Marathon Petroleum 10-K 2022-12-31
Filed 2023-02-23. 21 sections, 642K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
OR
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-35054
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 27-1284632 | |||||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(419) 422-2121
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
| Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act | ||||||||
| Title of each class | Trading symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
| Common Stock, par value $.01 | MPC | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large Accelerated Filer ☑ Accelerated Filer ☐ Non-accelerated Filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2022 was approximately $42.1 billion. This amount is based on the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2022. Shares of Common Stock held by executive officers and directors of the registrant are not included in the computation. The registrant, solely for the purpose of this required presentation, has deemed its directors and executive officers to be affiliates.
There were 445,546,907 shares of Marathon Petroleum Corporation Common Stock outstanding as of February 16, 2023.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement relating to its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are incorporated by reference to the extent set forth in Part III, Items 10-14 of this Report.
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, all references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “MPC,” “us,” “our,” “we” or the “Company” mean Marathon Petroleum Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Glossary of Terms
Throughout this report, the following company or industry specific terms and abbreviations are used:
| ANS | Alaska North Slope crude oil, an oil index benchmark price | ||||
| ASC | Accounting Standards Codification | ||||
| ASU | Accounting Standards Update | ||||
| ATB | Articulated tug barges | ||||
| barrel | One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons. | ||||
| CARB | California Air Resources Board | ||||
| CARBOB | California Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending | ||||
| CBOB | Conventional Blending for Oxygenate Blending | ||||
| EBITDA | Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (a non-GAAP financial measure) | ||||
| EPA | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
| ESG | Environmental, social and governance | ||||
| GAAP | Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States | ||||
| GHG | Greenhouse gas | ||||
| LCFS | Low Carbon Fuel Standard | ||||
| LCM | Lower of cost or market | ||||
| LIFO | Last in, first out | ||||
| LLS | Louisiana Light Sweet crude oil, an oil index benchmark price | ||||
| mbbls | Thousands of barrels | ||||
| mbpd | Thousand barrels per day | ||||
| mbpcd | Thousand barrels per calendar day | ||||
| MEH | Magellan East Houston crude oil, an oil index benchmark price | ||||
| MMcf/d | One million cubic feet of natural gas per day | ||||
| MMBtu | One million British thermal units | ||||
| NGL | Natural gas liquids, such as ethane, propane, butanes and natural gasoline | ||||
| NYMEX | New York Mercantile Exchange | ||||
| NYSE | New York Stock Exchange | ||||
| OSHA | U. S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration | ||||
| OTC | Over-the-Counter | ||||
| PP&E | Property, plant and equipment | ||||
| RFS2 | Revised Renewable Fuel Standard program, as required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 | ||||
| RIN | Renewable Identification Number | ||||
| SEC | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | ||||
| SOFR | Secured overnight financing rate | ||||
| STAR | South Texas Asset Repositioning | ||||
| ULSD | Ultra-low sulfur diesel | ||||
| USGC | U.S. Gulf Coast | ||||
| UST | Underground storage tank | ||||
| VIE | Variable interest entity | ||||
| VPP | Voluntary Protection Program | ||||
| WTI | West Texas Intermediate crude oil, an oil index benchmark price |
Disclosures Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 3. Legal Proceedings, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, contingencies or uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “commitment,” “could,” “design,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “opportunity,” “outlook,” “plan,” “policy,” “position,” “potential,” “predict,” “priority,” “project,” “prospective,” “pursue,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding:
-
future financial and operating results;
-
ESG goals and targets, including those related to GHG emissions, diversity and inclusion and ESG reporting;
-
our plans to achieve our ESG goals and targets and to monitor and report progress thereon;
-
future levels of capital, environmental or maintenance expenditures, general and administrative and other expenses;
-
expected savings from the restructuring or reorganization of business components;
-
the success or timing of completion of ongoing or anticipated maintenance projects or transactions;
-
business strategies, growth opportunities and expected investments;
-
consumer demand for refined products, natural gas, renewables and NGLs;
-
the timing, amount and form of future capital return transactions at MPC or MPLX; and
-
the anticipated effects of actions of third parties such as competitors, activist investors, federal, foreign, state or local regulatory authorities, or plaintiffs in litigation.
Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not rely unduly on them, as they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. Material differences between actual results and any future performance suggested in our forward-looking statements could result from a variety of factors, including the following:
-
general economic, political or regulatory developments, including inflation, changes in governmental policies relating to refined petroleum products, crude oil, natural gas, NGLs or renewables, or taxation;
-
further impairments;
-
the regional, national and worldwide availability and pricing of refined products, crude oil, natural gas, renewables, NGLs and other feedstocks;
-
disruptions in credit markets or changes to credit ratings;
-
the adequacy of capital resources and liquidity, including availability, timing and amounts of free cash flow necessary to execute business plans and to effect any share repurchases or to maintain or increase the dividend;
-
the potential effects of judicial or other proceedings on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;
-
volatility in or degradation of general economic, market, industry or business conditions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, other infectious disease outbreaks, natural hazards, extreme weather events, the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, other conflicts, inflation, rising interest rates or otherwise;
-
compliance with federal and state environmental, economic, health and safety, energy and other policies and regulations or enforcement actions initiated thereunder;
-
adverse market conditions or other risks affecting MPLX;
-
refining industry overcapacity or under capacity;
-
changes in producer customers’ drilling plans or in volumes of throughput of crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, refined products, other hydrocarbon-based products or renewables;
-
non-payment or non-performance by our customers;
-
changes in the cost or availability of third-party vessels, pipelines, railcars and other means of transportation for crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, feedstocks, refined products and renewables;
-
the price, availability and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative-fuel vehicles and laws mandating such fuels or vehicles;
-
political and economic conditions in nations that consume refined products, natural gas, renewables and NGLs, including the United States and Mexico, and in crude oil producing regions, including the Middle East, Russia, Africa, Canada and South America;
-
actions taken by our competitors, including pricing adjustments, the expansion and retirement of refining capacity and the expansion and retirement of pipeline capacity, processing, fractionation and treating facilities in response to market conditions;
-
completion of pipeline projects within the United States;
-
changes in fuel and utility costs for our facilities;
-
accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our refineries, machinery, pipelines, processing, fractionation and treating facilities or equipment, means of transportation, or those of our suppliers or customers;
-
acts of war, terrorism or civil unrest that could impair our ability to produce refined products, receive feedstocks or to gather, process, fractionate or transport crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, refined products or renewables;
-
political pressure and influence of environmental groups and other stakeholders upon policies and decisions related to the production, gathering, refining, processing, fractionation, transportation and marketing of crude oil or other feedstocks, refined products, natural gas, NGLs or other hydrocarbon-based products or renewables;
-
labor and material shortages;
-
our ability to successfully achieve our ESG goals and targets within the expected timeframe, if at all;
-
the costs, disruption and diversion of management’s attention associated with campaigns commenced by activist investors;
-
personnel changes; and
-
the other factors described in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by applicable law.
PART I
Item 1. Business
OVERVIEW
Marathon Petroleum Corporation (“MPC”) has 135 years of history in the energy business, and is a leading, integrated, downstream energy company. We operate the nation's largest refining system with approximately 2.9 million barrels per day of crude oil refining capacity and believe we are one of the largest wholesale suppliers of gasoline and distillates to resellers in the United States. We distribute our refined products through one of the largest terminal operations in the United States and one of the largest private domestic fleets of inland petroleum product barges. In addition, our integrated midstream energy asset network links producers of natural gas and NGLs from some of the largest supply basins in the United States to domestic and international markets.
Our operations consist of two reportable operating segments: Refining & Marketing and Midstream. Each of these segments is organized and managed based upon the nature of the products and services it offers.
-
Refining & Marketing – refines crude oil and other feedstocks, including renewable feedstocks, at our refineries in the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent and West Coast regions of the United States, purchases refined products and ethanol for resale and distributes refined products, including renewable diesel, through transportation, storage, distribution and marketing services provided largely by our Midstream segment. We sell refined products to wholesale marketing customers domestically and internationally, to buyers on the spot market, to independent entrepreneurs who operate primarily Marathon® branded outlets and through long-term supply contracts with direct dealers who operate locations mainly under the ARCO® brand.
-
Midstream – transports, stores, distributes and markets crude oil and refined products principally for the Refining & Marketing segment via refining logistics assets, pipelines, terminals, towboats and barges; gathers, processes and transports natural gas; and gathers, transports, fractionates, stores and markets NGLs. The Midstream segment primarily reflects the results of MPLX LP (“MPLX”). MPLX is a diversified, large-cap master limited partnership (“MLP”) formed in 2012 that owns and operates midstream energy infrastructure and logistics assets and provides fuels distribution services. As of December 31, 2022, we owned the general partner of MPLX and approximately 65 percent of the outstanding MPLX common units.
Corporate History and Structure
MPC was incorporated in Delaware on November 9, 2009 in connection with an internal restructuring of Marathon Oil Corporation (“Marathon Oil”). On May 25, 2011, the Marathon Oil board of directors approved the spinoff of its Refining, Marketing & Transportation Business into an independent, publicly traded company, MPC, through the distribution of MPC common stock to the stockholders of Marathon Oil on June 30, 2011. Our common stock trades on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “MPC.”
On October 1, 2018, we acquired Andeavor. Andeavor shareholders received in the aggregate approximately 239.8 million shares of MPC common stock valued at $19.8 billion and $3.5 billion in cash. Andeavor was a highly integrated marketing, logistics and refining company operating primarily in the Western and Mid-Continent United States. Our acquisition of Andeavor in 2018 substantially increased our geographic diversification and the scale of our assets, which provides increased opportunities to optimize our system.
On May 14, 2021, we completed the sale of Speedway, our company-owned and operated retail transportation fuel and convenience store business, to 7-Eleven, Inc. (“7-Eleven”) for cash proceeds of $21.38 billion ($17.22 billion after cash-tax payments). This transaction resulted in a pretax gain of $11.68 billion ($8.02 billion after income taxes), after deducting the book value of the net assets and certain other adjustments.
OUR OPERATIONS
Refining & Marketing
Refineries
We currently own and operate refineries in the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent and West Coast regions of the United States with an aggregate crude oil refining capacity of 2,898 mbpcd. During 2022, our refineries processed 2,761 mbpd of crude oil and 190 mbpd of other charge and blendstocks. During 2021, our refineries processed 2,621 mbpd of crude oil and 178 mbpd of other charge and blendstocks.
Our refineries include crude oil atmospheric and vacuum distillation, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, catalytic reforming, coking, desulfurization and sulfur recovery units. The refineries process a wide variety of condensate and light and heavy crude oils purchased from various domestic and foreign suppliers. We produce numerous refined products, ranging from transportation fuels, such as reformulated gasolines, blend-grade gasolines intended for blending with ethanol and ULSD fuel, to heavy fuel oil
and asphalt. Additionally, we manufacture NGLs and petrochemicals and propane. See the Refined Product Marketing section for further information about the products we produce.
Our refineries are integrated with each other via pipelines, terminals and barges to maximize operating efficiency. The transportation links that connect our refineries allow the movement of intermediate products between refineries to optimize operations, produce higher margin products and efficiently utilize our processing capacity. Also, shipping intermediate products between facilities during partial refinery shutdowns allows us to utilize processing capacity that is not directly affected by the shutdown work.
Following is a description of each of our refineries and their capacity by region.
Gulf Coast Region (1,189 mbpcd)
Garyville, Louisiana Refinery (596 mbpcd)
Our Garyville refinery, which is one of the largest refineries in the U.S., is located along the Mississippi River in southeastern Louisiana between New Orleans, Louisiana and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The Garyville refinery is configured to process a wide variety of crude oils into gasoline, distillates, NGLs and petrochemicals, heavy fuel oil, asphalt and propane. The refinery has access to the export market and multiple options to sell refined products. Our Garyville refinery has earned designation as an OSHA VPP Star site.
Galveston Bay, Texas City, Texas Refinery (593 mbpcd)
Our Galveston Bay refinery is a combination of our former Texas City refinery and Galveston Bay refinery. The refinery is located on the Texas Gulf Coast southeast of Houston, Texas and can process a wide variety of crude oils into gasoline, distillates, NGLs and petrochemicals, heavy fuel oil and propane. The refinery has access to the export market and multiple options to sell refined products. Our cogeneration facility, which supplies the Galveston Bay refinery, currently has 1,055 megawatts of electrical production capacity and can produce 4.3 million pounds of steam per hour. Approximately 48 percent of the power generated in 2022 was used at the refinery, with the remaining electricity being sold into the electricity grid.
Mid-Continent Region (1,159 mbpcd)
Catlettsburg, Kentucky Refinery (291 mbpcd)
Our Catlettsburg refinery is located in northeastern Kentucky on the western bank of the Big Sandy River, near the confluence with the Ohio River. The Catlettsburg refinery processes sweet and sour crude oils, including production from the nearby Utica Shale, into gasoline, distillates, asphalt, NGLs and petrochemicals, propane and heavy fuel oil. Our Catlettsburg refinery has earned designation as an OSHA VPP Star site.
Robinson, Illinois Refinery (253 mbpcd)
Our Robinson refinery is located in southeastern Illinois. The Robinson refinery processes sweet and sour crude oils into gasoline, distillates, NGLs and petrochemicals, propane and heavy fuel oil. The Robinson refinery has earned designation as an OSHA VPP Star site.
**De
Showing the first 8K of 73K characters. Open the full section
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in evaluating us and our common stock. Although the risks are organized by headings, and each risk is discussed separately, many are interrelated. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected by these risks, and, as a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline. We have in the past been adversely affected by certain of, and may in the future be affected by, these risks. You should not interpret the disclosure of any risk factor to imply that the risk has not already materialized.
Business and Operational Risks
Our financial results are affected by volatile refining margins, which are dependent on factors beyond our control.
Our operating results, cash flows, future rate of growth, the carrying value of our assets and our ability to execute share repurchases and continue the payment of our base dividend are highly dependent on the margins we realize on our refined products. Historically, refining and marketing margins have been volatile, and we believe they will continue to be volatile. Our margins from the sale of gasoline and other refined products are influenced by a number of conditions, including the price of crude oil and other feedstocks. The prices of feedstocks and the prices at which we can sell our refined products fluctuate independently due to a variety of regional and global market factors that are beyond our control, including:
-
worldwide and domestic supplies of and demand for feedstocks and refined products;
-
transportation infrastructure cost and availability;
-
operation levels of other refineries in our markets;
-
the development by competitors of new refining or renewable conversion capacity;
-
natural gas and electricity supply costs;
-
political instability, threatened or actual terrorist incidents, armed conflict or other global political or economic conditions;
-
local weather conditions; and
-
the occurrence of other risks described herein.
Some of these factors can vary by region and may change quickly, adding to market volatility, while others may have longer-term effects. The longer-term effects of these and other factors on refining and marketing margins are uncertain. We generally purchase our feedstocks weeks before we refine them and sell the refined products. Price level changes during the period between purchasing feedstocks and selling the refined products from these feedstocks can have a significant effect on our financial results. We also purchase refined products manufactured by others for resale to our customers. Price changes during the periods between purchasing and reselling those refined products can have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Lower refining and marketing margins have in the past, and may in the future, lead us to reduce the amount of refined products we produce, which may reduce our revenues, income from operations and cash flows. Significant reductions in refining and marketing margins could require us to reduce our capital expenditures, impair the carrying value of our assets (such as property, plant and equipment, inventory or goodwill), and require us to re-evaluate practices regarding our repurchase activity and dividends.
Legal, technological, political and scientific developments regarding emissions, fuel efficiency and alternative fuel vehicles may decrease demand for petroleum-based transportation fuels.
