NetApp 10-K 2017-04-28
Filed 2017-06-20. 21 sections, 396K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
10-K 1 ntap-10k_20170428.htm 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
| ☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
| For the fiscal year ended April 28, 2017 |
|---|
or
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
| For the transition period from to |
|---|
Commission File Number 000-27130

NetApp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 77-0307520 | |
|---|---|---|
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
495 East Java Drive,
Sunnyvale, California 94089
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(408) 822-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of exchange on which registered | |
|---|---|---|
| Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☑ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | ||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of October 28, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $4,706,796,074 (based on the closing price for shares of the registrant’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date). Shares of common stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of possible affiliate status is not a conclusive determination for other purposes.
On June 9, 2017, 271,737,598 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information called for by Part III of this Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement for our annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after April 28, 2017.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements are all statements (and their underlying assumptions) included in this document that refer, directly or indirectly, to future events or outcomes and, as such, are inherently not factual, but rather reflect only our current projections for the future. Consequently, forward-looking statements usually include words such as “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “seek,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” or similar words, in each case, intended to refer to future events or circumstances. A non-comprehensive list of the topics including forward-looking statements in this document includes:
| • | our future financial and operating results; |
|---|
| • | our strategy; |
|---|
| • | our beliefs and objectives for future operations, research and development; |
|---|
| • | expectations regarding future product releases, growth and performance; |
|---|
| • | political, economic and industry trends; |
|---|
| • | expected timing of, customer acceptance of and benefits from, product introductions, developments and enhancements; |
|---|
| • | expected benefits from acquisitions, including our acquisition of SolidFire, Inc. and joint ventures, growth opportunities and investments; |
|---|
| • | expected outcomes from legal, regulatory and administrative proceedings; |
|---|
| • | our competitive position; |
|---|
| • | our short-term and long-term cash requirements, including, without limitation, anticipated capital expenditures; |
|---|
| • | our anticipated tax rate; |
|---|
| • | the repayment of our indebtedness; and |
|---|
| • | future uses of our cash, including, without limitation, the continuation of our stock repurchase and cash dividend programs. |
|---|
All forward-looking statements included in this document are inherently uncertain as they are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions concerning future events, and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Therefore, actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, but are not limited to:
| • | the overall growth, structure and changes in the networked storage hardware market; |
|---|
| • | our ability to expand our total available market and grow our portfolio of products; |
|---|
| • | our ability to gain customer acceptance of new products and enable customer transitions from older products; |
|---|
| • | our ability to successfully execute new business models; |
|---|
| • | general global political, macroeconomic and market conditions; |
|---|
| • | our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products and services, and future financial performance; |
|---|
| • | our ability to successfully manage our backlog; |
|---|
| • | our ability to successfully execute on our Data Fabric strategy to generate profitable growth and stockholder return; |
|---|
| • | disruptions in our supply chain, which could limit our ability to ship products to our customers in the amounts and at the prices forecasted; |
|---|
| • | our ability to maintain our customer, partner, supplier and contract manufacturer relationships on favorable terms and conditions; |
|---|
| • | our ability to maintain our gross profit margins; |
|---|
| • | our ability to timely and successfully introduce and increase volumes of new products and services and to forecast demand and pricing for the same; |
|---|
| • | changes in U.S. government spending; |
|---|
| • | the actions of our competitors including, without limitation, their ability to introduce competitive products and to acquire businesses and technologies that negatively impact our strategy, operations or customer demand for our products; |
|---|
| • | the impact of industry consolidation affecting our suppliers, competitors, partners and customers; |
|---|
| • | our ability to grow direct and indirect sales and to efficiently provide global service and support; |
|---|
| • | our ability to design, manufacture and market products meeting global environmental standards; |
|---|
| • | failure of our products and services to meet our customers’ quality requirements, including, without limitation, any epidemic failure event relating to our systems installed by our customers in their IT infrastructures; |
|---|
| • | our ability to resolve ongoing litigation, tax audits, government audits, inquiries and investigations in line with our expectations; |
|---|
| • | the availability of acceptable financing to support our future cash requirements; |
|---|
| • | our ability to effectively integrate acquired businesses, products and technologies; |
|---|
| • | valuation and liquidity of our investment portfolio; |
|---|
| • | foreign exchange rate impacts; |
|---|
| • | our ability to successfully recruit and retain critical employees and to manage our investment in people, process and systems; |
|---|
| • | our ability to anticipate techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems and to implement adequate preventative measures against cybersecurity and other security breaches; and |
|---|
| • | those factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|---|
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document and are based upon information available to us at this time. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to update information in any forward-looking statement. Actual results could vary from our forward-looking statements due to the foregoing factors as well as other important factors.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
NetApp ®, Inc. (NetApp, we or us) is a leader in data insight, access and control for hybrid cloud environments. We provide global organizations the ability to manage and share their data across on-premises, private and public clouds. We were incorporated in 1992 and are headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
NetApp, together with our partners, provides a full range of enterprise-class solutions that customers use to modernize their infrastructures, build next generation data centers and harness the power of hybrid clouds. We continue to pioneer a Data Fabric platform that allows infrastructure experts, cloud architects, developers and CIOs to easily and securely unite and manage data across the widest variety of environments.
Customer Business and IT Needs
In a world where technology is changing our everyday lives, digital transformation tops the strategic agenda in most organizations. For organizations to be successful in their digital transformations, data must become the lifeblood of an organization, seamlessly flowing through it to optimize operations, create innovative business opportunities and enable new customer touchpoints through technology. Correspondingly, IT leaders are under tremendous pressure to harness today’s wealth of data and apply it to create new value across the entire organization—all with limited time, skills and budget.
Building a data-centric organization is no small undertaking. No longer is data locked away on devices hidden behind firewalls. Instead, it is becoming distributed, dynamic and diverse. Thriving in this environment requires a holistic approach to data insight, access and control that is secure, efficient, future-proof and provides freedom of choice.
To help our customers and partners manage and share their data across on-premises, and private and public clouds, we are:
| • | Focusing on the customer by delivering an exceptional customer experience and becoming their preferred data partner; and |
|---|
| • | Extending our cloud integration and hybrid cloud leadership through the NetApp Data Fabric platform and expanding our consumption model offerings to match customer needs across cloud and on-premises offerings. |
|---|
The NetApp Data Fabric
The NetApp Data Fabric is a platform designed to simplify, automate and evolve the management of data. Data Fabric empowers our customers to seamlessly liberate, integrate and unleash the full potential of their data in a cloud, hybrid and on-premises world.
Built for the challenges and opportunities of the data-centric world, NetApp products and solutions are designed for simplicity and optimized to manage, protect and secure data. Because the Data Fabric platform is open by design, we can constantly fuel innovation and flexibility.
Our products and solutions portfolio centers on the digital transformation phases through which our customers are progressing: modernizing storage and data management, building next generation data centers and harnessing the power of hybrid cloud.
Product, Services and Solutions Portfolio
Flash
Flash plays a key role in customers’ digital transformation efforts as they seek to gain advantage through greater speed, responsiveness and value from key business applications, while lowering total cost of ownership. All-flash array technology is the de facto choice for primary application workloads as customers seek performance and economic benefits by replacing hard disk installations. With a highly differentiated and broad portfolio of all-flash and hybrid array offerings, NetApp is well positioned to enable customers to accomplish this transition.
All-Flash Arrays
The AFF A-Series All-Flash Arrays supply enterprise class scale-out all flash storage, harnessing the power of ONTAP and OnCommand software to deliver the industry’s most advanced data management and protection, along with high efficiency, performance and availability. The AFF A-Series is also the fastest enterprise All-Flash storage in the smallest package available in today’s market. The first generation of our All-Flash Array line, AFF8000 systems delivers all-flash performance with best-in-class data management. Through FlashEssentials software optimizations, we increase flash performance and efficiency. AFF models can be ordered as standalone systems and as a converged infrastructure validated design. Professional services, delivered by NetApp or its partners, help users identify those workloads that are best served by all-flash systems.
SolidFire All-Flash Arrays deliver fully automated agility and guaranteed application performance at web scale so customers can achieve the next-generation data center. The NetApp SolidFire SF-Series 19210 decreases the cost of all-flash arrays by offering the highest density and lowest cost per GB/IOPS, making it well suited for heavily virtualized and cloud infrastructures.
EF-Series all-flash arrays deliver fast, consistent response times to accelerate high-performance databases and data analytics. NetApp SANtricity Plug-Ins for Microsoft, Oracle, Splunk and VMware provide a consolidated view of the NetApp EF-Series systems, enabling users to monitor and manage their NetApp EF-Series storage from the application, reducing the total cost of ownership by eliminating the need to manually compile critical information from several different tools.
With our all-flash array portfolio, NetApp is enabling customers to modernize storage and data management to boost performance in their traditional data centers, while mapping out their move to a hybrid cloud.
Hybrid Flash Arrays
NetApp hybrid flash storage serves customers who want the option to deploy the speed of flash storage where they need it while using more affordable hard disk drives to address capacity requirements. NetApp hybrid arrays include the FAS series of unified storage systems and the E-Series of block storage offerings.
Converged Infrastructure
Due to budget constraints and skill imbalances, our customers need greater support from their technology partners to evaluate, integrate, deploy and sustain the sophisticated solutions they need to stay competitive. This trend is driving the demand for converged infrastructure solutions that reduce the time of deployment and lower integration risk.
Backed by one of the most successful alliances in the industry, FlexPod has become the converged infrastructure of choice for many of the largest enterprises around the globe. FlexPod is a portfolio of pre-validated, integrated infrastructure solutions that combine the Cisco Unified Computing System integrated infrastructure and NetApp storage components. Today, customers and partners can choose from more than 100 validated application and infrastructure designs. These solutions are designed and validated to reduce deployment time, project risk and the cost of IT. The portfolio is validated with leading hypervisors, operating systems, systems management tools and cloud management platforms for major enterprise workloads such as Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, Openstack and Docker.
Hybrid Cloud
NetApp believes that the hybrid cloud is fast becoming the dominant model for enterprise IT. Customers are attracted by the speed and scale benefits of the public cloud but need new data management capabilities to keep control of data as it moves beyond the walls of the enterprise. Our Data Fabric platform enables our customers to manage, secure and protect their data from on-premises to public to hybrid clouds, all at the scale needed to accommodate the exponential data growth of the digital world.
ONTAP Cloud
The ONTAP Cloud storage data management service allows customers to build an enterprise storage service on Amazon Web Services (AWS) Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) with Elastic Block Storage (EBS) with the flexibility to pay for only what a customer needs, when it needs it. In September 2016, we expanded this to support the Microsoft Azure public cloud. Whether customers want to move traditional database applications or legacy NAS applications to the cloud, ONTAP Cloud provides the data access, insights and control along the way.
NetApp Cloud Sync
NetApp Cloud Sync hybrid data management Software as a Service (“SaaS”) offering synchronizes customer data seamlessly and securely between on-premises or cloud storage and AWS Simple Storage Service (S3). Transfer times drop from hours to minutes.
NetApp Private Storage (NPS) for Cloud
NetApp Private Storage for Cloud is a family of enterprise storage solutions that lets customers use multiple industry-leading clouds and maintain complete control over their data on dedicated storage systems from NetApp while achieving the flexibility of the cloud for application and compute resources. In this approach, customer data resides on NetApp storage “next to”, rather than “in”, the cloud provider’s environment. The customer-owned NetApp system is co-located in data centers managed by our partner, Equinix, which has data centers located next to major networks and in close proximity to major cloud providers including AWS, Microsoft Azure and IBM SoftLayer.
AltaVault ® Cloud-integrated Solutions
With AltaVault, customers have the power to tap into cloud economics while preserving investments in existing backup infrastructure and meeting their backup and recovery service levels. AltaVault is offered in three deployment models to meet customer
needs. AltaVault physical appliances are often deployed in the data center to protect large volumes of data. These datasets typically require the highest levels of performance and scalability available. AltaVault virtual appliances, with support for VMware and Hyper-V, are an ideal solution for medium-sized businesses that want to get started with cloud backup or for enterprises that want to protect branch offices and remote offices with the same level of protection they enjoy in the data center. AltaVault cloud-based appliances on AWS and Azure are designed to offer an efficient and secure approach to backing up cloud-based workloads. Companies without a secondary data center or those looking for a low-cost tertiary recovery site also can use them for disaster recovery purposes.
NetApp Software Portfolio
OpenStack ® Contributions
NetApp is a Gold Member of the OpenStack Foundation, a global collaboration which supports the creation of an open-source cloud operating system. OpenStack is a global collaboration of developers and cloud computing technologists producing a ubiquitous open-source cloud computing platform for public and private clouds. NetApp storage integration with OpenStack makes deployment of cloud services simpler, faster and more scalable. NetApp drivers for OpenStack reduce the integration burden for IT departments deploying cloud services and enable high-value services and tight service-level agreements.
ONTAP Storage Operating System
In September 2016, we announced the latest release of our clustered ONTAP software, NetApp ONTAP 9. It simplifies customers’ digital transformations to next generation data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Customers can choose the architecture of their choice (engineered systems, software-defined storage or cloud), all with industry-leading efficiency, performance and density for flash environments; rapid and simplified deployment; and greater data protection and security. We continue to sell and support our legacy 7-mode Data ONTAP operating system for the decreasing number of installations that are not yet ready to move to ONTAP 9.
SANtricity Storage Operating System
In April 2016, we announced the newest release of the SANtricity OS, optimized for the new generations of data analytics applications. SANtricity provides superior performance, reliability and data protection for application-driven workloads that run on NetApp EF-Series and E-Series platforms. It allows customers to optimize performance on the fly, with adaptive caching algorithms to achieve high IOPS and throughput. Installed on over one million systems worldwide, the SANtricity OS is field-proven.
SolidFire Element Operating System
Announced in June 2016, NetApp’s newest version of Element OS delivers the industry’s most comprehensive enterprise feature set for creating a next generation data center. By consolidating multiple mixed workloads onto an agile, secure and automated infrastructure, Element OS 9 significantly improves flexibility and expands the range of use cases for SolidFire’s all-flash scale-out system.
Object Storage Software
NetApp StorageGRID ® Webscale software allows customers to store and manage massive amounts of data on premises and in the cloud. As a software-defined solution for media repositories, web data stores and large archives, the sophisticated policy engine provides automated data placement across storage tiers, physical sites and hybrid clouds. Real-time auditing provides continuous and active monitoring for service-level agreement verification and reporting. With support for Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift and NFS/SMB, it provides a scalable, highly durable object storage solution for primary storage and long-term archives.
NetApp Integrated Data Protection (IDP) Solutions
Embedded in ONTAP 9, our IDP solutions ensure customer data is available when and where it’s needed. Customers can scale their NetApp data protection capabilities across applications, virtual infrastructures and cloud architectures. They additionally benefit from controlled data access with secure multi-tenancy and military-grade (AES-256) encryption and proven key-management solutions.
Other critical IDP solutions include SnapMirror ® data replication technology; MetroCluster™ continuous-availability and disaster recovery software; SnapVault ® software for simplified backup and data recovery; SnapRestore ® data recovery software; and SnapLock ® compliance software.
OnCommand ® Management Software and Management Integration Tools
The NetApp OnCommand storage management software portfolio incorporates a broad range of data management tools for NetApp and multivendor storage. These products help our customers’ transition to the hybrid cloud. They improve visibility and allow customers to manage, monitor and optimize their hybrid cloud environments.
FlexArray ® Storage Virtualization Software
FlexArray software enables NetApp systems to virtualize existing EMC, HP, Hitachi and NetApp E-Series arrays to unify and streamline IT operations. Customers can transform existing arrays to create storage that spans private, public and hybrid clouds. It reduces capacity requirements on arrays by more than 35% and increases the usefulness of current storage.
Professional and Support Services
NetApp and our ecosystem of partners deliver a full portfolio of professional and technical services that enable customers to achieve greater business value from NetApp products and solution investments. Our professional services team and certified services partners have the expertise to assist customers with each phase of their IT lifecycle, from planning next-generation storage systems and deploying new technology to optimizing the operational efficiency of existing infrastructures.
Technical support services ensure our products operate efficiently and benefit from the most up-to-date software to help customers minimize downtime for systems running business-critical applications. Our services organization also provides in-depth guidance and education that include extensive access to our global technical resources and intellectual property. Customers can choose from a number of support options including direct touch, web-based My AutoSupport ® service, training on our product and solutions and an active online community of customers.
Sales, Principal Markets, and Distribution Channels
We market and sell our products in numerous countries throughout the world. To increase visibility of NetApp in the broader IT segment, we continue to make investments in our multi-year branding and awareness campaigns.
Our diversified customer base spans industry segments and vertical markets such as energy, financial services, government, high technology, internet, life sciences, healthcare services, manufacturing, media, entertainment, animation, video postproduction and telecommunications. NetApp focuses primarily on the data management and storage markets. We design our products to meet the needs of our broad customer base – from large enterprises to midsize customers.
NetApp uses a multichannel distribution strategy. We sell our products and services to end-user business customers and service providers through a direct sales force and an ecosystem of partners. We work with a wide range of partners for our customers, including technology partners, value-added resellers, system integrators, OEMs, service providers and distributors. During fiscal 2017, sales through our indirect channels represented 78% of our net revenues. Our global partner ecosystem is critical to NetApp’s growth and success. We are continually strengthening existing partnerships and investing in new ones to ensure we are meeting the evolving needs of our customers.
As of April 28, 2017, our worldwide sales and marketing functions consisted of approximately 5,100 managers, sales representatives and technical support personnel. We have field sales offices in approximately 45 countries. Sales to customers Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Avnet, Inc., which are distributors, accounted for 22% and 20% of our net revenues, respectively, in fiscal 2017. Information about sales to and accounts receivables from our major customers, segment disclosures, foreign operations and net sales attributable to our geographic regions is included in Note 16 – Segment, Geographic, and Significant Customer Information of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Seasonality
We have historically experienced a decline in revenues in the first quarter of our fiscal year, as the sales organization spends time developing new business after higher close rates in the fourth quarter, and because sales to European customers are historically weaker during the summer months. During the second quarter of our fiscal year, we have historically experienced increased sales, driven by the government sector, concurrent with the end of the U.S. federal government’s fiscal year in September, as well as an increase in business from European markets. We derive a majority of our revenue in any given quarter from orders booked in the same quarter. Bookings and revenues typically follow intra-quarter seasonality patterns weighted toward the back end of the quarter.
Backlog
We manufacture products based on a combination of specific order requirements and forecasts of our customers’ demand. Orders are generally placed by customers on an as-needed basis. A substantial portion of our products is sold on the basis of standard purchase orders that are cancellable prior to shipment without penalty. In certain circumstances, purchase orders are subject to change with respect to quantity of product or timing of delivery resulting from changes in customer requirements. Our business is characterized by seasonal and intra-quarter variability in demand, as well as short lead times and product delivery schedules. Accordingly, backlog at any given time might not be a meaningful indicator of future revenue.
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
We have outsourced manufacturing operations to third parties located in Memphis, Tennessee; San Jose, California; Guadalajara, Mexico; San Antonio, Texas; Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands; Komarom and Tiszaujvaros, Hungary; Wuxi and Tianjin, China; Taoyuan City, Taiwan; and Singapore. These operations include materials procurement, commodity management, component engineering, test engineering, manufacturing engineering, product assembly, product assurance, quality control, final test, and global logistics. We rely on a limited number of suppliers for materials, as well as several key subcontractors for the production of certain subassemblies and finished systems. We use multiple vendors and have our products manufactured in a number of locations wherever possible to mitigate our supply chain risk. Our strategy has been to develop close relationships with our suppliers, maximizing the exchange of critical information and facilitating implementation of joint quality programs. We use contract manufacturers for the production of major subassemblies and final system configuration. This manufacturing strategy minimizes capital investments and overhead expenditures while creating flexibility for rapid expansion.
We are certified to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 certification standards.
Research and Development
We conduct research and development activities in various locations throughout the world. Total research and development expenses were $779 million, $861 million and $920 million in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costs consist primarily of personnel and related costs incurred to conduct product development activities. Although we develop many of our products internally, we may acquire technology through business combinations or through licensing from third parties when appropriate. We believe that technical leadership is essential to our success, and we expect to continue to commit substantial resources to research and development.
Competition
We compete with many companies in the markets we serve, including established public companies, newly public companies with a strong flash focus, and new market entrants addressing the growing opportunity for hyperconverged systems. Some offer a broad spectrum of IT products and services (full-stack vendors) and others offer a more limited set of storage and data management products or services.
Technology trends, such as the emergence of hosted (or cloud) storage, SaaS and flash storage are driving significant changes in storage architectures and solution requirements. Cloud service providers provide customers storage as an operating expense, rather than storage systems capital expenditures, for the customers’ data centers, which competes with more traditional storage offerings. While the short- and long-term impact of these evolving trends cannot be predicted, NetApp is confident that our customers recognize the value in our cloud and Data Fabric strategy. Our strategy includes integrating and building relationships with these new classes of providers, and to date, we have established relationships with more than 300 cloud service providers and hyperscaler providers, including AWS, Google, IBM SoftLayer and Microsoft Azure.
We compete against HPE, Dell Technologies, HDS and IBM, as well as Pure Storage and other smaller players. Our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including some of our partners. It is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors might emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.
We consider innovation and our technology partnerships key to our competitive differentiation. We believe our competitive advantage also includes the nature of the relationships we form with our customers and partners worldwide. We strive to deliver an outstanding experience in every interaction we have with our customers and partners through our product, service, and support offerings, which enable us to provide our customers with a full range of expertise before, during and after their purchase.
Proprietary Rights
NetApp generally relies on patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and contract laws to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our technology and products. While our intellectual property rights are important to our success, we believe that our business as a whole is not materially dependent on any particular patent, trademark, copyright, license or other intellectual property right. We have been granted or own by assignment over 2,100 patents issued by, and have over 640 patent applications pending with, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as well as a corresponding number of international patents and patent applications. While the durations of our patents vary, we believe that the durations of our patents are adequate relative to the expected lives of our products.
NetApp, the NetApp logo, Active IQ, AltaVault, ASUP, AutoSupport, Campaign Express, Clustered Data ONTAP, Customer Fitness, Data ONTAP, DataMotion, Element, Fitness, Flash Accel, Flash Cache, Flash Pool, FlexArray, FlexCache, FlexClone, FlexPod, FlexScale, FlexShare, FlexVol, FPolicy, Fueled by SolidFire, GetSuccessful, Go Further, Faster, LockVault, Manage ONTAP, MetroCluster, MultiStore, NetApp Insight, OnCommand, ONTAP, ONTAPI, RAID DP, RAID-TEC, SANtricity, SecureShare, Simplicity, Simulate ONTAP, SnapCenter, Snap Creator, SnapCopy, SnapDrive, SnapIntegrator, SnapLock,
SnapManager, SnapMirror, SnapMover, SnapProtect, SnapRestore, Snapshot, SnapValidator, SnapVault, SolidFire, SolidFire Helix, SolidFire Helix Design, StorageGRID, SyncMirror, Tech OnTap, Unbound Cloud, WAFL and other names are trademarks or registered trademarks of NetApp Inc., in the United States and/or other countries.
We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, resellers, customers, and suppliers. In addition, through various licensing arrangements, we receive certain rights to intellectual property of others. We expect to maintain current licensing arrangements and to secure licensing arrangements in the future, as needed and to the extent available on reasonable terms and conditions, to support continued development and sales of our products and services. Some of these licensing arrangements require or might require royalty payments and other licensing fees. The amount of these payments and fees might depend on various factors, including but not limited to the structure of royalty payments; offsetting considerations, if any; and the degree of use of the licensed technology.
The industry in which we compete is characterized by rapidly changing technology, a large number of patents, and frequent claims and related litigation regarding intellectual property rights, and we may be exposed to various risks related to such claims or legal proceedings. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we might be subject to increased competition that could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
Environmental Disclosure
We are committed to the success of our customers and partners, to delivering value to our stockholders, and to positively affecting the communities where our employees work and live. We firmly believe that we can accomplish these objectives concurrently with our commitment to sustainability. We are committed to the prevention of pollution; efficient use of natural resources; and minimizing, relative to the growth of the company, the environmental impacts from our operations, products, and services, as well as complying with laws and regulations related to these areas. Our environmental management system provides the framework for setting, monitoring, and continuously improving our environmental goals and objectives.
We are voluntarily measuring, monitoring, and publicly reporting our scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions and participate in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). The CDP is a global standardized mechanism by which companies report their greenhouse gas emissions to institutional investors. We promote alternative transportation programs through education and awareness campaigns, and we continuously seek to optimize the energy efficiency of our buildings, labs, and data centers. At both the global and regional/state levels, various laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental laws are complex, change frequently, and have tended to become more stringent over time. It is often difficult to estimate the future impact of environmental matters. Based on current information, we believe that our primary risk related to climate change is the risk of increased energy costs. We are not subject to a cap and trade system or any other mitigation measures that could be material to our operations in the near future. Additionally, we have implemented disaster recovery and business resiliency measures to mitigate the physical risks our facilities, business, and supply chain might face as a consequence of severe weather-/climate-related phenomena such as earthquakes, floods, droughts, and other such natural occurrences.
We are also subject to other federal, state, and local regulations regarding workplace safety and protection of the environment. Various international, federal, state, and local provisions regulate the use and discharge of certain hazardous materials used in the manufacture of our products. Failure to comply with environmental regulations in the future could cause us to incur substantial costs or subject us to business interruptions. We believe we are substantially compliant with all applicable environmental laws. All of our products meet the requirements of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH); Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE); Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS); and China RoHS directives. We have maintained an environmental management system since December 2004. As part of ISO 14001 requirements, we set local environmental performance goals such as reducing energy use per square foot and minimizing waste generated on site, that are aligned with our overall corporate strategy. We also conduct an annual review and third-party verified audits of our operations, and we monitor environmental legislation and requirements to help make sure we are taking necessary measures to remain in compliance with applicable laws, not only in our operations but also for our products.
Employees
As of April 28, 2017, we had approximately 10,100 employees world-wide. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we consider relations with our employees to be good. Competition for technical personnel in the industry in which we compete is intense. We believe that our future success depends in part on our continued ability to hire, assimilate, and retain qualified personnel. To date, we believe that we have been successful in recruiting qualified employees, but there is no assurance that we will continue to be successful in the future.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers and their ages as of June 1, 2017, are as follows:
| Name | Age | Position |
| George Kurian | 50 | Chief Executive Officer and President |
| Ronald J. Pasek | 56 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Henri Richard | 59 | Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field and Customer Operations |
| Joel D. Reich | 58 | Executive Vice President, Product Operations |
| Matthew K. Fawcett | 49 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
George Kurian was appointed chief executive officer on June 1, 2015 and president on May 20, 2016. He joined our board of directors in June 2015. From September 2013 to May 2015, he was executive vice president of product operations, overseeing all aspects of technology strategy, product and solutions development across our product portfolio. Mr. Kurian joined NetApp in April 2011 as the senior vice president of the storage solutions group and was appointed to senior vice president of the Data ONTAP group in December 2011. Prior to NetApp, from 2002 to 2011, Mr. Kurian held several positions at Cisco Systems, including most recently vice president and general manager of the application networking and switching technology group. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Kurian was the vice president of product management and strategy at Akamai Technologies. Prior to that, he was a management consultant with McKinsey and Company, and led software engineering and product management teams at Oracle Corporation. Mr. Kurian holds a BS degree in electrical engineering from Princeton University and an MBA from Stanford University.
Ronald J. Pasek joined NetApp in April 2016 as executive vice president and chief financial officer, overseeing the finance, customer leasing, workplace resources, internal audit, and IT functions. Mr. Pasek served as senior vice president, finance and chief financial officer of Altera Corporation, a worldwide provider of programmable logic devices, from December 2009 until its acquisition by Intel in December 2015. Mr. Pasek was previously employed by Sun Microsystems, where he most recently served as vice president and corporate treasurer. In his 19 years at Sun Microsystems, he also held a variety of other positions in finance, including vice president of worldwide field finance, worldwide manufacturing, and U.S. field finance. Mr. Pasek is the Chairman of the board of directors of Spectra7 Microsystems Inc., a Canadian publicly traded consumer connectivity company. Mr. Pasek holds a BS degree from San Jose State University and an MBA from Santa Clara University.
Henri Richard joined NetApp in May 2016 as executive vice president of worldwide field and customer operations, leading NetApp’s global field and customer success operations, which supports the company’s ecosystem of channel, alliance, and service partners and perform customer-facing functions. Before joining NetApp, from April 2013 to May 2016, he was senior vice president of worldwide sales and support at SanDisk Corporation. Prior to SanDisk, Mr. Richard served as senior vice president of worldwide sales and marketing at Freescale Semiconductor from September 2007 to April 2013. Mr. Richard brings 30-years of experience serving in global executive roles at companies including Seagate, IBM, WebGain and AMD. He started his career in IT with Informatique Haute Performance in Paris, France, a company he founded. Mr. Richard was a member of the board of directors of Ultratech Inc., a formerly publicly traded advance packaging and laser processing company, until its acquisition by Veeco Instruments, Inc. in May 2017. Henri holds a bachelor of science degree from the Ecole Nationale de Radiotechnique et d’Electronique Appliquee in Asnieres, France.
Joel D. Reich joined NetApp in 2002 and was appointed executive vice president of product operations in June 2015. He is responsible for overseeing the strategy, development and manufacturing operations of the NetApp product and solutions portfolio. From April 2011 to June 2015, Mr. Reich served as NetApp’s senior vice president of the Hyperscale Storage Group. Before that time, he served in various NetApp Data ONTAP engineering leadership roles. Before joining NetApp, Joel was vice president of marketing and product operations for HighGround Systems, Inc. He also held the position of director of product management at Data General Corporation and EMC Corporation and was director of sales and marketing for Conner Peripherals Storage Systems Group. Mr. Reich holds a bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University.
Matthew K. Fawcett joined the company in September 2010 as senior vice president, general counsel, and secretary. Prior to joining NetApp, from 1999 to August 2010, Mr. Fawcett served in various legal positions at JDS Uniphase Corporation, an optical components company, including as senior vice president, general counsel, and corporate secretary. Prior to joining JDSU, Mr. Fawcett was counsel at Fujitsu and worked in private practice at Morrison & Foerster LLP. Mr. Fawcett is a member of the boards of the Association of Corporate Counsel and the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. Mr. Fawcett holds a BA degree from the University of California at Berkeley and a JD degree from the University of California at Los Angeles.
Additional Information
Our Internet address is www.netapp.com. We make available through our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and other documents filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC.
The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The public also may read and copy these filings at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information about this Public Reference Room is available by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
| --- | --- |
The following risk factors and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be considered and understood in the context of the following risk factors, which describe circumstances that may materially harm our future business, operating results or financial condition. The following discussion reflects our current judgment regarding the most significant risks we face. These risks can and will change in the future.
Our business may be harmed by trends in the networked storage hardware market or if we are unable to keep pace with rapid industry, technological and market changes.
Our industry and the markets in which we compete have historically experienced significant growth due to the increase in the demand for storage and data management solutions by consumers, enterprises and government bodies around the world, and the resultant purchases of storage and data management solutions to address this demand. However, despite continued data growth, the networked storage hardware market experienced a decline in each of the last two calendar years due to a combination of customers delaying purchases in the face of technology transitions, increasing adoption of Cloud environment built on commodity hardware, increased storage efficiency, and changing economic and business environments. While customers are navigating through their IT transformations, which leverage modern architectures and hybrid cloud environments, they are also reducing IT budgets, looking for simpler solutions, and rethinking how they consume IT. This evolution is diverting spending towards transformational projects and architectures like flash, hybrid cloud, IT as a service, converged infrastructure, and software defined storage. Our business may be adversely impacted if we are unable to keep pace with rapid industry, technological or market changes or if our Data Fabric strategy is not accepted in the marketplace. As a result of these and other factors discussed in the report, our revenue may grow at a slower rate than in past periods, or may decline as it did in fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017, on a year-over year basis. The future impact of these trends on both short-term and long-term growth patterns is uncertain. If the general historical rate of industry growth declines, if the growth rates of the specific markets in which we compete decline, and/or if the consumption model of storage changes and our new and existing products, services and solutions do not receive customer acceptance, our business, operating results and financial condition could suffer.
If we are unable to develop, introduce and gain market acceptance for new products while managing the transition from older products, or if we cannot provide the expected level of quality, service and support for our new products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
Our future growth depends upon the successful development and introduction of new hardware and software products and related services. Due to the complexity of storage software, subsystems and appliances and the difficulty in gauging the engineering effort required to produce new products, such products are subject to significant technical and quality control risks.
If we are unable, for technological, customer reluctance or other reasons, to develop, introduce and gain market acceptance for new products, as and when required by the market and our customers, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
New or additional product introductions, including new software and flash product offerings, such as ONTAP Cloud, all flash FAS, AltaVault, and SolidFire, subject us to additional financial and operational risks, including our ability to forecast customer preferences and/or demand, our ability to successfully manage the transition from older products and solutions, our ability to forecast the impact of customers’ demand for new products and solutions or the products being replaced, and our ability to manage production capacity to meet the demand for new products. In addition, as new or enhanced products are introduced, we must also avoid excessive levels of older product inventories and related components and ensure that enough supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customers’ demands. Further risks inherent in new product and solutions introductions include the uncertainty of price-performance relative to products of competitors, competitors’ responses to the introductions, delays in sales caused by the desire of customers to evaluate new products for extended periods of time and our partners’ investment in selling our new products and solutions. If these risks are not managed effectively, we could experience material risks to our operations, financial condition and business model.
As we enter new or emerging markets, we will likely increase demands on our service and support operations and may be exposed to additional competition. We may not be able to provide products, service and support to effectively compete for these market opportunities.
Our new consumption based business models may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We offer customers a full range of consumption models, including the deployment of our software through our subscription and cloud-based SaaS, and utility pricing and managed services offerings for our hardware and software systems. These business models continue to evolve, and we may not be able to compete effectively, generate significant revenues or maintain the profitability of our consumption based offerings. Additionally, the increasing prevalence of cloud and SaaS delivery models offered by us and our competitors may unfavorably impact the pricing of our on-premise hardware and software offerings and could have a dampening impact on overall demand for our on-premise hardware and software product and service offerings, which could reduce our revenues
and profitability, at least in the near term. If we do not successfully execute our consumption model strategy or anticipate the needs of our customers, our revenues and profitability could decline.
As customer demand for our consumption model offerings increases, we could experience volatility in our reported revenues and operating results due to the differences in timing of revenue recognition between our hardware arrangements and software licenses, (that are generally recognized in full at the time of delivery), relative to our consumption model offering arrangements, (that are generally recognized ratably over the terms of the arrangement). We incur certain expenses associated with the infrastructure and marketing of our consumption model offerings in advance of our ability to recognize the revenues associated with these offerings.
Our sales and distribution structure makes forecasting revenues difficult and, if disrupted, could harm our operating results.
Our business and sales models make revenues difficult to forecast. We sell to a variety of customers, with a corresponding variety of sales cycles. In addition, the majority of our sales are made and/or fulfilled indirectly through channel partners, including value-added resellers, systems integrators, distributors, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and strategic business partners. This structure significantly complicates our ability to forecast future revenue, especially within any particular fiscal quarter or year. Moreover, our relationships with our indirect channel partners are critical to our success. The loss of one or more of our key indirect channel partners in a given geographic area or the failure of our channel partners to promote our products could harm our operating results, as qualifying and developing new indirect channel partners typically require a significant investment of time and resources before acceptable levels of productivity are met. If we
Showing the first 8K of 61K characters. Open the full section
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
| --- | --- |
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
| --- | --- |
We own approximately 1.1 million square feet of facilities at our Sunnyvale, California headquarters. The Sunnyvale site supports research and development, corporate general administration, sales and marketing, global services and operations.
We own approximately 0.8 million square feet of facilities in Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina. In addition, we own 65 acres of undeveloped land. The RTP site supports research and development, global services and sales and marketing.
We own forty acres of land and approximately 0.3 million square feet of facilities in Wichita, Kansas. This site supports sales and marketing, research and development, and global services.
We own approximately 1.0 million square feet of facilities in Bangalore, India. The Bangalore site supports research and development, marketing and global services.
We lease other sales offices and research and development facilities throughout the U.S. and internationally. We expect that our existing facilities and those being developed worldwide are suitable and adequate for our requirements over at least the next two years and that additional space will be available as needed.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
| --- | --- |
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
| --- | --- |
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| --- | --- |
The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol NTAP.
Price Range of Common Stock
The price range per share of common stock presented below represents the highest and lowest intraday sales prices for the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ during each quarter of our two most recent fiscal years.
| Fiscal 2017 | Fiscal 2016 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 26.95 | $ | 22.50 | $ | 37.07 | $ | 30.25 | ||||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 36.10 | $ | 25.82 | $ | 34.81 | $ | 28.75 | ||||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 39.00 | $ | 30.36 | $ | 34.73 | $ | 20.66 | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 43.14 | $ | 37.48 | $ | 27.51 | $ | 20.89 |
Holders
As of June 9, 2017 there were 474 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
The Company paid cash dividends of $0.19 per outstanding common share in each quarter of fiscal 2017 for an aggregate of $208 million, $0.18 per outstanding common share in each quarter of fiscal 2016 for an aggregate of $210 million, and $0.165 per outstanding common share in each quarter of fiscal 2015 for an aggregate of $208 million.
Performance Graph
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return, calculated on a dividend reinvested basis, of an investment of $100 for the Company, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the S&P 1500 Technology Hardware & Equipment Index for the five years ended April 28, 2017. The comparisons in the graphs below are based upon historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock. The graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any past or future filing with the SEC, except to the extent that such filing specifically states that such graph and related information are incorporated by reference into such filing.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among NetApp, Inc., the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the S&P 1500 Technology Hardware & Equipment Index*

*$100 invested on April 27, 2012 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the Company’s common stock and each of the indexes.
| April 2012 | April 2013 | April 2014 | April 2015 | April 2016 | April 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetApp, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 89.34 | $ | 91.05 | $ | 95.66 | $ | 64.23 | $ | 110.78 | ||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 115.32 | $ | 138.69 | $ | 160.85 | $ | 160.35 | $ | 189.08 | ||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Information Technology Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 98.03 | $ | 123.36 | $ | 153.98 | $ | 151.51 | $ | 205.08 | ||||||||||||
| S&P 1500 Technology Hardware & Equipment Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 84.18 | $ | 113.20 | $ | 147.88 | $ | 119.17 | $ | 176.51 |
We believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. See Item 1A. – Risk Factors.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table provides information with respect to the shares of common stock repurchased by us during the three months ended April 28, 2017:
| Total Number of Shares | Approximate Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Number | Average | Purchased as Part of | of Shares That May Yet | |||||||||||||
| of Shares | Price Paid | Publicly Announced | Be Purchased Under The | |||||||||||||
| Period | Purchased | per Share | Program | Repurchase Program | ||||||||||||
| (Shares in thousands) | (Shares in thousands) | (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
| January 28, 2017 - February 24, 2017 | 345 | $ | 40.56 | 266,103 | $ | 910 | ||||||||||
| February 25, 2017 - March 24, 2017 | 2,770 | $ | 41.87 | 268,873 | $ | 794 | ||||||||||
| March 25, 2017 - April 28, 2017 | — | $ | — | 268,873 | $ | 794 | ||||||||||
| Total | 3,115 | $ | 41.72 |
In May 2003, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program. As of April 28, 2017, our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $9.6 billion of our common stock. Since inception of the program through April 28, 2017, we repurchased a total of 269 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $8.8 billion. Under this program, we may purchase shares of our outstanding common stock through open market and privately negotiated transactions at prices deemed appropriate by our management. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
| --- | --- |
The following selected consolidated financial data set forth below was derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results of operations are not indicative of our future results of operations.
| Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015 | April 25, 2014 | April 26, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues | $ | 5,519 | $ | 5,546 | $ | 6,123 | $ | 6,325 | $ | 6,332 | ||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 3,390 | $ | 3,373 | $ | 3,833 | $ | 3,919 | $ | 3,761 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 509 | $ | 229 | $ | 560 | $ | 638 | $ | 505 | ||||||||||
| Net income per share, basic | $ | 1.85 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 1.77 | $ | 1.87 | $ | 1.40 | ||||||||||
| Net income per share, diluted | $ | 1.81 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||||
| Shares used in basic computation | 275 | 294 | 316 | 340 | 362 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares used in diluted computation | 281 | 297 | 321 | 348 | 368 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.60 | $ | — |
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015 | April 25, 2014 | April 26, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ | 4,921 | $ | 5,303 | $ | 5,326 | $ | 5,003 | $ | 6,953 | ||||||||||
| Working capital | $ | 2,076 | $ | 2,786 | $ | 4,064 | $ | 3,776 | $ | 4,588 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 9,493 | $ | 10,037 | $ | 9,401 | $ | 9,214 | $ | 11,235 | ||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | 1,993 | $ | 2,339 | $ | 1,487 | $ | 990 | $ | 2,252 | ||||||||||
| Total deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue | $ | 3,342 | $ | 3,385 | $ | 3,197 | $ | 3,100 | $ | 3,010 | ||||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | $ | 2,780 | $ | 2,881 | $ | 3,414 | $ | 3,787 | $ | 4,718 |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| --- | --- |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and the accompanying notes set forth under Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The following discussion also contains trend information and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A. – Risk Factors are hereby incorporated into the discussion by reference.
Executive Overview
Our Company
We are a leader in data insight, access, and control for hybrid cloud environments. We provide global organizations the ability to manage and share their data across on-premises, private and public clouds. We, together with our partners, provide a full range of enterprise-class solutions that customers use to modernize their infrastructures, build next generation data centers and harness the power of hybrid clouds. We continue to pioneer a Data Fabric platform that allows infrastructure experts, cloud architects, developers and CIOs to easily and securely unite and manage data across the widest variety of environments.
To help our customers and partners manage and share their data across on-premises, and private and public clouds, we are focusing on the customer by delivering an exceptional customer experience and becoming their preferred data partner; extending our cloud integration and hybrid cloud leadership through the NetApp Data Fabric platform and expanding our consumption model offerings to match customer needs across cloud and on-premises offerings.
The NetApp Data Fabric is a platform designed to simplify, automate and evolve the management of data. Data Fabric empowers our customers to seamlessly liberate, integrate and unleash the full potential of their data in a cloud, hybrid and on-premises world. Built for the challenges and opportunities of the data-centric world, our products and solutions are designed for simplicity and optimized to manage, protect and secure data. Because our Data Fabric platform is open by design, we can constantly fuel innovation and flexibility. Our products and solutions portfolio centers on the digital transformation phases through which our customers are progressing: modernizing storage and data management, building next generation data centers and harnessing the power of hybrid cloud.
Our unified scale-out fabric-attached storage (FAS) platform is designed to meet the demanding requirements of shared infrastructures and cloud environments. Our FAS storage platform uses the NetApp Data ONTAP storage operating system to deliver integrated data protection, comprehensive data management, and built-in efficiency software for virtualized, shared infrastructures, cloud computing, and mixed workload business applications. Our E-Series high-performance storage area network platform is designed to meet demanding performance and capacity requirements of dedicated workloads, while retaining simplicity and an optimized price to performance ratio. Our SolidFire All-Flash Arrays deliver fully automated agility and guaranteed application performance at web scale so customers can achieve the next-generation data center.
Flash plays a key role in customers’ digital transformation efforts as they seek to gain advantage through greater speed, responsiveness and value from key business applications, while lowering total cost of ownership. All-flash array technology is the de facto choice for primary application workloads as customers seek performance and economic benefits by replacing hard disk installations. With our all-flash array portfolio, including our AFF-Series, EF-Series and SolidFire SF-Series products, we enable customers to modernize storage and data management to boost performance in their traditional data centers, while mapping out their move to a hybrid cloud.
Our hybrid flash storage serves customers who want the option to deploy the speed of flash storage where they need it while using more affordable hard disk drives to address capacity requirements. Our hybrid arrays include the FAS series of unified storage systems and the E-Series of block storage offerings.
We employ a multichannel distribution strategy, selling products and services to end users and service providers through a direct sales force and through channel partners, including value-added resellers, system integrators, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and distributors.
To provide visibility into our transition from older products to our newer, higher growth products and clarity into the dynamics of our product revenue, we group our products by “Strategic” and “Mature” solutions. Strategic solutions include Clustered ONTAP, branded E-Series, SolidFire, AltaVault and optional add-on software products. Mature solutions include 7-mode OnTap, add-on hardware and related operating system (OS) software and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) products. Both our Mature and Strategic product lines include a mix of disk, hybrid and all flash storage media.
In addition to our products, we provide a variety of services including software maintenance, hardware maintenance and other services including professional services, global support solutions, and customer education and training to help customers most effectively manage their data.
Financial Results and Key Performance Metrics Overview
The following table provides an overview of some of our key financial metrics for each of the last three fiscal years (in millions, except per share amounts, percentages and cash conversion cycle):
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues | $ | 5,519 | $ | 5,546 | $ | 6,123 | ||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 3,390 | $ | 3,373 | $ | 3,833 | ||||||
| Gross profit margin percentage | 61 | % | 61 | % | 63 | % | ||||||
| Income from operations | $ | 665 | $ | 348 | $ | 716 | ||||||
| Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues | 12 | % | 6 | % | 12 | % | ||||||
| Net income | $ | 509 | $ | 229 | $ | 560 | ||||||
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 1.81 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 1.75 | ||||||
| Operating cash flows | $ | 986 | $ | 974 | $ | 1,268 |
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue | $ | 3,342 | $ | 3,385 | ||||
| Cash conversion cycle | 15 | 28 |
| • | Net revenues: Our net revenues were relatively flat in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. This was primarily due to an increase of 1% in product revenues, partially offset by a 2% decrease in software and hardware maintenance and other services revenues. |
|---|
| • | Gross profit margin percentage: Our gross profit margin as a percentage of net revenues was relatively flat in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 reflecting a decrease in gross profit margin on product revenues, mostly offset by an increase in gross profit margin on hardware maintenance and other services revenues. |
|---|
| • | Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues: Our income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to lower operating expenses resulting from our cost reduction initiatives. |
|---|
| | • | Net income and Diluted income per share: The 122% and 135% increases in net income and diluted net income per share, respectively, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 reflect the factors discussed above, as well as a decrease in our effective tax rate of 10 percentage points. Diluted net income per share was favorably impacted by a 5% d
Showing the first 8K of 96K characters. Open the full section
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
| --- | --- |
We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exchange risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. All financial instruments are used in accordance with management-approved policies.
Interest Rate Risk
Fixed Income Investments — As of April 28, 2017, we had fixed income debt investments of $2.6 billion. Our investment portfolio primarily consists of investments with original maturities greater than three months at the date of purchase, which are classified as available-for-sale investments. These investments, which consist primarily of corporate bonds, U.S. Treasury and government debt securities, commercial paper, and certificates of deposit, are subject to interest rate and interest income risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. Conversely, declines in interest rates, including the impact from lower credit spreads, could have a material adverse impact on interest income for our investment portfolio. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in market interest rates from levels as of April 28, 2017 would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed-income securities of approximately $39 million. Volatility in market interest rates over time will cause variability in our interest income. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
Our investment policy is to limit credit exposure through diversification and investment in highly rated securities. We further mitigate concentrations of credit risk in our investments by limiting our investments in the debt securities of a single issuer and by diversifying risk across geographies and type of issuer. We actively review, along with our investment advisors, current investment ratings, company-specific events and general economic conditions in managing our investments and in determining whether there is a significant decline in fair value that is other-than-temporary. We monitor and evaluate our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for any other-than-temporary impairments.
Debt — As of April 28, 2017, we have outstanding $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes. We carry these instruments at face value less unamortized discount on our consolidated balance sheets. Since these instruments bear interest at fixed rates, we have no financial statement risk associated with changes in interest rates. However, the fair value of these instruments fluctuates when interest rates change. See Note 10 – Financing Arrangements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Credit Facility — We are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates in connection with our $600 million five-year revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the facility accrue interest at rates that vary based on certain market rates and our credit rating on our Senior Notes. Consequently, our interest expense would fluctuate with any changes in these market interest rates or in our credit rating if we were to borrow any amounts under the credit facility. As of April 28, 2017, no amounts were outstanding under the credit facility.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We hedge risks associated with foreign currency transactions to minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on earnings. We utilize foreign currency exchange forward and option contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. We also use foreign currency exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency exposures related to forecasted sales transactions denominated in certain foreign currencies. These derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
We do not enter into foreign currency exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes. In entering into foreign currency exchange forward and option contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of the contracts. We attempt to limit our exposure to credit risk by executing foreign currency exchange contracts with creditworthy multinational commercial banks. All contracts have a maturity of less than six months. See Note 12 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our derivatives and hedging activities.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
| --- | --- |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NETAPP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except par value) | ||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,444 | $ | 2,868 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 2,477 | 2,435 | ||||||
| Accounts receivable | 731 | 813 | ||||||
| Inventories | 163 | 98 | ||||||
| Other current assets | 383 | 234 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 6,198 | 6,448 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 799 | 937 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 1,684 | 1,676 | ||||||
| Other intangible assets, net | 131 | 180 | ||||||
| Other non-current assets | 681 | 796 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 9,493 | $ | 10,037 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 347 | $ | 254 | ||||
| Accrued expenses | 782 | 765 | ||||||
| Commercial paper notes | 500 | — | ||||||
| Short-term loan | — | 849 | ||||||
| Current portion of long-term debt | 749 | — | ||||||
| Short-term deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue | 1,744 | 1,794 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 4,122 | 3,662 | ||||||
| Long-term debt | 744 | 1,490 | ||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 249 | 413 | ||||||
| Long-term deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue | 1,598 | 1,591 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 6,713 | 7,156 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) | ||||||||
| Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding as of April 28, 2017 or April 29, 2016 | — | — | ||||||
| Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value, 885 shares authorized; 269 and 281 shares issued and outstanding as of April 28, 2017 and April 29, 2016, respectively | 2,769 | 2,912 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 40 | — | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (29 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 2,780 | 2,881 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 9,493 | $ | 10,037 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NETAPP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015 | ||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Product | $ | 3,006 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,655 | ||||||
| Software maintenance | 965 | 949 | 899 | |||||||||
| Hardware maintenance and other services | 1,548 | 1,611 | 1,569 | |||||||||
| Net revenues | 5,519 | 5,546 | 6,123 | |||||||||
| Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Cost of product | 1,614 | 1,558 | 1,657 | |||||||||
| Cost of software maintenance | 28 | 37 | 36 | |||||||||
| Cost of hardware maintenance and other services | 487 | 578 | 597 | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenues | 2,129 | 2,173 | 2,290 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 3,390 | 3,373 | 3,833 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 1,633 | 1,792 | 1,913 | |||||||||
| Research and development | 779 | 861 | 920 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 271 | 307 | 284 | |||||||||
| Restructuring charges | 52 | 108 | — | |||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | — | 8 | — | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of properties | (10 | ) | (51 | ) | — | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 2,725 | 3,025 | 3,117 | |||||||||
| Income from operations | 665 | 348 | 716 | |||||||||
| Other expense, net | — | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 665 | 345 | 713 | |||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | 156 | 116 | 153 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 509 | $ | 229 | $ | 560 | ||||||
| Net income per share: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.85 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 1.77 | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | 1.81 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 1.75 | ||||||
| Shares used in net income per share calculations: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 275 | 294 | 316 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 281 | 297 | 321 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NETAPP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| . | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 28, 2017 | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015 | ||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 509 | $ | 229 | $ | 560 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (10 | ) | 4 | (28 | ) | |||||||
| Defined benefit obligations: | ||||||||||||
| Defined benefit obligation adjustments | 25 | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
| Reclassification adjustments related to defined benefit obligations | 1 | 2 | — | |||||||||
| Income tax effect | (10 | ) | 2 | 4 | ||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | 2 | |||||||
| Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income | — | (1 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges: | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | 8 | (4 | ) | 15 | ||||||||
| Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net income | (6 | ) | 1 | (14 | ) | |||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): |
Showing the first 8K of 146K characters. Open the full section
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
| --- | --- |
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
| --- | --- |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The phrase “disclosure controls and procedures” refers to controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of April 28, 2017, the end of the fiscal period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Evaluation Date). Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of April 28, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2017 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
| --- | --- |
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
| --- | --- |
The information required by Item 10 with respect to our executive officers is incorporated herein by reference from the information under Item 1 – Business of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the section entitled “Executive Officers.” The information required by Item 10 with respect to the Company’s directors and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the headings “Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance,” respectively, in the Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our year ended April 28, 2017. The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to our Board of Directors and all of our employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. A copy of the code of ethics, which we refer to as our “Code of Conduct,” is available on our website at http://investors.netapp.com/governance.cfm. We will post any amendments to or waivers from the provisions of our Code of Conduct on our website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
| --- | --- |
Information regarding the compensation of executive officers and directors of the Company is incorporated by reference from the information under the headings “Executive Compensation and Related Information” and “Director Compensation,” respectively, in our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
| --- | --- |
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is incorporated by reference from the information under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
| --- | --- |
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is incorporated by reference from the information under the headings “Corporate Governance” and “Certain Transactions with Related Parties” in our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
| --- | --- |
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Audit Fees” in our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
With the exception of the information incorporated in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, NetApp’s Proxy Statement is not deemed “filed” as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
| --- | --- |
| (a) | Documents filed as part of this report |
| (1) | All Financial Statements |
See index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K
| (2) | Financial Statement Schedules |
All financial statement schedules have been omitted, since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K.
| (3) | Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K |
The information required by this Section (a)(3) of Item 15 is set forth on the exhibit index that follows the Signatures page of this Form 10-K.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NETAPP, INC. | ||
|---|---|---|
| By: | /s/ GEORGE KURIAN | |
| George Kurian | ||
| Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Operating Officer) | ||
| Date: June 20, 2017 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints George Kurian and Ronald J. Pasek, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /s/ GEORGE KURIAN | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Operating Officer) | June 20, 2017 | ||
| George Kurian | ||||
| /s/ RONALD J. PASEK | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Ronald J. Pasek | ||||
| /s/ T. MICHAEL NEVENS | Chairman of the Board | June 20, 2017 | ||
| T. Michael Nevens | ||||
| /s/ JEFFRY R. ALLEN | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Jeffry R. Allen | ||||
| /s/ ALAN L. EARHART | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Alan L. Earhart | ||||
| /s/ GERALD HELD | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Gerald Held | ||||
| /s/ KATHRYN M. HILL | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Kathryn M. Hill | ||||
| /s/ GEORGE T. SHAHEEN | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| George T. Shaheen | ||||
| /s/ STEPHEN M. SMITH | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Stephen M. Smith | ||||
| /s/ ROBERT T. WALL | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Robert T. Wall | ||||
| /s/ RICHARD P. WALLACE | Director | June 20, 2017 | ||
| Richard P. Wallace |
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Incorporation by Reference | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exhibit No | Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | |||||
| 31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | — | — | — | — |
| * | Identifies management plan or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|---|
| † | The schedules and other attachments to this exhibit have been omitted. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any omitted schedules or attachments to the SEC upon request. |
|---|