Freeport-McMoRan 10-K 2024-12-31

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

OR

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-11307-01

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(602) 366-8100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☑ No

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $69.5 billion on June 30, 2024.

Common stock issued and outstanding was 1,437,073,006 shares on January 31, 2025.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Showing the first 8K of 262K characters. Open the full section

This report contains forward-looking statements in which we discuss our potential future performance, operations and projects. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts, such as plans, projections, or expectations relating to business outlook, strategy, goals or targets; global market conditions; ore grades and milling rates; production and sales volumes; unit net cash costs (credits) and operating costs; capital expenditures; operating plans (including mine sequencing); cash flows; liquidity; PT Freeport Indonesia’s (PT-FI) commissioning, remediation, including expected costs, insurance recovery and timing, and full ramp-up of its new smelter and full production at the precious metals refinery (PMR); potential extension of PT-FI’s special mining business license (IUPK) beyond 2041; export licenses, export duties and export volumes, including PT-FI’s ability to continue exports of copper concentrate until full ramp-up is achieved at its new smelter in Indonesia; timing of shipments of inventoried production; our commitment to deliver responsibly produced copper and molybdenum, including plans to implement, validate and maintain validation of our operating sites under specific frameworks; execution of our energy and climate strategies and the underlying assumptions and estimated impacts on our business and stakeholders related thereto; achievement of 2030 climate targets and 2050 net zero aspiration; improvements in operating procedures and technology innovations and applications; exploration efforts and results; development and production activities, rates and costs; future organic growth opportunities; tax rates; the impact of copper, gold and molybdenum price changes; the impact of deferred intercompany profits on earnings; mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; final resolution of settlements associated with ongoing legal and environmental proceedings; debt repurchases; and the ongoing implementation of our financial policy and future returns to shareholders, including dividend payments (base or variable) and share repurchases.

We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We caution readers that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, expected, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that can cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements are included below.

Risk Factor Summary

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the information included in other sections of this annual report on Form 10-K, including, but not limited to, Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties,” Item 1C. “Cybersecurity,” Items 7. and 7A. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” (MD&A) and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” prior to investing in our securities. If any of the following risks occur, they may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial performance, stock price, results of operations, operating flexibility, reputation, costs or liabilities and you could lose part or all of your investment. The summary and risks that follow are organized under headings as determined to be most applicable, but such risks also may be relevant to other headings. Moreover, the risk factors described herein are not all of the risks we may face and there may be other risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial or general risks that apply to all companies operating in the United States (U.S.) and globally, which may emerge or become material.

Financial risks

• Fluctuations or extended material declines in the market prices of the commodities we produce;

• Fluctuations in price and availability of consumables and components we purchase as well as constraints on supply and logistics, and transportation services;

• Less flexibility because of our debt and other financial commitments;

• Changes in or failure to comply with financial assurance requirements relating to our mine closure reclamation obligations;

• Unanticipated legal proceedings or negative developments in pending legal proceedings or other contingencies; and

• Changes in tax laws and regulations.

International risks

• Geopolitical, economic, regulatory and social risks for our operations; and

• PT-FI’s failure to meet its commitments to achieve the extension of its IUPK.

Table of Contents

Operational risks

• Operational risks inherent in our operations, including underground mining and the ability to smelt and refine;

• Environmental, safety and engineering challenges and risks associated with management of waste rock and tailings;

• Environmental challenges associated with our Indonesia operations;

• Violence, civil and religious strife, and activism;

• Availability of significant quantities of secure water supplies for our operations, including future expansions or development projects;

• Disruptions, damage, failure and implementation and integration risks associated with information and operational technology systems;

• Failure to successfully implement or develop and risks associated with new technologies; and

• Any major public health crisis.

Human capital risks

• Failure to maintain good relations with our workforce and labor disputes or labor unrest; and

• Ability to recruit, retain, develop and advance qualified personnel.

Risks related to development projects and mineral reserves

• Inherent risks associated with development projects and unique risks associated with development of underground mining;

• Ability to maintain or grow our mineral reserves; and

• Inherent uncertainty associated with estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources.

Regulatory, environmental and social risks

• Compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;

• Remediation of properties no longer in operation;

• Ability to meet our energy requirements while complying with climate-related regulations and expectations and other energy transition policy changes;

• The physical impacts of climate change on our operations, workforce, communities, biodiversity and ecosystems, supply chains and customers;

• Increasing scrutiny, action and evolving expectations from stakeholders and other third parties with respect to our environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, performance, commitments and disclosures; and

• Failure or perceived failure to manage relationships with the communities and/or Indigenous Peoples where we operate or that are near our operations.

Risks related to our common stock

• Impact of our holding company structure on our ability to service debt, declare cash dividends, or repurchase shares and debt; and

• Impact of anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law.

Financial risks

Fluctuations in the market prices of the commodities we produce have caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in our financial performance and in the trading prices of our common stock. Extended material declines in the market prices of such commodities could adversely affect our financial condition and operating plans.

Our financial results are significantly influenced by and vary with fluctuations in the market prices of the commodities we produce, primarily copper and gold, and to a lesser extent molybdenum. Extended material declines in market prices of such commodities could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the value of our assets, may depr

Showing the first 8K of 129K characters. Open the full section

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Risk Management and Strategy

We maintain a cyber risk management program designed to assess, identify, manage, mitigate and respond to cybersecurity threats and incidents. We seek to address material risks from cybersecurity threats through a cross-functional approach, and we utilize various processes to inform our identification, assessment and management of material risks from cybersecurity threats. Our cyber risk management program is integrated into our overall enterprise risk management (ERM) program. Cybersecurity risks are identified and assessed through our ERM program, which is designed to provide cross-functional executive insight across the business to identify and monitor risks, opportunities and emerging trends that can impact our strategic business objectives. The underlying controls of our cyber risk management program are based on recognized best practices and standards for cybersecurity and information technology, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework.

We utilize dedicated internal and external cybersecurity personnel to focus on assessing, detecting, identifying, managing, preventing and responding to cybersecurity threats and incidents. Our approach to cybersecurity incorporates a layered portfolio of technology controls, including strategic partnerships for our cybersecurity platforms, documented policies and procedures, periodic end user training, including cybersecurity awareness training for employees and certain contractors, and dedicated resources to manage and monitor the evolving threat landscape, including through the gathering of actionable threat intelligence. We maintain and periodically evaluate and, as needed, update our information security policy and an incident response plan, which describes the processes we use to prepare for, detect, respond to and recover from a cybersecurity incident, including processes to assess severity, escalate, contain, investigate and remediate an incident, as well as to comply with potentially applicable legal and disclosure obligations.

We regularly evaluate and assess the threat landscape and our security controls, including through audits and assessments, regular network and endpoint monitoring, vulnerability testing, penetration testing and tabletop exercises that include senior management. To assess the design and effectiveness of our cybersecurity controls, we engage with assessors, consultants, auditors and other third parties, including through independent third-party reviews of our information technology security program conducted on at least an annual basis. We also have processes to oversee and identify material cybersecurity risks associated with our use of third-party service providers, including utilizing safeguards to protect sensitive data, performing diligence on certain third parties that have access to our systems, data or facilities that store such systems or data, continually monitoring cybersecurity threat risks identified through such diligence and contracting to manage cybersecurity risks in specified ways such as requiring agreements to be subject to periodic cybersecurity audits.

We have experienced targeted and non-targeted cybersecurity incidents in the past, including an incident in August 2023 that affected certain of our information systems and resulted in temporary disruptions to parts of our operations. However, prior cybersecurity incidents, including the August 2023 incident, have not materially affected us. Notwithstanding our cyber risk management program, we may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident that could materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further information on the risks we face from cybersecurity threats.

Governance

Our Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer, who has served in various senior leadership roles in operational improvement and technology during his nearly 30-year tenure with us, leads our innovation and technology initiatives, corporate information systems and financial shared services. Our cybersecurity risk management and strategy processes described in “Risk Management and Strategy” above are led by our Chief Information Officer (CIO) and our Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). Our CIO and CISO each report to our Chief Innovation Officer. Our CIO is responsible for the strategy, deployment, operational effectiveness and risk management of our technology systems and operations. Our CIO has over 30 years of experience in technology, cybersecurity and risk management, including leading information and technology initiatives for companies in the mining and energy sectors as a partner and senior managing director at a global professional services public company specializing in information technology services and management consulting. Our CISO is responsible for protecting our global technology systems from cybersecurity incidents, which includes overseeing the deployment of cybersecurity controls, managing a team of cybersecurity professionals and reporting on cybersecurity matters to management and the Audit Committee of our Board. Our CISO has 30 years of experience in the technology and

Table of Contents

cybersecurity industries, including 15 years serving as CISO for public companies. Our CISO is also a Certified Information Systems Security Professional.

Our ERM management committee is responsible for providing input and oversight on our ERM program, including cybersecurity risks. Our ERM management committee is comprised of senior leaders, including our Chief Innovation Officer, with responsibility across operations and core business functions, and with a breadth of knowledge, influence and experience covering the risks we face. An annual report on our enterprise risks, including cybersecurity risks, is presented to the Audit Committee and/or the full Board of Directors (Board).

While management is responsible for the day-to-day management of cybersecurity risks, our Board and its Audit Committee have ongoing oversight roles. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management, including reports from our Chief Innovation Officer, at least annually:

• the adequacy and effectiveness of our information technology security processes and procedures,

• the assessment of risks and threats to our information technology systems,

• the internal controls regarding information technology security and cybersecurity, and

• the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate information technology security and cybersecurity risks.

The Audit Committee also periodically receives reports on notable cybersecurity incidents and briefs the full Board on these matters.

Below is a discussion of pending legal proceedings not otherwise required to be disclosed in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.

In addition to the proceedings discussed below and in Note 10, we are involved periodically in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business and not required to be disclosed, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief.

United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations require us to disclose environmental proceedings involving a governmental authority if we reasonably believe that such proceedings may result in monetary sanctions above a stated threshold. Pursuant to the SEC regulations, we use a threshold of $1 million for purposes of determining whether disclosure of any such environmental proceedings is required.

Management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition; although individual or cumulative outcomes could be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on the nature and magnitude of the outcome and the operating results for the period.

Water Rights Adjudications

Our operations in the western U.S. require significant secure quantities of water for mining and ore processing activities, and related support facilities. Continuous operation of our mines is dependent on, among other things, our ability to maintain our water rights and claims and the continuing physical availability of the water supplies. In the arid western U.S., where certain of our mines are located, water rights are often contested, and disputes over water rights are generally time-consuming, expensive and not necessarily dispositive unless they resolve both actual and potential claims. The loss of a water right or a currently available water supply could force us to curtail operations, or force premature closures, thereby increasing and/or accelerating costs or foregoing profitable operations.

At our North America operations, certain of our water supplies are supported by surface water rights, which give us the right to use public waters for a statutorily defined beneficial use at a designated location. In Arizona, where our operations use both surface and groundwater, we are a participant in an active adjudication in which Arizona courts have been attempting, for 50 years, to quantify and prioritize surface water claims for the Gila River system, one of the state’s largest river systems. This Gila River adjudication primarily affects our Morenci, Safford (including Lone Star) and Sierrita mines. The Gila River adjudication is addressing the state law claims of thousands of competing users, including us, as well as significant federal water claims that are potentially adverse to the state law claims of both surface water and groundwater users. Groundwater is treated differently from surface water under Arizona law,

Table of Contents

which historically allowed landowners to pump unlimited quantities of subsurface water, subject only to the requirement of putting it to “reasonable use.” However, court decisions in the adjudication have concluded that some subsurface water constitutes “subflow” that is to be treated legally as surface water and is therefore subject to the Arizona doctrine of prior appropriation and to the adjudication, and potentially unavailable to groundwater pumpers, including us, in the absence of valid surface water claims. Any re-characterization of groundwater as surface water could affect the ability of consumers, farmers, ranchers, municipalities, and industrial users like us to continue to access water supplies that have been relied on for decades. Because we are a user of both groundwater and surface water in Arizona, we are an active participant in the Gila River adjudication.

In Re The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Sources, Maricopa County, Superior Court, Cause Nos. W-1 (Salt), W-2 (Verde), W-3 (Upper Gila), and W-4 (San Pedro). This case was originally initiated in 1974 with the filing of a petition with the Arizona State Land Department and was consolidated and transferred to the Maricopa County Superior Court in 1981. The principal parties, in addition to us, include: Arizona Public Service Company, ASARCO, LLC; BHP Copper, Inc; the state of Arizona; various cities and towns and water companies; the Gila Valley Irrigation District; the Franklin Irrigation District; the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District; the Salt River Project; the San Carlos Apache Tribe; the Gila River Indian Community; and the U.S. on behalf of those tribes, on its own behalf, and on behalf of the White Mountain Apache Tribe, the Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Indian Community, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, and the Payson Community of Yavapai Apache Indians. Prior to January 1, 1983, various Indian tribes filed separate suits in the U.S. District Court in Arizona claiming superior rights to water being used by many other parties, including us, and claiming damages for prior use in derogation of their allegedly superior rights. These federal proceedings have been stayed in favor of the adjudications pending in Arizona state courts, and some of the federal suits have since been settled.

In 2005, the Maricopa County Superior Court directed the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) to prepare detailed recommendations regarding the delineation of the “subflow” zone of the San Pedro River, a tributary of the Gila River. Subsurface water within the subflow zone is presumed to constitute appropriable subflow rather than groundwater. Although we have minimal interests in the San Pedro River Basin, a decision that re-characterizes groundwater in that basin as appropriable subflow may set a precedent for other river systems in Arizona that could have material implications for many commercial, industrial, municipal and agricultural users of groundwater, including our Arizona operations. In 2017, the court approved ADWR’s proposed subflow zone maps; water pumped from wells located inside the mapped subflow zone is now presumed to be appropriable subflow. No party has appealed that decision.

ADWR is now in the process of preparing subflow zone delineations for the applicable watercourses in the Verde River watershed. In December 2021, ADWR issued a report proposing a subflow zone delineation for the Verde River mainstem and Sycamore Creek and objections to that report were submitted in May 2022. While we do not have any active mining operations in the Verde River watershed that would be impacted by this phase of the adjudication, we filed a set of limited objections on issues that could set a precedent for other watersheds in Arizona that could have material implications for many users of groundwater, including our Arizona operations. The Special Master has directed ADWR to submit revised subflow zone delineations consistent with our objections.

In 2014, ADWR submitted a proposal for the development of procedures for “cone of depression” analyses to determine whether a well located outside of the subflow zone creates a cone of depression that intersects the subflow zone. Based on these cone of depression analyses, wells outside of the subflow zone could be subject to the adjudications pending in Arizona state courts. In the absence of a valid surface water claim to support the pumping, owners of wells deemed to be depleting the subflow zone through their cones of depression may be subject to claims that they must refrain from pumping subflow or must pay damages. In January 2017, ADWR issued a report containing its recommended cone of depression test.

In November 2018, the Special Master for the Gila River adjudication issued a final decision rejecting ADWR’s recommended cone of depression test, adopting our position that a numeric model capable of accounting for complexities of the aquifer system should be used. However, the Special Master confirmed that the cone of depression test would be the initial test for determining which wells are subject to the adjudications, rather than proving that a well is pumping subflow or establishing how much of a well’s water production is subflow. Such matters will be determined by a subsequent “subflow depletion test,” which is currently under development. While some of our adversaries objected to the Special Master’s final decision, in July 2022, the Arizona Superior Court issued a decision affirming the Special Master’s decision in all respects. No party has appealed that decision.

Table of Contents

In December 2018, ADWR submitted its initial report on the “subflow depletion test,” noting that the test will specify the methodology a well owner must use to quantify the portion of the water drawn from a well that is subflow as opposed to groundwater. In February 2024, ADWR issued a report setting forth its proposed subflow depletion test, and objections were filed in April 2024. The Special Master ordered ADWR to file an addendum to its report concerning various issues raised in the objections. A status conference is scheduled for February 2025.

An issue litigated in the 2018 proceeding concerned whether for the subflow depletion test the subflow zone should be represented in the numeric model as extending only as deep as the bottom of the floodplain alluvium or extend all the way down to bedrock. In August 2021, the Special Master issued an order recognizing our position that if the vertical extent of the subflow zone is extended below the floodplain alluvium, it would result in overstated depletion calculations. Accordingly, the Special Master ordered that the vertical boundary of the subflow zone be restricted to the floodplain alluvium. No party has appealed that decision, and we expect the guidance from the Special Master’s order to be reflected in the subflow depletion test.

In proceedings separate from the development of the subflow depletion test, in June 2020, the Special Master designated legal questions to be resolved concerning a well owner’s ability to obtain a surface water right for subsurface water that, while initially believed to be non-appropriable groundwater, is ultimately determined to be appropriable subflow. In April 2021, the Special Master ruled that, for uses initiated after enactment of the 1919 permitting statute, a well owner may not pursue a surface water right for subsurface water now unless the well owner filed an application for a permit to appropriate prior to initiating the water use. We, along with allied parties, have objected to the Special Master’s ruling and are awaiting further proceedings before the Arizona Superior Court. Regardless of the outcome in the Arizona Superior Court, we anticipate this issue will be appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.

As part of the adjudications, the U.S. has asserted numerous claims for express and implied “reserved” surface water and groundwater rights on Indian and non-Indian federal lands throughout Arizona. These claims are related to reservations of federal land for specific purposes (e.g., Indian reservations, national parks, military bases and wilderness areas). Unlike state law-based water rights, federal reserved water rights are given priority in the “prior appropriation” system based on the date the land was reserved, not the date that water was first used on the land. In addition, federal reserved water rights may enjoy greater protection from groundwater pumping than is accorded to state law-based water rights.

In multiple instances, the U.S. asserts a right to all water in a particular watershed that was not effectively appropriated under state law prior to the establishment of the federal reservation. This creates risks for both surface water users and groundwater users because such expansive claims may severely impede competing uses of water within the same watershed. Because there are numerous federal reservations in watersheds across Arizona, the reserved water right claims of the U.S. pose a significant risk to multiple operations, including Morenci and Safford (including Lone Star) in the Upper Gila River watershed, and Sierrita in the Santa Cruz watershed. Because federal reserved water rights may adversely affect water uses at each of these operations, we have been actively involved in litigation over these claims. Because federal reserved water rights have not yet been quantified, the task of determining how much water each federal reservation may use has been left to the Arizona Superior Court handling the Gila River adjudication. Various “contested cases” to quantify reserved water rights for particular federal reservations in Arizona are currently pending, four of which have been resolved at this time. The first resolved decision was issued in In re Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area, which pertained to the U.S.’s claims to water for the Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area. The court issued a decision in December 2018 supportive of our position on almost all issues, rejecting the U.S.’s argument that wilderness areas are entitled to all water that was not appropriated at the time the reservation was created. The second resolved decision was issued in In re Redfield Canyon Wilderness Area, which was another case pertaining to claims for a wilderness area. The court issued its decision in August 2022 supportive of our position on almost all issues, denying the U.S.’s federal reserved water rights claims for the wilderness area. The U.S. declined to pursue an interlocutory appeal in either of the In re Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area or In re Redfield Canyon Wilderness Area cases. The third resolved decision was issued in In re San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area, which pertained to the U.S.’s claims to water for a national conservation area. The court issued its decision in August 2023 supportive of our position on nearly all issues, rejecting the U.S.’s argument that quantification was based on a more lenient standard than the “minimal need” doctrine, and holding that the U.S. may not obtain a federal reserved right to “optimal” flows to support the riparian and aquatic resources. The court adopted our proposed period of record for quantifying the stream, and therefore adopted our proposed streamflow, and rejected the U.S.’s claims for “streamflow augmentation” and claims to water from various point sources. We anticipate that a decree will be entered in 2025. It is unknown whether the U.S. will pursue an interlocutory appeal. The fourth resolved decision was issued in, In re Fort

Table of Contents

Huachuca, which involved the U.S.’s claims to water for an Arizona army base. Trial concluded in February 2017. The court issued its decision in September 2024 supportive of our position on almost all issues and entered a decree in December 2024. The result was an approximate 80% reduction of the total acre-feet per year claimed by the U.S. It is unknown whether the U.S. will pursue an interlocutory appeal.

In addition, in January 2023, the U.S. filed several federal reserved water rights claims for wilderness areas in portions of the Verde River watershed, as well as a claim for the Verde River pursuant to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, claiming all unappropriated flow within each of the wilderness areas, along with alternative claims to specific stream flows. In reliance on the favorable precedent created in the cases discussed above, we successfully defeated the claims to all unappropriated flow on summary judgment. We anticipate that the Special Master will establish litigation schedules concerning the other claims to specific stream flows.

Given the legal and technical complexity of these adjudications, their long history, and their long-term legal, economic and political implications, it is difficult to predict the timing or the outcome of these proceedings. If we are not able to satisfactorily resolve the issues being addressed in the adjudications, our water uses could be diminished or curtailed, and our operations and any future expansions at Morenci, Safford (including Lone Star) and Sierrita could be adversely affected unless we are able to acquire alternative water sources.

Our highest priority is the health, safety and well-being of our workforce. We believe health and safety considerations are integral to, and fundamental for, all other functions in our organization, and we understand that the health and safety of our workforce is critical to our operational efficiency and long-term success. Our global health and safety strategy, “Safe Production Matters,” is focused on fatality prevention, eliminating systemic root causes of incidents and continuous improvement through robust management systems, which are supported by leaders empowering our teams to work safely. Foundational to our Safe Production Matters strategy is our Fatal Risk Management (FRM) program. The goal of our FRM program is to achieve zero workplace fatalities by raising awareness to fatal risks and the measures necessary to mitigate them.

Refer to Exhibit 95.1 for mine safety disclosures required in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of SEC Regulation S-K.

Information About Our Executive Officers.

Certain information as of February 14, 2025, about our executive officers is set forth in the following table and accompanying text:

Kathleen L. Quirk has served as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since June 2024, as President since February 2021 and as a director of the Board of Directors (Board) since February 2023. Ms. Quirk previously served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) from December 2003 to March 2022, Executive Vice President from March 2007 to February 2021, Senior Vice President from December 2003 to March 2007 and Treasurer from February 2000 to August 2018. Ms. Quirk also serves on the Board of Directors of Vulcan Materials Company.

Maree E. Robertson has served as Executive Vice President since July 2024 and CFO since March 2022. She previously served as Senior Vice President from March 2022 to June 2024. Prior to joining the company, Ms. Robertson served as CFO, Energy and Minerals of Rio Tinto Group, a multinational metals and mining company, from September 2019 to December 2021. Prior to joining Rio Tinto, Ms. Robertson had a 17-year career at BHP Group, a multinational natural resources company, serving in a broad range of international finance functions, including Vice President, Finance, Petroleum USA; Head of Finance, Conventional and Potash, Petroleum, USA; Vice President, Finance, Potash Canada; and Vice President, Finance, Minera Escondida Ltda.

Table of Contents

Richard C. Adkerson has served as Chairman of the Board since February 2021 and has been a director since October 2006. Mr. Adkerson previously served as CEO from December 2003 to June 2024, Vice Chairman of the Board from May 2013 to February 2021, President from January 2008 to February 2021 and also from April 1997 to March 2007, and CFO from October 2000 to December 2003.

Stephen T. Higgins has served as Executive Vice President since July 2024 and Chief Administrative Officer since January 2019. Mr. Higgins previously served as Senior Vice President from August 2018 to June 2024, Vice President – Sales and Marketing from March 2007 to August 2018 and President of Freeport-McMoRan Sales Company Inc. from April 2006 to August 2019.

Douglas N. Currault II has served as Executive Vice President since July 2024 and General Counsel since October 2019. Mr. Currault previously served as Senior Vice President from October 2019 to June 2024, Deputy General Counsel from January 2015 to October 2019, Assistant General Counsel from January 2008 to January 2015, Secretary from May 2007 to December 2019 and Assistant Secretary from February 2000 to May 2007.

PART II

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2024.

Common Stock

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FCX.” At January 31, 2025, there were 9,109 holders of record of our common stock.

Common Stock Dividends

In February 2021, our Board of Directors (Board) reinstated a cash dividend on our common stock (base dividend) at an annual rate of $0.30 per share, and in November 2021, the Board approved a variable cash dividend on our common stock at an annual rate of $0.30 per share. The combined annual rate of the base dividend and the variable dividend totaled $0.60 per share in 2024 and 2023.

In December 2024, our Board declared cash dividends totaling $0.15 per share on our common stock (including a $0.075 per share quarterly base cash dividend and a $0.075 per share variable, performance-based cash dividend), which was paid on February 3, 2025, to shareholders of record as of January 15, 2025. Based on current market conditions, the base and variable dividends on our common stock are anticipated to total $0.60 per share for 2025 (including the dividends paid on February 3, 2025), comprised of a $0.30 per share base dividend and $0.30 per share variable dividend. The declaration and payment of dividends (base or variable) is at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon our financial results, cash requirements, global economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board. See “Cautionary Statement” in Items 7. and 7A. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and Note 8 for further discussion.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of FCX common stock purchased by us during the quarter ended December 31, 2024, and the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to our share repurchase program:

a.On November 1, 2021, our Board approved a share repurchase program authorizing repurchases of up to $3.0 billion of our common stock. On July 19, 2022, our Board authorized an increase in the share repurchase program up to $5.0 billion. The share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific amount of shares and does not have an expiration date.

The timing and amount of the share repurchases is at the discretion of management and will depend on a variety of factors. The share repurchase program may be modified, increased, suspended or terminated at any time at our Board’s discretion. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Note 8 for further discussion.

Items 7. and 7A. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (MD&A), “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The results of operations reported and summarized below include forward-looking statements that are not guarantees of future performance and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results (refer to “Cautionary Statement” below for further discussion). References to “Notes” are Notes included in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Throughout MD&A, all references to income or losses per share are on a diluted basis.

This section of our Form 10-K discusses the results of operations for the years 2024 and 2023 and comparisons between these years. Discussion of the results of operations for the year 2022 and comparisons between the years 2023 and 2022 are not included in this Form 10-K and can be found in Items 7. and 7A. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

OVERVIEW

We are a leading international metals company with the objective of being foremost in copper. Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, we operate large, long-lived, geographically diverse assets with significant proven and probable mineral reserves of copper, gold and molybdenum. We are one of the world’s largest publicly traded copper producers. Our portfolio of assets includes the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia, one of the world’s largest copper and gold deposits; and significant operations in North America and South America, including the large-scale Morenci minerals district in Arizona and the Cerro Verde operation in Peru.

Our results for 2024 reflect solid execution of our operating plans and we are committed to enhancing productivity, managing costs and capital and advancing opportunities for long-term profitable growth and value creation. We believe the actions we have taken in recent years to strengthen our balance sheet and maintain flexible organic growth options will allow us to continue to execute our business plans, and reliably and responsibly generate cash flows to pursue value-enhancing organic growth options and return cash to shareholders.

We believe that we have a high-quality portfolio of long-lived copper assets positioned to generate long-term value, and we remain focused on executing our operating and investment plans. Our underground mining operations at the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia continue to perform well, with copper production increasing in each of the past three years. During 2024, construction of PT Freeport Indonesia’s (PT-FI) new smelter and precious metals refinery (PMR) (collectively, PT-FI’s new downstream processing facilities) in Eastern Java, Indonesia were completed and as part of start-up activities, PT-FI commenced gold production from the PMR in December 2024. In October 2024, during start-up activities of the new smelter, a fire occurred requiring a temporary suspension of smelting operations to complete repairs. PT-FI expects repairs to be completed by mid-2025 and ramp-up to full capacity to be achieved by year-end 2025.

We are progressing initiatives across our North America and South America operations by incorporating new applications, technologies and data analytics to our leaching processes. Incremental copper production from these initiatives totaled 214 million pounds in 2024, compared with a total of 144 million pounds in 2023. We have projects underway to apply recent operational enhancements to our leaching processes on a larger scale and are testing new innovative technology applications that we believe have the potential for significant increases in recoverable metal from leach stockpiles beyond the current run rate.

We believe we benefit from significant copper reserves and resources with embedded growth options, an experienced team and exposure to markets with a favorable fundamental outlook.

Net income attributable to common stock totaled $1.9 billion in 2024 and $1.8 billion in 2023. Our results in 2024, compared to 2023, primarily reflect higher average realized copper and gold prices and higher gold sales volumes, partly offset by higher operating costs and higher income attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily related to higher operating income at PT-FI. Refer to “Consolidated Results” for discussion of items impacting our consolidated results for the two years ended December 31, 2024.

At December 31, 2024, we had consolidated debt of $8.9 billion and consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $3.9 billion, $4.7 billion including current restricted cash and cash equivalents associated with a portion of PT-FI’s export proceeds required to be temporarily deposited in Indonesia banks. Net debt totaled $1.06 billion, excluding $3.2 billion of debt for PT-FI’s new downstream processing facilities. Refer to “Net Debt” for reconciliations of consolidated debt, consolidated cash and cash equivalents and current restricted cash associated with PT-FI's export proceeds to net debt.

At December 31, 2024, we had $3.0 billion of availability under our revolving credit facility, and PT-FI and Cerro Verde had $1.5 billion and $350 million, respectively, of availability under their revolving credit facilities. In November 2024, we repaid $0.7 billion in scheduled senior note maturities using cash on hand and have no further senior note maturities until 2027. Refer to Note 6 and “Capital Resources and Liquidity” for further discussion of our debt.

We have significant mineral reserves, mineral resources and future development opportunities within our portfolio of mining assets. At December 31, 2024, our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves totaled 97.0 billion pounds of copper, 23.0 million ounces of gold and 3.16 billion pounds of molybdenum. Refer to Note 15 and “Critical Accounting Estimates – Mineral Reserves” for further discussion.

During 2024, production from our mines totaled 4.2 billion pounds of copper, 1.9 million ounces of gold and 80 million pounds of molybdenum. Following is the allocation of our consolidated copper, gold and molybdenum production in 2024 by geographic location:

a.Our North America copper mines produced 38% of consolidated molybdenum production, and our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines produced 37%.

Copper production from three of our mines (the Morenci mine in North America, the Cerro Verde mine in Peru and the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia) together totaled 77% of our consolidated copper production in 2024.

OUTLOOK

Our financial results vary as a result of fluctuations in market prices primarily for copper, gold and, to a lesser extent, molybdenum, as well as other factors. World market prices for these commodities have fluctuated historically and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. Refer to “Markets,” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of o

Showing the first 8K of 196K characters. Open the full section

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.’s (the Company’s) management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

• Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets;

• Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

• Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the COSO criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Freeport-McMoRan Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and our report dated February 14, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

February 14, 2025

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at Decemb

Showing the first 8K of 329K characters. Open the full section

Not applicable.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the participation of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the report thereon of Ernst & Young LLP are included herein under Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Director and Officer Trading Arrangements

During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, no director or officer of FCX adopted or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as such terms are defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement

As previously reported, Kathleen L. Quirk, the President of FCX, was promoted to the additional role of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of FCX effective June 11, 2024. In light of her expanded responsibilities, on February 11, 2025, she and FCX entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement (the Agreement), which amends and restates the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between FCX and Ms. Quirk dated effective December 2, 2008, and amended effective April 27, 2011 (the Prior Agreement). The Agreement reflects Ms. Quirk’s roles with FCX and includes other updates to incorporate current market practices. The Agreement is effective through December 31, 2027, after which it will automatically renew for additional one-year periods unless prior written notice of non-renewal is provided to the other party in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

The principal terms of the Agreement are substantially similar to the Prior Agreement and does not change Ms. Quirk’s current compensation, although her base salary has been updated to reflect her base salary as of the date she assumed the role of CEO. The Agreement revises certain potential severance benefits to better align with current market practices. Specifically, in connection with a termination without Cause or with Good Reason unrelated to a Change in Control (as such terms are defined in the Agreement), the severance payment multiple has been reduced from three times to two times. In connection with a termination without Cause or with Good Reason related to a Change in Control, the multiple remains at three times, but the protected period has been reduced from three years to two years and includes a limited pre-Change in Control period. In addition, the severance payment related to a Change in Control will be calculated using the three-year average bonus (instead of the highest bonus during that period), and the pro-rated bonus for the year of termination will likewise be based on the three-year average bonus (instead of actual results for the year). The benefit continuation period in connection with all qualifying terminations has been reduced from three years to two years.

The Agreement also requires Ms. Quirk to deliver a release in favor of FCX in order to receive certain severance benefits, extends Ms. Quirk’s limited covenant not to compete from six months to eighteen months post-termination, and specifically confirms the application of FCX’s Incentive-Based Compensation Recovery Policy on Ms. Quirk’s compensation, where applicable.

The foregoing description of the Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Agreement, which is attached this Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.8 and incorporated by reference herein.

Not applicable.

PART III

The information required by this item regarding our executive officers appears in a separately captioned heading after Item 4. “Information About Our Executive Officers” in Part I of this report.

We have a Principles of Business Conduct, which defines the expected behavior of our Board of Directors and all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, and persons performing similar functions. We have posted a copy of our Principles of Business Conduct on our website at fcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Governance Documents.” Amendments to, or waivers of, our Principles of Business Conduct granted to any of our directors or executive officers will be published promptly on our website at fcx.com.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to “Information About Director Nominees,” “Board Committees,” and “Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial Experts,” and “Compensation Processes and Policies” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), relating to our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Director Compensation” and “Executive Officer Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Only our stockholder-approved 2016 Stock Incentive Plan has shares of our common stock available for future grant. However, we have equity compensation plans pursuant to which awards have previously been made that could result in issuance of our common stock to employees and non-employees as compensation.

The following table presents information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2024:

a.Includes shares of our common stock issuable upon the vesting of 3,325,514 restricted stock units (RSUs) and 2,619,000 performance share units at maximum performance levels, and the termination of deferrals with respect to 1,220,070 RSUs that were vested as of December 31, 2024. These awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price. The number of securities to be issued in column (a) does not include RSUs that are payable solely in cash.

b.Represents securities to be issued under awards assumed in our acquisition of McMoRan Exploration Co. The shares are issuable upon the termination of deferrals with respect to 13,500 RSUs that were vested as of December 31, 2024, and the awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price.

The other information required by this item is incorporated by reference to “Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to “Certain Transactions” and “Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial Experts” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC (including fees billed to us by Ernst & Young, PCAOB ID No. 42), relating to our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

PART IV

(a)(1). Financial Statements.

The consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and equity, and the consolidated balance sheets are included as part of Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

(a)(2). Financial Statement Schedules.

The following financial statement schedule is presented below.

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Schedules other than the one above have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and have issued our report thereon dated February 14, 2025 included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15 (a)(2) of this Form 10-K (the “schedule”). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s schedule, based on our audits.

In our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when considered in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

February 14, 2025

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (In millions)

a.Primarily relates to expirations of United States (U.S.) foreign tax credits.

b.Relates to a valuation allowance for tax benefits primarily associated with actuarial losses (gains) for U.S. defined benefit plans included in other comprehensive income.

c.Primarily relates to $32 million of U.S. federal net operating losses (NOLs) utilized during 2023 and a $292 million decrease related to expirations of U.S. foreign tax credits, partially offset by an increase of $188 million, primarily associated with changes in U.S. federal temporary differences and a $22 million increase in valuation allowances against Section 163(j) deferred tax assets.

d.Primarily relates to $163 million of U.S. federal NOLs utilized during 2022 and a $22 million decrease related to expiration of U.S. foreign tax credits, partially offset by an increase of $104 million, primarily associated with changes in U.S. federal temporary differences.

e.Represents amounts paid or adjustments to reserves based on revised estimates.

(a)(3). Exhibits.

Note: Certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of FCX have not been filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K since the total amount of securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of FCX and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. FCX agrees to furnish a copy of each such instrument upon request of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

• Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Not applicable.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Following is a glossary of selected terms used throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are technical in nature:

Adits. A horizontal passage leading into a mine for the purposes of access or drainage.

Alluvial aquifers. A water-bearing deposit of loosely arranged gravel, sand or silt left behind by a river or other flowing water.

Anode. A positively charged metal sheet, usually lead, on which oxidation occurs. During the electro-refining process, anodes are impure copper sheets from the smelting process that require further processing to produce refined copper cathode.

Azurite. A bluish supergene copper mineral and ore found in the oxidized portions of copper deposits often associated with malachite.

Bench. The horizontal floor cuttings along which mining progresses in an open-pit mine. As the pit progresses to lower levels, safety benches are left in the walls to catch any falling rock.

Blasthole stoping. An underground mining method that extracts the ore zone in large vertical rooms. The ore is broken by blasting using large-diameter vertical drill holes.

Block cave. A general term used to describe an underground mining method where the extraction of ore depends largely on the action of gravity. By continuously removing a thin horizontal layer at the bottom mining level of the ore column, the vertical support of the ore column is removed and the ore then caves by gravity.

Bornite. A red-brown isometric mineral comprising copper, iron and sulfur.

British thermal unit or Btu. One British thermal unit is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.

Brochantite. A greenish-black copper mineral occurring in the oxidation zone of copper sulfide deposits.

Cathode. Refined copper produced by electro-refining of impure copper or by electrowinning.

Chalcocite. A grayish copper sulfide mineral, usually found as a supergene in copper deposits formed from the re-deposition of copper minerals that were solubilized from the oxide portion of the deposit.

Chalcopyrite. A brass-yellow sulfide of mineral copper and iron.

Chrysocolla. A bluish-green to emerald-green oxide copper mineral that forms incrustations and thin seams in oxidized parts of copper-mineral veins; a source of copper and an ornamental stone.

Cobalt. A tough, lustrous, nickel-white or silvery-gray metallic element often associated with nickel and copper ores from which it is obtained as a by-product.

Concentrate. The resulting product from the concentrating process that is composed predominantly of copper sulfide or molybdenum sulfide minerals. Further processing might include smelting and electro-refining, or roasting.

Concentrating. The process by which ore is separated into metal concentrate through crushing, milling and flotation.

Concentrator. A process plant used to separate targeted minerals from gangue and produce a mineral concentrate that can be marketed or processed by additional downstream processes to produce salable metals or mineral products. Term is used interchangeably with Mill.

Contained metal. The amount of metal in a mineral sample before the reduction of amounts unable to be recovered during the metallurgical process.

Covellite. A metallic, indigo-blue supergene mineral found in copper deposits.

Crushed-ore leach pad. A slightly sloping pad upon which leach ores are placed in lifts for processing.

Cutoff grade. The minimum grade contained in the ore for processing. When percentages are below this grade, the material would be routed to an overburden stockpile or left unmined. When percentages are above grade, the material would be processed using concentrating or leaching methods.

Disseminations. A mineral deposit in which the desired minerals occur as scattered particles in the rock that has sufficient quantity to be considered an ore deposit.

Electrolytic refining. The purification of metals by electrolysis. A large piece of impure copper is used as the anode with a thin strip of pure copper as the cathode.

Electrowinning. A process that uses electricity to plate copper contained in an electrolyte solution into copper cathode.

Flotation. A concentrating process in which valuable minerals attach themselves to bubbles of an oily froth for separation as concentrate. The gangue material from the flotation process reports as a tailing product.

Grade. The relative quality or percentage of metal content.

Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples are distinct social and cultural groups that share collective ancestral ties to the lands and natural resources where they live, occupy or from which they have been displaced.

Leach stockpiles. A quantity of leachable ore placed on a leach pad or in another suitable location that permits leaching and collection of solutions that contain solubilized metal.

Leaching. The process of extracting copper using a chemical solution to dissolve copper contained in ore.

Malachite. A bright-green copper mineral (ore) that often occurs with azurite in oxidized zones of copper deposits.

Metric ton. The equivalent of 2,204.62 pounds.

Mill stockpile. Millable ore that has been mined, and is available for future processing.

Mine-for-leach. A mining operation focused on mining only leachable ores. Also, referred to as crushed leach.

Mineralization. The process by which a mineral is introduced into a rock, resulting in concentration of minerals that may form a valuable or potentially valuable deposit.

Molybdenite. A black, platy, disulfide of molybdenum. It is the most common ore of molybdenum.

Ore body. A continuous, well-defined mass of mineralized material of sufficient ore content to make extraction economically feasible.

Oxide. In mining, oxide is used as an ore classification relating to material that usually leaches well but does not perform well in a concentrator. Oxide minerals in mining refer to an oxidized form.

Paste backfill. A slurry of paste material produced from tailings with engineered cement and water content that is used to fill underground mined out stopes.

Porphyry. A deposit in which minerals of copper, molybdenum, gold or, less commonly, tungsten and tin are disseminated or occur in stock-work of small veinlets within a large mass of hydro-thermally altered igneous rock. The host rock is commonly an intrusive porphyry, but other rocks intruded by a porphyry can also be hosts for ore minerals.

Production level. With respect to underground mining, the elevation of the underground works that permit extraction/transport of the ore to a common point, shaft or plant.

Pseudomalachite. A dark-green monoclinic copper mineral.

Roasting. The heating of sulfide ores to oxidize sulfides to facilitate further processing.

Run-of-Mine (ROM). Leachable ore that is mined and directly placed on a leach pad without utilizing any further processes to reduce particle size prior to leaching.

Skarn. A Swedish mining term for silicate gangue of certain iron ore and sulfide deposits of Archaean age, particularly those that have replaced limestone and dolomite. Its meaning has been generally expanded to include lime-bearing silicates, of any geologic age, derived from nearly pure limestone and dolomite with the introduction of large amounts of silicon, aluminum, iron and magnesium.

Smelting. The process of melting and oxidizing concentrate to separate copper and precious metals from metallic and non-metallic impurities, including iron, silica, alumina and sulfur.

Solution extraction. A process that transfers copper from a copper-bearing ore to an organic solution, then to an electrolyte. The electrolyte is then pumped to a tankhouse where the copper is extracted, using electricity, into a copper cathode (refer to the term Electrowinning), together referred to as solution extraction/electrowinning (SX/EW).

Stope. An underground mining method that is usually applied to highly inclined or vertical veins. Ore is extracted by driving horizontally upon it in a series of workings, one immediately over the other. Each horizontal working is called a stope because when a number of them are in progress, each working face under attack assumes the shape of a flight of stairs.

Sulfide. A mineral compound containing sulfur and a metal. Copper sulfides can be concentrated or leached, depending on the mineral type.

Tailings. The crushed and ground material remaining after economically recoverable minerals have been extracted. In upstream design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment, with subsequent crest raises progressively shifting upstream of each previous raise, using deposited tailings as a foundation. In downstream design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment. Borrow fill or a portion of the tailings are placed on the downstream side of the starter embankment. Subsequent crest raises progressively shift downstream of each previous raise, such that the previous raise becomes the foundation of the subsequent raise. As a result, the toe and the crest of the embankment progressively shift downstream as the embankment is raised. In centerline design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment. Borrow fill or a portion of the tailings are placed on the crest of the starter embankment. Subsequent crest raises are constructed vertically along the centerline of the previous raise such that the previous raise becomes the foundation of the subsequent raise. As a result, the toe of the embankment shifts downstream but the crest stays along initial alignment as the embankment is raised.

Tolling. The process of converting customer-owned material into specified products, which is then returned to the customer.

Working interest. An interest in an oil and gas lease that gives the owner of the interest the right to drill for and produce oil and gas on the leased acreage and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production operations.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 14, 2025.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

By:/s/ Kathleen L. Quirk

Kathleen L. Quirk

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on February 14, 2025.

S-1