A Dark Vector Cognition product

Item 1A. Risk Factors

16K characters. Original on sec.gov ·

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following is an update to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Other than the following update, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. You should carefully consider the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We are sensitive to reductions in Medicaid and other state-based revenue programs as well as regulatory, economic, environmental and competitive changes in certain states.

As described in Sources of Revenue elsewhere in this Report, we receive revenues from various state and county-based programs, including Medicaid in all the states in which we operate. We receive annual Medicaid revenues of approximately $100 million or greater, from each of Texas, California, Nevada, Washington, D.C., Illinois, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Florida, Mississippi and Washington. Most of these programs are approved on a year-to-year basis and there is no assurance that these revenues will continue at their current rates or at all. We are therefore particularly sensitive to reductions in Medicaid and other state-based revenue programs as well as regulatory, economic, environmental and competitive changes in those states.

We are subject to uncertainties regarding recent legislative changes to Medicaid program.

Legislation adopted on July 4, 2025 (the One Big Beautiful Budget Act), attaches work and community service requirements to eligibility for Medicaid benefits that will have the effect of limiting Medicaid enrollment and expenditure. That legislation also places limits on provider fees used to increase federal Medicaid funding to states. The legislation prohibits states not previously having expanded Medicaid eligibility to 138% of federal poverty level from increasing the rate of current provider fees which fund certain state supplemental payments or increasing the base of the fee to a class or items of services that the fee did not previously cover. That current provider fee threshold will remain at 6%. For states having expanded Medicaid eligibility under the legislation, the provider fee threshold will be reduced by 0.5% annually between federal fiscal years 2028 and 2032 with the resulting threshold ultimately becoming 3.5%. The legislation also eliminates certain insurance exchange premium tax credits beyond 2025 and exchange enrollment is expected to be adversely impacted. Extension of tax credits is currently the subject of Congressional debate as part of the federal budget negotiation, and we cannot predict whether these subsidies will ultimately be adopted in federal fiscal year 2026. All of these factors, which could have a material unfavorable impact on our results of operations, may be expected to reduce our revenue and likely increase the level of uncompensated care provided by our facilities.

We are subject to pending legal actions, purported stockholder class actions, governmental investigations and regulatory actions.

We and our subsidiaries are subject to pending legal actions, governmental investigations and regulatory actions (see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Commitments and Contingencies, as included this Report). We may become subject to additional medical malpractice lawsuits, product liability lawsuits, class action lawsuits and other legal actions in the ordinary course of business.

Defending ourselves against the allegations in the lawsuits and governmental investigations, or similar matters and any related publicity, could potentially entail significant costs and could require significant attention from our management and our reputation could suffer significantly.

For example, as discussed elsewhere herein, Cumberland Hospital for Children and Adolescents (“Cumberland”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, is a defendant in multi-plaintiff lawsuits filed in the Circuit Court for Richmond, Virginia (the “Cumberland Litigation”), relating to allegations of inappropriate sexual contact during medical examinations by Dr. Daniel Davidow, an independent contractor and the former medical director for Cumberland. The Company and UHS of Delaware, Inc., our administrative services subsidiary (“UHS Delaware”), were also named as co-defendants in the Cumberland Litigation. Plaintiffs have asserted claims of negligence, assault and battery (against Dr. Davidow), false imprisonment, violations of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (“VCPA”), and vicarious liability for Dr. Davidow’s conduct against Cumberland, the Company, and UHS Delaware. The Company and UHS Delaware were dismissed from the action during the trial, which occurred in September, 2024. On September 27, 2024, a jury entered a verdict finding Dr. Davidow and Cumberland liable and awarded these three plaintiffs combined compensatory damages of $60 million for all liability theories, an additional combined $180 million in trebled damages for violation of the VCPA, and an additional combined $120 million in punitive damages. Cumberland has filed post-trial motions challenging this verdict, including the amounts awarded in the verdict. Based upon Virginia law, the Court has recently reduced the punitive damage

amount to a combined maximum of $1.05 million ($350,000 per plaintiff). Cumberland has filed a notice of appeal on the remaining verdict. Plaintiffs have separately filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge the dismissal of the Company and UHS Delaware during trial, and the Court’s order reducing the punitive damages award against Cumberland. There are approximately 40 additional plaintiffs making similar allegations with claims pending in the Cumberland Litigation. The Company and UHS Delaware remain defendants with respect to the remaining plaintiffs. We expect that the trials for the remaining plaintiffs, as well as any additional plaintiffs, will be scheduled at various times over the next several years and will continue to be tried in small groups.

We are uncertain as to the ultimate financial exposure related to the Cumberland matters (which relate to occurrences in the 2020 policy year) and we can make no assurances regarding timing or substance of their outcome, or the amount of damages that may be ultimately held recoverable after post-judgment proceedings and appeals. As of September 30, 2025, without reduction for any potential amounts related to the Cumberland matter, the Company and its subsidiaries have aggregate insurance coverage of approximately $147 million remaining under commercial policies for matters applicable to the 2020 policy year (in excess of the applicable self-insured retention amounts of $10 million per single occurrence/$25 million for multi-plaintiff matters for professional liability claims and $3 million per occurrence for general liability claims). In the event the resolution of the Cumberland matter exhausts all or a significant portion of the remaining commercial insurance coverage available to the Company and its subsidiaries related to other matters that occurred in 2020, or the Cumberland matter causes the posting of large bonds or other collateral during the appeal processes, our future results of operations and capital resources would be materially adversely impacted.

UHS Delaware is also a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Washoe County, Nevada, along with Pinnacle Management Group NV, LLC ("Pinnacle Medical Group", in which a subsidiary of the Company holds a 50% interest) and several individuals. The Company was previously dismissed from the lawsuit.

The lawsuit contains allegations of intentional interference with contractual relationships and prospective economic advantage resulting from the departure of several physicians from St. Mary’s Medical Group in Reno, Nevada, who joined Pinnacle Medical Group in 2021. A trial of this matter was concluded on September 26, 2025, with a verdict rendered against UHS Delaware and the other defendants for approximately $4.7 million in compensatory damages. The jury also awarded punitive damages against UHS Delaware of $500 million and lesser amounts against some of the other defendants. Based upon Nevada statutory law, we expect the punitive damages to be reduced to a maximum of approximately $14 million. We also believe that recent Nevada Supreme Court precedent could further reduce the amount of punitive damages.

UHS Delaware, and the other defendants are evaluating all legal options and intend to challenge this verdict in post-judgment trial court proceedings and on appeal. We are uncertain as to the ultimate financial exposure related to this matter and we can make no assurance regarding its outcome, or the amount of damages that may be recoverable after post-judgment proceedings and appeals. If we are unsuccessful in reversing the verdict, or significantly reducing the level of damages, or we are required to post a substantial bond pending appeal, this matter could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

We are unable to predict the outcome of these litigation matters or to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any such loss; however, these lawsuits and the related publicity and news articles that have been published concerning these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows which in turn could cause a decline in our stock price. In an effort to resolve one or more of these matters, we may choose to negotiate a settlement. Amounts we pay to settle any of these matters may be material.

All professional and general liability insurance we purchase is subject to policy limitations. Our estimated liability for self-insured professional and general liability claims is based on a number of factors including, among other things, the number of asserted claims and reported incidents, estimates of losses for these claims based on recent and historical settlement amounts and jury verdicts, estimates of incurred but not reported claims based on historical experience, and estimates of amounts recoverable under our commercial insurance policies. All relevant information, including our own historical experience, applicable per occurrence and aggregate self-insured retentions, and limitations and exclusions pursuant to our commercial insurance policies, is used in estimating our expected liability for self-insured claims. While we continuously monitor these factors, our ultimate liability for professional and general liability claims could change materially from our current estimates due to inherent uncertainties involved in making this estimate. Given our significant exposure to professional and general liability claims, there can be no assurance that a sharp increase in the number and/or severity of claims asserted against us, and/or reductions in the amount of commercial coverage available to us, will not have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations. In addition, our commercial insurance coverage for the period commencing in March, 2025, contains less favorable terms than previous years including coverage exclusions for incidents involving sexual molestation or abuse, higher premiums and potentially lower aggregate limitations.

We are and may become subject to other loss contingencies, both known and unknown, which may relate to past, present and future facts, events, circumstances and occurrences. Should an unfavorable outcome occur in some or all of our legal proceedings or other loss contingencies, or if successful claims and other actions are brought against us in the future, there could be a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In particular, government investigations, as well as qui tam and stockholder lawsuits, may lead to material fines, penalties, damages payments or other sanctions, including exclusion from government healthcare programs. The federal False Claims Act permits private

parties to bring qui tam, or whistleblower, lawsuits on behalf of the government against companies alleging that the defendant has defrauded the federal government. These private parties are entitled to share in any amounts recovered by the government, and, as a result, the number of whistleblower lawsuits that have been filed against providers has increased significantly in recent years. Because qui tam lawsuits are filed under seal, we could be named in one or more such lawsuits of which we are not aware. Settlements of lawsuits involving Medicare and Medicaid issues routinely require both monetary payments and corporate integrity agreements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equi****ty Securities and Use of Proceeds

As of December 31, 2024, we had an aggregate available repurchase authorization of $824.4 million pursuant to our stock repurchase program. Pursuant to this program, shares of our Class B Common Stock may be repurchased, from time to time as conditions allow, on the open market or in negotiated private transactions. There is no expiration date for our stock repurchase program.

As reflected below, during the three-month period ended September 30, 2025, we have repurchased approximately 1.3 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $234.3 million (average price of approximately $178.23 per share) pursuant to the terms of our stock repurchase program. In addition, during the three-month period ended September 30, 2025, 16,092 shares were repurchased in connection with income tax withholding obligations resulting from stock-based compensation programs.

On October 27, 2025, our Board of Directors authorized a $1.5 billion increase in our stock repurchase program, thereby increasing the aggregate available repurchase authorization to $1.759 billion as of that date.

During the period of July 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025, we repurchased the following shares:

Additional Dollars Authorized For Repurchase (in thousands)Total number of shares purchasedTotal number of shares cancelledAverage price paid per share for forfeited restricted sharesTotal Number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced programsAverage price paid per share for shares purchased as part of publicly announced programAggregate purchase price paid for shares purchased as part of publicly announced program (in thousands)Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programMaximum number of dollars that may yet be purchased under the program (in thousands) (a.)
July, 2025$-1,486—$0.01—$-$-—$492,867
August, 2025$-1,317,349—$0.011,314,696$178.23$234,319—$258,548
September, 2025$-11,953—$0.01—$-$-—$258,548
Total July through September, 2025$-1,330,788—$0.011,314,696—178.23$234,319

Dividends

During the quarter ended September 30, 2025, we declared and paid dividends of $.20 per share. Dividend equivalents are accrued on unvested restricted stock units and will be paid upon vesting of the restricted stock unit.

Previous: Item 1. Legal Proceedings · Next: Item 5. Other Information