A Dark Vector Cognition product

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

5K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

LITIGATION

We incorporate by reference into this Item our disclosures made in Part II, Item 8 of this report included in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption “Legal Contingencies.”

ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT MATTERS

While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the following environmental proceedings, if any one or more of them were decided against us, we believe that there would be no material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. We are reporting these proceedings to comply with SEC regulations, which require us to disclose certain information about proceedings arising under federal, state, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or protecting the environment if we reasonably believe that such proceedings will result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more.

U.S. EPA (Fuels). In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, we reported that we had an outstanding Notice of Violation (NOV) from the U.S. EPA related to violations from a 2015 Mobile Source Inspection. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we received a draft Consent Order from the U.S. EPA proposing penalties of $3.4 million. We are working with the U.S. EPA to resolve this matter.

Attorney General of the State of Texas (Texas AG) (Corpus Christi Asphalt Plant). In our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we reported that we had received a letter and draft Agreed Final Judgment from the Texas AG related to a contaminated water backflow incident that occurred at the Valero Corpus Christi Asphalt Plant. The draft Agreed Final Judgment assesses proposed penalties in the amount of $1.3 million. We are working with the Texas AG to resolve this matter.

Texas AG (Port Arthur Refinery). In our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, we reported that the Texas AG had filed suit against our Port Arthur Refinery in the 419th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-19-004121, for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act seeking injunctive relief and penalties. We are working with the Texas AG to resolve this matter.

Texas AG (Houston Terminal). In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, we reported that we had an outstanding Notice of Enforcement (NOE) from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and an outstanding Violation Notice (VN) from the Harris County Pollution Control Services Department, both alleging excess emissions from Tank 003 that occurred during Hurricane Harvey. On January 27, 2020, the Texas AG filed suit related to this incident against our Houston Terminal in the 419th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-20-000516 seeking injunctive relief and penalties. We are working with the Texas AG to resolve this matter.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and Solano County Department of Resource Management Certified Unified Program Agency (Solano County) (Benicia Refinery). In our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we reported that we had received multiple VNs issued by the BAAQMD related to an upset of the Flue Gas Scrubber (FGS) at our Benicia Refinery, and a draft Consent from Solano County related to the FGS incident proposing penalties of $242,840. In our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we reported that we had resolved the matter with Solano County. We continue to work with the BAAQMD on a final resolution of the remaining VNs.

BAAQMD (Benicia Refinery). In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, we reported that we had multiple outstanding VNs issued by the BAAQMD. These VNs are for various alleged air regulation and air permit violations at our Benicia Refinery and asphalt plant. We continue to work with the BAAQMD to resolve these VNs.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) (Wilmington Refinery). In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, we reported that we had outstanding Notices of Violation (NOVs) issued by the SCAQMD. These NOVs are for alleged reporting violations and excess emissions at our Wilmington Refinery. We are working with the SCAQMD to resolve these NOVs.

TCEQ (Port Arthur). In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, we reported that we had an outstanding NOE from the TCEQ alleging unauthorized emissions associated with a November 18, 2017 release of crude oil from the 24-inch fill pipe of Tank T-285. We are working with the TCEQ to resolve this matter.

Previous: Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS · Next: Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES