Essex Property Trust 10-K 2024-12-31
Filed 2025-02-21. 24 sections, 630K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to _____________
001-13106 (Essex Property Trust, Inc.)
333-44467-01 (Essex Portfolio, L.P.)
(Commission File Number)
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Maryland | 77-0369576 | |||||||
| (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) | (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) | |||||||
| California | 77-0369575 | |||||||
| (Essex Portfolio, L.P.) | (Essex Portfolio, L.P.) | |||||||
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1100 Park Place, Suite 200
San Mateo, California 94403
(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)
(650) 655-7800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||||||||
| Common Stock, $.0001 par value (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) | ESS | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Essex Property Trust, Inc.:
| Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
Essex Portfolio, L.P.:
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | ☐ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | ☒ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | ☐ |
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | Essex Portfolio, L.P. | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ |
As of June 28, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of Essex Property Trust, Inc. was approximately $17.4 billion. The aggregate market value was computed with reference to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. There is no public trading market for the common units of Essex Portfolio, L.P. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of Essex Portfolio, L.P. cannot be determined.
As of February 19, 2025, 64,325,080 shares of common stock ($.0001 par value) of Essex Property Trust, Inc. were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders of Essex Property Trust, Inc. are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
Auditor Name: KPMG LLP Location: San Francisco, California PCAOB ID: 185
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 of Essex Property Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and Essex Portfolio, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership of which Essex Property Trust, Inc. is the sole general partner.
Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” mean collectively Essex Property Trust, Inc. and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Essex Property Trust, Inc., including Essex Portfolio, L.P., and references to the “Operating Partnership,” or “EPLP” mean Essex Portfolio, L.P. and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Essex Portfolio, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Essex” mean Essex Property Trust, Inc., not including any of its subsidiaries.
Essex operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2024, Essex owned approximately 96.5% of the ownership interest in the Operating Partnership with the remaining 3.5% interest owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, Essex has exclusive control of the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management.
The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and Essex contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings to the Operating Partnership. In return for those contributions, Essex receives a number of Operating Partnership limited partnership units (“OP Units,” and the holders of such OP Units, “Unitholders”) equal to the number of shares of common stock it has issued in the equity offerings. Contributions of properties to the Operating Partnership can be structured as tax-deferred transactions through the issuance of OP Units, which is one of the reasons why the Company is structured in the manner outlined above. Based on the terms of the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, OP Units can be exchanged into Essex common stock on a one-for-one basis. The Company maintains a one-for-one relationship between the OP Units issued to Essex and shares of common stock.
The Company believes that combining the reports on Form 10-K of Essex and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
-
enhances investors’ understanding of Essex and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
-
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both Essex and the Operating Partnership; and
-
creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
Management operates Essex and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of Essex consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership.
All of the Company’s property ownership, development, and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and Essex has no material assets, other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Essex’s primary function is acting as the general partner of the Operating Partnership. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, Essex consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of Essex and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. Essex also issues equity from time to time and guarantees certain debt of the Operating Partnership, as disclosed in this report. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company’s ownership interests in its co-investments. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by the Company, which are contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units (on a one-for-one share of common stock per OP Unit basis), the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company’s business. These sources of capital include the Operating Partnership’s working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from disposition of certain properties and co-investments.
The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between Essex and the Operating Partnership in the context of how Essex and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. Stockholders’ equity, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interest are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Essex and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as noncontrolling interest in Essex’s consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the interest of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships and co-investment partners.
iii
The noncontrolling interest in Essex’s consolidated financial statements include (i) the same noncontrolling interest as presented in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and (ii) OP Unitholders. The differences between stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at Essex and Operating Partnership levels.
To help investors understand the significant differences between Essex and the Operating Partnership, this report on Form 10-K provides separate consolidated financial statements for Essex and the Operating Partnership; a single set of consolidated notes to such financial statements that includes separate discussions of stockholders’ equity or partners’ capital, and earnings per share/unit, as applicable; and a combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This report on Form 10-K also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of Essex and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that Essex and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
In order to highlight the differences between Essex and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report on Form 10-K for Essex and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to Essex and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of Essex and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and co-investments and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the Company is one business and the Company operates that business through the Operating Partnership. The separate discussions of Essex and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.
The information furnished in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, capital, and cash flows of the Company and the Operating Partnership reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements for the periods and are normal and recurring in nature, except as otherwise noted.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to such consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations herein.
iv
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
2024 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
v
PART I
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such forward-looking statements are described in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Forward-Looking Statements.” Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in each forward-looking statement. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in this report, including in Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
Item 1. Business
OVERVIEW
Essex Property Trust, Inc. (“Essex”), a Maryland corporation, is an S&P 500 company that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Essex owns all of its interest in its real estate and other investments directly or indirectly through Essex Portfolio, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or “EPLP”). Essex is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and as of December 31, 2024, had an approximately 96.5% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership. In this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” also refer to Essex Property Trust, Inc., the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Essex and/or the Operating Partnership.
Essex has elected to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the year ended December 31, 1994. Essex completed its initial public offering on June 13, 1994. In order to maintain compliance with REIT tax rules, the Company utilizes taxable REIT subsidiaries for various revenue generating or investment activities. A domestic taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to federal income tax as a regular C Corporation. All taxable REIT subsidiaries are consolidated by the Company for financial reporting purposes.
The Company is engaged primarily in the ownership, operation, management, acquisition, development and redevelopment of predominantly apartment communities, located along the West Coast of the United States. As of December 31, 2024, the Company owned or had ownership interests in 255 operating apartment communities, aggregating 62,157 apartment homes, excluding the Company’s ownership in preferred equity co-investments, loan investments, two operating commercial buildings, and a development pipeline comprised of various predevelopment projects (collectively, the “Portfolio”).
The Company’s website address is https://www.essex.com. The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and the Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders are available, free of charge, on its website as soon as practicable after the Company files the reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information contained on the Company’s website shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this report.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
The following is a discussion of the Company’s business strategies in regards to real estate investment and management.
Business Strategies
Research Driven Approach to Investments – The Company believes that successful real estate investment decisions and portfolio growth begin with extensive regional economic research and local market knowledge. The Company continually assesses markets where the Company operates, as well as markets where the Company considers future investment opportunities by evaluating markets and focusing on the following strategic criteria:
-
Major metropolitan areas that have regional population in excess of one million;
-
Constraints on new supply driven by: (i) low availability of developable land sites where competing housing could be economically built; (ii) political growth barriers, such as protected land, urban growth boundaries, and potential lengthy and expensive development permit processes; and (iii) natural limitations to development, such as mountains or waterways;
-
Rental demand enhanced by affordability of rents relative to costs of for-sale housing; and
-
Housing demand based on job growth, proximity to jobs, high median incomes and the quality of life including related commuting factors.
Recognizing that all real estate markets are cyclical, the Company regularly evaluates the results of its regional economic, and local market research, and adjusts the geographic focus of its portfolio accordingly. The Company seeks to increase its portfolio allocation in markets projected to have the strongest local economies and to decrease allocations in markets projected to have declining economic conditions. Likewise, the Company also seeks to increase its portfolio allocation in markets that have attractive property valuations and to decrease allocations in markets that have inflated valuations and low relative yields.
Property Operations – The Company manages its communities by focusing on activities that may generate above-average rental growth, tenant retention/satisfaction and long-term asset appreciation. The Company intends to achieve this by utilizing the strategies set forth below:
-
Property Management – Oversee delivery and quality of the housing provided to our tenants and manage the properties financial performance.
-
Capital Preservation – The Company’s asset management services are responsible for the planning, budgeting and completion of major capital improvement projects at the Company’s communities.
-
Business Planning and Control – Comprehensive business plans are implemented in conjunction with significant investment decisions. These plans include benchmarks for future financial performance based on collaborative discussions between property operations teams and the senior leadership team.
-
Development and Redevelopment – The Company focuses on acquiring and developing apartment communities in supply constrained markets, and redeveloping its existing communities to improve the financial and physical aspects of the Company’s communities.
CURRENT BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
Acquisitions of Real Estate Interests
The table below summarizes acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 ($ in millions):
| Property Name | Location | Apartment Homes | Essex Ownership Percentage | Contract Price at Pro Rata Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BEXAEW Portfolio | CA and WA | 1,480 | 100% | $ | 252.0 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maxwell Sunnyvale | CA | 75 | 100% | 46.6 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARLO Mountain View | CA | 164 | 100% | 101.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patina at Midtown | CA | 269 | 100% | 58.4 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Century Towers | CA | 376 | 100% | 86.8 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BEX II Portfolio | CA | 871 | 100% | 168.4 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beaumont | WA | 344 | 100% | 136.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total acquisitions | 3,579 | $ | 849.4 |
(1)In March 2024, the Company acquired its joint venture partner's 49.9% interest in the BEXAEW LLC’s (“BEXAEW”) portfolio comprised of four communities for a total purchase price of $505.0 million on a gross basis.
(2)In April 2024, the Company accepted the third-party sponsor’s common equity interest affiliated with its $14.7 million preferred equity investment. The community was consolidated on the Company’s financial statements at a $46.6 million valuation.
(3)In July 2024, the Company acquired its joint venture partner's 49.9% common equity interest in Patina at Midtown for a total purchase price of $117.0 million on a gross basis.
(4)In September 2024, the Company acquired its joint venture partner's 50% common equity interest in Century Towers for a total purchase price of $173.5 million on a gross basis.
(5)In October 2024, the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s 49.9% interest in the BEX II, LLC (“BEX II”) portfolio, comprised of four communities for a total contract price of $337.5 million on a gross basis.
Dispositions of Real Estate Interests
As part of its strategic plan to own quality real estate in supply-constrained markets, the Company continually evaluates all of its communities and sells those communities that no longer meet the Company’s strategic criteria. The Company may use the capital generated from the dispositions to invest in higher-return communities, other real estate investments or to fund other commitments. The Company believes that the sale of these communities will not have a material impact on its future results of operations or cash flows nor will the sale of these communities materially affect the Company’s ongoing operations. In general, the Company seeks to offset the dilutive impact on long-term earnings and funds from operations from these dispositions through the positive impact of reinvestment of proceeds.
The table below summarizes disposition activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 ($ in millions):
| Property Name | Location | Apartment Homes | Sale Price at Pro Rata Share | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Hillsdale Garden | CA | 697 | $ | 205.7 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total dispositions | 697 | $ | 205.7 |
(1) In October 2024, the Company sold its 81.5% interest in a consolidated co-investment, Hillsdale Garden, a 697-unit apartment home community, for a contract price of $252.4 million on a gross basis ($205.7 million at pro rata).
Development Pipeline
The Company defines development projects as new communities that are being constructed, or are newly constructed and are in a phase of lease-up and have not yet reached stabilized operations.
The Company defines predevelopment projects as proposed communities in negotiation or in the entitlement process with an expected high likelihood of becoming entitled development projects. The Company may also acquire land for future development purposes. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s development pipeline was comprised of various consolidated predevelopment projects with total incurred costs of $52.7 million.
Long Term Debt
During 2024, the Company made regularly scheduled principal payments of $3.1 million to its secured mortgage notes payable at an average interest rate of 3.5%.
In March 2024, the Operating Partnership issued $350.0 million of senior unsecured notes due on April 1, 2034 with a coupon rate of 5.500% per annum (the "2034 Notes"), which are payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on October 1, 2024. The 2034 Notes were offered to investors at a price of 99.752% of the principal amount. The 2034 Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Operating Partnership, rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of the Operating Partnership and are unconditionally guaranteed by Essex. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay debt maturities, including to fund a portion of the repayment of its outstanding 3.875% senior unsecured notes due May 2024 and for other general corporate and working capital purposes. In August 2024, the Operating Partnership issued an additional $200.0 million of the 2034 Notes at a price of 102.871% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest from and including March 2024, up to, but excluding, the settlement date of August 21, 2024, with an effective yield of 5.110% per annum. These additional notes have substantially identical terms of the 2034 Notes issued in March 2024.
Bank Debt
As of December 31, 2024, Moody’s Investor Service and Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) credit agencies rated Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Essex Portfolio, L.P. Baa1/Stable and BBB+/Stable, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had two unsecured lines of credit aggregating $1.28 billion. The Company’s $1.2 billion credit facility had an interest rate of Adjusted Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“Adjusted SOFR”) plus 0.765% which is based on a tiered rate structure tied to the Company’s credit ratings, adjusted for the facility’s sustainability metric adjustment feature, and a scheduled maturity date of January 2029 with two six-month extensions, exercisable at the Company’s option. In September 2024, the scheduled maturity date was extended from January 2027 to January 2029. The Company’s $75.0 million working capital unsecured line of credit had an interest rate of Adjusted SOFR plus 0.765%, which is based on a tiered rate structure tied to the Company’s credit ratings, adjusted for the facility’s sustainability metric adjustment feature. Prior to its maturity in July 2024 the line of credit facility was amended such that the line’s capacity was increased from $35.0 million to $75.0 million and the scheduled maturity date was extended to July 2026.
Equity Transactions
In August 2024, the Company entered into a new equity distribution agreement pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $900.0 million (the “2024 ATM Program”). In connection with the 2024 ATM Program, the Company may also enter into related forward sale agreements whereby, at the Company’s discretion, it may sell shares of its common stock under the 2024 ATM Program under forward sale agreements. The use of a forward sale agreement would allow the Company to lock in a share price on the sale of shares of its common stock at the time the agreement is executed, but defer receipt of the proceeds from the sale of shares until a later date.
The 2024 ATM Program replaced the prior equity distribution agreement entered into in September 2021 (the “2021 ATM Program”), which was terminated upon the establishment of the 2024 ATM Program.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock under the 2024 ATM Program or the 2021 ATM Program. As of December 31, 2024, there were no outstanding forward sale agreements, and $900.0 million of shares remained available to be sold under the 2024 ATM Program.
In September 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan to allow the Company to acquire shares of common stock up to an aggregate value of $500.0 million. The plan supersedes the Company’s previous common stock repurchase plan announced in December 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not repurchase any shares. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $302.7 million of purchase authority remaining under the stock repurchase plan.
Co-investments
The Company has entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which it owns an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or land or other investments owned directly by the joint venture or partnership. For each joint venture the Company holds a non-controlling interest in the venture and, in most cases, may earn customary management fees, development fees, asset property management fees, and a promote interest.
The Company has also made, and may continue in the future to make, preferred equity investments in various multifamily stabilized communities or development projects. The Company earns a preferred rate of return on these investments.
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Company Overview and Values
The Company’s mission is to create quality communities in premier locations and it is critical to the Company’s mission that it attracts, trains and retains a talented and diverse team by providing a compelling place to work and opportunities for professional growth. The Company’s culture supports its mission and is guided by its core values: to act with integrity, to care about what matters, to do right with urgency, to lead at every level and to seek fairness. The Company is headquartered in San Mateo, CA, and has regional corporate offices in Woodland Hills, CA; Irvine, CA and Bellevue, WA.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 1,715 employees, 99.8% of whom were full-time employees. A total of 1,293 employees worked on-site at our operating communities and 422 worked in our corporate offices. The Company’s employee statistics for 2024 include the following data as of December 31, 2024: the Company’s workforce was comprised of 6 self-identified ethnically diverse groups, making up 71% of our population, 52% of the Company’s managerial employees, and included 29% of its senior executives; there were 204 women in positions of manager or higher, equating to 59% of managerial positions in the Company; the Company’s workforce self-identified as 41% female and 58% male (1% chose not to disclose their gender); and, 55% of the Company’s corporate associates self-identified as female.
Workplace Culture
The Company believes it has a broad perspective that better serves both the communities it operates in and the associates it employs due to fostering one of the most talented and diverse workforces among its peers in the real estate industry. The Company also supports employee-led resource groups which are open to all employees and intended to foster a sense of community and inclusion for associates at the Company that are intended to engage, educate, enable, and empower the Company’s employees.
Training and Development
The Company values leadership at every level and enables the same by providing opportunities for all associates to develop personal and professional skills through programs that encourage associate retention and advancement. The Company currently offers training courses to its associates via Workday Learning, and its associates spent 13,122 hours learning in 2024. The Company also provides its associates with an annual $3,000 tuition reimbursement to further support outside professional growth opportunities. To identify, retain and reward top performers, the Company engages in meaningful internal succession planning and offers a tenure program, excellence awards, and a bonus recognition program to reward associates for good teamwork, good ideas, and good service. The Company encourages internal promotions and hiring for open positions, and the executive team actively mentors the Company’s top talent to ensure strong leadership at the Company for the future. 38% of the Company’s associates have approached or surpassed the Company’s average tenure of 6.57 years, with 22% reaching beyond 10 years of service.
Employee Safety, Health, and Wellness
Safety is a top priority. The Company deeply cares about the wellbeing of its associates and residents. The Essex Safety Committee, comprised of key stakeholders across departments, meets quarterly and reviews the overall safety of the company in both our corporate offices and our communities. To maximize real-time responses, the Company has also established a working safety subcommittee that meets bi-weekly. The Company has implemented enhanced safety programs, which include a new Workplace Violence Prevention Program enacted companywide in 2024, regular safety inspections, emergency preparedness processes, hazard identification and control protocols, and related associate training.
The Company’s safety policies align with its health and wellness goals and seeks to proactively prevent workplace accidents and protect the health, wellness and safety of the Company’s associates through training and analysis of incident reports. Additionally, the Company offers retirement support, associate discount programs, a mental health program (which includes counseling and coaching sessions for mental well-being support at no cost), refresh days for our operations teams, and health benefit credits for participation in wellness programs.
Compensation and Benefits
The Company offers competitive compensation to secure and retain top talent. Alongside competitive pay, the Company is committed to pay parity, and conducts a pay analysis on an annual basis which includes the development and use of a robust, multiple regression analysis model to confirm the Company’s continued achievement of gender pay parity.
Beyond competitive compensation, the Company offers a suite of benefits, including health insurance, a retirement plan with a $6,000 annual matching potential benefit, life and disability coverage, supplemental paid parental leave, and the robust health and wellness support programs noted above. Additionally, the Company offers an associate housing discount.
Employee Engagement
In order to engage and promote communication with our associates and solicit meaningful feedback on our efforts to create a positive work environment, the Company issues engagement surveys to all associates to measure 10 key drivers of employee engagement including goal setting, organizational fit, well-being, freedom of opinion, meaningful work, management support and recognition, among others. Engagement surveys are split into three phases: new hire surveys, Company-wide annual surveys, and exit surveys. 90% of Company employees participated in the surveys in 2024. The Company’s overall engagement score on the surveys was 8 out of 10. Goal setting, Performance, and Alignment were recognized as the top three areas of strength for the organization.
Community and Social Impact
The Company believes volunteering can create positive change in the communities where our associates live and work and that the Company’s commitment to giving back helps it attract and retain associates. The Company’s volunteer program is aimed at supporting and encouraging eligible associates to become actively involved in their communities through the Company’s support of charity initiatives and offering paid hours for volunteer time. Additionally, the Company’s “Essex Cares” program provides direct aid to the Company’s residents, associates, and local communities.
INSURANCE
The Company purchases general liability and property insurance coverage, including loss of rent, for each of its communities. The Company also purchases limited earthquake, terrorism, environmental and flood insurance. There are certain types of losses which may not be covered or could exceed coverage limits. The insurance programs are subject to deductibles and self-insured retentions in varying amounts. The Company utilizes a wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Pacific Western Insurance LLC (“PWI”), to self-insure certain earthquake and property losses. As of December 31, 2024, PWI had cash and marketable securities of $98.9 million, and is consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.
All of the Company’s communities are located in areas that are subject to earthquake activity. The Company evaluates its financial loss exposure to seismic events by using actuarial loss models developed by the insurance industry and in most cases property vulnerability analysis based on structural evaluations by seismic consultants. The Company manages this exposure, where considered appropriate, desirable, and cost-effective, by upgrading properties to increase their resistance to forces caused by seismic events, by considering available funds and coverages provided by PWI and/or by purchasing seismic insurance. In most cases the Company also purchases limited earthquake insurance for certain properties owned by the Company’s co-investments.
In addition, the Company carries other types of insurance coverage related to a variety of risks and exposures.
Based on market conditions, the Company may change or potentially eliminate insurance coverages, or increase levels of self-insurance. Further, the Company may incur losses, which could be material, due to uninsured risks, deductibles and self-insured retentions, and/or losses in excess of coverage limits.
COMPETITION
There are numerous housing alternatives that compete with the Company’s communities in attracting tenants. These include other apartment communities, condominiums and single-family homes. If the demand for the Company’s communities is reduced or if competitors develop and/or acquire competing housing, rental rates and occupancy may drop which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company faces competition from other REITs, businesses and other entities in the acquisition, development and operation of apartment communities. Some competitors are larger and have greater resources than the Company. This competition may result in increased costs of apartment communities the Company acquires and/or develops.
WORKING CAPITAL
The Company believes that cash flows generated by its operations, existing cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities balances, availability under existing lines of credit, access to capital markets and the ability to generate cash from the disposition of real estate are sufficient to meet all of its reasonably anticipated cash needs during 2025.
The timing, source and amounts of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to changes in interest rates, stock price, and other fluctuations in the capital markets environment, which can affect the Company’s plans for acquisitions, dispositions, development and redevelopment activities.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
As a real estate owner and operator, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances and may be subject to liability and the costs of removal or remediation of certain potentially hazardous materials that may be present in our communities. See the discussion under the caption, “Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Operations - The Company’s portfolio may have environmental liabilities.” in Item 1A, Risk Factors, for information concerning the potential effect of environmental regulations on its operations, which discussion is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
OTHER MATTERS
Certain Policies of the Company
The Company intends to continue to operate in a manner that will not subject it to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company may in the future (i) issue securities senior to its common stock, (ii) fund acquisition activities with borrowings under its line of credit and (iii) offer shares of common stock and/or units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership or affiliated partnerships as partial consideration for property acquisitions. The Company from time to time acquires partnership interests in partnerships and joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries of the Company, when such entities’ underlying assets are real estate.
The Company invests primarily in apartment communities that are located in predominantly coastal markets within Southern California, Northern California, and the Seattle metropolitan area. The Company currently intends to continue to invest in apartment communities in such regions. However, the geographical composition of the portfolio is evaluated periodically and may be modified by management.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
For purposes of this section, the term “stockholders” means the holders of shares of Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s common stock. Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to Essex Property Trust, Inc.’s stockholders and Essex Portfolio, L.P.’s unitholders. You should carefully consider the following factors in evaluating our Company, our properties and our business.
Our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results of operations to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results.
Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Operations
General real estate investment risks may materially adversely affect property income and values, and therefore our stock price may be materially adversely affected. If the communities and other real estate investments, including development and redevelopment properties, do not generate sufficient income to meet operating and financing expenses, cash flow and the ability to make distributions will be materially adversely affected. Income and growth from the communities may be further materially adversely affected by, among other things, the following factors, in addition to the other risk factors listed in this Item 1A:
-
changes in the general or local economic climate that could affect demand for housing, including an increase in the use of new technologies and artificial intelligence to replace workers, and other events negatively impacting local employment rates, tenant dispersion, wages and the local economy;
-
changes in demand for rental housing due to a variety of factors, including changing demographics or policies governing legal immigration, which could lead to a relative decrease in the renting population;
-
changes in supply and cost of housing;
-
changes in economic conditions, such as high or sustained inflationary periods in which our operating and financing costs may increase at a rate greater than our ability to increase rents, thereby compressing our operating margins which may have a material adverse effect on our business, or deflationary periods where rents may decline more quickly relative to operating and financing costs; and
-
the appeal and desirability of our communities to tenants relative to other housing alternatives, including the size and amenity offerings, safety and location convenience, and our technology offerings.
Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents, and the Company may be unable to renew leases or relet units as leases expire. If the Company is unable to promptly renew or re-let existing leases, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then the Company’s results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Economic environments can negatively impact the Company’s liquidity and results of operations. In the event of a recession or other negative economic effects, including slowing job growth in key markets, the Company could incur reductions in rental and occupancy rates, property valuations and increases in costs. Any such recession or economic downturn may also affect consumer confidence and spending and negatively impact the volume and pricing of real estate transactions, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and its ability to vary its portfolio promptly in response to changes to the economy.
Rent control, or future or potential changes in applicable laws, or noncompliance with applicable laws, could materially adversely affect the Company’s stock price, business, financial condition and results of operations, and/or expose us to liability. The Company must own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop its properties in compliance with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, some of which may conflict with one another or be subject to limited judicial or regulatory interpretations. These laws and regulations may include zoning laws, building codes, rent control or stabilization laws, emergency orders, laws benefiting disabled persons, federal, state and local tax laws, landlord tenant laws, environmental laws, employment laws, immigration laws and other laws regulating housing, revenue management software and practices, or laws that are generally applicable to the Company’s business and operations. Changes in, or noncompliance with, laws and regulations could expose the Company to liability and could require the Company to make significant unanticipated expenditures to address noncompliance.
Existing and future rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations, along with similar laws and regulations that expand tenants’ rights or impose additional costs on landlords, including any such laws or regulations imposed in response to natural disasters and/or media attention on the housing industry, may reduce rental revenues or increase operating costs and thus such laws and regulations may materially adversely affect our stock price, business, financial condition and results of operations. Such laws and regulations limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents, evict tenants or recover increases in our
operating expenses and could reduce the value of our communities or make it more difficult for us to dispose of properties in certain circumstances. Expenses associated with our investment in these communities, such as debt service, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in rental income from the community.
Future pandemics could materially affect our business, financial condition, stock price, and results of operations. Due to the national and global impacts of a pandemic or other health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company may be subject to eviction moratoria, temporary or permanent legislative restrictions, limits on rent increases and collection efforts, or may be legally required to, or otherwise agree to, restructure tenants’ rent obligations on less favorable terms than those currently in place. In the event of tenant nonpayment, default or bankruptcy, we may incur costs in protecting our investment, collecting delinquent rents, and re-leasing our property and we may have limited ability to renew existing leases or sign new leases at levels consistent with market rents. A pandemic or other health crisis may cause increased costs, lower profitability and market fluctuations that may affect our ability to obtain necessary funds for our business or negatively impact the ability of the Company’s third-party mezzanine loan borrowers and preferred equity investment sponsors to repay the Company.
Acquisitions of communities involve various risks and uncertainties and may fail to meet expectations. The Company’s acquisition of apartment communities may fail to meet the Company’s expectations due to factors including inaccurate estimates of future income, expenses, and the costs of improvements or redevelopment, which may be exacerbated by the lack of reliable market data due to inconsistent deal flow. Further, the value and operational performance of an apartment community may be diminished if neighborhood changes occur before we are able to redevelop or sell the community. Also, in connection with such acquisitions, we may assume unknown or contingent liabilities, which could ultimately lead to material costs for us that we did not expect to incur. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with apartment communities may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may materially adversely
Showing the first 8K of 90K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None**.**
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
The Company has developed and implemented a cybersecurity risk management program intended to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of its critical systems and information. The Company’s cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our overall risk management program, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply across the risk management program to other legal, compliance, strategic, operational and financial risk areas.
The Company’s cybersecurity risk management program employs several different measures, including perimeter monitoring, endpoint monitoring and user management, designed to assess and identify cybersecurity risks. The Company’s technology management team is principally responsible for managing the Company’s cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes. The Company’s technology management team performs enterprise-level risk assessments designed to help identify
material cybersecurity risks to our critical systems, information, products, services, and our broader enterprise IT environment. The Company’s technology management team and third-party professionals perform penetration tests, vulnerability scans, and patch management to assess and protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of its critical systems and information. The Company provides training to its employees on cybersecurity matters, performs periodic awareness testing to facilitate compliance with the Company’s cybersecurity policies, and maintains a method for its employees and consultants to communicate any suspected cybersecurity incident. In addition, the Company evaluates key third-party service providers before the Company grants the service provider access to its information systems and has a process in place to ensure that future access is appropriate.
The Company has an established incident response plan for responding to cybersecurity incidents. The goal of the incident response plan is to detect and react to cybersecurity incidents, evaluate the scope and risk, respond appropriately, communicate effectively to all stakeholders, and ultimately reduce the likelihood of an incident recurrence. The Company’s incident response team consists of seasoned information technology, legal and financial reporting Company personnel. The incident response plan, members of the incident response team and the steps to respond to a security incident are evaluated for appropriateness and effectiveness, and key personnel from cross-functional departments are involved.
The Board of Directors considers cybersecurity risk as part of its risk oversight function and has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of enterprise level risks, including any cybersecurity-related risks faced by the Company. At least quarterly, the Audit Committee reviews cyber risks and mitigation strategies with senior management. The Audit Committee periodically reports to the full Board regarding its activities, including those relating to cybersecurity. Additionally, on an annual basis, the Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”) presents to the Audit Committee on any material updates to the cybersecurity program, such as process improvements, new initiatives and key vendor performance. Material cybersecurity events, if any, are escalated to the Board on an ongoing basis. The Board is also briefed annually on all major enterprise risks, including cybersecurity risks.
The Company’s management team, including the CTO, is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s material risks from cybersecurity threats. The CTO leads the technology management team and has extensive cybersecurity knowledge and expertise developed through a career of serving in various roles in information technology for over 20 years. The CTO oversees the Company’s initiatives to address existing or evolving cyber risks and is a member of the Enterprise Risk Committee. The CTO reports to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and provides updates to the Company’s senior leadership team on a regular basis, at least quarterly, about risks from cybersecurity threats, the results of penetration tests, vulnerability scans and userbase issues. The CTO and other members of the Company’s management team takes steps to stay informed about and monitor efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate and remediate cybersecurity risks and incidents through various means, such as briefings from internal security personnel; threat intelligence and other information obtained from governmental, public or private sources, including external consultants engaged; and alerts and reports produced by security tools deployed in our IT environment.
Over the past fiscal year, the Company has not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, including its operations, business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. See the discussion under the caption, “Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Operations - We are subject to laws and regulations relating to the handling of personal information and we rely on information technology to sustain our operations. Any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or breach of the Company’s privacy or information systems, or those of our vendors or other third parties, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.” in Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Form 10-K for further information.
Item 2. Properties
The Company’s portfolio as of December 31, 2024 (including communities owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, but excluding communities underlying preferred equity investments) was comprised of 255 stabilized operating apartment communities (comprising 62,157 apartment homes), of which 26,484 apartment homes are located in Southern California, 22,804 apartment homes are located in Northern California, and 12,869 apartment homes are located in the Seattle metropolitan area. The Company’s apartment communities accounted for 99.0% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Occupancy Rates
Financial occupancy is defined as the percentage resulting from dividing actual rental income by total scheduled rental income. Total scheduled rental income represents the value of all apartment homes, with occupied apartment homes valued at contractual rental rates pursuant to leases and vacant apartment homes valued at estimated market rents. When calculating actual rents for occupied apartment homes and market rents for vacant apartment homes, delinquencies and concessions are not taken into account. The Company believes that financial occupancy is a meaningful measure of occupancy because it considers the value of each vacant unit at its estimated market rate. Financial occupancy may not completely reflect short-term trends in physical occupancy and financial occupancy rates, and the Company’s calculation of financial occupancy may not be comparable to financial occupancy as disclosed by other REITs. Market rates are determined using the recently signed effective rates on new leases at the property and are used as the starting point in the determination of the market rates of vacant apartment homes. The Company may increase or decrease these rates based on a variety of factors, including overall supply and demand for housing, concentration of new apartment deliveries within the same submarket which can cause periodic disruption due to greater rental concessions to increase leasing velocity, and rental affordability.
For communities that are development properties in lease-up without stabilized occupancy figures, the Company believes the physical occupancy rate is the appropriate performance metric. While a community is in the lease-up phase, the Company’s primary motivation is to stabilize the property, which may entail the use of rent concessions and other incentives, and thus financial occupancy which is based on contractual income is not considered the best metric to quantify occupancy.
Communities
The Company’s communities are primarily urban and suburban high density wood frame communities comprising of two to seven stories above grade construction with structured parking situated on 1-20 acres of land with densities of approximately 10 to 80+ units per acre. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s communities include 103 garden-style, 142 mid-rise, and 10 high-rise communities. Garden-style communities are generally defined as on-grade properties with two and/or three-story buildings with no structured parking while mid-rise communities are generally defined as properties with three to seven story buildings and some structured parking. High-rise communities are typically defined as properties with buildings that are greater than seven stories, are steel or concrete framed, and frequently have structured parking. The communities have an average of approximately 244 apartment homes, with a mix of studio, one-, two- and some three-bedroom apartment homes. A wide variety of amenities are available at the Company’s communities, including covered parking, fireplaces, swimming pools, clubhouses with fitness facilities, playground areas and dog parks.
The Company hires, trains and supervises on-site service and maintenance personnel. The Company believes that the following primary factors enhance the Company’s ability to retain tenants:
-
located near employment centers;
-
attractive communities that are well maintained; and
-
proactive customer service.
Commercial Buildings
The Company owns two operating commercial buildings (totaling approximately 185,000 square feet) located in California and Washington, of which the Company occupied an aggregate of approximately 50,000 square feet as of December 31, 2024. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2024, the commercial buildings’ physical occupancy rate was 93% consisting of seven tenants, including the Company.
Operating Portfolio
The table below describes the Company’s operating portfolio as of December 31, 2024 (See Note 8, “Mortgage Notes Payable” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about the Company’s secured mortgage debt and Schedule III thereto for a list of secured mortgage loans related to the Company’s portfolio.):
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern California | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alpine Village | Alpine, CA | Garden | 301 | 1971 | 2002 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park Viridian | Anaheim, CA | Mid-rise | 320 | 2008 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Barkley (4)(5) | Anaheim, CA | Garden | 161 | 1984 | 2000 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonita Cedars | Bonita, CA | Garden | 120 | 1983 | 2002 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Village at Toluca Lake | Burbank, CA | Mid-rise | 146 | 1974 | 2017 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Camarillo Oaks | Camarillo, CA | Garden | 564 | 1985 | 1996 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Camino Ruiz Square | Camarillo, CA | Garden | 160 | 1990 | 2006 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hacienda at Camarillo Oaks | Camarillo, CA | Garden | 73 | 1984 | 2023 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle at Otay Ranch I & II | Chula Vista, CA | Mid-rise | 364 | 2001 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mesa Village | Clairemont, CA | Garden | 133 | 1963 | 2002 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Villa Siena | Costa Mesa, CA | Garden | 274 | 1974 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emerald Pointe | Diamond Bar, CA | Garden | 160 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regency at Encino | Encino, CA | Mid-rise | 75 | 1989 | 2009 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Havens | Fountain Valley, CA | Garden | 440 | 1969 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Valley Park | Fountain Valley, CA | Garden | 160 | 1969 | 2001 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capri at Sunny Hills (5) | Fullerton, CA | Garden | 102 | 1961 | 2001 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Haver Hill (6) | Fullerton, CA | Garden | 265 | 1973 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle at Fullerton | Fullerton, CA | Mid-rise | 192 | 2004 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wilshire Promenade | Fullerton, CA | Mid-rise | 149 | 1992 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montejo | Garden Grove, CA | Garden | 124 | 1974 | 2001 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Henley I | Glendale, CA | Mid-rise | 83 | 1974 | 1999 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Henley II | Glendale, CA | Mid-rise | 132 | 1970 | 1999 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Huntington Breakers | Huntington Beach, CA | Mid-rise | 344 | 1984 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Huntington | Huntington Beach, CA | Garden | 276 | 1975 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hillsborough Park | La Habra, CA | Garden | 235 | 1999 | 1999 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Village Green | La Habra, CA | Garden | 272 | 1971 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Palms at Laguna Niguel | Laguna Niguel, CA | Garden | 460 | 1988 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trabuco Villas | Lake Forest, CA | Mid-rise | 132 | 1985 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marbrisa | Long Beach, CA | Mid-rise | 202 | 1987 | 2002 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pathways at Bixby Village | Long Beach, CA | Garden | 296 | 1975 | 1991 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5600 Wilshire | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 284 | 2008 | 2014 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alessio | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 624 | 2001 | 2014 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ashton Sherman Village | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 264 | 2014 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Avant | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 443 | 2014 | 2015 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Avery | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 121 | 2014 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bellerive | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 63 | 2011 | 2011 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belmont Station | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 275 | 2009 | 2009 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Catalina Gardens | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 128 | 1987 | 2014 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cochran Apartments | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 58 | 1989 | 1998 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emerson Valley Village | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 144 | 2012 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gas Company Lofts (6) | Los Angeles, CA | High-rise | 251 | 2004 | 2013 | 92% |
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marbella | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 60 | 1991 | 2005 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pacific Electric Lofts (7) | Los Angeles, CA | High-rise | 314 | 2006 | 2012 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park Catalina | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 90 | 2002 | 2012 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park Place | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 60 | 1988 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regency Palm Court | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 116 | 1987 | 2014 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Santee Court | Los Angeles, CA | High-rise | 165 | 2004 | 2010 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Santee Village | Los Angeles, CA | High-rise | 73 | 2011 | 2011 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skye at Bunker Hill | Los Angeles, CA | High-rise | 456 | 1968 | 1998 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Blake LA | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 196 | 1979 | 1997 | 98% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tiffany Court | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 101 | 1987 | 2014 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wallace on Sunset | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 200 | 2021 | 2021 | 91% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wilshire La Brea | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 478 | 2014 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Windsor Court | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 95 | 1987 | 2014 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Windsor Court | Los Angeles, CA | Mid-rise | 58 | 1988 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aqua at Marina Del Rey | Marina Del Rey, CA | Mid-rise | 500 | 2001 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marina City Club (8) | Marina Del Rey, CA | Mid-rise | 101 | 1971 | 2004 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mirabella | Marina Del Rey, CA | Mid-rise | 188 | 2000 | 2000 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mira Monte | Mira Mesa, CA | Garden | 356 | 1982 | 2002 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hillcrest Park | Newbury Park, CA | Garden | 608 | 1973 | 1998 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fairway at Big Canyon (9) | Newport Beach, CA | Mid-rise | 74 | 1972 | 1999 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Muse | North Hollywood, CA | Mid-rise | 152 | 2011 | 2011 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Country Villas | Oceanside, CA | Garden | 180 | 1976 | 2002 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mission Hills | Oceanside, CA | Garden | 282 | 1984 | 2005 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Renaissance at Uptown Orange | Orange, CA | Mid-rise | 460 | 2007 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Arbors at Parc Rose (7) | Oxnard, CA | Mid-rise | 373 | 2001 | 2011 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mariner’s Place | Oxnard, CA | Garden | 105 | 1987 | 2000 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monterey Villas | Oxnard, CA | Garden | 122 | 1974 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tierra Vista | Oxnard, CA | Mid-rise | 404 | 2001 | 2001 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Hallie | Pasadena, CA | Mid-rise | 292 | 1972 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Stuart | Pasadena, CA | Mid-rise | 188 | 2007 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Villa Angelina | Placentia, CA | Garden | 256 | 1970 | 2001 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fountain Park | Playa Vista, CA | Mid-rise | 705 | 2002 | 2004 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Highridge (5) | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | Mid-rise | 255 | 1972 | 1997 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cortesia | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA | Garden | 308 | 1999 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle at Talega | San Clemente, CA | Mid-rise | 362 | 2002 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allure at Scripps Ranch | San Diego, CA | Mid-rise | 194 | 2002 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bernardo Crest | San Diego, CA | Garden | 216 | 1988 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cambridge Park | San Diego, CA | Mid-rise | 320 | 1998 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carmel Creek | San Diego, CA | Garden | 348 | 2000 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carmel Landing | San Diego, CA | Garden | 356 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carmel Summit | San Diego, CA | Mid-rise | 246 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CentrePointe | San Diego, CA | Garden | 224 | 1974 | 1997 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Esplanade | San Diego, CA | Garden | 616 | 1986 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Form 15 | San Diego, CA | Mid-rise | 242 | 2014 | 2016 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LIVIA at Scripps Ranch (10)(14) | San Diego, CA | Mid-rise | 264 | 2024 | 2024 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montanosa | San Diego, CA | Garden | 472 | 1990 | 2014 | 97% |
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summit Park | San Diego, CA | Garden | 300 | 1972 | 2002 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Essex Skyline (11) | Santa Ana, CA | High-rise | 350 | 2008 | 2010 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fairhaven (5) | Santa Ana, CA | Garden | 164 | 1970 | 2001 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Parkside Court | Santa Ana, CA | Mid-rise | 210 | 1986 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle at MacArthur Place | Santa Ana, CA | Mid-rise | 253 | 2002 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hope Ranch | Santa Barbara, CA | Garden | 108 | 1965 | 2007 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bridgeport Coast (12) | Santa Clarita, CA | Mid-rise | 188 | 2006 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Meadowood | Simi Valley, CA | Garden | 320 | 1986 | 1996 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shadow Point | Spring Valley, CA | Garden | 172 | 1983 | 2002 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Fairways at Westridge (12) | Valencia, CA | Mid-rise | 234 | 2004 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Vistas of West Hills (12) | Valencia, CA | Mid-rise | 220 | 2009 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allegro | Valley Village, CA | Mid-rise | 97 | 2010 | 2010 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lofts at Pinehurst, The | Ventura, CA | Garden | 118 | 1971 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinehurst (13) | Ventura, CA | Garden | 28 | 1973 | 2004 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Woodside Village | Ventura, CA | Garden | 145 | 1987 | 2004 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Passage Buena Vista (14) | Vista, CA | Garden | 179 | 2020 | 2021 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Walnut Heights | Walnut, CA | Garden | 163 | 1964 | 2003 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Dylan | West Hollywood, CA | Mid-rise | 184 | 2014 | 2014 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Huxley | West Hollywood, CA | Mid-rise | 187 | 2014 | 2014 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Avondale at Warner Center | Woodland Hills, CA | Mid-rise | 446 | 1970 | 1999 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reveal | Woodland Hills, CA | Mid-rise | 438 | 2010 | 2011 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vela (16) | Woodland Hills, CA | Mid-rise | 379 | 2018 | 2022 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26,484 | 96% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northern California | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belmont Terrace | Belmont, CA | Mid-rise | 71 | 1974 | 2006 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fourth & U | Berkeley, CA | Mid-rise | 171 | 2010 | 2010 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Commons | Campbell, CA | Garden | 264 | 1973 | 2010 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pointe at Cupertino | Cupertino, CA | Garden | 116 | 1963 | 1998 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Connolly Station | Dublin, CA | Mid-rise | 309 | 2014 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Avenue 64 | Emeryville, CA | Mid-rise | 224 | 2007 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emme | Emeryville, CA | Mid-rise | 190 | 2015 | 2015 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Courtyards at 65th Street (15) | Emeryville, CA | Mid-rise | 331 | 2004 | 2019 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foster’s Landing | Foster City, CA | Garden | 490 | 1987 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Boulevard | Fremont, CA | Garden | 172 | 1978 | 1996 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Briarwood (7) | Fremont, CA | Garden | 160 | 1978 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mission Peaks | Fremont, CA | Mid-rise | 453 | 1995 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mission Peaks II | Fremont, CA | Garden | 336 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paragon | Fremont, CA | Mid-rise | 301 | 2013 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stevenson Place | Fremont, CA | Garden | 200 | 1975 | 2000 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Rexford (16) | Fremont, CA | Garden | 203 | 1973 | 2021 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Woods (7) | Fremont, CA | Garden | 160 | 1978 | 2011 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| City Centre (12) | Hayward, CA | Mid-rise | 192 | 2000 | 2014 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| City View | Hayward, CA | Garden | 572 | 1975 | 1998 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lafayette Highlands | Lafayette, CA | Garden | 150 | 1973 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 777 Hamilton (17) | Menlo Park, CA | Mid-rise | 195 | 2017 | 2019 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apex | Milpitas, CA | Mid-rise | 367 | 2014 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARLO Mountain View | Mountain View, CA | Mid-rise | 164 | 2018 | 2024 | 95% |
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regency at Mountain View (6) | Mountain View, CA | Mid-rise | 142 | 1970 | 2013 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bridgeport | Newark, CA | Garden | 184 | 1987 | 1987 | 99% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Grand | Oakland, CA | High-rise | 243 | 2009 | 2009 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Landing at Jack London Square | Oakland, CA | Mid-rise | 282 | 2001 | 2014 | 94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Galloway | Pleasanton, CA | Mid-rise | 506 | 2016 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Radius | Redwood City, CA | Mid-rise | 264 | 2015 | 2015 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Township | Redwood City, CA | Mid-rise | 132 | 2014 | 2019 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Marcos | Richmond, CA | Mid-rise | 432 | 2003 | 2003 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 500 Folsom (14) | San Francisco, CA | High-rise | 537 | 2021 | 2021 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bennett Lofts | San Francisco, CA | Mid-rise | 178 | 2004 | 2012 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fox Plaza | San Francisco, CA | High-rise | 445 | 1968 | 2013 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MB 360 | San Francisco, CA | Mid-rise | 360 | 2014 | 2014 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park West | San Francisco, CA | Mid-rise | 126 | 1958 | 2012 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101 San Fernando | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 323 | 2001 | 2010 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 360 Residences (15) | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 213 | 2010 | 2017 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bella Villagio | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 231 | 2004 | 2010 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Century Towers | San Jose, CA | High-rise | 376 | 2017 | 2017 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enso | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 183 | 2014 | 2015 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 769 | 2013 | 2013 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Esplanade | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 278 | 2002 | 2004 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fountains at River Oaks | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 226 | 1990 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marquis | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 166 | 2015 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Meridian at Midtown (15) | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 218 | 2015 | 2018 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mio | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 103 | 2015 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Palm Valley | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 1,100 | 2008 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patina at Midtown | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 269 | 2021 | 2021 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sage at Cupertino (5) | San Jose, CA | Garden | 230 | 1971 | 2017 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Silver (14) | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 268 | 2019 | 2021 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Carlyle | San Jose, CA | Garden | 132 | 2000 | 2000 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Waterford Place | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 238 | 2000 | 2000 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Willow Lake | San Jose, CA | Mid-rise | 508 | 1989 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lakeshore Landing | San Mateo, CA | Mid-rise | 308 | 1988 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Station Park Green | San Mateo, CA | Mid-rise | 599 | 2018 | 2018 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deer Valley | San Rafael, CA | Garden | 171 | 1996 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bel Air | San Ramon, CA | Garden | 462 | 1988 | 1995 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canyon Oaks | San Ramon, CA | Mid-rise | 250 | 2005 | 2007 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crow Canyon | San Ramon, CA | Mid-rise | 400 | 1992 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foothill Gardens | San Ramon, CA | Garden | 132 | 1985 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mill Creek at Windermere | San Ramon, CA | Mid-rise | 400 | 2005 | 2007 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Twin Creeks | San Ramon, CA | Garden | 44 | 1985 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1000 Kiely | Santa Clara, CA | Garden | 121 | 1971 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Le Parc | Santa Clara, CA | Garden | 140 | 1975 | 1994 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marina Cove (18) | Santa Clara, CA | Garden | 292 | 1974 | 1994 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mylo | Santa Clara, CA | Mid-rise | 476 | 2021 | 2021 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Riley Square (7) | Santa Clara, CA | Garden | 156 | 1972 | 2012 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Villa Granada | Santa Clara, CA | Mid-rise | 270 | 2010 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chestnut Street | Santa Cruz, CA | Garden | 96 | 2002 | 2008 | 96% |
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bristol Commons | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 188 | 1989 | 1995 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brookside Oaks (5) | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 170 | 1973 | 2000 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lawrence Station | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 336 | 2012 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Magnolia Lane (19) | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 32 | 2001 | 2007 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Magnolia Square (5) | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 156 | 1963 | 2007 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maxwell Sunnyvale | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 75 | 2022 | 2024 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montclaire | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 390 | 1973 | 1988 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reed Square | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 100 | 1970 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Solstice | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 280 | 2014 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summerhill Park | Sunnyvale, CA | Garden | 100 | 1988 | 1988 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Via | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 284 | 2011 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Windsor Ridge | Sunnyvale, CA | Mid-rise | 216 | 1989 | 1989 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vista Belvedere | Tiburon, CA | Mid-rise | 76 | 1963 | 2004 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Verandas (12) | Union City, CA | Mid-rise | 282 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agora | Walnut Creek, CA | Mid-rise | 49 | 2016 | 2016 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brio (5) | Walnut Creek, CA | Mid-rise | 300 | 2015 | 2019 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22,804 | 96% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seattle, Washington Metropolitan Area | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belcarra | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 296 | 2009 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BellCentre | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 249 | 2001 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cedar Terrace | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 180 | 1984 | 2005 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Courtyard off Main | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 110 | 2000 | 2010 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ellington | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 220 | 1994 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emerald Ridge | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 180 | 1987 | 1994 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foothill Commons | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 394 | 1978 | 1990 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Palisades, The | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 192 | 1977 | 1990 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park Highland | Bellevue, WA | Mid-rise | 250 | 1993 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Piedmont | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 396 | 1969 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sammamish View | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 153 | 1986 | 1994 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Woodland Commons | Bellevue, WA | Garden | 302 | 1978 | 1990 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bothell Ridge | Bothell, WA | Garden | 214 | 1988 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canyon Pointe | Bothell, WA | Garden | 250 | 1990 | 2003 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inglenook Court | Bothell, WA | Garden | 224 | 1985 | 1994 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle Sonata | Bothell, WA | Mid-rise | 268 | 2000 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Salmon Run at Perry Creek | Bothell, WA | Garden | 132 | 2000 | 2000 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stonehedge Village | Bothell, WA | Garden | 196 | 1986 | 1997 | 98% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Highlands at Wynhaven | Issaquah, WA | Mid-rise | 333 | 2000 | 2008 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Park Hill at Issaquah | Issaquah, WA | Garden | 245 | 1999 | 1999 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wandering Creek | Kent, WA | Garden | 156 | 1986 | 1995 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ascent | Kirkland, WA | Garden | 90 | 1988 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bridle Trails | Kirkland, WA | Garden | 108 | 1986 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corbella at Juanita Bay | Kirkland, WA | Garden | 169 | 1978 | 2010 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evergreen Heights | Kirkland, WA | Garden | 200 | 1990 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montebello | Kirkland, WA | Garden | 248 | 1996 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Slater 116 | Kirkland, WA | Mid-rise | 108 | 2013 | 2013 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Martha Lake (16) | Lynwood, WA | Mid-rise | 155 | 1991 | 2021 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aviara (19) | Mercer Island, WA | Mid-rise | 166 | 2013 | 2014 | 97% |
| Apartment | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communities (1) | Location | Type | Homes | Built | Acquired (2) | Occupancy**(3)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Laurels at Mill Creek | Mill Creek, WA | Garden | 164 | 1981 | 1996 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monterra in Mill Creek (16) | Mill Creek, WA | Garden | 139 | 2003 | 2021 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Parkwood at Mill Creek | Mill Creek, WA | Garden | 240 | 1989 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Elliot at Mukilteo (5) | Mukilteo, WA | Garden | 301 | 1981 | 1997 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Castle Creek | Newcastle, WA | Garden | 216 | 1998 | 1998 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elevation | Redmond, WA | Garden | 158 | 1986 | 2010 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pure Redmond | Redmond, WA | Mid-rise | 105 | 2016 | 2019 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redmond Hill (7) | Redmond, WA | Garden | 442 | 1985 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shadowbrook | Redmond, WA | Garden | 418 | 1986 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Trails of Redmond | Redmond, WA | Garden | 423 | 1985 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesta (7) | Redmond, WA | Garden | 440 | 1998 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brighton Ridge | Renton, WA | Garden | 264 | 1986 | 1996 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fairwood Pond | Renton, WA | Garden | 194 | 1997 | 2004 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forest View | Renton, WA | Garden | 192 | 1998 | 2003 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinnacle on Lake Washington | Renton, WA | Mid-rise | 180 | 2001 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8th & Republican (15) | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 211 | 2016 | 2017 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annaliese | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 56 | 2009 | 2013 | 98% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Bernard | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 63 | 2008 | 2011 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cairns, The | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 99 | 2006 | 2007 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Collins on Pine | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 76 | 2013 | 2014 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canvas | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 123 | 2014 | 2021 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domaine | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 92 | 2009 | 2012 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expo (14) | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 275 | 2012 | 2012 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fountain Court | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 320 | 2000 | 2000 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent 523 | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 295 | 2010 | 2010 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taylor 28 | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 197 | 2008 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Audrey at Belltown | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 137 | 1992 | 2014 | 97% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Velo and Ray (15) | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 308 | 2014 | 2019 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vox | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 58 | 2013 | 2013 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wharfside Pointe | Seattle, WA | Mid-rise | 155 | 1990 | 1994 | 96% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beaumont | Woodinville, WA | Mid-rise | 344 | 2009 | 2024 | 93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12,869 | 97% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total: | 62,157 | Weighted Average: | 96% |
Footnotes to the Company’s Portfolio Listing as of December 31, 2024
(1)Unless otherwise specified, the Company consolidates each community in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(2)Represents the initial year the joint venture or consolidated community was acquired.
(3)For communities, occupancy rates are based on financial occupancy for the year ended December 31, 2024, except for communities that were stabilized during the year, in which case physical occupancy was used. For an explanation of how financial occupancy is calculated, see “Occupancy Rates” in this Item 2.
(4)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2083.
(5)Each of these communities is part of a DownREIT structure in which the Company is the general partner or manager and the other limited partners or members are granted rights of redemption for their interests.
(6)This community is owned by Wesco III, LLC (“Wesco III”). The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco III, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(7)This community is owned by Wesco I, LLC (“Wesco I”). The Company has a 58% interest in Wesco I, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(8)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2067.
(9)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2027.
(10)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2086.
(11)The Company has a 97% interest and a former Executive Vice President of the Company has a 3% interest in this community.
(12)This community is owned by Wesco IV, LLC (“Wesco IV”). The Company has a 65.1% interest in Wesco IV, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(13)This community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2028.
(14)The Company has an interest in a single asset entity owning this community.
(15)This community is owned by Wesco V, LLC (“Wesco V”). The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco V, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(16)This community is owned by Wesco VI, LLC (“Wesco VI”). The Company has a 50% interest in Wesco VI, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(17)This community is owned by BEX IV, LLC (“BEX IV”). The Company has a 50.1% interest in BEX IV, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(18)A portion of this community on which 84 apartment homes are presently located is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2028.
(19)The community is subject to a ground lease, which, unless extended, will expire in 2070.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The information regarding lawsuits, other proceedings and claims, set forth in Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to our consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3. In addition to such matters referred to in Note 17, the Company is subject to various other legal and/or regulatory proceedings arising in the course of its business operations. We believe that, with respect to such matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
The shares of the Company’s common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ESS.”
There is no established public trading market for the Operating Partnership’s limited partnership units (“OP Units”).
Holders
The approximate number of holders of record of the shares of Essex’s common stock was 973 as of February 19, 2025. This number does not include stockholders whose shares are held in investment accounts by other entities. Essex believes the actual number of stockholders is greater than the number of holders of record.
As of February 19, 2025, there were 62 holders of record of OP Units, including Essex.
Return of Capital
Under provisions of the Code, the portion of the cash dividend, if any, that exceeds earnings and profits is considered a return of capital. The return of capital is generated due to a variety of factors, including the deduction of non-cash expenses, primarily depreciation, in the determination of earnings and profits.
Cash dividends distributed for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 related to common stock were classified for federal income tax purposes as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | 98.19 | % | 88.46 | % | 80.17 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 1.81 | % | 8.32 | % | 16.78 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Unrecaptured section 1250 capital gain | — | % | 3.22 | % | 3.05 | % | ||||||||||||||
| 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Dividends and Distributions
Future dividends/distributions by Essex and the Operating Partnership will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Essex and will depend on the actual cash flows from operations of the Company, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, applicable legal restrictions and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. There are currently no contractual restrictions on Essex’s and the Operating Partnership’s present or future ability to pay dividends and distributions, and we do not anticipate that our ability to pay dividends/distributions will be impaired; however, there can be no assurances in that regard.
The Board of Directors declared a dividend/distribution for the fourth quarter of 2024 of $2.45 per share. The dividend/distribution was paid on January 15, 2025 to stockholders/unitholders of record as of January 2, 2025.
Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan
Essex has adopted a dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan designed to provide holders of common stock with a convenient and economical means to reinvest all or a portion of their cash dividends in shares of common stock and to acquire additional shares of common stock through voluntary purchases. Computershare, LLC, which serves as Essex’s transfer agent, administers the dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan. For a copy of the plan, contact Computershare, LLC at (312) 360-5354.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The information required by this section is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under the heading “Equity Compensation Plans,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
Issuance of Registered Equity Securities
In August 2024, the Company entered into the 2024 ATM Program. In connection with the 2024 ATM Program, the Company may also enter into related forward sale agreements whereby, at the Company’s discretion, it may sell shares of its common stock under the 2024 ATM Program under forward sale agreements. The use of a forward sale agreement would allow the Company to lock in a share price on the sale of shares of its common stock at the time the agreement is executed, but defer receipt of the proceeds from the sale of shares until a later date. The 2024 ATM Program replaced the 2021 ATM Program, which was terminated upon the establishment of the 2024 ATM Program.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock under the 2024 ATM Program or the 2021 ATM Program. As of December 31, 2024, there were no outstanding forward sale agreements, and $900.0 million of shares remained available to be sold under the 2024 ATM Program.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In September 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan to allow the Company to acquire shares of common stock up to an aggregate value of $500.0 million. The plan supersedes the Company’s previous common stock repurchase plan announced in December 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not repurchase any shares. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $302.7 million of purchase authority remaining under the stock repurchase plan.
Performance Graph
The line graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Essex’s common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Apartments index over the same period. This comparison assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock and each index was $100 on December 31, 2019 and that all dividends were reinvested.

| Index | 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2021 | 12/31/2022 | 12/31/2023 | 12/31/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Essex Property Trust, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 81.91 | $ | 124.83 | $ | 77.69 | $ | 94.76 | $ | 112.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FTSE NAREIT Equity Apartments Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 84.66 | $ | 138.51 | $ | 94.25 | $ | 99.78 | $ | 120.22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 118.40 | $ | 152.39 | $ | 124.79 | $ | 157.59 | $ | 197.02 |
(1)Common stock performance data is provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence.
The graph and other information furnished under the above caption “Performance Graph” in this Part II Item 5 of this Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of the Exchange Act.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Operating Partnership issued OP Units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, Essex issued an aggregate of 56,304 and zero shares of its common stock upon the exercise of stock options, respectively. Essex contributed the proceeds from the option exercises of $12.3 million to the Operating Partnership in exchange for an aggregate of 56,304 OP Units, as required by the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2024.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, Essex issued an aggregate of 13,217 and 22,236 shares, respectively, of its common stock in connection with restricted stock awards for no cash consideration. For each share of common stock issued by Essex in connection with such awards, the Operating Partnership issued OP Units to Essex as required by the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, for an aggregate of 13,217 and 22,236 OP Units during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, Essex issued an aggregate of 7,448 and 13,684 shares of its common stock in connection with the exchange of OP Units by limited partners into shares of common stock. For each share of common stock issued by Essex in connection with such exchange, the Operating Partnership issued OP Units to Essex as required by the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, for an aggregate of 7,448 and 13,684 OP Units during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Essex may sell shares through its equity distribution program, then contribute the net proceeds from these share issuances to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units as required by the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not issue or sell any shares of common stock pursuant to the 2024 ATM Program and 2021 ATM Program. As of December 31, 2024, there were no outstanding forward sale agreements.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. These consolidated financial statements include all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to reflect a fair statement of the results and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
OVERVIEW
Essex is a self-administered and self-managed REIT that acquires, develops, redevelops, and manages apartment communities in selected residential areas located on the West Coast of the United States. Essex owns all of its interests in its real estate investments, directly or indirectly, through the Operating Partnership. Essex is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2024, had an approximately 96.5% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.
The Company’s investment strategy has two components: constant monitoring of existing markets, and evaluation of new markets to identify areas with the characteristics that underlie rental growth. The Company’s strong financial condition supports its investment strategy by enhancing its ability to quickly shift acquisition, development, redevelopment, and disposition activities to markets that will optimize the performance of the Company’s portfolio.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company owned or had ownership interests in 255 operating apartment communities, comprising 62,157 apartment homes, excluding the Company’s ownership in preferred equity co-investments, loan investments, and two operating commercial buildings.
The Company’s apartment communities are predominately located in the following major regions:
Southern California (primarily Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and Ventura counties)
Northern California (the San Francisco Bay Area)
Seattle Metro (Seattle metropolitan area)
By region, the Company’s operating results for 2024 and 2023 and projection for 2025 new housing supply (defined as new multifamily apartment homes and single family homes, excluding developments with fewer than 50 apartment homes as well as student, senior and 100% affordable housing) are as follows:
Southern California Region: As of December 31, 2024, this region represented 44% of the Company’s consolidated operating apartment homes. Revenues for “2024 Same-Properties” (as defined below), or “Same-Property revenues,” increased 4.0% in 2024 as compared to 2023.
Northern California Region: As of December 31, 2024, this region represented 36% of the Company’s consolidated operating apartment homes. 2024 Same-Property revenues increased 2.6% in 2024 as compared to 2023.
Seattle Metro Region**:** As of December 31, 2024, this region represented 20% of the Company’s consolidated operating apartment homes. 2024 Same-Property revenues increased 2.9% in 2024 as compared to 2023.
In each of these regions, projected 2025 growth in new residential supply of apartment homes and single family homes is expected to be 1% or less of the total housing stock.
The Company’s consolidated operating communities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apartment Homes | % | Apartment Homes | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern California | 23,817 | 44 | % | 21,986 | 43 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Northern California | 19,747 | 36 | % | 19,245 | 37 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Seattle Metro | 10,899 | 20 | % | 10,341 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 54,463 | 100 | % | 51,572 | 100 | % |
Co-investments, including Wesco I, Wesco III, Wesco IV, Wesco V, Wesco VI, BEX IV, and other co-investments, developments under construction, and preferred equity interest co-investment communities are not included in the table presented above for both periods. The communities previously held in the BEXAEW, BEX II, Patina at Midtown, and Century
Towers co-investments, which were consolidated in 2024, are excluded from the table as December 31, 2023 but included in the table as of December 31, 2024.
Market Considerations
Elevated inflation in recent years has caused an increase in consumer prices, thereby reducing purchasing power and elevating the risks of a recession. In response to increased inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate throughout 2022 and 2023 resulting in a significant increase of market interest rates. In the second half of 2024, the U.S. Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate in conjunction with the softening of U.S. inflation and short term market interest rates have declined. Concurrently, geopolitical tensions and regional conflicts have increased uncertainty during recent years. The long-term impact of these developments will largely depend on the impact on job growth, the broader economy, and reactions by consumers, companies, governmental entities and capital markets.
The foregoing macroeconomic conditions have not negatively impacted the Company’s ability to access traditional funding sources on the same or reasonably similar terms as were available in recent periods prior to the pandemic, as demonstrated by the Company’s financing activity during the year ended December 31, 2024 discussed in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below. The Company is not at material risk of not meeting the covenants in its credit agreements and is able to timely service its debt and other obligations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2024 to the Year Ended December 31, 2023
The average financial occupancy for the Company’s 2024 Same-Property portfolio (stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023) was 96.1% and 96.5% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Financial occupancy is defined as the percentage resulting from dividing actual rental income by total scheduled rental income. Actual rental income represents contractual rental income pursuant to leases without considering delinquency and concessions. Total scheduled rental income represents the value of all apartment homes, with occupied apartment homes valued at contractual rental rates pursuant to leases and vacant apartment homes valued at estimated market rents. The Company believes that financial occupancy is a meaningful measure of occupancy because it considers the value of each vacant apartment home at its estimated market rate.
Market rates are determined using the recently signed effective rates on new leases at the property and are used as the starting point in the determination of the market rates of vacant apartment homes. The Company may increase or decrease these rates based on a variety of factors, including overall supply and demand for housing, concentration of new apartment deliveries within the same submarket which can cause periodic disruption due to greater rental concessions to increase leasing velocity, and rental affordability. Financial occupancy may not completely reflect short-term trends in physical occupancy and financial occupancy rates, and the Company’s calculation of financial occupancy may not be comparable to financial occupancy disclosed by other REITs.
The Company does not take into account delinquency and concessions to calculate actual rent for occupied apartment homes and market rents for vacant apartment homes. The calculation of financial occupancy compares contractual rates for occupied apartment homes to estimated market rents for unoccupied apartment homes, and thus the calculation compares the gross value of all apartment homes excluding delinquency and concessions. For apartment communities that are development properties in lease-up without stabilized occupancy figures, the Company believes the physical occupancy rate is the appropriate performance metric. While an apartment community is in the lease-up phase, the Company’s primary motivation is to stabilize the property, which may entail the use of rent concessions and other incentives, and thus financial occupancy, which is based on contractual income, is not considered the best metric to quantify occupancy.
The regional breakdown of the Company’s 2024 Same-Property portfolio for financial occupancy for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Southern California | 95.8 | % | 96.3 | % | |||||||
| Northern California | 96.3 | % | 96.5 | % | |||||||
| Seattle Metro | 96.7 | % | 96.6 | % |
The following table provides a breakdown of property revenue amounts, including the revenues attributable to 2024 Same-Properties ($ in thousands):
| Number of Apartment Homes | Year Ended December 31, | Dollar Change | Percentage Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Same-Properties: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern California | 21,573 | $ | 697,394 | $ | 670,475 | $ | 26,919 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northern California | 18,273 | 648,843 | 632,440 | 16,403 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seattle Metro | 10,341 | 290,294 | 282,092 | 8,202 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2024 Same-Property Revenues | 50,187 | 1,636,531 | 1,585,007 | 51,524 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 Non-Same Property Revenues | 127,654 | 73,257 | 54,397 | 74.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Property Revenues | $ | 1,764,185 | $ | 1,658,264 | $ | 105,921 | 6.4 | % |
2024 Same-Property Revenues increased by $51.5 million or 3.3%. The increase was primarily attributable to increases of 1.9% in average rental rates from $2,605 for 2023 to $2,655 for 2024, 0.8% in other property income, and 0.9% from a decrease in delinquencies, partially offset by a decrease of 0.4% in occupancy.
2024 Non-Same Property Revenues increased by $54.4 million or 74.3% to $127.7 million in 2024 compared to $73.3 million in 2023. The increase was primarily due to acquisitions of Hacienda at Camarillo Oaks in 2023, as well as the acquisitions of ARLO Mountain View, Maxwell Sunnyvale, and Beaumont, and the acquisition of the Company’s joint venture partner’s interests in the BEXAEW and BEX II portfolios, Patina at Midtown, and Century Towers in 2024. The increases were partially offset by the sale of Hillsdale Garden in 2024.
Property operating expenses, excluding real estate taxes increased by $26.4 million or 8.8% to $326.1 million in 2024 compared to $299.7 million in 2023, primarily due to increases of $10.6 million in utilities expenses, $7.8 million in administrative expenses, $7.3 million in personnel costs, and $0.7 million in maintenance and repairs expenses. 2024 Same-Property operating expenses, excluding real estate taxes, increased by $19.5 million or 6.7% to $308.8 million in 2024 compared to $289.3 million in 2023, primarily due to increases of $7.5 million in utilities expenses, $6.9 million in insurance and other expenses, $4.5 million in personnel costs, and $1.3 million in administrative expenses, offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in maintenance and repairs expenses.
Real estate taxes increased by $7.6 million or 4.1% to $193.4 million in 2024 compared to $185.8 million in 2023, primarily due to increases in tax rates in California and the Seattle Metro region and due to the purchase of Hacienda at Camarillo Oaks in 2023 and acquisitions in 2024. 2024 Same-Property real estate taxes increased by $3.4 million or 1.9% to $179.8 million in 2024 compared to $176.4 million in 2023 primarily due to increases in tax rates in California and
the Seattle Metro region.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $31.8 million or 5.8% to $580.2 million in 2024 compared to $548.4 million in 2023, primarily due to acquisitions in 2023 and 2024. These increases were offset by the sale of CBC and The Sweeps in 2023 and Hillsdale Garden in 2024.
Gain on sale of real estate and land of $175.6 million in 2024 was attributable to the sale of Hillsdale Garden in 2024.
Interest expense increased by $22.6 million or 10.6% to $235.5 million in 2024 compared to $212.9 million in 2023*,* primarily due to the issuance of $550.0 million senior unsecured notes in 2024 which resulted in an increase in interest expense of $20.1 million. The increase was also due to borrowing on the $300.0 million unsecured term loan in April 2023, the $298.0 million of 10-year secured loans closed in July 2023, and increased borrowing on the Company’s unsecured lines of credit in 2024 resulting in a $16.2 million increase in interest expense. Additionally, there was a $0.6 million decrease in capitalized interest in 2024, due to a decrease in development activity as compared to the same period in 2023. These increases in interest expense were partially offset by regular principal payments and various debts that matured or were paid off, primarily due to the pay off of the $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2023 and $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2024 during and after 2023, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $14.3 million for 2024.
Interest and other income increased by $34.7 million or 74.9% to $81.0 million in 2024 compared to $46.3 million in 2023, primarily due to increases of $34.8 million in legal settlements and $1.3 million in interest income, offset by a decrease of $1.7 million in realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities.
Equity income from co-investments increased by $37.6 million or 354.7% to $48.2 million in 2024 compared to $10.6 million in 2023, primarily due to a decrease of $30.0 million in impairment losses from unconsolidated co-investments, increases of $8.7 million in equity income from non-core co-investments, $1.5 million in co-investment promote income, and a decrease of $4.8 million in equity loss from co-investments. These increases were offset by a decrease of $6.5 million in income from preferred equity investments, including income from early redemption of preferred equity investments.
Gain on remeasurement of co-investments of $210.6 million resulted from the Company's acquisition of its joint venture partner's interests in the BEXAEW and BEX II portfolios, Patina at Midtown and Century Towers.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2023 to the Year Ended December 31, 2022
For the comparison of the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, refer to Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2024 under the subheading “Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2023 to the Year Ended December 31, 2022.”
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth the Company’s cash flows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 1,068,305 | $ | 980,064 | $ | 975,649 | ||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | $ | (973,051) | $ | (145,140) | $ | 145,958 | ||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | $ | (419,742) | $ | (477,271) | $ | (1,137,564) |
Essex’s business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership. Essex issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses from operating as a public company which are fully reimbursed by the Operating Partnership.
Essex itself does not hold any indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. Essex’s principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common stock. Essex’s sole source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.
As of December 31, 2024, Essex owned a 96.5% general partner interest and the limited partners owned the remaining 3.5% interest in the Operating Partnership.
The liquidity of Essex is dependent on the Operating Partnership’s ability to make sufficient distributions to Essex. The primary cash requirement of Essex is its payment of dividends to its stockholders. Essex also guarantees some of the Operating Partnership’s debt, as discussed further in Note 7, “Unsecured Debt”, and Note 8, “Mortgage Notes Payable”, to our consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If the Operating Partnership fails to fulfill certain of its debt requirements, which trigger Essex’s guarantee obligations, then Essex will be required to fulfill its cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, Essex’s only significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership.
For Essex to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it must pay dividends to its stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. While historically Essex has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its stockholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of other property, including, in limited circumstances, Essex’s own stock. As a result of this distribution requirement, the Operating Partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its ongoing operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not REITs can. Essex may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the Operating Partnership’s working capital needs, acquisitions and developments.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $66.8 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $69.8 million in marketable securities, all of which were equity securities. The Company believes that cash flows generated by its operations, existing cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities balances and availability under existing lines of credit are sufficient to
meet all of its anticipated cash needs during 2025. Additionally, the capital markets continue to be available and the Company is able to generate cash from the disposition of real estate assets to finance additional cash flow needs, including continued development and select acquisitions. In the event that economic disruptions occur, the Company may further utilize other resources such as its cash reserves, lines of credit, or decreased investment in redevelopment activities to supplement operating cash flows. The timing, source and amounts of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to changes in interest rates and other fluctuations in the capital markets environment, which can affect the Company’s plans for acquisitions, dispositions, development and redevelopment activities.
As of December 31, 2024, Moody’s Investor Service and Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) credit agencies rated Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Essex Portfolio, L.P. Baa1/Stable and BBB+/Stable, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $5.2 billion of fixed rate public bonds outstanding at an average interest rate of 3.4% with maturity dates ranging from 2025 to 2050.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s mortgage notes payable totaled $989.9 million, net of unamortized premiums and debt issuance costs, which consisted of $674.1 million in fixed rate debt at an average interest rate of 4.3% with maturity dates ranging from 2025 to 2033 and $315.8 million of variable rate debt at an average interest rate of 4.2% with maturity dates ranging from 2026 to 2046. A total of $220.8 million of variable rate debt is tax-exempt demand notes which are subject to total return swaps and $95.0 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable has an interest rate swap that effectively converts $47.5 million to an all-in fixed rate of 2.83%.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had two unsecured lines of credit aggregating $1.28 billion, including a $1.2 billion unsecured line of credit and a $75.0 million working capital unsecured line of credit. As of December 31, 2024, there was $75.0 million outstanding on the $1.2 billion unsecured line of credit. The underlying interest rate is based on a tiered rate structure tied to the Company’s credit ratings, adjusted for the Company’s sustainability metric adjustment feature, and was at the Adjusted SOFR plus 0.765% as of December 31, 2024. This facility is scheduled to mature in January 2029, with two six-month extensions, exercisable at the Company’s option. As of December 31, 2024, there was $62.9 million outstanding on the Company’s $75.0 million working capital unsecured line of credit. The underlying interest rate on the $75.0 million line is based on a tiered rate structure tied to the Company’s credit ratings, adjusted for the Company’s sustainability metric adjustment feature, and was at the Adjusted SOFR plus 0.765% as of December 31, 2024. This facility is scheduled to mature in July 2026.
The Company’s unsecured lines of credit and unsecured debt agreements contain debt covenants related to limitations on indebtedness and liabilities and maintenance of minimum levels of consolidated earnings before depreciation, interest and amortization. The Company was in compliance with the debt covenants as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
The Company pays quarterly dividends from cash available for distribution. Until it is distributed, cash available for distribution is invested by the Company primarily in investment grade securities held available for sale or is used by the Company to reduce balances outstanding under its lines of credit.
Derivative Activity
The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, and total return swap contracts to manage certain interest rate risks. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps and total return swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
The Company has four total return swap contracts, with an aggregate notional amount of $220.8 million, that effectively converts $220.8 million of fixed mortgage notes payable to a floating interest rate based on the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index (“SIFMA”) plus a spread. The total return swaps provide fair market value protection on the mortgage notes payable to our counterparties during the initial period of the total return swap until the Company’s option to call the mortgage notes at par can be exercised. The Company can currently call all four of the total return swaps, with $220.8 million of the outstanding debt at par. These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting. The aggregate carrying and fair value of the total return swaps was zero at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023 the aggregate carrying value of the interest rate swap contracts are an asset of $5.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively, and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company had no interest rate cap agreements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Hedge ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges, which is reported in current year income as interest expense, net was zero for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Issuance of Common Stock
In August 2024, the Company entered into the 2024 ATM Program. In connection with the 2024 ATM Program, the Company may also enter into related forward sale agreements whereby, at the Company's discretion, it may sell shares of its common stock under the 2024 ATM Program under forward sale agreements. The use of a forward sale agreement would allow the Company to lock in a share price on the sale of shares of its common stock at the time the agreement is executed, but defer receipt of the proceeds from the sale of shares until a later date.
The 2024 ATM Program replaced the 2021 ATM Program, which was terminated upon the establishment of the 2024 ATM Program. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company did not sell any shares of common stock through the 2024 ATM Program nor 2021 ATM Program. As of December 31, 2024, there were no outstanding forward purchase agreements, and $900.0 million of shares of common stock remained available to be sold under the 2024 ATM Program.
Capital Expenditures
Non-revenue generating capital expenditures are improvements and upgrades that extend the useful life of the property. For the year ended December 31, 2024, non-revenue generating capital expenditures averaged approximately $2,109 per apartment home. These expenditures do not include expenditures for deferred maintenance on acquisition properties, expenditures for property renovations and improvements which are expected to generate additional revenue or cost savings, and do not include expenditures incurred due to changes in government regulations that the Company would not have incurred otherwise, retail, furniture and fixtures, or expenditures for which the Company has been reimbursed or expects to be reimbursed. The Company expects that cash from operations and/or its lines of credit will fund such expenditures.
Development and Predevelopment Pipeline
The Company defines development projects as new communities that are being constructed, or are newly constructed and are in a phase of lease-up and have not yet reached stabilized operations.
The Company defines predevelopment projects as proposed communities in negotiation or in the entitlement process with an expected high likelihood of becoming entitled development projects. The Company may also acquire land for future development purposes or sale. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s development and predevelopment pipeline was comprised of various consolidated predevelopment projects, with total incurred costs of $52.7 million.
The Company expects to fund the development and predevelopment communities by using a combination of some or all of the following sources: its working capital, amounts available on its lines of credit, construction loans, net proceeds from public and private equity and debt issuances, and proceeds from the disposition of assets, if any.
Alternative Capital Sources
The Company utilizes co-investments as an alternative source of capital for acquisitions of both operating and development communities. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had an interest in 7,694 apartment homes in operating communities with joint ventures and technology co-investments for a total book value of $379.5 million.
Real Estate and Other Commitments
The following table summarizes the Company’s unfunded real estate and other future commitments as of December 31, 2024 ($ in thousands):
| Number of Properties | Investment | Remaining Commitment | ||||||||||||||||||
| Joint ventures : | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred equity investments | 1 | $ | 85,000 | $ | 35,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-core co-investments | — | 86,000 | 34,465 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 171,000 | $ | 69,465 |
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had operating lease commitments of $125.1 million for ground, building and garage leases with maturity dates ranging from 2025 to 2083. $6.4 million of these commitments are due within the next twelve months.
Variable Interest Entities
In accordance with accounting standards for consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”), the Company consolidated the Operating Partnership, 18 DownREIT entities (comprising nine communities) and five co-investments as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2023, the Company consolidated the Operating Partnership, 18 DownREIT entities (comprising nine communities) and six co-investments. The Company consolidates these entities because it is deemed the primary beneficiary. Essex has no assets or liabilities other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. The consolidated total assets and liabilities related to the above consolidated co-investments and DownREIT entities, net of intercompany eliminations, were $893.0 million and $319.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2024, and $956.7 million and $324.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2023. Noncontrolling interests in these entities were $105.1 million and $121.1 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company’s financial risk in each VIE is limited to its equity investment in the VIE. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of any other VIEs.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company defines critical accounting estimates as those that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The Company’s critical accounting estimates relate principally to the following key areas: (i) accounting for the acquisition of investments in real estate; and (ii) evaluation of events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of any of the Company’s rental properties may not be recoverable.
The Company accounts for its acquisitions of investments in real estate by assessing each acquisition to determine if it meets the definition of a business or if it qualifies as an asset acquisition. We expect that acquisitions of individual operating communities will generally be viewed as asset acquisitions, and result in the capitalization of acquisition costs, and the allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the relative fair value of the respective assets and liabilities.
In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent land appraisals which consider comparable market transactions, its own analysis of recently acquired or developed comparable properties in our portfolio for land comparables and building replacement costs, and other publicly available market data. In calculating the fair value of identified intangible assets of an acquired property, the in-place leases are valued based on in-place rent rates and amortized over the average remaining term of all acquired leases. The allocation of the total consideration exchanged for a real estate acquisition between the identifiable assets and liabilities and the depreciation we recognize over the estimated useful life of the asset could be impacted by different assumptions and estimates used in the calculation. The reasonable likelihood that the estimate could have a material impact on the financial condition of the Company is based on the total consideration exchanged for real estate during any given year.
The Company periodically assesses its real estate investments for events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on monitoring investment market conditions and performance for operating properties including the net operating income for the most recent
12 month period, monitoring estimated costs for properties under development, the Company’s ability to hold and its intent with regard to each asset, and each property’s remaining useful life. Although each of these may result in an impairment indicator, the shortening of an expected holding period due to the potential sale of a property is the most likely impairment indicator. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property held for investment may not be fully recoverable, the carrying amount is evaluated. If the sum of the property’s expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property, then the Company will recognize an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the property. Changes in operating and market conditions may result in a change of our intent to hold the property through the end of its useful life and may impact the assumptions utilized to determine the future cash flows of the real estate investment.
The Company bases its accounting estimates on historical experience, current market conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may vary from those estimates made by management and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.
Funds from Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders and Unitholders
Funds from Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders and Unitholders (“FFO”) is a financial measure that is commonly used in the REIT industry. The Company presents FFO and FFO excluding non-core items (referred to as “Core FFO”) as supplemental operating performance measures. FFO and Core FFO are not used by the Company as, nor should they be considered to be, alternatives to net income computed under U.S. GAAP as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or as alternatives to cash from operating activities computed under U.S. GAAP as an indicator of the Company’s ability to fund its cash needs.
FFO and Core FFO are not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and do not present, nor do they intend to present, a complete picture of the Company’s financial condition and operating performance. The Company believes that net income computed under U.S. GAAP is the primary measure of performance and that FFO and Core FFO are only meaningful when they are used in conjunction with net income.
The Company considers FFO and Core FFO to be useful financial performance measurements of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO and Core FFO provide investors with additional bases to evaluate operating performance and ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures and to pay dividends. By excluding gains or losses related to sales of depreciated operating properties and land, excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates) and excluding impairment write-downs from operating real estate and unconsolidated co-investments driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of real estate held by the co-investment, FFO can help investors compare the operating performance of a real estate company between periods or as compared to different companies. By further adjusting for items that are not considered part of the Company’s core business operations, Core FFO allows investors to compare the core operating performance of the Company to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the Company’s actual operating results. The Company believes that its consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of its financial condition and its operating performance.
In calculating FFO, the Company follows the definition for this measure published by NAREIT, which is the leading REIT industry association. The Company believes that, under the NAREIT FFO definition, the two most significant adjustments made to net income are (i) the exclusion of historical cost depreciation and (ii) the exclusion of gains and losses from the sale of previously depreciated properties. The Company agrees that these two NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons:
(a)historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP assumes, through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on Funds from Operations “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” Consequently, NAREIT’s definition of FFO reflects the fact that real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges required by U.S. GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities.
(b)REITs were created as a legal form of organization in order to encourage public ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, of gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REIT’s activity and assists in comparing those operating results between periods.
Management believes that it has consistently applied the NAREIT definition of FFO to all periods presented. However, there is judgment involved and other REITs’ calculation of FFO may vary from the NAREIT definition for this measure, and thus their disclosure of FFO may not be comparable to the Company’s calculation.
The table below is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO and Core FFO for the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share amounts).
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 741,522 | $ | 405,825 | $ | 408,315 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 580,220 | 548,438 | 539,319 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gains not included in FFO | (386,138) | (59,238) | (111,839) | |||||||||||||||||
| Casualty loss | — | 433 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Impairment loss from unconsolidated co-investments | 3,726 | 33,700 | 2,105 | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated co-investments | 66,943 | 71,745 | 72,585 | |||||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest related to Operating Partnership units | 26,414 | 14,284 | 14,297 | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation attributable to third party ownership and other (1) | 31,191 | (1,474) | (1,421) | |||||||||||||||||
| Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders and unitholders | $ | 1,063,878 | $ | 1,013,713 | $ | 923,361 | ||||||||||||||
| FFO per share-diluted | $ | 15.99 | $ | 15.24 | $ | 13.70 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-core items: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Expensed acquisition and investment related costs | $ | 72 | $ | 595 | $ | 2,132 | ||||||||||||||
| Tax (benefit) expense on unconsolidated co-investments (2) | (929) | 697 | (10,236) | |||||||||||||||||
| Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on marketable securities, net | (8,347) | (10,006) | 45,547 | |||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (179) | 70 | (381) | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity (income) loss from non-core co-investments (3) | (10,344) | (1,685) | 38,045 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt, net | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt from unconsolidated co-investment | — | — | 988 | |||||||||||||||||
| Co-investment promote income | (1,531) | — | (17,076) | |||||||||||||||||
| Income from early redemption of preferred equity investments and notes receivable | — | (285) | (1,669) | |||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative and other, net (4) | 39,341 | 6,629 | 2,536 | |||||||||||||||||
| Insurance reimbursements, legal settlements, and other, net (5) | (43,794) | (9,821) | (5,392) | |||||||||||||||||
| Core funds from operations attributable to common stockholders and unitholders | $ | 1,038,167 | $ | 999,907 | $ | 977,857 | ||||||||||||||
| Core FFO per share-diluted | $ | 15.60 | $ | 15.03 | $ | 14.51 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of shares outstanding, diluted (6) | 66,533,908 | 66,514,456 | 67,374,526 |
(1)The Company consolidates certain co-investments. The noncontrolling interest’s share of net operating income in these investments for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $2.9 million, $3.3 million, and $3.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the amount includes $32.4 million of gain on sale attributable to noncontrolling interest.
(2)Represents tax related to net unrealized gains or losses on technology co-investments.
(3)Represents the Company’s share of co-investment income or loss from technology co-investments.
(4)Includes political advocacy costs of $33.3 million, $4.1 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively.
(5)Includes legal settlement gains of $42.5 million, $7.7 million, and $4.2 million for the for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively.
(6)Assumes conversion of all outstanding OP Units into shares of the Company’s common stock and excludes DownREIT limited partnership units.
Net Operating Income
Net operating income (“NOI”) and Same-Property NOI are considered by management to be important supplemental performance measures to earnings from operations included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. The presentation of Same-Property NOI assists with the presentation of the Company’s operations prior to the allocation of depreciation and any corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of individual communities or groups of communities. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. The Company defines Same-Property NOI as Same-Property revenues less Same-Property operating expenses, including property taxes. Please see the reconciliation of earnings from operations to NOI and Same-Property NOI, which in the table below is the NOI for stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the periods presented ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Earnings from operations | $ | 703,095 | $ | 584,342 | $ | 595,229 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
| Corporate-level property management expenses | 48,218 | 45,872 | 40,704 | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 580,220 | 548,438 | 539,319 | ||||||||||||||
| Management and other fees from affiliates | (10,265) | (11,131) | (11,139) | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 98,902 | 63,474 | 56,577 | ||||||||||||||
| Expensed acquisition and investment related costs | 72 | 595 | 2,132 | ||||||||||||||
| Casualty loss | — | 433 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of real estate and land | (175,583) | (59,238) | (94,416) | ||||||||||||||
| NOI | 1,244,659 | 1,172,785 | 1,128,406 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: Non Same-Property NOI | (96,666) | (53,485) | (59,321) | ||||||||||||||
| Same-Property NOI | $ | 1,147,993 | $ | 1,119,300 | $ | 1,069,085 |
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the Company’s expectations, estimates, assumptions, hopes, intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Words such as “expects,” “assumes,” “anticipates,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “future,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding expected operating performance and results (including projected Same-Property revenues and expenses), qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, property stabilizations, property acquisition and disposition activity, joint venture and co-investment activity, development and redevelopment activity and other capital expenditures, capital raising and financing activity, revenue and expense growth, financial occupancy, interest rate and other economic expectations, included projected new housing supply.
While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements; rather, these statements merely reflect the Company’s current expectations of the approximate outcomes of the matters discussed. Factors that might cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: the short and long-term impact of the January 2025 California wildfires, including in relation to regulation, insurance, tenant demand and other factors; occupancy rates and rental demand may be adversely affected by competition and local economic and market conditions; there may be increased interest rates, inflation, escalated operating costs and possible recessionary impacts; geopolitical tensions and regional conflicts, and the related impacts on macroeconomic conditions, including, among other things, interest rates and inflation; the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness; the Company’s inability to maintain its investment grade credit rating with the rating agencies; the Company may be unsuccessful in the management of its relationships with its
co-investment partners; the Company may fail to achieve its business objectives; time of actual completion and/or stabilization of development and redevelopment projects; estimates of future income from an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate; future cash flows may be inadequate to meet operating requirements and/or may be insufficient to provide for dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements; changes in laws or regulations and the anticipated or actual impact of future changes in laws or regulations; unexpected difficulties in leasing of future development projects; volatility in financial and securities markets; the Company’s failure to successfully operate acquired properties; unforeseen consequences from cyber-intrusion; government approvals, actions and initiatives, including the need for compliance with environmental requirements; and those further risks, special considerations, and other factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K, and those risk factors and special considerations set forth in the Company’s other filings with the SEC which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof, the Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement this information for any reason, and therefore, they may not represent the Company’s estimates and assumptions after the date of this report.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
Interest Rate Hedging Activities
The Company’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, the Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had two interest rate swap contracts to mitigate the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows on the Company’s $300.0 million unsecured term loan and $47.5 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable. The Company’s interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge as of December 31, 2024. The following table summarizes the notional amount, carrying value, and estimated fair value of the Company’s cash flow hedge derivative instruments used to hedge interest rates as of December 31, 2024. The notional amount represents the aggregate amount of a particular security that is currently hedged at one time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rates or market risks. The table also includes a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate the impact on the Company’s derivative instruments from an increase or decrease in 10-year Treasury bill interest rates by 50 basis points, as of December 31, 2024 ($ in thousands).
| Notional Amount | Maturity Date | Carrying and Estimated Fair Value | Estimated Carrying Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| +50 | -50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basis Points | Basis Points | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 347,500 | 2026 | $ | 5,467 | $ | 8,185 | $ | 2,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash flow hedges | $ | 347,500 | 2026 | $ | 5,467 | $ | 8,185 | $ | 2.732 |
Additionally, the Company has entered into total return swap contracts, with an aggregate notional amount of $220.8 million that effectively convert $220.8 million of fixed mortgage notes payable to a floating interest rate based on the SIFMA plus a spread and have a carrying value of zero as of December 31, 2024. The Company is exposed to insignificant interest rate risk on these total return swaps as the related mortgages are callable, at par, by the Company, co-terminus with the termination of any related swap. These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Interest Rate Sensitive Liabilities
The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of its lines of credit and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company’s real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, the Company borrows primarily at fixed rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. The Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
The Company’s interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows. Management has estimated the fair value of the Company’s $5.9 billion of fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2024, to be $5.5 billion. Management has estimated the fair value of the Company’s $754.7 million of variable rate debt as of December 31, 2024, to be $749.4 million
based on the terms of existing mortgage notes payable and variable rate demand notes compared to those available in the marketplace. The following table represents scheduled principal payments ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | Thereafter | Total | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate debt | $ | 643,035 | $ | 548,291 | $ | 419,558 | $ | 517,000 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 3,248,000 | $ | 5,875,884 | $ | 5,489,008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest rate | 3.5 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.8 | % | 2.2 | % | 4.1 | % | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable rate debt (1) | $ | 1,019 | $ | 159,059 | $ | 384,397 | $ | 1,332 | $ | 76,456 | $ | 132,481 | $ | 754,744 | $ | 749,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest rate | 4.2 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.2 | % | 5.7 | % | 4.2 | % |
(1)$220.8 million of variable rate debt is tax exempt to the note holders.
The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2024. It does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, the Company’s ultimate realized gain or loss, with respect to interest rate fluctuations and hedging strategies would depend on the exposures that arise prior to settlement.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this Form 10-K. See Item 15.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
As of December 31, 2024, Essex carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Essex’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Essex’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, Essex’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2024, Essex’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by Essex in the reports that Essex files or submits under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such disclosure controls and procedures were also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that Essex files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to Essex’s management, including Essex’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in Essex’s internal control over financial reporting, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Essex’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Essex’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Essex’s management assessed the effectiveness of Essex’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making this assessment, Essex’s management used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Essex’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria. Essex’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report over Essex’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, Essex’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Essex Portfolio, L.P.
As of December 31, 2024, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Essex’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2024, the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in the reports that the Operating Partnership files or submits under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such disclosure controls and procedures were also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Operating Partnership files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Operating Partnership’s management, including Essex’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Operating Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making this assessment, the Operating Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)” published by COSO. The Operating Partnership’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, the Operating Partnership’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Item 9B. Other Information
Securities Trading Plans of Directors and Executive Officers
Except as described below, during the three months ended December 31, 2024, none of our officers or directors adopted, modified or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any “non Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement*.”*
On November 18, 2024, Amal Johnson, a director, modified a previously adopted “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement”, as such item is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K, that provides for the potential exercise of stock options and associated sale of up to 15,258 shares of common stock. The plan had an initial adoption date of February 8, 2024 and will expire on November 20, 2026, subject to early termination for certain specified events as set forth in the plan.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the heading “Board and Corporate Governance Matters,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024. The Company has insider trading policies and procedures that govern the purchase, sale and other dispositions of its securities by directors, officers and employees. We believe these policies and procedures are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations and applicable listing standards. A copy of our insider trading policy is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 19.1.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the headings “Named Executive Officer Compensation” and “Director Compensation,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the headings “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Fees Paid to KPMG LLP,” to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2024.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(A) Financial Statements
| (1) Consolidated Financial Statements of Essex Property Trust, Inc. | Page | ||||
| Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 185) | F-1 | ||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets: As of December 31, 2024 and 2023 | F-6 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Income: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-7 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-8 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Equity: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-9 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-11 | ||||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-20 | ||||
| (2) Consolidated Financial Statements of Essex Portfolio, L.P. | |||||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-4 | ||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets: As of December 31, 2024 and 2023 | F-13 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Income: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-14 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-15 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Capital: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-16 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 | F-18 | ||||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-20 | ||||
| (3) Financial Statement Schedule – Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2024 | F-56 | ||||
| (4) See the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the signature page and certifications for a list of exhibits filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report. |
(B) Exhibits
The Company hereby files, as exhibits to this Form 10-K, those exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index referenced in Item 15(A)(4) above.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Essex Property Trust, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Essex Property Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Evaluation of events or changes in circumstances that indicate rental properties may not be recoverable
As discussed in Note 2(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluates the carrying amount of rental properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of any of the rental properties may not be recoverable. The evaluation of impairment indicators includes an assessment of the Company’s ability to hold and its intent with regard to each asset, and each property’s remaining useful life. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $11.4 billion in rental properties.
We identified the assessment of events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of rental properties may not be recoverable as a critical audit matter. Specifically, subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the Company’s estimated holding period of rental properties. Changes to shorten the holding period the Company expects to receive cash flows from rental properties could have had a significant impact on the determination of impairment indicators.
F- 1
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the internal control over the Company’s process to estimate the holding period for rental properties. We assessed management’s assumptions and the likelihood that a rental property will be sold significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life or holding period. We assessed the Company’s intent and ability to hold each rental property by examining documents to assess the Company’s plans, if any, to dispose of individual rental properties significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life or holding period. We inquired of Company officials and obtained written representations regarding the status of potential plans, if any, to dispose of individual rental properties, and discussed the Company’s plans with others in the organization who are responsible for, and have the authority over, potential disposition activities.
| /s/ KPMG LLP |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1994.
San Francisco, California
February 21, 2025
F- 2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Essex Property Trust, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Essex Property Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting bas
Showing the first 8K of 341K characters. Open the full section