10-K comparison

EchoStar (ECHO) 10-K risk factor changes: FY2012 vs FY2011

The 2012-12-31 10-K against the 2011-12-31 one, compared heading by heading and sentence by sentence. One of these filings carries no fiscal year tag, so its year is the calendar year of the period end.

Item 1A165 rewritten55 added98 removed248 unchanged

All filing items1,543 rewritten1,481 added1,230 removed1,421 unchanged

Read the changesGo to Item 1A

EchoStar Form 10-K, every itemFY2012, filed 20 February 2013, against FY2011, filed 7 March 2012FY2012 on sec.govFY2011 on sec.govRead this filingJSON

Summary

counted, not written

New Item 1A headings (5)

  1. The digital set-top box industry is extremely competitive. We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants.
  2. The failure to adequately anticipate the need for satellite capacity or the inability to obtain satellite capacity for our Hughes segment could harm our results of operations.
  3. We may not be able to generate cash to meet our debt service needs or fund our operations.
  4. Covenants in HSS’ indentures restrict its business in many ways.
  5. We rely on network and information systems and other technologies and a disruption, cyber attack, failure or destruction of such networks, systems or technologies may disrupt or harm our business.Cybersecurity

Removed Item 1A headings (14)

  1. _Certain of our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice, which would have a detrimental effect on us._
  2. _We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions._
  3. _Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure or those of our third-party service providers could harm our business._
  4. _We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional_ _debt._
  5. _We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for a substantial portion of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations._
  6. _Our business may suffer if our customer base does not compete successfully with existing and emerging competition._
  7. _Component pricing may remain stable or be negatively affected by inflation, increased demand, decreased supply, or other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations._
  8. _Growth in our EchoStar Technologies_ _segment_ _likely requires expansion of our sales to international customers, and we may be unsuccessful in expanding international sales._
  9. _If we are successful in growing sales of our digital set-top boxes to international customers, we may be subject to additional risks including, among other things, trade barriers and political instability abroad._
  10. _The digital set-top box industry is extremely competitive._
  11. _We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants, principally located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes._
  12. _Our digital set-top boxes are highly complex and may experience quality or supply problems._
  13. _Our reliance on a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers for several components used in our digital set-top boxes could restrict production, result in higher digital set-top box costs and delay deliveries to_ _customers._
  14. _The enterprise network communications industry is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against other terrestrial and satellite-based network providers in our enterprise groups._
Reworded Item 1A headings (7)
  1. [removed: _We] [added: We] currently derive a [removed: substantial] [added: significant] portion of our revenue from our [removed: two] primary [removed: customers,] [added: customer,] DISH [removed: Network and_ _Bell TV__.] [added: Network.] The loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from, or a decrease in selling prices of digital set-top boxes, transponder leasing, provision of digital broadcast [removed: services] [added: services,] and/or other products or services to DISH Network [removed: or Bell TV] would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our results of [removed: operations._][added: operations.]
  2. [removed: _Our] [added: Our] future financial performance depends in part on our ability to penetrate new [added: international] markets for digital set-top [removed: boxes._][added: boxes.]
  3. [removed: _The consumer] [added: The] network communications market is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against [removed: fiber, DSL, cable service providers and] other [added: terrestrial and] satellite broadband [removed: providers in the consumer market._][added: and network providers.]
  4. [removed: _The] [added: The] average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes [removed: has] [added: have] been decreasing and may decrease even further, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of [removed: operations._][added: operations.]
  5. [removed: _We_ _currently] [added: We may] have unused satellite capacity in our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are not able to lease [removed: more of] this capacity to third [removed: parties._][added: parties.]
  6. [removed: _Our] [added: Our] business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others. The loss of [added: our intellectual property rights] or [added: our] infringement of [removed: our] [added: the] intellectual property rights [added: of others] could have a significant adverse impact on our [removed: business._][added: business.]
  7. [removed: _Our] [added: Our] business depends on FCC [added: and other] licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC [added: and other] licenses that may not [removed: be_ _granted._][added: be granted.]

A heading is new when no FY2011 heading matches it after ignoring case and punctuation, and reworded when it shares at least 60 percent of its words with one that went away. All current risk factor headings.

Sentences by item

21 items, with every count and a link to each item that changed

Underlined words on a shaded ground are new in FY2012; struck-through words were in FY2011. Sentences that are wholly new or wholly gone are labelled rather than marked.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

165 rewritten, 55 added, 98 removed, 248 unchanged

Rewritten

[removed: _We] [added: We] currently derive a [removed: substantial] [added: significant] portion of our revenue from our [removed: two] primary [removed: customers,] [added: customer,] DISH [removed: Network and_ _Bell TV__.][added: Network.]

Rewritten

The loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from, or a decrease in selling prices of digital set-top boxes, transponder leasing, provision of digital broadcast [removed: services] [added: services,] and/or other products or services to DISH Network [removed: or Bell TV] would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our results of [removed: operations._][added: operations.]

Rewritten

DISH Network accounted for [removed: 59.9%, 82.5%] [added: 49.5%, 59.9%] and [removed: 81.3%] [added: 82.5%] of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009,] [added: 2010,] respectively.

Rewritten

[removed: Bell TV] [added: Our operations outside the U.S.] accounted for [removed: 7.9%, 8.6%] [added: approximately 23.0%, 19.3%] and [removed: 10.5%] [added: 14.5%] of our [removed: total revenue] [added: revenues] for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009,] [added: 2010,] respectively.

Rewritten

Any reduction in sales to DISH Network or [removed: Bell TV or] in the prices [removed: they pay] [added: it pays] for the products and services [removed: they purchase] [added: it purchases] from us could have a significant negative impact on our business.

Rewritten

In addition, because a significant portion of our revenue is derived from DISH [removed: Network and Bell TV,] [added: Network,] our success also depends to a significant degree on the continued success of DISH Network [removed: and Bell TV] in attracting new [removed: subscribers and in] [added: subscribers,] marketing programming [removed: packages] [added: packages,] and other services and features to subscribers that will [removed: require] [added: result in] the purchase of new digital set-top boxes, and in particular, new digital set-top boxes at the high-end of our product range that incorporate high-definition, multiple [removed: tuners] [added: tuners,] and other advanced technology.

Rewritten

If DISH Network’s gross subscriber additions are adversely affected by the sustained economic weakness in the [removed: U.S.] [added: U.S.,] or for any other reason, we may experience a decline in our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network.

Rewritten

In addition, the timing of orders for digital set-top boxes from [removed: these two customers] [added: DISH Network] could vary significantly depending on equipment promotions [removed: these customers offer] [added: offered] to [removed: their] [added: its] subscribers, changes in technology, and [removed: their] [added: its] use of remanufactured digital set-top boxes, which may cause our revenue to vary significantly quarter over quarter and could expose us to the risks of inventory shortages or excess inventory.

Rewritten

Furthermore, because of the maturing and competitive nature of the digital set-top box business, the limited number of potential new [removed: customers] [added: customers,] and the short-term nature of our purchase orders with DISH [removed: Network and Bell TV,] [added: Network,] we could in the future experience downward pricing pressure on our digital set-top boxes [added: sold] to DISH [removed: Network or Bell TV,] [added: Network,] which in turn would adversely affect our gross margins and profitability.

Rewritten

Thereafter, if we are unable to extend those contracts on similar terms with DISH Network, or if we are otherwise unable to obtain acceptable replacement contracts from third parties following a termination by DISH Network, there could be a significant adverse effect on our business, results of [removed: operations] [added: operations,] and financial position.

Rewritten

There are a relatively small number of potential new customers for our digital set-top boxes, satellite [removed: services] [added: services,] and digital broadcast operations, and we expect this customer concentration to continue for the foreseeable future.

Rewritten

In addition, we [removed: may] [added: may,] from time to [removed: time] [added: time,] enter into customer agreements providing for exclusivity periods during which we may sell a specified product only to that customer.

Rewritten

[removed: Historically,] [added: However,] many of our potential customers have [added: historically] perceived us as a competitor due to our affiliation with DISH Network.

Rewritten

[removed: _Economic] [added: Economic] weakness, including high unemployment and reduced consumer spending, may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our [removed: business._][added: business.]

Rewritten

A [removed: substantial] [added: significant] portion of our revenue comes from providers of pay-TV services that in turn derive a substantial majority of their revenue from residential customers whose spending is affected by economic uncertainty.

Rewritten

Our ability to grow or maintain our business may be adversely affected by sustained economic weakness, including the effect of wavering consumer confidence, high [removed: unemployment] [added: unemployment,] and other factors that may adversely affect our [removed: EchoStar Technologies segment and providers of pay-TV services] [added: customers] and the telecommunications industry.

Rewritten

Increased pricing pressures may result in reduced margins for pay-TV providers, including DISH Network and [removed: Bell TV and] may reduce demand for high-end digital set top boxes on which we earn higher gross margins.

Rewritten

Furthermore, pay-TV providers may increasingly look to make purchases from foreign set-top box suppliers [removed: primarily located in Asia] with lower-priced products as their customers become more cost-sensitive in making purchase decisions as a result of weak economic conditions.

Rewritten

In addition, the telecommunications industry has been facing significant challenges resulting from excess capacity, new [removed: technologies] [added: technologies,] and intense price competition.

Rewritten

· _Excess Inventories and Satellite Capacity._ There is an increased risk of [added: having] excess and obsolete inventories as a result of possible lower demand for pay-TV services and the resultant lower demand for digital set-top boxes from pay-TV providers.

Rewritten

· _Increased Impairment Charges._ Sustained economic weakness could result in substantial future impairment charges relating to, among other things, satellites, [removed: FCC] [added: regulatory] authorizations, goodwill and intangibles, and our debt and equity investments.

Rewritten

[removed: _If] [added: If] we are unable to properly [removed: re__spond] [added: respond] to technological changes, our business could be [removed: significantly_ _harmed._][added: significantly harmed.]

Rewritten

Our business and the [removed: market] [added: markets] in which we operate are characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and frequent product and service introductions and enhancements.

Rewritten

If we [added: or our suppliers] are unable to properly respond to or keep pace with technological developments, [removed: or] fail to develop new technologies, [added: or if] our [added: competitors obtain or develop proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior to ours, our] existing products and services may become obsolete and demand for our products and services may decline.

Rewritten

Even if we keep up with technological innovation, we may not meet the demands of the [removed: network communications market.][added: markets we serve.]

Rewritten

[added: In addition,] DISH Network has no obligations to continue to purchase our products and only certain obligations to continue to purchase certain of our services.

Rewritten

Any material reduction in our sales to DISH Network would have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of [removed: operations] [added: operations,] and financial position.

Rewritten

[removed: Furthermore, if] [added: If] we lose DISH Network as a customer, it will be difficult for us to replace, in whole or in part, our historical revenues from DISH Network [removed: because there are a relatively small number of potential customers for our products] and [removed: services, and] we have had limited success in attracting such potential [added: new] customers in the past.

Rewritten

[removed: We] [added: HSS] may need to raise additional debt in order to fund ongoing operations or to capitalize on [removed: our] business opportunities.

Rewritten

In addition, sustained economic weakness may limit our ability to generate sufficient internal cash to fund investments, capital expenditures, [removed: acquisitions] [added: acquisitions,] and other strategic transactions.

Rewritten

[removed: _We] [added: We] may experience significant financial losses on our existing [removed: investments._][added: investments.]

Rewritten

These investments involve a high degree of risk and could diminish our ability to fund [removed: our stock buyback] [added: share repurchase] program, invest capital in our business or return capital to our shareholders.

Rewritten

[removed: _We] [added: We] may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our business, which may not be successful and we may lose up to the entire value of our investment in these acquisitions and [removed: transactions._][added: transactions.]

Rewritten

Our future success may depend on the existence of, and our ability to capitalize on, opportunities to [removed: buy] [added: acquire] other businesses or technologies or partner with other companies that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or products or that may otherwise offer us growth opportunities.

Rewritten

Any such acquisitions, transactions or investments that we are able to identify and complete which may become substantial over time, involve a high degree of [removed: risks,] [added: risk,] including, but not limited to, the following:

Rewritten

[removed: _We] [added: We] may not be aware of certain foreign government laws or regulations or changes to them which [removed: could_ _have] [added: could have] a significant adverse impact on our [removed: business._][added: business.]

Rewritten

[removed: The] failure to obtain the authorizations necessary to operate satellites internationally could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue and our overall competitive position.

Rewritten

[removed: _Our] [added: Our] international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our [removed: operations._][added: operations.]

Rewritten

[removed: _Our] [added: Our] business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others.

Rewritten

The loss of [added: our intellectual property rights] or [added: our] infringement of [removed: our] [added: the] intellectual property rights [added: of others] could have a significant adverse impact on our [removed: business._][added: business.]

New in FY2012

As previously disclosed by DISH Network, in May 2012, Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against DISH Network Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, DISH Network, L.L.C., in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that certain services provided by DISH Network, including Slingbox functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their carriage contracts.

New in FY2012

An adverse decision against DISH Network could decrease the number of Sling enabled set-top boxes we sell to DISH Network which could have an adverse impact on the business operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment.

New in FY2012

To succeed in these

New in FY2012

We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants.

New in FY2012

The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes have been decreasing and may decrease even further due to, among other things, an increase in the sales of lower-priced digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and increased competitive pricing pressure.

New in FY2012

We currently have unused satellite capacity in our EchoStar Satellite Services segment.

New in FY2012

Violations of these laws could result in fines or other penalties.

New in FY2012

In

New in FY2012

We may not be able to generate cash to meet our debt service needs or fund our operations.

New in FY2012

Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSS”), our wholly owned subsidiary that, together with its subsidiaries, operates our Hughes segment and our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, has incurred significant indebtedness.

New in FY2012

HSS currently has outstanding $1.1 billion of senior secured notes (the “Secured Notes”) and $900 million of senior unsecured notes (the “Unsecured Notes” and, together with the Secured Notes, the “Notes”).

New in FY2012

HSS’ ability to make payments on or to refinance its indebtedness and to fund its operations will depend on its ability to generate cash in the future, which is subject in part to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

New in FY2012

HSS may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available in amounts sufficient to enable HSS to service its indebtedness or to fund its operations or other liquidity needs.

New in FY2012

If HSS is unable to generate sufficient cash, it may be forced to take actions such as revising or delaying its strategic plans, reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing its debt or seeking additional equity capital.

New in FY2012

HSS may not be able to affect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.

New in FY2012

The indentures governing the Notes also limit HSS’ ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from such dispositions.

New in FY2012

Therefore, HSS may not be able to consummate those dispositions on satisfactory terms, or at all, or to use those proceeds in a manner it may otherwise prefer.

New in FY2012

Covenants in HSS’ indentures restrict its business in many ways.

New in FY2012

The indentures governing the Notes contain various covenants, subject to certain exceptions, that limit HSS’ ability and/or its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:

New in FY2012

· pay dividends or make distributions on HSS’ capital stock or repurchase HSS’ capital stock;

New in FY2012

· incur additional debt;

New in FY2012

· make certain investments;

New in FY2012

· create liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

New in FY2012

· merge or consolidate with another company;

New in FY2012

· transfer and sell assets;

New in FY2012

· enter into transactions with affiliates; and

New in FY2012

· allow to exist certain restrictions on the ability of certain subsidiaries of HSS to pay dividends, make distributions, make other payments, or transfer assets to HSS or its subsidiaries.

New in FY2012

Failure to comply with these and certain other financial covenants, if not cured or waived, may result in an event of default under the indentures, which could have a material adverse effect on HSS’ business or prospects.

New in FY2012

If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the respective indenture, the trustee under that indenture or the requisite holders of the Notes under that indenture may declare all such Notes to be immediately due and payable and, in the case of the indenture governing the Secured Notes, could proceed against the collateral that secures the Secured Notes.

New in FY2012

HSS and certain of its subsidiaries have pledged a significant portion of their assets as collateral under the indenture governing the Secured Notes.

New in FY2012

If HSS does not have enough cash to service its debt or fund other liquidity needs, it may be required to take actions such as requesting a waiver from the holders of the Notes, reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing all or part of the existing debt, or seeking additional equity capital.

New in FY2012

We cannot assure you that any of these remedies can be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

New in FY2012

RISKS RELATED TO OUR SATELLITES

New in FY2012

We may be required to perform

New in FY2012

use of certain frequencies or access to certain markets.

New in FY2012

RISKS RELATED TO OUR PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY

New in FY2012

Such encryption and related

New in FY2012

We rely on network and information systems and other technologies and a disruption, cyber attack, failure or destruction of such networks, systems or technologies may disrupt or harm our business.

New in FY2012

RISKS RELATED TO THE REGULATION OF OUR BUSINESS

New in FY2012

have changed from time to time.

Dropped from FY2011

As disclosed by DISH Network in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, DISH Network experienced fewer gross subscriber additions during 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

Therefore, it is possible that DISH Network will purchase fewer digital set-top boxes and related components from us in the future than it purchased during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

This decrease could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Dropped from FY2011

For instance, there is increasing demand for the delivery of digital video services via the Internet.

Dropped from FY2011

If this increasing demand, along with other changes in technology leads pay-TV subscribers to use devices such as personal computers, Internet ready televisions, blu-ray players or gaming consoles, instead of set-top boxes, to receive their pay-TV services, our customers may not need to purchase our digital set-top boxes to provide their subscribers with their pay-TV services.

Dropped from FY2011

Our competitors may also introduce technologies that compete favorably with our digital set-top boxes or that cause our digital set-top boxes to no longer be of significant benefit to our customers.

Dropped from FY2011

We and our suppliers may not be able to keep pace with technological developments.

Dropped from FY2011

If we fail to timely obtain such technologies from our suppliers or introduce products and services with superior technologies, if the new technologies developed by us or our partners fail to achieve sustained acceptance in the marketplace or become obsolete, or if our competitors obtain or develop proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior to ours, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our future competitive position that could in turn decrease our revenues and earnings.

Dropped from FY2011

Even if we keep up with technological innovation, we may not meet market demands.

Dropped from FY2011

_Certain of our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice, which would have a detrimental effect on us._

Dropped from FY2011

_We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions._

Dropped from FY2011

Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult for issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets at reasonable rates.

Dropped from FY2011

Currently, we have not been materially impacted by events in the current credit market.

Dropped from FY2011

However, we cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the future by the current conditions which may adversely affect our ability to secure additional financing to support our growth initiatives.

Dropped from FY2011

In particular, it may be difficult for us to raise debt financing on

Dropped from FY2011

acceptable terms.

Dropped from FY2011

In particular, the laws, regulations and practices of certain countries may make it harder for our international investments to be successful.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition, we have entered, and may continue to enter, into strategic transactions and investments in North America, Asia and elsewhere.

Dropped from FY2011

Even

Dropped from FY2011

_Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure or those of our third-party service providers could harm our business._

Dropped from FY2011

necessary intellectual property rights at any price, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

Dropped from FY2011

Paul W.

Dropped from FY2011

Orban, our Controller, provides services to us pursuant to a management services agreement with DISH Network.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition, Roger J.

Dropped from FY2011

_We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional_ _debt._

Dropped from FY2011

As of December 31, 2011, our total debt, including the debt of our subsidiaries, was approximately $2.534 billion.

Dropped from FY2011

Our debt levels could have significant consequences, including:

Dropped from FY2011

· making it more difficult to satisfy our obligations;

Dropped from FY2011

· having a dilutive effect on our outstanding equity capital or future earnings;

Dropped from FY2011

· increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including changes in interest rates;

Dropped from FY2011

· limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;

Dropped from FY2011

· requiring us to devote a substantial portion of our available cash and cash flow to make interest and principal payments on our debt, thereby reducing the amount of available cash for other purposes;

Dropped from FY2011

· limiting our financial and operating flexibility in responding to changing economic and competitive conditions; and

Dropped from FY2011

· placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have relatively less debt.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition, we may incur substantial additional debt in the future.

Dropped from FY2011

The terms of the indentures relating to our senior notes permit us to incur additional debt.

Dropped from FY2011

If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the risks we now face could intensify.

Dropped from FY2011

Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Technologies Segment

Dropped from FY2011

_We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for a substantial portion of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations._

Dropped from FY2011

Our historical revenues consist primarily of sales of our digital set-top boxes.

An excerpt. Shown here: 40 of 165 rewritten, 40 of 55 added and 40 of 98 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 1A. RISK FACTORS in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued

32 rewritten, 447 added, 22 removed, 35 unchanged

Rewritten

[removed: · _Business combinations._] When we acquire a business, we [removed: allocate] [added: assign] the purchase price to the [removed: various components of the acquisition] [added: acquired assets and liabilities] based upon [removed: the] [added: their] fair value [removed: of each component] using various valuation techniques, including the market approach, income [removed: approach] [added: approach,] and/or cost approach.

Rewritten

[removed: Amortization of these intangible assets is recorded on a straight line basis over an average finite useful] life primarily ranging from approximately one to twenty years or in relation to the estimated discounted cash flows over the life of the intangible.

Rewritten

[removed: · _Valuation of long-lived assets__._] We evaluate [removed: the carrying value of] [added: our] long-lived assets [removed: to be held and used,] other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, [removed: when] [added: for impairment whenever] events and [added: changes in] circumstances [removed: warrant such a review.][added: indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.]

Rewritten

See Note [removed: 2] [added: 8] in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this [removed: Annual Report on Form 10-K.][added: report for further discussion.]

Rewritten

The carrying [removed: value] [added: amount] of a long-lived asset or asset group is considered [added: to be] impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from such asset or asset group is less than its carrying [removed: value.][added: amount.]

Rewritten

In that event, [removed: a] [added: an impairment] loss [removed: will be] [added: is] recorded in [removed: “Impairments of long-lived asset” on our Consolidated Statements] [added: the determination] of [removed: Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)] [added: operating income] based on the amount by which the carrying [removed: value] [added: amount] exceeds the [added: estimated] fair value of the long-lived asset or asset group.

Rewritten

Fair value is determined primarily using [added: discounted cash flow techniques reflecting] the estimated cash flows [removed: associated with] [added: and discount rate that would be assumed by a market participant for] the asset or asset group under [removed: review, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.][added: review.]

Rewritten

[removed: Losses] [added: Impairment losses] on long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are determined in a similar manner, except that fair [removed: values] [added: value estimates] are reduced for estimated selling costs.

