Leidos Holdings 10-K 2025-01-03

Filed 2025-02-11. 24 sections, 535K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON

What changed since the 2023-12-29 10-KNew, removed and reworded risk factor headings, then every item sentence by sentence.

Cover and table of contents

logoa22.jpg

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025

or

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-33072

Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware20-3562868
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1750 Presidents Street,Reston,Virginia20190
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(571) 526-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $.0001 per shareLDOSNew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer☐
Non-accelerated filer☐Smaller reporting company☐
Emerging growth company☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. x

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No x

As of June 28, 2024, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of Leidos Holdings, Inc. common stock (based upon the closing price of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $19,549,744,128.

The number of shares issued and outstanding of the registrant’s class of common stock as of February 4, 2025, was 131,167,372 shares ($.0001 par value per share).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (”2025 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements1
Part I
Item 1. Business3
Item 1A. Risk Factors14
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments37
Item 1C. Cybersecurity37
Item 2. Properties38
Item 3. Legal Proceedings39
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures39
Executive Officers of the Registrant40
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities43
Item 6. [Reserved]45
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations46
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk57
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data58
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure104
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures104
Item 9B. Other Information106
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections106
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance107
Item 11. Executive Compensation107
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters108
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence108
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services108
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules109
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary112
Signatures113

Table of Contents

LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our management’s belief and assumptions about the future in light of information currently available to our management. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar words or phrases or the negative of these words or phrases. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. There are a number of important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those results anticipated by our forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to:

udevelopments in the U.S. government defense and non-defense budgets, including budget reductions, sequestration, implementation of spending limits or changes in budgetary priorities, delays in the U.S. government budget process or a government shutdown, or the U.S. government’s failure to raise the debt ceiling, which increases the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession;

uuncertainties in tax due to new tax legislation or other regulatory developments;

udeterioration of economic conditions or weakening in credit or capital markets;

uuncertainty in the consequences of current and future geopolitical events;

uinflationary pressures and fluctuations in interest rates;

udelays in the U.S. government contract procurement process or the award of contracts and delays or loss of contracts as a result of competitor protests;

uchanges in U.S. government procurement rules, regulations and practices, including its organizational conflict of interest rules;

uchanges in global trade policies, tariffs and other measures that could restrict international trade;

uincreased preference by the U.S. government for minority-owned, small and small disadvantaged businesses;

ufluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

uour compliance with various U.S. government and other government procurement rules and regulations;

ugovernmental reviews, audits and investigations of our company;

uour ability to effectively compete and win contracts with the U.S. government and other customers;

uour ability to respond rapidly to emerging technology trends, including the use of artificial intelligence;

uour reliance on information technology spending by hospitals/healthcare organizations;

uour reliance on infrastructure investments by industrial and natural resources organizations;

uenergy efficiency and alternative energy sourcing investments;

uinvestments by U.S. government and commercial organizations in environmental impact and remediation projects;

uthe effects of an epidemic, pandemic or similar outbreak may have on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows;

uour ability to attract, train and retain skilled employees, including our management team, and to obtain security clearances for our employees;

uour ability to accurately estimate costs, including cost increases due to inflation, associated with our firm-fixed-price (“FFP”) contracts and other contracts;

uresolution of legal and other disputes with our customers and others or legal or regulatory compliance issues;

ucybersecurity, data security or other security threats, system failures or other disruptions of our business;

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report1

Table of Contents

LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K

uour compliance with international, federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding privacy, data security, protection, storage, retention, transfer, disposal and other processing, technology protection and personal information;

uthe damage and disruption to our business resulting from natural disasters and the effects of climate change;

uour ability to effectively acquire businesses and make investments;

uour ability to maintain relationships with prime contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners;

uour ability to manage performance and other risks related to customer contracts;

uthe failure of our inspection or detection systems to detect threats;

uthe adequacy of our insurance programs, customer indemnifications or other liability protections designed to protect us from significant product or other liability claims, including cybersecurity attacks;

uour ability to manage risks associated with our international business;

uour ability to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and similar worldwide anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations;

uour ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights by third parties of infringement, misappropriation or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights;

uour ability to prevail in litigation brought by third parties of infringement, misappropriation or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights;

uour ability to declare or increase future dividends based on our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, including compliance with applicable law and our agreements;

uour ability to grow our commercial health and infrastructure businesses, which could be negatively affected by budgetary constraints faced by hospitals and by developers of energy and infrastructure projects;

uour ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses; and

uour ability to execute our business plan and long-term management initiatives effectively and to overcome these and other known and unknown risks that we face.

We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances, changes in expectations, or the occurrence of unanticipated events after the date of those statements or to conform these statements to actual results.

2Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1. Business

OUR COMPANY

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (“Leidos”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary and principal operating company is Leidos, Inc. Leidos was founded in 1969 by physicist Dr. Robert Beyster. Since our founding 56 years ago, we have applied our expertise in science, research and engineering in rapidly-evolving technologies and markets to solve complex problems of global concern.

We use the terms “we,” “us” and “our” to refer collectively to Leidos Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Leidos is an industry and technology leader serving government and commercial customers with smarter, more efficient digital and mission innovations. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, with 48,000, global employees, we bring domain-specific capabilities, technologies and insights to customers in each of these markets by leveraging seven technical core capabilities: trusted mission artificial intelligence, cyber operations, digital modernization, mission software systems, integrated systems, mission operations, and rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Applying our technically-advanced solutions to help solve our customers’ most difficult problems has enabled us to build strong relationships with key customers. Our customers include the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) and many other U.S. civilian, state and local government agencies, foreign government agencies and commercial businesses. With a focus on delivering mission-critical solutions, Leidos generated 87% of revenues for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, (“fiscal 2024”) from U.S. government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government. Approximately 8% of our revenues are generated by entities located outside of the United States.

By leveraging expertise in multiple disciplines, tailoring our services and solutions to the particular needs of our targeted markets and using advanced analytics, we work to securely deliver services and solutions that not only meet customers’ current goals, but also support their future missions.

For additional discussion and analysis related to recent business developments, see “Business Environment and Trends” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Beginning in fiscal 2024, we realigned our business and operate in four reportable segments that are focused on specific, defined capability sets we bring to our customers. As a result of this change, prior year segment results and disclosures have been recast to reflect the current reportable segment structure. We now operate in the following reportable segments: National Security & Digital, Health & Civil, Commercial & International and Defense Systems. We also separately present the unallocated costs associated with corporate functions as Corporate.

We provide a wide array of scientific, engineering and technical services and solutions across these reportable segments.

NATIONAL SECURITY & DIGITAL

Our National Security & Digital business provides leading-edge and technologically advanced services, solutions and products, as well as mission software capabilities for defense and intelligence customers in the areas of cyber, logistics, security operations and decision analytics. We also deliver IT operations and digital transformation programs across all U.S. federal government customers. Our advanced capabilities include the delivery of technology-enabled services, mission software capabilities and IT modernization services. Our capabilities allow us to provide innovative technology solutions in software development, engineering & design, modeling & simulation, analytics, cyber security, intelligence analysis, linguistics and mission operations.

uMission Software – We deliver trusted national security software for defense, intelligence, and homeland security customers. Our mission software aims to provide the decision advantage for protecting the homeland, securing critical infrastructure, enabling logistics and conducting multi-domain operations. The core of this capability offering is our Secure Development Operations approach that is designed to ensure our code is secure and assured from the start, enabling our mission partners to focus on execution.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report3

Table of Contents

PART I

uMulti-Domain Solutions – We provide services by using artificial intelligence and machine learning to coordinate sea, ground, air and space rapidly and securely, helping our warfighters have the right information at the right time to take action with decision advantage. We apply an open architecture approach to digitally connect the joint force across air, land, sea, cyber and space domains in support of the DoD’s multi-domain operations through innovative solutions, essential services and enriched data management tools facilitating critical decision making.

uCyber Operations – We offer full-spectrum cyber solutions to include offensive, defensive, and physical cyber operations. We drive new advances for our customers in the areas of Zero Trust, Cognitive Cyber, Quantum Cryptography, Identity, Credential and Access Management. We deliver global-scale cryptographic management solutions to protect our customers’ most critical information and assets.

uIntelligence Analysis, Mission Support, and Global Logistics Services – We provide intelligence analysis, operational support, logistics operations, security, linguistics, force production, biometrics, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives, energetics, and training. In addition, we deliver tailored IT services and solutions to our customers. We offer product support and lifecycle sustainment services to our customers, including planning and managing the cost and performance across the product’s lifecycle. We offer reverse engineering, classified manufacturing and design, and threat exploitation services to U.S. Intelligence Community customers. We use predictive analytics and AI to securely deliver transformational logistics to our customers. We provide a wide range of integrated logistics systems, including rapid procurement, inventory and facility management, and distribution systems.

uDigital Modernization – We provide worldwide digital support for our nation’s largest and most critical infrastructure. We design, develop, implement and maintain IT environments to provide stability and flexibility to mission needs. Our capabilities support offerings including cybersecurity, data analytics, and operations and logistics. Our cybersecurity solutions help detect and manage the most sophisticated cyber threats.

uDigital Transformation – We deliver secure, user-centric IT solutions in cloud computing, mobility, application modernization, DevOps, data center and network modernization, asset management, help desk operations and digital workplace enablement. We help our customers achieve their missions and business goals by delivering purpose-built solutions, cybersecurity as a standard, efficient project delivery and end-user satisfaction. We accelerate enterprise transformation using customizable roadmaps and repeatable processes, enabling customers to effectively use their resources and advance their objectives. Using our cyber expertise, we continually enhance our techniques and processes to build systems that operate resiliently in the face of evolving cyber threats. Leidos is modernizing enterprise IT in classified and unclassified environments, including programs with the FAA, NASA, U.S. Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, U.S. MINT, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

National Security & Digital represented 44% of total revenues for fiscal 2024, 47% of total revenues for both the fiscal year ended December 29, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”) and the fiscal year ended December 30, 2022 (“fiscal 2022”).

HEALTH & CIVIL

Our Health & Civil business provides services and solutions to federal and commercial customers in the areas of public health, care coordination, life and environmental sciences and transportation. We are dedicated to delivering effective and affordable solutions that are responsible for the health and well-being of people, including service members and veterans. Our core capabilities include health information management services, managed health services, systems and infrastructure modernization, and life sciences research and development. We help customers achieve their missions and take on the connected world with data-driven insights, improved efficiencies and technological advantages. Health & Civil represented 30% of total revenues for fiscal 2024 and 27% of total revenues for both fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022.

uTransportation Solutions – Leidos is a trusted systems developer, service provider and integrator serving Air Navigation Service Providers around the world, including the FAA. We provide air traffic control systems that help manage the world’s most complex airspace. We deliver many of the FAA’s key automation systems and services, including the En Route Automation Modernization (“ERAM”), Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures (“ATOP”), Time Based Flow Management, Terminal Flight Data Manager, Enterprise-Information Display System, Geo-7 and Future Flight Services. Leidos received 10 plus year extensions to the ERAM and ATOP contracts for continued delivery of the evolving National Airspace System needs. In addition, under the Mode S Beacon Replacement Systems contract, Leidos is supporting the replacement of the FAA’s Mode S Beacon Systems, which are secondary surveillance radar capable of providing surveillance and specific aircraft information necessary to support Air Traffic Control automation in all traffic environments. We also provide key air traffic control systems around the world, including New Zealand and South Korea.

4Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

uHealth Mission Software – Leidos employs holistic-systems used for fielding applied technology solutions across the entire continuum of healthcare. We deliver a single, common electronic health record to both DoD and VA hospitals and treatment facilities worldwide. Our responsibilities range from integrating software for the electronic healthcare record vendor and dental record vendors to integrating picture archiving and communications software and more. We support cybersecurity across all integrated systems. We also provide enterprise IT solutions to the VA, National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), DoD and other federal health customers to help operate mission critical infrastructure reliably and at a reasonable cost.

uManaged Health Services – We deploy a national footprint of health clinics and health providers to support care delivery services, including medical disability and behavioral health examinations for the VA, as well as serving other independent medical exam markets. We have developed unique capabilities in behavioral health management through many decades of experience with a special emphasis on substance abuse services and non-medical counseling. We believe that these capabilities can be expanded into other clinical adjacencies. Our managed health services activities leverage our IT and mission enablement capabilities, which underpin solutions we offer to our customers across all of our served markets.

uClimate, Energy and Environment – We believe that we are trusted by government agencies with substantial environmental and sustainability driven-missions. We strive to ensure that our reputation across climate science, environmental management and operations, nuclear security, infrastructure management, mission support and IT modernization provides the applicable expertise needed to transform operations while modernizing aging infrastructure and maintaining environmental stewardship. We support the critical missions of the Department of Energy (“DoE”), National Nuclear Security Administration, and National Science Foundation. At the DoE Hanford site, we provide site-wide infrastructure management and operation, including oversight of land and logistics, public works, information technology, fleet transportation, environmental sustainability, and compliance, first responder services and future project planning. At the National Energy Technology Laboratory, we actively conduct and support fundamental and applied research efforts, including providing product and logistical support comprising strategic business development, technology transfer and agreements and education and outreach support for the effective and efficient execution of research programs.

uLife Sciences Research & Development – We provide life science research and development support to the NIH, Center for Disease Control, Army Medical Research community and commercial biotech companies. Most notably, on behalf of the U.S. government and the public trust, we operate the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, where we employ thousands of scientists, technicians, administrators and support staff. Our professionals operate a wide range of leading-edge research and development laboratories in the areas of genetics and genomics, proteins and proteomics, advanced biomedical computing and information technology, biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing, nanotechnology characterization and clinical trials management.

From the biomedical sciences to implementing and optimizing electronic health records and enabling providers to perform care coordination and population health management, Leidos is pioneering the use of the depth and breadth of systems integration principles, processes and technologies to transform the health industry’s evolution towards better quality and more efficient and effective care.

COMMERCIAL & INTERNATIONAL

Commercial & International delivers a portfolio of products, services, and solutions aimed at securing national assets, modernizing energy and critical infrastructure, and enhancing mission outcomes. Our key customers include Investor-Owned Utilities, government agencies in the United Kingdom and Australia, the Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Customs & Border Protection ("CBP"), as well as airports and ports and borders authorities. We offer a broad range of capabilities, including design and engineering services, security products and solutions, digital modernization, mission software, logistics, and airborne solutions. Commercial & International represented 14% of total revenues for both fiscal 2024 and 2023, and 13% of total revenues for fiscal 2022.

uEnergy Infrastructure – Leidos partners with utilities seeking reliable energy modernization solutions, demonstrated by our strong relationships and collaboration with over 75 investor-owned utilities. Our project portfolio spans large-scale energy initiatives across the United States, serving electric utilities, generation owners, and industrial clients. We support utilities and industrial customers in modernizing power delivery systems for enhanced reliability, implementing energy management strategies, advancing vehicle electrification, transforming digital infrastructure, and optimizing operational efficiency to meet evolving energy demands and market expectations. Our expertise spans power grid engineering and design, grid modernization, utility planning and consulting, energy management and efficiency, technical and financial consulting, and technology-driven innovation, including software and application development.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report5

Table of Contents

PART I

uGlobal Security Products and Services – Leidos is a global leader in fully integrated security detection solutions, enhancing the safety of screening and checkpoints for aviation, ports, borders, and critical infrastructure worldwide. With over 30,000 products deployed across more than 120 countries, we lead the aviation screening equipment sector, including people scanners, computed tomography carry-on baggage scanners, checked baggage scanners, and explosive trace detectors. Leidos is also the primary supplier of mobile, non-intrusive inspection systems to CBP and other international customers. Our Ports & Borders solutions secure the flow of travel and trade by effectively detecting and mitigating threats across cargo, vehicles, and individuals. Our digital solution features a secure and scalable open-architecture platform that transforms airport security by integrating disparate devices and technologies into a unified management system. This holistic approach provides real-time data and automated controls, improving throughput and operational efficiency.

uInternational – Leidos delivers a wide range of mission-focused services across multiple domains to address critical threats and provide innovative solutions to government agencies in the UK and Australia. Our core areas of expertise include Digital Modernization, Mission Software, Logistics, and Airborne Solutions. In the UK, we are a trusted partner of the Ministry of Defense, delivering logistics and transformation solutions, developing advanced biometric and smart border protection systems to enhance national security, and leading IT service management and transformation programs. In Australia, we provide secure, resilient, and innovative technology solutions that support the Defense sector’s modern warfighting capabilities. We also conduct aerial border surveillance and search-and-rescue operations, covering Australia’s exclusive economic zone and search-and-rescue region.

DEFENSE SYSTEMS

Defense Systems addresses threats facing our nation by rapidly prototyping and delivering advanced hardware, software, and integrated systems solutions for the U.S. Department of Defense, Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, Marine Corps, United States Special Operations Command, NASA, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, intelligence agencies, and international customers. We are heavily engaged in the top defense Research Development Test and Evaluation priorities that are driven by critical evolving threat-driven needs. Defense Systems provides services in the air, land, sea, space and cyberspace environments. The Defense Systems business is dedicated to delivering cost-effective solutions in the space, airborne, land, maritime and cyber domains and supporting critical missions worldwide. Defense Systems represented 12% of total revenues for both fiscal 2024 and 2023, and 13% of total revenues for fiscal 2022.

uAirborne Systems – Leidos develops and integrates mission-enhancing airborne solutions, equipping government and Leidos-owned fixed-wing, rotary-wing, and unmanned aircraft with advanced sensors and processing systems. We execute airborne training, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions as a service for the DoD, the U.S. Intelligence Community, and military services worldwide. Our key served markets include aircraft integration and operations, sensor and autonomous systems, and Multi-Domain Operation enablers, addressing diverse missions such as target identification, border security, and counter-narcotics operations. We design and integrate open-architecture sensing systems powered by advanced sensors, algorithms, and processing capabilities to meet complex mission requirements. Beyond integration, we deliver high-end solutions and services globally, providing intelligence analysis, operational support, and logistics. Leidos airborne also designs and manufactures low-cost, high-impact airborne effectors, including guided munitions (e.g. GBU-69), cruise missiles (e.g. Black Arrow), and components for air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. In the realm of autonomous systems, we develop innovative software and hardware solutions for unmanned aerial systems and autonomous platforms. Our unique autonomy algorithms enhance system capabilities, decision-making, alleviate the burden on warfighters, and enable seamless coordination between manned and autonomous platforms, ensuring mission success in dynamic environments.

uLand Systems – We develop Integrated Air and Missile Defense systems, including the US Army Enduring Indirect Fire Protection Capability and AirShield systems. Enduring Shield is a ground-based, mobile system that defends against cruise missiles and unmanned aircraft systems. The system protects and defends critical civilian and military infrastructure, bridging the gap between tactical short range air defense and strategic systems. We are delivering systems for Initial Operational Test & Evaluation, and we are under contract to deliver systems in support of Guam Defense. AirShield delivers robust air defense while on the move, providing capabilities among the most advanced in the industry. The system employs advanced threat assessment along with kinetic and non-kinetic effectors that is designed to provide air defense against unmanned aerial vehicles, particularly in dynamic operational environments. We design and manufacture persistent surveillance radar systems, advanced sensors, and radio frequency seekers, including the associated advanced algorithms that accompany them. We use this expertise to provide military sensor and electronic system R&D services for our customers.

6Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

uMaritime Systems – On and under the sea, we offer a wide range of capabilities. We continue to enhance our surface and subsurface autonomous and unmanned technologies to help make maritime operations safer and more efficient for government and industry by providing innovative platforms, software solutions for vessel control and autonomous behaviors, leading sensor systems, signal processing, communications hardware and software to support these vital missions. We are a market leader in submarine data collection technologies and anti-submarine warfare system installation and maintenance and are expanding our capabilities in these areas to meet market demand for this growing threat. We also provide prototyping and research and development support services to a wide variety of DoD customers from concept analysis to classified manufacturing. Our naval architecture services span the entire ship’s lifetime, from early-stage concept designs through detailed design, shipyard construction support, full lifecycle and sustainment support, ship alterations, service life extensions, and disposal. Our marine engineering involves a wide range of activities, beginning with concept and feasibility design and continues through land-based test sites, cyber and shock hardening of key components, detailed design, construction support, life-cycle support and into ship-alt design for service-life extensions.

uAerospace Systems – We provide expertise in the design, manufacturing, and integration of space-based electro-optic infrared system, multi/hyperspectral, electronic warfare and signals intelligence, and communications payloads. In space we provide sensor, algorithm development and integrated payload capabilities to identify and track threats and cue defensive systems. We have developed and delivered full integrated small satellite systems and are under contract for payload deliveries on the Space Development Agency Wide Field of View Tranches 0, 1, and 2 programs. We manufacture structures and thermal protection systems for hypersonic boost-glide missiles, and we provide testing services for hypersonic vehicles.

uCyber and Threat Systems - We offer reverse engineering, classified manufacturing and design, and threat exploitation services to a wide breadth of U.S. Intelligence Community customers. We model, simulate, and analyze cyber and electro-magnetic threats, develop threat emulators for range testing, and develop cyber-physical solutions.

CORPORATE

Corporate includes the operations of various corporate activities, certain expense items that are not reimbursed by our U.S. government customers and certain other expense items excluded from a reportable segment’s performance.

ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

During fiscal 2022, we completed the acquisition of Cobham Aviation Services Australia’s Special Mission business. See “Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

During fiscal 2023, we completed an immaterial disposition of a business within our Defense Solutions segment. During fiscal 2022, we completed the disposition of Aviation & Missile Solutions LLC within our Defense Solutions segment. For further information, see “Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

KEY CUSTOMERS

The majority of our revenues are generated in the United States. Our consolidated revenues are largely attributable to prime contracts or to subcontracts with other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government, with the remaining attributable to international customers, including the UK Ministry of Defence and Australian Department of Defence, and customers across a variety of commercial markets. Within the U.S. government, our revenues are diversified across many agencies, including various intelligence agencies, the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force, U.S Space Force, DHS, Defense Information Security Agency, FAA, Transportation Security Administration, CBP, Defense Health Agency, VA, Department of Health and Human Services, NASA, National Science Foundation, DoE, the Environmental Protection Agency and research agencies such as Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

These customers have a number of subsidiary agencies that have separate budgets and procurement functions. Our contracts may be with the highest level of these agencies or with the subsidiary agencies of these customers.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report7

Table of Contents

PART I

HUMAN CAPITAL

EMPLOYEE AND WORKFORCE DEMOGRAPHICS

As of January 3, 2025, we employed approximately 48,000 full and part-time employees of whom approximately 42,600 are located in the United States and the remainder of which are located in approximately 50 countries worldwide. Approximately 37% of our employees have degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics fields, approximately 24% of our employees have advanced degrees, 52% of our employees possess U.S. security clearances and approximately 19% of our employees are military veterans.

As of January 3, 2025, our workforce consisted of the following:

Gender of global employees**(1)**
Male65%
Female35%

(1)Based on employees who self-identify.

Age of global employees
Less than 30 years15%
30-50 years48%
Greater than 50 years37%
Ethnicity of U.S. employees**(1)**
White59%
Black14%
Asian/Indian10%
Hispanic/Latino10%
Other4%
Undisclosed3%

(1)Based on employees who self-identify.

CULTURE AND CORPORATE VALUES

Leidos has adopted six values that help define its culture: integrity, inclusion, innovation, agility, collaboration and commitment. These values provide a roadmap for our workplace behavior and help guide our business decisions. They are a key component of our corporate culture and are part of our employees’ annual performance assessments. Our values are based on our commitment to do the right thing for our customers, our employees and our communities. Our values are demonstrated by our employees as they help our customers execute important missions in the world’s most complex markets.

Our policies, procedures, training and communications form a comprehensive program that promotes a culture of integrity as a foundation for employee conduct. For the seventh consecutive year, the Ethisphere Institute named Leidos one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies in 2024.

Our approach to workplace culture and employee development focuses on education and best practices for leaders and employees. Leidos has programs designed to promote our corporate values throughout the enterprise and with our senior leadership. Leaders, managers and employees of the Company are required to take annual training to reinforce our corporate values.

We continue to grow and expand our learning and upskilling tools to develop and enhance our employees technical and leadership skills to actively maintain our workplace culture. Company councils continue to champion and integrate Leidos values across the enterprise and are comprised of employees across our business areas and functions with oversight and guidance from executive leadership.

8Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

TALENT ACQUISITION PRACTICES

Leidos is committed to promoting hiring practices that are designed and executed to recruit, hire, train and retain best-in-class talent, including building a deep and broad pipeline of candidates. We leverage college campuses, military veteran resources, industry associations, and other sources to expand our outreach. Each year we also attend and sponsor national conferences and local career fairs that target our key market segments and talent.

Our military veteran outreach program attracts, retains and supports current veterans, transitioning service members and military spouses. Our college campus outreach engages talent from multiple university sources.

CAREER MOBILITY AND GROWTH

We have a strong focus on our employees’ career, flexibility and well-being. We embrace what makes Leidos great by advancing a culture that helps every employee achieve personal and professional success. This is part of our broader Employee Value Proposition to 'break limits' and a commitment to make Leidos an even better place to work. Leidos empowers and challenges employees to continuously seek, share and apply new knowledge, skills and behaviors. We recognize the value of a high-performing workforce where every member of the team has an opportunity to feel motivated, valued and fulfilled, and have a purposeful and long career at Leidos. We provide resources, development, and experiential learning to enable employees to grow, including a talent marketplace where employees can fill temporary roles to develop skills or provide additional assistance. We provide leaders with the knowledge, skills and resources needed to coach employees and enable employees’ career development.

We value and develop a future-ready workforce to meet customer needs and stay ahead of emerging technologies. We have a strong technical upskilling and reskilling program to develop, mobilize and retain talent. We offer formal programs to help employees earn many industry-standard professional and technical certifications. Additionally, we offer tuition reimbursement and certification exam reimbursement to full-time employees at accredited universities.

Our Internal Mobility Program has a dedicated team that proactively focuses on the mobilization of our employees. We teach employees how to use the tools and resources available to them and help them gain visibility across the enterprise. We assist managers and recruiters in identifying internal candidates for their programs.

We conduct formal employee engagement surveys to listen to employees and develop customized strategies to drive engagement, inclusion and retention across the organization.

We invest in our current and future leaders in several ways. We provide a variety of leadership development programs, targeted for each level of leader, and numerous resources for leader development. Annually, we host a two-day Leadership Summit for approximately 350 of our most senior leaders to align our growth strategy and transformation initiatives.

Through our ongoing talent planning processes, we identify and develop high-potential employees for future roles. We create succession plans for all executive-level positions as well as for other roles throughout the organization considered vital to our success. In addition, we establish development and engagement plans for top talent that may include formal training, mentoring, coaching, sponsorship and experiential learning opportunities.

HEALTH AND WORKPLACE SAFETY

Our primary focus is on the health and safety of our employees, with the physical and mental well-being of our employees being top priority. To support the physical and mental well-being of our employees, we provide many well-being and mental health benefits to all employees, including access to our Employee Assistance Program, Headspace, Personify Health and meQuilibrium resources. These partners provide a multitude of free resources to assist employees with their mental, financial, and physical health.

We are a leader in the field of occupational health and safety (“OH&S”), and place a strong emphasis on these activities, both internally and on behalf of our customers. Internally, we emphasize direct management responsibility, corporate policies and procedures, OH&S program implementation, employee training and compliance assessments. Our corporate policies and procedures support compliance with OH&S regulations at work locations. We have a proactive compliance program of employee education, training, auditing and reporting that, through employee awareness and integration into our business operations, supports our commitment to a safe and healthy work environment.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report9

Table of Contents

PART I

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Our operations are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, our operations may become subject to future laws and regulations, including those related to climate change and environmental sustainability. See “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details. Although we do not currently anticipate that the costs of complying with, or the liabilities associated with, environmental laws will materially and adversely affect us, we cannot ensure that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in the future.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

We conduct research and development activities under customer-funded contracts and with company-funded research and development funds. Company-funded research and development includes independent research and development (“IR&D”) and commercial and international research and development. Company-funded research and development expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Our company-funded research and development expense was $150 million, $128 million and $116 million for fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which as a percentage of consolidated revenues was 0.9% for fiscal 2024 and 0.8% for both fiscal 2023 and 2022. We charge expenses for research and development activities performed under customer contracts directly to those contracts.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Our technical services and products are not generally dependent upon patent protection, although we do selectively seek patent protection. We claim a proprietary interest in certain of our products, software programs, methodologies and know-how. This proprietary information is protected in confidence as trade secrets, using non-disclosure and other definitive agreements. We selectively pursue opportunities to license or transfer our technologies to third parties.

In connection with the performance of services and solutions, the U.S. government has certain rights to inventions, data, software codes and related material that we develop under U.S. government-funded contracts and subcontracts. Generally, the U.S. government may disclose or license such information to third parties, including, in some instances, our competitors. In the case of some subcontracts that we perform, the prime contractor generally obtains rights to use the programs and products that we deliver under the subcontract to perform its prime contract obligations.

COMPETITION

Competition for contracts is significant, and we often compete against many well-established corporations with strong name and brand recognition. We also compete against smaller, more specialized companies that concentrate their resources in particular areas, the U.S. government’s own capabilities and federal non-profit contract research centers. Due to the diverse requirements of the U.S. government and our commercial customers, we frequently collaborate with other companies to compete for large contracts and bid against these same companies in other situations.

Our principal competitors currently include the following companies: Accenture Federal Systems, Amentum Services Inc., BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., CACI International Inc., Deloitte, General Dynamics Corporation, GovCIO, IBM, KBR Inc., L3Harris, Lockheed Martin Corporation, ManTech, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Optum, Parsons Corp, Peraton, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and SAIC. These companies span across sectors that include systems development and integration, engineering and technical services divisions of large defense contractors, diversified U.S. and international IT providers and contractors focused solely on technical services, supply chain management, other logistics services and major systems operations and maintenance, homeland security and health solutions.

We compete on various factors, including our technical expertise and qualified professional and/or security-cleared personnel, our ability to deliver innovative high value solutions in a timely manner, successful program execution, our understanding of our customers’ missions, the size and scale of our company and past performance credentials.

10Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

CONTRACT PROCUREMENT

Our business is heavily regulated, and we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government and other contracts. The U.S. government procurement environment has evolved due to statutory and regulatory procurement reform initiatives. Today, U.S. government customers employ several contracting methods to purchase services and products. Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many U.S. government customers to increasingly purchase services and products using contracting methods that give them the ability to select multiple contract winners or pre-qualify certain contractors to provide services or products on established general terms and conditions rather than through single-award contracts. The predominant contracting methods through which U.S. government agencies procure services and products include the following:

uDefinitive Award Contracts. U.S. government agencies may procure services and products through single definitive award contracts which specify the scope of services or products purchased and identify the contractor that will provide the specified services or products. When an agency has a requirement, the agency will issue a solicitation or request for proposal to which interested contractors can submit a proposal. The bidding and selection process can take a year or more to complete. For the contractor, this method of contracting may provide greater certainty of the timing and amounts to be received at the time of contract award because it generally results in the customer contracting for a specific scope of services or products from the single definitive successful awardee.

uIndefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) Contracts. The U.S. government uses IDIQ contracts to obtain commitments from contractors to provide certain services or products on pre-established terms and conditions. The U.S. government then issues task orders under the IDIQ contracts to purchase specific services or products. IDIQ contracts are awarded to one or more contractors following a competitive procurement process. Under a single-award IDIQ contract, all task orders under that contract are issued to the one contractor awarded the IDIQ. Under a multiple-award IDIQ contract, task orders are competitively bid by the contractors awarded the IDIQ. Multiple-award IDIQ contracts that are open for any government agency to use for procurement are commonly referred to as “government-wide acquisition contracts.” IDIQ contracts often have multi-year terms and unfunded ceiling amounts, therefore enabling, but not committing, the U.S. government to purchase substantial amounts of services or products from one or more contractors. At the time an IDIQ contract is awarded (prior to the award of any task orders), a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. government will purchase under the contract, and in the case of a multiple-award IDIQ contracts, the contractor from which such purchases may be made.

uU.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedule Contracts. The GSA maintains listings of approved suppliers of services and products with agreed-upon prices for use throughout the U.S. government. In order for a company to provide services under a GSA Schedule contract, a company must be pre-qualified and awarded a contract by the GSA. When an agency uses a GSA Schedule contract to meet its requirements, the agency, or the GSA on behalf of the agency, conducts the procurement. The user agency, or the GSA on its behalf, evaluates the user agency’s requirements and initiates a competition limited to GSA Schedule qualified contractors. GSA Schedule contracts are designed to provide the user agency with reduced procurement time and lower procurement costs. Similar to IDIQ contracts, at the time a GSA Schedule contract is awarded, a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. government will purchase under the contract.

uOther Transaction Authority (“OTA”) agreements. Under certain circumstances, U.S. government agencies can enter into OTA agreements instead of traditional contracts. Agencies are explicitly authorized by Congress for specific uses, limitations or restrictions in the use of OTAs. In the case of DoD, the department is authorized to use OTAs to carry out basic, applied or advanced research projects, prototype development projects or follow-on production to initial prototype projects. OTA agreements are generally exempt from federal procurement regulations. These exemptions grant the U.S. government the flexibility to include, amend or exclude contract clauses and requirements that are mandatory in traditional procurements. OTA agreements also grant more flexibility to structure agreements in numerous ways, including joint ventures, partnerships or multiple agencies joining together to fund an agreement encompassing multiple providers.

We often team together with other companies to submit bids for large U.S. government procurements or other opportunities where we believe that the combination of services and products that we can provide as a team will help us win and perform the contract. Our relationships with our teammates, including whether we serve as the prime contractor or as a subcontractor, vary with each contract opportunity and typically depend on the program, contract or customer requirements, as well as the relative size, qualifications, capabilities, customer relationships and experience of our company and our teammates.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report11

Table of Contents

PART I

Contracting with the U.S. government also subjects us to substantial regulation and unique risks, including the U.S. government’s ability to cancel any contract at any time through a termination for the convenience. Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed prior to U.S. government termination for convenience. These regulations and risks are described in more detail below under “Business–Regulation” and “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CONTRACT PAYMENT TYPES

Generally, the type of contract for our services and products is determined by or negotiated with the U.S. government and may depend on certain factors, including the type and complexity of the work to be performed, degree and timing of the responsibility to be assumed by the contractor for the costs of performance, the extent of price competition and the amount and nature of the profit incentive offered to the contractor for achieving or exceeding specified standards or goals. We generate revenues under several types of contracts, including the following:

uCost-reimbursement contracts include cost-plus-fixed-fee, award-fee and incentive-fee contracts. These contracts provide for reimbursement of our direct contract costs and allocable indirect costs, plus a fee. These contracts are typically used when uncertainties involved in contract performance do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy to use a fixed-price contract. Cost-reimbursement contracts generally subject us to lower risk but require us to use our best efforts to accomplish the scope of the work within a specified time and budget. Award and incentive fees are generally based on performance criteria such as cost, schedule, quality and/or technical performance. Award fees are determined and earned based on customer evaluation of the Company’s performance against contractual criteria. Incentive fees that are based on cost provide for an initially negotiated fee to be adjusted later, typically using a formula to measure performance against the associated criteria, based on the relationship of total allowable costs to total target costs.

uFixed-price-incentive-fee (“FPIF”) contracts are substantially similar to cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts except they establish specified targets for cost and profit, a price ceiling (but not a profit ceiling or floor) and a profit adjustment formula. Under an FPIF contract, the allowable costs incurred are eligible for reimbursement but are subject to a cost-share arrangement, which affects profitability. Generally, if our costs exceed the contract target cost or are not allowable under the applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all costs and may have our fees reduced or eliminated.

uTime-and-materials (“T&M”) contracts typically provide for negotiated fixed hourly rates for specified categories of direct labor plus reimbursement of other direct costs. This type of contract is generally used when there is uncertainty about the extent or duration of the work to be performed by the contractor at the time of contract award or it is not possible to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. On T&M contracts, we assume the risk of providing appropriately qualified staff to perform these contracts at the hourly rates set forth in the contracts over the period of performance of the contracts.

uFixed-price-level-of-effort (“FPLOE”) contracts are substantially similar to T&M contracts except they require a specified level of effort over a stated period of time on work that can be stated only in general terms. This type of contract is generally used when the contractor is required to perform an investigation or study in a specific research and development area and to provide a report showing the results achieved based on the level of effort. Payment is based on the effort expended rather than the results achieved.

uFirm-Fixed-Price (“FFP”) contracts provide for a fixed price for specified products, systems and/or services. This type of contract is typically used when the customer acquires products and services on the basis of reasonably definitive specifications that allow parties to develop an estimate of the costs to complete the work. The price for a FFP contract is often determined through competitive bidding by multiple contractors vying for award of the contract, but the price may also be determined through price negotiations with the customer. These contracts offer us potential increased profits if we can complete the work at lower costs than planned, but FFP contracts increase our exposure to the risk of cost overruns.

Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract, the nature of services or products provided, as well as the achievement of performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive-fee and award-fee contracts, is finally determined. Cost-reimbursement and T&M contracts generally have lower profitability than FFP contracts.

12Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

SEASONALITY

The U.S. government’s fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. While not certain, it is not uncommon for U.S. government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the timeframe leading up to the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds, which may favorably impact our third fiscal quarter. In addition, our quarterly results may be impacted by the number of working days in a given quarter. We tend to generate less revenue from our labor services during the fourth quarter as a result of the holiday season.

REGULATION

We are heavily regulated in most of the fields in which we operate. We provide services and products to numerous U.S. government agencies and entities, including to the DoD, the U.S. Intelligence Community and the DHS. When working with these and other U.S. government agencies and entities, we must comply with various laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of contracts. Some significant laws and regulations that affect us include:

uthe Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) and supplements, including the DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”), which regulate the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts;

uthe Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act, which requires certification and disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;

uthe Procurement Integrity Act, which regulates access to competitor bid and proposal information and government source selection information and our ability to provide compensation to certain former government officials;

uthe Civil False Claims Act, which provides for substantial civil penalties for violations, including for submission of a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government for payment or approval;

uthe False Statements Act, which imposes civil and criminal liability for making false statements to the U.S. government;

uthe U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”), which imposes accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. government contracts; and

uThe International Trade in Arms Regulation (“ITAR”), which governs the manufacture, export, and temporary import of defense articles, the furnishing of defense services, and brokering activities involving items described on the U.S. munitions list.

These regulations impose a broad range of requirements, many of which are unique to government contracting, including various procurement, import and export, security, contract pricing and cost, contract termination and adjustment and audit requirements. Among other things, these laws and regulations:

urequire certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;

udefine allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under various cost-type U.S. government contracts;

urequire compliance with U.S. government CAS;

urequire reviews by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”), Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) and other U.S. government agencies of compliance with government requirements for a contractor’s business systems;

urestrict the use and dissemination of and require the protection of unclassified contract-related information and information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data; and

urequire us not to compete for work if an actual or potential organizational conflict of interest, as defined by these laws and regulations, related to such work exists and/or cannot be appropriately mitigated, neutralized or avoided.

The U.S. government may revise its procurement practices or adopt new contract rules and regulations at any time. In order to help ensure compliance with these complex laws and regulations, all of our employees are required to complete ethics and other compliance trainings relevant to their position.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report13

Table of Contents

PART I

DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY LAWS

Some of our operations and service offerings involve access to and use by us of personal information and/or protected health information. These activities are regulated by extensive federal, state and international data privacy and security laws requiring organizations to, among other things, provide certain privacy protections and security safeguards for such information. For example, among others:

uthe European Union’s (“EU’s”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which imposes compliance obligations for companies that process personal data of EU data subjects, necessitating investment into ongoing data protection activities and documentation requirements, and creates the potential for significant fines for noncompliance;

uthe United Kingdom’s (“UK’s”) General Data Protection Regulation, (“U.K. GDPR”), which creates similar compliance obligations for companies that process personal data of UK data subjects as are imposed by the GDPR;

uthe California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, “CCPA”), which broadly defines personal information and provides expanded consumer privacy rights to natural persons residing in California, such as affording them the right to access and request deletion of their information and to opt out of certain sharing and sales of personal information; and

uthe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which establishes privacy and security compliance obligations with respect to the processing of protected health information by covered entities and business associates, necessitating investment in technical and organizational compliance measures and creates the potential for substantial fines for noncompliance.

These regulations and related risks are described in more detail below under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

COMPANY WEBSITE AND INFORMATION

Our corporate headquarters is located at 1750 Presidents Street, Reston, VA 20190 and our telephone number is (571) 526-6000. Our website can be accessed at www.leidos.com. The website contains information about our company and operations. Through a link on the Investor Relations section of our website, copies of each of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including Leidos. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In your evaluation of our company and business, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with information disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report, and other documents we file with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we have identified as material but are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed, and our stock price could decline. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, such as our ability to collect receivables, overall U.S. and global economic and industry conditions, geopolitical events, changes in laws or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest, exchange rates and inflation, terrorism, international conflicts, major health concerns, climate change or other disruptions of expected economic and business conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may materially harm our business, financial condition or operating results. In that event, the trading price of our stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

14Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

This risk factor summary contains a high-level summary of risks associated with our business. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you, and you should read this risk factor summary together with the more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties set forth following this summary. A summary of our risks includes, but is not limited to, the following:

uWe depend on government agencies as our primary customers and if our reputation or relationships with these agencies were harmed, our future revenues and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

uA decline in the U.S. government budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future revenues and limit our growth prospects.

uBecause we depend on U.S. government contracts, a delay in the completion of the U.S. government’s budget and appropriations process could delay procurement of the products, services and solutions we provide and adversely affect our future revenues.

uDue to the competitive process to obtain contracts and the likelihood of bid protests, we may be unable to achieve or sustain revenue growth and profitability.

uThe U.S. government may terminate, cancel, modify, renew on less favorable terms or curtail our contracts at any time prior to their completion and, if we do not replace them, this may adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.

uWe face intense competition that can impact our ability to obtain contracts and therefore affect our future revenues and growth prospects.

uDeterioration of economic conditions or weakening in credit or capital markets may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

uWe cannot predict the consequences of current or future geopolitical events, but they may adversely affect the markets in which we operate and our results of operations.

uGlobal supply chain issues and inflationary pressures have disrupted supply and increased the prices of goods and services, which could raise the costs associated with providing our services, diminish our ability to compete for new contracts or task orders and reduce customer buying power.

uOur failure to comply with various complex procurement rules and regulations could result in our being liable for penalties, including termination of our U.S. government contracts, disqualification from bidding on future U.S. government contracts and suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracting.

uThe U.S. government may adopt new contract rules and regulations or revise its procurement practices in a manner adverse to us at any time.

uApplication of the U.S. government's organizational conflict of interest (OCI) rules could limit our ability to successfully compete for new contracts or task orders, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

uAs a U.S. government contractor, our partners and we are subject to reviews, audits and cost adjustments by the U.S. government, which could adversely affect our profitability, cash position or growth prospects if resolved unfavorably to us.

uOur business is subject to governmental review and investigation, which could adversely affect our financial position, operating results and growth prospects.

uInvestigations, audits, claims, disputes, enforcement actions, litigation, arbitration or other legal proceedings could require us to pay potentially large damage awards or penalties and could be costly to defend, which would adversely affect our cash balances and profitability, and could damage our reputation.

uOur business and operations expose us to numerous legal and regulatory requirements, and any violation of these requirements could harm our business.

uOur business is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding data privacy and security which could subject us to investigations, claims or monetary penalties against us, require us to change our business practices or otherwise adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

uMisconduct of employees, subcontractors, agents, suppliers, business partners or joint ventures and others working on our behalf could cause us to lose existing contracts or customers and adversely affect our ability to obtain new contracts and could have a material adverse impact on our business, reputation and future results.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report15

Table of Contents

PART I

uA failure to attract, retain, and develop talent with critical skills, including our leadership team, would adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and may disrupt our operations.

uWe may not realize the full amounts reflected in our backlog as revenues, which could adversely affect our expected future revenues and growth prospects.

uOur earnings and profitability may vary based on the mix of our contracts and may be adversely affected by our failure to estimate and manage costs, time and resources accurately.

uWe use estimates in recognizing revenues, and if we make changes to estimates used in recognizing revenues, our profitability may be adversely affected.

uCybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents could negatively impact our business and financial results, impair our ability to effectively provide our services to our customers and cause harm to our reputation or competitive position.

uInternal system or service failures, or failures in the systems or services of third parties on which we rely, could disrupt our business and impair our ability to effectively provide our services and products to our customers, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

uCustomer systems failures could damage our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

uOur success depends, in part, on our ability to work with complex and rapidly changing technologies to meet the needs of our customers.

uWe utilize artificial intelligence, which could expose us to liability or adversely affect our business, especially if we are unable

Showing the first 8K of 128K characters. Open the full section

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

RISK MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGY

Cybersecurity risk management is an integral part of our digital posture and enterprise risk management strategy. Cybersecurity is critical to maintaining the trust of our customers and business partners, and we are committed to protecting our and their confidential and sensitive information, including personal information, and mitigating cybersecurity risks that impact our systems and networks. We maintain technologies, programs and processes designed to assess, identify, manage and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Our efforts include regular monitoring of Leidos-managed systems and networks for internal and external cybersecurity threats, providing cybersecurity training to our employees during the onboarding process and annually, and continually reviewing and refining formal policies and procedures designed to deter, identify and remediate cybersecurity incidents. We regularly perform evaluations of our cybersecurity program and continue to invest in our capabilities to keep our customers, partners, suppliers and information assets in our possession safe. Although we employ service provider due diligence and onboarding procedures to identify potential cybersecurity risk, our ability to monitor the cybersecurity practices of our service providers is limited and there can be no assurance that we can prevent or mitigate the risk of any compromise or failure in the information system, software, networks and other assets owned or controlled by our vendors.

Our Chief Information Security Officer leads our Cybersecurity Intelligence and Response Team (“CSIRT”) whose function is to stay apprised of existing and emerging cyber threats and monitor our global enterprise and proactively identify and protect against cybersecurity risk. The CSIRT uses intelligence collected from various sources, fused with intelligence collected from analysis and response actions, to proactively search for, and address adversary activity against the Leidos network. The CSIRT possesses in-depth knowledge of network, endpoint, perimeter security systems, identity, data protection, threat intelligence, forensics, penetration testing and malware reverse engineering, as well as the functioning of specific applications or underlying information technology infrastructure.

Leidos CSIRT owns the incident response process and provides direction and guidance to users of Leidos computing resources when responding to cybersecurity incidents. Leidos CSIRT also provides intrusion monitoring of networks and information systems and continuously monitors the Leidos computing environments and performs triage and analysis of events to identify potential incidents.

We employ multiple security and monitoring systems and applications throughout the Company to identify, alert, report and log authorized and unauthorized access to the Leidos systems and networks. We use an application that collects, correlates, and notifies CSIRT analysts regarding any item meeting an electronic intrusion event. We categorize anomalous cyber events into discrete levels in which cybersecurity matters are escalated to certain levels of management, as well as our Board, based on the severity of the incident, as appropriate. Sharing cyber threat information at these levels supports the Company’s ability to integrate cybersecurity considerations into its overarching risk management system and processes.

We also conduct periodic internal and third-party assessments to test our cybersecurity controls, perform cyber simulations and exercises, and continually evaluate our internal governing policies and procedures to help detect and respond to cybersecurity events in order to reduce harms or impacts from breaches and other information security incidents.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report37

Table of Contents

PART I

GOVERNANCE

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES

Our global information security program is led by our corporate Chief Information Security Officer, who works closely with key corporate functional and line of business stakeholders. The Chief Information Security Officer partners with these functions for the purpose of identifying, considering and assessing material cybersecurity risks on an ongoing basis, establishing processes to ensure that such potential cybersecurity risks are monitored, implementing appropriate mitigation measures, reporting cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents, and maintaining our cybersecurity program. The team of senior management officers, who support our information security program, have expertise with cybersecurity, as demonstrated qualifications such as by prior work experience, possession of a cybersecurity certification, degree, or other cybersecurity experience. Our management team receives regular updates on our cybersecurity posture and reviews detailed information about our cybersecurity preparedness. Additionally, we have a Leidos Security Council that is co-chaired by the Chief Information Security Officer and the Chief Security Officer to address “all security hazards” across our global enterprise to ensure cohesion and effectiveness of our combined security governance and risk mitigations.

BOARD’S ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

We have a Technology and Information Security Committee, comprised of six board members, with relevant backgrounds and experience, that oversees and advises the Board and management on matters involving the Company’s overall strategic direction and significant business risks and opportunities in the areas of technology and information security.

At least quarterly, management provides our Board and the Technology and Information Security Committee with updates about our cybersecurity and related risk exposures, our policies and procedures to mitigate such exposures and the status of projects to strengthen our information security infrastructure and program maturity and defend against and respond to cybersecurity threats. In addition, we use a risk-based escalation process to notify the Board and the Technology and Information Security Committee outside of the regular reporting cycle should we identify a significant emerging risk or potentially material issue that should be brought to their attention.

CYBERSECURITY THREATS

To date, we have not identified any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business strategy, results of our operations, or our financial condition. However, despite our efforts to identify and respond to cybersecurity threats, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced an undetected cybersecurity incident. For more information about these risks, please see “Risk Factors – Cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents could negatively impact our business and financial results, impair our ability to effectively provide our services to our customers and cause harm to our reputation or competitive position” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Properties

As of January 3, 2025, we conducted our operations in 412 locations in 44 states, the District of Columbia and various foreign countries. We occupy approximately 8.4 million square feet of floor space. Of this amount, we own approximately 1.1 million square feet, and the remaining balance is leased. Our major locations are in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, where we occupy a combination of leased and owned floor space of approximately 1.8 million square feet. We also have employees working at customer sites throughout the United States and in other countries.

As of January 3, 2025, we owned the following properties:

LocationNumber of buildingsSquare footageAcreage
Huntsville, Alabama7801,00090.7
Columbia, Maryland195,0007.3
Orlando, Florida185,0008.5
Oak Ridge, Tennessee183,0008.4
Decatur, Alabama150,0005.0

The nature of our business is such that there is no practicable way to relate occupied space to our reportable segments.

38Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We have provided information about legal proceedings in which we are involved in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, we are routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations. Additional information regarding such investigations and reviews is set forth in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report39

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following is a list of the names and ages (as of February 11, 2025) of our executive officers, indicating all positions and offices held by each such person and each such person’s business experience during at least the past five years. All such persons have been elected to serve until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

Name of OfficerAgePosition(s) with the company and prior business experience
Thomas A. Bell64Mr. Bell serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Leidos. He joined Leidos as CEO on May 3, 2023. Mr. Bell has held leadership roles as President – Defense Rolls-Royce plc; Chairman and CEO – Rolls-Royce North America (Rolls-Royce) since February 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Bell was Senior Vice President of global sales and marketing for defense, space and security at The Boeing Company (Boeing) from 2015. Before joining Boeing in 2015, Mr. Bell was President of Rolls-Royce Defense Aerospace, having joined as President, Customer Business, North America in mid-2012.
Christopher R. Cage53Mr. Cage has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2021. He has served in several capacities throughout his 25-year tenure with Leidos, including Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller, Senior Vice President for Financial Planning and Analysis and Chief Financial Officer for the Health Group.
Daniel Atkinson46Mr. Atkinson has served as the Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller since 2024. Previously, he served as the Company's Assistant Corporate Controller since June 2021. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Atkinson was Director of Technical Accounting and Revenue Recognition at Booz Allen Hamilton from April 2018 until June 2021. He also held key leadership roles within the controller's organization at CSRA, Inc. from October 2016 to April 2018.
Gerard A. Fasano59Mr. Fasano has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Growth Officer since January 2024. Previously, he served as President for our Defense Group since October 2018. Mr. Fasano also served as the Company’s Chief of Business Development and Strategy Officer, and led the separation from the Lockheed Martin Corporation and the integration of the Information Systems & Global Solutions Business into Leidos. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Fasano served Lockheed Martin Corporation for over 30 years.
Daniel J. Antal53Mr. Antal has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel since April 2024. He rejoined Leidos in April 2024 after serving as General Counsel for Rolls-Royce Defense and North America since January 2021. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Antal served as U.S. senior counsel for a Canadian based A&E firm, and previously spent 10 years with MWH Global. He held a variety of leadership roles at MWH, including as Associate General Counsel, Director of Risk Management for the Middle East, and completed a two-year assignment in the UK in operational capacity, where he led the integration of a strategic acquisition and assumed the role of International Managing Director.
Elizabeth M. Porter54Ms. Porter has served as President for the Health and Civil Sector since January 2024. Previously, she served as President for our Health Group since August 2020 and, before that, as Acting Group President for the Health Group since March 2020. Ms. Porter also served as Senior Vice President and Operation Manager for Leidos’ Federal Energy and Environment business. Prior to that role, Ms. Porter served as the Department of Defense Information Networks & Mission Partner Program Director. Prior to joining Leidos, Ms. Porter served Lockheed Martin Corporation in several capacities, most recently as Director of Energy Initiatives, Corporate Engineering and Technology.
40Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Name of OfficerAgePosition(s) with the company and prior business experience
Roy Stevens56Mr. Stevens has served as President for the National Security Sector since January 2024. Previously, he served as President for our Intelligence Group since July 2021, and before that, as Chief of Business Development and Strategy. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Stevens served Lockheed Martin Corporation in a variety of executive level positions for over 20 years, most recently as Vice President of Global Solutions under the Information Systems & Global Solutions business, and has also been integral to the merger and acquisition of several companies during his career. He serves on the Board of Directors for the Intelligence and National Security Alliance and Cornerstones as well as the Advisory Board for the Center for a New American Security.
Thomas C. Sanglier64Mr. Sanglier has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Audit Executive since July 2022. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Sanglier served as Senior Director, Internal Audit with Raytheon Technologies from November 2016 to June 2022 and as a Partner with Ernst & Young’s Advisory practice serving private and public organizations in the technology, manufacturing and professional services industries during June 2008 to December 2010. He previously served as Chair of the North American Board and a member of the Global Board of the Institute of Internal Auditors (“IIA”) from April 2022 to March 2023. He has been involved as a volunteer leader with the IIA since becoming a member in 2011. Mr. Sanglier has also served as a member of The IIA’s Audit Committee, Guidance Development Committee, North American Publications Advisory Committee and multiple task forces.
Leslie Fautsch52Ms. Fautsch has served as Chief Human Resources Officer of Leidos since October 2024. Ms. Fautsch has held several key leadership roles at Leidos, including Senior Vice President for Human Resources Operations and Total Rewards, Vice President of Human Resources Strategic Operations, and Vice President of Human Resources for corporate and enterprise functions. Prior to joining Leidos in 2011, she held senior leadership roles in Human Resources management, employee relations, and ethics at Northrop Grumman.
James F. Carlini59Mr. Carlini has served as Chief Technology Officer of Leidos since June 2019. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Carlini founded and operated a national security consultancy from May 2006 to October 2018. Previously, Mr. Carlini served at Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems from July 2002 to May 2006, with his last position being Vice President of Advanced Development Programs. He also served at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for six years, with his last position being Director of the Special Projects Office. Mr. Carlini is a former member of the United States Army Science Board and the United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. He is currently a member of the Department of Defense’s Defense Science Board.
M. Victoria Schmanske62Ms. Schmanske has served as the President of the Commercial and International Sector since January 2024. Previously, she served as the Executive Vice President of Leidos Corporate Operations since July 2021, and before that, as President for the Intelligence Group. Ms. Schmanske has also served as the Leidos Chief Administrative Officer and Deputy President and Chief Operations Officer for the Health Group. Prior to joining Leidos, Ms. Schmanske served Lockheed Martin Corporation for over 30 years, most recently as Vice President for Operations IS&GS. She serves on multiple outside boards to include the University of Virginia School of Data Science Advisory Board, the Virginia Engineering Foundation Board of Directors, and The Women’s Center.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report41

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Name of OfficerAgePosition(s) with the company and prior business experience
Cindy Gruensfelder59Ms. Gruensfelder has served as the President of the Defense Systems Sector since January 2024. Ms. Gruensfelder has extensive Aerospace and Defense leadership expertise, serving for more than 30 years in a variety of leadership roles at Boeing, and its heritage company, McDonnell Douglas. She served as Vice President and General Manager of the Missile and Weapon Systems (“MWS”), division of Boeing Defense, Space & Security, from April 2021 to November 2022, and prior to that role, as Vice President of Weapons for the MWS division from October 2018 to April 2021.
Steve Hull55Mr. Hull has served as the President for the Digital Modernization Sector since January 2024. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Operations Manager for Enterprise and Cyber Solutions at Leidos from March 2022 through December 2023, and Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) at Leidos from August 2016 through March 2022. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Hull served as the CIO of the Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Information Systems & Global Solutions business area from January 2013 through August 2016, ensuring operations and security of IT systems for over 20,000 employees. Mr. Hull has over 30 years of experience in the IT field.
42Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “LDOS.”

HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

As of February 4, 2025, there were approximately 16,202 holders of record of Leidos common stock. The number of stockholders of record of our common stock is not representative of the number of beneficial owners due to the fact that many shares are held by depositories, brokers or nominees.

DIVIDEND POLICY

During fiscal 2024 and 2023, we declared and paid quarterly dividends totaling $1.54 and $1.46 per share, respectively, of Leidos common stock. We currently intend to continue paying dividends on a quarterly basis, although the declaration of any future dividends will be determined by our Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including available cash, estimated cash needs, earnings, financial condition, operating results and capital requirements, as well as limitations in our contractual agreements, applicable law, regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business considerations that the Board of Directors considers relevant. Our ability to declare and pay future dividends on Leidos stock may be restricted by the provisions of Delaware law and covenants in our then-existing indebtedness arrangements.

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

This stock performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Leidos under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The following graph compares the total cumulative five-year return on Leidos common stock through January 3, 2025, to two indices: (i) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite index and (ii) the Standard & Poor’s 500 IT Services Industry index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on January 3, 2020, and that dividends, if any, have been reinvested. The comparisons in the graph are required by the SEC, based upon historical data and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of Leidos common stock.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report43

Table of Contents

PART II

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

9895604663087

02 435467-3_legend_boxline purple.jpgLeidos Holdings, Inc.04_435588-1_gfx_Legend.jpgS&P 500 Composite Index02 435467-3_legend_boxline k30%.jpgS&P 500 IT Services Index
Company/Market/Peer Group1/3/20201/1/202112/31/202112/30/202212/29/20231/3/2025
Leidos Inc.$100.00$107.22$91.99$110.43$115.41$158.58
S&P 500 Composite Index$100.00$116.11$147.34$118.69$147.45$183.70
S&P 500 IT Services Index$100.00$120.77$125.47$100.99$132.74$147.85

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

The following table presents information related to the repurchases of our common stock during the quarter ended January 3, 2025:

PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased**(1)**Average Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or ProgramsMaximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs**(2)**
September 28, 2024 - September 30, 202462.00$157.06—9,819,502
October 1, 2024 - October 31, 2024———9,819,502
November 1, 2024 - November 30, 20241,471,766169.861,471,7668,347,736
December 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024942,326159.18942,3267,405,410
January 1, 2025 - January 3, 2025———7,405,410
Total2,414,154$165.692,414,092

(1)The total number of shares purchased includes shares surrendered to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations related to vesting of restricted stock units.

(2)In February 2022, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to 20 million shares of our outstanding common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in one or more open market repurchases or privately negotiated transactions, including accelerated share repurchase transactions. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the program will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of our common stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements, compliance with the terms of our outstanding indebtedness and other considerations. There is no assurance as to the number of shares that will be repurchased, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our Board of Directors’ discretion. This share repurchase authorization replaces the previous share repurchase authorization announced in February 2018.

44Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 6. [Reserved]

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report45

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s (“Leidos”) financial condition, results of operations and quantitative and qualitative disclosures about business environment and trends and market risk should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those described under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.” You should also review the disclosure under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Unless indicated otherwise, references in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” refer collectively to Leidos and its consolidated subsidiaries.

OVERVIEW

Leidos is an industry and technology leader serving government and commercial customers with smarter, more efficient digital and mission innovations. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, with 48,000, global employees, we bring domain-specific capabilities, technologies and insights to customers in each of these markets by leveraging seven technical core capabilities: trusted mission artificial intelligence, cyber operations, digital modernization, mission software systems, integrated systems, mission operations, and rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Our customers include the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) and many other U.S. civilian, state and local government agencies, foreign government agencies and commercial businesses. Approximately 8% of our revenues are generated by entities located outside of the United States.

Beginning in fiscal 2024, we realigned our business and operate in four reportable segments that are focused on specific, defined capability sets we bring to our customers. As a result of this change, prior year segment results and disclosures have been recast to reflect the current reportable segment structure. We now operate in the following reportable segments: National Security & Digital, Health & Civil, Commercial & International and Defense Systems. We also separately present the unallocated costs associated with corporate functions as Corporate.

For additional information regarding our reportable segments, see “Business” in Part I and “Note 20—Business Segments” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our significant initiatives include the following:

uachieving annual revenue growth through internal collaboration and better leveraging of key differentiators across our company and the deployment of resources and investments into profitable growth markets;

ucontinued improvement in our back-office infrastructure and related business processes for greater effectiveness and efficiency across all business functions; and

udisciplined deployment of our cash resources and use of our capital structure to enhance shareholder value while retaining an appropriate amount of financial leverage.

Sales Trend. For fiscal 2024, revenues increased $1.2 billion, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2023, the increase was primarily due to a net increase in volumes on certain programs and program wins, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

For fiscal 2023, revenues increased $1.0 billion, or 7%, compared to fiscal 2022, primarily due to program wins, a net increase in volumes on certain programs and a net increase in revenues attributable to our business acquisitions. The increase was partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

Operating Expenses and Income Trend. For fiscal 2024, operating expenses increased by $27 million, or less than 1%, compared to fiscal 2023. Operating margin for fiscal 2024 was 11% compared to 4% for fiscal 2023. Operating income was $1,827 million, a $1,206 million increase compared to fiscal 2023. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to the impairment and restructuring charges of $689 million at the SES reporting unit in fiscal 2023 as compared to $11 million of impairment charges for the facility rationalization effort in fiscal 2024 (see "Note 10—Leases" of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and a net increase in volumes on certain programs.

46Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

For fiscal 2023, operating expenses increased by $1.5 billion, or 11%, compared to fiscal 2022. Operating margin for fiscal 2023 was 4.0% compared to 7.6% for fiscal 2022. Operating income was $621 million, a $467 million decrease compared to fiscal 2022. The decrease was primarily attributable to impairment and restructuring charges of $689 million at the SES reporting unit in fiscal 2023 (see “Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The decrease was partially offset by program wins, a net increase in volumes on certain programs and lower amortization expenses.

From a macroeconomic perspective, our industry is under general competitive pressures associated with spending from our largest customer, the U.S. government, and requires a high level of cost management focus to allow us to remain competitive. Although the U.S. Presidential Administration has not indicated a desire to reduce spending in the defense and homeland security sectors, the likelihood, extent and duration of current spending levels in these areas remains unclear. We continue to review our cost structure against our anticipated sales and undertake cost management actions and efficiency initiatives where necessary.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND TRENDS

U.S. GOVERNMENT MARKETS

We generated approximately 87% of our total revenues from contracts with the U.S. government in fiscal 2024 and 2023 as compared to 86% of our total revenues from contracts with the U.S. government in fiscal 2022, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government. Revenues under contracts with the DoD and U.S. Intelligence Community, including subcontracts under which the DoD or the U.S. Intelligence Community is the ultimate purchaser, represented approximately 48%, 49% and 44% of our total revenues for fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Accordingly, our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending, especially national security, homeland security and intelligence spending, and the alignment of our service and product offerings and capabilities with current and future budget priorities of the U.S. government.

On December 21, 2024, the U.S. federal government avoided a shutdown by passing into law a continuing resolution that provides government funding through March 14, 2025. The continuing resolution gives lawmakers additional time to consider the 12 appropriations bills for government fiscal year 2025. Failure to pass the appropriations bills or another continuing resolution by March 14, 2025, will result in a partial or complete federal government shutdown.

Trends in the U.S. government contracting process, including a shift towards multiple-awards contracts, in which certain contractors are preapproved using IDIQ and U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) contract vehicles, have increased competition for U.S. government contracts, reduced backlogs by shortening periods of performance on contracts and increased pricing pressure. We expect that a majority of the business that we seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through a competitive bidding process. For more information on these risks and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS

Sales to customers in international markets represented approximately 8% of total revenues for fiscal 2024, as compared to 9% and 8% of total revenues for fiscal 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our international customers include foreign governments and their agencies. Our international business increases our exposure to international markets and the associated international regulatory, foreign currency exchange rate and geopolitical risks.

Changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials, may increase our procurement costs of certain IT hardware used both on our contracts and for internal use. However, we expect to recover certain portions of these higher tariffs through our cost-plus contracts. While we evaluate the impact of higher tariffs, currently, we do not expect tariffs to have a significant impact to our business.

KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The primary financial performance measures we use to manage our business and monitor results of operations are revenue, operating income, cash flows from operations and diluted earnings per share. Bookings and backlog are also useful measures for management and investors to evaluate our performance and potential future revenues. In addition, we consider business performance by contract type to be useful to management and investors when evaluating our operating income and margin performance.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report47

Table of Contents

PART II

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our results of operations for the periods presented were as follows:

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
(dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Revenues$16,662$15,438$14,3968%7%
Cost of revenues13,86413,19412,3125%7%
Selling, general and administrative expenses9839429514%(1)%
Acquisition, integration and restructuring costs162417(33)%41%
Goodwill impairment charges—596—NMNM
Asset impairment charges119140(88)%128%
Equity earnings of non-consolidated subsidiaries(39)(30)(12)(30)%(150)%
Operating income1,8276211,088194%(43)%
Non-operating expense, net(188)(218)(202)(14)%(8)%
Income before income taxes1,639403886NM(55)%
Income tax expense(388)(195)(193)99%1%
Net income1,251208693NM(70)%
Less: net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest(3)98(133)%13%
Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders$1,254$199$685NM(71)%
Operating margin11.0%4.0%7.6%

NM - Not meaningful

SEGMENT AND CORPORATE RESULTS

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
National Security & Digital (dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Revenues$7,365$7,196$6,7452%7%
Operating income7206726067%11%
Operating margin9.8%9.3%9.0%

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes on certain programs, program wins and net write-ups, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes on certain programs and net write-ups, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to improved program execution on certain programs, a net increase in volumes and program wins, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to net write-ups on certain programs.

48Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
Health & Civil (dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Revenues$5,015$4,238$3,94518%7%
Operating income1,09557444891%28%
Operating margin21.8%13.5%11.4%

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes and case complexity within the managed health services business, an increase in net write-ups on certain programs and program wins.

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes on certain programs and increased earnings from incentive awards. The increase was partially offset by a net decrease in the recovery of expenditures in the medical examination business and the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to an increase in volumes and case complexity within the managed health services business.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to a net increase in earnings from incentive awards and a net increase in volumes on certain programs, partially offset by a net decrease in the recovery of expenditures in the medical examination business and the completion of certain contracts.

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
Commercial & International (dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Revenues$2,252$2,126$1,9006%12%
Operating income (loss)104(560)131119%NM
Operating margin4.6%(26.3)%6.9%

NM - Not meaningful

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to program wins and a net increase in volumes on certain programs, partially offset by the impact of write-downs on certain programs within our UK operations for which cost and schedule were rebaselined as well as the completion of certain programs.

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes on certain programs and a $94 million net increase in revenues related to our Cobham Special Mission acquisition made in the last quarter of fiscal 2022. The increase was partially offset by write-downs on certain programs and the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily driven by impairment and restructuring charges of $689 million at the SES reporting unit in fiscal 2023, program wins and a net increase in volumes, partially offset by the impact of write-downs on certain programs within our UK operations for which cost and schedule were rebaselined as well as the completion of certain programs.

The decrease in operating income for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to impairment and restructuring charges of $689 million at the SES reporting unit in fiscal 2023, and write-downs on certain programs. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in volumes on certain programs.

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
Defense Systems (dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Revenues$2,030$1,878$1,8068%4%
Operating income94651145%491%
Operating margin4.6%3.5%0.6%
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report49

Table of Contents

PART II

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to program wins and a net increase in volumes on certain programs, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in revenues for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes on certain programs and program wins, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to program wins and improved program execution on certain programs, partially offset by a one-time write-down related to program assets.

The increase in operating income for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable a net increase in volumes on certain programs, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.

Year Ended2024 to 20232023 to 2022
Corporate (dollars in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022Percent changePercent change
Operating loss$(186)$(130)$(108)(43)%(20)%

The increase in operating loss for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, was primarily attributable to an increase in research and development activities and general and administrative costs.

The increase in operating loss for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, was primarily attributable to higher legal costs, increased expenses in integration and restructuring activities, partially offset by the impact of foreign payroll tax reserves.

NON-OPERATING EXPENSE, NET

Non-operating expense, net decreased by $30 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023, primarily due to higher interest income earned from higher cash balances.

Non-operating expense, net increased by $16 million for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, primarily due to a net increase in interest expense driven by higher interest rates and refinancing activities.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

Our effective tax rate was 23.7%, 48.4% and 21.8% in fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2024 was favorably impacted primarily by federal research tax credits and lower state income taxes, partially offset by an increase in unrecognized tax benefits. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2023 was unfavorably impacted primarily by non tax deductible goodwill impairments. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2022 was favorably impacted primarily by federal research tax credits and excess tax benefits related to employee stock-based payment transactions.

In December 2021, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development enacted model rules for a new 15% global minimum tax framework (“Pillar Two”). Many governments around the world have enacted or are in the process of enacting Pillar Two legislation. The Pillar Two legislation became effective for certain jurisdictions beginning in fiscal 2024. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the rules as additional legislation gets enacted; however, there is not a material impact from jurisdictions where Pillar Two rules are currently in effect.

BOOKINGS AND BACKLOG

We had net bookings of $23.4 billion and $16.5 billion during fiscal 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net bookings represent the estimated amount of revenue to be earned in the future from funded and unfunded contract awards that were received during the year, net of any adjustments to previously awarded backlog amounts. We calculate net bookings as the year’s ending backlog, plus the year’s revenues, less the prior year’s ending backlog and any impacts from foreign currency or acquisitions and divestitures.

Backlog represents the estimated amount of future revenues to be recognized under negotiated contracts. We segregate our backlog into two categories as follows:

uFunded Backlog. Funded backlog for contracts with the U.S. government represents the value on contracts for which funding is appropriated less revenues previously recognized on these contracts. Funded backlog for contracts with non-U.S. government entities and commercial customers represents the estimated value on contracts, which may cover multiple future years, under which we are obligated to perform, less revenues previously recognized on the contracts.

50Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

uNegotiated Unfunded Backlog. Negotiated unfunded backlog represents estimated amounts of revenue to be earned in the future from contracts for which funding has not been appropriated and unexercised priced contract options. Negotiated unfunded backlog does not include unexercised option periods and future potential task orders expected to be awarded under IDIQ, GSA Schedule or other master agreement contract vehicles, with the exception of certain IDIQ contracts where task orders are not competitively awarded and separately priced but instead are used as a funding mechanism, and where there is a basis for estimating future revenues and funding on future anticipated task orders.

The estimated value of our segment backlog for the periods presented was as follows:

January 3, 2025December 29, 2023
(in millions)FundedUnfundedTotalFundedUnfundedTotal
National Security & Digital$2,881$19,086$21,967$2,714$15,113$17,827
Health & Civil1,45610,56812,0242,3349,04411,378
Commercial & International2,4561,9014,3572,5671,1053,672
Defense Systems1,6163,5905,2061,1812,9044,085
Total$8,409$35,145$43,554$8,796$28,166$36,962

Bookings and backlog fluctuate from period to period depending on our success rate in winning contracts and the timing of contract awards, renewals, modifications and cancellations, as well as foreign currency movements. Contract awards may be negatively impacted by ongoing industry-wide delays in procurement decisions and budget cuts by the U.S. government as discussed in “Business Environment and Trends” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We expect to recognize a substantial portion of our funded backlog as revenues within the next 12 months. However, the U.S. government may cancel any contract at any time through a termination for the convenience of the U.S. government. In addition, certain contracts with commercial or non-U.S. government customers may include provisions that allow the customer to cancel at any time. Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed.

CONTRACT TYPES

Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract. For a discussion of the types of contracts under which we generate revenues, see “Business—Contract Types” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Revenues by contract type as a percentage of our total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:

Year Ended
January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022
Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee44%48%50%
Firm-fixed-price43%39%38%
Time-and-materials and fixed-price-level-of-effort13%13%12%
Total100%100%100%
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report51

Table of Contents

PART II

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

OVERVIEW OF LIQUIDITY

As of January 3, 2025, we had $943 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have a senior unsecured revolving credit facility which can provide up to $1.0 billion in additional borrowing, if required. As of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, there were no borrowings outstanding under any revolving credit facility.

We had outstanding debt of $4.7 billion at both January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023. In February 2023, we issued and sold $750 million 5.75% fixed-rate senior notes. The annual interest rate is payable on a semi-annual basis. In March 2023, we entered into a Credit Agreement with certain financial institutions, which provided for a senior unsecured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion (the “Term Loan Facility”). The proceeds of the Term Loan Facility and cash on hand were used to repay in full all indebtedness, terminate all commitments and discharge all guarantees existing in connection with a predecessor $1.9 billion senior unsecured term loan facility and a senior unsecured revolving facility.

As of January 3, 2025, borrowings under our Credit Agreement were based on a Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) with a 0.10% Term SOFR adjustment and an applicable margin range from 1.00% to 1.50%. At January 3, 2025, the applicable margin for SOFR-denominated borrowings was 1.25%.

We have a commercial paper program in which we may issue short-term unsecured commercial paper notes (“Commercial Paper Notes”) that have maturities of up to 397 days from the date of issuance (see “Note 13—Debt” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). As of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, we did not have any commercial paper notes outstanding.

We made principal payments, excluding the impacts of our Commercial Paper Notes, on our debt of $18 million, $2,045 million and $545 million during fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The activity for fiscal 2023 included a $1,210 million payment to discharge the $1.9 billion 5.77% senior unsecured term loan facility, a $498 million payment to discharge the $500 million 2.95% notes, due May 2023, and a principal repayment of $320 million to discharge the 364-day term loan credit agreement.

Our credit facility, term loan facility, commercial paper notes and notes outstanding as of January 3, 2025, contain financial covenants and customary restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all covenants as of January 3, 2025.

We paid dividends of $208 million, $201 million and $199 million for fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Stock repurchases of Leidos common stock may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions with third parties including through accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreements. Whether repurchases are made and the timing and actual number of shares repurchased depends on a variety of factors including price, corporate capital requirements, other market conditions and regulatory requirements. The repurchase program may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time.

During fiscal 2024 and 2023, we made open market repurchases of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $850 million and $225 million, respectively. There were no open market share repurchases in fiscal 2022.

In fiscal 2022, we entered into an ASR with a financial institution to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock. We paid $500 million to the financial institution and received 4.8 million shares (see “Note 16—Earnings Per Share” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). All shares delivered were immediately retired.

For the next 12 months, we anticipate that we will be able to meet our liquidity needs, including servicing our debt, through cash generated from operations, available cash balances, borrowings from our commercial paper program and, if needed, sales of accounts receivable and borrowings from our revolving credit facility.

52Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

SUMMARY OF CASH FLOWS

The following table summarizes cash flow information for the periods presented:

Year Ended
(in millions)January 3, 2025December 29, 2023December 30, 2022
Net cash provided by operating activities(1)$1,392$1,165$992
Net cash used in investing activities(142)(211)(313)
Net cash used in financing activities(1,084)(715)(865)

(1)Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 30, 2022, was recast to present the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as a separate line in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $227 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings and favorable timing of payroll and employee benefit accruals.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $173 million for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022. The increase was primarily due to faster collections on receivables and favorable timing of customer advance payments, partially offset by higher tax payments of $260 million mainly in connection with the TCJA provision.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $69 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower capital expenditures of $58 million in the current year.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $102 million for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022. The decrease was primarily due to $190 million of cash paid in connection with our Cobham Special Mission acquisition from the prior year, partially offset with higher capital expenditures of $78 million in the current year.

Net cash used in financing activities increased $369 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The increase was primarily due to a $625 million increase in stock repurchases, a $35 million increase in shares withheld for tax obligations, partially offset by a decrease of $291 million in net payments made on debt activities.

Net cash used in financing activities decreased $150 million for fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022. The decrease was primarily due a net decrease of $296 million in stock repurchases driven by the accelerated share repurchase agreement in the prior year and an increase of $1.4 billion in proceeds received from the issuance of debt in the current year, partially offset by an increase of $1.5 billion in payments of debt.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain aspects of our business. We have letters of credit outstanding principally related to performance guarantees on contracts and surety bonds outstanding principally related to performance and subcontractor payment bonds as described in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Our future contractual obligations are related to debt, finance and operating leases, long-term liabilities under deferred compensation arrangements, purchase obligations for long-term purchases and service agreements and other liabilities. For more information, see “Note 10—Leases”, “Note 13—Debt”, “Note 19—Retirement Plans” and “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have interest payments related to our outstanding debt and finance leases. As of January 3, 2025, future scheduled interest payments on our outstanding debt and finance leases were $208 million, expected to be paid in fiscal 2025 and $1.1 billion expected to be paid thereafter.

As of January 3, 2025, future payments on our deferred compensation arrangements and purchase obligations for long-term purchases and service agreements were $65 million, expected to be paid in fiscal 2025, and $371 million expected to be paid thereafter. Our future payments do not include $162 million of income tax liabilities, primarily as a result of uncertain tax positions, and the timing of such payments, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated. For additional information, see “Note 18—Income Taxes” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report53

Table of Contents

PART II

GUARANTORS AND ISSUERS OF GUARANTEED SECURITIES

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (“Guarantor”) has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the debt securities of its subsidiary, Leidos, Inc. (“Issuer”), that were issued pursuant to transactions that were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (collectively, the “Registered Notes”). The following is a list of the Registered Notes guaranteed by Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Senior unsecured Registered Notes issued by Leidos, Inc.:
$500 million 3.625% notes, due May 2025
$750 million 4.375% notes, due May 2030
$1,000 million 2.300% notes, due February 2031
$750 million 5.750% notes, due March 2033

Leidos Holdings, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed debt securities of Leidos, Inc. that were issued pursuant to transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The following is a list of unregistered debt securities guaranteed by Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Senior unsecured unregistered debt securities issued by Leidos, Inc.:
$250 million 7.125% notes, due July 2032
$300 million 5.500% notes, due July 2033

Additionally, Leidos, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed debt securities of Leidos Holding, Inc. that were issued pursuant to transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The following is a list of unregistered debt securities guaranteed by Leidos, Inc.

Senior unsecured unregistered debt securities issued by Leidos Holdings, Inc.:
$300 million 5.950% notes, due December 2040

The following summarized financial information includes the assets, liabilities and results of operations for the Guarantor and Issuer of the Registered Notes described above. Intercompany balances and transactions between the Issuer and Guarantor have been eliminated from the financial information below. Investments in the consolidated subsidiaries of the Issuer and Guarantor that do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes have been excluded from the financial information. Intercompany payables represent amounts due to non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Issuer.

BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION FOR THE GUARANTOR AND ISSUER OF REGISTERED NOTES

(in millions)January 3, 2025
Total current assets$2,550
Goodwill5,673
Other long-term assets1,498
Total assets$9,721
Total current liabilities$2,677
Long-term debt, net of current portion4,052
Intercompany payables3,319
Other long-term liabilities820
Total liabilities$10,868
54Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION FOR THE GUARANTOR AND ISSUER OF REGISTERED NOTES

(in millions)January 3, 2025
Revenues, net$10,564
Operating income807
Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders119

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

We have identified the following accounting policies as critical because they require significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

uRevenue Recognition

uGoodwill

REVENUE RECOGNITION

We perform work under various types of contracts, which include FFP, T&M, FPLOE, cost-plus-fixed-fee, cost-plus-award-fee, cost-plus-incentive-fee and fixed-price-incentive-fee contracts.

On FFP contracts requiring system integration and cost-plus contracts with variable consideration, revenue is generally recognized over time using a method that measures the extent of progress towards completion of a performance obligation, principally using a cost-input method (referred to as the cost-to-cost method). Under the cost-to-cost method, revenue is recognized based on the proportion of total costs incurred to estimated total costs-at-completion (“EAC”), which require us to use estimates of the revenue and cost associated with the design, manufacture and delivery of our offerings and services. A performance obligation’s EAC includes all direct costs such as materials, labor, subcontract costs, overhead and a ratable portion of general and administrative costs. If the estimated cost of a performance obligation whose associated revenue is recognized using the cost-to-cost method exceeds the estimated transaction price, the entire amount of the loss is recognized in operations in the period the loss is known.

Some of our cost-plus and fixed-price contracts contain award fees, incentive fees or other provisions that may either increase or decrease the transaction price. These variable amounts generally are awarded upon achievement of certain performance metrics, program milestones or cost targets and can be based upon customer discretion. We estimate variable consideration at the most probable amount that we expect to be entitled to, based on the assessment of the contract specific variable fee criteria, complexity of work and related risks, extent of customer discretion, amount of variable consideration received historically and the potential of significant reversal of revenue.

We allocate the transaction price of a contract to its performance obligations primarily based upon the proportional individual selling prices. The standalone selling price of the performance obligations is generally based on an expected cost-plus margin approach. For certain product sales, performance obligations may be allocated to a contract's transaction price based on prices observed in other standalone sales or the residual value method. Substantially all of our contracts do not contain a significant financing component, which would require an adjustment to the transaction price of the contract.

For the impacts of changes in estimates on our contracts, see “Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report55

Table of Contents

PART II

GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is tested annually, at the beginning of the fourth quarter, for impairment at the reporting unit level and may be tested more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, goodwill represented 46% and 48% of our total assets, respectively.

We may perform qualitative or quantitative analysis to test for impairment. Qualitative factors include macroeconomic, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance, industry, legal and other relevant events and factors affecting the reporting unit.

Our quantitative analysis utilizes discounted cash flow models and market multiple valuation methods to estimate reporting unit fair values. Discounted cash flow analyses rely on significant judgment and assumptions about expected future cash flows, weighted-average cost of capital, discount rates, expected long-term growth rates and operating margins. These assumptions are based on estimates of future sales and earnings after considering such factors as general market conditions, customer budgets, existing firm and future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance. Market multiple analyses incorporate significant judgments and assumptions related to the selection of guideline public companies, our forecast earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), forecast EBITDA of guideline public companies and control premium estimates.

Operations of the Security Enterprise Solutions (“SES”) reporting unit rely heavily on the sales and servicing of security and detection products, which prior to fiscal 2024, have been negatively impacted due to delays in airline travel infrastructure projects as customer budgets recover from the pandemic.

During fiscal 2023, the SES reporting unit refined its portfolio and made strategic business decisions to exit certain product offerings, as well as cease operations in certain countries in order to align the operations of the reporting unit with its strategic business plan. These decisions, along with the delays in airline travel infrastructure projects and higher than anticipated servicing costs, contributed to a significant reduction in the reporting unit’s forecasted revenue and cash flows.

Accordingly, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $596 million for fiscal 2023 (see “Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The goodwill impairment resulted in a lower difference between the fair value and carrying value for the SES reporting unit and therefore, in fiscal 2024, we performed a quantitative impairment analysis for the SES reporting unit, which resulted in no further impairment.

In fiscal 2024, we performed our annual test for impairment as of September 28, 2024, which resulted in no impairments being identified.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits, other uncertainties and future obligations related to our business. For a discussion of these items, see “Note 10—Leases” and “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For a discussion of these items, see “Note 2—Accounting Standards” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

56Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks in the normal course of business. Our current market risk exposures are primarily related to interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations. The following information about our market sensitive financial instruments contains forward-looking statements.

INTEREST RATE RISK

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to long-term debt obligations and derivatives. Our policy authorizes, with Board of Directors’ approval, the limited use of derivative instruments to hedge specific interest rate risks.

DEBT AND DERIVATIVES

At January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, we had $4.7 billion of debt, which included $1.0 billion related to our senior unsecured term loans that have a variable stated interest rate that is determined based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin. As a result, we may experience fluctuations in interest expense.

We have interest rate swap agreements to hedge the cash flows of a portion of our variable rate senior unsecured term loan (“Variable Rate Loan”). Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, we receive monthly variable interest payments based on the one-month SOFR rate and pay interest at a fixed rate. As of January 3, 2025, the notional value of the interest rate swap agreements was $500 million. The interest rate swap agreements effectively converted a portion of our variable rate borrowing to a fixed rate borrowing. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements with respect to our Variable Rate Loan was an asset of $4 million and $11 million as of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, respectively.

The counterparties to these agreements are financial institutions. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We cannot predict future market fluctuations in interest rates and their impact on our interest rate swaps. A net hypothetical 10% movement in the one-month SOFR rate would not have a significant impact on our annual interest expense. For additional information related to our interest rate swap agreements and debt, see “Note 12—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 13—Debt,” respectively, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

As of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, our cash and cash equivalents included investments in several large institutional money market accounts. For fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, a hypothetical 10% interest rate movement would not have a significant impact on the value of our holdings or on interest income.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

Although the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, some of our transactions are denominated in foreign currencies. Our foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to receipts from customers, payments to suppliers and certain intercompany transactions denominated in currencies other than our (or one of our subsidiaries’) functional currency. Our foreign operations represented 8%, 9% and 8% of total revenues for fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report57

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 34)59
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 3, 2025, and December 29, 202362
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 202263
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 202264
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 202265
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 202266
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements68

Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

58Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Reston, Virginia

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 3, 2025 and December 29, 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows, for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 3, 2025 and December 29, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 11, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Goodwill Valuation – Security Enterprise Solutions Reporting Unit - Refer to Notes 3 and 8 to the Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company performed a quantitative impairment evaluation of the goodwill for the Security Enterprise Solutions reporting unit by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. Estimating the fair value of a reporting unit requires the exercise of significant judgment and assumptions including judgments about expected future cash flows, weighted-average cost of capital, discount rates, expected long-term growth rates and operating margins as well as changes in the business environment. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the reporting unit, the amount of any goodwill impairment charg

Showing the first 8K of 202K characters. Open the full section

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of January 3, 2025. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the fourth quarter of the period ended January 3, 2025, covered by this Annual Report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2025, and has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of that date was effective.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our internal control over financial reporting, and that firm’s report on our internal control over financial reporting is set forth below.

February 11, 2025

104Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART II

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Reston, Virginia

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 3, 2025, of the Company and our report dated February 11, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 11, 2025

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report105

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 9B. Other Information

RULE 10B5-1 TRADING ARRANGEMENT

During the three months ended January 3, 2025, no director or officer of the Company adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

106Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

For certain information required by Item 10 with respect to executive officers, see “Executive Officers of the Registrant” at the end of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For additional information required by Item 10 with respect to executive officers and directors, including audit committee and audit committee financial experts, procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, see the information set forth under the captions “Proposal 1–Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Other Information” appearing in the 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have a code of conduct that applies to our principal executive officer and our senior financial officers. A copy of our code of conduct is available on the Investor Relations section of our website free of charge at www.leidos.com by clicking on the links entitled “Investors” then “Governance” then "Documents & Charters" and then “Code of Conduct.” Documents available under “Governance” in the Investor Relations section of our website also include our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters for the Audit and Finance Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Ethics Committee, and Technology and Information Security Committee of the Board of Directors.

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of business ethics by posting such information on our website. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Insider Trading Policy (the “Insider Trading Policy”) sets forth the general rules that our directors, executive officers and employees must follow with respect to transactions in our securities to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations. This description of the Insider Trading Policy is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Insider Trading Policy, which is filed hereto as Exhibit 19.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

For information required by Item 11 with respect to executive compensation and director compensation, see the information set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance” in the 2025 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

For information required by Item 11 with respect to compensation committee interlocks and insider participation, see the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance” in the 2025 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report107

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

For information required by Item 12 with respect to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management, see the information set forth under the caption “Other Information” in the 2025 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of January 3, 2025, is set forth below:

Plan Category(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)2,862,703(2)$97.53(3)7,996,467(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (5)———
Total2,862,703(2)$97.53(3)7,996,467

(1)The following equity compensation plans approved by security holders are included in this plan category: the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.

(2)Represents (i) 1,693,633 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance for service-based awards and performance and market-based awards assuming achievement of the target level of performance for unearned performance and market-based awards (does not include an additional 364,885 shares if the maximum level of performance is achieved) and other stock awards under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) 3,723 shares of Leidos common stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights and (iii) 1,169,070 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options awarded under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Does not include shares to be issued pursuant to purchase rights under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(3)Does not include shares to be issued for performance-based and other stock awards and shares of stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights.

(4)Represents 6,061,764 and 1,934,703 shares of Leidos common stock under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively. The maximum number of shares initially available for issuance under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan was 7.5 million. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan was amended in June 2012 to provide that the maximum number of shares available for issuance thereunder is 12.5 million. The 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was amended in September 2016 to provide that the maximum number of shares available for issuance thereunder is 5.0 million. Those shares that are issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan that are forfeited or repurchased at the original purchase price or less or that are issuable upon exercise of awards granted under the plan that expire or become unexercisable for any reason after their grant date without having been exercised in full.

(5)The Management Stock Compensation Plan has not been approved by security holders and is included in this plan category. This plan does not provide for a maximum number of shares available for future issuance. For further information on this plan, see “Note 17—Stock-Based Compensation” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

For information required by Item 13 with respect to certain relationships and related transactions and the independence of directors and nominees, see the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance” in the 2025 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

For information required by Item 14 with respect to principal accounting fees and services, see the information set forth under the caption “Audit Matters” in the 2025 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

108Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

**(a)**Documents filed as part of the report:

1.Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statements of Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2.Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in our consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

3.Exhibits

Exhibit NumberDescription of Exhibit
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Leidos Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2020.
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Leidos Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 25, 2024.
4.1**Indenture dated June 28, 2002, between Leidos, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2002. (SEC File No. 000-12771)
4.2First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 13, 2006, by and among Leidos, Inc., Leidos Holdings, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 17, 2006. (SEC File No. 001-33072)
4.3Indenture dated as of December 20, 2010, among Leidos Holdings, Inc., Leidos, Inc., and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on December 22, 2010.
4.4Indenture relating to the 2.950% Senior Notes due 2023, 3.625% Senior Notes due 2025 and the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2030, dated as of May 12, 2020, by and among Leidos, Inc., as issuer, Leidos Holdings, Inc., as guarantor, and Citibank, N.A., as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 12, 2020.
4.5Form of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2025. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 12, 2020.
4.6Form of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2030. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 12, 2020.
4.7Indenture relating to the 2.300% Senior Notes due 2031, dated as of October 8, 2020 among Leidos, Inc., Leidos Holdings, Inc, as guarantor, and Citibank, N.A., as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 9, 2020.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report109

Table of Contents

PART IV

Exhibit NumberDescription of Exhibit
4.8Form of 2.300% Senior Notes due 2031. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 9, 2020.
4.9Officers’ Certificate of Leidos, Inc., dated as of February 28, 2023. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2023.
4.10Form of Global Note representing Leidos, Inc.’s 5.750% Notes due 2033. Included in Exhibit 4.11 and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2023.
4.11Description of Common Stock. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2021.
10.1*Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.2 *Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023.
10.3*Leidos, Inc.’s Management Stock Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.4*Amended and Restated Leidos, Inc.’s Keystaff Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.
10.5*Amended and Restated Leidos, Inc.’s Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.
10.6*Amended and Restated Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 4, 2017.
10.7*Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.8*Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.9*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.10*Form of Restricted Unit Award Agreement (Management) of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed as with the SEC on March 27, 2014.
10.11*Form of Indemnification Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 25, 2015.
10.12*Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 29, 2019.
10.13*Executive Employment Agreement dated June 30, 2014. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July, 2, 2014.
10.14*Form of Performance Share Award Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (for Performance Share Award Agreements entered into on or after April 3, 2015). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 25, 2015.
110Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART IV

Exhibit NumberDescription of Exhibit
10.15*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 5, 2017.
10.16*Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (for Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreements granted on March 3, 2017). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 5, 2017.
10.17*Form of Performance Share Award Agreement of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (for Performance Share Award Agreements granted on March 3, 2017). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 5, 2017.
10.18*Form of Notice of Grant of Options for Non-Employee Directors under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018.
10.19*Form of Notice of Grant of Options for Employees under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.
10.20*Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Performance-Vesting) for Employees under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.
10.21*Form of Notice of Grant of Performance Share Awards for Employees under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.
10.22*Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Time-Vesting) for Employees under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.
10.23*Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards for Non-Employee Directors under the Leidos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018.
10.24Intellectual Property Matters Agreement, dated August 16, 2016, between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Abacus Innovations Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 4, 2016.
10.25Credit Agreement dated as of March 10, 2023, by and among Leidos Holdings, Inc., Leidos, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2023.
10.26Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated July 12, 2021, between Leidos, Inc., as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and the applicable Dealer party thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 12, 2021.
10.27Amended and Restated Leidos Holdings, Inc. Severance Plan for Executive Officers, effective July 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 1, 2023.
10.28Executive Employment Agreement, dated February 23, 2023, between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Thomas A. Bell. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2023.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report111

Table of Contents

PART IV

Exhibit NumberDescription of Exhibit
10.29Consulting Employee Agreement, dated January 17, 2024, between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Jerald S. Howe, Jr. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 17, 2024.
19Insider Trading Policy
21Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
22List of Guarantors and Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP.
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
97.1Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s Financial Restatement Compensation Clawback Policy. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.
101Interactive Data File.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File. The cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
  • Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements

** Paper filing

† Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of these exhibits

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

112Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Leidos Holdings, Inc.
By/s/ Christopher R. Cage
Christopher R. Cage Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 11, 2025

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Leidos Holdings, Inc., in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Thomas A. BellPrincipal Executive OfficerFebruary 11, 2025
Thomas A. Bell
/s/ Christopher R. CagePrincipal Financial OfficerFebruary 11, 2025
Christopher R. Cage
/s/ Daniel A. AtkinsonPrincipal Accounting OfficerFebruary 11, 2025
Daniel A. Atkinson
/s/ Gregory R. DahlbergDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Gregory R. Dahlberg
/s/ David G. FubiniDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
David G. Fubini
/s/ Noel B. GeerDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Noel B. Geer
/s/ Tina W. JonasDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Tina W. Jonas
/s/ Robert C. Kovarik, Jr.DirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Robert C. Kovarik, Jr.
/s/ Harry M. J. Kraemer, Jr.DirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Harry M. J. Kraemer, Jr.
/s/ Gary S. MayDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Gary S. May
/s/ Surya N. MohapatraDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Surya N. Mohapatra
/s/ Nancy A. NortonDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Nancy A. Norton
/s/ Patrick M. ShanahanDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Patrick M. Shanahan
/s/ Robert S. ShapardDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Robert S. Shapard
/s/ Susan M. StalneckerDirectorFebruary 11, 2025
Susan M. Stalnecker
Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report113