Developments aimed at reducing vehicle emissions, increasing vehicle efficiency or reducing the sale of new petroleum-fueled vehicles may decrease the demand and may increase the cost for our transportation fuels. At the direction of President Biden in his Executive Order setting a goal that 50 percent of all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in 2030 be zero emission vehicles, EPA and NHTSA have promulgated separate rules setting more stringent requirements for reductions through model year 2026. NHTSA’s amended CAFE standards increase in stringency from model year 2023 levels by eight percent annually for model years 2024-2025 and ten percent annually for model year 2026. EPA’s revised model year 2023-2026 CO2 emission standards, which were finalized in December 2021, result in average fuel economy of 40 mpg in model year 2026. Other jurisdictions have issued or considered issuing similar mandates, and we expect this trend will continue.
Moreover, consumer acceptance and market penetration of electric, hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles continues to increase. In 2021, several automobile manufacturers jointly announced their shared goal that 40-50% of their new vehicle sales be battery electric, fuel cell or plug-in hybrid vehicles by 2030. Other automobile manufacturers have similar, or more aggressive, goals with respect to vehicle electrification. Technological breakthroughs relating to renewable fuels or other fuel alternatives such as hydrogen or ammonia, or efficiency improvements for internal combustion engines could reduce demand for petroleum-based transportation fuels.
Together, these trends and developments have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse effect on sales of our petroleum-based transportation fuels, which in turn could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations are subject to business interruptions and casualty losses.
Our operations are subject to business interruptions, such as scheduled and unscheduled refinery turnarounds, unplanned maintenance, explosions, fires, refinery or pipeline releases, product quality incidents, power outages, severe weather, labor disputes, acts of terrorism, or other natural or man-made disasters. These types of incidents adversely affect our operations and may result in serious personal injury or loss of human life, significant damage to property and equipment, impaired ability to manufacture our products, environmental pollution, and substantial losses. We have experienced certain of these incidents in the past.
For assets located near populated areas, the level of damage resulting from such an incident could be greater. In addition, we operate in and adjacent to environmentally sensitive waters where tanker, pipeline, rail car and refined product transportation and storage operations are closely regulated by federal, state and local agencies and monitored by environmental interest groups. Certain of our refineries receive crude oil and other feedstocks by tanker or barge. MPLX operates a fleet of boats and barges to transport light products, heavy oils, crude oil, renewable fuels, chemicals and feedstocks to and from refineries and terminals owned by MPC. Transportation and storage of crude oil, other feedstocks and refined products over and adjacent to water involves inherent risk and subjects us to the provisions of the OPA-90 and state laws in U.S. coastal and Great Lakes states and states bordering inland waterways on which we operate, as well as international laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. If we are unable to promptly and adequately contain any accident or discharge involving tankers, pipelines, rail cars or above ground storage tanks transporting or storing crude oil, other feedstocks or refined products, we may be subject to substantial liability. In addition, the service providers contracted to aid us in a discharge response may be unavailable due to weather conditions, governmental regulations or other local or global events.
Damages resulting from an incident involving any of our assets or operations may result in our being named as a defendant in one or more lawsuits asserting potentially substantial claims or i
Showing the first 8K of 73K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2. Properties
We believe that our properties and facilities are adequate for our operations and that our facilities are adequately maintained. See the following sections for details of our assets by segment.
REFINING & MARKETING
The table below sets forth the location and crude oil refining capacity for each of our refineries as of December 31, 2022. Refining throughput can exceed crude oil refining capacity due to the processing of other charge and blendstocks in addition to crude oil and the timing of planned turnaround and major maintenance activity.
| Refinery | Crude Oil Refining Capacity (mbpcd) | |||||||
| Gulf Coast Region | ||||||||
| Garyville, Louisiana | 596 | |||||||
| Galveston Bay, Texas City, Texas | 593 | |||||||
| Subtotal Gulf Coast region | 1,189 | |||||||
| Mid-Continent Region | ||||||||
| Catlettsburg, Kentucky | 291 | |||||||
| Robinson, Illinois | 253 | |||||||
| Detroit, Michigan | 140 | |||||||
| El Paso, Texas | 133 | |||||||
| St. Paul Park, Minnesota | 105 | |||||||
| Canton, Ohio | 100 | |||||||
| Mandan, North Dakota | 71 | |||||||
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 66 | |||||||
| Subtotal Mid-Continent region | 1,159 | |||||||
| West Coast Region | ||||||||
| Los Angeles, California | 363 | |||||||
| Anacortes, Washington | 119 | |||||||
| Kenai, Alaska | 68 | |||||||
| Subtotal West Coast region | 550 | |||||||
| Total | 2,898 |
The Dickinson, North Dakota, renewable fuels facility has the capacity to produce 184 million gallons per year of renewable diesel from corn oil, soybean oil, fats and greases. MPC is currently in the process of converting the Martinez refinery to a renewable diesel facility. The full capacity of the Martinez facility is expected to be approximately 730 million gallons per year.
The following table sets forth the approximate number of locations where jobbers maintain branded outlets, marketing fuels under the Marathon, ARCO, Shell, Mobil, Tesoro and other brands, as of December 31, 2022.
| Location | Number of Branded Outlets | |||||||
| Alabama | 404 | |||||||
| Alaska | 54 | |||||||
| Arizona | 79 | |||||||
| Arkansas | 1 | |||||||
| California | 114 | |||||||
| Colorado | 12 | |||||||
| District of Columbia | 2 | |||||||
| Florida | 639 | |||||||
| Georgia | 400 | |||||||
| Idaho | 105 | |||||||
| Illinois | 183 | |||||||
| Indiana | 640 | |||||||
| Iowa | 4 | |||||||
| Kentucky | 515 | |||||||
| Louisiana | 57 | |||||||
| Maryland | 60 | |||||||
| Massachusetts | 1 | |||||||
| Mexico | 281 | |||||||
| Michigan | 732 | |||||||
| Minnesota | 299 | |||||||
| Mississippi | 118 | |||||||
| Nevada | 19 | |||||||
| New Mexico | 38 | |||||||
| New York | 62 | |||||||
| North Carolina | 208 | |||||||
| North Dakota | 119 | |||||||
| Ohio | 811 | |||||||
| Oregon | 43 | |||||||
| Pennsylvania | 85 | |||||||
| Rhode Island | 3 | |||||||
| South Carolina | 102 | |||||||
| South Dakota | 33 | |||||||
| Tennessee | 407 | |||||||
| Texas | 11 | |||||||
| Utah | 109 | |||||||
| Virginia | 192 | |||||||
| Washington | 95 | |||||||
| West Virginia | 109 | |||||||
| Wisconsin | 58 | |||||||
| Wyoming | 5 | |||||||
| Total | 7,209 |
The Refining & Marketing segment sells transportation fuels through long-term fuel supply contracts to direct dealer locations, primarily under the ARCO brand. The following table sets forth the number of direct dealer locations by state as of December 31, 2022.
| Location | Number of Locations | |||||||
| Arizona | 69 | |||||||
| California | 1,035 | |||||||
| Nevada | 68 | |||||||
| Total | 1,172 |
The following table sets forth details about our Refining & Marketing owned and operated terminals as of December 31, 2022. See the Midstream - MPLX section for information with respect to MPLX owned and operated terminals.
| Owned and Operated Terminals | Number of Terminals | Tank Storage Capacity (thousand barrels) | ||||||||||||
| Light Products Terminals: | ||||||||||||||
| Alaska | 1 | 231 | ||||||||||||
| New York | 1 | 352 | ||||||||||||
| Subtotal light products terminals | 2 | 583 | ||||||||||||
| Asphalt Terminals: | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 1 | 263 | ||||||||||||
| Indiana | 1 | 121 | ||||||||||||
| Kentucky | 4 | 549 | ||||||||||||
| Louisiana | 1 | 54 | ||||||||||||
| Michigan | 1 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| New York | 1 | 417 | ||||||||||||
| Ohio | 4 | 2,207 | ||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 451 | ||||||||||||
| Tennessee | 2 | 480 | ||||||||||||
| Subtotal asphalt terminals | 16 | 4,554 | ||||||||||||
| Total owned and operated terminals | 18 | 5,137 |
MIDSTREAM - MPLX
The following table sets forth certain information relating to MPLX’s crude oil and refined products pipeline systems and storage assets as of December 31, 2022.
| Pipeline System or Storage Asset | Diameter (inches) | Length (miles) | Capacity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total crude oil pipeline systems(a)(b) | 2" - 42" | 5,135 | Various | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total refined products pipeline systems(a)(b)(c) | 4" - 36" | 3,732 | Various | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Barge Docks (mbpd) | 4,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Storage assets: (mbbls) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refining Logistics(d) | 93,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tank Farms | 33,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caverns | 4,209 |
(a) Includes approximately 16 miles of crude pipeline and 2 miles of refined product pipeline leased from third parties.
(b) Includes approximately 1,173 miles of inactive crude pipeline and 203 miles of inactive refined product pipeline.
(c) Includes approximately 87 miles and 17 miles of refined product pipelines in which MPLX has partial ownership of 65% and 50%, respectively.
(d) Refining logistics assets primarily include tankage. During 2022, MPC formed the Martinez Renewables joint venture and is currently in the process of converting the Martinez refinery to a renewable diesel facility. MPLX owns refining logistics assets with 5,809 mbbls of storage capacity associated with the facility and has entered into terminalling and storage service agreements with the joint venture and its partners to provide logistics services for the facility.
The following table sets forth information regarding the pipeline systems which MPLX has an interest in through ownership of its equity method investments as of December 31, 2022.
| Diameter (inches) | Length (miles) | Ownership Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||
| Crude Systems: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| MarEn Bakken Company LLC(a) | 30" | 1,916 | 25% | |||||||||||||||||
| Minnesota Pipe Line Company LLC | 16"-24" | 975 | 17% | |||||||||||||||||
| Wink to Webster Holdings LLC | 36" | 522 | 11% | |||||||||||||||||
| Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC | 24" | 168 | 35% | |||||||||||||||||
| Andeavor Logistics Rio Pipeline LLC | 12" | 119 | 67% | |||||||||||||||||
| LOCAP LLC | 48" | 57 | 59% | |||||||||||||||||
| LOOP LLC | 48" | 48 | 41% | |||||||||||||||||
| Refined Product Systems: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Explorer Pipeline Company | 12" - 28" | 1,826 | 25% | |||||||||||||||||
| Natural Gas and NGL Systems: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Whistler Pipeline LLC | 36" - 42" | 498 | 38% | |||||||||||||||||
| BANGL LLC(a) | 12" - 24" | 109 | 25% |
(a) The investment in MarEn Bakken Company LLC includes MPLX’s 9.19 percent indirect interest in a joint venture that owns and operates the Dakota Access Pipeline and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Pipeline projects, collectively referred to as the Bakken Pipeline system or DAPL.
(b) BANGL LLC also owns a 30% interest in a 323 mile NGL pipeline.
The following table sets forth details about MPLX owned and operated terminals as of December 31, 2022. Additionally, MPLX has partial ownership interest in one terminal.
| Owned and Operated Terminals | Number of Terminals | Tank Storage Capacity (mbbls) | ||||||||||||
| Refined Products Terminals: | ||||||||||||||
| Alabama | 2 | 443 | ||||||||||||
| Alaska | 3 | 1,573 | ||||||||||||
| California | 8 | 3,483 | ||||||||||||
| Florida | 3 | 2,265 | ||||||||||||
| Georgia | 4 | 982 | ||||||||||||
| Idaho | 3 | 999 | ||||||||||||
| Illinois | 2 | 562 | ||||||||||||
| Indiana | 7 | 3,812 | ||||||||||||
| Kentucky | 6 | 2,587 | ||||||||||||
| Louisiana | 2 | 5,404 | ||||||||||||
| Michigan | 8 | 2,440 | ||||||||||||
| Minnesota | 1 | 13 | ||||||||||||
| New Mexico | 3 | 471 | ||||||||||||
| North Carolina | 3 | 1,356 | ||||||||||||
| North Dakota | 1 | — | ||||||||||||
| Ohio | 12 | 3,200 | ||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 390 | ||||||||||||
| South Carolina | 1 | 371 | ||||||||||||
| Tennessee | 4 | 1,149 | ||||||||||||
| Texas | 1 | 76 | ||||||||||||
| Utah | 1 | 21 | ||||||||||||
| Washington | 4 | 920 | ||||||||||||
| West Virginia | 2 | 1,564 | ||||||||||||
| Subtotal light products terminals | 82 | 34,081 | ||||||||||||
| Asphalt Terminals | ||||||||||||||
| Arizona | 3 | 554 | ||||||||||||
| Minnesota | 1 | — | ||||||||||||
| Nevada(a) | 1 | 283 | ||||||||||||
| New Mexico | 1 | 38 | ||||||||||||
| Texas | 1 | 197 | ||||||||||||
| Subtotal asphalt terminals | 7 | 1,072 | ||||||||||||
| Total owned and operated terminals | 89 | 35,153 |
(a) MPLX accounts for this terminal as an equity method investment.
The following table sets forth details about MPLX barges and towboats as of December 31, 2022.
| Class of Equipment | Number in Class | Capacity (mbbls) | ||||||||||||
| Inland tank barges | 296 | 7,820 | ||||||||||||
| Inland towboats | 23 | N/A |
The following tables set forth certain information relating to MPLX’s consolidated and operated joint venture gas processing facilities, fractionation facilities, natural gas gathering systems, NGL pipelines and natural gas pipelines as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.
| Gas Processing Complexes | Design Throughput Capacity (MMcf/d) | Natural Gas Throughput (MMcf/d)(a) | Utilization of Design Capacity(a) | |||||||||||||||||
| Marcellus Operations | 6,320 | 5,515 | 87 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Utica Operations | 1,325 | 495 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Southern Appalachia Operations | 495 | 217 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Southwest Operations(b) | 2,545 | 1,637 | 69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Bakken Operations | 185 | 146 | 79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Rockies Operations | 1,177 | 438 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 12,047 | 8,448 | 71 | % |
(a) Natural gas throughput is a weighted average for days in operation. The utilization of design capacity has been calculated using the weighted average design throughput capacity.
(b) The capacity presented above includes MPLX’s proportionate share of Centrahoma Processing LLC’s processing capacity of 550 MMcf/d, as MPLX owns a non-operating 40 percent interest in this joint venture. Actual throughput of 170 MMcf/d representing MPLX’s share of processed volumes is also included and used to compute the utilization presented above.
| Fractionation & Condensate Stabilization Facilities | Design Throughput Capacity (mbpd) | NGL Throughput (mbpd)(a) | Utilization of Design Capacity(a) | |||||||||||||||||
| Marcellus Operations | 413 | 307 | 74 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Utica Operations | 23 | 14 | 61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Southern Appalachia Operations | 24 | 11 | 46 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Bakken Operations | 33 | 21 | 64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Rockies Operations | 5 | 4 | 80 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 498 | 357 | 72 | % |
(a) NGL throughput is a weighted average for days in operation. The utilization of design capacity has been calculated using the weighted average design throughput capacity.
| De-ethanization Facilities | Design Throughput Capacity (mbpd) | NGL Throughput (mbpd)(a) | Utilization of Design Capacity(a) | |||||||||||||||||
| Marcellus Operations | 309 | 204 | 72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Utica Operations | 40 | 5 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Rockies Operations | 5 | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 354 | 209 | 64 | % |
(a) NGL throughput is a weighted average for days in operation. The utilization of design capacity has been calculated using the weighted average design throughput capacity.
| Natural Gas Gathering Systems | Design Throughput Capacity (MMcf/d) | Natural Gas Throughput (MMcf/d)(a) | Utilization of Design Capacity(a) | |||||||||||||||||
| Marcellus Operations | 1,547 | 1,321 | 85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Utica Operations | 3,183 | 2,134 | 67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Southwest Operations | 2,980 | 1,629 | 58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Bakken Operations | 189 | 152 | 80 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Rockies Operations(b) | 1,486 | 448 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 9,385 | 5,684 | 62 | % |
(a) Natural gas throughput is a weighted average for days in operation. The utilization of design capacity has been calculated using the weighted average design throughput capacity.
(b) This region does not include MPLX’s operated joint venture, Rendezvous Gas Services, L.L.C. (“RGS”), which has a gathering capacity of 1,032 MMcf/d; this system supports other systems which are included in the Rockies region and that throughput is presented in the Rockies gathering throughput above. The third party volumes gathered for RGS during the year ended December 31, 2022 were 110 MMcf/d.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to MPLX’s NGL pipelines as of December 31, 2022.
| NGL Pipelines | Diameter (inches) | Length (miles) | Design Throughput Capacity (mbpd) | |||||||||||||||||
| Marcellus Operations | 4” - 20” | 442 | Various | |||||||||||||||||
| Utica Operations | 4”- 12” | 119 | Various | |||||||||||||||||
| Southern Appalachia Operations | 6” - 8” | 138 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
| Southwest Operations(a) | 6” | 50 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
| Bakken Operations | 8” - 12” | 84 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||
| Rockies Operations | 8” | 10 | 15 |
(a) Includes 38 miles of inactive pipeline.
MIDSTREAM - MPC-RETAINED ASSETS AND INVESTMENTS
The following table sets forth certain information related to our crude oil and refined products pipeline systems not owned by MPLX.
As of December 31, 2022, we had partial ownership interests in the following pipeline companies.
| Pipeline Company | Diameter (inches) | Length (miles) | Ownership Interest | Operated by MPL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crude oil pipeline companies: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capline Pipeline Company LLC | 40” | 644 | 33% | Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gray Oak Pipeline, LLC | 8”-30” | 845 | 25% | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LOOP(a) | 48” | 48 | 10% | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1,489 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refined products pipeline companies: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ascension Pipeline Company LLC | 12” | 32 | 50% | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Centennial Pipeline LLC(b) | 24”-26” | 793 | 50% | Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Muskegon Pipeline LLC | 10”-12” | 170 | 60% | Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wolverine Pipe Line Company | 6”-18” | 798 | 6% | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1,793 |
(a)Represents interest retained by MPC and excludes MPLX’s 40.7 percent ownership interest in LOOP. Pipeline mileage is excluded from total as it is included with MPLX assets.
(b)All system pipeline miles are inactive.
As of December 31, 2022, we had a partial ownership interest in the following crude oil terminal.
| Terminal | Ownership Interest | Tank Storage Capacity (million barrels) | ||||||||||||
| South Texas Gateway Terminal LLC | 25% | 8.6 |
The following table sets forth details about our ocean vessels as of December 31, 2022.
| Class of Equipment | Number in Class | Capacity (mbbls) | ||||||||||||
| Jones Act product tankers | 4 | 1,320 | ||||||||||||
| 750 Series ATB vessels(a) | 3 | 990 |
(a)Represents ownership through our indirect noncontrolling 50% interest in Crowley Blue Water Partners.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. While it is possible that an adverse result in one or more of the lawsuits or proceedings in which we are a defendant could be material to us, based upon current information and our experience as a defendant in other matters, we believe that these lawsuits and proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 103 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a governmental authority is a party to the proceedings and such proceedings involve potential monetary sanctions, unless we reasonably believe that the matter will result in no monetary sanctions, or in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, of less than a specified threshold. We use a threshold of $1 million for this purpose.
Climate Change Litigation
Governmental and other entities in various states have filed climate-related lawsuits against a number of energy companies, including MPC. The lawsuits allege damages as a result of climate change and the plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and abatement under various tort theories. Similar lawsuits may be filed in other jurisdictions. The names of the courts in which the proceedings are pending and the dates instituted are as follows:
| Plaintiff | Date Instituted | Name of Court(s) where pending | ||||||||||||
| County of San Mateo, California | July 17, 2017 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| County of Marin, California | July 17, 2017 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| City of Imperial Beach, California | July 17, 2017 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| County of Santa Cruz, California | December 20, 2017 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| City of Santa Cruz, California | December 20, 2017 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| City of Richmond, California | January 22, 2018 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| State of Rhode Island | July 2, 2018 | Superior Court of Providence County; U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit | ||||||||||||
| Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland | July 20, 2018 | Circuit Court of Baltimore City; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Inc. | November 14, 2018 | U.S. District Court (Northern District of California) | ||||||||||||
| City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii | March 9, 2020 | U.S. District Court (District of Hawaii); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Circuit Court of the First Circuit (State of Hawaii); Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals | ||||||||||||
| City of Charleston, South Carolina | September 9, 2020 | U.S. District Court (District of South Carolina) | ||||||||||||
| State of Delaware | September 10, 2020 | U.S. District Court (District of Delaware); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | ||||||||||||
| County of Maui, Hawaii | October 12, 2020 | U.S. District Court (District of Hawaii); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Circuit Court of the First Circuit (State of Hawaii) | ||||||||||||
| City of Annapolis, Maryland | February 22, 2021 | U.S. District Court (District of Maryland); US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | ||||||||||||
| Anne Arundel County, Maryland | April 26, 2021 | U.S. District Court (District of Maryland); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
Dakota Access Pipeline
MPLX holds a 9.19 percent indirect interest in a joint venture (“Dakota Access”) that owns and operates the Dakota Access Pipeline and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Pipeline projects, collectively referred to as the Bakken Pipeline system or DAPL. In 2020, the D.D.C. ordered the Army Corps, which granted permits and an easement for the Bakken Pipeline system, to prepare an environmental impact statement (“EIS”) relating to an easement under Lake Oahe in North Dakota. The D.D.C. later vacated the easement. The Army Corps expects to release a draft EIS in 2023.
In May 2021, the D.D.C. denied a renewed request for an injunction to shut down the pipeline while the EIS is being prepared. In June 2021, the D.D.C. issued an order dismissing without prejudice the tribes’ claims against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The litigation could be reopened or new litigation challenging the EIS, once completed, could be filed. The pipeline remains operational.
MPLX has entered into a Contingent Equity Contribution Agreement whereby it, along with the other joint venture owners in the Bakken Pipeline system, has agreed to make equity contributions to the joint venture upon certain events occurring to allow the entities that own and operate the Bakken Pipeline system to satisfy their senior note payment obligations. The senior notes were issued to repay amounts owed by the pipeline companies to fund the cost of construction of the Bakken Pipeline system. If the pipeline were temporarily shut down, MPLX would have to contribute its 9.19 percent pro rata share of funds required to pay interest accruing on the notes and any portion of the principal that matures while the pipeline is shutdown. MPLX also expects to contribute its 9.19 percent pro rata share of any costs to remediate any deficiencies to reinstate the permit and/or return the pipeline into operation. If the vacatur of the easement permit results in a permanent shutdown of the pipeline, MPLX would have to contribute its 9.19 percent pro rata share of the cost to redeem the bonds (including the 1% redemption premium required pursuant to the indenture governing the notes) and any accrued and unpaid interest. As of December 31, 2022, our maximum potential undiscounted payments under the Contingent Equity Contribution Agreement were approximately $170 million.
Tesoro High Plains Pipeline
In July 2020, Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC (“THPP”), a subsidiary of MPLX, received a Notification of Trespass Determination from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) relating to a portion of the Tesoro High Plains Pipeline that crosses the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota. The notification demanded the immediate cessation of pipeline operations and assessed trespass damages of approximately $187 million. After subsequent appeal proceedings and in compliance with a new order issued by the BIA, in December 2020, THPP paid approximately $4 million in assessed trespass damages and ceased use of the portion of the pipeline that crosses the property at issue. In March 2021, the BIA issued an order purporting to vacate the BIA's prior orders related to THPP’s alleged trespass and direct the Regional Director of the BIA to reconsider the issue of THPP’s alleged trespass and issue a new order. In April 2021, THPP filed a lawsuit in the District of North Dakota against the United States of America, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the BIA (together, the “U.S. Government Parties”) challenging the March 2021 order purporting to vacate all previous orders related to THPP’s alleged trespass. On February 8, 2022, the U.S. Government Parties filed their answer and counterclaims to THPP’s suit claiming THPP is in continued trespass with respect to the pipeline and seek disgorgement of pipeline profits from June 1, 2013 to present, removal of the pipeline and remediation. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these counterclaims.
Martinez Refinery
We have resolved 99 NOVs received from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) through settlement with the BAAQMD that includes payment of a cash penalty of approximately $1.5 million. The NOVs were issued from 2011 to 2018 and allege violations of air quality regulations and the idled Martinez refinery’s air permit.
On July 18, 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) lodged a complaint on behalf of EPA and a Consent Decree in the U.S. Court for the Western District of Texas. Among other things, the Consent Decree required that the Martinez refinery meet certain annual emission limits for NOx by July 1, 2018. In 2018, TRMC informed EPA that it would need additional time to satisfy requirements of the Consent Decree. In 2019, TRMC and the United States entered into an agreement to amend the Consent Decree to resolve these issues. In light of the actions to strategically reposition the Martinez refinery to a renewable diesel facility, we are renegotiating the Consent Decree modification. Subject to final approval by the court, we expect that, contingent on TRMC completing the conversion of the Martinez refinery to renewable diesel production, the renegotiated Consent Decree modification will no longer require the installation of a Selective Catalytic Reduction system to control NOx emissions from the now-idled fluid catalytic cracking unit, but will result in an increased civil penalty.
Gathering and Processing
MPLX has been negotiating with the EPA with respect to multiple alleged violations of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants by the Chapita, Coyote Wash, Island, River Bend and Wonsits Valley Compressor Stations in Utah as well as the Robinson Lake Gas Plant in North Dakota. MPLX is in the process of finalizing a settlement with the EPA pursuant to which MPLX expects to pay a cash penalty of $2 million, incorporate additional remedial measures, mitigate excess emissions associated with events and enter into a consent decree covering MPLX gas plants and compressor stations located in Utah, North Dakota and Wyoming. We expect the settlement to be finalized later in 2023.
Edwardsville Incident
In March 2022, the State of Illinois brought an action in Madison County Circuit Court in Illinois against Marathon Pipe Line LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MPLX, asserting various violations and demanding a permanent injunction and civil penalties in connection with a March 2022 release of crude oil on the Wood River to Patoka 22" line near Edwardsville, Illinois. We are negotiating a settlement of the allegations. We cannot currently estimate the amount of any civil penalty or the timing of the resolution of this matter but do not believe any civil penalty will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE and traded under the symbol “MPC.” As of February 16, 2023, there were 26,034 registered holders of our common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth a summary of our purchases during the quarter ended December 31, 2022, of equity securities that are registered by MPC pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended:
| Millions of Dollars | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(a) | Average Price Paid per Share(b) | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(c)(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/01/2022-10/31/2022 | 991,728 | $ | 105.08 | 989,787 | $ | 5,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 11/01/2022-11/30/2022 | 3,742,961 | 122.76 | 3,742,909 | 4,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/01/2022-12/31/2022 | 10,773,486 | 112.56 | 10,773,486 | 3,332 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 15,508,175 | 114.54 | 15,506,182 |
(a)The amounts in this column include 1,941, 52 and 0 shares of our common stock delivered by employees to MPC, upon vesting of restricted stock, to satisfy tax withholding requirements in October, November and December, respectively.
(b)Amounts in this column reflect the weighted average price paid for shares repurchased under our share repurchase authorizations and for shares tendered to us in satisfaction of employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock granted under our stock plans. The weighted average price includes commissions paid to brokers during the quarter.
(c)On February 2, 2022, we announced that our board of directors had approved an additional $5 billion share repurchase authorization, which was exhausted during the fourth quarter of 2022. On August 2, 2022, we announced that our board of directors had approved an additional $5 billion share repurchase authorization. On January 31, 2023, we announced that our board of directors had approved an additional $5 billion share repurchase authorization, which authorization is not reflected in this column. These share repurchase authorizations have no expiration date.
(d)Includes the payment of any commissions paid to brokers during the quarter.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
All statements in this section, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements that are inherently uncertain. See “Disclosures Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. The following information concerning our business, results of operations and financial condition should also be read in conjunction with the information included under Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Update
For the year ended December 31, 2022, our results were favorably impacted by the continuing recovery in the environment in which our business operates. The increase in global demand for refined products and global commodity supply constraints have contributed to increases in the market prices of petroleum-based transportation fuels and in Refining & Marketing margins and Midstream throughputs. Supply has remained constrained for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, effects from refinery closures and disruptions in the crude oil and petroleum-based products markets resulting from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. We are unable to predict the potential effects that resurgences of COVID-19 or the continuance or escalation of the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and related sanctions or market disruptions, may have on our financial position and results. It remains uncertain how long these conditions may last or how severe they may become.
In 2022, data indicated a sharp rise in inflation in the U.S. and globally. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, supply chain disruptions, governmental stimulus or fiscal policies and increasing demand for certain goods and services as recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic continues. We have observed higher costs for feedstocks, labor and materials used in our business. We cannot predict the effect of rising interest rates, the concerns of a recession and higher inflation and fuel prices on demand for our products and services.
In response to this business environment, we continue to focus on the following priorities for our business:
Strengthen Competitive Position of Assets
We are committed to positioning our assets so that we are a leader in operational, financial, and sustainability performance and are evaluating the strength and fit of assets in our portfolio. Our goal is that each individual asset generates free-cash-flow back to the business and contributes to shareholder returns. With our investments, we are focused on high returning projects that we believe will enhance the competitiveness of our portfolio, including our investments in sustainable fuels and technologies that lower our carbon intensity as the global energy mix evolves.
Improve Commercial Performance
We are focused on leveraging advantaged raw material selection, new approaches in the commercial space to be more dynamic amidst changing market conditions and achieving technology improvements to advance our commercial performance. A near-term focus has been securing advantaged renewable feedstocks as we continue to advance our renewable fuels production capabilities. This includes exploring joint venture opportunities and strategic alliances within the renewable fuels value chain.
Continued Capital Discipline and Focus on Low-Cost Culture
We are committed to achieving operational excellence by reducing costs, improving efficiency, driving operational improvements and being disciplined in capital allocation. This means lowering our costs in all aspects of our business and challenging ourselves to be disciplined in every dollar we spend across our organization. We look to optimize our portfolio of investment opportunities to ensure efficient deployment of capital focusing on projects with the highest returns.
Commitment to Sustainability
Our approach to sustainability spans the environmental, social and governance dimensions of our business. That means strengthening resiliency by lowering the carbon intensity and conserving natural resources; innovating for the future by investing in renewables and emerging technologies; and embedding sustainability in decision-making and in how we engage our people and many stakeholders. Specifically, in 2022, we were the first among U.S. independent refiners to establish a 2030 target to reduce absolute Scope 3 - Category 11 GHG emissions. This goal added to our existing targets for reducing Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions intensity, for lowering methane emissions intensity and for lowering our freshwater withdrawal intensity. Additionally, MPLX is progressing towards meeting its 2025 and 2030 methane intensity reduction goals, as well as its biodiversity target, by applying sustainable landscapes to its compatible right of ways.
Strategic Updates
Martinez Renewable Fuels Project Joint Venture
On September 21, 2022, MPC closed on the formation of the Martinez Renewable joint venture. The partnership is structured as a 50/50 joint venture with Neste expected to contribute a total of $1 billion. These contributions will continue into 2023. At the closing date, MPC contributed property, plant and equipment, inventory, and working capital valued at $1.47 billion and Neste contributed $728 million in cash. MPC recorded a gain of $549 million resulting from the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the contributed property, plant and equipment and inventory. Subsequent to the closing, the joint venture paid a special distribution to MPC of $500 million, which is reflected as a return of capital in MPC’s consolidated statements of cash flows. At December 31, 2022, MPC’s investment value in the entity is approximately $1.07 billion.
MPC will continue to manage project execution and operate the facility once construction is complete. The annual feedstock supply requirements are split between the joint venture partners, which include specific commitments to supply advantaged feedstocks. The annual production output will be shared evenly between the joint venture partners, and each partner will have the ability to market its share of the products. The joint venture, being optimally located to strengthen both partners' footprint in renewable fuels, will utilize existing processing infrastructure and diverse inbound and outbound logistics.
This strategic partnership is expected to advance the current project objectives of delivering low carbon intensity fuels to support California's climate goals. MPC and Neste will leverage their complementary core competencies in the joint venture. MPC brings experience in renewable diesel facility conversion, large capital project execution and operating expertise in the California market. Neste brings knowledge in sustainable feedstock sourcing and in renewable liquid fuels production. The joint venture reflects both partners' commitment to obtain low carbon intensity feedstocks to achieve the project objectives of providing fuels that meet the demand driven by the Low Carbon Fuel Standard.
The facility is expected to ramp up to producing 730 million gallons per year by the end of 2023, with pretreatment capabilities coming online in 2023.
Share Repurchase Authorization
As of December 31, 2022, MPC had $3.33 billion remaining under its share repurchase authorizations. On January 31, 2023, the company announced that its Board of Directors had approved an incremental $5.0 billion share repurchase authorization. Future repurchases under this incremental authorization will depend on the macro environment, cash available after opportunities for capital investment and growth of the business and market conditions. This authorization is in addition to a $5.0 billion share re
Showing the first 8K of 123K characters. Open the full section
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
GENERAL
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility of crude oil and refined product prices. We employ various strategies, including the use of commodity derivative instruments, to hedge the risks related to these price fluctuations. We are also exposed to market risks related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. As of December 31, 2022, we did not have any financial derivative instruments to hedge the risks related to interest rate fluctuations; however, we have used them in the past, and we continually monitor the market and our exposure and may enter into these agreements again in the future. We are at risk for changes in fair value of all of our derivative instruments; however, such risk should be mitigated by price or rate changes related to the underlying commodity or financial transaction.
We believe that our use of derivative instruments, along with our risk assessment procedures and internal controls, does not expose us to material adverse consequences. While the use of derivative instruments could materially affect our results of operations in particular quarterly or annual periods, we believe that the use of these instruments will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity.
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes 20 and 21 for more information about the fair value measurement of our derivatives, as well as the amounts recorded in our consolidated balance sheets and statements of income. We do not designate any of our commodity derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes.
Commodity Price Risk
Refining & Marketing
Our strategy is to obtain competitive prices for our products and allow operating results to reflect market price movements dictated by supply and demand. We use a variety of commodity derivative instruments, including futures, swaps and options, as part of an overall program to hedge commodity price risk. We also do a limited amount of trading not directly related to our physical transactions.
We use derivative instruments related to the acquisition of foreign-sourced crude oil and ethanol blended with refined petroleum products to hedge price risk associated with market volatility between the time we purchase the product and when we use it in the refinery production process or it is blended. In addition, we may use commodity derivative instruments on fixed price contracts for the sale of refined products to hedge risk by converting the refined product sales to market-based prices. The majority of these derivatives are exchange-traded contracts, but we also enter into over-the-counter swaps, options and over-the-counter options. We closely monitor and hedge our exposure to market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. Our positions are monitored daily by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy.
Midstream
NGL and natural gas prices are volatile and are impacted by changes in fundamental supply and demand, as well as market uncertainty, availability of NGL transportation and fractionation capacity and a variety of additional factors that are beyond MPLX’s control. MPLX may at times use a variety of commodity derivative instruments, including futures and options, as part of an overall program to economically hedge commodity price risk. A portion of MPLX’s profitability is directly affected by prevailing commodity prices primarily as a result of purchasing and selling NGLs and natural gas at index-related prices. To the extent that commodity prices influence the level of drilling by MPLX producer customers, such prices also indirectly affect profitability. MPLX may enter into derivative contracts, which are primarily swaps traded on the OTC market as well as fixed price forward contracts. MPLX’s risk management policy does not allow it to enter into speculative positions with its derivative contracts. Execution of MPLX’s hedge strategy and the continuous monitoring of commodity markets and its open derivative positions are carried out by its hedge committee, comprised of members of senior management.
To mitigate MPLX’s cash flow exposure to fluctuations in the price of NGLs, it may use NGL derivative swap contracts. A small portion of its NGL price exposure may be managed by using crude oil contracts. To mitigate MPLX’s cash flow exposure to fluctuations in the price of natural gas, it may use natural gas derivative swap contracts, taking into account the partial offset of its long and short natural gas positions resulting from normal operating activities.
MPLX would be exposed to additional commodity risk in certain situations such as if producers under‑deliver or over‑deliver products or if processing facilities are operated in different recovery modes. In the event that MPLX has derivative positions in excess of the product delivered or expected to be delivered, the excess derivative positions may be terminated.
MPLX management conducts a standard credit review on counterparties to derivative contracts, and it has provided the counterparties with a guaranty as credit support for its obligations. MPLX uses standardized agreements that allow for offset of certain positive and negative exposures in the event of default or other terminating events, including bankruptcy.
Open Derivative Positions and Sensitivity Analysis
The following table includes the composition of net losses/gains on our commodity derivative positions for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
| (In millions) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Realized loss on settled derivative positions | $ | (93) | $ | (359) | |||||||
| Unrealized gain (loss) on open net derivative positions | 35 | (21) | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (58) | $ | (380) |
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 21 for additional information on our open derivative positions at December 31, 2022.
Sensitivity analysis of the incremental effects on income from operations (“IFO”) of hypothetical 10 percent and 25 percent increases and decreases in commodity prices for open commodity derivative instruments as of December 31, 2022 is provided in the following table.
| Change in IFO from a Hypothetical Price Increase of | Change in IFO from a Hypothetical Price Decrease of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions) | 10% | 25% | 10% | 25% | |||||||||||||||||||
| As of December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crude | $ | (109) | $ | (273) | $ | 109 | $ | 273 | |||||||||||||||
| Refined products | 67 | 169 | (67) | (169) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Blending products | (16) | (39) | 16 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Soybean oil | (11) | (27) | 11 | 27 |
We remain at risk for possible changes in the market value of commodity derivative instruments; however, such risk should be mitigated by price changes in the underlying physical commodity. Effects of these offsets are not reflected in the above sensitivity analysis.
We evaluate our portfolio of commodity derivative instruments on an ongoing basis and add or revise strategies in anticipation of changes in market conditions and in risk profiles. Changes to the portfolio after December 31, 2022 would cause future IFO effects to differ from those presented above.
Interest Rate Risk
Our use of fixed or variable-rate debt directly exposes us to interest rate risk. Fixed rate debt, such as our senior notes, exposes us to changes in the fair value of our debt due to changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt also exposes us to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at higher rates or that our current fixed rate debt may be higher than the current market. Variable-rate debt, such as borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, exposes us to short-term changes in market rates that impact our interest expense. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 22 for additional information on our debt.
Sensitivity analysis of the effect of a hypothetical 100-basis-point change in interest rates on long-term debt, including the portion classified as current and excluding finance leases, as of December 31, 2022 is provided in the following table. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued interest approximate carrying value and, in addition to short-term investments which are recorded at fair value, are relatively insensitive to changes in interest rates due to the short-term maturity of the instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are excluded from the table.
| (In millions) | Fair Value(a) | Change in Fair Value(b) | Change in Net Income for the Year ended December 31, 2022(c) | |||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | $ | 24,209 | $ | 1,901 | n/a | |||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | $ | — | — | $ | — |
(a)Fair value was based on market prices, where available, or current borrowing rates for financings with similar terms and maturities.
(b)Assumes a 100-basis point decrease in the weighted average yield-to-maturity at December 31, 2022.
(c)Assumes a 100-basis-point change in interest rates. The change in net income was based on the weighted average balance of debt outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 for additional information on the fair value of our debt.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are impacted by foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to some of our purchases of crude oil denominated in Canadian dollars and some of our sales of finished products denominated in Mexican pesos. We did not use derivatives to hedge our market risk exposure to these foreign exchange rate fluctuations in 2022.
Counterparty Risk
MPLX is subject to risk of loss resulting from nonpayment by its customers to whom it provides services, leases assets, or sells natural gas or NGLs. MPLX believes that certain contracts where it sells NGLs and acts as its producer customers’ agent would allow it to pass those losses through to its customers, thus reducing its risk, when it is selling NGLs and acting as its producer customers’ agent. Its credit exposure related to these customers is represented by the value of its trade receivables or lease receivables. Where exposed to credit risk, MPLX analyzes the customer’s financial condition prior to entering into a transaction or agreement, establishes credit terms and monitors the appropriateness of these terms on an ongoing basis. In the event of a customer default, MPLX may sustain a loss and its cash receipts could be negatively impacted.
We are subject to risk of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by counterparties to our derivative contracts. Our credit exposure related to commodity derivative instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a net positive fair value at the reporting date. Outstanding instruments expose us to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. Should the creditworthiness of one or more of our counterparties decline, our ability to mitigate nonperformance risk is limited to a counterparty agreeing to either a voluntary termination and subsequent cash settlement or a novation of the derivative contract to a third party. In the event of a counterparty default, we may sustain a loss and our cash receipts could be negatively impacted.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX
Management’s Responsibilities for Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Marathon Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries (“MPC”) are the responsibility of management and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. They necessarily include some amounts that are based on best judgments and estimates. The financial information displayed in other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is consistent with these consolidated financial statements.
MPC seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of its financial records by careful selection of its managers, by organizational arrangements that provide an appropriate division of responsibility and by communications programs aimed at assuring that its policies and methods are understood throughout the organization.
The board of directors pursues its oversight role in the area of financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting through its Audit Committee. This committee, composed solely of independent directors, regularly meets (jointly and separately) with the independent registered public accounting firm, management and internal auditors to monitor the proper discharge by each of their responsibilities relative to internal accounting controls and the consolidated financial statements.
| /s/ Michael J. Hennigan | /s/ Maryann T. Mannen | /s/ C. Kristopher Hagedorn | ||||||||||||
| Michael J. Hennigan President and Chief Executive Officer | Maryann T. Mannen Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | C. Kristopher Hagedorn Senior Vice President and Controller |
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
MPC’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). An evaluation of the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on the results of this evaluation, MPC’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.
The effectiveness of MPC’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
| /s/ Michael J. Hennigan | /s/ Maryann T. Mannen | |||||||||||||
| Michael J. Hennigan President and Chief Executive Officer | Maryann T. Mannen Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Marathon Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective inte
Showing the first 8K of 261K characters. Open the full section
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
Item 9C. Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information concerning our executive officers is included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information concerning our directors is incorporated by reference to “Corporate Governance—Proposal 1. Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2022 (the “Proxy Statement”).
Our Code of Business Conduct, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, defines our expectations for ethical decision-making, accountability and responsibility. Our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is specifically applicable to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Controller, Vice President and Treasurer, and other leaders performing similar functions, affirms the principle that the honesty, integrity and sound judgment of our senior executives with responsibility for preparation and certification of our financial statements is essential to the proper functioning and success of our company. These codes are available on our website at www.marathonpetroleum.com/Investors/Corporate-Governance/. We would post on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, either of these codes requiring disclosure under applicable rules within four business days following any such amendment or waiver. Information contained on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or other securities filings.
The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to “Corporate Governance—Board Leadership and Function—Board Committees” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to “Executive Compensation,” “Executive Compensation—Executive Compensation Tables” and “Corporate Governance—Director Compensation” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this Item is incorporated by reference to “Other Information—Stock Ownership Information” in our Proxy Statement.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2022 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under the MPC 2021 Plan, the MPC 2012 Plan, the MPC 2011 Plan and the Andeavor Plans:
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(a) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)(c) | ||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | 4,563,076 | $ | 46.78 | 19,816,073 | |||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plan not approved by stockholders | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 4,563,076 | N/A | 19,816,073 |
(a) Includes the following:
-
2,489,234 stock options granted pursuant to the MPC 2012 Plan and not forfeited, cancelled or expired as of December 31, 2022.
-
2,020,472 restricted stock units granted pursuant to the MPC 2021 Plan, the MPC 2012 Plan and the MPC 2011 Plan for shares unissued and not forfeited, cancelled or expired as of December 31, 2022. The amounts in column (a) do not include 404 restricted stock units granted under the Andeavor Plans and not forfeited, cancelled or expired as of December 31, 2022.
-
53,370 shares as the maximum potential number of shares that could be issued in settlement of performance units outstanding as of December 31, 2022 pursuant to the MPC 2012 Plan, based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2022 of $116.39 per share. The number of shares reported for this award vehicle may overstate dilution. See Note 27 for more information on performance unit awards granted under the MPC 2012 Plan.
(b)Restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units are not taken into account in the weighted-average exercise price as such awards have no exercise price.
(c)Reflects the shares available for issuance pursuant to the MPC 2021 Plan. All granting authority under the MPC 2012 Plan was revoked following the approval of the MPC 2021 Plan by shareholders on April 28, 2021, all granting authority under the MPC 2011 Plan was revoked following the approval of the MPC 2012 Plan by shareholders on April 25, 2012, and all granting power under the Andeavor Plans was revoked at the time of the Andeavor Merger. Shares related to (i) grants made pursuant to the MPC 2012 Plan that are forfeited, cancelled or expire unexercised become immediately available for issuance under the MPC 2021 Plan (ii) shares withheld for taxes related to vestings under the MPC 2012 Plan become immediately available for issuance under the MPC 2021 Plan.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to “Other Information—Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance—Board Composition and Director Selection—Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to “Audit Matters—Auditor Fees and Services” in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
A. Documents Filed as Part of the Report
-
Financial Statements (see Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding financial statements)
-
Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules required under SEC rules but not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is contained in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
- Exhibits:
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | Furnished Herewith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | SEC File No. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.49* | Form of 2023 MPC Officer RSU Award Agreement - 2021 Plan | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.50* | Amended and Restated Marathon Petroleum Thrift Plan | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.51* | Marathon Petroleum Excess Benefit Plan Amendment | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.52* | Form of 2023 MPLX Phantom Unit Award Agreement | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24.1 | Power of Attorney of Directors and Officers of Marathon Petroleum Corporation | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14 and 15(d)-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14 and 15(d)-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded with the Inline XBRL document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). |
† The exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
- Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which one or more directors or executive officers of the Registrant may be participants.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| February 23, 2023 | MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION | |||||||
| By: /s/ C. Kristopher Hagedorn | ||||||||
| C. Kristopher Hagedorn Senior Vice President and Controller |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on February 23, 2023 on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
| Signature | Title | |||||||
| /s/ Michael J. Hennigan | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | |||||||
| Michael J. Hennigan | ||||||||
| /s/ Maryann T. Mannen | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | |||||||
| Maryann T. Mannen | ||||||||
| /s/ C. Kristopher Hagedorn | Senior Vice President and Controller (principal accounting officer) | |||||||
| C. Kristopher Hagedorn | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Abdulaziz F. Alkhayyal | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Evan Bayh | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Charles E. Bunch | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Jonathan Z. Cohen | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Edward G. Galante | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Kim K.W. Rucker | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Frank M. Semple | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| J. Michael Stice | ||||||||
| * | Chairman of the Board | |||||||
| John P. Surma | ||||||||
| * | Director | |||||||
| Susan Tomasky | ||||||||
- The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does sign and execute this report pursuant to the Power of Attorney executed by the above-named directors and officers of the registrant, which is being filed herewith on behalf of such directors and officers.
| By: /s/ Michael J. Hennigan | February 23, 2023 | |||||||
| Michael J. Hennigan Attorney-in-Fact |