Item 3. Legal Proceedings
4K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
As part of our global policing program to protect our intellectual property rights, from time to time, we file lawsuits in various jurisdictions asserting claims for alleged acts of trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, and trademark dilution. We generally have multiple actions such as these pending at any given point in time. These actions may result in seizure of counterfeit merchandise, out of court settlements with defendants, or other outcomes. In addition, from time to time, we are subject to claims in which opposing parties will raise, either as affirmative defenses or as counterclaims, the invalidity or unenforceability of certain of our intellectual property rights, including allegations that the UGG brand trademark registrations and design patents are invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, we are aware of many instances throughout the world in which a third-party is using our UGG brand trademarks within its internet domain name, and we have discovered and are investigating several manufacturers and distributors of counterfeit UGG brand products.
On March 28, 2016, we filed a lawsuit alleging trademark infringement, patent infringement, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division (District Court) against Australian Leather. In response, Australian Leather raised a number of affirmative defenses and counterclaims, including seeking declaratory judgment that the UGG brand trademark is invalid and unenforceable in the US, cancellation of certain of our US UGG brand trademark registrations, false designation of origin and declaratory judgment that certain of our US design patents are invalid and unenforceable. On September 13, 2018, the District Court granted summary judgment that dismissed most of Australian Leather’s defenses and counterclaims. The remaining claims and defenses went to trial in May 2019. On May 10, 2019, a jury returned a ruling in our favor in our lawsuit against Australian Leather. The District Court entered judgments upholding the UGG trademark on February 6 and June 8, 2020. On August 12, 2020, Australian Leather filed an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the District Court’s dismissal of its affirmative defenses and counterclaims that the UGG brand trademark is invalid and unenforceable. The Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from the parties on May 5, 2021 and, on May 7, 2021, affirmed the District Court’s ruling dismissing Australian Leather’s affirmative defenses and counterclaims and upholding the UGG brand trademark. It is unknown whether Australian Leather will challenge the decision of the Court of Appeals. While we believe that any potential challenge would have no merit, a judgment invalidating the UGG brand trademark would have a material adverse effect on our business.
Although we are subject to legal proceedings and other disputes from time to time in the ordinary course of business, including employment, intellectual property, and product liability claims, we believe the outcome of all pending legal proceedings and other disputes in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. However, regardless of the outcome, resolving legal proceedings and other disputes can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management's time and resources, and other factors.
PART II
Previous: Item 2. Properties · Next: Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities