NXP Semiconductors 20-F 2014-12-31
Filed 2015-03-06. 23 sections, 588K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
20-F 1 d819256d20f.htm 20-F
Table of Contents
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2015
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
| ¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
OR
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
OR
| ¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---|
Date of event requiring this shell company report
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34841
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
The Netherlands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
High Tech Campus 60, Eindhoven 5656 AG, the Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices)
Jean Schreurs, SVP and Senior Corporate Counsel, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Telephone: +31 40 2728686 / E-mail: jean.schreurs@nxp.com
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common shares—par value euro (EUR) 0.20 per share | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
(Title of class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Common shares—par value EUR 0.20 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report.
| Class | Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | |
| Ordinary shares, par value EUR 0.20 per share | 251,751,500 shares |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes ¨ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨ Yes x No
Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| U.S. GAAP x | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ | Other ¨ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Introduction
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that contain risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from future results as a result of factors such as those set forth in Part I. Item 3D. Risk Factors and Part I, Item 5G. Safe Harbor.
The financial information included in this Annual Report is based on United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), unless otherwise indicated.
In presenting and discussing our financial position, operating results and cash flows, management uses certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. These non-U.S. GAAP financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as alternatives to the equivalent U.S. GAAP measures and should be used in conjunction with the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures. A discussion of non-U.S. GAAP measures included in this Annual Report and a reconciliation of such measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are set forth under “Use of Certain Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures” contained in this report under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results.
Unless otherwise required, all references herein to “we”, “our”, “us”, “NXP” and the “Company” are to NXP Semiconductors N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
A glossary of abbreviations and technical terms used in this Annual Report is set forth on page 74.
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
| --- | --- |
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
| --- | --- |
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
| --- | --- |
A. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents a summary of our selected historical consolidated financial data. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The results of operations for prior years are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
Table of Contents
The selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the discussion under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
| As of and for the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions unless otherwise stated) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | 5,647 | 4,815 | 4,358 | 4,194 | 4,402 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 1,049 | 651 | 412 | 357 | 273 | |||||||||||||||
| Financial income (expense)-net | (410 | ) | (274 | ) | (437 | ) | (257 | ) | (628 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to stockholders | 539 | 348 | (116 | ) | (44 | ) | (515 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to stockholders | — | — | 1 | 434 | 59 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders | 539 | 348 | (115 | ) | 390 | (456 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Per share data(1)(2): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from continuing operations | 2.27 | 1.40 | (0.46 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (2.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | 1.74 | 0.26 | |||||||||||||||
| - Net income (loss) | 2.27 | 1.40 | (0.46 | ) | 1.57 | (1.99 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from continuing operations | 2.17 | 1.36 | (0.46 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (2.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
| - Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | 1.74 | 0.26 | |||||||||||||||
| - Net income (loss) | 2.17 | 1.36 | (0.46 | ) | 1.57 | (1.99 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| • Basic | 237,954 | 248,526 | 248,064 | 248,812 | 229,280 | |||||||||||||||
| • Diluted | 248,609 | 255,050 | 248,064 | (3) | 248,812 | (3) | 229,280 | (3) | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,185 | 670 | 617 | 743 | 898 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 6,893 | 6,449 | 6,439 | 6,612 | 7,637 | |||||||||||||||
| Net assets | 801 | 1,546 | 1,284 | 1,357 | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||
| Working capital(4) | 1,340 | 939 | 765 | 969 | 811 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt(5) | 3,999 | 3,321 | 3,492 | 3,799 | 4,551 | |||||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 538 | 1,301 | 1,049 | 1,145 | 986 | |||||||||||||||
| Common stock | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
| Other operating data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | (329 | ) | (215 | ) | (251 | ) | (221 | ) | (258 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization(6) | 405 | 514 | 533 | 591 | 684 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated statements of cash flows data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | 1,468 | 891 | 722 | 175 | 361 | |||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (387 | ) | (240 | ) | (243 | ) | (202 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||||||||
| Financing activities | (554 | ) | (598 | ) | (574 | ) | (926 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations | 527 | 53 | (95 | ) | (953 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations | — | — | (45 | ) | 809 | (5 | ) |
| (1) | In 2010, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split, decreasing the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 4.3 billion to approximately 215 million and increasing the par value of the shares of common stock from €0.01 to €0.20. In all periods presented, basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and earnings per share have been calculated to reflect the 1-for-20 reverse stock split. |
|---|
| (2) | The Company has not paid any dividends during the periods presented. |
|---|
| (3) | Due to our net losses from continuing operations attributable to stockholders in the periods from 2010 to 2012, all potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. |
|---|
| (4) | Working capital is calculated as current assets less current liabilities (excluding short-term debt). |
|---|
Table of Contents
| (5) | As adjusted for our cash and cash equivalents our net debt was calculated as follows: |
|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 3,979 | 3,281 | 3,185 | 3,747 | 4,128 | |||||||||||||||
| Short-term debt | 20 | 40 | 307 | 52 | 423 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt | 3,999 | 3,321 | 3,492 | 3,799 | 4,551 | |||||||||||||||
| Less: cash and cash equivalents | (1,185 | ) | (670 | ) | (617 | ) | (743 | ) | (898 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net debt | 2,814 | 2,651 | 2,875 | 3,056 | 3,653 |
Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures” under Part I, 5A. Operating Results.
| (6) | Depr
Showing the first 8K of 98K characters. Open the full section
Item 4. Information on the Company
| --- | --- |
A. History and Development of the Company
Name and History
Our legal name is NXP Semiconductors N.V. and our commercial name is “NXP” or “NXP Semiconductors”.
We were incorporated in the Netherlands as a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met
Table of Contents
beperkte aansprakelijkheid) under the name KASLION Acquisition B.V. on August 2, 2006, in connection with the sale by Philips of 80.1% of its semiconductor business to the “Private Equity Consortium”. Initially, the Private Equity Consortium invested in our Company through KASLION Holding B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability.
On May 21, 2010, we converted into a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed our name to NXP Semiconductors N.V. Concurrently, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our shares of common stock.
On August 5, 2010, we made an initial public offering of 34 million shares of our common stock and listed our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
In 2014, the last members of the Private Equity Consortium sold their remaining shares of our common stock. Representatives of certain members of the Private Equity Consortium continue to serve on our Board of Directors.
On March 2, 2015, NXP announced that the company has entered into a definitive agreement under which NXP will merge with Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. (Freescale).
Under the terms of the agreement, Freescale shareholders will receive $6.25 in cash and 0.3521 of an NXP ordinary share for each Freescale common share held at the close of the transaction. The purchase price implies a total equity value for Freescale of approximately $11.8 billion (based on NXP’s closing stock price as of February 27, 2015) and a total enterprise value of approximately $16.7 billion including Freescale’s net debt. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of calendar 2015. NXP intends to fund the transaction with $1.0 billion of cash from its balance sheet, $1.0 billion of new debt and approximately 115 million of NXP ordinary shares. Post transaction, Freescale shareholders are expected to own approximately 32 percent of the combined company. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is subject to regulatory approvals in various jurisdictions and customary closing conditions, as well as the approval of NXP and Freescale shareholders. Upon consummation, we expect to account for the merger under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic 805, Business Combinations, with NXP treated as the accounting acquirer.
We are a holding company whose only material assets are the direct ownership of 100% of the shares of NXP B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid).
Our corporate seat is in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Our principal executive office is at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, the Netherlands, and our telephone number is +31 40 2729233. Our registered agent in the United States is NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc., 411 East Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, United States of America, phone number +1 408 5185400.
Reporting Segments
NXP is organized into two market oriented reportable segments, High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) and Standard Products (“SP”). Corporate and Other represents the remaining portion (or “segment”) to reconcile to the Consolidated Financial Statements. You can find a description of each of our reportable segments below. We also have a manufacturing group that manages our manufacturing and supply chain activities. Prior to January 1, 2013 we had three reportable segments: HPMS, SP and Manufacturing Operations. During the first quarter of 2013 we moved our General Purpose Logic Product Line from our HPMS segment (Portable & Computing) to our SP segment; and our NXP software product line to our HPMS Segment (Industrial & Infrastructure) from Corporate and Other. We also determined in the fourth quarter of 2013 that Manufacturing Operations no longer meets the criteria for separate reporting as a reportable segment and consequently, its results are now reflected within Corporate and Other. As a result of the above changes to the composition of our operating and reportable segments, corresponding information for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
B. Business Overview
Our Company
We are a global semiconductor company and a long-standing supplier in the industry, with over 50 years of innovation and operating history. We provide leading High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage our deep application insight and our technology and manufacturing expertise in security, interface, RF, analog, power management and digital processing products. Our product solutions are used in a wide range of applications such as: automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer and computing. We engage with leading original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) worldwide and 68% of our revenue in 2014 was derived from Asia Pacific (excluding Japan).
As of December 31, 2014, we had 27,884 full-time equivalent employees located in over 20 countries, with research and development activities in Asia, Europe and the United States, and manufacturing facilities in Asia and Europe. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we generated revenue of $5,647 million.
Markets, applications and products
We sell two categories of products, High Performance Mixed Signal product solutions and Standard Products. The first category, which consists of highly differentiated application-specific High Performance Mixed Signal semiconductors and system solutions, accounted for 77% of our total product revenue in 2014. We believe that High Performance Mixed Signal is an attractive market in terms of growth, barriers to entry, relative business and pricing stability and capital intensity. The second of our product categories, Standard Products, accounted for 23% of our total product revenue in 2014, and consists of devices that can be incorporated in many different types of electronics equipment and that are typically sold to a wide variety of customers, both directly and through distributors. Manufacturing cost, supply chain efficiency and continuous improvement of manufacturing processes drive the profitability of our Standard Products.
Reorganization of HPMS segment
Effective January 1, 2015, NXP has reorganized the HPMS segment from the four business lines: Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing into the following four business lines: Automotive, Secure Identification Solutions, Secure Connected Devices and Secure Interfaces and Power.
Table of Contents
High Performance Mixed Signal
We focus on developing products and system and sub-system solutions that are innovative and allow our customers to bring their end products to market more quickly. Our products, particularly our application system and sub-system solutions, help our customers design critical parts of their end products and thus help many of them to differentiate themselves based on feature performance, advanced functionality, cost or time-to-market.
We leverage our technical expertise in the areas of RF, analog, power management, interface, security technologies and digital processing across our priority applications markets. Our strong RF capabilities are utilized in our high performance RF for wireless infrastructure and industrial applications, television tuners, car security and car radio products and contactless identification products. Our power technologies and capabilities are applied in our lighting products, AC-DC power conversion and audio power products, while our ability to design ultra-low power semiconductors is used in a wide range of our products including our consumer, mobile, identification, healthcare products and our microcontrollers. Our high-speed interface design skills are applied in our interface products business, and our security solutions are used in our identification, microcontroller, telematics and smart metering products and solutions. Finally, our digital processing capabilities are used in our Auto DSPs, the products leveraging our Coolflux ultra-low power DSPs, such as in our hearing aid business, and our microcontroller based products. In addition, our digital processing knowledge is used to design High Performance Mixed Signal solutions that leverage other suppliers’ digital processing products.
The High Performance Mixed Signal segment is organized into four business lines named: Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing. The below table provides an overview of the key applications per business line, the leading market positions and our key customers.
| Automotive | Identification | Infrastructure & Industrial | Portable & Computing | |||||
| Key applications | • Car access & immobilizers • In vehicle networking • Car entertainment • Telematics • ABS • Transmission/ throttle control • Automotive Lighting | • Secure identity • Secure transactions • Tagging & authentication | • Wireless base stations • Satellite & CATV infra • Radar • Power supplies • Lighting • Personal Healthcare • TV & Set-top boxes • Mobile Handsets | • Mobile handset • Tablet • Monitor • Personal computer • Smart metering • White goods & home appliances • Pachinko machines • Medical • Industrial • Consumer | ||||
| Selected market leading positions | • #1 Can/LIN/ Flex Ray in-vehicle networking • #1 passive keyless entry/ immobilizers • #1 car radio • #2 audio amplifiers | • #1 e-Government • #1 Transport & Access management • #1 Banking • #1 NFC | • #2 in RF Power | • # 3 in sensor hub | ||||
| Key OEM and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) end customers | • Becker • Bosch • Clarion • Continental • Delphi • Fujitsu Ten • Hyundai • Mitsubishi • Panasonic • Visteon | • Apple • Bundesdruckerei • Gemalto • Giesecke • Kona • Oberthur • Samsung • Smartrac • Sony • Wuhan/Tianyu Info | • Alcatel • BBK • Ericsson • HTC • Huawei • NSN • Philips • Samsung • Sony • ZTE | • Apple • Continental • Foxconn • Huawei • Inventec • Samsung • Vasco • Wistron • ZLG Electronics • ZTE |
The list above, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabetical order, represents our key OEM, ODM and electronic manufacturing services end customers based on 2014 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Edom, Vitec and WPG.
Automotive****. In the automotive market we are a leader in in-vehicle networking, car passive keyless entry and immobilization, and car radio and car audio amplifiers. We also have an emerging business in car solid state lighting drivers and are investing in growth areas, such as Car2X communication products which relate to assisted and autonomous driving.
In the can/LIN/FlexRay in-vehicle networking market, we are the market leader, having played a defining role in setting the can/LIN and more recently FlexRay standards. We are a leading supplier to major OEMs and continue to drive new system concepts, such as partial networking for enhanced energy efficiency. In the car access and immobilizers market, we lead the development of new passive keyless entry/start and two-way key concepts with our customers and, as a result, we are a key supplier to almost all car OEMs for those products. We are the market leader in AM/FM car radio chip sets.
Our leadership in mid- and high-end car radio is driven by excellent reception performance, whereas in the low-end and after-market car radio, our leadership is driven by our one-chip radio solutions that offer ease of implementation and low cost of ownership. In digital reception, we have developed multi-standard radios based on our software-defined radio implementation. Based on these software-defined radio technology, we are developing Car2X communication products. In addition, we provide class-AB and class-D audio amplifiers and power analog products for car entertainment. We leverage our proprietary processes for automotive, high-voltage, RF and non-volatile processes as well as our technology standards and leading edge security IP developed by our identification business, to deliver our automotive solutions. We are compliant with all globally relevant automotive quality standards (such as ISO/TS16949 and VDA6.3).
Table of Contents
In 2013, we made (together with Cisco), a strategic investment in Cohda Wireless, an equipment vendor in the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) market with whom we co-operate for Car2X solutions. In December 2013, we announced a joint venture with Datang Telecom, targeting the China domestic hybrid and electrical car market which became active in April 2014. In December 2013, we also announced the intended sale of our Telematics Module business to Telit communications which was closed end of March 2014.
For the full year 2014, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $1,144 million in automotive applications, compared to $1,019 million in 2013, which represents a 12.3% year over year increase. According to Strategy Analytics, the total market for automotive semiconductors was $27.7 billion in 2013, and projects it will grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 7.4% between 2013 and 2017. According to Strategy Analytics’ estimates we were the fifth largest supplier of automotive semiconductors worldwide in 2013.
Identification****. Based on revenue in 2014, NXP continues to have the leading position in the overall identification chip market segment. We address all segments of the market, except for the commodity SIM market. We are the largest supplier world-wide of ICs for e-government, transportation and access management.
NXP is a global market segment leader in the EMV migration wave in which credit and debit cards around the world are transitioning from non-secure magnetic stripes to secure chips.
Our MIFARE products are widely used in worldwide e-passport projects and public transport systems that have adopted electronic ticketing.
We have led the development and standard setting of Near Field Communications (NFC), which is a rapidly growing standard for secure short-range connectivity. In combination with our Secure Element portfolio, this has given us a leadership position in Mobile wallets and Mobile payment.
Our leadership in the identification market is based on the breadth of our product portfolio underpinned by the successful launch of new product platforms led by the strength of our security and our end-to-end system contactless read speed performance.
Key growth drivers will be the further adoption of security ICs in governmental documents and payment cards, the adoption of new security standards, the need for multi-application solutions in existing smart card markets and the increasing needs of anti-counterfeiting solutions.
For the full year 2014, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $1,469 million in identification applications, compared to $1,297 million in 2013, which represents a 13.3% year over year growth. According to ABI Research, the market size for identification ICs was $3.3 billion in 2013, and is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 14% to $5.6 billion in 2017.
Infrastructure and Industrial****. We have a leading market position in high-performance radio frequency solutions and have a broad portfolio in lighting drivers and strong positions in selected niche segments of the AC-DC power conversion and personal healthcare markets. In addition, we have an emerging business in low power connectivity and mobile audio. Our overall revenue in these businesses was $883 million in 2014 versus $729 million in 2013, which represents an increase of 21.1% year over year.
Our leading high-performance radio frequency business mainly provides RF front-end solutions for markets, such as mobile base stations, wireless connectivity, satellite and CATV infrastructure and receivers, industrial applications, and to a lesser extent addresses the military and aerospace markets. We have a leading position in RF Power Amplifiers and significant sales in Small Signal RF discretes and RF ICs for mobile, consumer electronics and cable television infrastructure, while we have emerging businesses in RF ICs for mobile base stations and monolithic microwave ICs (“MMICs”). Our leadership is based on our world-class proprietary RF process technologies and technology advancements that drive overall system performance, such as power scaling in mobile base stations. We are engaged with the majority of the largest customers in mobile base stations and in several other application areas. Key growth drivers for our high-performance RF business include infrastructure build-outs driven by the substantial growth in mobile data use and digital broadcast adoption, infrastructure development of developing countries, including China, 4G roll out, and our expansion into new product markets such as wireless communications LNAs and infrastructure MMICs. We estimate that the market for RF Power Amplifiers was $0.8 billion in 2013 and is expected to grow with a compounded annual growth rate of 8.8% till 2017.
Our market strengths are our specialty RF process technology, decades of experience in designing tuners that work under all broadcasting standards and conditions across the world, and our innovations in new broadcasting standards.
In lighting, we have a broad driver portfolio serving all main segments in general lighting applications. Our strength in lighting ICs is based on our leading-edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and system optimization concepts, such as our patented technology to develop sensors-less temperature-controlled LED drivers. The growth of the lighting IC market has been partly driven by government regulations around the world that ban or discourage the use of incandescent light bulbs and encourage or mandate CFL and LED lighting solutions and by energy-savings conscious customers.
Table of Contents
We are a key player in high efficiency AC-DC power conversion ICs for notebook personal computers (our “green chip” solutions). Our strength in AC-DC power conversion is based on our leading edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and engineering capabilities in designing high efficiency power conversion products. Due to worldwide conservation efforts, many countries, states and local governments have adopted regulations that increase the demand for higher power efficiency solutions in computing and consumer applications, especially in power conversion.
Our personal healthcare revenue is generated by our hearing aid products, which leverage our proprietary ultra low power Coolflux DSP, our low power audio IC design capabilities and our magnetic induction radio technology. We design customer-specific ICs for major hearing aid OEMs, and many of these customers fund our product development efforts.
In addition, we have two emerging product areas, one focused on the mobile audio market and the other on the low power connectivity market. Our mobile audio business focuses on smart speaker drivers and leverages many of the same core technologies and competencies as our personal healthcare business. In 2012 we started shipping to a key smart phone OEMs, followed by many other design wins and significant revenue ramp up in 2014. Our low power connectivity business started in 2010 through the acquisition of Jennic, which brought us a portfolio of 802.15.4-based low power connectivity ICs with a broad range of both the Zigbee standard-based as well as proprietary protocol stacks. In November 2014 we entered into a definitive agreement with Quintic to acquire assets and IP, which will add Bluetooth Low Energy to our connectivity portfolio. With this portfolio we target the emerging Internet of Things market, starting with application solutions for smart lighting, smart energy, wireless remote controls & switches and healthcare monitoring.
We also sell software solutions for mobile phones through our NXP Software business.
The NXP Software solutions business develops audio solutions that enable mobile device manufacturers to produce differentiated hand held products that enhance the end-user experience. Our software has been incorporated into over 1 billion mobile devices produced by many of the world’s leading mobile device manufacturers.
Portable and Computing. We are a top three supplier in the fragmented interface market outside Japan and have a strong portfolio in 32-bit ARM microcontrollers. Our overall High Performance Mixed Signal revenue in these businesses was $712 million in 2014, compared to $488 million in 2013, which represents a 45.9% year over year growth.
In microcontrollers, we have a strong position in multi-purpose 32-bit ARM microcontrollers serving a broad array of applications. ARM processor cores have been gaining momentum in the general purpose MCU market during the past few years. Our competitive advantage is based on having been a launching partner for several low power ARM microcontroller cores, our rich portfolio of analog and security IP, which we integrate with the ARM core into a family of microcontroller products, and our distribution leverage based on our ability to offer a full microcontroller software development kit. Our ARM Cortex M0-based products achieve pricing levels that places it squarely in competition with 8-bit microcontrollers, while offering better performance in terms of processing speed and system power consumption, expanding the addressable market for 32-bit ARM microcontrollers at the expense of 8-bit ARM microcontrollers. Gartner 1 estimates the worldwide market for Microcontrollers 32-bit to be $5.7 billion in 2013, and expects a compounded annual growth rate of 7.6% between 2013 and 2017 2.
