A Dark Vector Cognition product

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

7K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

How We Assess Director Independence

BOARD MEMBERS

All of our Board members (listed in Item 10 above, beginning on page 6) other than our CEO, Mr. Lawler, are independent.

The Board’s guidelines. For a director to be considered independent, the Board, through its Nominating Committee, must determine that he or she does not have any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with his or her independent judgment as a director. The Board’s guidelines for director independence conform to the independence requirements in the NYSE listing standards. In addition to applying these guidelines, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances when making an independence determination.

Applying the guidelines in 2019. In determining director independence, the Board considered relevant transactions, relationships and arrangements in assessing independence, including relationships among Board members, their family members and the Company in 2017, 2018, 2019, and the 2020 first quarter, as described below under the caption: “Relationships and Transactions Considered for Director Independence.” In accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles and the NYSE listing standards, the Nominating Committee determined that all transactions and relationships it considered during its review were not material transactions or relationships with the Company and did not impair the independence of any of the independent directors.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

All members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Finance Committee and Nominating Committee must be independent, as defined by the Board’s Governance Principles.

•Heightened standards for Audit Committee members. Under a separate SEC independence requirement. Audit Committee members may not accept any consulting, advisory or other fee from Chesapeake or any of its subsidiaries, except compensation for Board service.
•Heightened standards for members of the Compensation and Nominating Committees. As a policy matter, the Board also apples a separate, heightened independence standard to members of the Compensation and Nominating Committees: no member of either committee may be a partner, member or principal of a law firm, accounting firm or investment banking firm that accepts consulting or advisory fees from Chesapeake or a subsidiary. In addition, in determining that Compensation Committee members are independent, NYSE rules require the Board to consider their sources of compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other compensation pair by Chesapeake or a subsidiary.

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees, as well as the Finance Committee, are independent and, where applicable, also satisfy these committee-specific independence requirements.

Relationships and Transactions Considered for Director Independence

DIRECTORORGANIZATION/ INDIVIDUALRELATIONSHIPTRANSACTIONSSIZE FOR EACH OF LAST THREE YEARS
Ms. BoylandFedEx CorporationFormer employee of FedExSales to Chesapeake<1% of FedEx revenues
Mr. CorbettGrant Loxton, employee of Chesapeake (not an executive officer)Son-in law of CorbettCompensation paid by Chesapeake to Mr. Loxton<$420,000 of annual cash and equity compensation paid by Chesapeake to Mr. Loxton
Mr. MartinFedEx Corporation Pilot Travel Centers LLCDirector Member of Board of ManagersSales to Chesapeake Sales to Chesapeake<1% of FedEx revenues <1% of Pilot revenues
Mr. MillerRanger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR)DirectorSales to Chesapeake<1% of RNGR revenues
All directorsVarious charitable organizationsDirector or TrusteeCharitable donations<1% of organization’s revenues

Transactions with Related Persons

The Company has adopted a written related party transaction policy with respect to any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) in which: (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000; (2) the Company is a participant; and (3) any of its currently serving directors and executive officers, or those serving as such at any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year, or greater than 5% shareholders, or any of the immediate family members of the foregoing persons, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The Audit Committee reviews and approves all interested transactions, as defined above, subject to certain enumerated exceptions that the Audit Committee has determined do not present a “direct or indirect material interest” on behalf of the related party, consistent with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Such transactions are subject to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct. Certain transactions with former executive officers and directors that fall within the enumerated exceptions are reviewed by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approves or ratifies only those transactions that it determines in good faith are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. All transactions described below that do not fall within the enumerated exceptions described in the policy have been reviewed or approved by the Audit Committee.

BP p.l.c.

David C. Lawler, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of BP p.l.c.’s “Lower 48 Onshore” business, is the brother of Robert D. Lawler, the Company’s CEO. The Company engages in transactions with BP in the ordinary course of business and no such transaction has been determined to be a related party transaction under the Company’s related party transaction policy.

Employment of Family Members

Grant Loxton, the son-in-law of Mr. Corbett, a director of the Company, has been an employee of the Company since May 2011. Mr. Loxton’s total 2018 cash and equity compensation was $402,119. The Company is a significant employer in Oklahoma City. We seek to fill positions with qualified employees, whether or not they are related to our executive officers or directors. We compensate employees who have such relationships within what we believe to be the current market rate for their position and provide benefits consistent with our policies that apply to similarly situated employees. Compensation arrangements for family members of related parties are approved by the Compensation Committee.

Previous: Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters · Next: Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services