Item 1. BUSINESS
30K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
UDR is a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, operates, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, disposes of, and manages multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets throughout the United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement processes, low single-family home affordability and strong employment growth potential. At December 31, 2018, our consolidated real estate portfolio included 127 communities located in 19 markets, with a total of 39,931 completed apartment homes, which are held directly or through our subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership and the DownREIT Partnership, and consolidated joint ventures. In addition, we have an ownership interest in 32 communities containing 8,112 apartment homes through unconsolidated joint ventures or partnerships. As of December 31, 2018, no wholly-owned or unconsolidated joint venture communities were under development.
At December 31, 2018, the Operating Partnership’s consolidated real estate portfolio included 52 communities located in 15 markets, with a total of 16,434 completed apartment homes. The Operating Partnership owns, operates, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, and manages multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets located throughout the United States. During the year ended December 31, 2018, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented approximately 42% of our total rental revenues.
UDR has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to in this Report as the “Code.” To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain tests which, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than our net capital gains) to our stockholders annually. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on our net income to the extent we distribute such net income to our stockholders annually. In 2018, we declared total distributions of $1.29 per common share and paid dividends of $1.2775 per common share.
| Dividends | Dividends | |||||
| Declared in | Paid in | |||||
| 2018 | 2018 | |||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.3225 | $ | 0.3100 | ||
| Second Quarter | 0.3225 | 0.3225 | ||||
| Third Quarter | 0.3225 | 0.3225 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | 0.3225 | 0.3225 | ||||
| Total | $ | 1.2900 | $ | 1.2775 |
UDR was formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation. In June 2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland. The Operating Partnership is the successor-in-interest to United Dominion Realty, L.P., a limited partnership formed under the laws of Virginia, which commenced operations in 1995. The Operating Partnership was redomiciled in 2004 as a Delaware limited partnership. Our corporate offices are located at 1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado and our telephone number is (720) 283‑6120. Our website is www.udr.com. The information contained on our website, including any information referred to in this Report as being available on our website, is not a part of or incorporated into this Report.
As of February 18, 2019, we had 1,405 full-time associates and 26 part-time associates, all of whom were employed by UDR.
Reporting Segments
We report in two segments: Same-Store Communities and Non-Mature Communities/Other.
Our Same-Store Communities segment represents those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2017, and held as of December 31, 2018. These communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct substantial redevelopment activities, and the communities are not classified as held for disposition at year end. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months.
Our Non-Mature Communities/Other segment represents those communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in Same-Store Communities, including, but not limited to, recently acquired, developed and redeveloped communities, and the non-apartment components of mixed use properties. For additional information regarding our operating segments, see Note 15, Reportable Segments, in the Notes to the UDR Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report and Note 11, Reportable Segments, in the Notes to the Operating Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Business Objectives
Our principal business objective is to maximize the economic returns of our apartment communities to provide our stockholders with the greatest possible total return and value. To achieve this objective, we intend to continue to pursue the following goals and strategies:
| · | own and operate apartments in high barrier-to-entry markets, which are characterized by limited land for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement processes, low single-family home affordability and strong employment growth potential, thus enhancing stability and predictability of returns to our stockholders; |
|---|
| · | manage real estate cycles by taking an opportunistic approach to buying, selling, renovating, redeveloping, and developing apartment communities; |
|---|
| · | empower site associates to manage our communities efficiently and effectively; |
|---|
| · | measure and reward associates based on specific performance targets; and |
|---|
| · | manage our capital structure to help enhance predictability of liquidity, earnings and dividends. |
|---|
2018 Highlights
In July 2018, the Company marked its 46th year as a REIT and, in October 2018, paid its 184th consecutive quarterly dividend. The Company’s annualized declared 2018 dividend of $1.29 represented a 4.0% increase over the previous year.
Total revenues increased 5.1% and net income attributable to common stockholders increased 69.1% over the prior year.
We achieved Same-Store revenue growth of 3.5% and Same-Store net operating income (“NOI”) growth of 3.4%.
We completed the development of two wholly-owned communities, located in Huntington Beach, California and Boston, Massachusetts, with a total of 1,101 apartment homes.
We completed the development of two communities held by unconsolidated joint ventures, located in Los Angeles, California and Addison, Texas, with a total of 533 apartment homes.
We recognized gains on the sale of real estate of $136.2 million from the sale of two communities in Huntington Beach, California and Fairfax, Virginia with a total of 868 apartment homes.
We contributed $120.7 million to seven unconsolidated investments under our Developer Capital Program, which earn preferred returns ranging between 8.0% to 12.5%.
We issued $300.0 million of 4.40% (4.27% effective rate after the effect of a cash flow hedge) 10-year senior unsecured medium-term notes.
