Leidos Holdings 10-K 2026-01-02
Filed 2026-02-17. 24 sections, 524K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026
or
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33072
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. | ||||||||
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
| Delaware | 20-3562868 | ||||||||||||||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||||||||||||||
| 1750 Presidents Street, | Reston, | Virginia | 20190 | ||||||||||||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(571) 526-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||||||||
| Common stock, par value $.0001 per share | LDOS | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. x
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No x
As of July 4, 2025, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of Leidos Holdings, Inc. common stock (based upon the closing price of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $21,002,965,945.
The number of shares issued and outstanding of the registrant’s class of common stock as of February 10, 2026, was 126,392,684 shares ($.0001 par value per share).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (”2026 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our management’s belief and assumptions about the future in light of information currently available to our management. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar words or phrases or the negative of these words or phrases. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. There are a number of important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those results anticipated by our forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to:
udevelopments in the U.S. government defense and non-defense budgets, including budget reductions, sequestration, implementation of spending limits or changes in budgetary priorities, initiatives aimed at improving governmental efficiency, delays in the U.S. government budget process or a government shutdown, or the U.S. government’s failure to raise the debt ceiling, which increases the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession;
uuncertainties in tax due to new tax legislation or other regulatory developments;
udeterioration of economic conditions or weakening in credit or capital markets;
uuncertainty in the consequences of current and future geopolitical events;
uinflationary pressures and fluctuations in interest rates;
udelays in the U.S. government contract procurement process or the award of contracts and delays or loss of contracts as a result of competitor protests;
uchanges in U.S. government procurement rules, regulations and practices, including its organizational conflict of interest rules;
uchanges in global trade policies, tariffs and other measures that could restrict international trade;
uincreased preference by the U.S. government for minority-owned, small and small disadvantaged businesses;
ufluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
uour compliance with various U.S. government and other government procurement rules and regulations;
ugovernmental reviews, audits and investigations of our company;
uour ability to effectively compete and win contracts with the U.S. government and other customers;
uour ability to respond rapidly to emerging technology trends, including the use of artificial intelligence;
uour reliance on information technology spending by hospitals/healthcare organizations;
uour reliance on infrastructure investments by industrial and natural resources organizations;
uenergy efficiency and alternative energy sourcing investments;
uinvestments by U.S. government and commercial organizations in environmental impact and remediation projects;
uthe effects of an epidemic, pandemic or similar outbreak may have on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows;
uour ability to attract, train and retain skilled employees, including our management team, and to obtain security clearances for our employees;
uour ability to accurately estimate costs, including cost increases due to inflation, associated with our firm-fixed-price contracts and other contracts;
uresolution of legal and other disputes with our customers and others or legal or regulatory compliance issues;
ucybersecurity, data security or other security threats, system failures or other disruptions of our business;
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 1 |
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-K
uour compliance with international, federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding privacy, data security, protection, storage, retention, transfer, disposal and other processing, technology protection and personal information;
uthe damage and disruption to our business resulting from natural disasters and the effects of climate change;
uour ability to effectively acquire businesses and make investments;
uour ability to manage risks associated with our joint ventures, including those in which we are a minority owner and do not operate the assets;
uour ability to maintain relationships with prime contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners;
uour ability to manage performance and other risks related to customer contracts;
uthe failure of our inspection or detection systems to detect threats;
uthe adequacy of our insurance programs, customer indemnifications or other liability protections designed to protect us from significant product or other liability claims, including cybersecurity attacks;
uour ability to manage risks associated with our international business;
uour ability to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and similar worldwide anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations;
uour ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights by third parties of infringement, misappropriation or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights;
uour ability to prevail in litigation brought by third parties of infringement, misappropriation or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights;
uour ability to declare or increase future dividends based on our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, including compliance with applicable law and our agreements;
uour ability to grow our commercial health and infrastructure businesses, which could be negatively affected by budgetary constraints faced by hospitals and by developers of energy and infrastructure projects;
uour ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses;
uour ability to complete the acquisition of KENE Parent, Inc. (“Entrust”) or successfully integrate Entrust to achieve the expected benefits of such acquisition; and
uour ability to execute our business plan and long-term management initiatives effectively and to overcome these and other known and unknown risks that we face.
We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances, changes in expectations, or the occurrence of unanticipated events after the date of those statements or to conform these statements to actual results.
| 2 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
Part I
Item 1. Business
OUR COMPANY
Leidos Holdings, Inc. (“Leidos”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary and principal operating company is Leidos, Inc. Leidos was founded in 1969 by physicist Dr. Robert Beyster. Since our founding 57 years ago, we have applied our expertise in science, research and engineering in rapidly-evolving technologies and markets to solve complex problems of global concern.
We use the terms “we,” “us” and “our” to refer collectively to Leidos Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Leidos is an industry and technology leader serving government and commercial customers with smarter, more efficient digital and mission innovations. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, with 47,000, global employees, we pursue strategic growth across five pillars: space and maritime; energy infrastructure; digital modernization and cyber; mission software; and managed health services. Our customers include the U.S. Department of War (“DoW”), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and many other U.S. civilian, state and local government agencies, foreign government agencies and commercial businesses. With a focus on delivering mission-critical solutions, Leidos generated 87% of revenues for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, (“fiscal 2025”) from U.S. government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to others. Approximately 8% of our revenues are generated by entities located outside of the United States.
By leveraging expertise in multiple disciplines, tailoring our services and solutions to the particular needs of our targeted markets and using advanced analytics, we work to securely deliver services and solutions that not only meet customers’ current goals, but also support their future missions.
For additional discussion and analysis related to recent business developments, see “Business Environment and Trends” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS
As of January 2, 2026, our business is aligned into four reportable segments: National Security & Digital, Health & Civil, Commercial & International and Defense Systems. Additionally, we separately present the unallocated costs associated with corporate functions as Corporate. We provide a wide array of scientific, engineering and technical services and solutions across these reportable segments.
NATIONAL SECURITY & DIGITAL
Our National Security & Digital business provides leading-edge and technologically advanced services, solutions and products across substantially all U.S. federal government customers. Our advanced capabilities allow us to provide technology-enabled services, software capabilities and IT modernization, including:
uDigital Modernization and Transformation – We provide worldwide digital support for our nation’s largest and most critical infrastructure. We design, develop, implement, protect and maintain IT environments to provide stability, security and flexibility to mission needs. We also deliver secure, user-centric IT solutions in cloud computing, mobility, application modernization, data center and network modernization, asset management, support desk operations and digital workplace enablement. We accelerate enterprise transformation using customizable roadmaps and repeatable processes in both classified and unclassified environments for our customers.
uMission Software – We deliver trusted national security software leveraging artificial intelligence tools for defense, intelligence, and homeland security customers.
uMulti-Domain Solutions – We provide services by using artificial intelligence and machine learning to coordinate sea, ground, air and space rapidly and securely to provide warfighters the right information at the right time for mission advantage.
uCyber Operations – We offer full-spectrum cyber solutions to include offensive, defensive, and physical cyber operations delivering global-scale cryptographic management solutions to protect our customers’ most critical information and assets.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 3 |
PART I
uIntelligence Analysis, Mission Support, and Global Logistics Services – We provide intelligence analysis, operational support, logistics operations, security, linguistics, force production, biometrics, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives, energetics, training and other services to Intelligence Community customers.
National Security & Digital represented 44% of total revenues for both fiscal 2025 and the fiscal year ended January 3, 2025 (“fiscal 2024”) and 47% of total revenues for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”).
HEALTH & CIVIL
Our Health & Civil business provides services and solutions to federal and commercial customers in the areas of public health, care coordination, life and environmental sciences and transportation. We are dedicated to delivering effective and affordable solutions that are responsible for the health and well-being of people, including service members and veterans. Our core capabilities include:
uManaged Health Services – We deploy a national footprint of health clinics and health providers to support care delivery services, including medical disability and behavioral health examinations for the VA, as well as serving other independent medical exam markets. We have developed unique capabilities in behavioral health management through many decades of experience with a special emphasis on substance abuse services and non-medical counseling. Our managed health services activities leverage our IT and mission enablement capabilities, which underpin solutions we offer to our customers across all of our served markets.
uTransportation Solutions – Leidos is a trusted systems developer, service provider and integrator for air navigation service providers around the world, including the FAA. We provide air traffic control systems that help manage the world’s most complex airspace. We also deliver crucial automation and capability development services to customers responsible for ensuring the safety and efficiency of air travel.
uHealth Mission Software – Leidos employs holistic-systems used for fielding applied technology solutions across the entire continuum of healthcare. We deliver a single, common electronic health record to both DoW and VA hospitals and treatment facilities worldwide. Our offerings range from integrating software for the electronic healthcare record vendor and dental record vendors to integrating picture archiving and communications software and more.
uEnergy and Environment – We support the critical missions of the Department of Energy (“DoE”), National Nuclear Security Administration, and National Science Foundation, providing infrastructure management and operation, logistical operations, information technology support, applied research efforts, as well as education and outreach support.
uLife Sciences Research & Development – We provide life science research and development support to the NIH, Center for Disease Control, Army Medical Research community and commercial biotech companies. Our professionals operate a wide range of leading-edge research and development laboratories in the areas of genetics and genomics, proteins and proteomics, advanced biomedical computing and information technology, biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing, nanotechnology characterization and clinical trials management.
Health & Civil represented 30% for both fiscal 2025 and 2024 and 27% of total revenues for fiscal 2023.
COMMERCIAL & INTERNATIONAL
Commercial & International delivers a portfolio of products, services, and solutions aimed at securing national assets, modernizing energy and critical infrastructure, and enhancing mission outcomes. Our key customers include Investor-Owned Utilities, government agencies in the United Kingdom and Australia, the Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Customs & Border Protection ("CBP"), as well as airports and ports and borders authorities.
uEnergy Infrastructure – Leidos partners with utilities seeking reliable energy modernization solutions. Our project portfolio spans large-scale energy initiatives across the United States, serving electric utilities, generation owners, and industrial clients. We support utilities and industrial customers in modernizing power delivery systems for enhanced reliability, implementing energy management strategies, advancing vehicle electrification, transforming digital infrastructure, and optimizing operational efficiency to meet evolving energy demands and market expectations. Our expertise spans power grid engineering and design, grid modernization, utility planning and consulting, energy management and efficiency, and technology-driven innovation, including software and application development.
uGlobal Security Products and Services – Leidos is a global leader in fully integrated security detection solutions, enhancing the safety of screening and checkpoints for aviation, ports, borders, and critical infrastructure worldwide. With over 30,000 products deployed across more than 120 countries, including people scanners, computed tomography carry-on baggage scanners, checked baggage scanners, and explosive trace detectors. We are also the primary supplier to CBP and other
| 4 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
international customers of mobile, non-intrusive ports and borders inspection systems that secure the flow of travel and trade by effectively detecting and mitigating threats across cargo, vehicles, and individuals. Our digital solutions feature a secure and scalable open-architecture platform that transforms airport security by integrating disparate devices and technologies into a unified management system.
uInternational – Leidos delivers a wide range of mission-focused services across multiple domains to address critical threats and provide innovative solutions to government agencies in the UK and Australia. Our core areas of expertise include Digital Modernization, Mission Software, Logistics, and Airborne Solutions.
Commercial & International represented 13% of total revenues for fiscal 2025, and 14% of total revenues for both fiscal 2024 and 2023.
DEFENSE SYSTEMS
Defense Systems addresses threats facing our nation by rapidly prototyping and delivering advanced hardware, software, and integrated systems solutions for the DoW, Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, Marine Corps, United States Special Operations Command, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and intelligence agencies. We are heavily engaged in the top defense Research Development Test and Evaluation priorities that are driven by evolving global threats. This business is dedicated to delivering cost-effective solutions and services in the space, airborne, land and maritime domains and supporting critical missions worldwide.
uMaritime Systems – On and under the sea, we offer a wide range of innovative capabilities. We continue to enhance our surface and subsurface autonomous and unmanned technologies to make maritime operations safer and more efficient. We provide innovative platforms, software solutions for vessel control and common core autonomous behaviors, enhanced sensor systems, advanced signal processing, secure communications hardware and software to fully support these vital missions. Our naval architecture and marine engineering services span an entire ship’s lifetime, from early-stage concept designs through service life extensions.
uAerospace Systems – We provide expertise in the design, manufacturing, and integration of space-based electro-optic infrared systems, multi/hyperspectral, electronic warfare and signals intelligence, and communications payloads. We also manufacture structures and thermal protection systems for hypersonic boost-glide missiles, and we provide testing services for hypersonic vehicles.
uLand Systems – We develop Integrated Air and Missile Defense systems, including the US Army Enduring Indirect Fire Protection Capability, Army Long Range Persistent Surveillance radar capability and AirShield systems. We design and manufacture other persistent surveillance radar systems, advanced sensors, and radio frequency seekers, including the associated advanced algorithms that accompany them. We use this expertise to provide military sensor and electronic system R&D services for our customers.
uAirborne Systems – Leidos develops and integrates mission-enhancing airborne solutions. We execute airborne training, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions as a service for the DoW, the U.S. Intelligence Community, and military services worldwide. Our key served markets include aircraft integration and operations, sensor and autonomous systems, and Multi-Domain Operation enablers, addressing diverse missions such as target identification, border security, and counter-narcotics operations.
Defense Systems represented 13% of total revenues for fiscal 2025, and 12% of total revenues for both fiscal 2024 and 2023.
CORPORATE
Corporate includes the operations of various corporate activities, certain expense items that are not reimbursed by our U.S. government customers and certain other expense items excluded from a reportable segment’s performance.
ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
During fiscal 2025, we completed the acquisition of Savanna Industries, Inc. ("Kudu Dynamics"). See “Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
During fiscal 2025, we completed an immaterial disposition of a business within our Commercial & International segment. Additionally, during fiscal 2023, we completed an immaterial disposition of a business within our Defense Systems segment. For further information, see “Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 5 |
PART I
KEY CUSTOMERS
The majority of our revenues are generated in the United States. Our consolidated revenues are largely attributable to prime contracts or to subcontracts with other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government, with the remaining attributable to international customers, including the UK Ministry of Defence, the Australian Department of Defence, NATO and customers across a variety of commercial markets. Within the U.S. government, our revenues are diversified across many agencies, including various intelligence agencies, the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force, U.S. Space Force, DHS, Defense Information Systems Agency, FAA, Transportation Security Administration, CBP, Defense Health Agency, VA, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, DoE, the Environmental Protection Agency and research agencies such as Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency.
These customers have a number of subsidiary agencies that have separate budgets and procurement functions. Our contracts may be with the highest level of these agencies or with the subsidiary agencies of these customers.
HUMAN CAPITAL
As of January 2, 2026, we employed approximately 47,000 full and part-time employees of whom approximately 41,900 are located in the United States and the remainder of which are located in approximately 45 countries worldwide. Approximately 38% of our employees have degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics fields, approximately 24% of our employees have advanced degrees, 53% of our employees possess U.S. security clearances and approximately 19% of our employees are military veterans.
CULTURE AND WORKFORCE
Leidos has adopted six values that help define its culture: integrity, inclusion, innovation, agility, collaboration and commitment. These values provide a roadmap for our workplace behavior and help guide our business decisions. They are a key component of our corporate culture and are part of our employees’ performance assessments. Our values are based on our commitment to do the right thing for our customers, our employees and our communities. Our values are demonstrated by our employees as they help our customers execute important missions in the world’s most complex markets.
Our policies, procedures, training and communications form a comprehensive program that promotes a culture of integrity as a foundation for employee conduct. For the eighth consecutive year, the Ethisphere Institute named Leidos one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies in 2025.
Our approach to workplace culture and employee development focuses on education and best practices for leaders and employees. Leidos has programs designed to promote our corporate values throughout the enterprise and with our senior leadership. Leaders, managers and employees of the Company are required to take annual training to reinforce our corporate values.
We continue to grow and expand our learning and upskilling tools to develop and enhance our employees' technical and leadership skills to actively maintain our workplace culture. Company councils continue to champion and integrate Leidos values across the enterprise and are comprised of employees across our business areas and functions with oversight and guidance from executive leadership. We continue to invest in our employees through the continuous improvement of our Total Rewards plans and programs. Our Total Rewards philosophy is built on providing competitive, market-based compensation; comprehensive and flexible benefits; and programs that support employees’ overall well-being, financial security, and career growth. These offerings are designed to attract, retain, and motivate a highly skilled workforce.
TALENT ACQUISITION PRACTICES
Leidos is committed to promoting hiring practices that are designed and executed to recruit, hire, train and retain best-in-class talent, including building a deep and broad pipeline of candidates. We leverage college campuses, military veteran resources, industry associations, and other sources to expand our outreach. Each year we also attend and sponsor national conferences and local career fairs that target our key market segments and talent.
Our military veteran outreach program attracts, retains and supports current veterans, transitioning service members and military spouses. Our college campus outreach engages talent from multiple university sources.
| 6 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
CAREER MOBILITY AND GROWTH
We have a strong focus on our employees’ career, flexibility and well-being. We embrace what makes Leidos great by advancing a culture that helps every employee achieve personal and professional success. This is part of our broader Employee Value Proposition to 'break limits' and a commitment to make Leidos an even better place to work. Leidos empowers and challenges employees to continuously seek, share and apply new knowledge, skills and behaviors. We recognize the value of a high-performing workforce where every member of the team has an opportunity to feel motivated, valued and fulfilled, resulting in a purposeful and long career at Leidos. We provide resources, development, and experiential learning to enable employees to grow, including a talent marketplace where employees can fill temporary roles to develop skills and broaden their network. We provide leaders with the knowledge, skills and resources needed to coach employees and enable employees’ career development.
We value and develop a future-ready workforce to meet customer needs and stay ahead of emerging technologies. We have a strong technical upskilling and reskilling program to develop, mobilize and retain talent. We offer formal programs to help employees earn many industry-standard professional and technical certifications. Additionally, we offer tuition reimbursement and certification exam reimbursement to full-time employees at accredited universities.
Our Internal Mobility Program has a dedicated team that proactively focuses on the mobilization of our employees. We teach employees how to use the tools and resources available to them and help them gain visibility to hiring managers and recruiters across the enterprise. We have career advisors that meet one-on-one with employees in key talent segments to provide career coaching and mobility counseling.
We conduct formal employee engagement surveys to listen to employees and develop customized strategies to drive engagement, inclusion and retention across the organization.
We invest in our current and future leaders in several ways. We provide a variety of leadership development offerings, comprised of formal training programs, live leader labs and self-paced e-learning. Annually, we host a two-day Leadership Summit for approximately 350 of our most senior leaders to align our growth strategy and transformation initiatives.
Through our ongoing talent planning processes, we identify and develop high-potential employees for future roles. We create succession plans for all executive-level positions as well as for other roles throughout the organization considered vital to our success. In addition, we establish development and engagement plans for top talent that may include formal training, mentoring, coaching, sponsorship and experiential learning opportunities.
HEALTH AND WORKPLACE SAFETY
Our primary focus is on the health and safety of our employees, with the physical and mental well-being of our employees being top priority. To support the physical and mental well-being of our employees, we provide many well-being and mental health benefits to all employees, including access to our Employee Assistance Program, Headspace, Personify Health and meQuilibrium resources. These partners provide a multitude of free resources to assist employees with their mental, financial, and physical health.
We are a leader in the field of occupational health and safety (“OH&S”) and place a strong emphasis on these activities, both internally and on behalf of our customers. Internally, we emphasize direct management responsibility, comprehensive corporate policies and procedures, OH&S program implementation, employee training and compliance assessments. Our corporate policies and procedures support compliance with OH&S regulations at work locations. We have a proactive compliance program of employee education, training, auditing and reporting that, through employee awareness and integration into our business operations, supports our commitment to a safe and healthy work environment.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 7 |
PART I
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Our operations are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, our operations may become subject to future laws and regulations, including those related to climate change and environmental sustainability. See “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details. Although we do not currently anticipate that the costs of complying with, or the liabilities associated with, environmental laws will materially and adversely affect us, we cannot ensure that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in the future.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
We conduct research and development activities under customer-funded contracts and with company-funded research and development funds. Company-funded research and development includes independent research and development (“IR&D”) and commercial and international research and development. Company-funded research and development expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Our company-funded research and development expense was $187 million, $150 million and $128 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which as a percentage of consolidated revenues was 1.1%, 0.9% and 0.8% for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We charge expenses for research and development activities performed under customer contracts directly to those contracts.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Our technical services and products are not generally dependent upon patent protection, although we do selectively seek patent protection. We claim a proprietary interest in certain of our products, software programs, methodologies and know-how. This proprietary information is protected in confidence as trade secrets, using non-disclosure and other definitive agreements. We selectively pursue opportunities to license or transfer our technologies to third parties.
In connection with the performance of services and solutions, the U.S. government has certain rights to inventions, data, software code and related material that we develop under U.S. government-funded contracts and subcontracts. Generally, the U.S. government may disclose or license such information to third parties, including, in some instances, our competitors. In the case of some subcontracts that we perform, the prime contractor generally obtains rights to use the programs and products that we deliver under the subcontract to perform its prime contract obligations.
COMPETITION
Competition for contracts is significant, and we often compete against many well-established corporations with strong name and brand recognition. We also compete against smaller, more specialized companies that concentrate their resources in particular areas, the U.S. government’s own capabilities and federal non-profit contract research centers. Due to the diverse requirements of the U.S. government and our commercial customers, we frequently collaborate with other companies to compete for large contracts and bid against these same companies in other situations.
Our principal competitors currently include the following companies: Accenture Federal Services LLC, Amentum Services Inc., KBR, Inc., BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., CACI International Inc., Deloitte, General Dynamics Corporation, GovCIO, IBM, KBR Inc., L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, ManTech, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Optum, Parsons Corporation, Peraton Inc., RTX Corporation and SAIC. These companies span across sectors that include systems development and integration, engineering and technical services divisions of large defense contractors, diversified U.S. and international IT providers and contractors focused solely on technical services, supply chain management, other logistics services and major systems operations and maintenance, homeland security and health solutions. We compete domestically and internationally against products and services of the companies listed above, numerous smaller competitors and startups, and increasingly, non-traditional and non-U.S. defense contractors. Technological advances, including artificial intelligence, autonomy and robotics, changing customer requirements, as well as the ongoing significant reform of the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") are enabling expanded competition from both traditional and non-traditional competitors.
We compete by offering strong technical expertise, mission understanding, and retaining qualified staff, including those with security clearances. We focus on fair pricing and program execution. Our competitive edge also comes from our proven track record, strong cybersecurity and compliance, reliable supply chain, effective data management, and our ability to use commercial technologies and AI integration at scale.
| 8 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
CONTRACT PROCUREMENT
Our business is heavily regulated, and we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government and other contracts. The U.S. government procurement environment has evolved due to statutory and regulatory procurement reform initiatives. Today, U.S. government customers employ several contracting methods to purchase services and products. Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many U.S. government customers to increasingly purchase services and products using contracting methods that give them the ability to select multiple contract winners or pre-qualify certain contractors to provide services or products on established general terms and conditions rather than through single-award contracts. The predominant contracting methods through which U.S. government agencies procure services and products include the following:
uDefinitive Award Contracts. U.S. government agencies may procure services and products through single definitive award contracts which specify the scope of services or products purchased and identify the contractor that will provide the specified services or products. When an agency has a requirement, the agency will issue a solicitation or request for proposal to which interested contractors can submit a proposal. The bidding and selection process can take a year or more to complete. For the contractor, this method of contracting may provide greater certainty of the timing and amounts to be received at the time of contract award because it generally results in the customer contracting for a specific scope of services or products from the single definitive successful awardee.
uIndefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) Contracts. The U.S. government uses IDIQ contracts to obtain commitments from contractors to provide certain services or products on pre-established terms and conditions. The U.S. government then issues task orders under the IDIQ contracts to purchase specific services or products. IDIQ contracts are awarded to one or more contractors following a competitive procurement process. Under a single-award IDIQ contract, all task orders under that contract are issued to the one contractor awarded the IDIQ. Under a multiple-award IDIQ contract, task orders are competitively bid by the contractors awarded the IDIQ. Multiple-award IDIQ contracts that are open for any government agency to use for procurement are commonly referred to as “government-wide acquisition contracts.” IDIQ contracts often have multi-year terms and unfunded ceiling amounts, therefore enabling, but not committing, the U.S. government to purchase substantial amounts of services or products from one or more contractors. At the time an IDIQ contract is awarded (prior to the award of any task orders), a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. government will purchase under the contract, and in the case of a multiple-award IDIQ contracts, the contractor from which such purchases may be made.
uU.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedule Contracts. The GSA maintains listings of approved suppliers of services and products with agreed-upon prices for use throughout the U.S. government. In order for a company to provide services under a GSA Schedule contract, a company must be pre-qualified and awarded a contract by the GSA. When an agency uses a GSA Schedule contract to meet its requirements, the agency, or the GSA on behalf of the agency, conducts the procurement. The user agency, or the GSA on its behalf, evaluates the user agency’s requirements and initiates a competition limited to GSA Schedule qualified contractors. GSA Schedule contracts are designed to provide the user agency with reduced procurement time and lower procurement costs. Similar to IDIQ contracts, at the time a GSA Schedule contract is awarded, a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. government will purchase under the contract.
uOther Transaction Authority (“OTA”) agreements. Under certain circumstances, U.S. government agencies can enter into OTA agreements instead of traditional contracts. Agencies are explicitly authorized by Congress for specific uses, limitations or restrictions in the use of OTAs. In the case of DoW, the department is authorized to use OTAs to carry out basic, applied or advanced research projects, prototype development projects or follow-on production to initial prototype projects. OTA agreements are generally exempt from federal procurement regulations. These exemptions grant the U.S. government the flexibility to include, amend or exclude contract clauses and requirements that are mandatory in traditional procurements. OTA agreements also grant more flexibility to structure agreements in numerous ways, including joint ventures, partnerships or multiple agencies joining together to fund an agreement encompassing multiple providers.
We often team together with other companies to submit bids for large U.S. government procurements or other opportunities where we believe that the combination of services and products that we can provide as a team will help us win and perform the contract. Our relationships with our teammates, including whether we serve as the prime contractor or as a subcontractor, vary with each contract opportunity and typically depend on the program, contract or customer requirements, as well as the relative size, qualifications, capabilities, customer relationships and experience of our company and our teammates.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 9 |
PART I
Contracting with the U.S. government also subjects us to substantial regulation and unique risks, including the U.S. government’s ability to cancel any contract at any time through a termination for the convenience. Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed prior to U.S. government termination for convenience. These regulations and risks are described in more detail below under “Business–Regulation” and “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CONTRACT PAYMENT TYPES
Generally, the type of contract for our services and products is determined by or negotiated with the U.S. government and may depend on certain factors, including the type and complexity of the work to be performed, degree and timing of the responsibility to be assumed by the contractor for the costs of performance, the extent of price competition and the amount and nature of the profit incentive offered to the contractor for achieving or exceeding specified standards or goals. We generate revenues under several types of contracts, including the following:
uCost-reimbursement contracts include cost-plus-fixed-fee, award-fee and incentive-fee contracts. These contracts provide for reimbursement of our direct contract costs and allocable indirect costs, plus a fee. These contracts are typically used when uncertainties involved in contract performance do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy to use a fixed-price contract. Cost-reimbursement contracts generally subject us to lower risk but require us to use our best efforts to accomplish the scope of the work within a specified time and budget. Award and incentive fees are generally based on performance criteria such as cost, schedule, quality and/or technical performance. Award fees are determined and earned based on customer evaluation of the Company’s performance against contractual criteria. Incentive fees that are based on cost provide for an initially negotiated fee to be adjusted later, typically using a formula to measure performance against the associated criteria, based on the relationship of total allowable costs to total target costs.
uFixed-price-incentive-fee (“FPIF”) contracts are substantially similar to cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts except they establish specified targets for cost and profit, a price ceiling (but not a profit ceiling or floor) and a profit adjustment formula. Under an FPIF contract, the allowable costs incurred are eligible for reimbursement but are subject to a cost-share arrangement, which affects profitability. Generally, if our costs exceed the contract target cost or are not allowable under the applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all costs and may have our fees reduced or eliminated.
uTime-and-materials (“T&M”) contracts typically provide for negotiated fixed hourly rates for specified categories of direct labor plus reimbursement of other direct costs. This type of contract is generally used when there is uncertainty about the extent or duration of the work to be performed by the contractor at the time of contract award or it is not possible to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. On T&M contracts, we assume the risk of providing appropriately qualified staff to perform these contracts at the hourly rates set forth in the contracts over the period of performance of the contracts.
uFixed-price-level-of-effort (“FPLOE”) contracts are substantially similar to T&M contracts except they require a specified level of effort over a stated period of time on work that can be stated only in general terms. This type of contract is generally used when the contractor is required to perform an investigation or study in a specific research and development area and to provide a report showing the results achieved based on the level of effort. Payment is based on the effort expended rather than the results achieved.
uFirm-Fixed-Price (“FFP”) contracts provide for a fixed price for specified products, systems and/or services. This type of contract is typically used when the customer acquires products and services on the basis of reasonably definitive specifications that allow parties to develop an estimate of the costs to complete the work. The price for a FFP contract is often determined through competitive bidding by multiple contractors vying for award of the contract, but the price may also be determined through price negotiations with the customer. These contracts offer us potential increased profits if we can complete the work at lower costs than planned, but FFP contracts increase our exposure to the risk of cost overruns.
Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract, the nature of services or products provided, as well as the achievement of performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive-fee and award-fee contracts, is finally determined. Cost-reimbursement and T&M contracts generally have lower profitability than FFP contracts.
| 10 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
SEASONALITY
The U.S. government’s fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. While not certain, it is not uncommon for U.S. government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the timeframe leading up to the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds, which may favorably impact our third fiscal quarter. In addition, our quarterly results may be impacted by the number of working days in a given quarter. We tend to generate less revenue from our labor services during the fourth quarter as a result of the holiday season.
REGULATION
We are heavily regulated in most of the fields in which we operate. We provide services and products to numerous U.S. government agencies and entities, including to the DoW, the U.S. Intelligence Community and the DHS. When working with these and other U.S. government agencies and entities, we must comply with various laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of contracts. Some significant laws and regulations that affect us include:
uthe FAR and supplements, including the DoW Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”), which regulate the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts;
uthe Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act, which requires certification and disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;
uthe Procurement Integrity Act, which regulates access to competitor bid and proposal information and government source selection information and our ability to provide compensation to certain former government officials;
uthe Civil False Claims Act, which provides for substantial civil penalties for violations, including for submission of a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government for payment or approval;
uthe False Statements Act, which imposes civil and criminal liability for making false statements to the U.S. government;
uthe U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”), which imposes accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. government contracts;
uThe International Trade in Arms Regulation (“ITAR”), which governs the manufacture, export, and temporary import of defense articles, the furnishing of defense services, and brokering activities involving items described on the U.S. munitions list;
uthe DoW Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification ("CMMC"), which is phasing-in between November 2025 and November 2028 and requires us to meet or exceed certain specified cybersecurity standards to be eligible for new contract awards with the DoW; and
uthe recent executive order titled "Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting,"
These regulations impose a broad range of requirements, many of which are unique to government contracting, including various procurement, import and export, security, contract pricing and cost, contract termination, adjustment and audit requirements and potential restrictions on stock buybacks, dividends and executive compensation. Among other things, these laws and regulations:
urequire certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;
udefine allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under various cost-type U.S. government contracts;
urequire compliance with U.S. government CAS;
urequire reviews by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”), Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) and other U.S. government agencies of compliance with government requirements for a contractor’s business systems;
urequire compliance with federal agency- specific cybersecurity standards in agency acquisition supplements such as DFARS;
urestrict the use and dissemination of and require the protection of unclassified contract-related information and information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data;
urequire us not to compete for work if an actual or potential organizational conflict of interest, as defined by these laws and regulations, related to such work exists and/or cannot be appropriately mitigated, neutralized or avoided.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 11 |
PART I
urestrict the conduct of stock buybacks or issuance of dividends during the continuation of any period in which the Secretary of War determines that we are underperforming on our government contracts or have insufficient prioritization, investment, or production speed; and
urequire that future government contracts (including renewals) restrict executive incentive compensation in a manner that is contingent on certain specified criteria, including on-time delivery of projects, increased production, and the facilitation of certain domestic investments and operating improvements.
The U.S. government may revise its procurement practices or adopt new contract rules and regulations at any time. In particular, pursuant to Executive Order 14275, “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement,” issued on April 15, 2025, the U.S. government is undertaking the first-ever comprehensive overhaul of the FAR which is expected to return the FAR to its statutory roots, rewrite it in plain language, and remove most non-statutory rules. In order to help ensure compliance with these complex laws and regulations, all of our employees are required to complete ethics and other compliance trainings relevant to their position.
DATA PRIVACY, CYBERSECURITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAWS
Some of our operations and service offerings involve access to and use by us of personal information and/or protected health information. These activities are regulated by extensive federal, state and international data privacy and security laws requiring organizations to, among other things, provide certain privacy protections and security safeguards for such information. For example, among others:
uthe European Union’s (“EU’s”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which imposes compliance obligations for companies that process personal data of EU data subjects, necessitating investment into ongoing data protection activities and documentation requirements, and creates the potential for significant fines for noncompliance;
uthe United Kingdom’s (“UK’s”) General Data Protection Regulation, (“U.K. GDPR”), which creates similar compliance obligations for companies that process personal data of UK data subjects as are imposed by the GDPR;
uthe California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, “CCPA”), which broadly defines personal information and provides expanded consumer privacy rights to natural persons residing in California, such as affording them the right to access and request deletion of their information and to opt out of certain sharing and sales of personal information;
uthe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which establishes privacy and security compliance obligations with respect to the processing of protected health information by covered entities and business associates, necessitating investment in technical and organizational compliance measures and creates the potential for substantial fines for noncompliance; and
ufederal data privacy laws pursuant to contract, such as the Privacy Act, when applicable.
Moreover, regulation of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar data-driven technologies (collectively, “AI”) is rapidly evolving and legislators and regulators worldwide are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including intellectual property, data privacy (including automated decision making), cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition and equal opportunity laws and regulations, and are expected to be subject to additional regulation, new legal frameworks or new application of existing frameworks. In particular, several states, including Colorado and California, have passed or proposed laws and regulations that specifically address various facets and uses of AI. In Europe, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (the “AI Act”), which began phasing-in in 2025, establishes, among other things, a risk-based governance framework for regulating AI systems operating in the EU.
These regulations and related risks are described in more detail below under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| 12 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
COMPANY WEBSITE AND INFORMATION
Our corporate headquarters is located at 1750 Presidents Street, Reston, VA 20190 and our telephone number is (571) 526-6000. Our website can be accessed at www.leidos.com. The website contains information about our company and operations. Through a link on the Investor Relations section of our website, copies of each of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including Leidos. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In your evaluation of our company and business, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with information disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report, and other documents we file with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we have identified as material but are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed, and our stock price could decline. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, such as our ability to collect receivables, overall U.S. and global economic and industry conditions, geopolitical events, changes in laws or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest, exchange rates and inflation, terrorism, international conflicts, major health concerns, climate change or other disruptions of expected economic and business conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may materially harm our business, financial condition or operating results. In that event, the trading price of our stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS
This risk factor summary contains a high-level summary of risks associated with our business. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you, and you should read this risk factor summary together with the more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties set forth following this summary. A summary of our risks includes, but is not limited to, the following:
uWe depend on government agencies as our primary customers and if our reputation or relationships with these agencies were harmed, our future revenues and growth prospects could be adversely affected.
uA decline in the U.S. government budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future revenues and limit our growth prospects.
uBecause we depend on U.S. government contracts, a delay in the completion of the U.S. government’s budget and appropriations process could delay procurement of the products, services and solutions we provide and adversely affect our future revenues.
uDue to the competitive process to obtain contracts and the likelihood of bid protests, we may be unable to achieve or sustain revenue growth and profitability.
uThe U.S. government may terminate, cancel, modify, renew on less favorable terms or curtail our contracts at any time prior to their completion and, if we do not replace them, this may adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
uWe face intense competition that can impact our ability to obtain contracts and therefore affect our future revenues and growth prospects.
uDeterioration of economic conditions or weakening in credit or capital markets may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
uWe cannot predict the consequences of current or future geopolitical events, but they may adversely affect the markets in which we operate and our results of operations.
uGlobal supply chain issues and inflationary pressures have disrupted supply and increased the prices of goods and services, which could raise the costs associated with providing our services, diminish our ability to compete for new contracts or task orders and reduce customer buying power.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 13 |
PART I
uOur failure to comply with various complex procurement rules and regulations could result in us being liable for penalties, including termination of our U.S. government contracts, disqualification from bidding on future U.S. government contracts and suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracting.
uThe U.S. government may adopt new contract rules and regulations or revise its procurement practices in a manner adverse to us at any time.
uApplication of the U.S. government's organizational conflict of interest (OCI) rules could limit our ability to successfully compete for new contracts or task orders, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
uAs a U.S. government contractor, our partners and we are subject to reviews, audits and cost adjustments by the U.S. government, which could adversely affect our profitability, cash position or growth prospects if resolved unfavorably to us.
uOur business is subject to governmental review and investigation, which could adversely affect our financial position, operating results and growth prospects.
uInvestigations, audits, claims, disputes, enforcement actions, litigation, arbitration or other legal proceedings could require us to pay potentially large damage awards or penalties and could be costly to defend, which would adversely affect our cash balances and profitability, and could damage our reputation.
uOur business and operations expose us to numerous legal and regulatory requirements, and any violation of these requirements could harm our business.
uOur business is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding data privacy and security which could subject us to investigations, claims or monetary penalties against us, require us to change our business practices or otherwise adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
uMisconduct of employees, subcontractors, agents, suppliers, business partners or joint ventures and others working on our behalf could cause us to lose existing contracts or customers and adversely affect our ability to obtain new contracts and could have a material adverse impact on our business, reputation and future results.
uA failure to attract, retain, and develop talent with critical skills, including our leadership team, would adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and may disrupt our operations.
uWe may not realize the full amounts reflected in our backlog as revenues, which could adversely affect our expected future revenues and growth prospects.
uOur earnings and profitability may vary based on the mix of our contracts and may be adversely affected by our failure to estimate and manage costs, time and resources accurately.
uWe use estimates in recognizing revenues, and if we make changes to estimates used in recognizing revenues, our profitability may be adversely affected.
uCybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents could negatively impact our business and financial results, impair our ability to effectively provide our services to our customers and cause harm to our reputation or competitive position.
uInternal system or service failures, or failures in the systems or services of third parties on which we rely, could disrupt our business and impair our ability to effectively provide our services and products to our customers, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
uCustomer systems failures could damage our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
uOur success depends, in part, on our ability to work with complex and rapidly changing technologies to meet the needs of our customers.
uWe utilize artificial intelligence, which could expose us to liability or adversely affect our business, especially if we are unable to compete effectively with others in adopting artificial intelligence.
uWe have classified contracts with the U.S. government, which may limit investor insight into portions of our business.
uW
Showing the first 8K of 142K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
RISK MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGY
Cybersecurity risk management is an integral part of our digital posture and enterprise risk management strategy. Cybersecurity is critical to maintaining the trust of our customers and business partners, and we are committed to protecting our and their confidential and sensitive information, including personal information, and mitigating cybersecurity risks that impact our systems and networks. We maintain technologies, programs and processes designed to assess, identify, manage
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 37 |
PART I
and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Our efforts include regular monitoring of Leidos-managed systems and networks for internal and external cybersecurity threats, providing cybersecurity training to our employees during the onboarding process and annually, and continually reviewing and refining formal policies and procedures designed to deter, identify and remediate cybersecurity incidents. We regularly perform evaluations of our cybersecurity program and continue to invest in our capabilities to keep our customers, partners, suppliers and information assets in our possession safe. Although we employ service provider due diligence and onboarding procedures to identify potential cybersecurity risk, our ability to monitor the cybersecurity practices of our service providers is limited and there can be no assurance that we can prevent or mitigate the risk of any compromise or failure in the information system, software, networks and other assets owned or controlled by our vendors.
Our Chief Information Security Officer leads our Cybersecurity Intelligence and Response Team (“CSIRT”) whose function is to stay apprised of existing and emerging cyber threats and monitor our global enterprise and proactively identify and protect against cybersecurity risk. The CSIRT uses intelligence collected from various sources, fused with intelligence collected from analysis and response actions, to proactively search for, and address adversary activity against the Leidos network. The CSIRT possesses in-depth knowledge of network, endpoint, perimeter security systems, identity, data protection, threat intelligence, forensics, penetration testing and malware reverse engineering, as well as the functioning of specific applications or underlying information technology infrastructure.
Leidos CSIRT owns the incident response process and provides direction and guidance to users of Leidos computing resources when responding to cybersecurity incidents. Leidos CSIRT also provides intrusion monitoring of networks and information systems and continuously monitors the Leidos computing environments and performs triage and analysis of events to identify potential incidents.
We employ multiple security and monitoring systems and applications throughout the Company to identify, alert, report and log authorized and unauthorized access to the Leidos systems and networks. We use an application that collects, correlates, and notifies CSIRT analysts regarding any item meeting an electronic intrusion event. We categorize anomalous cyber events into discrete levels in which cybersecurity matters are escalated to certain levels of management, as well as our Board, based on the severity of the incident, as appropriate. Sharing cyber threat information at these levels supports the Company’s ability to integrate cybersecurity considerations into its overarching risk management system and processes.
We also conduct periodic internal and third-party assessments to test our cybersecurity controls, perform cyber simulations and exercises, and continually evaluate our internal governing policies and procedures to help detect and respond to cybersecurity events in order to reduce harms or impacts from breaches and other information security incidents.
GOVERNANCE
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Our global information security program is led by our corporate Chief Information Security Officer, who works closely with key corporate functional and line of business stakeholders. The Chief Information Security Officer partners with these functions for the purpose of identifying, considering and assessing material cybersecurity risks on an ongoing basis, establishing processes to ensure that such potential cybersecurity risks are monitored, implementing appropriate mitigation measures, reporting cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents, and maintaining our cybersecurity program. The team of senior management officers, who support our information security program, have expertise with cybersecurity, as demonstrated qualifications such as by prior work experience, possession of a cybersecurity certification, degree, or other cybersecurity experience. Our management team receives regular updates on our cybersecurity posture and reviews detailed information about our cybersecurity preparedness. Additionally, we have a Leidos Security Council that is co-chaired by the Chief Information Security Officer and the Chief Security Officer to address “all security hazards” across our global enterprise to ensure cohesion and effectiveness of our combined security governance and risk mitigations.
BOARD’S ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
We have a Technology and Information Security Committee, comprised of six board members, with relevant backgrounds and experience, that oversees and advises the Board and management on matters involving the Company’s overall strategic direction and significant business risks and opportunities in the areas of technology and information security.
| 38 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART I
At least quarterly, management provides our Board and the Technology and Information Security Committee with updates about our cybersecurity and related risk exposures, our policies and procedures to mitigate such exposures and the status of projects to strengthen our information security infrastructure and program maturity and defend against and respond to cybersecurity threats. In addition, we use a risk-based escalation process to notify the Board and the Technology and Information Security Committee outside of the regular reporting cycle should we identify a significant emerging risk or potentially material issue that should be brought to their attention.
CYBERSECURITY THREATS
To date, we have not identified any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business strategy, results of our operations, or our financial condition. However, despite our efforts to identify and respond to cybersecurity threats, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced an undetected cybersecurity incident. For more information about these risks, please see “Risk Factors – Cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents could negatively impact our business and financial results, impair our ability to effectively provide our services to our customers and cause harm to our reputation or competitive position” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Properties
As of January 2, 2026, we conducted our operations in 361 locations in 43 states, the District of Columbia and various foreign countries. We occupy approximately 8.8 million square feet of floor space. Of this amount, we own approximately 1.1 million square feet, and the remaining balance is leased. Our major locations are in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, where we occupy a combination of leased and owned floor space of approximately 1.9 million square feet. We also have employees working at customer sites throughout the United States and in other countries.
As of January 2, 2026, we owned the following properties:
| Location | Number of buildings | Square footage | Acreage | ||||||||
| Huntsville, Alabama | 7 | 801,000 | 90.7 | ||||||||
| Columbia, Maryland | 1 | 95,000 | 7.3 | ||||||||
| Orlando, Florida | 1 | 85,000 | 8.5 | ||||||||
| Oak Ridge, Tennessee | 1 | 83,000 | 8.4 | ||||||||
| Decatur, Alabama | 1 | 50,000 | 5.0 |
The nature of our business is such that there is no practicable way to relate occupied space to our reportable segments.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We have provided information about legal proceedings in which we are involved in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition, we are routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations. Additional information regarding such investigations and reviews is set forth in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 39 |
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following is a list of the names and ages (as of February 17, 2026) of our executive officers, indicating all positions and offices held by each such person and each such person’s business experience during at least the past five years. All such persons have been elected to serve until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
| Name of Officer | Age | Position(s) with the company and prior business experience | ||||||
| Thomas A. Bell | 65 | Mr. Bell serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Leidos. He joined Leidos as CEO on May 3, 2023. Mr. Bell has held leadership roles as President – Defense Rolls-Royce plc; Chairman and CEO – Rolls-Royce North America (Rolls-Royce) since February 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Bell was Senior Vice President of global sales and marketing for defense, space and security at The Boeing Company (Boeing) from 2015. Before joining Boeing in 2015, Mr. Bell was President of Rolls-Royce Defense Aerospace, having joined as President, Customer Business, North America in mid-2012. | ||||||
| Christopher R. Cage | 54 | Mr. Cage has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2021. He has served in several capacities throughout his 26-year tenure with Leidos, including Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller, Senior Vice President for Financial Planning and Analysis and Chief Financial Officer for the Health Group. | ||||||
| Daniel Atkinson | 47 | Mr. Atkinson has served as the Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller since 2024. Previously, he served as the Company's Assistant Corporate Controller since June 2021. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Atkinson was Director of Technical Accounting and Revenue Recognition at Booz Allen Hamilton from April 2018 until June 2021. He also held key leadership roles within the controller's organization at CSRA, Inc. from October 2016 to April 2018. | ||||||
| Daniel J. Antal | 54 | Mr. Antal has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel since April 2024. He rejoined Leidos in April 2024 after serving as General Counsel for Rolls-Royce Defense and North America since January 2021. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Antal served as U.S. senior counsel for a Canadian based A&E firm, and previously spent 10 years with MWH Global. He held a variety of leadership roles at MWH, including as Associate General Counsel, Director of Risk Management for the Middle East, and completed a two-year assignment in the UK in operational capacity, where he led the integration of a strategic acquisition and assumed the role of International Managing Director. | ||||||
| Elizabeth M. Porter | 55 | Ms. Porter has served as President for the Health and Civil Sector since January 2024. Previously, she served as President for our Health Group since August 2020 and, before that, as Acting Group President for the Health Group since March 2020. Ms. Porter also served as Senior Vice President and Operation Manager for Leidos’ Federal Energy and Environment business. Prior to that role, Ms. Porter served as the Department of Defense Information Networks & Mission Partner Program Director. Prior to joining Leidos, Ms. Porter served Lockheed Martin Corporation in several capacities, most recently as Director of Energy Initiatives, Corporate Engineering and Technology. | ||||||
| Roy Stevens | 58 | Mr. Stevens has served as President for the National Security Sector since January 2024. Mr. Stevens has been a Leidos corporate officer since 2018 serving in a variety of executive roles prior to this including Chief Growth Officer and Intelligence Group President. Before joining Leidos, Mr. Stevens served in several senior leadership positions at Lockheed Martin Corporation over 20 years. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for Cornerstones and the Intelligence and National Security Alliance, as well as the Board of Advisors for the Center for a New American Security. |
| 40 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
| Name of Officer | Age | Position(s) with the company and prior business experience | ||||||
| Thomas C. Sanglier | 65 | Mr. Sanglier has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Audit Executive since July 2022. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Sanglier served as Senior Director, Internal Audit with Raytheon Technologies from November 2016 to June 2022 and as a Partner with Ernst & Young’s Advisory practice serving private and public organizations in the technology, manufacturing and professional services industries during June 2008 to December 2010. He previously served as Chair of the North American Board and a member of the Global Board of the Institute of Internal Auditors (“IIA”) from April 2022 to March 2023. He has been involved as a volunteer leader with the IIA since becoming a member in 2011. Mr. Sanglier has also served as a member of The IIA’s Audit Committee, Guidance Development Committee, North American Publications Advisory Committee and multiple task forces. | ||||||
| Leslie Fautsch | 53 | Ms. Fautsch has served as Chief Human Resources Officer of Leidos since October 2024. Ms. Fautsch has held several key leadership roles at Leidos, including Senior Vice President for Human Resources Operations and Total Rewards, Vice President of Human Resources Strategic Operations, and Vice President of Human Resources for corporate and enterprise functions. Prior to joining Leidos in 2011, she held senior leadership roles in Human Resources management, employee relations, and ethics at Northrop Grumman. | ||||||
| Jason O'Connor | 56 | Mr. O’Connor has served as Senior Vice President for our Cyber and Analytics business area since January 2024, and before that, led numerous business areas including National Solutions, Homeland Security, and served as Deputy President for our Advanced Solutions Group. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. O’Connor served Lockheed Martin Corporation in a variety of executive level positions for over 25 years, including Vice President of National Solutions and Vice President of Engineering & Chief Technology Officer for Intelligence under the Information Systems & Global Solutions business. | ||||||
| Cindy Gruensfelder | 60 | Ms. Gruensfelder has served as the President of the Defense Systems Sector since January 2024. Ms. Gruensfelder has extensive Aerospace and Defense leadership expertise, serving for more than 30 years in a variety of leadership roles at Boeing, and its heritage company, McDonnell Douglas. She served as Vice President and General Manager of the Missile and Weapon Systems (“MWS”), division of Boeing Defense, Space & Security, from April 2021 to November 2022, and prior to that role, as Vice President of Weapons for the MWS division from October 2018 to April 2021. | ||||||
| Steve Hull | 56 | Mr. Hull has served as the President for the Digital Modernization Sector since January 2024. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Operations Manager for Enterprise and Cyber Solutions at Leidos from March 2022 through December 2023, and Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) at Leidos from August 2016 through March 2022. Prior to joining Leidos, Mr. Hull served as the CIO of the Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Information Systems & Global Solutions business area from January 2013 through August 2016, ensuring operations and security of IT systems for over 20,000 employees. Mr. Hull has over 30 years of experience in the IT field. |
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 41 |
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “LDOS.”
HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
As of February 10, 2026, there were approximately 15,268 holders of record of Leidos common stock. The number of stockholders of record of our common stock is not representative of the number of beneficial owners due to the fact that many shares are held by depositories, brokers or nominees.
DIVIDEND POLICY
During fiscal 2025 and 2024, we declared and paid quarterly dividends totaling $1.63 and $1.54 per share, respectively, of Leidos common stock. We currently intend to continue paying dividends on a quarterly basis, although the declaration of any future dividends will be determined by our Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including available cash, estimated cash needs, earnings, financial condition, operating results and capital requirements, as well as limitations in our contractual agreements, applicable law, regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business considerations that the Board of Directors considers relevant. Our ability to declare and pay future dividends on Leidos stock may be restricted by the provisions of Delaware law and covenants in our then-existing indebtedness arrangements.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
This stock performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Leidos under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The following graph compares the total cumulative five-year return on Leidos common stock through January 2, 2026, to two indices: (i) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite index and (ii) the Standard & Poor’s 500 IT Services Industry index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on January 1, 2021, and that dividends, if any, have been reinvested. The comparisons in the graph are required by the SEC, based upon historical data and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of Leidos common stock.
| 42 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

![]() | Leidos Holdings, Inc. | ![]() | S&P 500 Composite Index | ![]() | S&P 500 IT Services Index |
| Company/Market/Peer Group | 1/1/2021 | 12/31/2021 | 12/30/2022 | 12/29/2023 | 1/3/2025 | 1/2/2026 | ||||||||||||||
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 85.80 | $ | 103.00 | $ | 107.64 | $ | 147.91 | $ | 186.30 | ||||||||
| S&P 500 Composite Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 126.89 | $ | 102.22 | $ | 126.99 | $ | 158.21 | $ | 182.60 | ||||||||
| S&P 500 IT Services Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 103.89 | $ | 83.62 | $ | 109.91 | $ | 122.42 | $ | 117.44 |
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
The following table presents information related to the repurchases of our common stock during the quarter ended January 2, 2026:
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased**(1)** | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs**(2)** | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| October 4, 2025 - October 31, 2025 | — | — | — | 3,234,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| November 1, 2025 - November 30, 2025 | 830,800 | 190.99 | 830,800 | 2,403,832 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 1, 2025 - December 31, 2025 | 760,116 | 188.84 | 748,138 | 1,655,694 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2026 - January 2, 2026 | — | — | — | 1,655,694 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1,590,916 | $ | 189.96 | 1,578,938 |
(1)The total number of shares purchased includes shares surrendered to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations related to vesting of restricted stock units.
(2)In February 2022, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to 20 million shares of our outstanding common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in one or more open market repurchases or privately negotiated transactions, including accelerated share repurchase transactions. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the program will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of our common stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements, compliance with the terms of our outstanding indebtedness and other considerations. There is no assurance as to the number of shares that will be repurchased, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our Board of Directors’ discretion. This share repurchase authorization replaces the previous share repurchase authorization announced in February 2018.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of Leidos Holdings, Inc.’s (“Leidos”) financial condition, results of operations and quantitative and qualitative disclosures about business environment and trends and market risk should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those described under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.” You should also review the disclosure under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
Unless indicated otherwise, references in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” refer collectively to Leidos and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In this section, we discuss our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of our operations for the year ended January 2, 2026, compared to the year ended January 3, 2025. For a discussion and analysis comparing our results for the year ended January 3, 2025, to the year ended December 29, 2023, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2025, under Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
OVERVIEW
Leidos is an industry and technology leader serving government and commercial customers with smarter, more efficient digital and mission innovations. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, with 47,000 global employees, we pursue strategic growth across five pillars: space and maritime; energy infrastructure; digital modernization and cyber; mission software; and managed health services. Our customers include the U.S. Department of War (“DoW”), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs and many other U.S. civilian, state and local government agencies, foreign government agencies and commercial businesses. Approximately 8% of our revenues are generated by entities located outside of the United States.
Our business is aligned into four reportable segments that are focused on specific, defined capability sets we bring to our customers. We operate in the following reportable segments: National Security & Digital, Health & Civil, Commercial & International and Defense Systems. We also separately present the unallocated costs associated with corporate functions as Corporate.
For additional information regarding our reportable segments, see “Business” in Part I and “Note 20—Business Segments” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our significant initiatives include the following:
uachieving annual revenue growth guided by our NorthStar 2030 strategy focusing on the growth pillars aligned with our customers’ priorities;
ucontinual improvements in the effectiveness and efficiency of our business processes driven by our enterprise transformation office leveraging artificial intelligence and automation; and
udisciplined deployment of our cash resources and use of our capital structure to enhance shareholder value while retaining an appropriate amount of financial leverage.
Sales Trend. For fiscal 2025, revenues increased $0.5 billion, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2024, the increase was primarily due to program wins and a net increase in volumes, partially offset by the completion of certain contracts.
Operating Expenses and Income Trend. For fiscal 2025, operating expenses increased by $223 million, or 1%, compared to fiscal 2024. Operating margin for fiscal 2025 was 12% compared to 11% for fiscal 2024. Operating income was $2,109 million, a $282 million increase compared to fiscal 2024. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to a program wins and a net increase in volumes on certain programs, partially offset by an increase in general & administrative expenses and the completion of programs.
| 44 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
From a macroeconomic perspective, our industry is under general competitive pressures associated with spending from our largest customer, the U.S. government, and requires a high level of cost management focus to allow us to remain competitive. Although the U.S. Presidential Administration has not indicated a desire to reduce spending in the defense and homeland security sectors, the likelihood, extent and duration of current spending levels in these areas remains unclear. We continue to review our cost structure against our anticipated sales and undertake cost management actions and efficiency initiatives where necessary.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND TRENDS
U.S. GOVERNMENT MARKETS
We generated approximately 87% of our total revenues from contracts with the U.S. government in both fiscal 2025 and 2024, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government. Revenues under contracts with the DoW and U.S. Intelligence Community, including subcontracts under which the DoW or the U.S. Intelligence Community is the ultimate purchaser, represented approximately 49% and 48% of our total revenues for fiscal 2025 and 2024, respectively. Accordingly, our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending, especially national security, homeland security and intelligence spending, and the alignment of our service and product offerings and capabilities with current and future budget priorities of the U.S. government.
On February 3, 2026, the House of Representatives passed five of the six remaining appropriations bills to fund the federal government for fiscal year 2026. On February 13, 2026, the Homeland Security bill was not passed and DHS was shutdown until another continuing resolution is agreed upon.
Trends in the U.S. government contracting process, including a shift towards multiple-awards contracts, in which certain contractors are preapproved using IDIQ and U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) contract vehicles, have increased competition for U.S. government contracts, reduced backlogs by shortening periods of performance on contracts and increased pricing pressure. We expect that a majority of the business that we seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through a competitive bidding process. For more information on these risks and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
Sales to customers in international markets represented approximately 8% of total revenues for fiscal 2025 and 2024. Our international customers include foreign governments and their agencies. Our international business increases our exposure to international markets and the associated international regulatory, foreign currency exchange rate and geopolitical risks.
Changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials, may increase our procurement costs of certain IT hardware used both on our contracts and for internal use. However, we expect to recover certain portions of these higher tariffs through our cost-plus contracts. While we evaluate the impact of higher tariffs, currently, we do not expect tariffs to have a significant impact to our business.
KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The primary financial performance measures we use to manage our business and monitor results of operations are revenue, operating income, cash flows from operations and diluted earnings per share. Bookings and backlog are also useful measures for management and investors to evaluate our performance and potential future revenues. In addition, we consider business performance by contract type to be useful to management and investors when evaluating our operating income and margin performance.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 45 |
PART II
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our results of operations for the periods presented were as follows:
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 17,174 | $ | 16,662 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Cost of revenues | 14,075 | 13,864 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 999 | 983 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition, integration and restructuring costs | 18 | 16 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||
| Asset impairment charges | 5 | 11 | (55) | % | |||||||||||||
| Equity earnings of non-consolidated subsidiaries | (32) | (39) | (18) | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating income | 2,109 | 1,827 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-operating expense, net | (200) | (188) | (6) | % | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 1,909 | 1,639 | 16 | % | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | (447) | (388) | 15 | % | |||||||||||||
| Net income | 1,462 | 1,251 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
| Less: net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest | 14 | (3) | (567) | % | |||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $ | 1,448 | $ | 1,254 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating margin | 12.3 | % | 11.0 | % | |||||||||||||
SEGMENT AND CORPORATE RESULTS
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| National Security & Digital (dollars in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 7,611 | $ | 7,365 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating income | 760 | 720 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 10.0 | % | 9.8 | % |
The increase in revenues for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to program wins, a net increase in volumes and $60 million recognized from the acquisition of Kudu Dynamics, partially offset by program completions and a net decrease in contract write-ups in the current year.
The increase in operating income for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to program wins and a net increase in volumes, partially offset by program completions and a net decrease in contract write-ups in the current year.
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| Health & Civil (dollars in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 5,069 | $ | 5,015 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating income | 1,202 | 1,095 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 23.7 | % | 21.8 | % |
The increase in revenues for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to a net increase in write-ups on certain programs primarily within the managed health services business, partially offset by a net decrease in volumes.
The increase in operating income for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily due to operational efficiencies on certain programs and a net increase in write-ups primarily within the managed health services business, partially offset by increased general and administrative expenses.
| 46 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial & International (dollars in millions) | January 3, 2025 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,315 | $ | 2,252 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating income | 166 | 104 | 60 | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 7.2 | % | 4.6 | % |
The increase in revenues for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to program wins, prior year write-downs on certain programs within our UK operations and a $13 million favorable impact from exchange rate movements, partially offset by completion of programs.
The increase in operating income for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily driven by prior year write-downs on certain programs within our UK operations, program wins and a net increase in volumes, partially offset by the completion of programs and increased in indirect expenses.
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| Defense Systems (dollars in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,179 | $ | 2,030 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating income | 156 | 94 | 66 | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 7.2 | % | 4.6 | % |
The increase in revenues for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to program wins and a net increase in volumes, partially offset by the completion of programs.
The increase in operating income for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to a net increase in volumes, a prior year one-time write-down related to program assets, program wins and lower amortization expense. The increase was partially offset by the completion of programs.
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| Corporate (dollars in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | Percent change | ||||||||||||||
| Operating loss | $ | (175) | $ | (186) | 6 | % |
The decrease in operating loss for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, was primarily attributable to a decrease in legal costs, partially offset by an increase in research and development activities.
NON-OPERATING EXPENSE, NET
Non-operating expense, net increased by $12 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily driven by a net increase in interest expense on borrowings, partially offset by a gain on an immaterial divested business that was not aligned to the Company's long term strategy.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate was 23.4% in fiscal 2025 compared to 23.7% in fiscal 2024. The decrease to the effective tax rate was primarily due to a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits, partially offset by the impacts from cross-border taxes resulting from the H.R.1 Reconciliation Act, commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”).
BOOKINGS AND BACKLOG
Effective fiscal 2025, we changed our backlog policy to include estimated future revenue on task orders expected to be awarded under sole source indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts in our reported backlog. We believe this presentation provides enhanced visibility for investors and more accurately reflects the future revenues we expect to generate from our business.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 47 |
PART II
We had net bookings of $17.5 billion and $23.2 billion during fiscal 2025 and 2024, respectively. Net bookings represent the estimated amount of revenue to be earned in the future from funded and unfunded contract awards and modifications and unissued task orders on sole source IDIQ contracts that were received during the year, net of any adjustments to previously awarded backlog amounts. We calculate net bookings as the year’s ending backlog, plus the year’s revenues, less the prior year’s ending backlog and any impacts from foreign currency or acquisitions and divestitures.
Backlog represents the revenues we expect to recognize under negotiated contracts and unissued task orders on sole source IDIQ contracts, to the extent we believe their execution and funding to be probable. Backlog does not include potential task orders expected to be awarded under multiple award IDIQ contracts.
We segregate our backlog into two categories as follows:
uFunded Backlog. Funded backlog for contracts with the U.S. government represents the value on contracts for which funding is appropriated less revenues previously recognized on these contracts. Funded backlog for contracts with non-U.S. government entities and commercial customers represents the estimated value on contracts, which may cover multiple future years, under which we are obligated to perform, less revenues previously recognized on the contracts.
uNegotiated Unfunded Backlog. Negotiated unfunded backlog represents all remaining value on task orders that is not funded, including options, that we expect to recognize as well as expected future task orders under sole source IDIQ contracts.
The estimated value of our segment backlog for the periods presented was as follows:
| January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Funded | Unfunded | Total | Funded | Unfunded | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| National Security & Digital | $ | 2,749 | $ | 23,891 | $ | 26,640 | $ | 2,881 | $ | 23,404 | $ | 26,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health & Civil | 2,745 | 7,690 | 10,435 | 1,456 | 10,735 | 12,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial & International | 2,588 | 2,659 | 5,247 | 2,456 | 1,901 | 4,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Defense Systems | 1,603 | 5,107 | 6,710 | 1,616 | 3,941 | 5,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 9,685 | $ | 39,347 | $ | 49,032 | $ | 8,409 | $ | 39,981 | $ | 48,390 |
(1)Amounts have been recast to include estimated future revenue on task orders expected to be awarded under sole source IDIQ contracts. As a result, unfunded backlog increased $4,836 million from our prior year annual report amounts.
Backlog at January 2, 2026, includes $149 million acquired through the acquisition of Kudu Dynamics within our National Security & Digital reportable segment.
Bookings and backlog fluctuate from period to period depending on our success rate in winning contracts and the timing of contract awards, renewals, modifications and cancellations, as well as foreign currency movements. Contract awards may be negatively impacted by ongoing industry-wide delays in procurement decisions and budget cuts by the U.S. government as discussed in “Business Environment and Trends” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We expect to recognize a substantial portion of our funded backlog as revenues within the next 12 months. However, the U.S. government may cancel any contract at any time through a termination for the convenience of the U.S. government. In addition, certain contracts with commercial or non-U.S. government customers may include provisions that allow the customer to cancel at any time. Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed.
| 48 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
CONTRACT TYPES
Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract. For a discussion of the types of contracts under which we generate revenues, see “Business—Contract Payment Types” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Revenues by contract type as a percentage of our total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||
| January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee | 44 | % | 44 | % | ||||||||||
| Firm-fixed-price | 43 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||||
| Time-and-materials and fixed-price-level-of-effort | 13 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | 100 | % | 100 | % |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW OF LIQUIDITY
As of January 2, 2026, we had $1,108 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have a senior unsecured revolving credit facility which can provide up to $1.0 billion in additional borrowing, if required. As of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, there were no borrowings outstanding under any revolving credit facility.
We had outstanding debt of $4.6 billion and $4.7 billion at January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, respectively. In fiscal 2025, we issued and sold $500 million 5.40% and $500 million 5.50% senior unsecured notes maturing in March 2032 and March 2035, respectively. The annual interest rate is payable on a semi-annual basis. The proceeds from the issuance of the notes were used to retire the $500 million senior unsecured notes due May 2025 and repurchase $500 million outstanding shares of common stock in an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement as discussed below.
We have a commercial paper program in which we may issue short-term unsecured commercial paper notes (“Commercial Paper Notes”) that have maturities of up to 397 days from the date of issuance (see “Note 13—Debt” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). As of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, we did not have any commercial paper notes outstanding.
We made principal payments, excluding the impacts of our Commercial Paper Notes, on our debt of $1,019 million, $18 million and $2,045 million during fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The activity for fiscal 2025 included a prepayment on our senior unsecured term loan of $450 million and a $500 million payment to discharge the $500 million notes due May 2025. The activity for fiscal 2023 included a $1,210 million payment to discharge the $1.9 billion 5.77% senior unsecured term loan facility, a $498 million payment to discharge the $500 million 2.95% notes, due May 2023, and a principal repayment of $320 million to discharge the 364-day term loan credit agreement.
Our credit facility, term loan facility, commercial paper notes and notes outstanding as of January 2, 2026, contain financial covenants and customary restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all covenants as of January 2, 2026.
We paid dividends of $211 million, $208 million and $201 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Stock repurchases of Leidos common stock may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions with third parties including through ASR agreements. Whether repurchases are made and the timing and actual number of shares repurchased depends on a variety of factors including price, corporate capital requirements, other market conditions and regulatory requirements. The repurchase program may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time.
During fiscal 2025, 2024, and 2023, we made open market repurchases of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $400 million, $850 million and $225 million, respectively.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 49 |
PART II
In fiscal 2025, we entered into an ASR agreement with a financial institution to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock. We paid $500 million to the financial institution and received 3.6 million shares. (see “Note 16—Earnings Per Share” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K). All shares delivered were immediately retired.
On July 4, 2025, tax legislation was enacted as part of the OBBBA, implementing several corporate tax law changes as described above within Results of Operations. We anticipate our income tax payments will decrease by approximately $91 million in fiscal 2026, as compared to our estimates prior to the OBBBA enactment, due to the decrease in our estimated 2025 taxable income related to these changes. The actual decrease may be impacted by future guidance or interpretive rules issued by the U.S. Treasury, among other factors. We will continue to assess the effects on our liquidity as tax legislation evolves.
On January 23, 2026, Leidos, Inc. entered into a stock purchase agreement to acquire all of the shares of Entrust for a purchase price of $2.4 billion in cash, subject to customary adjustments for Entrust’s cash, debt, transaction expenses and net working capital. In connection with the stock purchase agreement, we entered into an agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., which provides for a senior unsecured 364-day bridge loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.4 billion. (See "Note 22—Subsequent Events" of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
On February 12, 2026 (the “Closing Date”), we amended and restated our existing senior unsecured revolving credit facility to increase the borrowing capacity from $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion. The amended revolving credit facility will mature five years from the Closing Date and permits two additional one-year extensions subject to lender consent. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear interest at a rate determined, at the Company's option, based on either an alternate base rate or term SOFR rate, plus an applicable margin.
For the next 12 months, we anticipate that we will be able to meet our liquidity needs, including servicing our debt, through cash generated from operations, available cash balances, borrowings from our commercial paper program and, if needed, sales of accounts receivable and borrowings from our revolving credit facility.
SUMMARY OF CASH FLOWS
The following table summarizes cash flow information for the periods presented:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | January 2, 2026 | January 3, 2025 | December 29, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities(1) | $ | 1,750 | $ | 1,435 | $ | 1,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (405) | (142) | (211) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (1,145) | (1,084) | (715) |
(1)Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023, was recast to reflect a change in the accounting policy, see "Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $315 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in tax benefits from the impacts of the OBBBA legislation and favorable changes in net working capital, partially offset by the timing of payroll and employee benefit payments.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $248 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings and favorable timing of payroll and employee benefit accruals.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $263 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily due to $293 million of net cash paid in connection with the acquisition of Kudu Dynamics, partially offset by a $24 million decrease in capital expenditures and $9 million of proceeds received from sale of an immaterial business within the Commercial and International segment.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $69 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower capital expenditures of $58 million in the current year.
| 50 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
Net cash used in financing activities increased $61 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $50 million increase in stock repurchases, a $11 million increase in net payments made on debt activities, a $10 million increase in net capital distributions to our non-controlling interest, partially offset by a $12 million decrease in shares withheld for tax obligations.
Net cash used in financing activities increased $369 million for fiscal 2024 as compared to fiscal 2023. The increase was primarily due to a $625 million increase in stock repurchases, a $35 million increase in shares withheld for tax obligations, partially offset by a decrease of $291 million in net payments made on debt activities.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain aspects of our business. We have letters of credit outstanding principally related to performance guarantees on contracts and surety bonds outstanding principally related to performance and subcontractor payment bonds as described in “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Our future contractual obligations are related to debt, finance and operating leases, long-term liabilities under deferred compensation arrangements, purchase obligations for long-term purchases and service agreements and other liabilities. For more information, see “Note 10—Leases”, “Note 13—Debt”, “Note 19—Retirement Plans” and “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have interest payments related to our outstanding debt and finance leases. As of January 2, 2026, future scheduled interest payments on our outstanding debt and finance leases were $208 million, expected to be paid in fiscal 2026 and $1.3 billion expected to be paid thereafter.
As of January 2, 2026, future payments on our deferred compensation arrangements and purchase obligations for long-term purchases and service agreements were $101 million, expected to be paid in fiscal 2026, and $429 million expected to be paid thereafter. Our future payments do not include $104 million of income tax liabilities, primarily as a result of uncertain tax positions, and the timing of such payments, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated. For additional information, see “Note 18—Income Taxes” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
GUARANTORS AND ISSUERS OF GUARANTEED SECURITIES
Leidos Holdings, Inc. (“Guarantor”) has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the debt securities of its subsidiary, Leidos, Inc. (“Issuer”), that were issued pursuant to transactions that were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (collectively, the “Registered Notes”). The following is a list of the Registered Notes guaranteed by Leidos Holdings, Inc.
| Senior unsecured Registered Notes issued by Leidos, Inc.: | ||
| $750 million 4.375% notes, due May 2030 | ||
| $1,000 million 2.300% notes, due February 2031 | ||
| $500 million 5.400% notes, due March 2032 | ||
| $750 million 5.750% notes, due March 2033 | ||
| $500 million 5.500% notes, due March 2035 |
Leidos Holdings, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed debt securities of Leidos, Inc. that were issued pursuant to transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The following is a list of unregistered debt securities guaranteed by Leidos Holdings, Inc.
| Senior unsecured unregistered debt securities issued by Leidos, Inc.: | ||
| $250 million 7.125% notes, due July 2032 | ||
| $300 million 5.500% notes, due July 2033 |
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 51 |
PART II
Additionally, Leidos, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed debt securities of Leidos Holding, Inc. that were issued pursuant to transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The following is a list of unregistered debt securities guaranteed by Leidos, Inc.
| Senior unsecured unregistered debt securities issued by Leidos Holdings, Inc.: | ||
| $300 million 5.950% notes, due December 2040 |
The following summarized financial information includes the assets, liabilities and results of operations for the Guarantor and Issuer of the Registered Notes described above. Intercompany balances and transactions between the Issuer and Guarantor have been eliminated from the financial information below. Investments in the consolidated subsidiaries of the Issuer and Guarantor that do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes have been excluded from the financial information. Intercompany payables represent amounts due to non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Issuer.
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION FOR THE GUARANTOR AND ISSUER OF REGISTERED NOTES
| (in millions) | January 2, 2026 | |||||||
| Total current assets | $ | 3,036 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 5,666 | |||||||
| Other long-term assets | 1,250 | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 9,952 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | $ | 1,954 | ||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | 4,628 | |||||||
| Intercompany payables | 4,706 | |||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 942 | |||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 12,230 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION FOR THE GUARANTOR AND ISSUER OF REGISTERED NOTES
| (in millions) | January 2, 2026 | |||||||
| Revenues, net | $ | 10,696 | ||||||
| Operating income | 836 | |||||||
| Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders | 5 |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
| 52 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
We have identified the following accounting policies as critical because they require significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
uRevenues
uGoodwill
REVENUES
We perform work under various types of contracts, which include firm-fixed-price ("FFP"), time-and-materials ("T&M"), fixed- price-level-of-effort ("FPLOE"), cost-plus-fixed-fee ("CPFF"), cost-plus-award-fee ("CPAF"), cost-plus-incentive-fee ("CPIF") and fixed-price-incentive-fee ("FPIF").
For contracts which involve complex deliverables, such as system integration, we usually recognize revenue over time as the work is completed. For contracts with an FFP component or variable fees, we measure progress using an input method, whereby revenue is recognized based on the percentage of costs incurred to date compared to total costs we anticipate by the end of the contract. Commonly referred to as the “cost-to-cost” method. To do this, we must estimate both the total revenue and total costs needed to design, build, and deliver our products and services. These cost estimates include all direct costs, such as materials, labor, subcontractors, overhead and a ratable portion of general and administrative expenses. If we determine that the total expected cost of completing a contract will be more than the total revenue we expect to receive, we record the entire expected loss when identified.
Some of our cost-plus and fixed-price contracts include award fees, incentive fees, or other terms that can either increase or decrease the total contract price. These amounts are usually earned by meeting specific performance goals, reaching key milestones, staying within cost targets or based on customer judgment. We estimate these variable amounts by determining the most likely amount we expect to earn. This estimate is based on factors such as the contract-specific fee achievement metrics, the complexity and risk of the work, the level of customer discretion involved, our past experience with similar contracts and the risk that recognized revenue could later be reversed.
We allocate the total contract price to each of the performance obligations within the contract proportionally based upon their individual standalone selling prices. We generally determine the standalone price by estimating the cost to perform the work and adding an expected profit margin. For some product sales, we may instead use the standalone prices of similar products or apply a residual value method. Nearly all of our contracts do not include a significant financing element, so we typically do not adjust the contract price for the timing of payments.
For the impacts of changes in estimates on our contracts, see “Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
GOODWILL
Goodwill is recognized when the transaction price for an acquired business is higher than the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired at the time of purchase. Goodwill is an indefinite-lived asset which is tested for impairment once a year or more frequently if a triggering event occurs which indicates an impairment may exist. The annual goodwill impairment test is performed at the start of the fourth quarter and includes an evaluation of whether the fair values of any of our reporting units are lower than their carrying values. As of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, goodwill represented 47% and 46% of our total assets, respectively.
When testing goodwill for impairment, we use either a qualitative or quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis considers factors such as overall economic conditions, industry and market trends, the financial performance of the business, and legal or other significant events that could affect the reporting unit.
When we perform a quantitative analysis, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using discounted future cash flows and market multiple models. These models require us to make significant assumptions about future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth, profit margins and in the identification of comparable public companies. These assumptions take into account expected future sales and earnings after considering market conditions, customer spending, existing and expected orders, working capital needs, long-term business plans and recent performance.
Operations of the Security Enterprise Solutions (“SES”) reporting unit within the Commercial & International reportable segment rely heavily on the sales and servicing of security and detection products. In fiscal 2023, SES restructured its portfolio by discontinuing select product offerings and ceasing operations in certain countries to better align with its strategic plan. These changes, along with delays in airline travel infrastructure projects and higher than anticipated servicing costs, contributed to a significant reduction in the reporting unit’s forecasted revenue and cash flows.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 53 |
PART II
In fiscal 2025 and 2024, we performed a quantitative analysis of our SES reporting unit, which holds goodwill in the amount of $311 million and $306 million as of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, respectively. The analysis resulted in the fair value of the reporting unit exceeding the carrying value for both periods.
In fiscal 2025 and 2024, we performed our annual test for impairment as of October 4, 2025, and September 28, 2024, respectively, which resulted in no impairments being identified.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits, other uncertainties and future obligations related to our business. For a discussion of these items, see “Note 10—Leases” and “Note 21—Commitments and Contingencies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a discussion of these items, see “Note 2—Accounting Standards” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks in the normal course of business. Our current market risk exposures are primarily related to interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations. The following information about our market sensitive financial instruments contains forward-looking statements.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to long-term debt obligations and derivatives. Our policy authorizes, with Board of Directors’ approval, the limited use of derivative instruments to hedge specific interest rate risks.
DEBT AND DERIVATIVES
As of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, we had $4.6 billion and $4.7 billion of debt, respectively, which included $500 million related to our senior unsecured term loans that have a variable stated interest rate that is determined based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin. As a result, we may experience fluctuations in interest expense.
We had interest rate swap agreements to hedge the cash flows of a portion of our variable rate senior unsecured term loan (“Variable Rate Loan”). Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, we received monthly variable interest payments based on the one-month SOFR rate and paid interest at a fixed rate. As of January 3, 2025, the notional value of the interest rate swap agreements was $500 million. The interest rate swap agreements effectively converted a portion of our variable rate borrowing to a fixed rate borrowing. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements with respect to our Variable Rate Loan was an asset of $4 million as of January 3, 2025. The interest rate swap agreements matured in August 2025. The counterparties to these agreements were financial institutions. We did not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We cannot predict future market fluctuations in interest rates. A net hypothetical 10% movement in the one-month SOFR rate would not have a significant impact on our annual interest expense. For additional information related to our interest rate swap agreements and debt, see “Note 12—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 13—Debt,” respectively, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
As of January 2, 2026, and January 3, 2025, our cash and cash equivalents included investments in several large institutional money market accounts. For fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, a hypothetical 10% interest rate movement would not have a significant impact on the value of our holdings or on interest income.
| 54 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Although the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, some of our transactions are denominated in foreign currencies. Our foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to receipts from customers, payments to suppliers and certain intercompany transactions denominated in currencies other than our (or one of our subsidiaries’) functional currency. Our foreign operations represented 8% of total revenues for both fiscal 2025 and 2024, and 9% for fiscal 2023.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 55 |
PART II
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
| 56 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Reston, Virginia
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, 2026 and January 3, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows, for each of the fiscal years ended January 2, 2026, January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 2, 2026 and January 3, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended January 2, 2026, January 3, 2025, and December 29, 2023 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2026, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has elected to change its method of accounting for cash in fiscal 2025.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Revenues – Refer to Notes 3 and 4 to the Financial Statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company recognizes revenue on certain contracts with customers over time using a method that measures the extent of progress towards completion of a performance obligation, principally using a cost-input method (referred to as the cost-to-cost method). Under the cost-to-cost method, revenue is recognized based on the proportion of total costs incurred to estimated total costs-at-completion (EAC). A performance obligation's EAC includes all direct costs such as materials, labor, subcontract costs, overhead and
Showing the first 8K of 198K characters. Open the full section
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of January 2, 2026. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the fourth quarter of the period ended January 2, 2026, covered by this Annual Report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As permitted by the SEC rules, management's assessment and conclusion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2026, excludes an assessment of the internal control over financial reporting of Kudu Dynamics, acquired on May 23, 2025. Kudu Dynamics represents approximately 0.2% of our consolidated total assets, excluding the preliminary value of goodwill and intangible assets related to Kudu Dynamics, at January 2, 2026, and 0.4% and 0.1% of our consolidated revenues and operating income, respectively, for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2026, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2026, and has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of that date was effective.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our internal control over financial reporting, and that firm’s report on our internal control over financial reporting is set forth below.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 103 |
PART II
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Reston, Virginia
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, 2026, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2026, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
As described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Kudu Dynamics, which was acquired on May 23, 2025. Kudu Dynamics represents approximately 0.2% of consolidated total assets, excluding the preliminary value of goodwill and intangible assets related to Kudu Dynamics at January 2, 2026, and 0.4% and 0.1% of consolidated revenues and operating income, respectively, for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Kudu Dynamics.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 2, 2026, of the Company and our report dated February 17, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's change in its method of accounting for cash.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 17, 2026
| 104 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART II
Item 9B. Other Information
RULE 10B5-1 TRADING ARRANGEMENT
During the three months ended January 2, 2026, no director or officer of the Company adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
For certain information required by Item 10 with respect to executive officers, see “Executive Officers of the Registrant” at the end of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For additional information required by Item 10 with respect to executive officers and directors, including audit committee and audit committee financial experts, procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, see the information set forth under the captions “Proposal 1–Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Ownership of Voting Securities” appearing in the 2026 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have a code of conduct that applies to our principal executive officer and our senior financial officers. A copy of our code of conduct is available on the Investor Relations section of our website free of charge at www.leidos.com by clicking on the links entitled “Investors” then “Governance” then "Documents & Charters" and then “Code of Conduct.” Documents available under “Governance” in the Investor Relations section of our website also include our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters for the Audit and Finance Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Ethics Committee, and Technology and Information Security Committee of the Board of Directors.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of business ethics by posting such information on our website. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our Insider Trading Policy (the “Insider Trading Policy”) sets forth the general rules that our directors, executive officers and employees must follow with respect to transactions in our securities to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations. This description of the Insider Trading Policy is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Insider Trading Policy, which is filed hereto as Exhibit 19.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
For information required by Item 11 with respect to executive compensation and director compensation, see the information set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance” in the 2026 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For information required by Item 11 with respect to compensation committee interlocks and insider participation, see the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance” in the 2026 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| 106 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART III
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
For information required by Item 12 with respect to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management, see the information set forth under the caption “Ownership of Voting Securities” in the 2026 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of January 2, 2026, is set forth below:
| Plan Category | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) | 2,750,416 | (2) | $ | 110.10 | (3) | 6,645,459 | (4) | |||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (5) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 2,750,416 | (2) | $ | 110.10 | (3) | 6,645,459 |
(1)The following equity compensation plans approved by security holders are included in this plan category: the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
(2)Represents (i) 1,691,254 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance for service-based awards and performance and market-based awards assuming achievement of the target level of performance for unearned performance and market-based awards (does not include an additional 444,758 shares if the maximum level of performance is achieved) and other stock awards under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, (ii) 3,138 shares of Leidos common stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights and (iii) 1,056,024 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options awarded under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Does not include shares to be issued pursuant to purchase rights under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(3)Does not include shares to be issued for performance-based and other stock awards and shares of stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights.
(4)Represents 5,104,853 and 1,540,606 shares of Leidos common stock under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively. The maximum number of shares initially available for issuance under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan was 7.5 million. The 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was amended in September 2016 to provide that the maximum number of shares available for issuance thereunder is 5.0 million. Those shares that are issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan that are forfeited or repurchased at the original purchase price or less or that are issuable upon exercise of awards granted under the plan that expire or become unexercisable for any reason after their grant date without having been exercised in full.
(5)The Management Stock Compensation Plan has not been approved by security holders and is included in this plan category. This plan does not provide for a maximum number of shares available for future issuance. For further information on this plan, see “Note 17—Stock-Based Compensation” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
For information required by Item 13 with respect to certain relationships and related transactions and the independence of directors and nominees, see the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance” in the 2026 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
For information required by Item 14 with respect to principal accounting fees and services, see the information set forth under the caption “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” in the 2026 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, which required information is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 107 |
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
**(a)**Documents filed as part of the report:
1.Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2.Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in our consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
3.Exhibits
| 108 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART IV
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 109 |
PART IV
- Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements
** Paper filing
† Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of these exhibits
| 110 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |
PART IV
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report | 111 |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. | |||||
| By | /s/ Christopher R. Cage | ||||
| Christopher R. Cage Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: February 17, 2026
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Leidos Holdings, Inc., in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||||||
| /s/ Thomas A. Bell | Principal Executive Officer | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Thomas A. Bell | ||||||||
| /s/ Christopher R. Cage | Principal Financial Officer | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Christopher R. Cage | ||||||||
| /s/ Daniel A. Atkinson | Principal Accounting Officer | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Daniel A. Atkinson | ||||||||
| /s/ Gregory R. Dahlberg | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Gregory R. Dahlberg | ||||||||
| /s/ David G. Fubini | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| David G. Fubini | ||||||||
| /s/ Noel B. Geer | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Noel B. Geer | ||||||||
| /s/ Tina W. Jonas | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Tina W. Jonas | ||||||||
| /s/ Harry M. J. Kraemer, Jr. | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Harry M. J. Kraemer, Jr. | ||||||||
| /s/ Gary S. May | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Gary S. May | ||||||||
| /s/ Nancy A. Norton | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Nancy A. Norton | ||||||||
| /s/ Patrick M. Shanahan | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Patrick M. Shanahan | ||||||||
| /s/ Robert S. Shapard | Director | February 17, 2026 | ||||||
| Robert S. Shapard | ||||||||
| 112 | Leidos Holdings, Inc. Annual Report |


