Essex Property Trust 10-K 2014-12-31

Filed 2015-03-02. 21 sections, 511K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON

What changed since the 2013-12-31 10-KNew, removed and reworded risk factor headings, then every item sentence by sentence.

Cover and table of contents

10-K 1 ess-123114x10k.htm 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO _____________

Commission file number: 1-13106 (Essex Property Trust, Inc.)

Commission file number: 333-44467-01 (Essex Portfolio, L.P.)

ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) California (Essex Portfolio, L.P.)77-0369576 (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) 77-0369575 (Essex Portfolio, L.P.)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

925 East Meadow Drive

Palo Alto, California 94303

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(650) 494-3700

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.0001 par value (Essex Property Trust, Inc.)New York Stock Exchange
7.125% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Essex Property Trust, Inc.)New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes x No oEssex Portfolio, L.P. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes o No xEssex Portfolio, L.P. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes x No oEssex Portfolio, L.P. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes x No oEssex Portfolio, L.P. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Essex Property Trust, Inc. oEssex Portfolio, L.P. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Essex Property Trust, Inc.:

Large accelerated filer xAccelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company o

Essex Portfolio, L.P.:

Large accelerated filer oAccelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes o No xEssex Portfolio, L.P. Yes o No x

As of June 30, 2014, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of Essex Property Trust, Inc. was $11,430,740,862. The aggregate market value was computed with reference to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. Shares of common stock held by executive officers, directors and holders of more than ten percent of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This exclusion does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes. There is no public trading market for the common units of Essex Portfolio, L.P. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of Essex Portfolio, L.P., cannot be determined.

As of February 24, 2015, 65,125,801 shares of common stock ($.0001 par value) of Essex Property Trust, Inc. were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

The following document is incorporated by reference in Part III of the Annual Report on Form 10-K: Proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of Essex Property Trust, Inc. to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Essex Portfolio, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “ESS” mean Essex Property Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “EPLP” mean Essex Portfolio, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company,” “Essex,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively ESS, EPLP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ESS and/or EPLP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively EPLP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EPLP.

ESS is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2014 owned an approximate 96.7% ownership interest in EPLP. The remaining 3.3% interest is owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of EPLP, ESS has exclusive control of EPLP's day-to-day management.

The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and ESS contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings to the Operating Partnership. In return for those contributions, ESS receives a number of OP Units (see definition below) in the Operating Partnership equal to the number of shares of common stock it has issued in the equity offering. Contributions of properties to the Company can be structured as tax-deferred transactions through the issuance of OP Units in the Operating Partnership, which is one of the reasons why the Company is structured in the manner shown above. Based on the terms of EPLP's partnership agreement, OP Units can be exchanged for ESS common stock on a one-for-one basis. The Company maintains a one-for-one relationship between the OP Units of the Operating Partnership issued to ESS and shares of common stock.

The Company believes that combining the reports on Form 10-K of ESS and EPLP into this single report provides the following benefits:

•enhances investors' understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
•eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
•creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of ESS consists of the same members as the management of EPLP.

All of the Company's property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and ESS has no material assets, other than its investment in EPLP. ESS's primary function is acting as the general partner of EPLP. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. ESS also issues equity from time to time and guarantees certain debt of EPLP, as disclosed in this report. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company's ownership interests in its joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by the Company, which are contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) (on a one-for-one share of common stock per OP Unit basis), the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company's business. These sources include the Operating Partnership's working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from disposition of certain properties and joint ventures.

The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between ESS and EPLP in the context of how ESS and EPLP operate as a consolidated company. Shareholders' equity, partners' capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners' capital in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements include the interests of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships and development joint venture partners. The noncontrolling interests in the Company's consolidated financial statements include (i) the same noncontrolling interests as presented in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and (ii) limited partner OP Unit holders of the Operating Partnership. The differences between

iii

stockholders' equity and partners' capital result from differences in the equity issued at the Company and Operating Partnership levels.

To help investors understand the significant differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report provides separate consolidated financial statements for the Company and the Operating Partnership; a single set of consolidated notes to such financial statements that includes separate discussions of shareholders' equity or partners' capital, earnings per share/unit; as applicable; and a combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that the Company and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

In order to highlight the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the Company is one business and the Company operates that business through the Operating Partnership. The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

iv

ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.

2014 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I.Page
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors7
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments20
Item 2.Properties20
Item 3.Legal Proceedings28
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures28
Part II.
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities28
Item 6.Selected Financial Data32
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations36
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks47
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data49
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure49
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures49
Item 9B.Other Information50
Part III.
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance50
Item 11.Executive Compensation50
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters50
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence50
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services50
Part IV.
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules51
SignaturesS-1

v

PART I

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements are described in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in the section, “Forward Looking Statements.” Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in each forward-looking statement. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in this report, including Item in 1A, Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.

Item 1. Business

OVERVIEW

Essex Property Trust, Inc. (“Essex” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The Company owns all of its interest in its real estate investments directly or indirectly through Essex Portfolio, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or “EPLP”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and as of December 31, 2014 owns a 96.7% general partnership interest. In this report, the terms “Essex” or the “Company” also refer to Essex Property Trust, Inc., its Operating Partnership and those entities owned or controlled by the Operating Partnership.

The Company has elected to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the year ended December 31, 1994 as the Company completed an initial public offering on June 13, 1994. In order to maintain compliance with REIT tax rules, the Company utilizes taxable REIT subsidiaries for various revenue generating or investment activities. All taxable REIT subsidiaries are consolidated by the Company.

The Company is engaged primarily in the ownership, operation, management, acquisition, development and redevelopment of predominantly apartment communities. As of December 31, 2014, the Company owned or held an interest in 239 communities, aggregating 57,455 units, located along the West Coast, as well as four commercial buildings (totaling approximately 325,200 square feet), and twelve active development projects with 2,920 units in various stages of development (collectively, the “Portfolio”).

The Company’s website address is http://www.essex.com. The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and the Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders are available, free of charge, on its website as soon as practicable after the Company files the reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

BUSINESS STRATEGIES

The following is a discussion of the Company’s business strategies in regards to real estate investment and management.

Business Strategies

Research Driven Approach to Investments – The Company believes that successful real estate investment decisions and portfolio growth begin with extensive regional economic research and local market knowledge. The Company continually assesses markets where the Company operates, as well as markets where the Company considers future investment opportunities by evaluating the following:

•Focus on markets in major metropolitan areas that have regional population in excess of one million;
•Constraints on new supply driven by: (i) low availability of developable land sites where competing housing could be economically built; (ii) political growth barriers, such as protected land, urban growth boundaries, and potential lengthy and expensive development permit processes; and (iii) natural limitations to development, such as mountains or waterways;
•Rental demand is enhanced by affordability of rents relative to costs of for-sale housing; and
•Housing demand that is based on job growth, proximity to jobs, high median incomes and the quality of life including related commuting factors.

Recognizing that all real estate markets are cyclical, the Company regularly evaluates the results of its regional economic, and local market research, and adjusts the geographic focus of its portfolio accordingly. The Company seeks to increase its Portfolio allocation in markets projected to have the strongest local economies and to decrease such allocations in markets

projected to have declining economic conditions. Likewise, the Company also seeks to increase its Portfolio allocation in markets that have attractive property valuations and to decrease such allocations in markets that have inflated valuations and low relative yields.

Property Operations – The Company manages its communities by focusing on activities that may generate above-average rental growth, tenant retention/satisfaction and long-term asset appreciation. The Company intends to achieve this by utilizing the strategies set forth below:

•Property Management – Oversee delivery of and quality of the housing provided to our residents and manage the properties financial performance.
•Capital Preservation –Asset Management is responsible for the planning, budgeting and completion of major capital improvement projects at the Company’s communities.
•Business Planning and Control – Comprehensive business plans are implemented in conjunction with significant investment decisions. These plans include benchmarks for future financial performance, based on collaborative discussions between on-site managers and senior management.
•Development and Redevelopment – The Company focuses on acquiring and developing apartment communities in supply constrained markets, and redeveloping its existing communities to improve the financial and physical aspects of the Company’s communities.

CURRENT BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

Merger with BRE Properties, Inc.

On April 1, 2014, Essex completed the merger with BRE Properties, Inc. (“BRE”). In connection with the closing of the merger, (1) BRE merged into a wholly owned subsidiary of Essex, and (2) each outstanding share of BRE common stock was converted into (i) 0.2971 shares (the “Stock Consideration”) of Essex common stock, and (ii) $7.18 in cash, (the “Cash Consideration”), plus cash in lieu of fractional shares for total consideration of approximately $4.3 billion. The Cash Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution to the stockholders of BRE of $5.15 per share of BRE common stock payable to BRE stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 31, 2014 (the “Special Dividend”). The Special Dividend was payable as a result of the closing of the sale of certain interests in assets of BRE to certain parties, which closed on March 31, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the amounts payable as a Special Dividend reduced the Cash Consideration of $12.33 payable by Essex in the merger to $7.18 per share of BRE common stock.

Essex issued approximately 23.1 million shares of Essex common stock as Stock Consideration in the merger. For purchase accounting, the value of the common stock issued by Essex upon the consummation of the merger was determined based on the closing price of BRE’s common stock on the closing date of the merger. As a result of Essex being admitted to the S&P 500 on the same date as the closing of the merger, Essex’s common stock price experienced significantly higher than usual trading volume and the closing price of $174 per share was significantly higher than its volume-weighted average trading price for the days before and after April 1, 2014. BRE’s common stock did not experience the same proportionate increase in common stock price leading up to April 1, 2014. As a result, given that a substantial component of the purchase price is an exchange of equity instruments, Essex used the closing price of BRE’s common stock on April 1, 2014 of $61 per share, less the Cash Consideration, as the fair value of the equity consideration. After deducting the Special Dividend and the Cash Consideration per share, this resulted in a value of $48.67 per share of BRE common stock which is the equivalent of approximately $164 per share of Essex common stock issued.

Acquisitions of Real Estate

Acquisitions are an important component of the Company’s business plan, and during 2014, the Company and its co-investments acquired ownership interests in seven communities comprising of 2,578 units for $640.7 million. The following is a summary of 2014 acquisitions ($ in millions):

Essex OwnershipPurchase
Property NameLocationUnitsPercentageOwnershipQuarter in 2014Price
The AveryLos Angeles, CA121100%EPLPQ1 2014$35.0
PiedmontBellevue, WA396100%EPLPQ2 201476.8
Collins on PineSeattle, WA76100%EPLPQ2 201429.2
ParagonFremont, CA301100%EPLPQ3 2014111.0
ApexMilpitas, CA366100%EPLPQ3 2014150.0
Ellington at BellevueBellevue, WA220100%EPLPQ3 201458.7
Palm Valley (1)San Jose, CA1,09850%JVQ4 2014180.0
Total 20142,578$640.7

(1) The Palm Valley purchase price represents the Company's share of the property.

Dispositions of Real Estate

As part of its strategic plan to own quality real estate in supply-constrained markets, the Company continually evaluates all the communities and sells those which no longer meet its strategic criteria. The Company may use the capital generated from the dispositions to invest in higher-return communities or other real estate investments, or repay unsecured and line of credit debts. The Company believes that the sale of these communities will not have a material impact on its future results of operations or cash flows nor will their sale materially affect its ongoing operations. Generally, the Company seeks to have any impact of earnings dilution resulting from these dispositions offset by the positive impact of its acquisitions, development and redevelopment activities.

During 2014, the Company sold four apartment communities, Vista Capri, Coldwater Canyon, Mt. Sutro, and Pinnacle Town Center for a total of $120.4 million, resulting in total gains of $43.6 million.

During 2014, Essex Apartment Value Fund II, L.P. (“Fund II”) sold Davey Glen for $23.8 million and Alderwood Park for $23.5 million. In connection with the sales, Fund II incurred a prepayment penalty on debt of which the Company’s pro rata share was $0.2 million. The total gains on the transactions in 2014 were $23.3 million, of which the Company’s share was $6.6 million.

Development Pipeline

The Company defines development projects as new communities that are in various stages of active development, or are in the process of leasing activities prior to stabilization. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had two consolidated development projects and ten joint venture development projects comprised of 2,920 units for an estimated cost of $1.5 billion, of which $420.0 million remains to be expended.

The Company defines the predevelopment projects as proposed communities in negotiation or in the entitlement process with an expected high likelihood of becoming entitled development projects. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had various consolidated predevelopment projects. The Company may also acquire land for future development purposes or sale.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s development pipeline ($ in millions):

As of
12/31/2014
EssexIncurredEstimated
Development PipelineLocationOwnership%UnitsProject CostProject Cost(1)
Development Projects - Consolidated
MB 360San Francisco, CA100%360$226$275
RadiusRedwood City, CA100%264163172
Total - Consolidated Development Projects624389447
Development Projects - Joint Venture
Epic - Phase IIISan Jose, CA55%2006497
The DylanWest Hollywood, CA50%1847878
Mosso IISan Francisco, CA55%282143150
Park 20San Mateo, CA55%1977477
One South MarketSan Jose, CA55%312120145
The VillageWalnut Creek, CA50%496089
EmmeEmeryville, CA55%1906262
OwensPleasanton, CA55%2552689
HaciendaPleasanton, CA55%2511686
Century TowersSan Jose, CA50%37640172
Total - Joint Venture Development Projects2,2966831,045
Predevelopment Projects - Consolidated
Other Projectsvarious100%—4545
Total - Predevelopment Projects—4545
Grand Total - Development and Predevelopment Pipeline2,920$1,117$1,537
(1)Includes incurred costs and estimated costs to complete these development projects. For predevelopment projects, only incurred costs are included in estimated costs.

Redevelopment Pipeline

The Company defines redevelopment pipeline as existing properties owned or recently acquired, which have been targeted for additional investment by the Company with the expectation of increased financial returns through property improvement. During redevelopment, apartment units may not be available for rent and, as a result, may have less than stabilized operations. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had ownership interests in three redevelopment communities aggregating 963 apartment units with estimated redevelopment costs of $122.0 million, of which approximately $96.4 million remains to be expended.

Long Term Debt

During 2014, the Company repaid $24.1 million of principal outstanding on its secured mortgage debt at an average interest rate of 4.9%.

In April 2014, the Company issued $400 million of 3.875% senior unsecured notes that mature in May 2024. The interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2014 until the maturity date in May 2024. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay indebtedness under the Company’s $1.0 billion unsecured line of credit facility and for other general corporate purposes. The carrying value of the 2024 Notes, net of discount was $397.2 million as of December 31, 2014.

In April 2014, the Company, assumed $900.0 million aggregate principal amount of BRE’s 5.500% senior notes due 2017; 5.200% senior notes due 2021; and 3.375% senior notes due 2023 (together “BRE Notes”). The carrying value of the BRE Notes, net of premium, was $934.7 million as of December 31, 2014. Also, in connection with the Merger, the Company assumed approximately $711.3 million of secured debt with remaining loan terms ranging from one to seven years and a weighted average interest rate of 5.6%.

Bank Debt

As of December 31, 2014, Fitch Ratings ("Fitch"), Moody’s Investor Service, and Standard and Poor's (“S&P”) credit agencies rated Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Essex Portfolio, L.P. BBB+/Stable, Baa2/Stable, and BBB/Stable, respectively.

In January 2014, the Company increased the capacity of the unsecured line of credit facility from $600.0 million to $1.0 billion and included an accordion feature pursuant to which the Company could expand to $1.5 billion. This facility matures in December 2017 with one 18-month extension, exercisable at the Company's option. In January 2015, the facility maturity date was extended to December 31, 2018 with one 18-month extension, exercisable by the Company. The facility carries an interest rate based on its current credit ratings of LIBOR plus 0.95%.

In January 2014, the Company extended the $25.0 million working capital unsecured line of credit for two additional years and reduced the pricing which carries an interest rate based on a tiered rate structure tied to Fitch and S&P ratings on the credit facility of LIBOR plus 0.95%.

In January 2014, the Company reduced the pricing on its $350.0 million unsecured term loan by 15 basis points to LIBOR plus 1.05%. In December 2014, the Company repaid $125.0 million outstanding on this term loan.

Equity Transactions

Essex issued approximately 23,067,446 shares of Essex common stock as Stock Consideration in the BRE merger. Excluding shares issued in connection with the BRE merger, during 2014, ESS issued 2,964,315 shares of common stock at an average share price of $181.56 for proceeds of $534.0 million, net of fees and commissions. During the first quarter of 2015 through February 24, 2015, ESS has issued 636,021 shares of common stock at an average price of $224.76 for proceeds of $142.0 million, net of fees and commissions. ESS contributed the net proceeds to the Operating Partnership and used the proceeds to fund external growth and for general corporate purposes.

Co-investments

The Company has entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which we own an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or land owned directly by the joint venture or partnership. For each joint venture the Company holds a 50% to 55% non-controlling interest in the venture and will earn customary management fees and may earn development, asset property management fees and may also earn a promote interest.

The Company has also made, and may continue in the future to make, preferred equity investments in various multifamily development projects. The Company earns a preferred rate of return on these investments.

OFFICES AND EMPLOYEES

The Company is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, and has regional offices in Woodland Hills, California; Irvine, California; San Diego, California and Bellevue, Washington. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had 1,725 employees.

INSURANCE

The Company purchases general liability and all risk property, including loss of rent, insurance coverage for each of its communities. The Company also purchases limited earthquake, terrorism, environmental and flood insurance. There are certain types of losses which may not be covered or could exceed coverage limits. The insurance programs are subject to deductibles and self-insured retentions in varying amounts. The Company utilizes a wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Pacific Western Insurance LLC ("PWI") to self-insure certain earthquake and all risk losses. As of December 31, 2014, PWI has cash and marketable securities of approximately $57.6 million, and is consolidated in the Company's financial statements.

All the communities are located in areas that are subject to earthquake activity. The Company evaluates its financial loss exposure to seismic events by using actuarial loss models developed by the insurance industry and property vulnerability based on structural evaluations of seismic consultants. The Company manages this exposure, where considered appropriate, desirable, and cost-effective, by upgrading properties to increase their resistance to forces caused by seismic events, by considering available funds and coverages provided by PWI and/or by purchasing seismic insurance. Since 2013, the Company accessed the commercial marketplace to purchase Earthquake insurance for certain properties.

In addition, the Company carries other types of insurance coverage related to a variety of risks and exposures, including cyber-attack.

Based on market conditions, the Company may change or potentially eliminate insurance coverages, or increase levels of self-insurance. Further, we cannot assure you that the company will not incur losses, which could be material, due to uninsured risks, deductibles and self-insured retentions, and/or losses in excess of coverage limits.

COMPETITION

There are numerous housing alternatives that compete with the Company’s communities in attracting residents. These include other apartment communities, condominiums and single-family homes. If the demand for the Company’s communities is reduced or if competitors develop and/or acquire competing housing, rental rates and occupancy may drop which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces competition from other real estate investment trusts, businesses and other entities in the acquisition, development and operation of apartment communities. Some competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than the Company. This competition may result in increased costs of apartment communities the Company acquires and or develops.

WORKING CAPITAL

The Company believes that cash flows generated by its operations, existing cash and marketable securities balances, availability under existing lines of credit, access to capital markets and the ability to generate cash from the disposition of real estate are sufficient to meet all of its reasonably anticipated cash needs during 2015.

The timing, source and amounts of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to changes in interest rates and other fluctuations in the capital markets environment, which can affect the Company’s plans for acquisitions, dispositions, development and redevelopment activities.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

See the discussion under the caption, “Risks Related to Real Estate Investments and Our Operations - The Company’s Portfolio may have environmental liabilities” in Item 1A, Risk Factors, for information concerning the potential effect of environmental regulations on its operations, which discussion under the caption “The Company’s Portfolio may have environmental liabilities” is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.

OTHER MATTERS

Certain Policies of the Company

The Company intends to continue to operate in a manner that will not subject it to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company has in the past five years and may in the future (i) issue securities senior to its common stock, (ii) fund acquisition activities with borrowings under its line of credit and (iii) offer shares of common stock and/or units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership or affiliated partnerships as partial consideration for property acquisitions. The Company from time to time acquires partnership interests in partnerships and joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries of the Company, when such entities’ underlying assets are real estate.

The Company invests primarily in apartment communities that are located in predominantly coastal markets within Southern California, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the Seattle metropolitan area. The Company currently intends to continue to invest in apartment communities in such regions. However, these practices may be reviewed and modified periodically by management.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

For purposes of this section, the term “stockholders” means the holders of shares of Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s common stock and preferred stock. Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s stockholders and Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s unit holders. You should carefully consider the following factors in evaluating our company, our properties and our business.

Our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual operating results to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results.

Risks Related to Real Investments and Our Operations

General real estate investment risks may adversely affect property income and values. Real estate investments are subject to a variety of risks. If the communities do not generate sufficient income to meet operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, cash flow and the ability to make distributions to stockholders will be adversely affected. Income from the communities may be further adversely affected by, among other things, the following factors:

•the general economic climate;
•local economic conditions in which the communities are located, such as oversupply of housing or a reduction in demand for rental housing;
•the attractiveness of the communities to tenants;
•competition from other available housing;
•rent control or stabilization laws or other laws regulating housing; and
•the Company’s ability to provide for adequate maintenance and insurance.

As leases at the communities expire, tenants may enter into new leases on terms that are less favorable to the Company. Income and real estate values also may be adversely affected by such factors as applicable laws (e.g., the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and tax laws). Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, the Company’s ability to vary its portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions may be quite limited.

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents. Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.

The Company may not realize the expected benefits of its merger with BRE because of transition difficulties and other challenges. As a result of its merger with BRE Properties, Inc., the Company will face various additional risks, including, among others, the following:

•the Company has incurred substantial expenses related to the merger;
•the Company may be unable to integrate BRE successfully and realize the anticipated synergies and other benefits of the merger or do so within the anticipated timeframe;
•properties acquired pursuant to the merger are subject to property value reassessments by taxing authorities, which may in turn lead to property tax increases that are higher than anticipated;
•the Company's future results will suffer if the Company does not effectively manage its expanded operations resulting from the merger; and
•joint ventures entered into in connection with the merger could be adversely affected by the Company’s lack of sole decision-making authority, its reliance on its joint venture partner’s financial condition and disputes between the Company and its joint venture partner.

Any of these risks could adversely affect the Company's business and financial results.

We may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, investments and joint ventures, which could adversely affect our results of operations. We may make acquisitions of and investments in businesses that offer complementary properties and communities to augment our market coverage, or enhance our property offerings, such as our recent acquisition of BRE. We may also enter into strategic alliances or joint ventures to achieve these goals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition, investment, alliance, or joint venture opportunities, that we will be able to consummate any such transactions or relationships on terms and conditions acceptable to us, or that such transactions or relationships will be successful. In addition,

our original estimates and assumptions used in assessing any acquisition may be inaccurate, and we may not realize the expected financial or strategic benefits of any such acquisition. From time to time, we may also divest portions of our business that are no longer strategically important or exit minority investments, which could materially affect our FFO, cash flows and results of operations.

These transactions or any other acquisitions or dispositions involve risks and uncertainties. For example, the integration of acquired businesses may not be successful and could result in disruption to other parts of our business. To integrate acquired businesses, we must implement our management information systems, operating systems and internal controls, and assimilate and manage the personnel of the acquired operations. There can be no assurance that all pre-acquisition property due diligence will have identified all material issues that might arise with respect to such acquired business and its properties.

Any acquisition may also cause us to assume liabilities and ongoing lawsuits, acquire goodwill and other non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential impairment charges, incur amortization expense related to certain intangible assets, increase our expenses and working capital requirements, and subject us to litigation, which would reduce our return on invested capital. In addition, if the businesses or properties that we acquire have a different pricing or cost structure than we do, such acquisitions may adversely affect our profitability and reduce our overall margin. Failure to manage and successfully integrate the acquisitions we make or to improve margins of the acquired businesses and products could materially harm our business, operating results and margins. Any dispositions we may make may also result in ongoing obligations to us following any such divestiture, for example as a result of any transition services or indemnities we agree to provide to the purchaser in any such transaction, which may result in additional expenses and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

Any future acquisitions we make may also require significant additional debt or equity financing, which, in the case of debt financing, would increase our leverage and potentially affect our credit ratings and, in the case of equity or equity-linked financing, would be dilutive to our existing stockholders. We also assumed a significant amount of debt in connection with our acquisition of BRE, which is secured by the substantial majority of the properties acquired. Any downgrades in our credit ratings associated with an acquisition could adversely affect our ability to borrow by resulting in more restrictive borrowing terms. As a result of the foregoing, we also may not be able to complete acquisitions or other strategic transactions in the future to the same extent as in the past, or at all. These and other factors could harm our ability to achieve anticipated levels of profitability at acquired operations or realize other anticipated benefits of an acquisition, and could adversely affect our b

Showing the first 8K of 79K characters. Open the full section

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The Company’s Portfolio as of December 31, 2014 (including communities owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, but excluding communities underlying preferred equity investments) was comprised of 239 apartment communities (comprising 57,455 apartment units), of which 27,125 units are located in Southern California, 17,604 units are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, and 12,174 units are located in the Seattle metropolitan area. The Company’s apartment communities accounted for 99.0% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Occupancy Rates

Financial occupancy is defined as the percentage resulting from dividing actual rental revenue by total possible rental revenue. When calculating actual rents for occupied units and market rents for vacant units, delinquencies and concessions are not taken into account. Total possible rental revenue represents the value of all apartment units, with occupied units valued at contractual

rental rates pursuant to leases and vacant units valued at estimated market rents. The Company believes that financial occupancy is a meaningful measure of occupancy because it considers the value of each vacant unit at its estimated market rate. Financial occupancy may not completely reflect short-term trends in physical occupancy and financial occupancy rates as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Company’s calculation of financial occupancy. Market rates are determined using a variety of factors such as effective rental rates at the property based on recently signed leases and asking rates for comparable properties in the market. The recently signed effective rates at the property are used as the starting point in the determination of the market rates of vacant units. The Company then increases or decreases these rates based on the supply and demand in the apartment community’s market. The Company will check the reasonableness of these rents based on its position within the market and compare the rents against the asking rents by comparable properties in the market.

For communities that are development properties in lease-up without stabilized occupancy figures, the Company believes the physical occupancy rate is the appropriate performance metric. While a community is in the lease-up phase, the Company’s primary motivation is to stabilize the property which may entail the use of rent concessions and other incentives, and thus financial occupancy which is based on contractual revenue is not considered the best metric to quantify occupancy.

Communities

The Company’s communities are primarily suburban garden-style communities and town homes comprising multiple clusters of two and three-story buildings situated on three to fifteen acres of land. As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s communities include 163 garden-style, 72 mid-rise, and 4 high-rise communities. The communities have an average of approximately 240 units, with a mix of studio, one, two and some three-bedroom units. A wide variety of amenities are available at the Company’s communities, including covered parking, fireplaces, swimming pools, clubhouses with fitness facilities, volleyball and playground areas and tennis courts.

The Company hires, trains and supervises on-site service and maintenance personnel. The Company believes that the following primary factors enhance the Company’s ability to retain tenants:

•located near employment centers;
•attractive communities that are well maintained; and
•proactive customer service.

Commercial Buildings

The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in two office buildings with approximately 39,600 square feet located at 925/935 East Meadow Drive, Palo Alto, California. The Company owns an office building with approximately 107,720 square feet located in Irvine, California, of which the Company occupies approximately 5,000 square feet at December 31, 2014. The Company owns Essex-Hollywood, a 34,000 square foot commercial building and a 138,915 square foot retail site in Santa Clara, California as future development sites that are currently 100% leased.

The following tables describe the Company’s operating portfolio as of December 31, 2014. The first table describes the Company’s communities and the second table describes the Company’s other real estate assets. (See Note 7 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for more information about the Company’s secured mortgage debt and Schedule III for a list of secured mortgage loans related to the Company’s Portfolio.)

RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
Southern California
Alpine VillageAlpine, CA301254,4001971200297%
AnaviaAnaheim, CA250312,3432009201096%
Barkley, The (3)(4)Anaheim, CA161139,8001984200097%
Park ViridianAnaheim, CA320254,6002008201496%
Bonita CedarsBonita, CA120120,8001983200297%
Camarillo OaksCamarillo, CA564459,0001985199696%
Camino Ruiz SquareCamarillo, CA160105,4481990200697%
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
Enclave at Town Square (34)Chino Hills, CA12489,9481987201497%
The Heights I & II (34)Chino Hills, CA332324,3702004201496%
The Summit (5)Chino Hills, CA12598,4201989201496%
Pinnacle at Otay RanchChula Vista, CA364384,1922001201495%
Mesa VillageClairemont, CA13343,6001963200297%
Villa SienaCosta Mesa, CA272262,8421974201496%
Emerald PointeDiamond Bar, CA160134,8161989201496%
Regency at EncinoEncino, CA7578,4871989200996%
The Havens (34)Fountain Valley, CA440414,0401969201496%
Valley ParkFountain Valley, CA160169,7001969200198%
Capri at Sunny Hills (4)Fullerton, CA100128,1001961200197%
Haver Hill (5)Fullerton, CA264224,1301973201296%
Pinnacle at FullertonFullerton, CA192174,3362004201496%
Wilshire PromenadeFullerton, CA149128,0001992199796%
Montejo (4)Garden Grove, CA124103,2001974200197%
CBC ApartmentsGoleta, CA14891,5381962200697%
The SweepsGoleta, CA9188,3701967200697%
416 on BroadwayGlendale, CA115126,7822009201097%
Hampton CourtGlendale, CA8371,5001974199995%
Hampton PlaceGlendale, CA132141,5001970199995%
DevonshireHemet, CA276207,2001988200296%
Jefferson at HollywoodHollywood, CA270238,1192010201494%
Huntington BreakersHuntington Beach, CA342241,7001984199794%
The HuntingtonHuntington Beach, CA276202,2561975201297%
Axis 2300Irvine, CA115170,7142010201095%
Hillsborough ParkLa Habra, CA235215,5001999199997%
Village GreenLa Habra, CA272175,7621971201496%
The Palms at Laguna NiguelLaguna Niguel, CA460362,1361988201496%
Trabuco VillasLake Forest, CA132131,0001985199798%
Madrid Apartments (6)Mission Viejo, CA230228,0992000201297%
MarbrisaLong Beach, CA202122,8001987200296%
PathwaysLong Beach, CA296197,7001975 (7)199196%
5600 WilshireLos Angeles, CA284243,9102008201495%
AlessioLos Angeles, CA624552,7162001201495%
The Avery (4)Los Angeles, CA121129,3932014201473%
Belmont StationLos Angeles, CA275225,0002008200897%
BelleriveLos Angeles, CA6379,2962011201197%
Bunker HillLos Angeles, CA456346,6001968199892%
Catalina GardensLos Angeles, CA128117,5851987201497%
Cochran ApartmentsLos Angeles, CA5851,4001989199897%
Kings RoadLos Angeles, CA196132,1001979199795%
Gas Company Lofts (5)Los Angeles, CA251226,6662004201396%
Marbella, TheLos Angeles, CA6050,1081991200597%
Pacific Electric Lofts (6)Los Angeles, CA314277,9802006201294%
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
Park CatalinaLos Angeles, CA9072,8642002201296%
Park PlaceLos Angeles, CA6048,0001988199797%
Regency Palm Court (5)Los Angeles, CA11654,8441987201496%
Santee CourtLos Angeles, CA165132,0402004201097%
Santee VillageLos Angeles, CA7369,8172011201197%
Tiffany CourtLos Angeles, CA10174,5381987201498%
Wilshire La BreaLos Angeles, CA478354,9722014201465%
Windsor Court (5)Los Angeles, CA9551,2661987201496%
Windsor CourtLos Angeles, CA5846,6001988199797%
Aqua at Marina Del ReyMarina Del Rey, CA500479,3122001201495%
Marina City Club (8)Marina Del Rey, CA101127,2001971200497%
MirabellaMarina Del Rey, CA188176,8002000200097%
Mira MonteMira Mesa, CA355262,6001982200296%
Hillcrest ParkNewbury Park, CA608521,9001973199896%
Fairways (9)Newport Beach, CA74107,1001972199995%
MuseNorth Hollywood, CA152135,2922011201197%
Candlewood NorthNorthridge, CA189166,9101964201497%
Canyon Creek (34)Northridge, CA200148,1501986201495%
Country VillasOceanside, CA180179,7001976200296%
Mission HillsOceanside, CA282244,0001984200597%
Renaissance at Uptown OrangeOrange, CA460432,8362007201496%
Mariners PlaceOxnard, CA10577,2001987200098%
Monterey VillasOxnard, CA122122,1001974199796%
Tierra VistaOxnard, CA404387,1002001200196%
Arbors Parc Rose (6)Oxnard, CA373503,1962001201195%
Monterra del MarPasadena, CA12374,4001972199792%
Monterra del ReyPasadena, CA8473,1001972199992%
Monterra del SolPasadena, CA8569,2001972199992%
Stuart at Sierra Madre VillaPasadena, CA188168,6302007201495%
Villa AngelinaPlacentia, CA256217,6001970200196%
Fountain ParkPlaya Vista, CA705608,9002002200497%
Highridge (4)Rancho Palos Verdes, CA255290,2001972 (10)199795%
Cortesia at Rancho Santa MargaritaRancho Santa Margarita, CA308277,5801999201495%
Pinnacle at TalegaSan Clemente, CA362355,7642002201496%
Allure at Scripps RanchSan Diego, CA194207,0522002201497%
Bernardo CrestSan Diego, CA216205,5481988201497%
Cambridge ParkSan Diego, CA320317,9581998201496%
Carmel CreekSan Diego, CA348384,2162000201496%
Carmel LandingSan Diego, CA356283,4261989201496%
Carmel SummitSan Diego, CA246225,8801989201497%
CentrePointeSan Diego, CA224126,7001974 (11)199794%
DomainSan Diego, CA379345,0442013201393%
Esplanade (34)San Diego, CA616479,6001986201496%
MontanosaSan Diego, CA472414,9681990201496%
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
Summit ParkSan Diego, CA300229,4001972200296%
Essex Skyline at MacArthur Place (12)Santa Ana, CA349512,7912008201296%
Fairhaven (4)Santa Ana, CA164135,7001970200197%
Parkside Court (34)Santa Ana, CA210152,4001986201496%
Hope Ranch CollectionSanta Barbara, CA108126,7001965&73200798%
Bridgeport Coast (35)Santa Clarita, CA188168,1982006201495%
Hidden Valley (13)Simi Valley, CA324310,9002004200497%
MeadowoodSimi Valley, CA320264,5001986199696%
Pinnacle at MacArthur PlaceSouth Coast Metro, CA253262,8672002201497%
Shadow PointSpring Valley, CA172131,2001983200296%
The Fairways at Westridge (35)Valencia, CA234223,3302004201496%
Vistas of West Hills (35)Valencia, CA220221,1192009201496%
AllegroValley Village, CA97127,8122010201096%
Lofts at Pinehurst, TheVentura, CA11871,1001971199798%
Pinehurst (14)Ventura, CA2821,2001973200497%
Woodside VillageVentura, CA145136,5001987200497%
Walnut HeightsWalnut, CA163146,7001964200397%
The Huxley (29)West Hollywood, CA187154,7762014201467%
Reveal (6)Woodland Hills, CA438414,8922010201195%
Avondale at Warner CenterWoodland Hills, CA446331,0001970 (15)199797%
27,12524,095,19095%
Northern California
Belmont TerraceBelmont, CA7172,9511974200695%
Fourth & UBerkeley, CA171146,2552010201096%
The CommonsCampbell, CA264153,1681973201096%
The Pointe at Cupertino (17)Cupertino, CA116135,2001963199894%
Connolly Station (36)Dublin, CA309286,3482014201493%
Avenue 64Emeryville, CA224196,8962007201495%
Foster's LandingFoster City, CA490415,1301987201495%
Stevenson PlaceFremont, CA200146,2001971198397%
Mission PeaksFremont, CA453404,0341995201496%
Mission Peaks IIFremont, CA336294,7201989201496%
Paragon ApartmentsFremont, CA301267,0472013201497%
BoulevardFremont, CA172131,2001978 (18)199697%
Briarwood (6)Fremont, CA160111,1601978201196%
The Woods (6)Fremont, CA160105,2801978201196%
City Centre (35)Hayward, CA192175,4202000201497%
City ViewHayward, CA572462,4001975 (19)199897%
Lafayette HighlandsLafayette, CA150151,7901973201496%
Sharon GreenMenlo Park, CA296328,0241970201495%
ApexMilpitas, CA366350,9612014201496%
Regency at Mountain View (5)Mountain View, CA142127,6001970201395%
BridgeportNewark, CA184139,0001987 (20)198797%
The Landing Jack London SqOakland, CA282257,7962001201495%
The GrandOakland, CA243205,0262009200997%
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
San MarcosRichmond, CA432407,6002003200397%
Bennett LoftsSan Francisco, CA165184,7132004201286%
Fox PlazaSan Francisco, CA443230,0171968201395%
Mosso ISan Francisco, CA181223,2222014201432%
Park WestSan Francisco, CA12690,0601958201294%
101 San FernandoSan Jose, CA323296,0782001201097%
Bella VillagioSan Jose, CA231227,5112004201097%
Epic - Phase I & II (21)San Jose, CA569472,2362013201386%
EsplanadeSan Jose, CA278279,0002002200496%
Fountains at River OaksSan Jose, CA226209,9541990201496%
Museum ParkSan Jose, CA117121,3292002201496%
Palm Valley (29)San Jose, CA1,0981,132,2842008201497%
The CarlyleSan Jose, CA132129,2002000200097%
The WaterfordSan Jose, CA238219,6002000200097%
Willow LakeSan Jose, CA508471,7441989201295%
Lakeshore LandingSan Mateo, CA308223,9721988201495%
Hillsdale GardenSan Mateo, CA697611,5051948200697%
Deer ValleySan Rafael, CA171167,2381996201497%
Bel AirSan Ramon, CA462391,0001988199596%
Canyon OaksSan Ramon, CA250237,8942005200797%
Crow CanyonSan Ramon, CA400337,0641992201496%
Foothill/Twins CreeksSan Ramon, CA132155,1001985199795%
Mill Creek at WindermereSan Ramon, CA400381,0602005200797%
Twin Creeks/FoothillSan Ramon, CA4451,7001985199795%
1000 KielySanta Clara, CA121128,4861971201196%
Le ParcSanta Clara, CA140113,2001975199496%
Marina Cove (22)Santa Clara, CA292250,2001974 (23)199496%
Riley Square (6)Santa Clara, CA156126,9001972201295%
Villa GranadaSanta Clara, CA270238,8412010201496%
Chestnut Street ApartmentsSanta Cruz, CA9687,6402002200898%
Harvest ParkSanta Rosa, CA104116,6282004200796%
Bristol CommonsSunnyvale, CA188142,6001989199596%
Brookside Oaks (4)Sunnyvale, CA170119,9001973200095%
Lawrence StationSunnyvale, CA336297,1882012201497%
Magnolia Lane (24)Sunnyvale, CA3231,5412001200795%
Magnolia Square (4)Sunnyvale, CA156110,8241969200795%
MontclaireSunnyvale, CA390294,1001973 (25)198897%
Reed SquareSunnyvale, CA10095,4401970201195%
SolsticeSunnyvale, CA280571,4662014201487%
Summerhill ParkSunnyvale, CA10078,5001988198894%
ViaSunnyvale, CA284309,4212011201196%
Windsor RidgeSunnyvale, CA216161,8001989198997%
Vista BelvedereTiburon, CA7678,3001963200495%
TuscanaTracy, CA3029,0882007200799%
Verandas (35)Union City, CA282199,0921989201497%
17,60415,895,84295%
Seattle, Washington Metropolitan Area
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
BelcarraBellevue, WA296241,5672009201496%
BellCentreBellevue, WA248181,2882001201496%
Cedar TerraceBellevue, WA180174,2001984200597%
Courtyard off MainBellevue, WA109108,3882000201096%
Ellington at BellevueBellevue, WA220165,7941994201495%
Emerald RidgeBellevue, WA180144,0001987199496%
Foothill CommonsBellevue, WA388288,3001978 (26)199095%
Palisades, TheBellevue, WA192159,7001977199097%
Park HighlandBellevue, WA250224,7501993201494%
PiedmontBellevue, WA396348,9691969201494%
Sammamish ViewBellevue, WA153133,5001986199497%
Woodland CommonsBellevue, WA302217,8781978 (27)199095%
Bothell Ridge (34)Bothell, WA214167,3701988201496%
Canyon PointeBothell, WA250210,4001990200395%
Inglenook CourtBothell, WA224183,6001985199496%
Pinnacle SonataBothell, WA268343,0952000201496%
Salmon Run at Perry CreekBothell, WA132117,1002000200098%
Stonehedge VillageBothell, WA196214,8001986199797%
Highlands at WynhavenIssaquah, WA333424,6742000200895%
Park Hill at IssaquahIssaquah, WA245277,7001999199997%
Wandering CreekKent, WA156124,3001986199597%
AscentKirkland, WA9075,8401988201296%
Bridle TrailsKirkland, WA10899,7001986 (28)199797%
Corbella at Juanita BayKirkland, WA169103,3391978201096%
Evergreen HeightsKirkland, WA200188,3001990199795%
Slater 116Kirkland, WA10881,4152013201393%
MontebelloKirkland, WA248272,7341996201295%
Aviara (16)Mercer Island, WA166147,0332013201494%
Laurels at Mill CreekMill Creek, WA164134,3001981199697%
Parkwood at Mill CreekMill Creek, WA240257,1601989201496%
The Elliot at Mukilteo (4)Mukilteo, WA301245,9001981199797%
Castle CreekNewcastle, WA216191,9001995199596%
Delano/Bon TerraRedmond, WA126116,3402005201198%
ElevationRedmond, WA157138,9161986201097%
Redmond Hill West (6)Redmond, WA442350,2751985201195%
ShadowbrookRedmond, WA416338,8801986201496%
The Trails of RedmondRedmond, WA423376,0001985201496%
Vesta (6)Redmond, WA440381,6751998201195%
Brighton RidgeRenton, WA264201,3001986199697%
Fairwood PondRenton, WA194189,2001997200496%
Forest ViewRenton, WA192182,5001998200397%
Pinnacle on Lake WashingtonRenton, WA180190,9082001201496%
AnnalieseSeattle, WA5648,2162009201395%
The Audrey at BelltownSeattle, WA13794,1191992201496%
Ballinger Commons (34)Seattle, WA485407,2531989201496%
The BernardSeattle, WA6343,1512008201196%
Cairns, TheSeattle, WA10070,8062006200796%
RentableYear
Communities (1)LocationUnitsSquare FootageYear BuiltAcquiredOccupancy(2)
Citywalk (34)Seattle, WA10292,0101988201496%
Collins on PineSeattle, WA7653,4742013201498%
DomaineSeattle, WA9279,4212009201296%
Expo (29)Seattle, WA275190,1762012201295%
Fountain CourtSeattle, WA320207,0002000200095%
Joule (30)Seattle, WA295191,1092010201096%
Taylor 28Seattle, WA197155,6302008201497%
VoxSeattle, WA5842,1732013201395%
Wharfside PointeSeattle, WA142119,2001990199493%
12,17410,508,72696%
Pinnacle South Mountain (36)Phoenix, AZ552569,8761988201494%
Total/Weighted Average57,45551,069,63495%
SquareYearYear
Other real estate assets (1)LocationTenantsFootageBuiltAcquiredOccupancy (2)
925 / 935 East Meadow Drive (31)Palo Alto, CA139,6001988 / 19621997 / 2007100%
6230 Sunset Blvd (32)Los Angeles, CA134,00019382006100%
17461 Derian Ave (33)Irvine, CA8107,7201983200098%
Santa Clara RetailSanta Clara, CA3138,91519702011100%
13320,23599%

Footnotes to the Company’s Portfolio Listing as of December 31, 2014

(1)Unless otherwise specified, the Company has a 100% ownership interest in each community.
(2)For communities, occupancy rates are based on financial occupancy for the year ended December 31, 2014; for the commercial buildings or properties which have not yet stabilized, or have insufficient operating history, occupancy rates are based on physical occupancy as of December 31, 2014. For an explanation of how financial occupancy and physical occupancy are calculated, see “Properties-Occupancy Rates” in this Item 2.
(3)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2082.
(4)The Company holds a 1% special limited partner interest in the partnerships which own these apartment communities. These investments were made under arrangements whereby EMC became the 1% sole general partner and the other limited partners were granted the right to require the applicable partnership to redeem their interest for cash. Subject to certain conditions, the Company may, however, elect to deliver an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock in satisfaction of the applicable partnership’s cash redemption obligation.
(5)This community is owned by Wesco III. The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco III which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(6)This community is owned by Wesco I. The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco I which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(7)The Company completed a $10.8 million redevelopment in 2009.
(8)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2067.
(9)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2027.
(10)The Company completed a $16.6 million redevelopment in 2010.
(11)The Company is in the late phases of performing a $13.0 million redevelopment.
(12)The Company has a 97% interest and an executive vice president of the Company has a 3% interest in this community.
(13)The Company has a 75% member interest.
(14)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2028.
(15)The Company completed a $12.0 million redevelopment in 2008.
(16)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2030.
(17)The Company is in the process of performing a $10.0 million redevelopment.
(18)The Company completed an $8.9 million redevelopment in 2008.
(19)The Company completed a $9.4 million redevelopment in 2009.
(20)The Company completed a $4.6 million redevelopment in 2009.
(21)The Company has 55% ownership in this community. The community is being developed in three phases with one remaining phase currently under development.
(22)A portion of this community on which 84 units are presently located is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2028.
(23)The Company is in the process of performing a $14.1 million redevelopment.
(24)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2070.
(25)The Company completed a $12.5 million redevelopment in 2009.
(26)The Company completed a $36.3 million redevelopment in 2012, which included the construction of 28 in-fill units in 2009.
(27)The Company completed the construction of 66 additional apartment homes in 2012 and is in the process of performing a redevelopment for a total cost of $15.4 million.
(28)The Company completed a $5.1 million redevelopment and completed construction of 16 units of the community’s 108 units in 2006.
(29)The Company has 50% ownership in each of these communities which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(30)The Company has 99% ownership in this community.
(31)The Company occupies 100% of this property.
(32)The property is leased through July 2015 to a single tenant.
(33)The Company occupies 5% of space in this property.
(34)This community is owned by BEXAEW. The Company has a 50% interest in BEXAEW which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(35)This community is owned by Wesco IV. The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco IV which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(36)The Company has a 55% ownership in this community.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The information, which regards lawsuits, other proceedings and claims, set forth in Note 16, “Commitments and Contingencies”, of our notes to consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3.

In addition to such matters referred to in said Note 16, the Company is subject to various other legal and/or regulatory proceedings arising in the course of its business operations. We believe that, with respect to such matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

The shares of the Company’s common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol ESS. ESS common stock has been traded on the NYSE since June 13, 1994. The high, low and closing price per share of common stock reported on the NYSE for the quarters indicated are as follows:

Quarter EndedHighLowClose
December 31, 2014$211.91$206.35$206.60
September 30, 2014$180.65$178.27$178.75
June 30, 2014$185.66$183.36$184.91
March 31, 2014$171.70$166.95$170.05
December 31, 2013$165.44$137.53$143.51
September 30, 2013$172.16$139.64$147.70
June 30, 2013$171.11$147.56$158.92
March 31, 2013$156.36$147.06$150.58

The closing price of ESS stock as of February 24, 2015 was $223.17.

There is no established public trading market for Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s OP Units.

Holders

The approximate number of holders of record of the shares of ESS common stock was 1,551 as of February 24, 2015. This number does not include stockholders whose shares are held in investment accounts by other entities. ESS believes the actual number of stockholders is greater than the number of holders of record.

As of February 24, 2015, there were 174 holders of record of Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s OP Units, including ESS.

Return of Capital

Under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the portion of the cash dividend, if any, that exceeds earnings and profits is considered a return of capital. The return of capital is generated due to a variety of factors, including the deduction of non-cash expenses, primarily depreciation, in the determination of earnings and profits.

The status of the cash dividends distributed for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 related to common stock, and Series F, G and H preferred stock for tax purposes are as follows:

201420132012
Common Stock
Ordinary income70.03%77.34%70.58%
Capital gain21.95%17.64%8.75%
Unrecaptured section 1250 capital gain8.02%5.02%7.97%
Return of capital—%—%12.70%
100.00%100.00%100.00%
201420132012
Series F, G, and H Preferred stock
Ordinary income70.03%77.34%80.85%
Capital gains21.95%17.64%10.02%
Unrecaptured section 1250 capital gain8.02%5.02%9.13%
100.00%100.00%100.00%

Dividends and Distributions

Since ESS’s initial public offering on June 13, 1994, ESS and the Operating Partnership have paid regular quarterly dividends/distributions to its stockholders and unitholders. ESS paid the following dividends per share of common stock and the Operating Partnership paid the following distributions per limited partner OP unit:

Year EndedAnnual Dividend/DistributionQuarter Ended201420132012
1995$1.69March 31,$1.21$1.21$1.10
1996$1.72June 30,$1.30$1.21$1.10
1997$1.77September 30,$1.30$1.21$1.10
1998$1.95December 31,$1.30$1.21$1.10
1999$2.15
2000$2.38Annual Dividend/Distribution$5.11$4.84$4.40
2001$2.80
2002$3.08
2003$3.12
2004$3.16
2005$3.24
2006$3.36
2007$3.72
2008$4.08
2009$4.12
2010$4.13
2011$4.16

Future dividends/distributions by ESS and the Operating Partnership will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors of ESS and will depend on the actual cash flows from operations of the Company, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, applicable legal restrictions and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant. There are currently no contractual restrictions on ESS and the Operating Partnership present or future ability to pay dividends and distributions.

The Board of Directors has declared a dividend/distribution for the first quarter of 2015 of $1.44 per share. The dividend/distribution will be payable on April 15, 2015 to shareholders/unitholders of record as of March 31, 2015.

Future distributions by Essex Portfolio, L.P., will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s general partner, Essex Property Trust, Inc. and will depend on our actual cash flows from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, applicable legal restrictions and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant. There are currently no contractual restrictions on Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s present or future ability to pay distributions.

Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan

ESS has adopted a dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan designed to provide holders of common stock with a convenient and economical means to reinvest all or a portion of their cash dividends in shares of common stock and to acquire additional shares of common stock through voluntary purchases. Computershare, LLC, which serves as ESS transfer agent, administers the dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan. For a copy of the plan, contact Computershare, LLC at (312) 360-5354.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

See the Company’s disclosure in the 2015 Proxy Statement under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information”, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

Issuance of Registered Equity Securities

In April 2014, Essex issued approximately 23,067,446 shares of Essex common stock as Stock Consideration in the BRE merger at an average price of $163.82.

During 2014, ESS sold 2,964,315 shares of common stock for proceeds of $534.0 million, net of commissions, at an average price of $181.56. During the first quarter of 2015 through February 24, 2015, ESS has issued 636,021 shares of common stock at an average price of $224.76 for proceeds of $142.0 million, net of fees and commissions. These sales were pursuant to a registration statement and ESS used the net proceeds from the stock offerings to pay down debt, fund redevelopment and development pipelines, fund acquisitions, and for general corporate purposes.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – Common Stock, Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock

In August 2007, ESS Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan to allow ESS to acquire shares in an aggregate of up to $200 million. ESS did not repurchase any shares during 2014, 2013 and 2012. Since ESS announced the inception of the stock repurchase plan, ESS repurchased and retired 816,659 shares totaling $66.6 million at an average stock price of $81.56 per share, including commissions as of December 31, 2014.

Performance Graph

The line graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on ESS common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 and the NAREIT All Equity REIT index over the same period. This comparison assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock and each index was $100 on December 31, 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested (1).

Period Ending
Index12/31/200912/31/201012/31/201112/31/201212/31/201312/31/2014
Essex Property Trust, Inc.100.00142.12180.57194.12196.17290.34
NAREIT All Equity REIT Index100.00127.95138.55165.84170.58218.38
S&P 500100.00115.06117.49136.30180.44205.14

(1) Common stock performance data is provided by SNL Financial.

The graph and other information furnished under the above caption “Performance Graph” in this Part II Item 5 of this Form 10-K shall not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of the Exchange Act, as amended.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Operating Partnership issued partnership units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:

On December 10, 2014, Essex Portfolio, L.P. issued 68,750 units under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan Award agreements to eighteen senior executives of the Company for no cash consideration.

During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Essex Property Trust, Inc. issued an aggregate of 185,387 and 52,970 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of stock options, respectively. Essex Property Trust, Inc. contributed the proceeds from the option exercises of $11.0 million and $5.0 million to our Operating Partnership in exchange for an aggregate of 185,387 and 52,970 common OP Units, as required by the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Essex Property Trust, Inc. issued an aggregate of 126,931 and 7,211 shares of its common stock in connection with restricted stock awards for no cash consideration, respectively. For each share of common stock issued by Essex Property Trust, Inc. in connection with such awards, our operating partnership issued a common unit to Essex Property Trust, Inc. as required by the partnership agreement, for an aggregate of 126,931 and 7,211 units during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Essex Property Trust, Inc. issued and sold an aggregate of 2,964,315 and 913,344 shares of its common stock, respectively, pursuant to a registration statement and its equity distribution program. Essex Property Trust, Inc. contributed the net proceeds from these share issuances of $534.0 million and $138.4 million in exchange for an aggregate of 2,964,315 and 913,344 common OP Units, respectively, as required by the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth summary financial and operating information for the Company and the Operating Partnership from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014.

Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Years Ended December 31,
20142013201220112010
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
OPERATING DATA:
Rental and other property$959,958$602,003$526,696$460,660$400,841
Management and other fees from affiliates(1)9,3477,2638,4575,4283,836
Income before discontinued operations$134,438$140,882$127,653$46,958$47,424
Income from discontinued operations—31,17311,93710,5583,358
Net income134,438172,055139,59057,51650,782
Net income available to common stockholders$116,859$150,811$119,812$40,368$33,764
Per share data:
Basic:
Income before discontinued operations available to common stockholders$2.07$3.26$3.10$0.94$1.03
Net income available to common stockholders$2.07$4.05$3.42$1.24$1.14
Weighted average common stock outstanding56,54737,24935,03232,54229,667
Diluted:
Income before discontinued operations available to common stockholders$2.06$3.25$3.09$0.94$1.03
Net income available to common stockholders$2.06$4.04$3.41$1.24$1.14
Weighted average common stock outstanding56,69737,33535,12532,62929,734
Cash dividend per common share$5.11$4.84$4.40$4.16$4.13
(1)Reclassifications have been made in prior periods to conform to the current year’s presentation.
As of December 31,
20142013201220112010
($ in thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Investment in rental properties (before accumulated depreciation)$11,252,511$5,443,757$5,033,672$4,313,064$3,964,561
Net investment in rental properties9,687,7054,188,8713,952,1553,393,0383,189,008
Real estate under development434,37150,43066,85144,280217,531
Co-investments1,036,411677,133571,345383,412107,840
Total assets11,562,8745,186,8394,847,2234,036,9643,732,887
Total secured indebtedness2,245,9441,404,0801,565,5991,745,8582,082,745
Total unsecured indebtedness2,863,8731,629,4441,253,084615,000176,000
Redeemable noncontrolling interest23,256————
Cumulative convertible preferred stock—4,3494,3494,3494,349
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock73,75073,75073,75073,75025,000
Stockholders' equity6,022,6721,884,6191,764,8041,437,5271,149,946
As of and for the years ended December 31,
20142013201220112010
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
OTHER DATA:
Funds from operations (FFO)(1):
Net income available to common stockholders$116,859$150,811$119,812$40,368$33,764
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization360,592193,518170,686152,543129,711
Gains not included in FFO, net of internal disposition costs(50,064)(67,975)(60,842)(7,543)—
Depreciation add back from unconsolidated co-investments and other, net37,55523,37721,19414,8047,893
Funds from operations$464,942$299,731$250,850$200,172$171,368
Non-core items:
Loss on early retirement of debt2683005,0091,163—
Merger and acquisition costs55,4085,4452,2551,2311,250
Gain on sale of marketable securities and note prepayment(886)(2,519)(819)(4,956)(12,491)
Co-investment promote income(10,640)—(2,299)—(500)
Income from early redemption of preferred equity investments(5,250)(1,358)———
Other items, net (2)(681)(1,503)—(831)1,168
Core funds from operations (Core FFO)$503,161$300,096$254,996$196,779$160,795
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, diluted (FFO)(3)58,92139,50137,37834,86132,028
Funds from operations per share - diluted$7.89$7.59$6.71$5.74$5.35
Core funds from operations per share - diluted$8.54$7.60$6.82$5.64$5.02
(1)FFO is a financial measure that is commonly used in the REIT industry. The Company presents funds from operations as a supplemental operating performance measure. FFO is not used by the Company, nor should it be considered to be, as an alternative to net earnings computed under GAAP as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP as an indicator of the Company's ability to fund its cash needs.

FFO is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor does it intend to present, a complete picture of the Company's financial condition and operating performance. The Company believes that net earnings computed under GAAP remain the primary measure of performance and that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings. The Company considers FFO and FFO excluding non-routine items (referred to as “Core FFO”) to be useful financial performance measurements of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate operating performance and ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures and its ability to pay dividends. Further, the Company believes that its consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of its financial condition and its operating performance.

In calculating FFO, the Company follows the definition for this measure published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which is a REIT trade association. The Company believes that, under the NAREIT FFO definition, the three most significant adjustments made to net income are (i) the exclusion of historical cost depreciation, (ii) the exclusion of gains and losses from the sale of previously depreciated properties and (iii) the exclusion of impairment losses on depreciated properties. Essex agrees that these three NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons:

(a)historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP assumes, through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on Funds from Operations “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost

accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” Consequently, NAREIT’s definition of FFO reflects the fact that real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges required by GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities.

(b)REITs were created as a legal form of organization in order to encourage public ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, of gains from the sales and impairment losses of previously depreciated operating real estate assets allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REIT’s activity and assists in comparing those operating results between periods.

Management has consistently applied the NAREIT definition of FFO to all periods presented. However, other REITs in calculating FFO may vary from the NAREIT definition for this measure, and thus their disclosure of FFO may not be comparable to the Company’s calculation.

(2)Other items, net are non-recurring in nature and include items such as gains on non-operating assets and tax related items.
(3)Assumes conversion of all dilutive outstanding operating partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.

Essex Portfolio, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Years Ended December 31,
20142013201220112010
($ in thousands, except per unit amounts)
OPERATING DATA:
Rental and other property$959,958$602,003$526,696$460,660$400,841
Management and other fees from affiliates(1)9,3477,2638,4575,4283,836
Income before discontinued operations$134,438$140,882$127,653$46,958$47,424
Income from discontinued operations—31,17311,93710,5583,358
Net income134,438172,055139,59057,51650,782
Net income available to common unitholders$121,726$159,749$127,771$43,593$42,842
Per unit data:
Basic:
Income before discontinued operations available to common unitholders$2.07$3.27$3.11$0.95$1.04
Net income available to common unitholders$2.07$4.06$3.43$1.25$1.14
Weighted average common units outstanding58,77239,38037,25234,77431,961
Diluted:
Income before discontinued operations available to common unitholders$2.07$3.26$3.10$0.95$1.03
Net income available to common unitholders$2.07$4.05$3.42$1.25$1.14
Weighted average common units outstanding58,92139,46737,34434,86132,028
Cash distributions per common unit$5.11$4.84$4.40$4.16$4.13
(1)Reclassifications have been made in prior periods to conform to the current year’s presentation.
As of December 31,
20142013201220112010
($ in thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Investment in rental properties (before accumulated depreciation)$11,252,511$5,443,757$5,033,672$4,313,064$3,964,561
Net investment in rental properties9,687,7054,188,8713,952,1553,393,0383,189,008
Real estate under development434,37150,43066,85144,280217,531
Co-investments1,036,411677,133571,345383,412107,840
Total assets11,562,8745,186,8394,847,2234,036,9643,732,887
Total secured indebtedness2,245,9441,404,0801,565,5991,745,8582,082,745
Total unsecured indebtedness2,863,8731,629,4441,253,084615,000176,000
Redeemable noncontrolling interest23,256————
Cumulative convertible preferred interest—4,3494,3494,3494,349
Cumulative redeemable preferred interest71,20971,20971,20971,209104,412
Partners' capital6,073,4331,932,1081,811,4271,486,9141,284,515

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. These consolidated financial statements include all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to reflect a fair statement of the results and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

On April 1, 2014, we completed the merger with BRE Properties, Inc. (“BRE”). For further details regarding the merger, see the discussion set forth under the caption “Current Business Activities - Merger with BRE Properties, Inc.” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. The net assets and results of operations of BRE are included in our consolidated financial statements as of April 1, 2014. Certain statements below discuss the Company’s estimates of its 2015 regional Same-Property revenues; these estimates are for Essex on a standalone basis, excluding the impact of the merger with BRE.

OVERVIEW

ESS is a self-administered and self-managed REIT that acquires, develops, redevelops and manages apartment communities in selected residential areas located primarily in the West Coast of the United States. ESS owns all of its interests in its real estate investments, directly or indirectly, through the Operating Partnership. ESS is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2014, had an approximately 96.7% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.

The Company’s investment strategy has two components: constant monitoring of existing markets, and evaluation of new markets to identify areas with the characteristics that underlie rental growth. The Company’s strong financial condition supports its investment strategy by enhancing its ability to quickly shift acquisition, development, and disposition activities to markets that will optimize the performance of the portfolio.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had ownership interests in 239 communities, comprising 57,455 apartment units.

The Company’s apartment communities are predominately located in the following major regions:

Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties)

Northern California (the San Francisco Bay Area)

Seattle Metro (Seattle metropolitan area)

As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s development pipeline was comprised of two consolidated projects under development, ten unconsolidated joint venture projects under development and various consolidated predevelopment projects aggregating 2,920 units, with total incurred costs of $1.1 billion, and estimated remaining project costs of approximately $0.4 billion for total estimated project costs of $1.5 billion.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company also had ownership interests in four commercial buildings (with approximately 325,200 square feet).

By region, the Company's operating results for 2014 and 2013 and projections for 2015 new housing supply, job growth, and rental income are as follows:

Southern California Region: As of December 31, 2014, this region represented 47% of the Company’s consolidated apartment units. During the year ended December 31, 2014, revenues for “2014/2013 Same-Properties” (as defined below), or “Same-Property revenues,” increased 5.5% in 2014 as compared to 2013. In 2015, the Company expects new residential supply of 17,950 multifamily and 14,300 single family homes, which represents a total new multifamily supply of 0.8% and 0.6% of total housing stock, respectively. The Company assumes an increase of 150,000 jobs or 2.1%, and an increase in same-property revenues between 4.50% to 5.50% in 2015.

Northern California Region: As of December 31, 2014, this region represented 31% of the Company’s consolidated apartment units. Same-Property revenues increased 9.6% in 2014 as compared to 2013. In 2015, the Company expects new residential supply of 11,400 multifamily and 7,000 single family homes, which represents a total new multifamily supply of 1.3% and 0.8%, respectively, of total housing stock. The Company assumes an increase of 90,200 jobs or 2.9%, and an increase in same-property revenues between 8.25% to 9.25% in 2015.

Seattle Metro Region: As of December 31, 2014, this region represented 21% of the Company’s consolidated apartment units. Same-Property revenues increased 7.5% in 2014 as compared to 2013. In 2015, the Company expects new residential supply of 9,000 multifamily and 7,500 single family homes, which represents a total new multifamily supply of 1.9% and 1.4%, respectively, of total housing stock. The Company assumes an increase of 43,300 jobs or 2.8%, and an increase in same-property revenues between 5.75% to 6.75% in 2015.

The Company expects 2015 Same-Property revenues to increase compared to 2014 results, as renewal and new leases are signed at higher rents in 2015 than 2014. Same-Property operating expenses are expected to increase in 2015 by 3% to 4%.

The Company’s consolidated communities are as follows:

As ofAs of
December 31, 2014December 31, 2013
Apartment Units%Apartment Units%
Southern California22,16847%13,85546%
Northern California14,78931%9,43132%
Seattle Metro10,21621%6,70322%
Other real estate assets(1)5521%——%
Total47,725100%29,989100%

(1) Includes one property in Arizona. With the sale of Pinnacle South Mountain, executed in January 2015, the Company has exited the Arizona apartment market (see Note 17, "Subsequent Events" for details).

Co-investments communities, developments under construction and eight preferred equity interest co-investment communities are not included in the table presented above for both periods.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2014 to the Year Ended December 31, 2013

The Company’s average financial occupancies for the Company’s stabilized apartment communities or “2014/2013 Same-Properties” (stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013) increased 10 basis points to 96.2% in 2014 from 96.1% in 2013. Financial occupancy is defined as the percentage resulting from dividing actual rental revenue by total possible rental revenue. Actual rental revenue represents contractual rental revenue pursuant to leases without considering delinquency and concessions. Total possible rental revenue represents the value of all apartment units, with occupied units valued at contractual rental rates pursuant to leases and vacant units valued at estimated market rents.

We believe that financial occupancy is a meaningful measure of occupancy because it considers the value of each vacant unit at its estimated market rate.

Market rates are determined using the recently signed effective rates on new leases at the property and are used as the starting point in the determination of the market rates of vacant units. The Company may increase or decrease these rates based on the supply and demand in the apartment community’s market. The Company will check the reasonableness of these rents based on its position within the market and compare the rents against the asking rents by comparable properties in the market. Financial occupancy may not completely reflect short-term trends in physical occupancy and financial occupancy rates, as disclosed by other REITs, may not be comparable to the Company’s calculation of financial occupancy.

The Company does not take into account delinquency and concessions to calculate actual rent for occupied units and market rents for vacant units. The calculation of financial occupancy compares contractual rates for occupied units to estimated market rents for unoccupied units, thus the calculation compares the gross value of all apartment units excluding delinquency and concessions. For apartment communities that are development properties in lease-up without stabilized occupancy figures, the Company believes the physical occupancy rate is the appropriate performance metric. While an apartment community is in the lease-up phase, the Company’s primary motivation is to stabilize the property which may entail the use of rent concessions and other incentives, and thus financial occupancy which is based on contractual revenue is not considered the best metric to quantify occupancy.

The regional breakdown of the Company’s 2014/2013 Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

Years ended December 31,
20142013
Southern California96.3%96.1%
Northern California96.3%96.1%
Seattle Metro96.0%96.1%

The following table provides a breakdown of revenue amounts, including the revenues attributable to 2014/2013 Same-Properties.

Number ofYears Ended December 31,DollarPercentage
Property Revenues ($ in thousands)Properties20142013ChangeChange
2014/2013 Same-Properties:
Southern California58$266,917$253,007$13,9105.5%
Northern California35218,014198,832$19,1829.6%
Seattle Metro29114,962106,9827,9807.5%
Total 2014/2013 Same-Property revenues122599,893558,82141,0727.3%
2014/2013 Non-Same Property Revenues (1)79,97843,18236,79685.2%
2014 BRE Legacy Property Revenues (2)280,087—280,087
Total property revenues$959,958$602,003$357,95559.5%

(1) Includes eleven communities acquired after January 1, 2013, three sold communities and one redevelopment community.

(2) Includes 55 stabilized properties acquired in connection with the BRE merger on April 1, 2014, and two development communities in lease-up.

2014/2013 Same-Property Revenues increased by $41.1 million or 7.3% to $599.9 million for 2014 compared to $558.8 million in 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in scheduled rents of $39.1 million as reflected in an increase of 7.1% in average rental rates from $1,619 per unit for 2013 to $1,734 per unit for 2014. Scheduled rents increased in all regions by 5.2%, 9.5%, and 7.4% in Southern California, Northern California, and Seattle Metro, respectively. Income from utility billings and other income increased by $2.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively in 2014 compared to 2013. Financial occupancy increased 10 basis points in 2014 to 96.2% compared to 96.1% in 2013.

2014/2013 Non-Same Property Revenues increased by $36.8 million or 85.2% to $80.0 million in 2014 compared to $43.2 million to 2013. The increase was primarily due to revenue generated from twelve communities acquired or consolidated since January 1, 2013.

Management and other fees from affiliates increased $2.0 million or 28.7% to $9.3 million in 2014 compared to $7.3 million in 2013. The increase is primarily due to the asset and property management fees earned from the Wesco III, Wesco IV, and BEXAEW co-investments formed during 2014. The increase in management fees was offset by a reduction of $1.2 million in asset and property management fees from the sale of two Fund II communities in 2014.

Property operating expenses, excluding real estate taxes increased $64.3 million or 46.3% in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to properties acquired in connection with the BRE merger and six other communities in 2014. 2014/2013 Same-Property operating expenses excluding real estate taxes, increased by $3.8 million or 3.0% in 2014 compared to 2013, due mainly to a $1.6 million increase in repairs and maintenance and a $1.3 million increase in utilities expense.

Real estate taxes increased $50.6 million or 88.3% in 2014 compared to 2013, due primarily to properties acquired in connection with the BRE merger and six other communities in 2014. 2014/2013 Same-Property real estate taxes increased by $2.3 million or 4.5% for 2014 compared to 2013 due to a $1.6 million or 15.6% increase in property taxes for Seattle Metro due to higher assessed values for 2014.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $168.2 million or 87.4% in 2014 compared to 2013, due to the acquisition of BRE and six other communities. The increase is due to the capitalization of approximately $313.1 million in additions to rental properties through 2014, including $152.8 million spent on acquisition of and additions to real estate under development, $81.4 million spent on redevelopment, and $78.9 million spent on capital expenditures on rental properties. Approximately $122.0 million in additions to rental properties were capitalized for 2013, including $17.8 million spent on acquisition of and additions to real estate under development, $47.3 million spent on redevelopment, and $56.9 million spent on capital expenditures on rental properties.

General and administrative expense increased $14.2 million or 53.2% in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to additional corporate employees from the BRE merger and $2.8 million in expenses related to the cyber-intrusion.

Merger and integration expenses include, but are not limited to, advisor fees, legal fees, and accounting fees related to the BRE merger. The Company completed the merger with BRE on April 1, 2014. Merger and integration expenses were $53.5 million for 2014 and $4.3 million for 2013.

Interest expense increased $48.0 million or 41.2% in 2014, primarily due to additional debt assumed as part of the BRE merger, offset by an increase in capitalized interest from development and redevelopment projects.

Equity income from co-investments decreased by $16.0 million to $39.9 million in 2014 compared to $55.9 million in 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the Company’s share of the gain on the sale of two Fund II communities of $6.6 million, promote income of $10.6 million, and income from early redemption of preferred equity investments of $5.3 million in 2014, compared to the Company's share of gain on the sale of five Fund II communities of $38.8 million, net of internal dispositions costs in 2013.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the Year Ended December 31, 2012

The Company’s average financial occupancies for the Company’s stabilized apartment communities for “2013/2012 Same-Properties” (stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012) decreased 10 basis points to 96.2% in 2013 from 96.3% in 2012. The regional breakdown of the Company’s stabilized 2013/2012 Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

Years ended December 31,
20132012
Southern California96.1%96.1%
Northern California96.3%96.7%
Seattle Metro96.1%96.1%

The following table provides a breakdown of revenue amounts, including the revenues attributable to 2013/2012 Same-Properties.

Number ofYears Ended December 31,DollarPercentage
Property Revenues ($ in thousands)Properties20132012ChangeChange
2013/2012 Same-Properties:
Southern California58$235,306$225,435$9,8714.4%
Northern California35184,508170,578$13,9308.2%
Seattle Metro2993,13986,483$6,6567.7%
Total 2013/2012 Same-Property revenues122512,953482,496$30,4576.3%
2013/2012 Non-Same Property Revenues (1)89,05044,200$44,850101.5%
Total property revenues$602,003$526,696$75,30714.3%

(1) Includes fifteen communities acquired after January 1, 2012, two redevelopment communities, and three commercial buildings.

2013/2012 Same-Property Revenues increased by $30.5 million or 6.3% to $513.0 million for 2013 compared to $482.5 million in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in scheduled rents of $29.6 million as reflected in an increase of 6.3% in average rental rates from $1,502 per unit for 2012 to $1,597 per unit for 2013. Scheduled rents increased in all regions by 4.1%, 8.4%, and 7.7% in Southern California, Northern California, and Seattle Metro, respectively. Income from utility billings and other income increased by $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively in 2013 compared to 2012. Occupancy decreased 10 basis points in 2013 to 96.2% compared to 96.3% in 2012.

2013/2012 Non-Same Property Revenues increased by $44.9 million or 102% to $89.1 million in 2013 compared to $44.2 million to 2012. The increase was primarily due to revenue generated from fifteen communities acquired or consolidated since January 1, 2012 (Annaliese, Ascent, Bennett Lofts, Domain, Domaine, Essex Skyline at MacArthur Place, Fox Plaza, Montebello, Park Catalina, Park West, Reed Square, Slater 116, The Huntington, Vox and Willow Lake).

Management and other fees from affiliates decreased $1.2 million or 14.1% to $7.3 million in 2013 compared to $8.5 million in 2012. The decrease is primarily due to a reduction of $2.3 million in asset and property management fees from the sale of eight Fund II communities since the fourth quarter of 2012. An additional four communities owned by Fund II were sold in 2013.

Property operating expenses, excluding real estate taxes increased $14.9 million or 12.1% in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to the acquisition of fifteen communities. 2013/2012 Same-Property operating expenses excluding real estate taxes, increased by $3.6 million or 3.2% in 2013 compared to 2012, due mainly to a $1.4 million increase in repairs and maintenance, a $1.2 million increase in utilities expense, and a $0.9 million increase in administration costs.

Real estate taxes increased $8.9 million or 18.5% in 2013 compared to 2012, due primarily to the acquisition of fifteen communities. 2013/2012 Same-Property real estate taxes increased by $2.6 million or 6.0% for the 2013 compared to 2012 due to $1.3 million or 17.5% increase in property taxes for Seattle Metro due to higher assessed values for 2013, and an increase of 3.7% in property taxes for the properties located in California.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $23.2 million or 13.7% in 2013 compared to 2012, due to the acquisition of fifteen communities. The increase is due to the capitalization of approximately $122.0 million in additions to rental properties through 2013, including $17.8 million spent on acquisition of and additions to real estate under development, $47.3 million spent on redevelopment, and $56.9 million spent on capital expenditures on rental properties. Approximately $121.2 million in additions to rental properties were capitalized for 2012, including $29.2 million spent on acquisitions of and additions to real estate under development, $46.6 million spent on redevelopment, and $45.4 million spent on capital expenditures on rental properties.

General and administrative expense increased $2.1 million or 8.6% in 2013 compared to 2012 offset by annual compensation increases for merit, investments in technology, and the addition of staff.

Merger and integration expenses include, but are not limited to, advisor fees, legal fees, and accounting fees related to the merger with BRE. The Company entered into a definitive agreement to combine with BRE in December 2013. Merger expenses were $4.3 million for 2013 and zero for 2012.

Interest expense increased $4.6 million or 4.1% in 2013, primarily due to an increase in average outstanding debt for the funding of 2012 and 2013 acquisitions and costs incurred on the development pipeline.

Interest and other income decreased by $2.2 million in 2013 primarily due to $2.3 million of promote income earned from achieving certain performance hurdles related to the Essex Skyline co-investment in 2012.

Equity income from co-investments increased by $14.2 million to $55.9 million in 2013 compared to $41.7 million in 2012. The increase was primarily due to the Company’s share of the gain on the sale of five Fund II communities of $38.8 million, net of internal disposition costs, and $1.4 million income earned from the early prepayment of a preferred equity investment in 2013. Additionally, equity income increased with income earned from four communities acquired by the Wesco joint ventures in the second half of 2012 and two communities in the second quarter of 2013. The increase in equity income in 2013 by the Wesco joint venture was offset by a decrease in income related to the sale of eight Fund II communities since the fourth quarter of 2012 including four communities sold in the third quarter of 2013.

Loss on early retirement of debt, net was $0.3 million for 2013 compared to $5.0 million in 2012. The $0.3 million loss in 2013 reflects a gain of $1.5 million earned from the redemption of bonds in the second quarter of 2013 offset by losses incurred from the write-off of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties related to the prepayment of secured debt loans in 2013. The 2012 loss was due to the write-off of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties related to the early termination of secured debt related to six communities. The loss for 2012 also included the Company’s pro-rata share of the write-off of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties incurred for the prepayment of the secured debt for the Essex Skyline joint venture and seven Fund II communities sold in 2012.

Income from discontinued operations for 2013 was $31.2 million and included gains of $29.2 million from the sales of Linden Square, Brentwood and Cambridge. For 2012, income from discontinued operations was $11.9 million and included a gain of $9.8 million from the sale of Tierra del Sol/Norte and Alpine Country, net of internal disposition costs. Discontinued operations for 2013 and 2012 reflect the operating results of the three communities sold in 2013 and the two communities sold in 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table sets forth the Company’s cash flows for 2014, 2013 and 2012 ($ in thousands):

For the year ended
12/31/201412/31/201312/31/2012
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities$492,983$304,982$267,499
Investing activities$(1,147,156)$(453,696)$(812,138)
Financing activities$520,610$148,599$550,356

ESS’s business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership. ESS issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company which are fully reimbursed by the Operating Partnership. ESS itself does not hold any indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. ESS’s principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common stock and preferred stock. ESS’s principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.

As of December 31, 2014, ESS owned a 96.7% general partner interest and the limited partners owned the remaining 3.3% interest in the Operating Partnership.

The liquidity of ESS is dependent on the Operating Partnership’s ability to make sufficient distributions to ESS. The primary cash requirement of ESS is its payment of dividends to its stockholders. ESS also guarantees some of the Operating Partnership’s debt, as discussed further in Notes 7 and 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere

herein. If the Operating Partnership fails to fulfill certain of its debt requirements, which trigger the ESS’s guarantee obligations, then ESS will be required to fulfill its cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, ESS’s only significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership.

For ESS to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it must pay dividends to its stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. While historically ESS has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its stockholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, ESS’s own stock. As a result of this distribution requirement, the Operating Partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its ongoing operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not REITs can. ESS may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the Operating Partnership’s working capital needs, acquisitions and developments.

Fitch Ratings ("Fitch"), Moody’s Investor Service, and Standard and Poor's (“S&P”) credit agencies rate Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Essex Portfolio, L.P. BBB+/Stable, Baa2/Stable, and BBB/Stable, respectively.

At December 31, 2014, the Company had $25.3 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $117.2 million in marketable securities, of which $44.2 million were held available for sale. The Company believes that cash flows generated by its operations, existing cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities balances, availability under existing lines of credit, access to capital markets and the ability to generate cash from the disposition of real estate are sufficient to meet all of the Company’s reasonably anticipated cash needs during 2015. The timing, source and amounts of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to changes in interest rates and other fluctuations in the capital markets environment, which can affect the Company’s plans for acquisitions, dispositions, development and redevelopment activities.

The Company has two lines of credit aggregating $1.03 billion as of December 31, 2014 including a $1.0 billion unsecured line of credit. As of December 31, 2014, there was a $229.8 million balance on this unsecured line of credit with an underlying interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.95%. In January 2015, the facility maturity date was extended to December 31, 2018 with one 18-month extension, exercisable by the Company. The Company also has a $25.0 million working capital unsecured line of credit agreement. As of December 31, 2014, there was a $16.6 million balance on this unsecured line with an underlying interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.95%. This facility matures in January 2016.

In April 2014, the Company, assumed $900.0 million aggregate principal amount of BRE’s 5.500% senior notes due 2017; 5.200% senior notes due 2021; and 3.375% senior notes due 2023 (together “BRE Notes”). The carrying value of the BRE Notes, plus premium, was $934.7 million as of December 31, 2014.

In April 2014, the Company issued $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due on May 1, 2024 with a coupon rate of 3.875% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2014 until the maturity date of May 1, 2024. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay indebtedness under the Company's $1.0 billion unsecured line of credit facility and for other general corporate purposes.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $465.0 million of private placement unsecured bonds outstanding at an average interest rate of 4.5% with maturity dates ranging from March 2016 through August 2021.

In April 2013, the Company issued $300.0 million of senior unsecured bonds due May 1, 2023 with a coupon rate of 3.25% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2013, until maturity. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay indebtedness under the Company’s $600.0 million unsecured line of credit facility and for other general corporate and working capital purposes.

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company issued $300 million of senior unsecured bonds due August 2022 with a coupon rate of 3.625% per annum and payable on February 15th and August 15th of each year, beginning February 15, 2013.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a $225.0 million unsecured term loan outstanding at a weighted average effective interest rate of 2.4%. The term loan has a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.05%. The Company has entered into interest rate swap contracts for a term of five years with a notional amount totaling $225.0 million, which effectively converted the interest rate on $225.0 million of the term loan to a fixed rate of 2.4%.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s mortgage notes payable totaled $2.2 billion which consisted of $2.1 billion in fixed rate debt with interest rates varying from 4.3% to 6.4% and maturity dates ranging from 2015 to 2021 and $179.2 million of

tax-exempt variable rate demand notes with a weighted average interest rate of 1.8%. The tax-exempt variable rate demand notes have maturity dates ranging from 2025 to 2040, and $153.2 million are subject to interest rate caps.

The Company’s unsecured line of credit and unsecured debt agreements contain debt covenants related to limitations on indebtedness and liabilities and maintenance of minimum levels of consolidated earnings before depreciation, interest and amortization. The Company was in compliance with the debt covenants as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company pays quarterly dividends from cash available for distribution. Until it is distributed, cash available for distribution is invested by the Company primarily in investment grade securities held available for sale or is used by the Company to reduce balances outstanding under its line of credit.

The Company has benefited from borrowing from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and there are no assurances that these entities will lend to the Company in the future. To the extent that the Company’s access to capital and credit is at a higher cost than the Company has experienced in recent years (reflected in higher interest rates for debt financing or a lower stock price for equity financing) the Company’s ability to make acquisitions, develop communities, obtain new financing, and refinance existing borrowing at competitive rates could be adversely impacted. For the past two years the Company has primarily issued unsecured debt and repaid secured debt when it has matured to place less reliance on mortgage debt financing, and to unencumber more of the Company's communities.

Derivative Activity

The Company uses interest rate swaps and interest rate cap contracts to manage certain interest rate risks. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.

The Company has entered into interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $225.0 million that effectively fixed the interest rate on the $225.0 million unsecured term loan at 2.4%. These derivatives qualify for hedge accounting.

As of December 31, 2014 the Company also had nine interest rate cap contracts totaling a notional amount of $153.2 million that effectively limit the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable interest rate for $153.2 million of the Company’s tax exempt variable rate debt.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the aggregate carrying value of the interest rate swap contracts was a liability of $1.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The aggregate carrying value of the interest rate cap contracts was zero on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Hedge ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges, which is reported in current year income as interest expense was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Issuance of Common Stock

In 2014, the Company filed a new shelf registration statement with the SEC, allowing the Company to sell an undetermined number or amount of certain equity (only ESS) and debt securities as defined in the prospectus.

ESS has entered into equity distribution agreements with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citigroup Global Markets Inc, Jefferies LLC ("Jefferies"), J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JP Morgan"), Liquidnet, Inc., Mitsubishi UFJ Securities(USA), Inc, and UBS Securities LLC ("UBS"). Pursuant to its equity distribution program, in 2014, ESS issued 2,964,315 shares of common stock for $534.0 million, net of fees and commissions, and in 2013, ESS issued 913,344 shares of common stock for proceeds of $138.4 million, net of fees and commissions. During the first quarter of 2015 through February 24, 2015, ESS has issued 636,021 shares of common stock at an average price of $224.76 for proceeds of $142.0 million, net of fees and commissions. Under this program, ESS may from time to time sell shares of common stock into the existing trading market at current market prices, and the Company anticipates using the net proceeds, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership, to pay down debt, acquire apartment communities and fund the

development pipeline. As of February 24, 2015, ESS may sell an additional 413,979,566 shares under the current equity distribution program.

Capital Expenditures

Non-revenue generating capital expenditures are improvements and upgrades that extend the useful life of the property. For the year ended December 31, 2014, non-revenue generating capital expenditures totaled approximately $1,198 per unit. The Company expects to incur approximately $1,200 per unit in non-revenue generating capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2015. These expenditures do not include the improvements required in connection with the origination of mortgage loans, expenditures for deferred maintenance on acquisition properties, and expenditures for property renovations and improvements which are expected to generate additional revenue. The Company expects that cash from operations and/or its lines of credit will fund such expenditures. However, there can be no assurance that the actual expenditures incurred during 2015 and/or the funding thereof will not be significantly different than the Company’s current expectations.

Development and Predevelopment Pipeline

The Company defines development activities as new communities that are in various stages of active development, or the community is in lease-up and phases of the project are not completed. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had two consolidated development projects comprised of 624 units with an estimated cost of $447.0 million of which $58.0 million remains to be expended, and ten unconsolidated joint venture active development projects comprised of 2,296 units with an estimated cost of $1.0 billion, of which $362.0 million remains to be expended. The Company's share of these estimated remaining project costs is approximately $192.0 million.

The Company defines the predevelopment pipeline as proposed communities in negotiation or in the entitlement process with a high likelihood of becoming entitled development projects. The Company may also acquire land for future development purposes or sale.

The Company expects to fund the development and predevelopment pipeline by using a combination of some or all of the following sources: its working capital, amounts available on its lines of credit, construction loans, net proceeds from public and private equity and debt issuances, and proceeds from the disposition of properties, if any.

Redevelopment Pipeline

The Company defines redevelopment communities as existing properties owned or recently acquired, which have been targeted for additional investment by the Company with the expectation of increased financial returns through property improvement. During redevelopment, apartment units may not be available for rent and, as a result, may have less than stabilized operations. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had ownership interests in three major redevelopment communities aggregating 963 apartment units with estimated redevelopment costs of $122.0 million, of which approximately $96.4 million remains to be expended.

Alternative Capital Sources

Wesco, I LLC (“Wesco I”) is a 50/50 programmatic joint venture with an institutional partner for a total equity commitment of $300.0 million. Each partner’s equity commitment is $150.0 million. Wesco I will utilize debt targeted at approximately 50% of the cost to acquire and improve real estate. The Company has contributed $150.0 million to Wesco I, and as of December 31, 2014, Wesco I owned nine apartment communities with 2,713 units with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $682.4 million.

During 2012, the Company entered into a 50/50 programmatic joint venture, Wesco III LLC (“Wesco III”), with an institutional partner for a total equity commitment from the parties of $120.0 million. Each partner’s equity commitment is $60.0 million, and Wesco III will utilize debt targeted at approximately 50% of the cost to acquire and improve real estate. During the first quarter of 2014, BRE contributed three assets to Wesco III. The Company has contributed $39.7 million to Wesco III and, as of December 31, 2014, Wesco III owned six apartment communities with 993 units for an aggregate carrying value of approximately $230.7 million.

Investments with Wesco I or Wesco III must meet certain criteria to qualify for inclusion in the joint ventures and both partners must approve any new acquisitions and material dispositions. The joint ventures have an investment period of up to two years. The Company records revenue for its asset management, property management, development, and redevelopment services when earned, and promote income when realized, if Wesco I or Wesco III exceeds certain financial return benchmarks.

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company provided two short-term bridge loans to Wesco III totaling $56.8 million to assist with the purchase of the Regency at Mountain View and Gas Company Lofts and both loans were at a rate of LIBOR + 2.50%. Wesco III repaid these two loans on Regency at Mountain View and Gas Company Lofts in January 2014 and April 2014, respectively.

On April 1, 2014, in connection with the merger, the Company acquired a 50% interest in Wesco IV LLC (“Wesco IV”) and a

50% interest in BEXAEW LLC (“BEXAEW”). Wesco IV and BEXAEW’s remaining 50% interest is owned by institutional partners. Wesco IV and BEXAEW expect to utilize debt targeted at approximately 50% and 60%, respectively, of the cost to acquire and improve real estate. Under the terms of Wesco IV’s and BEXAEW’s operating agreements, Essex is entitled to asset management, property management, development and redevelopment service fees. In addition, Essex is entitled to its 50% pro rata share of the income or loss generated by these entities and, upon the achievement of certain performance measures, is entitled to promote income. As of December 31, 2014, Wesco IV owned five apartment communities with 1,116 units with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $297.9 million. As of December 31, 2014, BEXAEW owned nine apartment communities with 2,723 units with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $519.2 million.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes the maturity or due dates of the Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments at December 31, 2014, and the effect such obligations could have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flow in future periods ($ in thousands):

20152016 and 20172018 and 2019ThereafterTotal
Mortgage notes payable$94,580$240,164$885,881$941,526$2,162,151
Unsecured debt—715,00075,0001,800,0002,590,000
Lines of credit—16,577—229,814246,391
Interest on indebtedness (1)188,481353,889286,471326,6661,155,507
Development commitments (including co-investments)185,65163,319578—249,548
$468,712$1,388,949$1,247,930$3,298,006$6,403,597
(1)Interest on indebtedness for variable debt was calculated using interest rates as of December 31, 2014.

Variable Interest Entities

In accordance with accounting standards for consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs), the Company consolidates 17 DownREIT limited partnerships (comprising ten communities). The Company consolidates these entities because it is deemed the primary beneficiary. The consolidated total assets and liabilities related to these VIEs, net of intercompany eliminations, were approximately $200.0 million and $196.6 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014, and $194.9 million and $178.3 million respectively, as of December 31, 2013. Interest holders in VIEs consolidated by the Company are allocated net income equal to the cash payments made to those interest holders for services rendered or distributions from cash flow. The remaining results of operations are generally allocated to the Company. As of December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any VIE’s of which it was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company defines critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that require the Company's management to exercise their most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. The Company’s critical accounting policies relate principally to the following key areas: (i) accounting for business combinations; (ii) consolidation under applicable accounting standards of various entities; (iii) assessing the carrying values of the Company's real estate and investments in and advances to joint ventures and affiliates; and (iv) internal cost capitalization. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates made by management.

The Company accounts for its business combinations, including the merger and other acquisitions of investments in real estate, in accordance with ASC 805-10, Business Combinations, which requires the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities to be recorded at fair value, with excess purchase price, if any, recorded to goodwill. The Company must make significant assumptions in determining the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired and consideration transferred. The use of different assumptions in estimating the fair value could affect the measurement and timing of recognition of acquired assets and liabilities and related expenses.

The consideration transferred in a business combination is generally measured at fair value. For debt assumed by the Company, the fair value is determined using estimated market interest rates for debt with comparable terms in place at the time of the acquisition. For equity issued by the Company, the fair value is generally based on the fair value of the Company’s equity interests at the date of issuance.

The fair value of the tangible assets, which principally includes land and building, is determined first by valuing the property as a whole as if it were vacant, using stabilized net operating income and market specific capitalization rates. The fair value of the land and building is then recorded based on its estimated fair value.

In calculating the fair value of identified intangible assets of an acquired property, the in-place leases are valued based on in-place rent rates and estimated time and cost to lease a unit.

The initial purchase accounting is based on the Company’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when additional information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase accounting, if any, are made within the measurement period, which will be finalized within one year of the acquisition date.

The Company assesses each entity in which it has an investment or contractual relationship to determine if it may be deemed to be a VIE. If such an entity is a VIE, then the Company performs an analysis to determine who is the primary beneficiary. If the Company is the primary beneficiary, then the entity is consolidated. The analysis required to identify VIEs and primary beneficiaries is complex and judgmental, and the analysis must be applied to various types of entities and legal structures.

The Company assesses the carrying value of its real estate investments by monitoring investment market conditions and performance compared to budget for operating properties and joint ventures, and by monitoring estimated costs for properties under development. Local market knowledge and data is used to assess carrying values of properties and the market value of acquisition opportunities. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property held for investment may not be fully recoverable, the carrying amount is evaluated. If the sum of the property’s expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property, then the Company will recognize an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the property. Adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of real estate investments could result in impairment charges. When the Company determines that a property is held for sale, it discontinues the periodic depreciation of that property. The criteria for determining when a property is held for sale requires judgment and has potential financial statement impact as depreciation would cease and an impairment loss could occur upon determination of held for sale status. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell.

Further, the Company evaluates whether its co-investments are other than temporarily impaired and, if so, records an impairment loss equal to the excess of the co-investments' carrying value over its estimated fair value.

The Company capitalizes all direct and certain indirect costs, including interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized costs are management’s accounting estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project costs associated with the Company's development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development, including accounting, legal fees, and various corporate and community onsite costs that clearly relate to projects under development.

The Company bases its accounting estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may vary from those estimates and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.

Net Operating Income (“NOI”)

Same-Property net operating income (“NOI”) is considered by management to be an important supplemental performance measure to earnings from operations included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The presentation of Same-Property NOI assists with the presentation of the Company’s operations prior to the allocation of depreciation and any corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of individual communities or groups of communities. Prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, and NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. The Company defines Same-Property NOI as Same-Property revenue less Same-Property operating expenses.

The reconciliation of earnings from operations to Same-Property NOI for the periods presented:

201420132012
Earnings from operations$201,514$188,705$167,025
Adjustments:
General and administrative40,87826,68424,573
Management and other fees from affiliates(9,347)(7,263)(8,457)
Depreciation and amortization360,592192,420169,173
Merger and integration expenses53,5304,284—
Acquisition and disposition costs1,8781,1612,215
Net operating income649,045405,991354,529
Less: Non Same-Property NOI(234,147)(26,073)(16,698)
Same-Property NOI$414,898$379,918$337,831

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not historical facts may be considered forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the Company's expectations, hopes, intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Forward looking statements include statements regarding the Company's expectations as to the timing of completion of current development and redevelopment projects and the stabilization dates of such projects, expectation as to the total projected costs of development and redevelopment projects, beliefs as to the adequacy of future cash flows to meet operating requirements, anticipated cash needs to provide for dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements, expectations as to the amount of non-revenue generating capital expenditures, future acquisitions, the Company's development and redevelopment pipeline and the sources of funding for it, the anticipated performance of existing properties, the effect of property sales on future results, anticipated property and growth trends in various geographic regions, statements regarding the Company’s expected 2015 Same-Property revenue, and 2015 Same-Property operating expenses, statements regarding the Company's financing activities, and the use of proceeds from such activities.

Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors including, but not limited to, that the Company will fail to achieve its business objectives, that the actual completion of development and redevelopment projects will be subject to delays, that the stabilization dates of such projects will be delayed, that the total projected costs of current development and redevelopment projects will exceed expectations, that such development and redevelopment projects will not be completed, that development and redevelopment projects and acquisitions will fail to meet expectations, that estimates of future income from an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate, that future cash flows will be inadequate to meet operating requirements and/or will be insufficient to provide for dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements, that the actual non-revenue generating capital expenditures will exceed the Company's current expectations, that there may be a downturn in the markets in which the Company's communities are located, that the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness, as well as those risks, special considerations, and other factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K, and those risk factors and special considerations set forth in the Company’s other filings with the SEC which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are made as of today, and the Company assumes no obligation to update this information.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Interest Rate Hedging Activities

The Company’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, the Company entered into interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has seven interest rate swap contracts to mitigate the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows on $225.0 million of the five-year unsecured term debt. As of December 31, 2014, the Company also had $189.2 million of variable rate indebtedness, of which $153.2 million is subject to interest rate cap protection. All of the Company’s derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges, and the Company does not have any fair value hedges as of December 31, 2014. The following table summarizes the notional amount, carrying value, and estimated fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments used to hedge interest rates as of December 31, 2014. The notional amount represents the aggregate amount of a particular security that is currently hedged at one time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rates or market risks. The table also includes a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate the impact on the Company’s derivative instruments from an increase or decrease in 10-year Treasury bill interest rates by 50 basis points, as of December 31, 2014.

Carrying andEstimated Carrying Value
MaturityEstimate+ 50- 50
($ in thousands)Notional AmountDate RangeFair ValueBasis PointsBasis Points
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps$225,0002016-2017$(1,767)$148$(3,846)
Interest rate caps153,2392015-2019—50—
Total cash flow hedges$378,2392015-2019$(1,767)$198$(3,846)

Interest Rate Sensitive Liabilities

The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of its line of credit and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company’s real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives the Company borrows primarily at fixed rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. The Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

The Company’s interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows. Management has estimated that the fair value of the Company’s $4.4 billion of fixed rate debt at December 31, 2014, to be $4.6 billion. Management has estimated the fair value of the Company’s $660.6 million of variable rate debt at December 31, 2014, is $656.3 million based on the terms of existing mortgage notes payable and variable rate demand notes compared to those available in the marketplace ($ in thousands).

For the Years Ended December 31,
20152016201720182019ThereafterTotalFair value
Fixed rate debt$94,580$191,481$538,683$320,080$630,801$2,562,324$4,337,949$4,531,964
Average interest rate5.1%4.5%3.3%5.5%4.3%3.9%
Variable rate debt$—$216,577$25,000$—$239,814$179,202(1)$660,593$656,345
Average interest rate—2.2%2.2%—1.7%1.9%
(1)$153.2 million subject to interest rate caps.

The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2014; it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, the Company’s ultimate realized gain or loss, with respect to interest rate fluctuations and hedging strategies would depend on the exposures that arise during the period.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this Form 10-K. See Item 15.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Essex Property Trust, Inc.

As of December 31, 2014, ESS carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, ESS’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2014, ESS’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by ESS in the reports that ESS files or submits under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such disclosure controls and procedures were also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that ESS files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the ESS’s management, including ESS’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in ESS’s internal control over financial reporting, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ESS’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

ESS’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). ESS’s management assessed the effectiveness of ESS’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, ESS’s management used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992)” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). ESS’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria. ESS’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report over ESS’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

Essex Portfolio, L.P.

As of December 31, 2014, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner concluded that as of December 31, 2014, the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in the reports that the files or submits under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such disclosure controls and procedures were also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Operating Partnership files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Operating Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, the Operating Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992)” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Operating Partnership’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the heading “Board and Corporate Governance Matters,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the headings “Executive Compensation and Other Information” and “Election of Directors – Governance, Board, and Committee Meetings: Compensation of Directors,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the headings “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Fees of KPMG LLP,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2014.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(A) Financial Statements

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements of Essex Property Trust, Inc.Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF- 1
Consolidated Balance Sheets: As of December 31, 2014 and 2013F- 4
Consolidated Statements of Income: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 6
Consolidated Statements of Equity: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 10
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF- 21
(2) Consolidated Financial Statements of Essex Portfolio, L.P.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF- 3
Consolidated Balance Sheets: As of December 31, 2014 and 2013F- 12
Consolidated Statements of Income: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 14
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 15
Consolidated Statements of Capital: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 16
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012F- 19
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF- 21
(3) Financial Statement Schedule – Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2014.F- 56
(4) See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page and certifications for a list of exhibits filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report.

(B) Exhibits

The Company hereby files, as exhibits to this Form 10-K, those exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index referenced in Item 15(A)(4) above.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Essex Property Trust, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Essex Property Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the accompanying financial statement schedule III. These consolidated financial statements and the accompanying financial statement schedule III are the responsibility of Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the accompanying financial statement schedule III based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Essex Property Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule III, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 2, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Essex Property Trust, Inc. changed its method for reporting discontinued operations in 2014 due to the adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.

/S/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

March 2, 2015

F- 1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Essex Property Trust, Inc.:

We have audited Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Essex Property Trust, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provi

Showing the first 8K of 256K characters. Open the full section