Item 3. Legal Proceedings
8K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various claims and legal proceedings of a nature considered ordinary course in our business, including the intellectual property litigation described below. Most of the issues raised by these claims are highly complex and subject to substantial uncertainties. For a description of risks relating to these and other legal proceedings we face, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” including the discussion under the headings entitled “Risks related to our intellectual property” and “Risks related to the manufacturing of our commercial products and product candidates.”
The outcome of any such proceedings, regardless of the merits, is inherently uncertain; therefore, assessing the likelihood of loss and any estimated damages is difficult and subject to considerable judgment. We describe below those legal matters for which a material loss is either (i) possible but not probable, and/or (ii) not reasonably estimable at this time.
Pfizer/BioNTech Patent Litigation
In August 2022, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer) and BioNTech SE, BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH and BioNTech US Inc. (collectively, BioNTech), asserting infringement of certain U.S. patents concerning our mRNA platform technology and disease-specific vaccine designs in Pfizer and BioNTech’s manufacture and sale of their mRNA COVID vaccines. The complaint seeks a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents and monetary damages. The case has been stayed pending the outcome of two Inter Partes Proceedings (IPRs) pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) regarding the validity of two of the three asserted patents in this lawsuit. The PTAB is expected to issue a decision on the IPRs on or before March 6, 2025, which would be subject to appeal.
Also in August 2022, we initiated patent infringement proceedings in Germany (in the Dusseldorf Regional Court), the Netherlands (in the District Court of The Hague) and the UK (in the High Court of Justice of England & Wales) against Pfizer, BioNTech and
related entities with respect to certain European patents that also concern our mRNA platform technology and disease-specific vaccine designs, including coronaviruses. In May 2023, we initiated patent infringement proceedings in Ireland (in the High Court) and Belgium (Brussels Business Court) against Pfizer, BioNTech and related entities with respect to the same European patents. As in the U.S. action, we seek a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents and monetary damages.
Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE have also filed an action seeking revocation of certain Moderna patents in the UK. In addition, the Moderna patents being asserted in the European actions are subject to notices of opposition, including by Pfizer and BioNTech SE and others. These actions seek to revoke the patents, which have been filed at the European Patent Office. There are two patents at issue in the European patent infringement proceedings–EP3590949 (the ‘949 patent), which relates to chemically-modified mRNA and EP3718565 (the ‘565 patent), which relates to coronavirus mRNA vaccines. In July 2024, the High Court of Justice of England & Wales issued a judgment confirming the validity of the ‘949 patent and finding that Pfizer and BioNTech had infringed the patent. The court further determined that the ‘565 patent was invalid. The High Court’s decision related to the ‘949 patent is subject to appeal. In December 2023, the District Court of The Hague issued a first instance decision determining that the ‘949 patent was invalid in the Netherlands. Moderna has appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal of The Hague, with a second instance decision expected in 2025. In addition, there remain ongoing Opposition Proceedings at the European Patent Office by a number of opponents, including Pfizer and BioNTech related to these two patents.
Proceedings Related to Patents Owned by Arbutus
In February 2022, Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (Arbutus) and Genevant Sciences GmbH (Genevant) filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting that our manufacture and sale of our COVID vaccine willfully infringes certain U.S. patents concerning lipid nanoparticles. The complaint seeks a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents and monetary damages, but does not seek to prevent or stop the marketing or sales of our COVID vaccines. The Court has set trial to begin September 24, 2025, subject to the Court’s availability.
Proceedings Related to Patents Owned by GSK
COVID-19 Vaccines
In October 2024, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GSK) filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting that our manufacture and sale of our COVID vaccines infringe certain U.S. patents directed to lipid-mRNA vaccine formulation technology. The complaint seeks a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents and unspecified damages, but does not seek injunctive relief.
RSV Vaccine
Also in October 2024, GSK filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting that our manufacture and sale of our RSV vaccine infringes certain U.S. patents directed to lipid-mRNA vaccine formulation technology. The complaint seeks a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents, unspecified damages and injunctive relief in the United States.
Proceedings Related to Patents Owned by Northwestern University
In October 2024, Northwestern University filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting that our COVID and RSV vaccines infringe several U.S. patents concerning lipid nanoparticle technology. The complaint seeks a judgment of infringement of the asserted patents and unspecified damages. The complaint does not seek injunctive relief.
Securities Class Action Litigation
In August 2024, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain officers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The action is purportedly brought on behalf of a class of shareholders who purchased Moderna common stock between January 18, 2023 and June 25, 2024. The complaint asserts claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding statements about our RSV vaccine (mRNA-1345) and seeks unspecified damages.
Derivative Litigation
Between September and November 2024, purported shareholder derivative complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against certain of our officers and directors and against the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaints allege breaches of fiduciary duty and claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding statements about mRNA-1345 and seek declaratory and injunctive relief and unspecified damages payable to us.
Proceedings Related to Patents Owned by Alnylam
In March 2022 and July 2022, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Alnylam) filed two complaints against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting that our manufacture and sale of our COVID vaccine infringes certain U.S. patents concerning cationic lipids. On August 25, 2023, the Court entered a Final Judgment of non-infringement of all asserted patents in these lawsuits. Alnylam has appealed this judgment to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.
In May 2023, Alnylam filed a third complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting three additional U.S. patents concerning cationic lipids. The complaints seek judgments of infringement of the asserted patents and monetary damages, but do not seek to prevent or stop the marketing or sales of our COVID vaccines. In November 2023, the District Court entered an order of partial dismissal with respect to two of the patents at issue. Subsequently, in October 2024, the District Court entered a final judgment of non-infringement in our favor with respect to the third patent at issue. The decision is subject to appeal.
Previous: Item 2. Properties · Next: Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures