NXP Semiconductors 20-F 2012-12-31
Filed 2013-03-01. 24 sections, 687K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
20-F 1 d425549d20f.htm FORM 20-F
Table of Contents
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
| ¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
OR
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
For the transition period from to
OR
| ¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
Date of event requiring this shell company report
Commission file number 001-34841
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
The Netherlands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
High Tech Campus 60, Eindhoven 5656 AG, the Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices)
Jean Schreurs, SVP and Senior Corporate Counsel, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Telephone: +31 40 2728686 / E-mail: jean.schreurs@nxp.com
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common shares—par value euro (EUR) 0.20 per share | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Common shares—par value EUR 0.20 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report.
| Class | Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | |
| Ordinary shares, par value EUR 0.20 per share | 251,751,500 shares |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes ¨ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨ Yes x No
Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| U.S. GAAP x | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued | Other ¨ | ||||
| by the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Introduction
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that contain risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from future results as a result of factors such as those set forth in Part I. Item 3D. Risk Factors and Part I, Item 5G. Safe Harbor.
The financial information included in this Annual Report is based on United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), unless otherwise indicated.
In presenting and discussing our financial position, operating results and cash flows, management uses certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. These non-U.S. GAAP financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as alternatives to the equivalent U.S. GAAP measures and should be used in conjunction with the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures. A discussion of non-U.S. GAAP measures included in this Annual Report and a reconciliation of such measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are set forth under “Use of Certain Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures” contained in this report under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results.
Unless otherwise required, all references herein to “we”, “our”, “us”, “NXP” and the “Company” are to NXP Semiconductors N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
A glossary of abbreviations and technical terms used in this Annual Report is set forth on page 82.
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents a summary of our selected historical consolidated financial data. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The results of operations for prior years are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
Table of Contents
The selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the discussion under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
| As of and for the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions unless otherwise stated) | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009(1) | 2008(1) | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | 4,358 | 4,194 | 4,402 | 3,519 | 5,104 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 412 | 357 | 273 | (931 | ) | (2,643 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Financial income (expense)-net | (437 | ) | (257 | ) | (628 | ) | 682 | (614 | ) | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to stockholders | (116 | ) | (44 | ) | (515 | ) | (199 | ) | (3,593 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to stockholders | 1 | 434 | 59 | 32 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders | (115 | ) | 390 | (456 | ) | (167 | ) | (3,557 | ) | |||||||||||
| Per share data(2)(3): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from continuing operations | (0.46 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (2.25 | ) | (0.93 | ) | (19.94 | ) | ||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | 1.74 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
| - Net income (loss) | (0.46 | ) | 1.57 | (1.99 | ) | (0.78 | ) | (19.74 | ) | |||||||||||
| Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year (in thousands)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| - Basic and diluted | 248,064 | 248,812 | 229,280 | 215,252 | 180,210 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 617 | 743 | 898 | 1,026 | 1,781 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 6,439 | 6,612 | 7,637 | 8,579 | 10,213 | |||||||||||||||
| Net assets | 1,284 | 1,357 | 1,219 | 1,041 | 1,182 | |||||||||||||||
| Working capital(5) | 765 | 969 | 811 | 870 | 1,355 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt(6) | 3,492 | 3,799 | 4,551 | 5,283 | 6,367 | |||||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,049 | 1,145 | 986 | 843 | 969 | |||||||||||||||
| Common stock | 51 | 51 | 51 | 42 | 42 | |||||||||||||||
| Other operating data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | (251 | ) | (221 | ) | (258 | ) | (92 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization(7) | 533 | 591 | 684 | 887 | 1,924 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated statements of cash flows data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | 722 | 175 | 361 | (701 | ) | (638 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (243 | ) | (202 | ) | (269 | ) | 63 | 1,046 | ||||||||||||
| Financing activities | (574 | ) | (926 | ) | (157 | ) | (109 | ) | 299 | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations | (95 | ) | (953 | ) | (65 | ) | (747 | ) | 707 | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations | (45 | ) | 809 | (5 | ) | — | 2 |
| (1) | All years prior to 2010 have been restated to reflect the effect of the sale of the Sound Solutions business in 2011 as discontinued operations. |
|---|
| (2) | On February 29, 2008, through a multi-step transaction, the nominal value of the common shares was decreased from €1.00 to €0.01 and all preference shares were converted into common shares, which resulted in an increase of outstanding common shares from 100 million to 4.3 billion. On August 2, 2010, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split, decreasing the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 4.3 billion to approximately 215 million and increasing the par value of the shares of common stock from €0.01 to €0.20. In all periods presented, basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and earnings per share have been calculated to reflect the 1-for-20 reverse stock split. |
|---|
| (3) | The Company has not paid any dividends during the periods presented. |
|---|
| (4) | Due to our net losses from continuing operations attributable to stockholders in the periods from 2008 to 2012, all potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. |
|---|
| (5) | Working capital is calculated as current assets less current liabilities (excluding short-term debt). |
|---|
Table of Contents
| (6) | As adjusted for our cash and cash equivalents our net debt was calculated as follows: |
|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 3,185 | 3,747 | 4,128 | 4,673 | 5,964 | |||||||||||||||
| Short-term debt | 307 | 52 | 423 | 610 | 403 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt | 3,492 | 3,799 | 4,551 | 5,283 | 6,367 | |||||||||||||||
| Less: cash and cash equivalents | (617 | ) | (743 | ) | (898 | ) | (1,026 | ) | (1,781 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net debt | 2,875 | 3,056 | 3,653 | 4,257 | 4,586 |
Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures” under Part I, 5A. Operating Results.
| (7) | Depreciation and amortization includes the cumulative net effect of purchase price adjustments related to a number of acquisitions and divestments, including the purchase by a consortium of private equity investors of an 80.1% interest in our business, described elsewhere in this Annual Report as our “Formation.” The cumulative net effects of purchase
Showing the first 8K of 102K characters. Open the full section
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company
Name and History
Our legal name is NXP Semiconductors N.V. and our commercial name is “NXP” or “NXP Semiconductors”.
We were incorporated in the Netherlands as a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid) under the name KASLION Acquisition B.V. on August 2, 2006, in connection with the sale by Philips of 80.1% of its semiconductor business to the “Private Equity Consortium”. For a list of the specific funds that hold our common stock and their respective share ownership, see Part I, Item 7A. Major Shareholders elsewhere in this document. Initially, the Private Equity Consortium invested in our Company through KASLION Holding B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability.
On May 21, 2010, we converted into a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed our name to NXP Semiconductors N.V. Concurrently, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our shares of common stock.
In August 2010, we made an initial public offering of 34 million shares of our common stock and listed our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
On March 31, 2011, certain of our stockholders offered 30 million shares of our common stock, priced at $30.00 per share. The underwriters of the offering exercised in full their option to purchase from the selling stockholders 4,431,000 additional shares of common
Table of Contents
stock at the secondary offering price. We did not receive any proceeds from this secondary offering. The settlement date for the offering was April 5, 2011. On February 4, 2013, certain of our stockholders offered 30 million shares of our common stock, priced at $30.35 per share. We did not receive any proceeds from this secondary offering either. The settlement date for the offering was February 7, 2013.
We are a holding company whose only material assets are the direct ownership of 100% of the shares of NXP B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid).
Our corporate seat is in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Our principal executive office is at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, the Netherlands, and our telephone number is +31 40 2729233. Our registered agent in the United States is NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc., 411 East Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, United States of America, phone number +1 408 5185400.
NXP Repositioning
Since our separation from Philips in 2006, we have significantly repositioned our business and market strategy. Further, between 2008 and 2011, we executed our Redesign Program to better align our costs with our more focused business scope, and in November 2012 we announced the introduction of our OPEX Reduction Program focusing specifically on selling, general and administrative expenses and aimed at finding ways to run our company more efficiently in our cyclical industry. Key elements of our repositioning are:
| • | Focus on High Performance Mixed Signal solutions. We have implemented our strategy of focusing on High Performance Mixed Signal solutions because we believe it to be an attractive market in terms of growth, barriers to entry, relative market share, relative business and pricing stability, and capital intensity. Several transactions have been core to our strategic realignment and focus on High Performance Mixed Signal: in September 2007, we divested our cordless phone system-on-chip business to DSP Group, Inc. (“DSPG”); in July 2008, we contributed our wireless activities to the ST-NXP Wireless joint venture (our stake in which was subsequently sold, with the business being renamed “ST-Ericsson”); and in February 2010, we merged our television systems and set-top box business with Trident. Our primary motivations for exiting the system-on-chip markets for wireless activities and consumer applications were the significant research and development investment requirements and high customer concentration inherent in these markets. In addition, we sold two non-semiconductor component businesses. On December 14, 2010, we sold NuTune Singapore Pte. Ltd. (“NuTune”), our joint venture with Technicolor S.A. that produces can tuner modules for all segments related to broadcast transmission, to AIAC. In July 2011, we sold our Sound Solutions business (formerly included in our Standard Products segment), which makes mobile speakers and receivers, to Knowles Electronics, an affiliate of Dover Corporation. This has enabled us to significantly increase our research and development investments in the High-Performance Mixed-Signal applications on which we focus. To further strengthen our High Performance Mixed Signal position, we have made a number of acquisitions in recent years, such as the acquisition on July 21, 2010 of Jennic Ltd., a developer of low power RF solutions for wireless applications. On April 12, 2012 we acquired Catena Holding B.V., a design and IP company, specialized in radio frequency communication, analog, mixed signal and digital signal processing. |
|---|
| • | New customer engagement strategy. We have implemented a new approach to serving our customers and have invested in significant additional resources in our sales and marketing organizations. We have created “application marketing” teams that focus on delivering solutions that include as many suitable NXP components as possible in their system reference designs, which helps us achieve greater cross-selling between our various product lines, while helping our customers accelerate their time to market. With an increased number of application engineers and our applications marketing approach, we are able to engage with more design locations ranging from our largest, highest volume customers to the mid-size customers who typically have lower volumes but more attractive margins. |
|---|
During the fourth quarter of 2012 NXP adopted a cost savings and restructuring initiative designed to improve operational efficiency and to competitively position the Company for sustainable growth. This initiative primarily relates to a worldwide workforce reduction of approximately 650 employees, with the majority of the headcount reductions in Europe and the U.S. For additional information regarding our restructuring initiatives please refer to Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report.
Reporting Segments
NXP is organized into three reportable segments in compliance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280 “Segment Reporting”.
The Company is structured in two market oriented business segments, High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products and one other reportable segment, Manufacturing Operations.
Corporate and Other is not a separate reporting segment anymore because it no longer meets the criteria for being separately reported. Particularly the quantitative thresholds are not met after the divestment of NuTune in 2010 and the reallocation of the remaining activities that used to belong to the Home segment. Items under Corporate and Other in this Annual Report represent the
remaining portion of our former Corporate and Other segment to reconcile to the Consolidated Financial Statements along with the Divested Home activities, which were divested in 2010.
Our High Performance Mixed Signal businesses deliver High Performance Mixed Signal solutions to our customers to satisfy their system and sub systems needs across application areas such as: automotive, identification, mobile, consumer, computing, wireless infrastructure, lighting and industrial.
Our Standard Products business segment offers standard products for use across many applications markets, as well as application-
Table of Contents
specific standard products predominantly used in application areas such as mobile handsets, computing, consumer and automotive.
Our Manufacturing Operations are conducted through a combination of wholly owned manufacturing facilities, manufacturing facilities operated jointly with other semiconductor companies and third-party foundries and assembly and test subcontractors, which together form our Manufacturing Operations segment. While the main function of our Manufacturing Operations segment is to supply products to our High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products segments, revenue and costs in this segment are to a large extent derived from sales of wafer foundry and packaging services to our divested businesses in order to support their separation and, on a limited basis, their ongoing operations. As these divested businesses develop or acquire their own foundry and packaging capabilities, our revenue from these sources is declining.
Corporate and Other includes unallocated research expenses not related to any specific business segment, corporate restructuring charges not allocated to High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products and other expenses, as well as some operations not included in our two business segments, such as software solutions for mobile phones (the “NXP Software” business). Revenue recorded in Corporate and Other is primarily generated by the NXP Software business.
B. Business Overview
Our Company
We are a global semiconductor company and a long-standing supplier in the industry, with over 50 years of innovation and operating history. We provide leading High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage our deep application insight and our technology and manufacturing expertise in RF, analog, power management, interface, security and digital processing products. Our product solutions are used in a wide range of applications such as: automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer and computing. We engage with leading original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) worldwide and 62% of our revenue in 2012 was derived from Asia Pacific (excluding Japan).
Since our separation from Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (“Philips”) in 2006, we have significantly repositioned our business to focus on High Performance Mixed Signal solutions and have implemented a restructuring program and taken other restructuring initiatives aimed at achieving a world-class cost structure and streamlined processes. As of December 31, 2012, we had 25,358 full-time equivalent employees located in over 25 countries, with research and development activities in Asia, Europe and the United States, and manufacturing facilities in Asia and Europe. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we generated revenue of $4,358 million.
Markets, applications and products
We sell two categories of products, High Performance Mixed Signal product solutions and Standard Products. The first category, which consists of highly differentiated application-specific High Performance Mixed Signal semiconductors and system solutions, accounted for 80% of our total product revenue in 2012. We believe that High Performance Mixed Signal is an attractive market in terms of growth, barriers to entry, relative business and pricing stability and capital intensity. The second of our product categories, Standard Products, accounted for 20% of our total product revenue in 2012, and consists of devices that can be incorporated in many different types of electronics equipment and that are typically sold to a wide variety of customers, both directly and through distributors. Manufacturing cost, supply chain efficiency and continuous improvement of manufacturing processes drive the profitability of our Standard Products.
High Performance Mixed Signal
We focus on developing products and system and sub-system solutions that are innovative and allow our customers to bring their end products to market more quickly. Our products, particularly our application system and sub-system solutions, help our customers design critical parts of their end products and thus help many of them to differentiate themselves based on feature performance, advanced functionality, cost or time-to-market.
We leverage our technical expertise in the areas of RF, analog, power management, interface, security technologies and digital processing across our priority applications markets. Our strong RF capabilities are utilized in our high performance RF for wireless infrastructure and industrial applications, television tuners, car security and car radio products and contactless identification products. Our power technologies and capabilities are applied in our lighting products, AC-DC power conversion and audio power products, while our ability to design ultra-low power semiconductors is used in a wide range of our products including our consumer, mobile, identification, healthcare products and our microcontrollers. Our high-speed interface design skills are applied in our interface products business, and our security solutions are used in our identification, microcontroller, telematics and smart metering products and solutions. Finally, our digital processing capabilities are used in our Auto DSPs, the products leveraging our Coolflux ultra-low power DSPs, such as in our mobile audio and hearing aid business, and our microcontroller based products. In addition, our digital processing knowledge is used to design High Performance Mixed Signal solutions that leverage other suppliers’ digital processing products.
In 2012, we organized the High Performance Mixed Signal segment in four Business Units named: Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing. The below table provides an overview of the key applications per Business Unit, the leading market positions and our key customers.
Table of Contents
| Automotive | Identification | Infrastructure & Industrial | Portable & Computing | |||||
| Key applications | • Car access & immobilizers • In vehicle networking • Car entertainment • Telematics • ABS • Transmission/throttle control • Automotive Lighting | • Secure identity • Secure transactions • Tagging & authentication | • Wireless base stations • Satellite & CATV infra • Radar • Power supplies • Lighting • Personal Healthcare • TV & Set-top boxes • Mobile Handsets | • Mobile handset • Tablet • Monitor • Personal computer • Smart metering • White goods & home appliances • Pachinko machines • Medical • Industrial • Consumer | ||||
| Selected market leading positions | • #1 Can/LIN/ Flex Ray in-vehicle networking • #1 passive keyless entry/ immobilizers • #1 car radio • #3 magnetic sensors | • #1 e-Government • #1 Transport & Access management • #2 Banking • #1 NFC | • #2 in RF Power • #1 in silicon tuners | • #2 Standard Logic • # 3 in interface | ||||
| Key OEM customers | • Alpine • Becker • Bosch • Clarion • Continental • Delphi • Hyundai • Panasonic • Valeo • Visteon | • Bundesdrucker • Giesecke • Gemalto • HTC • KEBT • Oberthur • ORGA • Samsung • Smartrac • Sony | • Ericsson • Huawei • Lite-on • LGE • Motorola • NSN • Philips • Samsung • TCL • ZTE | • Apple • Bosch • Continental • Cisco • Foxconn • HP • Huawei • Nintendo • Philips • Samsung |
The customers listed above represent our key OEM and electronic manufacturing services customers based on 2012 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Vitec and WPG. These distributors represent our top four distributors in terms of revenue in 2012 in the High Performance Mixed Signal segment.
Automotive****. In the automotive market we are a leader in in-vehicle networking, car passive keyless entry and immobilization, and car radio and car audio amplifiers. We also hold a number 3 position1,2 in the automotive magnetic field sensors market based on worldwide revenues for 2011 and have an emerging business in telematics and car solid state lighting drivers.
In the can/LIN/FlexRay in-vehicle networking market, we are the market leader, having played a defining role in setting the can/LIN and more recently FlexRay standards. We are a leading supplier to major OEMs and continue to drive new system concepts, such as partial networking for enhanced energy efficiency. In the car access and immobilizers market, we lead the development of new passive keyless entry/start and two-way key concepts with our customers and, as a result, we are a key supplier to almost all car OEMs for those products. We are the market leader in AM/FM car radio chip sets.
Our leadership in mid- and high-end car radio is driven by excellent reception performance, whereas in the low-end and after-market car radio, our leadership is driven by our one-chip radio solutions that offer ease of implementation and low cost of ownership. In digital reception, we have developed multi-standard radios based on our software-defined radio implementation. In addition, we provide class-AB and class-D audio amplifiers and power analog products for car entertainment. In telematics, we have developed a complete and secure systems solution for implementation in car on-board units, which we supply in a module that is small in size and delivers good performance. We leverage our proprietary processes for automotive, high-voltage, RF and non-volatile processes as well as our technology standards and leading edge security IP developed by our identification business, to deliver our automotive solutions. We are compliant with all globally relevant automotive quality standards (such as ISO/TS16949 and VDA6.3)
For the full year 2012, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $939 million in automotive applications, compared to $930 million in 2011, which represents a 1% year over year increase. According to Strategy Analytics, the total market for automotive semiconductors was $23.7 billion in 2011, and projects it will grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 9.5% between 2011 and 2015. According to Strategy Analytics’ estimates we were the fifth largest supplier of automotive semiconductors worldwide in 2011, with a market share of 6.4%.
Identification****. Based on our 2012 revenue, we are number 1 in the overall identification chip market, and are especially well positioned in the faster growing contactless identification IC market.
We address all segments of the market, except for the commodity SIM market. We are the largest supplier world-wide of IC’s for e-government, transportation and access management and NFC. For example, we supply to approximately 85% of worldwide e-passport
| 1 | Source: Gartner, Inc., Market Share, Semiconductor Applications, Worldwide, 2011, March 27, 2012. |
|---|
| 2 | The Gartner Report(s) described herein, (the “Gartner Report(s)”) represent(s) data, research opinion or viewpoints published, as part of a syndicated subscription service, by Gartner, Inc. (“Gartner”), and are not representations of fact. Each Gartner Report speaks as of its original publication date (and not as of the date of this Filing) and the opinions expressed in the Gartner Report(s) are subject to change without notice. |
|---|
Table of Contents
projects, and our MIFARE product is used in approximately 70% of the public transport systems that have adopted electronic ticketing. We have led the development and standard setting of near field communications (NFC), which is a rapidly growing standard for secure short-range connectivity that has been established to enable secure transactions between mobile devices and point-of-sale terminals or other devices, and are pursuing the fast-growing product authentication market. Our leadership in the identification market is based on the strength of our security, end-to-end system contactless read speed performance, our ability to drive new standard settings and the breadth of our product portfolio. Key growth drivers will be the adoption of new security standards in existing smart card markets, the implementation of security ICs in a range of devices to enable secure mobile transactions and product authentication, and the increase in new radio frequency identification applications such as supply chain management.
For the full year 2012, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $986 million in identification applications, compared to $698 million in 2011, which represents a 41.3% year over year growth. According to ABI Research, the market size for identification ICs was $2.2 billion in 2011, and is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 20% to $4.6 billion in 2015.
Infrastructure and Industrial****. We have a leading market position in high-performance radio frequency solutions, are the market leader in silicon tuners, have a broad portfolio in lighting drivers and strong positions in selected niche segments of the AC-DC power conversion and personal healthcare markets. In addition, we have an emerging business in low power connectivity and mobile audio. Our overall revenue in these businesses was $604 million in 2012 versus $617 million in 2011, which represents a decline of 2.1% year over year.
Our leading high-performance radio frequency business mainly provides RF front-end solutions for markets, such as mobile base stations, wireless connectivity, satellite and CATV infrastructure and receivers, industrial applications, and to a lesser extent addresses the military and aerospace markets. We have a leading position in RF Power Amplifiers and significant sales in Small Signal RF discretes and RF ICs for consumer electronics and cable television infrastructure, while we have emerging businesses in RF ICs for mobile base stations and monolithic microwave ICs (“MMICs”). Our leadership is based on our world-class proprietary RF process technologies and technology advancements that drive overall system performance, such as power scaling in mobile base stations. We are engaged with the majority of the largest customers in mobile base stations and in several other application areas. Key growth drivers for our high-performance RF business include infrastructure build-outs driven by the substantial growth in mobile data use and digital broadcast adoption, infrastructure development of developing countries, including China, new radar implementations, and our expansion into new product markets such as wireless communications LNAs and infrastructure MMICs. The market for RF Power Amplifiers, is estimated to be $1.3 billion in 2012.
We are the leader in silicon tuners for televisions and set-top boxes. Our market strengths are our specialty RF process technology, decades of experience in designing tuners that work under all broadcasting standards and conditions across the world, and our innovations in new broadcasting standards. Key growth drivers for our products in these markets include the adoption of silicon tuners by TV manufacturers, penetration of new broadcast standards such as DVB-T2, DVB-C2 and DOCSIS 3.0, and the adoption of multi-tuner applications. The market for silicon tuners was$0.3 billion in 2011, and is expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 2.7% between 2011 and 2015.
In lighting, we have a broad driver portfolio serving all main segments in general lighting applications. Our strength in lighting ICs is based on our leading-edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and system optimization concepts, such as our patented technology to develop sensors-less temperature-controlled LED drivers. The lighting IC market is a high growth market, partly driven by government regulations around the world that ban or discourage the use of incandescent light bulbs and encourage or mandate CFL and LED lighting solutions and by energy-savings conscious customers. We have doubled our sales in LED drivers from 2011 to 2012.
We are a key player in high efficiency AC-DC power conversion ICs for notebook personal computers (our “green chip” solutions), and are expanding our offering into mobile device chargers. Our strength in AC-DC power conversion is based on our leading edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and engineering capabilities in designing high efficiency power conversion products. Due to worldwide conservation efforts, many countries, states and local governments have adopted regulations that increase the demand for higher power efficiency solutions in computing and consumer applications, especially in power conversion.
Our personal healthcare revenue is generated by our hearing aid products, which leverage our proprietary ultra low power Coolflux DSP, our low power audio IC design capabilities and our magnetic induction radio technology. We design customer-specific ICs for major hearing aid OEMs, and many of these customers fund our product development efforts.
In addition, we have two emerging product development areas, one focused on the mobile audio market and the other on the low power connectivity market. Our mobile audio business focuses on smart speaker drivers and leverages many of the same core technologies and competencies as our personal healthcare business. In 2012 we started shipping to a key smart phone OEMs. Our low power connectivity business started in 2010 through the acquisition of Jennic, which brought us a portfolio of 802.15.4-based low power connectivity ICs with a broad range of both the Zigbee standard-based as well as proprietary protocol stacks. With this portfolio we target the emerging Internet of Things market, starting with application solutions for smart lighting, smart energy, wireless remote controls & switches and healthcare monitoring.
Portable and Computing. We are a leader in digital logic, a top three supplier in the fragmented interface market and have a strong portfolio in 32-bit ARM microcontrollers. Our overall High Performance Mixed Signal revenue in these businesses was $753 million in 2012, compared to $661 million in 2011, which represents a 13.9% year over year growth.
Table of Contents
In microcontrollers, we have a strong position in multi-purpose 32-bit ARM microcontrollers serving a broad array of applications. ARM processor cores have been gaining momentum in the general purpose MCU market during the past few years. Our competitive advantage is based on having been a launching partner for several low power ARM microcontroller cores, our rich portfolio of analog and security IP, which we integrate with the ARM core into a family of microcontroller products, and our distribution leverage based on our ability to offer a full microcontroller software development kit. Our ARM Cortex M0-based products achieve pricing levels that places it squarely in competition with 8-bit microcontrollers, while offering better performance in terms of processing speed and system power consumption, expanding the addressable market for 32-bit ARM microcontrollers at the expense of 8-bit ARM microcontrollers. Gartner estimates the worldwide market for Microcontrollers 32-bit to be $5.0 billion in 2011, and expects a compounded annual growth rate of 7.6% between 2011 and 20153. The interface products market is highly fragmented with niche markets around each of the established interface standards, where overall we are the 3rd ranked player1 in 2011 for worldwide shipments of Interface ICs. Our products address many interface standards and we serve various applications across the mobile, computing, industrial, consumer and automotive markets. We have broad product portfolios in five interface segments, being UARTs and bridges, I2C and SPI LED controllers, low power real-time clocks and watch ICs, HDMI switches and transceivers, and display port multiplexers. Our core competencies are the design of high speed interfaces, high voltage design needed for LED and LCD drivers, ultra low power design for real-time clocks and watch ICs, and our ability to engage with leading OEMs in defining new interface standards and product designs. While we successfully engage with leading OEMs to drive our innovation roadmaps, we generate a large part of our revenue by subsequently selling these products to a very broad customer base, which we serve through our distribution channel. We are engaged in development activities and standard setting initiatives with many of the innovation leaders in each of these markets. Key growth drivers will be the adoption rate of new high-speed interface standards such as display port and USB, and application specific interface products for the mobile market. In 2012 we ramped up a major design win with one of the leading smart phone OEMs. According to Gartner, the worldwide Interface IC market is projected to grow at a 1.8% compounded annual rate between 2011 and 2015, from a revenue base of $1.6 billion in 20113.
We have a number 2 position in Standard Logic IC markets based on worldwide revenue for 20111, which we leverage in a large number of our High Performance Mixed Signal solutions. We offer several product families for low-voltage applications in communication equipment, personal computers, personal computer peripherals and consumer and portable electronics. Our 3V and 5V families hold a leading share of the logic market. We are currently expanding the higher margin product range in this business by expanding, among others, our switches and translators (or custom logic) portfolio and optimizing our manufacturing. Gartner sizes the worldwide Standard Logic market at $1.6 billion in 2011, and is estimated to grow with compound annual rate of 1% between 2011 and 20153.
Standard Products
Our Standard Products business supplies a broad range of standard semiconductor components, such as small signal discretes, power discretes, protection and signal conditioning devices and linear devices, which we largely produce in dedicated in-house high-volume manufacturing operations. Our portfolio consists of a large variety of catalog products, using widely-known production techniques, with characteristics that are largely standardized throughout the industry as well as leading discrete solutions especially in the field of ESD protection / EMI filtering and low loss rectification and power switching. Our Standard Products are often sold as separate components, but in many cases, are used in conjunction with our High Performance Mixed Signal solutions, often within the same subsystems. Further, we are able to leverage customer engagements where we provide standard products devices, as discrete components, within a system to identify and pursue potential High Performance Mixed Signal opportunities.
Our products are sold both directly to OEMs as well as through distribution, and are primarily differentiated on cost, packaging type and miniaturization, and supply chain performance. Alternatively, our innovative products include “design-in” products, which require significant engineering effort to be designed into an application solution. For these products, our efforts make it more difficult for a competitor to easily replace our product, which makes these businesses more predictable in terms of revenue and pricing than is typical for standard products.
| 3 | Source: Gartner, Inc., Semiconductor Forecast Database, 4Q12 Update, December 7, 2012. |
|---|
Table of Contents
Our key product applications, markets and customers are described in the table below.
| Key applications | • SS Transistors and Diodes • SS MOS • Power MOS • Bipolar Power Transistors • Thyristors • Rectifiers • Interface protection devices • Voltage Regulators | |
| Key product markets | • All applications | |
| Key OEM and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) customers | • Apple • Asustek • Bosch • Continental • Delphi • Delta Electronics • Foxconn • Nokia • Philips • Samsung |
The customers listed above represent our key OEM and electronic manufacturing services customers based on 2012 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Future and WPG. These distributors represent our top four distributors in terms of revenue in 2012 in the Standard Products segment.
In 2012, our Standard Products business generated net revenue of $832 million, compared to $925 million in 2011, which represents a 10.1% year over year decline. The market for discretes, excluding RF & Microwave, is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 3%, from $20 billion in 2011 to $22 billion in 2015.
We are the number two global supplier of small-signal discretes with one of the broadest product portfolios in the industry. We have a strong position due to our strong cost competitiveness, supply chain performance, leverage of our OEM relationships and a broadening portfolio. We are focusing on expanding our share of higher margin products in this business. In addition, we are also building a small signal MOSFET product line, which leverages our small signal transistors and diodes packaging operations and strong customer relationships. In addition to our small signal discretes products, we have a Power MOSFET product line, which is focused on the low-voltage segment of the market. The majority of our revenue in Power MOSFETs is to automotive customers. We have recently introduced a new range of Automotive Power MOSFET products in our Trench 6 manufacturing process. Finally, we have small bipolar power, thyristor and rectifier product lines, which are focused on specific applications, such as white goods and power supplies, and are sold as part of our overall High Performance Mixed Signal application solutions.
We have invested significantly into developing a competitive range of LDO’s especially for use in mobile devices. In the coming year we will further enhance our portfolio in this area and complement it with state-of-the-art DC/DC devices as well. Our range of ICs also includes ESD protection and filtering solutions for standard interfaces in consumer products, computing, and mobile devices.
Manufacturing
We manufacture integrated circuits and discrete semiconductors through a combination of wholly owned manufacturing facilities, manufacturing facilities operated jointly with other semiconductor companies and third-party foundries and assembly and test subcontractors. Our manufacturing operations primarily focus on manufacturing and supplying products to our High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products businesses. We manage our manufacturing assets together through one centralized organization to ensure we realize scale benefits in asset utilization, purchasing volumes and overhead leverage across businesses.
In addition, on a limited basis, we also produce and sell wafers and packaging services to our divested businesses (currently Entropic Communications, Sigma Designs, IDT and DSPG) in order to support their separation and, on a limited basis, their ongoing operations. As these divested businesses develop or acquire their own foundry and packaging capabilities, our revenue from these sources is declining. Our agreement with DSPG expired in December 2010 (although we have an ongoing obligation to supply services relating to certain specialty processes until December 2014), the supplies to ST-Ericsson have effectively been terminated except for a small number of identified products and the former agreement with Trident Microsystems was converted into two separate agreements with Entropic and Sigma after Trident’s bankruptcy. The agreement with IDT is the result of the sale of our high-speed dataconverter activity to IDT.
In the future, we expect to outsource an increased part of our internal demand for wafer foundry and packaging services to third-party manufacturing sources in order to increase our flexibility to accommodate increased demand mainly in our High Performance Mixed Signal and to a lesser extent in Standard Products businesses.
Table of Contents
The manufacturing of a semiconductor involves several phases of production, which can be broadly divided into “front-end” and “back-end” processes. Front-end processes take place at highly complex wafer manufacturing facilities (called fabrication plants or “wafer fabs”), and involve the imprinting of substrate silicon wafers with the precise circuitry required for semiconductors to function. The front-end production cycle requires high levels of precision and involves as many as 300 process steps. Back-end processes involve the assembly, test and packaging of semiconductors in a form suitable for distribution. In contrast to the highly complex front-end process, back-end processing is generally less complicated, and as a result we tend to determine the location of our back-end facilities based more on cost factors than on technical considerations.
We primarily focus our internal and joint venture wafer manufacturing operations on running proprietary specialty process technologies that enable us to differentiate our products on key performance features, and we generally outsource wafer manufacturing in process technologies that are available at third-party wafer foundries when it is economical to do so. In addition, we increasingly focus our in-house manufacturing on our competitive 8-inch facilities, which predominantly run manufacturing processes in the 140 nanometer, 180 nanometer and 250 nanometer process nodes, and have concentrated the majority of our manufacturing base in Asia. This focus increases our return on invested capital and reduces capital expenditures.
Our front-end manufacturing facilities use a broad range of production processes and proprietary design methods, including CMOS, bipolar, bipolar CMOS (“BiCMOS”) and double-diffused metal on silicon oxide semiconductor (“DMOS”) technologies. Our wafer fabs produce semiconductors with line widths ranging from 140 nanometers to 3 microns for integrated circuits and 0.5 microns to greater than 4 microns for discretes. This broad technology portfolio enables us to meet increasing demand from customers for system solutions, which require a variety of technologies.
Our back-end manufacturing facilities test and package many different types of products using a wide variety of processes. To optimize flexibility, we use shared technology platforms for our back-end assembly operations. Most of our assembly and test activities are maintained in-house, as internal benchmarks indicate that we achieve a significant cost advantage over outsourcing options due to our scale and operational performance. In addition, control over these processes enables us to deliver better supply chain performance to our customers. Finally, a number of our High Performance Mixed Signal products enjoy significant packaging cost and innovation benefits due to the scale of our Standard Products business, which manufactures tens of billions of units per year.
The following table shows selected key information with respect to our major front-end and back-end facilities:
| Site | Ownership | Wafer sizes used | Line widths used (vm) | Technology | ||||||||||
| (Microns) | ||||||||||||||
| Front-end | ||||||||||||||
| Singapore(1) | 61.2 | % | 8” | 0.14-0.25 | CMOS | |||||||||
| Jilin, China(2) | 60 | % | 5” | >4 | Bipolar | |||||||||
| Nijmegen, the Netherlands | 100 | % | 8” | 0.14-0.80 | CMOS, BiCMOS, LDMOS | |||||||||
| Nijmegen, the Netherlands(3) | 100 | % | 6” | 0.50-3.0 | CMOS | |||||||||
| Hamburg, Germany | 100 | % | 6”/8” | 0.5-3.0 | Discretes, Bipolar | |||||||||
| Manchester, United Kingdom | 100 | % | 6” | 0.5 | Power discretes | |||||||||
| Back-end(4) | ||||||||||||||
| Kaohsiung, Taiwan | 100 | % | — | — | Leadframe-based packages and ball grid arrays | |||||||||
| Bangkok, Thailand | 100 | % | — | — | Low-pin count leadframes | |||||||||
| Hong Kong, China(5) | 100 | % | — | — | Pilot factory discrete devices | |||||||||
| Guangdong, China | 100 | % | — | — | Discrete devices | |||||||||
| Seremban, Malaysia | 100 | % | — | — | Discrete devices | |||||||||
| Cabuyao, Philippines | 100 | % | — | — | Power discretes, sensors and RF modules processes |
| (1) | Joint venture with TSMC; we are entitled to 60% of the joint venture’s annual capacity. |
|---|
| (2) | Joint venture with Jilin Sino-Microelectronics Co. Ltd.; we own 60% of the joint venture’s annual capacity. |
|---|
| (3) | Closure foreseen for 2013. |
|---|
| (4) | In back-end manufacturing we entered into a joint venture with ASE in Suzhou (ASEN), in which we currently hold a 40% interest. |
|---|
| (5) | Closure foreseen for 2013. |
|---|
We use a large number of raw materials in our front- and back-end manufacturing processes, including silicon wafers, chemicals, gases, lead frames, substrates, molding compounds and various types of precious and other metals. Our most important raw materials are the raw, or substrate, silicon wafers we use to make our semiconductors. We purchase these wafers, which must meet exacting specifications, from a limited number of suppliers in the geographic region in which our fabrication facilities are located. At our wholly owned fabrication plants, we use raw wafers ranging from 6 inches to 8 inches in size, while our joint venture plants use wafers ranging from 5 inches to 8 inches. In addition, our SSMC wafer fab facility, which produces 8 inch wafers, is jointly owned by TSMC and ourselves. We are leveraging our experience in that fab facility in optimizing our remaining wholly owned Nijmegen and Hamburg wafer fabs. Our other two remaining fabs are small and are focused exclusively on manufacturing power discretes. Emerging fabrication technologies employ larger wafer sizes and, accordingly, we expect that our production requirements will in the future shift towards larger substrate wafers.
Table of Contents
We typically source our other raw materials in a similar fashion as our wafers, although our portfolio of suppliers is more diverse. Some of our suppliers provide us with materials on a just-in-time basis, which permits us to reduce our procurement costs and the negative cash flow consequences of maintaining inventories, but exposes us to potential supply chain interruptions. We purchase most of our raw materials on the basis of fixed price contracts, but generally do not commit ourselves to long-term purchase obligations, which permits us to renegotiate prices periodically.
Corporate and Other
We also sell software solutions for mobile phones through our NXP Software business.
The NXP Software solutions business develops audio and video multimedia solutions that enable mobile device manufacturers to produce differentiated hand held products that enhance the end-user experience. Our software has been incorporated into over 1 billion mobile devices produced by the world’s leading mobile device manufacturers.
Sales, Marketing and Customers
We market our products worldwide to a variety of OEMs, ODMs, contract manufacturers and distributors. We generate demand for our products by delivering High Performance Mixed Signal solutions to our customers, and supporting their system design-in activities by providing application architecture expertise and local field application engineering support. We have 36 sales offices worldwide.
Our sales and marketing teams are organized into six regions, which are EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa), the Americas, Japan, South Korea, Greater China and Asia Pacific. These sales regions are responsible for managing the customer relationships, design-in and promotion of new products. We seek to further expand the presence of application engineers closely supporting our customers and to increase the amount of product development work that we can conduct jointly with our leading customers. Our web-based marketing tool is complementary to our direct customer technical support.
Our sales and marketing strategy focuses on deepening our relationship with our top OEMs and electronic manufacturing service customers and distribution partners and becoming their preferred supplier, which we believe assists us in reducing sales volatility in challenging markets. We have long-standing customer relationships with most of our customers. Our 10 largest OEM customers are Apple, Bosch, Continental, Delphi, Gemalto, Giesecke/Devrient, Huawei, NSN, Panasonic and Samsung. When we target new customers, we generally focus on companies that are leaders in their markets either in terms of market share or leadership in driving innovation. We also have a strong position with our distribution partners, being the number two semiconductor supplier (other than microprocessors) through distribution worldwide. Our 3 largest distribution partners are Arrow, Avnet and WPG.
Based on total revenue during 2012, excluding the revenue from Manufacturing Operations, our top 40 OEM customers, of which some are supplied via distributors, accounted for 49% of our total revenue, our ten largest OEM customers accounted for approximately 28% of our total revenue and no customer represented more than 7% of our total revenue. We generated approximately 27% of our total revenue through our 3 largest distribution partners, of which WPG was the only larger than 10% customer with 12% of total revenues, and another 20% with our other distributors.
Our sales and marketing activities are regulated by certain laws and government regulations, including antitrust laws, legislation governing our customers’ privacy and regulations prohibiting or restricting the transfer of technology to foreign nationals and the export of certain electronic components that may have a military application. For example, we are required to obtain licenses and authorizations under the U.S. Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, in order to export some of our products and technology. Further, some of our products that contain encrypted information are required to undergo a review by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the U.S. Department of Commerce prior to export. While we believe that we have been and continue to be in compliance with these laws and regulations, if we fail to comply with their requirements, we could face fines or other sanctions. We do not believe any such fines or sanctions would be material to our business. In addition, we do not believe that such laws and government regulations impact on the time-to-market of our products. However, any changes in export regulations may impose additional licensing requirements on our business or may otherwise impose restrictions on the export of our products.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
See the discussion set forth under Part I, Item 5C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Competition
We compete with many different semiconductor companies, ranging from multinational companies with integrated research and development, manufacturing, sales and marketing organizations across a broad spectrum of product lines, to “fabless” semiconductor companies, to companies that are focused on a single application market segment or standard product. Most of these competitors compete with us with respect to some, but not all, of our businesses. Few of our competitors have operations across our business lines.
Our key competitors in alphabetical order include Analog Devices Inc., Atmel Corporation, Entropic Communications Inc., Fairchild Semiconductors International Inc., Freescale, Infineon, International Rectifier Corporation, Linear Technology Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., MaxLinear, Renesas, ON Semiconductor Corporation, Power Integrations Inc., ROHM Co., Ltd., Silicon Laboratories Inc., STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments Incorporated.
Table of Contents
The basis on which we compete varies across market segments and geographic regions. Our High Performance Mixed Signal businesses compete primarily on the basis of our ability to timely develop new products and the underlying intellectual property and on meeting customer requirements in terms of cost, product features, quality, warranty and availability. In addition, our High Performance Mixed Signal system solutions businesses require in-depth knowledge of a given application market in order to develop robust system solutions and qualified customer support resources. In contrast, our Standard Products business competes primarily on the basis of manufacturing and supply chain excellence and breadth of product portfolio.
Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under the “Litigation” caption of Note 10 of our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors above.
Environmental Regulation
The information set forth under the “Environmental remediation” caption of Note 10 of our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with environmental regulation, see Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors above.
Table of Contents
C****. Organizational Structure
A list of our significant subsidiaries, including name, country of incorporation or residence and proportion of ownership interest and voting power is provided as “Exhibit 21.1” under Part III, Item 19. Exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
The following chart reflects our corporate structure as of December 31, 2012.

| (1) | Includes the Private Equity Consortium, as well as certain co-investors. Some of our co-investors have recently sold all or part of their shares of our common stock, in accordance with the applicable securities law exemptions from registration. |
|---|
| (2) | On October 29, 2010, PPTL Investment LP purchased shares of common stock from Philips Pension Trustees Limited. The latter had purchased these shares of common stock from Royal Philips Electronics on September 7, 2010. |
|---|
| (3) | For a more detailed description of our management equity stock option plan (“Management Equity Stock Option Plan”) and our Long-Term Incentive Plans 2011 and 2012, see the discussion set forth under “Share Based Compensation Plans” contained in this Report in Part I, Item 6B. Compensation. |
|---|
Table of Contents
D****. Property, Plant and Equipment
NXP uses 56 sites in 29 countries with approximately 25,300 full-time employees, 8.9 million square feet of total owned and leased building space of which 6.0 million square feet is owned property.
The following table sets out our principal real property holdings as of December 31, 2012:
| Location | Use | Owned/leased | Building space (square feet) | |||||||||
| Eindhoven, the Netherlands | Headquarters | Leased | 248,736 | |||||||||
| Hamburg, Germany | Manufacturing | Owned | 798,336 | |||||||||
| Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Manufacturing | Owned | 2,031,242 | |||||||||
| Singapore | Manufacturing | Owned | 739,502 | |||||||||
| Bangkok, Thailand | Manufacturing | Owned | 560,493 | |||||||||
| Cabuyao, Philippines | Manufacturing | Owned | 444,059 | |||||||||
| Kaohsiung, Taiwan | Manufacturing | Owned | 342,971 | |||||||||
| Manchester, United Kingdom | Manufacturing | Owned | 273,266 | |||||||||
| Jilin, China(1) | Manufacturing | Leased | 138,850 | |||||||||
| Hong Kong, China | Manufacturing | Leased | 289,971 | |||||||||
| Guangdong, China | Manufacturing | Leased | 889,374 | |||||||||
| Seremban, Malaysia | Manufacturing | Owned | 316,471 |
| (1) | Leased by the Jilin joint venture. |
|---|
The following is a summary of the terms of our material lease agreements:
Manufacturing in Singapore (SSMC) leases the land at 70 Pasir Ris Drive 1 in Singapore from Jurong Town Corporation for use as a manufacturing facility. The lease commenced on June 1, 1999 for a term of 30 years at an annual rental rate of 1,484,584 Singapore Dollars ($1,146,378), which amount is subject to revision up to, but not exceeding, 5% of the yearly rent for the immediately preceding year, on the anniversary of the lease commencement date. The building has 739,502 square feet of floor space and is owned by us.
We lease 889,374 square feet of manufacturing space through our subsidiary, NXP Semiconductors Guangdong Ltd., at Tian Mei High Tech, Industrial Park, Huang Jiang Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong, China, from Huangjiang Investment Development Company (“Huangjiang”). The lease commenced on October 1, 2003 for a term of 13 years at an annual rental rate calculated to be the greater of: (a) a yearly rental rate of RMB96 ($15) per square meter or (b) a yearly rent equal to 13% of the actual construction cost of the leased facility. The rental amount is subject to revision on an annual basis, subject to the interest rate Huangjiang must pay for loans used in the construction of the facilities agreed upon in the lease.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
A. Operating Results
Basis of Presentation
Reporting Segments
We are a global semiconductors company and leading provider of High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage our leading RF, Analog, power management, interface, security and digital processing expertise. These innovations are used in a wide range of automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer and computing applications.
We have operations in more than 27 countries and our business is organized into three reportable segments: two market-oriented business segments, High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) and Standard Products (“SP”), and one other reportable segment, Manufacturing Operations. Corporate and Other represents the remaining portion to reconcile to the consolidated statements along with the divested Home activities, which were divested in 2010. For additional information refer to “Reporting Segments” within Part I, Item 4A. History and Development of the Company.
Table of Contents
Recent Developments
Management Change
Effective January 7, 2013, Hans Rijns and Dave French became jointly responsible for research and development. Mr Rijns has been appointed chief technology officer and has combined that role with his current position of senior vice president and head of research. Mr French has been appointed executive vice president of research and development in combination with his role as general manager of High-Performance Mixed-Signal portable and computing.
Private offering of 5.75% senior notes due 2021 to institutional investors
On February 1, 2013, we announced the pricing of a private offering to institutional investors of $500 million aggregate principal amount of U.S. dollar-denominated 5.75% senior notes due 2021 by our wholly-owned subsidiaries NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC. This offering closed on February 14, 2013. We will use the net proceeds of this private offering to repay amounts outstanding under our Second 2017 Term Loan.
Secondary offering of common shares
On February 4, 2013, we announced a secondary offering of 30,000,000 shares of our common stock to be sold by certain of our principal stockholders, pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form F-3, at a price to the public of $30.35 per share. The offering was settled and closed on February 7, 2013. Subsequent to the settlement and closing, the consortium of funds advised by KKR, Bain, Silver Lake, APAX and Alpinvest collectively beneficially owns 42% of our shares of common stock as of that date. NXP did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares in the offering.
Treasury shares
As announced on July 29 and August 17, 2011, we started a stock repurchase program to repurchase shares to cover in part employee stock options and equity rights under our long term incentive plans. Under the repurchase program, we may repurchase up to 8 million shares of our common stock from time to time in both privately negotiated and open market transactions, subject to management’s evaluation of market conditions, terms of private transactions, the best interests of our shareholders, applicable legal requirements and other factors. There is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be repurchased under the stock repurchase program, and we may terminate the repurchase program at any time. In connection with our share repurchase programs, shares that have been repurchased are held in treasury for delivery upon exercise of options and under restricted share programs and are accounted for as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. As at December 31, 2012, 2,726,000 shares were held in treasury under this program.
Factors Affecting Comparability
Economic Situation
In 2012, amidst a renewed global economic slowdown, the semiconductor market faced an uncertain economic and demand environment which negatively impacted our more cyclically exposed or economically sensitive businesses. In 2011, the massive earthquake in Japan followed by a tsunami, a major flood in Thailand and the global weakening of the economic climate had an impact on the demand and supply in the semiconductor market and has negatively impacted our revenues and profitability in the year 2011. In the year 2010, an overall market recovery from the global economic downturn, which started in the second half of 2008 and continued through 2009, had a positive impact on our revenues and profitability. For more information on trends and other factors affecting our business see Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors.
Restructuring Programs
During the fourth quarter of 2012, we announced a cost savings and restructuring initiative designed to improve operational efficiency and to competitively position the Company for sustainable growth. In aforementioned quarter, we recognized a restructuring charge of $98 million associated with a restructuring initiative (including but not limited to the OPEX Reduction Program). The components of the restructuring initiative were: $55 million in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) costs to assist in driving such costs down to 12 percent of revenue; $23 million in R&D to refocus resources; and $20 million in cost of goods sold, mainly related to the consolidation of MOS technologies from our German fabrication facility to the company’s 8-inch Dutch facility.
Since our separation from Philips, we have taken significant steps to reposition our businesses and operations through a number of acquisitions, divestments and restructurings. Between 2008 and 2011, we executed a restructuring program to refocus and resize our business in response to a challenging economic environment. As a result, costs were reduced significantly, driven by lower costs in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative activities.
Table of Contents
Net investment hedge accounting
The Company has applied net investment hedge accounting since May, 2011. The U.S. dollar exposure of the $1.7 billion net investment in U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries has been hedged by our U.S. dollar denominated notes. As a result, in 2012, a benefit of $26 million, before tax, (2011: a charge of $203 million) was recorded in other comprehensive income, relating to the foreign currency result on the U.S. dollar notes that are recorded in a euro functional currency entity. Absent the application of net investment hedge accounting this amount would have been recorded as a gain within financial income (expense) in the statement of operations.
Capital Structure
In 2012 we entered into the 2019 and the 2020 Term Loan, dated February 16, 2012 and December 10, 2012, respectively and concluded the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (the proceeds of which were used to settle and close the pre-existing revolving credit facility).
In 2012, through a combination of individually negotiated buybacks and debt redemptions described in B.Liquidity and Capital Resources, we were able to reduce the book value of our total debt to $3,492 million consisting of short-term debt of $307 million and long-term debt of $3,185 million reflecting a reduction of $307 million from the prior year.
Effect of Acquisition Accounting
Our Formation
On September 29, 2006, Philips sold 80.1% of its semiconductor business to the Private Equity Consortium in a multi-step transaction. We refer to this acquisition as our “Formation”.
The Formation has been accounted for using the acquisition method. Accordingly, the $10,601 million purchase price has been “pushed down” within the NXP group and allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The carrying value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as of the Formation date on September 29, 2006, amounted to $3,302 million. This resulted in an excess of the pur
Showing the first 8K of 96K characters. Open the full section
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following description sets forth certain information about management and management-related matters. We have a one-tier board structure.
Board of Directors
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions as of December 31, 2012, of the persons who serve as members of our board of directors.
| Name | Age | Position | ||||
| Richard L. Clemmer | 61 | Executive director, president and chief executive officer | ||||
| Sir Peter Bonfield | 68 | Non-executive director and chairman of the board | ||||
| Johannes P. Huth | 52 | Non-executive director and vice-chairman of the board | ||||
| Vikram Bhatia | 65 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Nicolas Cattelain | 39 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Egon Durban | 39 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Kenneth A. Goldman | 63 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Josef Kaeser | 55 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Ian Loring | 46 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Michel Plantevin | 56 | Non-executive director | ||||
| Roy MacKenzie * | 41 | Non-executive director |
| * | Mr. MacKenzie was appointed to replace Richard Wilson, who resigned as non-executive director of the Company on May 30, 2012. |
|---|
| • | Richard L. Clemmer (1951, American). Mr. Clemmer became executive director, president and chief executive officer on January 1, 2009. Prior to that, from December 2007, Mr. Clemmer was a member of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. and a senior advisor of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Prior to joining NXP, he drove the turnaround and re-emergence of Agere, a spin-off from Lucent and a leader in semiconductors for storage, wireless data, and public and enterprise networks. He also served as Chairman of u-Nav Microelectronics Corporation, a leading GPS technology provider, and held a five-year tenure at Quantum Corporation where he was executive vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to that, Mr. Clemmer worked for Texas Instruments Incorporated as senior vice president and semiconductor group chief financial officer. Mr. Clemmer also serves on the board of NCR Corporation. |
|---|
| • | Sir Peter Bonfield CBE FREng (1944, British). Sir Peter has been appointed as a non-executive director and as the chairman of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Sir Peter was the chairman of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. from September 29, 2006. Sir Peter served as chief executive officer and chairman of the executive committee for British Telecom plc from 1996 to 2002 and prior to that was chairman and chief executive officer of ICL plc (now Fujitsu Services Holdings Ltd.). Sir Peter also worked in the semiconductor industry during his tenure as a divisional director at Texas Instruments Incorporated, for whom he held a variety of senior management positions around the world. Sir Peter currently holds non-executive directorships at Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Mentor Graphics Corporation and Sony Corporation. Sir Peter is Chair of Council and Senior Pro-Chancellor at Loughborough University, Advisor to Apax Partners LLP, Senior Advisor to N M Rothschild (both in London) and Board Mentor at CMi in Belgium. He is also Advisor to Longreach LLP in Hong Kong and NVP LLP in New Jersey. |
|---|
Table of Contents
| • | Johannes P. Huth (1960, German). Mr. Huth has been appointed as a non-executive director and vice-chairman of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Huth was a member and chairman of our supervisory board and a member and vice-chairman of NXP B.V.’s supervisory board from September 29, 2006. He is currently a member of the supervisory board of Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG), chairman of WMF AG and a director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Ltd, President of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. SAS, vice-chairman of the supervisory board of ProSieben Sat 1 Media AG and a member of the advisory board of Wild Flavors GmbH. Mr. Huth also serves on the supervisory board of KION Holding 1 GmbH. |
|---|
| • | Vikram Bhatia (1947, British). Mr. Bhatia has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective May 26, 2011. He has held numerous senior positions and various assignments in the past years, including in iSoftGroup Plc, Monarch Holdings PLC, Page and Moy Travel Group and the Claverley Group of companies. In May 2006, working with PricewaterhouseCoopers, he was appointed the Turnaround Programme Director in the Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital NHS Trust. Prior to these assignments, he fulfilled various other senior roles, which included Sithe Energy, British Telecom, Philips and Deloitte. |
|---|
| • | Nicolas Cattelain (1973, French). Mr. Cattelain has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors in August 2010. Mr. Cattelain became a member of our supervisory board and the supervisory board of NXP B.V. in February 2010 and was a director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., Europe from 2000 to 2012. Before 2000, Mr. Cattelain was with the private equity firm Industri Kapital in London and prior to that he worked in the Mergers and Acquisitions Department of Merrill Lynch. Mr. Cattelain also serves on the board of Pagesjaunes Groupe where he sits in the remuneration and audit committees. |
|---|
| • | Egon Durban (1973, German). Mr. Durban has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Durban was a member of our supervisory board and a member of NXP B.V.’s supervisory board from September 29, 2006. Mr. Durban is a Managing Partner and Managing Director of Silver Lake. Mr. Durban joined Silver Lake in 1999 as a founding principal and has worked in the firm’s Menlo Park and New York offices and set-up and oversaw the Firm’s London office from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Durban serves on the board of directors of Intelsat S.A., MultiPlan, Inc., and on the Executive Committee of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC. Mr. Durban also oversees the firm’s investments in Groupon and Zynga and oversaw investments in Unity Media, Tandberg, and Intelsat debt. Previously, he served on the Board of Skype Global S.à r.l. and was the Chairman of its Operating Committee. Earlier, Mr. Durban worked in Morgan Stanley’s Corporate Finance Technology and Equity Capital Markets Group. Mr. Durban graduated from Georgetown University with a B.S. in Finance. |
|---|
| • | Kenneth A. Goldman (1949, American). Mr. Goldman has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective August 6, 2010. Mr. Goldman is the chief financial officer of Yahoo!, Inc since October 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Goldman served as the senior vice president and chief financial officer of Fortinet, Inc, from 2006 to 2012 and as senior vice president, finance and administration, and chief financial officer of Siebel Systems, Inc. from 2000 to 2006. Mr. Goldman has also served as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Excite@Home Corporation and Sybase, Inc., as well as serving as chief financial officer of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation and VLSI. Technology, Inc. Mr. Goldman also serves on the board of directors of Infinera, Inc. and several private companies. Mr. Goldman also served as a member of the Treasury Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession. He is also a member of the board of trustees of Cornell University. |
|---|
| | • | | Josef Kaeser (1957, German). Mr. Kaeser has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective S
Showing the first 8K of 62K characters. Open the full section
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A****. Major Shareholders
The following table shows the amount of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2012 (unless otherwise noted), by (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each member of our board of directors, (iii) each director nominee, (iv) each of the named executive officers, (v) certain former members of management and (vi) all members of the board, director nominees and all of our executive officers as a group. A person is a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting or investment power over the security or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Unless otherwise noted, these persons may be contacted at our executive offices and, to our knowledge, have sole voting and investment power over the shares listed.
Table of Contents
Percentage computations are based on 251,751,500 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of February 7, 2013. As shown in the table below, funds advised by KKR, Bain and Silver Lake are considered U.S. beneficial holders and collectively beneficially owned 28.14% of our shares of common stock
| Common Stock Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
| Number | % | |||||||
| Funds advised by KKR(1)(6) | 32,197,150 | 12.79 | ||||||
| Funds advised by Bain(2)(6) | 25,756,791 | 10.23 | ||||||
| Funds advised by Silver Lake(3)(6) | 12,879,469 | 5.12 | ||||||
| Funds advised by Apax(4)(6) | 14,487,057 | 5.75 | ||||||
| Funds advised by Alpinvest(5) | 6,438,284 | 2.56 | ||||||
| NXP Co-Investment Partners L.P.(6) | 15,029,155 | 5.97 | ||||||
| PPTL Investment LP(7) | 16,549,097 | 6.57 | ||||||
| Richard L. Clemmer | 1,309,587 | 0.52 | ||||||
| Sir Peter Bonfield | 27,897 | 0.01 | ||||||
| Johannes P. Huth | 79,999 | 0.03 | ||||||
| Nicolas Cattelain | 9,999 | 0.004 | ||||||
| Egon Durban(8) | 12,899,968 | 5.12 | ||||||
| Ian Loring(9) | 25,766,790 | 10.24 | ||||||
| Kenneth Goldman | 14,999 | 0.01 | ||||||
| Michel Plantevin | 9,999 | 0.004 | ||||||
| Roy MacKenzie | — | — | ||||||
| Josef Kaeser | 9,999 | 0.004 | ||||||
| Vikram Bhatia | 3,333 | 0.001 | ||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group(10) | 40,132,570 | 15.94 |
| (1) | KKR’s affiliates and certain funds advised by KKR, through various KKR-affiliated entities, hold shares of our common stock through a newly organized Luxembourg holding company. As per December 31, 2012, the following KKR-affiliated entities (the “KKR Entities”) had an indirect interest in 40,028,656 (as per February 7, 2013: 32,197,150) shares of our common stock through their ownership of such Luxembourg holding company: KKR NXP (2006) Limited (3,121,680 shares); KKR NXP (European II) Limited (20,010,767 shares); KKR NXP (Millennium) Limited (16,896,200 shares); and KKR Associates Europe II Limited Partnership (9 shares). As the designated members of KKR Management LLC (which may be deemed to indirectly control one or more general partners, stockholders or members of the entities that own or control the KKR Entities), Henry R. Kravis and George R. Roberts may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of our common stock indirectly held by the KKR Entities, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. In addition, as the voting partner of certain affiliates of the KKR Entities, KKR SP Limited may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of our common stock indirectly held by the KKR Entities, but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. The principal business address of each of the entities and persons identified in this footnote except Mr. Roberts is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019, U.S.A. The principal business office for Mr. Roberts is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 200, Menlo Park, CA 94025, U.S.A. |
|---|
| (2) | As per February 7, 2013, Bain Pumbaa LuxCo S.à.r.l. owns 25,756,791 shares of our common stock. As a shareholder of Bain Pumbaa LuxCo S.à.r.l., Bain Capital Lion Holdings, L.P. (“Lion Holdings”) has voting and dispositive power over 25,756,791 shares of our common stock held by Bain Pumbaa LuxCo S.à.r.l. and may be deemed to beneficially own all shares of our common stock held by Bain Pumbaa LuxCo S.à.r.l. Bain Capital Investors, LLC (“BCI”) is the managing general partner of Lion Holdings. As a result, BCI may be deemed to beneficially own all of the shares of our common stock held by Lion Holdings, but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares of our common stock. BCI is controlled by an investment committee composed of 22 members, Andrew Balson, Steven Barnes, Joshua Bekenstein, Louis Bremer, John Connaughton, Todd Cook, Paul Edgerley, Christopher Gordon, Blair Hendrix, Jordan Hitch, David Humphrey, John Kilgallon, Lewis Klessel, Matthew Levin, Ian Loring, Philip Loughlin, Seth Meisel, Mark Nunnelly, Stephen Pagliuca, Ian Reynolds, Mark Verdi and Stephen Zide. Each such investment committee member disclaims beneficial ownership of shares indirectly held by Lion Holdings. In addition, the Bain-affiliated funds and individuals named above may be deemed by virtue of their rights under the shareholders’ agreement with respect to the Company to share voting power with respect to the shares of our common stock held by the other parties to the shareholders’ agreement, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of BCI and Lion Holdings is John Hancock Tower, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, MA 02116, U.S.A. |
|---|
| (3) | As per February 7, 2013, SL II NXP S.à r.l. owns 12,879,469 shares of our common stock. SLP II Cayman NXP, Ltd. owns 99.57% of the outstanding shares of our common stock held by SL II NXP S.à r.l. and may be deemed to beneficially own all shares of our common stock held by SL II NXP S.à r.l. Silver Lake Partners II Cayman, L.P. is the sole shareholder of SLP II Cayman NXP, Ltd. Silver Lake (Offshore) AIV GP II, Ltd. is the general partner of Silver Lake Technology Associates II Cayman, L.P. Because of the foregoing relationships, each of SLP II Cayman NXP, Ltd., Silver Lake Partners II Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Associates II Cayman, L.P. and Silver Lake (Offshore) AIV GP II, Ltd. (together, the “Silver Lake Funds”) may be deemed to beneficially own all of the shares of our common stock held by SL II NXP S.à r.l. Messrs. James A. Davidson, Glenn H. Hutchins, David J. Roux, Alan K. Austin, Michael J. Bingle, Gregory Keith Mondre, Charles Giancarlo, Andrew Wagner and Kenneth Y. Hao and Mses. Karen King and Yolande A. Jun serve as directors of Silver Lake (Offshore) AIV GP II, Ltd. They disclaim beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares indirectly owned by the Silver Lake Funds. In addition, the Silver Lake-affiliated funds and individuals named above may be deemed by virtue of their rights under the shareholders’ agreement with respect to the Company to share voting power with respect to the shares of our common stock held by the other parties to the shareholders’ agreement, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. Silver Lake’s address is c/o 2775 Sand Hill Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. |
|---|
| (4) | As per February 7, 2013, Meridian Holding S.à.r.l. owns 14,487,057shares of our common stock. Apax NXP VI A L.P. is an English limited partnership and owns 66.59% of the outstanding shares of Meridian Holding S.à.r.l. Apax NXP (UK) VI A1 GP Co. Ltd, and English private limited company, is the general partner of Apax NXP VI A L.P. Apax WW Nominees Ltd, and English company, holds, directly or indirectly, 100% of the interests in Apax NXP (UK) VI A1 GP Co. Ltd as nominee for Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd, the custodian of Apax Europe VI-A, L.P., an English limited partnership. Apax Europe VI GP L.P. Inc., a Guernsey limited partnership, is the general partner of Apax Europe VI-A, L.P. Apax Europe VI GP Co. Limited, a Guernsey company, is the general partner of Apax Europe VI GP L.P. Inc. Apax Partner Europe Managers Ltd, an English company, holds 100% of the interests in Apax WW Nominees Ltd. Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd has also been appointed by Apax Europe VI GP L.P. Inc. (acting by Apax Europe VI GP Co. Limited, its general partner) as discretionairy investment manager of the investments of Apax Europe VI-A, L.P. Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd, Apax Europe VI GP Co. Limited and Apax Europe VI GP L.P. Inc. are responsible for the investments and general administration of Apax Europe VI-A, L.P. Because of the foregoing relationships, each of Apax NXP VI A L.P., Apax NXP (UK) VI A1 GP Co. Ltd, Apax Europe VI-A, L.P., Apax Europe VI GP L.P. Inc., Apax Europe VI GP Co. Limited and Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd—may be deemed to beneficially own all of the shares of our common stock held by Meridian Holding S.à.r.l. As directors and shareholders of Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd., Martin Halusa, Nico Hansen, Michael Phillips and Ian Jones may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of our common stock indirectly held by Apax Europe VI, but disclaim ownership of such shares. In addition, the Apax-affiliated |
|---|
Table of Contents
| funds and individuals named above may be deemed by virtue of their rights under the shareholders’ agreement with respect to the Company to share voting power with respect to the shares of our common stock held by the other parties to the shareholders’ agreement, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of Apax Partners LLP and Apax Partners Europe Managers Ltd. is 33 Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6DN, England, and the address of Apax Partners L.P. is 601 Lexington Avenue, 53rd Floor, New York, NY 10022, U.S.A. |
|---|
| (5) | As per December 31, 2012, AlpInvest Partners CSI 2006 Lion C.V. owned 7,938,871 shares in our common stock and AlpInvest Partners Later Stage II-A Lion C.V. owned 65,435 shares of our common stock (combined these two entities own 6,438,284shares as per February 7, 2013). As the managing director of AlpInvest Partners Beheer 2006 B.V. (which manages AlpInvest Partners CSI 2006 Lion C.V. and AlpInvest Partners Later Stage II-A Lion C.V.), AlpInvest Partners B.V. may be deemed to hold voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares in our common stock beneficially owned by AlpInvest Partners CSI 2006 Lion C.V. and AlpInvest Partners Later Stage II-A Lion C.V., but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. As managing directors of AlpInvest Partners B.V. Volkert Doeksen and Johan Paul de Klerk may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of our common stock owned by AlpInvest Partners Later Stage II-A Lion C.V. and AlpInvest Partners CSI 2006 Lion C.V., but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. |
|---|
| In addition, the Alpinvest-affiliated funds and individuals named above may be deemed by virtue of their rights under the shareholders’ agreement with respect to the Company to share voting power with respect to the shares of our common stock held by the other parties to the shareholders’ agreement, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. Alpinvest’s address is c/o Alpinvest Beheer, Jachthavenweg 118, 1081 KJ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. |
|---|
| (6) | As the general partner of NXP Co-Investment Partners L.P., NXP Co-Investment GP Ltd. beneficially owns the shares held indirectly by NXP Co-Investment Partners L.P. Funds and entities advised by KKR, Bain, Silver Lake and Apax own NXP Co-Investment GP Ltd., but none of them own a majority, and none may be deemed to beneficially own them. |
|---|
| (7) | PPTL Investment LP and the individuals named above may be deemed by virtue of their rights under the shareholders’ agreement with respect to the Company to share voting power with respect to the shares of our common stock held by the other parties to the shareholders’ agreement, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. PPTL Investment LP is a Scottish law limited partnership of which PPTL Investment Limited is the general partner and Philips Pension Trustees Limited (in its capacity as the trustee of the Philips Pension Fund) is the sole limited partner investor. The business address of PPTL Investment LP is 15 Atholl Crescent Edinburgh EH3 8HA, United Kingdom. |
|---|
| (8) | Mr. Durban is a director of our Company, as well as a director of SLP II Cayman NXP, Ltd. Amounts disclosed for Mr. Durban include shares beneficially owned by the funds advised by Silver Lake. Mr. Durban disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned directly or indirectly by funds advised by Silver Lake. |
|---|
| (9) | Mr. Loring is a director of our Company, as well as a member of the investment committee of Bain Capital Investors, LLC. Amounts disclosed for Mr. Loring include shares beneficially owned by the funds advised by Bain. Mr. Loring disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned directly or indirectly by funds advised by Bain. |
|---|
| (10) | Reflects shares that may be beneficially owned by our directors. However, each director disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned as a group options or equity rights representing 8,852,272 shares of our common stock. If exercised, these shares would represent 3.5% of the shares of our common stock. At any time that the Private Equity Consortium reduces its shareholding in us or in the event that the Private Equity Consortium no longer holds in the aggregate at least 30% of our common stock, vested stock options granted under our Management Equity Stock Option Plan would become exercisable. The stock options, performance related stock units and the restricted stock units granted under our Long Term Incentive Plan 2010 and 2011 vest over a three or four year period, subject to certain conditions and are exercisable immediately after vesting. Under the post-IPO Long Term Incentive Plan 2010, 2011 and 2012 implemented in November 2010, November 2011 and November 2012, respectively, our directors and executive officers have been awarded with restrictive or performance related stock, vesting between one and three-years from when such stock was awarded. |
|---|
B****. Related Party Transactions
Private Equity Consortium, Philips and Philips Pension Trustees
Advisory Services Agreements
The members of the Private Equity Consortium will provide certain advisory services to us. We have entered into separate agreements in this regard with the respective parties, under which each of the various legal entities will receive an annual advisory fee of $25,000 (with an aggregate total amount of $125,000 annually).
Shareholders’ Agreement
Prior to the consummation of the initial public offering in August 2010, the members of the Private Equity Consortium restructured their indirect shareholding in our common stock such that each of them holds directly, or indirectly through a separate Luxembourg holding company, shares of our common stock. At the same time, KASLION Holding B.V. ceased to hold shares of our common stock. In connection with this restructuring, the members of the Private Equity Consortium, Philips and the Management Foundation (together, the “Existing Shareholders”) entered into a new shareholders’ agreement among themselves, which replaced the shareholders’ agreement entered into on September 29, 2006. We are not a party to the new shareholders’ agreement.
Under the terms of the new shareholders’ agreement, the Existing Shareholders and any affiliate to which the Existing Shareholders transfer common stock are only allowed to sell shares of our common stock after having received approval from an investors committee consisting of representatives of the Private Equity Consortium. These restrictions will terminate upon the Existing Shareholders collectively ceasing to hold a percentage of shares of our common stock equal to at least (i) 25% of their shareholding immediately prior to the initial public offering and (ii) 10% (or, with respect to restrictions on sales by Philips, its affiliate transferees and transferees pursuant to clause (ii) of the following paragraph (collectively, the “Philips Parties”), 20%) of the shares of our common stock outstanding at any time, whichever occurs earlier. Any approved sale, other than sales by any Philips Party, will also be subject to pro rata tag-along rights for other Existing Shareholders.
The transfer restrictions do not apply to (i) transfers of shares of our common stock by the Existing Shareholders to their respective affiliates, (ii) transfers of shares of our common stock held by Philips to affiliated entities or one or more pension funds operated for the
Table of Contents
benefit of Philips’ current and former employees, provided such persons enter into the new shareholders’ agreement, and (iii) transfers of shares in our common stock held by Philips Parties, provided that the aggregate number of shares of our common stock that can be sold by Philips Parties may not exceed (a) 4% of the Outstanding Share Amount during the twelve-month period immediately preceding the date of the consummation of the relevant transfer or (b) 2% of the Outstanding Share Amount during the three-month period immediately preceding the date of the consummation of the relevant transfer. For purposes of these restrictions, “Outstanding Share Amount” shall mean (i) with respect to any transfer in respect of which a Form 144 has been filed with the SEC, the number of shares of common stock outstanding as shown on such form and (ii) with respect to any other transfer, that number of shares of common stock outstanding that we shall have most recently disclosed in our public filings with the SEC.
Existing Shareholders proposing to sell at least 40% of the shares of our common stock outstanding at any time to a third party purchaser can also require the other Existing Shareholders to sell to such third party purchaser.
The new shareholders’ agreement also contains voting agreements among the Existing Shareholders with respect to, among other matters, the election of certain non-executive members to our board of directors. The shareholders’ agreement provides that our board of directors shall be comprised of, among others, seven non-executive members and that certain stockholders have the right to designate such non-executive members, subject to their election by our general meeting of stockholders. So long as any fund advised by KKR, Bain, Silver Lake, Apax or AlpInvest beneficially owns at least 2.5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, such fund shall have the right to designate either one or two members to our board of directors. The funds advised by KKR and Bain each have the right to designate two members of our board of directors and the funds advised by Silver Lake and Apax each have the right to designate one member to our board of directors. If any party’s shareholding falls below the relevant threshold, it will cause the board member(s) nominated by it to promptly resign from the board of directors, unless otherwise agreed.
The new shareholders agreement will terminate upon the occurrence of certain events, including: (i) with respect to the individual parties to the agreement, upon such party ceasing to hold shares of common stock, (ii) with respect to Philips, upon the date that is three years after the consummation of the initial public offering in August 2010 and (iii) with respect to all parties, upon certain parties’ collective shareholdings falling below specified thresholds.
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the restructuring, the Existing Shareholders and certain other investors have entered into a registration rights agreement with us. In accordance with the registration rights agreement, we have filed a shelf registration statement on Form F-3 with the SEC on August 23, 2011. In addition, the registration rights agreement provides the Existing Shareholders with an unlimited number of demand registration rights and with piggyback registration rights, with a right to participate for certain other investors, which, in either case if exercised, would impose on us an obligation to register for public resale with the SEC shares of our common stock that are held by the Existing Shareholders or such other investors. The demand registration rights can be exercised at any time after the expiration of the lockup period. The piggyback registration rights may be exercised whenever we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act or equivalent non-U.S. securities laws, other than the initial public offering on August 5, 2010 or a registration pursuant to demand registration rights, on Form F-4 or S-4 or any successor form or solely relating to an offering and sale to our employees or directors pursuant to any employee stock option plan or any other benefit plan arrangement. In each such event, we are required to pay the registration expenses.
Philips, Philips Pension Trustees Limited and PPTL Investment LP
On September 7, 2010, Philips Pension Trustees Limited purchased Philips’ 42,715,650 shares of common stock in the Company (“Transfer Shares”) in a private transaction. In a subsequent private transaction, on October 29, 2010, PPTL Investment LP purchased the Transfer Shares from Philips Pension Trustees Limited by way of a transfer agreement, to which also Philips is a party (“Amended Transfer Agreement”). PPTL Investment LP acquired the Transfer Shares for the purpose of owning and managing such assets as may be contributed to Philips Pension Trustees Limited. In connection with this transaction, PPTL Investment LP was required to join the new shareholders agreement, to which Philips and Philips Pension Trustees Limited were already a party. Under the terms of the new shareholders agreement, PPTL Investment LP is required to vote the Transfer Shares in favor of certain other parties’ nominees to the Company’s board of directors. In addition, PPTL Investment LP may be required in the future to sell the Transfer Shares and to vote in favor of a sale of control of the Company pursuant to drag-along provisions contained in the new shareholders agreement, and may, if joining together with other parties thereto to form the percentage of common stock required to trigger such drag-along provisions, similarly require the other parties thereto to sell common stock and vote in favor of a sale of control of the Issuer. Philips may appoint the majority of the board of directors of Philips Pension Trustees Limited. In addition, the Amended Transfer Agreement limits the ability of PPTL Investment LP as the holder of the Transfer Shares to dispose of the Transfer Shares without the consent of Philips. Furthermore, the shareholders’ agreement grants Philips the right to nominate one non-executive member of the Issuer’s board of directors and requires PPTL Investment LP to vote the Transfer Shares in favor of such nominee. In the secondary offering of shares of our common stock, consummated on April 5, 2011, PPTL Investment LP sold 7,182,436 shares of common stock. In addition, on July 6, 2011, PPTL Investment LP entered into a sales plan with a broker. On the basis of that plan PPTL Investment LP disposed of 2.5 million shares of common stock. On November 1, 2011, it entered into a sales plan on the basis of which plan it disposed of 2,515,915 shares of common stock. On February 17, 2012, PPTL Investment LP entered into a sales plan with a broker on the basis of which plan it disposed 4,940,316 shares of common stock. On July 30, 2012 PPTL Investment LP entered into a sales plan with a broker on the basis of which plan it disposed of 2,405,524 shares of common stock. On November 7, 2012 PPTL Investment LP entered into a sales plan with a broker in order to enable the disposition of 2,597,026 shares of common stock within a three month period.
Table of Contents
Private Equity Consortium and Certain Co-investors
We have been advised by the Private Equity Consortium that it has entered into an agreement relating to shares of our common stock with certain co-investors that participated with the Private Equity Consortium in connection with its purchase from Philips of 80.1% of its semiconductor business in 2006. Pursuant to this agreement, until November 5, 2011, 15 months after the initial public offering on August 5, 2010, the co-investors were restricted from selling the shares of our common stock held by them as of the date of the initial public offering on August 5, 2010. These volume and other limitations terminated on November 5, 2011, and the co-investors may now freely sell their shares without restriction under the agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by these co-investors was 19,314,431, representing approximately 7.67% of our outstanding shares. On February 4, 2013, we announced a secondary offering of 30,000,000 shares of our common stock to be sold by certain of our principal stockholders, pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form F-3, at a price to the public of $30.35 per share. The offering was settled and closed on February 7, 2013. Funds advised by KKR, Bain and Silver Lake are considered U.S. beneficial holders and collectively beneficially owned 28.14% of our shares of common stock as of that date. NXP did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares in the offering. As of February 7, 2013, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by these co-investors was 15,658,799, representing approximately 6.22% of our outstanding shares.
C****. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Statements
See Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is limited by the covenants of our Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the Term Loans and the Indentures and may be limited by the terms of any future debt or preferred securities. As a result, we currently expect to retain future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and the repayment of our debt, and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Whether or not dividends will be paid in the future will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors and our stockholders may deem relevant. If, in the future, our board of directors decides not to allocate profits to our reserves (making such profits available to be distributed as dividends), any decision to pay dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our stockholders.
B. Significant Changes
No significant changes have occurred since the date of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A****. Offer and Listing Details
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
The following table shows the high and low closing sales prices of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ as reported in the Official Price List since its introduction on August 6, 2010. The introduction price was fixed on August 5, 2010 at $14.00 per share.
| Most recent six months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2013 | December 2012 | November 2012 | October 2012 | September 2012 | August 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30.50 | 26.55 | 26.32 | 23.31 | 26.19 | 22.69 | 25.28 | 20.93 | 26.67 | 22.96 | 26.04 | 21.55 |
On February 22, 2013, the closing sales price of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ was $31.55.
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1st quarter | 26.97 | 16.01 | 31.95 | 21.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2nd quarter | 26.32 | 18.81 | 34.18 | 22.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3rd quarter | 26.67 | 20.03 | 27.51 | 14.03 | 14.00 | 10.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4th quarter | 26.32 | 20.93 | 19.66 | 13.68 | 20.93 | 11.85 |
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
The shares of common stock of the Company are listed on the stock market of the NASDAQ Global Select Market in New York under the ticker symbol “NXPI”.
The Notes, co-issued by NXP Funding LLC and NXP B.V. both of which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, and which are guaranteed by certain of our other wholly-owned subsidiaries, are listed on the Global Exchange Market of the Irish Stock Exchange.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed on August 5, 2010 (File No. 333-166128).
C. Material Contracts
Other than the material contracts described below, we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business.
On February 16, 2012, our wholly owned subsidiary NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC entered into the $475 million 2019 Term Loan. This new long-term debt has a seven year maturity, has a margin of 4% above LIBOR, with a LIBOR floor of 1.25%, and was priced at 98.5% of par. The covenants of this term loan are substantially the same as those contained in our 2017 Term Loans. The proceeds from this new term loan, together with available borrowing capacity under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility, were used to redeem all of our outstanding euro-denominated 8 5/8% Senior Notes due October 2015 and U.S. dollar-denominated 9 1/2% Senior Notes due October 2015, for a total amount of approximately $775 million.
On April 27, 2012, NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC entered into €500 million Secured Revolving Credit Facility with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as global collateral agent and administrative agent and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan collateral agent, replacing the 2006 secured Revolving Credit Facility. This Secured revolving Credit Facility has a five year maturity. Its covenants
Table of Contents
are substantially the same as those contained in the 2006 Secured Revolving Credit Facility. On October 24, 2012, NXP has agreed with certain participating banks to increase the borrowing capacity of the Secured Revolving Credit Agreement entered into on April 27, 2012, to €620 million.
On December 10, 2012, NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC entered into the $500 million 2020 Term Loan. This new long term debt has a seven year maturity, a margin of 3.5% above LIBOR, with a LIBOR floor of 1.25% and was priced at 99.5% of par. The covenants of this term loan are substantially the same as those under the 2017 Term Loans and the 2019 Term Loan. The proceeds were used to repurchase part of our outstanding U.S. dollar denominated 9 3/4% Dollar Fixed Rate Secured Notes due in 2018.
On February 1, 2013 we announced the pricing of a private offering to institutional investors of $500 million aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar-denominated 5.75% senior notes due 2021 by our wholly-owned subsidiaries NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC. This offering closed February 14, 2013. We will use the net proceeds of this private offering to repay amounts outstanding under our Second 2017 Term Loan.
D. Exchange Controls
Cash dividends payable on our ordinary shares and cash interest payments to holders of our debt securities may be remitted from the Netherlands to nonresidents without legal restrictions imposed by the laws of the Netherlands, except that (i) such payments must be reported to the Dutch Central Bank for statistical purposes only and (ii) the transfer of funds to jurisdictions subject to general economic sanctions adopted in connection with policies of the United Nations, European Commission or similar measures imposed directly by the Government of the Netherlands may be restricted.
E. Taxation
Certain Tax Considerations-Holder of Common Stock
Summary of Dutch Tax Considerations
The following summary describes the material Dutch tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares of common stock as of the date hereof and is intended as general information only. This summary does not contain a detailed description of all the Dutch tax law consequences to you as a holder of shares of common stock in the Company in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the effects of any non-Dutch tax laws. For Dutch tax purposes, a holder of our shares may include an individual who or an entity that does not have the legal title of the shares, but to whom nevertheless the shares are attributed based either on such individual or entity holding a beneficial interest in the shares or based on specific statutory provisions, including statutory provisions pursuant to which shares are attributed to an individual who is, or who has directly or indirectly inherited from a person who was, the settlor, grantor or similar originator of a trust, foundation or similar entity that holds the shares.
If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the Dutch tax consequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
The following summary is based on the Dutch tax law as applied and interpreted by Dutch tax courts and as published and in effect on the date hereof, without prejudice to any amendments introduced at a later date and implemented with or without retroactive effect. For the purpose of this paragraph, “Dutch taxes” means taxes of whatever nature levied by or on behalf of the Netherlands or any of its subdivisions or taxing authorities. The Netherlands means the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands located in Europe and does not include Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba. Any reference hereafter made to a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by the Netherlands includes the Tax Regulation for the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor het Koninkrijk), the Tax Regulation for the country of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor het land Nederland) and the Agreement between the Taipei Representative Office in the Netherlands and the Netherlands Trade and Investment Office in Taipei for the avoidance of double taxation.
Withholding Tax
A stockholder is generally subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent on dividends distributed by us. Generally, we are responsible for the withholding of such dividend withholding tax at source; the dividend withholding tax is for the account of the stockholder.
Dividends distributed by us include, but are not limited to:
| (i) | distributions of profits in cash or in kind, whatever they be named or in whatever form; |
|---|
| (ii) | proceeds from the liquidation of the Company, or proceeds from the repurchase of shares by the Company, in excess of the average paid-in capital recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes; |
|---|
| (iii) | the par value of shares issued to a stockholder or an increase in the par value of shares, to the extent that no contribution, recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, has been made or will be made; and |
|---|
Table of Contents
| (iv) | partial repayment of paid-in capital, that is not recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, or recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, to the extent that we have net profits (zuivere winst) and unless (a) the general meeting of stockholders has resolved in advance to make such repayment, and (b) the par value of the shares concerned has been reduced with an equal amount by way of an amendment to our articles of association. The term net profits includes anticipated profits that have yet to be realized. |
|---|
Notwithstanding the above, no withholding is required in the event of a repurchase of shares, if certain conditions are fulfilled.
Furthermore, subject to certain exceptions under Dutch domestic law, we may not be required to transfer to the Dutch tax authorities the full amount of Dutch dividend withholding tax withheld in respect of dividends distributed by us, if we have received a profit distribution from a qualifying foreign subsidiary (including a subsidiary resident on Bonaire, St. Eustatius or Saba), which distribution is exempt from Dutch corporate income tax and has been subject to a foreign withholding tax of at least 5 percent. The amount that does not have to be transferred to the Dutch tax authorities can generally not exceed the lesser of (i) 3 percent of the dividends distributed by us and (ii) 3 percent of the profit distributions that we received from qualifying foreign subsidiaries in the calendar year in which we distribute the dividends (up to the moment of such dividend distribution) and in the two previous calendar years. Further limitations and conditions apply. We will, upon request, provide stockholders with information regarding the Dutch dividend withholding tax that was retained by us.
If a stockholder is resident in a country other than the Netherlands under the provisions of a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation between the Netherlands and such country, such stockholder may, depending on the terms of such treaty, be entitled to an exemption from, reduction in or refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
If a stockholder is subject to Dutch corporate income tax and is entitled to the participation exemption in relation to the benefits derived from the shares held by it and such shares are attributable to an enterprise carried out in the Netherlands, such stockholder will generally be entitled to an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
If a stockholder (i) is resident in another member state of the European Union or an appointed state of the European Economic Area, i.e. Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, according to the tax laws of that state and, under the terms of a double taxation agreement concluded by that state with a third state, is not considered to be resident for tax purposes outside the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein; and (ii) owns an interest in us to which the Dutch participation exemption would be applicable if the stockholder were resident in the Netherlands; such stockholder will generally be eligible for an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
Furthermore, if a stockholder:
| (a) | is an entity which is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a member state of the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein or which is a qualifying stockholders resident elsewhere; |
|---|
| (b) | is not subject to a tax levied by reference to its profits in its country of residence; and |
|---|
| (c) | would not have been subject to Dutch corporate income tax had the stockholder been resident in the Netherlands for Dutch tax purposes; |
|---|
such stockholder will be eligible for a full refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us, unless such stockholder is comparable to an exempt investment institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling) or fiscal investment institution (fiscale beleggingsinstelling), as defined respectively in article 6a and 28 of the Dutch corporate income tax act 1969 (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969). For purposes of (a) above, a qualifying stockholder is an entity that (i) is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a jurisdiction which has an arrangement for the exchange of tax information with the Netherlands and (ii) holds its shares as a portfolio investment, i.e. such shares are not held with a view to the establishment or maintenance of lasting and direct economic links between the stockholder and the company and the shares do not allow the stockholder to participate effectively in the management or control of the company.
A stockholder who is considered to be resident in the United States and is entitled to the benefits of the convention between the United States and the Netherlands for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, dated December 18, 1992, as amended most recently by the Protocol signed March 8, 2004 (the “Treaty”), will be entitled to a reduction in the Dutch withholding tax by way of an exemption, reduction or refund, as follows:
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is an exempt pension trust, as described in article 35 of the Treaty, or an exempt organization, as described in article 36 of the Treaty, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; |
|---|
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent of the voting power in the company, the U.S. stockholder will be subject to Dutch withholding tax at a rate not exceeding 5 percent; |
|---|
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 80 percent of the voting power in the company and certain other conditions are met, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; and |
|---|
| • | in all other cases, the U.S. stockholder will be subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent. |
|---|
According to Dutch domestic anti-dividend stripping rules, no credit against Dutch (corporate) income tax, exemption from, reduction in or refund of, Dutch dividend withholding tax will be granted if the recipient of the dividend paid by us is not considered to be the beneficial owner (uiteindelijk gerechtigde) of such dividends as meant in these rules.
Table of Contents
Taxes on Income and Capital Gains
The description of taxation set out in this section of the Report does not apply to any stockholder who is an individual for whom the income or capital gains derived from our shares of common stock are attributable to employment activities, the income from which is taxable in the Netherlands.
A stockholder will not be subject to Dutch taxes on income or capital gains in respect of the ownership and disposal of our shares, other than Dutch dividend withholding tax as described above, except if:
| (i) | the stockholder is, or is deemed to be, resident in the Netherlands for Dutch (corporate) income tax purposes; |
|---|
| (ii) | the stockholder is an individual and the stockholder has opted to be treated as resident in the Netherlands for purposes of Dutch income tax; |
|---|
| (iii) | the stockholder derives profits from an enterprise, whether as entrepreneur (ondernemer) or pursuant to a co—entitlement to the net worth of such enterprise other than as an entrepreneur or a stockholder, which enterprise is, in whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment (vaste inrichting) or a permanent representative (vaste vertegenwoordiger) in the Netherlands, to which the shares are attributable; |
|---|
| (iv) | the stockholder is an individual and derives benefits from miscellaneous activities (resultaat uit overige werkzaamheden) carried out in the Netherlands in respect of the shares, including, without limitation, activities which are beyond the scope of active portfolio investment activities; |
|---|
| (v) | the stockholder is an individual and has a substantial interest (aanmerkelijk belang) or a fictitious substantial interest (fictief aanmerkelijk belang) in the company, which is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise; |
|---|
| (vi) | the stockholder is not an individual and has a substantial interest or a fictitious substantial interest in the company, which (fictitious) substantial interest is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise and (one of) the main purposes of the chosen ownership structure is the evasion of Dutch income tax or dividend withholding tax; |
|---|
| (vii) | the stockholder is not an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise or a co-entitlement to the net-worth of an enterprise, other than by way of the holding of securities, which enterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares are attributable; or |
|---|
| (viii) | the stockholder is an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise, other than by way of the holding of securities, which enterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares are attributable. |
|---|
Generally, a stockholder has a substantial interest if such stockholder, alone or together with its partner, directly or indirectly (a) owns, or holds certain rights on, shares representing five percent or more of the total issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of the company; (b) holds rights, directly or indirectly, to acquire shares, whether or not already issued, representing five percent or more of the total issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of the company; or (c) owns, or holds certain rights on, profit participating certificates that relate to five percent or more of the annual profit of the company or to five percent or more of the liquidation proceeds of the company. A stockholder will also have a substantial interest if its partner or one of certain relatives of the stockholder or of its partner has a substantial interest.
Generally, a stockholder has a fictitious substantial interest in the company if, without having an actual substantial interest in the company (i) an enterprise has been contributed to the company in exchange for shares on an elective non-recognition basis; (ii) the shares have been obtained under inheritance law or matrimonial law, on a non-recognition basis, while the disposing stockholder had a substantial interest in the company; (iii) the shares have been acquired pursuant to a share merger, legal merger or legal demerger, on an elective non-recognition basis, while the stockholder prior to this transaction had a substantial interest in an entity that was party thereto; or (iv) the shares held by the stockholder, prior to dilution, qualified as a substantial interest and, by election, no gain was recognized upon disqualification of these shares.
Gift Tax and Inheritance Tax
No Dutch gift or inheritance tax is due in respect of any gift of the shares by, or inheritance of the shares on the death of, a stockholder, except if:
| (i) | at the time of the gift or death of the stockholder, the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands; |
|---|
| (ii) | the stockholder passes away within 180 days after the date of the gift of the shares and is not, or not deemed to be, at the time of the gift, but is, or deemed to be, at the time of its death, resident in the Netherlands; or |
|---|
| (iii) | the gift of the shares is made under a condition precedent and the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands at the time the condition is fulfilled. |
|---|
For purposes of Dutch gift or inheritance tax, an individual who is of Dutch nationality will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has been resident in the Netherlands at any time during the ten years preceding the date of the gift or its death. For purposes of Dutch gift tax, any individual, irrespective of its nationality, will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has been resident in the Netherlands at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of the gift.
Table of Contents
Other Taxes and Duties
No other Dutch Taxes, including turnover tax and taxes of a documentary nature, such as capital tax, stamp or registration tax or duty, are payable by or on behalf of a stockholder by reason only of the purchase, ownership and disposal of the shares.
Residency
A stockholder will not become resident, or deemed resident in the Netherlands for tax purposes by reason only of holding the shares.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following summary describes the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares as of the date hereof. The discussion set forth below is applicable only to United States Holders (as defined below) (i) who are residents of the United States for purposes of the Treaty, (ii) whose shares do not, for purposes of the Treaty, form part of the business property of a permanent establishment, or pertain to a fixed base, in the Netherlands, and (iii) who otherwise qualify for the full benefits of the Treaty. Except where noted, this summary deals only with shares held as capital assets. As used herein, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of a share that is for United States federal income tax purposes:
| • | an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|---|
| • | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|---|
| • | an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|---|
| • | a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person. |
|---|
This summary does not represent a detailed description of the United States federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the United States federal income tax laws, including if you are:
| • | a dealer in securities or currencies; |
|---|
| • | a financial institution; |
|---|
| • | a regulated investment company; |
|---|
| • | a real estate investment trust; |
|---|
| • | an insurance company; |
|---|
| • | a tax-exempt organization; |
|---|
| • | a person holding our shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, a constructive sale or a straddle; |
|---|
| • | a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities; |
|---|
| • | a person liable for alternative minimum tax; |
|---|
| • | a person who owns or is deemed to own 10% or more of our voting stock; |
|---|
| • | a person holding our shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States; |
|---|
| • | a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States federal income tax purposes; or |
|---|
| • | a person whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar. |
|---|
The discussion below is based upon the provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be replaced, revoked or modified so as to result in United States federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below.
If a partnership holds our shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partnership or a partner of a partnership holding our shares, you should consult your tax advisors.
This discussion does not contain a detailed description of all the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the effects of any state, local or non-United States tax laws. If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
Taxation of Dividends
The gross amount of distributions on the shares (including any amounts withheld in respect of Dutch withholding taxes to the extent such amounts are actually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Withholding Tax” above) will be taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles.
Table of Contents
Such income (including withheld taxes paid over to the Dutch tax authorities) will be includable in your gross income as ordinary income on the day actually received by you or on the day received by your nominee or agent that holds the shares on your behalf. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
With respect to non-corporate United States investors, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the United States Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of information provision. The United States Treasury Department has determined that the Treaty meets these requirements. We believe we are currently eligible for the benefits of the Treaty. A foreign corporation is also treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that our shares, which are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, are considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There can be no assurance that our shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Non-corporate holders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from a risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. For this purpose, the minimum holding period requirement will not be met if a share has been held by a holder for 60 days or less during the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which such share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend, appropriately reduced by any period in which such holder is protected from risk of loss. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of this legislation to your particular circumstances.
The maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to you pursuant to the Treaty is 15 percent. You may be required to properly demonstrate to the Company and the Dutch tax authorities your entitlement to the reduced rate of withholding under the Treaty. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Dutch withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability. However, amounts withheld to reflect Dutch withholding taxes will not be creditable to the extent that we are allowed to reduce the amount of the withholding tax that is actually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Withholding Tax” above. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on the shares will be treated as income from sources outside the United States and will generally constitute passive category income. Further, in certain circumstances, if you:
| • | have held shares for less than a specified minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss, or |
|---|
| • | are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, |
|---|
you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on the shares. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, as determined under United States federal income tax principles, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the shares, and to the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds your tax basis, the excess will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange. However, we do not expect to determine earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend (as discussed above).
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Based on the composition of our income and valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for the 2012 taxable year, and we do not expect to become one in the future, although there can be no assurance in this regard. If, however, we are or become a PFIC, you could be subject to additional United States federal income taxes on gain recognized with respect to the shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred under the PFIC rules. Non-corporate United States Holders will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us if we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in the preceding taxable year.
Taxation of Capital Gains
For United States federal income tax purposes, you will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of a share in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for the share and your tax basis in the share. Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of individuals derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized by you will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss.
Table of Contents
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of our shares and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of our shares that are paid to you within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you are an exempt recipient. Backup withholding may apply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your United States federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this Report on Form 20-F that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges.
The Company’s SEC filings are also publicly available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates because we finance certain operations through fixed and variable rate debt instruments and denominate our transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. Changes in these rates may have an impact on future cash flow and earnings. We manage these risks through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
By using derivative instruments, we are subject to credit and market risk. The fair market value of the derivative instruments is determined by using valuation models whose inputs are derived using market observable inputs, including interest rate yield curves, as well as foreign exchange and commodity spot and forward rates, and reflects the asset or liability position as of the end of each reporting period. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, thus creating a receivable risk for us. We are exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to our derivative agreements. We minimize counterparty credit (or repayment) risk by entering into transactions with major financial institutions of investment grade credit rating. Our exposure to market risk is not hedged in a manner that completely eliminates the effects of changing market conditions on earnings or cash flow.
Interest Rate Risk
Given the leveraged nature of our Company, we have inherent exposure to changes in interest rates. Our Secured Revolving Credit Facility has a floating rate interest. We have issued several Term Loans that have a floating rate interest and have issued several series of notes with maturities ranging from 4 to 8 years and a mix of floating and fixed rates. From time to time, we may execute a variety of interest rate derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. Consistent with our risk management objective and strategy, we have no interest rate risk hedging transactions in place.
For additional information regarding our interest rate risks see the discussion set for under “Interest rate risk” of Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report.
Foreign Currency Risks
We are also exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results as well as our financial position and cash flows. We monitor our exposures to these market risks and generally employ operating and financing activities to offset these exposures where appropriate. If we do not have operating or financing activities to sufficiently offset these exposures, from time to time, we may employ derivative financial instruments such as swaps, collars, forwards, options or
other instruments to limit the volatility to earnings and cash flows generated by these exposures. Derivative financial instruments are only used for hedging purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes. The Company measures all derivative financial instruments based on fair values derived from market prices of the instruments or from option pricing models, as appropriate and record these as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair values are recognized in the statement of operations immediately unless cash flow hedge accounting is applied.
Table of Contents
Our primary foreign currency exposure relates to the U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate. However, our foreign currency exposures also relate, but are not limited, to the Chinese Yuan, the Japanese Yen, the Pound Sterling, the Malaysian Ringit, the Singapore Dollar, the Taiwan Dollar and the Thailand Baht.
For additional information regarding our foreign currency risks see the discussion set for under “Currency risk” of Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Report such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and included controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that assessment our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at December 31, 2012.
It should be noted that any control system, regardless of how well it is designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Remediation of Material Weakness in Prior Period
In connection with our assessment of the internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2009, NXP B.V., which was an SEC registrant for a number of years and of which we own 100% of the shares, identified and reported a material weakness related to the accounting and disclosure for income taxes, specifically relating to the execution of the procedures surrounding the preparation and review of our income tax provision. The execution of our controls did not ensure the accuracy and validity of our acquisition accounting adjustments and the determination of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Part of the identified issue was caused by the complexity that resulted from the fact that step-ups from acquisitions are accounted for centrally.
In the Report for the year ended December 31, 2010, we described the controls that were implemented to improve our internal control over financial reporting and to remediate the material weakness described above. Based on our evaluation of these enhanced controls and increased staffing levels, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2010, we had remediated the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting that we identified as of December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we have improved the process by removing the complexities resulting from the step-ups from acquisitions being accounted for centrally.
Table of Contents
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
For the year ended December 31, 2012 an attestation report regarding internal control over financial reporting of the Company’s registered public accounting firm is required. The attestation is included in Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Mr. Goldman, chairman of our audit committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and as determined by our board of directors.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
The NXP Code of Conduct outlines our general commitment to be a responsible social partner and the way in which we attempt to interact with our stakeholders, including stockholders, suppliers, customers, employees and the market. The Code of Conduct expresses our commitment to an economically, socially and ethically sustainable way of working. It covers our policy on a diverse array of subjects, including corporate gifts, child labor, International Labor Organization conventions, working hours, sexual harassment, free-market competition, bribery and the integrity of financial reporting.
We have also adopted a Financial Code of Ethics applicable to certain of our senior employees, which constitutes a “code of ethics” as such term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Both the NXP Code of Conduct and our Financial Code of Ethics are available on our website at www.nxp.com/investor/governance. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of this Report on Form 20-F nor is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The Company has instituted a comprehensive auditor independence policy that regulates the relation between the Company and its external auditors and is available on our website (www.nxp.com/investor/governance). The policy includes rules for the pre-approval by the audit committee of all services to be provided by the external auditor. The policy also describes the prohibited services that may not be provided. Proposed services may be pre-approved at the beginning of the year by the audit committee (annual pre-approval) or may be pre-approved during the year by the audit committee in respect of a particular engagement (specific pre-approval). The annual pre-approval is based on a detailed, itemized list of services to be provided, designed to ensure that there is no management discretion in determining whether a service has been approved and to ensure the audit committee is informed of each service it is pre-approving. Unless pre-approval with respect to a specific service has been given at the beginning of the year, each proposed service requires specific pre-approval during the year. Any annually pre-approved services where the fee for the engagement is expected to exceed pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval. The term of any annual pre-approval is 12 months from the date of the pre-approval unless the audit committee states otherwise. During 2012, there were no services provided to the Company by the external auditors which were not pre-approved by the audit committee.
The external auditor attends, in principle, all meetings of the audit committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the risk analysis are also discussed at these meetings. The external auditor attends the meeting of the board of directors at which the report of the external auditor with respect to the audit of the annual accounts is discussed, and at which the annual accounts are approved. In its audit report on the annual accounts to the board of directors, the external auditor refers to the financial reporting risks and issues that were identified during the audit, internal control matters, and any other matters, as appropriate, requiring communication under the auditing standards generally accepted in the Netherlands and the United States.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report have been audited by KPMG Accountants N.V., an independent registered public accounting firm. These financial statements have been approved by the relevant boards.
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the fiscal periods 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
Aggregate fees KPMG
| ($ in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
| Audit fees | 3.3 | 3.7 | ||||||
| Audit-related fees | 0.9 | 1.4 | ||||||
| Tax fees | — | — | ||||||
| Other fees | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
| 4.4 | 5.2 |
Audit fees consist of fees for the examination of both the consolidated and statutory financial statements.
Audit-related fees consist of fees in connection with audits of acquisitions, divestments and registration statements.
Tax fees consist of fees for professional services in relation to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
Table of Contents
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table provides a summary of shares repurchased by the Company in 2012:
| Date | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | |||||||||
| April 26, 2012 | 79,513 | $ | 25.0100 | 79,513 | ||||||||
| April 27, 2012 | 100,000 | $ | 26.3721 | 100,000 | ||||||||
| May 1, 2012 | 4,100 | $ | 25.6856 | 4,100 | ||||||||
| May 2, 2012 | 98,641 | $ | 25.7805 | 98,641 | ||||||||
| May 3, 2012 | 200,000 | $ | 25.5676 | 200,000 | ||||||||
| May 4, 2012 | 100,000 | $ | 25.5832 | 100,000 | ||||||||
| May 8, 2012 | 46,485 | $ | 24.3642 | 46,485 | ||||||||
| May 9, 2012 | 44,150 | $ | 23.3674 | 44,150 | ||||||||
| June 7, 2012 | 300,000 | $ | 20.2950 | 300,000 | ||||||||
| June 8, 2012 | 248,845 | $ | 20.1082 | 248,845 | ||||||||
| June 11, 2012 | 285,243 | $ | 20.0183 | 285,243 | ||||||||
| June 12, 2012 | 40,688 | $ | 19.9171 | 40,688 | ||||||||
| June 14, 2012 | 146,089 | $ | 20.0378 | 146,089 | ||||||||
| June 24, 2012 | 149,940 | $ | 21.6354 | 149,940 |
In 2012, the General Meeting of Shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to repurchase shares of our common stock. On that basis, the Board of Directors resolved to repurchase shares to cover in part employee stock options and equity rights under its long term incentive plans. The purchases identified in the table were all pursuant to this authorization.
Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16. G. Corporate Governance
The Dutch Corporate Governance Code
Since our initial public offering in August 2010, we have been required to comply with the Dutch corporate governance code. The Dutch corporate governance code, as revised, became effective on January 1, 2009, and applies to all Dutch companies listed on a government-recognized stock exchange, whether in the Netherlands or elsewhere. The code is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, companies are required to disclose in their Annual Reports filed in the Netherlands whether or not they are complying with the various rules of the Dutch corporate governance code that are addressed to the board of directors or, if any, the supervisory board of the company and, if they do not apply those provisions, to give the reasons for such non-application. The code contains principles and best practice provisions for managing boards, supervisory boards, stockholders and general meetings of stockholders, financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards.
We expect to take various actions towards compliance with the provisions of the Dutch corporate governance code.
The Dutch corporate governance code provides that if a company indicates to what extent it applies the best practice provisions, such company will deemed to have applied the Dutch corporate governance code.
The following discussion summarizes the primary differences between our corporate governance structure and best practice provisions of the Dutch corporate governance code:
| • | Best practice provisions II.2.4 and II.2.5 state that stock options granted to members of our board shall, in any event, not be exercised in the first three years after the date of granting and shares granted to board members without financial consideration shall be retained for a period of at least five years or until at least the end of the employment, if this period is shorter. Under our equity incentive schemes, part of the stock options granted to our chief executive officer in November 2010, November 2011 and November 2012 are exercisable one year after the date of grant, and members of our board who received restrictive shares and performance shares in November 2010, November 2011 and November 2012 are not required to retain these shares for at least five years. Although a deviation from the Corporate Governance Code, we hold the view that the combination of equity incentives granted to our chief executive officer, in relation to his obligation to invest in the Company and the applicable strict vesting and performance criteria, as well as the limited exercise possibility for pre-IPO MEP stock options granted to him, will enhance the goal of promoting long-term investments in the Company. The same is true for the equity grants made to other members of our board, which also have very strict vesting criteria with the purpose of creating long-term commitment to the Company. |
|---|
Table of Contents
| • | Best practice provision III.8.4 states that the majority of the members of the board shall be independent. In our board of directors, four non-executive members are independent. It is our view that given the nature of our business and the practice in our industry and considering our stockholder structure, it is justified that only four non-executive directors are independent. |
|---|
| • | Pursuant to best practice provision IV.1.1, a general meeting of stockholders is empowered to cancel binding nominations of candidates for the board, and to dismiss members of the board by a simple majority of votes of those in attendance, although the company may require a quorum of at least one third of the voting rights outstanding. If such quorum is not represented, but a majority of those in attendance vote in favor of the proposal, a second meeting may be convened and its vote will be binding, even without a one-third quorum. Our articles of association currently state that the general meeting of stockholders may at all times overrule a binding nomination by a resolution adopted by at least a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, if such majority represents more than half of the issued share capital. Although a deviation from provision IV.1.1 of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, we hold the view that these provisions will enhance the continuity of the Company’s management and policies. |
|---|
Effective January 1, 2012, Dutch law does not allow directors to vote on a matter with regard to which they have an interest.
The NASDAQ Global Select Market Corporate Governance Rules
NASDAQ rules provide that NASDAQ may provide exemptions from its corporate governance standards to a foreign issuer when those standards are contrary to a law, rule or regulation of any public authority exercising jurisdiction over such issuer or contrary to generally accepted business practices in the issuer’s country of domicile. We are exempt from certain NASDAQ corporate governance standards that are contrary to the laws, rules, regulations or generally accepted business practices of the Netherlands. These exemptions and the practices followed by our company are described below:
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of stockholders. Pursuant to Dutch corporate law, the validity of a resolution by the general meeting of stockholders does not depend on the proportion of the capital or stockholders represented at the meeting (i.e. quorum), unless the law or articles of association of a company provide otherwise. Our articles of association provide that a resolution proposed to the general meeting of stockholders by the board of directors shall be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast, unless another majority of votes or quorum is required under Dutch law or our articles of association. All other resolutions shall be adopted by a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents at least half of the issued share capital, unless another majority of votes or quorum is required under Dutch law. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirement of Listing Rule 5620(c), which requires an issuer to provide in its bylaws for a quorum, and that such quorum may not be less than one-third of the outstanding voting stock. |
|---|
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies and provision of proxy statements for meetings of stockholders. We inform stockholders of meetings in a public notice. We prepare a proxy statement and solicit proxies from the holders of our listed stock. Our practice in this regard, however, differs from the typical practice of U.S. corporate issuers in that the advance record date for determining the holders of record entitled to attend and vote at our stockholder meetings is determined by Dutch law (currently 28 days prior to the meeting). As an administrative necessity, we establish a mailing record date in advance of each meeting of stockholders for purposes of determining the stockholders to which the proxy statement and form of proxy will be sent. However, only stockholders of record on the specified record date are entitled to attend and vote, directly or by proxy, at the meeting. |
|---|
| • | NASDAQ requires stockholder approval prior to the issuance of securities when a stock option or purchase plan is to be established or materially amended or other equity compensation arrangement made or materially amended, pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors, employees or consultants. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, stockholder approval is only required for equity compensation plans (or changes thereto) for members of the board, and not for equity compensation plans for other groups of employees. However, we note that under Dutch law, the stockholders have the power to issue shares or rights to subscribe for shares at the general meeting of the stockholders unless such power has been delegated to the board. Our board is designated for a period of five years from the date of the public offering in August 2010 to issue shares and rights to subscribe for shares. |
|---|
| • | NASDAQ requires the majority of the board of directors to be comprised of independent directors. Although the Dutch corporate governance code provides that the majority of the members of the board be independent, it also provides that if a company expressly indicates the reasons and the extent to which it does not apply the provisions of the Dutch corporate governance code, such company will deemed to have applied the code. As described under “—Corporate Governance—The Dutch Corporate Governance Code” above, four non-executive members of our board of directors will be independent. It is our view that given the nature of our business and the practice in our industry and considering our stockholder structure, it is justified that only four non-executive directors will be independent. |
|---|
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement to have independent director oversight of executive officer compensation. Although the SEC has recently proposed new rules directing national securities exchanges, including NASDAQ, to adopt listing standards requiring that issuers’ compensation committees be comprised exclusively of independent directors, we, as a foreign private issuer, remain exempt from this requirement provided that we disclose the reasons for not having such an independent compensation committee. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, the general meeting of stockholders must adopt a policy in respect of the remuneration of the board. In accordance with our articles of association and our board rules, the remuneration of the |
|---|
Table of Contents
| executive directors is determined by the board of directors upon the recommendation of our nominating and compensation committee. Accordingly, applicable laws, regulations and corporate governance rules and practices do not require independence of the members of our nominating and compensation committee. |
|---|
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement to have independent director oversight of director nominations. In accordance with Dutch law, our articles of association require that our directors will be appointed by the general meeting of stockholders upon the binding nomination of the board. In accordance with our board rules, the nominating and compensation committee will recommend the nomination of directors to our board. |
|---|
| • | NASDAQ requires us to adopt a nominations committee charter or a board resolution addressing the nominations process. In accordance with the Dutch corporate governance code, we have adopted the committee’s charter. However, the nominations process has been set out in our articles of association and board rules. |
|---|
Moreover, we will not distribute Annual Reports to all of our stockholders in accordance with NASDAQ rules. Dutch law requires that the external auditors be appointed at the general meeting of stockholders and not by the audit committee. Our audit committee, which consists of members of our board of directors, shall only make a recommendation to the stockholders through the board of directors for the appointment and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm and shall oversee and evaluate the work of our independent registered public accounting firm.
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
We are furnishing the financial statements pursuant to the instructions of Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements of this Report.
Item 18. Financial Statements
See pages F-1 to F-50
Item 19. Exhibits
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
| 2.1# | Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2010, between NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V., the Dover Corporation, Knowles Electronics, LLC and EFF Acht Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 3.2 | Articles of Association of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 4.1 | Senior Secured Indenture dated as of October 12, 2006 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement on Form F-4 of NXP B.V. filed on April 23, 2007 (File No. 333-142287)) | |
| 4.2 | Collateral Agency Agreement dated as of September 29, 2006 among NXP Semiconductors N.V. (formerly known as KASLION Acquisition B.V.), NXP B.V., the Guarantors named therein, the Secured Parties as defined therein and from time to time parties thereto, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registration Statement on Form F-4 of NXP B.V. filed on April 23, 2007 (File No. 333-142287)) | |
| 4.3 | Senior Secured Indenture dated as of July 20, 2010 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on July 22, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 4.4 | Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement dated August 5, 2010 among the AlpInvest Parties, Apax Parties, Bain Capital Parties, Co-Invest Parties, Kaslion S.à r.l., KASLION Holding B.V., the KKR Parties, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., the Silver Lake Parties and Stichting Management Co-Investment NXP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the current report on Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on August 10, 2010) | |
| 4.5 | Registration Rights Agreement dated August 5, 2010 among NXP Semiconductors N.V., AlpInvest Partners CSI 2006 Lion C.V., AlpInvest Partners Later Stage II-A Lion C.V., Meridian Holding S.à.r.l., Bain Pumbaa Luxco S.à.r.l., KKR NXP Investor S.à.r.l., NXP Co-Investment Investor S.à.r.l., SLII NXP S.à.r.l., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Stichting Management Co-Investment NXP and certain hedge funds party to the agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the current report on Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on August 10, 2010) | |
| 4.6 | Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 4.7 | Joinder and Amendment Agreement dated November 18, 2011 amending the Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) |
Table of Contents
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
| 4.8 | New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated February 16, 2012 amending the Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 4.9 | Senior Secured Indenture dated as of November 10, 2011 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee, registrar, paying agent, calculation agent and transfer agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, and Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 4.10 | Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2012 among NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Administrative Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent and the lenders party thereto | |
| 4.11 | Incremental Joinder Agreement, dated October 24, 2012, to the Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2012 among NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Administrative Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent and the lenders party thereto | |
| 4.12 | New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated December 10, 2012 amending the Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and the lenders party thereto | |
| 4.13 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of February 14, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature page thereto as borrower and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee | |
| 10.1 | Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of September 28, 2006 between Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and NXP B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.2 | Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of November 16, 2009 among NXP B.V., Virage Logic Corporation and VL C.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.3 | Secured Revolving Credit Facility dated as of September 29, 2006 among NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrowers, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Taiwan Collateral Agent, Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, as Syndication Agent, Merrill Lynch Capital C |
Showing the first 8K of 269K characters. Open the full section