We prepaid $224.8 million of our secured credit facility and $50.1 million of fixed rate mortgage debt with proceeds from the refinance of a mortgage note payable and proceeds from the issuance of senior unsecured medium-term notes.
We extended the maturity and lowered the rates on our $1.1 billion Revolving Credit Facility and $350 million Term Loan Facility.
We repurchased 593,373 shares of common stock at a weighted average price per share of $33.69, for total consideration of approximately $20.0 million.
We sold 7,150,000 shares of common stock for aggregate net proceeds of $299.8 million at a price per share of $41.98.
Thomas W. Toomey was named Chairman of the Board, in addition to his responsibilities as Chief Executive Officer.
Refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information on the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s activities in 2018.
Our Strategic Vision
Our strategic vision is to be the multifamily public REIT of choice. We intend to realize this vision by executing on our strategic objectives, which are:
| 1. | Maintaining a Diversified Portfolio and Allocating Capital to Accretive Investment Opportunities |
|---|
| 2. | Maintaining a Strong Balance Sheet |
|---|
| 3. | Consistently Driving Operating Excellence |
|---|
| 4. | Advancing a Strong Corporate Culture and Ensuring High Resident Satisfaction |
|---|
Maintaining a Diversified Portfolio and Allocating Capital to Accretive Investment Opportunities
We believe greater portfolio diversification, as defined by geographic concentration, location within a market (i.e., urban or suburban) and property quality (i.e., A or B), reduces the volatility of our same-store growth throughout the real estate cycle, appeals to a wider renter and investor audience and lessens the market risk associated with owning a homogenous portfolio. Diversified characteristics of our portfolio include:
| · | our consolidated apartment portfolio includes 127 communities located in 19 markets throughout the U.S., including both Coastal and Sunbelt locations; and |
|---|
| · | our mix of urban/suburban communities and our mix of A/B quality properties is approximately 50%/50%. |
|---|
We are focused on increasing our presence in markets with favorable job formation, high propensity to rent, low single-family home affordability, and a favorable demand/supply ratio for multifamily housing. Portfolio investment decisions consider internal analyses and third-party research.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
When evaluating potential acquisitions, we consider a wide variety of factors, including:
| · | whether it is located in a high barrier-to-entry market; |
|---|
| · | population growth, cost of alternative housing, overall potential for economic growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is located; |
|---|
| · | geographic location, including proximity to jobs, entertainment, transportation, and our existing communities which can deliver significant economies of scale; |
|---|
| · | construction quality, condition and design of the property; |
|---|
| · | current and projected cash flow of the property and the ability to increase cash flow; |
|---|
| · | ability of the property’s projected cash flows to exceed our cost of capital; |
|---|
| · | potential for capital appreciation of the property; |
|---|
| · | ability to increase the value and profitability of the property through operations and redevelopment; |
|---|
| · | terms of resident leases, including the potential for rent increases; |
|---|
| · | occupancy and demand by residents for properties of a similar type in the vicinity; |
|---|
| · | prospects for liquidity through sale, financing, or refinancing of the property; and |
|---|
| · | competition from existing multifamily communities and the potential for the construction of new multifamily properties in the area. |
|---|
We regularly monitor our assets to increase the quality and performance of our portfolio. Factors we consider in deciding whether to dispose of a property include:
| · | current market price for an asset compared to projected economics for that asset; |
|---|
| · | potential increases in new construction in the market area; |
|---|
| · | areas with low job growth prospects; |
|---|
| · | markets where we do not intend to establish a long-term concentration; and |
|---|
| · | operating efficiencies. |
|---|
The following table summarizes our apartment community acquisitions and dispositions and our consolidated year-end ownership position for the past five years (dollars in thousands):
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| Homes acquired | — | 462 | 508 | 3,246 | 358 | ||||||||||
| Homes disposed | 868 | 218 | 1,782 | 2,735 | 2,500 | ||||||||||
| Homes owned at December 31, | 39,931 | 39,998 | 39,454 | 40,728 | 39,851 | ||||||||||
| Total real estate owned, at cost | $ | 10,196,159 | $ | 10,177,206 | $ | 9,615,753 | $ | 9,190,276 | $ | 8,383,259 |
The following table summarizes the Operating Partnership’s apartment community acquisitions and dispositions and year-end ownership position for the past five years (dollars in thousands):
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| Homes acquired | — | 218 | — | 421 | — | ||||||||||
| Homes disposed | 264 | 218 | 276 | 4,256 | (a) | 264 | |||||||||
| Homes owned at December 31, | 16,434 | 16,698 | 16,698 | 16,974 | 20,814 | ||||||||||
| Total real estate owned, at cost | $ | 3,811,985 | $ | 3,816,956 | $ | 3,674,704 | $ | 3,630,905 | $ | 4,238,770 |
(a)Includes 3,107 homes deconsolidated in 2015 upon contribution of communities by the Operating Partnership to the DownREIT Partnership.
Development Activities
Our objective in developing a community is to create value while improving the quality of our portfolio. Demographic trends, economic drivers, and how multifamily fundamentals and valuations have trended over the long-term generally govern our review process on where to allocate development capital. At December 31, 2018, no communities were under development. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we completed the development of two wholly-owned communities, located in Huntington Beach, California and Boston, Massachusetts, with a total of 1,101 homes.
Redevelopment Activities
Our objective in redeveloping a community is twofold: we aim to meaningfully grow rental rates while also producing a higher yielding and more valuable asset through asset quality improvement. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred $22.8 million in major renovations, which include major structural changes and/or architectural revisions to existing buildings. As of December 31, 2018, no communities were under redevelopment.
Joint Venture and Partnership Activities
We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures (including limited liability companies or partnerships) through which we would own an indirect economic interest of less than 100% of the community or communities owned directly by such joint ventures. Our decision to either hold an apartment community in fee simple or have an indirect interest in the community through a joint venture is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) the economic and tax terms required by the seller of land or a community; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of communities by market, submarket and product type; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) our projections, in some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk if a joint venture vehicle is used. Each joint venture agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture agreement.
Maintaining a Strong Balance Sheet
We maintain a capital structure that we believe allows us to proactively source potential investment opportunities in the marketplace. We have structured our debt maturity schedule to be able to opportunistically access both secured and unsecured debt markets when appropriate.
Financing Activities
As part of our plan to finance our activities, we utilize proceeds from debt and equity offerings and refinancings to extend maturities, pay down existing debt, fund development and redevelopment activities, and acquire apartment communities.
Consistently Driving Operational Excellence
Investment in new technologies continues to drive operating efficiencies in our business and help us to better meet the changing needs of our residents. Our residents have the ability to conduct business with us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and complete online leasing applications and renewals throughout our portfolio using our web-based resident internet portal.
As a result of transforming our operations through technology, residents’ satisfaction has improved, and our operating teams have become more efficient. Web-based technologies have also resulted in declining marketing and advertising costs, improved cash management, and better pricing management of our available apartment homes.
Operating Partnership Strategies and Vision
The Operating Partnership’s long-term strategic vision is the same as that of the Company as described above.
Competitive Conditions
Competition for new residents is generally intense across all of our markets. Some competing communities offer features that our communities do not have. Competing communities can use rental concessions or lower rents to obtain temporary competitive advantages. Also, some competing communities are larger or newer than our communities. The competitive position of each community is different depending upon many factors, including sub-market supply and demand. In addition, other real estate investors compete with us to acquire existing properties, redevelop existing properties, and to develop new properties. These competitors include insurance companies, pension and investment funds, public and private real estate companies, investment companies and other public and private apartment REITs, some of which may have greater resources, or lower capital costs, than we do.
We believe that, in general, we are well-positioned to compete effectively for residents and investments. We believe our competitive advantages include:
| · | a fully integrated organization with property management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, marketing, sales and financing expertise; |
|---|
| · | scalable operating and support systems, which include automated systems to meet the changing electronic needs of our residents and to effectively focus on our Internet marketing efforts; |
|---|
| · | access to sources of capital; |
|---|
| · | geographic diversification with a presence in 19 markets across the country; and |
|---|
| · | significant presence in many of our major markets that allows us to be a local operating expert. |
|---|
Moving forward, we will continue to optimize lease management, improve expense control, increase resident retention efforts and align employee incentive plans with our bottom line performance. We believe this plan of operation, coupled with the portfolio’s strengths in targeting renters across a geographically diverse platform, should position us for continued operational upside.
Communities
At December 31, 2018, our consolidated real estate portfolio included 127 communities with a total of 39,931 completed apartment homes, which included the Operating Partnership’s consolidated real estate portfolio of 52 communities with a total of 16,434 completed apartment homes. The overall quality of our portfolio enables us to raise rents and to attract residents with higher levels of disposable income who are more likely to absorb such rents.
At December 31, 2018, no communities were under development or redevelopment.
Same-Store Community Comparison
We believe that one pertinent quantitative measurement of the performance of our portfolio is tracking the results of our Same-Store Communities’ NOI, which is total rental revenue, less rental and other operating expenses excluding property management. Our Same-Store Community population is comprised of operating communities which we own and have stabilized occupancy, revenues and expenses as of the beginning of the prior year.
Net income attributable to common stockholders was $199.2 million as compared to $117.9 million in the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by higher operating income, including gains on the sale of real estate.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, our Same-Store NOI increased by $22.0 million compared to the prior year. Our Same-Store Community properties provided 91.8% of our total NOI for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in NOI for the 37,673 Same-Store apartment homes, or 94.3% of our portfolio, was primarily driven by an increase in rental rates and reimbursements and ancillary and fee income, partially offset by an increase in real estate taxes.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Operating Partnership’s Same-Store NOI increased by $12.5 million compared to the prior year. The Operating Partnership’s Same-Store Community properties provided 96.0% of its total NOI for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in NOI for the 16,216 Same-Store apartment homes, or 98.7% of the Operating Partnership’s portfolio, was primarily driven by an increase in rental rates and reimbursements and ancillary and fee income, partially offset by an increase in real estate taxes.
Revenue growth in 2019 may be impacted by adverse developments affecting the general economy, reduced occupancy rates, increased rental concessions, new supply, increased bad debt and other factors which may adversely impact our ability to increase rents.
Tax Matters
UDR has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. To continue to qualify as a REIT, UDR must continue to meet certain tests that, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than net capital gains) to our stockholders annually. Provided we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on our net income to the extent such net income is distributed to our stockholders annually. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.
We may utilize our taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) to engage in activities that REITs may be prohibited from performing, including the provision of management and other services to third parties and the conduct of certain nonqualifying real estate transactions. Our TRS generally is taxable as a regular corporation, and therefore, subject to federal, state and local income taxes.
The Operating Partnership intends to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership generally is not a taxable entity and does not incur federal income tax liability. However, any state or local revenue, excise or franchise taxes that result from the operating activities of the Operating Partnership are incurred at the entity level.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results of operations as a result of wage pressures and increases in utilities and material costs, the majority of our apartment leases have initial terms of 12 months or less, which generally enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our apartment homes. Although an extreme escalation in costs could have a negative impact on our residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had a material impact on our results for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Environmental Matters
Various environmental laws govern certain aspects of the ongoing operation of our communities. Such environmental laws include those regulating the existence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, management of surfaces with lead-based paint (and notices to residents about the lead-based paint), use of active underground petroleum storage tanks, and waste-management activities. The failure to comply with such requirements could subject us to a government enforcement action and/or claims for damages by a private party.
To date, compliance with federal, state and local environmental protection regulations has not had a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. We have a property management plan for hazardous materials. As part of the plan, Phase I environmental site investigations and reports have been completed for each property we acquire. In addition, all proposed acquisitions are inspected prior to acquisition. The inspections are conducted by qualified environmental consultants, and we review the issued report prior to the purchase or development of any property. Nevertheless, it is possible that the environmental assessments will not reveal all environmental liabilities, or that some material environmental liabilities exist of which we are unaware. In some cases, we have abandoned otherwise economically attractive acquisitions because the costs of removal or control of hazardous materials have been prohibitive or we have been unwilling to accept the potential risks involved. We do not believe we will be required to engage in any large-scale abatement at any of our properties. We believe that through professional environmental inspections and testing for asbestos, lead paint and other hazardous materials, coupled with a relatively conservative posture toward accepting known environmental risk, we can minimize our exposure to potential liability associated with environmental hazards.
Federal legislation requires owners and landlords of residential housing constructed prior to 1978 to disclose to potential residents or purchasers of the communities any known lead paint hazards and imposes treble damages for failure to provide such notification. In addition, lead based paint in any of the communities may result in lead poisoning in children residing in that community if chips or particles of such lead based paint are ingested, and we may be held liable under state laws for any such injuries caused by ingestion of lead based paint by children living at the communities.
We are unaware of any environmental hazards at any of our properties that individually or in the aggregate may have a material adverse impact on our operations or financial position. We have not been notified by any governmental authority, and we are not otherwise aware, of any material non-compliance, liability, or claim relating to environmental liabilities in connection with any of our properties. We do not believe that the cost of continued compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on us or our financial condition or results of operations. Future environmental laws, regulations, or ordinances, however, may require additional remediation of existing conditions that are not currently actionable. Also, if more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, the costs of compliance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition.
Insurance
We carry comprehensive general liability coverage on our communities, with limits of liability customary within the multi-family apartment industry to insure against liability claims and related defense costs. We are also insured, with limits of liability customary within the multi-family apartment industry, against the risk of direct physical
damage in amounts necessary to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property, including loss of rental income during the reconstruction period.
Available Information
Both UDR and the Operating Partnership file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission their respective annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, and current reports on Form 8‑K, pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may obtain a free copy of our annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, and current reports on Form 8‑K, and amendments to those reports on the day of filing with the SEC on our website at www.udr.com, or by sending an e-mail message to ir@udr.com.
Previous: Cover and table of contents · Next: Item 1A. RISK FACTORS