Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
101K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Fixed Maturities, AFS by Type
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | ACL [1] | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities ("ABS") | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | $ | 1,396 | $ | — | $ | 35 | $ | — | $ | 1,431 | 3.2 | % | $ | 1,350 | $ | 16 | $ | (3) | $ | 1,363 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 129 | — | 4 | — | 133 | 0.3 | % | 111 | 2 | — | 113 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs") | 2,780 | — | 7 | (7) | 2,780 | 6.2 | % | 2,186 | 5 | (8) | 2,183 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency [2] | 1,779 | — | 117 | (6) | 1,890 | 4.2 | % | 1,878 | 43 | (7) | 1,914 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonds | 2,160 | — | 159 | (13) | 2,306 | 5.1 | % | 2,108 | 86 | (4) | 2,190 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest only | 280 | — | 10 | (2) | 288 | 0.6 | % | 224 | 12 | (2) | 234 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic industry | 727 | — | 69 | (1) | 795 | 1.8 | % | 539 | 31 | (1) | 569 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 1,488 | — | 148 | (11) | 1,625 | 3.6 | % | 1,495 | 72 | (9) | 1,558 | 3.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 1,434 | (1) | 108 | (1) | 1,540 | 3.4 | % | 991 | 57 | (1) | 1,047 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 2,878 | — | 314 | (4) | 3,188 | 7.1 | % | 2,372 | 137 | (3) | 2,506 | 5.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Energy | 1,474 | (1) | 147 | (4) | 1,616 | 3.6 | % | 1,550 | 96 | (3) | 1,643 | 3.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | 4,523 | (21) | 398 | (4) | 4,896 | 10.9 | % | 3,977 | 192 | (4) | 4,165 | 9.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tech./comm. | 2,651 | — | 370 | (3) | 3,018 | 6.7 | % | 2,360 | 208 | — | 2,568 | 6.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transportation | 747 | — | 85 | (3) | 829 | 1.8 | % | 743 | 44 | — | 787 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Utilities | 1,999 | — | 250 | — | 2,249 | 5.0 | % | 2,019 | 132 | (4) | 2,147 | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 480 | — | 37 | — | 517 | 1.1 | % | 389 | 17 | — | 406 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign govt./govt. agencies | 842 | — | 77 | — | 919 | 2.0 | % | 1,057 | 66 | — | 1,123 | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Municipal bonds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 1,084 | — | 109 | (1) | 1,192 | 2.6 | % | 815 | 45 | (1) | 859 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 7,480 | — | 831 | — | 8,311 | 18.5 | % | 7,948 | 692 | (1) | 8,639 | 20.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency | 1,829 | — | 92 | (2) | 1,919 | 4.3 | % | 2,409 | 57 | (1) | 2,465 | 5.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-agency | 1,755 | — | 41 | (1) | 1,795 | 4.0 | % | 1,786 | 17 | (2) | 1,801 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alt-A | 27 | — | 2 | — | 29 | 0.1 | % | 40 | 3 | — | 43 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-prime | 355 | — | 9 | — | 364 | 0.8 | % | 540 | 20 | — | 560 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasuries | 1,264 | — | 141 | — | 1,405 | 3.1 | % | 1,191 | 75 | (1) | 1,265 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturities, AFS | $ | 41,561 | $ | (23) | $ | 3,560 | $ | (63) | $ | 45,035 | 100.0 | % | $ | 40,078 | $ | 2,125 | $ | (55) | $ | 42,148 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
*[1]*Represents the ACL recorded following the adoption of accounting guidance for credit losses on January 1, 2020. For further information refer to Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
*[2]*Includes securities with pools of loans issued by the Small Business Administration which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
The fair value of fixed maturities, AFS increased as compared with December 31, 2019, primarily due to net additions of corporate securities and an increase in valuations as a result of a decline in interest rates. The Company increased holdings in consumer cyclical and non-cyclical, financial services and technology/communication corporate bonds as well as in CLOs and taxable municipal bonds, while reducing holdings in tax-exempt municipal bonds, RMBS, and foreign government/government agencies.
Energy Exposure
Oil prices came under significant pressure during the first half of
2020, particularly during March and April, largely due to the unprecedented reduction in demand stemming from the global pandemic as well as a decision by Saudi Arabia to raise production despite declining demand. The uncertain outlook caused credit spreads to widen for corporate and sovereign issuers that participate in the exploration, production, transportation and refining of oil and gas. Subsequently, OPEC Plus' agreement to reduce production in combination with recovering demand from economic re-openings has contributed to a strong recovery in oil prices to average levels for the post 2014 cycle. With the stabilization of oil prices, credit spreads have recovered
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
meaningfully. Ultimately, the impact of price volatility in the Company’s energy sector investments will be determined by the durability of the recovery in energy prices and the ability of issuers to maintain liquidity, manage indebtedness, and navigate changing regulations and growing consolidation trends within the industry.
The Company's direct exposure within its investment portfolio to
the energy sector totals approximately 3% of invested assets as of December 31, 2020 and is primarily comprised of investment grade corporate debt. These investments are diversified by issuer and different sub-sectors of the energy market, with the highest exposure to the midstream industry and the lowest to refining services. The following table summarizes the Company's exposure to the energy sector by security type and credit quality.
| Exposure to Energy | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate securities, AFS and Equity securities, at fair value | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment grade | $ | 1,170 | $ | 1,307 | $ | 1,425 | $ | 1,516 | |||||||||
| Below investment grade | 304 | 309 | 125 | 127 | |||||||||||||
| Equity securities, at fair value | 21 | 21 | 45 | 45 | |||||||||||||
| Total corporate, AFS and equity securities, at fair value | 1,495 | 1,637 | 1,595 | 1,688 | |||||||||||||
| Foreign govt./govt agencies | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment grade | 189 | 214 | 232 | 254 | |||||||||||||
| Below investment grade | — | — | 9 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Total foreign govt./govt. agencies, AFS | 189 | 214 | 241 | 264 | |||||||||||||
| Other | 5 | 6 | 20 | 21 | |||||||||||||
| Total energy exposure | $ | 1,689 | $ | 1,857 | $ | 1,856 | $ | 1,973 |
The Company manages the credit risk associated with the energy sector within the investment portfolio on an on-going basis using macroeconomic analysis and issuer credit analysis. The Company considers alternate scenarios including oil prices remaining at low levels for an extended period and/or declining significantly below current levels. For additional details regarding the Company’s management of credit risks, see the Credit Risk Section of this MD&A. The Company has evaluated available-for-sale securities with exposure to energy for a potential ACL as of December 31, 2020 and concluded that for all but one of the securities in an unrealized loss position, it is more likely than not that the Company will recover the entire amortized cost basis of the securities. In addition, no other securities in the table above have been identified as intent-to-sell, nor is the Company required to sell. For additional details regarding the Company’s credit loss assessment process, see the Credit Losses on Fixed Maturities, AFS and Intent-to-Sell Impairments section below.