The interface products market is highly fragmented with niche markets around each of the established interface standards. Our products address many interface standards and we serve various applications across the mobile, computing, industrial, consumer and automotive markets. We have broad product portfolios in five interface segments, being UARTs and bridges, I 2 C and SPI LED controllers, low power real-time clocks and watch ICs, HDMI switches and transceivers, and display port multiplexers. Our core competencies are the design of high speed interfaces, high voltage design needed for LED and LCD drivers, ultra low power design for real-time clocks and watch ICs, and our ability to engage with leading OEMs in defining new interface standards and product designs. While we successfully engage with leading OEMs to drive our innovation roadmaps, we generate a large part of our revenue by subsequently selling these products to a very broad customer base, which we serve through our distribution channel. We are engaged in development activities and standard setting initiatives with many of the innovation leaders in each of these markets. Key growth drivers will be the adoption rate of new high-speed interface standards such as display port and USB, and application specific interface products for the mobile market. According to Gartner, the worldwide Interface IC market is projected to grow at a 4.5% compounded annual rate between 2013 and 2017, from a revenue base of $1.5 billion in 2013 2.
| 1 | The Gartner Report(s) described herein, (the “Gartner Report(s)”) represent(s) data, research opinion or viewpoints published, as part of a syndicated subscription service, by Gartner, Inc. (“Gartner”), and are not representations of fact. Each Gartner Report speaks as of its original publication date (and not as of the date of this Filing) and the opinions expressed in the Gartner Report(s) are subject to change without notice. |
|---|
| 2 | Source: Gartner, Inc., Semiconductor Forecast Database, 4Q14 Update, December, 2014. |
|---|
Table of Contents
Standard Products
Our Standard Products business supplies a broad range of standard semiconductor components, such as small signal discretes, power discretes, protection and signal conditioning devices and standard logic devices, which we largely produce in dedicated in-house high-volume manufacturing operations. Our portfolio consists of a large variety of catalog products, using widely-known production techniques, with characteristics that are largely standardized throughout the industry as well as leading discrete solutions especially in the field of ESD protection / EMI filtering and low loss rectification and power switching. Our Standard Products are often sold as separate components, but in many cases, are used in conjunction with our High Performance Mixed Signal solutions, often within the same subsystems. Further, we are able to leverage customer engagements where we provide standard products devices, as discrete components, within a system to identify and pursue potential High Performance Mixed Signal opportunities.
Our products are sold both directly to OEMs as well as through distribution, and are primarily differentiated on cost, packaging type and miniaturization, and supply chain performance. Alternatively, our innovative products include “design-in” products, which require significant engineering effort to be designed into an application solution. For these products, our efforts make it more difficult for a competitor to easily replace our product, which makes these businesses more predictable in terms of revenue and pricing than is typical for standard products.
Our key product applications, markets and customers are described in the table below.
| Key Products | • SS Transistors and Diodes • SS MOS • Power MOS • Bipolar Power Transistors • Thyristors • Rectifiers • Interface protection devices • General Purpose Logic | |
| Key OEM and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) end customers | • Apple • Asustek • Bosch • Continental • Delphi • Delta Electronics • Huawei • LGE • Philips • Samsung |
The list above, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabetical order, represents our key OEM and electronic manufacturing services end customers based on 2014 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Future and WPG.
In 2014, our Standard Products business generated net revenue of $1,275 million, compared to $1,145 million in 2013, which represents a 11.4% year over year growth.
We are the number one global supplier of small-signal discretes with one of the broadest product portfolios in the industry. We have a strong position due to our strong cost competitiveness, supply chain performance, leverage of our OEM relationships and a broadening portfolio. We are focusing on expanding our share of higher margin products in this business. In addition, we are also building a small signal MOSFET product line, which leverages our small signal transistors and diodes packaging operations and strong customer relationships. In addition to our small signal discretes products, we have a Power MOSFET product line, which is focused on the low-voltage segment of the market. The majority of our revenue in Power MOSFETs is to automotive customers.
We have introduced a new range of Automotive Power MOSFET products in our Trench 6 manufacturing process. Finally, we have small bipolar power, thyristor and rectifier product lines, which are focused on specific applications, such as white goods and power supplies, and are sold as part of our overall High Performance Mixed Signal application solutions. We estimate that the market for discretes, excluding RF & Microwave, was $18 billion in 2013 and is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 5%, between 2013 and 2017.
Next to discrete semiconductors, the Standard Products segment also includes Standard Logic ICs. We have the number two position in Standard Logic IC markets 3 based on worldwide revenue for 2013, which we leverage in a large number of our High Performance Mixed Signal solutions. We offer several product families for low-voltage applications in communication equipment, personal computers, personal computer peripherals and consumer and portable electronics. Our 3V and 5V families hold a leading share of the logic market. We continue to expand into the higher margin product range in this business by expanding, among others, our switches and translators (or custom logic) portfolio and optimizing our manufacturing. Gartner sizes the worldwide Standard Logic market at $1.5 billion in 2013, and is estimated to grow with compound annual rate of 2.9% between 2013 and 2017 2.
| 3 | Source: Gartner, Inc., Market Share, Semiconductor Applications, Worldwide, 2013, March 2014 |
|---|
Table of Contents
Corporate and Other
We manufacture integrated circuits and discrete semiconductors through a combination of wholly owned manufacturing facilities, manufacturing facilities operated jointly with other semiconductor companies and third-party foundries and assembly and test subcontractors. Our manufacturing operations primarily focus on manufacturing and supplying products to our High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products businesses. We manage our manufacturing assets together through one centralized organization to ensure we realize scale benefits in asset utilization, purchasing volumes and overhead leverage across businesses.
In the future, we expect to outsource an increased part of our internal demand for wafer foundry and packaging services to third-party manufacturing sources in order to increase our flexibility to accommodate increased demand mainly in our High Performance Mixed Signal and to a lesser extent in Standard Products businesses.
The manufacturing of a semiconductor involves several phases of production, which can be broadly divided into “front-end” and “back-end” processes. Front-end processes take place at highly complex wafer manufacturing facilities (called fabrication plants or “wafer fabs”), and involve the imprinting of substrate silicon wafers with the precise circuitry required for semiconductors to function. The front-end production cycle requires high levels of precision and involves as many as 300 process steps. Back-end processes involve the assembly, test and packaging of semiconductors in a form suitable for distribution. In contrast to the highly complex front-end process, back-end processing is generally less complicated, and as a result we tend to determine the location of our back-end facilities based more on cost factors than on technical considerations.
We primarily focus our internal and joint venture wafer manufacturing operations on running proprietary specialty process technologies that enable us to differentiate our products on key performance features, and we generally outsource wafer manufacturing in process technologies that are available at third-party wafer foundries when it is economical to do so. In addition, we increasingly focus our in-house manufacturing on our competitive 8-inch facilities, which predominantly run manufacturing processes in the 140 nanometer, 180 nanometer and 250 nanometer process nodes, and have concentrated the majority of our manufacturing base in Asia. This focus increases our return on invested capital and reduces capital expenditures.
Our front-end manufacturing facilities use a broad range of production processes and proprietary design methods, including CMOS, bipolar, bipolar CMOS (“BiCMOS”) and double-diffused metal on silicon oxide semiconductor (“DMOS”) technologies. Our wafer fabs produce semiconductors with line widths ranging from 140 nanometers to 3 microns for integrated circuits and 0.5 microns to greater than 4 microns for discretes. This broad technology portfolio enables us to meet increasing demand from customers for system solutions, which require a variety of technologies.
Our back-end manufacturing facilities test and package many different types of products using a wide variety of processes. To optimize flexibility, we use shared technology platforms for our back-end assembly operations. Most of our assembly and test activities are maintained in-house. Finally, a number of our High Performance Mixed Signal products enjoy significant packaging cost and innovation benefits due to the scale of our Standard Products business, which manufactures tens of billions of units per year.
Table of Contents
The following table shows selected key information with respect to our major front-end and back-end facilities:
| Site | Ownership | Wafer sizes used | Line widths used (vm) | Technology | ||||||||||
| (Microns) | ||||||||||||||
| Front-end | ||||||||||||||
| Singapore(1) | 61.2 | % | 8” | 0.14-0.25 | CMOS | |||||||||
| Jilin, China | 100 | % | 5” | >4 | Bipolar | |||||||||
| Nijmegen, the Netherlands | 100 | % | 8” | 0.14-0.80 | CMOS, BiCMOS, LDMOS | |||||||||
| Hamburg, Germany | 100 | % | 6”/8” | 0.5-3.0 | Discretes, Bipolar | |||||||||
| Manchester, United Kingdom | 100 | % | 6” | 0.5 | Power discretes | |||||||||
| Back-end(2) | ||||||||||||||
| Kaohsiung, Taiwan | 100 | % | — | — | Leadframe-based packages and ball grid arrays | |||||||||
| Bangkok, Thailand | 100 | % | — | — | Low-pin count leadframes | |||||||||
| Guangdong, China | 100 | % | — | — | Discrete devices | |||||||||
| Seremban, Malaysia | 100 | % | — | — | Discrete devices | |||||||||
| Cabuyao, Philippines | 100 | % | — | — | Power discretes, sensors and RF modules processes |
| (1) | Joint venture with TSMC; we are entitled to 60% of the joint venture’s annual capacity. |
|---|
| (2) | In back-end manufacturing we entered into a joint venture with ASE in Suzhou (ASEN), in which we currently hold a 40% interest. |
|---|
We use a large number of raw materials in our front- and back-end manufacturing processes, including silicon wafers, chemicals, gases, lead frames, substrates, molding compounds and various types of precious and other metals. Our most important raw materials are the raw, or substrate, silicon wafers we use to make our semiconductors. We purchase these wafers, which must meet exacting specifications, from a limited number of suppliers in the geographic region in which our fabrication facilities are located. At our wholly owned fabrication plants, we use raw wafers ranging from 5 inches to 8 inches in size. Our SSMC wafer fab facility, which produces 8 inch wafers, is jointly owned by TSMC and ourselves. We are leveraging our experience in that fab facility in optimizing our remaining wholly owned Nijmegen and Hamburg wafer fabs. Our other remaining fabs are small and are focused exclusively on manufacturing power discretes. Emerging fabrication technologies employ larger wafer sizes and, accordingly, we expect that our production requirements will in the future shift towards larger substrate wafers.
We typically source our other raw materials in a similar fashion as our wafers, although our portfolio of suppliers is more diverse. Some of our suppliers provide us with materials on a just-in-time basis, which permits us to reduce our procurement costs and the negative cash flow consequences of maintaining inventories, but exposes us to potential supply chain interruptions. We purchase most of our raw materials on the basis of fixed price contracts, but generally do not commit ourselves to long-term purchase obligations, which permits us to renegotiate prices periodically.
In addition, on a limited basis, we also produce and sell wafers and packaging services to our divested businesses in order to support their separation and, on a limited basis, their ongoing operations. As these divested businesses develop or acquire their own foundry and packaging capabilities, our revenue from these sources is declining. Our agreement with DSPG expired in December 2010 (although we had an ongoing obligation to supply services relating to certain specialty processes until December 2014), the supplies to ST-Ericsson have effectively been terminated except for a small number of identified products. The former agreement with Trident Microsystems was converted into two separate agreements with Entropic and Sigma after Trident’s bankruptcy. The agreement with IDT is the result of the sale of our high-speed data-converter activity to IDT.
Sales, Marketing and Customers
We market our products worldwide to a variety of OEMs, ODMs, contract manufacturers and distributors. We generate demand for our products by delivering High Performance Mixed Signal solutions to our customers, and supporting their system design-in activities by providing application architecture expertise and local field application engineering support. We have 36 sales offices worldwide.
