Vivmark Residential 10-K 2017-12-31

Filed 2018-02-22. 17 sections, 675K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON

What changed since the 2016-12-31 10-KNew, removed and reworded risk factor headings, then every item sentence by sentence.

Cover and table of contents

10-K 1 eqr-10k_20171231.htm 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 2017

OR

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-12252 (Equity Residential)

Commission File Number: 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland (Equity Residential)13-3675988 (Equity Residential)
Illinois (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)36-3894853 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Two North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60606(312) 474-1300
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 Par Value (Equity Residential)New York Stock Exchange
7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)New York Stock Exchange
(Title of each class)(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None (Equity Residential)

Units of Limited Partnership Interest (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

(Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Equity Residential Yes ☒ No ☐ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Equity Residential Yes ☐ No ☒ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Equity Residential Yes ☒ No ☐ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Equity Residential Yes ☒ No ☐ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Equity Residential ☒ERP Operating Limited Partnership ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Equity Residential:
Large accelerated filer☒Accelerated filer☐
Non-accelerated filer☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company☐
Emerging growth company☐
ERP Operating Limited Partnership:
Large accelerated filer☐Accelerated filer☐
Non-accelerated filer☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company☐
Emerging growth company☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Equity Residential ☐ ERP Operating Limited Partnership ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Equity Residential Yes ☐ No ☒ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $23.8 billion based upon the closing price on June 30, 2017 of $65.83 using beneficial ownership of shares rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting shares owned by Trustees and Executive Officers, some of whom may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination.

The number of Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value, outstanding on February 16, 2018 was 368,169,571.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates by reference certain information that will be contained in Equity Residential’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which Equity Residential intends to file no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Equity Residential is the general partner and 96.4% owner of ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Equity Residential and ERP Operating Limited Partnership. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “EQR” mean Equity Residential, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “ERPOP” mean ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP. The following chart illustrates the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s corporate structure:

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2017 owned an approximate 96.4% ownership interest in, ERPOP. The remaining 3.6% interest is owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of ERPOP, EQR has exclusive control of ERPOP’s day-to-day management. Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of EQR consists of the same members as the management of ERPOP.

The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and EQR contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings to ERPOP. In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units (see definition below) in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering. The Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of OP Units as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales. This is one of the reasons why the Company is structured in the manner shown above. Based on the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, OP Units can be exchanged with Common Shares on a one-for-one basis because the Company maintains a one-for-one relationship between the OP Units of ERPOP issued to EQR and the outstanding Common Shares.

The Company believes that combining the reports on Form 10-K of EQR and ERPOP into this single report provides the following benefits:

•enhances investors’ understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
•eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
•creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between EQR and ERPOP in the context of how EQR and ERPOP operate as a consolidated company. All of the Company’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. EQR’s primary function is acting as the general partner of ERPOP. EQR also issues equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, and guarantees certain debt of ERPOP, as disclosed in this report. EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company’s ownership interests in its joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by EQR, which are contributed to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional partnership interests in ERPOP (“OP Units”) (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or additional preference units in ERPOP (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis), the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company’s business. These sources include the Operating Partnership’s working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facility and/or commercial paper program, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from disposition of certain properties and joint venture interests.

Shareholders’ equity, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements include the interests of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships. The noncontrolling interests in the Company’s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership level and limited partner OP Unit holders of the Operating Partnership. The differences between shareholders’ equity and partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at the Company and Operating Partnership levels.

To help investors understand the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report provides separate consolidated financial statements for the Company and the Operating Partnership; a single set of consolidated notes to such financial statements that includes separate discussions of each entity’s debt, noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity or partners’ capital, as applicable; and a combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section that includes discrete information related to each entity.

This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that the Company and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

In order to highlight the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the Company is one business and the Company operates that business through the Operating Partnership.

As general partner with control of ERPOP, EQR consolidates ERPOP for financial reporting purposes, and EQR essentially has no assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
PART I.
Item 1.Business6
Item 1A.Risk Factors8
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments28
Item 2.Properties28
Item 3.Legal Proceedings30
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures30
PART II.
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities31
Item 6.Selected Financial Data32
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations35
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk54
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data55
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure56
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures56
Item 9B.Other Information57
PART III.
Item 10.Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance58
Item 11.Executive Compensation58
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters58
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence58
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services58
PART IV.
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules59
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary59
EX-12
EX-21
EX-23.1
EX-23.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-31.3
EX 31.4
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-32.3
EX-32.4
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Equity Residential (“EQR”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of rental apartment properties in urban and high-density suburban coastal gateway markets. ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”), an Illinois limited partnership, was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP. Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to consolidated financial statements apply to both the Company and the Operating Partnership.

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2017 owned an approximate 96.4% ownership interest in, ERPOP. All of the Company’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. EQR issues public equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, but does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company’s ownership interests in its joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.

The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and the Company also operates property management offices in each of its coastal gateway markets. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately 2,700 employees who provided real estate operations, leasing, legal, financial, accounting, acquisition, disposition, development and other support functions.

Certain capitalized terms used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See also Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s segment disclosures.

Available Information

You may access our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to any of those reports we file with the SEC free of charge on our website, www.equityapartments.com. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with the SEC. The information contained on our website, including any information referred to in this report as being available on our website, is not a part of or incorporated into this report.

Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies

The Company invests in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets with the goal of maximizing our risk adjusted total return (operating income plus capital appreciation) on invested capital.

We seek to maximize the income and capital appreciation of our properties by investing in markets that are characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property operations and appreciation. We are focused on the coastal gateway markets of Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California (including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego), San Francisco and Seattle. These markets generally feature one or more of the following characteristics that allow us to increase rents:

•High home ownership costs;
•Strong economic growth leading to job growth and household formation, which in turn leads to high demand for our apartments;
•Urban and high-density suburban locations with an attractive quality of life leading to high resident demand and retention;
•Favorable demographics contributing to a larger pool of target residents with a high propensity or greater preference to rent apartments; and
•Higher barriers to entry where, because of land scarcity or government regulation, it is typically more difficult or costly to build new apartment properties, creating limits on new supply.

We believe our strategy also capitalizes on the increasing preference of renters of all ages to live in the urban core of cities or dense suburban locations near transit, entertainment and cultural amenities. Millennials, the approximately 78 million people born between 1981 and 2000, are a prime apartment rental demographic. Reports also show a growing trend among aging Baby Boomers, a demographic of more than 76 million people born between 1946 and 1964, toward apartment rentals. We believe that both groups appreciate the locational values described above as well as the flexibility that rental apartments offer.

Our operating focus is on balancing occupancy and rental rates to maximize our revenue while exercising tight cost control to generate the highest possible return to our shareholders. Revenue is maximized by attracting qualified prospects to our properties, cost-effectively converting these prospects into new residents and keeping our residents satisfied so they will renew their leases upon expiration. While we believe that it is our high-quality, well-located assets that bring our customers to us, it is the customer service and superior value provided by our on-site personnel that keeps them renting with us and recommending us to their friends.

We use technology to engage our customers in the way that they want to be engaged. Many of our residents utilize our web-based resident portal which allows them to sign and renew their leases, review their accounts and make payments, provide feedback and make service requests on-line.

Acquisitions and developments may be financed from various sources of capital, which may include retained cash flow, issuance of additional equity and debt, sales of properties and joint venture arrangements. In addition, the Company may acquire properties in transactions that include OP Units as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer, in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales.

As part of its strategy, the Company purchases completed and fully occupied apartment properties, partially completed or partially occupied properties and may acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell based on market opportunities as well as options to buy more land in the future. The Company may also seek to acquire properties by purchasing defaulted or distressed debt that encumbers desirable properties in the hope of obtaining title to property through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure proceedings.

Over the past several years, the Company has done an extensive repositioning of its portfolio into urban and highly walkable, close-in suburban assets. Since 2005, the Company has sold approximately 199,000 apartment units primarily located in the less dense portion of suburban markets for an aggregate sales price of approximately $23.8 billion, acquired nearly 70,000 apartment units primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets for approximately $20.5 billion and began approximately $5.9 billion of development projects primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets. We are currently seeking to acquire and develop assets in the following coastal gateway metropolitan areas: Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California, San Francisco and Seattle.

We endeavor to provide a richly diverse work environment that employs the highest performers, cultivates the best ideas and creates the widest possible platform for success. We are committed to elevating and supporting the core values of diversity and inclusion, total well-being (which brings together physical, financial, career, social and community well-being into a cohesive whole), and environmental, social and governance ("ESG"), which includes sustainability and social responsibility, by actively engaging in these areas. Each member of the executive team maintains an annual goal related to these core values. Our goal is to create and sustain an inclusive environment where diversity will thrive, employees will want to work and residents will want to live. We are committed to providing our employees with encouragement, guidance, time and resources to learn and apply the skills required to succeed in their jobs. We provide many classroom and on-line training courses to assist our employees in interacting with prospects and residents as well as extensive training for our customer service specialists in maintaining our properties and improvements, equipment and appliances. We actively promote from within and many senior corporate and property leaders have risen from entry level or junior positions. We monitor our employees' engagement by surveying them annually and find most employees say they are proud to work at the Company, value one another as colleagues, believe in our mission and values and feel their skills meet their job requirements.

We have a commitment to sustainability and consider the environmental impacts of our business activities. Sustainability and social responsibility are key drivers of our focus on creating the best apartment communities for residents to live, work and play. We have a dedicated in-house team that initiates and applies sustainable practices in all aspects of our business, including investment activities, development, property operations and property management activities. With its high density, multifamily

housing is, by its nature, an environmentally friendly property type. Our recent acquisition and development activities have been primarily concentrated in pedestrian-friendly urban and close-in suburban locations near public transportation. When developing and renovating our properties, we strive to reduce energy and water consumption by investing in energy saving technology while positively impacting the experience of our residents and the value of our assets. We continue to implement a combination of irrigation, lighting, HVAC and renewable energy improvements at our properties that will reduce energy and water consumption. The Company was named the 2017 Global Residential Listed Sector Leader in ESG by GRESB, a globally recognized analysis of the ESG indicators of more than 800 real estate portfolios worldwide. The Company was also recently awarded the 2017 Residential Leader in the Light award for sustainability by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). For additional information regarding our sustainability efforts, see our December 2017 Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report at our website, www.equityapartments.com. This report was reviewed and approved by the Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Trustees, which monitors the Company’s ongoing ESG efforts. For 2018, we continue to have an express company-wide goal regarding enhanced ESG efforts. Employees, including our executives, will have their performance against our various ESG goals evaluated as part of our annual performance review process.

Please refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the Company’s Results of Operations and Liquidity.

Starwood Transaction

The Company executed an agreement with controlled affiliates of Starwood Capital Group (“Starwood”) on October 23, 2015 to sell a portfolio of 72 operating properties consisting of 23,262 apartment units located in five markets across the United States for $5.365 billion (the “Starwood Transaction” or “Starwood Portfolio”). On January 26 and 27, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of the entire portfolio described above. The sale of the Starwood Portfolio, combined with the other 2016 dispositions, resulted in the Company’s exit from the South Florida, Denver and New England (excluding Boston) markets and substantially completed the Company’s portfolio transformation which started approximately ten years ago. These sales narrowed the Company’s focus, which is now entirely directed towards our coastal gateway markets.

The Company used the majority of the proceeds from the Starwood Transaction and other 2016 dispositions to pay two special dividends to its shareholders and holders of OP Units of $11.00 per share/unit in the aggregate, consisting of special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016. The Company used the majority of the remaining proceeds to reduce aggregate indebtedness in order to make the transaction leverage neutral. The Company retired approximately $2.0 billion in secured and unsecured debt, the majority of which was scheduled to mature in 2016 and 2017, which improved the Company’s already strong credit metrics.

Competition

All of the Company’s properties are located in developed areas that include other multifamily properties. The number of competitive multifamily properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Company’s ability to lease apartment units at its properties and on the rents charged. The Company may be competing with other entities that have greater resources than the Company and whose managers have more experience than the Company’s managers. In addition, other forms of rental properties and single family housing provide housing alternatives to potential residents of multifamily properties. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information with respect to competition.

Environmental Considerations

See Item 1A. Risk Factors for information concerning the potential effects of environmental regulations on our operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

General

References to “EQR” mean Equity Residential, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “ERPOP” mean ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, when used in this section, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP and the term “Operating Partnership” means collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP. This Item 1A. includes forward-looking statements. You should refer to

our discussion of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements included in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The occurrence of the events discussed in the following risk factors could adversely affect, possibly in a material manner, our business, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect the value of our common shares of beneficial interest or preferred shares of beneficial interest (which we refer to collectively as “Shares”), Preference Units, OP Units, restricted units and our public unsecured debt. In this section, we refer to the Shares, Preference Units, OP Units, restricted units and public unsecured debt together as our “securities” and the investors who own such securities as our “security holders”.

Our performance and securities value are subject to risks associated with the real estate industry.

General

Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk and are relatively illiquid. Numerous factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our properties and the ability to realize that value. These factors include changes in the global, national, regional and local political and economic climates, local conditions such as an oversupply of multifamily properties or a reduction in demand for our multifamily properties, the attractiveness of our properties to residents, competition from other multifamily properties and single family homes (both as rentals and owned housing) and changes in market rental rates. Our performance also depends on our ability to collect rent from residents and to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance and other operating costs, including real estate taxes, all of which could increase over time. Besides utilities, we are generally not able to pass through to our residents under existing leases any other operating expenses, including real estate taxes. These operating expenses could rise faster than our revenues causing our income to decline. In circumstances where we buy or sell properties, including large portfolios of properties, overhead (property management expense and general and administrative expense) may not increase/decrease proportionally with the associated changes in revenue. Costs of labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may be more expensive than anticipated. Also, the expenses of owning and operating a property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in income from the property.

We may be unable to renew leases or relet units as leases expire.

When our residents decide to leave our apartments, we may not be able to relet their apartment units. Even if the residents do renew or we can relet the apartment units, the terms of renewal or reletting may be less favorable than current lease terms. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the apartment units, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. If residents do not experience increases in their income, we may be unable to increase rent and/or delinquencies may increase. Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local political, economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use, rental housing subsidized by the government, other government programs that favor single family rental housing or owner occupied housing over multifamily rental housing, governmental regulations, slow or negative employment growth and household formation, the availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers, changes in social preferences and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond our control. Finally, the federal government’s policies, many of which may encourage home ownership, can increase competition, possibly limit our ability to raise rents in our markets and lower the value of our properties. Consequently, our cash flow and ability to service debt and make distributions to security holders could be reduced.

The retail/commercial space (including parking garages) at our properties primarily serves as an additional amenity for our residents and neighbors. The long-term nature of our retail/commercial leases (generally five to ten years with market based renewal options) and the characteristics of many of our retail/commercial tenants (generally small, local businesses) may subject us to certain risks. We may not be able to lease new space for rents that are consistent with our projections or for market rates. Also, when leases for our existing retail/commercial space expire, the space may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than the current lease terms. Our properties compete with other properties with retail/commercial space. The presence of competitive alternatives may affect our ability to lease space and the level of rents we can obtain. If our retail/commercial tenants experience financial distress or bankruptcy, they may fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations or cease their operations which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. The revenues from our retail/commercial space represent approximately 4.6% of our total rental income.

Changes in rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations and eviction laws and regulations in our markets could have an adverse effect on our operations and property values.

Various state and local governments have enacted and may continue to enact rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations or take other actions which could limit our ability to raise rents or charge certain fees such as pet fees or application fees. We have seen a recent increase in governments considering or being urged by advocacy groups to consider rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations. For example, California may have a ballot measure in November 2018 that would seek to repeal an existing state law that limits the ability of local governments to enact some forms of rent control. Depending on the extent and terms of future enactments of rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations, as well as any lawsuits against the Company arising from such issues, such future enactments could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and the value of our properties.

State and local governments may also make changes to eviction and other tenants’ rights laws and regulations that could have an adverse impact on our operations and property values. Under current laws and regulations, eviction proceedings for delinquent residents are already costly and time-consuming, especially in markets like New York where housing courts are backlogged. If we are restricted from releasing apartment units due to the inability to evict

Showing the first 8K of 110K characters. Open the full section

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2017, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 305 properties located in 10 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 78,611 apartment units. See Item 1, Business, for additional information regarding the Company’s properties and the markets/metro areas upon which we are focused. The Company’s properties are summarized by building type in the following table:

TypePropertiesApartment UnitsAverage Apartment Units
Garden10727,007252
Mid/High-Rise19851,604261
30578,611258

The Company’s properties are summarized by ownership type in the following table:

PropertiesApartment Units
Wholly Owned Properties28373,598
Master-Leased Properties – Consolidated3853
Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated173,215
Partially Owned Properties – Unconsolidated2945
30578,611

The following table sets forth certain information by market relating to the Company’s properties at December 31, 2017:

Portfolio Summary
Markets/Metro AreasPropertiesApartment Units% of Stabilized NOI (A)Average Rental Rate (B)
Los Angeles7116,16018.6%$2,454
Orange County134,0284.4%2,142
San Diego123,3853.9%2,288
Subtotal – Southern California9623,57326.9%2,375
San Francisco5412,96119.5%3,089
Washington D.C.4815,81117.3%2,360
New York3910,46216.5%3,758
Boston246,2639.9%3,001
Seattle418,4609.9%2,365
Other Markets1136—%1,157
Total30377,666100.0%2,729
Unconsolidated Properties2945——
Grand Total30578,611100.0%$2,729

Note: Projects under development are not included in the Portfolio Summary until construction has been completed.

(A)% of Stabilized NOI - Represents budgeted 2018 NOI for stabilized properties and projected annual NOI at stabilization (defined as having achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months) for properties that are in lease-up.
(B)Average Rental Rate - Total residential rental revenues reflected on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period presented.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s same store occupancy was 95.9% and its total portfolio-wide occupancy, which includes completed development properties in various stages of lease-up, was 95.0%. Certain of the Company’s properties are encumbered by mortgages and additional detail can be found on Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation. Resident leases are generally for twelve months in length and can require security deposits. The garden-style properties are generally defined as properties with two and/or three story buildings while the mid-rise/high-rise are defined as properties with greater than three story buildings. These two property types typically provide residents with amenities, such as rooftop decks and swimming pools, fitness centers and community rooms. In addition, many of our urban properties have parking garage and/or retail components.

The consolidated properties currently in various stages of development and lease-up at December 31, 2017 are included in the following table:

Development and Lease-Up Projects as of December 31, 2017
(Amounts in thousands except for project and apartment unit amounts)
ProjectsLocationNo. of Apartment UnitsTotal Budgeted Capital Cost (1)Total Book Value to DateTotal Book Value Not Placed in ServiceTotal DebtPercentage CompletedPercentage LeasedPercentage OccupiedEstimated Completion DateEstimated Stabilization Date
Projects Under Development:
855 BrannanSan Francisco, CA449$304,035$296,916$90,676$—96%55%50%Q1 2018Q1 2019
100 K StreetWashington D.C.22288,02345,60345,603—33%——Q4 2018Q4 2019
1401 E. MadisonSeattle, WA13762,35218,33418,334—3%——Q3 2019Q1 2020
249 Third StreetCambridge, MA8451,4478,9348,934—1%——Q4 2019Q2 2020
Projects Under Development892505,857369,787163,547—
Completed Not Stabilized (2):
455 Eye StreetWashington D.C.17473,15772,972——96%91%CompletedQ1 2018
Helios (formerly 2nd & Pine)Seattle, WA398227,287220,101——54%48%CompletedQ2 2019
CascadeSeattle, WA477176,378169,597——50%47%CompletedQ2 2019
Projects Completed Not Stabilized1,049476,822462,670——
Completed and Stabilized During the Quarter:
Altitude (formerly Village at Howard Hughes)Los Angeles, CA545192,331191,747——96%95%CompletedStabilized
The Alton (formerly Millikan)Irvine, CA344107,381106,795——96%95%CompletedStabilized
One Henry AdamsSan Francisco, CA241169,437167,256——96%93%CompletedStabilized
Projects Completed and Stabilized During the Quarter1,130469,149465,798——
Total Development Projects3,071$1,451,828$1,298,255$163,547$—
Land Held for DevelopmentN/AN/A$98,963$98,963$—

Note: All development projects are wholly owned by the Company.

(1)Total Budgeted Capital Cost - Estimated cost for projects under development and/or developed and all capitalized costs incurred to date plus any estimates of costs remaining to be funded for all projects, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, capitalized real estate taxes and insurance, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all in accordance with GAAP.
(2)Properties included here are substantially complete. However, they may still require additional exterior and interior work for all apartment units to be available for leasing.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

As of December 31, 2017, the Company does not believe there is any litigation pending or threatened against it that, individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Common Share Market Prices and Dividends (Equity Residential)

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the high, low and closing sales prices for and the distributions declared on the Company’s Common Shares, which trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol EQR.

Sales Price
HighLowClosingDistributions
2017
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2017$70.46$63.20$63.77$0.50375
Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2017$68.77$63.98$65.93$0.50375
Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2017$68.83$61.59$65.83$0.50375
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2017$65.71$59.49$62.22$0.50375
2016
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2016$65.14$58.28$64.36$0.50375
Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2016$71.53$62.39$64.33$3.50375
Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2016$75.49$63.11$68.88$0.50375
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2016$81.76$66.62$75.03$8.50375

Note: In addition to the regular quarterly dividends in 2016, the Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016.

The number of record holders of Common Shares at February 16, 2018 was approximately 2,300. The number of outstanding Common Shares as of February 16, 2018 was 368,169,571.

Unit Dividends (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

There is no established public market for the Units (OP Units and restricted units).

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the distributions declared on the Operating Partnership’s Units.

Distributions
20172016
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31,$0.50375$0.50375
Third Quarter Ended September 30,$0.50375$3.50375
Second Quarter Ended June 30,$0.50375$0.50375
First Quarter Ended March 31,$0.50375$8.50375

Note: In addition to the regular quarterly dividends in 2016, the Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016.

The number of record holders of Units in the Operating Partnership at February 16, 2018 was approximately 500. The number of outstanding Units as of February 16, 2018 was 382,197,057.

Unregistered Common Shares Issued in the Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 (Equity Residential)

During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, EQR issued 41,549 Common Shares in exchange for 41,549 OP Units held by various limited partners of ERPOP. OP Units are generally exchangeable into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis or, at the option of ERPOP, the cash equivalent thereof, at any time one year after the date of issuance. These shares were either registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as these were transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In light of the manner of the sale and information obtained by EQR from the limited partners in connection with these transactions, EQR believes it may rely on these exemptions.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017 with respect to the Company’s Common Shares that may be issued under its existing equity compensation plans.

Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities in column (a))
(a) (1)(b) (1)(c) (2)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders6,483,832$46.469,751,123
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholdersN/AN/AN/A
(1)The amounts shown in columns (a) and (b) of the above table do not include 369,741 outstanding Common Shares (all of which are restricted and subject to vesting requirements) that were granted under the Company’s 2011 Share Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2011 Plan”) and outstanding Common Shares that have been purchased by employees and trustees under the Company’s ESPP.
(2)Includes 6,913,246 Common Shares that may be issued under the 2011 Plan, of which only 33% may be in the form of restricted shares/units, and 2,837,877 Common Shares that may be sold to employees and trustees under the ESPP.

Any Common Shares issued pursuant to EQR’s incentive equity compensation and employee share purchase plans will result in ERPOP issuing OP Units to EQR on a one-for-one basis, with ERPOP receiving the net cash proceeds of such issuances.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth selected financial and operating information on a historical basis for the Company and the Operating Partnership. The following information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The historical operating and balance sheet data have been derived from the historical financial statements of the Company and the Operating Partnership. Selected cash flow amounts have also been restated in accordance with the Company’s early adoption of the new statement of cash flows guidance effective October 1, 2017 (see Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). Certain capitalized terms as used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Financial information in thousands except for per share and property data)

Year Ended December 31,
20172016201520142013
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenues from continuing operations$2,471,406$2,425,800$2,744,965$2,614,748$2,387,702
Interest and other income$6,136$65,773$7,372$4,462$5,283
Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties$157,057$4,044,055$335,134$212,685$—
Income (loss) from continuing operations$628,381$4,479,586$907,621$657,101$(168,174)
Discontinued operations, net$—$518$397$1,582$2,073,527
Net income$628,381$4,480,104$908,018$658,683$1,905,353
Net income available to Common Shares$600,363$4,289,072$863,277$627,163$1,826,468
Earnings per share – basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Common Shares$1.64$11.75$2.37$1.73$(0.47)
Net income available to Common Shares$1.64$11.75$2.37$1.74$5.16
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding366,968365,002363,498361,181354,305
Earnings per share – diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Common Shares$1.63$11.68$2.36$1.72$(0.47)
Net income available to Common Shares$1.63$11.68$2.36$1.73$5.16
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding382,678381,992380,620377,735354,305
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding$2.015$13.015$2.21$2.00$1.85
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation$26,026,896$25,386,425$25,182,352$27,675,383$26,800,948
Real estate, after accumulated depreciation$19,986,518$20,026,036$20,276,946$22,242,578$21,993,239
Real estate held for sale$—$—$2,181,135$—$—
Total assets$20,570,599$20,704,148$23,110,196$22,902,160$22,789,040
Total debt$8,957,291$8,987,258$10,921,366$10,796,407$10,720,749
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership$366,955$442,092$566,783$500,733$363,144
Total shareholders’ equity$10,242,464$10,229,078$10,470,368$10,368,456$10,507,201
Total Noncontrolling Interests$231,399$231,906$225,987$339,320$337,995
OTHER DATA:
Total properties (at end of period)305302394391390
Total apartment units (at end of period)78,61177,458109,652109,225109,855
Funds from operations available to Common Shares and Units – basic (1)$1,204,904$1,123,530$1,323,786$1,190,915$872,421
Normalized funds from operations available to Common Shares and Units – basic (1)$1,199,237$1,179,650$1,317,802$1,196,446$1,057,073
Cash flow provided by (used for):
Operating activities$1,265,788$1,214,123$1,356,628$1,324,611$1,085,809
Investing activities$(594,296)$5,903,942$(695,814)$(678,468)$(120,454)
Financing activities$(789,818)$(7,054,092)$(666,167)$(685,412)$(1,637,779)

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Financial information in thousands except for per Unit and property data)

Year Ended December 31,
20172016201520142013
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenues from continuing operations$2,471,406$2,425,800$2,744,965$2,614,748$2,387,702
Interest and other income$6,136$65,773$7,372$4,462$5,283
Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties$157,057$4,044,055$335,134$212,685$—
Income (loss) from continuing operations$628,381$4,479,586$907,621$657,101$(168,174)
Discontinued operations, net$—$518$397$1,582$2,073,527
Net income$628,381$4,480,104$908,018$658,683$1,905,353
Net income available to Units$622,967$4,460,583$897,518$651,994$1,901,746
Earnings per Unit – basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units$1.64$11.75$2.37$1.73$(0.47)
Net income available to Units$1.64$11.75$2.37$1.74$5.16
Weighted average Units outstanding379,869378,829377,074374,899368,038
Earnings per Unit – diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units$1.63$11.68$2.36$1.72$(0.47)
Net income available to Units$1.63$11.68$2.36$1.73$5.16
Weighted average Units outstanding382,678381,992380,620377,735368,038
Distributions declared per Unit outstanding$2.015$13.015$2.21$2.00$1.85
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation$26,026,896$25,386,425$25,182,352$27,675,383$26,800,948
Real estate, after accumulated depreciation$19,986,518$20,026,036$20,276,946$22,242,578$21,993,239
Real estate held for sale$—$—$2,181,135$—$—
Total assets$20,570,599$20,704,148$23,110,196$22,902,160$22,789,040
Total debt$8,957,291$8,987,258$10,921,366$10,796,407$10,720,749
Redeemable Limited Partners$366,955$442,092$566,783$500,733$363,144
Total partners’ capital$10,469,155$10,450,375$10,691,747$10,582,867$10,718,613
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties$4,708$10,609$4,608$124,909$126,583
OTHER DATA:
Total properties (at end of period)305302394391390
Total apartment units (at end of period)78,61177,458109,652109,225109,855
Funds from operations available to Units – basic (1)$1,204,904$1,123,530$1,323,786$1,190,915$872,421
Normalized funds from operations available to Units – basic (1)$1,199,237$1,179,650$1,317,802$1,196,446$1,057,073
Cash flow provided by (used for):
Operating activities$1,265,788$1,214,123$1,356,628$1,324,611$1,085,809
Investing activities$(594,296)$5,903,942$(695,814)$(678,468)$(120,454)
Financing activities$(789,818)$(7,054,092)$(666,167)$(685,412)$(1,637,779)
(1)See Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a reconciliation of net income to FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and the definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company and the Operating Partnership should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Due to the Company’s ability to control the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary entity has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, except for two unconsolidated operating properties. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are as defined elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements in this Item 7 as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management. While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management’s control. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results or events. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or supplement these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to the following:

•We intend to actively acquire, develop and renovate multifamily properties for rental operations as market conditions dictate. We may also acquire multifamily properties that are unoccupied or in the early stages of lease-up. We may be unable to lease these apartment properties on schedule, resulting in decreases in expected rental revenues and/or lower yields due to lower occupancy and rental rates as well as higher than expected concessions or higher than expected operating expenses. We may not be able to achieve rents that are consistent with expectations for acquired, developed or renovated properties. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position, to complete a development property or to complete a renovation. Additionally, we expect that other real estate investors with capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development and acquisition efforts. This competition (or lack thereof) may increase (or depress) prices for multifamily properties. We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms. We have acquired in the past and intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of properties, including large portfolios of properties, that could increase our size and result in alterations to our capital structure. The total number of apartment units under development, costs of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation;
•Debt financing and other capital required by the Company may not be available or may only be available on adverse terms;
•Labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may be more expensive than anticipated;
•Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local political, economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use, rental housing subsidized by the government, other government programs that favor single family rental housing or owner occupied housing over multifamily rental housing, slow or negative employment growth and household formation, the availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers, changes in social preferences, governmental regulations (including rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations) and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond the Company’s control; and
•Additional factors as discussed in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly those under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Overview

See Item 1. Business for discussion regarding the Company’s overview.

Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies

See Item 1. Business for discussion regarding the Company’s business objectives and operating and investing strategies.

Results of Operations

2017 and 2016 Transactions

In conjunction with our business objectives and operating strategy, the Company continued to invest in apartment properties located in our coastal gateway markets and sell apartment properties located primarily in the less dense portion of suburban markets and/or properties that are functionally or locationally challenged during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2017:

•Acquired four consolidated apartment properties, located in the Seattle (two properties), Boston and Los Angeles markets, consisting of 947 apartment units for approximately $468.0 million at a weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate (see definition below) of 4.8%;
•Sold five consolidated apartment properties, located in the Boston (three properties), New York and San Diego markets, consisting of 1,194 apartment units for approximately $355.0 million, at a weighted average Disposition Yield (see definition below) of 5.1% and generating an Unlevered IRR (see definition below) of 12.4%;
•Started construction on two projects, located in the Boston and Seattle markets, consisting of 221 apartment units totaling approximately $113.8 million of expected development costs; and
•Substantially completed construction on four projects, located in the Orange County, Washington D.C. and Seattle (two properties) markets, consisting of 1,393 apartment units totaling approximately $584.2 million of development costs and stabilized five development projects, located in the San Francisco (three properties), Los Angeles and Orange County markets, consisting of 1,931 apartments units totaling approximately $983.1 million of development costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2016:

•Acquired four consolidated apartment properties consisting of 573 apartment units for approximately $249.3 million at a weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate of 4.8%;
•Sold 98 consolidated apartment properties consisting of 29,440 apartment units for approximately $6.8 billion, which includes the sale of the Starwood Portfolio consisting of 72 consolidated apartment properties containing 23,262 apartment units for $5.365 billion, at a weighted average Disposition Yield of 5.4% and generating an Unlevered IRR of 11.8%;

| | • | Sold one unconsolidated property consist

Showing the first 8K of 98K characters. Open the full section

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates primarily relates to the refinancing of its long-term debt and floating interest rate instruments that include its unsecured revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, floating rate tax-exempt debt and fair value hedges that convert fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. These exposures to interest rates are primarily driven by changes in long-term U.S. Treasury rates for refinancing activity, changes in short-term LIBOR borrowing rates and the SIFMA index for floating rate debt and changes in commercial paper market conditions. The Company evaluates various factors including its total debt, the current and future anticipated economic environment and other factors to manage this risk. We generally hedge a portion of future long-term debt issuances and target a level of floating rate debt of 20% or less depending upon market conditions. To the extent the Company carries substantial cash balances, this will tend to partially counterbalance any changes in interest rates.

The Company also utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to manage market risk. Derivatives are used to convert floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis or vice versa as well as to partially lock in rates on future debt issuances. Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes. See also Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments.

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments (including such items in the financial statement captions as cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities) approximate their carrying or contract values based on their nature, terms and interest rates that approximate current market rates. The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured debt (including its commercial paper and line of credit, if applicable) were approximately $3.6 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2017.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.4 billion, or 15.4% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 16 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.2 million. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently decreased by 16 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.2 million.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $7.6 billion, or 84.6% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest permanently increased by 47 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $6.9 billion. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 47 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $8.5 billion.

At December 31, 2017, the Company’s derivative instruments had a net asset fair value of approximately $3.5 million. If market rates of interest permanently increased by 24 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $7.7 million. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 24 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net liability fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $0.7 million.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.1 billion, or 12.3% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 11 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently decreased by 11 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $7.9 billion, or 87.7% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest permanently increased by 49 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $7.2 billion. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 49 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $8.8 billion.

At December 31, 2016, the Company’s derivative instruments had a net asset fair value of approximately $1.9 million. If market rates of interest permanently increased by 24 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $0.4 million. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 24 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $3.4 million.

These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the Company’s financial instruments. The foregoing assumptions apply to the entire amount of the Company’s debt and derivative instruments and do not differentiate among maturities. These analyses do not consider the effects of the changes in overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of changes of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the changes. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, this analysis assumes no changes in the Company’s financial structure or results.

The Company cannot predict the effect of adverse changes in interest rates on its debt and derivative instruments and, therefore, its exposure to market risk, nor can there be any assurance that long-term debt will be available at advantageous pricing. Consequently, future results may differ materially from the estimated adverse changes discussed above.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Equity Residential

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Effective as of December 31, 2017, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

Equity Residential’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Based on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited as of December 31, 2017 by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Company identified in connection with the Company’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ERP Operating Limited Partnership

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Effective as of December 31, 2017, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Based on the Operating Partnership’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited as of December 31, 2017 by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Operating Partnership identified in connection with the Operating Partnership’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters; Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence; and Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14 is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, Equity Residential’s Proxy Statement, which the Company intends to file no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Equity Residential is the general partner and 96.4% owner of ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(1)Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
(2)Exhibits: See the Exhibit Index.
(3)Financial Statement Schedules: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

EXHIBIT INDEX

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report. References to exhibits or other filings under the caption “Location” indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference. The Commission file numbers for our Exchange Act filings referenced below are 1-12252 (Equity Residential) and 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership).

ExhibitDescriptionLocation
3.1Articles of Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Equity Residential dated December 9, 2004.Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
3.2Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential, effective as of October 1, 2015.Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 8-K dated and filed on October 1, 2015.
3.3First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential, dated November 20, 2017.Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 8-K dated and filed on November 20, 2017.
3.4Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for ERP Operating Limited Partnership dated as of March 12, 2009.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential’s and ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated March 12, 2009, filed on March 18, 2009.
4.1Indenture, dated October 1, 1994, between the Operating Partnership and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee (“Indenture”).Included as Exhibit 4(a) to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form S-3 filed on October 7, 1994. **
4.2First Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2004.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004.
4.3Second Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of August 23, 2006.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated August 16, 2006, filed on August 23, 2006.
4.4Third Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2007, filed on June 1, 2007.
4.5Fourth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of December 12, 2011.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.
4.6Fifth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2016.Included as Exhibit 4.6 to Equity Residential’s and ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
4.7Form of 2.375% Note due July 1, 2019.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated June 16, 2014, filed on June 18, 2014.
4.8Form of 4.75% Note due July 15, 2020.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated July 12, 2010, filed on July 15, 2010.
4.9Form of 4.625% Note due December 15, 2021.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.
4.10Form of 3.00% Note due April 15, 2023.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated April 3, 2013, filed on April 8, 2013.
4.11Form of 3.375% Note due June 1, 2025.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.
4.12Terms Agreement regarding 7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026.Included as Exhibit 1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on August 13, 1996.
4.13Form of 2.850% Note due November 1, 2026.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated October 4, 2016, filed on October 7, 2016.
4.14Form of 3.250% Note due August 1, 2027.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential’s and ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated July 31, 2017, filed on August 2, 2017.
4.15Form of 4.500% Note due July 1, 2044.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated June 16, 2014, filed on June 18, 2014.
4.16Form of 4.500% Note due June 1, 2045.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.
4.17Form of 4.000% Note due August 1, 2047.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to Equity Residential’s and ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated July 31, 2017, filed on August 2, 2017.
ExhibitDescriptionLocation
10.1*Noncompetition Agreement (Zell).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential’s Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **
10.2*Noncompetition Agreement (Spector).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential’s Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **
10.3*Form of Noncompetition Agreement (other officers).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential’s Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **
10.4[Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 3, 2016 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and a syndicate of other banks (the “Credit Agreement”).](http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/906107/000119312516758

Showing the first 8K of 394K characters. Open the full section