Commercial & Residential Real Estate
The following table presents the Company’s exposure to CMBS and RMBS by current credit quality included in the preceding Fixed Maturities, AFS by Type table.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Exposure to CMBS and RMBS as of December 31, 2020
| AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB and Below | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency [1] | $ | 1,771 | $ | 1,882 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,779 | $ | 1,890 | ||||||||||||||
| Bonds | 1,009 | 1,101 | 541 | 582 | 423 | 430 | 170 | 179 | 17 | 14 | 2,160 | 2,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Only | 177 | 183 | 90 | 93 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 280 | 288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total CMBS | 2,957 | 3,166 | 639 | 683 | 431 | 437 | 174 | 183 | 18 | 15 | 4,219 | 4,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency | 1,807 | 1,894 | 22 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,829 | 1,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-Agency | 1,034 | 1,063 | 371 | 380 | 313 | 315 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 1,755 | 1,795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alt-A | — | — | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 22 | 27 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Prime | 1 | 1 | 25 | 26 | 114 | 116 | 102 | 105 | 113 | 116 | 355 | 364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total RMBS | 2,842 | 2,958 | 421 | 434 | 429 | 433 | 140 | 143 | 134 | 139 | 3,966 | 4,107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total CMBS & RMBS | $ | 5,799 | $ | 6,124 | $ | 1,060 | $ | 1,117 | $ | 860 | $ | 870 | $ | 314 | $ | 326 | $ | 152 | $ | 154 | $ | 8,185 | $ | 8,591 |
Exposure to CMBS and RMBS as of December 31, 2019
| AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB and Below | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency [1] | $ | 1,878 | $ | 1,914 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,878 | $ | 1,914 | ||||||||||||||
| Bonds | 1,013 | 1,055 | 561 | 576 | 416 | 438 | 118 | 121 | — | — | 2,108 | 2,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Only | 150 | 158 | 67 | 70 | — | — | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 224 | 234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total CMBS | 3,041 | 3,127 | 628 | 646 | 416 | 438 | 123 | 126 | 2 | 1 | 4,210 | 4,338 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agency | 2,386 | 2,441 | 23 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,409 | 2,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-Agency | 1,215 | 1,226 | 300 | 304 | 257 | 257 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1,786 | 1,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alt-A | — | — | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 40 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Prime | 9 | 9 | 56 | 57 | 167 | 173 | 164 | 171 | 144 | 150 | 540 | 560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total RMBS | 3,610 | 3,676 | 387 | 393 | 428 | 434 | 185 | 193 | 165 | 173 | 4,775 | 4,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total CMBS & RMBS | $ | 6,651 | $ | 6,803 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 1,039 | $ | 844 | $ | 872 | $ | 308 | $ | 319 | $ | 167 | $ | 174 | $ | 8,985 | $ | 9,207 |
[1]Includes securities with pools of loans issued by the Small Business Administration which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
The Company also has exposure to commercial mortgage loans. These loans are collateralized by real estate properties that are diversified both geographically throughout the United States and by property type. These commercial loans are originated by the Company as high quality whole loans, and the Company may sell participation interests in one or more loans to third parties. A loan participation interest represents a pro-rata share in interest and principal payments generated by the participated loan, and the relationship between the Company as loan originator, lead participant and servicer and the third party as a participant are governed by a participation agreement.
As of December 31, 2020, mortgage loans had an amortized cost of $4.5 billion and carrying value of $4.5 billion, with an ACL of $38. As of December 31, 2019, mortgage loans had an amortized cost of $4.2 billion and carrying value of $4.2 billion with no valuation allowance. The increase in the allowance is attributable
to both the recognition of an ACL in connection with the adoption of accounting guidance for credit losses on January 1, 2020 and the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on the economic forecasts, as well as lower estimated property values and operating income as compared to the prior year. For further information refer to Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company funded $647 of commercial mortgage loans with a weighted average loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of 59% and a weighted average yield of 3.2% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. The Company continues to originate commercial mortgage loans in high growth markets across the country focusing primarily on institutional-quality industrial and multi-family properties with strong LTV ratios. There were no
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
mortgage loans held for sale as of December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019.
Municipal Bonds
The following table presents the Company’s exposure to
municipal bonds by type and weighted average credit quality included in the preceding Securities by Type table.
Available For Sale Investments in Municipal Bonds
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Weighted Average Credit Quality | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Weighted Average Credit Quality | ||||||||||||||||||
| General Obligation | $ | 1,082 | $ | 1,232 | AA+ | $ | 1,157 | $ | 1,268 | AA | |||||||||||||
| Pre-refunded [1] | 889 | 940 | AAA | 936 | 985 | AAA | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transportation | 1,441 | 1,636 | A+ | 1,509 | 1,675 | A+ | |||||||||||||||||
| Health Care | 1,273 | 1,407 | A+ | 1,360 | 1,454 | A+ | |||||||||||||||||
| Leasing [2] | 905 | 985 | AA- | 781 | 842 | AA- | |||||||||||||||||
| Education | 732 | 824 | AA | 784 | 853 | AA | |||||||||||||||||
| Water & Sewer | 644 | 694 | AA | 660 | 700 | AA | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales Tax | 394 | 464 | AA | 456 | 517 | AA | |||||||||||||||||
| Power | 401 | 450 | A+ | 339 | 374 | A | |||||||||||||||||
| Housing | 102 | 109 | AA+ | 114 | 117 | AA+ | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 701 | 762 | A+ | 667 | 713 | AA- | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | 6,593 | 7,331 | AA- | 6,670 | 7,245 | AA- | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Municipal | $ | 8,564 | $ | 9,503 | AA- | $ | 8,763 | $ | 9,498 | AA- |
*[1]*Pre-refunded bonds are bonds for which an irrevocable trust containing sufficient U.S. treasury, agency, or other securities has been established to fund the remaining payments of principal and interest.
*[2]*Leasing revenue bonds are generally the obligations of a financing authority established by the municipality that leases facilities back to a municipality. The notes are typically secured by lease payments made by the municipality that is leasing the facilities financed by the issue. Lease payments may be subject to annual appropriation by the municipality or the municipality may be obligated to appropriate general tax revenues to make lease payments.
As of December 31, 2020, the largest issuer concentrations were the New York Dormitory Authority, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, which each comprised less than 3% of the municipal bond portfolio and were primarily comprised of general obligation and revenue bonds. As of December 31, 2019, the largest issuer concentrations were the New York Dormitory Authority, the New York City Transitional Finance Authority, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which each comprised less than 3% of the municipal bond portfolio and were primarily comprised of general obligation and revenue bonds. In total, municipal bonds make up 17% of the fair value of the Company's investment portfolio. While COVID-19 has had an impact on many municipal issuers, the average credit quality of the Company’s holdings is AA-, and the Company believes the issuers in which it invests have multiple levers to maintain the strength of their credit profile.
Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments
The following table presents the Company’s investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments which include hedge funds, real estate funds, and private equity funds. Real estate funds consist of investments primarily in real estate joint ventures and, to a lesser extent, equity funds. Private equity funds primarily consist of investments in funds whose assets typically consist of a diversified pool of investments in small to mid-sized non-public businesses with high growth potential, and
strong owner sponsorship, as well as limited exposure to public markets.
Income or losses on investments in limited partnerships and alternative investments are recognized on a lag as results from private equity investments and other funds are generally reported on a three-month delay.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments - Net Investment Income
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hedge funds | $ | 9 | 7.1 | % | $ | 5 | 7.2 | % | $ | 4 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate funds | 85 | 20.3 | % | 70 | 17.0 | % | 58 | 12.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private equity funds | 106 | 12.4 | % | 126 | 16.6 | % | 144 | 22.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other alternative investments [1] | 22 | 5.4 | % | 31 | 8.2 | % | (1) | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 222 | 12.3 | % | $ | 232 | 14.4 | % | $ | 205 | 13.2 | % |
Investments in Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||
| Hedge funds | $ | 158 | 7.6 | % | $ | 94 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||
| Real estate funds | 563 | 27.0 | % | 407 | 23.2 | % | |||||||||||
| Private equity and other funds | 944 | 45.4 | % | 851 | 48.4 | % | |||||||||||
| Other alternative investments [1] | 417 | 20.0 | % | 406 | 23.1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,082 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,758 | 100.0 | % |
*[1]*Consists of an insurer-owned life insurance policy which is primarily invested in fixed income, private equity, and hedge funds.
Fixed Maturities, AFS — Unrealized Loss Aging
The total gross unrealized losses were $63 as of December 31, 2020, and have increased $8 from December 31, 2019, primarily due to wider credit spreads within higher yielding corporates and CMBS. As of December 31, 2020, $49 of the gross unrealized losses were associated with fixed maturities, AFS depressed less than 20% of amortized cost. The remaining $14 of gross unrealized losses were associated with fixed maturities, AFS depressed greater than 20%. The fixed maturities, AFS depressed more than 20% were primarily related to one variable-rate coupon corporate issuer with a long-dated maturity date as well as commercial real estate securities that were purchased at tighter credit spreads.
As part of the Company’s ongoing investment monitoring process, the Company has reviewed its fixed maturities, AFS in an unrealized loss position and concluded that these fixed maturities are temporarily depressed and are expected to recover in value as the investments approach maturity or as market spreads tighten. For these fixed maturities in an unrealized loss position where an ACL has not been recorded, the Company’s best estimate of expected future cash flows are sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of the investment. Furthermore, the Company neither has an intention to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell these investments. For further information regarding the Company’s ACL analysis, see the Credit Losses on Fixed Maturities, AFS and Intent-to-Sell Impairments section below.
Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Maturities, AFS
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consecutive Months | Items | Amortized Cost | ACL [1] | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Items | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months or less | 102 | $ | 625 | $ | — | $ | (3) | $ | 622 | 347 | $ | 2,529 | $ | (15) | $ | 2,514 | ||||||||||||||||
| Greater than three to six months | 46 | 367 | — | (5) | 362 | 114 | 712 | (8) | 704 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than six to nine months | 8 | 6 | — | (1) | 5 | 50 | 190 | (2) | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than nine to eleven months | 186 | 1,275 | (1) | (27) | 1,247 | 15 | 24 | (1) | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Twelve months or more | 205 | 994 | — | (27) | 967 | 345 | 1,440 | (29) | 1,411 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 547 | $ | 3,267 | $ | (1) | $ | (63) | $ | 3,203 | 871 | $ | 4,895 | $ | (55) | $ | 4,840 |
*[1]*Represents the ACL recorded following the adoption of accounting guidance for credit losses on January 1, 2020. For further information refer to Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Maturities, AFS Continuously Depressed Over 20%
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consecutive Months | Items | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Items | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months or less | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | (1) | $ | 1 | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
| Greater than three to six months | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | (1) | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than six to nine months | 1 | 46 | (10) | 36 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than nine to eleven months | 2 | 5 | (1) | 4 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Twelve months or more | 24 | 5 | (2) | 3 | 32 | 10 | (4) | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 29 | $ | 58 | $ | (14) | $ | 44 | 37 | $ | 12 | $ | (5) | $ | 7 |
Credit Losses on Fixed Maturities, AFS and Intent-to-Sell Impairments
For the year ended December 31, 2020
The Company recorded net credit losses on fixed maturities, AFS of $28. The losses were primarily attributable to corporate fixed maturities, mainly one private regional and commercial aircraft lessor and to a lesser extent, one tax-exempt municipal bond impacted by COVID-19. Unrealized losses on securities with ACL recognized in other comprehensive income were $1. For further information, refer to Note 6 - Investments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Intent-to-sell impairments of $5 were primarily related to one corporate issuer in the energy sector and one issuer with exposure to India.
The Company incorporates its best estimate of future performance using internal assumptions and judgments that are informed by economic and industry specific trends, as well as our expectations with respect to security specific developments.
Future intent-to-sell impairments or credit losses may develop as the result of changes in our intent to sell specific securities that are in an unrealized loss position or if modeling assumptions, such as macroeconomic factors or security specific developments, change unfavorably from our current modeling assumptions, resulting in lower cash flow expectations. For a discussion of impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, refer to the Impact of COVID-19 on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity section of this MD&A.
For the year ended December 31, 2019
Impairments recognized in earnings were comprised of credit impairments of $3 primarily related to two corporate securities experiencing issuer-specific financial difficulties.
Non-credit impairments recognized in other comprehensive income were $3.
ACL on Mortgage Loans
The Company reviews mortgage loans on a quarterly basis to estimate the ACL with changes in the ACL recorded in net realized capital gains and losses. Apart from an ACL recorded on
individual mortgage loans where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, the Company records an ACL on the pool of mortgage loans based on lifetime expected credit losses. For further information, refer to Note 6 - Investments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the year-ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded an increase in the ACL on mortgage loans of $19. The increase in the allowance was due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on the economic forecasts, as well as lower estimated property values and operating income as compared to the prior year. The Company did not record an ACL on any individual mortgage loans.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The following section discusses the overall financial strength of The Hartford and its insurance operations including their ability to generate cash flows from each of their business segments, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet operating and growth needs over the next twelve months.
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Capital available to the holding company as of December 31, 2020:
-
$1.8 billion in fixed maturities, short-term investments, investment sales receivable and cash at the HFSG Holding Company.
-
A senior unsecured five-year revolving credit facility that provides for borrowing capacity up to $750 of unsecured credit through March 29, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding.
-
An intercompany liquidity agreement that allows for short-term advances of funds among the HFSG Holding Company and certain affiliates of up to $2.0 billion for liquidity and other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
2021 expected dividends and other sources of capital:
The future payment of dividends from our subsidiaries is dependent on several factors including the extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity
-
P&C -** The Company's U.S. property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have dividend capacity of $1.7 billion for 2021, with $850 to $900 of net dividends expected in 2021.
-
Group Benefits -** HLA has dividend capacity of $295 in 2021 with $250 to $295 of dividends expected in 2021.
-
Hartford Funds** - HFSG Holding Company expects to receive $125 to $150 in dividends from Hartford Funds in 2021.
Expected liquidity requirements for the next twelve months as of December 31, 2020:
-
$215 of interest on debt.
-
$21 dividends on preferred stock, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors.
-
$500 of common stockholders' dividends, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and before share repurchases.
Equity repurchase program:
In December, 2020, the Company announced a $1.5 billion share repurchase authorization by the Board of Directors, which is effective from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. The Company’s 2019 share repurchase program expired on December 31, 2020.
Liquidity Requirements and Sources of Capital
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. ("HFSG Holding Company")
The liquidity requirements of the holding company of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. will primarily be met by HFSG Holding Company’s fixed maturities; short-term investments and cash; and dividends, principally from its subsidiaries.
The Company maintains sufficient liquidity and has a variety of contingent liquidity resources to manage liquidity across a range of economic scenarios. To date, the impact of the pandemic and resulting economic downturn on net operating cash flows have been relatively modest. The amount of such impacts will ultimately depend on the length and severity of the pandemic and its effects on the economy. We continue to expect to successfully manage our liquidity throughout the pandemic.
In parts of the second and third quarters of 2020, the Company waived late payment fees for a period of time for business and personal insurance customers and temporarily suspended the
policy cancellation process for policyholders of our Commercial Lines, Personal Lines and Group Benefits segments. Due to those actions and the economic effects of the pandemic, we experienced an increase in uncollectible premiums receivable and, accordingly, increased our current expected credit loss allowance on premiums receivable by $40 before tax for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The HFSG Holding Company expects to continue to receive dividends from its operating subsidiaries in the future and manages capital in its operating subsidiaries to be sufficient under significant economic stress scenarios . Dividends from subsidiaries and other sources of funds at the holding company may be used to repurchase shares under the authorized share repurchase program at the discretion of management.
Under significant economic stress scenarios that could arise due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has the ability to meet short-term cash requirements, if needed, by borrowing under its revolving credit facility or by having its insurance subsidiaries take collateralized advances under a facility with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”). The Company could also choose to have its insurance subsidiaries sell certain highly liquid, high quality fixed maturities or the Company could issue debt in the public markets under its shelf registration. No borrowings or advances have occurred to date.
During the second quarter of 2020, fixed maturities, with a value of $63 as of December 31, 2020, were deposited by Hartford Fire Insurance Company into a Lloyd’s trust account to provide required capital to The Hartford’s Lloyd’s Syndicate. During the fourth quarter of 2020, additional fixed maturities, with a value of $112 as of December 31, 2020, were deposited by Hartford Fire Insurance Company into this trust account. This transaction provided required capital to The Hartford's Lloyd's syndicate, by which we reduced the amount of letters of credit under the Lloyd's Letter of Credit Facility supporting Lloyd's capital requirements. This was in accordance with the Lloyd's requirements reducing the maximum amount of letters of credit permitted to support Lloyd's capital requirements as of the end of 2020. As of December 31, 2020, a total of $175 of fixed maturities were held by Hartford Fire Insurance Company in this trust account.
In July 2020, the Company contributed €18 million to Navigators Holdings (Europe) N.V., a Belgium holding company.
In September 2020, the Company received a $30 dividend from its retained equity interest in the legal entity that acquired the life and annuity business sold in May 2018.
Through December 30, 2020, HFSG Holding Company received cash tax receipts of $533, including realization of net operating losses and refunds of prior period AMT credits.
Debt
On March 30, 2020, The Hartford repaid at maturity the $500 principal amount of its 5.5% senior notes.
For additional information on Debt, see Note 14 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Equity
In December, 2020, the Company announced a $1.5 billion share repurchase authorization by the Board of Directors which is effective from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
During the period from January 1, 2021 through February 18, 2021, the Company repurchased 1.1 million shares for $56. The timing of any future repurchases will be dependent upon several factors, including the market price of the Company's securities, the Company's capital position, consideration of the effect of any repurchases on the Company's financial strength or credit ratings, and other considerations.
Under the previous $1.0 billion share repurchase authorization that was effective through December 31, 2020, the Company repurchased 2.7 million and 3.4 million shares for $150 and $200 during the years ended 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company’s 2019 share repurchase program expired on December 31, 2020.
For further information, see Note 16 - Equity of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Dividends
The Hartford's Board of Directors declared the following quarterly dividends since October 1, 2020:
Common Stock Dividends
| Declared | Record | Payable | Amount per share | ||||||||
| October 21, 2020 | December 1, 2020 | January 5, 2021 | $ | 0.325 | |||||||
| February 4, 2021 | March 1, 2021 | April 2, 2021 | $ | 0.35 | |||||||
Preferred Stock Dividends
| Declared | Record | Payable | Amount per share | ||||||||
| October 21, 2020 | February 1, 2021 | February 16, 2021 | $ | 375.00 | |||||||
| February 18, 2021 | May 1, 2021 | May 17, 2021 | $ | 375.00 | |||||||
There are no current restrictions on HFSG Holding Company's ability to pay dividends to its stockholders.
For a discussion of restrictions on dividends to HFSG Holding Company from its insurance subsidiaries, see the following "Dividends from Subsidiaries" discussion. For a discussion of potential restrictions on the HFSG Holding Company's ability to pay dividends, see Part I, Item 1A, — Risk Factors for the risk factor "Our ability to declare and pay dividends is subject to limitations."
Dividends from Subsidiaries
Dividends to HFSG Holding Company from its insurance subsidiaries are restricted by insurance regulation. Upon the acquisition of Navigators Group, the Company’s principal insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in the United States, the United Kingdom and Belgium.
The payment of dividends by Connecticut-domiciled insurers is limited under the insurance holding company laws of Connecticut. These laws require notice to and approval by the state insurance commissioner for the declaration or payment of any dividend, which, together with other dividends or distributions made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of the insurer’s statutory policyholder surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or (ii) net income (or net gain from operations, if such company is a life insurance company) for the twelve-month period ending on the thirty-first day of December last preceding, in each case determined under
statutory insurance accounting principles. In addition, if any dividend of a Connecticut-domiciled insurer exceeds the insurer’s earned surplus, it requires the prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner.
Property casualty insurers domiciled in New York, including Navigators Insurance Company ("NIC") and Navigators Specialty Insurance Company ("NSIC"), generally may not, without notice to and approval by the state insurance commissioner, pay dividends out of earned surplus in any twelve‑month period that exceeds the lesser of (i) 10% of the insurer’s statutory policyholders’ surplus as of the most recent financial statement on file, or (ii) 100% of its adjusted net investment income, as defined, for the same twelve month period. As part of the New York state insurance commissioner's approval of the Navigators Group acquisition, and as is common practice, any dividend from NIC and NSIC before May 2021 will require prior approval from the state insurance commissioner.
The insurance holding company laws of the other jurisdictions in which The Hartford’s insurance subsidiaries are incorporated (or deemed commercially domiciled) generally contain similar (although in certain instances more restrictive) limitations on the payment of dividends. In addition to statutory limitations on paying dividends, the Company also takes other items into consideration when determining dividends from subsidiaries. These considerations include, but are not limited to, expected earnings and capitalization of the subsidiaries, regulatory capital requirements and liquidity requirements of the individual operating company.
Corporate members of Lloyd's Syndicates may pay dividends to its parent to the extent of available profits that have been distributed from the syndicate in excess of the Funds at Lloyd's ("FAL") capital requirement. The FAL is determined based on the syndicate’s solvency capital requirement under the Solvency II capital adequacy model, the current regulatory framework governing UK domiciled insurers, plus a Lloyd’s specific economic capital assessment.
Insurers domiciled in the United Kingdom may pay dividends to their parent out of their statutory profits subject to restrictions imposed under U.K. Company law and Solvency II. Belgium domiciled insurers may only pay dividends if, at the end of their previous fiscal year, the total amount of their assets, as reduced by its provisions and debts, are in excess of certain minimum capital thresholds calculated under Belgian law.
In 2020, HFSG Holding Company received $350 of dividends from HLA and $127 from Hartford Funds. In addition, HFSG Holding Company received $900 of net dividends from P&C subsidiaries in 2020 which excludes $50 of P&C dividends that were subsequently contributed to a run-off P&C subsidiary and $78 of P&C dividends related to interest payments on an intercompany note owed by Hartford Holdings, Inc. ("HHI") to Hartford Fire Insurance Company.
Other Sources of Capital for the HFSG Holding Company
The Hartford endeavors to maintain a capital structure that provides financial and operational flexibility to its insurance subsidiaries, ratings that support its competitive position in the financial services marketplace (see the "Ratings" section below for further discussion), and stockholder returns. As a result, the Company may from time to time raise capital from the issuance of debt, common equity, preferred stock, equity-related debt or
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
other capital securities and is continuously evaluating strategic opportunities. The issuance of debt, common equity, equity-related debt or other capital securities could result in the dilution of stockholder interests or reduced net income due to additional interest expense.
Shelf Registrations
The Hartford filed an automatic shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("the SEC") on May 17, 2019 that permits it to offer and sell debt and equity securities during the three-year life of the registration statement.
For further information regarding Shelf Registrations, see Note 14 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revolving Credit Facilities
The Company has a senior unsecured five-year revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") that provides up to $750 of unsecured credit through March 29, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, no borrowings were outstanding, no letters of credit were issued under the Credit Facility and the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
Commercial Paper
On December 17, 2020, the Board of Directors terminated the HFSG Holding Company's commercial paper program, under which the maximum borrowings available were $750. The Company maintains sufficient liquidity and continues to have a variety of other contingent liquidity resources to meet its short-term liquidity requirements.
Intercompany Liquidity Agreements
The Company has $2.0 billion available under an intercompany liquidity agreement that allows for short-term advances of funds among the HFSG Holding Company and certain affiliates of up to $2.0 billion for liquidity and other general corporate purposes. The Connecticut Department of Insurance ("CTDOI") granted approval for certain affiliated insurance companies that are parties to the agreement to treat receivables from a parent, including the HFSG Holding Company, as admitted assets for statutory accounting purposes.
As of December 31, 2020, there were no amounts outstanding at the HFSG Holding Company.
Collateralized Advances with Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston
The Company’s subsidiaries, Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford Fire”) and HLA, are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”). Membership allows these subsidiaries access to collateralized advances, which may be short- or long-term with fixed or variable rates. Advances may be used to support general corporate purposes, which would be presented as short- or long-term debt, or to earn incremental investment income, which would be presented in other liabilities consistent with other collateralized financing transactions. As of December 31, 2020, there were no advances outstanding. The Connecticut Department of Insurance permits Hartford Fire and HLA to pledge up to $1.2 billion and $0.6 billion in qualifying assets, respectively, without prior approval, to secure FHLBB advances in 2021. For further information regarding the Company's collateralized advances with Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, see Note 14 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lloyd's Letter of Credit Facilities
As a result of the acquisition of Navigators Group, The Hartford had two letter of credit facility agreements: the Club Facility and the Bilateral Facility, which were used to provide a portion of the capital requirements at Lloyd's. As of September 30, 2020, uncollateralized letters of credit with an aggregate face amount of $165 and £60 million, or $78, were outstanding under the Club Facility and £18 million, or $23, was outstanding under the $25 Bilateral Facility. These agreements terminated on November 5, 2020.
On November 5, 2020, The Hartford entered into a new committed credit facility agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the “Club Facility”). The Club Facility has two tranches with one tranche extending a $104 commitment and the other tranche extending a £85 million ($116 as of December 31, 2020) commitment. In addition, on November 5, 2020, The Hartford entered into a new non-committed $25 credit facility with a lender (the “Bilateral Facility”). The term of both of these facilities is two years. The purpose of these facilities is to issue letters of credit to provide Funds at Lloyd’s to support underwriting capacity provided by the Navigators Corporate Underwriters Limited to the Lloyd’s Syndicate for the 2021 and 2022 underwriting years of account (and prior open years). As of December 31, 2020, letters of credit with an aggregate face amount of $104 and £85 million, or $116, were outstanding under the Club Facility and no letters of credit were outstanding under the Bilateral Facility.
Among other covenants, the Club Facility and Bilateral Facility contain financial covenants regarding The Hartford’s consolidated net worth and financial leverage and that limit the amount of letters of credit that can support Funds at Lloyd’s, consistent with Lloyd’s requirements. As of December 31, 2020, The Hartford was in compliance with all financial covenants of both facilities.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
While the Company has significant discretion in making voluntary contributions to the U. S. qualified defined benefit pension plan, minimum contributions are mandated in certain circumstances pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21) and Internal Revenue Code regulations. The Company made contributions to the U. S. qualified defined benefit pension plan of approximately $70, $70 and $101 in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No contributions were made to the other postretirement plans in 2020, 2019 and 2018. The Company’s 2020, 2019 and 2018 required minimum funding contributions were immaterial. The Company does not have a 2021 required minimum funding contribution for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan and the funding requirements for all pension plans are expected to be immaterial. The Company has not determined whether, and to what extent, contributions may be made to the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan in 2021. The Company will monitor the funded status of the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan during 2021 to make this determination.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Derivative Commitments
Certain of the Company’s derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial strength ratings, as set by nationally recognized statistical agencies, of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement. If the legal entity’s financial strength were to fall below certain ratings, the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances enable the counterparties to terminate the agreements and demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement. For further information, refer to Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2020, no derivative positions would be subject to immediate termination in the event of a downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings. This could change as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in contractual terms are negotiated.
Insurance Operations
While subject to variability period to period, underwriting and investment cash flows continue to provide sufficient liquidity to meet anticipated demands over the next twelve months. For information about the impact of COVID-19 on the Company's cash flows see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For a discussion and tabular presentation of the Company’s current contractual obligations by period, refer to Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations within the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A.
The principal sources of operating funds are premiums, fees earned from assets under management and investment income, while investing cash flows primarily originate from maturities and sales of invested assets. The primary uses of funds are to pay claims, claim adjustment expenses, commissions and other underwriting and insurance operating costs, to pay taxes, to purchase new investments and to make dividend payments to the HFSG Holding Company.
The Company’s insurance operations consist of property and casualty insurance products (collectively referred to as “Property & Casualty Operations”) and Group Benefits.
The Company's insurance operations hold fixed maturity securities including a significant short-term investment position (securities with maturities of one year or less at the time of purchase) to meet liquidity needs. Liquidity requirements that are
unable to be funded by the Company's insurance operations' short-term investments would be satisfied with current operating funds, including premiums or investing cash flows, which includes proceeds received through the sale of invested assets. A sale of invested assets could result in significant realized capital losses.
The following tables represent the fixed maturity holdings, including the aforementioned cash and short-term investments available to meet liquidity needs, for each of the Company’s insurance operations.
Property & Casualty
| As of | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||
| Fixed maturities | $ | 34,173 | |||
| Short-term investments | 1,086 | ||||
| Cash | 120 | ||||
| Less: Derivative collateral | 77 | ||||
| Total | $ | 35,302 |
Group Benefits Operations
| As of | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||
| Fixed maturities | $ | 10,521 | |||
| Short-term investments | 254 | ||||
| Cash | 13 | ||||
| Less: Derivative collateral | 42 | ||||
| Total | $ | 10,746 |
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources of the Company, except for unfunded commitments to purchase investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments, private placements, and mortgage loans as disclosed in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Aggregate Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2020
| Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||
| Property and casualty obligations [1] | $ | 29,989 | $ | 7,157 | $ | 7,865 | $ | 3,901 | $ | 11,066 | |||||||
| Group life and disability obligations [2] | 10,407 | 1,403 | 3,457 | 1,514 | 4,033 | ||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations [3] | 243 | 47 | 81 | 52 | 63 | ||||||||||||
| Long-term debt obligations [4] | 9,371 | 215 | 427 | 427 | 8,302 | ||||||||||||
| Purchase obligations [5] | 2,814 | 2,233 | 444 | 127 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Other liabilities reflected on the balance sheet [6] | 45 | 45 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 52,869 | $ | 11,100 | $ | 12,274 | $ | 6,021 | $ | 23,474 |
*[1]*The following points are significant to understanding the cash flows estimated for obligations (gross of reinsurance) under property and casualty contracts:
*•*Reserves for Property & Casualty unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses include IBNR and case reserves. While payments due on claim reserves are considered contractual obligations because they relate to insurance policies issued by the Company, the ultimate amount to be paid to settle both case reserves and IBNR is an estimate, subject to significant uncertainty. The actual amount to be paid is not finally determined until the Company reaches a settlement with the claimant. Final claim settlements may vary significantly from the present estimates, particularly since many claims will not be settled until well into the future.
*•*In estimating the timing of future payments by year, the Company has assumed that its historical payment patterns will continue. However, the actual timing of future payments could vary materially from these estimates due to, among other things, changes in claim reporting and payment patterns and large unanticipated settlements. In particular, there is significant uncertainty over the claim payment patterns of asbestos and environmental claims. In addition, the table does not include future cash flows related to the receipt of premiums that may be used, in part, to fund loss payments.
*•*Under U.S. GAAP, the Company is only permitted to discount reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses in cases where the payment pattern and ultimate loss costs are fixed and determinable on an individual claim basis. For the Company, these include claim settlements with permanently disabled claimants. As of December 31, 2020, the total property and casualty reserves in the above table are gross of a reserve discount of $367.
*•*Amounts shown do not consider $5.7 billion of reinsurance and other recoverables the Company expects to collect related to property and casualty obligations.
[2] Estimated group life and disability obligations are based on assumptions comparable with the Company’s historical experience, modified for recent observed trends. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results. As of December 31, 2020, the total group life and disability obligations in the above table are gross of a reserve discount of $1.4 billion.
*[3]*Includes undiscounted lease payments on operating lease agreements, including leases that have not yet commenced. See Note 21 - Leases of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on lease commitments.
[4] Long-term debt obligations include payments of contractual principal and interest through final maturity. Contractual interest payments are based on stated rates for fixed rate notes and based on prevailing rates at December 31, 2020 for the period of time the Company’s junior subordinated debentures have floating rates. Interest payments do not consider the impact of future rate movements. Payments exclude amounts associated with an interest rate swap of the Company’s $500 junior subordinated debenture. See Note 14 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of long-term debt obligations.
*[5]*Includes $1.1 billion in commitments to purchase investments including approximately $804 of limited partnership and other alternative investments, $79 of private debt and equity securities, and $236 of mortgage loans. Of the $1.1 billion in commitments to purchase investments, $149 are related to mortgage loan commitments which the Company can cancel unconditionally. Outstanding commitments under these limited partnerships and mortgage loans are included in payments due in less than 1 year since the timing of funding these commitments cannot be reliably estimated. In addition, $904 relates to commitments to purchase investments which are reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining balance relates to contractual commitments to purchase various goods and services such as maintenance, human resources, and information technology in the normal course of business, as well as unfunded tax credit investments. Purchase obligations exclude contracts that are cancellable without penalty or contracts that do not specify minimum levels of goods or services to be purchased.
*[6]*Includes cash collateral of $30 which the Company has accepted in connection with the Company’s derivative instruments. Since the timing of the return of the collateral is uncertain, the return of the collateral has been included in the payments due in less than 1 year.
Capitalization
| Capital Structure | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | Change | |||||||||
| Short-term debt (includes current maturities of long-term debt) | $ | — | $ | 500 | (100%) | ||||||
| Long-term debt | 4,352 | 4,348 | —% | ||||||||
| Total debt | 4,352 | 4,848 | (10%) | ||||||||
| Common stockholders' equity, excluding AOCI, net of tax | 17,052 | 15,884 | 7% | ||||||||
| Preferred stock | 334 | 334 | —% | ||||||||
| AOCI, net of tax | 1,170 | 52 | NM | ||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 18,556 | $ | 16,270 | 14% | ||||||
| Total capitalization | $ | 22,908 | $ | 21,118 | 8% | ||||||
| Debt to stockholders’ equity | 23 | % | 30 | % | |||||||
| Debt to capitalization | 19 | % | 23 | % |
Total capitalization increased $1,790, or 8%, as of December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 primarily due to an
increase in AOCI and net income in excess of stockholder dividends, partially offset by a paydown of debt.
For additional information on AOCI, net of tax, including
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
unrealized capital gains from securities, see Note 18 - Changes in and Reclassifications From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Note 6 - Investments of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. For additional information on debt, see Note 14 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flow [1][2]
| 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 3,871 | $ | 3,489 | $ | 2,843 | |||||
| Net cash used for investing activities | $ | (2,066) | $ | (2,148) | $ | (1,962) | |||||
| Net cash used for financing activities | $ | (1,778) | $ | (1,191) | $ | (1,467) | |||||
| Cash and restricted cash— end of year | $ | 239 | $ | 262 | $ | 121 |
*[1]*Cash activities in 2018 include cash flows from Discontinued Operations; see Note 22 - Business Dispositions and Discontinued Operations of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on cash flows from Discontinued Operations.
*[2]*Cash activities in 2020 include cash flows related to Continental Europe Operations classified as held for sale beginning in the third quarter of 2020. See Note 2 - Business Acquisition and Disposition of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of this transaction.
Year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019
Net cash provided by operating activities increased as compared to the prior year period primarily driven by the inclusion of Navigators Group for the full year in 2020, subrogation benefit distributions collected of $227 arising from the PG&E settlement agreement, a decrease in claims paid for Group Benefits and P&C excluding Navigators, lower operating expenses paid and the deferral of paying payroll taxes as a result of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act, partially offset by lower P&C premiums received excluding Navigators and a lower refund of AMT credits.
Cash used for investing activities decreased primarily due to the acquisition of Navigators Group for $1.9 billion in 2019, an increase in net proceeds from equity securities, and a decrease in net payments from mortgage loans, partially offset by a change from net proceeds to net payments from short-term investments, and an increase in net purchases of partnerships and fixed maturities.
Cash used for financing activities increased primarily due to a decrease in proceeds from issuing debt and a larger net decrease in securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, partially offset by a decrease in repayments of debt.
Operating cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 have been adequate to meet liquidity requirements.
Equity Markets
For a discussion of the potential impact of the equity markets on capital and liquidity, see the Financial Risk on Statutory Capital and Liquidity Risk section in this MD&A.
Ratings
Ratings are an important factor in establishing a competitive position in the insurance marketplace and impact the Company's ability to access financing and its cost of borrowing. There can be no assurance that the Company’s ratings will continue for any given period of time, or that they will not be changed. In the event the Company’s ratings are downgraded, the Company’s competitive position, ability to access financing, and its cost of borrowing, may be adversely impacted.
On June 19, 2020, A.M. Best raised its financial strength rating on Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("HLA") to A+ from A. The upgrade is reflective of the support provided by The Hartford, as well as the group benefits business' growing contribution to consolidated revenue and earnings and the overall diversification it provides.
Insurance Financial Strength Ratings as of February 18, 2021
| A.M. Best | Standard & Poor's | Moody's | |||||||||
| Hartford Fire Insurance Company | A+ | A+ | A1 | ||||||||
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company | A+ | A+ | A2 | ||||||||
| Navigators Insurance Company | A+ | A | Not Rated | ||||||||
| Other Ratings: | |||||||||||
| The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.: | |||||||||||
| Senior debt | a- | BBB+ | Baa1 | ||||||||
These ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any of The Hartford’s securities and they may be revised or revoked at any time at the sole discretion of the rating organization. Each agency’s rating should be evaluated independently of any other agency’s rating. The system and the number of rating categories can vary across rating agencies.
Among other factors, rating agencies consider the level of statutory capital and surplus of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries as well as the level of a measure of GAAP capital held by the Company in determining the Company's financial strength and credit ratings. Rating agencies may implement changes to their capital formulas that have the effect of increasing the amount of capital we must hold in order to maintain our current ratings. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors — “Downgrades in our financial strength or credit ratings may make our products less attractive, increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt.”
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Statutory Capital
| U.S. Statutory Capital Rollforward for the Company's Insurance Subsidiaries | |||||||||||
| Property and Casualty Insurance Subsidiaries [1] [2] | Group Benefits Insurance Subsidiary | Total | |||||||||
| U.S. statutory capital at January 1, 2020 | $ | 10,208 | $ | 2,644 | $ | 12,852 | |||||
| Statutory income | 1,598 | 310 | 1,908 | ||||||||
| Contributions from (dividends to) parent [3] | (898) | (350) | (1,248) | ||||||||
| Other items | (113) | (3) | (116) | ||||||||
| Net change to U.S. statutory capital | 587 | (43) | 544 | ||||||||
| U.S. statutory capital at December 31, 2020 | $ | 10,795 | $ | 2,601 | $ | 13,396 |
*[1]*The statutory capital for property and casualty insurance subsidiaries in this table does not include the value of an intercompany note owed by HHI to Hartford Fire Insurance Company.
*[2]*Excludes insurance operations in the U.K. and Continental Europe.
*[3]*P&C insurance subsidiaries dividends to Parent of $898 includes $900 of net dividends from P&C subsidiaries, offset by $2 related to the interest on the HHI note.
Stat to GAAP Differences
Significant differences between U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity and aggregate statutory capital prepared in accordance with U.S. STAT include the following:
-
U.S. STAT excludes equity of non-insurance and foreign insurance subsidiaries not held by U.S. insurance subsidiaries.
-
Costs incurred by the Company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under U.S. GAAP while those costs are expensed immediately under U.S. STAT.
-
Temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under U.S. GAAP while these amounts are then subject to further admissibility tests under U.S. STAT.
-
The assumptions used in the determination of Group Benefits reserves (i.e. for Group Benefits contracts) are prescribed under U.S. STAT, while the assumptions used under U.S. GAAP are generally the Company’s best estimates.
-
The difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments, net of tax, is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under U.S. GAAP, while, under U.S. STAT, most investments are carried at amortized cost with only certain securities carried at fair value, such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the NAIC to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.
-
U.S. STAT for life insurance companies like HLA establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets (the Asset Valuation Reserve), while U.S. GAAP does not. Also, for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates, U.S. STAT for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses, caused by changes in interest rates, into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold (the Interest Maintenance Reserve) while U.S. GAAP does not.
-
Goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis (or more frequently, as necessary) for U.S. GAAP, while under U.S. STAT goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the amount of goodwill admitted as an asset is limited.
-
The deferred gain on retroactive reinsurance for losses ceded to the Navigators and A&E ADC agreements is recognized within a special category of surplus under U.S. STAT but is recognized within other liabilities under U.S. GAAP.
In addition, certain assets, including a portion of premiums receivable and fixed assets, are non-admitted (recorded at zero value and charged against surplus) under U.S. STAT. U.S. GAAP generally evaluates assets based on their recoverability.
Risk-Based Capital
The Company's U.S. insurance companies' states of domicile impose RBC requirements. The requirements provide a means of measuring the minimum amount of statutory capital appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations based on its size and risk profile. Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. All of the Company's U.S. operating insurance subsidiaries had RBC ratios in excess of the minimum levels required by the applicable insurance regulations.
Similar to the RBC ratios that are employed by U.S. insurance regulators, regulatory authorities in the international jurisdictions in which the Company operates generally establish minimum solvency requirements for insurance companies. All of the Company's international insurance subsidiaries expect to maintain capital levels in excess of the minimum levels required by the applicable regulatory authorities.
Sensitivity
In any particular period, statutory capital amounts and RBC ratios may increase or decrease depending upon a variety of factors. The amount of change in the statutory capital or RBC ratios can vary based on individual factors and may be compounded in extreme scenarios or if multiple factors occur at the same time. At times the impact of changes in certain market factors or a combination of multiple factors on RBC ratios can be counterintuitive. For further discussion on these factors, see
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MD&A - Enterprise Risk Management, Financial Risk on Statutory Capital.
Statutory capital at the insurance subsidiaries has been maintained at capital levels commensurate with the Company's desired RBC ratios and ratings from rating agencies. The amount of statutory capital can increase or decrease depending on a number of factors affecting insurance results including, among other factors, the level of catastrophe claims incurred, the amount of reserve development, the effect of changes in interest rates on investment income and the discounting of loss reserves, and the effect of realized gains and losses on investments.
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
For a discussion regarding contingencies related to The Hartford’s legal proceedings, see the information
contained under “Litigation” and “Run-off Asbestos and Environmental Claims,” in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Part I, Item 3 Legal Proceedings, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Legislative and Regulatory Developments
COVID-19 Global Pandemic
State and federal retroactive business interruption coverage and other insurance regulatory relief initiatives - State and federal lawmakers are continuing to consider legislation and regulation in response to COVID-19. There have been proposals to impose retroactive coverage of COVID-19 claims under existing business interruption coverage provisions. If such proposals were enacted, they could represent a material exposure for the Company. Further, some states have adopted, or are considering incorporating, a presumption that if certain workers become infected with COVID-19, such infection would constitute an occupational disease triggering workers’ compensation coverage. In addition, state insurance regulators, including California, New Jersey and New York, have encouraged (and in some cases required) insurers to offer immediate relief to policyholders including refunding and offering discounts for drivers, incorporating flexible payment solutions for families, individuals, and businesses, providing additional time to make payments, waiving insurance premium late fees, pausing cancellation of coverage for personal and commercial policies due to non-payment and policy expiration, and suspending personal automobile exclusions for restaurant employees who are transitioning to meal delivery services using their personal automobile policy as coverage. The Hartford has offered consumer financial relief including a 15 percent refund on policyholders’ April and May 2020 personal automobile insurance premiums, waived late payments fees for a period of time for business and personal insurance customers and temporarily suspended policy cancellations for policyholders of our Commercial Lines, Personal Lines and Group Benefits segments. As the COVID-19 global pandemic continues, regulators may require us to or we may elect to provide additional consumer and/or business financial relief. The duration and scope of such regulatory/Company actions are uncertain, and the impacts of
such actions could adversely affect the Company’s insurance business.
Federal pandemic risk insurance - Congress is considering possible action for future pandemic risk insurance coverage through a risk sharing mechanism between insurers and the federal government. Timing for any Congressional action with respect to these efforts is uncertain at this time. If such a program were to be enacted, it could represent a significant obligation for the company in terms of deductible and co-share obligations.
Federal emergency leave legislation - On March 18, 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act ("FFCRA") was signed into law by the President, and was effective from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. This legislation included a number of funding provisions and worker protections including mandated emergency paid sick leave and paid family and medical leave programs. For private employers with fewer than 500 employees, and most public employers, new programs were put in place to guarantee individuals 10 days of paid sick leave, and up to 10 weeks of paid family and medical leave to deal directly with COVID-19. Eligible employers have access to a tax credit to reimburse for costs related to the emergency leave programs. On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 was signed into law and included a bipartisan COVID-19 relief bill. Although the mandatory paid leave provisions from the FFCRA expired on December 31, 2020, the new law extends FFCRA tax credits through March 31, 2021, for covered employers that voluntarily continue to offer paid leave under the FFCRA framework. The Hartford is providing support for the administration of the family and medical leave component of the FFCRA for our Group Benefits customers. Congress also approved a $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security ("CARES") Act. The bill, signed into law on March 27, 2020, focused on providing financial support for small businesses, individuals, emergency workers, airlines and other industries of national security. The CARES Act included several technical corrections to the emergency leave programs and created advance refunding credits, which allow the U.S. Treasury to develop regulations or guidance to permit advancement of the tax credit for both the emergency paid sick leave and paid family and medical leave. While any further Congressional action could trigger a significant increase in claims volume and compliance requirements for Group Benefits, the timing of additional legislation is unclear at this time.
Federal tax legislation - In response to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic, Congress, various states and other global jurisdictions have passed various pieces of legislation which contain various changes to the tax laws in order to aid impacted businesses and individuals, as well as provide economic stimulus. The Company deferred the employer’s portion of the Social Security tax on wages from March 27, 2020 to year-end 2020. Such deferred amounts would be due and payable over a two-year period, 50% by December 31, 2021 and 50% by December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information about the impact of these new tax laws on the Company. The U.S. Treasury and IRS continue to develop guidance implementing these new tax law provisions, and Congress may consider additional technical corrections to these laws. Tax proposals and regulatory initiatives which have been or are being considered by Congress and/or the U.S. Treasury Department could have a material effect on the Company and its insurance businesses. The nature and timing of any Congressional or regulatory action with respect to any such efforts is unclear.
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
Part II - Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the "Affordable Care Act") It is unclear whether the Administration, Congress or the courts will seek to reverse, amend or alter the ongoing operation of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"). If such actions were to occur, they may have an impact on various aspects of our business, including our insurance businesses. It is unclear what an amended ACA would entail, and to what extent there may be a transition period for the phase out of the ACA. The impact to The Hartford as an employer would be consistent with other large employers. The Hartford’s core business does not involve the issuance of health insurance, and we have not observed any material impacts on the Company’s workers’ compensation business or group benefits business from the enactment of the ACA. We will continue to monitor the impact of the ACA and any reforms on consumer, broker and medical provider behavior for leading indicators of changes in medical costs or loss payments primarily on the Company's workers' compensation and disability liabilities.
Tax Reform At the end of 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("TCJA") was enacted. The TCJA made significant reforms to the U.S. tax code. The major areas of interest to the Company included the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and the repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT) and the refunding of AMT credits. The U.S. Treasury and IRS continue to develop guidance implementing TCJA, and Congress may consider additional technical corrections to the law. In addition, President Biden has indicated he will propose to
increase the corporate tax rate to as high as 28% and revisit other aspects of TCJA. Tax proposals and regulatory initiatives which have been or are being considered by Congress and/or the U.S. Treasury Department could have a material effect on the Company and its insurance businesses. The nature and timing of any Congressional or regulatory action with respect to any such efforts is unclear. For additional information on risks to the Company related to TCJA, see the risk factor entitled "Changes in federal or state tax laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity" under "Risk Factors" in Part I.
Guaranty Fund and Other Insurance-related Assessments
For a discussion regarding Guaranty Fund and Other Insurance-related Assessments, see Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of accounting standards, see Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ACRONYMS
| A&E Asbestos and Environmental | HHI Hartford Holdings, Inc. | |||||||
| ABS Asset Backed Securities | HIMCO Hartford Investment Management Company | |||||||
| ACL Allowance for Credit Losses | IBNR Incurred But Not Reported | |||||||
| ADC Adverse Development Cover | IT Information Technology | |||||||
| AFS Available-For-Sale | LCL Liability for Credit Losses | |||||||
| ALAE Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses | LIBOR London Inter-Bank Offered Rate | |||||||
| AMT Alternative Minimum Tax | LTD Long-Term Disability | |||||||
| AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | LTV Loan-to-Value | |||||||
| AUM Assets Under Management | MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis | |||||||
| CAY Current Accident Year | NAIC National Association of Insurance Commissioners | |||||||
| CLO Collateralized Loan Obligation | NIC Navigators Insurance Company | |||||||
| CMBS Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | NICO National Indemnity Company, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire”) | |||||||
| CMT Crisis Management Team | NM Not Meaningful | |||||||
| DAC Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs | NOLs Net Operating Loss Carryforwards or Carrybacks | |||||||
| DLR Disabled Life Reserve | NSIC Navigators Specialty Insurance Company | |||||||
| DSCR Debt Service Coverage Ratio | OCI Other Comprehensive Income | |||||||
| ERCC Enterprise Risk and Capital Committee | OTC Over-the-Counter | |||||||
| ESPP The Hartford Employee Stock Purchase Plan | P&C Property and Casualty | |||||||
| ETF Exchange-Traded Funds | PG&E PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company | |||||||
| ETP Exchange-Traded Products | PYD Prior Year Development | |||||||
| FAL Funds at Lloyd's | RBC Risk-Based Capital | |||||||
| FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board | RMBS Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | |||||||
| FHLBB Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston | ROE Return on Equity | |||||||
| GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles | SCR Solvency Capital Requirement | |||||||
| GB Group Benefits | SOFR Secured Overnight Funding Rate | |||||||
| HFSG The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. | ULAE Unallocated Loss Adjustment Expenses | |||||||
Part II - Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The Company's principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, based on their evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purposes set forth in the definition thereof in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of December 31, 2020.
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting
The management of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“The Hartford”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for The Hartford as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Hartford's management assessed its internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment under those criteria, The Hartford's management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth fiscal quarter of 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting despite the fact that most employees of the Company and of our vendors have had to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic though we will continue to assess the impact on the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls.
Attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm
The Hartford's independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued their attestation report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting which is set forth below.
Previous: Item 5. MARKET FOR THE HARTFORD’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES · Next: Item 9A. Controls and Procedures