HP 10-K/A 2019-10-31
Filed 2020-02-27. 7 sections, 212K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)
| (Mark One) | |
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended | |
| October 31, 2019 | |
| Or | |
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-4423
HP INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 94-1081436 |
|---|---|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
| 1501 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California | 94304 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(650) 857-1501(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common stock, par value $0.01 per share | HPQ | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
| Large accelerated filer ☒ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Non-accelerated filer ☐ | Smaller reporting company ☐ | Emerging growth company ☐ |
|---|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was $30,007,738,276 based on the last sale price of common stock on April 30, 2019.
The number of shares of HP Inc. common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2020 was 1,433,345,730 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Explanatory Note
On December 12, 2019, HP Inc. filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019 (the “Original Form 10-K”). HP Inc. is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) because it will not file its definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended October 31, 2019. This Form 10-K/A amends and restates in its entirety Part III, Items 10 through 14 of the Original Form 10-K, to include information previously omitted from the Original Form 10-K in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. The reference on the cover page of the Original Form 10-K to the incorporation by reference of portions of HP Inc.’s definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Form 10-K is hereby deleted. In this Form 10-K/A, unless the context indicates otherwise, the designations “HP,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to HP Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), certifications by HP’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A under Item 15 of Part IV hereof. Because no financial statements have been included in this Form 10-K/A and this Form 10-K/A does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the certifications have been omitted. We are not including the certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as no financial statements are being filed with this Form 10-K/A.
Except as described above, this Form 10-K/A does not modify or update disclosure in, or exhibits to, the Original Form 10-K. Furthermore, this Form 10-K/A does not change any previously reported financial results, nor does it reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Form 10-K. Information not affected by this Form 10-K/A remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time the Original Form 10-K was filed. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Website Information
This document includes several website references. The information on these websites is not part of this Form 10-K/A.
HP Inc. and Subsidiaries Form 10-K/A For the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2019 Table of Contents
i
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Executive Officers
The names of the executive officers of HP and their ages, titles and biographies as of the date hereof are incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1, of the Original Form 10-K.
Director Nominees
The biographies describe each Director nominee’s qualifications and relevant experience. The biographies include key qualifications, skills, and attributes most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on the board at the upcoming annual meeting of HP’s stockholders.
![]() | Aida M. Alvarez | |||||
| Most Recent Role —Former Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration & Cabinet Member | Current Public Company Boards —HP —K12 Inc. —Fastly, Inc. —Oportun, Inc. | Prior Public Company Boards —MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation —Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. —PacifiCare Health Systems Inc. |
| Independent Director Age: 70 Director since: 2016 HP Board Committees: HRC, NGSR | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Founding Chair, Latino Community Foundation (since 2003) —Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration (1997–2001) —Director, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (1993–1997) —Vice President, First Boston Corporation and Bear Stearns & Co. (prior to 1993) Other Key Qualifications The Honorable Aida Alvarez brings to the Board a wealth of expertise in media, public affairs, finance, and government. She led important financial and government agencies and served in the Cabinet of U.S. President William J. Clinton where she provided strategic feedback to the President. She has also been a public finance executive, has chaired a prominent philanthropic organization and was an award-winning journalist. The Board also benefits from Ms. Alvarez’s knowledge of investment banking and finance. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVERNMENT STRATEGY | FINANCE ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | |||
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 1 |
![]() | Shumeet Banerji | |||||
| Current Role —Co-founder and Partner of Condorcet, LP, an advisory and investment firm that specializes in developing early stage companies (since 2013) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Reliance Industries Limited | Prior Public Company Boards —Innocoll AG |
| Independent Director Age: 60 Director since: 2011 HP Board Committees: HRC, NGSR (Chair) | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Senior Partner, Booz & Company, a consulting company (May 2012–March 2013) —Chief Executive Officer, Booz & Company (July 2008–May 2012) —President of the Worldwide Commercial Business, Booz Allen Hamilton (February 2008–July 2008) —Managing Director, Europe, Booz Allen Hamilton (2007–2008) —Managing Director, United Kingdom, Booz Allen Hamilton (2003–2007) —Faculty, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Other Key Qualifications Mr. Banerji brings to the Board a robust understanding of the issues facing companies and governments in both mature and emerging markets around the world through his two decades of work with Booz & Company. In particular, Mr. Banerji has valuable experience in addressing a variety of complex issues ranging from corporate strategy, organizational structure, governance, transformational change, operational performance improvement, and merger integration. As CEO of Booz & Company, Mr. Banerji oversaw the separation of Booz & Company from Booz Allen Hamilton. During his career at Booz Allen Hamilton and Booz & Company, he has advised numerous companies on restructuring and M&A, particularly in mature industries. He is the co-author of Cut Costs, Grow Stronger, published by Harvard Business Press in 2009. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION FINANCE ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A STRATEGY | |||
![]() | Robert R. Bennett | |||||
| Current Role —Managing Director, Hilltop Investments, LLC, a private investment company (since 2005) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Discovery Communications, Inc. —Liberty Media Corporation | Prior Public Company Boards —Sprint Corporation —Demand Media, Inc. —Discovery Holding Company —Liberty Interactive Corporation —Sprint Nextel Corporation |
| Independent Director Age: 61 Director since: 2013 HP Board Committees: Audit, FIT (Chair) | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —President, Discovery Holding Company (2005–2008) —President and Chief Executive Officer, Liberty Media Corporation (prior to 2005) Other Key Qualifications Mr. Bennett brings to the Board in-depth knowledge of the media and telecommunications industry and his knowledge of the capital markets and other financial and operational matters from his experience as the president and chief executive officer of another public company. Additionally, as a result of his positions at Liberty Media, Mr. Bennett brings experience leading organizations through significant strategic transactions, including acquisitions, divestitures and integration. Mr. Bennett also has an in-depth understanding of finance and has held various financial management positions during his career including serving as CFO of a public company. He also contributes valuable insight to the Board due to his experience serving on the boards of both public and private companies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION FINANCE ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS | OPERATIONS STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A STRATEGY | |||
| 2 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
![]() | Charles “Chip” V. Bergh | |||||
| Current Role —President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Levi Strauss & Co., an apparel/retail company (since September 2011) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Levi Strauss & Co. | Prior Public Company Boards —VF Corporation |
| Independent Chairman of the Board Age: 62 Director since: 2015 Chairman since: 2017 HP Board Committees: HRC, NGSR | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Group President, Global Male Grooming, Procter & Gamble Co. (2009–September 2011) —In 28 years at Procter & Gamble, Mr. Bergh served in a variety of executive roles, including managing business in multiple regions worldwide Other Key Qualifications Mr. Bergh brings to the Board extensive experience in executive leadership at large global companies and international business management. From his more than 30 years at Levi Strauss and Procter & Gamble, Mr. Bergh has a strong operational and strategic background with significant experience in brand management. He also brings public company governance experience as a board member and chair of boards and board committees of other public and private companies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE OPERATIONS STRATEGY | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A | |||
![]() | Stacy Brown-Philpot | |||||
| Current Role —Chief Executive Officer, TaskRabbit, an online labor interface company (since April 2016) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Nordstrom, Inc. | Prior Public Company Boards —None |
| Independent Director Age: 44 Director since: 2015 HP Board Committees: Audit, NGSR | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Chief Operating Officer, TaskRabbit (January 2013–April 2016) —Entrepreneur-in-Residence, Google Ventures, the venture capital investment arm of Google, Inc., a technology company (“Google”) (May 2012–December 2012) —Senior Director of Global Consumer Operations, Google (2010–May 2012) —Prior to 2010, Ms. Brown-Philpot served in a variety of Director-level positions at Google —Prior to joining Google in 2003, Ms. Brown-Philpot served as a senior analyst and senior associate at the financial firms Goldman Sachs and PwC Other Key Qualifications Ms. Brown-Philpot brings to the Board extensive operational, analytical, financial, and strategic experience. In addition to her current role as CEO of TaskRabbit, Ms. Brown-Philpot’s decade of experience leading various operations at Google and her prior financial experience from her roles at Goldman Sachs and PwC provide unique operational and financial expertise to the Board. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | FINANCE OPERATIONS STRATEGY TECHNOLOGY | |||
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 3 |
![]() | Stephanie A. Burns | |||||
| Current Role —Director | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Corning Incorporated —Kellogg Company | Prior Public Company Boards —Dow Corning Corporation —GlaxoSmithKline plc —Manpower, Inc. |
| Independent Director Age: 65 Director since: 2015 HP Board Committees: FIT, HRC (Chair) | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Chief Executive Officer, Dow Corning Corp., a silicon-based manufacturing company (2004–May 2011) —President, Dow Corning (2003–November 2010) —Executive Vice President, Dow Corning (2000–2003) Other Key Qualifications Dr. Burns has more than 30 years of global innovation and business leadership experience and brings significant expertise in scientific research, product development, issues management, science and technology leadership, and business management to the Board. Her leadership experience includes steering Dow Corning Corporation during an extended bankruptcy and restructuring process. Dr. Burns also brings public company governance experience to the Board as a member of boards and board committees of other public companies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE OPERATIONS SCIENCE STRATEGY | FINANCE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A TECHNOLOGY | |||
![]() | Mary Anne Citrino | |||||
| Current Role —Senior Advisor and former Senior Managing Director, Blackstone, an investment firm (since 2004) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Royal Ahold Delhaize —Alcoa Corporation —Barclays | Prior Public Company Boards —Health Net, Inc. —Dollar Tree Inc. |
| Independent Director Age: 60 Director since: 2015 HP Board Committees: AUDIT (Chair), FIT | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Managing Director, Global Head of Consumer Products Investment Banking Group, and Co-head of Health Care Services Investment Banking, Morgan Stanley (1986–2004) Other Key Qualifications Ms. Citrino’s more than 30-year career as an investment banker provides the Board with substantial knowledge regarding business operations strategy, as well as valuable financial and investment expertise. She also brings public company governance experience as a member of boards and board committees of other public companies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION FINANCE ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A STRATEGY | |||
| 4 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
![]() | Richard L. Clemmer | |||||
| Current Role —Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of NXP Semiconductors N. V., a semiconductor company (since January 2009) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —NCR Corporation —NXP Semiconductors N. V. | Prior Public Company Boards —i2 Technologies, Inc. |
| Independent Director Age: 68 Director since: 2020 HP Board Committees: N/A | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Senior Advisor, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (May 2007-December 2008) —President and Chief Executive Officer, Agere Systems Inc. (October 2005–April 2007) Other Key Qualifications Mr. Clemmer brings to the Board significant leadership experience in the high tech industry, including experience with semiconductor, storage, e-Commerce, and software companies, and brings valuable experience leading organizations through strategic transactions. In his roles at NXP Semiconductors and Agere Systems, Mr. Clemmer has overseen the successful execution of a number of key strategic transactions, including the acquisition and integration of several companies and business units. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPITAL ALLOCATION FINANCE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS | ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A STRATEGY TECHNOLOGY | |||
![]() | Enrique Lores | |||||
| Current Role —President and Chief Executive Officer, HP (since November 2019) | Current Public Company Boards —HP | Prior Public Company Boards —None |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Age: 54 Director since: 2019 HP Board Committees: N/A | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —President, Imaging and Printing Solutions, HP Inc. (November 2015–October 2019) —Separation Leader, Hewlett-Packard Company (2014–October 2015) —Senior Vice President & General Manager, Business Personal Systems, Hewlett-Packard Company (2013–2014) —Senior Vice President, Worldwide Customer Support & Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (2011–2013) —Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Solutions Partner Organization, Hewlett-Packard Company (2008–2011) —Vice President & General Manager, Large Format Printing, Hewlett-Packard Company (2003–2008) —Vice President, Imaging & Printing Group, EMEA, Hewlett-Packard Company (2001–2003) —Experience in a variety of roles at Hewlett-Packard Company (1989–2003) Other Key Qualifications Mr. Lores’s international business and leadership experience, and his service in multiple facets of the HP business worldwide, provide the Board with an enhanced global perspective. Mr. Lores’s more than 25 years of experience in the information and technology industry with HP, and his position as HP’s Chief Executive Officer, provide the Board with valuable industry insight and expertise. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY | DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A | |||
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 5 |
![]() | Yoky Matsuoka | |||||
| Current Role —Division CEO, Panasonic Corporation (since October 2019) | Current Public Company Boards —HP | Prior Public Company Boards —None |
| Independent Director Age: 47 Director since: 2019 HP Board Committees: AUDIT, FIT | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Vice President, Healthcare at Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. (“Alphabet”), a technology company (2018–October 2019) —Chief Technology Officer, Nest, Alphabet (2010–2015; 2017–2018) —Executive experience in healthcare, Apple Inc., a technology company (May 2016–December 2016) —Chief Executive Officer, Quanttus, a technology company (2015–2016) —Head of Innovation and Co-Founder, Google [X], Alphabet (2009–2010) —Academic experience including professorships at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Washington (2000–2011) —MacArthur Fellow (2007) Other Key Qualifications Ms. Matsuoka is an accomplished executive and technologist who brings more than two decades of leadership experience to the HP Board. Throughout her career, she has held innovation-centric roles in both Silicon Valley and in academia and brings her strong background in management, strategy and research & development to the Board. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACADEMICS DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION SCIENCE STRATEGY | CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE TECHNOLOGY | |||
![]() | Stacey Mobley | |||||
| Current Role —Director | Current Public Company Boards —HP | Prior Public Company Boards —International Paper Company —Hewitt Associates, Inc. |
| Independent Director Age: 74 Director since: 2015 HP Board Committees: HRC, NGSR | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Senior Counsel and Advisor, Dickstein Shapiro, LLP, a law firm (2008–2016) —Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), a chemical company (1999–2008) —35 years of experience at DuPont (1973–2008) serving in a variety of leadership roles Other Key Qualifications Mr. Mobley’s more than 35 years of legal and senior management experience at DuPont brings a deep understanding of governance, regulations and risk management including the government relations strategies of public companies. He also brings public company governance experience as a member of boards and board committees of other public and private companies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | OPERATIONS | |||
| 6 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
![]() | Subra Suresh | |||||
| Current Role —President, Nanyang Technological University, autonomous global research university in Singapore (since January 2018) | Current Public Company Boards —HP —Singapore Exchange Limited | Prior Public Company Boards —None |
| Independent Director Age: 63 Director since: 2015 HP Board Committees: AUDIT, FIT | Qualifications: Prior Business and Other Experience —Senior Advisor, Temasek International Private Ltd., an investment company headquartered in Singapore (since September 2017) —President, Carnegie Mellon University, a global research university (July 2013–June 2017) —Independent Director of the Board, Battelle Memorial Institute, Ohio, an international nonprofit that develops and commercializes technology and manages laboratories for government customers (2014–2017) —Director, National Science Foundation, a federal agency charged with advancing science and engineering research and education (October 2010–March 2013) —Dean and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Engineering, School of Engineering (2007-2010), and Professor (1993–2013), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Other Key Qualifications Mr. Suresh is one of the few Americans to have been elected to all three branches of the U.S. National Academies (Engineering, Sciences and Medicine) in recognition of his considerable scientific and technical accomplishments. Mr. Suresh’s experience as the president of two prominent research universities and his experience leading new entrepreneurship and innovation bring the Board valuable insights with respect to strategic opportunities and a robust understanding of the organizational, scientific, and technological requirements of ongoing innovation. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACADEMICS FINANCE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY | DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION GOVERNMENT STRATEGY | |||
Other Director(s)
In addition, Dion J. Weisler, 52, who has served as Senior Executive Advisor at HP, a non-executive officer role, since November 1, 2019, is not currently standing for re-election at our upcoming annual meeting. Mr. Weisler previously served as our President and Chief Executive Officer between November 2015 and November 2019. Previously, Mr. Weisler served in various roles at our predecessor, Hewlett-Packard Company, including as Executive Vice President, the Printing and Personal Systems Group, Hewlett-Packard Company (June 2013–November 2015), Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Printing and Personal Systems, Asia Pacific and Japan, Hewlett-Packard Company (January 2012–June 2013) and Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, the Product and Mobile Internet Digital Home Groups, Lenovo Group Ltd. (January 2008–December 2011). Mr. Weisler also serves on the board of directors of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 7 |
Code of Conduct
We maintain a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, officers and employees known as Integrity at HP, which is available on our website at https://investor.hp.com/governance/integrity-at-hp/default.aspx. If the Board grants any waivers from our Standards of Business Conduct to any of our Directors or executive officers, or if we amend our Standards of Business Conduct, we will, if required, disclose these matters via updates to our website on a timely basis.
Information about the Audit Committee
We have an Audit Committee established in accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing our financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements. Specific duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
| Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ●appointing, overseeing the work of, evaluating, compensating and retaining the independent registered public accounting firm; ●discussing with the independent registered public accounting firm its relationships with HP and its independence, and periodically considering whether there should be a regular rotation of the accounting firm in order to assure continuing independence; ●overseeing the rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s lead audit and concurring partners at least once every five years and the rotation of other audit partners at least once every seven years in accordance with SEC regulations, with the Audit Committee directly involved in the selection of the accounting firm’s lead partner; and ●determining whether to retain or, if appropriate, terminate the independent registered public accounting firm. | |
|---|---|---|
| Audit & Non-Audit Services; Financial Statements; Audit Report | ●reviewing and approving the scope of the annual independent audit, the audit fee, and other audit services; ●preparing the Audit Committee report for inclusion in the annual proxy statement; and ●overseeing our financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements, including the integrity of our financial statements. | |
| Disclosure Controls; Internal Controls & Procedures; Legal Compliance | ●reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls, information and technology security policies, internal audit function, and corporate policies with respect to financial information and earnings guidance; and ●overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. | |
| Risk Oversight | ●reviewing risks facing HP and management’s approach to addressing these risks, including significant risks or exposures relating to litigation and other proceedings and regulatory matters that may have a significant impact on our financial statements; and ●discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. | |
| Related Party Transactions | ●overseeing relevant related party transactions governed by applicable accounting standards (other than related-person transactions addressed by the Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility (“NGSR”) Committee). | |
| Annual Review/Evaluation | ●annually reviewing the Audit Committee’s charter and performance. |
| 8 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
The Board determined that Ms. Citrino, Chair of the Audit Committee, and each of the other Audit Committee members (Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Ms. Matsuoka and Mr. Suresh) are independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and SEC standards of independence for directors and audit committee members, and has satisfied the NYSE financial literacy requirements. The Board also determined that each of Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Ms. Citrino and Mr. Suresh is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy and program, the compensation decisions the HR and Compensation (“HRC”) Committee has made under the program, and the considerations in making those decisions in fiscal 2019.
Named Executive Officers Our NEOs for fiscal 2019 are:
| ● | Dion J. Weisler, former President and CEO; |
|---|---|
| ● | Steven J. Fieler, Chief Financial Officer; |
| ● | Enrique J. Lores, President and CEO and former President, Imaging, Printing and Solutions; |
| ● | Kim M. Rivera, President, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer; and |
| ● | Alex Cho, President, Personal Systems. |
Following the end of fiscal 2019, Mr. Weisler stepped down as our President and CEO on November 1, 2019, and Mr. Lores was appointed to the role. Upon stepping down from such positions, Mr. Weisler continues to be employed by the Company as Senior Executive Advisor, a non-executive officer role, through our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Weisler will also continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors until the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Executive Summary
The HRC Committee continues to review and refine our compensation programs to support our evolving business strategy and attract high caliber executive talent. The HRC Committee’s assessment includes regular stockholder engagement and consideration of stockholder feedback. HP’s fiscal 2019 executive compensation structure remained the same as its fiscal 2018 program.
Below are brief highlights of key compensation decisions with respect to NEOs:
We provided competitive target pay opportunities, where amounts and mix were consistent with peers and stable year over year.
Target total direct compensation (“TDC”) consists of base salary, percent-of-salary target annual incentives that would be earned for achieving 100% of goals, and long-term incentive grant-date value. NEO base salaries were unchanged for fiscal 2019, except a 7.4% promotional increase for Ms. Rivera upon being appointed President, Strategy and Business Management in addition to her ongoing role as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, plus a 3.6% market adjustment for Mr. Weisler, HP’s President and CEO. Target annual incentives were unchanged at 200% of salary for Mr. Weisler and 125% of salary for each of the other NEOs. Regular long-term incentive grant values increased moderately consistent with the market.
We aligned real pay delivery with performance through rigorous goal setting and performance measurement.
While our target TDC opportunities reflect market practice, our real pay delivery reflects performance. Annual incentives reward short-term performance measured against applicable enterprise-wide, business unit, and individual goals. Goals were set for the overall Company and businesses against internal budgets for revenues, net earnings/profit, and free cash flow as a percent of revenue. Non-financial individual performance goals under the Management by Objectives (“MBO”) program were set for each NEO. Meanwhile, regular annual long-term incentive grants were approximately 60% in PARSUs that reward strategic performance measured by relative TSR compared to the S&P 500 and EPS measured in two and three year overlapping segments as explained on pages 16-18; the remaining 40% is in RSUs that are primarily for ownership and retention with the delivered value tied to stock price and reinvested dividend equivalents.
NEOs earned annual incentives averaging 117.2% of target for fiscal 2019. Individual bonuses varied from 93.2% to 150.7% of target and HP’s President & CEO was at 111.5%. The Company achieved above-target results with respect to HP net earnings/profit and free cash flow margin. Revenue results were below target. Further, NEOs successfully delivered against their MBOs as detailed on pages 15-16.
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 9 |
NEOs received payout for Segment 1 FY18 and Segment 2 FY17 PARSUs (measurement periods ending in fiscal 2019). EPS FY18 and EPS FY19 were above target. Fiscal 2017-2019 relative TSR approximated the 35th percentile of the S&P 500. Fiscal 2018-2019 relative TSR approximated the 15th percentile of the S&P 500.
We regularly engaged with and listened to stockholders, practiced strong governance, and mitigated potential compensation-related risks.
Our executive compensation program is continuously reviewed for peer group alignment and strategic relevance as part of a process that includes ongoing stockholder engagement. At the annual meeting in 2019, our say-on-pay proposal was approved by over 93% of the voted shares, indicating strong stockholder support. Consequently, changes have not been extensive. To ensure alignment with our three-year financial plan, we have moved our long-term performance-based incentives (PARSUs) to a single three-year performance period with full vesting only after three years of service and achievement of financial goals for that timeframe. We are also changing relative TSR from a standalone measure to a “modifier” on earnouts determined based on the three-year performance period. We feel that this will increase focus on line-of-sight strategic performance while continuing close alignment between stockholder value creation and real pay delivery.
We transitioned to a new HP President & CEO at the start of fiscal 2020, successfully executing the Board’s succession-planning process.
After a robust, in-depth succession planning assessment, Mr. Lores was appointed as President and CEO effective November 1, 2019. Mr. Lores’s initial target TDC was set moderately below the peer group median and the HRC Committee’s intent is to move him to the median or above median over the period of the next two-or-three years based on Company and individual performance. Mr. Lores did not receive a promotion grant or any special rewards in connection to his appointment as President and CEO.
Executive Compensation Program Oversight and Authority
Role of the HRC Committee and its Advisor The HRC Committee continued to retain FW Cook as its independent consultant during fiscal 2019, and to work with them and management on all aspects of our pay program for senior executives. The HRC Committee makes recommendations regarding the CEO’s compensation to the independent members of the Board for approval, and reviews and approves the compensation of the remaining Section 16 officers, including our NEOs. Each HRC Committee member is an independent non-employee Director with significant experience in executive compensation matters.
The HRC Committee continually considers feedback from stockholders and the potential executive compensation implications of evolving business and strategic objectives. Based on these considerations, the HRC determined that it would be appropriate to make some fine-tuning changes in the program structure for 2020 (described further on page 19) that we believe are in our stockholders’ interests. We believe that our current compensation structure and proposed changes incent and reward achievement of specific goals, reinforce year-over-year results and provide an attractive pay-for-performance opportunity that encourages retention and leadership engagement.
FW Cook provides analyses and recommendations that inform the HRC Committee’s decisions; identifies peer group companies for competitive market comparisons; evaluates market pay data and competitive-position benchmarking; provides analyses and inputs on program structure, performance measures, and goals; provides updates on market trends and the regulatory environment as it relates to executive compensation; reviews various management proposa
Showing the first 8K of 142K characters. Open the full section
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of October 31, 2019.
| PLAN CATEGORY | COMMON SHARES TO BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS(1) (A) | WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS(2) (B) | COMMON SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (EXCLUDING SECURITIES REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) (C) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity compensation plans approved by HP stockholders | 36,472,053 | (3) | $15.4187 | 265,135,483 | (4) | |||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by HP stockholders | — | — | — | |||||||
| Total | 36,472,053 | $15.4187 | 265,135,483 |
| (1) | This column does not reflect awards of options and RSUs assumed in acquisitions where the plans governing the awards were not available for future awards as of October 31, 2019. As of October 31, 2019, there were no individual awards of options or RSUs outstanding pursuant to awards assumed in connection with acquisitions and granted under such plans. |
| (2) | This column does not reflect the exercise price of shares underlying the assumed options referred to in footnote (1) to this table or the purchase price of shares to be purchased pursuant to the HP Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2011 ESPP”) or the legacy HP Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Legacy ESPP”). In addition, the weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs and PARSUs, which have no exercise price. |
| (3) | Includes awards of options and RSUs outstanding under the 2004 Plan and 2011 ESPP. Also includes awards of PARSUs representing 4,465,608 shares that may be issued under the 2004 Plan. Each PARSU award reflects a target number of shares that may be issued to the award recipient. HP determines the actual number of shares the recipient receives at the end of a three-year performance period based on results achieved compared with Company performance goals and stockholder return relative to the market. The actual number of shares that a grant recipient receives at the end of the period may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares. |
| (4) | Includes (i) 184,508,645 shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan; (ii) 76,534,847 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ESPP; (iii) 2,725,611 shares available for future issuances under the Legacy ESPP, a plan under which employee stock purchases are no longer made; and (iv) 1,366,380 shares are reserved for issuance under our Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a plan under which awards are no longer granted. Taking into account the enumerated unavailable shares from the Legacy ESPP and the Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a total of 265,135,483 shares were available for future grants as of October 31, 2019. |
Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2019 (or as of the date otherwise indicated below) concerning beneficial ownership by:
| ● | holders of more than 5% of HP’s outstanding shares of common stock; |
|---|---|
| ● | our Directors and nominees; |
| ● | each of the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23; and |
| ● | all of our Directors and executive officers as a group. |
The information provided in the table is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to HP, except where otherwise noted.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each entity or individual is determined under SEC rules, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the entity or individual has sole or shared voting or investment power and also any shares that the entity or individual has the right to acquire as of March 1, 2020 (60 days after December 31, 2019) through the exercise of any stock options, through the vesting/settlement of RSUs payable in shares, or upon the exercise of other rights. Beneficial ownership excludes options or other rights vesting after March 1, 2020
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 37 |
and any RSUs vesting/settling, as applicable, on or before March 1, 2020 that may be payable in cash or shares at HP’s election. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table.
Beneficial Ownership Table
| NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER | SHARES OF COMMON STOCK BENEFICIALLY OWNED | PERCENT OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge & Cox**(1)** | 146,883,601 | 10.1% | ||||
| BlackRock, Inc.(2) | 99,903,361 | 6.9% | ||||
| The Vanguard Group(3) | 129,732,144 | 8.9% | ||||
| Aida M. Alvarez | 50,698 | * | ||||
| Shumeet Banerji | 31,311 | * | ||||
| Robert R. Bennett | 71,091 | * | ||||
| Charles “Chip” V. Bergh(4) | 150,382 | * | ||||
| Stacy Brown-Philpot | 51,663 | * | ||||
| Stephanie A. Burns | 63,233 | * | ||||
| Mary Anne Citrino(5) | 197,682 | * | ||||
| Richard L. Clemmer | 4,000 | * | ||||
| Yoky Matsuoka | 17,138 | * | ||||
| Stacey Mobley | 51,663 | * | ||||
| Subra Suresh | 36,924 | * | ||||
| Dion J. Weisler(6) | 1,767,869 | * | ||||
| Alex Cho(7) | 88,582 | * | ||||
| Steven J. Fieler(8) | 341,859 | * | ||||
| Enrique J. Lores(9) | 540,626 | * | ||||
| Kim M. Rivera | 203,223 | * | ||||
| All current Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (20 persons)(10) | 4,555,175 | * |
| * | Represents holdings of less than 1% based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019. |
| (1) | Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020 by Dodge & Cox. According to its Schedule 13G/A, Dodge & Cox reported having sole voting power over 140,708,785 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 146,883,601 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The securities reported on the Schedule 13G/A are beneficially owned by clients of Dodge & Cox, which clients may include investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other managed accounts, and which clients have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, and the proceeds from the sale of, HP’s stock. Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, has an interest of 91,145,478 shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of January 31, 2020 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of Dodge & Cox is 555 California Street, 40th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. |
| (2) | Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc. According to its Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. reported having sole voting power over 83,693,896 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 99,903,361 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2019 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
| (3) | Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed by the Vanguard Group on February 12, 2020. According to its Schedule 13G/A, the Vanguard Group reported having sole voting power over 2,199,101 shares, shared voting power over 460,709 shares, sole dispositive power over 127,188,851 shares, and shared dispositive power over 2,543,293 shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2019 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address for the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. |
| (4) | Includes 146,148 shares that Mr. Bergh has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options. |
| (5) | Includes 159,671 shares that Ms. Citrino has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options. |
| (6) | Includes 894,739 shares that Mr. Weisler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options. |
| (7) | Includes 58,378 shares that Mr. Cho has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options. |
| (8) | Includes 198,332 shares that Mr. Fieler has the right to acquire by settlement of Restricted Stock Units. |
| (9) | Includes 156,976 shares that Mr. Lores has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options. |
| (10) | Includes 1,790,132 shares that current executive officers and Directors have the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 198,332 shares that current executive officers and Directors have the right to acquire by settlement of Restricted Stock Units. |
| 38 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Director Independence
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at https://investor.hp.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx, provide that a substantial majority of the Board will consist of independent Directors and that the Board can include no more than three Directors who are not independent Directors. The independence standards can be found as Exhibit A to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Director independence standards are consistent with, and in some respects more stringent than, the NYSE director independence standards. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee meets the heightened independence standards required for audit committee members under the applicable listing and SEC standards and each member of the HRC Committee meets the heightened independence standards required for compensation committee members under the applicable listing standards and SEC standards.
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director will not be considered independent in the following circumstances:
| ● | The Director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of HP, or an immediate family member of the Director is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of HP. |
|---|---|
| ● | The Director has been employed as an executive officer of HP, its subsidiaries or affiliates within the last five years. |
| ● | The Director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from HP, other than compensation for Board service, compensation received by a Director’s immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee of HP, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service with HP that is not contingent on continued service. |
| ● | (A) The Director or an immediate family member is a current partner of the firm that is HP’s internal or external auditor; (B) the Director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally worked on HP’s audit; or (D) the Director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on HP’s audit within that time. |
| ● | The Director or an immediate family member is, or has been in the past three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of HP’s present executive officers at the same time serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee. |
| ● | The Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, HP for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
| ● | The Director is affiliated with a charitable organization that receives significant contributions from HP. |
| ● | The Director has a personal services contract with HP or an executive officer of HP. |
For these purposes, an “immediate family” member includes a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, step-children, siblings, mother and father-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the Director’s home.
In determining independence, the Board reviews whether Directors have any material relationship with HP. An independent Director must not have any material relationship with HP, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with HP, nor any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. In assessing the materiality of a Director’s relationship to HP, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including consideration of the issues from the Director’s standpoint and from the perspective of the persons or organizations with which the Director has an affiliation, and is guided by the standards set forth above.
In making its independence determinations, the Board considered transactions occurring since the beginning of fiscal 2017 between HP and entities associated with the independent Directors or their immediate family members. In addition to the transactions described below under “Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions,” if any, the Board’s independence determinations included consideration of the following transactions:
Current Directors:
| ● | Mr. Bergh has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Levi Strauss & Co. since September 2011. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Levi Strauss & Co. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Levi Strauss & Co., and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Levi Strauss & Co., did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
|---|
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 39 |
| ● | Mr. Clemmer has served as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of NXP Semiconductors N.V. since January 2009. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with NXP Semiconductors N.V. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to NXP Semiconductors N.V.,and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from NXP Semiconductors N.V., did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
|---|---|
| ● | Mr. Suresh has served as President of Nanyang Technological University since January 2018. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Nanyang Technological University. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Nanyang Technological University, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Nanyang Technological University, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either entity’s consolidated gross revenues. |
| ● | Ms. Matsuoka served as Vice President, Healthcare at Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, from 2018 to October 2019. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Google and Alphabet. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Google and Alphabet, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Google and Alphabet, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
| ● | Ms. Matsuoka has served as Division CEO at Panasonic since October 2019. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Panasonic. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Panasonic, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Panasonic, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
| ● | Each of Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Dr. Burns, Ms. Citrino, Ms. Matsuoka, and Mr. Mobley, or one of their immediate family members, is a non-employee director, trustee or advisory board member of another company that did business with HP at some time during the past three fiscal years. These business relationships were as a supplier or purchaser of goods or services in the ordinary course of business. |
As a result of this review, the Board has determined the transactions described above and below under “Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions,” if any, would not interfere with the Director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. The Board has also determined that, with the exception of Messrs. Lores and Weisler, (i) each of HP’s remaining Directors, including Ms. Alvarez, Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Bergh, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Dr. Burns, Ms. Citrino, Mr. Clemmer, Ms. Matsuoka, Mr. Mobley and Mr. Suresh, and (ii) each of the members of the Audit Committee, the HRC Committee and the NGSR Committee, has (or had) no material relationship with HP (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with HP) and is (or was) independent within the meaning of the NYSE and our Director independence standards. The Board has determined that Mr. Lores is not independent because of his status as our current President and CEO, and Mr. Weisler is not independent due to his prior service as our President and CEO until November 1, 2019 and his subsequent role as Senior Executive Advisor to the Company.
Related Person Transactions Policies and Procedures
Related Person Transactions Policy
We have adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between us and our non-employee Directors, Director nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of HP’s stock, and their respective immediate family members where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000 in a single calendar year.
The policy provides that the NGSR Committee reviews certain transactions subject to the policy and decides whether to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the NGSR Committee determines whether the transaction is in the best interests of HP. In making that determination, the NGSR Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate:
| ● | the extent of the related-person’s interest in the transaction; |
|---|---|
| ● | whether the transaction is on terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances; |
| ● | the benefits to HP; |
| ● | the impact or potential impact on a Director’s independence in the event the related person is a Director, an immediate family member of a Director or an entity in which a Director is a partner, 10% stockholder or executive officer; |
| ● | the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; and |
| ● | the terms of the transaction. |
| 40 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
The NGSR Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the NGSR Committee to pre-approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1 million.
A summary of any new transactions pre-approved by the Chair is provided to the full NGSR Committee for its review at each of the NGSR Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.
The NGSR Committee has adopted standing pre-approvals under the policy for limited transactions with related persons. Pre-approved transactions include:
| ● | compensation of executive officers that is excluded from reporting under SEC rules where the HRC Committee approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation; |
|---|---|
| ● | non-employee Director compensation; |
| ● | transactions with another company with a value that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s annual revenues, where the related-person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer), Director or beneficial holder of less than 10% of the other company’s shares; |
| ● | contributions to a charity in an amount that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charity’s annual receipts, where the related person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer) or non-employee Director; and |
| ● | transactions where all stockholders receive proportional benefits. |
A summary of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals relating to other companies (as described above) is provided to the NGSR Committee for its review in connection with that committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.
Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions
We enter into commercial transactions with many entities for which our executive officers or non-employee Directors serve as non-employee Directors and/or employees in the ordinary course of our business. All those transactions were pre-approved transactions as defined above. There have otherwise been no related-person transactions (actual or proposed) since the beginning of HP’s last completed fiscal year.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fees incurred by HP for Ernst & Young LLP
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by HP for audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 2019 and 2018. All fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy, as discussed below.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN MILLIONS | ||||||
| Audit Fees(1) | $15.9 | $15.9 | ||||
| Audit-Related Fees(2) | $2.4 | $3.3 | ||||
| Tax Fees(3) | $2.9 | $4 | ||||
| All Other Fees(4) | $— | $0.2 | ||||
| Total | $21.2 | $23.4 |
| (1) | Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. |
| (2) | Audit-related fees for fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of accounting consultations, employee benefit plan audits and other attestation services. Audit-related fees for fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of accounting consultations, employee benefit plan audits, and other attestation services. |
| (3) | Tax fees consisted primarily of tax advice and tax planning fees of $650,000 and $1.6 million for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, respectively. For fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, tax fees also included tax compliance fees of $2.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively. |
| (4) | For fiscal 2018, all other fees included primarily advisory service fees. |
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Policy
The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and associated fees up to a maximum for any one service of $250,000, provided that the chair shall report any decisions to pre-approve services and fees to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting.
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 41 |
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits.
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A. Those exhibits incorporated by reference are indicated as such in the parenthetical following the description. All other exhibits are included herewith.
| (31.1)# | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|---|---|---|
| (31.2)# | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| (104)# | The cover page from this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, formatted in Inline XBRL. |
| # | Filed herewith. |
| 42 ½ | ![]() | 2019 Form 10-K |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Date: February 27, 2020 | HP INC. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| By: | /s/ STEVE FIELER | |||
| Steve Fieler | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer |
| 2019 Form 10-K | ![]() | ½ 43 |

GOVERNMENT
STRATEGY
FINANCE
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CAPITAL ALLOCATION
FINANCE
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
STRATEGY
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
FINANCE
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
STRATEGY
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
OPERATIONS
STRATEGY
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
FINANCE
OPERATIONS
STRATEGY
TECHNOLOGY
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
OPERATIONS
SCIENCE
STRATEGY
FINANCE
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
TECHNOLOGY
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
FINANCE
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
STRATEGY
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
TECHNOLOGY
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
STRATEGY
DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS; M&A
ACADEMICS
DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION
SCIENCE
STRATEGY
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE 
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
ROBUST BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
OPERATIONS
ACADEMICS
FINANCE
SCIENCE
TECHNOLOGY
DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION
GOVERNMENT
STRATEGY