Vivmark Residential 10-Q 2026-06-30
Filed 2026-07-30. 8 sections, 240K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON
Cover and table of contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| ☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2026 |
OR
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 1-12252 (Equity Residential)
Commission File Number: 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Maryland (Equity Residential) | 13-3675988 (Equity Residential) | |
| Illinois (ERP Operating Limited Partnership) | 36-3894853 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership) | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| Two North Riverside Plaza**,** Chicago**,** Illinois 60606 | (312) 474-1300 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
| Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 Par Value (Equity Residential) | EQR | New York Stock Exchange | ||
| 7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership) | N/A | New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| Equity Residential Yes ☒ No ☐ | ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☒ No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
| Equity Residential Yes ☒ No ☐ | ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☒ No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Equity Residential:
| Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
l
ERP Operating Limited Partnership:
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
| Equity Residential ☐ | ERP Operating Limited Partnership ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
| Equity Residential Yes ☐ No ☒ | ERP Operating Limited Partnership Yes ☐ No ☒ |
The number of EQR Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value, outstanding on July 24, 2026 was 374,944,409.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2026 of Equity Residential and ERP Operating Limited Partnership. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “EQR” mean Equity Residential, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “ERPOP” mean ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP. The following chart illustrates the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s corporate structure:

EQR is the general partner of, and as of June 30, 2026 owned an approximate 97.6% ownership interest in, ERPOP. The remaining 2.4% interest is owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of ERPOP, EQR has exclusive control of ERPOP’s day-to-day management. Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of EQR consists of the same members as the management of ERPOP.
The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and EQR contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings to ERPOP. In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units (see definition below) in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering. The Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of OP Units as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales. This is one of the reasons why the Company is structured in the manner shown above. Based on the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, OP Units can be exchanged with Common Shares on a one-for-one basis because the Company maintains a one-for-one relationship between the OP Units of ERPOP issued to EQR and the outstanding Common Shares.
The Company believes that combining the reports on Form 10-Q of EQR and ERPOP into this single report provides the following benefits:
-
enhances investors’ understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
-
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
-
creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between EQR and ERPOP in the context of how EQR and ERPOP operate as a consolidated company. All of the Company’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. EQR’s primary function is acting as the general partner of ERPOP. EQR also issues equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP. EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantial
Showing the first 8K of 148K characters. Open the full section
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For further information including definitions for capitalized terms not defined herein, refer to the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-looking statements are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management. While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, with respect to our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our pending Merger with AvalonBay or to complete the pending Merger on the terms or timing contemplated or at all. Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management’s control. Additional factors that might cause such differences are discussed in Part I of the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, particularly those under Item 1A, Risk Factors. Additional factors are also included in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report*.* Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results or events. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or supplement these forward-looking statements.
Overview
Equity Residential (“EQR”) is committed to creating communities where people thrive. The Company, a member of the S&P 500, owns and manages rental properties in dynamic metro areas across the U.S. ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) is focused on conducting the multifamily property business of EQR. EQR is a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993 and ERPOP is an Illinois limited partnership formed in May 1993. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.
EQR is the general partner of, and as of June 30, 2026 owned an approximate 97.6% ownership interest in, ERPOP. All of the Company’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. EQR issues equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, but does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company’s ownership interests in its joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.
The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and the Company also operates regional property management offices in most of its markets.
Available Information
You may access our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statements and any amendments to any of those reports/statements we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) free of charge on our website, www.equityapartments.com. These reports/statements are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with or furnish them to the SEC. The information contained on our website, including any information referred to in this report as being available on our website, is not a part of or incorporated into this report.
Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies
The Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s overall business objectives and operating and investing strategies have not changed from the information included in the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, except as it relates to the potential Merger transaction with AvalonBay as discussed further below.
Pending Merger
On May 20, 2026, EQR, ERPOP, AvalonBay and Merger Sub entered into the Merger Agreement, which provides for the combination of EQR and AvalonBay in a merger of equals transaction. Each of the Board of Trustees of EQR and the Board of Directors of AvalonBay has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, stockholders of AvalonBay will receive 2.793 Common Shares for each share of AvalonBay Common Stock if the Merger is completed. The Merger, which is currently expected to be completed in the second half of 2026, is subject to the approval of the issuance of shares of the Company in connection with the Merger by the Company’s shareholders, the approval of the Merger by the AvalonBay stockholders and other customary closing conditions. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the structural, accounting and conditional commitments associated with the pending Merger.
Results of Operations
2026 Transactions
In conjunction with our business objectives and operating and investing strategies, the following table provides a rollforward of the transactions that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2026:
Portfolio Rollforward
($ in thousands)
| Properties | Apartment Units | Sales Price | Disposition Yield | |||||||||||||
| 12/31/2025 | 312 | 85,190 | ||||||||||||||
| Dispositions: | ||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Rental Properties | (2 | ) | (515 | ) | $ | (164,000 | ) | (5.3 | %) | |||||||
| Completed Developments – Consolidated | 1 | 440 | ||||||||||||||
| Completed Developments – Unconsolidated | 1 | 369 | ||||||||||||||
| Configuration Changes | — | 36 | ||||||||||||||
| 6/30/2026 | 312 | 85,520 |
Dispositions
The consolidated properties disposed of were located in the Los Angeles and San Francisco markets.
Developments
Consolidated:
Completed construction on one partially owned consolidated apartment property, located in the Boston market, consisting of 440 apartment units totaling approximately $232.2 million of development costs.
Unconsolidated:
Completed construction on one partially owned unconsolidated apartment property, located in the Seattle market, consisting of 369 apartment units totaling approximately $185.3 million of development costs.
See Notes 4 and 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s real estate investments and investments in partially owned entities.
Comparison of the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 to the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2025
The following table presents a reconciliation of diluted earnings per share/unit for the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same periods in 2025:
| Six Months Ended June 30 | Quarter Ended June 30 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings per share/unit for period ended 2025 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 0.50 | |||
| Property NOI | 0.04 | 0.02 | |||||
| Interest expense | (0.03 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||
| Net gain/loss on property sales | (0.59 | ) | (0.20 | ) | |||
| Non-operating asset gains/losses | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||
| Depreciation expense | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||
| Other | (0.08 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||
| Diluted earnings per share/unit for period ended 2026 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.30 |
The Company’s primary financial measure for evaluating each of its apartment communities is net operating income (“NOI”). NOI represents rental income less direct property operating expenses (including real estate taxes and insurance). The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of its operating performance because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company’s apartment properties.
The following tables present reconciliations of net income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI, along with rental income, operating expenses and NOI per the consolidated statements of operations allocated between same store and non-same store/other results (amounts in thousands):
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Quarter Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 210,841 | $ | 463,583 | $ | (252,742 | ) | (54.5 | )% | $ | 117,740 | $ | 198,785 | $ | (81,045 | ) | (40.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property management | 73,290 | 70,602 | 2,688 | 3.8 | % | 38,149 | 34,786 | 3,363 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 33,505 | 36,786 | (3,281 | ) | (8.9 | )% | 16,640 | 18,531 | (1,891 | ) | (10.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 493,875 | 497,635 | (3,760 | ) | (0.8 | )% | 246,379 | 240,889 | 5,490 | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties | 16,776 | (212,432 | ) | 229,208 | (107.9 | )% | 16,744 | (58,280 | ) | 75,024 | (128.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest and other income | (15,192 | ) | (3,821 | ) | (11,371 | ) | 297.6 | % | (12,954 | ) | (2,129 | ) | (10,825 | ) | 508.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 50,792 | 8,961 | 41,831 | 466.8 | % | 10,004 | 4,805 | 5,199 | 108.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expense incurred, net | 159,832 | 147,431 | 12,401 | 8.4 | % | 82,462 | 75,317 | 7,145 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 4,290 | 4,247 | 43 | 1.0 | % | 2,145 | 2,103 | 42 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income and other tax expense (benefit) | 833 | 829 | 4 | 0.5 | % | 411 | 407 | 4 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities | 4,360 | 11,407 | (7,047 | ) | (61.8 | )% | 2,318 | 4,996 | (2,678 | ) | (53.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net (gain) loss on sales of land parcels | — | 78 | (78 | ) | (100.0 | )% | — | 11 | (11 | ) | (100.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total NOI | $ | 1,033,202 | $ | 1,025,306 | $ | 7,896 | 0.8 | % | $ | 520,038 | $ | 520,221 | $ | (183 | ) | (0.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||
| Rental income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Same store | $ | 1,490,275 | $ | 1,460,433 | $ | 29,842 | 2.0 | % | $ | 749,417 | $ | 735,526 | $ | 13,891 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-same store/other | 74,620 | 69,204 | 5,416 | 7.8 | % | 35,632 | 33,301 | 2,331 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total rental income | 1,564,895 | 1,529,637 | 35,258 | 2.3 | % | 785,049 | 768,827 | 16,222 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Same store | 486,146 | 470,201 | 15,945 | 3.4 | % | 239,928 | 232,943 | 6,985 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-same store/other | 45,547 | 34,130 | 11,417 | 33.5 | % | 25,083 | 15,663 | 9,420 | 60.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 531,693 | 504,331 | 27,362 | 5.4 | % | 265,011 | 248,606 | 16,405 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOI: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Same store | 1,004,129 | 990,232 | 13,897 | 1.4 | % | 509,489 | 502,583 | 6,906 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-same store/other | 29,073 | 35,074 | (6,001 | ) | (17.1 | )% | 10,549 | 17,638 | (7,089 | ) | (40.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total NOI | $ | 1,033,202 | $ | 1,025,306 | $ | 7,896 | 0.8 | % | $ | 520,038 | $ | 520,221 | $ | (183 | ) | (0.0 | )% |
Properties that the Company owned and were stabilized for all of both of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, which represented 78,385 apartment units, drove the Company’s results of operations. Properties are considered “stabilized” when they have achieved 90% Physical Occupancy for three consecutive months.
The following table provides results and statistics related to our Residential same store operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
June YTD 2026 vs. June YTD 2025
Same Store Residential Results/Statistics by Market
| Increase (Decrease) from Prior Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets/Metro Areas | Apartment Units | June YTD 26 % of Actual NOI | June YTD 26 Average Rental Rate | June YTD 26 Weighted Average Physical Occupancy % | June YTD 26 Turnover | Revenues | Expenses | NOI | Average Rental Rate | Physical Occupancy | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Los Angeles | 13,438 | 16.1 | % | $ | 3,007 | 95.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 0.8 | % | 4.6 | % | (0.9 | %) | 1.0 | % | (0.2 | %) | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orange County | 3,718 | 5.2 | % | 3,048 | 96.0 | % | 17.1 | % | 2.2 | % | 4.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.8 | % | (0.4 | %) | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Diego | 2,225 | 3.4 | % | 3,327 | 96.0 | % | 20.4 | % | 1.3 | % | 5.1 | % | 0.3 | % | 1.9 | % | (0.6 | %) | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subtotal – Southern California | 19,381 | 24.7 | % | 3,052 | 95.7 | % | 19.5 | % | 1.2 | % | 4.6 | % | (0.2 | %) | 1.5 | % | (0.3 | %) | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Francisco | 11,241 | 17.7 | % | 3,597 | 97.7 | % | 17.1 | % | 6.7 | % | (0.6 | %) | 9.9 | % | 6.0 | % | 0.6 | % | (1.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington, D.C. | 12,928 | 14.9 | % | 2,893 | 96.0 | % | 18.6 | % | 1.2 | % | 4.1 | % | (0.1 | %) | 2.4 | % | (1.1 | %) | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 8,235 | 14.3 | % | 4,954 | 97.6 | % | 16.5 | % | 4.2 | % | 3.1 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.3 | % | (0.1 | %) | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Boston | 6,908 | 10.6 | % | 3,748 | 95.9 | % | 19.3 | % | 1.6 | % | 6.4 | % | (0.5 | %) | 1.9 | % | (0.4 | %) | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seattle | 8,050 | 9.1 | % | 2,733 | 95.8 | % | 22.6 | % | 1.6 | % | 4.9 | % | 0.2 | % | 2.2 | % | (0.7 | %) | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Denver | 3,972 | 3.4 | % | 2,139 | 96.9 | % | 21.9 | % | (6.1 | %) | 2.4 | % | (10.0 | %) | (7.6 | %) | 1.4 | % | (2.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atlanta | 4,126 | 3.1 | % | 1,963 | 95.9 | % | 22.8 | % | (1.2 | %) | 5.1 | % | (4.4 | %) | (1.6 | %) | 0.4 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dallas/Austin | 3,544 | 2.2 | % | 1,819 | 95.8 | % | 23.7 | % | (1.3 | %) | (3.8 | %) | 0.6 | % | (1.9 | %) | 0.6 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 78,385 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,177 | 96.3 | % | 19.5 | % | 2.2 | % | 3.3 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.4 | % | (0.2 | %) | 0.3 | % |
Note: The above table reflects Residential same store results only. Residential operations account for more than 96.0% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026.
See Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for our disclosure of reportable segments.
The comparison discussions provided below detail the changes in results for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year period.
The increase in same store rental income is primarily driven by strong Physical Occupancy and better than anticipated renewal rates.
The increase in same store operating expenses is due primarily to:
Real estate taxes – A $4.0 million increase due to escalation in rates and assessed values;
Utilities – A $6.0 million increase primarily driven by higher costs for trash removal and higher commodity prices, particularly impacting electricity and gas; and
Repairs and maintenance - A $2.7 million increase primarily driven by costs associated with the implementation of various resident technology initiatives (including bulk Wi-Fi programs), which is more than offset by a corresponding increase in same store revenues.
Non-same store/other NOI results consist primarily of properties acquired in 2025, operations from the Company’s development properties, other corporate operations and operations prior to disposition from 2025 and 2026 sold properties. The decrease in NOI is primarily a result of the Company's 2025 and 2026 net disposition activity, partially offset by the lease-up activity from the Company's development activities and 2025 acquisition activity.
The increase in consolidated total NOI is a result of the Company’s higher NOI from same store properties, largely due to improvement in same store revenues and the Company's continued focus on same store expense efficiency, partially offset by lower NOI from non-same store properties as noted above.
See the reconciliation table of net income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI above for the dollar and percentage changes related to the comparison discussions provided below.
Property management expenses include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third-party management companies. The increases during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods are primarily attributable to increases in legal and professional fees and information technology expenses, partially offset by decreases in training and marketing expenses.
General and administrative expenses, which include corporate operating expenses, decreased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily due to decreases in payroll-related costs, partially offset by increases in legal and professional fees and other public company costs.
Depreciation expense decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year period, primarily as a result of in-place leases for 2024 acquisitions still being depreciated in 2025 and lower depreciation from properties sold in 2025 and 2026, partially offset by additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2025 and development properties placed in service during 2025 and 2026. Depreciation expense increased during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year period, primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2025 and development properties placed in service during 2025 and 2026, partially offset by lower depreciation from properties sold in 2025 and 2026.
Net gain on sales of real estate properties decreased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily due to a net loss on sale of two consolidated properties in 2026 as compared to a gain on sale of three consolidated properties in 2025.
Interest and other income increased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily due to a net increase in realized/unrealized gains on various investment securities and interest income on mortgages receivable.
Other expenses increased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily due to increases in litigation accruals (year-to-date period only), advocacy contributions and Merger transaction costs.
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, increased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily due to higher overall rates and debt balances, Merger financing costs and lower capitalized interest. The effective interest cost on all indebtedness, excluding debt extinguishment costs/prepayment penalties and Merger financing costs, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 3.96% as compared to 3.93% for the prior year period, and for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 was 3.95% as compared to 3.93% for the prior year period. The Company capitalized interest of approximately $4.7 million and $6.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $2.1 million and $2.8 million during the quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Loss from investments in unconsolidated entities decreased during the six months and quarter ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year periods, primarily as a result of lower net losses incurred on our unconsolidated development properties that recently stabilized, partially offset by losses incurred on our unconsolidated development properties which recently started lease-up activities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
With approximately $1.8 billion in readily available liquidity, a strong balance sheet, well-staggered debt maturities, very strong credit metrics and ample access to capital markets, the Company believes it is well positioned to meet its future obligations and take advantage of opportunities. See further discussion below.
Statements of Cash Flows
The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (amounts in thousands):
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | |||||||
| Cash flows provided by (used for): | ||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 702,398 | $ | 785,070 | ||||
| Investing activities | $ | (44,983 | ) | $ | (518,995 | ) | ||
| Financing activities | $ | (672,889 | ) | $ | (294,287 | ) |
The following provides information regarding the Company’s cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026.
Operating Activities
Our operating cash flows are primarily impacted by NOI and its components, such as Average Rental Rates, Physical Occupancy levels and operating expenses related to our properties. Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year period decreased by approximately $82.7 million primarily as a result of the NOI and other changes, as well as higher interest payments, discussed above in Results of Operations, the payment of approximately $58.7 million towards the settlement of various litigation proceedings (see Note 11 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion), the payment of Merger-related costs as well as the timing of certain other expense payments.
Investing Activities
Our investing cash flows are primarily impacted by our transaction activity (acquisitions/dispositions), development spend and capital expenditures. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, key drivers were:
Disposed of two consolidated rental properties, receiving net proceeds of approximately $153.2 million;
Invested $40.1 million primarily in consolidated development projects; and
Invested $160.3 million in capital expenditures to real estate.
Financing Activities
Our financing cash flows primarily relate to our borrowing activity (debt proceeds or repayment), distributions/dividends to shareholders/unitholders and other Common Share activity. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, key drivers were:
Received net proceeds of $81.2 million from our unsecured commercial paper note program;
Paid dividends/distributions on Common Shares, Preferred Shares, Units (including OP Units and restricted units) and noncontrolling interests in partially owned properties totaling approximately $541.6 million; and
Repurchased and retired 3,458,394 Common Shares, at a weighted average purchase price of $63.42 per share, for an aggregate purchased amount of approximately $219.4 million. See Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Short-Term Liquidity and Cash Proceeds
The Company generally expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to maintaining its existing properties and scheduled unsecured note and mortgage note repayments, through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and commercial paper program. Currently, the Company considers its cash provided by operating activities to be adequate to meet operating requirements and payments of distributions.
The following table presents the Company’s balances for cash and cash equivalents, restricted deposits and the available borrowing capacity on its revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (amounts in thousands):
| June 30, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 36,405 | $ | 55,904 | ||||
| Restricted deposits | $ | 106,975 | $ | 102,950 | ||||
| Unsecured revolving credit facility availability | $ | 1,828,536 | $ | 1,909,127 |
Credit Facility and Commercial Paper Program
The Company has a $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing December 3, 2030. The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $1.0 billion by adding lenders to the facility, obtaining the agreement of existing lenders to increase their commitments or incurring one or more term loans. The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") plus a spread (currently 0.725%), or based on bids received from the lending group,
and the Company pays an annual facility fee (currently 0.125%). Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the Company’s senior unsecured credit rating. See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of the Company’s credit facility.
The Company has an unsecured commercial paper note program under which it may borrow up to a maximum of $1.5 billion subject to market conditions. The notes will be sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and will rank pari passu with all of the Company’s other unsecured senior indebtedness.
The Company limits its utilization of the revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity to support its $1.5 billion commercial paper program along with certain other obligations. The following table presents the availability on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility as of July 24, 2026 (amounts in thousands):
| July 24, 2026 | ||||
| Unsecured revolving credit facility commitment | $ | 2,500,000 | ||
| Commercial paper balance outstanding | (792,000 | ) | ||
| Unsecured revolving credit facility balance outstanding | — | |||
| Other restricted amounts | (3,464 | ) | ||
| Unsecured revolving credit facility availability | $ | 1,704,536 |
Other
On May 20, 2026, the Company entered into a commitment letter for a senior unsecured bridge loan facility of up to $2.0 billion to fund potential transaction costs and refinancings of existing debt in connection with its pending Merger with AvalonBay. No amounts were drawn under the bridge loan facility during the six months ended June 30, 2026. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.
Dividend Policy
The Company declared a dividend/distribution for the first and second quarters of 2026 of $0.7025 per share/unit in each quarter, an annualized increase of 1.4% over the amount paid in 2025. All future dividends/distributions remain subject to the discretion of the Company’s Board of Trustees.
Total dividends/distributions paid in July 2026 amounted to $269.5 million (excluding distributions on Partially Owned Properties), which consisted of certain distributions declared during the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
Long-Term Financing and Capital Needs
The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, such as lump sum unsecured note and mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions and financing of development activities, through the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities (including additional OP Units), proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties and joint ventures, along with cash generated from operations after all distributions. The Company has a significant number of unencumbered properties available to secure additional mortgage borrowings should unsecured capital be unavailable or the cost of alternative sources of capital be too high. The value of and cash flow from these unencumbered properties are in excess of the requirements the Company must maintain in order to comply with covenants under its unsecured notes and line of credit. Of the $30.4 billion in investment in real estate on the Company’s balance sheet at June 30, 2026, $27.4 billion or 90.0% was unencumbered. However, there can be no assurances that these sources of capital will be available to the Company in the future on acceptable terms or otherwise. For additional details, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
EQR issues equity and guarantees certain debt of the Operating Partnership from time to time. EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.
The Company’s total debt summary schedule as of June 30, 2026 is as follows:
Debt Summary as of June 30, 2026
($ in thousands)
| Debt Balances | % of Total | |||||||
| Secured | $ | 1,591,821 | 19.3 | % | ||||
| Unsecured | 6,669,848 | 80.7 | % | |||||
| Total | $ | 8,261,669 | 100.0 | % | ||||
| Fixed Rate Debt: | ||||||||
| Secured – Conventional | $ | 1,404,902 | 17.0 | % | ||||
| Unsecured – Public | 6,002,002 | 72.7 | % | |||||
| Fixed Rate Debt | 7,406,904 | 89.7 | % | |||||
| Floating Rate Debt: | ||||||||
| Secured – Tax Exempt | 186,919 | 2.3 | % | |||||
| Unsecured – Revolving Credit Facility | — | — | ||||||
| Unsecured – Commercial Paper Program | 667,846 | 8.0 | % | |||||
| Floating Rate Debt | 854,765 | 10.3 | % | |||||
| Total | $ | 8,261,669 | 100.0 | % |
The Company’s long-term financing and capital needs and sources have not changed materially from the information included in the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, except as it relates to the potential Merger transaction with AvalonBay as discussed further above.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed from the information included in the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
The following is the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s reconciliation of net income to FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units for the six months and quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
(Amounts in thousands)
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Quarter Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 210,841 | $ | 463,583 | $ | 117,740 | $ | 198,785 | ||||||||
| Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties | (2,173 | ) | (2,307 | ) | (1,104 | ) | (1,203 | ) | ||||||||
| Preferred/preference distributions | (711 | ) | (711 | ) | (355 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income available to Common Shares and Units / Units | 207,957 | 460,565 | 116,281 | 197,227 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 493,875 | 497,635 | 246,379 | 240,889 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation – Non-real estate additions | (2,023 | ) | (1,834 | ) | (1,014 | ) | (884 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation – Partially Owned Properties | (1,293 | ) | (963 | ) | (677 | ) | (485 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation – Unconsolidated Properties | 8,080 | 8,735 | 4,748 | 4,340 | ||||||||||||
| Net (gain) loss on sales of unconsolidated entities - operating assets | — | (138 | ) | — | (174 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties | 16,776 | (212,432 | ) | 16,744 | (58,280 | ) | ||||||||||
| FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4) | 723,372 | 751,568 | 382,461 | 382,633 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Write-off of pursuit costs | 1,610 | 2,048 | 656 | 727 | ||||||||||||
| Debt extinguishment and preferred share/preference unit redemption (gains) losses | — | 97 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Non-operating asset (gains) losses | (10,960 | ) | 624 | (11,376 | ) | 186 | ||||||||||
| Other miscellaneous items | 60,439 | 4,971 | 21,628 | 3,244 | ||||||||||||
| Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (2) (3) (4) | $ | 774,461 | $ | 759,308 | $ | 393,369 | $ | 386,790 | ||||||||
| FFO (1) (3) | $ | 724,083 | $ | 752,279 | $ | 382,816 | $ | 382,988 | ||||||||
| Preferred/preference distributions | (711 | ) | (711 | ) | (355 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||||||
| FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4) | $ | 723,372 | $ | 751,568 | $ | 382,461 | $ | 382,633 | ||||||||
| Normalized FFO (2) (3) | $ | 775,172 | $ | 760,019 | $ | 393,724 | $ | 387,145 | ||||||||
| Preferred/preference distributions | (711 | ) | (711 | ) | (355 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||||||
| Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (2) (3) (4) | $ | 774,461 | $ | 759,308 | $ | 393,369 | $ | 386,790 |
(1)
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (December 2018 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)), excluding gains or losses from sales and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and land when connected to the main business of a REIT, impairment write-downs of investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity and depreciation and amortization related to real estate. Adjustments for partially owned consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis.
(2)
Normalized funds from operations (“Normalized FFO”) begins with FFO and excludes:
-
the impact of any expenses relating to non-operating real estate asset impairment;
-
pursuit cost write-offs;
-
gains and losses from early debt extinguishment and preferred share/preference unit redemptions;
-
gains and losses from non-operating assets; and
-
other miscellaneous items.
(3)
The Company believes that FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company, because they are recognized measures of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses from sales and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and excluding depreciation related to real estate (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. The Company also believes that Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company because they allow investors to compare the Company’s operating performance to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the Company’s actual operating results. FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units do not represent net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units should not be exclusively considered as alternatives to net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity. The Company’s calculation of FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.
(4)
FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are calculated on a basis consistent with net income available to Common Shares / Units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred distributions and premiums on redemption of preferred shares/preference units in accordance with GAAP. The equity positions of various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units are collectively referred to as the “Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership.” Subject to certain restrictions, the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership may exchange their OP Units for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s market risk has not changed materially from the amounts and information reported in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, to the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Equity Residential
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
Effective as of June 30, 2026, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b)
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:
There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Company identified in connection with the Company’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the second quarter of 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ERP Operating Limited Partnership
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
Effective as of June 30, 2026, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b)
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:
There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Operating Partnership identified in connection with the Operating Partnership’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the second quarter of 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As of June 30, 2026, the Company does not believe there is any litigation pending or threatened against it that, either individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial condition. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors that were discussed in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, except for the following:
The Merger is subject to conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Merger could have material adverse effects on the Company.
The completion of the Merger is subject to a number of conditions, including, among others, the approval of the issuance of shares of the Company in connection with the Merger by the Company’s shareholders, the approval of the Merger by the AvalonBay stockholders and the absence of a law or order restraining, enjoining, rendering illegal or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, which makes the completion of the Merger and timing thereof uncertain. In addition, the Company and AvalonBay are entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances.
If the Merger is not completed, the Company’s ongoing business may be materially adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Merger, the Company will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
The market price of the Common Shares could decline;
The Company could owe substantial termination fees to AvalonBay under certain circumstances;
If the Merger Agreement is terminated and the Board of Trustees seeks another business combination, the Company’s shareholders cannot be certain that the Company will be able to find a party willing to enter into a transaction on terms equivalent to or more attractive than the terms agreed to in the Merger Agreement;
Time, resources, and costs committed by the Company’s management team to matters relating to the Merger could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other beneficial opportunities for the Company;
The Company may experience negative reactions from the financial markets or from its customers, suppliers, employees, labor unions or other business partners; and
The Company will be required to pay its costs relating to the Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory and printing fees, whether or not the Merger is completed.
In addition, if the Merger is not completed, the Company could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or to any enforcement proceeding commenced against the Company to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement, and whether or not any such litigation has any merit, the cost of defending such litigation may be significant. The materialization of any of these risks could adversely impact the Company’s ongoing business.
Similarly, delays in the completion of the Merger could, among other things, result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue, or other negative effects associated with uncertainty about completion of the Merger.
The exchange ratio will not be adjusted in the event of any change in either the Company’s or AvalonBay’s stock price. As a result, the Merger Consideration payable to AvalonBay’s stockholders may be subject to change if the Company’s stock price fluctuates.
Upon completion of the Merger, each eligible share of AvalonBay Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive 2.793 Common Shares, plus the right to receive cash in lieu of fractional Common Shares, if any, into which such AvalonBay Common Stock would have been converted. The exchange ratio will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of either Common Shares or AvalonBay Common Stock between the date the Merger Agreement was signed and completion of the Merger. Due to the fixed nature
of the exchange ratio, fluctuations in the price of Common Shares will drive corresponding changes in the value of the Merger Consideration payable to each AvalonBay stockholder, and accordingly, at the time of the AvalonBay special meeting, AvalonBay stockholders will not know or be able to determine the market value of the consideration they will receive upon completion of the Merger. Factors influencing stock prices include:
Market reaction to the Merger announcement and combined company prospects;
Changes in the respective business, operations, assets, liabilities or financial outlook of either company;
Investor sentiment and perceived likelihood of closing of the Merger;
Economic conditions, geopolitical uncertainties, interest rates, regulatory developments and other factors generally affecting the market prices of Common Shares and AvalonBay Common Stock and the broader financial markets;
Federal, state and local legislation, governmental regulation and legal developments in the businesses in which the Company and AvalonBay operate; and
Other factors beyond the control of the Company and AvalonBay.
The price of Common Shares has fluctuated since the date the Merger Agreement was executed, and may continue to fluctuate through the date of each of the Company’s special meeting and the AvalonBay special meeting and the date the Merger is completed. For example, based on the range of closing prices of Common Shares during the period from May 20, 2026, the last trading day before the public announcement of the Merger Agreement, through July 24, 2026, the exchange ratio resulted in an implied value of the Merger Consideration ranging from a high of approximately $195.93 to a low of approximately $179.00 for each share of AvalonBay Common Stock. The actual market value of the Common Shares received by AvalonBay stockholders upon completion of the Merger may result in an implied value of the Merger Consideration outside this range.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit the Company’s ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger, which could discourage a potential competing acquirer of the Company from making an alternative proposal and, in specified circumstances, could require the Company to pay substantial termination fees to AvalonBay.
The Merger Agreement contains certain provisions that restrict the Company’s ability to initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or, subject to certain exceptions, engage in discussions or negotiations with respect to, or to approve or recommend, any alternative proposal. Further, even if the Board of Trustees withdraws or qualifies its recommendation with respect to the Share Issuance, the Company will still be required to submit the Share Issuance to a vote at its special meeting. In addition, AvalonBay generally has an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in response to any alternative proposal before the Board of Trustees may withdraw or qualify its recommendation with respect to the Share Issuance.
In some circumstances, upon termination of the Merger Agreement in connection with an alternative proposal, the Company may be required to pay a termination fee of approximately $1.005 billion to AvalonBay. This provision could discourage a potential third-party acquirer or merger partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of the Company, or pursuing an alternative acquisition transaction, from considering or proposing such a transaction, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per-share value than the per-share value proposed to be received or realized in the Merger. In particular, a termination fee, if applicable, could result in a potential third-party acquirer or merger partner proposing to pay a lower price to the Company’s shareholders than it might otherwise have proposed to pay absent such a fee.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, and the Company determines to seek another business combination, the Company may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger will result in changes to the Board of Trustees that may affect the strategy of the combined company as compared to that of the Company independently.
If the Merger is completed, the composition of the Board of Trustees will change. Immediately following the Merger, the Board of Trustees will consist of fourteen (14) members, seven (7) of whom are current trustees of the Company and seven (7) of whom are current directors of AvalonBay. The composition of the Board of Trustees may affect the business strategy and operating decisions of the combined company upon the completion of the Merger.
The Company is subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending, which could adversely affect the Company’s business and operations.
In connection with the pendency of the Merger, some customers, suppliers and other persons with whom the Company has a business relationship have delayed or deferred or may delay or defer certain business decisions or terminate, change, or renegotiate their relationships with the Company as a result of the Merger, which could negatively affect the Company’s revenues, earnings, and cash flows, as well as the market price of the Common Shares, regardless of whether the Merger is completed.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect its ability to execute certain of its business strategies, including the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness, incur capital expenditures, settle litigation, amend organizational documents, declare dividends, enter new business lines and invest in third parties. Such limitations could adversely affect the Company’s businesses and operations prior to the completion of the Merger.
Each of the risks described above may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the Merger.
Uncertainties associated with the Merger may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees, and the Company and AvalonBay may have difficulty attracting and motivating management personnel and other key employees, which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company or, in the event the Merger is not completed, the Company.
The Company and AvalonBay are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of their respective management personnel and other key employees to execute their business plans. The combined company’s success after the completion of the Merger will depend in part upon the ability of the Company and AvalonBay to attract, motivate, and retain key management personnel and other key employees. Prior to completion of the Merger, current and prospective employees of the Company and AvalonBay may experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined company following the completion of the Merger, which may have an adverse effect on the ability of each of the Company and AvalonBay to attract, motivate or retain management personnel and other key employees. In addition, no assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to attract, motivate or retain management personnel and other key employees to the same extent that the Company and AvalonBay have previously been able to attract or retain their own employees. These same risks apply to the ability of the Company to retain its key management personnel and other key employees, in the event the Merger is not completed.
If the Merger is not consummated by the outside date, either the Company or AvalonBay may terminate the Merger Agreement.
Either the Company or AvalonBay may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not been consummated by the outside date in the Merger Agreement. However, this termination right will not be available to a party if that party materially breached any of its obligations under the Merger Agreement and that breach resulted in the failure to consummate the Merger before such date. Any termination of the Merger Agreement may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
The Company has been and may continue to be the target of securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed, whether or not such lawsuits have any merit.
Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into merger agreements. Even if the lawsuits are without merit, defending against or otherwise resolving these claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on the Company’s or the combined company’s liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the Merger, then that injunction may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed, or from being completed within the expected timeframe, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company’s shareholders will not have appraisal rights or dissenters’ rights in the Merger.
Appraisal rights (also known as dissenters’ rights) are statutory rights that, if applicable under law, enable shareholders to dissent from an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, and to demand that the corporation pay the fair value for their shares as determined by a court in a judicial proceeding instead of receiving the consideration offered to shareholders in connection with the extraordinary transaction.
Under Maryland law, dissenting shareholders may have, subject to satisfying certain procedures, the right to demand and receive payment of the fair value of their shares of stock in connection with certain transactions (often referred to as appraisal rights),
including a proposed merger, share exchange or sale of substantially all of the assets of the corporation. Under Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust Law and the Company’s declaration of trust, the Company’s shareholders are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters’ rights in connection with the Merger, the Share Issuance or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Completion of the Merger may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Equity Residential, AvalonBay or their respective subsidiaries are a party, which may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business and results of operations.
The completion of the Merger may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Equity Residential, AvalonBay or their respective subsidiaries are a party. If Equity Residential and AvalonBay are unable to obtain certain consents or waivers from the applicable counterparties, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies under the applicable agreements, potentially resulting in defaults, accelerations of indebtedness, termination of the applicable agreements, or claims for monetary damages. Even if Equity Residential and AvalonBay are able to negotiate the required consents or waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for such consents or waivers or seek to renegotiate the agreements on terms less favorable to Equity Residential, AvalonBay or the combined company. Any of the foregoing or similar developments may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The combined company may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses of the Company and AvalonBay and realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.
The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on the combined company’s ability to successfully combine the businesses of the Company and AvalonBay, which currently operate as independent public companies, and realize the anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings, innovation, operational efficiencies and reduced cost of capital, from the combination. If the combined company is unable to achieve these objectives within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected and the value of the Common Shares may be harmed. Additionally, as a result of the Merger, rating agencies may take negative actions against the combined company’s credit ratings, which may increase the combined company’s financing costs, including in connection with any financing of the Merger.
The Merger involves the integration of the Company’s and AvalonBay’s businesses, which is a complex, costly, and time-consuming process. Neither the Company nor AvalonBay has previously completed a transaction comparable in size or scope to the Merger. The integration of the two companies may result in material challenges, including, without limitation:
The diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the devotion of management’s attention to the Merger;
Managing a larger combined company;
Creating, implementing, and executing a unified business strategy and operational, financial and managerial control with respect to the combined entity;
Maintaining employee morale and attracting, motivating and retaining management personnel and other key employees;
The possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration process;
Retaining existing business and operational relationships and attracting new business and operational relationships;
Issues in integrating information technology, operational, safety, communications and other systems, including maintaining cybersecurity and data privacy protections and avoiding security breaches, data loss, or service interruptions during the integration of the combined company’s systems;
Consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations and inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies;
Coordinating geographically separate organizations;
Legislative, regulatory and economic developments, including the level of new multifamily communities construction and development, government regulations and competition, that may restrict or adversely impact the combined company’s business operations;
Expansion of rent control, rent stabilization, eviction moratoriums or other regulations that restrict the methods and strategies of the combined company’s business; and
Unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the Merger.
Many of these factors will be outside of the combined company’s control and any one of them could result in delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially affect the combined company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company and AvalonBay have operated, and until completion of the Merger will continue to operate, independently. The Company and AvalonBay have not yet determined the exact nature of how the businesses and operations of the two companies will be combined after the Merger. The actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized. In particular, the integration of two large multifamily REIT platforms—each with its own property management systems, technology platforms, employee benefit plans, and corporate cultures—presents significant operational challenges. Integration costs may exceed current estimates, and the combined company may incur significant one-time charges in connection with the integration.
The Company’s shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the Merger and will exercise less influence over the policies of the combined company than they now have on the policies of the Company.
The Company’s shareholders presently have the right to vote in the election of the Board of Trustees and on other matters affecting the Company. Immediately after the Merger is completed, it is expected that the Company’s legacy shareholders will own approximately 49% of the combined company’s common shares outstanding and AvalonBay’s legacy stockholders will own approximately 51% of the combined company’s common shares outstanding.
As a result, the Company’s current shareholders will have less influence on the policies of the combined company than they now have on the policies of the Company as an individual company.
The future results of the combined company may be adversely impacted if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations following the completion of the Merger.
Following the completion of the Merger, the size of the combined company’s business will be significantly larger than the current size of either the Company’s or AvalonBay’s respective businesses. The combined company’s ability to successfully manage this expanded business will depend, in part, upon management’s ability to design and implement operational, managerial, financial and strategic initiatives that address not only the integration of two independent stand-alone companies, but also the increased scale and scope of the combined business with its associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that the combined company will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, synergies, cost savings and other benefits currently anticipated from the Merger.
The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses related to the completion of the Merger and the integration of the Company and AvalonBay.
The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses in connection with the completion of the Merger and the integration of the Company and AvalonBay. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, payroll, pricing, revenue management, marketing and benefits. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses related to the Merger (including any financing of the Merger), facilities and systems consolidation costs. The combined company may incur additional costs to retain employees and/or maintain employee morale and to attract, motivate or retain management personnel and other key employees. The Company and AvalonBay will also incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating integration plans for the combined business, and the execution of these plans may lead to additional unanticipated costs. Additionally, as a result of the Merger, rating agencies may take negative actions with regard to the combined company’s credit ratings, which may increase the combined company’s financing costs, including in connection with any financing of the Merger. These incremental transaction and Merger-related costs may exceed the savings the combined company expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative costs and the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, particularly in the near term, and in the event there are material unanticipated costs.
In connection with the Merger, the combined company may refinance a significant amount of indebtedness and cannot guarantee that it will be able to obtain the necessary funds on favorable terms or at all.
In connection with the Merger, the combined company may seek to refinance some or all of the indebtedness of each of the Company and AvalonBay or, alternatively, seek any waivers or amendments that may be necessary or advisable to permit certain indebtedness to remain outstanding following the Merger. The combined company’s ability to obtain such refinancing, waivers or amendments will depend on, among other factors, prevailing market conditions and other factors beyond the control of the combined company. The Company cannot assure you that the combined company will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to the combined company or at all, and any such failure could materially adversely affect the operations and financial conditions of the
combined company. If the combined company is not able to obtain such refinancing, waivers or amendments, it may be required to repay some or all of such indebtedness upon consummation of the Merger. Under such circumstances, the combined company may not have sufficient resources to repay such indebtedness. Completion of the Merger is not conditioned on completing such financing transactions.
The combined company will have significantly greater indebtedness than the Company on a standalone basis, which may adversely affect the combined company’s financial flexibility and increase its exposure to interest rate risk.
The significantly increased level of indebtedness of the combined company following the closing of the Merger may limit the combined company’s financial flexibility, increase its exposure to interest rate fluctuations, and require a greater portion of the combined company’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service. A significant portion of the combined company’s indebtedness may bear interest at variable rates, and increases in interest rates could materially increase the combined company’s interest expense and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
Following the Merger, the combined company’s indebtedness, under certain circumstances, contains restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact the combined company’s ability to operate its business and increase its borrowing costs.
Following the Merger, the combined company’s consolidated indebtedness may have the effect of, among other things, increasing borrowing costs. In addition, the amount of cash required to service the indebtedness levels will be greater than the amount of cash flows required to service the indebtedness of Equity Residential and AvalonBay individually prior to completion of the Merger. The level of indebtedness of the combined company following the Merger could also reduce or limit dividend payments, share repurchases, and other activities and may create competitive disadvantages relative to other companies with lower debt levels. The combined company may be required to raise additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes. Following the Merger, the combined company’s ability to arrange additional financing or refinancing will depend on, among other factors, its financial condition and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions, the terms of third-party debt financing incurred in connection with the consummation of the Merger (if any), and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that the combined company will be able to obtain additional financing or arrange refinancing on terms acceptable to it or at all, and any such failure could materially adversely affect its operations and financial condition.
Additionally, the combined company expects that the agreements that will govern the terms of its indebtedness will contain a number of restrictive covenants (including, without limitation, financial maintenance covenants) that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on the combined company and may limit its ability to engage in acts that may be in its long-term best interest. Moreover, the combined company’s ability to satisfy any financial maintenance covenants may be affected by events beyond its control and, as a result, it cannot provide assurance that it will be able to satisfy any such covenants.
Following the Merger, a breach of the covenants under the agreements that will govern the terms of any of the combined company’s indebtedness could result in a default or an event of default under the applicable indebtedness agreement. Such an event of default or a default that matures into an event of default may allow the applicable creditors to foreclose on any collateral for such debt, accelerate the related debt, and/or terminate any related commitments to extend further credit and may result in a default or an event of default under or the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In the event debtholders accelerate the repayment of the combined company’s indebtedness, the combined company may not have sufficient resources to repay such indebtedness.
Following the Merger, the combined company cannot assure you that it will be able to pay dividends at or above the rate currently paid by the Company or AvalonBay.
Following the Merger, the combined company is expected to pay an initial annualized dividend equivalent to the Company’s existing dividend per share, which is higher than AvalonBay’s current dividend yield per share. However, there can be no guarantee that shareholders of the combined company will receive dividends at the same rate, or any rate, that they received as shareholders of the Company or stockholders of AvalonBay prior to the Merger. Dividend payments are subject to the discretion of the Board of Trustees, which reserves the right to change the combined company’s dividend policy at any time and for any reason, including as a result of the other risk factors discussed in this section.
The combined company may incur adverse tax consequences if the Company or AvalonBay has failed or fails to qualify as a REIT.
Each of the Company and AvalonBay has operated in a manner that it believes has allowed it to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and intends to continue to do so through the time of the Merger. The combined company intends to continue operating in such a manner following the Merger. Neither the Company nor AvalonBay has requested or plans to request a ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) that it qualifies
as a REIT. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within the control of the Company or AvalonBay may affect each company’s ability to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, each of the Company and AvalonBay must satisfy a number of requirements, including requirements regarding the ownership of its stock and the composition of its gross income and assets. Also, a REIT must make distributions to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its net taxable income, excluding any net capital gains.
The closing of the Merger is conditioned on receipt by the Company of an opinion from Goodwin Procter LLP (or other nationally recognized tax counsel reasonably acceptable to the Company), dated as of the closing date of the Merger, substantially in the form attached to the Merger Agreement, to the effect that, beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994 and through its taxable year ending immediately prior to the Effective Time, AvalonBay has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and receipt by AvalonBay of an opinion from DLA Piper LLP (US) (or other nationally recognized tax counsel as may be reasonably acceptable to AvalonBay), dated as of the closing date of the Merger, substantially in the form attached to the Merger Agreement, to the effect that, beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1992, the Company has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and the Company’s proposed method of organization and operation will enable it to continue to satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code for its taxable year which includes the closing date of the Merger and thereafter. The foregoing REIT opinions, however, will be based on the factual representations provided by the Company and AvalonBay to counsel and limited by the exceptions, assumptions and qualifications set forth therein, and if any such representations are or become inaccurate or incomplete, such opinions may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized. The foregoing REIT opinions are not a guarantee that the Company or AvalonBay, in fact, has qualified, or, in the case of the combined company, will continue to qualify, as a REIT, nor are such opinions binding on the IRS and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a contrary position or that such position would not be sustained.
If, notwithstanding the opinions described above, the Company (or, following the Merger, the combined company) loses its REIT status, or is determined to have failed to qualify as a REIT in a prior year, it will face serious tax consequences that would substantially reduce the funds available for distribution to its shareholders, because:
It would be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on its net income at regular corporate rates for the years it did not qualify as a REIT (and, for such years, would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing its taxable income);
It could be subject to a U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, stock buyback excise tax, and possibly increased state and local taxes for such periods;
Unless it is entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, neither it nor any “successor” company could re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which it was disqualified as a REIT;
If it were to re-elect REIT status, it would have to distribute all earnings and profits from non-REIT years before the end of the first new REIT taxable year; and
For five years following re-election of REIT status, upon a taxable disposition of an asset owned as of such re-election, it could be subject to U.S. federal corporate level income tax with respect to any built-in gain inherent in such asset at the time of re-election.
Even if the Company (or, following the Merger, the combined company) retains its REIT status, if AvalonBay is determined to have lost its REIT status for a taxable year ending on or before the Merger, AvalonBay would be subject to adverse tax consequences similar to those described above. This could substantially reduce the combined company’s funds available for distributions to shareholders, because, assuming that the combined company otherwise maintains its REIT qualification:
The combined company generally would be subject to U.S. federal corporate level income tax with respect to the built-in gain on each asset of AvalonBay existing at the time of the Merger if the combined company were to dispose of the AvalonBay asset during the five-year period following the Merger;
The combined company would succeed to any earnings and profits accumulated by AvalonBay for taxable periods that it did not qualify as a REIT, and the combined company would have to pay a special dividend and/or employ applicable deficiency dividend procedures (including interest payments to the IRS) to eliminate such earnings and profits (or if the combined company does not timely distribute those earnings and profits, the combined company could fail to qualify as a REIT); and
If AvalonBay incurred any unpaid tax liabilities, including penalties and interest, prior to the Merger, those tax liabilities would be transferred to the combined company as a result of the Merger.
If there is an adjustment to AvalonBay’s taxable income or dividends paid deductions, the combined company could elect to use the deficiency dividend procedure in order to maintain AvalonBay’s REIT status. That deficiency dividend procedure could require the
combined company to make significant distributions to its shareholders and to pay significant interest to the IRS.
As a result of all these factors, the Company’s or AvalonBay’s (or, following the Merger, the combined company’s) failure to qualify as a REIT could impair the combined company’s ability to expand its business and raise capital, and would materially adversely affect the value of its common shares.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Common Shares Issued in the Quarter Ended June 30, 2026 (Equity Residential)
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, EQR issued 83,116 Common Shares in exchange for 83,116 OP Units held by various limited partners of ERPOP. OP Units are generally exchangeable into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis or, at the option of ERPOP, the cash equivalent thereof, at any time one year after the date of issuance. These shares were either registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as these were transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In light of the manner of the sale and information obtained by EQR from the limited partners in connection with these transactions, EQR believes it may rely on these exemptions.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, no trustee or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Item 6. Exhibits – See the Exhibit Index.
EXHIBI****T INDEX
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report. References to exhibits or other filings under the caption “Location” indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference. The Commission file numbers for our Exchange Act filings referenced below are 1-12252 (Equity Residential) and 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership).
*Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. Equity Residential agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of such schedules and exhibits, or any section thereof, to the SEC upon request; provided, however, that Equity Residential may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act, for any schedules so furnished.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| EQUITY RESIDENTIAL | ||||
| Date: | July 30, 2026 | By: | /s/ Bret D. McLeod | |
| Bret D. McLeod | ||||
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
| (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
| Date: | July 30, 2026 | By: | /s/ Ian S. Kaufman | |
| Ian S. Kaufman | ||||
| Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | ||||
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: EQUITY RESIDENTIAL ITS GENERAL PARTNER | ||||
| Date: | July 30, 2026 | By: | /s/ Bret D. McLeod | |
| Bret D. McLeod | ||||
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
| (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
| Date: | July 30, 2026 | By: | /s/ Ian S. Kaufman | |
| Ian S. Kaufman | ||||
| Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | ||||
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |