Item 8. , ITEM 15 (a) (1) and (2)
349K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown
Item 8. , ITEM 15 (a) (1) and (2)
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| Form10-K Page | ||
|---|---|---|
| KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 42 | |
| Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules: | ||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 43 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 44 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 45 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 46 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 47 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 48 | |
| Financial Statement Schedules: | ||
| II. | Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | 94 |
| III. | Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | 95 |
| IV. | Mortgage Loans on Real Estate | 102 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Kimco Realty Corporation:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kimco Realty Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedules, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 26, 2013
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share information)
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Real Estate | ||||||||
| Rental property | ||||||||
| Land | $ | 2,024,300 | $ | 1,945,045 | ||||
| Building and improvements | 6,825,724 | 6,646,490 | ||||||
| 8,850,024 | 8,591,535 | |||||||
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,745,462 | ) | (1,693,090 | ) | ||||
| 7,104,562 | 6,898,445 | |||||||
| Real estate under development | 97,263 | 179,722 | ||||||
| Real estate, net | 7,201,825 | 7,078,167 | ||||||
| Investments and advances in real estate joint ventures | 1,428,155 | 1,404,214 | ||||||
| Other real estate investments | 317,557 | 344,131 | ||||||
| Mortgages and other financing receivables | 70,704 | 102,972 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 141,875 | 112,882 | ||||||
| Marketable securities | 36,541 | 33,540 | ||||||
| Accounts and notes receivable | 161,113 | 164,053 | ||||||
| Deferred charges and prepaid expenses | 171,373 | 161,974 | ||||||
| Other assets | 211,664 | 226,829 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 9,740,807 | $ | 9,628,762 | ||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 3,192,127 | $ | 2,983,886 | ||||
| Mortgages payable | 1,003,190 | 1,085,371 | ||||||
| Construction loans payable | - | 45,128 | ||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 111,881 | 125,544 | ||||||
| Dividends payable | 96,518 | 92,159 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 323,535 | 321,457 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 4,727,251 | 4,653,545 | ||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | 81,076 | 95,074 | ||||||
| Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, authorized 5,961,200 and 5,146,000 shares, respectively, 102,000 and 954,000 shares issued and outstanding (in series), respectively, Aggregate liquidation preference $975,000 and $810,000, respectively | 102 | 954 | ||||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 750,000,000 shares issued and outstanding 407,782,102 and 406,937,830 shares, respectively | 4,078 | 4,069 | ||||||
| Paid-in capital | 5,651,170 | 5,492,022 | ||||||
| Cumulative distributions in excess of net income | (824,008 | ) | (702,999 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | (66,182 | ) | (107,660 | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 4,765,160 | 4,686,386 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | 167,320 | 193,757 | ||||||
| Total equity | 4,932,480 | 4,880,143 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 9,740,807 | $ | 9,628,762 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||||||
| Revenues from rental properties | $ | 884,782 | $ | 825,737 | $ | 786,940 | ||||||
| Management and other fee income | 37,522 | 35,320 | 39,866 | |||||||||
| Total revenues | 922,304 | 861,057 | 826,806 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||
| Rent | 12,761 | 13,863 | 13,731 | |||||||||
| Real estate taxes | 115,282 | 108,782 | 105,336 | |||||||||
| Operating and maintenance | 118,787 | 114,101 | 108,357 | |||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 124,480 | 118,873 | 109,034 | |||||||||
| Provision for doubtful accounts | 6,880 | 7,723 | 10,642 | |||||||||
| Impairment charges | 37,111 | 13,077 | 32,661 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 249,493 | 231,712 | 217,205 | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 664,794 | 608,131 | 596,966 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 257,510 | 252,926 | 229,840 | |||||||||
| Other income/(expense) | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage financing income | 7,504 | 7,273 | 9,405 | |||||||||
| Interest, dividends and other investment income | 2,170 | 16,567 | 21,229 | |||||||||
| Other expense, net | (7,971 | ) | (4,680 | ) | (4,459 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (227,595 | ) | (223,526 | ) | (223,032 | ) | ||||||
| Early extinguishment of debt | - | - | (10,811 | ) | ||||||||
| Income from other real estate investments | 2,451 | 3,824 | 3,653 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of development properties | - | 12,074 | 2,080 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in income of joint ventures, gains on change in control of interests and equity in income from other real estate investments | 34,069 | 64,458 | 27,905 | |||||||||
| Provision for income taxes, net | (3,939 | ) | (21,330 | ) | (3,208 | ) | ||||||
| Equity in income of joint ventures, net | 112,896 | 63,467 | 34,579 | |||||||||
| Gains on change in control of interests | 15,555 | 569 | - | |||||||||
| Equity in income of other real estate investments, net | 53,397 | 51,813 | 60,846 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 211,978 | 158,977 | 120,122 | |||||||||
| Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||
| Income from discontinued operating properties, net of tax | 3,084 | 23,021 | 43,366 | |||||||||
| Impairment/loss on operating properties sold, net of tax | (22,339 | ) | (17,343 | ) | (6,175 | ) | ||||||
| Gain on disposition of operating properties, net of tax | 83,253 | 17,327 | 1,961 | |||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | 63,998 | 23,005 | 39,152 | |||||||||
| Loss on transfer of operating properties, net | - | - | (57 | ) | ||||||||
| Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax | 4,299 | 108 | 2,434 | |||||||||
| Total net gain on transfer of operating properties, net | 4,299 | 108 | 2,377 | |||||||||
| Net income | 280,275 | 182,090 | 161,651 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (14,202 | ) | (13,039 | ) | (18,783 | ) | ||||||
| Net income attributable to the Company | 266,073 | 169,051 | 142,868 | |||||||||
| Preferred stock redemption costs | (21,703 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | (71,697 | ) | (59,363 | ) | (51,346 | ) | ||||||
| Net income available to the Company's common shareholders | $ | 172,673 | $ | 109,688 | $ | 91,522 | ||||||
| Per common share: | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations: | ||||||||||||
| -Basic | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
| -Diluted | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
| Net income attributable to the Company: | ||||||||||||
| -Basic | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||
| -Diluted | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||
| Weighted average shares: | ||||||||||||
| -Basic | 405,997 | 406,530 | 405,827 | |||||||||
| -Diluted | 406,689 | 407,669 | 406,201 | |||||||||
| Amounts attributable to the Company's common shareholders: | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations, net of tax | $ | 110,406 | $ | 88,067 | $ | 57,658 | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | 62,267 | 21,621 | 33,864 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 172,673 | $ | 109,688 | $ | 91,522 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 280,275 | $ | 182,090 | $ | 161,651 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on marketable securities, net | 3,013 | (4,065 | ) | 37,006 | ||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps, net | 450 | 549 | (420 | ) | ||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net | 43,515 | (82,228 | ) | 52,849 | ||||||||
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | 46,978 | (85,744 | ) | 89,435 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive income | 327,253 | 96,346 | 251,086 | |||||||||
| Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (19,702 | ) | (11,102 | ) | (35,639 | ) | ||||||
| Comprehensive income attributable to the Company | $ | 307,551 | $ | 85,244 | $ | 215,447 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
(in thousands)
| Cumulative Distributions | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Excess | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of Net | Comprehensive | Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Paid-in | Stockholders' | Noncontrolling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | Income | Issued | Amount | Issued | Amount | Capital | Equity | Interests | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, January 1, 2010 | $ | (338,738 | ) | $ | (96,432 | ) | 884 | $ | 884 | 405,533 | $ | 4,055 | $ | 5,283,204 | $ | 4,852,973 | $ | 265,005 | $ | 5,117,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,721 | 2,721 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 142,868 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 142,868 | 18,783 | 161,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities | - | 37,006 | - | - | - | - | - | 37,006 | - | 37,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps | - | (420 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (420 | ) | - | (420 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustment | - | 35,993 | - | - | - | - | - | 35,993 | 16,856 | 52,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (6,500 | ) | (6,500 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends ($0.66 per Common Share; $1.6625 per Class F Depositary Share, $1.9375 per Class G Depositary Share and $0.5798 per Class H Depositary Share, respectively) | (319,294 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (319,294 | ) | - | (319,294 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (64,658 | ) | (64,658 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | - | - | - | - | 353 | 4 | 4,426 | 4,430 | - | 4,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Surrender of common stock | - | - | - | - | (78 | ) | (1 | ) | - | (1 | ) | - | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred stock | - | - | 70 | 70 | - | - | 169,114 | 169,184 | - | 169,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of common stock options | - | - | - | - | 616 | 6 | 8,561 | 8,567 | - | 8,567 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | (7,196 | ) | (7,196 | ) | (6,763 | ) | (13,959 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of equity awards | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11,732 | 11,732 | - | 11,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 | (515,164 | ) | (23,853 | ) | 954 | 954 | 406,424 | 4,064 | 5,469,841 | 4,935,842 | 225,444 | 5,161,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,045 | 1,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 169,051 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 169,051 | 13,039 | 182,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities | - | (4,065 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (4,065 | ) | - | (4,065 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps | - | 549 | - | - | - | - | - | 549 | - | 549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustment | - | (80,291 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (80,291 | ) | (1,937 | ) | (82,228 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (6,370 | ) | (6,370 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends ($0.73 per Common Share; $1.6625 per Class F Depositary Share, $1.9375 per Class G Depositary Share and $1.7250 per Class H Depositary Share, respectively) | (356,886 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (356,886 | ) | - | (356,886 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (13,827 | ) | (13,827 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | - | - | - | - | 438 | 5 | 4,936 | 4,941 | - | 4,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Surrender of common stock | - | - | - | - | (34 | ) | (2 | ) | (579 | ) | (581 | ) | - | (581 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | (334 | ) | (2 | ) | (6,001 | ) | (6,003 | ) | - | (6,003 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of common stock options | - | - | - | - | 444 | 4 | 6,533 | 6,537 | - | 6,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,452 | 4,452 | (23,637 | ) | (19,185 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of equity awards | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12,840 | 12,840 | - | 12,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2011 | (702,999 | ) | (107,660 | ) | 954 | 954 | 406,938 | 4,069 | 5,492,022 | 4,686,386 | 193,757 | 4,880,143 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,384 | 1,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 266,073 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 266,073 | 14,202 | 280,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities | - | 3,013 | - | - | - | - | - | 3,013 | - | 3,013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps | - | 450 | - | - | - | - | - | 450 | - | 450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustment | - | 38,015 | - | - | - | - | - | 38,015 | 5,500 | 43,515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (6,337 | ) | (6,337 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends ($0.78 per common share; $1.0344 per Class F Depositary Share, $1.5016 per Class G Depositary Share, $1.725 per Class H Depositary Share and $1.1708 per Class I Depositary Share, and $0.5958 per Class J Depositary Share, and $0.0938 per Class K Depositary Share, respectively) | (387,082 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (387,082 | ) | - | (387,082 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (15,328 | ) | (15,328 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | - | - | - | - | 1,096 | 11 | 18,104 | 18,115 | - | 18,115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred stock | - | - | 32 | 32 | - | - | 774,125 | 774,157 | - | 774,157 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Surrender of common stock | - | - | - | - | (111 | ) | (1 | ) | (2,072 | ) | (2,073 | ) | - | (2,073 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | (1,636 | ) | (16 | ) | (30,931 | ) | (30,947 | ) | - | (30,947 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of common stock options | - | - | - | - | 1,495 | 15 | 22,576 | 22,591 | - | 22,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | (95 | ) | (95 | ) | (25,858 | ) | (25,953 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of equity awards | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11,557 | 11,557 | - | 11,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of preferred stock | - | - | (884 | ) | (884 | ) | - | - | (634,116 | ) | (635,000 | ) | - | (635,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | $ | (824,008 | ) | $ | (66,182 | ) | 102 | $ | 102 | 407,782 | $ | 4,078 | $ | 5,651,170 | $ | 4,765,160 | $ | 167,320 | $ | 4,932,480 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 280,275 | $ | 182,090 | $ | 161,651 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 262,742 | 251,139 | 247,637 | |||||||||
| Loss on operating/development properties held for sale/sold/transferred | - | - | 57 | |||||||||
| Impairment charges | 59,569 | 32,763 | 39,121 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of development properties | - | (12,074 | ) | (2,130 | ) | |||||||
| Gain on sale of operating properties | (94,369 | ) | (17,435 | ) | (4,366 | ) | ||||||
| Equity in income of joint ventures, net | (112,896 | ) | (63,467 | ) | (55,705 | ) | ||||||
| Gains on change in control of interests | (15,555 | ) | (569 | ) | - | |||||||
| Equity in income from other real estate investments, net | (53,397 | ) | (51,813 | ) | (39,642 | ) | ||||||
| Distributions from joint ventures and other real estate investments | 194,110 | 163,048 | 162,860 | |||||||||
| Cash retained from excess tax benefits | - | - | (103 | ) | ||||||||
| Change in accounts and notes receivable | 2,940 | (19,271 | ) | (17,388 | ) | |||||||
| Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses | (11,281 | ) | (8,082 | ) | 15,811 | |||||||
| Change in other operating assets and liabilities | (33,084 | ) | (7,716 | ) | (27,868 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash flow provided by operating activities | 479,054 | 448,613 | 479,935 | |||||||||
| Cash flow from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition of and improvements to operating real estate | (552,469 | ) | (343,299 | ) | (182,482 | ) | ||||||
| Acquisition of and improvements to real estate under development | (2,487 | ) | (37,896 | ) | (41,975 | ) | ||||||
| Investment in marketable securities | - | - | (9,041 | ) | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale/repayments of marketable securities | 156 | 188,003 | 30,455 | |||||||||
| Investments and advances to real estate joint ventures | (219,885 | ) | (171,695 | ) | (138,796 | ) | ||||||
| Reimbursements of investments and advances to real estate joint ventures | 187,856 | 63,529 | 85,205 | |||||||||
| Other real estate investments | (5,638 | ) | (6,958 | ) | (12,528 | ) | ||||||
| Reimbursements of investments and advances to other real estate investments | 33,720 | 68,881 | 30,861 | |||||||||
| Investment in mortgage loans receivable | (16,021 | ) | - | (2,745 | ) | |||||||
| Collection of mortgage loans receivable | 63,600 | 19,148 | 27,587 | |||||||||
| Other investments | (924 | ) | (730 | ) | (4,004 | ) | ||||||
| Reimbursements of other investments | 11,553 | 20,116 | 8,792 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of operating properties | 449,539 | 135,646 | 238,746 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of development properties | - | 44,495 | 7,829 | |||||||||
| Net cash flow (used for)/provided by investing activities | (51,000 | ) | (20,760 | ) | 37,904 | |||||||
| Cash flow from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Principal payments on debt, excluding normal amortization of rental property debt | (284,815 | ) | (62,470 | ) | (226,155 | ) | ||||||
| Principal payments on rental property debt | (23,130 | ) | (22,720 | ) | (23,645 | ) | ||||||
| Principal payments on construction loan financings | (2,177 | ) | (3,428 | ) | (30,383 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from mortgage/construction loan financings | 14,776 | 20,346 | 13,960 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from (repayment of)/borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facilities, net | 8,559 | 112,137 | (11,309 | ) | ||||||||
| Repayment of unsecured term loan/notes | (215,900 | ) | (92,600 | ) | (471,725 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of unsecured term loan/notes | 400,000 | - | 449,720 | |||||||||
| Financing origination costs | (2,138 | ) | (11,478 | ) | (5,330 | ) | ||||||
| Redemption of/distribution to noncontrolling interests | (42,315 | ) | (26,682 | ) | (80,852 | ) | ||||||
| Dividends paid | (382,722 | ) | (353,764 | ) | (306,964 | ) | ||||||
| Cash retained from excess tax benefits | - | - | 103 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of stock | 796,748 | 6,537 | 177,837 | |||||||||
| Redemption of preferred stock | (635,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Repurchase of common stock | (30,947 | ) | (6,003 | ) | - | |||||||
| Net cash flow used for financing activities | (399,061 | ) | (440,125 | ) | (514,743 | ) | ||||||
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | 28,993 | (12,272 | ) | 3,096 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 112,882 | 125,154 | 122,058 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 141,875 | $ | 112,882 | $ | 125,154 | ||||||
| Interest paid during the period (net of capitalized interest of $1,538, $7,086, and $14,730 respectively) | $ | 226,775 | $ | 220,270 | $ | 242,033 | ||||||
| Income taxes paid during the period | $ | 2,122 | $ | 2,606 | $ | 3,278 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amounts relating to the number of buildings, square footage, tenant and occupancy data, joint venture debt average interest rates and terms and estimated project costs are unaudited.
- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Business
Kimco Realty Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company" or "Kimco"), affiliates and related real estate joint ventures are engaged principally in the operation of neighborhood and community shopping centers which are anchored generally by discount department stores, supermarkets or drugstores. The Company also provides property management services for shopping centers owned by affiliated entities, various real estate joint ventures and unaffiliated third parties.
Additionally, in connection with the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999 (the "RMA"), which became effective January 1, 2001, the Company is permitted to participate in activities which it was precluded from previously in order to maintain its qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"), so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code"), subject to certain limitations. As such, the Company, through its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), has been engaged in various retail real estate related opportunities including (i) ground-up development of neighborhood and community shopping centers and the subsequent sale thereof upon completion, (ii) retail real estate management and disposition services which primarily focuses on leasing and disposition strategies of retail real estate controlled by both healthy and distressed and/or bankrupt retailers and (iii) acting as an agent or principal in connection with tax deferred exchange transactions.
The Company seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through diversification achieved by the geographic distribution of its properties, avoiding dependence on any single property and a large tenant base. At December 31, 2012, the Company's single largest neighborhood and community shopping center accounted for only 1.7% of the Company's annualized base rental revenues and only 1.2% of the Company’s total shopping center gross leasable area ("GLA"), including the proportionate share of base rental revenues from properties in which the Company has less than a 100% economic interest. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s five largest tenants were The Home Depot, TJX Companies, Wal-Mart, Sears Holdings and Bed Bath & Beyond, which represented 3.0%, 2.9%, 2.6%, 2.0% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s annualized base rental revenues, including the proportionate share of base rental revenues from properties in which the Company has less than a 100% economic interest.
The principal business of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is the ownership, management, development and operation of retail shopping centers, including complementary services that capitalize on the Company’s established retail real estate expertise. The Company evaluates performance on a property specific or transactional basis and does not distinguish its principal business or group its operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. Accordingly, the Company believes it has a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").
Principles of Consolidation and Estimates
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Kimco Realty Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”). The Company’s subsidiaries includes subsidiaries which are wholly-owned and all entities in which the Company has a controlling interest, including where the Company has been determined to be a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) or meets certain criteria of a sole general partner or managing member in accordance with the Consolidation guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during a reporting period. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, equity method investments, marketable securities and other investments, including the assessment of impairments, as well as, depreciable lives, revenue recognition, the collectability of trade accounts receivable, realizability of deferred tax assets and the assessment of uncertain tax positions. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties, and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in its consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate
Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building, building improvements and tenant improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), assumed debt and redeemable units issued at the date of acquisition, based on evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, the Company allocates the estimated fair value to the applicable assets and liabilities. Fair value is determined based on an exit price approach, which contemplates the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. If, up to one year from the acquisition date, information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation on a retrospective basis. The Company expenses transaction costs associated with business combinations in the period incurred.
In allocating the purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts, including fixed rate renewal options, to be paid pursuant to the leases and management’s estimate of the market lease rates and other lease provisions (i.e., expense recapture, base rental changes, etc.) measured over a period equal to the estimated remaining term of the lease. The capitalized above-market or below-market intangible is amortized to rental income over the estimated remaining term of the respective leases, which includes the expected renewal option period. Mortgage debt discounts or premiums are amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt instrument. Unit discounts and premiums are amortized into noncontrolling interest in income, net over the period from the date of issuance to the earliest redemption date of the units.
In determining the value of in-place leases, management considers current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases in arriving at an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up period from vacant to existing occupancy. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods and costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs based on current market demand. The value assigned to in-place leases and tenant relationships is amortized over the estimated remaining term of the leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its scheduled expiration, all unamortized costs relating to that lease would be written off.
Depreciation and amortization are provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
| Buildings and building improvements | 15 to 50 years |
|---|---|
| Fixtures, leasehold and tenant improvements (including certain identified intangible assets) | Terms of leases or useful lives, whichever is shorter |
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renovations and replacements, which improve and extend the life of the asset, are capitalized. The useful lives of amortizable intangible assets are evaluated each reporting period with any changes in estimated useful lives being accounted for over the revised remaining useful life.
When a real estate asset is identified by management as held-for-sale, the Company ceases depreciation of the asset and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the asset is less than the net book value of the asset, an adjustment to the carrying value would be recorded to reflect the estimated fair value of the property.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
On a continuous basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators, including property operating performance and general market conditions, that the value of the real estate properties (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. A property value is considered impaired only if management’s estimate of current and projected operating cash flows (undiscounted and unleveraged) of the property over its remaining useful life is less than the net carrying value of the property. Such cash flow projections consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. To the extent impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the property would be adjusted to an amount to reflect the estimated fair value of the property.
Real Estate Under Development
Real estate under development represents both the ground-up development of neighborhood and community shopping center projects which may be subsequently sold upon completion and projects which the Company may hold as long-term investments. These properties are carried at cost. The cost of land and buildings under development includes specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved and other costs incurred during the period of development. The Company ceases cost capitalization when the property is held available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from the completion of major construction activity. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of assets held for resale or the current and projected undiscounted cash flows of these assets to be held as long-term investments is less than the net carrying value, the carrying value would be adjusted to an amount that reflects the estimated fair value of the property.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for cash contributions and distributions. Earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with each respective investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period.
The Company’s joint ventures and other real estate investments primarily consist of co-investments with institutional and other joint venture partners in neighborhood and community shopping center properties, consistent with its core business. These joint ventures typically obtain non-recourse third-party financing on their property investments, thus contractually limiting the Company’s exposure to losses primarily to the amount of its equity investment; and due to the lender’s exposure to losses, a lender typically will require a minimum level of equity in order to mitigate its risk. The Company, on a limited selective basis, obtains unsecured financing for certain joint ventures. These unsecured financings are guaranteed by the Company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the Company is obligated to make.
To recognize the character of distributions from equity investees the Company reviews the nature of the cash distribution to determine the proper character of cash flow distributions as either returns on investment, which would be included in operating activities or returns of investment, which would be included in investing activities.
On a continuous basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators, including the underlying investment property operating performance and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment and such difference is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the estimated fair value of the investment.
The Company’s estimated fair values are based upon a discounted cash flow model for each specific property that includes all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. Capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads utilized in these models are based upon rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for each respective property.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Other Real Estate Investments
Other real estate investments primarily consist of preferred equity investments for which the Company provides capital to owners and developers of real estate. The Company typically accounts for its preferred equity investments on the equity method of accounting, whereby earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with each respective investment agreement and based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period.
On a continuous basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators, including the underlying investment property operating performance and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s Other real estate investments may be impaired. An investment’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment and such difference is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the estimated fair value of the investment.
The Company’s estimated fair values are based upon a discounted cash flow model for each specific property that includes all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. Capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads utilized in these models are based upon rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for each respective property.
Mortgages and Other Financing Receivables
Mortgages and other financing receivables consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the Company. Borrowers of these loans are primarily experienced owners, operators or developers of commercial real estate. The Company’s loans are primarily mortgage loans that are collateralized by real estate. Loan receivables are recorded at stated principal amounts, net of any discount or premium or deferred loan origination costs or fees. The related discounts or premiums on mortgages and other loans purchased are amortized or accreted over the life of the related loan receivable. The Company defers certain loan origination and commitment fees, net of certain origination costs and amortizes them as an adjustment of the loan’s yield over the term of the related loan. The Company reviews on a quarterly basis credit quality indicators such as (i) payment status to identify performing versus non-performing loans, (ii) changes affecting the underlying real estate collateral and (iii) national and regional economic factors.
Interest income on performing loans is accrued as earned. A non-performing loan is placed on non-accrual status when it is probable that the borrower may be unable to meet interest payments as they become due. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status unless there is sufficient collateral to assure collectability of principal and interest. Upon the designation of non-accrual status, all unpaid accrued interest is reserved against through current income. Interest income on non-performing loans is generally recognized on a cash basis. Recognition of interest income on non-performing loans on an accrual basis is resumed when it is probable that the Company will be able to collect amounts due according to the contractual terms.
The Company has determined that it has one portfolio segment, primarily represented by loans collateralized by real estate, whereby it determines, as needed, reserves for loan losses on an asset-specific basis. The reserve for loan losses reflects management's estimate of loan losses as of the balance sheet date. The reserve is increased through loan loss expense and is decreased by charge-offs when losses are confirmed through the receipt of assets such as cash or via ownership control of the underlying collateral in full satisfaction of the loan upon foreclosure or when significant collection efforts have ceased.
The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the existing contractual terms. A reserve allowance is established for an impaired loan when the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral (for collateralized loans) or the present value of expected future cash flows is lower than the carrying value of the loan. An internal valuation is performed generally using the income approach to estimate the fair value of the collateral at the time a loan is determined to be impaired. The model is updated if circumstances indicate a significant change in value has occurred. The Company does not provide for an additional allowance for loan losses based on the grouping of loans as the Company believes the characteristics of the loans are not sufficiently similar to allow an evaluation of these loans as a group for a possible loan loss allowance. As such, all of the Company’s loans are evaluated individually for impairment purposes.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents (demand deposits in banks, commercial paper and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less) includes tenants' security deposits, escrowed funds and other restricted deposits of $4.0 million and $5.6 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Cash and cash equivalent balances may, at a limited number of banks and financial institutions, exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates risk by investing in or through major financial institutions and primarily in funds that are currently U.S. federal government insured. Recoverability of investments is dependent upon the performance of the issuers.
Marketable Securities
The Company classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the FASB’s Investments-Debt and Equity Securities guidance. These securities are carried at fair market value with unrealized gains and losses reported in stockholders’ equity as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income ("OCI"). Gains or losses on securities sold are based on the specific identification method.
All debt securities are generally classified as held-to-maturity because the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. It is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery and the Company expects to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis even if the entity does not intend to sell. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Debt securities which contain conversion features generally are classified as available-for-sale.
On a continuous basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s marketable securities may be impaired, which includes reviewing the underlying cause of any decline in value and the estimated recovery period, as well as the severity and duration of the decline. In the Company’s evaluation, the Company considers its ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the Company to recover its cost basis. A marketable security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than the carrying value of the security and such difference is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the security over the estimated fair value in the security.
Deferred Leasing and Financing Costs
Costs incurred in obtaining tenant leases and long-term financing, included in deferred charges and prepaid expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the related leases or debt agreements, as applicable. Such capitalized costs include salaries, lease incentives and related costs of personnel directly involved in successful leasing efforts.
Software Development Costs
Expenditures for major software purchases and software developed for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis generally over a 3 to 5 year period. The Company’s policy provides for the capitalization of external direct costs of materials and services associated with developing or obtaining internal use computer software. In addition, the Company also capitalizes certain payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with internal use computer software projects. The amount of capitalizable payroll costs with respect to these employees is limited to the time directly spent on such projects. Costs associated with preliminary project stage activities, training, maintenance and all other post-implementation stage activities are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had unamortized software development costs of $26.8 million and $23.8 million, respectively. The Company incurred $5.5 million, $3.1 million and $1.9 million in amortization of software development costs during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Base rental revenues from rental property are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Certain of these leases also provide for percentage rents based upon the level of sales achieved by the lessee. These percentage rents are recognized once the required sales level is achieved. Rental income may also include payments received in connection with lease termination agreements. In addition, leases typically provide for reimbursement to the Company of common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and other operating expenses. Operating expense reimbursements are recognized as earned.
Management and other fee income consists of property management fees, leasing fees, property acquisition and disposition fees, development fees and asset management fees. These fees arise from contractual agreements with third parties or with entities in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest. Management and other fee income, including acquisition and disposition fees, are recognized as earned under the respective agreements. Management and other fee income related to partially owned entities are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated interest.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Gains and losses from the sale of depreciated operating property and ground-up development projects are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB’s real estate sales guidance, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of sale and subsequent involvement by the Company with the properties are met.
Gains and losses on transfers of operating properties result from the sale of a partial interest in properties to unconsolidated joint ventures and are recognized using the partial sale provisions of the FASB’s real estate sales guidance.
The Company makes estimates of the uncollectability of its accounts receivable related to base rents, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and other revenues. The Company analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims. The Company’s reported net earnings are directly affected by management’s estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable.
Income Taxes
The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its stockholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under Section 856 through 860 of the Code.
In connection with the RMA, which became effective January 1, 2001, the Company is permitted to participate in certain activities which it was previously precluded from in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted by entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries under the Code. As such, the Company is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these activities. The Company is also subject to local taxes on certain non-U.S. investments.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.
The Company reviews the need to establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. The review includes an analysis of various factors, such as future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, the capacity for the carryback or carryforward of any losses, the expected occurrence of future income or loss and available tax planning strategies.
The Company applies the FASB’s guidance relating to uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements. Under this guidance the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, and accounting in interim periods.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated using year-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated using exchange rates as determined throughout the year. Gains or losses resulting from translation are included in OCI, as a separate component of the Company’s stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are translated to local currency at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. The effect of the transactions gain or loss is included in the caption Other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Derivative/Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risk through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company may use derivatives to manage exposures that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and market value fluctuations of equity securities. The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives.
The Company measures its derivative instruments at fair value and records them in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an asset or liability, depending on the Company’s rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. The accounting for changes in the fair value of the derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting under the Derivatives and Hedging guidance issued by the FASB.
The effective portion of the changes in fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in OCI and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no hedge ineffectiveness.
Noncontrolling Interests
The Company accounts for noncontrolling interests in accordance with the Consolidation guidance and the Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance issued by the FASB. Noncontrolling interests represent the portion of equity that the Company does not own in those entities it consolidates. The Company identifies its noncontrolling interests separately within the equity section on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amounts of consolidated net earnings attributable to the Company and to the noncontrolling interests are presented separately on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Noncontrolling interests also includes amounts related to partnership units issued by consolidated subsidiaries of the Company in connection with certain property acquisitions. These units have a stated redemption value or a defined redemption amount based upon the trading price of the Company’s common stock and provides the unit holders various rates of return during the holding period. The unit holders generally have the right to redeem their units for cash at any time after one year from issuance. For convertible units, the Company typically has the option to settle redemption amounts in cash or common stock.
