Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

20K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS

Registrant

By:/s/ ADAM H. SCHECHTER
Adam H. Schechter
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated:February 25, 2021

Index

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on February 25, 2021 in the capacities indicated.

SignatureTitle
/s/ ADAM H. SCHECHTERPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Adam H. Schechter(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ GLENN A. EISENBERGExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Glenn A. Eisenberg(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ PETER J. WILKINSONSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Peter J. Wilkinson(Principal Accounting Officer)
*Director
Kerrii B. Anderson
*Director
Jean-Luc Bélingard
*Director
Jeffrey A. Davis
*Director
D. Gary Gilliland, M.D., Ph.D.
*Director
Garheng Kong, M.D., Ph.D.
*Director
Peter M. Neupert
*Director
Richelle Parham
*Director
R. Sanders Williams, M.D.
  • Sandra van der Vaart, by her signing her name hereto, does hereby sign this Annual Report on behalf of the directors of the Registrant after whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
By:/s/ Sandra van der Vaart
Sandra van der Vaart
Attorney-in-fact

Index

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-5
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive EarningsF-7
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' EquityF-8
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-10

F-1

Index

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive earnings, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and

F-2

Index

expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation of Labcorp Diagnostics Segment (Dx) Net Accounts Receivable

As described in Notes 2 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Dx business’s revenues are distributed among four payer portfolios - clients, patients, Medicare and Medicaid, and third-party. Dx accounts receivable due from these payer portfolios was $1,515.5 million as of December 31, 2020. Management has a formal process to estimate implicit price concessions for uncollectable accounts. Management considers negotiated discounts and anticipated adjustments, including historical collection experience for each of the payer portfolios, when revenues and accounts receivable are recorded. Anticipated write-offs are recorded as an adjustment to revenue and at an amount considered necessary to record the revenue at its net realizable value. In addition to contractual discounts, other adjustments including anticipated payer denials and other external factors that could affect the collectibility of its receivables are considered when determining revenue and the net receivable amount.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of Dx net accounts receivable is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment and estimation by management to determine net accounts receivable related to the Dx segment, which led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating the audit evidence related to the valuation of net Dx accounts receivable.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of Dx net accounts receivable. These procedures also included, among others, testing management's process for developing the estimate of net accounts receivable, and the relevance of historical billing and collection data as an input to the analysis; testing the accuracy of a sample of revenue transactions and a sample of cash collections from the historical billing and collection data which is used in management’s analysis; and performing a retrospective comparison of actual cash collected to the prior year estimate of net accounts receivable.

Revenue Recognition - Estimating Costs to Complete for Clinical Research Services

As described in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements, Labcorp Drug Development (DD) revenue was $4,877.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Clinical services utilizing the input-based measure of progress account for 50% of DD revenue. The majority of clinical development and commercialization service long-term contracts within the DD segment are service contracts for clinical research that represent a single performance obligation (e.g., management of a clinical study). Revenue for these service contracts is recognized over time based on the progress of the performance obligation which was measured by the proportion of the actual costs incurred to the total costs expected to complete the contract (including labor and pass-through costs such as investigator grants and reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses). This cost-based method of revenue recognition required management to estimate the costs to complete these service contracts on an ongoing basis.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to estimating costs to complete for clinical research services is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment and estimation by management when developing the costs to complete, including the labor and third party costs to complete the service contracts, which led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating evidence related to the cost estimates made by management.

F-3

Index

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the revenue recognition process, including controls over the estimated costs to complete. These procedures also included, among others, testing management's process for estimating cost to complete the service contracts, testing, for certain contracts, actual costs incurred and evaluating the reasonableness of management’s estimation of costs to complete projects, including labor and third party costs to complete service contracts; and evaluating whether the assumptions used were reasonable by performing a retrospective comparison of current year project costs to historical cost estimates made by management.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment - Two Reporting Units within the DD Segment

As described in Notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $7,751.5 million as of December 31, 2020, and the goodwill associated with the Company’s DD segment was $3,951.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded goodwill impairment of $418.7 million for one of its reporting units within the DD segment. Management assesses goodwill for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes an impairment charge for the amount by which the reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using both income-based and market-based valuation methods. Management’s impairment analysis for certain reporting units utilized significant judgments and assumptions related to the market comparable method analysis, such as selected market multiples, and related to cash flow projections, such as revenue and terminal growth rates, projected operating margin, and the discount rate.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the two reporting units within the DD segment is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value estimate of the reporting units, which led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and audit effort in performing procedures to evaluate management’s market comparable method analysis and cash flow projections, including significant assumptions for the selected market multiples, revenue and terminal growth rates, projected operating margin, and the discount rate. Also, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the significant assumptions used in the valuation of the reporting units. These procedures also included, among others, testing management's process for estimating the fair value of the reporting units which involved evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods and the reasonableness of significant assumptions used in the market comparable method analysis and cash flow projections, including the selected market multiples, revenue and terminal growth rates, projected operating margin, and the discount rate. Evaluating the reasonableness of the revenue and terminal growth rates and projected operating margin involved considering the past performance of the reporting unit and considering whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the appropriateness of the Company’s valuation methods and the reasonableness of (i) the terminal growth rates impacting the reporting units' future cash flows, (ii) the selected market multiple applied to the reporting units' financial information and (iii) the discount rate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

February 25, 2021

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1997.

F-4

Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Previous: Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES · Next: Item 1. Financial Information