Mid-America Apartment Communities 10-K 2017-12-31
Filed 2018-02-23. 22 sections, 534K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
10-K 1 maa12312017-10k.htm 10-K
| UNITED STATES | |||||
| SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |||||
| Washington, D.C. 20549 | |||||
| FORM 10-K | |||||
| (Mark One) | |||||
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 | ||||
| OR | |||||
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to ___________ | ||||
| Commission File Number 001-12762 (Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.) | |||||
| Commission File Number 333-190028-01 (Mid-America Apartments, L.P.) | |||||
| MID-AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. | |||||
| MID-AMERICA APARTMENTS, L.P. | |||||
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | |||||
| Tennessee (Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.) | 62-1543819 | ||||
| Tennessee (Mid-America Apartments, L.P.) | 62-1543816 | ||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||
| 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee, 38138 | |||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | |||||
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (901) 682-6600 | |||||
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | |||||
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.) | New York Stock Exchange | ||||
| 8.50% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share (Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.) | New York Stock Exchange |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. | |||
| Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. | |||
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | Yes ý | No o | |
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | Yes o | No ý | |
| Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. | |||
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | Yes o | No ý | |
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | Yes o | No ý | |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding | |||
| 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. | |||
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | Yes ý | No o | |
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | Yes ý | No o | |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and | |||
| posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and | |||
| post such files). | |||
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | Yes ý | No o | |
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | Yes ý | No o | |
| Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of | |||
| registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o | |||
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the | |||
| definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one) |
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | ||||
| Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | Emerging growth company o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | ||||
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | ||||
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer ý | Smaller reporting company o | Emerging growth company o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | ||||
| If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). | |||
| Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | Yes o | No ý | |
| Mid-America Apartments, L.P. | Yes o | No ý |
The aggregate market value of the 78,829,719 shares of common stock of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. held by non-affiliates was approximately $8,307,075,788 based on the closing price of $105.38 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2017. This calculation excludes shares of common stock held by the registrant's officers and directors and each person known by the registrant to beneficially own more than 5% of the registrant's outstanding shares, as such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status should not be deemed conclusive for any other purpose. As of February 19, 2018 there were 113,688,972 shares of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. common stock outstanding.
There is no public trading market for the partnership units of Mid-America Apartments, L.P. As a result, an aggregate market value of the partnership units of Mid-America Apartments, L.P. cannot be determined.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. to be held on May 22, 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. We expect to file our proxy statement within 120 days after December 31, 2017.
Explanatory Note
This report combines the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, and Mid-America Apartments, L.P., a Tennessee limited partnership, of which Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. is the sole general partner. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. and its 96.4% owned subsidiary, Mid-America Apartments, L.P., are both required to file annual reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to "MAA" refer only to Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., and not any of its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to "we," "us," "our," or the "Company" refer collectively to Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Mid-America Apartments, L.P. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to the "Operating Partnership" or "MAALP" refer to Mid-America Apartments, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries. "Common stock" refers to the common stock of MAA, "preferred stock" refers to the preferred stock of MAA, and "shareholders" means the holders of shares of MAA’s common stock or preferred stock, as applicable. The common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership are referred to as "OP Units" and the holders of the OP Units are referred to as "common unitholders".
As of December 31, 2017, MAA owned 113,643,166 OP units (or approximately 96.4% of the total number of OP Units). MAA conducts substantially all of its business and holds substantially all of its assets through the Operating Partnership, and by virtue of its ownership of the OP Units and being the Operating Partnership's sole general partner, MAA has the ability to control all of the day-to-day operations of the Operating Partnership.
We believe combining the Annual Reports on Form 10-K of MAA and the Operating Partnership, including the notes to the consolidated financial statements, into this report results in the following benefits:
| • | enhances investors' understanding of MAA and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner that management views and operates the business; |
| • | eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure in this report applies to both MAA and the Operating Partnership; and |
| • | creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports. |
MAA is a multifamily focused, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Management operates MAA and the Operating Partnership as one business. We believe it is important to understand the few differences between MAA and the Operating Partnership in the context of how MAA and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. MAA and the Operating Partnership are structured as an "umbrella partnership REIT," or UPREIT. MAA's interest in the Operating Partnership entitles MAA to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to MAA's percentage interest therein and entitles MAA to vote on substantially all matters requiring a vote of the partners. MAA's only material asset is its ownership of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (other than cash held by MAA from time-to-time); therefore, MAA does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time-to-time and guaranteeing certain debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds, directly or indirectly, all of the real estate assets. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by MAA, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership interests, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company's business through the Operating Partnership's operations, direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness and issuance of units of limited partnership interest.
The presentation of MAA's shareholders' equity and the Operating Partnership's capital are the principal areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of MAA and those of the Operating Partnership. MAA's shareholders' equity may include shares of preferred stock, shares of common stock, additional paid-in capital, cumulative earnings, cumulative distributions, noncontrolling interest, treasury shares, accumulated other comprehensive income and redeemable common stock. The Operating Partnership's capital may include common capital and preferred capital of the general partner (MAA), limited partners' common capital and preferred capital, noncontrolling interest, accumulated other comprehensive income and redeemable common units. Redeemable common units represent the number of outstanding limited partnership units as of the date of the applicable balance sheet, valued at the greater of the closing market price of MAA's common stock or the aggregate value of the individual partners' capital balances. Holders of OP Units (other than MAA and its entity affiliates) may require the Operating Partnership to redeem their OP Units from time to time, in which case the Operating Partnership may, at its option, pay the redemption price either in cash (in an amount per OP Unit equal, in general, to the average closing price of MAA's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, over a specified period prior to the redemption
date) or by delivering one share of MAA's common stock (subject to adjustment under specified circumstances) for each OP Unit so redeemed.
In order to highlight the material differences between MAA and the Operating Partnership, this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes sections that separately present and discuss areas that are materially different between MAA and the Operating Partnership, including:
| • | the selected financial data in Item 6 of this report; |
| • | the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report; |
| • | certain accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements, including Note 3 - Earnings per Common Share of MAA and Note 4 - Earnings per OP Unit of MAALP; Note 9 - Shareholders' Equity of MAA and Note 10 - Partners' Capital of MAALP; and Note 16 - Selected Quarterly Financial Information of MAA (Unaudited) and Note 17 - Selected Quarterly Financial Information of MAALP (Unaudited); |
| • | the controls and procedures in Item 9A of this report; and |
| • | the certifications included as Exhibits 31 and 32 to this report. |
In the sections that combine disclosures for MAA and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership (directly or indirectly through one of its subsidiaries) is generally the entity that enters into contracts, holds assets and issues debt, management believes this presentation is appropriate for the reasons set forth above and because the business is one enterprise, and we operate the business through the Operating Partnership.
PART I
Risks Associated with Forward Looking Statements
We consider this and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections, intentions or other items related to the future. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and dispositions, joint venture activity, development and renovation activity as well as other capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent and expense growth, occupancy, financing activities and interest rate and other economic expectations, and the anticipated benefits of our merger with Post Properties, Inc., or "Post Properties" and Post Apartment Homes, L.P., or "Post LP". Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results of operations, financial conditions or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such forward-looking statements included in this report may not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
The following factors, among others, could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
| • | inability to generate sufficient cash flows due to market conditions, changes in supply and/or demand, competition, uninsured losses, changes in tax and housing laws, or other factors; |
| • | exposure, as a multifamily focused REIT, to risks inherent in investments in a single industry and sector; |
| • | adverse changes in real estate markets, including, but not limited to, the extent of future demand for multifamily units in our significant markets, barriers of entry into new markets, which we may seek to enter in the future, limitations on our ability to increase rental rates, competition, our ability to identify and consummate attractive acquisitions or development projects on favorable terms, our ability to consummate any planned dispositions in a timely manner on acceptable terms, and our ability to reinvest sale proceeds in a manner that generates favorable returns; |
| • | failure of new acquisitions to achieve anticipated results or be efficiently integrated; |
| • | failure of development communities to be completed within budget and on a timely basis or to lease-up as anticipated, if at all; |
| • | unexpected capital needs; |
| • | changes in operating costs, including real estate taxes, utilities and insurance costs; |
| • | losses from catastrophes in excess of our insurance coverage; |
| • | difficulty in integrating MAA's and Post Properties' businesses; |
| • | ability to obtain financing at favorable rates, if at all, and refinance existing debt as it matures; |
| • | level and volatility of interest or capitalization rates or capital market conditions; |
| • | loss of hedge accounting treatment for interest rate swaps or interest rate caps; |
| • | the continuation of the good credit of our interest rate swap and cap providers; |
| • | price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the financial markets and the resulting impact on financing; |
| • | the effect of any rating agency actions on the cost and availability of new debt financing; |
| • | significant decline in market value of real estate serving as collateral for mortgage obligations; |
| • | significant change in the mortgage financing market that would cause single-family housing, either as an owned or rental product, to become a more significant competitive product; |
| • | our ability to continue to satisfy complex rules in order to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the ability of the Operating Partnership to satisfy the rules to maintain its status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the ability of our taxable REIT subsidiaries to maintain their status as such for federal income tax purposes, and our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to operate effectively within the limitations imposed by these rules; |
| • | inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
| • | cyberliability or potential liability for breaches of our privacy or information security systems; |
| • | potential liability for environmental contamination; |
| • | adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes; |
| • | litigation and compliance costs associated with laws requiring access for disabled persons; and |
| • | other risks identified in this Annual Report on Form 10-K including under the caption "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and, from time to time, in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, or in other documents that we publicly disseminate. |
New factors may also emerge from time to time that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Except as otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances or changes in expectations after the date on which this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed.
Item 1. BUSINESS
Overview
MAA is a multifamily focused, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. We own, operate, acquire and selectively develop apartment communities primarily located in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States. As of December 31, 2017, activities include full ownership and operation of 301 multifamily properties, which includes commercial space at certain properties, four additional commercial properties, and a partial ownership in one multifamily property. These properties are located in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Washington, D.C. As of December 31, 2017, we maintained full or partial ownership in the following properties:
| Multifamily: | ||||||
| Consolidated Properties | Units | Unconsolidated Properties | Units | Total Properties | Total Units | |
| 301 | 99,523 | 1 | 269 | 302 | 99,792 | |
| Commercial: | ||||||
| Consolidated Properties | Sq. Ft. (1) | Unconsolidated Properties | Sq. Ft. | Total Properties | Total Sq. Ft. | |
| 4 | 231,821 | — | — | 4 | 231,821 |
(1) Excludes commercial space located at our multifamily communities, which totals approximately 620,000 square feet of gross leasable space.
Our business is conducted principally through the Operating Partnership. MAA is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, holding 113,643,166 OP units, comprising a 96.4% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017. MAA and MAALP were formed in Tennessee in 1993. As of December 31, 2017, we had 2,419 full time employees and 45 part-time employees.
Business Objectives
Our primary business objectives are to protect and grow existing property values, to maintain a stable and increasing cash flow that will fund our dividends and distributions through all parts of the real estate investment cycle, and to create shareholder value by growing in a disciplined manner. To achieve these objectives, we intend to continue to pursue the following goals and strategies:
| • | effectively and efficiently operate our existing properties with an intense property and asset management focus and a decentralized structure; |
| • | manage real estate cycles by taking an opportunistic approach to buying, selling, developing and renovating apartment communities; |
| • | diversify investment capital across markets in which we operate to achieve a balanced portfolio and minimize volatile operating performance; and |
| • | actively manage our capital structure to enhance predictability of earnings to fund our dividends and distributions. |
Operations
Our goal is to generate return on investment collectively and in each apartment community by increasing revenues, controlling operating expenses, maintaining high occupancy levels and reinvesting in the income producing capacity of each apartment community as appropriate. The steps taken to meet these objectives include:
| • | providing management information and improved customer services through technology innovations; |
| • | utilizing systems to enhance property managers’ ability to optimize revenue by adjusting rental rates in response to local market conditions and individual unit amenities; |
| • | implementing programs to control expenses through investment in cost-saving initiatives; |
| • | analyzing individual asset productivity performances to identify best practices and improvement areas; |
| • | maintaining the physical condition of each property through ongoing capital investments; |
| • | improving the "curb appeal" of the apartment communities through extensive landscaping and exterior improvements, and repositioning apartment communities from time-to-time to enhance or maintain market positions; |
| • | managing lease expirations to align with peak leasing traffic patterns and to maximize productivity of property staffing; |
| • | allocating additional capital, including capital for selective interior and exterior improvements; |
| • | compensating employees through performance-based compensation and stock ownership programs; and |
| • | maintaining a hands-on management style and "flat" organizational structure that emphasizes property level decision making coupled with asset management and senior management's monitoring. |
We believe that our decentralized operating structure capitalizes on specific market knowledge, provides greater personal accountability than a centralized structure and is beneficial in the acquisition and redevelopment processes. To support this decentralized operational structure, senior management, along with various asset management functions, are proactively involved in supporting and reviewing property management through extensive reporting processes and frequent on-site visits. To maximize the amount of information shared between senior management and the properties on a real-time basis, we utilize a web-based property management system. The system contains property and accounting modules that allow for operating efficiencies and continued expense control, provide for various expanded revenue management practices, and improve the support provided to on-site property operations. We use a "yield management" pricing program that helps our property managers optimize rental revenues, and we also utilize purchase order and accounts payable software to provide improved controls and management information.
Investment in technology continues to drive operating efficiencies in our business and help us to better meet the changing needs of our residents. Our residents have the ability to conduct business with us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and complete online leasing applications and renewals via the use of our web-based resident Internet portal. Interacting with our residents through such technology has allowed us to improve resident satisfaction ratings and increase the efficiency of our operating teams.
We report in the following operating segments:
| • | Large market same store communities are generally communities in markets with a population of at least 1 million and at least 1% of the total public multifamily REIT units that we have owned and have been stabilized for at least a full 12 months. |
| • | Secondary market same store communities are generally communities in markets with populations of more than 1 million but less than 1% of the total public multifamily REIT units or markets with populations of less than 1 million that we have owned and have been stabilized for at least a full 12 months. |
| • | Non-same store communities and other includes recent acquisitions, communities in development or lease-up, communities that have been identified for disposition, and communities that have undergone a significant casualty loss. Also included in non-same store communities are non-multifamily activities. |
On the first day of each calendar year, we determine the composition of our same store operating segments for that year as well as adjust the previous year, which allows us to evaluate full period-over-period operating comparisons. An apartment community in development or lease-up is added to the same store portfolio on the first day of the calendar year after it has been owned and stabilized for at least a full 12 months. Communities are considered stabilized after achieving 90% occupancy for 90 days. Communities that have been identified for disposition are excluded from the same store portfolio.
All properties acquired from Post Properties in the Merger remained in the Non-Same Store and Other operating segment during 2017, as the properties were recent acquisitions and had not been owned and stabilized for at least 12 months as of January 1, 2017. For additional information regarding our operating segments, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Acquisitions
One of our growth strategies is to acquire apartment communities that are located in various large or secondary markets primarily throughout the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States. Acquisitions, along with dispositions, help us achieve and maintain our desired product mix, geographic diversification and asset allocation. Portfolio growth allows for maximizing the efficiency of the existing management and overhead structure. We have extensive experience in the acquisition of multifamily communities. We will continue to evaluate opportunities that arise, and we will utilize this strategy to increase our number of apartment communities in strong and growing markets.
We acquired the following apartment communities during the year ended December 31, 2017:
| Community | Market | Units | Closing Date | |||
| Charlotte at Midtown | Nashville, TN | 279 | March 16, 2017 | |||
| Acklen West End | Nashville, TN | 320 | December 28, 2017 |
Dispositions
We sell apartment communities and other assets that no longer meet our long-term strategy or when market conditions are favorable, and we redeploy the proceeds from those sales to acquire, develop and redevelop additional apartment communities and rebalance our portfolio across or within geographic regions. Dispositions also allow us to realize a portion of the value created through our investments and provide additional liquidity. We are then able to redeploy the net proceeds from our dispositions in lieu of raising additional capital. In deciding to sell an apartment community, we consider current market conditions and generally solicit competing bids from unrelated parties for these individual assets, considering the sales price and other key terms of each proposal. We also consider portfolio dispositions when such a structure is useful to maximize proceeds and efficiency of execution. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of five multifamily properties totaling 1,760 units and four land parcels totaling approximately 23 acres.
Development
As another part of our growth strategy, we invest in a limited number of development projects. Development activities may be conducted through wholly-owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with unaffiliated parties. Fixed price construction contracts are signed with unrelated parties to minimize construction risk. We typically manage the leasing portion of the project as units become available for lease. We may also engage in limited expansion development opportunities on existing communities in which we typically serve as the developer. While we seek opportunistic new development investments offering attractive long-term investment returns, we intend to maintain a total development commitment that we consider modest in relation to our total balance sheet and investment portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we incurred $170.1 million in development costs and completed 7 development projects.
The following multifamily projects were under development as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Project: | Market | Total Units | Units Completed | Cost to Date | Budgeted Cost | Estimated Cost Per Unit | Expected Completion | |||
| Post River North | Denver, CO | 359 | 240 | $81,195 | $88,200 | $246 | 1st Quarter 2018 | |||
| 1201 Midtown II | Charleston, SC | 140 | — | 12,624 | 29,500 | 211 | 4th Quarter 2018 | |||
| Post Centennial Park | Atlanta, GA | 438 | — | 73,837 | 96,300 | 220 | 3rd Quarter 2018 | |||
| 937 | 240 | $167,656 | $214,000 |
Redevelopment
We focus on both interior unit upgrades and exterior amenities above and beyond routine capital upkeep on existing apartment communities across our portfolio that we believe have the ability to support additional rent growth. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we renovated 8,375 units at an average cost of $5,463 per unit, achieving average rental rate increases of 8.8% above the normal market rate for similar but non-renovated units.
Capital Structure
We use a combination of debt and equity sources to fund our business objectives. We maintain a capital structure, focused on maintaining access, flexibility and low costs, that we believe allows us to proactively source potential investment opportunities in the marketplace. We structure our debt maturities to avoid disproportionate exposure in any given year. Our primary debt financing strategy is to access the unsecured debt markets to provide our debt capital needs, but we also maintain a limited amount of secured debt and maintain our access to both the secured and unsecured debt markets for maximum flexibility. We also believe that we have significant access to the equity capital markets.
At December 31, 2017, 27.5% of our total market capitalization consisted of debt borrowings, including 21.5% under unsecured credit facilities and unsecured senior notes and 6.0% under secured borrowings. We currently intend to target our total debt, net of cash held, to a range of approximately 32% to 38% of the undepreciated book value of our assets. Our charter and bylaws do not limit our debt levels and our Board of Directors can modify this policy at any time. We may issue new equity to maintain our debt within the target range. Covenants for our unsecured senior notes limit our debt to undepreciated book value of our assets to 60%. As of December 31, 2017, our ratio of total debt to our adjusted total assets (as defined in the covenants for the bonds issued by MAALP) was approximately 33.2%. We continuously review opportunities for lowering our cost of capital. We plan to continue using unsecured debt in order to take advantage of the lower cost of capital and flexibility provided by these markets. We will evaluate opportunities to repurchase shares when we believe that our share price is significantly below our net present value. We also look for opportunities where we can acquire or develop apartment communities, selectively funded or partially funded by sales of equity securities, when appropriate opportunities arise. We focus on improving the net present value of our investments by generating cash flows from our portfolio of assets above the estimated total cost of debt and equity capital. We routinely make new investments when we believe it will be accretive to shareholder value over the life of the investments.
Competition
All of our apartment communities are located in areas that include other apartment communities. Occupancy and rental rates are affected by the number of competitive apartment communities in a particular area. The owners of competing apartment communities may have greater resources than us, and the managers of these apartment communities may have more experience than our management. Moreover, single-family rental housing, manufactured housing, condominiums and the new and existing home markets provide housing alternatives to potential residents of apartment communities. Competition for new residents is generally intense across all of our markets. Some competing communities offer features that our communities do not have. Competing communities can use concessions or lower rents to obtain temporary competitive advantages. Also, some competing communities are larger or newer than our communities. The competitive position of each community is different depending upon many factors including sub-market supply and demand. In addition, other real estate investors compete with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new properties. These competitors include insurance companies, pension and investment funds, public and private real estate companies, investment companies and other public and private apartment
REITs, some of which may have greater resources, or lower capital costs, than we do.
We believe, however, that we are generally well-positioned to compete effectively for residents and investments. We believe our competitive advantages include:
| • | a fully integrated organization with property management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, marketing, sales and financing expertise; |
| • | scalable operating and support systems, which include automated systems to meet the changing technological needs of our residents; |
| • | access to a wide variety of debt and equity capital sources; |
| • | geographic diversification with a presence in approximately 37 defined Metropolitan Statistical Areas, or MSAs, across the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States; and |
| • | significant presence in many of our major markets that allows us to be a local operating expert. |
Moving forward, we plan to continue to optimize lease expiration management, improve expense control, increase resident retention efforts and align employee incentive plans with our performance. We believe this plan of operation, coupled with the portfolio’s strengths in targeting residents across a geographically diverse platform, should position us for continued operational upside. We also make capital improvements to both our apartment communities and individual units on a regular basis in order to maintain a competitive position in each individual market.
Environmental Matters
As a part of our standard apartment community acquisition and development processes, we generally obtain environmental studies of the sites from outside environmental engineering firms. The purpose of these studies is to identify potential sources of contamination at the site and to assess the status of environmental regulatory compliance. These studies generally include historical reviews of the site, reviews of certain public records, preliminary investigations of the site and surrounding properties, inspection for the presence of asbestos, poly-chlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, and underground storage tanks and the preparation and issuance of written reports. Depending on the results of these studies, more invasive procedures, such as soil sampling or ground water analysis, may be performed to investigate potential sources of contamination. These studies must be satisfactorily completed before we take ownership of an acquisition or development property; however, no assurance can be given that the studies or additional documents reviewed identify all significant environmental risks. See "Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Real Estate Investments and Our Operations - Environmental problems are possible and can be costly."
The environmental studies we received on properties that we have acquired have not revealed any material environmental liabilities. Should any potential environmental risks or conditions be discovered during our due diligence process, the potential costs of remediation will be assessed carefully and factored into the cost of acquisition, assuming the identified risks and factors are deemed to be manageable and within reason. We are not aware of any existing conditions that we believe would be considered a material environmental liability. Nevertheless, it is possible that the studies do not reveal all environmental risks or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are not aware. Moreover, no assurance can be given concerning future laws, ordinances or regulations, or the potential introduction of hazardous or toxic substances by neighboring properties or residents.
Merger of MAA and Post Properties
On December 1, 2016, MAA completed its merger with Post Properties. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement, Post Properties merged with and into MAA, with MAA continuing as the surviving corporation, or the Parent Merger, and Post LP merged with and into MAALP, with MAALP continuing as the surviving entity, or the Partnership Merger. We refer to the Parent Merger, together with the Partnership Merger, as the Merger in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated net assets and results of operations of Post Properties are included in our consolidated financial statements from and after the closing date of the Merger. The 2016 and 2017 operating results of the Post Properties assets we acquired in the Merger are included in our non-same store and other operating segment, as those assets were not eligible to be included in our same store segments until January 1, 2018.
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust
MAA has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. To continue to qualify as a REIT, MAA must continue to meet certain tests which, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than our net capital gains) to our shareholders annually. If MAA maintains its qualification as a REIT, MAA generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on its net income
to the extent it distributes such net income to its shareholders annually. Even if MAA continues to qualify as a REIT, it will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and its property. In 2017, MAA paid total distributions of $3.48 per share of common stock to its shareholders, which was above the 90% REIT distribution requirement and was in excess of REIT taxable income.
Recent Developments
On February 1, 2018, the Company retired a $38.5 million mortgage associated with Highlands of West Village. The mortgage was scheduled to mature in May 2018.
Website Access to Our Reports
MAA and the Operating Partnership file combined periodic reports with the SEC. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, along with our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, are available on our website at www.maac.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Reference to our website does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the site and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All of the aforementioned materials may also be obtained free of charge by contacting our Legal Department, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, TN 38138.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have identified the following additional risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition or results of operations. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business faces significant risks and the risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also significantly impact our business operations. If any of these risks occur, our business prospects, financial condition or results of operations could suffer, the market price of our capital stock and the trading price of our debt securities could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment in our capital stock or debt securities.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND OUR OPERATIONS
Developments such as an economic downturn, instability in the banking sector or a negative impact on economic growth resulting from current or future legislation or government initiatives may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The industry in which we operate may be adversely affected by national and international economic conditions. Although the U.S. real estate market has recently improved, certain international markets are experiencing increased levels of volatility due to a combination of factors, including, among others, political instability from ongoing geopolitical conflicts, high unemployment rates, fluctuating oil and gas prices and fiscal deficits, and these factors could contribute to an economic downturn in the U.S. If the U.S. experiences a downturn in the economy, instability in the banking sector or a negative impact on economic growth resulting from changes in legislation, government tax increases, debt policy or spending restrictions, we may experience adverse effects on our occupancy levels, our rental revenues and the value of our properties, any of which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
Other economic risks which may adversely affect conditions in the markets in which we operate include the following:
| • | local conditions, such as an oversupply of apartments or other housing available for rent, or a reduction in demand for apartments in the area; |
| • | low mortgage interest rates and home pricing, making alternative housing more affordable; |
| • | government or builder incentives with respect to home ownership, making alternative housing options more attractive; and |
| • | regional economic downturns which affect one or more of our geographical markets. |
Failure to generate sufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make payments on our debt and to make distributions.
Our ability to make payments on our debt and to make distributions depends on our ability to generate cash flow in excess of operating costs and capital expenditure requirements and/or to have access to the markets for debt and equity
financing. Our funds from operations may be insufficient because of factors that are beyond our control. Such events or conditions could include:
| • | competition from other apartment communities; |
| • | overbuilding of new apartments or oversupply of available apartments in our markets, which might adversely affect occupancy or rental rates and/or require rent concessions in order to lease apartments; |
| • | conversion of condominiums and single family houses to rental use or the increase in the number condominiums and single family homes available for sale; |
| • | weakness in the overall economy which lowers job growth and the associated demand for apartment housing; |
| • | increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes, utilities and insurance premiums) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rental rates; |
| • | inability to initially, or subsequently after lease terminations, rent apartments on favorable economic terms; |
| • | failure of development communities to be completed within budget and on a timely basis or to lease-up as anticipated, if at all; |
| • | changes in governmental regulations and the related costs of compliance; |
| • | changes in laws including, but not limited to, tax laws and housing laws including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; |
| • | withdrawal of government support of apartment financing through its financial backing of the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac; |
| • | an uninsured loss, including those resulting from a catastrophic storm, earthquake, or act of terrorism; |
| • | changes in interest rate levels and the availability of financing, borrower credit standards, and down-payment requirements which could lead renters to purchase homes (if interest rates decrease and home loans are more readily available) or increase our acquisition and operating costs (if interest rates increase and financing is less readily available); and |
| • | the relative illiquidity of real estate investments. |
At times, we have relied on external funding sources to fully fund the payment of distributions to shareholders and our capital investment program, including our existing property developments. While we have sufficient liquidity to permit distributions at current rates through additional borrowings, if necessary, any significant and sustained deterioration in operations could result in our financial resources being insufficient to make payments on our debt and to make distributions at the current rate, in which event we would be required to reduce the distribution rate. Any decline in our funds from operations could adversely affect our ability to make distributions or to meet our loan covenants and could have a material adverse effect on our stock price or the trading price of our debt securities.
We are dependent on a concentration of our investments in a single asset class, making our results of operations more vulnerable to a downturn or slowdown in the sector or other economic factors.
As of December 31, 2017, substantially all of our investments are concentrated in the multifamily sector. As a result, we will be subject to risks inherent in investments in a single type of property. A downturn or slowdown in the demand for multifamily housing may have more pronounced effects on our results of operations or on the value of our assets than if we had diversified our investments into more than one asset class.
Our operations are concentrated in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States; we are subject to general economic conditions in the regions in which we operate.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately 39.4% of our portfolio is located in our top five markets: Atlanta, Georgia; Dallas, Texas; Austin, Texas; Charlotte, North Carolina; and Orlando, Florida. In addition, our overall operations are concentrated in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States. Our performance could be adversely affected by economic conditions in, and other factors relating to, these geographic areas, including supply and demand for apartments in these areas, zoning and other regulatory conditions and competition from other communities and alternative forms of housing. In particular our performance is disproportionately influenced by job growth and unemployment. To t
Showing the first 8K of 72K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
Item 2. PROPERTIES.
We seek to acquire newer apartment communities and those with opportunities for repositioning through capital additions and management improvement located in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States with the potential for above average growth and return on investment. Approximately 68% of our apartment units are located in the Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas markets. Our strategic focus is to provide our residents high quality apartment units in attractive community settings, characterized by upscale amenities, extensive landscaping and attention to aesthetic detail.
The following table summarizes our apartment community portfolio and occupancy levels by location, as of December 31, 2017:
| Number of Communities | Number of Units (1) | Average Unit Size (Square Footage) | Average Occupancy(2) | |||||||||
| Atlanta, GA | 15 | 5,259 | 1,106.5 | 97.2 | % | |||||||
| Dallas, TX | 14 | 4,359 | 924.7 | 96.7 | % | |||||||
| Austin, TX | 18 | 5,838 | 928.2 | 96.8 | % | |||||||
| Charlotte, NC | 16 | 4,401 | 965.6 | 97.2 | % | |||||||
| Orlando, FL | 9 | 3,190 | 1,044.8 | 97.2 | % | |||||||
| Tampa, FL | 9 | 2,878 | 1,041.8 | 97.4 | % | |||||||
| Raleigh/ Durham, NC | 14 | 4,397 | 1,016.5 | 97.5 | % | |||||||
| Houston, TX | 11 | 3,232 | 907.5 | 98.2 | % | |||||||
| Nashville, TN | 10 | 3,776 | 1,019.6 | 96.2 | % | |||||||
| Fort Worth, TX | 11 | 4,249 | 902.9 | 96.2 | % | |||||||
| Washington, DC | 2 | 741 | 944.5 | 97.6 | % | |||||||
| Phoenix, AZ | 7 | 2,301 | 981.1 | 97.9 | % | |||||||
| South Florida, FL | 1 | 480 | 1,189.4 | 97.7 | % | |||||||
| Large Market Same Store | 137 | 45,101 | 985.9 | 97.1 | % | |||||||
| Jacksonville, FL | 10 | 3,496 | 964.4 | 97.7 | % | |||||||
| Charleston, SC | 10 | 2,648 | 958.6 | 96.9 | % | |||||||
| Savannah, GA | 9 | 2,219 | 1,021.3 | 97.3 | % | |||||||
| Greenville, SC | 8 | 1,748 | 902.0 | 97.0 | % | |||||||
| Richmond, VA | 6 | 1,668 | 862.3 | 97.0 | % | |||||||
| Memphis, TN | 4 | 1,811 | 974.2 | 95.1 | % | |||||||
| San Antonio, TX | 4 | 1,504 | 910.3 | 96.3 | % | |||||||
| Birmingham, AL | 5 | 1,462 | 1,054.8 | 95.6 | % | |||||||
| Little Rock, AR | 5 | 1,368 | 981.5 | 96.8 | % | |||||||
| Jackson, MS | 4 | 1,241 | 970.1 | 96.9 | % | |||||||
| Huntsville, AL | 3 | 1,228 | 1,089.9 | 96.9 | % | |||||||
| Chattanooga, TN | 4 | 943 | 905.7 | 96.1 | % | |||||||
| Lexington, KY | 4 | 924 | 914.4 | 96.7 | % | |||||||
| Norfolk / Hampton / Virginia Beach, VA | 3 | 788 | 924.5 | 97.8 | % | |||||||
| Las Vegas, NV | 2 | 721 | 953.5 | 97.1 | % | |||||||
| Tallahassee, FL | 2 | 604 | 1,111.2 | 97.0 | % | |||||||
| Kansas City, MO | 2 | 603 | 965.9 | 95.4 | % | |||||||
| Columbia, SC | 2 | 576 | 1,028.6 | 96.4 | % | |||||||
| Gainesville, FL | 2 | 468 | 1,137.7 | 97.4 | % | |||||||
| Louisville, KY | 1 | 384 | 845.7 | 96.4 | % | |||||||
| Gulf Shores, AL | 1 | 324 | 993.0 | 98.2 | % | |||||||
| Panama City, FL | 1 | 254 | 1,117.5 | 97.6 | % | |||||||
| Charlottesville, VA | 1 | 251 | 943.5 | 96.4 | % | |||||||
| Secondary Market Same Store | 93 | 27,233 | 969.9 | 96.8 | % | |||||||
| Atlanta, GA | 14 | 5,737 | 973.2 | 92.6 | % | |||||||
| Dallas, TX | 16 | 5,406 | 856.5 | 95.8 | % | |||||||
| Washington, DC | 9 | 3,608 | 919.4 | 96.3 | % | |||||||
| Tampa, FL | 5 | 2,342 | 983.6 | 96.8 | % | |||||||
| Orlando, FL | 4 | 2,084 | 985.7 | 96.9 | % | |||||||
| Charlotte, NC | 5 | 1,748 | 963.6 | 96.1 | % | |||||||
| Houston, TX | 4 | 1,635 | 829.2 | 96.1 | % | |||||||
| Austin, TX | 4 | 1,279 | 896.2 | 94.8 | % | |||||||
| Raleigh/Durham, NC | 1 | 803 | 892.6 | 97.5 | % | |||||||
| Nashville, TN | 2 | 599 | 811.2 | 88.3 | % | |||||||
| Kansas City, MO | 2 | 507 | 1,383.8 | 73.0 | % | |||||||
| Charleston, SC | 1 | 380 | 932.3 | 96.1 | % | |||||||
| Greenville, SC | 1 | 336 | 1,029.4 | 95.5 | % | |||||||
| Richmond, VA | 1 | 336 | 994.2 | 96.1 | % | |||||||
| Phoenix, AZ | 1 | 322 | 901.3 | 96.3 | % | |||||||
| Denver, CO | 1 | 240 | 819.5 | 33.4 | % | |||||||
| Gulf Shores, AL | 1 | 96 | 2,145.8 | 95.8 | % | |||||||
| Non-Same Store | 72 | 27,458 | 936.2 | 94.3 | % | |||||||
| Total | 302 | 99,792 |
| (1) | Number of Units excludes development units not yet delivered. |
| (2) | Average Occupancy is calculated by dividing the number of units occupied by the total number of units at each property. |
Twenty -nine of our multifamily properties reflected in the above table also include commercial components totaling approximately 620,000 square feet of gross leasable space. We also owned four commercial properties totaling approximately 230,000 square feet of combined gross leasable space as of December 31, 2017.
Mortgage Financing
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $962.8 million of indebtedness collateralized, secured, and outstanding as set forth in Schedule III, Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In September 2010, the United States Department of Justice, or the DOJ, filed suit against Post Properties (and by virtue of the Merger, MAA) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that certain of our apartments violated accessibility requirements of the FHA and the ADA. The DOJ is seeking, among other things, an injunction against us, requiring us to retrofit the properties and comply with FHA and ADA standards in future design and construction, as well as monetary damages and civil penalties. No trial date has been set.
In December 2017, The Equal Rights Center, a non-profit civil rights organization, filed suit against MAA and the Operating Partnership in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. This suit alleges that we maintained and enforced a criminal records screening policy at certain of our apartment communities, all of which are communities that we acquired from Post Properties in the Merger, which violates the FHA. The suit seeks injunctive relief, actual and punitive damages and attorneys' fees and costs.
In addition, we are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the course of our business operations. While no assurances can be given, we do not currently believe that any of these other outstanding matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Market Information
MAA's common stock has been listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol "MAA" since its initial public offering in February 1994. On February 16, 2018, the reported last sale price of our common stock on the NYSE was $88.75 per share, and there were approximately 2,800 holders of record of the common stock. MAA believes it has a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of its common stock. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low intra-day sales prices of MAA's common stock and the dividends declared and paid by MAA with respect to the periods indicated.
| Sales Prices | Dividends Paid | Dividends Declared | ||||||||||||||
| High | Low | |||||||||||||||
| 2017: | ||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 103.64 | $ | 92.50 | $ | 0.8700 | $ | 0.8700 | ||||||||
| Second Quarter | 110.95 | 96.20 | 0.8700 | 0.8700 | ||||||||||||
| Third Quarter | 109.25 | 99.06 | 0.8700 | 0.8700 | ||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | 110.24 | 98.54 | 0.8700 | 0.9225 | (1) | |||||||||||
| 2016: | ||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 102.42 | $ | 82.91 | $ | 0.8200 | $ | 0.8200 | ||||||||
| Second Quarter | 106.68 | 94.57 | 0.8200 | 0.8200 | ||||||||||||
| Third Quarter | 110.01 | 91.77 | 0.8200 | 0.8200 | ||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | 98.35 | 85.04 | 0.8200 | 0.8700 |
| (1) | Generally, MAA's Board of Directors declares dividends prior to the quarter in which they are paid. The dividend declared in the fourth quarter of 2017 was paid on January 31, 2018 to shareholders of record on January 12, 2018. |
MAA's quarterly dividend rate is currently $0.9225 per common share. MAA's Board of Directors reviews and declares the dividend rate quarterly. Actual dividends made by MAA will be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the gross revenues received from our apartment communities, our operating expenses, the interest expense incurred on borrowings and unanticipated capital expenditures. MAA expects to make future quarterly distributions to shareholders; however, future distributions by MAA will be at the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend on our actual funds from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code (see "Business - Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust" above) and such other factors as MAA's Board of Directors deems relevant.
Direct Stock Purchase and Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We have established the dividend and distribution reinvestment stock purchase plan, or DRSPP, under which holders of common stock, preferred stock and OP units can elect to automatically reinvest their distributions in shares of MAA common stock. The DRSPP also allows for the optional purchase of MAA common stock of at least $250, but not more than$5,000 in any given month, free of brokerage commissions and charges. In our absolute discretion, we may grant waivers to allow for optional cash payments in excess of $5,000. To fulfill our obligations under the DRSPP, we may either issue additional shares of common stock or repurchase common stock in the open market. We may elect to sell shares under the DRSPP at up to a 5% discount. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, we had issuances with no discounts through our DRSPP of 9,568 shares, 7,906 shares, and 8,562 shares, respectively.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2017:
| Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a)(1) | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options Warrants and Rights (b)(1) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)(2) | |||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 108,438 | $ | 72.93 | 224,393 | |||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Total | 108,438 | $ | 72.93 | 224,393 |
| (1) | Columns (a) and (b) do not include 180,692 shares of restricted common stock that are subject to vesting requirements which were issued through our 2004 Stock Plan or the Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan or 127,711 shares of common stock that have been purchased by employees through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
| (2) | Column (c) includes 202,104 shares available to be issued under our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 22,289 shares available to be issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
The outstanding options noted in the table above were issued in exchange for outstanding options in connection with previous parent mergers, including the Parent Merger.
Mid-America Apartments, L.P.
Operating Partnership Units
There is no established public trading market for the Operating Partnership's OP Units. From time-to-time, we issue shares of MAA's common stock in exchange for OP Units tendered to the Operating Partnership for redemption in accordance with the provisions of the Operating Partnership’s limited partnership agreement. At December 31, 2017, there were 117,834,752 OP Units outstanding in the Operating Partnership, of which 113,643,166 OP Units, or 96.4%, were owned by MAA and 4,191,586 OP Units, or 3.6% were owned by limited partners. Under the terms of the Operating Partnership’s limited partnership agreement, the limited partner holders of OP Units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the OP Units held by the holder in exchange for one share of MAA common stock per one OP Unit or a cash payment based on the market value of our common stock at the time of redemption, at the option of MAA. During the year ended December 31, 2017, MAA issued a total of 28,813 shares of common stock upon redemption of OP Units.
At-the-Market Offering
On December 9, 2015, we entered into distribution agreements with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp. and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. to sell up to an aggregate of 4.0 million shares of common stock, from time-to-time in at-the-market offerings or negotiated transactions through controlled equity offering programs, or ATMs. As of December 31, 2017, there were 4.0 million shares available to be sold under the ATMs.
Stock Repurchase Plan
On December 8, 2015, MAA's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 4.0 million shares of MAA common stock, which represented approximately 5.3% of MAA's common stock outstanding at the time of such authorization. This December 2015 authorization replaced and superseded a previous authorization from 1999, under which approximately 2.1 million shares remained to be repurchased at the time of the December 2015 authorization but through which no shares had been repurchased since April 2001. From time to time, we may repurchase shares under the current authorization when we believe that shareholder value would be enhanced. Factors affecting this determination include, among others, the share price and expected rates of return. As of December 31, 2017, no shares have been repurchased under the current authorization.
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table reflects repurchases of shares of MAA's common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2017:
| Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) | ||||||||
| October 1, 2017 - October 31, 2017 | — | $ | — | — | 4,000,000 | ||||||
| November 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017 | — | $ | — | — | 4,000,000 | ||||||
| December 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 | — | $ | — | — | 4,000,000 | ||||||
| Total | — | $ | — | — | 4,000,000 |
| (1) | This column reflects the number of shares of MAA's common stock that were available for purchase under the 4.0 million share repurchase program authorized by MAA's Board of Directors in December 2015. |
Comparison of Five-year Cumulative Total Returns
The following graph compares the cumulative total returns of the shareholders of MAA since December 31, 2012 with the S&P 500 Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index . The graph assumes that the base share price for our common stock and each index is $100 and that all dividends are reinvested. The performance graph is not necessarily indicative of future investment performance.

| Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MAA | $ | 100.00 | $ | 97.81 | $ | 125.60 | $ | 158.84 | $ | 177.25 | $ | 188.37 | ||||||||||||
| S&P 500 | 100.00 | 132.39 | 150.51 | 152.59 | 170.84 | 208.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
| FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index | 100.00 | 102.47 | 133.35 | 137.61 | 149.33 | 157.14 |
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following tables set forth selected financial data on a historical basis for MAA and the Operating Partnership. As previously discussed, the consolidated assets, liabilities, and results of operations of Post Properties are included in MAA's selected financial data from the closing date of the Merger through the end of MAA's fiscal year, December 31, 2017. Likewise, the consolidated assets, liabilities, and results of operations of Post LP are included in the Operating Partnership's selected financial data from the closing date of the Partnership Merger, December 1, 2016, through the end of the Operating Partnership's fiscal year, December 31, 2017. This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,528,987 | $ | 1,125,348 | $ | 1,042,779 | $ | 992,332 | $ | 635,490 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 340,536 | 224,402 | 350,745 | 150,946 | 37,692 | ||||||||||||||
| Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations before (loss) gain on sale | — | — | — | (63 | ) | 4,743 | |||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations | — | — | — | 5,394 | 76,844 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | 340,536 | 224,402 | 350,745 | 156,277 | 119,279 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 12,157 | 12,180 | 18,458 | 8,297 | 3,998 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends to MAA Series I preferred shareholders | 3,688 | 307 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for MAA common shareholders | $ | 324,691 | $ | 211,915 | $ | 332,287 | $ | 147,980 | $ | 115,281 | |||||||||
| Per Common Share Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 113,407 | 78,502 | 75,176 | 74,982 | 50,677 | ||||||||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities and partnership units (1) | 280 | 298 | — | — | 2,439 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 113,687 | 78,800 | 75,176 | 74,982 | 53,116 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share - basic: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations available for common shareholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 0.72 | |||||||||
| Discontinued property operations | — | — | — | 0.07 | 1.55 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for common shareholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.27 | |||||||||
| Earnings per common share - diluted: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations available for common shareholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 0.71 | |||||||||
| Discontinued property operations | — | — | — | 0.07 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for common shareholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.25 | |||||||||
| Dividends declared per common share(2) | $ | 3.5325 | $ | 3.3300 | $ | 3.1300 | $ | 2.9600 | $ | 2.8150 | |||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate owned, at cost | $ | 13,336,995 | $ | 13,016,663 | $ | 8,217,579 | $ | 8,071,187 | $ | 7,694,618 | |||||||||
| Real estate assets, net | 11,261,924 | 11,341,862 | 6,718,366 | 6,697,508 | 6,556,303 | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 11,491,919 | 11,604,491 | 6,847,781 | 6,821,778 | 6,835,012 | ||||||||||||||
| Total debt | 4,502,057 | 4,499,712 | 3,427,568 | 3,512,699 | 3,463,239 | ||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | 233,982 | 238,282 | 165,726 | 161,287 | 166,726 | ||||||||||||||
| Total MAA shareholders' equity and redeemable stock | 6,350,320 | 6,413,892 | 3,000,347 | 2,896,435 | 2,951,861 | ||||||||||||||
| Other Data (at end of period): | |||||||||||||||||||
| Funds from operations | $ | 699,561 | $ | 463,385 | $ | 452,372 | $ | 404,087 | $ | 231,025 | |||||||||
| Market capitalization (shares and units) (3) | $ | 11,849,463 | $ | 11,528,965 | $ | 7,225,894 | $ | 5,933,985 | $ | 4,801,990 | |||||||||
| Ratio of total debt to total capitalization (4) | 27.5 | % | 28.1 | % | 32.2 | % | 37.3 | % | 42.0 | % | |||||||||
| Number of multifamily properties, including joint venture ownership interest (5) | 302 | 303 | 254 | 268 | 275 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of multifamily units, including joint venture ownership interest (5) | 99,792 | 99,393 | 79,496 | 82,316 | 83,641 |
(1) See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Beginning in 2006, at their regularly scheduled meetings, our Board of Directors began routinely declaring dividends for payment in the following quarter. This can result in dividends declared during a calendar year being different from dividends paid during a calendar year.
(3) Market capitalization includes all shares of common stock, regardless of classification on the balance sheet, as well as partnership units (value based on common stock equivalency).
(4) Total capitalization is market capitalization plus total debt.
(5) Multifamily properties and unit totals have not been adjusted to exclude properties held for sale.
Mid-America Apartments, L.P.
Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per unit data)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,528,987 | $ | 1,125,348 | $ | 1,042,779 | $ | 992,332 | $ | 635,490 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 340,536 | 224,402 | 350,745 | 150,946 | 37,692 | ||||||||||||||
| Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from discontinued operations before (loss) gain on sale | — | — | — | (63 | ) | 4,332 | |||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations | — | — | — | 5,394 | 65,520 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | 340,536 | 224,402 | 350,745 | 156,277 | 107,544 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends to preferred unitholders | 3,688 | 307 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for common unitholders | $ | 336,848 | $ | 224,095 | $ | 350,745 | $ | 156,277 | $ | 107,544 | |||||||||
| Per Common Unit Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average units outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 117,617 | 82,661 | 79,361 | 79,188 | 53,075 | ||||||||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities(1) | 280 | 298 | — | — | 88 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 117,897 | 82,959 | 79,361 | 79,188 | 53,163 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common unit - basic: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations available for common unitholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.70 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 0.71 | |||||||||
| Discontinued property operations | — | — | — | 0.07 | 1.31 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for common unitholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.70 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.02 | |||||||||
| Earnings per common unit - diluted: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations available for common unitholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.70 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 0.71 | |||||||||
| Discontinued property operations | — | — | — | 0.07 | 1.31 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income available for common unitholders | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.70 | $ | 4.41 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.02 | |||||||||
| Distributions declared per common unit (2) | $ | 3.5325 | $ | 3.3300 | $ | 3.1300 | $ | 2.9600 | $ | 2.8150 | |||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate owned, at cost | $ | 13,336,995 | $ | 13,016,663 | $ | 8,217,579 | $ | 8,071,187 | $ | 7,694,618 | |||||||||
| Real estate assets, net | 11,261,924 | 11,341,862 | 6,718,366 | 6,697,508 | 6,556,303 | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 11,491,919 | 11,604,491 | 6,847,781 | 6,821,778 | 6,835,012 | ||||||||||||||
| Total debt | 4,502,057 | 4,499,712 | 3,427,568 | 3,512,699 | 3,463,239 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Partnership capital and redeemable units | 6,581,977 | 6,649,849 | 3,166,054 | 3,057,703 | 3,118,568 | ||||||||||||||
| Other Data (at end of period): | |||||||||||||||||||
| Number of multifamily properties, including joint venture ownership interest (3) | 302 | 303 | 254 | 268 | 275 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of multifamily units, including joint venture ownership interest (3) | 99,792 | 99,393 | 79,496 | 82,316 | 83,641 |
(1) See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Beginning in 2006, at their regularly scheduled meetings, the Board of Directors began routinely declaring distributions for payment in the following quarter. This can result in distributions declared during a calendar year being different from distributions paid during a calendar year.
(3) Multifamily property and unit totals have not been adjusted to exclude properties held for sale.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of both MAA and the Operating Partnership, of which MAA is the sole general partner and in which MAA owned a 96.4% limited partner interest as of December 31, 2017. MAA conducts all of its business through the Operating Partnership and its various subsidiaries. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
MAA is a multifamily focused, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. We own, operate, acquire and selectively develop apartment communities primarily located in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States. As of December 31, 2017, activities include full ownership and operation of 301 multifamily properties, which includes commercial space at certain properties, four additional commercial properties, and a partial ownership in one multifamily property. These properties are located in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Washington, D.C.
Our primary business objectives are to protect and grow existing property values, to maintain a stable and increasing cash flow that will fund our dividends and distributions through all parts of the real estate investment cycle, and to create shareholder value by growing in a disciplined manner. To achieve these objectives, we intend to continue to pursue the following goals and strategies:
| • | effectively and efficiently operate our existing properties with an intense property and asset management focus and a decentralized structure; |
| • | manage real estate cycles by taking an opportunistic approach to buying, selling, renovating and developing apartment communities; |
| • | diversify investment capital across markets in which we operate to achieve a balanced portfolio with less volatile operating performance; and |
| • | actively manage our capital structure to enhance predictability of earnings to fund our dividends and distributions. |
OVERVIEW
We experienced an increase in net income available for MAA common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 as the growth in revenues outpaced increases in our property operating expenses. The increase in revenues was primarily driven by a 3.0% increase in our Large Market Same Store segment, a 2.6% increase in our Secondary Market Same Store segment and a $375.2 million increase in our Non-Same Store and Other segment, which was primarily a result of the Merger. The increase in property operating expenses was primarily due to a 2.0% increase in our Large Market Same Store segment, a 2.7% increase in our Secondary Market Same Store segment and a $145.1 million increase in our Non-Same Store and Other segment, which was primarily the result of the Merger. The drivers of these increases are discussed below in the "Results of Operations" section.
On December 1, 2016, we consummated the Merger and acquired all of Post Properties' consolidated net assets. The consolidated net assets and results of operations of Post Properties are included in our consolidated financial statements from the closing date of the Merger going forward. All properties acquired from Post Properties are included in our Non-Same Store and Other operating segment, as the properties are recent acquisitions and had not been owned and stabilized for at least twelve months as of January 1, 2017.
Over the past three years, our growth has been driven by our acquisition strategy to invest in large and mid-sized growing markets in the Southeast and Southwest region of the United States. As a result of the Merger, we acquired 61 apartment communities in 2016. We acquired two apartment communities in 2017, five in 2016 apart from the Merger, and seven in 2015. We disposed of five apartment communities in 2017, 12 in 2016, and 21 in 2015.
TRENDS
During the year ended December 31, 2017, demand for apartments continued to be relatively strong, as it was during the year ended December 31, 2016. This strength was evident on two fronts: occupancy and effective rent per unit. Same store physical occupancy at December 31, 2017 was 97%. Average physical occupancy for the same store portfolio was 96.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017, consistent with the year ended December 31, 2016. Same store average effective rent per unit continued to increase, and was up 3.0% for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. As we move through the remainder of the typically slower winter leasing season and into the typically stronger spring leasing season, we believe the current level of physical occupancy puts us in a good position to capture solid pricing in the first half of 2018.
An important part of our portfolio strategy is to maintain a diversity of markets, submarkets, product types and price points across the Southeast and Southwest regions of the United States. This diversity tends to mitigate exposure to economic issues in any one geographic market or area. We believe that a well-balanced portfolio, including inner loop, suburban, and downtown/central business district locations and various monthly rent price points, will perform well in "up" cycles as well as weather "down" cycles better. Through our investment in 37 defined Metropolitan Statistical Areas, or MSAs, we are diversified across markets, urban and suburban submarkets, and a variety of monthly rent pricing points.
Current supply levels are impacting our total portfolio from a demand standpoint, particularly properties located in urban submarkets, the majority of which were acquired in the Merger. Properties in our same store portfolio have been impacted somewhat less by supply, primarily because less new development has occurred in those submarkets. Encouragingly, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, full year 2017 multifamily permitting across our markets was down 5% as compared to the prior year. This activity should result in relatively lower supply in our markets in the future as compared to the current environment.
Demand for our apartments is primarily driven by general economic conditions in our markets. In particular, job growth relative to new supply is a critical factor in our ability to maintain occupancy and increase rents. To the extent that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act results in improving economic conditions such as increased job growth or more disposable income, we believe that we may be able to maintain occupancy more effectively and increase rents.
Also, we believe that more disciplined credit terms for residential mortgages should continue to favor rental demand at existing multifamily properties. Furthermore, rental competition from single family homes has not been a major competitive factor impacting our portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2017, total move outs attributable to single family home
rentals for our combined portfolio represented about 6% of total move outs, in line with the year ended December 31, 2016. We have seen significant rental competition from single family homes in only a few of our submarkets. Long term, we expect demographic trends (including the growth of prime age groups for rentals and immigration and population movement to the Southeast and Southwest regions) will continue to support apartment rental demand in our markets.
Rising interest rates may have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $4.5 billion of debt, of which 17% had variable rate interest and 83% had fixed or hedged interest rates. To the extent interest rates rise, our net interest expense on variable rate debt will increase as will potentially our net interest expense on any debt refinancing. Given the short-term nature of our leases, to the extent interest rates rise due to general economic growth, we would expect increases in interest expense to be somewhat offset by positive leasing trends.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2017 to the Year Ended December 31, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we achieved net income available for MAA common shareholders of $324.7 million, a 53.2% increase over the prior year, and total revenue growth of $403.6 million, a 35.9% increase over the prior year. The following discussion describes the primary drivers of the increase in net income for MAA common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Property Revenues
The following table presents our property revenues by segment for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||
| Large Market Same Store | $ | 672,131 | $ | 652,560 | $ | 19,571 | 3.0 | % | ||||||
| Secondary Market Same Store | 349,007 | 340,161 | 8,846 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||
| Same Store Portfolio | 1,021,138 | 992,721 | 28,417 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||
| Non-Same Store and Other | 507,849 | 132,627 | 375,222 | 282.9 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,528,987 | $ | 1,125,348 | $ | 403,639 | 35.9 | % |
The increases in property revenues from our Large Market Same Store and Secondary Market Same Store portfolio were primarily a result of increased effective rent per unit of 3.1% and 2.7%, respectively, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in property revenues from our Non-Same Store and Other portfolio was primarily the result of the Merger, as we classified the properties we acquired as Non-Same Store.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses include costs for property personnel, building repairs and maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, utilities, landscaping, other operating expenses and depreciation and amortization. The following table reflects our property operating expenses by segment excluding depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||
| Large Market Same Store | $ | 250,056 | $ | 245,266 | $ | 4,790 | 2.0 | % | ||||||
| Secondary Market Same Store | 130,334 | 126,888 | 3,446 | 2.7 | % | |||||||||
| Same Store Portfolio | 380,390 | 372,154 | 8,236 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||
| Non-Same Store and Other | 196,341 | 51,202 | 145,139 | 283.5 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 576,731 | $ | 423,356 | $ | 153,375 | 36.2 | % |
The increase in property operating expenses for our Large Market Same Store segment was primarily the result of increases in real estate taxes of $4.7 million, personnel expenses of $1.0 million, and utilities expense of $0.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in insurance expense of $1.5 million. The increase in property operating expenses for our Secondary Market Same Store segment was primarily driven by increases in real estate taxes of $1.5 million, personnel expenses of $1.3 million, and utilities expense of $0.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in insurance expense of $0.3 million. The increase in property operating expenses for our Non-Same Store and Other portfolio was primarily due to the Merger.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $493.7 million, an increase of $170.8 million from the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition to asset acquisitions made in the normal course of business, the increase was primarily driven by the full year of depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the Merger compared to only one month of comparable depreciation and amortization in 2016. As a result of the Merger, depreciation expense and amortization expense increased $138.2 million and $23.2 million, respectively, for year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
Other Operating Expenses
Property management expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $43.6 million, an increase of $9.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to the growth in our portfolio as a result of the Merger.
Merger and integration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were primarily comprised of $16.0 million of systems and professional costs and $4.0 million of legal costs, as we integrated Post Properties into our consolidated operations. Merger and integration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $20.8 million less than merger and integration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, as we incurred significant merger related expenses in 2016 to complete the Merger on December 1, 2016.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $40.2 million, an increase of $11.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by legal expenses.
Non-Operating Expenses and Other
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $154.8 million, an increase of $24.8 million from the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to increased borrowing as we assumed several loans as a result of the Merger, including a secured loan with a face value of $186.0 million and two unsecured loans with face values of $150.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively. We entered into a new $300.0 million term loan on the closing date of the Merger. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $16.0 million due to these borrowings resulting from the Merger. In addition, in May 2017, we publicly issued senior unsecured notes with a face value of $600.0 million, bearing interest at 3.60% per annum, which resulted in additional interest expense of approximately $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Such increases were offset by a slight decreases in interest expense as a result of retirements of secured property mortgages and unsecured notes during the year ended December 31, 2017; the notes were scheduled to mature in October 2017.
Gains on sale of depreciable assets totaled $127.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of approximately $47.0 million from the year ended December 31, 2016. Although disposition activity decreased year-over-year, the gain on sale of depreciable assets increased primarily due to the nature of the real estate assets sold.
Other non-operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $14.4 million, an increase of approximately $16.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to an $8.8 million increase in the net mark-to-market adjustments of the bifurcated embedded derivative related to the MAA Series I preferred stock issued in the Merger. The year-over-year increase was also driven by the $3.3 million increase in the net gain on debt extinguishment, primarily due to gains of $4.8 million from the write-offs of mark-to-market debt adjustments related to the retirement of secured mortgages and a term loan, partially offset by a cash prepayment penalty of $1.6 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 we recorded quarterly dividend distributions to holders of MAA's Series I preferred stock totaling $3.7 million. As there were no shares of MAA Series I preferred stock issued and outstanding until completion of the Merger on December 1, 2016, preferred dividends only impacted our results of operations for one month totaling $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2016 to the Year Ended December 31, 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we achieved net income available for MAA common shareholders of $211.9 million, a 36.2% decrease over the prior year, and total revenue growth of $82.6 million, a 7.9% increase over the prior year.
The following discussion describes the primary drivers of the decrease in net income for MAA common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015 shows the segment break down based on the 2016 same store portfolios. A comparison using the 2017 same store portfolio would not be comparative due to the nature of the classifications.
Property Revenues
The following table presents our property revenues by segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||
| Large Market Same Store | $ | 642,679 | $ | 612,934 | $ | 29,745 | 4.9 | % | ||||||
| Secondary Market Same Store | 337,883 | 327,700 | 10,183 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||
| Same Store Portfolio | 980,562 | 940,634 | 39,928 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||
| Non-Same Store and Other | 144,786 | 102,145 | 42,641 | 41.7 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,125,348 | $ | 1,042,779 | $ | 82,569 | 7.9 | % |
The increase in property revenues from our same store portfolio was primarily a result of increased effective rent per unit of 4.9% and 2.9% for our large and secondary markets, respectively. The increase in property revenues from our Non-Same Store and Other segment was due to the Merger.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses include costs for property personnel, building repairs and maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, utilities, landscaping, other operating expenses and depreciation and amortization. The following table reflects our property operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization by segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||
| Large Market Same Store | $ | 243,392 | $ | 235,909 | $ | 7,483 | 3.2 | % | ||||||
| Secondary Market Same Store | 125,830 | 123,318 | 2,512 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||
| Same Store Portfolio | 369,222 | 359,227 | 9,995 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||
| Non-Same Store and Other | 54,134 | 41,418 | 12,716 | 30.7 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 423,356 | $ | 400,645 | $ | 22,711 | 5.7 | % |
The increase in property operating expenses from our Large Market Same Store segment was primarily the result of increases in real estate taxes of $5.3 million, personnel expenses of $1.5 million and utilities expenses of $1.2 million. The increase in property operating expenses from our Secondary Market Same Store segment was primarily driven by increases in real estate taxes of $1.3 million. The increase in property operating expenses from our Non-Same Store and Other segment was due to the Merger.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $323.0 million, an increase of $28.4 million, from the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily driven by depreciation expense of $17.4 million related to the Merger. Additionally, the amortization of the fair market value of in-place leases related to the Merger began in December 2016, and totaled $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Other Operating Expenses
Merger and integration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $40.8 million as a result of the expenses associated with the Merger, which closed on December 1, 2016. There were no merger and integration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 as no merger occurred in that year.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $129.9 million, an increase of $7.6 million from the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due in part to decreased amortization of the fair market value of
debt adjustments related to debt acquired and increased interest rates towards the end of 2016. Additionally, we assumed additional debt as a result of the Merger, including a secured loan in the principal amount of $186.0 million and two series of unsecured senior notes with face values of $150.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively. Additionally, we entered into a new $300.0 million term loan on the closing date of the Merger.
We recorded a gain on sale of depreciable assets of $80.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of approximately $109.6 million from the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily the result of a decline in disposition activity year-over-year. Dispositions decreased from 21 multifamily properties for the year ended December 31, 2015, to 12 multifamily properties for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Non-Operating Expenses and Other
Other non-operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.8 million, a decrease of approximately $4.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to the $3.5 million decrease in loss on debt extinguishment due to the 2015 removal of properties from a secured tax-free debt facility; there was an immaterial loss on debt extinguishment activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations, or FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents net income available for MAA common shareholders (computed in accordance with the United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) excluding extraordinary items, asset impairment and gains or losses on disposition of real estate assets, plus net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, depreciation and amortization of real estate, and adjustments for joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis. Because noncontrolling interest is added back, FFO, when used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, represents FFO attributable to the Company.
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other GAAP measurement of performance, as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities as a measure of liquidity. Management believes that FFO is helpful to investors in understanding our operating performance primarily because its calculation excludes depreciation and amortization expense on real estate assets. We believe that GAAP historical cost depreciation of real estate assets is generally not correlated with changes in the value of those assets, whose value does not diminish predictably over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. While our calculation of FFO is in accordance with NAREIT's definition, it may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income available for MAA common shareholders to FFO for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, as we believe net income available for MAA common shareholders is the closest corresponding GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
| Net income available for MAA common shareholders | $ | 324,691 | $ | 211,915 | $ | 332,287 | |||||
| Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets | 489,503 | 319,528 | 291,572 | ||||||||
| Gain on sale of depreciable real estate assets | (127,386 | ) | (80,397 | ) | (189,958 | ) | |||||
| Loss (gain) on disposition within unconsolidated entities | — | 98 | (12 | ) | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets of real estate joint ventures | 596 | 61 | 25 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 12,157 | 12,180 | 18,458 | ||||||||
| Funds from operations attributable to the Company | $ | 699,561 | $ | 463,385 | $ | 452,372 |
FFO for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased by approximately $236.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily as a result of the increases in property revenues of $403.6 million and other non-operating income of $16.2 million, in addition to decreased merger and integration expenses of $20.8 million. The increases to FFO were offset by the impact of increases in property operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, of $153.4 million, interest expense of $24.8 million, general and administrative expenses of $11.2 million, property management expenses of $9.5 million and preferred dividends of $3.4 million.
FFO for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased by approximately $11.0 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of the increase in property revenues of $82.6 million, which was offset by increases in merger and integration expenses of $40.8 million, property operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, of $22.7 million, general and administrative expenses of $3.3 million and property management expenses of $3.1 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities, as well as general economic and market conditions, are the principal factors affecting our liquidity and capital resources.
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased to $658.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $484.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of twelve months of operating results of Post Properties for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to one month of operating results for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $283.4 million compared to net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $710.5 million. The primary drivers of the change were as follows:
| Primary drivers of cash inflow (outflow) | Increase (Decrease) in Net Cash | Percentage Increase (Decrease) in Net Cash | ||||||||||||
| during the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Purchases of real estate and other assets | $ | (136,065 | ) | $ | (339,186 | ) | $ | 203,121 | 59.9 | % | ||||
| Capital improvements, development and other | (343,890 | ) | (183,977 | ) | (159,913 | ) | (86.9 | )% | ||||||
| Proceeds from disposition of real estate assets | 187,429 | 296,700 | (109,271 | ) | (36.8 | )% | ||||||||
| Return (funding) of escrow for future acquisitions | 10,591 | (58,259 | ) | 68,850 | 118.2 | % | ||||||||
| Acquisition of Post Properties, net of cash acquired | — | (427,764 | ) | 427,764 | (100.0 | )% |
The decrease in cash outflows for purchases of real estate and other assets resulted from the acquisition of two apartment communities during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the acquisition of five apartment communities during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash outflows for capital improvements, development and other during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year resulted from the property portfolio increase and development pipeline increase as a result of the Merger. The decrease in proceeds from the disposition of real estate assets primarily resulted from the sale of five apartment communities and four land parcels during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the sale of 12 apartment communities, one commercial property, and three land parcels during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash inflows from the funding of escrow for future acquisitions resulted from the funding of three anticipated future 1031(b) transactions offset by the release of three 1031(b) transactions that never occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the funding of one anticipated future 1031(b) transaction during the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in cash outflows for the acquisition of Post Properties, net of cash acquired, compared to prior year resulted from the completion of the Merger; there were no mergers during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Financing Activities
Net cash used by financing activities was $397.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $222.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The primary drivers of the change were as follows:
| Primary drivers of cash inflow (outflow) | Increase (Decrease) in Net Cash | Percentage Increase (Decrease) in Net Cash | ||||||||||||
| during the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Net change in credit lines | $ | (160,000 | ) | $ | 335,000 | $ | (495,000 | ) | (147.8 | )% | ||||
| Proceeds from notes payable | 597,480 | 300,000 | 297,480 | 99.2 | % | |||||||||
| Principal payments on notes payable | (413,557 | ) | (146,026 | ) | (267,531 | ) | (183.2 | )% | ||||||
| Dividends paid on common shares | (395,294 | ) | (247,652 | ) | (147,642 | ) | (59.6 | )% |
The decrease in cash outflows related to the net change in credit lines resulted from the decrease in net borrowings of $80.0 million on our unsecured revolving credit facility and $80.0 million on our secured credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to an increase in net borrowings of $415.0 million on the unsecured revolving credit facility and a decrease of $80.0 million on the secured credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in proceeds from notes payable during the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the May 2017 issuance of $600.0 million senior unsecured notes, as discussed in Note 6, compared to the 2016 issuance of the unsecured term loan in the amount of $300.0 million. The increase in cash outflows from principal payments on notes payable primarily resulted from paying off approximately $233.6 million of secured property mortgages and $168.0 million of senior unsecured notes during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to paying off the $140.0 million legacy Post Properties' line of credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash outflows from dividends paid on common shares primarily resulted from the increased number of common shares outstanding as a result of the Merger and the increase in the annual dividend rate to $3.48 per share during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the dividend rate of $3.28 per share during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Equity
As of December 31, 2017, MAA owned 113,643,166 OP Units, comprising a 96.4% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, while the remaining 4,191,586 outstanding OP Units were held by third party limited partners of the Operating Partnership. Holders of OP Units (other than MAA and its corporate affiliates) may require us to redeem their OP Units from time to time, in which case MAA may, at its option, pay the redemption price either in cash (in an amount per OP Unit equal, in general, to the average closing price of MAA's common stock on the NYSE over a specified period prior to the redemption date) or by delivering one share of MAA's common stock (subject to adjustment under specified circumstances) for each OP Unit so redeemed. In addition, MAA has registered under the Securities Act the 4,191,586 shares of its common stock, that as of December 31, 2017, were issuable upon redemption of OP Units, so that those shares can be sold freely in the public markets.
For more information regarding our equity capital resources, see Note 9 and Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Debt
The following schedule outlines our fixed and variable rate debt, including the impact of our interest rate swaps and cap, outstanding as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Principal Balance | Average Years to Maturity | Effective Rate | |||||||
| Unsecured debt | |||||||||
| Fixed rate or swapped | $ | 2,842,000 | 5.5 | 3.8 | % | ||||
| Variable rate | 710,000 | 0.1 | 2.4 | % | |||||
| Fair market value adjustments, debt issuance costs and discounts | (26,235 | ) | |||||||
| Total unsecured rate maturity | $ | 3,525,765 | 4.9 | 3.5 | % | ||||
| Secured debt | |||||||||
| Conventional - fixed rate or swapped | $ | 882,752 | 1.8 | 4.0 | % | ||||
| Conventional - variable rate - capped (1) | 25,000 | 0.1 | 1.8 | % | |||||
| Total fixed or hedged rate maturity | $ | 907,752 | 1.7 | 3.9 | % | ||||
| Conventional - variable rate | 55,000 | 0.1 | 1.8 | % | |||||
| Fair market value adjustments and debt issuance costs | 13,540 | ||||||||
| Total secured rate maturity | $ | 976,292 | 1.6 | 3.8 | % | ||||
| Total debt | $ | 4,502,057 | 3.9 | 3.6 | % | ||||
| Total fixed or hedged debt | $ | 3,737,763 | 4.7 | 3.8 | % |
| (1) | The effective rate represents the average rate on the underlying variable debt unless the cap rate of 4.5% of the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, is reached. |
As of December 31, 2017, we had entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $550.0 million related to issued debt. To date, these swaps have proven to be highly effective hedges. We had also entered into an interest rate cap agreement totaling a notional amount of $25.0 million as of December 31, 2017.
The following schedule outlines the contractual maturity dates of our outstanding debt, net of fair market value adjustments, debt issuance costs and discounts, as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Key Bank Unsecured Credit Facility | Public Bonds | Other Unsecured | Secured | Total | |||||||||||||||
| 2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 300,261 | $ | 118,658 | $ | 418,919 | |||||||||
| 2019 | — | — | 19,967 | 559,378 | 579,345 | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 410,000 | — | 149,773 | 163,054 | 722,827 | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | — | — | 222,091 | 124,711 | 346,802 | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | — | 248,144 | 415,798 | — | 663,942 | ||||||||||||||
| Thereafter | — | 1,727,590 | 32,141 | 10,491 | 1,770,222 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 410,000 | $ | 1,975,734 | $ | 1,140,031 | $ | 976,292 | $ | 4,502,057 |
The following schedule outlines the interest rate maturities of our outstanding fixed or hedged debt, net of fair market value adjustments, debt issuance costs and discounts, as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
| Fixed Rate Debt | Interest Rate Swaps | Total Fixed Rate Balances | Contract Rate | Interest Rate Cap | Total Fixed or Hedged | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | $ | 88,633 | $ | 250,286 | $ | 338,919 | 3.1 | % | $ | 25,000 | $ | 363,919 | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 579,345 | — | 579,345 | 5.9 | % | — | 579,345 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 163,054 | 299,148 | 462,202 | 3.7 | % | — | 462,202 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 197,281 | — | 197,281 | 5.2 | % | — | 197,281 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 364,794 | — | 364,794 | 3.6 | % | — | 364,794 | ||||||||||||||||
| Thereafter | 1,770,222 | — | 1,770,222 | 3.7 | % | — | 1,770,222 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,163,329 | $ | 549,434 | $ | 3,712,763 | 4.0 | % | $ | 25,000 | $ | 3,737,763 |
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
On October 15, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility agreement with a syndicate of banks led by KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, and fourteen other banks, the KeyBank Facility. The KeyBank Facility replaced our Operating Partnership's previous unsecured credit facility with KeyBank. The interest rate is determined using an investment grade pricing grid using LIBOR plus a spread of 0.85% to 1.55%. On December 1, 2016, the Operating Partnership amended the KeyBank Facility by increasing the borrowing capacity from $750.0 million to $1.0 billion. As of December 31, 2017, we had $410.0 million borrowed under the KeyBank Facility, bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.90%. The KeyBank Facility serves as our primary source of short-term liquidity and has an accordion feature that we may use to expand its capacity to $1.5 billion. This facility matures on April 15, 2020, with an option to extend for an additional six months.
Senior Unsecured Notes
We have also issued both public and private unsecured notes. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $2.0 billion (face value) of publicly issued notes and $292.0 million of unsecured notes issued in two private placements. In October 2013, we publicly issued $350.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2023 with a coupon of 4.30%, paid semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. In June 2014, we publicly issued $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2024 with a coupon of 3.75%, paid semi-annually on June 15 and December 15. In November 2015, we publicly issued $400.0 million senior unsecured notes due 2025 with a coupon of 4.00%, paid semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. As a result of the Merger in December 2016, we assumed two series of publicly issued senior notes totaling $400.0 million. One series of senior notes assumed as a result of the Merger has a face value of $250.0 million, is due 2022, and has a coupon of 3.38% paid semi-annually on June 1 and December 1. The other series of senior notes assumed as a result of the Merger had a face value of $150.0 million and was due in October 2017, but was paid off in July 2017. In May 2017, we publicly issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes due June 1, 2027 with a coupon of 3.60%, paid semi-annually on June 1 and December 1. The proceeds from the senior unsecured notes issued in May 2017 were used to pay down outstanding amounts of the Key Bank Facility. As of December 31, 2017, all of these amounts, with the exception of the series of senior unsecured notes assumed in the Merger with a face value of $150.0 million that was paid off in July 2017, remained outstanding.
In July 2011, we issued $135.0 million of senior unsecured notes. The notes were offered and sold in a private placement with three maturity tranches: $50.0 million at 4.7% maturing on July 29, 2018, $72.8 million at 5.4% maturing on July 29, 2021; and $12.3 million at 5.6% maturing on July 29, 2023; all of which were outstanding at December 31, 2017. On August 31, 2012, we issued $175.0 million of senior unsecured notes. The notes were offered and sold in a private placement with four tranches: $18.0 million at 3.15% maturing on November 30, 2017; $20.0 million at 3.61% maturing on November 30, 2019; $117.0 million at 4.17% maturing on November 30, 2022; and $20.0 million at 4.33% maturing on November 30, 2024. The $18 million tranche was paid off on its maturity date. The remaining tranches were outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
Unsecured Term Loans
In addition to the KeyBank Facility, we maintain four unsecured term loans. We had total borrowings of $850.0 million outstanding under these term loan agreements at December 31, 2017, comprised of:
A $250.0 million term loan with Wells Fargo, N.A., or Wells Fargo, that bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 0.90% to 1.90% based on the credit ratings of our unsecured debt. The loan matures on August 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, this loan was bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.98%.
A $150.0 million term loan with U.S. Bank National Association, or U.S. Bank, that bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 0.90% to 1.90% based on the credit ratings of our unsecured debt. The loan matures on March 1, 2020. As of December 31, 2017, this loan was bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.98%.
A $150.0 million term loan with Key Bank that bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 0.90% to 1.75% based on the credit ratings of our unsecured debt. The loan matures on March 1, 2021. As of December 31, 2017, this loan was bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.95%.
A $300.0 million term loan with Wells Fargo that bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 0.90% to 1.75% based on the credit ratings of our unsecured debt. The loan matures on March 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2017, this loan was bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.95%.
Secured Property Mortgages
We also maintain secured property mortgages with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and various life insurance companies. These mortgages are usually fixed rate and can range from five to ten years in maturity. As of December 31, 2017, we had $882.8 million of secured property mortgages.
Secured Credit Facility
Approximately 1.8% of our outstanding obligations at December 31, 2017 were borrowed through a credit facility with Prudential Mortgage Capital, which is credit enhanced by Fannie Mae, or the Fannie Mae Facility. The Fannie Mae Facility has a combined line limit of $80.0 million, of which $80.0 million was collateralized, available to borrow, and borrowed, at December 31, 2017. The Fannie Mae Facility matures in 2018.
For more information regarding our debt capital resources, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects our total contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017, which consist of our long-term debt, development fees and operating leases (dollars in thousands):
| Contractual Obligations (1) | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt obligations (2) | $ | 428,942 | $ | 570,114 | $ | 718,281 | $ | 342,903 | $ | 668,401 | $ | 1,786,111 | $ | 4,514,752 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate or swapped interest (3) | 145,867 | 113,339 | 98,021 | 89,454 | 82,771 | 196,190 | 725,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase obligations (4) | 672 | — | — | — | — | — | 672 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations (5) | 882 | 724 | 708 | 718 | 733 | 62,788 | 66,553 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 576,363 | $ | 684,177 | $ | 817,010 | $ | 433,075 | $ | 751,905 | $ | 2,045,089 | $ | 5,307,619 |
(1) Fixed rate and swapped interest are reflected in this table. The average interest rates of variable rate debt are presented in preceding tables.
(2) Represents principal payments gross of discounts, debt issuance costs and fair market value adjustments of debt assumed.
(3) Swapped interest is subject to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4) Represents development fees.
(5) Primarily comprised of a ground lease underlying one apartment community we own.
We have a commitment, which is not reflected in the table above, to make additional capital contributions to a limited partnership in which we hold an equity interest. The capital contributions may be called by the general partner at any time until September 2022 after giving appropriate notice. At December 31, 2017, we had committed to make additional capital contributions totaling up to $13.5 million if and when called by the general partner of the limited partnership and prior to September 2022.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, and 2016, we did not have any relationships, including those with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
As of December 31, 2017, we had a 35.0% ownership interest in a limited liability company, which owns one apartment community comprised of 269 units, located in Washington, D.C. We also had a 31.0% ownership interest in a limited partnership. Our interests in these investments are unconsolidated and are recorded using the equity method for the investments as we do not have a controlling interest.
In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. We do not have any relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationships with us or our related parties other than those disclosed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
INSURANCE
We carry comprehensive general liability coverage on our communities, with limits of liability we believe are customary within the multifamily apartment industry, to insure against liability claims and related defense costs. We also maintain insurance against the risk of direct physical damage to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property, including loss of rental income during the reconstruction period.
We renegotiated our primary insurance programs effective July 1, 2017. We believe that the current property and casualty insurance program in place provides appropriate insurance coverage for financial protection against insurable risks such that any insurable loss experienced that can be reasonably anticipated would not have a significant impact on our liquidity, financial position or results of operation.
INFLATION
Our resident leases at our apartment communities allow, at the time of renewal, for adjustments in the rent payable thereunder, and thus may enable us to seek rent increases. Almost all leases are for one year or less. The short-term nature of these leases generally serves to reduce our risk to adverse effects of inflation.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to our financial condition and results of operations and that involves some degree of uncertainty. The preceding discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other factors and circumstances. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
We believe that the estimates and assumptions listed below are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations because they require the greatest subjective determinations and form the basis of accounting policies deemed to be most critical.
Acquisition of real estate assets
We account for our acquisitions of investments in real estate as asset acquisitions in accordance with ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which requires the cost of the of the real estate acquired to be allocated to the individual acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements and other, and identified intangible assets, consisting of the value of in-place leases and other contracts, on a relative fair value basis. In calculating the total asset value of acquired tangible assets, management uses stabilized net operating income, or NOI, and market specific capitalization and discount rates. Management analyzed historical stabilized NOI to determine its estimate for forecasted NOI. Management estimates the market capitalization rate by analyzing the market capitalization rates for properties with comparable ages in similarly sized markets. Management then allocates the purchase price of the asset acquisition based on the relative fair value of the individual components as a proportion of the total assets acquired.
Impairment of long-lived assets
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of accounting standards for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. We periodically evaluate long-lived assets, including investments in real estate, for indicators that would suggest that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The judgments regarding the existence of such indicators are based on factors such as operating performance, market conditions and legal factors. Long-lived assets, such as real estate assets, equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, which is estimated by analyzing historical cash flows of the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. We calculate the fair value of an asset by dividing historical operating cash flows by a market capitalization rate. We estimate the market capitalization rate by analyzing the market capitalization rates for properties with comparable ages in similarly sized markets. No material impairment losses have been recognized
during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Cost capitalization
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures that materially enhance the value of an existing asset or substantially extend the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as incurred. Therefore, repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred while significant improvements, renovations, and replacements are capitalized. The cost to complete any deferred repairs and maintenance at properties acquired by us in order to elevate the condition of the property to our standards are capitalized as incurred. The carrying costs related to development projects, including interest, property taxes, insurance and allocated direct development salary cost during the construction period, are capitalized. Management uses judgment in determining whether costs should be expensed or capitalized. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional detail.
Loss contingencies
The outcomes of claims, disputes and legal proceedings are subject to significant uncertainty. We record an accrual for loss contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We review these accruals quarterly and make revisions based on changes in facts and circumstances. When a loss contingency is not both probable and reasonably estimable, then we do not accrue the loss. However, for material loss contingencies, if the unrecorded loss (or an additional loss in excess of the accrual) is at least a reasonable possibility and material, then we disclose a reasonable estimate of the possible loss, or range of loss, if such reasonable estimate can be made. If we cannot make a reasonable estimate of the possible loss, or range of loss, then that is disclosed.
The assessment of whether a loss is probable or a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or range of loss is reasonably estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Among the factors that we consider in this assessment, including with respect to the matters disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are the nature of existing legal proceedings and claims, the asserted or possible damages or loss contingency (if reasonably estimable), the progress of the matter, existing law and precedent, the opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisers, our experience in similar matters, the facts available to us at the time of assessment, and how we intend to respond, or have responded, to the proceeding or claim. Our assessment of these factors may change over time as individual proceedings or claims progress. For matters where we are not currently able to reasonably estimate a range of reasonably possible loss, the factors that have contributed to this determination include the following: (i) the damages sought are indeterminate; (ii) the proceedings are in the early stages; (iii) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories or a large or uncertain number of actual or potential cases or parties; and/or (iv) discussions with the parties in matters that are expected ultimately to be resolved through negotiation and settlement have not reached the point where we believe a reasonable estimate of loss, or range of loss, can be made. In such instances, we believe that there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss or business impact, if any.
For more information regarding our significant accounting policies, including a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a material impact on our financial statements, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. Our primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates on our borrowings. At December 31, 2017, 27.5% of our total capitalization consisted of borrowings. Our interest rate risk objective is to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve this objective, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates for borrowings through the use of fixed rate debt instruments and interest rate swaps and caps, which mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument and effectively fix or cap the interest rate on a portion of our variable debt or on future refinancings. We use our best efforts to have our debt instruments mature across multiple years, which we believe limits our exposure to interest rate changes in any one year. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. At December 31, 2017, approximately 83.0% of our outstanding debt was subject to fixed or capped rates after considering related derivative instruments We regularly review interest rate exposure on outstanding borrowings in an effort to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For our interest rate swaps and cap, the table presents the notional amount of the swaps and cap and the years in which they expire. Weighted average variable rates are based on rates in effect at the reporting date (dollars in thousands).
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Total Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | $ | 98,942 | $ | 570,114 | $ | 158,281 | $ | 192,903 | $ | 368,401 | $ | 1,786,111 | $ | 3,174,752 | $ | 3,289,428 | |||||||||||||||
| Average interest rate | 4.06 | % | 4.43 | % | 4.40 | % | 5.19 | % | 3.63 | % | 3.88 | % | 4.06 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable rate (1) | $ | 55,000 | $ | — | $ | 560,000 | $ | 150,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 765,000 | $ | 1,346,309 | |||||||||||||||
| Average interest rate | 1.76 | % | — | % | 2.43 | % | 2.31 | % | — | % | — | % | 2.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable to fixed | $ | 550,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 550,000 | $ | 2,235 | |||||||||||||||
| Average pay rate | 2.00 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable to fixed | $ | 25,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25,000 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
| Average pay rate | 4.50 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | 4.50 | % |
(1) Excluding the effect of interest rate swap and cap agreements.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The consolidated financial statements and related financial information required to be filed are set forth on pages F-1 to F-55 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
MAA is required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures, within the meaning of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. MAA's management, with the participation of MAA’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of MAA's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on that evaluation, MAA’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by MAA in its Exchange Act filings is accurately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and
is accumulated and communicated to MAA's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
MAA's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting within the meaning of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. MAA's management, with the participation of MAA's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of MAA's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on the framework specified in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, MAA's management concluded that MAA's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on MAA’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change to MAA’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation by MAA’s management referred to above that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, MAA’s internal control over financial reporting.
Mid-America Apartments, L.P.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Operating Partnership is required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures, within the meaning of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Management of the Operating Partnership, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAA, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAA, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in its in Exchange Act filings is accurately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Operating Partnership's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAA, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Operating Partnership is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15. Management of the Operating Partnership, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAA, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on the framework specified in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, management of the Operating Partnership has concluded that the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. An attestation report of the independent registered public accounting firm of the Operating Partnership will not be required as long as the Operating Partnership is a non-accelerated filer.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change to the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation by the Operating Partnership’s management referred to above that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information contained in MAA's 2018 Proxy Statement in the sections entitled "Information About The Board of Directors and Its Committees", "Proposal 1 - Election of Directors", "Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 10.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct applicable to all officers, directors and employees, which can be found on our website at http://www.maac.com, on the For Investors page in the "Governance Documents" section under "Corporate Overview". We will provide a copy of this document to any person, without charge, upon request, by writing to the Legal Department at MAA, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, TN 38138. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct by posting such information on our website at the address and the locations specified above. Reference to our website does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the site and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information contained in MAA's 2018 Proxy Statement in the sections entitled "Executive Compensation", "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 11.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information contained in MAA's 2018 Proxy Statement in the sections entitled "Security Ownership of Management" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners," is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 12.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information contained in MAA's 2018 Proxy Statement in the sections entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Information About The Board of Directors and Its Committees" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 13.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The information contained in MAA's 2018 Proxy Statement in the section entitled "Proposal 4 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm," is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 14.
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
- This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAA or MAALP, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filings.
| (b) | Exhibits: See Item 15(a)(3) above. |
| (c) | Financial Statement Schedule: See Item 15(a)(2) above. |
Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| MID-AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ H. Eric Bolton, Jr. |
| H. Eric Bolton, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ H. Eric Bolton, Jr. |
| H. Eric Bolton, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Albert M. Campbell, III |
| Albert M. Campbell, III Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ A. Clay Holder |
| A. Clay Holder Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Russell R. French |
| Russell R. French Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Alan B. Graf, Jr. |
| Alan B. Graf, Jr. Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Toni Jennings |
| Toni Jennings Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ James K. Lowder |
| James K. Lowder Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Thomas H. Lowder |
| Thomas H. Lowder Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Monica McGurk |
| Monica McGurk Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Claude B. Nielsen |
| Claude B. Nielsen Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Philip W. Norwood |
| Philip W. Norwood Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ W. Reid Sanders |
| W. Reid Sanders Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Gary Shorb |
| Gary Shorb Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ David P. Stockert |
| David P. Stockert Director |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| MID-AMERICA APARTMENTS, L.P. | ||
| a Tennessee Limited Partnership | ||
| By: Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., its general partner | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ H. Eric Bolton, Jr. |
| H. Eric Bolton, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant as an officer or director of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., in its capacity as the general partner of the registrant and on the dates indicated.
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ H. Eric Bolton, Jr. |
| H. Eric Bolton, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Albert M. Campbell, III |
| Albert M. Campbell, III Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ A. Clay Holder |
| A. Clay Holder Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Russell R. French |
| Russell R. French Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Alan B. Graf, Jr. |
| Alan B. Graf, Jr. Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Toni Jennings |
| Toni Jennings Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ James K. Lowder |
| James K. Lowder Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Thomas H. Lowder |
| Thomas H. Lowder Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Monica McGurk |
| Monica McGurk Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Claude B. Nielsen |
| Claude B. Nielsen Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Philip W. Norwood |
| Philip W. Norwood Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ W. Reid Sanders |
| W. Reid Sanders Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ Gary Shorb |
| Gary Shorb Director | ||
| Date: | February 22, 2018 | /s/ David P. Stockert |
| David P. Stockert Director |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 22, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.
Memphis, Tennessee
February 22, 2018
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Par
Showing the first 8K of 295K characters. Open the full section