The Company evaluates the terms of the partnership units issued in accordance with the FASB’s Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance. Units which embody an unconditional obligation requiring the Company to redeem the units for cash at a specified or determinable date (or dates) or upon an event that is certain to occur are determined to be mandatorily redeemable under this guidance and are included as Redeemable noncontrolling interest and classified within the mezzanine section between Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Convertible units for which the Company has the option to settle redemption amounts in cash or Common Stock are included in the caption Noncontrolling interest within the equity section on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of earnings and the weighted-average number of shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts presented in thousands, except per share data):
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share: | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 211,978 | $ | 158,977 | $ | 120,122 | ||||||
| Total net gain on transfer or sale of operating properties, net | 4,299 | 108 | 2,377 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (14,202 | ) | (13,039 | ) | (18,783 | ) | ||||||
| Discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1,731 | 1,384 | 5,288 | |||||||||
| Preferred stock redemption costs | (21,703 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | (71,697 | ) | (59,363 | ) | (51,346 | ) | ||||||
| Income from continuing operations available to the common shareholders | 110,406 | 88,067 | 57,658 | |||||||||
| Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares | (1,221 | ) | (608 | ) | (375 | ) | ||||||
| Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders | 109,185 | 87,459 | 57,283 | |||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations attributable to the Company | 62,267 | 21,621 | 33,864 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to the Company’s common shareholders for basic earnings per share | $ | 171,452 | $ | 109,080 | $ | 91,147 | ||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 405,997 | 406,530 | 405,827 | |||||||||
| Basic Earnings Per Share Attributable to the Company’s Common Shareholders: | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 |
| Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Share: | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders | $ | 109,185 | $ | 87,459 | $ | 57,283 | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operations attributable to the Company | 62,267 | 21,621 | 33,864 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to common shareholders for diluted earnings per share | $ | 171,452 | $ | 109,080 | $ | 91,147 | ||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic | 405,997 | 406,530 | 405,827 | |||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities(a): | ||||||||||||
| Equity awards | 692 | 1,139 | 374 | |||||||||
| Shares for diluted earnings per common share | 406,689 | 407,669 | 406,201 | |||||||||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to the Company’s Common Shareholders: | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operations | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.08 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 |
(a) The effect of the assumed conversion of certain convertible units had an anti-dilutive effect upon the calculation of Income from continuing operations per share. Accordingly, the impact of such conversions has not been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share calculations. Additionally, there were 11,159,160, 13,304,016 and 12,085,874, stock options that were not dilutive as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
The Company's unvested restricted share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions or distribution equivalents. The impact of the unvested restricted share awards on earnings per share has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted share awards based on dividends declared and the unvested restricted shares' participation rights in undistributed earnings.
Stock Compensation
The Company maintains two equity participation plans, the Second Amended and Restated 1998 Equity Participation Plan (the “Prior Plan”) and the 2010 Equity Participation Plan (the “2010 Plan”) (collectively, the “Plans”). The Prior Plan provides for a maximum of 47,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options and restricted stock grants. The 2010 Plan provides for a maximum of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options, restricted stock, performance awards and other awards, plus the number of shares of common stock which are or become available for issuance under the Prior Plan and which are not thereafter issued under the Prior Plan, subject to certain conditions. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion, options granted under the Plans generally vest ratably over a range of three to five years, expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant. Restricted stock grants generally vest (i) 100% on the fourth or fifth anniversary of the grant, (ii) ratably over three or four years, (iii) over three years at 50% after two years and 50% after the third year or (iv) over ten years at 20% per year commencing after the fifth year. Performance share awards may provide a right to receive shares of restricted stock based on the Company’s performance relative to its peers, as defined, or based on other performance criteria as determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Plans provide for the granting of certain options and restricted stock to each of the Company’s non-employee directors (the “Independent Directors”) and permits such Independent Directors to elect to receive deferred stock awards in lieu of directors’ fees.
The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with the FASB’s Stock Compensation guidance which requires that all share based payments to employees, be recognized in the Statement of Income over the service period based on their fair values. Fair value is determined, depending on the type of award, using either the Black-Scholes option pricing formula or the Monte Carlo method, both of which are intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date (see Footnote 21 for additional disclosure on the assumptions and methodology).
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 is intended to improve comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments are of two types: (i) those that clarify the Board’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and (ii) those that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 201l. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its financial statement presentation.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). The amendments in this ASU require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. In December 2011, the FASB deferred portions of this update in its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 (“ASU 2011-12”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU 2011-05. The amendment requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-12 defers only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted, but full retrospective application is required. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 and ASU 2011-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
In January 2013, the FASB released ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). This guidance is the culmination of the board’s redeliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income. The standard requires that companies present either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source (e.g., the release due to cash flow hedges from interest rate contracts) and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification (e.g., interest income or interest expense). If a component is not required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety (e.g., the net periodic pension cost), companies would instead cross reference to the related footnote for additional information (e.g., the pension footnote). The new requirements will take effect for public companies in interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation.
In November 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate - a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2011-10”). ASU 2011-10 requires a parent company that ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate because the subsidiary has defaulted on its nonrecourse debt should use the FASB’s Real Estate guidance to determine whether to derecognize the in substance real estate entities. ASU 2011-10 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In December 2011, the FASB released ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). ASU 2011-11 requires companies to provide new disclosures about offsetting and related arrangements for financial instruments and derivatives. The provisions of ASU 2011-11 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and are required to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2011-11 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current year presentation. Specifically, the Company reclassified amounts relating to rent security deposits from Accounts payable and accrued expenses to Other liabilities. Additionally, the Company is presenting on its Consolidated Statements of Income its provision for doubtful accounts, which was previously included in Revenues from rental properties, as a separate line item included in Operating expenses as well as certain other immaterial reclassifications.
- Impairments:
Management assesses on a continuous basis whether there are any indicators, including property operating performance and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s assets (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. To the extent impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the asset would be adjusted to an amount to reflect the estimated fair value of the asset.
Real estate market conditions, including capitalization rates, discount rates and vacancies continued to improve throughout 2011 and 2012; however, declines in certain real estate markets continued to have a negative effect on transactional activity as it related to dispositions of select real estate assets. This factor, in addition to the Company’s efforts to market certain assets and management’s assessment as to the likelihood and timing of such potential transactions caused the Company to recognize impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 as follows (in millions):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impairment of property carrying values (including amounts within discontinued operations) | $ | 56.9 | $ | 22.8 | $ | 8.7 | ||||||
| Real estate under development | - | - | 11.7 | |||||||||
| Investments in other real estate investments | 2.7 | 3.3 | 13.4 | |||||||||
| Marketable securities and other investments | - | 1.6 | 5.3 | |||||||||
| Investments in real estate joint ventures | - | 5.1 | - | |||||||||
| Total gross impairment charges | 59.6 | 32.8 | 39.1 | |||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | (0.4 | ) | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
| Income tax benefit | (10.6 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (7.6 | ) | ||||||
| Total net impairment charges | $ | 48.6 | $ | 29.0 | $ | 31.4 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
In addition to the impairment charges above, the Company recognized pretax impairment charges during 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $11.1 million, $14.1 million, and $28.3 million, respectively, relating to certain properties held by various unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company holds noncontrolling interests. These impairment charges are included in Equity in income of joint ventures, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company will continue to assess the value of its assets on an on-going basis. Based on these assessments, the Company may determine that one or more of its assets may be impaired due to a decline in value and would therefore write-down its cost basis accordingly (see Footnotes 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12).
- Real Estate:
The Company’s components of Rental property consist of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 1,927,800 | $ | 1,847,770 | ||||
| Undeveloped land | 96,500 | 97,275 | ||||||
| Buildings and improvements: | ||||||||
| Buildings | 4,607,931 | 4,513,339 | ||||||
| Building improvements | 1,091,810 | 1,024,514 | ||||||
| Tenant improvements | 708,626 | 715,951 | ||||||
| Fixtures and leasehold improvements | 59,690 | 56,827 | ||||||
| Other rental property (1) | 357,667 | 335,859 | ||||||
| 8,850,024 | 8,591,535 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,745,462 | ) | (1,693,090 | ) | ||||
| Total | $ | 7,104,562 | $ | 6,898,445 |
(1) At December 31, 2012 and 2011, Other rental property (net of accumulated amortization of $212.9 million and $180.7 million, respectively), consisted of intangible assets including (i) $237,166 and $213,915, respectively, of in-place leases, (ii) $21,335 and $21,444, respectively, of tenant relationships, and (iii) $99,166 and $100,500, respectively, of above-market leases.
In addition, at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had intangible liabilities relating to below-market leases from property acquisitions of $167.2 million and $165.0 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $138.3 million and $120.5 million, respectively. These amounts are included in the caption Other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s amortization expense associated with the above mentioned intangible assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $15.4 million, $15.2 million and $12.6 million, respectively. The estimated net amortization expense associated with the Company’s intangible assets and liabilities for the next five years are as follows (in millions): 2013, $9.6; 2014, $1.7; 2015, $(0.8); 2016, $(3.4) and 2017, $(3.0).
- Property Acquisitions, Developments and Other Investments:
Operating property acquisitions, ground-up development costs and other investments have been funded principally through the application of proceeds from the Company's public equity and unsecured debt issuances, proceeds from mortgage and construction financings and availability under the Company’s revolving lines of credit.
Acquisition of Operating Properties –
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company acquired 24 operating properties, 69 net leased parcels and five outparcels, in separate transactions as follows (in thousands):
| Purchase Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property Name | Location | Month Acquired | Cash | Debt Assumed | Total | GLA* | ||||||||||||||
| Woodbridge S.C. | Sugarland, TX | Jan-12 | $ | 9,000 | $ | - | $ | 9,000 | 97 | |||||||||||
| Bell Camino Center | Sun City, AZ | Jan-12 | 4,185 | 4,210 | 8,395 | 63 | ||||||||||||||
| 31 parcels (2) | Various | Jan-12 | 30,753 | - | 30,753 | 83 | ||||||||||||||
| 1 parcel (3) | Duncan, SC | Jan-12 | 1,048 | - | 1,048 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Olympia West Outparcel | Olympia, WA | Feb-12 | 1,200 | - | 1,200 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Frontier Village (1) | Lake Stevens, WA | Mar-12 | 12,231 | 30,900 | 43,131 | 195 | ||||||||||||||
| Silverdale S.C. (1) | Silverdale, WA | Mar-12 | 8,335 | 24,000 | 32,335 | 170 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 parcels (2) | Various | Mar-12 | 39,493 | - | 39,493 | 107 | ||||||||||||||
| 1 parcel (3) | Peru, IL | Mar-12 | 995 | - | 995 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Towson Place (4) | Towson, MD | Apr-12 | 69,375 | 57,625 | 127,000 | 680 | ||||||||||||||
| Prien Lake Outparcel | Lake Charles, LA | May-12 | 1,800 | - | 1,800 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Devon Village | Devon, PA | Jun-12 | 28,550 | - | 28,550 | 79 | ||||||||||||||
| 4 Properties | Various, NC | Jun-12 | 63,750 | - | 63,750 | 368 | ||||||||||||||
| Lake Jackson (5) | Lake Jackson, TX | Jul-12 | 5,500 | - | 5,500 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
| Woodlawn S.C. | Charlotte, NC | Jul-12 | 7,050 | - | 7,050 | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Columbia Crossing - 2 Outparcels | Columbia, MD | Jul-12 | 11,060 | - | 11,060 | 69 | ||||||||||||||
| Pompano Beach (6) | Pompano Beach, FL | Jul-12 | 12,180 | - | 12,180 | 81 | ||||||||||||||
| 6 Parcels (2) | Various | Jul-12 | 8,111 | - | 8,111 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Wilton S.C. | Wilton, CT | Aug-12 | 18,800 | 20,900 | 39,700 | 96 | ||||||||||||||
| Hawthorne Hills S. C. | Vernon Hills, IL | Aug-12 | 15,974 | 21,563 | 37,537 | 193 | ||||||||||||||
| Greeley Shopping Center (7) | Greeley, CO | Oct-12 | 23,250 | - | 23,250 | 139 | ||||||||||||||
| Savi Ranch Center Phase II | Yorba Linda, CA | Oct-12 | 34,500 | - | 34,500 | 161 | ||||||||||||||
| Wild Lake Plaza Outparcel | Columbia, MD | Nov-12 | 300 | - | 300 | 75 | ||||||||||||||
| City Heights Retail Village | San Francisco, CA | Nov-12 | 15,600 | 20,000 | 35,600 | 109 | ||||||||||||||
| Snowden Square (8) | Columbia, MD | Dec-12 | 6,182 | - | 6,182 | 50 | ||||||||||||||
| “Key Food” Portfolio (5 properties) | Various, NY | Dec-12 | 26,058 | - | 26,058 | 59 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 455,280 | $ | 179,198 | $ | 634,478 | 3,086 |
- Gross leasable area ("GLA")
(1) These properties were acquired from a joint venture in which the Company has a 15% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated these transactions pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized an aggregate gain of $2.0 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control.
(2) Acquired an aggregate of 67 parcels net leased to restaurants through a consolidated joint venture, in which the Company has a 99.1% controlling interest. During July 2012, the Company purchased the remaining 0.9% interest for $0.7 million.
(3) Acquired an aggregate of two parcels net leased to restaurants through a consolidated joint venture, in which the Company has a 92.0% controlling interest. During July 2012, the Company sold 4% of its interest for $0.1 million. The Company continues to have a controlling interest in the joint venture and therefore continues to consolidate this investment.
(4) This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company had a 30% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $12.1 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control. In addition, the Company recognized promote income of $1.1 million in connection with this transaction. The promote income is included in Equity in income of joint ventures, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, the debt assumed in connection with this transaction of $57.6 million was repaid in May 2012.
(5) The Company acquired this property from a preferred equity investment in which the Company held a noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance. This transaction resulted in a change in control with no gain or loss recognized.
(6) This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company had a 50% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance. This transaction resulted in a change in control with no gain or loss recognized.
(7) This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company has an 11% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $0.4 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control.
(8) This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company has a 50% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $1.0 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company acquired 19 operating properties, a land parcel and an outparcel, in separate transactions as follows (in thousands):
| Purchase Price | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property Name | Location | Month Acquired | Cash | Debt Assumed | Total | GLA* | |||||||||||||||
| Columbia Crossing | Columbia, MD | Jan-11 | $ | 4,100 | $ | - | $ | 4,100 | 31 | ||||||||||||
| Turnpike Plaza | Huntington Station, NY | Feb-11 | 7,920 | - | 7,920 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
| Center Court | Pikesville, MD | Mar-11 | 9,955 | 15,445 | 25,400 | 106 | |||||||||||||||
| Flowery Branch | Flowery Branch, GA | April-11 | 4,427 | 9,273 | 13,700 | 93 | |||||||||||||||
| Garden State Pavilions | Cherry Hill, NJ | June-11 | 18,250 | - | 18,250 | 257 | |||||||||||||||
| Village Crossroads | Phoenix, AZ | July-11 | 29,240 | - | 29,240 | 185 | |||||||||||||||
| University Town Center | (1) | Pensacola, FL | Aug-11 | 17,750 | - | 17,750 | 101 | ||||||||||||||
| Gateway Station | (2) | Burleson, TX | Sept-11 | 6,625 | 18,832 | 25,457 | 280 | ||||||||||||||
| Park Hill Plaza | Miami, FL | Sept-11 | 17,251 | 8,199 | 25,450 | 112 | |||||||||||||||
| Island Gate | Corpus Christi, TX | Oct-11 | 8,750 | - | 8,750 | 60 | |||||||||||||||
| Village Center West | Highlands Ranch, CO | Oct-11 | 3,995 | 6,105 | 10,100 | 30 | |||||||||||||||
| Belleville Road S.C. | (3) | Fairview Heights, IL | Oct-11 | 1,900 | - | 1,900 | - | ||||||||||||||
| Grand Oaks Village | Orlando, FL | Nov-11 | 19,051 | 5,949 | 25,000 | 86 | |||||||||||||||
| Market at Southpark | Littleton, CO | Nov-11 | 30,000 | - | 30,000 | 190 | |||||||||||||||
| Jetton Village Shoppes | Charlotte, NC | Nov-11 | 5,110 | 8,250 | 13,360 | 81 | |||||||||||||||
| Brennan Station | Raleigh, NC | Nov-11 | 20,225 | 9,125 | 29,350 | 136 | |||||||||||||||
| Woodruff Outparcel | (4) | Woodruff, SC | Nov-11 | 1,183 | - | 1,183 | 119 | ||||||||||||||
| Westridge Square | Greensboro, NC | Nov-11 | 26,125 | - | 26,125 | 215 | |||||||||||||||
| Highlands Ranch | Highland Ranch, CO | Nov-11 | 7,035 | 20,599 | 27,634 | 123 | |||||||||||||||
| North Valley Plaza | Peoria, AZ | Dec-11 | 7,260 | 16,135 | 23,395 | 168 | |||||||||||||||
| College Park S.C. | Tempe, AZ | Dec-11 | 10,500 | - | 10,500 | 62 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 256,652 | $ | 117,912 | $ | 374,564 | 2,488 |
- Gross leasable area ("GLA")
(1) This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company has a 13.4% noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recorded a gain of $0.6 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original 13.4% ownership due to a change in control.
(2) The Company purchased the leasehold improvements at this property for which it previously owned the land.
(3) The Company acquired the land at this site for which it previously held a ground lease.
(4) The Company purchased this out parcel next to an existing property that the Company previously owned.
The aggregate purchase price of the above 2012 and 2011 property acquisitions have been allocated as follows (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land | $ | 196,219 | $ | 104,824 | ||||
| Buildings | 319,955 | 174,129 | ||||||
| Below Market Rents | (40,375 | ) | (16,958 | ) | ||||
| Above Market Rents | 14,977 | 12,345 | ||||||
| In-Place Leases | 31,248 | 20,031 | ||||||
| Building Improvements | 99,092 | 72,979 | ||||||
| Tenant Improvements | 19,327 | 14,110 | ||||||
| Mortgage Fair Value Adjustment | (5,965 | ) | (6,896 | ) | ||||
| $ | 634,478 | $ | 374,564 |
Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company acquired the remaining interest in six and two previously consolidated joint ventures for $12.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Also during 2011, the Company acquired additional interests in two separate consolidated joint ventures for an aggregate cost of $9.7 million. The Company continues to consolidate these entities as there was no change in control from these transactions. The purchase of the remaining and additional partnership interests resulted in an aggregate decrease in noncontrolling interest of $10.4 million and $13.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and an aggregate decrease of $0.3 million and an aggregate increase of $3.6 million to the Company’s Paid-in capital, during 2012 and 2011, respectively.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Ground-Up Development -
The Company is engaged in ground-up development projects, which will be held as long-term investments by the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had in progress a total of three ground-up development projects, consisting of two located in the U.S. and one located in Peru.
During 2011, the Company acquired a land parcel located in Lima, Peru through a newly formed joint venture in which the Company has a 95% controlling ownership interest for a purchase price of 6.8 million Peruvian Sols (USD $2.5 million). This parcel will be developed into a grocery anchored shopping center.
Kimsouth -
Kimsouth Realty Inc. (“Kimsouth”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that holds a 13.4% noncontrolling interest in a joint venture which owns a portion of Albertson’s Inc. During 2012, the joint venture distributed $50.3 million of which the Company received $6.9 million, which was recognized as income from cash received in excess of the Company’s investment, before income tax. During 2011, the joint venture distributed $100.0 million of which the Company received $13.9 million, which was recognized as income from cash received in excess of the Company’s investment, before income tax. The income for both 2012 and 2011 was included in Equity in income from other real estate investments, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
FNC Realty Corporation –
During 2011, the Company acquired an additional 12.48% interest in FNC Realty Corporation (“FNC”) for $12.4 million, which increased the Company’s total controlling ownership interest to 69.08%. During 2012, the Company acquired an additional 13.62% interest in FNC for $15.3 million, which increased the Company’s total ownership interest to 82.70%. The Company had previously and continues to consolidate FNC. Since there was no change in control from these transactions, the purchase of the additional interest resulted in an increase to the Company’s Paid-in capital of $0.1 million and $1.0 million during 2012 and 2011, respectively.
- Dispositions of Real Estate:
Operating Real Estate –
During 2012, the Company disposed of 62 operating properties and two outparcels, in separate transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $418.9 million. These transactions, which are included in discontinued operations, resulted in an aggregate pre-tax gain of $85.9 million and aggregate impairment charges of $22.5 million, before income taxes. The Company provided seller financing in connection with the sale of one of the operating properties for $4.2 million, which bears interest at a rate of 6.0% and matures in November 2013. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s real estate sales guidance and concluded that the criteria for sale recognition were met.
Additionally, during 2012, the Company disposed of four land parcels and two outparcels for an aggregate sales price of $7.1 million and recognized an aggregate gain of $2.0 million and aggregate impairment charges of $0.3 million related to these transactions. The gains from these transactions are recorded as other income, which is included in Other expense, net, and the impairment charges have been recorded as Impairment charges in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company provided seller financing in connection with the sale of one of the land parcels for $1.8 million, which bears interest at a rate of 6.5% for the first six months and 7.5% for the remaining term and is scheduled to mature in March 2013. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s real estate sales guidance and concluded that the criteria for sale recognition were met.
Also, during 2012, the Company sold a land parcel in San Juan del Rio, Mexico for a sales price of 24.3 million Mexican Pesos (“MXN”) (USD $1.9 million). The Company recognized a gain of MXN 5.7 million (USD $0.4 million) on this transaction. The gain from this transaction is recorded as other income, which is included in Other expense, net, in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During 2012, the Company sold a previously consolidated operating property to a newly formed unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has a 20% noncontrolling interest for a sales price of $55.5 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $10.0 million, of which the Company deferred $2.0 million due to its continued involvement. This gain has been recorded as Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
During 2011, the Company disposed of 27 operating properties, one development property and one outparcel, in separate transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $124.9 million. These transactions, which are included in discontinued operations, resulted in an aggregate gain of $17.3 million and aggregate impairment charges of $16.9 million, before an income tax benefit and noncontrolling interest. The Company provided seller financing aggregating $11.9 million on three of these transactions which bear interest at rates ranging from 5.50% to 8.00% per annum and have maturities ranging from one to seven years. The Company evaluated these transactions pursuant to the FASB’s real estate sales guidance to determine sale and gain recognition.
Additionally, during 2011 the Company disposed of a portion of an operating property and a land parcel, in separate transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $5.4 million. These transactions resulted in aggregate impairment charges of $1.6 million which is included in Impairment charges, on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Also, during 2011, a consolidated joint venture in which the Company had a preferred equity investment disposed of a property for a sales price of $6.1 million. As a result of this capital transaction, the Company received $1.4 million of profit participation, before noncontrolling interest of $0.1 million. This profit participation has been recorded as Income from other real estate investments and is reflected in Income from discontinued operating properties in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
During 2011, the Company transferred an operating property for a sales price of $23.9 million to a newly formed unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest. This transaction resulted in a gain of $0.4 million, of which the Company deferred $0.1 million due to its continued involvement.
During 2010, the Company (i) sold seven operating properties, which were previously consolidated, to two new joint ventures in which the Company holds noncontrolling equity interests for an aggregate sales price of $438.1 million including the assignment of $159.9 million of non-recourse mortgage debt encumbering three of the properties and (ii) disposed of, in separate transactions, seven operating properties for an aggregate sales price of $100.5 million including the assignment of $81.0 million of non-recourse mortgage debt encumbering one of the properties. These transactions resulted in aggregate gains of $4.4 million and aggregate losses/impairments of $5.0 million.
Additionally, during 2010, the Company disposed of (i) three properties, in separate transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $23.8 million and (ii) five properties from a consolidated joint venture in which the Company had a preferred equity investment for a sales price of $40.8 million. These transactions resulted in an aggregate profit participation of $20.8 million, before income tax of $1.0 million and noncontrolling interest of $4.9 million. This profit participation has been recorded as Income from other real estate investments and is reflected in Income from discontinued operating properties, net of tax in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
During 2010, the Company also disposed of, in separate transactions, nine land parcels for an aggregate sales price of $25.6 million which resulted in an aggregate gain of $3.4 million. This gain is included in Other expense, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Ground-up Development –
During 2011, the Company transferred a merchant building property for a sales price of $37.6 million to a newly formed unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest. This transaction resulted in an aggregate gain of $14.2 million, before income tax expense, of which the Company deferred $2.1 million due to its continued involvement.
During 2010, the Company disposed of a land parcel for a sales price of $0.8 million resulting in a gain of $0.4 million. Additionally, the Company recognized $1.7 million in income on previously sold development properties during the year ended December 31, 2010.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
- Adjustment of Property Carrying Values and Real Estate Under Development:
Impairments –
During 2012, the Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $34.1 million, before income tax benefit of $10.7 million, relating to its investment in four operating properties, which are included in Impairment charges in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The aggregate book value of these properties was $86.6 million. The estimated aggregate fair value of these properties is based upon purchase price offers and comparable sales information aggregating $52.5 million (see footnote 16 for additional disclosure on fair value). These impairment charges resulted from the Company’s efforts to market certain assets and management’s assessment as to the likelihood and timing of such potential transactions.
During 2011, the Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $3.9 million, before income tax benefit of $1.1 million, relating to its investment in two operating properties and one land parcel. The aggregate book value of these properties was $9.2 million. The estimated aggregate fair value of these properties was based upon purchase prices and purchase price offers aggregating $5.3 million. These impairment charges resulted from the Company’s efforts to market certain assets and management’s assessment as to the likelihood and timing of such potential transactions.
During 2010, the Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $8.7 million, of which $5.2 million is classified as discontinued operations on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income, relating to its investment in seven properties. Four of these properties were sold during 2010 and one of these properties was classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2010. The estimated individual fair value of these properties was based upon purchase prices and current purchase price offers. These impairments were primarily due to declines in real estate fundamentals along with adverse changes in local market conditions and the uncertainty of their recovery.
Additionally, during 2010, the Company had determined that one of its unconsolidated joint ventures’ ground-up development projects, located in Miramar, FL, estimated recoverable value will not exceed its estimated cost. As a result, the Company recorded a pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment on its investment of $11.7 million, representing the excess of the investment’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. The Company’s estimated fair value was based upon projected operating cash flows (discounted and unleveraged) of the property over its specified holding period. Such cash flow projections consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in this model were based upon rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties.
- Discontinued Operations and Assets Held-for-Sale:
The Company reports as discontinued operations assets held-for-sale as of the end of the current period and assets sold during the period. All results of these discontinued operations are included in a separate component of income on the Consolidated Statements of Income under the caption Discontinued operations. This has resulted in certain reclassifications of 2012, 2011 and 2010 financial statement amounts.
The components of Income from discontinued operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, are shown below. These include the results of Income through the date of each respective sale for properties sold during 2012, 2011 and 2010, and the operations for the applicable periods for those assets classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property | $ | 27,155 | $ | 65,783 | $ | 96,794 | ||||||
| Rental property expenses | (10,069 | ) | (24,144 | ) | (33,015 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (13,249 | ) | (19,427 | ) | (30,431 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (997 | ) | (1,848 | ) | (9,429 | ) | ||||||
| Income from other real estate investments | 13 | 2,000 | 20,781 | |||||||||
| Other expense, net | (212 | ) | (114 | ) | (760 | ) | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operating properties, before income taxes | 2,641 | 22,250 | 43,940 | |||||||||
| Loss on operating properties sold, before income taxes | - | - | (35 | ) | ||||||||
| Impairment of property carrying value, before income taxes | (22,458 | ) | (19,698 | ) | (6,460 | ) | ||||||
| Gain on disposition of operating properties, before income taxes | 85,894 | 17,327 | 1,981 | |||||||||
| (Provision)/ benefit for income taxes | (2,079 | ) | 3,126 | (274 | ) | |||||||
| Income from discontinued operating properties | 63,998 | 23,005 | 39,152 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,731 | ) | (1,384 | ) | (5,288 | ) | ||||||
| Income from discontinued operations attributable to the Company | $ | 62,267 | $ | 21,621 | $ | 33,864 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During 2012, the Company classified as held-for-sale 18 operating properties, comprising 2.1 million square feet of GLA. The book value of these properties was $73.2 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $57.2 million. The Company recognized impairment charges of $4.2 million on three of these properties. The book value of the other properties did not exceed their estimated fair value, less costs to sell, and as such no impairment charges were recognized. The Company’s determination of the fair value of these properties, aggregating $102.0 million, was based upon executed contracts of sale with third parties (see Footnote 16). In addition, the Company completed the sale of 19 operating properties during the year ended December 31, 2012, of which two were classified as held-for-sale during 2011 (these dispositions are included in Footnote 2 above). At December 31, 2012, the Company had one operating property classified as held-for-sale at a carrying amount of $3.4 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $6.8 million, which is included in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2011, the Company classified as held-for-sale seven operating properties and one land parcel, comprising 0.2 million square feet of GLA. The book value of each of these properties aggregated $10.0 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $7.3 million. The Company recognized impairment charges of $1.1 million on the land parcel. The individual book values of the seven operating properties did not exceed each of their estimated fair values less costs to sell; as such no impairments were recognized. The Company’s determination of the fair value of these properties and land parcel, aggregating $19.7 million, was based upon executed contracts of sale with third parties. The Company completed the sale of five of these operating properties during the year ended December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011 the Company had two properties classified as held-for-sale at an aggregate carrying amount of $3.8 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $0.5 million, which are included in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2010, the Company classified as held-for-sale 12 operating properties comprising 0.5 million square feet of GLA. The book value of each of these properties aggregated $40.5 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $11.9 million. The Company recognized impairment charges of $5.2 million, before income tax benefit, on seven of these properties. The individual book value of the five remaining properties did not exceed each of their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The Company’s determination of the fair value of the 12 properties, aggregating $66.1 million, was based upon executed contracts of sale with third parties. The Company completed the sale of eleven of these properties during 2010. During 2011, the Company reclassified one property previously classified as held-for-sale into held-for-use. At December 31, 2010 the Company had one property classified as held-for-sale at a carrying value of $4.4 million, which was included in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
- Investment and Advances in Real Estate Joint Ventures:
The Company and its subsidiaries have investments in and advances to various real estate joint ventures. These joint ventures are engaged primarily in the operation of shopping centers which are either owned or held under long-term operating leases. The Company and the joint venture partners have joint approval rights for major decisions, including those regarding property operations. As such, the Company holds noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures and accounts for them under the equity method of accounting. The table below presents joint venture investments for which the Company held an ownership interest at December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in millions, except number of properties):
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| As of December 31, 2012 | As of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venture | Average Ownership Interest | Number of Properties | GLA | Gross Real Estate | The Company's Investment | Number of Properties | GLA | Gross Real Estate | The Company's Investment | |||||||||||||||
| Prudential Investment Program (“KimPru” and “KimPru II”) (1) (2) | 15.00 | % | 61 | 10.7 | $ | 2,744.9 | $ | 170.1 | 63 | 10.9 | $ | 2,781.4 | $ | 151.9 | ||||||||||
| Kimco Income Opportunity Portfolio (“KIR”) (2) | 45.00 | % | 58 | 12.4 | 1,543.2 | 140.3 | 59 | 12.6 | 1,556.6 | 151.4 | ||||||||||||||
| UBS Programs (2)* | 17.90 | % | 40 | 5.7 | 1,260.1 | 58.4 | 42 | 5.9 | 1,330.5 | 61.3 | ||||||||||||||
| BIG Shopping Centers (2)* | 37.70 | % | 22 | 3.6 | 547.7 | 31.3 | 23 | 3.7 | 557.4 | 41.2 | ||||||||||||||
| The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPP”) (2) | 55.00 | % | 6 | 2.4 | 436.1 | 149.5 | 6 | 2.4 | 430.0 | 140.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Kimco Income Fund (2) | 15.20 | % | 12 | 1.5 | 287.0 | 12.3 | 12 | 1.5 | 281.1 | 12.1 | ||||||||||||||
| SEB Immobilien (2) | 15.00 | % | 13 | 1.8 | 361.2 | 1.5 | 13 | 1.8 | 360.5 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||
| Other Institutional Programs (2) | Various | 58 | 2.6 | 499.2 | 21.3 | 67 | 4.7 | 804.4 | 33.7 | |||||||||||||||
| RioCan | 50.00 | % | 45 | 9.3 | 1,379.3 | 111.0 | 45 | 9.3 | 1,367.0 | 62.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Intown (3) | - | 138 | N/A | 841.0 | 86.9 | 138 | N/A | 829.9 | 90.8 | |||||||||||||||
| Latin America | Various | 131 | 18.0 | 1,198.1 | 334.2 | 130 | 17.9 | 1,145.8 | 318.0 | |||||||||||||||
| Other Joint Venture Programs (4) (5) (7) (8) | Various | 87 | 13.2 | 1,846.7 | 311.4 | 92 | 13.7 | 2,016.5 | 338.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | 671 | 81.2 | $ | 12,944.5 | $ | 1,428.2 | 690 | 84.4 | $ | 13,461.1 | $ | 1,404.2 |
| * | Ownership % is a blended rate |
|---|
The table below presents the Company’s share of net income/(loss) for these investments which is included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income under Equity in income of joint ventures, net and Gains on change in control of interests for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| KimPru and KimPru II (14) (15) (16) | $ | 7.4 | $ | (1.6 | ) | $ | (18.4 | ) | ||||
| KIR (17) (18) | 23.4 | 17.3 | 19.8 | |||||||||
| UBS Programs (19) | 0.5 | (0.8 | ) | 1.2 | ||||||||
| BIG Shopping Centers (20) | (3.7 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||
| CPP | 5.3 | 5.2 | 3.2 | |||||||||
| Kimco Income Fund | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||||
| SEB Immobilien | 0.7 | - | 0.8 | |||||||||
| Other Institutional Programs (6) (10) (13) (21) | 19.6 | 5.5 | - | |||||||||
| RioCan (9) | 30.4 | 19.7 | 18.6 | |||||||||
| Intown | 4.0 | (1.9 | ) | (6.0 | ) | |||||||
| Latin America | 15.8 | 12.5 | 10.4 | |||||||||
| Other Joint Venture Programs (11) (12) (22) (23) (24) | 23.4 | 10.0 | 5.2 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 128.5 | $ | 64.0 | $ | 34.6 |
(1) This venture represents four separate joint ventures, with four separate accounts managed by Prudential Real Estate Investors (“PREI”), three of these ventures are collectively referred to as KimPru and the remaining venture is referred to as KimPru II.
(2) The Company manages these joint venture investments and, where applicable, earns acquisition fees, leasing commissions, property management fees, assets management fees and construction management fees.
(3) The Company’s share of this investment is subject to fluctuation and is dependent upon property cash flows.
(4) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company amended one of its Canadian preferred equity investment agreements to restructure the investment as a pari passu joint venture in which the Company holds a noncontrolling interest. As a result of this transaction, the Company continues to account for its investment in this joint venture under the equity method of accounting and includes this investment in Investments and advances to real estate joint ventures within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
(5) During the year ended December 31, 2012, a joint venture in which the Company holds a noncontrolling interest sold an operating property for a sales price of $62.0 million, which resulted in no gain or loss recognized.
(6) During the year ended December 31, 2012, a joint venture in which the Company held a noncontrolling interest sold an operating property to the Company for a sales price of $127.0 million. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $12.1 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control. In addition, the Company recognized promote income of $1.1 million in connection with this transaction.
(7) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold an operating property to a newly formed unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest for a sales price of $55.5 million.
(8) During the year ended December 31, 2012, a joint venture in which the Company holds a noncontrolling interest acquired an operating property in Alberta, Canada for a purchase price of $42.4 million. The Company’s capital contribution was $14.5 million.
(9) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized income of $7.5 million, before taxes of $1.5 million, from the sale of certain air rights at one of the properties in this portfolio.
(10) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company acquired four properties from joint ventures in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated these transactions pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized an aggregate gain of $14.5 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control.
(11) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company acquired a property from a joint venture in which the Company had a noncontrolling interest. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized an aggregate gain of $1.0 million from the fair value adjustment associated with its original ownership due to a change in control.
(12) During the year ended December 31, 2012, two joint ventures in which the Company holds noncontrolling interests sold two properties for an aggregate sales price of $118.0 million. The Company received distributions of $18.5 million and recognized an aggregate gain of $8.3 million.
(13) During the year ended December 31, 2012, a joint venture in which the Company holds a noncontrolling interest sold two encumbered operating properties to the Company for an aggregate sales price of $75.5 million. The Company recognized promote income of $2.6 million.
(14) KimPru recognized impairment charges of $6.5 million related to the sale of two properties; $53.6 million related to the potential foreclosure of two properties and $161.7 million related to the sale of 26 properties, during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company had previously taken other-than-temporary impairment charges on its investment in KimPru and had allocated these impairment charges to the underlying assets of the KimPru joint ventures including a portion to these operating properties. As such, the Company’s share of these impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $0.8 million, $6.0 million and $14.8 million, respectively.
(15) During 2011, a third party mortgage lender foreclosed on an operating property for which KimPru had previously taken an impairment charge during 2010. As a result of the foreclosure during 2011, KimPru recognized an aggregate gain on early extinguishment of debt of $29.6 million. The Company’s share of this gain was $4.4 million, before income taxes.
(16) KimPru II recognized impairment charges of $7.3 million and $25.6 million, during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The impairment charges recognized in 2011 related to the foreclosure of one operating property and the impairment charges recognized in 2010 related to the sale of four operating properties. The Company had previously taken other-than-temporary impairment charges on its investment in KimPru II and had allocated these impairment charges to the underlying assets of the KimPru II joint ventures including a portion to these operating properties. As such, the Company’s share of these impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
(17) KIR recognized impairment charges of $4.6 million related to the sale of one operating property and $6.7 million related to the sale of one operating property and one out-parcel during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s share of these impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $2.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
(18) During 2010, KIR recognized a gain on early extinguishment of debt of $5.8 million related to a property that was foreclosed on by a third party lender. The Company’s share of this gain was $2.6 million.
(19) The UBS Program recognized impairment charges of $13.0 million related to the sale of two properties and $9.7 million related to the sale of one property, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company’s share of these impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $2.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2011, the UBS Program recognized an impairment charge of $5.0 million relating to a property that was anticipated to be foreclosed on by the third party lender in 2012. The Company’s share of this impairment charge was $0.8 million. A deed in lieu of foreclosure was given to the third party lender in 2012.
(20) During the year ended December 31, 2012, BIG recognized an impairment charge of $9.0 million on a property that is expected to be foreclosed upon in 2013. The Company’s share of this impairment charge was $0.9 million.
(21) During the year ended December 31, 2012, two joint ventures in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest recognized aggregate impairment charges of $6.5 million related to the sale of four operating properties. The Company’s share of these impairment charges was $0.8 million.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
(22) During the year ended December 31, 2012, three joint ventures in which the Company has noncontrolling interests recognized aggregate impairment charges of $12.8 million related to the sale of one operating property, the pending sale of one property and the potential foreclosure of another property. The Company’s share of these impairment charges was $6.4 million.
(23) During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company sold its interest in a Canadian hotel portfolio to its partner, for Canadian Dollars (“CAD”) $2.5 million (USD $2.4 million). As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of USD $5.2 million, before income taxes.
(24) For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized impairment charges of $7.0 million, against the carrying value of its investments in various unconsolidated joint ventures. These impairment charges resulted from properties, within various unconsolidated joint ventures, being classified as held-for-sale.
The table below presents debt balances within the Company’s joint venture investments for which the Company held noncontrolling ownership interests at December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions):
| As of December 31, 2012 | As of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venture | Mortgages and Notes Payable | Average Interest Rate | Average Remaining Term (months)** | Mortgages and Notes Payable | Average Interest Rate | Average Remaining Term (months)** | ||||||||||||||||||
| KimPru and KimPru II | $ | 1,010.2 | 5.54 | % | 44.5 | $ | 1,185.2 | 5.59 | % | 52.6 | ||||||||||||||
| KIR | 914.6 | 5.22 | % | 78.6 | 911.5 | 5.89 | % | 75.6 | ||||||||||||||||
| UBS Programs | 691.9 | 5.40 | % | 39.1 | 718.9 | 5.66 | % | 47.4 | ||||||||||||||||
| BIG Shopping Centers | 443.8 | 5.52 | % | 45.5 | 444.5 | 5.52 | % | 57.4 | ||||||||||||||||
| CPP | 141.5 | 5.19 | % | 31.0 | 166.3 | 4.45 | % | 27.0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Kimco Income Fund | 161.4 | 5.45 | % | 20.7 | 164.7 | 5.45 | % | 32.7 | ||||||||||||||||
| SEB Immobilien | 243.8 | 5.11 | % | 55.3 | 243.7 | 5.34 | % | 61.9 | ||||||||||||||||
| RioCan | 923.2 | 5.16 | % | 41.2 | 925.0 | 5.66 | % | 43.3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Intown | 614.4 | 4.46 | % | 46.1 | 621.8 | 5.09 | % | 39.6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Institutional Programs | 310.5 | 5.24 | % | 39.0 | 514.4 | 4.90 | % | 45.4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Joint Venture Programs | 1,612.2 | 5.70 | % | 57.8 | 1,804.7 | 5.60 | % | 56.9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 7,067.5 | $ | 7,700.7 |
** Average remaining term includes extensions
Other Real Estate Joint Ventures -
During 2011, the Company exited its investment in a redevelopment joint venture property in Harlem, NY. As a result, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of approximately $3.1 million representing the Company’s entire investment balance.
Additionally, during 2011, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $2.0 million, before income tax benefit, against the carrying value of an investment in which the Company holds a 13.4% noncontrolling ownership interest. The Company determined the fair value of its investment based on the estimated sales price of the property in the joint venture.
KIR -
The Company holds a 45% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in KIR and has a master management agreement whereby the Company performs services for fees relating to the management, operation, supervision and maintenance of the joint venture properties.
The Company’s equity in income from KIR for the year ended December 31, 2012, exceeded 10% of the Company’s income from continuing operations before income taxes; as such the Company is providing summarized financial information for KIR as follows (in millions):
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Real estate, net | $ | 1,134.2 | $ | 1,177.6 | ||||
| Other assets | 87.7 | 76.4 | ||||||
| $ | 1,221.9 | $ | 1,254.0 | |||||
| Liabilities and Members’ Capital: | ||||||||
| Mortgages payable | $ | 914.6 | $ | 911.5 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 26.8 | 27.4 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | - | 10.7 | ||||||
| Members’ capital | 280.5 | 304.4 | ||||||
| $ | 1,221.9 | $ | 1,254.0 |
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property | $ | 197.3 | $ | 195.1 | $ | 193.9 | ||||||
| Operating expenses | (53.0 | ) | (54.3 | ) | (54.0 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (54.0 | ) | (60.2 | ) | (66.6 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (40.7 | ) | (38.2 | ) | (38.6 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment charges | (0.1 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||
| Other expense, net | (1.3 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (2.6 | ) | ||||||
| (149.1 | ) | (155.7 | ) | (162.3 | ) | |||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 48.2 | 39.4 | 31.6 | |||||||||
| Discontinued Operations: | ||||||||||||
| Income/(loss) from discontinued operations | 0.1 | (0.7 | ) | 8.3 | ||||||||
| Impairment on dispositions of properties | (0.1 | ) | (4.6 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||
| Gain on dispositions of properties | - | - | 5.6 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 48.2 | $ | 34.1 | $ | 39.2 |
RioCan Investments -
During October 2001, the Company formed three joint ventures (collectively, the "RioCan Ventures") with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust ("RioCan"), in which the Company has 50% noncontrolling interests, to acquire retail properties and development projects in Canada. The acquisition and development projects are to be sourced and managed by RioCan and are subject to review and approval by a joint oversight committee consisting of RioCan management and the Company’s management personnel. Capital contributions will only be required as suitable opportunities arise and are agreed to by the Company and RioCan.
The Company’s equity in income from the Riocan Ventures for the year ended December 31, 2012, exceeded 10% of the Company’s income from continuing operations, as such the Company is providing summarized financial information for the RioCan Ventures as follows (in millions):
| December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Real estate, net | $ | 1,189.9 | $ | 1,143.6 | ||||
| Other assets | 43.7 | 26.6 | ||||||
| $ | 1,233.6 | $ | 1,170.2 | |||||
| Liabilities and Members' Capital: | ||||||||
| Mortgages payable | $ | 923.2 | $ | 925.0 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 18.1 | 19.7 | ||||||
| Members' capital | 292.3 | 225.5 | ||||||
| $ | 1,233.6 | $ | 1,170.2 |
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Revenues from rental properties | $ | 213.3 | $ | 209.2 | $ | 197.1 | ||||||
| Operating expenses | (78.1 | ) | (73.0 | ) | (70.9 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (51.9 | ) | (57.5 | ) | (52.6 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (37.3 | ) | (36.8 | ) | (34.4 | ) | ||||||
| Other income/(expense), net | 14.7 | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||
| (152.6 | ) | (167.5 | ) | (158.2 | ) | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 60.7 | $ | 41.7 | $ | 38.9 |
Summarized financial information for the Company’s investment and advances in real estate joint ventures (excluding KIR and the RioCan Ventures, which is presented above) is as follows (in millions):
| December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Real estate, net | $ | 8,523.3 | $ | 9,158.5 | ||||
| Other assets | 507.7 | 609.3 | ||||||
| $ | 9,031.0 | $ | 9,767.8 | |||||
| Liabilities and Partners’/Members’ Capital: | ||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 148.0 | $ | 150.5 | ||||
| Mortgages payable | 5,056.5 | 5,604.3 | ||||||
| Construction loans | 25.1 | 109.4 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 188.5 | 216.2 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | 19.1 | 25.4 | ||||||
| Partners’/Members’ capital | 3,593.8 | 3,662.0 | ||||||
| $ | 9,031.0 | $ | 9,767.8 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property | $ | 1,074.5 | $ | 1,115.4 | $ | 1,028.6 | ||||||
| Operating expenses | (350.2 | ) | (390.5 | ) | (368.1 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (311.3 | ) | (332.7 | ) | (316.6 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (283.3 | ) | (325.1 | ) | (313.3 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment charges | (15.5 | ) | (20.9 | ) | (3.1 | ) | ||||||
| Other (expense)/income, net | (11.2 | ) | 22.9 | (18.4 | ) | |||||||
| (971.5 | ) | (1,046.3 | ) | (1,019.5 | ) | |||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 103.0 | 69.1 | 9.1 | |||||||||
| Discontinued Operations: | ||||||||||||
| Income/(loss) from discontinued operations | 0.3 | 16.6 | (12.4 | ) | ||||||||
| Impairment on dispositions of properties | (31.4 | ) | (68.4 | ) | (194.3 | ) | ||||||
| Gain on dispositions of properties | 94.5 | (0.1 | ) | 3.1 | ||||||||
| Net income/(loss) | $ | 166.4 | $ | 17.2 | $ | (194.5 | ) |
Other liabilities included in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets include accounts with certain real estate joint ventures totaling $21.3 million and $24.2 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company and its subsidiaries have varying equity interests in these real estate joint ventures, which may differ from their proportionate share of net income or loss recognized in accordance with GAAP.
The Company’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its unconsolidated joint ventures is primarily limited to its carrying value in these investments. Generally, such investments contain operating properties and the Company has determined these entities do not contain the characteristics of a VIE. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s carrying value in these investments is $1.4 billion.
- Other Real Estate Investments:
Preferred Equity Capital –
The Company previously provided capital to owners and developers of real estate properties through its Preferred Equity program. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s net investment under the Preferred Equity program was $287.8 million relating to 504 properties, including 397 net leased properties. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company earned $43.1 million from its preferred equity investments, including $17.6 million in profit participation earned from 21 capital transactions. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company earned $35.7 million from its preferred equity investments, including $13.7 million in profit participation earned from 13 capital transactions. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company earned $37.6 million from its preferred equity investments, including $9.7 million in profit participation earned from nine capital transactions.
During 2012, the Company amended one of its preferred equity agreements to restructure its investment, into a pari passu joint venture investment in which the Company holds a noncontrolling interest. The Company will continue to account for this investment under the equity method of accounting and from the date of the amendment will include this investment in Investments and advances in real estate joint ventures within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Included in the capital transactions described above for the year ended December 31, 2012, is the sale of three preferred equity investments in which the Company had a $0 investment and recognized promote income of $10.0 million. In connection with this transaction, the Company provided seller financing for $7.5 million, which bears interest at a rate of 7.0% and matures in December 2013. The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s real estate sales guidance and concluded that the criteria for sale recognition was met.
During 2011, the Company, in separate transactions, amended three preferred equity agreements to restructure its investments, which hold investments in seven retail properties, into three pari passu joint venture investments in which the Company holds noncontrolling interests. The Company will continue to account for these investments under the equity method of accounting and from the dates of the amendments will include these investments in Investments and advances in real estate joint ventures within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Footnote 8).
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2011, two properties within two of the Company’s preferred equity investments were in default of the their respective mortgages and received foreclosure notices from the respective mortgage lenders. As such, the Company recognized full impairment charges on both of the investments aggregating $2.2 million.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During 2010, the Company sold 50% of a preferred equity investment in a Canadian retail operating property for CAD $31.9 million (USD $31.0 million). In connection with this sale the Company (i) recognized profit participation of CAD $1.7 million (USD $1.6 million) and (ii) amended its preferred equity agreement to restructure the Company’s remaining investment as a pari passu joint venture investment. Additionally, during 2010, the Company amended its preferred equity agreement to restructure another Canadian investment that holds investments in 12 retail properties as a pari passu joint venture investment. The Company will continue to account for both of these investments under the equity method of accounting and includes these investments in Investments and advances in real estate joint ventures within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Footnote 8).
Also during 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $3.8 million against the carrying value of its preferred equity investment in an operating property located in Tucson, AZ based on its estimated sales price. During 2010, the Company acquired the remaining ownership interest in this operating property for a purchase price of $90.0 million, including the assumption of $81.0 million in non-recourse mortgage debt, which bears interest at a rate of 6.08% and is scheduled to mature in 2016. During August 2010, this property was fully disposed of.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $5.0 million against the carrying value of two of its preferred equity investments, based on estimated sales prices. During 2010, the Company sold one of these preferred equity investments for a sales price of $0.3 million.
The Company’s estimated fair values relating to the impairment assessments above were based upon sales prices, where applicable, or discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. Capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads utilized in these models were based upon rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties.
During 2007, the Company invested $81.7 million of preferred equity capital in an entity which was comprised of 403 net leased properties (“Net Leased Portfolio”) which consist of 30 master leased pools with each pool leased to individual corporate operators. Each master leased pool is accounted for as a direct financing lease. These properties consist of a diverse array of free-standing restaurants, fast food restaurants, convenience and auto parts stores. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining 397 properties were encumbered by third party loans aggregating $358.9 million with interest rates ranging from 5.08% to 10.47% with a weighted-average interest rate of 9.3% and maturities ranging from one to 10 years. The Company recognized $14.0 million, $12.7 million and $12.1 million in equity in income from this investment during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its preferred equity investments is primarily limited to its invested capital. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s invested capital in its preferred equity investments approximated $287.8 million and $316.0 million, respectively.
Summarized financial information relating to the Company’s preferred equity investments is as follows (in millions):
| December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Real estate, net | $ | 824.7 | $ | 1,058.1 | ||||
| Other assets | 719.1 | 760.5 | ||||||
| $ | 1,543.8 | $ | 1,818.6 | |||||
| Liabilities and Partners’/Members’ Capital: | ||||||||
| Notes and mortgages payable | $ | 1,116.9 | $ | 1,338.7 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 51.8 | 39.9 | ||||||
| Partners’/Members’ capital | 375.1 | 440.0 | ||||||
| $ | 1,543.8 | $ | 1,818.6 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property | $ | 195.0 | $ | 233.1 | $ | 278.4 | ||||||
| Operating expenses | (44.7 | ) | (57.0 | ) | (73.2 | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (72.0 | ) | (89.5 | ) | (104.0 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (33.7 | ) | (43.6 | ) | (52.3 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment charges (a) | (2.7 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Other expense, net | (8.3 | ) | (6.3 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 33.6 | 36.7 | 42.6 | |||||||||
| Discontinued Operations: | ||||||||||||
| Gain on disposition of properties | 17.5 | 6.2 | 13.7 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 51.1 | $ | 42.9 | $ | 56.3 |
(a) Represents an impairment charge against one master leased pool due to decline in fair market value.
Other –
During 2010, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $2.1 million against the carrying value of an investment that owns two operating properties located in Manchester, NH and Nashua, NH. The Company determined the fair value of its investment based on an estimated sales price of the operating properties. During 2011, these two properties were sold and as a result of an adjustment to the purchase price, the Company recognized an additional $0.5 million in impairment charges.
Investment in Retail Store Leases -
The Company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers. These premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements. Income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, was $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively. These amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, of $3.9 million, $5.1 million and $5.9 million, respectively, less related expenses of $3.0 million, $4.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The Company's future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases, assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises, for future years are as follows (in millions): 2013, $3.7 and $2.3; 2014, $2.9 and $1.7; 2015, $2.0 and $1.3; 2016, $1.6 and $1.0; 2017, $1.0 and $0.5, and thereafter, $0.4 and $0.04, respectively.
Leveraged Lease -
During June 2002, the Company acquired a 90% equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties. The properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016, with the lessee having certain renewal option rights. The Company’s cash equity investment was $4.0 million. This equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the FASB’s lease guidance.
As of December 31, 2012, 19 of these properties were sold, whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by $32.3 million and the remaining 11 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of $21.1 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease.
As an equity participant in the leveraged lease, the Company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt, which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease. Accordingly, this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following (in millions):
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remaining net rentals | $ | 24.0 | $ | 30.8 | ||||
| Estimated unguaranteed residual value | 30.3 | 30.3 | ||||||
| Non-recourse mortgage debt | (19.0 | ) | (25.1 | ) | ||||
| Unearned and deferred income | (27.6 | ) | (29.9 | ) | ||||
| Net investment in leveraged lease | $ | 7.7 | $ | 6.1 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
- Variable Interest Entities:
Consolidated Operating Properties
Included within the Company’s consolidated operating properties at December 31, 2012, are two consolidated entities that are VIEs, for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. These entities have been established to own and operate real estate property. The Company’s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership and management of the properties. The entities were deemed VIEs primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors is not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity's activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights. The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as a result of its controlling financial interest.
At December 31, 2012, total assets of these VIEs were $10.8 million and total liabilities were $0.1 million. The classification of these assets is primarily within real estate and the classifications of liabilities are primarily within accounts payable and accrued expenses.
The majority of the operations of these VIEs are funded with cash flows generated from the properties. The Company has not provided financial support to any of these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide, which consists primarily of funding any capital expenditures, including tenant improvements, which are deemed necessary to continue to operate the entity and any operating cash shortfalls that the entity may experience.
Consolidated Ground-Up Development Projects
Included within the Company’s ground-up development projects at December 31, 2012, are two entities that are VIEs, for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. These entities were established to develop real estate property to hold as long-term investments. The Company’s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership and management of the properties. The entities were deemed VIEs primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. The initial equity contributed to these entities was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period. The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as a result of its controlling financial interest.
At December 31, 2012, total assets of these ground-up development VIEs were $87.8 million and total liabilities were $0.1 million. The classification of these assets is primarily within real estate under development and the classifications of liabilities are primarily within accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Substantially all of the projected development costs to be funded for these ground-up development VIEs, aggregating $33.3 million, will be funded with capital contributions from the Company and by the outside partners, when contractually obligated. The Company has not provided financial support to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide.
Unconsolidated Ground-Up Development
Also included within the Company’s ground-up development projects at December 31, 2012, is an unconsolidated joint venture, which is a VIE for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. This joint venture is primarily established to develop real estate property for long-term investment and was deemed a VIE primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. The initial equity contributed to this entity was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period. The Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of this VIE based on the fact that the Company has shared control of this entity along with the entity’s partners and therefore does not have a controlling financial interest.
The Company’s investment in this VIE was $17.9 million as of December 31, 2012, which is included in Real estate under development in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with this VIE is estimated to be $36.3 million, which primarily represents the Company’s current investment and estimated future funding commitments of $18.4 million. The Company has not provided financial support to this VIE that it was not previously contractually required to provide. All future costs of development will be funded with capital contributions from the Company and the outside partner in accordance with their respective ownership percentages.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Unconsolidated Redevelopment Investment
Included in the Company’s joint venture investments at December 31, 2012, is one unconsolidated joint venture, which is a VIE for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. This joint venture was primarily established to develop real estate property for long-term investment and was deemed a VIE primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. The initial equity contributed to this entity was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period. The Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of this VIE based on the fact that the Company has shared control of this entity along with the entity’s partners and therefore does not have a controlling financial interest.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s investment in this VIE was a negative $12.1 million, due to the fact that the Company had a remaining capital commitment obligation, which is included in Other liabilities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with this VIE is estimated to be $12.1 million, which is the remaining capital commitment obligation. The Company has not provided financial support to this VIE that it was not previously contractually required to provide. All future costs of development will be funded with capital contributions from the Company and the outside partner in accordance with their respective ownership percentages.
- Mortgages and Other Financing Receivables:
The Company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the Company. For a complete listing of the Company’s mortgages and other financing receivables at December 31, 2012, see Financial Statement Schedule IV included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
The following table reconciles mortgage loans and other financing receivables from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1 | $ | 102,972 | $ | 108,493 | $ | 131,332 | ||||||
| Additions: | ||||||||||||
| New mortgage loans | 29,496 | 14,297 | 1,411 | |||||||||
| Additions under existing mortgage loans | 895 | - | 3,047 | |||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | 1,181 | - | 3,923 | |||||||||
| Amortization of loan discounts | 247 | 247 | 247 | |||||||||
| Deductions: | ||||||||||||
| Loan repayments | (60,740 | ) | (15,803 | ) | (24,860 | ) | ||||||
| Loan impairments | - | - | (700 | ) | ||||||||
| Charge off/foreign currency translation | (430 | ) | (863 | ) | (3,101 | ) | ||||||
| Collections of principal | (2,861 | ) | (3,345 | ) | (2,726 | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of loan costs | (56 | ) | (54 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||
| Balance at December 31 | $ | 70,704 | $ | 102,972 | $ | 108,493 |
The Company reviews payment status to identify performing versus non-performing loans. Interest income on performing loans is accrued as earned. A non-performing loan is placed on non-accrual status when it is probable that the borrower may be unable to meet interest payments as they become due. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status unless there is sufficient collateral to assure collectability of principal and interest. Upon the designation of non-accrual status, all unpaid accrued interest is reserved against through current income. Interest income on non-performing loans is generally recognized on a cash basis. The following table presents performing and non-performing loans as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| Number of Loans | Amount | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing Loans | 24 | $ | 50,802 | |||||
| Non-Performing Loans | 4 | 19,902 | ||||||
| Total | 28 | $ | 70,704 |
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had four loans aggregating $19.9 million which were in default for nonpayment of interest only or principal and interest. The Company has placed all of these loans on non-accrual status with respect to the recognition of interest income starting from each loan’s nonperformance date. Nonperformance dates for these loans range from 7 months to 7 years. The Company assessed each of these four loans and determined that the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral exceeded the respective carrying values as of December 31, 2012.
During 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $0.7 million, against the carrying value, including accrued interest of a mortgage receivable that was in default. This impairment charge reflects a decrease in the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. The remaining balance on this mortgage receivable as of December 31, 2010, was $1.4 million. This impairment charge is reflected in Impairments charges on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
- Marketable Securities:
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | $ | 14,205 | $ | 19,223 | $ | - | $ | 33,428 | ||||||||
| Held-to-maturity: | ||||||||||||||||
| Other debt securities | 3,113 | 284 | - | 3,397 | ||||||||||||
| Total marketable securities | $ | 17,318 | $ | 19,507 | $ | - | $ | 36,825 |
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | $ | 14,253 | $ | 16,210 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 30,462 | |||||||
| Held-to-maturity: | ||||||||||||||||
| Other debt securities | 3,078 | 378 | (10 | ) | 3,446 | |||||||||||
| Total marketable securities | $ | 17,331 | $ | 16,588 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 33,908 |
During February 2008, the Company acquired an aggregate $190 million Australian denominated (“AUD”) ( USD $170.1 million) convertible notes (the “Valad notes”) issued by a subsidiary of Valad Property Group (“Valad”), a publicly traded Australian company listed on the Australian stock exchange that is a diversified, property fund manager, investor, developer and property investment banker with property investments in Australia, Europe and Asia. The notes were guaranteed by Valad and bore interest at 9.5% payable semi-annually in arrears. The notes were repayable after five years with an option for Valad to extend up to 18 months, subject to certain interest rate and conversion price resets. The notes were convertible any time into publicly traded Valad securities at a price of AUD $26.60. During 2010, the Company acquired an additional AUD $10 million (USD $9.3 million) of Valad notes. Additionally, during 2010, Valad made a principal payment of AUD $8.0 million (USD $7.9 million).
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
During 2011, the Company received an additional principal payment of $7.0 million AUD ( USD $6.9 million) and the Company sold its remaining Valad notes for a sales price of AUD $165.0 million ( USD $169.1 million), plus unpaid accrued interest. In connection with the anticipation of this sale, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract to sell AUD $165.0 million and buy USD $169.1 million in efforts to mitigate the foreign exchange risk resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates. The Company designated the AUD-USD foreign exchange risk as the risk being hedged.
The Company recorded an adjustment to the carrying value of the Valad notes, including amounts allocated to the conversion option described below, of USD $0.9 million based upon the agreed sales price. This adjustment is recorded in Other expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. At the completion of the sale, the Company received AUD $170.2 million (USD $174.7 million) representing the principal and unpaid interest and settled its foreign currency forward contract. Upon settling the foreign currency forward contract, the Company recorded a reclass of $10.0 million from Accumulated other comprehensive income to Other expense, net, which was fully offset by a foreign currency gain on sale of the Valad notes. As a result there was no net gain or loss recognized.
In accordance with the FASB’s Derivative and Hedging guidance, the Company bifurcated the conversion option within the Valad notes and separately accounted for this option as an embedded derivative. The original host instrument was classified as an available-for-sale security at fair value and was included in Marketable securities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in the fair value recorded through Stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2010, the Company had an unrealized gain, including foreign currency adjustments, associated with these notes of $6.0 million. The embedded derivative was recorded at fair value and was included in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair value recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The value attributed to the embedded convertible option was AUD $10.0 million, ( USD $10.2 million). As a result of the fair value remeasurement of this derivative instrument during 2010 there was an AUD $0.2 million (USD $0.2 million) unrealized decrease in the fair value of the convertible option. This unrealized increase/decrease is included in Other expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
During 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.6 million, and $4.6 million, respectively, before income tax benefits of $0.4 million, and $0 million, respectively, due to the decline in value of certain marketable securities and other investments that were deemed to be other-than-temporary. These impairments were a result of the deterioration of the equity markets for these securities during their respective years and the uncertainty of their future recoverability. Market value for the equity securities represents the closing price of each security as it appears on their respective stock exchange at the end of the period.
During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company received $0.1 million, $22.7 million and $23.2 million in proceeds from the sale/redemption of certain marketable securities, respectively. In connection with these transactions, during 2012. 2011 and 2010 the Company recognized (i) gross realizable gains of $0.0 million, $0.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively, (ii) foreign currency gains of $0.0 million, $1.6 million and $0.0 million, respectively, and (iii) gross realizable losses of $0.0 million, $0.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2012, the contractual maturities of Other debt securities classified as held-to-maturity are as follows: after one year through five years, $0.1 million; and after five years through 10 years, $3.0 million. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as issuers may have the right to prepay debt obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
- Notes Payable:
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Company’s Notes Payable consisted of the following (dollars in millions):
| Balance at 12/31/12 | Interest Rate Range (Low) | Interest Rate Range (High) | Maturity Date Range (Low) | Maturity Date Range (High) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Unsecured Notes (c) | $ | 965.9 | 4.70 | % | 6.88 | % | Jan-2013 | Oct-2019 | |||||||
| Medium Term Notes | 1,144.6 | 4.30 | % | 5.78 | % | Oct-2013 | Feb-2018 | ||||||||
| Unsecured Term Loan | 400.0 | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | Apr-2014 | Apr-2014 | ||||||||
| Canadian Notes Payable | 352.4 | 5.18 | % | 5.99 | % | Aug-2013 | Apr-2018 | ||||||||
| Credit Facility (a) | 249.9 | 1.10 | % | 1.26 | % | Oct-2015 | Oct-2015 | ||||||||
| Mexican Term Loan | 76.9 | 8.58 | % | 8.58 | % | Mar-2013 | Mar-2013 | ||||||||
| Other Notes Payable (b) | 2.4 | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | Jan-2013 | Sept-2013 | ||||||||
| $ | 3,192.1 |
| Balance at 12/31/11 | Interest Rate Range (Low) | Interest Rate Range (High) | Maturity Date Range (Low) | Maturity Date Range (High) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Unsecured Notes | $ | 1,164.8 | 4.70 | % | 6.88 | % | Nov-2012 | Oct-2019 | |||||||
| Medium Term Notes | 1,161.6 | 4.30 | % | 5.98 | % | July-2012 | Feb-2018 | ||||||||
| Canadian Notes Payable | 342.6 | 5.18 | % | 5.99 | % | Aug-2013 | Apr-2018 | ||||||||
| Credit Facilities (a) | 238.9 | 1.35 | % | 1.35 | % | Oct-2015 | Oct-2015 | ||||||||
| Mexican Term Loan | 71.5 | 8.58 | % | 8.58 | % | Mar-2013 | Mar-2013 | ||||||||
| Other Notes Payable (b) | 4.5 | 3.80 | % | 3.80 | % | Sept-2012 | Sept-2012 | ||||||||
| $ | 2,983.9 |
(a) Interest rate is equal to LIBOR plus 1.05%
(b) Interest rate is equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%
(c) During January 2013, the Company repaid the $100.0 million outstanding balance on its 6.125% senior unsecured note, which matured in January 2013.
Senior Unsecured Notes/Medium Term Notes –
During September 2009, the Company entered into a fifth supplemental indenture, under the indenture governing its Medium Term Notes ("MTN") and Senior Notes, which included the financial covenants for future offerings under the indenture that were removed by the fourth supplemental indenture.
In accordance with the terms of the Indenture, as amended, pursuant to which the Company's Senior Unsecured Notes, except for $300.0 million issued during April 2007 under the fourth supplemental indenture, have been issued, the Company is subject to maintaining (a) certain maximum leverage ratios on both unsecured senior corporate and secured debt, minimum debt service coverage ratios and minimum equity levels, (b) certain debt service ratios, (c) certain asset to debt ratios and (d) restricted from paying dividends in amounts that exceed by more than $26.0 million the funds from operations, as defined, generated through the end of the calendar quarter most recently completed prior to the declaration of such dividend; however, this dividend limitation does not apply to any distributions necessary to maintain the Company's qualification as a REIT providing the Company is in compliance with its total leverage limitations.
The Company had a MTN program pursuant to which it offered for sale its senior unsecured debt for any general corporate purposes, including (i) funding specific liquidity requirements in its business, including property acquisitions, development and redevelopment costs and (ii) managing the Company's debt maturities.
Interest on these fixed-rate senior unsecured notes is payable semi-annually in arrears. Proceeds from these issuances were primarily used for the acquisition of neighborhood and community shopping centers, the expansion and improvement of properties in the Company’s portfolio and the repayment of certain debt obligations of the Company.
During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company repaid the following notes (dollars in millions):
| Type | Date Issued | Amount Repaid | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | Date Paid | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | July-02 | $ | 17.0 | 5.98 | % | July-12 | July-12 | |||||||
| Senior Note | Nov-02 | $ | 198.9 | 6.00 | % | Nov-12 | Nov-12 | |||||||
| MTN | Aug-04 | $ | 88.0 | 4.82 | % | Aug-11 | Aug-11 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Credit Facility –
The Company has a $1.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of banks, which is scheduled to expire in October 2015 and has a one-year extension option. This credit facility, provides funds to finance general corporate purposes, including (i) property acquisitions, (ii) investments in the Company’s institutional management programs, (iii) development and redevelopment costs and (iv) any short-term working capital requirements. Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility accrues at LIBOR plus 1.05% and fluctuates in accordance with changes in the Company’s senior debt ratings and has a facility fee of 0.20% per annum. As part of this Credit Facility, the Company has a competitive bid option whereby the Company could auction up to $875.0 million of its requested borrowings to the bank group. This competitive bid option provides the Company the opportunity to obtain pricing below the currently stated spread. In addition, as part of the Credit Facility, the Company has a $500.0 million sub-limit which provides it the opportunity to borrow in alternative currencies such as Canadian Dollars, British Pounds Sterling, Japanese Yen or Euros. Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company, among other things, is subject to covenants requiring the maintenance of (i) maximum leverage ratios on both unsecured and secured debt and (ii) minimum interest and fixed coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2012, the Credit Facility had a balance of $249.9 million outstanding and $27.3 million appropriated for letters of credit.
U.S. Term Loan -
During 2012, the Company obtained a $400.0 million unsecured term loan with a consortium of banks, which accrues interest at LIBOR plus 105 basis points. The term loan is scheduled to mature in April 2014, with three additional one-year options to extend the maturity date, at the Company’s discretion, to April 17, 2017. Proceeds from this term loan were used for general corporate purposes including the repayment of maturing debt amounts. Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company, among other things is subject to covenants requiring the maintenance of (i) maximum indebtedness ratios and (ii) minimum interest and fixed charge coverage ratios.
Mexican Term Loan -
During March 2008, the Company obtained a Mexican peso (“MXN”) 1.0 billion term loan, which bears interest at a rate of 8.58%, subject to change in accordance with the Company’s senior debt ratings, and is scheduled to mature in March 2013. The Company utilized proceeds from this term loan to fully repay the outstanding balance of a MXN 500.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which was terminated by the Company. Remaining proceeds from this term loan were used for funding MXN denominated investments. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance on this term loan was MXN 1.0 billion (USD $76.9 million). The Mexican term loan covenants are similar to the Credit Facility covenants described above. During December 2012, the lender agreed to extend this term loan for an additional five years at an interest rate of TIIE (Equilibrium Interbank Interest Rate) plus 1.35%, which will be effective subsequent to the scheduled maturity in March 2013. The Company has the option to swap this rate to a fixed rate at any time during the term of the loan.
The weighted-average interest rate for all unsecured notes payable is 4.72% as of December 31, 2012. The scheduled maturities of all unsecured notes payable as of December 31, 2012, were as follows (in millions): 2013, $555.4; 2014, $694.8; 2015, $600.0; 2016, $300.0; 2017, $290.9 and thereafter, $751.0.
- Mortgages Payable:
During 2012, the Company (i) assumed $185.3 million of individual non-recourse mortgage debt relating to the acquisition of seven operating properties, including an increase of $6.1 million associated with fair value debt adjustments, (ii) paid off $284.8 million of mortgage debt that encumbered 19 properties and (iii) assigned five mortgages aggregating $17.1 million in connection with property dispositions.
During 2011, the Company assumed $124.8 million of individual non-recourse mortgage debt relating to the acquisition of 12 operating properties, including an increase of $6.9 million associated with fair value debt adjustments and paid off $62.5 million of mortgage debt that encumbered 10 operating properties.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Mortgages payable, collateralized by certain shopping center properties and related tenants' leases, are generally due in monthly installments of principal and/or interest, which mature at various dates through 2035. Interest rates range from LIBOR (0.17% as of December 31, 2012) to 9.75% (weighted-average interest rate of 6.18% as of December 31, 2012). The scheduled principal payments (excluding any extension options available to the Company) of all mortgages payable, excluding unamortized fair value debt adjustments of $10.3 million, as of December 31, 2012, were as follows (in millions): 2013, $104.3; 2014, $206.1; 2015, $131.3; 2016, $253.1; 2017, $178.0 and thereafter, $120.1.
- Noncontrolling Interests:
Noncontrolling interests represent the portion of equity that the Company does not own in those entities it consolidates as a result of having a controlling interest or determined that the Company was the primary beneficiary of a VIE in accordance with the provisions of the FASB’s Consolidation guidance.
The Company accounts and reports for noncontrolling interests in accordance with the Consolidation guidance and the Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance issued by the FASB. The Company identifies its noncontrolling interests separately within the equity section on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Units that are determined to be mandatorily redeemable are classified as Redeemable noncontrolling interests and presented in the mezzanine section between Total liabilities and Stockholder’s equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the Company and to the noncontrolling interests are presented separately on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company owns seven shopping center properties located throughout Puerto Rico. These properties were acquired partially through the issuance of $158.6 million of non-convertible units and $45.8 million of convertible units. Noncontrolling interests related to these acquisitions totaled $233.0 million of units, including premiums of $13.5 million and a fair market value adjustment of $15.1 million (collectively, the "Units"). The Company is restricted from disposing of these assets, other than through a tax free transaction until November 2015. The Units and related annual cash distribution rates consisted of the following:
| Type | Number of Units Issued | Par Value Per Unit | Return Per Annum | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred A Units (1) | 81,800,000 | $ | 1.00 | 7.0% | |||||||||
| Class A Preferred Units (1) | 2,000 | $ | 10,000 | LIBOR | plus | 2.0% | |||||||
| Class B-1 Preferred Units (2) | 2,627 | $ | 10,000 | 7.0% | |||||||||
| Class B-2 Preferred Units (1) | 5,673 | $ | 10,000 | 7.0% | |||||||||
| Class C DownReit Units (2) | 640,001 | $ | 30.52 | Equal to the Company’s common stock dividend |
(1) These units are redeemable for cash by the holder or callable by the Company and are included in Redeemable noncontrolling interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) These units are redeemable for cash by the holder or at the Company’s option, shares of the Company’s common stock, based upon the conversion calculation as defined in the agreement. These units are included in Noncontrolling interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following Units have been redeemed for cash as of December 31, 2012:
| Type | Units Redeemed | Par Value Redeemed (in millions) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred A Units | 2,200,000 | $ | 2.2 | |||||
| Class A Preferred Units | 2,000 | $ | 20.0 | |||||
| Class B-1 Preferred Units | 2,438 | $ | 24.4 | |||||
| Class B-2 Preferred Units | 5,576 | $ | 55.8 | |||||
| Class C DownReit Units | 61,804 | $ | 1.9 |
Noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $110.8 million and $110.5 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
The Company owns two shopping center properties located in Bay Shore, NY and Centereach, NY. Included in Noncontrolling interests was $41.6 million, including a discount of $0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $3.8 million, in redeemable units, issued by the Company in connection with these transactions. The properties were acquired through the issuance of $24.2 million of these units, which are redeemable at the option of the holder; $14.0 million of fixed rate units and the assumption of $23.4 million of non-recourse debt. These units and related annual cash distribution rates consist of the following:
| Type | Number of Units Issued | Par Value Per Unit | Return Per Annum | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class A Units (1) | 13,963 | $ | 1,000 | 5.0% | ||||||||
| Class B Units (2) | 647,758 | $ | 37.24 | Equal to the Company’s common stock dividend |
(1) These units are redeemable for cash by the holder or callable by the Company any time after April 3, 2016 and are included in Redeemable noncontrolling interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) These units are redeemable for cash by the holder or at the Company’s option, shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 and are callable by the Company any time after April 3, 2026. These units are included in Noncontrolling interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2012, all 13,963 Class A Units were redeemed by the holder in cash. Additionally, during 2007, 30,000 units, or $1.1 million par value, of the Class B Units were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the Company. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $26.4 million and $40.4 million, respectively.
Noncontrolling interests also includes 138,015 convertible units issued during 2006, by the Company, which were valued at $5.3 million, including a fair market value adjustment of $0.3 million, related to an interest acquired in an office building located in Albany, NY. These units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the Company for the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 1:1. The holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the Company’s common stock. The Company is restricted from disposing of these assets, other than through a tax free transaction, until January 2017.
The following table presents the change in the redemption value of the Redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, | $ | 95,074 | $ | 95,060 | ||||
| Unit redemptions | (13,998 | ) | - | |||||
| Fair market value amortization | - | 14 | ||||||
| Balance at December 31, | $ | 81,076 | $ | 95,074 |
- Fair Value Disclosure of Financial Instruments:
All financial instruments of the Company are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at amounts which, in management’s estimation based upon an interpretation of available market information and valuation methodologies, reasonably approximate their fair values, except those listed below, for which fair values are reflected. The valuation method used to estimate fair value for fixed-rate and variable-rate debt and noncontrolling interests relating to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests associated with finite-lived subsidiaries of the Company is based on discounted cash flow analyses, with assumptions that include credit spreads, loan amounts and debt maturities. The fair values for marketable securities are based on published or securities dealers’ estimated market values. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition.
As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB’s Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
The following are financial instruments for which the Company’s estimate of fair value differs from the carrying amounts (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
| Carrying Amounts | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Amounts | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Marketable Securities (1) | $ | 36,541 | $ | 36,825 | $ | 33,540 | $ | 33,908 | ||||||||
| Notes Payable (2) | $ | 3,192,127 | $ | 3,408,632 | $ | 2,983,886 | $ | 3,136,728 | ||||||||
| Mortgages Payable (3) | $ | 1,003,190 | $ | 1,068,616 | $ | 1,085,371 | $ | 1,166,116 | ||||||||
| Construction Loans Payable (3) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 45,128 | $ | 49,345 | ||||||||
| Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests (termination dates ranging from 2019 – 2027) (4) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,654 | $ | 5,044 |
(1) As of December 31, 2012, $33.4 million of these assets’ estimated fair value were classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and the remaining $3.4 million were classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
(2) The Company determined that its valuation of these Notes payable was classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(3) The Company determined that its valuation of these liabilities was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
(4) The Company sold its investment in the consolidated joint ventures that included mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests during 2012.
The Company has certain financial instruments that must be measured under the FASB’s Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance, including: available for sale securities, convertible notes and derivatives. The Company currently does not have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Available for sale securities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company from time to time has used interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. Based on these inputs, the Company has determined that interest rate swap valuations are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company did not have any interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2012.
To comply with the FASB’s Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. The credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2012, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives.
The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | $ | 33,428 | $ | 33,428 | $ | - | $ | - |
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | $ | 30,462 | $ | 30,462 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 222 | $ | - | $ | 222 | $ | - |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate | $ | 52,505 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 52,505 |
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate | $ | 5,289 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5,289 | ||||||||
| Other investments | $ | 9,041 | $ | - | $ | 9,041 | $ | - |
The Company’s estimated fair values for the year ended December 31, 2012, relating to the real estate assets measured on a non-recurring basis, which were non-retail assets, were based upon estimated sales prices from third party offers and comparable sales values ranging from $1.1 million to $42.0 million. The Company does not have access to certain unobservable inputs used by these third parties to determine these estimated fair values (see footnote 6 for additional discussion related to these assets). Certain assets in 2011 were valued through the usage of discounted cash flow models that included all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. These cash flows were comprised of unobservable inputs which included contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models were based upon observable rates that the Company believed to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties. Based on these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation in these investments was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
- Preferred Stock, Common Stock and Convertible Unit Transactions –
Preferred Stock –
The Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock is detailed below (in thousands, except share information and par values):
| As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series of Preferred Stock | Shares Authorized | Shares Issued and Outstanding | Liquidation Preference | Dividend Rate | Annual Dividend per Depositary Share | Par Value | ||||||||||||||||||
| Series H | 70,000 | 70,000 | $ | 175,000 | 6.90 | % | $ | 1.72500 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| Series I | 18,400 | 16,000 | 400,000 | 6.00 | % | $ | 1.50000 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| Series J | 9,000 | 9,000 | 225,000 | 5.50 | % | $ | 1.37500 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| Series K | 8,050 | 7,000 | 175,000 | 5.625 | % | $ | 1.40625 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| 105,450 | 102,000 | $ | 975,000 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series of Preferred Stock | Shares Authorized | Shares Issued and Outstanding | Liquidation Preference | Dividend Rate | Annual Dividend per Depositary Share | Par Value | ||||||||||||||||||
| Series F | 700,000 | 700,000 | $ | 175,000 | 6.65 | % | $ | 1.66250 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| Series G | 184,000 | 184,000 | 460,000 | 7.75 | % | $ | 1.93750 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| Series H | 70,000 | 70,000 | 175,000 | 6.90 | % | $ | 1.72500 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| 954,000 | 954,000 | $ | 810,000 |
The following Preferred Stock series were issued during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2010:
| Series of Preferred Stock | Date Issued | Depositary Shares Issued | Fractional Interest per Share | Net Proceeds, After Expenses (in millions) | Offering/ Redemption Price | Optional Redemption Date | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series H(1) | 8/30/2010 | 7,000,000 | 1/100 | $ | 169.2 | $ | 25.00 | 8/30/2015 | ||||||
| Series I (2) | 3/20/2012 | 16,000,000 | 1/1000 | $ | 387.2 | $ | 25.00 | 3/20/2017 | ||||||
| Series J (3) | 7/25/2012 | 9,000,000 | 1/1000 | $ | 217.8 | $ | 25.00 | 7/25/2017 | ||||||
| Series K (4) | 12/7/2012 | 7,000,000 | 1/1000 | $ | 169.1 | $ | 25.00 | 12/7/2017 |
(1) The net proceeds received from this offering were used to repay $150.0 million in mortgages payable and for general corporate purposes.
(2) The net proceeds received from this offering were used for general corporate purposes, including the reduction of borrowings outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility and the redemption of shares of the Company’s preferred stock.
(3) The net proceeds received from this offering were used for the redemption of all the outstanding depositary shares representing the Company’s Class F preferred stock, which redemption occurred on August 15, 2012, as discussed below, with the remaining proceeds used towards the redemption of outstanding depositary shares representing the Company’s Class G preferred stock, which redemption occurred on October 10, 2012, as discussed below, and general corporate purposes.
(4) The net proceeds received from this offering were used for general corporate purposes, including funding towards the repayment of maturing Senior Unsecured Notes.
The following Preferred Stock series were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2012:
| Series of Preferred Stock | Date Issued | Depositary Shares Issued | Redemption Amount (in millions) | Offering/ Redemption Price | Optional Redemption Date | Actual Redemption Date | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series F (1) | 6/5/2003 | 7,000,000 | $ | 175.0 | $ | 25.00 | 6/5/2008 | 8/15/2012 | ||||||
| Series G (2) | 10/10/2007 | 18,400,000 | $ | 460.0 | $ | 25.00 | 10/10/2012 | 10/10/2012 |
(1) In connection with this redemption the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $6.2 million resulting from the difference between the redemption amount and the carrying amount of the Class F Preferred Stock on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with the FASB’s guidance on Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The $6.2 million was subtracted from net income to arrive at net income available to common shareholders and is used in the calculation of earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2012.
(2) In connection with this redemption the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $15.5 million resulting from the difference between the redemption amount and the carrying amount of the Class G Preferred Stock on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with the FASB’s guidance on Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The $15.5 million was subtracted from net income to arrive at net income available to common shareholders and is used in the calculation of earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Company’s Preferred Stock Depositary Shares for all series are not convertible or exchangeable for any other property or securities of the Company.
Voting Rights - The Class K Preferred Stock, Class J Preferred Stock, Class I Preferred Stock and Class H Preferred Stock rank pari passu as to voting rights, priority for receiving dividends and liquidation preference as set forth below.
As to any matter on which the Class H Preferred Stock may vote, including any actions by written consent, each share of the Class H Preferred Stock shall be entitled to 100 votes, each of which 100 votes may be directed separately by the holder thereof. With respect to each share of Class H Preferred Stock, the holder thereof may designate up to 100 proxies, with each such proxy having the right to vote a whole number of votes (totaling 100 votes per share of Class H Preferred Stock). As a result, each Class H Depositary Share is entitled to one vote.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
As to any matter on which the Class I, J, or K Preferred Stock may vote, including any actions by written consent, each share of the Class I, J or K Preferred Stock shall be entitled to 1,000 votes, each of which 1,000 votes may be directed separately by the holder thereof. With respect to each share of Class I, J or K Preferred Stock, the holder thereof may designate up to 1,000 proxies, with each such proxy having the right to vote a whole number of votes (totaling 1,000 votes per share of Class I, J or K Preferred Stock). As a result, each Class I, J or K Depositary Share is entitled to one vote.
Liquidation Rights –
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, preferred stock holders are entitled to be paid, out of the assets of the Company legally available for distribution to its stockholders, a liquidation preference of $2,500.00 Class H Preferred Stock per share, $25,000.00 Class I Preferred Stock per share, $25,000.00 Class J Preferred Stock per share and $25,000.00 Class K Preferred Stock per share ($25.00 per each Class H, Class I, Class J and Class K Depositary Share), plus an amount equal to any accrued and unpaid dividends to the date of payment, before any distribution of assets is made to holders of the Company’s common stock or any other capital stock that ranks junior to the preferred stock as to liquidation rights.
Common Stock –
The Company, from time to time, repurchases shares of its common stock in amounts that offset new issuances of common shares in connection with the exercise of stock options or the issuance of restricted stock awards. These share repurchases may occur in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise subject to prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,635,823 shares of the Company’s common stock for $30.9 million, of which $22.6 million was provided to the Company from stock options exercised.
Convertible Units –
The Company has varies types of convertible units that were issued in connection with the purchase of operating properties (see footnote 15). The amount of consideration that would be paid to unaffiliated holders of units issued from the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries which are not mandatorily redeemable, as if the termination of these consolidated subsidiaries occurred on December 31, 2012, is $28.7 million. The Company has the option to settle such redemption in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. If the Company exercised its right to settle in Common Stock, the unit holders would receive 1.5 million shares of Common Stock.
- Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing/Financing Activities:
The following schedule summarizes the non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition of real estate interests by assumption of mortgage debt | $ | 179,198 | $ | 117,912 | $ | 670 | ||||||
| Disposition of real estate interest by assignment of debt | $ | 17,083 | $ | - | $ | 81,000 | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock | $ | 18,115 | $ | 4,940 | $ | 5,070 | ||||||
| Surrender of common stock | $ | (2,073 | ) | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (840 | ) | |||
| Disposition of real estate through the issuance of loan receivables | $ | 13,475 | $ | 14,297 | $ | 975 | ||||||
| Investment in real estate joint venture by contribution of properties and assignment of debt | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 149,034 | ||||||
| Declaration of dividends paid in succeeding period | $ | 96,518 | $ | 92,159 | $ | 89,037 | ||||||
| Consolidation of Joint Ventures: | ||||||||||||
| Increase in real estate and other assets | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 174,327 | ||||||
| Increase in mortgage payable | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 144,803 |
- Transactions with Related Parties:
The Company provides management services for shopping centers owned principally by affiliated entities and various real estate joint ventures in which certain stockholders of the Company have economic interests. Such services are performed pursuant to management agreements which provide for fees based upon a percentage of gross revenues from the properties and other direct costs incurred in connection with management of the centers. Reference is made to Footnotes 4, 5, 8 and 20 for additional information regarding transactions with related parties.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Ripco Real Estate Corp. (“Ripco”) business activities include serving as a leasing agent and representative for national and regional retailers including Target, Best Buy, Kohls and many others, providing real estate brokerage services and principal real estate investing. Mr. Todd Cooper, an officer and 50% shareholder of Ripco, is a son of Mr. Milton Cooper, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid brokerage commissions of $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, to Ripco for services rendered primarily as leasing agent for various national tenants in shopping center properties owned by the Company. The Company believes that the brokerage commissions paid were at or below the customary rates for such leasing services.
Additionally, the Company held joint venture investments with Ripco. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had two operating properties and one land parcel, through joint ventures, in which the Company and Ripco each held 50% noncontrolling interests. The Company accounts for its investment in these joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. During 2011, the joint ventures sold one land parcel and one operating property to third parties, in separate transactions, which were encumbered by loans aggregating $14.2 million. As a result of these transactions the loans were fully repaid and the Company was relieved of the corresponding debt guarantees on these two loans. During 2012, the Company acquired the remaining 50% noncontrolling interest held by Ripco in a joint venture investment. As a result of this transaction, the Company now owns a 100% controlling interest and consolidates this investment.
As of December 31, 2012, the remaining joint venture has a $2.8 million loan payable which is scheduled to mature in 2013 and bears interest at rate of LIBOR plus 1.05%. This loan is jointly and severally guaranteed by the Company and the joint venture partner.
- Commitments and Contingencies:
Operations -
The Company and its subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the operation of shopping centers that are either owned or held under long-term leases that expire at various dates through 2095. The Company and its subsidiaries, in turn, lease premises in these centers to tenants pursuant to lease agreements which provide for terms ranging generally from 5 to 25 years and for annual minimum rentals plus incremental rents based on operating expense levels and tenants' sales volumes. Annual minimum rentals plus incremental rents based on operating expense levels comprised 97% of total revenues from rental property for each of the three years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
The future minimum revenues from rental property under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant leases, assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises, for future years are as follows (in millions): 2013, $676.0; 2014, $614.0; 2015, $545.4; 2016, $465.4; 2017, $380.3 and thereafter; $1,815.1.
Base rental revenues from rental property are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. The difference between the amount of rental income contracted through leases and rental income recognized on a straight-line basis for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is $9.5 million, $9.8 million and $12.0 million, respectively.
Minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable operating leases pertaining to the Company’s shopping center portfolio for future years are as follows (in millions): 2013, $12.6; 2014, $12.2; 2015, $11.1; 2016, $10.3; 2017, $9.9 and thereafter, $172.6.
Captive Insurance -
In October 2007, the Company formed a wholly-owned captive insurance company, Kimco Insurance Company, Inc., ("KIC"), which provides general liability insurance coverage for all losses below the deductible under our third-party policy. The Company entered into the Insurance Captive as part of its overall risk management program and to stabilize its insurance costs, manage exposure and recoup expenses through the functions of the captive program. The Company capitalized KIC in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. KIC established annual premiums based on projections derived from the past loss experience of the Company’s properties. KIC has engaged an independent third party to perform an actuarial estimate of future projected claims, related deductibles and projected expenses necessary to fund associated risk management programs. Premiums paid to KIC may be adjusted based on this estimate, like premiums paid to third-party insurance companies, premiums paid to KIC may be reimbursed by tenants pursuant to specific lease terms.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Guarantees –
On a select basis, the Company provides guarantees on interest bearing debt held within real estate joint ventures in which the Company has noncontrolling ownership interests. The Company is often provided with a back-stop guarantee from its partners. The Company had the following outstanding guarantees as of December 31, 2012 (amounts in millions):
| Name of Joint Venture | Amount of Guarantee | Interest rate | Maturity, with extensions | Terms | Type of debt | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InTown Suites Management, Inc. (1) | $ | 145.2 | LIBOR | plus | 1.15% | 2015 | 25% partner back-stop | Unsecured credit facility | |||||
| Hillsborough | $ | 2.8 | LIBOR | plus | 1.05% | 2013 | Jointly and severally with partner | Promissory note | |||||
| Victoriaville | $ | 5.1 | 3.92% | 2020 | Jointly and severally with partner | Promissory note |
(1) During October 2012, a purchase and sale agreement was executed to sell the InTown Suites company and related real estate assets for a gross sales price of $735 million, including $617 million of existing debt. The sale is contingent upon satisfactorily completing a due diligence process and other closing conditions, including lender approvals. The Company expects to complete this transaction in the first half of 2013. If the transaction is completed, the Company has agreed to maintain $145.2 million in preexisting guarantees of outstanding debt to be assumed by the buyer.
The Company evaluated these guarantees in connection with the provisions of the FASB’s Guarantees guidance and determined that the impact did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Letters of Credit -
The Company has issued letters of credit in connection with the completion and repayment guarantees for loans encumbering certain of the Company’s redevelopment projects and guaranty of payment related to the Company’s insurance program. At December 31, 2012, these letters of credit aggregated $33.6 million.
Other -
In connection with the construction of its development and redevelopment projects and related infrastructure, certain public agencies require posting of performance and surety bonds to guarantee that the Company’s obligations are satisfied. These bonds expire upon the completion of the improvements and infrastructure. As of December 31, 2012, there were $20.7 million in performance and surety bonds outstanding.
On January 28, 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the Enforcement Division of the SEC in connection with an investigation, In the Matter of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (FW-3678), that the SEC Staff is currently conducting with respect to possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Company is responding to the subpoena and intends to cooperate fully with the SEC in this matter. The Company has also been notified that the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is conducting a parallel investigation, and the Company expects that it will cooperate with the DOJ investigation. At this point, we are unable to predict the duration, scope or result of the SEC or DOJ investigation.
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company as of December 31, 2012.
- Incentive Plans:
The Company maintains two equity participation plans, the Second Amended and Restated 1998 Equity Participation Plan (the “Prior Plan”) and the 2010 Equity Participation Plan (the “2010 Plan”) (collectively, the “Plans”). The Prior Plan provides for a maximum of 47,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options and restricted stock grants. The 2010 Plan provides for a maximum of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options, restricted stock, performance awards and other awards, plus the number of shares of common stock which are or become available for issuance under the Prior Plan and which are not thereafter issued under the Prior Plan, subject to certain conditions. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion, options granted under the Plans generally vest ratably over a range of three to five years, expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant. Restricted stock grants generally vest (i) 100% on the fourth or fifth anniversary of the grant, (ii) ratably over three or four years, (iii) over three years at 50% after two years and 50% after the third year or (iv) over ten years at 20% per year commencing after the fifth year. Performance share awards may provide a right to receive shares of restricted stock based on the Company’s performance relative to its peers, as defined, or based on other performance criteria as determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Plans provide for the granting of certain options and restricted stock to each of the Company’s non-employee directors (the “Independent Directors”) and permit such Independent Directors to elect to receive deferred stock awards in lieu of directors’ fees.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with FASB’s Compensation – Stock Compensation guidance which requires that all share based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the Statement of Income over the service period based on their fair values.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The assumption for expected volatility has a significant effect on the grant date fair value. Volatility is determined based on the historical equity of common stock for the most recent historical period equal to the expected term of the options plus an implied volatility measure. The expected term is determined using the simplified method due to the lack of exercise and cancelation history for the current vesting terms. The more significant assumptions underlying the determination of fair values for options granted during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average fair value of options granted | $ | 4.52 | $ | 4.39 | $ | 3.82 | ||||||
| Weighted average risk-free interest rates | 1.04 | % | 2.02 | % | 2.40 | % | ||||||
| Weighted average expected option lives (in years) | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | |||||||||
| Weighted average expected volatility | 37.53 | % | 36.82 | % | 37.98 | % | ||||||
| Weighted average expected dividend yield | 3.94 | % | 3.98 | % | 4.21 | % |
Information with respect to stock options under the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 are as follows:
| Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options outstanding, January 1, 2010 | 17,560,921 | $ | 29.69 | $ | 3.4 | |||||||
| Exercised | (616,245 | ) | $ | 13.73 | ||||||||
| Granted | 1,776,175 | $ | 15.63 | |||||||||
| Forfeited | (1,605,062 | ) | $ | 33.68 | ||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2010 | 17,115,789 | $ | 28.32 | $ | 18.0 | |||||||
| Exercised | (444,368 | ) | $ | 14.71 | ||||||||
| Granted | 1,888,017 | $ | 18.77 | |||||||||
| Expired | (655,748 | ) | $ | 16.40 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | (793,098 | ) | $ | 23.74 | ||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2011 | 17,110,592 | $ | 28.14 | $ | 8.0 | |||||||
| Exercised | (1,495,432 | ) | $ | 19.84 | ||||||||
| Granted | 1,522,450 | $ | 18.78 | |||||||||
| Forfeited | (579,613 | ) | $ | 28.73 | ||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2012 | 16,557,997 | $ | 28.42 | $ | 14.9 | |||||||
| Options exercisable (fully vested)- | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2010 | 11,712,900 | $ | 29.74 | $ | 5.8 | |||||||
| December 31, 2011 | 12,459,598 | $ | 30.77 | $ | 3.9 | |||||||
| December 31, 2012 | 12,830,255 | $ | 31.57 | $ | 7.7 |
The exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2012, range from $11.54 to $53.14 per share. The Company estimates forfeitures based on historical data. The weighted-average remaining contractual life for options outstanding as of December 31, 2012, was 4.9 years. The weighted-average remaining contractual term of options currently exercisable as of December 31, 2012, was 4.9 years. Options to purchase 8,871,495, 5,776,270 and 5,874,704, shares of the Company’s common stock were available for issuance under the Plan at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had 3,727,742 options expected to vest, with a weighted-average exercise price per share of $17.58 and an aggregate intrinsic value of $7.2 million.
Cash received from options exercised under the Plan was $22.6 million, $6.5 million and $8.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $7.0 million, $1.5 million, and $2.1 million, respectively.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company had restricted shares outstanding of 1,562,912, 832,726 and 526,728, respectively.
The Company recognized expense associated with its equity awards of $17.9 million, $16.9 million and $14.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $31.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock compensation granted under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.8 years.
The Company, from time to time, repurchases shares of its common stock in amounts that offset new issuances of common shares in connection with the exercise of stock options or the issuance of restricted stock awards. These repurchases may occur in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, subject to prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. During 2012, the Company repurchased 1.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock for $30.9 million, of which $22.6 million was provided to the Company from options exercised. During 2011, the Company repurchased 333,998 shares of the Company’s common stock for $6.0 million, of which $4.9 million was provided to the Company from options exercised.
The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement plan covering substantially all officers and employees, which permits participants to defer up to the maximum allowable amount determined by the Internal Revenue Service of their eligible compensation. This deferred compensation, together with Company matching contributions, which generally equal employee deferrals up to a maximum of 5% of their eligible compensation (capped at $250,000), is fully vested and funded as of December 31, 2012. The Company’s contributions to the plan were $2.1 million, $1.9 million, and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company recognized severance costs associated with employee terminations during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $5.4 million, $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The 2012 expense includes $2.5 million of severance costs related to the departure of an executive officer during January 2012.
- Income Taxes:
The Company elected to qualify as a REIT in accordance with the Code commencing with its taxable year which began January 1, 1992. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet several organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted REIT taxable income to its stockholders. Management intends to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s REIT status. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate federal income tax, provided that distributions to its stockholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income. If the Company failed to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it would be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be permitted to elect REIT status for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. The Company is also subject to local taxes on certain Non-U.S. investments.
Reconciliation between GAAP Net Income and Federal Taxable Income:
The following table reconciles GAAP net income to taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
| 2012 (Estimated) | 2011 (Actual) | 2010 (Actual) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAAP net income attributable to the Company | $ | 266,073 | $ | 169,051 | $ | 142,868 | ||||||
| Less: GAAP net (income)/loss of taxable REIT subsidiaries | (5,249 | ) | (19,572 | ) | 13,920 | |||||||
| GAAP net income from REIT operations (a) | 260,824 | 149,479 | 156,788 | |||||||||
| Net book depreciation in excess of tax depreciation | 32,517 | 30,603 | 13,568 | |||||||||
| Deferred/prepaid/above and below market rents, net | (17,643 | ) | (16,463 | ) | (19,978 | ) | ||||||
| Book/tax differences from non-qualified stock options | 1,653 | 9,879 | 9,103 | |||||||||
| Book/tax differences from investments in real estate joint ventures | 16,837 | 52,564 | 69,581 | |||||||||
| Book/tax difference on sale of property | (69,961 | ) | 1,811 | (39,139 | ) | |||||||
| Book adjustment to property carrying values and marketable equity securities | 9,956 | 8,721 | 19,065 | |||||||||
| Taxable currency exchange (loss)/gain, net | (1,611 | ) | 6,502 | 13,134 | ||||||||
| Book/tax differences on capitalized costs | 2,899 | 3,228 | (12,782 | ) | ||||||||
| Dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries | 1,000 | 15,969 | - | |||||||||
| Other book/tax differences, net | (845 | ) | 1,016 | (6,064 | ) | |||||||
| Adjusted REIT taxable income | $ | 235,626 | $ | 263,309 | $ | 203,276 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Certain amounts in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, in the table above.
| (a) | All adjustments to "GAAP net income from REIT operations" are net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest and taxable REIT subsidiaries. |
|---|
Cash Dividends Paid and Dividends Paid Deductions (in thousands):
For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 cash dividends paid exceeded the dividends paid deduction and amounted to $382,722, $353,764, and $306,964, respectively.
Characterization of Distributions:
The following characterizes distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred F Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 9,116 | 94 | % | $ | 11,638 | 100 | % | $ | 11,638 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 582 | 6 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 9,698 | 100 | % | $ | 11,638 | 100 | % | $ | 11,638 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
| Preferred G Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 33,046 | 94 | % | $ | 35,650 | 100 | % | $ | 35,650 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 2,109 | 6 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 35,155 | 100 | % | $ | 35,650 | 100 | % | $ | 35,650 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
| Preferred H Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 11,351 | 94 | % | $ | 13,584 | 100 | % | $ | - | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 725 | 6 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 12,076 | 100 | % | $ | 13,584 | 100 | % | $ | - | - | % | |||||||||||||
| Preferred I Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 12,847 | 94 | % | $ | - | - | % | $ | - | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 820 | 6 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 13,667 | 100 | % | $ | - | - | % | $ | - | - | % | |||||||||||||
| Preferred J Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 2,585 | 94 | % | $ | - | - | % | $ | - | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital gain | 165 | 6 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,750 | 100 | % | $ | - | - | % | $ | - | - | % | |||||||||||||
| Common Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 222,751 | 72 | % | $ | 208,832 | 71 | % | $ | 181,773 | 70 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital Gain | 15,469 | 5 | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | |||||||||||||||
| Return of capital | 71,156 | 23 | % | 84,060 | 29 | % | 77,903 | 30 | % | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 309,376 | 100 | % | $ | 292,892 | 100 | % | $ | 259,676 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
| Total dividends distributed | $ | 382,722 | $ | 353,764 | $ | 306,964 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries and Taxable Entities:
The Company is subject to federal, state and local income taxes on income earned from activities conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”). TRS activities include Kimco Realty Services ("KRS"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and its subsidiaries, and the consolidated entities of FNC Corporation (“FNC”), and Blue Ridge Real Estate Company/Big Boulder Corporation. The Company is also subject to taxes on its activities in Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, and Peru. Dividends paid to the Company from its subsidiaries and joint ventures in Canada, Mexico and Brazil are generally not subject to withholding taxes under the applicable tax treaty with the United States. Chile and Peru impose a 10% and 4.1% withholding tax, respectively, on dividend distributions. Brazil levies a 0.38% transaction tax on return of capital distributions. During 2012, less than $0.1 million of withholding and transaction taxes were withheld from distributions related to foreign activities.
Income taxes have been provided for on the asset and liability method as required by the FASB’s Income Tax guidance. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of taxable assets and liabilities.
The Company’s pre-tax book income/(loss) and (provision)/benefit for income taxes relating to the Company’s TRS and taxable entities which have been consolidated for accounting reporting purposes, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income/(loss) before income taxes – U.S. | $ | 8,389 | $ | 36,077 | $ | (23,658 | ) | |||||
| (Provision)/benefit for income taxes, net: | ||||||||||||
| Federal : | ||||||||||||
| Current | (503 | ) | (2,463 | ) | 1,482 | |||||||
| Deferred | (535 | ) | (10,635 | ) | 7,136 | |||||||
| Federal tax (provision)/benefit | (1,038 | ) | (13,098 | ) | 8,618 | |||||||
| State and local: | ||||||||||||
| Current | (1,543 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (265 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred | (560 | ) | (2,064 | ) | 1,385 | |||||||
| State tax (provision)/benefit | (2,103 | ) | (3,407 | ) | 1,120 | |||||||
| Total tax (provision)/benefit – U.S. | (3,141 | ) | (16,505 | ) | 9,738 | |||||||
| Net income/(loss) from U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries | $ | 5,248 | $ | 19,572 | $ | (13,920 | ) | |||||
| Income before taxes – Non-U.S. | $ | 33,842 | $ | 63,154 | $ | 102,426 | ||||||
| (Provision)/benefit for Non-U.S. income taxes: | ||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 5,790 | $ | (4,484 | ) | $ | (13,671 | ) | ||||
| Deferred | 1,239 | 2,784 | 430 | |||||||||
| Non-U.S. tax provision | $ | 7,029 | $ | (1,700 | ) | $ | (13,241 | ) |
The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2011, were as follows (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Tax/GAAP basis differences | $ | 68,623 | $ | 66,177 | ||||
| Net operating losses | 43,483 | 47,719 | ||||||
| Related party deferred loss | 6,214 | 7,577 | ||||||
| Tax credit carryforwards | 3,815 | 3,537 | ||||||
| Capital loss carryforwards | 647 | 364 | ||||||
| Charitable contribution carryforward | 3 | - | ||||||
| Non-U.S. tax/GAAP basis differences | 62,548 | 63,610 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance – U.S. | (33,783 | ) | (33,783 | ) | ||||
| Valuation allowance – Non-U.S. | (38,129 | ) | (32,737 | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax assets | 113,421 | 122,464 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities – U.S. | (9,933 | ) | (11,434 | ) | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities – Non-U.S. | (13,263 | ) | (16,085 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 90,225 | $ | 94,945 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $90.2 million comprised of (i) $58.7 million relating to the difference between the basis of accounting for federal and state income tax reporting and GAAP reporting for real estate assets, joint ventures, and other investments, net of $9.9 million of deferred tax liabilities, (ii) $4.0 million and $5.7 million for the tax effect of net operating loss carryovers within KRS and FNC, respectively, net of a valuation allowance within FNC of $33.8 million, (iii) $6.2 million for losses deferred for federal and state income tax purposes for transactions with related parties, (iv) $3.8 million for tax credit carryovers, (v) $0.6 million for capital loss carryovers, and (vi) $11.2 million of deferred tax assets related to its investments in Canada and Latin America, net of a valuation allowance of $38.1 million and deferred tax liabilities of $13.3 million. General business tax credit carryovers of $2.2 million within KRS expire during taxable years from 2027 through 2031, and alternative minimum tax credit carryovers of $1.6 million do not expire.
The major differences between GAAP basis of accounting and the basis of accounting used for federal and state income tax reporting consist of impairment charges recorded for GAAP, but not recognized for tax purposes, depreciation and amortization, rental revenue recognized on the straight line method for GAAP, reserves for doubtful accounts, and the period in which certain gains were recognized for tax purposes, but not yet recognized under GAAP. The Company had foreign net deferred tax assets of $11.2 million, related to its operations in Canada and Latin America, which consists primarily of differences between the GAAP book basis and the basis of accounting applicable to the jurisdictions in which the Company is subject to tax.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are included in the caption Other assets and Other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Operating losses and the valuation allowance are related primarily to the Company’s consolidation of its taxable REIT subsidiaries for accounting and reporting purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2011, KRS generated $12.5 million, of net operating loss carryovers that expire 2031. For the year ended December 31, 2012, KRS produced $12.1 million of taxable income and utilized $12.1 million of its $22.1 million net operating loss carryovers. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, FNC had $101.3 million and $106.2 million, respectively, of net operating loss carryovers that expire from 2021 through 2026.
The Company maintained a valuation allowance of $33.8 million within FNC to reduce the deferred tax asset of $39.5 million related to net operating loss carryovers to the amount the Company determined is more likely than not realizable. The Company analyzed projected taxable income and the expected utilization of FNC’s remaining net operating loss carryovers and determined a partial valuation allowance was appropriate.
The Company’s investments in Latin America are made through individual entities which are subject to local taxes. The Company assesses each entity to determine if deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable. This assessment primarily includes an analysis of cumulative earnings and the determination of future earnings to the extent necessary to fully realize the individual deferred tax asset. Based on this analysis the Company has determined that a full valuation allowance is required for entities which have a three-year cumulative book loss and for which future earnings are not readily determinable. In addition, the Company has determined that no valuation allowance is needed for entities that have three-years of cumulative book income and future earnings are anticipated to be sufficient to more likely than not realize their deferred tax assets. At December 31, 2012, the Company had total deferred tax assets of $43.8 million relating to its Latin American investments with an aggregate valuation allowance of $38.1 million.
The Company’s deferred tax assets in Canada result principally from depreciation deducted under GAAP that exceed capital cost allowances claimed under Canadian tax rules. The deferred tax asset will naturally reverse upon disposition as tax basis will be greater than the basis of the assets under generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company determined that no valuation allowance was needed against a $70.2 million net deferred tax asset within KRS. The Company based its determination on an analysis of both positive evidence and negative evidence using its judgment as to the relative weight of each. The Company believes, when evaluating KRS’s deferred tax assets, special consideration should be given to the unique relationship between the Company as a REIT and KRS as a taxable REIT subsidiary. This relationship exists primarily to protect the REIT’s qualification under the Code by permitting, within certain limits, the REIT to engage in certain business activities in which the REIT cannot directly participate. As such, the REIT controls which and when investments are held in, or distributed or sold from, KRS. This relationship distinguishes a REIT and taxable REIT subsidiary from an enterprise that operates as a single, consolidated corporate taxpayer. The Company will continue through this structure to operate certain business activities in KRS.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
The Company’s analysis of KRS’s ability to utilize its deferred tax assets includes an estimate of future projected income. To determine future projected income, the Company scheduled KRS’s pre-tax book income and taxable income over a twenty year period taking into account its continuing operations (“Core Earnings”). Core Earnings consist of estimated net operating income for properties currently in service and generating rental income. Major lease turnover is not expected in these properties as these properties were generally constructed and leased within the past five years. The Company also included known future events in its projected income forecast. In addition, the Company can employ additional strategies to realize KRS’s deferred tax assets including transferring its property management business, sale of certain built-in gain assets, and further reducing intercompany debt.
The Company’s projection of KRS’s future taxable income over twenty years, utilizing the assumptions above with respect to Core Earnings, net of related expenses, generates $315.2 million after the reversal of $87.4 million of deductible temporary differences. Based on this analysis, the Company concluded it is more likely than not that KRS’s net deferred tax asset of $70.2 million will be realized and therefore, no valuation allowance is needed at December 31, 2012. If future income projections do not occur as forecasted or the Company incurs additional impairment losses in excess of the amount Core Earnings can absorb, the Company will reconsider the need for a valuation allowance.
(Benefit)/provision differ from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to taxable income before income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal benefit at statutory tax rate (35%) | $ | 2,936 | $ | 12,627 | $ | (8,280 | ) | |||||
| State and local taxes, net of federal benefit | 230 | 1,683 | (728 | ) | ||||||||
| Other | (25 | ) | 2,195 | (730 | ) | |||||||
| Total tax provision/(benefit) – U.S. | $ | 3,141 | $ | 16,505 | $ | (9,738 | ) |
Uncertain Tax Positions:
The Company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the U.S., principally Canada and Mexico. The statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue. Tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities. The Company is currently under audit by the Canadian Revenue Agency, Mexican Tax Authority and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). In October 2011, the IRS issued a notice of proposed adjustment, which proposes pursuant to Section 482 of the Code, to disallow a capital loss claimed by KRS on the disposition of common shares of Valad Property Ltd., an Australian publicly listed company. Because the adjustment is being made pursuant to Section 482 of the Code, the IRS may assert a 100 percent “penalty” tax pursuant to Section 857(b)(7) of the Code in lieu of disallowing the capital loss deduction. The notice of proposed adjustment indicates the IRS’ intention to impose the 100 percent penalty tax on the Company in the amount of $40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by KRS. The Company strongly disagrees with the IRS’ position on the application of Section 482 of the Code to the disposition of the shares, the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction.The Company received a Notice of Proposed Assessment and filed a written protest and requested an IRS Appeals Office conference, which has yet to be scheduled. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail.
Resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The Company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.
The liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign, federal and state income tax liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows (in thousands):
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 16,901 | $ | 14,908 | ||||
| Increases for tax positions related to current year | 3,079 | 1,993 | ||||||
| Reductions due to lapsed statute of limitations | (3,090 | ) | - | |||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | 16,890 | $ | 16,901 |
- Supplemental Financial Information:
The following represents the results of income, expressed in thousands except per share amounts, for each quarter during the years 2012 and 2011:
| 2012 (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar. 31 | June 30 | Sept. 30 | Dec. 31 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property(1) | $ | 214,851 | $ | 220,670 | $ | 220,188 | $ | 229,073 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to the Company | $ | 53,638 | $ | 69,112 | $ | 54,941 | $ | 88,382 | ||||||||
| Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 |
| 2011 (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar. 31 | June 30 | Sept. 30 | Dec. 31 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues from rental property(1) | $ | 206,156 | $ | 206,034 | $ | 201,082 | $ | 212,465 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to the Company | $ | 28,963 | $ | 38,709 | $ | 54,981 | $ | 46,398 | ||||||||
| Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.08 |
(1) All periods have been adjusted to reflect the impact of operating properties sold during 2012 and 2011 and properties classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2012, which are reflected in the caption Discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Accounts and notes receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are net of estimated unrecoverable amounts of $16.4 million and $18.1 million of billed accounts receivable at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, Accounts and notes receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are net of estimated unrecoverable amounts of $22.8 million and $25.4 million of straight-line rent receivable at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
- Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited):
As discussed in Notes 5, 6 and 7, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries acquired and disposed of interests in certain operating properties during 2012. The pro forma financial information set forth below is based upon the Company's historical Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, adjusted to give effect to these transactions at the beginning of 2011.
The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of Income would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of 2011, nor does it purport to represent the results of Income for future periods. (Amounts presented in millions, except per share figures.)
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Revenues from rental property | $ | 903.2 | $ | 867.5 | ||||
| Net income | $ | 228.5 | $ | 174.7 | ||||
| Net income attributable to the Company’s common shareholders | $ | 120.9 | $ | 102.3 | ||||
| Net income attributable to the Company’s common shareholders per common share: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.25 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
(in thousands)
| Balance at beginning of period | Charged to expenses | Adjustments to valuation accounts | Deductions | Balance at end of period | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for uncollectable accounts | $ | 18,059 | $ | 6,309 | $ | - | $ | (7,966 | ) | $ | 16,402 | |||||||||
| Allowance for deferred tax asset | $ | 66,520 | $ | - | $ | 5,392 | $ | - | $ | 71,912 | ||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for uncollectable accounts | $ | 15,712 | $ | 7,027 | $ | - | $ | (4,680 | ) | $ | 18,059 | |||||||||
| Allowance for deferred tax asset | $ | 43,596 | $ | - | $ | 22,924 | $ | - | $ | 66,520 | ||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for uncollectable accounts | $ | 12,200 | $ | 10,043 | $ | - | $ | (6,531 | ) | $ | 15,712 | |||||||||
| Allowance for deferred tax asset | $ | 33,783 | $ | - | $ | 9,813 | $ | - | $ | 43,596 |
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2012
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| GLENN SQUARE | 3,306,779 | - | 44,149,548 | 3,306,779 | 44,149,548 | 47,456,327 | 3,457,974 | 43,998,353 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| THE GROVE | 18,951,763 | 6,403,809 | 27,536,024 | 16,395,647 | 36,495,949 | 52,891,596 | 2,930,399 | 49,961,197 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| CHANDLER AUTO MALLS | 9,318,595 | - | (4,255,793 | ) | 4,623,497 | 439,305 | 5,062,802 | 8,907 | 5,053,895 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| EL MIRAGE | 6,786,441 | 503,987 | 130,064 | 6,786,441 | 634,051 | 7,420,492 | 18,289 | 7,402,203 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| TALAVI TOWN CENTER | 8,046,677 | 17,291,542 | (24,407 | ) | 8,046,677 | 17,267,135 | 25,313,812 | 8,289,742 | 17,024,070 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| MESA PAVILLIONS | 6,060,018 | 35,955,005 | (19,054 | ) | 6,060,018 | 35,935,950 | 41,995,969 | 4,207,683 | 37,788,286 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| MESA RIVERVIEW | 15,000,000 | - | 139,626,899 | 307,992 | 154,318,907 | 154,626,899 | 28,304,759 | 126,322,140 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| ANA MARIANA POWER CENTER | 30,043,645 | - | 7,698,708 | 30,131,356 | 7,610,996 | 37,742,352 | 213,200 | 37,529,152 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MESA PAVILLIONS - SOUTH | - | 148,508 | (27,651 | ) | - | 120,858 | 120,858 | 25,871 | 94,986 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| METRO SQUARE | 4,101,017 | 16,410,632 | 520,771 | 4,101,017 | 16,931,403 | 21,032,420 | 6,486,711 | 14,545,708 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| HAYDEN PLAZA NORTH | 2,015,726 | 4,126,509 | 5,013,176 | 2,015,726 | 9,139,685 | 11,155,411 | 3,053,920 | 8,101,491 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| PHOENIX, COSTCO | 5,324,501 | 21,269,943 | 1,033,546 | 4,577,869 | 23,050,120 | 27,627,990 | 6,000,660 | 21,627,330 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| PHOENIX | 2,450,341 | 9,802,046 | 929,417 | 2,450,341 | 10,731,463 | 13,181,804 | 4,411,736 | 8,770,068 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| PINACLE PEAK- N. CANYON RANCH | 1,228,000 | 8,774,694 | 20,500 | 1,228,000 | 8,795,194 | 10,023,194 | 1,855,367 | 8,167,828 | 1,853,110 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| VILLAGE CROSSROADS | 5,662,554 | 24,981,223 | (171,233 | ) | 5,662,554 | 24,809,989 | 30,472,543 | 1,190,895 | 29,281,648 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| NORTH VALLEY | 6,861,564 | 18,200,901 | 2,539,809 | 3,861,272 | 23,741,002 | 27,602,274 | 1,113,619 | 26,488,655 | 16,320,882 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| ASANTE RETAIL CENTER | 8,702,635 | 3,405,683 | 2,865,559 | 11,039,472 | 3,934,405 | 14,973,877 | 105,624 | 14,868,253 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| SURPRISE II | 4,138,760 | 94,572 | 1,035 | 4,138,760 | 95,607 | 4,234,367 | 2,833 | 4,231,534 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| BELL CAMINO CENTER | 2,427,465 | 6,439,065 | - | 2,427,465 | 6,439,065 | 8,866,530 | 352,701 | 8,513,829 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| COLLEGE PARK SHOPPING CENTER | 3,276,951 | 7,741,323 | 37,500 | 3,276,951 | 7,778,823 | 11,055,774 | 412,115 | 10,643,659 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| ALHAMBRA, COSTCO | 4,995,639 | 19,982,557 | 333,261 | 4,995,639 | 20,315,818 | 25,311,457 | 7,654,985 | 17,656,472 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ANGEL'S CAMP TOWN CENTER | 1,000,000 | 6,463,129 | - | 1,000,000 | 6,463,129 | 7,463,129 | 728,463 | 6,734,666 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| MADISON PLAZA | 5,874,396 | 23,476,190 | 668,915 | 5,874,396 | 24,145,105 | 30,019,501 | 8,984,338 | 21,035,163 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CHULA VISTA, COSTCO | 6,460,743 | 25,863,153 | 11,689,917 | 6,460,743 | 37,553,070 | 44,013,813 | 12,001,986 | 32,011,828 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CORONA HILLS, COSTCO | 13,360,965 | 53,373,453 | 5,955,208 | 13,360,965 | 59,328,661 | 72,689,626 | 22,144,201 | 50,545,425 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| LABAND VILLAGE SC | 5,600,000 | 13,289,347 | 9,337 | 5,607,237 | 13,291,448 | 18,898,685 | 4,736,363 | 14,162,322 | 8,500,000 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| CUPERTINO VILLAGE | 19,886,099 | 46,534,919 | 4,625,122 | 19,886,099 | 51,160,041 | 71,046,140 | 14,969,322 | 56,076,818 | 33,678,588 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| CHICO CROSSROADS | 9,975,810 | 30,534,524 | 717,076 | 9,987,652 | 31,239,758 | 41,227,410 | 5,833,271 | 35,394,139 | 24,510,565 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| CORONA HILLS MARKETPLACE | 9,727,446 | 24,778,390 | 184,823 | 9,727,446 | 24,963,214 | 34,690,660 | 6,349,975 | 28,340,684 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| RIVER PARK SHOPPING CENTER | 4,324,000 | 18,018,653 | (448,708 | ) | 4,324,000 | 17,569,945 | 21,893,945 | 1,933,015 | 19,960,930 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| GOLD COUNTRY CENTER | 3,272,212 | 7,864,878 | 37,687 | 3,278,290 | 7,896,487 | 11,174,777 | 2,178,896 | 8,995,881 | 6,901,658 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| LA MIRADA THEATRE CENTER | 8,816,741 | 35,259,965 | (6,747,916 | ) | 6,888,680 | 30,440,110 | 37,328,790 | 11,068,980 | 26,259,809 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
| KENNETH HAHN PLAZA | 4,114,863 | 7,660,855 | 47,284 | 4,114,863 | 7,708,139 | 11,823,002 | 2,295,093 | 9,527,909 | 6,000,000 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| NOVATO FAIR S.C. | 9,259,778 | 15,599,790 | 159,789 | 9,259,778 | 15,759,579 | 25,019,357 | 2,600,473 | 22,418,884 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| SOUTH NAPA MARKET PLACE | 1,100,000 | 22,159,086 | 6,838,973 | 1,100,000 | 28,998,059 | 30,098,059 | 10,512,866 | 19,585,193 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PLAZA DI NORTHRIDGE | 12,900,000 | 40,574,842 | (792,333 | ) | 12,900,000 | 39,782,509 | 52,682,509 | 10,809,040 | 41,873,469 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| POWAY CITY CENTRE | 5,854,585 | 13,792,470 | 7,701,699 | 7,247,814 | 20,100,941 | 27,348,754 | 5,923,090 | 21,425,664 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| REDWOOD CITY | 2,552,000 | 6,215,168 | - | 2,552,000 | 6,215,168 | 8,767,168 | 516,707 | 8,250,461 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| TYLER STREET | 3,020,883 | 7,811,339 | 53,109 | 3,200,516 | 7,684,814 | 10,885,331 | 2,486,959 | 8,398,372 | 6,643,654 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| SANTA ANA, HOME DEPOT | 4,592,364 | 18,345,257 | - | 4,592,364 | 18,345,257 | 22,937,622 | 6,935,088 | 16,002,534 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| SAN/DIEGO CARMEL MOUNTAIN | 5,322,600 | 8,873,991 | (11,005 | ) | 5,322,600 | 8,862,986 | 14,185,586 | 1,432,895 | 12,752,691 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| FULTON MARKET PLACE | 2,966,018 | 6,920,710 | 927,435 | 2,966,018 | 7,848,145 | 10,814,163 | 2,371,319 | 8,442,844 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MARIGOLD SC | 15,300,000 | 25,563,978 | 3,406,662 | 15,300,000 | 28,970,640 | 44,270,640 | 12,905,960 | 31,364,680 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| BLACK MOUNTAIN VILLAGE | 4,678,015 | 11,913,344 | 89,992 | 4,678,015 | 12,003,336 | 16,681,350 | 3,265,898 | 13,415,452 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| CITY HEIGHTS | 10,687,472 | 28,324,896 | 26,489 | 10,687,472 | 28,351,385 | 39,038,857 | 85,288 | 38,953,568 | 21,808,858 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| TRUCKEE CROSSROADS | 2,140,000 | 8,255,753 | 611,777 | 2,140,000 | 8,867,531 | 11,007,530 | 4,803,398 | 6,204,133 | 3,264,029 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| WESTLAKE SHOPPING CENTER | 16,174,307 | 64,818,562 | 94,358,492 | 16,174,307 | 159,177,054 | 175,351,360 | 30,127,534 | 145,223,827 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
| SAVI RANCH | 7,295,646 | 29,752,511 | - | 7,295,646 | 29,752,511 | 37,048,157 | 321,298 | 36,726,859 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| VILLAGE ON THE PARK | 2,194,463 | 8,885,987 | 5,619,852 | 2,194,463 | 14,505,839 | 16,700,302 | 4,460,720 | 12,239,582 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| AURORA QUINCY | 1,148,317 | 4,608,249 | 988,825 | 1,148,317 | 5,597,074 | 6,745,391 | 1,995,723 | 4,749,668 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| AURORA EAST BANK | 1,500,568 | 6,180,103 | 753,032 | 1,500,568 | 6,933,136 | 8,433,703 | 2,773,641 | 5,660,063 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| SPRING CREEK COLORADO | 1,423,260 | 5,718,813 | 798,280 | 1,423,260 | 6,517,092 | 7,940,353 | 2,438,037 | 5,502,316 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| DENVER WEST 38TH STREET | 161,167 | 646,983 | - | 161,167 | 646,983 | 808,150 | 247,437 | 560,713 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ENGLEWOOD PHAR MOR | 805,837 | 3,232,650 | 249,867 | 805,837 | 3,482,517 | 4,288,354 | 1,354,400 | 2,933,954 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| FORT COLLINS | 1,253,497 | 7,625,278 | 1,599,608 | 1,253,497 | 9,224,886 | 10,478,382 | 2,706,634 | 7,771,748 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| GREELEY COMMONS | 3,313,095 | 20,069,559 | 24,300 | 3,313,095 | 20,093,859 | 23,406,954 | 241,795 | 23,165,159 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| HIGHLANDS RANCH VILLAGE S.C. | 8,135,427 | 21,579,936 | (879,782 | ) | 5,337,081 | 23,498,500 | 28,835,581 | 833,081 | 28,002,500 | 20,870,995 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| VILLAGE CENTER WEST | 2,010,519 | 8,361,084 | 6,815 | 2,010,519 | 8,367,899 | 10,378,418 | 377,958 | 10,000,460 | 6,205,857 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| HERITAGE WEST | 1,526,576 | 6,124,074 | 774,090 | 1,526,576 | 6,898,164 | 8,424,740 | 2,464,339 | 5,960,401 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| MARKET AT SOUTHPARK | 9,782,769 | 20,779,522 | (32,455 | ) | 9,782,769 | 20,747,067 | 30,529,837 | 1,045,288 | 29,484,549 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| WEST FARM SHOPPING CENTER | 5,805,969 | 23,348,024 | 4,537,981 | 5,805,969 | 27,886,005 | 33,691,974 | 8,979,729 | 24,712,246 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| N.HAVEN, HOME DEPOT | 7,704,968 | 30,797,640 | 1,050,387 | 7,704,968 | 31,848,027 | 39,552,995 | 11,775,885 | 27,777,110 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| WATERBURY | 2,253,078 | 9,017,012 | 653,224 | 2,253,078 | 9,670,236 | 11,923,314 | 4,631,458 | 7,291,857 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| WILTON RIVER PARK SHOPPING CTR | 7,154,585 | 27,509,279 | 70,777 | 7,154,585 | 27,580,056 | 34,734,641 | 423,247 | 34,311,394 | 19,896,160 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| BRIGHT HORIZONS | 1,211,748 | 4,610,610 | 9,499 | 1,211,748 | 4,620,109 | 5,831,857 | 64,596 | 5,767,262 | 1,768,215 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| DOVER | 122,741 | 66,738 | 4,007,816 | 3,024,375 | 1,172,921 | 4,197,296 | 52,085 | 4,145,211 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| ELSMERE | - | 3,185,642 | 2,287,586 | - | 5,473,228 | 5,473,228 | 3,235,258 | 2,237,969 | 1979 | ||||||||||||||
| ALTAMONTE SPRINGS | 770,893 | 3,083,574 | (1,322,574 | ) | 538,796 | 1,993,097 | 2,531,893 | 808,903 | 1,722,990 | 1995 | |||||||||||||
| AUBURNDALE | 751,315 | - | - | 751,315 | - | 751,315 | - | 751,315 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| BOCA RATON | 573,875 | 2,295,501 | 1,722,099 | 733,875 | 3,857,600 | 4,591,475 | 2,030,398 | 2,561,077 | 1992 | ||||||||||||||
| BAYSHORE GARDENS, BRADENTON FL | 2,901,000 | 11,738,955 | 1,234,179 | 2,901,000 | 12,973,134 | 15,874,134 | 4,848,241 | 11,025,893 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| SHOPPES @ MT. CARMEL | 204,432 | 937,457 | 79,652 | 204,432 | 1,017,110 | 1,221,542 | 72,719 | 1,148,823 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| CORAL SPRINGS | 710,000 | 2,842,907 | 3,804,755 | 710,000 | 6,647,662 | 7,357,662 | 2,685,234 | 4,672,428 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||
| CORAL SPRINGS | 1,649,000 | 6,626,301 | 443,196 | 1,649,000 | 7,069,497 | 8,718,497 | 2,795,837 | 5,922,660 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CURLEW CROSSING S.C. | 5,315,955 | 12,529,467 | 1,709,383 | 5,315,955 | 14,238,851 | 19,554,805 | 3,480,389 | 16,074,416 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| CLEARWATER FL | 3,627,946 | 918,466 | (269,494 | ) | 2,174,938 | 2,101,980 | 4,276,918 | 227,901 | 4,049,016 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| EAST ORLANDO | 491,676 | 1,440,000 | 2,626,124 | 1,007,882 | 3,549,918 | 4,557,800 | 2,297,443 | 2,260,357 | 1971 | ||||||||||||||
| FT.LAUDERDALE/CYPRESS CREEK | 14,258,760 | 28,042,390 | 1,856,935 | 14,258,760 | 29,899,324 | 44,158,084 | 4,115,199 | 40,042,885 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| OAKWOOD BUSINESS CTR-BLDG 1 | 6,792,500 | 18,662,565 | 773,436 | 6,792,500 | 19,436,000 | 26,228,500 | 2,661,544 | 23,566,957 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| SHOPPES AT AMELIA CONCOURSE | 7,600,000 | - | 8,936,082 | 1,138,216 | 15,397,866 | 16,536,082 | 1,246,842 | 15,289,240 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| AVENUES WALKS | 26,984,546 | - | 49,385,331 | 33,225,306 | 43,144,571 | 76,369,877 | - | 76,369,877 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| RIVERPLACE SHOPPING CTR. | 7,503,282 | 31,011,027 | (97,137 | ) | 7,503,282 | 30,913,890 | 38,417,172 | 3,406,770 | 35,010,402 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| MERCHANTS WALK | 2,580,816 | 10,366,090 | 4,929,224 | 2,580,816 | 15,295,313 | 17,876,130 | 3,872,480 | 14,003,650 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
| LARGO | 293,686 | 792,119 | 1,620,990 | 293,686 | 2,413,109 | 2,706,795 | 1,979,625 | 727,169 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||
| LEESBURG | - | 171,636 | 193,651 | - | 365,287 | 365,287 | 308,023 | 57,264 | 1969 | ||||||||||||||
| LARGO EAST BAY | 2,832,296 | 11,329,185 | 2,144,729 | 2,832,296 | 13,473,914 | 16,306,210 | 8,224,095 | 8,082,115 | 1992 |
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| LAUDERHILL | 1,002,733 | 2,602,415 | 12,606,236 | 1,774,443 | 14,436,941 | 16,211,384 | 9,000,490 | 7,210,894 | 1974 | ||||||||||||||
| THE GROVES | 1,676,082 | 6,533,681 | (1,330,869 | ) | 2,606,246 | 4,272,648 | 6,878,894 | 1,239,092 | 5,639,802 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| LAKE WALES | 601,052 | - | - | 601,052 | - | 601,052 | - | 601,052 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| MELBOURNE | - | 1,754,000 | 2,666,332 | - | 4,420,332 | 4,420,332 | 2,845,961 | 1,574,372 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||
| GROVE GATE | 365,893 | 1,049,172 | 1,207,100 | 365,893 | 2,256,272 | 2,622,165 | 1,869,682 | 752,483 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||
| CHEVRON OUTPARCEL | 530,570 | 1,253,410 | - | 530,570 | 1,253,410 | 1,783,980 | 125,210 | 1,658,770 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
| NORTH MIAMI | 732,914 | 4,080,460 | 10,926,161 | 732,914 | 15,006,621 | 15,739,535 | 7,875,165 | 7,864,370 | 6,178,961 | 1985 | |||||||||||||
| MILLER ROAD | 1,138,082 | 4,552,327 | 2,220,561 | 1,138,082 | 6,772,889 | 7,910,970 | 5,404,854 | 2,506,116 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| MARGATE | 2,948,530 | 11,754,120 | 7,919,694 | 2,948,530 | 19,673,814 | 22,622,344 | 7,798,185 | 14,824,159 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| MT. DORA | 1,011,000 | 4,062,890 | 436,174 | 1,011,000 | 4,499,064 | 5,510,064 | 1,698,879 | 3,811,185 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| KENDALE LAKES PLAZA | 18,491,461 | 28,496,001 | (2,846,737 | ) | 15,362,227 | 28,778,497 | 44,140,724 | 3,093,301 | 41,047,424 | - | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| PLANTATION CROSSING | 7,524,800 | - | 11,187,936 | 7,153,784 | 11,558,952 | 18,712,736 | 1,210,330 | 17,502,406 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MILTON, FL | 1,275,593 | - | - | 1,275,593 | - | 1,275,593 | - | 1,275,593 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| FLAGLER PARK | 26,162,980 | 80,737,041 | 1,766,686 | 26,162,980 | 82,503,727 | 108,666,707 | 14,174,502 | 94,492,205 | 25,428,794 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| PARK HILL PLAZA | 10,763,612 | 19,264,248 | 142,579 | 10,891,930 | 19,278,508 | 30,170,439 | 1,411,534 | 28,758,905 | 8,328,658 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| RENAISSANCE CENTER | 9,104,379 | 36,540,873 | 5,612,056 | 9,122,758 | 42,134,550 | 51,257,308 | 17,212,832 | 34,044,475 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ORLANDO | 560,800 | 2,268,112 | 3,203,429 | 580,030 | 5,452,310 | 6,032,341 | 2,167,664 | 3,864,677 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| OCALA | 1,980,000 | 7,927,484 | 8,942,057 | 1,980,000 | 16,869,541 | 18,849,541 | 6,361,694 | 12,487,848 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| MILLENIA PLAZA PHASE II | 7,711,000 | 20,702,992 | 300,011 | 7,711,000 | 21,003,004 | 28,714,004 | 4,905,798 | 23,808,205 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| GRAND OAKS VILLAGE | 7,409,319 | 19,653,869 | (946,240 | ) | 5,846,339 | 20,270,609 | 26,116,948 | 1,057,056 | 25,059,892 | 6,553,929 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| GONZALEZ | 1,620,203 | - | 40,689 | 954,876 | 706,016 | 1,660,892 | 62,757 | 1,598,135 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| POMPANO BEACH | 10,516,500 | 1,359,236 | 530,900 | 10,516,500 | 1,890,136 | 12,406,636 | 46,452 | 12,360,184 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER | 5,515,265 | 13,041,400 | 149,024 | 5,515,265 | 13,190,424 | 18,705,689 | 585,718 | 18,119,971 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| PALM BEACH GARDENS | 2,764,953 | 11,059,812 | 278,643 | 2,764,953 | 11,338,456 | 14,103,409 | 663,589 | 13,439,820 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. PETERSBURG | - | 917,360 | 1,266,811 | - | 2,184,171 | 2,184,171 | 1,104,439 | 1,079,732 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||
| TUTTLE BEE SARASOTA | 254,961 | 828,465 | 1,806,633 | 254,961 | 2,635,098 | 2,890,059 | 2,027,155 | 862,904 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTH EAST SARASOTA | 1,283,400 | 5,133,544 | 3,400,091 | 1,399,525 | 8,417,510 | 9,817,035 | 4,875,432 | 4,941,603 | 1989 | ||||||||||||||
| SANFORD | 1,832,732 | 9,523,261 | 6,256,188 | 1,832,732 | 15,779,449 | 17,612,181 | 9,703,986 | 7,908,195 | 1989 | ||||||||||||||
| STUART | 2,109,677 | 8,415,323 | 1,694,863 | 2,109,677 | 10,110,186 | 12,219,863 | 4,480,377 | 7,739,486 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTH MIAMI | 1,280,440 | 5,133,825 | 3,087,209 | 1,280,440 | 8,221,034 | 9,501,474 | 3,418,560 | 6,082,914 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| TAMPA | 5,220,445 | 16,884,228 | 2,249,431 | 5,220,445 | 19,133,659 | 24,354,104 | 6,951,838 | 17,402,267 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| VILLAGE COMMONS S.C. | 2,192,331 | 8,774,158 | 2,715,244 | 2,192,331 | 11,489,402 | 13,681,733 | 3,772,873 | 9,908,860 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| MISSION BELL SHOPPING CENTER | 5,056,426 | 11,843,119 | 8,661,955 | 5,067,033 | 20,494,467 | 25,561,501 | 4,908,884 | 20,652,617 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| WEST PALM BEACH | 550,896 | 2,298,964 | 1,426,083 | 550,896 | 3,725,047 | 4,275,943 | 1,526,491 | 2,749,452 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| CROSS COUNTRY PLAZA | 16,510,000 | 18,264,427 | 465,515 | 16,510,000 | 18,729,942 | 35,239,942 | 2,278,594 | 32,961,348 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| AUGUSTA | 1,482,564 | 5,928,122 | 2,439,437 | 1,482,564 | 8,367,559 | 9,850,123 | 3,508,069 | 6,342,054 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| MARKET AT HAYNES BRIDGE | 4,880,659 | 21,549,424 | 505,236 | 4,889,863 | 22,045,456 | 26,935,319 | 4,382,415 | 22,552,904 | 15,626,501 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| EMBRY VILLAGE | 18,147,054 | 33,009,514 | 215,338 | 18,160,524 | 33,211,382 | 51,371,906 | 6,869,361 | 44,502,545 | 30,025,443 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| VILLAGE SHOPPES-FLOWERY BRANCH | 4,444,148 | 10,510,657 | (17,119 | ) | 4,444,148 | 10,493,538 | 14,937,686 | 692,289 | 14,245,397 | 8,992,979 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| SAVANNAH | 2,052,270 | 8,232,978 | 2,408,812 | 2,052,270 | 10,641,790 | 12,694,060 | 5,042,393 | 7,651,667 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| CHATHAM PLAZA | 13,390,238 | 35,115,882 | 848,242 | 13,403,262 | 35,951,100 | 49,354,362 | 8,985,806 | 40,368,556 | 28,767,663 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| KIHEI CENTER | 3,406,707 | 7,663,360 | 654,468 | 3,406,707 | 8,317,828 | 11,724,535 | 4,710,325 | 7,014,210 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| CLIVE | 500,525 | 2,002,101 | - | 500,525 | 2,002,101 | 2,502,626 | 868,433 | 1,634,193 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| METRO CROSSING | 3,013,647 | - | 35,426,260 | 1,514,916 | 36,924,991 | 38,439,907 | 2,167,911 | 36,271,996 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER | 1,720,330 | 6,916,294 | 3,760,738 | 1,720,330 | 10,677,032 | 12,397,362 | 3,338,432 | 9,058,930 | 635,871 | 1999 | |||||||||||||
| DES MOINES | 500,525 | 2,559,019 | 37,079 | 500,525 | 2,596,098 | 3,096,623 | 1,101,693 | 1,994,930 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| DUBUQUE | - | 2,152,476 | 239,217 | - | 2,391,693 | 2,391,693 | 852,030 | 1,539,663 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| WATERLOO | 500,525 | 2,002,101 | 2,869,100 | 500,525 | 4,871,201 | 5,371,726 | 2,930,608 | 2,441,117 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| NAMPA (HORSHAM) FUTURE DEV. | 6,501,240 | - | 11,902,537 | 10,567,218 | 7,836,559 | 18,403,777 | 264,671 | 18,139,106 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| AURORA, N. LAKE | 2,059,908 | 9,531,721 | 308,208 | 2,059,908 | 9,839,929 | 11,899,837 | 3,618,787 | 8,281,050 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| BLOOMINGTON | 805,521 | 2,222,353 | 4,246,390 | 805,521 | 6,468,743 | 7,274,264 | 4,118,981 | 3,155,283 | 1972 | ||||||||||||||
| BELLEVILLE S.C. | - | 5,372,253 | 1,255,387 | 1,161,195 | 5,466,445 | 6,627,640 | 1,996,939 | 4,630,701 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| BRADLEY | 500,422 | 2,001,687 | 424,877 | 500,422 | 2,426,564 | 2,926,986 | 1,024,922 | 1,902,064 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| CALUMET CITY | 1,479,217 | 8,815,760 | 13,905,512 | 1,479,216 | 22,721,273 | 24,200,489 | 5,850,753 | 18,349,735 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| COUNTRYSIDE | - | 4,770,671 | (4,531,252 | ) | 95,647 | 143,772 | 239,419 | 77,913 | 161,506 | 1997 | |||||||||||||
| CHICAGO | - | 2,687,046 | 871,802 | - | 3,558,848 | 3,558,848 | 1,377,935 | 2,180,912 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CHAMPAIGN, NEIL ST. | 230,519 | 1,285,460 | 725,493 | 230,519 | 2,010,953 | 2,241,472 | 771,170 | 1,470,302 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ELSTON | 1,010,374 | 5,692,212 | 498,828 | 1,010,374 | 6,191,040 | 7,201,414 | 2,095,504 | 5,105,910 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CRYSTAL LAKE, NW HWY | 179,964 | 1,025,811 | 564,039 | 180,269 | 1,589,545 | 1,769,814 | 471,852 | 1,297,962 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| 108 WEST GERMANIA PLACE | 2,393,894 | 7,366,681 | 360 | 2,393,894 | 7,367,041 | 9,760,935 | 312,936 | 9,447,998 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| BUTTERFIELD SQUARE | 1,601,960 | 6,637,926 | (3,588,725 | ) | 1,182,677 | 3,468,484 | 4,651,161 | 1,180,384 | 3,470,777 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
| DOWNERS PARK PLAZA | 2,510,455 | 10,164,494 | 968,249 | 2,510,455 | 11,132,743 | 13,643,198 | 4,071,520 | 9,571,678 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| DOWNER GROVE | 811,778 | 4,322,956 | 3,221,260 | 811,778 | 7,544,216 | 8,355,994 | 2,348,423 | 6,007,571 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| ELGIN | 842,555 | 2,108,674 | 1,728,298 | 500,927 | 4,178,600 | 4,679,527 | 2,922,303 | 1,757,224 | 1972 | ||||||||||||||
| FOREST PARK | - | 2,335,884 | 154,213 | - | 2,490,097 | 2,490,097 | 915,328 | 1,574,768 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| FAIRVIEW HTS, BELLVILLE RD. | - | 11,866,880 | 2,049,362 | - | 13,916,242 | 13,916,242 | 4,916,488 | 8,999,754 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| BELLEVILLE ROAD S.C..-fee | 1,900,000 | - | - | 1,900,000 | - | 1,900,000 | - | 1,900,000 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| GENEVA | 500,422 | 12,917,712 | 33,551 | 500,422 | 12,951,263 | 13,451,685 | 4,920,006 | 8,531,679 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| LAKE ZURICH PLAZA | 1,890,319 | 2,649,381 | 63,057 | 1,890,319 | 2,712,438 | 4,602,757 | 381,569 | 4,221,189 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MATTERSON | 950,515 | 6,292,319 | 10,560,785 | 950,514 | 16,853,105 | 17,803,619 | 6,079,166 | 11,724,453 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| MT. PROSPECT | 1,017,345 | 6,572,176 | 4,016,735 | 1,017,345 | 10,588,911 | 11,606,256 | 4,277,134 | 7,329,122 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| MUNDELEIN, S. LAKE | 1,127,720 | 5,826,129 | 77,350 | 1,129,634 | 5,901,565 | 7,031,199 | 2,197,292 | 4,833,907 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| NORRIDGE | - | 2,918,315 | - | - | 2,918,315 | 2,918,315 | 1,136,649 | 1,781,666 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| NAPERVILLE | 669,483 | 4,464,998 | 456,947 | 669,483 | 4,921,945 | 5,591,428 | 1,742,823 | 3,848,605 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| MARKETPLACE OF OAKLAWN | - | 678,668 | 25,343 | - | 704,011 | 704,011 | 487,474 | 216,537 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ORLAND PARK, S. HARLEM | 476,972 | 2,764,775 | (2,694,903 | ) | 87,998 | 458,846 | 546,844 | 163,240 | 383,603 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
| OAK LAWN | 1,530,111 | 8,776,631 | 588,483 | 1,530,111 | 9,365,115 | 10,895,225 | 3,596,903 | 7,298,322 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| OAKBROOK TERRACE | 1,527,188 | 8,679,108 | 3,298,212 | 1,527,188 | 11,977,320 | 13,504,508 | 4,215,711 | 9,288,797 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| PEORIA | - | 5,081,290 | 2,403,560 | - | 7,484,850 | 7,484,850 | 5,368,740 | 2,116,110 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| FREESTATE BOWL | 252,723 | 998,099 | (485,425 | ) | 252,723 | 512,674 | 765,396 | 123,060 | 642,336 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
| ROCKFORD CROSSING | 4,575,990 | 11,654,022 | (577,091 | ) | 4,583,005 | 11,069,916 | 15,652,921 | 1,881,847 | 13,771,073 | 10,226,384 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| ROUND LAKE BEACH PLAZA | 790,129 | 1,634,148 | 587,575 | 790,129 | 2,221,723 | 3,011,852 | 298,029 | 2,713,823 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| SKOKIE | - | 2,276,360 | 9,518,382 | 2,628,440 | 9,166,303 | 11,794,742 | 2,763,160 | 9,031,582 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| KRC STREAMWOOD | 181,962 | 1,057,740 | 216,585 | 181,962 | 1,274,324 | 1,456,287 | 443,639 | 1,012,648 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| HAWTHORN HILLS SQUARE | 6,783,928 | 33,033,624 | - | 6,783,928 | 33,033,624 | 39,817,551 | 449,689 | 39,367,863 | 21,471,879 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| WOODGROVE FESTIVAL | 5,049,149 | 20,822,993 | 4,067,683 | 4,805,866 | 25,133,960 | 29,939,825 | 9,043,249 | 20,896,576 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| WAUKEGAN PLAZA | 349,409 | 883,975 | 2,276,671 | 349,409 | 3,160,646 | 3,510,055 | 244,873 | 3,265,182 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| GREENWOOD | 423,371 | 1,883,421 | 3,259,073 | 584,445 | 4,981,420 | 5,565,865 | 3,221,547 | 2,344,318 | 1970 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTH BEND, S. HIGH ST. | 183,463 | 1,070,401 | 196,857 | 183,463 | 1,267,258 | 1,450,721 | 446,936 | 1,003,786 | 1998 |
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| OVERLAND PARK | 1,183,911 | 6,335,308 | 142,374 | 1,185,906 | 6,475,686 | 7,661,593 | 2,357,930 | 5,303,662 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| BELLEVUE | 405,217 | 1,743,573 | 247,204 | 405,217 | 1,990,776 | 2,395,994 | 1,837,655 | 558,339 | 1976 | ||||||||||||||
| LEXINGTON | 1,675,031 | 6,848,209 | 5,773,377 | 1,551,079 | 12,745,538 | 14,296,617 | 5,987,902 | 8,308,715 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| HAMMOND AIR PLAZA | 3,813,873 | 15,260,609 | 7,073,544 | 3,813,873 | 22,334,153 | 26,148,025 | 7,305,037 | 18,842,988 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTRE AT WESTBANK | 9,554,230 | 24,401,082 | 748,757 | 9,564,644 | 25,139,425 | 34,704,069 | 5,454,766 | 29,249,302 | 18,622,165 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| LAFAYETTE | 2,115,000 | 8,508,218 | 10,371,406 | 3,678,274 | 17,316,349 | 20,994,624 | 6,429,882 | 14,564,742 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| PRIEN LAKE | 6,426,167 | 15,181,072 | (109,020 | ) | 6,341,896 | 15,156,323 | 21,498,219 | 2,265,376 | 19,232,843 | 15,696,967 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
| PRIEN LAKE PLAZA OUTPARCEL | 540,000 | 1,260,000 | - | 540,000 | 1,260,000 | 1,800,000 | 14,700 | 1,785,300 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| AMBASSADOR PLAZA | 1,803,672 | 4,260,966 | (6,701 | ) | 1,796,972 | 4,260,966 | 6,057,938 | 636,346 | 5,421,592 | 4,585,336 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
| BAYOU WALK | 4,586,895 | 10,836,007 | 153,992 | 4,586,326 | 10,990,568 | 15,576,894 | 2,162,600 | 13,414,294 | 12,654,406 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| EAST SIDE PLAZA | 3,295,799 | 7,785,942 | 216,325 | 3,295,635 | 8,002,431 | 11,298,065 | 1,155,980 | 10,142,086 | 8,786,146 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| GREAT BARRINGTON | 642,170 | 2,547,830 | 7,315,207 | 751,124 | 9,754,083 | 10,505,207 | 3,875,356 | 6,629,851 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||
| SHREWSBURY SHOPPING CENTER | 1,284,168 | 5,284,853 | 5,000,687 | 1,284,168 | 10,285,540 | 11,569,708 | 3,049,544 | 8,520,163 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| SNOWDEN SQUARE S.C. | 1,929,402 | 4,557,934 | - | 1,929,402 | 4,557,934 | 6,487,336 | - | 6,487,336 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WILDE LAKE | 1,468,038 | 5,869,862 | 1,800,813 | 1,558,038 | 7,580,675 | 9,138,712 | 1,699,357 | 7,439,355 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
| LYNX LANE | 1,019,035 | 4,091,894 | 76,423 | 1,019,035 | 4,168,317 | 5,187,352 | 1,183,038 | 4,004,314 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
| CLINTON BANK BUILDING | 82,967 | 362,371 | - | 82,967 | 362,371 | 445,338 | 234,824 | 210,514 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| CLINTON BOWL | 39,779 | 130,716 | 4,247 | 38,779 | 135,963 | 174,742 | 73,284 | 101,459 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| TJMAXX | 1,279,200 | 2,870,800 | 11,810,000 | 4,597,200 | 11,362,800 | 15,960,000 | 256,207 | 15,703,793 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| VILLAGES AT URBANA | 3,190,074 | 6,067 | 10,496,574 | 4,828,774 | 8,863,942 | 13,692,715 | 802,502 | 12,890,214 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| GAITHERSBURG | 244,890 | 6,787,534 | 230,545 | 244,890 | 7,018,079 | 7,262,969 | 2,366,356 | 4,896,613 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| SHAWAN PLAZA | 4,466,000 | 20,222,367 | (857,895 | ) | 4,466,000 | 19,364,472 | 23,830,472 | 7,681,230 | 16,149,242 | 8,449,348 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| LAUREL | 349,562 | 1,398,250 | 1,073,324 | 349,562 | 2,471,574 | 2,821,136 | 1,300,592 | 1,520,544 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| LAUREL | 274,580 | 1,100,968 | 283,421 | 274,580 | 1,384,389 | 1,658,969 | 1,384,389 | 274,580 | 1972 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTHWEST MIXED USE PROPERTY | 403,034 | 1,325,126 | 306,510 | 361,035 | 1,673,635 | 2,034,670 | 846,473 | 1,188,197 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| OWINGS MILLS PLAZA | 303,911 | 1,370,221 | (503,247 | ) | 303,911 | 866,973 | 1,170,885 | 88,106 | 1,082,779 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| PERRY HALL | 3,339,309 | 12,377,339 | 824,994 | 3,339,309 | 13,202,333 | 16,541,642 | 5,332,593 | 11,209,049 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTRE COURT-RETAIL/BANK | 1,035,359 | 7,785,830 | - | 1,035,359 | 7,785,830 | 8,821,189 | 474,591 | 8,346,598 | 2,757,103 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| CENTRE COURT-GIANT | 3,854,099 | 12,769,628 | - | 3,854,099 | 12,769,628 | 16,623,727 | 642,900 | 15,980,828 | 7,622,825 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| CENTRE COURT-OLD COURT/COURTYD | 2,279,177 | 5,284,577 | - | 2,279,177 | 5,284,577 | 7,563,754 | 386,602 | 7,177,152 | 5,366,536 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| TIMONIUM SHOPPING CENTER | 6,000,000 | 24,282,998 | 16,354,691 | 7,331,195 | 39,306,494 | 46,637,689 | 16,208,739 | 30,428,950 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| TOWSON PLACE | 43,886,876 | 101,764,931 | 533,557 | 43,886,876 | 102,298,489 | 146,185,364 | 3,523,695 | 142,661,670 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WALDORF BOWL | 225,099 | 739,362 | 84,327 | 235,099 | 813,688 | 1,048,787 | 423,742 | 625,045 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| WALDORF FIRESTONE | 57,127 | 221,621 | - | 57,127 | 221,621 | 278,749 | 120,629 | 158,120 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| BANGOR, ME | 403,833 | 1,622,331 | 93,752 | 403,833 | 1,716,083 | 2,119,916 | 483,647 | 1,636,270 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
| MALLSIDE PLAZA | 6,930,996 | 18,148,727 | (245,736 | ) | 6,939,589 | 17,894,397 | 24,833,987 | 4,981,362 | 19,852,624 | 14,706,340 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| CLAWSON | 1,624,771 | 6,578,142 | 8,699,369 | 1,624,771 | 15,277,511 | 16,902,282 | 5,264,478 | 11,637,804 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| WHITE LAKE | 2,300,050 | 9,249,607 | 1,980,754 | 2,300,050 | 11,230,361 | 13,530,411 | 4,782,295 | 8,748,116 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| CANTON TWP PLAZA | 163,740 | 926,150 | 5,249,730 | 163,740 | 6,175,879 | 6,339,620 | 686,681 | 5,652,938 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| CLINTON TWP PLAZA | 175,515 | 714,279 | 1,147,275 | 59,450 | 1,977,619 | 2,037,068 | 499,210 | 1,537,858 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| FARMINGTON | 1,098,426 | 4,525,723 | 2,563,624 | 1,098,426 | 7,089,347 | 8,187,773 | 3,427,716 | 4,760,057 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| FLINT - VACANT LAND | 101,424 | - | - | 101,424 | - | 101,424 | - | 101,424 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| LIVONIA | 178,785 | 925,818 | 1,180,992 | 178,785 | 2,106,810 | 2,285,595 | 1,274,808 | 1,010,787 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||
| MUSKEGON | 391,500 | 958,500 | 952,381 | 391,500 | 1,910,881 | 2,302,381 | 1,628,078 | 674,303 | 1985 | ||||||||||||||
| OKEMOS PLAZA | 166,706 | 591,193 | 1,878,684 | 166,706 | 2,469,877 | 2,636,583 | 175,724 | 2,460,859 | - | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| TAYLOR | 1,451,397 | 5,806,263 | 275,289 | 1,451,397 | 6,081,552 | 7,532,949 | 2,978,032 | 4,554,917 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| WALKER | 3,682,478 | 14,730,060 | 2,108,718 | 3,682,478 | 16,838,778 | 20,521,256 | 7,957,641 | 12,563,616 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| EDEN PRAIRIE PLAZA | 882,596 | 911,373 | 570,450 | 882,596 | 1,481,823 | 2,364,419 | 186,485 | 2,177,934 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| FOUNTAINS AT ARBOR LAKES | 28,585,296 | 66,699,024 | 10,230,741 | 28,585,296 | 76,929,765 | 105,515,061 | 14,214,473 | 91,300,588 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| ROSEVILLE PLAZA | 132,842 | 957,340 | 4,739,103 | 132,842 | 5,696,443 | 5,829,285 | 699,739 | 5,129,546 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| CREVE COEUR, WOODCREST/OLIVE | 1,044,598 | 5,475,623 | 615,905 | 960,814 | 6,175,312 | 7,136,126 | 2,298,884 | 4,837,242 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CRYSTAL CITY, MI | - | 234,378 | - | - | 234,378 | 234,378 | 85,376 | 149,003 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| INDEPENDENCE, NOLAND DR. | 1,728,367 | 8,951,101 | 193,000 | 1,731,300 | 9,141,168 | 10,872,468 | 3,378,067 | 7,494,401 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| NORTH POINT SHOPPING CENTER | 1,935,380 | 7,800,746 | 679,841 | 1,935,380 | 8,480,587 | 10,415,967 | 2,982,749 | 7,433,218 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| KIRKWOOD | - | 9,704,005 | 13,172,627 | - | 22,876,632 | 22,876,632 | 11,532,591 | 11,344,042 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| KANSAS CITY | 574,777 | 2,971,191 | 274,976 | 574,777 | 3,246,167 | 3,820,944 | 1,264,213 | 2,556,730 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| LEMAY | 125,879 | 503,510 | 3,828,858 | 451,155 | 4,007,092 | 4,458,247 | 1,306,750 | 3,151,497 | 1974 | ||||||||||||||
| GRAVOIS | 1,032,416 | 4,455,514 | 11,032,682 | 1,032,413 | 15,488,199 | 16,520,612 | 7,923,972 | 8,596,640 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. CHARLES-UNDERDEVELOPED LAND, MO | 431,960 | - | 758,854 | 431,960 | 758,855 | 1,190,814 | 229,569 | 961,246 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| SPRINGFIELD | 2,745,595 | 10,985,778 | 7,221,086 | 2,904,022 | 18,048,437 | 20,952,459 | 7,377,882 | 13,574,577 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||
| KMART PARCEL | 905,674 | 3,666,386 | 4,933,942 | 905,674 | 8,600,328 | 9,506,001 | 2,258,408 | 7,247,593 | 1,418,352 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
| KRC ST. CHARLES | - | 550,204 | - | - | 550,204 | 550,204 | 197,509 | 352,695 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. LOUIS, CHRISTY BLVD. | 809,087 | 4,430,514 | 3,160,390 | 809,087 | 7,590,904 | 8,399,991 | 2,496,596 | 5,903,395 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| OVERLAND | - | 4,928,677 | 1,136,797 | - | 6,065,474 | 6,065,474 | 2,369,370 | 3,696,104 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. LOUIS | - | 5,756,736 | 849,684 | - | 6,606,420 | 6,606,420 | 2,647,657 | 3,958,763 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. LOUIS | - | 2,766,644 | 143,298 | - | 2,909,942 | 2,909,942 | 2,909,942 | - | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| ST. PETERS | 1,182,194 | 7,423,459 | 7,227,838 | 1,563,694 | 14,269,797 | 15,833,491 | 9,292,852 | 6,540,639 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| SPRINGFIELD,GLENSTONE AVE. | - | 608,793 | 2,100,419 | - | 2,709,212 | 2,709,212 | 820,464 | 1,888,748 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| TURTLE CREEK | 11,535,281 | - | 32,945,553 | 10,150,881 | 34,329,953 | 44,480,834 | 5,525,086 | 38,955,748 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| OVERLOOK VILLAGE | 8,276,500 | 17,249,587 | - | 8,276,500 | 17,249,587 | 25,526,087 | 446,927 | 25,079,160 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| CHARLOTTE | 919,251 | 3,570,981 | 2,343,716 | 919,251 | 5,914,696 | 6,833,948 | 2,100,714 | 4,733,233 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| TYVOLA RD. | - | 4,736,345 | 5,082,086 | - | 9,818,431 | 9,818,431 | 7,346,453 | 2,471,979 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| CROSSROADS PLAZA | 767,864 | 3,098,881 | 34,566 | 767,864 | 3,133,447 | 3,901,310 | 1,029,216 | 2,872,094 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| KIMCO CARY 696, INC. | 2,180,000 | 8,756,865 | 527,277 | 2,256,799 | 9,207,343 | 11,464,142 | 3,416,224 | 8,047,917 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| JETTON VILLAGE SHOPPES | 3,875,224 | 10,292,231 | (535,197 | ) | 2,143,695 | 11,488,563 | 13,632,258 | 410,825 | 13,221,433 | 8,174,304 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| MOUNTAIN ISLAND MARKETPLACE | 3,318,587 | 7,331,413 | - | 3,318,587 | 7,331,413 | 10,650,000 | 211,794 | 10,438,206 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WOODLAWN SHOPPING CENTER | 2,010,725 | 5,833,626 | - | 2,010,725 | 5,833,626 | 7,844,351 | 93,684 | 7,750,667 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| DURHAM | 1,882,800 | 7,551,576 | 2,097,270 | 1,882,800 | 9,648,846 | 11,531,646 | 4,027,430 | 7,504,216 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| DAVIDSON COMMONS | 2,978,533 | 12,859,867 | 11,600 | 2,978,533 | 12,871,467 | 15,850,000 | 224,091 | 15,625,909 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WESTRIDGE SQUARE S.C. | 7,456,381 | 19,778,703 | (282,578 | ) | 11,977,700 | 14,974,806 | 26,952,506 | 1,441,815 | 25,510,691 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| HILLSBOROUGH CROSSING | 519,395 | - | - | 519,395 | - | 519,395 | - | 519,395 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| PARK PLACE | 5,461,478 | 16,163,494 | 79,783 | 5,469,809 | 16,234,946 | 21,704,755 | 3,327,202 | 18,377,553 | 13,351,804 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| MOORESVILLE CROSSING | 12,013,727 | 30,604,173 | (520,444 | ) | 11,625,801 | 30,471,654 | 42,097,455 | 5,874,124 | 36,223,332 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| RALEIGH | 5,208,885 | 20,885,792 | 12,105,168 | 5,208,885 | 32,990,960 | 38,199,845 | 14,412,743 | 23,787,102 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| WAKEFIELD COMMONS II | 6,506,450 | - | (2,728,390 | ) | 2,357,636 | 1,420,424 | 3,778,060 | 320,662 | 3,457,399 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
| WAKEFIELD CROSSINGS | 3,413,932 | - | (3,017,960 | ) | 336,236 | 59,737 | 395,973 | 1,650 | 394,323 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
| EDGEWATER PLACE | 3,150,000 | - | 10,087,943 | 3,062,768 | 10,175,175 | 13,237,943 | 1,744,609 | 11,493,334 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| BRENNAN STATION | 7,749,751 | 20,556,891 | (970,033 | ) | 6,321,923 | 21,014,686 | 27,336,609 | 1,037,588 | 26,299,021 | 9,223,411 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| BRENNAN STATION OUTPARCEL | 627,906 | 1,665,576 | (93,482 | ) | 450,232 | 1,749,768 | 2,200,000 | 77,396 | 2,122,604 | 2011 |
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| WINSTON-SALEM | 540,667 | 719,655 | 6,059,518 | 540,667 | 6,779,173 | 7,319,840 | 3,116,963 | 4,202,877 | 4,800,575 | 1969 | |||||||||||||
| SORENSON PARK PLAZA | 5,104,294 | - | 31,258,442 | 4,017,569 | 32,345,167 | 36,362,736 | 2,732,253 | 33,630,484 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| LORDEN PLAZA | 8,872,529 | 22,548,382 | 222,227 | 8,883,003 | 22,760,134 | 31,643,138 | 3,994,273 | 27,648,865 | 24,688,250 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| ROCKINGHAM | 2,660,915 | 10,643,660 | 12,042,678 | 3,148,715 | 22,198,538 | 25,347,253 | 9,091,824 | 16,255,430 | 17,652,812 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| BRIDGEWATER NJ | 1,982,481 | (3,666,959 | ) | 11,229,293 | 1,982,481 | 7,562,335 | 9,544,815 | 3,502,689 | 6,042,126 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
| BAYONNE BROADWAY | 1,434,737 | 3,347,719 | 2,825,469 | 1,434,737 | 6,173,188 | 7,607,924 | 1,454,367 | 6,153,557 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| BRICKTOWN PLAZA | 344,884 | 1,008,941 | (307,857 | ) | 344,884 | 701,084 | 1,045,968 | 50,634 | 995,334 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| BRIDGEWATER PLAZA | 350,705 | 1,361,524 | 6,068,929 | 350,705 | 7,430,453 | 7,781,158 | 323,509 | 7,457,649 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| CHERRY HILL | 2,417,583 | 6,364,094 | 1,583,669 | 2,417,583 | 7,947,764 | 10,365,346 | 6,178,224 | 4,187,122 | 1985 | ||||||||||||||
| MARLTON PIKE | - | 4,318,534 | 9,000 | - | 4,327,534 | 4,327,534 | 1,814,867 | 2,512,667 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| CINNAMINSON | 652,123 | 2,608,491 | 3,448,659 | 652,123 | 6,057,150 | 6,709,273 | 2,570,735 | 4,138,538 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| GARDEN STATE PAVILIONS | 7,530,709 | 10,801,949 | (249,040 | ) | 7,530,709 | 10,552,909 | 18,083,618 | 1,249,226 | 16,834,392 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| EASTWINDOR VILLAGE | 9,335,011 | 23,777,978 | 63,800 | 9,335,011 | 23,841,778 | 33,176,789 | 3,196,805 | 29,979,984 | - | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| HILLSBOROUGH | 11,886,809 | - | (6,880,755 | ) | 5,006,054 | - | 5,006,054 | - | 5,006,054 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
| HOLMDEL TOWNE CENTER | 10,824,624 | 43,301,494 | 5,002,494 | 10,824,624 | 48,303,988 | 59,128,612 | 12,618,170 | 46,510,442 | 26,182,239 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
| HOLMDEL COMMONS | 16,537,556 | 38,759,952 | 3,442,519 | 16,537,556 | 42,202,471 | 58,740,027 | 11,798,091 | 46,941,936 | 18,964,653 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| HOWELL PLAZA | 311,384 | 1,143,159 | 4,694,515 | 311,384 | 5,837,674 | 6,149,058 | 525,817 | 5,623,240 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MAPLE SHADE | - | 9,957,611 | (78,995 | ) | - | 9,878,615 | 9,878,615 | 639,957 | 9,238,659 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| NORTH BRUNSWICK | 3,204,978 | 12,819,912 | 21,300,476 | 3,204,978 | 34,120,388 | 37,325,366 | 13,175,516 | 24,149,850 | 27,001,490 | 1994 | |||||||||||||
| PISCATAWAY TOWN CENTER | 3,851,839 | 15,410,851 | 692,255 | 3,851,839 | 16,103,106 | 19,954,945 | 6,075,094 | 13,879,851 | 10,741,884 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
| RIDGEWOOD | 450,000 | 2,106,566 | 1,015,675 | 450,000 | 3,122,241 | 3,572,241 | 1,328,600 | 2,243,641 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||
| SEA GIRT PLAZA | 457,039 | 1,308,010 | 1,460,149 | 457,039 | 2,768,159 | 3,225,198 | 219,802 | 3,005,396 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| UNION CRESCENT | 7,895,483 | 3,010,640 | 25,415,422 | 8,696,579 | 27,624,967 | 36,321,545 | 5,896,757 | 30,424,788 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| WESTMONT | 601,655 | 2,404,604 | 10,689,752 | 601,655 | 13,094,356 | 13,696,011 | 4,742,968 | 8,953,043 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||
| WILLOWBROOK PLAZA | 15,320,436 | 40,996,874 | (969,688 | ) | 15,320,436 | 40,027,186 | 55,347,622 | 7,082,874 | 48,264,747 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| SYCAMORE PLAZA | 1,404,443 | 5,613,270 | 283,450 | 1,404,443 | 5,896,720 | 7,301,163 | 2,289,963 | 5,011,200 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| PLAZA PASEO DEL-NORTE | 4,653,197 | 18,633,584 | 1,334,022 | 4,653,197 | 19,967,606 | 24,620,803 | 7,484,306 | 17,136,497 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| JUAN TABO, ALBUQUERQUE | 1,141,200 | 4,566,817 | 264,134 | 1,141,200 | 4,830,951 | 5,972,151 | 1,795,765 | 4,176,386 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| WARM SPRINGS PROMENADE | 7,226,363 | 19,109,946 | 2,609,141 | 7,226,363 | 21,719,087 | 28,945,450 | 4,642,620 | 24,302,830 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| COMP USA CENTER | 2,581,908 | 5,798,092 | (363,745 | ) | 2,581,908 | 5,434,347 | 8,016,255 | 2,767,691 | 5,248,564 | 2,749,590 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
| DEL MONTE PLAZA | 2,489,429 | 5,590,415 | 332,589 | 2,210,000 | 6,202,433 | 8,412,434 | 1,707,367 | 6,705,067 | 3,625,911 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| D'ANDREA MARKETPLACE | 11,556,067 | 29,435,364 | (56,105 | ) | 11,556,067 | 29,379,259 | 40,935,327 | 4,295,084 | 36,640,243 | 14,350,098 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
| KEY BANK BUILDING | 1,500,000 | 40,486,755 | - | 1,500,000 | 40,486,755 | 41,986,755 | 11,581,670 | 30,405,086 | 13,967,886 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| BRIDGEHAMPTON | 1,811,752 | 3,107,232 | 24,873,129 | 1,858,188 | 27,933,925 | 29,792,113 | 15,789,825 | 14,002,288 | 33,628,529 | 1972 | |||||||||||||
| GENOVESE DRUG STORE | 564,097 | 2,268,768 | - | 564,097 | 2,268,768 | 2,832,865 | 568,249 | 2,264,616 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| KINGS HIGHWAY | 2,743,820 | 6,811,268 | 1,338,513 | 2,743,820 | 8,149,781 | 10,893,601 | 2,423,832 | 8,469,769 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| HOMEPORT-RALPH AVENUE | 4,414,466 | 11,339,857 | 3,227,468 | 4,414,467 | 14,567,325 | 18,981,792 | 3,378,307 | 15,603,485 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| BELLMORE | 1,272,269 | 3,183,547 | 381,803 | 1,272,269 | 3,565,350 | 4,837,619 | 999,255 | 3,838,364 | 78,209 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| MARKET AT BAY SHORE | 12,359,621 | 30,707,802 | 1,145,127 | 12,359,621 | 31,852,929 | 44,212,550 | 8,591,642 | 35,620,908 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| 5959 BROADWAY | 6,035,726 | - | (2,612,192 | ) | 3,405,334 | 18,200 | 3,423,534 | 4,651 | 3,418,883 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| KEY FOOD OPERATOR ATLANTIC AVE | 2,272,500 | 5,624,589 | - | 2,272,500 | 5,624,589 | 7,897,089 | - | 7,897,089 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| KING KULLEN PLAZA | 5,968,082 | 23,243,404 | 4,934,985 | 5,980,130 | 28,166,341 | 34,146,471 | 9,678,626 | 24,467,845 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| PATHMARK SC | 6,714,664 | 17,359,161 | 526,939 | 6,714,664 | 17,886,100 | 24,600,764 | 4,018,260 | 20,582,504 | - | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| BIRCHWOOD PLAZA COMMACK | 3,630,000 | 4,774,791 | 274,672 | 3,630,000 | 5,049,463 | 8,679,463 | 1,299,251 | 7,380,213 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| ELMONT | 3,011,658 | 7,606,066 | 2,204,704 | 3,011,658 | 9,810,769 | 12,822,428 | 2,597,309 | 10,225,118 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| FRANKLIN SQUARE | 1,078,541 | 2,516,581 | 3,835,813 | 1,078,541 | 6,352,394 | 7,430,934 | 1,296,602 | 6,134,332 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| KISSENA BOULEVARD SC | 11,610,000 | 2,933,487 | 1,519 | 11,610,000 | 2,935,006 | 14,545,006 | 807,978 | 13,737,027 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| HAMPTON BAYS | 1,495,105 | 5,979,320 | 3,304,710 | 1,495,105 | 9,284,031 | 10,779,135 | 5,186,357 | 5,592,778 | 1989 | ||||||||||||||
| HICKSVILLE | 3,542,739 | 8,266,375 | 1,327,458 | 3,542,739 | 9,593,833 | 13,136,572 | 2,654,197 | 10,482,376 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| TURNPIKE PLAZA | 2,471,832 | 5,839,416 | 125,480 | 2,471,832 | 5,964,896 | 8,436,728 | 1,097,876 | 7,338,852 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| BIRCHWOOD PLAZA (NORTH & SOUTH) | 12,368,330 | 33,071,495 | 224,943 | 12,368,330 | 33,296,439 | 45,664,769 | 5,969,361 | 39,695,407 | 12,364,313 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| 501 NORTH BROADWAY | - | 1,175,543 | 607 | - | 1,176,150 | 1,176,150 | 593,997 | 582,153 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MERRYLANE (P/L) | 1,485,531 | 1,749 | 539 | 1,485,531 | 2,288 | 1,487,819 | 208 | 1,487,611 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| FAMILY DOLLAR UNION TURNPIKE | 909,000 | 2,249,775 | - | 909,000 | 2,249,775 | 3,158,775 | - | 3,158,775 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| DOUGLASTON SHOPPING CENTER | 3,277,254 | 13,161,218 | 3,777,781 | 3,277,253 | 16,939,000 | 20,216,253 | 3,897,231 | 16,319,023 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| KEY FOOD OPERATOR 21ST STREET | 1,090,800 | 2,699,730 | - | 1,090,800 | 2,699,730 | 3,790,530 | - | 3,790,530 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| MANHASSET VENTURE LLC | 4,567,003 | 19,165,808 | 24,661,004 | 3,471,939 | 44,921,876 | 48,393,816 | 17,724,834 | 30,668,982 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| MANHASSET CENTER (residential) | 950,000 | - | - | 950,000 | - | 950,000 | - | 950,000 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| MASPETH QUEENS-DUANE READE | 1,872,013 | 4,827,940 | 931,187 | 1,872,013 | 5,759,126 | 7,631,139 | 1,472,344 | 6,158,795 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| MASSAPEQUA | 1,880,816 | 4,388,549 | 964,761 | 1,880,816 | 5,353,310 | 7,234,126 | 1,594,788 | 5,639,337 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| MINEOLA SC | 4,150,000 | 7,520,692 | (413,995 | ) | 4,150,000 | 7,106,697 | 11,256,697 | 1,506,875 | 9,749,822 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| BIRCHWOOD PARK DRIVE (LAND LOT) | 3,507,162 | 4,126 | 49,191 | 3,507,406 | 53,074 | 3,560,480 | 466 | 3,560,014 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| SMITHTOWN PLAZA | 3,528,000 | 7,364,098 | 289,959 | 3,528,000 | 7,654,056 | 11,182,056 | 885,427 | 10,296,630 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| 4452 BROADWAY | 12,412,724 | - | (5,400,000 | ) | 7,012,724 | - | 7,012,724 | - | 7,012,724 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| PREF. EQUITY-30 WEST 21ST STREET | 6,250,000 | 21,974,274 | 11,441,353 | 6,250,000 | 33,415,627 | 39,665,627 | 2,291,319 | 37,374,308 | - | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| PLAINVIEW | 263,693 | 584,031 | 9,810,734 | 263,693 | 10,394,766 | 10,658,458 | 5,253,472 | 5,404,986 | 13,372,058 | 1969 | |||||||||||||
| POUGHKEEPSIE | 876,548 | 4,695,659 | 13,008,483 | 876,548 | 17,704,142 | 18,580,690 | 8,630,708 | 9,949,982 | 15,055,537 | 1972 | |||||||||||||
| SYOSSET, NY | 106,655 | 76,197 | 1,551,676 | 106,655 | 1,627,873 | 1,734,528 | 987,021 | 747,507 | 1990 | ||||||||||||||
| STATEN ISLAND | 2,280,000 | 9,027,951 | 7,421,413 | 2,280,000 | 16,449,364 | 18,729,364 | 9,386,052 | 9,343,312 | 1989 | ||||||||||||||
| STATEN ISLAND | 2,940,000 | 11,811,964 | 1,191,309 | 3,148,424 | 12,794,849 | 15,943,273 | 4,920,384 | 11,022,889 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| STATEN ISLAND PLAZA | 5,600,744 | 6,788,460 | (1,553,829 | ) | 5,600,744 | 5,234,632 | 10,835,375 | 303,161 | 10,532,215 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| HYLAN PLAZA | 28,723,536 | 38,232,267 | 33,893,096 | 28,723,536 | 72,125,364 | 100,848,899 | 19,716,591 | 81,132,308 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| STOP N SHOP STATEN ISLAND | 4,558,592 | 10,441,408 | 155,848 | 4,558,592 | 10,597,256 | 15,155,848 | 2,977,858 | 12,177,990 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| KEY FOOD OPERATOR CENTRAL AVE. | 2,787,600 | 6,899,310 | - | 2,787,600 | 6,899,310 | 9,686,910 | - | 9,686,910 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WHITE PLAINS | 1,777,775 | 4,453,894 | 2,010,606 | 1,777,775 | 6,464,500 | 8,242,274 | 1,783,336 | 6,458,938 | 2,956,088 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| CHAMPION FOOD SUPERMARKET | 757,500 | 1,874,813 | - | 757,500 | 1,874,813 | 2,632,313 | - | 2,632,313 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| YONKERS | 871,977 | 3,487,909 | - | 871,977 | 3,487,909 | 4,359,886 | 1,773,622 | 2,586,264 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| STRAUSS ROMAINE AVENUE | 782,459 | 1,825,737 | 586,255 | 782,459 | 2,411,992 | 3,194,451 | 303,737 | 2,890,714 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| BEAVERCREEK | 635,228 | 3,024,722 | 4,205,673 | 635,228 | 7,230,395 | 7,865,623 | 4,633,238 | 3,232,385 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| OLENTANGY RIVER RD. | 764,517 | 1,833,600 | 2,340,830 | 764,517 | 4,174,430 | 4,938,947 | 3,554,751 | 1,384,196 | 1988 | ||||||||||||||
| MONTGOMERY PLAZA | 530,893 | 1,302,656 | 3,226,699 | 530,893 | 4,529,354 | 5,060,248 | 414,150 | 4,646,098 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| KENT, OH | 6,254 | 3,028,914 | - | 6,254 | 3,028,914 | 3,035,168 | 1,967,433 | 1,067,735 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| KENT | 2,261,530 | - | - | 2,261,530 | - | 2,261,530 | - | 2,261,530 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| NORTH OLMSTED | 626,818 | 3,712,045 | 35,000 | 626,818 | 3,747,045 | 4,373,862 | 2,635,775 | 1,738,087 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| ORANGE OHIO | 3,783,875 | - | (2,342,306 | ) | 921,704 | 519,865 | 1,441,569 | - | 1,441,569 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
| EDMOND | 477,036 | 3,591,493 | 375,195 | 477,036 | 3,966,688 | 4,443,724 | 1,401,219 | 3,042,505 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTENNIAL PLAZA | 4,650,634 | 18,604,307 | 437,071 | 4,650,634 | 19,041,378 | 23,692,012 | 8,114,100 | 15,577,912 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CANBY SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER | 2,727,000 | 4,347,500 | (180,402 | ) | 2,727,000 | 4,167,098 | 6,894,098 | 1,058,383 | 5,835,714 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| OREGON TRAIL CENTER | 5,802,422 | 12,622,879 | (164,516 | ) | 5,802,422 | 12,458,362 | 18,260,784 | 2,835,919 | 15,424,866 | 2009 |
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| POWELL VALLEY JUNCTION | 5,062,500 | 3,152,982 | (2,801,856 | ) | 2,035,125 | 3,378,501 | 5,413,626 | 913,731 | 4,499,895 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| MEDFORD CENTER | 8,940,798 | 16,995,113 | 46,881 | 8,943,600 | 17,039,192 | 25,982,792 | 3,765,357 | 22,217,435 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| MCMINNVILLE | 4,062,327 | - | 881,473 | 4,062,327 | 881,473 | 4,943,800 | 18,895 | 4,924,906 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PIONEER PLAZA | 952,740 | 6,638,583 | 3,012,460 | 3,982,020 | 6,621,763 | 10,603,783 | 2,039,818 | 8,563,965 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| ALLEGHENY | - | 30,061,177 | 59,094 | - | 30,120,271 | 30,120,271 | 6,162,210 | 23,958,061 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| SUBURBAN SQUARE | 70,679,871 | 166,351,381 | 4,358,017 | 71,279,871 | 170,109,398 | 241,389,270 | 34,626,138 | 206,763,132 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| CHIPPEWA | 2,881,525 | 11,526,101 | 153,289 | 2,881,525 | 11,679,391 | 14,560,916 | 3,911,007 | 10,649,909 | 5,919,679 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
| BROOKHAVEN PLAZA | 254,694 | 973,318 | (61,414 | ) | 254,694 | 911,903 | 1,166,598 | 72,032 | 1,094,565 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
| CARNEGIE | - | 3,298,908 | 17,747 | - | 3,316,655 | 3,316,655 | 1,105,552 | 2,211,103 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTER SQUARE | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | 1,269,064 | 731,888 | 4,196,615 | 4,928,503 | 2,250,128 | 2,678,375 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| WAYNE PLAZA | 6,127,623 | 15,605,012 | 210,038 | 6,135,670 | 15,807,004 | 21,942,674 | 2,118,606 | 19,824,068 | 13,803,320 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| CHAMBERSBURG CROSSING | 9,090,288 | - | 26,037,242 | 8,790,288 | 26,337,242 | 35,127,530 | 4,038,945 | 31,088,585 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| DEVON VILLAGE | 4,856,379 | 25,846,910 | - | 4,856,379 | 25,846,910 | 30,703,289 | 407,493 | 30,295,795 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| EAST STROUDSBURG | 1,050,000 | 2,372,628 | 1,434,371 | 1,050,000 | 3,806,999 | 4,856,999 | 2,985,664 | 1,871,335 | 1973 | ||||||||||||||
| RIDGE PIKE PLAZA | 1,525,337 | 4,251,732 | 3,016,678 | 1,525,337 | 7,268,410 | 8,793,747 | 1,152,303 | 7,641,444 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| EXTON | 176,666 | 4,895,360 | - | 176,666 | 4,895,360 | 5,072,026 | 1,631,787 | 3,440,239 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| EXTON | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | - | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | 3,659,439 | 1,226,069 | 2,433,370 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| EASTWICK | 889,001 | 2,762,888 | 3,074,728 | 889,001 | 5,837,616 | 6,726,617 | 2,271,015 | 4,455,603 | 4,258,331 | 1997 | |||||||||||||
| EXTON PLAZA | 294,378 | 1,404,778 | 338,373 | 130,246 | 1,907,284 | 2,037,529 | 175,108 | 1,862,422 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| FEASTERVILLE | 520,521 | 2,082,083 | 2,593,014 | 520,521 | 4,675,097 | 5,195,618 | 887,834 | 4,307,784 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| GETTYSBURG | 74,626 | 671,630 | 101,519 | 74,626 | 773,149 | 847,775 | 750,878 | 96,897 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| HARRISBURG, PA | 452,888 | 6,665,238 | 3,969,364 | 452,888 | 10,634,601 | 11,087,489 | 7,428,586 | 3,658,903 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
| HAMBURG | 439,232 | - | 2,023,428 | 494,982 | 1,967,677 | 2,462,660 | 543,391 | 1,919,269 | 2,062,577 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
| HAVERTOWN | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | - | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | 3,659,439 | 1,226,069 | 2,433,370 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| NORRISTOWN | 686,134 | 2,664,535 | 3,751,641 | 774,084 | 6,328,226 | 7,102,310 | 4,249,355 | 2,852,956 | 1984 | ||||||||||||||
| NEW KENSINGTON | 521,945 | 2,548,322 | 705,540 | 521,945 | 3,253,862 | 3,775,807 | 2,939,109 | 836,698 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| PHILADELPHIA | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | - | 731,888 | 2,927,551 | 3,659,439 | 1,226,069 | 2,433,370 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| PHILADELPHIA PLAZA | 209,197 | 1,373,843 | 16,952 | 209,197 | 1,390,795 | 1,599,992 | 125,900 | 1,474,093 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| STRAUSS WASHINGTON AVENUE | 424,659 | 990,872 | 468,821 | 424,659 | 1,459,693 | 1,884,352 | 363,424 | 1,520,928 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| WEXFORD PLAZA | 6,413,635 | 9,774,600 | 5,413,946 | 6,413,635 | 15,188,547 | 21,602,182 | 1,742,241 | 19,859,940 | 12,500,000 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| 242-244 MARKET STREET | 704,263 | 2,117,182 | 290,927 | 704,263 | 2,408,109 | 3,112,372 | 104,290 | 3,008,082 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| 1401 WALNUT ST LOWER ESTATE - UNIT A | - | 7,001,199 | 173,928 | - | 7,175,127 | 7,175,127 | 1,113,355 | 6,061,771 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| 1401 WALNUT ST LOWER ESTATE | - | 32,081,992 | (256,606 | ) | - | 31,825,386 | 31,825,386 | 3,417,725 | 28,407,661 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| 1831-33 CHESTNUT STREET | 1,982,143 | 5,982,231 | (601,274 | ) | 1,740,416 | 5,622,684 | 7,363,100 | 258,238 | 7,104,862 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| 1429 WALNUT STREET-COMMERCIAL | 5,881,640 | 17,796,661 | (17,251,273 | ) | 4,530,789 | 1,896,240 | 6,427,029 | 1,776,743 | 4,650,286 | 6,705,528 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 1805 WALNUT STREET UNIT A | - | 17,311,529 | 2,929,832 | - | 20,241,360 | 20,241,360 | 424,388 | 19,816,972 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| RICHBORO | 788,761 | 3,155,044 | 12,694,159 | 976,439 | 15,661,524 | 16,637,964 | 8,557,940 | 8,080,024 | 9,353,995 | 1986 | |||||||||||||
| SPRINGFIELD | 919,998 | 4,981,589 | 10,121,925 | 920,000 | 15,103,512 | 16,023,512 | 6,559,055 | 9,464,457 | 1983 | ||||||||||||||
| UPPER DARBY | 231,821 | 927,286 | 5,779,270 | 231,821 | 6,706,556 | 6,938,377 | 2,604,689 | 4,333,688 | 3,345,831 | 1996 | |||||||||||||
| WEST MIFFLIN | 1,468,342 | - | - | 1,468,342 | - | 1,468,342 | - | 1,468,342 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| WHITEHALL | - | 5,195,577 | - | - | 5,195,577 | 5,195,577 | 2,175,926 | 3,019,651 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| W. MARKET ST. | 188,562 | 1,158,307 | - | 188,562 | 1,158,307 | 1,346,869 | 1,158,307 | 188,562 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||
| REXVILLE TOWN CENTER | 24,872,982 | 48,688,161 | 6,073,121 | 25,678,064 | 53,956,200 | 79,634,264 | 19,860,598 | 59,773,666 | 39,022,236 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| PLAZA CENTRO - COSTCO | 3,627,973 | 10,752,213 | 1,554,239 | 3,866,206 | 12,068,219 | 15,934,425 | 5,303,539 | 10,630,885 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PLAZA CENTRO - MALL | 19,873,263 | 58,719,179 | 7,435,470 | 19,408,112 | 66,619,799 | 86,027,911 | 28,394,791 | 57,633,121 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PLAZA CENTRO - RETAIL | 5,935,566 | 16,509,748 | 2,482,741 | 6,026,070 | 18,901,985 | 24,928,055 | 8,212,600 | 16,715,455 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PLAZA CENTRO - SAM'S CLUB | 6,643,224 | 20,224,758 | 2,356,555 | 6,520,090 | 22,704,447 | 29,224,537 | 20,944,334 | 8,280,203 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| LOS COLOBOS - BUILDERS SQUARE | 4,404,593 | 9,627,903 | 1,378,199 | 4,461,145 | 10,949,550 | 15,410,696 | 6,255,889 | 9,154,807 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| LOS COLOBOS - KMART | 4,594,944 | 10,120,147 | 743,305 | 4,402,338 | 11,056,057 | 15,458,396 | 6,510,717 | 8,947,679 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| LOS COLOBOS I | 12,890,882 | 26,046,669 | 3,340,866 | 13,613,375 | 28,665,042 | 42,278,417 | 12,145,876 | 30,132,541 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| LOS COLOBOS II | 14,893,698 | 30,680,556 | 3,367,798 | 15,142,300 | 33,799,752 | 48,942,052 | 14,422,685 | 34,519,367 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| WESTERN PLAZA - MAYAQUEZ ONE | 10,857,773 | 12,252,522 | 1,296,644 | 11,241,993 | 13,164,945 | 24,406,939 | 5,724,931 | 18,682,007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| WESTERN PLAZA - MAYAGUEZ TWO | 16,874,345 | 19,911,045 | 1,732,421 | 16,872,647 | 21,645,164 | 38,517,811 | 9,464,269 | 29,053,542 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MANATI VILLA MARIA SC | 2,781,447 | 5,673,119 | 417,977 | 2,606,588 | 6,265,955 | 8,872,543 | 3,505,919 | 5,366,624 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| PONCE TOWN CENTER | 14,432,778 | 28,448,754 | 4,972,360 | 14,903,024 | 32,950,868 | 47,853,893 | 8,985,068 | 38,868,825 | 22,728,601 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| TRUJILLO ALTO PLAZA | 12,053,673 | 24,445,858 | 3,847,438 | 12,289,288 | 28,057,682 | 40,346,970 | 14,827,153 | 25,519,817 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MARSHALL PLAZA, CRANSTON RI | 1,886,600 | 7,575,302 | 1,771,187 | 1,886,600 | 9,346,489 | 11,233,089 | 3,821,835 | 7,411,254 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CHARLESTON | 730,164 | 3,132,092 | 18,725,743 | 730,164 | 21,857,835 | 22,587,999 | 6,357,742 | 16,230,257 | 1978 | ||||||||||||||
| CHARLESTON | 1,744,430 | 6,986,094 | 4,308,629 | 1,744,430 | 11,294,723 | 13,039,153 | 4,681,114 | 8,358,040 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| FLORENCE | 1,465,661 | 6,011,013 | 849,832 | 1,465,661 | 6,860,845 | 8,326,506 | 2,476,193 | 5,850,313 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| GREENVILLE | 2,209,812 | 8,850,864 | 887,322 | 2,209,811 | 9,738,187 | 11,947,998 | 3,849,666 | 8,098,332 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CHERRYDALE POINT | 5,801,948 | 32,055,019 | 1,165,166 | 5,801,948 | 33,220,185 | 39,022,133 | 3,676,308 | 35,345,825 | - | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| WOODRUFF SHOPPING CENTER | 3,110,439 | 15,501,117 | 1,182,533 | 3,465,199 | 16,328,890 | 19,794,089 | 980,086 | 18,814,003 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
| FOREST PARK | 1,920,241 | 9,544,875 | - | 1,920,241 | 9,544,875 | 11,465,115 | 183,040 | 11,282,075 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| MADISON | - | 4,133,904 | 2,880,678 | - | 7,014,582 | 7,014,582 | 5,461,380 | 1,553,202 | 1978 | ||||||||||||||
| HICKORY RIDGE COMMONS | 596,347 | 2,545,033 | (2,404,809 | ) | 683,820 | 52,750 | 736,571 | 15,667 | 720,903 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
| TROLLEY STATION | 3,303,682 | 13,218,740 | 203,711 | 3,303,682 | 13,422,451 | 16,726,133 | 4,909,872 | 11,816,262 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| MARKET PLACE AT RIVERGATE | 2,574,635 | 10,339,449 | 1,544,098 | 2,574,635 | 11,883,547 | 14,458,182 | 4,616,355 | 9,841,827 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| RIVERGATE, TN | 3,038,561 | 12,157,408 | 3,914,995 | 3,038,561 | 16,072,403 | 19,110,964 | 5,793,057 | 13,317,907 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTER OF THE HILLS, TX | 2,923,585 | 11,706,145 | 1,106,611 | 2,923,585 | 12,812,756 | 15,736,341 | 5,106,895 | 10,629,446 | 9,876,829 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| ARLINGTON | 3,160,203 | 2,285,378 | 490,738 | 3,160,203 | 2,776,116 | 5,936,320 | 891,995 | 5,044,325 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| DOWLEN CENTER | 2,244,581 | - | (722,251 | ) | 484,828 | 1,037,502 | 1,522,330 | 87,738 | 1,434,592 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
| GATEWAY STATION | 1,373,692 | 28,145,158 | 14,389 | 1,374,880 | 28,158,358 | 29,533,238 | 903,104 | 28,630,133 | - | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| BAYTOWN | 500,422 | 2,431,651 | 681,655 | 500,422 | 3,113,306 | 3,613,728 | 1,201,001 | 2,412,727 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| LAS TIENDAS PLAZA | 8,678,107 | - | 25,971,206 | 7,943,925 | 26,705,388 | 34,649,313 | 2,393,126 | 32,256,187 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| CORPUS CHRISTI, TX | - | 944,562 | 3,526,281 | - | 4,470,843 | 4,470,843 | 1,216,263 | 3,254,579 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| ISLAND GATE PLAZA | 4,343,000 | 4,723,215 | 230,224 | 4,343,000 | 4,953,438 | 9,296,438 | 293,813 | 9,002,625 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| PRESTON LEBANON CROSSING | 13,552,180 | - | 25,307,090 | 12,163,694 | 26,695,576 | 38,859,270 | 2,377,064 | 36,482,206 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| LAKE PRAIRIE TOWN CROSSING | 7,897,491 | - | 24,220,124 | 6,783,464 | 25,334,151 | 32,117,615 | 2,783,528 | 29,334,087 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| CENTER AT BAYBROOK | 6,941,017 | 27,727,491 | 9,849,161 | 7,063,186 | 37,454,483 | 44,517,669 | 11,379,867 | 33,137,802 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| HARRIS COUNTY | 1,843,000 | 7,372,420 | 2,272,522 | 2,003,260 | 9,484,682 | 11,487,942 | 3,459,942 | 8,028,000 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||
| CYPRESS TOWNE CENTER | 6,033,932 | - | 1,041,845 | 2,251,666 | 4,824,111 | 7,075,777 | 211,531 | 6,864,246 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| SHOPS AT VISTA RIDGE | 3,257,199 | 13,029,416 | 332,552 | 3,257,199 | 13,361,967 | 16,619,167 | 5,201,257 | 11,417,909 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| VISTA RIDGE PLAZA | 2,926,495 | 11,716,483 | 2,239,786 | 2,926,495 | 13,956,270 | 16,882,764 | 5,297,941 | 11,584,823 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| VISTA RIDGE PHASE II | 2,276,575 | 9,106,300 | 1,226,061 | 2,276,575 | 10,332,361 | 12,608,936 | 3,536,613 | 9,072,324 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTH PLAINES PLAZA, TX | 1,890,000 | 7,555,099 | 444,355 | 1,890,000 | 7,999,454 | 9,889,454 | 2,978,446 | 6,911,008 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||
| LAKE JACKSON | 1,562,328 | 4,144,212 | - | 1,562,328 | 4,144,212 | 5,706,540 | 153,224 | 5,553,316 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| MESQUITE | 520,340 | 2,081,356 | 1,081,051 | 520,340 | 3,162,408 | 3,682,747 | 1,360,886 | 2,321,862 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| MESQUITE TOWN CENTER | 3,757,324 | 15,061,644 | 2,394,853 | 3,757,324 | 17,456,497 | 21,213,821 | 6,637,964 | 14,575,857 | 1998 |
| INITIAL COST | SUBSEQUENT | TOTAL COST, NET OF | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUILDING & | TO | BUILDING & | ACCUMULATED | ACCUMULATED | DATE OF | DATE OF | |||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTIES | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | ACQUISITION | LAND | IMPROVEMENT | TOTAL | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ENCUMBRANCES | ACQUISITION | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||
| NEW BRAUNSFELS | 840,000 | 3,360,000 | - | 840,000 | 3,360,000 | 4,200,000 | 820,144 | 3,379,856 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| PARKER PLAZA | 7,846,946 | - | - | 7,846,946 | - | 7,846,946 | - | 7,846,946 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| PLANO | 500,414 | 2,830,835 | - | 500,414 | 2,830,835 | 3,331,249 | 1,174,107 | 2,157,142 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| SOUTHLAKE OAKS | 3,011,260 | 7,703,844 | (62,791 | ) | 3,019,951 | 7,632,363 | 10,652,313 | 2,009,778 | 8,642,536 | 6,192,143 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| WOODBRIDGE SHOPPING CENTER | 2,568,705 | 6,813,716 | - | 2,568,705 | 6,813,716 | 9,382,421 | 222,553 | 9,159,869 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| WEST OAKS | 500,422 | 2,001,687 | 325,191 | 500,422 | 2,326,878 | 2,827,300 | 875,080 | 1,952,220 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||
| OGDEN | 213,818 | 855,275 | 4,084,007 | 850,699 | 4,302,401 | 5,153,100 | 1,960,182 | 3,192,918 | 1967 | ||||||||||||||
| COLONIAL HEIGHTS | 125,376 | 3,476,073 | 294,598 | 125,376 | 3,770,671 | 3,896,047 | 1,241,353 | 2,654,695 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| OLD TOWN VILLAGE | 4,500,000 | 41,569,735 | (2,194,866 | ) | 4,300,819 | 39,574,050 | 43,874,869 | 2,185,444 | 41,689,424 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| RICHMOND | 82,544 | 2,289,288 | 280,600 | 82,544 | 2,569,889 | 2,652,432 | 727,619 | 1,924,813 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| RICHMOND | 670,500 | 2,751,375 | - | 670,500 | 2,751,375 | 3,421,875 | 1,241,294 | 2,180,580 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||
| VALLEY VIEW SHOPPING CENTER | 3,440,018 | 8,054,004 | 922,790 | 3,440,018 | 8,976,794 | 12,416,812 | 1,945,689 | 10,471,123 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| POTOMAC RUN PLAZA | 27,369,515 | 48,451,209 | (639,454 | ) | 27,369,515 | 47,811,755 | 75,181,270 | 10,338,425 | 64,842,845 | 40,997,953 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| MANCHESTER SHOPPING CENTER | 2,722,461 | 6,403,866 | 639,555 | 2,722,461 | 7,043,421 | 9,765,882 | 2,278,877 | 7,487,005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||
| AUBURN NORTH | 7,785,841 | 18,157,625 | 60,221 | 7,785,841 | 18,217,846 | 26,003,688 | 5,120,435 | 20,883,253 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| FRONTIER VILLAGE SHOPPING CTR. | 10,750,863 | 34,566,734 | 96,299 | 10,750,863 | 34,663,033 | 45,413,896 | 936,452 | 44,477,445 | 32,418,427 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| OLYMPIA WEST OUTPARCEL | 360,000 | 799,640 | 40,360 | 360,000 | 840,000 | 1,200,000 | 15,400 | 1,184,600 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| SILVERDALE PLAZA | 3,875,013 | 32,083,427 | 205,450 | 3,875,013 | 32,288,878 | 36,163,890 | 907,828 | 35,256,063 | 25,050,616 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| CHARLES TOWN | 602,000 | 3,725,871 | 11,269,416 | 602,000 | 14,995,287 | 15,597,287 | 8,669,491 | 6,927,796 | 1985 | ||||||||||||||
| BLUE RIDGE | 12,346,900 | 71,529,796 | (8,432,419 | ) | 17,608,591 | 57,835,686 | 75,444,277 | 16,200,943 | 59,243,334 | 14,561,754 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
| MICROPROPERTIES | 24,206,390 | 56,481,576 | - | 24,206,390 | 56,481,576 | 80,687,966 | 2,096,513 | 78,591,453 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| BRAZIL-RIO CLARO | 1,300,000 | - | 3,772,616 | 1,485,574 | 3,587,042 | 5,072,616 | 255,004 | 4,817,612 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| BRAZIL-VALINHOS | 5,204,507 | 14,997,200 | 7,368,362 | 1,777,214 | 25,792,855 | 27,570,069 | 1,073,687 | 26,496,382 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| CHILE-EKONO | 414,730 | - | 782,802 | 477,858 | 719,674 | 1,197,532 | 93,789 | 1,103,743 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| CHILE-VICUNA MACKENA | 362,556 | 5,205,439 | (1,083,208 | ) | 2,083,831 | 2,400,956 | 4,484,787 | 218,218 | 4,266,569 | 40,336,996 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| CHILE-VINA DEL MAR | 11,096,948 | 720,781 | 57,366,844 | 17,095,769 | 52,088,804 | 69,184,573 | 848,759 | 68,335,814 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-HERMOSILLO | 11,424,531 | - | 32,709,395 | 11,933,599 | 32,200,327 | 44,133,926 | 1,639,074 | 42,494,852 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-GIGANTE ACQ. | 7,568,417 | 19,878,026 | (5,696,608 | ) | 5,866,102 | 15,883,733 | 21,749,835 | 3,970,928 | 17,778,908 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| MEXICO-MOTOROLA | 47,272,528 | - | 57,967,312 | 39,201,766 | 66,038,074 | 105,239,840 | 2,993,678 | 102,246,162 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON ADM BT-LOS CABOS | 10,873,070 | 1,257,517 | 9,050,975 | 9,127,801 | 12,053,761 | 21,181,563 | 2,078,591 | 19,102,972 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON ADM-GRAN PLZ CANCUN | 13,976,402 | 30,219,719 | (9,417,640 | ) | 15,782,094 | 18,996,388 | 34,778,481 | 5,092,210 | 29,686,271 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON BUS ADM-MULT.CANCUN | 4,471,987 | - | 12,789,095 | 4,650,512 | 12,610,570 | 17,261,082 | 450,635 | 16,810,447 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-PLAZA SORIANA | 2,639,975 | 346,945 | 257,302 | 2,384,667 | 859,555 | 3,244,222 | - | 3,244,222 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-PLAZA CENTENARIO | 3,388,861 | - | 3,914,208 | 2,698,888 | 4,604,181 | 7,303,069 | 566,388 | 6,736,681 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON BUS.ADM -LINDAVISTA | 19,352,453 | - | 24,362,687 | 16,484,680 | 27,230,460 | 43,715,140 | 2,761,512 | 40,953,628 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NONADM BUS-NUEVO LAREDO | 10,627,540 | - | 19,967,340 | 8,697,111 | 21,897,768 | 30,594,879 | 4,266,135 | 26,328,744 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON ADM-PLAZA LAGO REAL | 11,336,743 | - | 18,051,588 | 9,521,305 | 19,867,026 | 29,388,331 | 631,171 | 28,757,159 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-MULTIPLAZA OJO DE AGUA | 4,089,067 | - | 11,247,962 | 4,244,783 | 11,092,246 | 15,337,029 | 1,072,271 | 14,264,758 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-PACHUCA (WALMART) | 3,621,985 | - | 5,711,916 | 3,253,476 | 6,080,425 | 9,333,901 | 1,838,821 | 7,495,080 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-NON ADM -PLAZA SAN JUAN | 9,631,035 | - | 2,494,078 | 6,586,692 | 5,538,421 | 12,125,113 | 524,000 | 11,601,113 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-RHODESIA | 3,924,464 | - | 9,767,648 | 4,517,829 | 9,174,283 | 13,692,112 | 894,726 | 12,797,386 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-RIO BRAVO HEB | 2,970,663 | - | 12,816,912 | 2,860,837 | 12,926,738 | 15,787,575 | 1,864,929 | 13,922,646 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-SALTILLO 2 | 11,150,023 | - | 16,604,023 | 9,425,609 | 18,328,437 | 27,754,046 | 4,974,037 | 22,780,009 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-SAN PEDRO | 3,309,654 | 13,238,616 | (3,098,054 | ) | 3,443,840 | 10,006,376 | 13,450,216 | 5,825,049 | 7,625,167 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| MEXICO-TAPACHULA | 13,716,428 | - | 19,589,751 | 11,329,441 | 21,976,738 | 33,306,179 | 1,375,665 | 31,930,514 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-TIJUANA 2000 LAND PURCHASE | 1,200,000 | - | 62,833 | 1,262,833 | - | 1,262,833 | - | 1,262,833 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| MEXICO-WALDO ACQ. | 8,929,278 | 16,888,627 | (6,134,466 | ) | 7,135,228 | 12,548,212 | 19,683,439 | 2,457,726 | 17,225,713 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| PERU-CAMPOY | 2,675,461 | - | 278,383 | 2,784,870 | 168,974 | 2,953,844 | 0 | 2,953,844 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| PERU-LIMA | 811,916 | - | 2,453,532 | 1,051,179 | 2,214,269 | 3,265,448 | 140,510 | 3,124,938 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| BALANCE OF PORTFOLIO | 133,248,688 | 4,492,127 | 11,287,272 | 1,763,183 | 147,264,903.95 | 149,028,087 | 40,346,030 | 108,682,055 | |||||||||||||||
| TOTALS | 2,239,195,318 | 4,916,652,429 | 1,791,438,899 | 2,045,185,881 | 6,902,100,765 | 8,947,286,646 | 1,745,461,577 | 7,201,825,069 | 1,003,189,611 |
Depreciation and amortization are provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
| Buildings | 15 to 50 years | |
|---|---|---|
| Fixtures, building and leasehold improvements (including certain identified intangible assets) | Terms of leases or useful lives, whichever is shorter |
The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $7.9 billion at December 31, 2012.
The changes in total real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance, beginning of period | 8,771,256,852 | 8,587,378,001 | 8,877,013,625 | |||||||||
| Acquisitions | 411,166,315 | 406,431,259 | 83,833,304 | |||||||||
| Improvements | 85,801,777 | 118,072,955 | 115,592,035 | |||||||||
| Transfers from (to) unconsolidated joint ventures | 212,231,319 | (49,812,485 | ) | 115,482,953 | ||||||||
| Sales | (503,767,086 | ) | (186,887,870 | ) | (603,652,663 | ) | ||||||
| Assets held for sale | (9,845,065 | ) | (4,503,823 | ) | (4,445,309 | ) | ||||||
| Adjustment of fully depreciated assets | (21,711,782 | ) | (27,412,282 | ) | (15,047,644 | ) | ||||||
| Adjustment of property carrying values | (34,121,504 | ) | (4,616,890 | ) | (17,601,053 | ) | ||||||
| Change in exchange rate | 36,275,820 | (67,392,013 | ) | 36,202,753 | ||||||||
| Balance, end of period | 8,947,286,646 | 8,771,256,852 | 8,587,378,001 |
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance, beginning of period | 1,693,089,989 | 1,549,380,256 | 1,343,148,498 | |||||||||
| Depreciation for year | 248,426,786 | 237,782,626 | 244,903,628 | |||||||||
| Transfers (to) unconsolidated joint ventures | (8,390,550 | ) | (2,725,794 | ) | - | |||||||
| Sales | (161,515,292 | ) | (59,086,170 | ) | (23,610,893 | ) | ||||||
| Adjustment of fully depreciated assets | (21,711,782 | ) | (27,412,282 | ) | (15,047,644 | ) | ||||||
| Assets held for sale | (6,582,611 | ) | (633,676 | ) | (13,333 | ) | ||||||
| Change in exchange rate | 2,145,037 | (4,214,971 | ) | |||||||||
| Balance, end of period | 1,745,461,577 | 1,693,089,989 | 1,549,380,256 |
Reclassifications:
Certain Amounts in the Prior Period Have Been Reclassified in Order to Conform with the Current Period's Presentation.
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
As of December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
| Type of Loan/Borrower | Description | Location (c) | Interest Accrual Rates | Interest Payment Rates | Final Maturity Date | Periodic Payment Terms (a) | Prior Liens | Face Amount of Mortgages or Maximum Available Credit (b) | Carrying Amount of Mortgages (b) (c) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgage Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Borrower A | Retail Development | Ontario, Canada | 8.50% | 8.50% | 4/13/2013 | I | - | $ | 16,906 | $ | 16,897 | |||||||||
| Borrower B | Apartments | Montreal, Canada | 8.50% | 8.50% | 6/27/2013 | P& I | - | 23,800 | 7,016 | |||||||||||
| Borrower C | Senior Living Center | Parker, CO | 7.00% | 7.00% | 12/31/2013 | P& I | - | 4,358 | 4,358 | |||||||||||
| Borrower D | Retail | Jacksonville, FL | 6.00% | 6.00% | 11/2/2013 | P&I | - | 4,221 | 4,221 | |||||||||||
| Borrower E | Retail | Arboledas, Mexico | 8.10% | 8.10% | 12/16/2013 | P&I | - | 13,000 | 3,835 | |||||||||||
| Borrower F | Retail | Miami, FL | 7.57% | 7.57% | 6/1/2019 | P&I | - | 6,509 | 3,792 | |||||||||||
| Borrower G | Retail | Las Vegas, NV | 10.00% | 10.00% | 5/14/2033 | I | - | 3,075 | 3,075 | |||||||||||
| Borrower H | Retail | Guadalajara, Mexico | 12.00% | 12.00% | 9/1/2016 | P&I | - | 5,307 | 2,706 | |||||||||||
| Borrower I | Retail | Miami, FL | 7.57% | 7.57% | 6/1/2019 | P&I | - | 4,201 | 2,633 | |||||||||||
| Borrower J | Retail | Miami, FL | 7.57% | 7.57% | 6/1/2019 | P&I | - | 3,966 | 2,584 | |||||||||||
| Borrower K | Retail | Miami, FL | 7.57% | 7.57% | 6/1/2019 | P&I | - | 3,678 | 2,394 | |||||||||||
| Individually < 3% | (d) | (e) | (e) | (f) | - | 15,779 | 13,800 | |||||||||||||
| 104,800 | 67,311 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lines of Credit: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually < 3% | 8.00% | 8.00% | 12/31/2013 | 2,400 | 1,405 | |||||||||||||||
| Other: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually < 3% | (g) | (g) | (h) | 2,050 | 1,952 | |||||||||||||||
| Capitalized loan costs | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 109,250 | $ | 70,704 |
(a) I = Interest only; P&I = Principal & Interest
(b) The instruments actual cash flows are denominated in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos as indicated by the geographic location above
(c) The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes is $70.7 million
(d) Comprised of 14 separate loans with original loan amounts ranging between $0.4 million and $3.3 million
(e) Interest rates range from 6.00% to 12.00%
(f) Maturity dates range from one to 18 years
(g) Interest rates range from 2.28% to 5.50%
(h) Maturity dates range from six to 15 years
For a reconcilition of mortgage and other financing receivables from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report of Form 10K.
The Company feels it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of each receivable as quoted market prices are not available.
The cost of obtaining an independent valuation on these assets is deemed excessive considering the materiality of the total receivables.
Previous: Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules