Williams Companies 10-K 2025-12-31

Filed 2026-02-24. 23 sections, 897K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown · JSON

What changed since the 2024-12-31 10-KNew, removed and reworded risk factor headings, then every item sentence by sentence.

Cover and table of contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

The Williams Companies, Inc.

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Northwest Pipeline LLC

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Commission file number:State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization:IRS Employer Identification No.:
The Williams Companies, Inc.1-4174Delaware73-0569878
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC1-7584Delaware74-1079400
Northwest Pipeline LLC1-7414Delaware26-1157701
Address of Principal Executive Offices:Zip Code:Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
The Williams Companies, Inc.One Williams Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma74172800-945-5426 (800-WILLIAMS)
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas77056713-215-2000
Northwest Pipeline LLCOne Williams Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma74172800-945-5426

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The Williams Companies, Inc.Common Stock, $1.00 par valueWMBNew York Stock Exchange
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCNoneNoneNone
Northwest Pipeline LLCNoneNoneNone

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

The Williams Companies, Inc.Yes☑No☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCYes☐No☑
Northwest Pipeline LLCYes☐No☑

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

The Williams Companies, Inc.Yes☐No☑
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCYes☐No☑
Northwest Pipeline LLCYes☐No☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

The Williams Companies, Inc.Yes☑No☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCYes☑No☐
Northwest Pipeline LLCYes☑No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

The Williams Companies, Inc.Yes☑No☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCYes☑No☐
Northwest Pipeline LLCYes☑No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

The Williams Companies, Inc.Large accelerated filer☑Accelerated filer☐Non-accelerated filer☐Smaller reporting company☐Emerging growth company☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCLarge accelerated filer☐Accelerated filer☐Non-accelerated filer☑Smaller reporting company☐Emerging growth company☐
Northwest Pipeline LLCLarge accelerated filer☐Accelerated filer☐Non-accelerated filer☑Smaller reporting company☐Emerging growth company☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

The Williams Companies, Inc.☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC☐
Northwest Pipeline LLC☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

The Williams Companies, Inc.☑
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC☐
Northwest Pipeline LLC☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

The Williams Companies, Inc.☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC☐
Northwest Pipeline LLC☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

The Williams Companies, Inc.☐
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC☐
Northwest Pipeline LLC☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

The Williams Companies, Inc.Yes☐No☑
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCYes☐No☑
Northwest Pipeline LLCYes☐No☑

The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter was approximately:

The Williams Companies, Inc.$67,728,227,765
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCNone
Northwest Pipeline LLCNone

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 19, 2026 was:

The Williams Companies, Inc.1,221,563,111
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCNone
Northwest Pipeline LLCNone

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The Williams Companies, Inc.Portions of the Williams’ Definitive Proxy Statement for the Williams’ Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2026, are incorporated into Part III, as specifically set forth in Part III.
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCNone
Northwest Pipeline LLCNone

Both Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and Northwest Pipeline LLC meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instructions I(2) of Form 10-K.

This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by The Williams Companies, Inc., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, and Northwest Pipeline LLC. Information contained herein relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating to the other registrants.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PART I
Item 1.Business4
Item 1A.Risk Factors28
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments48
Item 1C.Cybersecurity48
Item 2.Properties49
Item 3.Legal Proceedings50
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures50
Information About Williams’ Executive Officers51
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities53
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations55
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk87
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data92
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure192
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures192
Item 9B.Other Information197
Item 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections197
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance197
Item 11.Executive Compensation198
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters198
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence198
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services199
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules200
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary213

DEFINITIONS

The following is a listing of certain abbreviations, acronyms, and other industry terminology that may be used throughout this Form 10-K.

Measurements:

Barrel or Bbl: One barrel of petroleum products that equals 42 U.S. gallons

Mbbls/d: One thousand barrels per day

Bcf : One billion cubic feet of natural gas

Bcf/d: One billion cubic feet of natural gas per day

MMcf/d: One million cubic feet of natural gas per day

British Thermal Unit (Btu): A unit of energy needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit

MMBtu: One million British thermal units

Dekatherms (Dth): A unit of energy equal to one million British thermal units

Mdth/d: One thousand dekatherms per day

MMdth: One million dekatherms or approximately one trillion British thermal units

MMdth/d: One million dekatherms per day

Government and Regulatory:

EPA: Environmental Protection Agency

Exchange Act, the: Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities Act, the: Securities Act of 1933, as amended

Other:

Note: References to numerical notes refer to the Combined Notes to Financial Statements*.*

EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, and amortization

Fractionation: The process by which a mixed stream of natural gas liquids is separated into constituent products, such as ethane, propane, and butane

GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

LNG: Liquefied natural gas; natural gas which has been liquefied at cryogenic temperatures

MVC: Minimum volume commitments

NGLs: Natural gas liquids; natural gas liquids result from natural gas processing and crude oil refining and are used as petrochemical feedstocks, heating fuels, and gasoline additives, among other applications.

Equity NGL margins: NGL revenues less Btu replacement cost, plant fuel, transportation, and fractionation

Registrants: The Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams), and Williams’ wholly owned subsidiaries Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) and Northwest Pipeline LLC (NWP) are each individually referred to as a Registrant and collectively as the Registrants.

Appalachia Midstream Investments: Williams’ equity-method investments with an approximate average 66 percent interest in multiple gas gathering systems in the Marcellus Shale region

Crowheart Acquisition: On November 1, 2024, Williams closed on the acquisition of Crowheart Energy, LLC, resulting in more than a 90 percent ownership interest in certain crude oil and natural gas properties in the Wamsutter basin in Wyoming. Prior to this acquisition, Williams held a 75 percent undivided interest in each well’s working interest.

Discovery Acquisition: On August 1, 2024, Williams closed on the acquisition of the remaining 40 percent interest in Discovery Producer Services, LLC (Discovery) which operates a natural gas gathering and transportation system in the Gulf of America and processing and fractionation facilities in Louisiana, along with certain other assets.

DJ Basin Acquisitions: On November 30, 2023, Williams closed on the acquisition of 100 percent of Cureton Front Range, LLC (Cureton) (Cureton Acquisition) and also closed on the acquisition of the remaining 50 percent interest in Rocky Mountain Midstream Holdings LLC (RMM) (RMM Acquisition), both of which operate midstream assets in the Denver-Julesberg (DJ) Basin.

Gulf Coast Storage Acquisition: On January 3, 2024, Williams closed on the acquisition of 100 percent of both Hartree Cardinal Gas, LLC and Hartree Natural Gas Storage, LLC (collectively, “Hartree”), which own natural gas storage facilities and pipelines in Louisiana and Mississippi.

MountainWest Acquisition: On February 14, 2023, Williams closed on the acquisition of 100 percent of MountainWest Pipelines Holding Company (MountainWest), which includes FERC-regulated interstate natural gas pipeline systems and natural gas storage capacity.

PART I

Item 1. Business

This report includes information for multiple registrants, specifically The Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams), as well as Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) and Northwest Pipeline LLC (NWP) both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of Williams (collectively, the Registrants). References to subsidiaries by name, including equity-method investees, Transco, and NWP, refer exclusively to those businesses and operations.

General

Williams is an energy company committed to being the leader in providing infrastructure that safely delivers natural gas products to reliably fuel the clean energy economy. Williams has operations in 11 supply areas that provide natural gas gathering and processing (G&P), transmission and storage services; NGL fractionation, transportation, and storage services; and marketing services to approximately 800 customers. Williams owns an interest in and operates over 32,000 miles of pipelines in 24 states and in the Gulf of America, 35 natural gas processing facilities, 9 NGL fractionation facilities, approximately 23 million barrels of NGL storage capacity, and 423 Bcf of natural gas storage capacity, and delivers natural gas that is used every day for clean-power generation, heating, and industrial use.

Williams was founded in 1908, originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1949 and reincorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware in 1987. Its common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WMB.” Its operations are located in the United States. Williams’ headquarters are located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, with other major offices in Houston, Texas; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Salt Lake City, Utah.

Transco owns and operates an approximately 9,600-mile natural gas pipeline system extending from Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and the Gulf of America through Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania and New Jersey to the New York City metropolitan area. The system serves customers in Texas and the 12 southeast and Atlantic seaboard states mentioned above, including major metropolitan areas in Georgia, Washington D.C., Maryland, North Carolina, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Transco’s principal business is the interstate transportation of natural gas, which is regulated by the FERC.

NWP owns and operates an approximately 3,900-mile natural gas pipeline system, extending from the San Juan basin in northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado through Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington to a point on the Canadian border near Sumas, Washington. The system serves customers in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, California, and Arizona, either directly or indirectly through interconnections with other pipelines. NWP’s principal business is the interstate transportation of natural gas, which is regulated by FERC.

2025 Value Chain (2).jpg

Service Assets, Customers, and Contracts

Key variables for Williams’ businesses will continue to be:

  • Obstacles to Williams’ construction and expansion efforts, including delays or denials of necessary permits and opposition to hydrocarbon-based energy development;

  • Producer drilling activities impacting natural gas supplies supporting Williams’ gathering and processing volumes;

  • Retaining and attracting customers by continuing to provide reliable services;

  • Revenue growth associated with additional infrastructure either completed or currently under construction;

  • Prices impacting Williams’ commodity-based activities;

  • Disciplined growth in Williams’ service areas.

2025 Map.jpg

Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Assets

Williams’ gathering, treating, and processing operations are presented within the Transmission, Power & Gulf; Northeast G&P; and West reporting segments, as described under the heading “Business Segments.”

Williams’ gathering systems receive natural gas from producers’ crude oil and natural gas wells and gather these volumes to gas processing, treating, or redelivery facilities. Typically, natural gas, in its raw form, is not acceptable for transportation in major interstate natural gas pipelines or for commercial use as a fuel. Williams’ treating facilities remove water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other contaminants, and collect condensate. Williams is generally paid a fee based on the volume of natural gas gathered and/or treated, generally measured in the Btu heating value.

In addition, natural gas contains various amounts of NGLs, which generally have a higher value when separated from the natural gas stream. Williams’ processing plants extract the NGLs, which include ethane, primarily used in the petrochemical industry; propane, used for heating, fuel, and also in the petrochemical industry; and, normal butane, isobutane, and natural gasoline, primarily used by the refining industry.

Williams’ gas processing services generate revenues primarily from the following types of contracts:

  • Fee-based: A cash fee is received based on the volume of natural gas processed, generally measured in the Btu heating value. A portion of Williams’ fee-based processing revenue includes a share of the margins on the NGLs produced. For the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 93 percent of NGL production volumes were under fee-based contracts.

  • Noncash commodity-based: Gas is also processed under primarily two types of commodity-based contracts, keep-whole and percent-of-liquids, where consideration for services is received in the form of NGLs. For a

keep-whole arrangement Williams replaces the Btu content of the retained NGLs with natural gas purchases, also known as shrink replacement gas. For a percent-of-liquids arrangement, Williams delivers an agreed-upon percentage of the extracted NGLs and retains the remainder. Retained NGLs, referred to as equity NGL production, are then sold. Per-unit NGL margins are calculated based on sales of these equity volumes at the processing plants. For the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 7 percent of NGL production volumes were under noncash commodity-based contracts.

Generally, Williams’ gathering and processing agreements are long-term agreements, with terms ranging from month-to-month to the life of the producing lease. Williams has certain gas gathering and processing agreements with MVC, whereby the customer is obligated to pay a contractually determined fee based on any shortfall between the actual gathered and processed volumes and the MVC for a stated period.

Demand for gas gathering and processing services is dependent on producers’ drilling activities, which is impacted by the strength of the economy, commodity prices, and the resulting demand for natural gas by manufacturing and industrial companies and consumers. Williams’ gathering, treating, and processing businesses do not have material direct exposure to crude oil prices. Williams’ on-shore natural gas gathering and processing businesses are substantially focused on gas-directed drilling basins rather than crude oil, with a broad diversity of basins and customers served. Declines in crude oil drilling would be expected to result in less associated natural gas production, which could drive more demand for natural gas produced from gas-directed basins served.

During 2025, Williams’ facilities gathered and processed gas for approximately 253 customers. The top ten customers accounted for approximately 55 percent of gathering and processing fee revenues and NGL margins from noncash commodity-based agreements. Williams believes counterparty credit concerns in its gathering and processing businesses are significantly mitigated by the physical nature of Williams’ services, where gathering oc

Showing the first 8K of 93K characters. Open the full section

Item 1A. Risk Factors

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF

THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

The reports, filings, and other public announcements of Williams, Transco, and NWP may contain or incorporate by reference statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements relate to anticipated financial performance, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, business prospects, outcomes of regulatory proceedings, market conditions, and other matters. Williams, Transco, and NWP make these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as applicable.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report that address activities, events, or developments that Williams, Transco, and NWP expect, believe, or anticipate will exist or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by various forms of words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “continues,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “might,” “goals,” “objectives,” “targets,” “planned,” “potential,” “projects,” “scheduled,” “will,” “assumes,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “in-service date,” or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management and include, among others, statements regarding:

  • Levels of dividends to Williams’ stockholders;

  • Future credit ratings of Transco, NWP, and Williams and its affiliates;

  • Amounts and nature of future capital expenditures;

  • Expansion and growth of business and operations;

  • Expected in-service dates for capital projects;

  • Financial condition and liquidity;

  • Business strategy;

  • Cash flow from operations or results of operations;

  • Rate case filings;

  • Seasonality of certain business components;

  • Natural gas, natural gas liquids, and crude oil prices, supply, and demand;

  • Demand for services.

Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, uncertainties, and risks that could cause future events or results to be materially different from those stated or implied in this report. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from results contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

  • Availability of supplies, market demand, and volatility of prices;

  • Development and rate of adoption of alternative energy sources;

  • The impact of existing and future laws and regulations, the regulatory environment, environmental matters, and litigation, as well as the ability and the ability of other energy companies with whom Williams, Transco, and NWP conduct or seek to conduct business, to obtain necessary permits and approvals, and the ability to achieve favorable rate proceeding outcomes;

  • Exposure to the credit risk of customers and counterparties;

  • Williams’ ability to acquire new businesses and assets and successfully integrate those operations and assets into existing businesses as well as successfully expand facilities and consummate asset sales on acceptable terms;

  • The ability to successfully identify, evaluate, and timely execute on capital projects and investment opportunities;

  • The strength and financial resources of competitors and the effects of competition;

  • The amount of cash distributions from and capital requirements of Williams’ investments and joint ventures in which Williams participates;

  • The ability of Williams to effectively execute on its financing plan;

  • Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to environmental, social, and governance practices;

  • The physical and financial risks associated with climate change;

  • The impacts of operational and developmental hazards and unforeseen interruptions;

  • The risks resulting from outbreaks or other public health crises;

  • Risks associated with weather and natural phenomena, including climate conditions and physical damage to facilities;

  • Acts of terrorism, cybersecurity incidents, and related disruptions;

  • Williams’ costs and funding obligations for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, and Transco’s and NWP’s allocations regarding the same;

  • Changes in maintenance and construction costs, as well as the ability to obtain sufficient construction- related inputs, including skilled labor;

  • Inflation, interest rates, tariffs on foreign-made materials and goods (including steel and steel pipes) necessary to conduct business, and general economic conditions (including future disruptions and volatility in the global credit markets and the impact of these events on customers and suppliers);

  • Risks related to financing, including restrictions stemming from debt agreements, future changes in credit ratings as determined by nationally recognized credit rating agencies, and the availability and cost of capital;

  • The ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other oil exporting nations to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls and the impact on domestic production;

  • Changes in the current geopolitical situation;

  • Changes in U.S. governmental administration and policies;

  • Whether Williams is able to pay current and expected levels of dividends;

  • Additional risks described in Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s SEC filings.

Given the uncertainties and risk factors that could cause Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, Williams, Transco, and NWP caution investors not to unduly rely on these forward-looking statements. Williams, Transco, and NWP disclaim any obligations to, and do not intend to, update the above list or announce publicly the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.

In addition to causing actual results to differ, the factors listed above and referred to below may cause Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s intentions to change from those statements of intention set forth in this report.

Such changes in intentions may also cause results to differ. Williams, Transco, and NWP may change intentions, at any time and without notice, based upon changes in such factors, assumptions, or otherwise.

Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, Williams, Transco, and NWP caution that there are important factors, in addition to those listed above, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These factors are described in the following section.

Summary of Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information in this report. Each of these factors could adversely affect Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s businesses, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and, in some cases, reputation. The occurrence of any of such risks could also adversely affect the value of an investment in securities. These factors are summarized below and described in more detail following the summary.

Risks Related to Business

  • The business, operating results, and financial condition of Williams’, Transco’s, and NWP’s natural gas transportation and midstream businesses are dependent on the continued availability of natural gas supplies in the supply basins and dema

Showing the first 8K of 92K characters. Open the full section

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Management for Williams, Transco, and NWP recognizes the increasing volume and sophistication of cyber threats and takes its responsibility to protect the information and systems under its purview seriously. Management’s cybersecurity processes aim to provide a comprehensive approach to assess, identify, and manage material risks arising from these cybersecurity threats.

Comprehensive Cybersecurity Program**:** Management has implemented a comprehensive cybersecurity risk management program (Cybersecurity Program) that is aligned with the National Institute for Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework. The Cybersecurity Program provides a risk-based approach to cybersecurity, and security controls are tailored so that cost-effective controls can be applied commensurate with the risk and sensitivity of specific information systems, control systems, and enterprise data. The Cybersecurity Program incorporates best practices and industry standards from multiple sources and is designed to comply with applicable regulations. The Cybersecurity Program includes, but is not limited to, the following elements: risk assessment, policies and procedures, contract management, training and awareness, auditing, compliance monitoring and testing, table-top exercises, and incident response.

Integration with Overall Risk Management**:** Management’s cybersecurity processes have been integrated into the overall risk management system and processes. Management considers cybersecurity threat risks alongside other company risks as part of its overall risk assessment process. Cybersecurity risk professionals collaborate with subject matter specialists, as necessary, to gather insights for identifying and assessing material cybersecurity threat risks, their severity, and potential mitigations.

Engagement of Third Parties**:** Management often engages with specialized third-party assessors, consultants, auditors, and other experts to review, validate, and enhance its cybersecurity practices. Third-party independent assessments provide an external perspective on management’s cybersecurity posture, allowing it to leverage best practices from the industry and ensure its defenses remain robust. All third parties engaged for such processes are subjected to rigorous scrutiny to ensure the third parties meet management’s security standards.

Oversight of Third-party Service Providers**:** Management acknowledges the potential risks associated with the use of third-party service providers. Therefore, management has established processes to oversee and identify material cybersecurity risks that may be associated with third-party service providers with whom it engages. This includes conducting thorough, risk-based due diligence before onboarding, performing security assessments, and confirming adherence to management’s cybersecurity requirements. Management also maintains active communication channels with these providers to stay informed about any potential security incidents or concerns.

Disclosure of Risks**:** Management describes how risks from cybersecurity threats could materially affect its business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, as part of its risk factor disclosures at Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. To date, Williams has not experienced any cybersecurity threats or incidents that have resulted in a material adverse effect on our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, management continues to monitor and assess risks that could have a material impact in the future.

Management is committed to continually enhancing its cybersecurity processes and practices to address the dynamic nature of the threats it faces and to ensure the security and integrity of its systems and data.

Cybersecurity Governance

Cybersecurity is an important part of the risk management processes and an area of focus for the Board of Directors and management. Each member of Williams’ organization, which includes Transco and NWP, from facility operators to board members, has a responsibility to safeguard the organization’s cybersecurity. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) collaborates with internal stakeholders to develop, implement and maintain the Cybersecurity Program, ensuring that the program addresses the evolving cybersecurity risk landscape. The CISO also engages with executive leadership to ensure that cybersecurity remains integrated with Williams’ overall risk management and strategic objectives.

The Board of Directors oversees cybersecurity-related policy and strategy. As part of this oversight, the CISO provides a cybersecurity dashboard that is reviewed by the Board annually, which includes key performance indicators for cybersecurity process maturity, operational performance, and enterprise performance toward TSA compliance. Additionally, the Audit Committee, comprised of independent directors, reviews the implementation and effectiveness of cybersecurity risk management protocol as part of the company’s accounting and internal control policies. As part of this oversight, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) presents to the Audit Committee bi-annually, as well as periodically in conjunction with any internal audits related to cybersecurity.

