the Code.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks not presently known to us, or which we currently consider immaterial, may also impair our business and operations.

Risks Associated with Real Estate, Real Estate Capital, and Credit Markets

Volatility in capital and credit markets, or other unfavorable changes in economic conditions, could adversely impact us.

The capital and credit markets are subject to volatility and disruption, as particularly experienced in the latter half of 2008 through most of 2010, during which spreads on prospective debt financings fluctuated and made it more difficult to borrow money. In the event of renewed market disruption and volatility, we may not be able to obtain new debt financing or refinance our existing debt on favorable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our liquidity, our ability to make distributions to shareholders, acquire and dispose of assets and continue our development pipeline. Other weakened economic conditions, including job losses and high unemployment rates, could adversely affect rental rates and occupancy levels. Unfavorable changes in economic conditions may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows and operating results.

Additional key economic risks which may adversely affect conditions in the markets in which we operate include the following:

•local conditions, such as an oversupply of apartments or other housing available for rent, or a reduction in demand for apartments in the area;
•declines in the financial condition of our tenants, which may make it more difficult for us to collect rents from some tenants;
•declines in market rental rates;
•low mortgage interest rates and home pricing, making alternative housing more affordable;
•government or builder incentives which enable home buyers to put little or no money down, making alternative housing options more attractive;
•regional economic downturns which affect one or more of our geographical markets; and
•increased operating costs, if these costs cannot be passed through to residents.
Table of Contents

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents.

Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of fifteen months or less. As these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.

We face risks associated with land holdings and related activities.

We hold land for future development and may in the future acquire additional land holdings. The risks inherent in purchasing, owning, and developing land increase as demand for apartments, or rental rates, decrease. Real estate markets are highly uncertain and, as a result, the value of undeveloped land has fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate. In addition, carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses or reduced profitability. As a result, we hold certain land, and may in the future acquire additional land, in our development pipeline at a cost we may not be able to fully recover or at a cost which precludes our developing a profitable multifamily community. If there are subsequent changes in the fair value of our land holdings which we determine is less than the carrying basis of our land holdings reflected in our financial statements plus estimated costs to sell, we may be required to take future impairment charges which would reduce our net income.

Difficulties of selling real estate could limit our flexibility.

We intend to continue to evaluate the potential disposition of assets which may no longer meet our investment objectives. When we decide to sell an asset, we may encounter difficulty in finding buyers in a timely manner as real estate investments generally cannot be disposed of quickly, especially when market conditions are poor. These factors may limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions and may also limit our ability to utilize sales proceeds as a source of liquidity, which would adversely affect our ability to make distributions to shareholders or repay debt. In addition, the provisions of the Code relating to REITs limit our ability to earn a gain on the sale of property (unless we own the property through a subsidiary which will incur a taxable gain upon sale) if we have held the property less than two years, and this limitation may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to shareholders.

We could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are a major source of financing for secured multifamily real estate. We and other multifamily companies depend heavily on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to finance growth by purchasing or guaranteeing apartment loans. There have been discussions of reducing or eliminating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a final decision by the government to eliminate Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or reduce their acquisitions or guarantees of apartment loans, may adversely affect interest rates, capital availability, and the development of multifamily communities.

Compliance or failure to comply with laws, including those requiring access to our properties by disabled persons, could result in substantial cost.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (“FHAA”), and other federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, generally require public accommodations and apartment homes be made accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the government or the award of damages to private litigants. These laws may require us to modify our existing properties. These laws may also restrict renovations by requiring improved access to such buildings by disabled persons or may require us to add other structural features which increase our construction costs. Legislation or regulations adopted in the future may impose further costs and obligations or restrictions on us with respect to improved access by disabled persons. We may incur unanticipated expenses which may be material to our financial condition or results of operations to comply with ADA, FHAA, and other federal, state, and local laws, or in connection with lawsuits brought by the government or private litigants.

Competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental income.

There are numerous housing alternatives which compete with our properties in attracting residents. Our properties compete directly with other multifamily properties as well as condominiums and single family homes which are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. This competitive environment could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease apartment homes at our present properties or any newly developed or acquired property, as well as on the rents realized.

Table of Contents

Risks Associated with Our Operations

Development and construction risks could impact our profitability.

We intend to continue to develop and construct multifamily apartment communities for our portfolio, and expect increased levels of development activity in 2012. Our development and construction activities may be exposed to a number of risks which may increase our construction costs and decrease our profitability, including the following:

•inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required permits and authorizations;
•increased materials and/or labor costs, problems with subcontractors, or other costs due to errors and omissions which occur in the design or construction process;
•inability to obtain financing with favorable terms for the development of a community;
•inability to complete construction and lease-up of a community on schedule;
•the expected occupancy and rental rates may differ from the actual results; and
•incurring costs related to the abandonment of development opportunities which we have pursued and subsequently deemed unfeasible.

Our inability to successfully implement our development and construction strategy could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and pay distributions to shareholders.

One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is engaged in the business of providing general contracting services under construction contracts entered into between it and third-parties (including nonconsolidated subsidiaries). The terms of those construction contracts generally require this subsidiary to estimate the time and costs to complete a project, and to assume the risk the time and costs associated with its performance may be greater than anticipated. As a result, profitability on those contracts is dependent on the ability to accurately predict such factors. The time and costs necessary to complete a project may be affected by a variety of factors, including those listed above, many of which are beyond this subsidiary’s control. In addition, the terms of those contracts generally require this subsidiary to warrant its work for a period of time during which it may be required to repair, replace, or rebuild non-conforming work. Further, trailing liabilities, based on various legal theories such as claims of negligent construction, may result from such projects, and these trailing liabilities may go on for a number of years depending on the length of the statutes of repose in various jurisdictions.

Our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected.

We may acquire additional operating properties on a selective basis. Our acquisition activities are subject to a number of risks, including the following:

•we may not be able to successfully integrate acquired properties into our existing operations;
•our estimates of the costs, if any, of repositioning or redeveloping the acquired property may prove inaccurate;
•the expected occupancy and rental rates may differ from the actual results; and
•we may not be able to obtain adequate financing.

With respect to acquisitions of operating properties, we may not be able to identify suitable candidates on terms acceptable to us and may not achieve expected returns or other benefits as a result of integration challenges, such as personnel and technology.

Table of Contents

Competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties.

We expect other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and investment funds, private investors, and other multifamily REITs, will compete with us to acquire additional operating properties. This competition could increase prices for the type of properties we would likely pursue and adversely affect our ability to acquire these properties or the profitability of such properties upon acquisition.

Losses from catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage.

We carry comprehensive property and liability insurance on our properties, which we believe is of the type and amount customarily obtained on similar real property assets by similar types of owners. We intend to obtain similar coverage for properties we acquire or develop in the future. However, some losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses from floods, hurricanes, or earthquakes, may be subject to coverage limitations. We exercise our discretion in determining amounts, coverage limits, and deductible provisions of insurance to maintain appropriate insurance on our investments at a reasonable cost and on suitable terms. If we suffer a catastrophic loss, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement value of our lost investment, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also may reduce the feasibility of using insurance proceeds to replace a property after it has been damaged or destroyed.

Investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor.

We have invested and may continue to invest as a joint venture partner in joint ventures. These investments involve risks, including the possibility the other joint venture partner may have business goals which are inconsistent with ours, possess the ability to take action or withhold consent contrary to our requests, or become insolvent and require us to assume and fulfill the joint venture’s financial obligations. We and our joint venture partner may each have the right to initiate a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our joint venture partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have entered into such a transaction. Each joint venture agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate, finance, and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture agreement.

We face risks associated with investments in and management of discretionary funds.

We have formed the Funds which, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, we manage as the general partner and advisor. Each of the Funds has total capital commitments of $187.5 million or $375 million in the aggregate. We have committed to invest 20% of the total equity interest in each of the Funds, up to $75 million in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2011, one of the Funds was closed for future investments. We have contributed approximately $33.0 million to this Fund and it had a combined equity capital investment of $165.0 million at December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, our capital contribution to the remaining open Fund was approximately $23.7 million and it had a combined equity capital investment of approximately $118.4 million. There are risks associated with the investment in and management of the Funds, including:

•investors in the remaining open Fund may fail to make their capital contributions when due and, as a result, the Fund may be unable to execute its investment objectives;
•the general partner of the Funds, our wholly-owned subsidiary, has unlimited liability for the third-party debts, obligations, and liabilities of the Funds pursuant to partnership law;
•investors in the Funds (other than us), by majority vote, may remove our subsidiary as the general partner of the Funds with or without cause and the Funds’ advisory boards, by a majority vote of their members, may remove our subsidiary as the general partner of the Funds at any time for cause;
•while we have broad discretion to manage the Funds and make investment decisions on behalf of the Funds, the investors or the advisory boards must approve certain matters, and as a result we may be unable to cause the Funds to make certain investments or implement certain decisions we consider beneficial;
Table of Contents
•we are permitted to acquire land and develop communities outside of the remaining open Fund, but are generally prohibited from acquiring fully developed multifamily properties outside of this Fund until the earlier of (i) April 8, 2012, or (ii) such time as 90% of the remaining open Fund’s committed capital is invested, subject to certain exceptions;
•our ability to dispose of all or a portion of our investments in the Funds is subject to significant restrictions; and
•we may be liable if the Funds fail to comply with various tax or other regulatory matters.

Tax matters, including failure to qualify as a REIT, could have adverse consequences.

We may not continue to qualify as a REIT in the future. The Internal Revenue Service may challenge our qualification as a REIT for prior years and new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions may change the tax laws or the application of the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal tax consequences of such qualification.

For any taxable year we fail to qualify as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions:

•we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax;
•we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify, thereby reducing our net income, including any distributions to shareholders, as we would be required to pay significant income taxes for the year or years involved; and
•our ability to expand our business and raise capital would be impaired, which may adversely affect the value of our common shares.

We may face other tax liabilities in the future which may impact our cash flow. These potential tax liabilities may be calculated on our income or property values at either the corporate or individual property levels. Any additional tax expense incurred would decrease the cash available for cash distributions to our common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and noncontrolling interest holders.

We depend on our key personnel.

Our success depends in part on our ability to attract and retain the services of executive officers and other personnel. There is substantial competition for qualified personnel in the real estate industry, and the loss of several of our key personnel could have an adverse effect on us.

Changes in litigation risks could affect our business.

As a large publicly-traded owner of multifamily properties, we may become involved in legal proceedings, including consumer, employment, tort, or commercial litigation, which if decided adversely to or settled by us, could result in liability which is material to our financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Associated with Our Indebtedness and Financing

Insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt obligations or pay distributions to shareholders.

Substantially all of our income is derived from rental and other income from our multifamily communities. As a result, our performance depends in large part on our ability to collect rent from residents, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including the following:

•delay in resident lease commencements;
Table of Contents
•decline in occupancy;
•failure of residents to make rental payments when due;
•the attractiveness of our properties to residents and potential residents;
•our ability to adequately manage and maintain our communities;
•competition from other available apartments and housing alternatives; and
•changes in market rents.

Cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest with respect to debt financing. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. This requirement limits the cash available to meet required principal payments on our debt.

We have significant debt, which could have important adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2011, we had outstanding debt of approximately $2.4 billion. This indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

•if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness, and if we are unable to meet our mortgage obligations, we could sustain a loss as a result of foreclosure on the mortgaged property;
•our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions is increased; and
•our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in business and industry conditions is limited.

The mortgages on our properties subject to secured debt, our unsecured credit facility, and the indentures under which our unsecured debt was issued contain customary restrictions, requirements, and other limitations, as well as certain financial and operating covenants including maintenance of certain financial ratios. Maintaining compliance with these provisions could limit our financial flexibility. A default in these provisions, if uncured, could require us to repay the indebtedness before the scheduled maturity date, which could adversely affect our liquidity and increase our financing costs.

We may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt.

We are subject to the risk that indebtedness on our properties or our unsecured indebtedness will not be renewed, repaid, or refinanced when due or the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the existing terms of such indebtedness. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, we might be forced to dispose of one or more of the properties on disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses to us. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders and pay amounts due on our debt. Furthermore, if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose on the property, appoint a receiver and exercise rights under an assignment of rents and leases, or pursue other remedies, all with a consequent loss of our revenues and asset value. Foreclosures could also create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, thereby hindering our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements of the Code.

Variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk.

We have mortgage debt with varying interest rates dependent upon various market indexes. In addition, we have a revolving credit facility bearing interest at a variable rate on all amounts drawn on the facility. We may incur additional variable rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates on variable rate debt would increase our interest expense, unless we make arrangements which hedge the risk of rising interest rates, which would adversely affect net income and cash available for payment of our debt obligations and distributions to shareholders.

Table of Contents

We may incur losses on interest rate hedging arrangements.

Historically, we have entered into agreements to reduce the risks associated with changes in interest rates, and we may continue to do so in the future. Although these agreements may partially protect against rising interest rates, they may also reduce the benefits to us if interest rates decline. If a hedging arrangement is not indexed to the same rate as the indebtedness which is hedged, we may be exposed to losses to the extent which the rate governing the indebtedness and the rate governing the hedging arrangement change independently of each other. Additionally, nonperformance by the other party to the hedging arrangement may subject us to increased credit risks.

Issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition.

Our capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including the rental and occupancy rates of our multifamily properties, dividend payment rates to our shareholders, development and capital expenditures, costs of operations, and potential acquisitions. If our capital requirements vary materially from our plans, we may require additional financing earlier than anticipated. If we issue more debt, we could become more leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in our debt service requirements, both of which could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to access debt and equity capital markets in the future.

Failure to maintain our current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets.

Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, the major debt rating agencies, routinely evaluate our debt and have given us ratings of Baa1 and BBB, respectively, with stable outlooks, on our senior unsecured debt. These ratings are based on a number of factors, which include their assessment of our financial strength, liquidity, capital structure, asset quality, and sustainability of cash flow and earnings. Due to changes in market conditions, we may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings, which could adversely affect our cost of funds and related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets.

Risks Associated with Our Shares

Share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent takeovers beneficial to shareholders.

For us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must have 100 or more shareholders during the year and not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals. As defined for federal income tax purposes, the term “individuals” includes a number of specified entities. To minimize the possibility of us failing to qualify as a REIT under this test, our declaration of trust includes restrictions on transfers of our shares and ownership limits. The ownership limits, as well as our ability to issue other classes of equity securities, may delay, defer, or prevent a change in control. These provisions may also deter tender offers for our common shares which may be attractive to you or limit your opportunity to receive a premium for your shares which might otherwise exist if a third party were attempting to effect a change in control transaction.

Our share price will fluctuate.

The market price and trading volume of our common shares are subject to fluctuation due to general market conditions, the risks discussed in this report and other matters, including the following:

•operating results which vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
•investor interest in our property portfolio;
•the reputation and performance of REITs;
•the attractiveness of REITs as compared to other investment vehicles;
•the results of our financial condition and operations;
Table of Contents
•the perception of our growth and earnings potential;
•dividend payment rates;
•increases in market interest rates, which may lead purchasers of our common shares to demand a higher yield; and
•changes in financial markets and national economic and general market conditions.

The form, timing and/or amount of dividend distributions in future periods may vary and be impacted by economic and other considerations.

The form, timing and/or amount of dividend distributions will be declared at the discretion of our Board of Trust Managers and will depend on actual cash from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and other factors as the Board of Trust Managers may consider relevant. The Board of Trust Managers may modify the form, timing and/or amount of dividends from time to time.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The Properties

Our properties typically consist of mid-rise buildings or two and three story buildings in a landscaped setting and provide residents with a variety of amenities. Most of the properties have one or more swimming pools and a clubhouse and many have whirlpool spas, weight room facilities, and controlled-access gates. Many of the apartment homes offer additional amenities common to multifamily rental properties.

Operating Properties (including properties held through unconsolidated joint ventures)

The 196 operating properties in which we owned interests and operated at December 31, 2011 averaged 928 square feet of living area per apartment home. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no single operating property accounted for greater than 1.5% of our total revenues. Our operating properties had a weighted average occupancy rate of approximately 94.5% and 93.3% for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and an average annual rental revenue per apartment home of $970 and $928 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Resident lease terms generally range from six to fifteen months. One hundred and seventy-one of our operating properties have over 200 apartment homes, with the largest having 904 apartment homes. Our operating properties have an average age of 12 years (calculated on the basis of investment dollars). Our operating properties were constructed and placed in service as follows:

September 30,
Year Placed in ServiceNumber of Operating Properties
2006-201136
2001-200532
1996-200057
1991-199519
1986-199034
Prior to 198618
Table of Contents

Property Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to our 196 operating properties at December 31, 2011:

September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and LocationYear Placed In ServiceAverage Apartment Size (Sq. Ft.)Number of Apartments2011 Average Occupancy (1)2011 Average Monthly Rental Rate per Apartment
ARIZONA
Phoenix
Camden Copper Square200078633292.8%$803
Camden Fountain Palms (2)1986/19961,05019290.4672
Camden Legacy19961,06742894.3887
Camden Pecos Ranch (2)200192427294.1796
Camden San Paloma1993/19941,04232494.0927
Camden Sierra (2)199792528890.2663
Camden Towne Center (2)199887124091.2669
Camden Vista Valley (3)198692335791.4626
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles/Orange County
Camden Crown Valley20011,00938094.51,532
Camden Harbor View200497553894.71,904
Camden Main & Jamboree (4)20081,01129095.81,756
Camden Martinique198679471494.71,276
Camden Parkside (2)197283642194.11,186
Camden Sea Palms199089113896.61,452
San Diego/Inland Empire
Camden Old Creek20071,03735093.21,564
Camden Sierra at Otay Ranch200396242293.21,494
Camden Tuscany200389616094.21,900
Camden Vineyards20021,05326492.31,222
COLORADO
Denver
Camden Caley200092521895.0923
Camden Centennial198574427693.2701
Camden Denver West (5)19971,01532094.11,083
Camden Highlands Ridge19961,14934293.71,146
Camden Interlocken19991,02234094.31,145
Camden Lakeway199793245193.7910
Camden Pinnacle198574822493.6725
WASHINGTON DC METRO
Camden Ashburn Farms20001,06216297.11,412
Camden Clearbrook20071,04829796.61,296
Camden College Park (4)200894250894.31,556
Camden Dulles Station200998436696.01,550
Camden Fair Lakes19991,05653096.31,571
Camden Fairfax200693448895.61,603
Camden Fallsgrove200499626896.11,613
Camden Grand Parc200267410595.22,430
Camden Lansdowne20021,00669096.21,349
Camden Largo Town Center2000/20071,02724593.81,586
Camden Monument Place200785636895.71,464
Camden Potomac Yard200883537894.81,912
Camden Roosevelt200385619897.72,331
Camden Russett200099242693.31,386
Camden Silo Creek200497528496.51,362
Camden Summerfield200895729193.71,546
FLORIDA
Southeast Florida
Camden Aventura19951,10837993.51,432
Camden Brickell200393740596.21,500
Camden Doral19991,12026094.71,501
Camden Doral Villas20001,25323294.31,615
Camden Las Olas20041,04342095.11,606
Camden Plantation19971,20150294.61,277
Table of Contents
September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and LocationYear Placed In ServiceAverage Apartment Size (Sq. Ft.)Number of Apartments2011 Average Occupancy (1)2011 Average Monthly Rental Rate per Apartment
Camden Portofino19951,11232294.4%$1,310
Orlando
Camden Club19861,07743695.1837
Camden Hunter’s Creek20001,07527095.6952
Camden Lago Vista200595536694.8863
Camden Landings198374822095.0654
Camden Lee Vista200093749295.5831
Camden Orange Court200881726894.81,056
Camden Renaissance1996/199889957893.9789
Camden Reserve1990/199182452694.2700
Camden World Gateway200097940894.9927
Tampa/St. Petersburg
Camden Bay1997/200194376094.8841
Camden Bay Pointe198477136894.5677
Camden Bayside1987/198974883295.5737
Camden Citrus Park198570424794.8654
Camden Lakes1982/198373268893.5663
Camden Lakeside198672922893.5719
Camden Live Oaks19901,09377094.0768
Camden Preserve199694227694.6999
Camden Providence Lakes19961,02426093.1886
Camden Royal Palms20061,01735293.2830
Camden Visconti (6) (7)20071,12545096.21,080
Camden Westshore198672827895.3807
Camden Woods19861,22344495.4817
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Camden Brookwood200291235995.3950
Camden Deerfield20001,18729293.1917
Camden Dunwoody19971,00732496.7860
Camden Ivy Hall (6) (8)20101,18111094.01,639
Camden Midtown Atlanta200193529693.1953
Camden Peachtree City20011,02739995.0884
Camden Phipps (6) (7)19961,01823494.11,123
Camden River19971,10335294.9862
Camden Shiloh1999/20021,14323294.7837
Camden St. Clair199799933693.5876
Camden Stockbridge20031,00930493.2742
Camden Sweetwater20001,15130893.0710
MISSOURI
Kansas City
Camden Passage (9)1989/199783459692.2663
St. Louis
Camden Cedar Lakes (9)198685242092.3641
Camden Cove West (9)199082827696.2835
Camden Cross Creek (9)1973/198094759194.9764
Camden Westchase (9)198694516097.3869
NEVADA
Las Vegas
Camden Bel Air1988/199594352891.6716
Camden Breeze198984632093.0721
Camden Canyon199598720094.8846
Camden Commons198893637691.3741
Camden Cove199089812493.1713
Camden Del Mar199598656095.4890
Camden Fairways198989632095.8868
Camden Hills199143918488.7499
Camden Legends199479211393.6818
Camden Palisades199190562491.9725
Camden Pines (2)199798231592.0795
Camden Pointe199698325293.5732
Table of Contents
September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and LocationYear Placed In ServiceAverage Apartment Size (Sq. Ft.)Number of Apartments2011 Average Occupancy (1)2011 Average Monthly Rental Rate per Apartment
Camden Summit (2)19951,18723494.0%$1,088
Camden Tiara (2)19961,04340093.3847
Camden Vintage199497836891.9715
Oasis Bay (10)199087612896.4752
Oasis Crossings (10)19969837293.5749
Oasis Emerald (10)198887313292.7627
Oasis Gateway (10)19971,14636091.6782
Oasis Island (10)199090111891.3636
Oasis Landing (10)199093814492.5693
Oasis Meadows (10)19961,03138391.1734
Oasis Palms (10)198988020891.7674
Oasis Pearl (10)19899309091.6711
Oasis Place (10)199244024087.6499
Oasis Ridge (10)198439147784.0421
Oasis Sierra (10)199892320893.8786
Oasis Springs (10)198883830490.8590
Oasis Vinings (10)19941,15223490.1733
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte
Camden Ballantyne19981,04540095.8866
Camden Cotton Mills200290518097.91,079
Camden Dilworth200685714597.01,099
Camden Fairview19831,03613596.2805
Camden Forest198970320891.6571
Camden Foxcroft (13)197994015696.0743
Camden Grandview20001,05726697.21,205
Camden Habersham198677324095.8630
Camden Park Commons199786123292.7645
Camden Pinehurst19671,14740795.5747
Camden Sedgebrook199997236896.0796
Camden Simsbury198587410096.3745
Camden South End Square200388229997.11,003
Camden Stonecrest20011,09830695.0906
Camden Touchstone198689913296.8729
Raleigh
Camden Crest20011,01343894.5773
Camden Governor’s Village19991,04624293.4879
Camden Lake Pine19991,06644694.9806
Camden Manor Park200696648495.7835
Camden Overlook20011,06032095.2887
Camden Reunion Park2000/200497242093.0701
Camden Westwood19991,02735495.9800
PENNSYLVANIA
Camden Valleybrook200299235294.11,323
TEXAS
Austin
Camden Amber Oaks (6)200986234894.4809
Camden Brushy Creek (6) (7)200888227296.9800
Camden Cedar Hills200891120894.5975
Camden Gaines Ranch199795539094.3995
Camden Huntingdon199590339895.0754
Camden Laurel Ridge198670218394.0600
Camden Ridgecrest199585528494.8699
Camden Shadow Brook (6) (7)200990949696.3885
Camden South Congress (6)200197525394.81,424
Camden Stoneleigh200190839095.9898
Corpus Christi
Camden Breakers199686828896.2930
Camden Copper Ridge198677534494.4694
Camden Miramar (11)1994-201048885580.7948
Camden South Bay (6)20071,05527095.11,060
Table of Contents
September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and LocationYear Placed In ServiceAverage Apartment Size (Sq. Ft.)Number of Apartments2011 Average Occupancy (1)2011 Average Monthly Rental Rate per Apartment
Dallas/Fort Worth
Camden Addison (2)199694245696.1%$790
Camden Buckingham199791946495.8804
Camden Centreport199791126895.1794
Camden Cimarron199277228695.8809
Camden Design District (6) (7)200993935592.91,120
Camden Farmers Market2001/200593290494.8910
Camden Gardens198365225696.4548
Camden Glen Lakes197987742495.4755
Camden Legacy Creek199583124096.4855
Camden Legacy Park199687127696.4869
Camden Panther Creek (6) (7)200994629594.9952
Camden Riverwalk (6) (7)200898260095.41,096
Camden Springs198771330495.4564
Camden Valley Park198674351694.3748
Camden Westview198369733593.2603
Houston
Camden Baytown199984427291.0786
Camden City Centre200793237996.71,293
Camden Creek198463945692.4587
Camden Cypress Creek (6) (7)200999331096.41,039
Camden Downs at Cinco Ranch (6) (7)20041,07531896.31,006
Camden Grand Harbor (6) (7)200895930096.9984
Camden Greenway199986175694.21,056
Camden Heights (6) (7)200492735296.81,154
Camden Holly Springs (2)199993454893.9899
Camden Lakemont (6) (7)200790431296.3862
Camden Midtown199984433796.01,252
Camden Northpointe (6) (7)200894038495.4922
Camden Oak Crest200387036492.4835
Camden Park (2)199586628894.3792
Camden Piney Point (6) (7)200491931896.5988
Camden Plaza (4)200791527194.01,281
Camden Royal Oaks200692323689.81,145
Camden Spring Creek (6) (7)20041,08030492.1981
Camden Steeplechase198274829091.6633
Camden Stonebridge199384520494.7806
Camden Sugar Grove (2)199792138093.2855
Camden Travis Street (12)201081925396.11,289
Camden Vanderbilt1996/199786389495.61,139
Camden Whispering Oaks200893427495.0989
Camden Woodson Park (6) (7)200891624897.0944
Camden Yorktown (6)200899530694.0915
San Antonio
Camden Braun Station (6) (7)200682724095.2828
Camden Westover Hills (6) (7)201095928896.31,029
(1)Represents average physical occupancy for the year except as noted.
(2)Properties owned through a joint venture in which we own a 20% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor. In January 2012, we acquired the remaining 80% ownership interest from this unaffiliated private investor.
(3)Property was included in properties held for sale at December 31, 2011. We sold this property in January 2012.
(4)Property owned through a fully-consolidated joint venture in which we own a 99.99% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor.
(5)Property owned through a joint venture in which we own a 50% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor.
(6)Properties owned through a joint venture in which we own a 20% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated pension fund.
Table of Contents
(7)Property acquired during 2011—average occupancy calculated from date at which property was acquired, unless otherwise noted.
(8)Development property stabilized during 2011—average occupancy calculated from date at which occupancy exceeded 90% through year-end.
(9)Properties owned through a joint venture in which we own a 15% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor.
(10)Properties owned through a joint venture in which we own a 20% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated pension fund.
(11)Miramar is a student housing project for Texas A&M at Corpus Christi. Average occupancy includes summer which is normally subject to high vacancies.
(12)Property owned through a fully-consolidated joint venture in which we own a 25% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor.
(13)Property owned through a fully-consolidated joint venture in which we own a 75% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated private investor.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

For discussion regarding legal proceedings, see Note 14, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The high and low closing prices per share of our common shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape under the symbol “CPT,” and distributions per share declared for the quarters indicated are as follows:

September 30,September 30,September 30,
HighLowDistributions
2011 Quarters:
First$59.17$53.47$0.49
Second65.2656.400.49
Third69.3255.260.49
Fourth62.3553.090.49
2010 Quarters:
First$43.94$36.77$0.45
Second51.5040.850.45
Third49.9039.150.45
Fourth54.1348.180.45

LOGO

This graph assumes the investment of $100 on December 31, 2006 and quarterly reinvestment of dividends. (Source: SNL Financial LC)

September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
Years Ended December 31,
Index200620072008200920102011
Camden Property Trust100.0068.2447.7169.1691.62109.26
FTSE NAREIT Equity100.0084.3152.5067.2085.9893.11
S&P 500100.00105.4966.4684.0596.7198.76
Russell 2000100.0098.4365.1882.89105.14100.75
MSCI US REIT (RMS) Index100.0083.1851.6066.3685.2692.67
Table of Contents

As of February 10, 2012, there were 553 shareholders of record and approximately 29,039 beneficial owners of our common shares.

In March 2010, we announced the creation of an at-the-market (“ATM”) share offering program through which we could, but had no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million (“2010 ATM program”), in amounts and at times as we determined, into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we issued approximately 4.9 million common shares at an average price of $48.37 per share for total net consideration of approximately $231.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued approximately 0.3 million common shares at an average price of $55.81 per share for total net consideration of approximately $13.8 million. The 2010 ATM program was terminated and no further common shares are available for sale under the 2010 ATM program.

In May 2011, we created a second ATM share offering program through which we can sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300 million (“2011 ATM program”) from time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. We may, but have no obligation to, sell common shares through the 2011 ATM share offering program in amounts and at times as we determine. Actual sales from time to time may depend on a variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and determination of the appropriate sources of funding for us. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued approximately 1.5 million common shares at an average price of $62.98 per share for total net consideration of approximately $92.7 million. In January 2012, we issued approximately 0.1 million common shares at an average price of $62.41 per share for total net consideration of approximately $3.2 million. As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $202.4 million remaining available for sale under the 2011 ATM program.

In January 2012, we issued approximately 6.6 million common shares in a public equity offering and received approximately $391.6 million in net proceeds. We utilized these proceeds to fund the acquisition of the 80% interest not owned by us in twelve related joint ventures for approximately $99.5 million and the repayment of approximately $272.6 million in mortgage debt associated with these joint ventures.

See Part III, Item 12, for a description of securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

In January 2008, our Board of Trust Managers approved an increase of the April 2007 repurchase plan to allow for the repurchase of up to $500 million of our common equity securities through open market purchases, block purchases, and privately negotiated transactions. Under this program, we have repurchased 4.3 million shares for a total of approximately $230.2 million from April 2007 through December 31, 2011. The remaining dollar value of our common equity securities authorized to be repurchased under the program was approximately $269.8 million as of December 31, 2011. There were no repurchases of our equity securities during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table provides selected financial data relating to our historical financial condition and results of operations as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2011. This data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Prior year amounts have been reclassified for discontinued operations.

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL AND PROPERTY DATA

September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts and property data)20112010200920082007
Operating Data (a)
Total property revenues$655,868$601,450$602,648$602,932$568,060
Total property expenses256,679242,912237,599230,275209,042
Total non-property income (loss)21,39528,33725,443(19,540)25,002
Total other expenses367,008367,523370,660325,469333,838
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders22,5468,242(75,201)(20,340)35,480
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders49,37923,216(50,800)70,973148,457
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders per share:
Basic$0.30$0.11$(1.19)$(0.37)$0.60
Diluted0.300.11(1.19)(0.37)0.59
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per share:
Basic$0.67$0.33$(0.80)$1.28$2.54
Diluted0.660.33(0.80)1.282.50
Distributions declared per common share$1.96$1.80$2.05$2.80$2.76
Balance Sheet Data (at end of year)
Total real estate assets, at cost (e)$5,875,515$5,675,309$5,505,168$5,491,593$5,527,403
Total assets4,622,0754,699,7374,607,9994,730,3424,890,760
Notes payable2,432,1122,563,7542,625,1992,832,3962,828,095
Perpetual preferred units97,92597,92597,92597,92597,925
Equity1,827,7681,757,3731,609,0131,501,3561,653,340
Other Data
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities$244,834$224,036$217,688$216,958$223,106
Investing activities(187,364)35,150(69,516)(37,374)(346,798)
Financing activities(172,886)(152,767)(91,423)(173,074)123,555
Funds from operations – diluted (b)207,535194,309109,947169,585227,153
Property Data
Number of operating properties (at the end of year)(c)196186183181182
Number of operating apartment homes (at end of year) (c)66,99763,31663,28662,90363,085
Number of operating apartment homes (weighted average) (c)(d)50,90550,79450,60851,27753,132
Weighted average monthly total property revenue per apartment home$1,098$1,030$1,045$1,067$1,032
Properties under development (at end of period)1022511
(a)Excludes discontinued operations.
(b)Management considers Funds from Operations (“FFO”) to be an appropriate measure of the financial performance of an equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses) associated with the sale of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation and amortization, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain noncontrolling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on dispositions of operating properties and excluding depreciation, FFO can assist in the comparison of the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
(c)Includes discontinued operations.
(d)Excludes apartment homes owned in joint ventures.
(e)Includes properties held for sale.
Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and trends which might appear in the consolidated financial statements should not be interpreted as being indicative of future operations.

We consider portions of this report to be “forward-looking” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections, intentions, or other items relating to the future; forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performances, results, or events. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance our expectations will be achieved. Any statements contained herein which are not statements of historical fact should be deemed forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements as they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors beyond our control and could differ materially from our actual results and performance.

Factors that may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

•volatility in capital and credit markets, or other unfavorable changes in economic conditions, could adversely impact us;
•short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents;
•we face risks associated with land holdings and related activities;
•difficulties of selling real estate could limit our flexibility;
•we could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac;
•compliance or failure to comply with laws, including those requiring access to our properties by disabled persons, could result in substantial cost;
•competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental income;
•development and construction risks could impact our profitability;
•our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected;
•competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties;
•losses from catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage;
•investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor;
•we face risks associated with investments in and management of discretionary funds;
•tax matters, including failure to qualify as a REIT, could have adverse consequences;
•we depend on our key personnel;
•changes in litigation risks could affect our business;
•insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt obligations or pay distributions to shareholders;
•we have significant debt, which could have important adverse consequences;
•we may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt;
•variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk;
•we may incur losses on interest rate hedging arrangements;
•issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition;
•failure to maintain our current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets;
•share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent takeovers beneficial to shareholders;
•our share price will fluctuate; and
•the form, timing and/or amount of dividend distributions in future periods may vary and be impacted by economic or other considerations.
Table of Contents

These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because of subsequent events.

Executive Summary

We are primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, acquisition and construction of multifamily apartment communities. As of December 31, 2011, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing 206 multifamily properties comprising 69,794 apartment homes across the United States as detailed in the following Property Portfolio table. In addition, we own other land parcels we may develop into multifamily apartment communities.

Property Operations

Our results for the year ended December 31, 2011 reflect an increase in rental revenue as compared to 2010, which we believe was primarily due to a gradually improving economy, favorable demographics, a modest supply of new multifamily housing, and a decrease in home ownership rates, which have resulted in increases in realized rental rates and average occupancy levels. Same store revenues increased 5.5% as compared to 2010. We believe economic and employment conditions will improve slightly during 2012 and the supply of new multifamily homes will continue to be modest. However, we believe significant risks to the economy remain prevalent, and while there has been a slight increase in employment levels in the majority of our markets, the unemployment rate remains at higher than historical levels. If economic conditions in the United States were to worsen, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Development Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we began construction on eight development projects including two development projects in our discretionary funds, in which we own a 20% ownership interest (the “Funds”). These eight projects contain 2,190 units, with initial occupancy expected throughout 2012 and 2013. At December 31, 2011, we had a total of ten development projects under construction containing 2,797 units with initial occupancy expected between 2011 and 2013. Excluding the two Fund development projects containing 520 units, we have remaining anticipated construction expenditures of approximately $180.0 million on the eight consolidated projects under construction as of December 31, 2011.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

In August 2011, we acquired 30.1 acres of land located in Atlanta, Georgia for approximately $40.1 million. In December 2011, we acquired 2.2 acres of land in Glendale, California for approximately $21.4 million. We intend to utilize these land holdings for development of multiple multifamily apartment communities, subject to, among other matters, market conditions.

During the fourth quarter of 2011, we sold two properties consisting of 788 units located in Dallas, Texas for approximately $39.7 million and recognized a gain of approximately $24.6 million on the sale. During January 2012, we sold one property consisting of 357 units located in Phoenix, Arizona for approximately $24.5 million.

In April 2011, we sold one of our land parcels to one of the Funds for app

Showing the first 8K of 100K characters. Open the full section

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks inherent in our operations. These risks generally arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business. We believe our primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The table below provides information about our assets and our liabilities sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,
December 31, 2011December 31, 2010
Amount (in millions)Weighted Average Maturity (in years)Weighted Average Interest Rate% Of TotalAmount (in millions)Weighted Average Maturity (in years)Weighted Average Interest Rate% Of Total
Fixed rate debt (1)$2,186.66.75.3%89.9%$2,333.55.25.4%91.0%
Variable rate debt245.57.61.110.1230.39.01.39.0
(1)December 31, 2010 included a $500 million term loan entered into in 2007 and $16.6 million of a construction loan entered into in 2008 which are effectively fixed by the use of interest rate swaps. The $500 million term loan was repaid in June. The $16.6 million construction loan interest rate swap matured and was not extended in conjunction with the one-year extension of the loan in July 2011.
Table of Contents

We have historically used variable rate indebtedness available under our revolving credit facility to initially fund acquisitions and our development pipeline. To the extent we utilize our revolving credit facility and increase our variable rate indebtedness, our exposure to increases in interest rates will also increase.

For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact net income attributable to common shareholders or cash flows. Conversely, for floating rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact net income attributable to common shareholders and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Holding other variables constant, a one percentage point variance in interest rates would change the unrealized fair market value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $119.6 million. The net income attributable to common shareholders and cash flows impact on the next year resulting from a one percentage point variance in interest rates on floating rate debt would be approximately $2.5 million, holding all other variables constant.

We have entered into, and may enter into in the future, interest rate swaps and caps to protect ourselves against fluctuations in the rates of our floating rate debt. In connection with the repayment of the $500 million loan in June 2011, we discontinued the hedging relationship on the $500 million interest rate swap on May 31, 2011. Upon repayment of the loan, which eliminated the probable future variable monthly interest payments being hedged, we recognized a non-cash charge of approximately $29.8 million which included the accelerated reclassification of amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to this swap. Due to the relatively short remaining life of the swap (which matures in October 2012) and the low expectation of the swap becoming a significantly larger liability, management elected to leave this interest rate swap in place through its original maturity rather than cash settle the swap. As a result, the changes in fair value of this swap have been marked to market through earnings in other income and other expense. The fair value of our interest rate swap totaled approximately $16.6 million as of December 31, 2011. During 2011, we recorded a loss of approximately $0.2 million related to this derivative instrument subsequent to the discontinuation of the hedging relationship.

Non-designated derivative financial instruments could expose us to credit risk and market risk. Our credit risk in this context is the failure of a counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty would owe us, which could create credit risk for us. If the fair value of a derivative is negative we would owe the counterparty and, therefore, we would not be exposed to credit risk. We believe we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our on-going control procedures, we monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, thus minimizing credit risk concentration. We believe the likelihood of realized losses from counterparty non-performance is remote. Our market risk related to derivative financial instruments is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument which results from changes in interest rates. We believe we minimize our market risk by monitoring the fair value of each financial instrument position.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our response to this item is included in a separate section at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act ("Exchange Act") Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are effective to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Management’ s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as follows:

A process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of trust managers, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
•Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and board of trust managers of the company; and
•Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment, management concluded our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2011.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders of

Camden Property Trust

Houston, Texas

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Camden Property Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of trust managers, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of trust managers of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the Company and our report dated February 17, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas

February 17, 2012

Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

Information with respect to this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about March 22, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information with respect to this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about March 22, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information with respect to this Item 12 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about March 22, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012 to the extent not set forth below.

The following table gives information about the equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

September 30,September 30,September 30,
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1,339,536$42.272,628,092
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders———
Total1,339,536$42.272,628,092

Incentive Compensation. During the second quarter of 2011, our Board of Trust Managers adopted, and on May 11, 2011 our shareholders approved, the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust (the “2011 Share Plan”). Under the 2011 Share Plan, we may issue up to a total of approximately 9.1 million fungible units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”), which is comprised of approximately 5.8 million new fungible units plus approximately 3.3 million fungible units previously available for issuance under our 2002 share incentive plan based on a 3.45 to 1.0 fungible unit-to full value award conversion ratio. Fungible units represent the baseline for the number of shares available for issuance under the 2011 Share Plan. Different types of awards are counted differently against the Fungible Pool Limit, as follows:

•Each share issued or to be issued in connection with an award, other than an option, right or other award which does not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares, will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 3.45 fungible pool units;
•Options and other awards which do not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares and which expire more than five years from date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as one fungible pool unit; and
•Options, rights and other awards which do not deliver the full value at date of grant and expire five years or less from the date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.83 of a fungible pool unit.
Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2011, approximately 9.1 million fungible units were available under the 2011 Share Plan, which results in approximately 2.6 million common shares which could be granted pursuant to full value awards based on the 3.45 to 1.0 fungible unit-to-full value award conversion ratio.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information with respect to this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about March 22, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information with respect to this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about March 22, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2012.

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009F-3
Consolidated Statements of Equity and Perpetual Preferred Units for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010,and 2009F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-9
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated DepreciationS-1

All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the financial statements and the related notes or is not applicable.

(3) Index to Exhibits:

The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference into this report:

Exhibit No.DescriptionFiled Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
3.1Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Camden Property TrustExhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993
3.2Amendment to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Camden Property TrustExhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997
3.3Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Camden Property TrustExhibit 3.3 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997
3.4Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Camden Property TrustExhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2006
4.1Specimen certificate for Common Shares of Beneficial InterestForm S-11 filed on September 15, 1993 (Registration No. 33-68736)
4.2Indenture dated as of February 15, 1996 between Camden Property Trust and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. (formerly known as U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.), as TrusteeExhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 15, 1996
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.DescriptionFiled Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
4.3First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 15, 1996 between Camden Property Trust and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. (formerly known as U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.), as TrusteeExhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on February 15, 1996
4.4Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of February 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and U. S. Bank National Association, as successor to SunTrust Bank, as TrusteeExhibit 4.1 to Form S-3 filed on February 12, 2003 (Registration No. 333-103119)
4.5First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 4, 2007 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to SunTrust Bank, as trusteeExhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007
4.6Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 3, 2011 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to Sun Trust Bank, as Trustee.Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2011
4.7Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1999, between Camden Property Trust and the unitholders named thereinExhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 10, 1999
4.8Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2003, between Camden Property Trust and the unitholders named thereinExhibit 4.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
4.9Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 28, 2005 between Camden Property Trust and the holders named thereinForm S-4 filed on November 24, 2004 (Registration No. 333-120733)
4.10Statement of Designation of Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial InterestExhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 10, 1999
4.11Amendment to Statement of Designation of Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, effective as of December 31, 2003Exhibit 4.10 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
4.12Form of Camden Property Trust 5.875% Note due 2012Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2002
4.13Form of Camden Property Trust 5.375% Note due 2013Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2003
4.14Form of Camden Property Trust 5.00% Note due 2015Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2005
4.15Form of Camden Property Trust 5.700% Note due 2017Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007
4.16Form of Camden Property Trust 4.625% Note due 2021Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2011
4.17Form of Camden Property Trust 4.875% Note due 2023Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2011
10.1Form of Indemnification Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain of its trust managers and executive officersForm S-11 filed on July 9, 1993 (Registration No. 33-63588)
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.DescriptionFiled Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
10.2Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and Richard J. CampoExhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
10.3Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and D. Keith OdenExhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
10.4Form of First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, effective as of January 1, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and each of Richard J. Campo and D. Keith Oden.Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007
10.5Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and D. Keith Oden.Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2008
10.6Form of Employment Agreement by and between Camden Property Trust and certain senior executive officersExhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
10.7Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2008, between the Company and Dennis M. Steen.Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007
10.8Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and H. Malcolm StewartExhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2008
10.9Second Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust Key Employee Share Option Plan (KEYSOPTM), effective as of January 1, 2008Exhibit 99.5 to Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007
10.10Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust Key Employee Share Option Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2008

Showing the first 8K of 217K characters. Open the full section