Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
21K characters. Original on sec.gov ·
Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Registrant
| By: | /s/ ADAM H. SCHECHTER | ||||||||||
| Adam H. Schechter | |||||||||||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||||||
| Dated: | February 26, 2024 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on February 26, 2024 in the capacities indicated.
| Signature | Title | |||||||
| /s/ ADAM H. SCHECHTER | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
| Adam H. Schechter | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||||||
| /s/ GLENN A. EISENBERG | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
| Glenn A. Eisenberg | (Principal Financial Officer) | |||||||
| /s/ PETER J. WILKINSON | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | |||||||
| Peter J. Wilkinson | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Kerrii B. Anderson | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Jean-Luc Bélingard | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Jeffrey A. Davis | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| D. Gary Gilliland, M.D., Ph.D. | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Kirsten M. Kliphouse | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Garheng Kong, M.D., Ph.D. | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Peter M. Neupert | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Richelle Parham | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Paul B. Rothman, M. D. | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Kathryn E. Wengel | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| R. Sanders Williams, M.D. |
- Sandra van der Vaart, by her signing her name hereto, does hereby sign this Annual Report on behalf of the directors of the Registrant after whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
| By: | /s/ Sandra van der Vaart | |||||||
| Sandra van der Vaart | ||||||||
| Attorney-in-fact |
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive earnings, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Labcorp Diagnostics (Dx) Segment Net Accounts Receivable— Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company recognizes Dx revenue and accounts receivable net of negotiated discounts and anticipated adjustments, including historical collection experience for each of its four payer portfolios (clients, patients, Medicare & Medicaid, and third party). Management has a formal process to estimate implicit price concessions for uncollectable accounts. Anticipated write-offs are recorded as adjustments to revenue at an amount considered necessary to record revenue at its net realizable value. In addition to negotiated contractual discounts, other adjustments including anticipated payer denials and other external factors that could affect the collectability of its receivables are considered when determining revenue and the net receivable amount.
Given the significant judgment and estimates necessary to determine the net realizable value of accounts receivable related to the Dx segment, auditing such estimates required extensive audit effort and a high degree of auditor judgment when performing audit procedures and evaluating the results of those procedures.
F-2
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to Dx Net Accounts Receivable included the following, among others:
-
We tested the effectiveness of controls over the valuation of net accounts receivable.
-
We evaluated management’s methodology for recording Dx net accounts receivable by performing a retrospective comparison of actual cash collected to the prior year estimate of net accounts receivable.
-
We developed an independent estimate of net accounts receivable by taking into consideration historical collections, write-offs, and other relevant internal and external factors.
-
We tested the completeness and accuracy of underlying historical data used as an input to management’s methodology and our independent estimate.
Tax Free Spin-Off – Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
On June 30, 2023, the Company completed the spin-off of its Clinical Development and Commercialization Services business comprised of certain clinical research business units within the former Drug Development segment into a standalone, publicly traded company named Fortrea Holdings, Inc. (Fortrea). The transaction was executed by distributing shares of Fortrea to the Company’s shareholders (the “Distribution”). The Company concluded the Distribution to be a tax-free transaction for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. We identified the Company’s conclusion that the Distribution was a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes to be a critical audit matter because of the complexity of the interpretation and application of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), the materiality of the potential tax consequences, and the need to involve our income tax specialists when performing audit procedures to evaluate the qualification of the Distribution as a tax-free transaction.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
With the assistance of our income tax specialists, the audit procedures we performed related to the Company’s conclusion that the Distribution was a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes included the following, among others:
-
We tested the effectiveness of controls over the Company’s conclusion that the Distribution was a tax-free transaction.
-
We inspected the Private Letter Ruling (PLR) received by the Company from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the external opinions received by the Company from third-party advisors, which were relied upon in the Company’s evaluation of whether the Distribution qualified as a tax-free transaction.
-
We evaluated the key factors addressed in the PLR and external opinions regarding the qualification of the Distribution as a tax-free transaction in comparison to the corresponding criteria prescribed by the Code, including interpretations of the Code and related statutes.
-
We evaluated the tax-free transaction materials prepared by the Company and used in its evaluation of whether the Distribution qualified as a tax-free transaction.
-
We searched for contradictory evidence regarding the qualification of the Distribution as a tax-free transaction by reading relevant documentation, such as income tax returns and historical financial, tax, and legal information, of the Company and the legal entities included in the Distribution, as applicable.
Goodwill – Reporting Unit within the BioPharma Laboratory Services (BLS) Segment – Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company assesses goodwill for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes an impairment charge for the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using both market-based valuation and income-based valuation approaches. Management’s impairment assessments utilize significant judgments and assumptions related to the market multiples selected for the market-based valuation approach and the related estimates of cash flows arising from future revenues and profitability, terminal growth rates, and the discount rate used in the income-based valuation approach.
The Company performed impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2023 and concluded that fair value was less than carrying value in its Early Development (ED) reporting unit within the BLS segment. As a result, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the BLS segment.
F-3
We identified goodwill for the ED reporting unit as a critical audit matter due to the significant estimates and assumptions used by management to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. Performing audit procedures to evaluate management's estimate of fair value of the reporting unit required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the market multiples selected by management for the market-based valuation approach and management’s estimates related to the cash flows arising from future revenues and profitability, terminal growth rates, and the discount rate used in the income-based valuation approach included the following, among others:
-
We tested the effectiveness of controls over management's goodwill impairment evaluation, including those over the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit, such as controls related to management's selection of market multiples, cash flows arising from future revenues and profitability, the terminal growth rate, and the discount rate.
-
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts by comparing the forecasts to (1) historical forecasts and the associated actual results, (2) internal communications to management, and (3) forecasted information included in analyst and industry reports for the Company and certain of its peer companies.
-
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the (1) valuation methodology, (2) the discount rate, and (3) market activity by:
◦Testing the source information underlying the determination of the discount rate and market multiples, including the mathematical accuracy of the calculations.
◦Developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the discount rate and market multiples selected by management.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 26, 2024
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
F-4
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 26, 2024
F-5
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Previous: Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES · Next: Item 1. Financial Information