Management has implemented processes and controls designed to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate cybersecurity incidents, ensuring ongoing protection of the company’s systems and data. Additionally, management has protocols by which cybersecurity incidents that meet established reporting thresholds are escalated internally and, where appropriate, are reported to the Board, as well as ongoing updates regarding any such incident until it has been addressed.

Williams’ CIO, who joined the company in February 2025, brings over 20 years of experience in information technology and leadership within the energy industry. He has extensive expertise in digital transformation, cloud strategies, enterprise artificial intelligence initiatives, and cybersecurity, as well as managing large-scale system implementations and integrations. He holds an Executive Master of Business Administration from the University of Texas at San Antonio, a Master of Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, and a Bachelor of Information Science and Engineering from Bangalore University.

Williams’ CISO joined the company in November 2025, bringing significant experience in cybersecurity and operational technology leadership within the energy industry. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Management Information Systems from Kansas State University and is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional. His expertise spans operational technology security, infrastructure management, and cybersecurity operations. At Williams, he is responsible for the company’s cybersecurity strategy and execution, ensuring robust protection of systems and data in a dynamic threat environment.

Item 2. Properties

Please read “Business” for a description of the location and general character of Williams’ principal physical properties. Williams generally owns its facilities in fee simple, although a substantial portion of our pipeline and gathering facilities is constructed and maintained pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses, or consents on and across properties owned by others.

Transco

Transco’s gas pipeline facilities are generally owned in fee simple. However, a substantial portion of such facilities is constructed and maintained pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses or consents on and across properties owned by others. Compressor stations, with appurtenant facilities, are located in whole or in part either on lands owned or on sites held under leases or permits issued or approved by public authorities. Transco’s storage facilities are either owned or contracted for under long-term leases or easements. Transco leases its company offices in Houston, Texas.

NWP

NWP’s gas pipeline facilities are generally owned in fee simple. However, a substantial portion of such facilities are constructed and maintained on and across properties owned by others pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses or consents. NWP’s compressor stations, with associated facilities, are located in whole or in part upon lands owned by them and upon sites held under leases or permits issued or approved by public authorities. Land owned by others, but used by NWP under rights-of-way, easements, permits, leases, licenses, or consents, includes land owned by private parties, federal, state, and local governments, quasi-governmental agencies, or Native American tribes. The Plymouth LNG facility is located on lands owned in fee simple by NWP. Various credit arrangements restrict the sale or disposal of a major portion of our pipeline system. NWP leases its company offices in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Environmental

Certain reportable legal proceedings involving governmental authorities under federal, state, and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment are described below. While it is not possible for Williams to predict the final outcome of the proceedings that are still pending, it does not anticipate a material effect on its consolidated financial position if it received an unfavorable outcome in any one or more of such proceedings. Williams’ threshold for disclosing material environmental legal proceedings involving a governmental authority where potential monetary sanctions are involved is $1 million.

Other environmental matters called for by this Item are described under the caption “Environmental Matters” in Note 18 – Contingencies and Commitments included under Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item.

Other Litigation

The additional information called for by this Item is provided in Note 18 – Contingencies and Commitments included under Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Information About Williams’ Executive Officers

The name, title, age, period of service, and recent business experience of each of Williams’ executive officers as of February 24, 2026, are listed below.

Name and PositionAgeBusiness Experience in Past Five Years (or Relevant Business Experience)
Alan S. Armstrong632025 to presentDirector and Executive Chairman of the Board, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Director and Executive Chairman of the Board2011 to 2025Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Payvand Fazel392026 to presentSenior Vice President - Commercial, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Commercial2025 to 2026Vice President Western Interstates, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2024 to 2025Vice President Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) Operations & Commercial - G&P, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2022 to 2024Vice President Strategic Development, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2021 to 2022Vice President Origination and NGL Marketing/Commercial, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Glen G. Jasek592026 to presentSenior Vice President - Transmission, Power & Gulf, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Transmission, Power & Gulf2019 to 2026Vice President/General Manager Eastern Interstates, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Mary A. Hausman542022 to presentVice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller2019 to 2022Staff Vice President of Internal Audit, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Principal Financial Officer - Transco and NWP
Larry C. Larsen512025 to presentExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer2022 to 2025Senior Vice President - Gathering & Processing, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2020 to 2022Vice President Strategic Development, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2019 to 2020Vice President Rocky Mountain Midstream, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Thomas F. McCoy632025 to presentSenior Vice President - Upstream, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Upstream2024 to 2025Adjunct Professor of Petroleum Practice, University of Tulsa
2020 to 2022Senior Vice President of Production, Cimarex Energy
Eric J. Ormond392023 to presentSenior Vice President - Project Execution, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Project Execution2023Senior Vice President Commercial Operations, Engineering & Project Management, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP
2020 to 2023Senior Vice President Engineering & Project Management, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP
2017 to 2020Vice President Strategic Development & New Ventures, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP
Name and PositionAgeBusiness Experience in Past Five Years (or Relevant Business Experience)
Debbie L. (Cowan) Pickle482026 to presentSenior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resources Officer, Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility2018 to 2026Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, The Williams Companies, Inc.
John D. Porter562026 to presentExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2022 to presentSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2020 to 2022Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Financial Planning & Analysis, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Todd J. Rinke522025 to presentSenior Vice President - Gathering & Processing, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President - Gathering & Processing2021 to 2025Vice President/General Manager - ORSH, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2018 to 2021Vice President/General Manager - Central, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Chad A. Teply542025 to 2026Senior Vice President - Transmission, Power & Gulf, The Williams Companies, Inc. (retiring April 3, 2026)
Senior Vice President - Transmission, Power & Gulf2023 to 2025Senior Vice President - Transmission & Gulf of Mexico, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Principal Executive Officer - Transco and NWP2020 to 2023Senior Vice President - Project Execution, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2017 to 2020Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development, PacifiCorp (a Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company)
T. Lane Wilson592017 to presentSenior Vice President and General Counsel, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Robert R. Wingo472025 to presentExecutive Vice President and Corporate Strategic Development, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Executive Vice President and Corporate Strategic Development2024 to 2025Executive Vice President of Corporate Ventures & Midstream, EQT Corporation
2021 to 2024Executive Vice President of Corporate Ventures, EQT Corporation
2018 to 2021Managing Director, Encap Flatrock Midstream
Chad J. Zamarin492025 to presentDirector, Chief Executive Officer, and President, The Williams Companies, Inc.
Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President2023 to 2025Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development, The Williams Companies, Inc.
2017 to 2023Senior Vice President - Corporate Strategic Development, The Williams Companies, Inc.

PART II

Item 5. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Williams’ common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WMB.” At the close of business on February 19, 2026, Williams had 5,329 holders of record of common stock.

Transco and NWP are indirectly wholly owned by Williams.

Cash distributions declared and paid to Williams are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
20252024
(Millions)
Transco$1,340$1,145
NWP148150

Share Repurchase Program

In September 2021, Williams’ Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program with a maximum dollar limit of $1.5 billion. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, by block purchases, in privately negotiated transactions, or in such other manner as determined by management. Williams will also determine the timing and amount of any repurchases based on market conditions and other factors. The share repurchase program does not obligate Williams to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and it may be suspended or discontinued at any time. This share repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Williams’ purchases of its equity securities are as follows:

PeriodTotal Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsMaximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 - October 31, 2025—$——$1,360,938,325
November 1 - November 30, 2025———1,360,938,325
December 1 - December 31, 2025———1,360,938,325
Total——

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing Williams’ cumulative total stockholder return on common stock (assuming reinvestment of dividends) with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index, the Bloomberg Americas Pipelines Index, and the Arca Natural Gas Index for the period of five fiscal years commencing January 1, 2021. The Bloomberg Americas Pipelines Index is composed of Enbridge Inc., TC Energy Corporation, Kinder Morgan, Inc., Keyera Corp., ONEOK, Inc., Cheniere Energy, Inc., Pembina Pipeline Corporation, Plains GP Holdings LP, Targa Resources Corp., and Williams. The Arca Natural Gas Index is comprised of 20 highly capitalized companies in the natural gas industry involved primarily in natural gas exploration and production and natural gas pipeline transportation and transmission. The graph below assumes an investment of $100 at the beginning of the period.

Shareholder Return.jpg

202020212022202320242025
The Williams Companies, Inc.$100$138$184$206$335$384
S&P 500 Index100129105133166196
Bloomberg Americas Pipelines Index100160261259283303
Arca Natural Gas Index100160205221268303

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsPage
General55
Company Outlook58
Results of Operations64
Williams64
Transco78
NWP81
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Liquidity83

General

Williams is an energy company committed to being the leader in providing infrastructure that safely delivers natural gas products to reliably fuel the clean energy economy. Its operations are located in the United States.

Williams’ interstate natural gas pipeline strategy is to create value by maximizing the utilization of its pipeline capacity by providing high-quality, low-cost transportation of natural gas to large and growing markets. Williams’ gas pipeline businesses’ interstate transmission and storage activities are subject to regulation by the FERC. As such, Williams’ rates and charges for the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce; the extension, expansion, or abandonment of jurisdictional facilities; and accounting, among other things, are subject to regulation. The rates are established primarily through the FERC’s ratemaking process, but Williams may also negotiate rates with its customers pursuant to the terms of its tariffs and FERC policy. Changes in commodity prices and volumes transported have limited near-term impact on these revenues because the majority of the cost of service is recovered through firm capacity reservation charges in transportation rates.

The ongoing strategy of Williams’ midstream operations is to safely and reliably operate large-scale midstream infrastructure where its assets can be fully utilized and drive low per-unit costs. Williams focuses on consistently attracting new business by providing highly reliable service to its customers. These services include natural gas gathering and processing, treating, compression and storage; NGL fractionation, transportation and storage; and crude oil production handling and transportation, as well as marketing services for NGL, crude oil, and natural gas.

Consistent with the manner in which Williams’ CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources, Williams’ operations are conducted, managed, and presented within the following reportable segments: Transmission, Power & Gulf; Northeast G&P; West; and Gas & NGL Marketing Services. All remaining business activities, including upstream operations and corporate activities, are included in Other. See Note 1 – Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a full description of each segment.

Unless indicated otherwise, the following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition and liquidity relates to Williams’ current continuing operations and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and combined notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.

Dividends

In December 2025, Williams paid a regular quarterly dividend of $0.500 per share. On January 27, 2026, Williams’ board of directors approved a regular quarterly dividend of $0.525 per share payable on March 30, 2026.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)

Overview of Year Ended December 31, 2025

Net income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2025, increased $393 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Further discussion of the results is found in this report in the Results of Operations.

Recent Developments

Transco FERC Rate Case Filing

On August 30, 2024, Transco filed a general rate case with the FERC for an overall increase in rates and to comply with the terms of the settlement of its prior rate case. On September 30, 2024, the FERC issued an order accepting and suspending Transco’s general rate filing to be effective March 1, 2025, subject to refund and the outcome of hearing procedures established by the FERC. The order also accepted rate decreases for certain services to be effective as of October 1, 2024. During the third quarter of 2025, Transco reached an agreement in principle with its customers and the other participants to settle all aspects of the rate case and has accrued a related liability for rate refunds. Transco filed with the FERC in October 2025 for approval of the settlement. On December 30, 2025, the FERC approved the settlement which will become effective March 1, 2026.

Power Innovation Projects

Williams continues to pursue projects to support the power demands created by new data center and industrial development in power grid-constrained markets, including agreements with a large, investment-grade company to provide onsite natural gas and power generation infrastructure. See Expansion Projects for further discussion.

Sale of Mid-Continent Gathering Assets

In December 2025, Williams’ management approved a plan to sell certain gas gathering assets in the Mid-Continent region. These operations were designated as held for sale at December 31, 2025 and an impairment, within the West segment, has been recognized for 2025.

Sale of South Mansfield Upstream Interests

In October 2025, Williams entered into an agreement to sell its interests in certain upstream ventures in the South Mansfield area of the Haynesville Shale region, included in Other, for consideration of $398 million with additional contingent consideration to possibly be received through 2029. The transaction closed in January 2026, and Williams expects to recognize a gain in the first quarter of 2026.

Investments in Louisiana LNG and Driftwood Pipeline Projects

In October 2025, Williams closed on various agreements with the same counterparty to acquire a 10 percent equity-method investment in Louisiana LNG, which is developing a fully permitted LNG export facility, and an 80 percent interest in Driftwood Pipeline, which is constructing a fully permitted greenfield pipeline, Line 200, connecting to multiple other pipelines, including Transco and Louisiana Energy Gateway, to supply the LNG facility. Williams will be the operator of the pipeline. The total initial purchase price was $378 million, and both investments will require additional capital to fund further construction. Williams will also manage the gas supply for the LNG facility and purchase approximately 10 percent of the LNG produced.

Saber Asset Purchase

In June 2025, Williams acquired 100 percent of Saber Midstream, LLC (Saber). The acquisition, which was accounted for as an asset purchase, included cash consideration of $47 million and the retention of $113 million of Saber’s debt, which was separately repaid in full within the same month. Saber operates a gas gathering system in the Haynesville Shale region in the West segment.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)

Cogentrix Investment

In March 2025, Williams purchased a minority interest in Cogentrix for $153 million, which is accounted for as an equity-method investment within the Gas & NGL Marketing Services segment. Cogentrix owns interests in 11 natural gas power plants (see Note 8 – Investing Act

Showing the first 8K of 116K characters. Open the full section

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Williams’ current interest rate risk exposure, inclusive of subsidiaries, is related primarily to its debt portfolio. The debt portfolio is primarily comprised of fixed rate debt, which mitigates the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. Any borrowings under the credit facility and any issuances under Williams’ commercial paper program could be at a variable interest rate and could expose it to the risk of increasing interest rates. The maturity of Williams’ long-term debt portfolio is partially influenced by the expected lives of its operating assets. Williams may utilize interest rate derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk associated with future debt issuances (see Note 13 – Debt and Banking Arrangements).

The tables below provide information by maturity date about the interest rate risk-sensitive instruments as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The tables exclude unamortized debt issuance costs and net unamortized debt premium (discount) as disclosed in Note 13 – Debt and Banking Arrangements. See Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements, Guarantees, and Concentration of Credit Risk for the methods used in determining the fair value of Williams’ long-term debt.

20262027202820292030ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2025
(Millions)
Long-term debt, including current portion:
Fixed rate$1,345$1,994$1,446$1,600$2,504$19,817$28,706$28,379
Weighted-average interest rate5.0%5.1%5.1%5.1%5.2%5.1%
Variable rate (1)$—$—$250$—$—$—$250$250
Commercial paper (2)$700$—$—$—$—$—$700$700
20252026202720282029ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2024
(Millions)
Long-term debt, including current portion:
Fixed rate$1,720$2,345$1,994$1,445$1,600$17,618$26,722$25,830
Weighted-average interest rate5.1%5.1%5%5.1%5.1%5.2%
Commercial paper (2)$455$—$—$—$—$—$455$455

(1) The weighted-average interest rate for the $250 million NWP term loan as of December 31, 2025 was approximately 4.69 percent.

(2) The weighted-average interest rate for commercial paper as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was 3.85 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively.

Transco

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, Transco’s debt portfolio included only fixed rate debt, which mitigates the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. Any borrowings under the credit facility would be at a variable interest rate and would expose it to the risk of increasing interest rates. The following tables provide Transco’s information by maturity date about the interest rate risk-sensitive instruments, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The tables exclude unamortized debt issuance costs and net unamortized debt premium (discount) as disclosed in Note 13 – Debt and Banking Arrangements. See Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements, Guarantees, and Concentration of Credit Risk for the methods used in determining the fair value of Transco’s long-term debt.

20262027202820292030ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2025
(Millions)
Long-term debt, excluding other financing obligation:
Fixed rate$208$—$400$—$700$3,575$4,883$4,620
Weighted-average interest rate4.4%4.3%4.4%4.4%4.5%4.9%
Other financing obligations, including current portion:
Fixed rate$38$42$46$50$54$825$1,055$1,321
Weighted-average interest rate9.1%9.1%9.1%9.1%9.1%9.2%
20252026202720282029ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2024
(Millions)
Long-term debt, excluding other financing obligation:
Fixed rate$—$1,208$—$400$—$2,575$4,183$3,858
Weighted-average interest rate5.2%4.8%4.2%4.2%4.2%4.5%
Other financing obligations, including current portion:
Fixed rate$35$37$41$45$50$878$1,086$1,418
Weighted-average interest rate9.2%9.2%9.2%9.2%9.2%9.3%

NWP

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, NWP’s debt portfolio included fixed rate debt and 2025 also included a variable-rate term loan. Any borrowings under the credit facility would be at a variable interest rate and would further expose it to the risk of increasing interest rates. The following tables provide NWP’s information by maturity date about the interest rate risk-sensitive instruments, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The tables exclude unamortized debt issuance costs and net unamortized debt premium (discount) as disclosed in Note 13 – Debt and Banking Arrangements. See Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements, Guarantees, and Concentration of Credit Risk for the methods used in determining the fair value of NWP’s long-term debt.

20262027202820292030ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2025
(Millions)
Long-term debt, including current portion:
Fixed rate$—$500$—$—$—$—$500$497
Weighted-average interest rate4.0%—%—%—%—%—%
Variable rate (1)$—$—$250$—$—$—$250$250
20252026202720282029ThereafterTotalFair Value December 31, 2024
(Millions)
Long-term debt:
Fixed rate$85$—$500$—$—$—$585$573
Weighted-average interest rate4.2%4.0%—%—%—%—%

(1) The weighted-average interest rate for the $250 million NWP term loan as of December 31, 2025 was approximately 4.69 percent.

Commodity Price Risk

Williams is exposed to commodity price risk through its natural gas and NGL marketing activities, including contracts to purchase, sell, transport, and store product. Williams routinely manages this risk with a variety of exchange-traded and OTC energy contracts such as forward contracts, futures contracts, and basis swaps, as well as physical transactions. Although many of the contracts used to manage commodity exposure are derivative instruments, these economic hedges are not designated or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

Williams is also exposed to commodity prices through the upstream business and certain gathering and processing contracts. Williams uses derivative instruments to lock in forward sales prices on a portion of expected future production and to lock in NGL margin on a portion of commodity-exposed gathering and processing volumes. These economic hedges are not designated for hedge accounting treatment.

The fair value measurements and maturities of Williams’ commodity derivative assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2025 and 2024, were as follows:

Total Fair ValueMaturity
Fair Value Measurements Level (1)20262027 - 20282029 - 2030+
(Millions)
Level 1 (2)$(66)$7$(51)$(22)
Level 2(112)(6)(71)(35)
Level 3(15)(42)(35)62
Fair value of contracts outstanding at December 31, 2025$(193)$(41)$(157)$5
Total Fair ValueMaturity
Fair Value Measurements Level (1)20252026 - 20272028 - 2029+
(Millions)
Level 1 (3)$(105)$(41)$(56)$(8)
Level 2(287)(97)(112)(78)
Level 34811829
Fair value of contracts outstanding at December 31, 2024$(344)$(127)$(160)$(57)

(1)See Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements, Guarantees, and Concentration of Credit Risk for discussion of valuation techniques by level within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 17 – Commodity Derivatives for the amount of change in fair value recognized in Williams’ Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2)Commodity derivative assets and liabilities exclude $189 million of net cash collateral in Level 1.

(3)Commodity derivative assets and liabilities exclude $288 million of net cash collateral in Level 1.

Value at Risk (VaR)

VaR is the maximum predicted loss in portfolio value over a specified time period that is not expected to be exceeded within a given degree of probability. Williams’ VaR may not be comparable to that of other companies due to differences in the factors used to calculate VaR. Williams’ VaR is determined using parametric models with 95 percent confidence intervals and one-day holding periods, which means that 95 percent of the time, the risk of loss in a day from a portfolio of positions is expected to be less than or equal to the amount of VaR calculated. Williams’ open exposure is managed in accordance with established policies that limit market risk and require daily reporting of predicted financial loss to management. Because Williams generally manages physical gas assets and economically protects its positions by hedging in the futures markets, its open exposure is generally mitigated. Williams employs daily risk testing, using both VaR and stress testing, to evaluate the risk of its positions.

Williams actively monitors open commodity marketing positions and the resulting VaR and maintains a relatively small risk exposure as total buy volume is close to sell volume, with minimal open natural gas price risk.

The VaR associated with Williams’ integrated natural gas trading operations was $11 million at December 31, 2025 and $4 million at December 31, 2024. Williams had the following VaRs for the period shown:

Year Ended December 31, 2025Year Ended December 31, 2024
(Millions)
Average$9$3
High1815
Low41

Williams’ non-trading portfolio primarily consists of commodity derivatives that hedge Williams’ upstream business and certain gathering and processing contracts. The VaR associated with these commodity derivatives was $2 million at December 31, 2025 and $8 million at December 31, 2024. Williams had the following VaRs for the period shown:

Year Ended December 31, 2025Year Ended December 31, 2024
(Millions)
Average$7$5
High188
Low13

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Page
Williams:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm93
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 202395
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 202396
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2025 and 202497
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 202398
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 202399
Transco:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm100
Statements of Net Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023102
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2025 and 2024103
Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023104
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023105
NWP:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm106
Statements of Net Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023108
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2025 and 2024109
Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023110
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023111
Combined Notes to Financial Statements112
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts191

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

The Williams Companies, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The Williams Companies, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 24, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Accounting
Description of the MatterAs discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, certain of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) and apply accounting principles outlined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 980, Regulated Operations. As such, certain incurred costs that would otherwise be charged to expense are deferred as regulatory assets, based on the expected recovery from customers in future rates. Likewise, certain actual or anticipated credits that would otherwise reduce expense are deferred as regulatory liabilities, based on

Showing the first 8K of 412K characters. Open the full section

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Williams

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Williams’ management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) of the Exchange Act) (Disclosure Controls) or internal control over financial reporting (Internal Controls) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Williams monitors the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls and makes modifications as necessary; Williams’ intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls will be modified as systems change and conditions warrant.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Williams’ Disclosure Controls was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Williams purchased Rimrock as part of the Rimrock Asset Purchase on January 31, 2025. Rimrock’s total revenues constituted approximately 2 percent of total revenues as shown in Williams’ consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025. Rimrock’s total assets constituted approximately 1 percent of total assets as shown in Williams’ consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2025. Williams has excluded Rimrock’s disclosure controls and procedures that are subsumed by their internal control over financial reporting from the scope of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Williams’ disclosure controls and procedures. This exclusion is in accordance with the guidance issued by the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that an assessment of recent business combinations may be omitted from management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting for one year following the acquisition.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes during the fourth quarter of 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Williams’ Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Exchange Act). Williams’ internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the

preparation and fair presentation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Williams’ internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and the board of directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on Williams’ financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of Williams’ management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, Williams assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2025, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment, which excluded Rimrock’s internal control over financial reporting as previously discussed, it was concluded that, at December 31, 2025, Williams’ internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Ernst & Young LLP, Williams’ independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

The Williams Companies, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited The Williams Companies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Williams Companies, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of a group of natural gas gathering and processing assets purchased from Rimrock Energy Partners, LLC (Rimrock), which is included in the 2025 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted approximately one percent of total assets as of December 31, 2025. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Rimrock.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 24, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 24, 2026

Transco

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Transco’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) of the Exchange Act) (Disclosure Controls) or internal control over financial reporting (Internal Controls) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Transco monitors the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls and makes modifications as necessary; Transco’s intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls will be modified as systems change and conditions warrant.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Transco’s Disclosure Controls was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes during the fourth quarter of 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Transco’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Exchange Act). Transco’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Transco’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of management; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely

detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on Transco’s financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of Transco’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, Transco assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2025, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment, it was concluded that, at December 31, 2025, Transco’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

NWP

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

NWP’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) of the Exchange Act) (Disclosure Controls) or internal control over financial reporting (Internal Controls) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. NWP monitors the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls and makes modifications as necessary; NWP’s intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls will be modified as systems change and conditions warrant.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of NWP’s Disclosure Controls was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of NWP’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes during the fourth quarter of 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NWP’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Exchange Act). NWP’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. NWP’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide

reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of management; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on NWP’s financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of NWP’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, NWP assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2025, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment, it was concluded that, at December 31, 2025, NWP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Item 9B. Other Information

Departure of Director

On February 20, 2026, Stacey Doré notified Williams that she has elected not to stand for re-election and will depart Williams’ Board of Directors when her term expires on April 28, 2026. Ms. Doré is a member of the Audit Committee and Governance and Sustainability Committee. Following Ms. Doré’s departure, the size of Williams’ Board of Directors will be reduced to eleven directors.

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements

During the three months ended December 31, 2025, no director or officer of Williams adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” and no director or officer of Williams adopted or terminated a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

PART III

Since Transco and NWP meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10‑K, the information required by Items 10, 11, 12, and 13, is omitted for Transco and NWP.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information regarding Williams’ directors and nominees for director required by Item 401 of Regulation S‑K will be presented under the heading “Election of Directors” in Williams’ definitive proxy statement prepared for the solicitation of proxies in connection with its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 28, 2026, which shall be filed no later than March 19, 2026 (“Proxy Statement”), which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Information regarding Williams’ executive officers required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is presented at the end of Part I herein and captioned “Information About Williams’ Executive Officers,” as permitted by General Instruction G(3) and the Instruction to Item 401 of Regulation S-K.

Information required by paragraphs (c), (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Item 407 of Regulation S-K will be included under the heading “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Information regarding Williams’ insider trading policy required by Item 408 of Regulation S-K will be included under the headings “Executing on Effective Corporate Governance” and “Mitigating Risk in Williams’ Compensation Programs” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein. Williams has adopted The Williams Policy on Securities Trading (“Securities Trading Policy”) that is applicable to Williams’ directors, officers, employees, and “any other person providing services to Williams who is aware of Material Nonpublic Information relating to Williams or other public companies,” as well as “family members of persons covered by this policy, others living in their households, and entities that are directed by or subject to their influence or control.” A copy of the Securities Trading Policy is filed as Exhibit 19.1 to this annual report on Form 10‑K. Williams complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and listing standards when it transacts in its own securities.

Williams’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for each of Williams’ board committees, and Williams’ Code of Business Conduct applicable to all employees, including Williams’ Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, or persons performing similar functions, are available on Williams’ Internet website at www.williams.com. Williams will provide, free of charge, a copy of Williams’ Code of Business Conduct or any of its other corporate documents listed above upon written request to Williams’ Corporate Secretary at Williams, One Williams Center, Suite 4700, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers, in each case, of the Code of Business Conduct on behalf of Williams’ Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and persons performing similar functions on the corporate governance section of Williams’ Internet website at www.williams.com, promptly following the date of any such amendment or waiver.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 402 and paragraphs (e)(4) and (e)(5) of Item 407 of Regulation S-K regarding executive compensation will be presented under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation Tables and Other Information,” “Director Compensation For Fiscal Year 2025,” “Compensation and Management Development Committee Report,” and “Compensation and Management Development Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the information provided under the heading “Compensation and Management Development Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement is furnished and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, is not subject to the liabilities of that section and is not deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act.

The information required by Item 408(x) regarding policies and practices related to the grant of certain equity awards close in time to the release of material nonpublic information will be presented under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K and the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K will be presented under the headings “Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information regarding certain relationships and related transactions required by Item 404 and Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K will be presented under the heading “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information regarding Williams’ principal accounting fees and services required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A will be presented under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein. Fees for professional services provided by Transco and NWP’s independent registered public accounting firm in each of the last two fiscal years in each of the following categories are (in millions):

Transco

Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Audit fees$1$1
Audit-related fees——
Tax fees——
All other fees——
Total fees$1$1

NWP

Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Audit fees$1$1
Audit-related fees——
Tax fees——
All other fees——
Total fees$1$1

Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews for Transco and NWP’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the reviews for other SEC and FERC filings, and accounting consultation.

As wholly owned subsidiaries of Williams, Transco and NWP do not have separate audit committees. The Williams Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as such appointment relates to Transco, NWP, and Williams’ other subsidiaries. The Williams Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the determination of fees associated with EY’s audit of Transco and NWP’s financial statements. The Williams Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by EY to Williams and its subsidiaries. On an ongoing basis, management presents specific projects and categories of service, including projects and categories of service relating to Transco and NWP, to the Williams Audit Committee to request advance approval. The Williams Audit Committee reviews those requests and advises management if the Williams Audit Committee approves the engagement of EY. On a periodic basis, management reports to the Williams Audit Committee regarding the actual spending for such projects and services compared to the approved amounts. The Williams Audit Committee may also delegate the authority to pre-approve audit and permitted non-audit services, excluding services related to internal control over financial reporting, to a subcommittee of one or more committee members, provided that any such pre-approvals are reported on at a subsequent Williams Audit Committee meeting.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Williams

(a) 1 and 2.

Page
Covered by report of independent auditors (PCAOB ID: 42):
Consolidated statement of income for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 202595
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 202596
Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2025 and 202497
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 202598
Consolidated statement of cash flows for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 202599
Combined Notes to Financial Statements112
Schedule for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025:
II — Valuation and qualifying accounts191

All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

(a) 3 and (b). The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this annual report.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.Description
3.1—Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, (filed on May 26, 2010, as Exhibit 3.(i)1 to The Williams Companies Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2—Certificate of Designations of Series B Preferred Stock of the Williams Companies, Inc. (filed on July17, 2018, as Exhibit 3.1 to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-04174) and Incorporated herein by reference).
3.3—Certificate of Amendment dated August 10, 2018 (filed on August 10, 2018, as Exhibit 3.1 to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4—By-laws of The Williams Companies, Inc., as last amended effective October 25, 2022 (filed on October 31, 2022, as Exhibit 3.4 to The Williams Companies Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1—Senior Indenture, dated February 25, 1997, between MAPCO Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (filed on February 25, 1997, as Exhibit 4.5.1 to MAPCO Inc.’s Amendment No. l to registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-20837) and incorporated herein by reference).
Exhibit No.Description
4.2—Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated March 5, 1997, between MAPCO Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (filed on March 4, 1998, as Exhibit 4(p) to MAPCO Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 001-05254) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3—Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated March 31, 1998, among MAPCO Inc., Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (filed on March 30, 1999, as Exhibit 4(J) to Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-20555) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4—Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 1999, among Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc., The Williams Companies, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (filed on March 28, 2000, as Exhibit 4(q) to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5—Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2010, between The Williams Companies, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed on February 2, 2010, as Exhibit 4.3 to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6—Fifth Supplemental Indenture between The Williams Companies, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, dated as of January 17, 2001 (filed on March 12, 2001, as Exhibit 4(k) to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7—Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated March 19, 2002, between The Williams Companies, Inc. as Issuer and Bank One Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee (filed on May 9, 2002, as Exhibit 4.1 to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.8—Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2010, between The Williams Companies, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed on February 2, 2010, as Exhibit 4.1 to The Williams Companies, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-04174) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9—[I

Showing the first 8K of 74K characters. Open the full section

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

Not applicable.

The Williams Companies, Inc.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. (Registrant)
By:/s/ MARY A. HAUSMAN
Mary A. Hausman Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

Date: February 24, 2026

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CHAD J. ZAMARINPresident, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Chad J. Zamarin(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ JOHN D. PORTERExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 24, 2026
John D. Porter(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ MARY A. HAUSMANVice President, Chief Accounting Officer and ControllerFebruary 24, 2026
Mary A. Hausman(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ ALAN S. ARMSTRONGExecutive Chairman of the BoardFebruary 24, 2026
Alan S. Armstrong
/s/ STEPHEN W. BERGSTROMLead Independent DirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Stephen W. Bergstrom
/s/ MICHAEL A. CREELDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Michael A. Creel
/s/ STACEY H. DORÉDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Stacey H. Doré
/s/ CARRI A. LOCKHARTDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Carri A. Lockhart
/s/ RICHARD E. MUNCRIEFDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Richard E. Muncrief
/s/ PETER A. RAGAUSSDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Peter A. Ragauss
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ ROSE M. ROBESONDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Rose M. Robeson
/s/ SCOTT D. SHEFFIELDDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ WILLIAM H. SPENCEDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
William H. Spence
/s/ JESSE J. TYSONDirectorFebruary 24, 2026
Jesse J. Tyson

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC (Registrant)
By:/s/ BILLEIGH W. MARK
Billeigh W. Mark Controller

Date: February 24, 2026

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CHAD A. TEPLYManagement Committee Member and Senior Vice PresidentFebruary 24, 2026
Chad A. Teply(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ MARY A. HAUSMANVice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 24, 2026
Mary A. Hausman(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ BILLEIGH W. MARKControllerFebruary 24, 2026
Billeigh W. Mark(Principal Accounting Officer)

Northwest Pipeline LLC

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NORTHWEST PIPELINE LLC (Registrant)
By:/s/ BILLEIGH W. MARK
Billeigh W. Mark Controller

Date: February 24, 2026

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CHAD A. TEPLYManagement Committee Member and Senior Vice PresidentFebruary 24, 2026
Chad A. Teply(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ MARY A. HAUSMANVice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 24, 2026
Mary A. Hausman(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ BILLEIGH W. MARKControllerFebruary 24, 2026
Billeigh W. Mark(Principal Accounting Officer)