Our sales and marketing teams are organized into six regions, which are EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa), the Americas, Japan, South Korea, Greater China and Asia Pacific. These sales regions are responsible for managing the customer relationships, design-in and promotion of new products. We seek to further expand the presence of application engineers closely supporting our customers and to increase the amount of product development work that we can conduct jointly with our leading customers. Our web-based marketing tool is complementary to our direct customer technical support.
Table of Contents
Our sales and marketing strategy focuses on deepening our relationship with our top OEMs and electronic manufacturing service customers and distribution partners and becoming their preferred supplier, which we believe assists us in reducing sales volatility in challenging markets. We have long-standing customer relationships with most of our customers. Our 10 largest OEM end customers, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabetical order, are Apple, Bosch, Continental, Gemalto, Giesecke/Devrient, Huawei, Kona, NSN, Panasonic and Samsung. When we target new customers, we generally focus on companies that are leaders in their markets either in terms of market share or leadership in driving innovation. We also have a strong position with our distribution partners, being the number two semiconductor supplier (other than microprocessors) through distribution worldwide. Our 3 largest distribution partners are Arrow, Avnet and WPG.
Our revenue is the sum of our direct sales to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, plus our distributors’ resale of NXP products. Two distributors accounted for more than 10% of total 2014 revenue: WPG accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2014, 11% in 2013 and 12% in 2012. Avnet accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2014. No other distributor accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in 2014, 2013 or 2012. No individual OEM for which we had direct sales to accounted for more than 10% of revenue in 2014, 2013 or 2012.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
See the discussion set forth under Part I, Item 5C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Competition
We compete with many different semiconductor companies, ranging from multinational companies with integrated research and development, manufacturing, sales and marketing organizations across a broad spectrum of product lines, to “fabless” semiconductor companies, to companies that are focused on a single application market segment or standard product. Most of these competitors compete with us with respect to some, but not all, of our businesses. None of our competitors have operations across all of our business lines.
Our key competitors in alphabetical order include Analog Devices Inc., Atmel Corporation, Entropic Communications Inc., Fairchild Semiconductors International Inc., Freescale, Infineon, Linear Technology Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., MaxLinear, Renesas, ON Semiconductor Corporation, Power Integrations Inc., ROHM Co., Ltd., Silicon Laboratories Inc., STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments Incorporated.
The basis on which we compete varies across market segments and geographic regions. Our High Performance Mixed Signal businesses compete primarily on the basis of our ability to timely develop new products and the underlying intellectual property and on meeting customer requirements in terms of cost, product features, quality, warranty and availability. In addition, our High Performance Mixed Signal system solutions businesses require in-depth knowledge of a given application market in order to develop robust system solutions and qualified customer support resources. In contrast, our Standard Products business competes primarily on the basis of manufacturing and supply chain excellence and breadth of product portfolio.
Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under the “Litigation” caption of note 17 of our notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors above.
Environmental Regulation
The information set forth under the “Environmental remediation” caption of note 17 of our notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18 of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with environmental regulation, see Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors above.
C. Organizational Structure
A list of our significant subsidiaries, including name, country of incorporation or residence and proportion of ownership interest and voting power is provided as “Exhibit 21.1” under Part III, Item 19. Exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.
Table of Contents
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
The following chart reflects our corporate structure as of December 31, 2014.

| (1) | For a more detailed description of our management equity stock option plan (“Management Equity Stock Option Plan”) and our Long-Term Incentive Plans as of 2010 see the discussion set forth under “Share Based Compensation Plans” contained in this Report in Part I, Item 6B. Compensation. |
|---|
| (2) | As of December 31, 2014, we had $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes outstanding. |
|---|
| (3) | As of December 31, 2014, no borrowings outstanding under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility. |
|---|
| (4) | As of December 31, 2014, we had $791 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Term Loans. |
|---|
| (5) | As of December 31, 2014, we had $2,250 million aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding. |
|---|
Table of Contents
D****. Property, Plant and Equipment
NXP uses 65 sites in over 25 countries with approximately 27,900 full-time employees, 8.5 million square feet of total owned and leased building space of which 5.5 million square feet is owned property.
The following table sets out our principal real property holdings as of December 31, 2014:
| Location | Use | Owned/leased | Building space (square feet) | |||||
| Eindhoven, the Netherlands | Headquarters | Leased | 152,666 | |||||
| Hamburg, Germany | Manufacturing | Owned | 844,899 | |||||
| Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Manufacturing | Owned | 1,845,542 | |||||
| Singapore | Manufacturing | Owned | 746,753 | |||||
| Bangkok, Thailand | Manufacturing | Owned | 561,402 | |||||
| Cabuyao, Philippines | Manufacturing | Owned | 444,080 | |||||
| Kaohsiung, Taiwan | Manufacturing | Owned | 342,971 | |||||
| Manchester, United Kingdom | Manufacturing | Owned | 273,266 | |||||
| Jilin, China | Manufacturing | Leased | 138,856 | |||||
| Guangdong, China | Manufacturing | Leased | 917,272 | |||||
| Seremban, Malaysia | Manufacturing | Owned | 304,309 |
The following is a summary of the terms of our material lease agreements:
Manufacturing in Singapore (SSMC) leases the land at 70 Pasir Ris Drive 1 in Singapore from Jurong Town Corporation for use as a manufacturing facility. The lease commenced on June 1, 1999 for a term of 30 years at an annual rental rate of 1,408,694 Singapore Dollars ($1,113,737), which amount is subject to revision up to, but not exceeding, 5% of the yearly rent for the immediately preceding year, on the anniversary of the lease commencement date. The building has 746,753 square feet of floor space and is owned by us.
We lease 917,272 square feet of manufacturing space through our subsidiary, NXP Semiconductors Guangdong Ltd., at Tian Mei High Tech, Industrial Park, Huang Jiang Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong, China, from Huangjiang Investment Development Company (“Huangjiang”). The lease commenced on October 1, 2003 for a term of 13 years at an annual rental rate of RMB 811,467.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
| --- | --- |
Not applicable.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
| --- | --- |
A. Operating Results
Effect of Acquisition Accounting
Our Formation
On September 29, 2006, Philips sold 80.1% of its semiconductor business to the Private Equity Consortium in a multi-step transaction. We refer to this acquisition as our “Formation”.
The Formation has been accounted for using the acquisition method. Accordingly, the $10,601 million purchase price has been “pushed down” within the NXP group and allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The carrying value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as of the Formation date on September 29, 2006, amounted to $3,302 million. This resulted in an excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of $7,299 million. The excess of the purchase price was allocated to intangible assets, step-up on tangible assets and liabilities assumed, using the estimated fair value of these assets and liabilities.
An amount of $3,096 million, being the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired, was allocated to goodwill. This goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually.
Table of Contents
Other Significant Acquisitions
Since its Formation, NXP has acquired various companies and businesses. These acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method, and the respective purchase prices have been “pushed down” within the NXP group and allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. This has also resulted in an allocation to goodwill for the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. The related goodwill is not amortized but included in the annual impairment test.
Adjusting the carrying value of the assets acquired in the Formation and subsequent acquisitions to their fair value has had an adverse effect on our operating income for various reporting periods, stemming from amortization charges on intangible assets and higher depreciation charges on tangible fixed assets that are the result of acquisition accounting effects.
The cumulative net effect resulting from the application of acquisition accounting is recorded in the financial statements with the term “PPA effect”. This effect is calculated taking into account the fact that any divestments and impairments in any particular reporting period reduce the amortization and depreciation charges going forward. Impairment losses are not part of the PPA effect.
Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total debt (short-term and long-term debt) after deduction of cash and cash equivalents. Management believes this measure is an appropriate reflection of our net leverage.
We understand that, although net debt is used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluation of companies, this concept has limitations as an analytical tool, and it should not be used as an alternative to any other measure in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Results of Operations
The following table presents the composition of operating income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Revenue | 5,647 | 4,815 | ||||||
| % nominal growth | 17.3 | 10.5 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 2,640 | 2,177 | ||||||
| Research and development | (763 | ) | (639 | ) | ||||
| Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) | (838 | ) | (896 | ) | ||||
| Other income (expense) | 10 | 9 | ||||||
| Operating income | 1,049 | 651 |
Revenue
The following table presents revenue by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) | Revenue | % nominal growth | Revenue | % nominal growth | ||||||||||||
| High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) | 4,208 | 19.1 | 3,533 | 18.7 | ||||||||||||
| Standard Products (“SP”) | 1,275 | 11.4 | 1,145 | (2.0 | ) | |||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 164 | 19.7 | 137 | (36.0 | ) | |||||||||||
| Total | 5,647 | 17.3 | 4,815 | 10.5 |
Revenue increased by $832 million to $5,647 million in 2014 compared to $4,815 million in 2013, a nominal increase of 17.3%. The increase was driven by strong growth in all of our business lines, highlighted by the growth in our HPMS segment.
Our HPMS segment saw an increase in revenue of $675 million to $4,208 million in 2014 compared to $3,533 million in 2013. The increase was primarily driven by increased demand in all four business lines - Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing. The increase in Automotive was driven by our In-Vehicle Networking products. The increase in Identification was primarily driven by our embedded secure solutions associated with the ramp up of mobile transactions used in high-end smartphone and tablet platforms and continued demand for banking dual-interface cards. The increase in Infrastructure & Industrial was mainly in RF Power, in connection with the roll out of 4G base stations. The increase in Portable & Computing was driven by our microcontrollers and interface products.
Revenue for our SP segment increased by $130 million to $1.275 million in 2014, compared to $1,145 million in 2013. The increase was primarily due to increased demand in general applications, as a result of market share gains.
Revenue for Corporate and Other amounted to $164 million in 2014, compared to $137 million in 2013 and mainly related to our manufacturing operations.
Gross Profit
The following table presents gross profit by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) | Gross Profit | % of segment revenue | Gross Profit | % of segment revenue | ||||||||||||
| HPMS | 2,253 | 53.5 | 1,905 | 53.9 | ||||||||||||
| SP | 382 | 30.0 | 285 | 24.9 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 5 | 3.0 | (13 | ) | (9.5 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total | 2,640 | 46.8 | 2,177 | 45.2 |
Gross profit in 2014 was $2,640 million, or 46.8% of revenue compared to $2,177 million, or 45.2% of revenue in 2013, an increase of $463 million. This increase was primarily attributable to market share gains in all business lines but primarily in our HPMS segment. Our gross profit rate, up 1.6 points when compared to 2013, is heavily influenced by our product mix and the end customer mix in our business lines.
Our HPMS segment had a gross profit of $2,253 million, or 53.5% of revenue in 2014, compared to $1,905 million, or 53.9% of revenue in 2013. The decrease in the
Showing the first 8K of 83K characters. Open the full section
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
| --- | --- |
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following description sets forth certain information about management and management-related matters. We have a one-tier board structure.
Board of Directors
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions as of December 31, 2014, of the persons who serve as members of our board of directors.
| Name | Age | Position | ||
| Richard L. Clemmer | 63 | Executive director, president and chief executive officer | ||
| Sir Peter Bonfield | 70 | Non-executive director and chairman of the board | ||
| Johannes P. Huth | 54 | Non-executive director and vice-chairman of the board | ||
| Kenneth A. Goldman | 65 | Non-executive director | ||
| Dr. Marion Helmes | 49 | Non-executive director | ||
| Josef Kaeser | 57 | Non-executive director | ||
| Ian Loring | 48 | Non-executive director | ||
| Eric Meurice | 58 | Non-executive director | ||
| Julie Southern | 55 | Non-executive director | ||
| Rick Tsai | 63 | Non-executive director |
Table of Contents
| • | Richard L. Clemmer (1951, American). Mr. Clemmer became executive director, president and chief executive officer on January 1, 2009. Prior to that, from December 2007, Mr. Clemmer was a member of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. and a senior advisor of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Prior to joining NXP, he was the President and CEO of Agere Systems, served as Chairman of u-Nav Microelectronics Corporation, and held a five-year tenure at Quantum Corporation where he was executive vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to that, Mr. Clemmer worked for Texas Instruments Incorporated as senior vice president and semiconductor group chief financial officer. Mr. Clemmer also serves on the board of NCR Corporation. |
|---|
| • | Sir Peter Bonfield CBE FREng (1944, British). Sir Peter has been appointed as a non-executive director and as the chairman of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Sir Peter was the chairman of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. from September 29, 2006. Sir Peter served as chief executive officer and chairman of the executive committee for British Telecom plc from 1996 to 2002 and prior to that was chairman and chief executive officer of ICL plc (now Fujitsu Services Holdings Ltd.). Sir Peter also worked in the semiconductor industry during his tenure as a divisional director at Texas Instruments Incorporated, for whom he held a variety of senior management positions around the world. Sir Peter currently holds non-executive directorships at Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Mentor Graphics Corporation and Global Logic Inc. Sir Peter is Chair of Council and Senior Pro-Chancellor at Loughborough University, Senior Advisor to N M Rothschild in London and Board Mentor at CMi in Belgium. He is also Advisor to Longreach LLP in Hong Kong and NVP LLP in New Jersey. |
|---|
| • | Johannes P. Huth (1960, German). Mr. Huth has been appointed as a non-executive director and vice-chairman of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Huth was a member and chairman of our supervisory board and a member and vice-chairman of NXP B.V.’s supervisory board from September 29, 2006. Mr. Huth joined Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. LLP in May 1999 and is a Member of KKR and Head of KKR’s operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. He is also a member of the Firm’s Management Committee and several of the Firm’s Investment Committees. Prior to joining KKR, he was a member of the Management Committee of Investcorp and jointly responsible for Investcorp’s operations in Europe. From 1986 to 1991, he worked at Salomon Brothers, where he was a Vice President in the Mergers and Acquisitions departments in London and New York. Mr. Huth currently is also a Member of the Supervisory Board of Kion, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of WMF, member of the Board of Hertha KGaA, and member of the Supervisory Board of GEG German Estate Group AG. He is the Chairman of the Trustees of Impetus – Private Equity Foundation, a charitable organization set up by the Private Equity industry focused on providing support to charities involved with young people not in education, employment or training. He is Vice-Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Design Museum, trustee of the Staedel Museum in Frankfurt, a governor of the London School of Economics and trustee of The Education Endowment Foundation. He is a Visiting Fellow of Oxford University and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. He earned a BSc with Highest Honors from the London School of Economics and an MBA from the University of Chicago. |
|---|
| • | Kenneth A. Goldman (1949, American). Mr. Goldman has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective August 6, 2010. Mr. Goldman is chief financial officer of Yahoo!, Inc responsible for Yahoo!’s global finance functions including financial planning and analysis, controllership, tax, treasury and investor relations since October 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance and administration, and chief financial officer of Fortinet, Inc, a provider of unified threat management solutions, from September 2007 to September 2012. From November 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Goldman served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Dexterra, Inc. From August 2000 until March 2006, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance and administration, and chief financial officer of Siebel Systems, Inc., and from December 1999 to December 2003, Mr. Goldman served on the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s primary advisory group. Mr. Goldman also serves on the board of directors of Gigamon, Yahoo! Japan, Trinet, GoPro, Inc. and several private companies. Mr. Goldman was a member of board of trustees of Cornell University from 2005 to 2013 and was designated as Emeritus Trustee. He was formerly a member of the Treasury Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, a public committee that made recommendations in September 2008 to encourage a more sustainable auditing profession. Mr. Goldman holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School. |
|---|
| • | Dr. Marion Helmes (1965, German). Dr. Helmes has been appointed a non-executive director of our board of directors in October 2013. Dr. Helmes was the Speaker of the Management Board of Celesio AG until July 2014; in addition she was CFO of Celesio from January 2012 until July 2014. Prior to joining Celesio, she was member of the board of management and CFO of Q-Cells SE and from 1997 until 2010 she held various management roles at ThyssenKrupp, including CFO of ThyssenKrupp Stainless and CFO of ThyssenKrupp Elevator. Dr. Helmes is currently also non-executive director and member of the audit and finance committee of ProSiebenSat1 Media AG and member of the Central Advisory Board of Commerzbank AG. |
|---|
| | • | | Josef Kaeser (1957, German). Mr. Kaeser has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective September 1, 2010. Mr. Kaeser is the president and chief executive officer of Siemens AG since August 2013. Prior to this, from May 2006 to August 2013, he was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Siemens AG. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Kaeser served as chief strategy officer for Siemens AG and as the chief financial officer for the mobile communications group from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Kaeser has additionally held various other positions within the Siemens group since he joined Siemens in 1980. Mr. Kaeser also serves on the managing board of Siemens AG and th
Showing the first 8K of 61K characters. Open the full section
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
| --- | --- |
A. Major Shareholders
The following table shows the amount and percentage of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by (i) each person who is or was known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each current member of our board of directors, and (iii) all members of the board and named executive officers as a group. A person is a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting or investment power over the security or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Unless otherwise noted, these persons may be contacted at our executive offices and, unless otherwise noted, have to our knowledge sole voting and investment power over the shares listed.
As of December 31, 2014, the Cede & Co., a nominee of the Depository Trust Company, was the sole registered owner of our common stock in the United States and held 100% of shares of our common stock.
In 2014, the Private Equity Consortium sold their remaining shares in the Company and as of December 31, 2014 no longer held any common stock in NXP.
| Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | %* | Number | %* | Number** | %* | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wellington Management Company, LLP(1) | 18,843,170 | 7.48 | 28,935,677 | 11.49 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| FMR and FIL(2) | 22,796,838 | 9.05 | 23,180,919 | 9.21 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| T. Rowe (3) | 1,715,115 | 0.68 | 18,606,181 | 7.39 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Richard L. Clemmer | 3,410,762 | 1.36 | 3,224,174 | 1.28 | 1,309,587 | 0.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Sir Peter Bonfield | 25,312 | 0.01 | 43,549 | 0.02 | 27,897 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Johannes P. Huth | 98,351 | 0.04 | 89,999 | 0.04 | 79,999 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Kenneth Goldman | 28,351 | 0.011 | 22,999 | 0.01 | 14,999 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Marion Helmes | 1,685 | 0.001 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Josef Kaeser | 25,312 | 0.01 | 19,999 | 0.01 | 9,999 | 0.004 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ian Loring(4) | 28,351 | 0.011 | 7,764,240 | 3.08 | 25,766,790 | 10.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Eric Meurice | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Julie Southern | 1,072 | 0.001 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Rick Tsai | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| All directors and named executive officers as a group(5) | 3,619,196 | 1.44 | 11,184,959 | 4.45 | 27,219,270 | 10.81 |
| * | Percentage computations are based on 251,751,500 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. |
|---|
| ** | As of February 7, 2013. |
|---|
| (1) | Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management”), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own 18,843,170 shares of our common stock, which are held by its clients and with regard to which Wellington Management has shared voting power and shared dispositive power. Wellington Management’s address is 28 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210, United States. |
|---|
| (2) | FMR LLC and/or Edward C. Johnson 3d, chairman of FMR LLC (collectively, “FMR”), through, among others, Fidelity Management & Research Company “Fidelity”), Strategic Advisers, Inc. (“SA”), Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC (“PGALLC”) and Pyramis Global Advisors Trust Company (“PGATC”), and/or FIL Limited (“FIL”), through, among others, various subsidiaries, are, directly or indirectly, the beneficial owners of 22,796,838 shares of our common stock. The address of Fidelity and SA is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, United Sates. The address of PGALLC and PGATC is 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917, United States. The address of FIL is Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane, Hamilton, Bermuda. |
|---|
| (3) | T.Rowe Rice Associates, inc. (“T.Rowe”), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own 1,715,115 shares of our common stock, which are held by its clients. T.Rowe’s address is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, United States. |
|---|
| (4) | Mr. Loring is a director of our Company, as well as a member of the investment committee of Bain Capital Investors, LLC. Amounts disclosed for Mr. Loring include shares beneficially owned by the funds advised by Bain. Mr. Loring disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned directly or indirectly by funds advised by Bain. |
|---|
| (5) | Reflects shares that may be beneficially owned by our directors. However, each director disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. In addition, as of December 31, 2014, stock options and other rights to shares represented a total of 17,696,555 shares of common stock were outstanding. |
|---|
No shareholders held different voting rights.
Table of Contents
B. Related Party Transactions
See Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, note 20 Related-party Transactions.
C****. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
| --- | --- |
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Statements
See Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
We currently retain all of our earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business, to repurchase or redeem capital stock, and in the repayment of our debt. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and may not pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Whether or not dividends will be paid in the future will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, cash requirements, covenants in our financings, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors and our stockholders may deem relevant. If, in the future, our board of directors decides not to allocate profits to our reserves (making such profits available to be distributed as dividends), any decision to pay dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our stockholders.
B. Significant Changes
See Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, note 24 Subsequent Events.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
| --- | --- |
A****. Offer and Listing Details
Not applicable.
The following table shows the high and low closing sales prices of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ as reported in the Official Price List for the following periods:
| Most recent six months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2015 | December 2014 | November 2014 | October 2014 | September 2014 | August 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.35 | 72.38 | 77.82 | 72.13 | 77.85 | 69.25 | 68.66 | 53.90 | 73.01 | 68.43 | 68.52 | 60.50 |
On February 20, 2015, the closing sales price of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ was $84.66.
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1st quarter | 59.91 | 42.94 | 32.80 | 26.55 | 26.97 | 16.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2nd quarter | 66.44 | 55.72 | 32.01 | 25.29 | 26.32 | 18.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3rd quarter | 73.01 | 60.50 | 39.11 | 31.18 | 26.67 | 20.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4th quarter | 77.85 | 53.90 | 45.95 | 36.03 | 26.32 | 20.93 |
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
The shares of common stock of the Company are listed on the stock market of the NASDAQ Global Select Market in New York under the ticker symbol “NXPI”.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
| --- | --- |
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed on August 5, 2010 (File No. 333-166128).
C. Material Contracts
Other than the material contracts described below, we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business.
2015
On March 1, 2015, we entered into a Merger Agreement, by and among the Company, Freescale and Nimble Acquisition Limited, a Bermuda exempted limited liability company and Sub, providing for the merger of Sub with and into Freescale (the “Merger”), with Freescale surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of the Company.
Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, Freescale Holdings L.P. (“Freescale LP”), the largest holder of Freescale Common Shares, the Company and certain limited partners of Freescale LP, entered into a support agreement (the “Support Agreement”) whereby Freescale LP committed, among other things, subject to the terms and conditions of the Support Agreement, to vote all of its Freescale Common Shares (representing approximately 64% of the Freescale Common Shares outstanding as of the date of the Support Agreement) for the adoption of (and not to participate in any litigation challenging) the Merger Agreement.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, NXP B.V. entered into a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (“Credit Suisse USA”) and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (“CS,” and together with Credit Suisse USA, “Credit Suisse”) regarding term loan facilities, in an aggregate amount of up to $6,500 million (the “Term Facilities”). The proceeds of the Term Facilities will be used (i) to finance the cash consideration due pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (ii) to refinance certain of Freescale’s indebtedness that becomes due as a result of the Merger, (iii) to effect the repayment of any amounts drawn under Freescale’s outstanding revolving credit facility and, if the Company so elects, the outstanding revolving credit facility of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and (iv) to pay certain transaction costs.
2014
We entered into an indenture in relation to $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar-denominated 1.00% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 on November 24, 2014.
NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC entered into a Senior Secured Term Loan Facility for an aggregate principal amount of $400 million at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus 2% with a floor of 0.75% due 2017 on February 18, 2014.
D. Exchange Controls
Cash dividends payable on our ordinary shares and cash interest payments to holders of our debt securities may be remitted from the Netherlands to nonresidents without legal restrictions imposed by the laws of the Netherlands, except that (i) such payments must be reported to the Dutch Central Bank for statistical purposes only and (ii) the transfer of funds to jurisdictions subject to general economic sanctions adopted in connection with policies of the United Nations, European Commission or similar measures imposed directly by the Government of the Netherlands may be restricted.
E. Taxation
Certain Tax Considerations-Holder of Common Stock
Summary of Dutch Tax Considerations
The following summary describes the material Dutch tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares of common stock as of the date hereof and is intended as general information only. This summary does not contain a detailed description of all the Dutch tax law consequences applicable to you as a holder of shares of common stock in the Company in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the effects of any non-Dutch tax laws. For Dutch tax purposes, a holder of our shares may include an individual who or an entity that does not have the legal title of the shares, but to whom nevertheless the shares are attributed based either on such individual or entity holding a beneficial interest in the shares or based on specific statutory provisions, including statutory provisions pursuant to which shares are attributed to an individual who is, or who has directly or indirectly inherited from a person who was, the settlor, grantor or similar originator of a trust, foundation or similar entity that holds the shares.
If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the Dutch tax consequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
The following summary is based on the Dutch tax law as applied and interpreted by Dutch tax courts and as published and in effect on the date hereof, without prejudice to any amendments introduced at a later date and implemented with or without retroactive effect. For the purpose of this paragraph, “Dutch taxes” means taxes of whatever nature levied by or on behalf of the Netherlands or any of its subdivisions or taxing authorities. The Netherlands means the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands located in Europe and does not include Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba. Any reference hereafter made to a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by the Netherlands includes the Tax Regulation for the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor het Koninkrijk), the Tax Regulation for the country of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor het land Nederland) and the Agreement between the Taipei Representative Office in the Netherlands and the Netherlands Trade and Investment Office in Taipei for the avoidance of double taxation.
Table of Contents
Withholding Tax
A stockholder is generally subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent on dividends distributed by us, if any. Generally, we are responsible for the withholding of such dividend withholding tax at source; the dividend withholding tax is for the account of the stockholder.
Dividends distributed by us include, but are not limited to:
| • | distributions of profits in cash or in kind, whatever they be named or in whatever form; |
|---|
| • | proceeds from the liquidation of the Company, or proceeds from the repurchase of shares by the Company, in excess of the average paid-in capital recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes; |
|---|
| • | the par value of shares issued to a stockholder or an increase in the par value of shares, to the extent that no contribution, recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, has been made or will be made; and |
|---|
| • | partial repayment of paid-in capital, that is (i) not recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, or (ii) recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, to the extent that we have net profits (zuivere winst), unless (a) the general meeting of stockholders has resolved in advance to make such repayment and (b) the par value of the shares concerned has been reduced with an equal amount by way of an amendment to our articles of association. The term net profits includes anticipated profits that have yet to be realized. |
|---|
Notwithstanding the above, no withholding is required in the event of a repurchase of shares, if certain conditions are fulfilled.
Furthermore, subject to certain exceptions under Dutch domestic law, we may not be required to transfer to the Dutch tax authorities the full amount of Dutch dividend withholding tax withheld in respect of dividends distributed by us, if we have received a profit distribution from a qualifying foreign subsidiary (including a subsidiary resident on Bonaire, St. Eustatius or Saba), which distribution is exempt from Dutch corporate income tax and has been subject to a foreign withholding tax of at least 5 percent. The amount that does not have to be transferred to the Dutch tax authorities can generally not exceed the lesser of (i) 3 percent of the dividends distributed by us and (ii) 3 percent of the profit distributions that we received from qualifying foreign subsidiaries in the calendar year in which we distribute the dividends (up to the moment of such dividend distribution) and in the two previous calendar years. Further limitations and conditions apply. We will, upon request, provide stockholders with information regarding the Dutch dividend withholding tax that was retained by us.
If a stockholder is resident in a country other than the Netherlands under the provisions of a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation between the Netherlands and such country, such stockholder may, depending on the terms of such treaty, be entitled to an exemption from, reduction in or refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
If a stockholder is subject to Dutch corporate income tax and is entitled to the participation exemption in relation to the benefits derived from the shares held by it and such shares are attributable to an enterprise carried out in the Netherlands, such stockholder will generally be entitled to an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
If a stockholder (i) is resident in another member state of the European Union or an appointed state of the European Economic Area, i.e. Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, according to the tax laws of that state and, under the terms of a double taxation agreement concluded by that state with a third state, is not considered to be resident for tax purposes outside the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein; and (ii) owns an interest in us to which the Dutch participation exemption would be applicable if the stockholder were resident in the Netherlands; such stockholder will generally be eligible for an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.
Furthermore, if a stockholder:
| (a) | is an entity which is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a member state of the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein or which is a qualifying stockholders resident elsewhere; |
|---|
| (b) | is not subject to a tax levied by reference to its profits in its country of residence; and |
|---|
| (c) | would not have been subject to Dutch corporate income tax had the stockholder been resident in the Netherlands for Dutch tax purposes; |
|---|
such stockholder will be eligible for a full refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us, unless such stockholder is comparable to an exempt investment institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling) or fiscal investment institution (fiscale beleggingsinstelling), as described respectively in article 6a and 28 of the Dutch corporate income tax act 1969 (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969). For purposes of (a) above, a qualifying stockholder is an entity that (i) is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a jurisdiction which has an arrangement for the exchange of tax information with the Netherlands and (ii) holds its shares as a portfolio investment, i.e. such shares are not held with a view to the establishment or maintenance of lasting and direct economic links between the stockholder and the company and the shares do not allow the stockholder to participate effectively in the management or control of the company.
A stockholder who is considered to be resident in the United States and is entitled to the benefits of the convention between the United States and the Netherlands for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, dated December 18, 1992, as amended most recently by the Protocol signed March 8, 2004 (the “Treaty”), will be entitled to a reduction in the Dutch withholding tax by way of an exemption, reduction or refund, as follows:
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is an exempt pension trust, as described in article 35 of the Treaty, or an exempt organization, as described in article 36 of the Treaty, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; |
|---|
Table of Contents
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent of the voting power in the company, the U.S. stockholder will be subject to Dutch withholding tax at a rate not exceeding 5 percent; |
|---|
| • | if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 80 percent of the voting power in the company and certain other conditions are met, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; and |
|---|
| • | in all other cases, the U.S. stockholder will be subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent. |
|---|
According to Dutch domestic anti-dividend stripping rules, no credit against Dutch (corporate) income tax, exemption from, reduction in or refund of, Dutch dividend withholding tax will be granted if the recipient of the dividend paid by us is not considered to be the beneficial owner (uiteindelijk gerechtigde) of such dividends as meant in these rules.
Taxes on Income and Capital Gains
The description of taxation set out in this section of the Report does not apply to any stockholder who is an individual for whom the income or capital gains derived from our shares of common stock are attributable to employment activities, the income from which is taxable in the Netherlands.
A stockholder will not be subject to Dutch taxes on income or capital gains in respect of the ownership and disposal of our shares, other than Dutch dividend withholding tax as described above, except if:
| (i) | the stockholder is, or is deemed to be, resident in the Netherlands for Dutch (corporate) income tax purposes; |
|---|
| (ii) | the stockholder derives profits from an enterprise, whether as entrepreneur (ondernemer) or pursuant to a co-entitlement to the net worth of such enterprise other than as an entrepreneur or a stockholder, which enterprise is, in whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment (vaste inrichting) or a permanent representative (vaste vertegenwoordiger) in the Netherlands, to which the shares are attributable; |
|---|
| (iii) | the stockholder is an individual and derives benefits from miscellaneous activities (resultaat uit overige werkzaamheden) carried out in the Netherlands in respect of the shares, including, without limitation, activities which are beyond the scope of active portfolio investment activities; |
|---|
| (iv) | the stockholder is an individual and has a substantial interest (aanmerkelijk belang) or a fictitious substantial interest (fictief aanmerkelijk belang) in the company, which is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise; |
|---|
| (v) | the stockholder is not an individual and has a substantial interest or a fictitious substantial interest in the company, which (fictitious) substantial interest is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise and (one of) the main purposes of the chosen ownership structure is the evasion of Dutch income tax or dividend withholding tax; |
|---|
| (vi) | the stockholder is not an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise or a co-entitlement to the net-worth of an enterprise, other than by way of the holding of securities, which enterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares are attributable; or |
|---|
| (vii) | the stockholder is an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise, other than by way of the holding of securities, which enterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares are attributable. |
|---|
Generally, a stockholder has a substantial interest if such stockholder, alone or together with its partner, directly or indirectly (a) owns, or holds certain rights on, shares representing five percent or more of the total issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of the company; (b) holds rights to, directly or indirectly, acquire shares, whether or not already issued, representing five percent or more of the total issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of the company; or (c) owns, or holds certain rights on, profit participating certificates that relate to five percent or more of the annual profit of the company or to five percent or more of the liquidation proceeds of the company. A stockholder will also have a substantial interest if its partner or one of certain relatives of the stockholder or of its partner has a substantial interest.
Generally, a stockholder has a fictitious substantial interest in the company if, without having an actual substantial interest in the company (i) an enterprise has been contributed to the company in exchange for shares on an elective non-recognition basis; (ii) the shares have been obtained under inheritance law or matrimonial law, on a non-recognition basis, while the disposing stockholder had a substantial interest in the company; (iii) the shares have been acquired pursuant to a share merger, legal merger or legal demerger, on an elective non-recognition basis, while the stockholder prior to this transaction had a substantial interest in an entity that was party thereto; or (iv) the shares held by the stockholder, prior to dilution, qualified as a substantial interest and, by election, no gain was recognized upon disqualification of these shares.
Table of Contents
Gift Tax and Inheritance Tax
No Dutch gift or inheritance tax is due in respect of any gift of the shares by, or inheritance of the shares on the death of, a stockholder, except if:
| (i) | at the time of the gift or death of the stockholder, the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands; |
|---|
| (ii) | the stockholder passes away within 180 days after the date of the gift of the shares and is not, or not deemed to be, at the time of the gift, but is, or deemed to be, at the time of its death, resident in the Netherlands; or |
|---|
| (iii) | the gift of the shares is made under a condition precedent and the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands at the time the condition is fulfilled. |
|---|
For purposes of Dutch gift or inheritance tax, an individual who is of Dutch nationality will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has been resident in the Netherlands at any time during the ten years preceding the date of the gift or its death. For purposes of Dutch gift tax, any individual, irrespective of its nationality, will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has been resident in the Netherlands at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of the gift.
Other Taxes and Duties
No other Dutch Taxes, including turnover tax and taxes of a documentary nature, such as capital tax, stamp or registration tax or duty, are payable by or on behalf of a stockholder by reason only of the purchase, ownership and disposal of the shares.
Residency
A stockholder will not become resident, or deemed resident in the Netherlands for tax purposes by reason only of holding the shares.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following summary describes the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares as of the date hereof. The summary set forth below is applicable only to United States Holders (as defined below) (i) who are residents of the United States for purposes of the Treaty, (ii) whose shares do not, for purposes of the Treaty, form part of the business property of a permanent establishment, or pertain to a fixed base, in the Netherlands, and (iii) who otherwise qualify for the full benefits of the Treaty. Except where noted, this summary deals only with shares held as capital assets. As used herein, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of a share that is for United States federal income tax purposes:
| • | an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|---|
| • | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|---|
| • | an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|---|
| • | a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person. |
|---|
This summary does not represent a detailed description of the United States federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the United States federal income tax laws, including if you are:
| • | a dealer in securities or currencies; |
|---|
| • | a financial institution; |
|---|
| • | a regulated investment company; |
|---|
| • | a real estate investment trust; |
|---|
| • | an insurance company; |
|---|
| • | a tax-exempt organization; |
|---|
| • | a person holding our shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, a constructive sale or a straddle; |
|---|
| • | a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities; |
|---|
| • | a person liable for alternative minimum tax; |
|---|
| • | a person liable for Medicare contribution tax; |
|---|
| • | a person who owns or is deemed to own 10% or more of our voting stock; |
|---|
| • | a person holding our shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States; |
|---|
| • | a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States federal income tax purposes; or |
|---|
| • | a person whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar. |
|---|
The summary below is based upon the provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be replaced, revoked or modified so as to result in United States federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below.
Table of Contents
If a partnership holds our shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partnership or a partner of a partnership holding our shares, you should consult your tax advisors.
This summary does not contain a detailed description of all the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or the effects of any state, local or non-United States tax laws. If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
Taxation of Dividends
The gross amount of distributions on the shares (including any amounts withheld in respect of Dutch withholding taxes to the extent such amounts are actually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Certain Tax Considerations—Holder of Common Stock—Summary of Dutch Tax Considerations—Withholding Tax” above) will be taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Such amounts taxable as dividends (including any portion thereof withheld and (or, in the case of amounts withheld, deemed received) paid over to the Dutch tax authorities) will be includable in your gross income as ordinary income on the day actually received by you or on the day received by your nominee or agent that holds the shares on your behalf. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
With respect to non-corporate United States investors, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the United States Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of information provision. The United States Treasury Department has determined that the Treaty meets these requirements. We believe we are currently eligible for the benefits of the Treaty. A foreign corporation is also treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that our shares, which are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, are considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There can be no assurance that our shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years.
Non-corporate holders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from a risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. For this purpose, the minimum holding period requirement will not be met if a share has been held by a holder for 60 days or less during the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which such share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend, appropriately reduced by any period in which such holder is protected from risk of loss. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of this legislation to your particular circumstances.
The maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to you pursuant to the Treaty is 15 percent. You may be required to properly demonstrate to the Company and the Dutch tax authorities your entitlement to the reduced rate of withholding under the Treaty. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Dutch withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability. However, amounts withheld to reflect Dutch withholding taxes will not be creditable to the extent that we are allowed to reduce the amount of the withholding tax that is actually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Certain Tax Considerations—Holder of Common Stock—Summary of Dutch Tax Considerations—Withholding Tax” above. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on the shares will be treated as income from sources outside the United States and will generally constitute passive category income. Further, in certain circumstances, if you:
| • | have held shares for less than a specified minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss, or |
|---|
| • | are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, |
|---|
you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on the shares. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, as determined under United States federal income tax principles, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the shares, and to the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds your tax basis, the excess will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange. However, we do not expect to determine earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend (as discussed above).
Table of Contents
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Based on the composition of our income and valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for the 2014 taxable year, and we do not expect to become one in the future, although there can be no assurance in this regard. If, however, we are or become a PFIC, you could be subject to additional United States federal income taxes on gain recognized with respect to the shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred under the PFIC rules. Non-corporate United States Holders will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us if we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in the preceding taxable year.
Taxation of Capital Gains
For United States federal income tax purposes, you will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of a share in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for the share and your tax basis in the share. Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of individuals derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized by you will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of our shares and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of our shares that are paid to you within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you are an exempt recipient. Backup withholding may apply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your United States federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this Report on Form 20-F that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges.
The Company’s SEC filings are also publicly available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
| --- | --- |
We are exposed to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates because we finance certain operations through fixed and variable rate debt instruments and denominate our transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. Changes in these rates may have an impact on future cash flow and earnings. We manage these risks through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
By using derivative instruments, we are subject to credit and market risk. The fair market value of the derivative instruments is determined by using valuation models whose inputs are derived using market observable inputs, including interest rate yield curves, as well as foreign exchange and commodity spot and forward rates, and reflects the asset or liability position as of the end of each reporting period. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, thus creating a receivable risk for us. We are exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to our derivative agreements. We minimize counterparty credit (or repayment) risk by entering into transactions with major financial institutions of investment grade credit rating. Our exposure to market risk is not hedged in a manner that completely eliminates the effects of changing market conditions on earnings or cash flow.
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk
Given the leveraged nature of our Company, we have inherent exposure to changes in interest rates. Our Secured Revolving Credit Facility has a floating rate interest. We have issued several Term Loans that have a floating rate interest and have issued several series of notes with maturities ranging from 3 to 10 years with fixed rates. From time to time, we may execute a variety of interest rate derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. Consistent with our risk management objective and strategy, we have no interest rate risk hedging transactions in place.
Foreign Currency Risks
We are also exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results as well as our financial position and cash flows. We monitor our exposures to these market risks and generally employ operating and financing activities to offset these exposures where appropriate. If we do not have operating or financing activities to sufficiently offset these exposures, from time to time, we may employ derivative financial instruments such as swaps, collars, forwards, options or other instruments to limit the volatility to earnings and cash flows generated by these exposures. Derivative financial instruments are only used for hedging purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes. The Company measures all derivative financial instruments based on fair values derived from market prices of the instruments or from option pricing models, as appropriate and record these as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair values are recognized in the statement of operations immediately unless cash flow hedge accounting is applied.
Our primary foreign currency exposure relates to the U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate. However, our foreign currency exposures also relate, but are not limited, to the Chinese Yuan, the Japanese Yen, the Pound Sterling, the Malaysian Ringit, the Singapore Dollar, the Taiwan Dollar and the Thailand Baht.
Equity Price Risk
2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes
Our 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes. In addition, the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock. The amount of cash we may be required to pay to the holders at conversion or maturity of the notes is determined by the price of our common stock. The amount of cash that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
| --- | --- |
None
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
| --- | --- |
None
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
| --- | --- |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Report such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and included controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). During the last quarter of 2014 the Company completed its transition to the updated 2013 COSO framework. Based on that assessment our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at December 31, 2014.
During 2014, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
It should be noted that any control system, regardless of how well it is designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
For the year ended December 31, 2014 an attestation report regarding internal control over financial reporting of the Company’s registered public accounting firm is required. The attestation is included in Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
| --- | --- |
Mr. Goldman, chairman of our audit committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and as determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Goldman is an independent director under the NASDAQ Global Select Market Corporate Governance Rules.
Table of Contents
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
| --- | --- |
The NXP Code of Conduct outlines our general commitment to be a responsible social partner and the way in which we attempt to interact with our stakeholders, including stockholders, suppliers, customers, employees and the market. The Code of Conduct expresses our commitment to an economically, socially and ethically sustainable way of working. It covers our policy on a diverse array of subjects, including corporate gifts, child labor, International Labor Organization conventions, working hours, sexual harassment, free-market competition, bribery and the integrity of financial reporting.
We have also adopted a Financial Code of Ethics applicable to certain of our senior employees, which constitutes a “code of ethics” as such term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Both the NXP Code of Conduct and our Financial Code of Ethics are available on our website at www.nxp.com/investor/governance. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of this Report on Form 20-F nor is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
| --- | --- |
The Company has instituted a comprehensive auditor independence policy that regulates the relation between the Company and its external auditors and is available on our website (www.nxp.com/investor). The policy includes rules for the pre-approval by the audit committee of all services to be provided by the external auditor. The policy also describes the prohibited services that may not be provided. Proposed services may be pre-approved at the beginning of the year by the audit committee (annual pre-approval) or may be pre-approved during the year by the audit committee in respect of a particular engagement (specific pre-approval). The annual pre-approval is based on a detailed, itemized list of services to be provided, designed to ensure that there is no management discretion in determining whether a service has been approved and to ensure the audit committee is informed of each service it is pre-approving. Unless pre-approval with respect to a specific service has been given at the beginning of the year, each proposed service requires specific pre-approval during the year. Any annually pre-approved services where the fee for the engagement is expected to exceed pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval. The term of any annual pre-approval is 12 months from the date of the pre-approval unless the audit committee states otherwise. During 2014, there were no services provided to the Company by the external auditors which were not pre-approved by the audit committee.
The external auditor attends, in principle, all meetings of the audit committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the risk analysis are also discussed at these meetings. The external auditor attends the meeting of the board of directors at which the report of the external auditor with respect to the audit of the annual accounts is discussed, and at which the annual accounts are approved. In its audit report on the annual accounts to the board of directors, the external auditor refers to the financial reporting risks and issues that were identified during the audit, internal control matters, and any other matters, as appropriate, requiring communication under the auditing standards generally accepted in the Netherlands and the United States.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report have been audited by KPMG Accountants N.V., an independent registered public accounting firm. These financial statements have been approved by the relevant boards.
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the fiscal periods 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
Aggregate fees KPMG
| ($ in millions) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Audit fees | 3.2 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Other fees | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
| 3.3 | 3.6 |
Audit fees consist of fees for the examination of both the consolidated and statutory financial statements. Audit fees also include fees that only our independent auditor can reasonably provide such as comfort letters and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Table of Contents
| Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
|---|
Not applicable.
| Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
|---|
The following table provides a summary of shares repurchased by the Company in 2014:
| Period begin | Period end | Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 1 | February 2 | January | 774 | 48.35 | 774 | 1,905,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 3 | March 2 | February | 7,929,712 | 54.80 | 7,929,712 | 18,975,302 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 3 | March 30 | March | 405,000 | 56.92 | 405,000 | 18,570,302 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31 | May 4 | April | 1,690,861 | 59.94 | 1,690,861 | 16,879,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May 5 | June 1 | May | 1,794,210 | 60.72 | 1,794,210 | 15,085,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2 | June 29 | June | 274,534 | 47.45 | 145,034 | 14,940,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30 | August 3 | July | 1,807,837 | 63.65 | 1,807,837 | 13,132,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| August 4 | August 31 | August | 4,621,487 | 64.58 | 4,582,991 | 8,549,369 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 1 | September 28 | September | 2,300,201 | 69.82 | 2,300,201 | 6,249,168 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 29 | November 2 | October | 452,540 | 65.68 | 452,540 | 5,796,628 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| November 3 | November 30 | November | — | — | — | 5,796,628 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 1 | December 31 | December | 1,969,021 | 76.18 | 1,969,021 | 3,827,607 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 2014 | 23,246,177 | 61.73 | 23,078,181 |
From time to time, last in February 2014, the General Meeting of Shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to repurchase shares of our common stock. On that basis, the Board of Directors resolved to repurchase shares to cover in part employee stock options and equity rights under its long term incentive plans. The purchases identified in the table were all pursuant to this authorization.
| Item 16F. | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant |
|---|
Not applicable.
| Item 16G. | Corporate Governance |
|---|
The Dutch Corporate Governance Code
Since our initial public offering in August 2010, we have been required to comply with the Dutch corporate governance code. The Dutch corporate governance code, as revised, became effective on January 1, 2009, and applies to all Dutch companies listed on a government-recognized stock exchange, whether in the Netherlands or elsewhere. The code is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, companies are required to disclose in their Annual Reports filed in the Netherlands whether or not they are complying with the various rules of the Dutch corporate governance code that are addressed to the board of directors or, if any, the supervisory board of the company and, if they do not apply those provisions, to give the reasons for such non-application. The code contains principles and best practice provisions for managing boards, supervisory boards, stockholders and general meetings of stockholders, financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards.
The Dutch corporate governance code provides that if a company indicates to what extent it applies the best practice provisions, such company will deemed to have applied the Dutch corporate governance code.
The following discussion summarizes the primary differences between our corporate governance structure and best practice provisions of the Dutch corporate governance code:
| • | Best practice provisions II.2.4 and II.2.5 state that stock options granted to members of our board shall, in any event, not be exercised in the first three years after the date of granting and shares granted to board members without financial consideration shall be retained for a period of at least five years or until at least the end of the employment, if this period is shorter. Under our equity incentive schemes, part of the stock options granted to our chief executive officer are exercisable one year after the date of grant, and members of our board who received restrictive shares and performance shares are not required to retain these shares for at least five years. Although a deviation from the Corporate Governance Code, we hold the view that the combination of equity incentives granted to our chief executive officer, in relation to his obligation—laid down in the NXP Executive Equity Ownership Policy of October 2013—to maintain at least 20% of the after tax number of NXP shares delivered upon the vesting of any performance stock units granted as of October 2013, as well as the applicable strict vesting and performance criteria, will enhance the goal of promoting long-term investments in the Company. The |
|---|
Table of Contents
| same is true for the equity grants made to other members of our board, which also have very strict vesting criteria with the purpose of creating long-term commitment to the Company. |
|---|
| • | Pursuant to best practice provision IV.1.1, a general meeting of stockholders is empowered to cancel binding nominations of candidates for the board, and to dismiss members of the board by a simple majority of votes of those in attendance, although the company may require a quorum of at least one third of the voting rights outstanding. If such quorum is not represented, but a majority of those in attendance vote in favor of the proposal, a second meeting may be convened and its vote will be binding, even without a one-third quorum. Our articles of association currently state that the general meeting of stockholders may at all times overrule a binding nomination by a resolution adopted by at least a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, if such majority represents more than half of the issued share capital. Although a deviation from provision IV.1.1 of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, we hold the view that these provisions will enhance the continuity of the Company’s management and policies. |
|---|
Effective January 1, 2012, Dutch law does not allow directors to vote on a matter with regard to which they have an interest.
The NASDAQ Global Select Market Corporate Governance Rules
We are a foreign private issuer. As a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we rely on home country governance requirements and are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements that would otherwise apply in accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. These exemptions and home country rules relied on by us are described below:
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of stockholders. Pursuant to Dutch corporate law, the validity of a resolution by the general meeting of stockholders does not depend on the proportion of the capital or stockholders represented at the meeting (i.e. quorum), unless the law or articles of association of a company provide otherwise. Our articles of association provide that a resolution proposed to the general meeting of stockholders by the board of directors shall be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast, unless another majority of votes or quorum is required under Dutch law or our articles of association. All other resolutions shall be adopted by a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents at least half of the issued share capital, unless another majority of votes or quorum is required under Dutch law. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirement of Listing Rule 5620(c), which requires an issuer to provide in its bylaws for a quorum, and that such quorum may not be less than one-third of the outstanding voting stock. |
|---|
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies and provision of proxy statements for meetings of stockholders. We inform stockholders of meetings in a public notice. We prepare a proxy statement and solicit proxies from the holders of our listed stock. Our practice in this regard, however, differs from the typical practice of U.S. corporate issuers in that the advance record date for determining the holders of record entitled to attend and vote at our stockholder meetings is determined by Dutch law (currently 28 days prior to the meeting). As an administrative necessity, we establish a mailing record date in advance of each meeting of stockholders for purposes of determining the stockholders to which the proxy statement and form of proxy will be sent. However, only stockholders of record on the specified record date are entitled to attend and vote, directly or by proxy, at the meeting. |
|---|
| • | NASDAQ requires stockholder approval prior to the issuance of securities when a stock option or purchase plan is to be established or materially amended or other equity compensation arrangement made or materially amended, pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors, employees or consultants. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, stockholder approval is only required for equity compensation plans (or changes thereto) for members of the board, and not for equity compensation plans for other groups of employees. However, we note that under Dutch law, the stockholders have the power to issue shares or rights to subscribe for shares at the general meeting of the stockholders unless such power has been delegated to the board. Our board is designated for a period of five years from the date of the public offering in August 2010 to issue shares and rights to subscribe for shares. |
|---|
| • | As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement that compensation committees be comprised exclusively of independent directors provided that we describe the home country practice followed in lieu of such requirement and disclose the reasons for not having such an independent compensation committee. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, the general meeting of stockholders must adopt a policy in respect of the remuneration of the board. In accordance with our articles of association and our board rules, the remuneration of the executive directors is determined by the board of directors upon the recommendation of our nominating and compensation committee. Accordingly, applicable laws, regulations and corporate governance rules and practices do not require independence of the members of our nominating and compensation committee. Currently, all three members of our nominating and compensation committee are independent directors under the Dutch corporate governance rules and under the NASDAQ and SEC compensation committee structure and membership requirements. |
|---|
| • | We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement to have independent director oversight of director nominations. In accordance with Dutch law, our articles of association require that our directors will be appointed by the general meeting of stockholders upon the binding nomination of the board. In accordance with our board rules, the nominating and compensation committee will recommend the nomination of directors to our board. |
|---|
Table of Contents
| • | NASDAQ requires us to adopt a nominations committee charter or a board resolution addressing the nominations process. In accordance with the Dutch corporate governance code, we have adopted the committee’s charter. However, the nominations process has been set out in our articles of association and board rules. |
|---|
Moreover, we will not distribute Annual Reports to all of our stockholders in accordance with NASDAQ rules. Dutch law requires that the external auditors be appointed at the general meeting of stockholders and not by the audit committee. Our audit committee, which consists of members of our board of directors, shall only make a recommendation to the stockholders through the board of directors for the appointment and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm and shall oversee and evaluate the work of our independent registered public accounting firm.
| Item 16H. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
|---|
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
| --- | --- |
We are furnishing the financial statements pursuant to the instructions of Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements of this Report.
Item 18. Financial Statements
| --- | --- |
See pages F-1 to F-36
Item 19. Exhibits
| --- | --- |
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
| 2.1# | Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2010, between NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V., the Dover Corporation, Knowles Electronics, LLC and EFF Acht Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 3.2 | Articles of Association of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 4.1 | Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011, as amended by (i) the Joinder and Amendment Agreement dated as of November 18, 2011, (ii) the New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of February 16, 2012, (iii) the New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of December 10, 2012, (iv) the 2013 New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of November 27, 2013, and (v) the 2014 New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of February 18, 2014, among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrowers, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 4.2 | Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2012, as amended by an Incremental Joinder Agreement dated as of October 29, 2012, among NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent and Administrative Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 1, 2013) | |
| 4.3 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of February 14, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature page thereto as borrower and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) | |
| 4.4 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of March 12, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) | |
| 4.5 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of May 20, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) | |
| 4.6 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of September 24, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on the signature page thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) | |
| 4.7 | Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of November 24, 2014 among NXP Semiconductors N.V. as Issuer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee | |
| 4.8 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP Semiconductors N.V., Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. and Nimble Acquisition Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) | |
| 4.9 | Support Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP Semiconductors N.V., Freescale Holdings L.P. and certain limited partners of Freescale Holdings L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) | |
| 4.10 | Commitment Letter, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP B.V., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) |
Table of Contents
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
| 10.1 | Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of September 28, 2006 between Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and NXP B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.2 | Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of November 16, 2009 among NXP B.V., Virage Logic Corporation and VL C.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.3 | Shareholders’ agreement dated as of March 30, 1999, as amended among EBD Investments Pte. Ltd., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.4 | Lease Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004 between Jurong Town Corporation and Systems on Silicon Manufacturing Company Pte. Ltd. for the property at No. 70 Pasir Ris Drive 1, Singapore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.5 | Lease Agreement dated September 26, 2003 between Huangjiang Investment Development Company and NXP Semiconductors (Guangdong) Company Ltd. for the property at Tian Mei High Tech Industrial Park, Huang, Jiang Town, Dongguan City, China (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.6 | Building Lease Contract dated as of May 12th, 2000 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.7 | Agreement with regard to the Lease of a Single (vehicle) Shelter dated as of October 30, 2009 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) | |
| 10.8 | Agreement with regard to the Lease of Standard Plant Basements dated as of July 1, 2011 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) | |
| 10.9 | Agreement with regard to the Lease of a Single (vehicle) Shelter dated as of March 8, 2010 between the Exp |
Showing the first 8K of 215K characters. Open the full section