Rewritten

[removed: · _Valuation of goodwill] [added: _Impairment Goodwill] and [removed: intangible assets with indefinite lives_.][added: Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets_]

Rewritten

Fair value is determined primarily using [added: discounted cash flow techniques reflecting] the estimated [removed: future] cash [removed: flows, discounted at a] [added: flows and discount] rate [removed: commensurate with the risk involved.][added: that we believe would be assumed by market participants.]

Rewritten

[removed: · _Revenue Recognition._] Our Hughes segment enters into contracts to design, [removed: develop] [added: develop,] and deliver telecommunication networks to customers in our enterprise market.

Rewritten

[removed: Sales] [added: Revenue] under these [removed: long-term] contracts [removed: are] [added: is] recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.

Rewritten

Profits expected to be realized on long-term contracts are based on estimates of total [removed: sale values] [added: revenue] and costs at completion.

Rewritten

Changes in our estimates related to revenue recognition for these contracts could result in significant changes in our [removed: revenues] [added: revenue] or costs, which could be material to our consolidated results of operations.

Rewritten

[removed: ·] _Income [removed: taxes_.][added: Taxes_]

Rewritten

Any such valuation allowance is recorded in either “Income tax [removed: (provision) benefit,] [added: benefit (provision),] net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) or “Accumulated other comprehensive income [removed: (loss)] within “Stockholders’ [removed: equity (deficit)”] [added: equity”] on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Rewritten

Management evaluates the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions based on applicable tax law, regulations, case law, administrative rulings and [removed: pronouncements] [added: pronouncements,] and the facts and circumstances surrounding the tax position.

Rewritten

Changes in our estimates related to the recognition and measurement of the amount recorded for uncertain tax positions could result in significant changes in our “Income tax [removed: (provision) benefit,”] [added: benefit (provision), net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)] which could be material to our consolidated results of operations.

Rewritten

[removed: ·] _Contingent [removed: liabilities_.][added: Liabilities_]

Rewritten

[removed: _New] [added: New] Accounting [removed: Pronouncements_][added: Pronouncements]

Rewritten

However, we [removed: can not] [added: cannot] provide assurance that this will continue in the future.

Rewritten

[removed: _Market] [added: Market] Risks Associated [removed: With] [added: with] Financial [removed: Instruments_][added: Instruments and Foreign currency]

Rewritten

[removed: _Cash,] [added: Cash,] Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable [removed: Investment_ _Securities_][added: Investment Securities]

Rewritten

As of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities had a fair value of [removed: $1.696] [added: $1.548] billion.

Rewritten

Of [removed: that amount,] [added: the $1.548 billion,] a total of [removed: $1.480] [added: $1.492] billion was invested in: (a) cash; (b) [removed: VRDNs] [added: variable rate demand notes] convertible into cash at par value plus accrued interest generally in five business days or less; (c) debt instruments of the U.S. [removed: Government] [added: government] and its agencies; (d) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and/or (e) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality characteristics to the commercial paper and corporate obligations described above.

Rewritten

The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make strategic [removed: investments] [added: investments,] and expand the business.

Rewritten

[removed: _Interest] [added: _Interest] Rate [removed: Risk_][added: Risk_]

Rewritten

A change in interest rates would affect the fair value of [removed: our cash, cash equivalents and] current marketable investment securities portfolio; however, we normally hold these investments to maturity.

Rewritten

Based on our current non-strategic investment portfolio of [removed: $1.480] [added: $1.492] billion as of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] a hypothetical 10% change in average interest rates during [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] would not have a material impact on their fair value due to the limited duration of our investments.

Rewritten

Our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities had an average annual rate of return for the year ended December 31, [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] of [removed: 0.7%.][added: 0.8%.]

Rewritten

A hypothetical 10% decrease in average interest rates during [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] would result in a decrease of approximately [removed: $1] [added: $1.1] million in annual interest income.

Rewritten

[removed: _Strategic Marketable] [added: _Marketable and Other] Investment [removed: Securities_][added: Securities_]

New in FY2012

market.

New in FY2012

Of the $1.063 billion of revenue backlog as of December 31, 2012, we expect to recognize approximately $391 million of revenue in 2013.

New in FY2012

We continue our efforts in growing our consumer revenue, which depends on our success in adding new subscribers on our Hughes segment’s satellite networks.

New in FY2012

Accordingly, we may need to adjust our service offerings in response to the offerings of our competitors, including ViaSat Communications, Inc. In addition, we focus on expanding our enterprise business, both domestically and internationally.

New in FY2012

However, the growth of the enterprise business relies heavily on global economic conditions.

New in FY2012

_Acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc._ On June 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hughes Communications”).

New in FY2012

In connection with the acquisition of Hughes Communications (the “Hughes Acquisition”), we recorded $504 million of goodwill, which was assigned to reporting units of the Hughes segment (“Hughes goodwill”).

New in FY2012

During the second quarter of 2012, we performed step one of our annual two-step test of impairment of such goodwill.

New in FY2012

Step one involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill.

New in FY2012

We estimated fair value of the reporting units using discounted cash flow techniques, which included significant assumptions about prospective financial information, terminal value and discount rates.

New in FY2012

Based on this quantitative test, we determined that the estimated fair values of the Hughes reporting units were in excess of the corresponding carrying amounts, including goodwill.

New in FY2012

Accordingly, we concluded that goodwill assigned to the Hughes segment was not impaired and it was not necessary to perform step-two of the two-step goodwill impairment test.

New in FY2012

Due to the relatively short period of time that had elapsed since the date of the Hughes Acquisition and the absence of significant changes in our business forecasts and market-based assumptions during that period, the estimated fair values and carrying amounts of our reporting units (which reflect fair value measurements on the acquisition date) had not changed significantly from the acquisition date.

New in FY2012

Consequently, the estimated fair values of our reporting units did not exceed their corresponding carrying amounts by a substantial amount.

New in FY2012

If the estimated cash flows reflected in our fair value estimates were decreased by 10% and/or the discount rate used to discount such cash flows were increased by 10%, a portion of our goodwill would have been impaired and it would have been necessary to perform step two of the impairment test to determine the amount of the impairment loss.

New in FY2012

Based on review and assessment of the business as of December 31, 2012, no “triggering” events were identified that indicated that the Hughes goodwill was impaired as of December 31, 2012.

New in FY2012

See Note 9 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion of our goodwill.

New in FY2012

Also, see Item 1A.

New in FY2012

“Risk Factors” for information about the risks related to the Hughes Acquisition.

New in FY2012

EchoStar Satellite Services Segment

New in FY2012

Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment operates its business using ten of its owned and leased in-orbit satellites, including EchoStar XVI launched in November 2012.

New in FY2012

We lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, United States government service providers, state agencies, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers.

New in FY2012

We continue to pursue expanding our business offerings by providing value added services such as telemetry, tracking and control services to third parties.

New in FY2012

However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.

New in FY2012

We depend on DISH Network for a significant portion of the revenue for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment and we expect that DISH Network will continue to be the primary source of revenue for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment.

New in FY2012

Therefore, our results of operations are and will be closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’s pay-TV service as well as changes in DISH Network’s satellite capacity requirements.

New in FY2012

In November 2012, we launched EchoStar XVI, which is fully leased to DISH Network beginning in the first quarter of 2013, for the delivery of direct-to-home (“DTH”) broadcast services to DISH Network customers in the United States.

New in FY2012

Any termination or reduction in the services we provide to DISH Network would increase excess capacity on our satellites and require that we aggressively pursue alternative sources of revenue for this segment.

New in FY2012

Possible adverse effects on the EchoStar Technologies segment from DISH Network’s possible decline in gross subscriber additions are not expected to materially impact the revenue generated within the EchoStar Satellite Services segment in the near term.

New in FY2012

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to satellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.440 billion and $1.285 billion, respectively, and contracted backlog attributable to satellites under construction of zero and $621

New in FY2012

million, respectively.

New in FY2012

Of the $1.440 billion of contracted backlog as of December 31, 2012, we expect to recognize approximately $251 million of revenue in 2013.

New in FY2012

While we also expect to provide services to other customers, the number of potential new customers for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment is small and may be limited as prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network may continue to view us as a competitor due to our common ownership with DISH Network.

New in FY2012

Our ability to expand revenues in the EchoStar Satellite Services segment will likely require that we displace incumbent suppliers that generally have well established business models and often benefit from long-term contracts with their customers.

New in FY2012

As a result, to grow our EchoStar Satellite Services segment we may need to develop or otherwise acquire access to new satellite-delivered services so that we may offer differentiated services to prospective customers.

New in FY2012

However, there can be no assurance that we would be able to develop or otherwise acquire access to such differentiated services or develop the sales and marketing expertise necessary to sell such services profitably.

New in FY2012

In addition, as our satellite fleet ages, we will be required to evaluate replacement alternatives such as acquiring, leasing or constructing additional satellites, with or without customer commitments for capacity, which may require us to seek additional financing.

New in FY2012

However, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to fund any such replacement alternatives on terms that would be attractive to us or at all.

New in FY2012

New Business Opportunities

New in FY2012

We are exploring opportunities to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities, domestically and internationally.

Dropped from FY2011

· _Acquisition of investments in non-marketable investment securities_.

Dropped from FY2011

We calculate the fair value of our interest in non-marketable investment securities either as consideration given, or for non-cash acquisitions, based on the results of valuation analyses utilizing a discounted cash flow or DCF model.

Dropped from FY2011

The DCF methodology involves the use of various estimates relating to future cash flow projections and discount rates for which significant judgments are required.

Dropped from FY2011

Among other reasons, changes in estimates of future cash flows could result in a write-down of the asset in a future period.

Dropped from FY2011

We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives annually, and also when events and circumstances warrant.

Dropped from FY2011

We use estimates of fair value to determine the amount of impairment, if any, of recorded goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.

Dropped from FY2011

While our impairment tests in 2011 indicated the fair value of our intangible assets were above their carrying amounts, significant changes in our estimates of future cash flows could result in a write-down of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives in a future period, which will be recorded in a new line item entitled “Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and could be material to our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Dropped from FY2011

Our newly acquired Hughes segment will complete its goodwill impairment testing annually in the quarter ended June 30.

Dropped from FY2011

A 10% decrease in the estimated future cash flows or a 10% increase in the discount rate used in estimating the fair value of these assets (while all other assumptions remain unchanged) would not result in these assets being impaired.

Dropped from FY2011

Revenues are also earned from long-term contracts for the sale of mobile satellite communications systems.

Dropped from FY2011

· _Uncertainty in tax positions_.

Dropped from FY2011

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 amending ASC 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” related to goodwill impairment testing.

Dropped from FY2011

Among other things, ASU 2011-08 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test.

Dropped from FY2011

Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.

Dropped from FY2011

The amendments include a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment.

Dropped from FY2011

Although early adoption is allowed, the amendment is effective for impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-08 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Dropped from FY2011

As of December 31, 2011, we held current strategic and financial debt and equity investments of public companies with a fair value of $216 million.

Dropped from FY2011

These investments, which are held for strategic and financial purposes, are concentrated in a small number of companies, are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility.

Dropped from FY2011

The fair value of our strategic and financial debt and equity investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors.

Dropped from FY2011

These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses.

Dropped from FY2011

In general, the debt instruments held in our strategic marketable investment

An excerpt. Shown here: all 32 rewritten, 40 of 447 added and all 22 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK — Continued

18 rewritten, 7 added, 9 removed, 4 unchanged

Rewritten

[added: In general, the debt instruments held in our strategic marketable investment] securities portfolio are not significantly impacted by interest rate fluctuations as their value is more closely related to factors specific to the underlying business.

Rewritten

A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of our public strategic debt and equity investments would result in a decrease of approximately [removed: $22] [added: $6] million in the fair value of these investments.

Rewritten

[removed: _Restricted] [added: Restricted] Cash and Marketable Investment Securities and Noncurrent Marketable and Other Investment [removed: Securities_][added: Securities]

Rewritten

[removed: _Restricted] [added: _Restricted] Cash and Marketable Investment [removed: Securities_][added: Securities_]

Rewritten

As of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] we had [removed: $24] [added: $29] million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities invested in: (a) cash; (b) VRDNs convertible into cash at par value plus accrued interest generally in five business days or less; (c) debt instruments of the U.S. [removed: Government] [added: government] and its agencies; (d) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; [removed: and/or] [added: and] (e) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality characteristics to the commercial paper described above.

Rewritten

Based on our investment portfolio as of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] a hypothetical 10% increase in average interest rates would not have a material impact in the fair value of our restricted cash and marketable investment securities.

Rewritten

[removed: _Other] [added: _Other] Investment [removed: Securities_][added: Securities_]

Rewritten

As of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] we had [removed: $140] [added: $183] million of noncurrent public and nonpublic debt and equity instruments that we hold for strategic business purposes and account for under the [removed: cost,] [added: cost or] equity [removed: and/or fair value] methods of accounting.

Rewritten

A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the value of these debt and equity instruments would result in a decrease of approximately [removed: $14] [added: $18] million in the fair value of these investments.

Rewritten

[removed: _Foreign] [added: Foreign] Currency [removed: Risk_][added: Risk]

Rewritten

We generally conduct our business in [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] dollars.

Rewritten

Our international business is conducted in a variety of foreign currencies, [removed: including U.S. dollars,] and it is therefore exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Rewritten

Accordingly, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, [removed: commitments] [added: commitments,] and anticipated foreign currency transactions.

Rewritten

As of December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] we had [removed: an estimated $28] [added: $49] million of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables outstanding, and [removed: $9 million of] foreign currency forward contracts [added: with a notional value of $28 million] in place to partially mitigate foreign currency [removed: risk.][added: risk related to forecasted collections on a Mexican peso denominated revenue contract.]

Rewritten

The differences between the face amounts of the foreign exchange contracts and their estimated fair values were not material as of December 31, [removed: 2011.][added: 2012.]

Rewritten

The impact of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange rates on the fair value of foreign currency denominated net assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries would be an estimated loss of [removed: $14] [added: $13] million as of December 31, [removed: 2011.][added: 2012.]

Rewritten

[removed: QUANTITATIVE] [added: Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE] AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK — Continued

Rewritten

[removed: _Derivative] [added: Derivative] Financial [removed: Instruments_][added: Instruments]

New in FY2012

_Strategic Marketable Investment Securities_

New in FY2012

As of December 31, 2012, we held current strategic investments in publicly traded common stock of several public companies with a fair value of $56 million.

New in FY2012

These investments, which are held for strategic and financial purposes, are concentrated in a small number of companies, are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility.

New in FY2012

The fair value of these investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors.

New in FY2012

These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses.

New in FY2012

In general we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedge accounting or speculative purposes.

New in FY2012

However, as of December 31, 2012, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional value of $28 million in place to partially mitigate foreign exchange risk, primarily in connection with a contract in Mexico.

Dropped from FY2011

_Long-Term Debt_

Dropped from FY2011

As of December 31, 2011, we had long-term debt of $2.007 billion, excluding capital lease obligations, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Dropped from FY2011

We estimated the fair value of this debt to be approximately $2.081 billion using quoted market prices for our publicly traded debt, which constitutes approximately 99% of our debt.

Dropped from FY2011

Our debt has fixed interest rates, however the fair value of our debt is affected by fluctuations in interest rates.

Dropped from FY2011

A hypothetical 10% decrease in assumed interest rates would increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $86 million.

Dropped from FY2011

To the extent interest rates increase, our costs of financing would increase if and when we refinance our debt.

Dropped from FY2011

As of December 31, 2011, a hypothetical 10% increase in assumed interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $14 million.

Dropped from FY2011

Item 7A.

Dropped from FY2011

In general we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedge accounting or speculative purposes, however, as of December 31, 2011, we had $9 million of foreign currency forward contracts in place to partially mitigate foreign exchange risk.

Item 1. BUSINESS

214 rewritten, 121 added, 112 removed, 176 unchanged

Rewritten

[removed: We were] [added: EchoStar Corporation (together with its subsidiaries is referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”) is a holding company that was] organized in October 2007 as a corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada.

Rewritten

· _EchoStar [removed: Technologies_ —] [added: Technologies_—] which designs, [removed: develops] [added: develops,] and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products and technology, [removed: including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology,] primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and [added: international] cable companies and, with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets.

Rewritten

[added: Our] EchoStar Technologies [added: segment] also provides digital broadcast operations including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access [removed: management] [added: management,] and other services primarily to DISH Network.

Rewritten

· _EchoStar Satellite Services_ [removed: —] [added: (“ESS”)—] which uses [removed: 10] [added: certain] of our [removed: 11] owned and leased in-orbit satellites and related [removed: FCC] licenses to lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Dish Mexico”), [removed: U.S.] [added: a joint venture that we entered into in 2008, United States] government service providers, state agencies, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, [removed: programmers] [added: programmers,] and private enterprise customers.

Rewritten

[added: Our] Hughes [added: segment] also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems.

Rewritten

Hughes became a new segment as a result of our acquisition [removed: (the “Hughes Acquisition”)] of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hughes Communications”) [removed: and the results of operations of Hughes Communications are included] in [removed: this report effective] June [removed: 9,] 2011.

Rewritten

See Note [removed: 13] [added: 15] in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this [removed: Annual Report on Form 10-K] [added: report] for further discussion of [removed: the] [added: our acquisition of] Hughes [removed: Acquisition.][added: Communications (the “Hughes Acquisition”).]

Rewritten

_Expand our [removed: digital] set-top box [removed: business to additional customers__._] [added: and customers premise equipment__._] We believe opportunities exist to expand our business by selling equipment and services in both the [removed: U.S.] [added: North American] and international markets.

Rewritten

[removed: As a result of] [added: With] our extensive experience [removed: with] [added: in] designing, [removed: developing] [added: developing,] and distributing digital set-top boxes and related products, we [removed: believe we] can leverage the broader adoption of advanced technologies within set-top boxes to create opportunities for us.

Rewritten

_Leverage satellite capacity and related infrastructure__._ We currently have available satellite [removed: and fiber] capacity.

Rewritten

We believe market opportunities exist to lease our capacity to a broader customer base, including providers of pay-TV services, satellite-delivered broadband, corporate [removed: communications] [added: communications,] and government services.

Rewritten

We will continue to assess the ability to cross sell services, bundle satellite broadband and video [removed: DTH] services, and explore opportunities in new markets.

Rewritten

We intend to capitalize on the [removed: increasing] demand for satellite-delivered broadband services and enterprise solutions by utilizing, among other things, our industry expertise, technology [removed: leadership] [added: leadership, satellite capacity,] and high-quality, reliable service to continue subscriber growth in the consumer and enterprise markets.

Rewritten

The combined engineering power of [removed: EchoStar and Hughes Communications] [added: our business units] will allow us to develop and deploy cutting edge [removed: technology] [added: technology, license our technologies to others] and maintain a leading technological position in our industry.

Rewritten

[removed: _Exploit international opportunities__._] We believe that DTH satellite and broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure, and we intend to continue to seek new investments and customer relationships with international DTH satellite service and broadband service providers.

Rewritten

Our available satellite capacity provides us, in certain cases, with the ability to initiate new services [added: relatively] quickly, which could give us a competitive advantage.

Rewritten

[removed: _Pursue strategic partnerships, joint ventures and acquisitions__._] We [removed: intend to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities, both domestically and internationally, that we] believe [added: that investments in these types of opportunities, such as the Brazil DTH market,] may allow us to increase our existing market share, expand into new markets, [added: support the development of new satellite-delivered services, such as broadband Internet connectivity and mobile video services,] broaden our portfolio of products and intellectual property, and strengthen our relationships with our customers.

Rewritten

[removed: ECHOSTAR] [added: _ECHOSTAR] TECHNOLOGIES [removed: SEGMENT][added: SEGMENT_]

Rewritten

[removed: · _Standard-definition (“SD”)_ _digital set-top boxes_:] These devices allow consumers who subscribe to television service from multi-channel video distributors to access encrypted digital video and audio content.

Rewritten

[removed: · _High-definition (“HD”) digital set-top boxes_:] These devices allow consumers who subscribe to television services from multi-channel video distributors to access the enhanced picture quality and sound of high-definition content, in addition to the SD functionality of our SD digital set-top boxes.

Rewritten

Certain models of our [removed: SD] [added: HD] digital set-top boxes and [removed: HD] [added: SD] digital set-top boxes also contain certain of the following advanced capabilities and functionalities:

Rewritten

[removed: · _Interactive Applications_:] These applications include an on-screen program guide, pay-per-view offerings, [removed: the ability to support V-chip type parental control technology, games] [added: video content/meta-data enhancing user applications, social media, games,] and shopping.

Rewritten

[removed: · _DVR_:] Enables subscribers to pause, stop, reverse, fast forward, [removed: record] [added: record,] and replay digital television content using a built-in and/or external hard drive capable of storing content.

Rewritten

[removed: · _Broadband Internet Connectivity_:] Provides IPTV functionality, which supports on-demand services that allow consumers to download television programming, movies, music [added: applications,] and other content.

Rewritten

[removed: · _Sling “placeshifting” technology_:] Allows consumers to watch and control their digital television content anywhere in the world via a broadband Internet connection.

Rewritten

[removed: _Digital Broadcast Operations._ We operate a number of digital broadcast centers in the U.S.] Our principal digital broadcast centers are located in Cheyenne, [removed: Wyoming,] [added: Wyoming] and Gilbert, Arizona.

Rewritten

We also have [removed: four] [added: multiple] regional [removed: digital broadcast centers] and [removed: four] micro digital broadcast centers that allow us to maximize the use of the spot beam capabilities of our satellites and our customers’ satellites.

Rewritten

Programming and other data [removed: is] [added: are] received at these centers by fiber optic cable or satellite.

Rewritten

[removed: It] [added: The data] is then processed, compressed, and encrypted and then uplinked to our satellites and our customers’ satellites for transmission to end users.

Rewritten

DISH Network accounted for [added: 76.9%,] 79.4%, [removed: 82.8%] and [removed: 81.9%] [added: 82.8%] of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009,] [added: 2010,] respectively.

Rewritten

Bell TV, a DTH satellite service provider in Canada, accounted for [removed: 12.3%, 9.8%] [added: 13.4%, 12.3%] and [removed: 11.7%] [added: 9.8%] of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009,] [added: 2010,] respectively.

Rewritten

[removed: Furthermore, Dish Mexico] [added: For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, DISH Network] accounted for [removed: 4.0%, 3.9%] [added: approximately 72.4%, 77.6%] and [removed: 2.1%] [added: 79.5%] of our total EchoStar [removed: Technologies] [added: Satellite Services] segment [removed: revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.][added: revenue.]

Rewritten

We also currently sell our digital set-top boxes to other international DTH satellite and cable providers such as [added: Dish Mexico and] Unitymedia GmbH, although these customers do not account for a significant amount of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue.

Rewritten

We expect [removed: to continue to rely on] DISH Network [removed: as] [added: will continue to be] the primary customer [removed: of our EchoStar Technologies segment] and [removed: for] the [removed: substantial majority of] [added: key revenue contributor for] our [removed: total] EchoStar Technologies [removed: segment revenue.][added: segment.]

Rewritten

[removed: The] [added: Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a] receiver [removed: agreement allows] [added: agreement, expiring on December 31, 2014, with] DISH Network [added: pursuant] to [added: which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to] purchase digital set-top boxes, related [removed: accessories] [added: accessories,] and other equipment from us either: (i) at [removed: a] cost (decreasing as we reduce [removed: cost] [added: costs] and increasing as [added: our] costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased.

Rewritten

Under the receiver agreement, our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be [removed: impaired] [added: decreased] if these costs increase.

Rewritten

A [removed: substantial] majority of our EchoStar Technologies segment international revenue during each of the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010,] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009] [added: 2010] was attributable to sales of digital set-top boxes to Bell [removed: TV and Dish Mexico.][added: TV.]

Rewritten

[removed: The] [added: Among other things, the] agreement [removed: includes] [added: entitles us to be Bell TV’s exclusive provider of digital set-top boxes, subject to certain limited exceptions, and provides] fixed pricing over the term of the agreement as well as providing future engineering development for enhanced Bell TV service offerings.

Rewritten

As we seek to [removed: establish ourselves] [added: grow our revenue and market share] in the digital set-top box industry as an independent business, we face substantial competition.

Rewritten

Many of our primary competitors, such as [removed: Motorola Mobility, Cisco (which owns Scientific Atlanta),] [added: Arris, Cisco,] Pace and [removed: Technicolor] [added: Technicolor,] have established longstanding relationships with their customers.

New in FY2012

Our Class A common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “SATS.” We are a global provider of satellite operations, video delivery solutions, and broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments.

New in FY2012

We currently operate in three business segments:

New in FY2012

_Exploit international opportunities__._ We believe that Direct-To-Home (“DTH”) satellite and broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure.

New in FY2012

We intend to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities that allow us to capitalize on our extensive experience in delivering end-to- end broadband and pay TV consumer services.

New in FY2012

Therefore, we continue to explore opportunities, including partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisitions, to expand our existing markets or enter new markets.

New in FY2012

With our extensive experience in designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing digital set-top boxes and related products, we believe we can leverage the broader adoption of advanced technologies such as whole home DVR, placeshifting for TVAnywhere, and Over-The-Top internet hybrid solutions within set-top boxes to create opportunities for us.

New in FY2012

In addition, we intend to seek opportunities to license our technology to other original equipment manufacturer or payTV providers.

New in FY2012

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

New in FY2012

· _High-definition (“HD”) digital set-top boxes_.

New in FY2012

· _Standard-definition (“SD”)_ _digital set-top boxes_.

New in FY2012

· _Interactive Applications_.

New in FY2012

· _Digital Video Recording (“DVR”)_.

New in FY2012

During the first quarter of 2012, we introduced a new whole-home HD DVR receiver, which provides subscribers a variety of options to control or view their recording.

New in FY2012

· _Broadband Internet Connectivity_.

New in FY2012

· _Slingbox “placeshifting” technology_.

New in FY2012

_Digital Broadcast Operations._ We operate a number of digital broadcast centers in the United States.

New in FY2012

In 2011, we extended our two-year contract with Bell TV until December 2013.

New in FY2012

The set-top box industry is highly competitive, and market leadership changes frequently as a result of new products, designs and pricing.

New in FY2012

In addition, a number of rapidly growing mainly Asian companies have recently entered the market with set-top box offerings similar to our existing satellite set-top box products.

New in FY2012

The entry of these new competitors may result in increased pricing pressure in the market.

New in FY2012

Our use of proprietary technology, together with our in-house engineering expertise, enables us to innovate and bring new features and enhancements quickly to our primary customers..

New in FY2012

In addition, our end-to-end video solution allows us to provide a more cost-effective solution for a PayTV Operator who may have to negotiate hardware, middleware and a Conditional Access System separately.

New in FY2012

We have a long-standing relationship with DISH Network and provide technologically advanced set-top boxes, now including advanced hybrid satellite and IP over-the-top delivery solutions, Slingbox placeshifting technology, and whole-home DVR functionality.

New in FY2012

Beginning in October 2012, we introduced HughesNet Gen4 broadband Internet services to our customers in North America on EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012.

New in FY2012

In October 2012, we entered into a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C (“dishNET”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, pursuant to which dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute the Hughes satellite Internet service (the “Hughes service”) under the dishNET brand.

New in FY2012

The Distribution Agreement provides that dishNET pays us a monthly per subscriber wholesale service fee for the Hughes service based upon a subscriber’s service level and beginning January 1, 2014, certain volume subscription thresholds.

New in FY2012

The Distribution Agreement also provides that dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase certain broadband equipment from us to support its services.

New in FY2012

The Distribution Agreement has a five year term with automatic renewal for successive one year terms unless terminated by either party with a written notice at least 180 days before the expiration of the then-current term.

New in FY2012

Upon expiration or termination of the Distribution Agreement, the parties will continue to provide the Hughes service to the then-current dishNET subscribers pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Distribution Agreement.

New in FY2012

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $1.063 billion and $1.036 billion, respectively, of contracted revenue backlog.

New in FY2012

Our revenue backlog as of December 31, 2011 included $252 million related to EchoStar XVII, which was under construction in 2011.

New in FY2012

Of the $1.063 billion of contracted backlog as of December 31, 2012, we expect to recognize approximately $391 million of revenue in 2013.

New in FY2012

In addition, we face competition against established domestic carriers such as AT&T Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and Sprint Corporation.

New in FY2012

With SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII and additional satellite capacity acquired from multiple third-party providers, we believe that we will have sufficient capacity to grow our consumer broadband business.

New in FY2012

Our Services

New in FY2012

Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment operates its business using ten of its owned and leased in-orbit satellites, including EchoStar XVI satellite launched in November 2012.

New in FY2012

We lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, United States government service providers, state agencies, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers.

New in FY2012

EchoStar XVI is fully leased to DISH Network for the delivery of DTH broadcast services to DISH customers in the United States.

New in FY2012

We expect to provide service to DISH Network on EchoStar XVI in the first quarter of 2013.

New in FY2012

Of the $1.440 billion of contracted backlog as of December 31, 2012, we expect to recognize approximately $251 million of revenue in 2013.

Dropped from FY2011

Our Class A common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “SATS.” Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Inverness Terrace East, Englewood, Colorado 80112-5308 and our telephone number is (303) 706-4000.

Dropped from FY2011

EchoStar Corporation is a holding company, whose subsidiaries (which together with EchoStar Corporation are referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”) operate three segments:

Dropped from FY2011

In particular, the broader adoption of advanced technologies within set-top boxes may launch a replacement cycle, particularly among direct-to-home (“DTH”) satellite and cable providers with substantial bases of legacy equipment.

Dropped from FY2011

_Offer_ _end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems__._ We intend to leverage our engineering resources to customize infrastructure solutions for a broad base of customers.

Dropped from FY2011

For example, as demonstrated by our Dish Mexico joint venture, we are offering customers end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and network design and management.

Dropped from FY2011

We recently introduced a new whole-home HD DVR.

Dropped from FY2011

Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a new receiver agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we are obligated to sell digital set-top boxes and related products to DISH Network until December 31, 2014.

Dropped from FY2011

However, DISH Network is under no obligation to purchase our digital set-top boxes or related products before or after this date.

Dropped from FY2011

In early 2009, we completed a multi-year contract extension with Bell TV that makes us the exclusive provider of digital set-top boxes to Bell TV, subject to certain limited exceptions.

Dropped from FY2011

Additionally, in 2008, we entered into a joint venture with Dish Mexico, to which we also sell digital set-top boxes and related accessories and uplink services to Dish Mexico.

Dropped from FY2011

Although some of the competitors own the conditional access technology deployed by their customers, the FCC’s rules regarding separate mandated removable security in digital cable systems may allow us to compete for this type of business.

Dropped from FY2011

We depend on a

Dropped from FY2011

EchoStar Satellite Services has five owned and five leased in-orbit satellites.

Dropped from FY2011

EchoStar Satellite Services also has one owned satellite currently under construction.

Dropped from FY2011

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, DISH Network accounted for approximately 77.6%, 79.5% and 75.4% of our total EchoStar Satellite Services segment revenue.

Dropped from FY2011

Future costs associated with our excess capacity will negatively impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset these costs.

Dropped from FY2011

Of these amounts, we expect approximately $230 million to be recognized in 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

further limit competition and competitive pricing.

Dropped from FY2011

On June 8, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Hughes Communications, Inc., pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger (the “Hughes Agreement”) by and between us, certain of our subsidiaries, including EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., and Hughes Communications, Inc. The funding of the Hughes Acquisition was supported by the issuance of $1.1 billion of senior secured notes and $900 million of senior unsecured notes.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition to the debt securities issued, we contributed cash and marketable investment securities to, and forgave certain net intercompany accounts payable of, Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSS”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, formerly known as EH Holding Corporation, totaling $609 million.

Dropped from FY2011

Of this amount, we expect approximately $370 million to be recognized in 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

We also face competition from established carriers such as AT&T Corp., Verizon, Sprint Corporation, British Telecommunications plc, France Télécom, Deutsche Telekom AG and the global consortia of telecom operators and other major carriers, which provide international telephone, private line and private network services using their own national telephone networks and those of others.

Dropped from FY2011

We currently utilize our SPACEWAY 3 satellite to operate our broadband business.

Dropped from FY2011

We believe that we will have sufficient capacity to grow our broadband business and that our capacity will grow significantly when we launch EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, formerly known as Jupiter, our next generation, high throughput geostationary satellite, in the summer of 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

INTERNATIONAL DTH PLATFORMS

Dropped from FY2011

Our experience with digital set-top boxes and satellite delivery systems enables us to provide end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and related components, and network design and management.

Dropped from FY2011

During 2008, we entered into our Dish Mexico joint venture.

Dropped from FY2011

Pursuant to this arrangement, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to Dish Mexico.

Dropped from FY2011

Subject to a number of conditions, we committed to provide $112 million of value over an initial ten year period in the form of cash, equipment and services, which was satisfied as of December 31, 2010.

Dropped from FY2011

We intend to evaluate new strategic development opportunities in North America and in other international markets.

Dropped from FY2011

We also plan to expand our business and support the development of new satellite-delivered services, such as broadband Internet connectivity and mobile video services.

Dropped from FY2011

The expertise we obtain through these strategic opportunities may also help us to improve and expand the services that we provide to our existing customers.

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | | | Original | |

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | Degree Orbital | | Useful Life/ | |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | Launch | | Location | | Lease Term | |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Leased from DISH Network: | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| EchoStar I (1) | | December 1995 | | 77 | | 12 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| AMC-15 (3) | | December 2004 | | 105 | | 10 | |

An excerpt. Shown here: 40 of 214 rewritten, 40 of 121 added and 40 of 112 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 1. BUSINESS in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

30 rewritten, 74 added, 52 removed, 30 unchanged

Rewritten

Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these [removed: cases] [added: proceedings] seek an indeterminate amount of damages.

Rewritten

We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or [added: an] additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate.

Rewritten

[removed: Broadcast Innovation] [added: TQP] is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.

Rewritten

[removed: _Cyberfone] [added: Cyberfone] Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, [removed: LLC)_][added: LLC)]

Rewritten

On September 15, 2011, LVL Patent Group, LLC filed a [removed: complaint] [added: suit] against [removed: us] [added: EchoStar Corporation] and our wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, and DirecTV, Inc. in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. 6,044,382, which is entitled “Data Transaction Assembly Server.” [removed: On November 18, 2011, Cyberfone Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, LLC) filed an amended complaint making] [added: DirecTV was dismissed from] the [removed: same claim.][added: case on January 4, 2012.]

Rewritten

We intend to vigorously [removed: defend] [added: litigate] this case.

Rewritten

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could [removed: require] [added: cause] us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.

Rewritten

[removed: _InterAD] [added: E-Contact] Technologies, [removed: LLC_][added: LLC]

Rewritten

[removed: _Joao] [added: Joao] Control & Monitoring [removed: Systems_][added: Systems]

Rewritten

During December 2010, Joao Control & Monitoring Systems (“Joao”) filed suit against Sling Media Inc., our [removed: indirect] [added: indirectly] wholly owned subsidiary, [added: as well as] ACTI Corporation, ADT Security, Alarmclub.Com, American Honda Motor Company, BMW, Byremote, Drivecam, Honeywell, Iveda Corporation, Magtec Products, Mercedes-Benz, On-Net Surveillance, OnStar, SafeFreight Technology, Skyway Security, SmartVue Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, Tyco, UTC Fire and Xanboo in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent Nos. 6,549,130 and 6,587,046.

Rewritten

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could [removed: require] [added: cause] us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.

Rewritten

[removed: _Nazomi] [added: Nazomi] Communications, [removed: Inc._][added: Inc.]

Rewritten

On February 10, 2010, Nazomi Communications, Inc. (“Nazomi”) filed suit against Sling Media, [removed: Inc.,] [added: Inc. (“Sling”),] our [removed: indirect] [added: indirectly] wholly owned subsidiary, [added: as well as] Nokia Corp, Nokia Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Western Digital Corp., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Garmin Corp., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Vizio Inc. and iOmega Corp in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. 7,080,362 (the [removed: “‘362] [added: “362] patent”) and [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. 7,225,436 (the [removed: “‘436] [added: “436] patent”).

Rewritten

The [removed: ‘362] [added: 362] patent and the [removed: ‘436] [added: 436] patent relate to Java hardware acceleration.

Rewritten

The suit alleges that the Slingbox-Pro-HD product infringes the [removed: ‘362] [added: 362] patent and the [removed: ‘436] [added: 436] patent because the Slingbox-PRO HD allegedly incorporates an ARM926EJ-S processor core capable of Java hardware acceleration.

Rewritten

On [removed: July 2,] [added: January 22,] 2009, [removed: NorthPoint Technology, Ltd. (“NorthPoint”)] [added: Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”)] filed suit against [removed: us, DISH Network,] [added: EchoStar Corporation] and [removed: DirecTV] [added: DISH Network] in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the [removed: Western] [added: Northern] District of [removed: Texas] [added: Illinois] alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. [removed: 6,208,636 (the “‘636 patent”).][added: Re.]

Rewritten

[removed: _Personalized] [added: Personalized] Media Communications, [removed: Inc._][added: Inc.]

Rewritten

During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”) filed suit against [removed: us,] [added: EchoStar Corporation,] DISH Network and Motorola Inc. in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent Nos. [removed: 4,694,490,] 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.

Rewritten

Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with [removed: PMC] [added: PMC,] leaving DISH Network and us as defendants.

Rewritten

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe [removed: any of] the asserted [removed: patents,] [added: patent,] we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain [removed: user-friendly] features [removed: that we currently offer to consumers.][added: of our products.]

Rewritten

[removed: Suomen] [added: Premier International Associates] is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.

Rewritten

[removed: _Technology] [added: Technology] Development and Licensing [removed: L.L.C._][added: L.L.C.]

Rewritten

In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two reexamination petitions before the [added: United States] Patent and Trademark Office.

Rewritten

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted [removed: patent,] [added: copyrights,] we may be subject to substantial damages, [removed: which may include treble damages,] and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain [removed: user-friendly] features that we currently offer to [removed: consumers.][added: DISH.]

Rewritten

[removed: _Vigilos, LLC_][added: Vigilos, LLC]

Rewritten

On February 23, 2011, Vigilos, LLC [added: (“Vigilos”)] filed suit against [removed: us,] [added: EchoStar Corporation,] two of our subsidiaries, Sling Media, Inc. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and Monsoon Multimedia, Inc. in the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. 6,839,731, which is entitled “System and Method for Providing Data Communication in a Device Network.” Subsequently in 2011, Vigilos added DISH Network L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of DISH Network, as a defendant in its First Amended Complaint and the case was transferred to the Northern District of California.

Rewritten

Later in 2011, Vigilos filed a Second Amended Complaint that added claims for infringement of a second patent, [removed: U.S.] [added: United States] Patent No. 7,370,074, which is entitled “System and Method for Implementing Open-Protocol Remote Device Control.” [added: Vigilos is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.]

Rewritten

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted [removed: patents,] [added: patent,] we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble [removed: damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.][added: damages.]

Rewritten

[removed: _Other_][added: Other]

Rewritten

In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of [added: our] business.

New in FY2012

On July 12, 2012, Cyberfone Systems, LLC (“Cyberfone”) filed the operative second amended complaint making the same claim.

New in FY2012

On January 24, 2013, Cyberfone voluntarily dismissed the action against us and DISH Network L.L.C. without prejudice, and the matter is now concluded.

New in FY2012

CreateAds LLC

New in FY2012

On February 7, 2013, CreateAds LLC (“CreateAds”) filed suit against our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hughes Network Systems, LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,535,320, which is entitled “Method of Generating a Visual Design.” CreateAds appears to assert that some portion of HughesNet web design services infringes its patent.

New in FY2012

On February 22, 2012, E-Contact Technologies, LLC (“E-Contact”) filed suit against two of our subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,347,579, which is entitled “Personal Computer Diary.” E-Contact appears to assert that some portion of HughesNet email services infringe that patent.

New in FY2012

HughesNet email services are provided by a third-party service provider, who has assumed indemnification obligations for the case.

New in FY2012

On May 31, 2012, E-Contact filed a first amended complaint.

New in FY2012

The amended complaint removed the original complaint’s requests for a finding of willfulness and entry of an injunction.

New in FY2012

We, along with the third-party service provider, intend to vigorously defend this case.

New in FY2012

In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages.

New in FY2012

The Hopper Litigation

New in FY2012

On May 24, 2012, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (“ABC”), CBS Corporation (“CBS”), Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Television Holdings, Inc., Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. (collectively, “Fox”) and NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBC”).

New in FY2012

The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that DISH Network L.L.C is not infringing any defendant’s copyright, or breaching any defendant’s retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop™ features in Hopper™ set-top boxes.

New in FY2012

The PrimeTime Anytime feature allows a user of a Hopper set-top box, at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days.

New in FY2012

The AutoHop feature allows a subscriber, at his or her option, to watch certain recordings the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back the next day after the show’s original airing.

New in FY2012

Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against DISH Network Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (collectively, “DISH”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as DISH’s use of Sling place-shifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC, Universal Network Television, LLC, Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal Media, LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.

New in FY2012

The Central District of California matters have been assigned to a single judge.

New in FY2012

As a result of certain parties’ competing venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks filing various amended complaints, the claims are presently pending in the following venues: (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC parties are pending in New York; (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the CBS parties are pending in New York; (3) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox parties are pending in California; and (4) the copyright claims regarding the NBC parties are pending in California, while the contract claims involving NBC are venued in both New York and California.

New in FY2012

Additional venue-related motions are still pending in the NBC actions in New York and California.

New in FY2012

On September 21, 2012, the California court heard the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features.

New in FY2012

The Court denied that motion.

New in FY2012

On August 17, 2012, the NBC plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint in their California action adding us and our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. to the NBC litigation, alleging various claims of copyright infringement.

New in FY2012

We and our subsidiary answered on September 18, 2012.

New in FY2012

On October 9, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C., with the CBS plaintiffs filing similar copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. on October 12, 2012.

New in FY2012

On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion in the New York action for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features, and we and the ABC plaintiffs have filed briefs related to that motion.

New in FY2012

We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases.

New in FY2012

An adverse decision against DISH Network could decrease the number of Sling enabled set-top boxes we sell to DISH Network, which could have an adverse impact on the business operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment.

New in FY2012

In addition, to the extent that DISH Network experiences fewer gross new subscriber additions, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

New in FY2012

We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

New in FY2012

On February 5, 2013, the case was dismissed by the plaintiff without prejudice.

New in FY2012

On August 14, 2012, the Court entered an order granting Sling’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement.

New in FY2012

On December 21, 2012, the Court entered final judgment in Sling’s favor.

New in FY2012

On January 15, 2013, Nazomi filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

New in FY2012

Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC

New in FY2012

On November 30, 2012, Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC (“NAT”) filed suit against Hughes Network Systems, LLC, our indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,091,710 (the “710 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Preventing Data Slow Down Over Asymmetric Data Transmission Links.” NAT is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.

New in FY2012

On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, “Gemstar”) as a party, and added a new claim

New in FY2012

against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstar’s license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and we are sub licensees.

New in FY2012

A new trial date has not yet been set.

New in FY2012

Premier International Associates, LLC

New in FY2012

On August 3, 2012, Premier International Associates, LLC (“Premier International Associates”) filed a suit against EchoStar Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH Network and its wholly owned subsidiaries, DISH DBS and DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,243,725 (the “725 patent”), which is entitled “List Building System.” The 725 patent relates to a system for building an inventory of audio/visual works.

Dropped from FY2011

In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with DISH Network that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation.

Dropped from FY2011

Under the terms of the separation agreement, we have assumed certain liabilities that relate to our business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off.

Dropped from FY2011

Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, we will only be liable for our acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify us for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as DISH Network’s acts or omissions following the Spin-off.

Dropped from FY2011

_Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C._

Dropped from FY2011

During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (“Broadcast Innovation”) filed a lawsuit against DISH Network, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in U.S. District Court in Denver, Colorado.

Dropped from FY2011

The suit alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the “‘094 patent”) and 4,992,066 (the “‘066 patent”).

Dropped from FY2011

The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data.

Dropped from FY2011

The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards.

Dropped from FY2011

Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving DISH Network as the only defendant.

Dropped from FY2011

During 2004, the District Court issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid.

Dropped from FY2011

Also in 2004, the District Court found the ‘094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast.

Dropped from FY2011

In 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned that finding of invalidity with respect to the ‘094 patent and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court.

Dropped from FY2011

During June 2006, Charter filed a request for reexamination of the ‘094 patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and on December 13, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate cancelling all claims of the ‘094 patent.

Dropped from FY2011

On February 2, 2012, Broadcast Innovation dismissed the case against DISH Network with prejudice.

Dropped from FY2011

DirecTV was dismissed from the case on January 4, 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

On September 16, 2011, InterAD Technologies, LLC (“InterAD”) filed a complaint against us and our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, AT&T, Inc., Bright House Networks, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., CSC Holdings, LLC, DirecTV, Inc., Insight Communications Company, Inc., Knology, Inc., Mediacom Broadband, LLC, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc., and Verizon, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,438,355, which is entitled “Interactive System for Processing Viewer Responses to Television Programming.” On January 5, 2012, InterAD voluntarily dismissed the case against us without prejudice.

Dropped from FY2011

_NorthPoint Technology, Ltd._

Dropped from FY2011

The ‘636 patent relates to the use of multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite reception.

Dropped from FY2011

On April 21, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued an order granting reexamination of the ‘636 patent.

Dropped from FY2011

On June 21, 2011, the District Court entered summary judgment in our favor, finding that all asserted claims of the ‘636 patent are invalid.

Dropped from FY2011

NorthPoint has appealed.

Dropped from FY2011

Trial is currently set for August 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

_Suomen Colorize Oy_

Dropped from FY2011

During October 2010, Suomen Colorize Oy (“Suomen”) filed suit against us and DISH Network L.L.C., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of DISH Network, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,277,398.

Dropped from FY2011

The abstract of the patent states that the claims are directed to a method and terminal for providing services in a telecommunications network.

Dropped from FY2011

The action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, and on January 10, 2012, Suomen voluntarily dismissed the case against us without prejudice.

Dropped from FY2011

On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”) filed suit against us and DISH Network in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. Re.

Dropped from FY2011

_TiVo Inc._

Dropped from FY2011

In connection with our litigation with TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”), which is described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3.

Dropped from FY2011

Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.,” on April 20, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the District Court’s contempt ruling on infringement, articulated a new standard for determining “colorable difference” and remanded that issue back to the District Court for determination.

Dropped from FY2011

The Federal Circuit also vacated the District Court’s amended injunction requiring that we inform the court of any further attempts to design around TiVo’s U.S. Patent No. 6,233,389 (the “‘389 patent”) and seek approval from the court before any such design-around is implemented.

Dropped from FY2011

The Federal Circuit also vacated the infringement damages for the period after we deployed our original alternative technology (although it did not foreclose that damages may be reinstated if upon remand a new court or jury decision found that the original alternative technology infringed TiVo’s ‘389 patent).

Dropped from FY2011

The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s contempt ruling on disablement, holding that the original 2006 injunction required that we disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes deployed with customers (the “Disablement Provision”) and affirmed the $90 million in contempt sanctions awarded against us for violating the Disablement Provision.

Dropped from FY2011

On April 29, 2011, we and DISH Network entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo.

Dropped from FY2011

The settlement resolves all pending litigation between us and DISH Network, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH Network digital video recorders, or DVRs, which litigation is described in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3.

Dropped from FY2011

Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.”

Dropped from FY2011

Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation has been dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by us and DISH Network have been dissolved.

Dropped from FY2011

We and DISH Network are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017.

Dropped from FY2011

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with our Spin-off from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for a contribution from us totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to our sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer.

Dropped from FY2011

Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and us based on historical sales of certain licensed products with our being responsible for 5% of each annual payment, or approximately $10 million in total.

An excerpt. Shown here: all 30 rewritten, 40 of 74 added and 40 of 52 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Cover and table of contents

49 rewritten, 17 added, 20 removed, 88 unchanged

Rewritten

[removed: |] x [removed: |] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [removed: |]

Rewritten

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, [removed: 2011][added: 2012]

Rewritten

[removed: |] o [removed: |] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [removed: |]

Rewritten

| [removed: |] Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered | [removed: |]

Rewritten

| [removed: |] Class A common stock, $0.001 par value | | The [removed: Nasdaq] [added: NASDAQ] Stock Market [removed: L.L.C. |] [added: LLC] |

Rewritten

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [removed: x][added: o]

Rewritten

As of June [removed: 30, 2011,] [added: 29, 2012,] the aggregate market value of Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was [removed: $1.404] [added: $1.038] billion based upon the closing price of the Class A common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market as of the close of business on that date.

Rewritten

As of February [removed: 14, 2012,] [added: 11, 2013,] the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of [removed: 38,982,802] [added: 40,111,841] shares of Class A common stock and 47,687,039 shares of Class B common stock, each $0.001 par value.

Rewritten

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Rewritten

[removed: TABLE] [added: TABLE] OF [removed: CONTENTS][added: CONTENTS]

Rewritten

| [PART [removed: I](#PartI_160658] [added: I](#Parti_165300] "Click to goto ") | | | [removed: | |]

Rewritten

| | [removed: |] [Disclosure Regarding [removed: Forward-Looking Statements](#DisclosureRegardingForwardlooking_160542] [added: Forward Looking Statements](#DisclosureRegardingForwardLooking_164057] "Click to goto ") | [removed: |] i |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 1.](#Item1_Business_160701) | | [Business](#Item1_Business_160701)] [added: 1.](#Item1_Business_165307)] | [added: [Business](#Item1_Business_165307)] | [removed: 1] [added: 2] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 1A.](#Item1a_RiskFactors_162551) |] [added: 1A.](#Item1a_RiskFactors_165823)] | [Risk [removed: Factors](#Item1a_RiskFactors_162551) |] [added: Factors](#Item1a_RiskFactors_165823)] | [removed: 18] [added: 19] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 1B.](#Item1b_UnresolvedStaffComments_160750) |] [added: 1B.](#Item1b_UnresolvedStaffComments_170621)] | [Unresolved Staff [removed: Comments](#Item1b_UnresolvedStaffComments_160750) |] [added: Comments](#Item1b_UnresolvedStaffComments_170621)] | [removed: 38] [added: 37] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 2.](#Item2_Properties_160802) | | [Properties](#Item2_Properties_160802)] [added: 2.](#Item2_Properties_170619)] | [added: [Properties](#Item2_Properties_170619)] | [removed: 39] [added: 38] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 3.](#Item3_LegalProceedings_161030) |] [added: 3.](#Item_171005)] | [Legal [removed: Proceedings](#Item3_LegalProceedings_161030) |] [added: Proceedings](#Item_171005)] | [removed: 40] [added: 39] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 4.](#Item4_MineSafetyDisclosures_161411) |] [added: 4.](#Item4_MineSafetyDisclosures_162512)] | [Mine Safety [removed: Disclosures](#Item4_MineSafetyDisclosures_161411) |] [added: Disclosures](#Item4_MineSafetyDisclosures_162512)] | 44 |

Rewritten

| [PART [removed: II](#Partii_161415] [added: II](#Partii_162513] "Click to goto ") | | | [removed: | |]

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 5.](#Item5_MarketForRegistrants_161418) |] [added: 5.](#Item5_MarketForRegistrantsCommonE_162514)] | [Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity [removed: Securities](#Item5_MarketForRegistrants_161418) |] [added: Securities](#Item5_MarketForRegistrantsCommonE_162514)] | 44 |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 6.](#Item6_SelectedFinancialData_161705) |] [added: 6.](#Item6_SelectedFinancialData_162535)] | [Selected Financial [removed: Data](#Item6_SelectedFinancialData_161705) |] [added: Data](#Item6_SelectedFinancialData_162535)] | 45 |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 7.](#Item7_ManagementsDiscussion_162611) |] [added: 7.](#Item7_ManagementsDiscussionAndAna_162810)] | [Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of [removed: Operations](#Item7_ManagementsDiscussion_162611) |] [added: Operations](#Item7_ManagementsDiscussionAndAna_162810)] | [removed: 48] [added: 46] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 7A.](#Item7a_QuantitativeAndQualitative_163918) |] [added: 7A.](#Item7a_QuantitativeAndQualitative_171003)] | [Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market [removed: Risk](#Item7a_QuantitativeAndQualitative_163918) |] [added: Risk](#Item7a_QuantitativeAndQualitative_171003)] | [removed: 66] [added: 64] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 8.](#Item8_FinancialStatementsAndSuppl_164208) |] [added: 8.](#Item8_FinancialStatementsAndSuppl_171115)] | [Financial Statements and Supplementary [removed: Data](#Item8_FinancialStatementsAndSuppl_164208) |] [added: Data](#Item8_FinancialStatementsAndSuppl_171115)] | [removed: 68] [added: 66] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 9.](#Item9_ChangesInAndDisagreementsWi_164212) |] [added: 9.](#Item9_ChangesInAndDisagreementsWi_171119)] | [Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial [removed: Disclosure](#Item9_ChangesInAndDisagreementsWi_164212) |] [added: Disclosure](#Item9_ChangesInAndDisagreementsWi_171119)] | [removed: 68] [added: 66] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 9A.](#Item9a_ControlsAndProcedures_164214) |] [added: 9A.](#Item9a_ControlsAndProcedures_171121)] | [Controls and [removed: Procedures](#Item9a_ControlsAndProcedures_164214) |] [added: Procedures](#Item9a_ControlsAndProcedures_171121)] | [removed: 68] [added: 66] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 9B.](#Item9b_OtherInformation_164225) |] [added: 9B.](#Item9b_OtherInformation_171933)] | [Other [removed: Information](#Item9b_OtherInformation_164225) |] [added: Information](#Item9b_OtherInformation_171933)] | [removed: 69] [added: 67] |

Rewritten

| [PART [removed: III](#Partiii_164229] [added: III](#PartIii_171935] "Click to goto ") | | | [removed: | |]

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 10.](#Item10_DirectorsExecutiveOfficers_164234) |] [added: 10.](#Item10_DirectorsExecutiveOfficers_171936)] | [Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate [removed: Governance](#Item10_DirectorsExecutiveOfficers_164234) |] [added: Governance](#Item10_DirectorsExecutiveOfficers_171936)] | [removed: 69] [added: 67] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 11.](#Item11_ExecutiveCompensation_164239) |] [added: 11.](#Item11_ExecutiveCompensation_171938)] | [Executive [removed: Compensation](#Item11_ExecutiveCompensation_164239) |] [added: Compensation](#Item11_ExecutiveCompensation_171938)] | [removed: 69] [added: 67] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 12.](#Item12_SecurityOwnershipOfCertain_164241) |] [added: 12.](#Item12_SecurityOwnershipOfCertain_171939)] | [Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder [removed: Matters](#Item12_SecurityOwnershipOfCertain_164241) |] [added: Matters](#Item12_SecurityOwnershipOfCertain_171939)] | [removed: 69] [added: 67] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 13.](#Item13_CertainRelationshipsAndRel_164244) |] [added: 13.](#Item13_CertainRelationshipsAndRel_171941)] | [Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director [removed: Independence](#Item13_CertainRelationshipsAndRel_164244) |] [added: Independence](#Item13_CertainRelationshipsAndRel_171941)] | [removed: 69] [added: 67] |

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 14.](#Item14_PrincipalAccountingFeesAnd_164249) |] [added: 14.](#Item14_PrincipalAccountingFeesAnd_171943)] | [Principal Accounting Fees and [removed: Services](#Item14_PrincipalAccountingFeesAnd_164249) |] [added: Services](#Item14_PrincipalAccountingFeesAnd_171943)] | [removed: 69] [added: 68] |

Rewritten

| [PART [removed: IV](#Partiv_161044] [added: IV](#Partiv_173247] "Click to goto ") | | | [removed: | |]

Rewritten

| [Item [removed: 15.](#Item15_ExhibitsFinancialStatement_161048) |] [added: 15.](#Item15_ExhibitsFinancialStatement_173248)] | [Exhibits, Financial Statement [removed: Schedules](#Item15_ExhibitsFinancialStatement_161048) |] [added: Schedules](#Item15_ExhibitsFinancialStatement_173248)] | [removed: 70] [added: 69] |

Rewritten

| | [removed: | [Signatures](#Signatures_161652] [added: [Signatures](#Signatures_173800] "Click to goto ") | [removed: |] 76 |

Rewritten

| | [removed: |] [Index to Consolidated Financial [removed: Statements](#IndexToConsolidatedFinancialState_163155] [added: Statements](#IndexToConsolidatedFinancialState_175447] "Click to goto ") | [removed: |] F-1 |

Rewritten

DISCLOSURE REGARDING [removed: FORWARD-LOOKING] [added: FORWARD LOOKING] STATEMENTS

Rewritten

· We currently derive a [removed: substantial] [added: significant] portion of our revenue from our [removed: two] primary [removed: customers,] [added: customer,] DISH [removed: Network and Bell TV.][added: Network.]

Rewritten

The loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from, or a decrease in selling prices of digital set-top boxes, transponder leasing, provision of digital broadcast services, and/or other products or services to DISH Network [removed: or Bell TV] would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our results of operations.

New in FY2012

10-K 1 a12-28611_110k.htm 10-K

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants.

New in FY2012

· We may not be able to generate cash to meet our debt service needs or fund our operations.

New in FY2012

· Covenants in HSS’ indentures restrict its business in many ways.

New in FY2012

Risks Related to Our Satellites

New in FY2012

Risks Related to Our Products and Technology

New in FY2012

· We rely on network and information systems and other technologies and a disruption, cyber attack, failure or destruction of such networks, systems or technologies may disrupt or harm our business.

New in FY2012

Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Business

Dropped from FY2011

10-K 1 a11-31128_110k.htm 10-K

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

· Certain of our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice, which would have a detrimental effect on us.

Dropped from FY2011

· We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions.

Dropped from FY2011

· Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure or those of our third-party service providers could harm our business.

Dropped from FY2011

· We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt.

Dropped from FY2011

Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Technologies Segment

Dropped from FY2011

· We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for a substantial portion of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Dropped from FY2011

· Our business may suffer if our customer base does not compete successfully with existing and emerging competition.

Dropped from FY2011

· Component pricing may remain stable or be negatively affected by inflation, increased demand, decreased supply, or other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Dropped from FY2011

· Growth in our EchoStar Technologies segment likely requires expansion of our sales to international customers, and we may be unsuccessful in expanding international sales.

Dropped from FY2011

· If we are successful in growing sales of our digital set-top boxes to international customers, we may be subject to additional risks including, among other things, trade barriers and political instability abroad.

Dropped from FY2011

· We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants, principally located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes.

Dropped from FY2011

· Our digital set-top boxes are highly complex and may experience quality or supply problems.

Dropped from FY2011

· Our reliance on a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers for several components used in our digital set-top boxes could restrict production, result in higher digital set-top box costs and delay deliveries to customers.

Dropped from FY2011

Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Satellite Services and Hughes Segments

Dropped from FY2011

· The consumer network communications market is highly competitive.

Dropped from FY2011

We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against fiber, Digital Subscriber Line (“DSL”), cable service providers and other satellite broadband providers in the consumer market.

An excerpt. Shown here: 40 of 49 rewritten, all 17 added and all 20 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Cover and table of contents in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

0 rewritten, 1 added, 1 removed, 0 unchanged

New in FY2012

None.

Dropped from FY2011

None

Item 2. PROPERTIES

34 rewritten, 11 added, 8 removed, 2 unchanged

Rewritten

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our principal properties related to our EchoStar Technologies segment [removed: (“ETS”),] [added: (“ET”), Hughes segment (“Hughes”),] EchoStar Satellite Services segment (“ESS”) and [removed: Hughes segment (“Hughes”).][added: Other segment.]

Rewritten

| [removed: Description/Use/Location |] [added: Location (3) (4)] | [removed: Segment(s) Using Property] | [added: Segment(s)] | [removed: Owned] | [added: Leased/ Owned] | [removed: Leased] | [added: Function] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Corporate headquarters and administrative offices,] Englewood, Colorado | | [removed: ETS/ESS |] [added: ET/ESS/Other] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Corporate headquarters, engineering offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering offices, Englewood,] [added: Superior,] Colorado | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | [removed: X] | [added: Leased] | | [added: Engineering offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering offices,] Atlanta, Georgia | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering offices,] American Fork, Utah | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering offices and warehouse,] Almelo, The Netherlands | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Engineering offices and warehouse] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering offices,] Steeton, England | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Engineering office] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering and administrative offices,] Gaithersburg, Maryland | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Manufacturing and testing facilities, engineering and administrative offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering and data center, San Francisco,] [added: Foster City,] California | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering and data center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering and sales office,] New York, New York | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering and sales offices] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering office,] [added: Bangalore,] India | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering office] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Engineering office,] [added: Kharkov,] Ukraine | | [removed: ETS |] [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Engineering office] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Hughes Communications, corporate headquarters and administrative offices,] Germantown, Maryland [added: (1)] | | Hughes | | [removed: X |] [added: Owned] | | [added: Hughes corporate headquarters, engineering offices, network operations and shared hubs] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Hughes Communications India Limited administrative offices, shared hub, operations and warehouse,] Gurgaon, India [added: (1) (2)] | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Administrative offices, shared hub, operations, warehouse, and development center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Hughes European corporate headquarters and operations,] Milton Keynes, United Kingdom | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Hughes Europe corporate headquarters and operations] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Corporate headquarters,] New Delhi, India | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Hughes India corporate headquarters] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Corporate headquarters, administrative and sales offices,] Sao Paulo, Brazil | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Hughes Brazil corporate headquarters, sales offices, and warehouse] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Digital broadcast operations center,] Cheyenne, Wyoming [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Digital broadcast operations center,] Gilbert, Arizona [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Regional digital broadcast operations center,] Monee, Illinois [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Regional digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Regional digital broadcast operations center,] New Braunfels, Texas [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Regional digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Regional digital broadcast operations center, Quicksburg,] [added: Winchester,] Virginia [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Regional digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Regional digital broadcast operations center,] Spokane, Washington [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Regional digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Micro digital broadcast operations center,] Atlanta, Georgia [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS] | [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Micro digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Micro digital broadcast operations center,] St. Louis, Missouri [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS] | [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Micro digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Micro digital broadcast operations center,] Jackson, Mississippi [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS] | [added: ET] | | [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Micro digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Micro digital broadcast operations center,] Orange, New Jersey [removed: |] [added: (1)] | [removed: ETS/ESS] | [added: ET/ESS] | [removed: X] | [added: Owned] | | [added: Regional digital broadcast operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Shared hub, operations, offices and warehouse,] Griesheim, Germany [added: (1)] | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Shared hub, operations, administrative offices and warehouse] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Shared hub and warehouse,] Barueri, Brazil [added: (1)] | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Shared hub] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Shared hub,] Southfield, Michigan [added: (1)] | | Hughes | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Shared hub] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Spacecraft autotrack operations center,] Baker, Montana [added: (1)] | | ESS | | [removed: |] [added: Leased] | [removed: X] | [added: Spacecraft autotrack operations center] |

Rewritten

| [removed: Spacecraft autotrack operations center,] Black Hawk, South Dakota [added: (1)] | | ESS | | [removed: X |] [added: Owned] | | [added: Spacecraft autotrack operations center] |

Rewritten

[added: (5)] See [removed: “Related Party Transactions with DISH Network — Real Estate Lease Agreements” set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Also, see] Note [removed: 17] [added: 19] in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this [removed: Annual Report on Form 10-K] [added: report] for further [removed: discussion.][added: discussion of our Related Party Transactions with DISH Network.]

New in FY2012

Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Inverness Terrace East, Englewood, Colorado 80112-5308 and our telephone number is (303) 706-4000.

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| Las Vegas, Nevada (1) | | Hughes | | Leased | | Shared hub, antennae yards, gateway, backup network operation and control center for Hughes corporate headquarters |

New in FY2012

| Kankakee, Illinois (1) | | ET/ESS | | Owned | | Regional digital broadcast operations center |

New in FY2012

| Mt. Jackson, Virginia (1) | | ET/ESS | | Owned | | Regional digital broadcast operations center |

New in FY2012

| Englewood, Colorado (5) | | Other | | Owned | | Lease to DISH Network |

New in FY2012

| Littleton, Colorado (5) | | Other | | Owned | | Lease to DISH Network |

New in FY2012

(1) We perform network services and customer support functions 24 hours a day, 365 days a year at these locations.

New in FY2012

(2) These properties are used by subsidiaries that are less than wholly-owned by the Company.

New in FY2012

(3) We have multiple gateways (25) throughout the Western part of the U.S. that support the SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII satellites.

New in FY2012

(4) In addition to the above properties, we lease rack and roof top space in 210 designated market areas throughout the U.S. to collect and broadcast local channels that are used by the ET segment.

Dropped from FY2011

We own or lease capacity on 11 satellites which are used in our EchoStar Satellite Services and Hughes segments.

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Development center, Gurgaon, India | | Hughes | | | | X | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Engineering offices and service center, Englewood, Colorado | | ETS | | X | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Engineering offices, Superior, Colorado | | ETS | | | | X | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Manufacturing and test facility, Gaithersburg, Maryland | | Hughes | | | | X | |

Dropped from FY2011

We lease portions of certain of our owned facilities to DISH Network.

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

12 rewritten, 7 added, 16 removed, 11 unchanged

Rewritten

_Market Information._ Our Class A common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “SATS.” The high and low closing sale prices of our Class A common stock during [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] and [removed: 2010] [added: 2011] on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (as reported by Nasdaq) are set forth below.

Rewritten

| Second Quarter | | [added: $ |] 37.62 | | [added: $] | 32.00 | | [removed: |]

Rewritten

| Third Quarter | | [added: $ |] 38.36 | | [added: $] | 21.36 | | [removed: |]

Rewritten

| Fourth Quarter | | [added: $ |] 26.80 | | [added: $] | 20.35 | | [removed: |]

Rewritten

| [removed: 2010] [added: 2012] | | High | | | Low | | |

Rewritten

As of February [removed: 14, 2012,] [added: 11, 2013,] there were approximately [removed: 10,822] [added: 10,665] holders of record of our Class A common stock, not including stockholders who beneficially own Class A common stock held in nominee or street name.

Rewritten

As of February [removed: 14, 2012, 38,952,789] [added: 11, 2013, 41,040,391] of the 47,687,039 outstanding shares of our Class B common stock were held by Charles W.

Rewritten

Ergen, our Chairman, and the remaining [removed: 8,734,250] [added: 6,646,648] were held in a trust for members of Mr. Ergen’s family.

Rewritten

There is currently no [added: established] trading market for our Class B common stock.

Rewritten

[removed: _Dividends._] We currently do not intend to declare dividends on our common stock.

Rewritten

Payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings, capital [removed: requirements] [added: requirements,] and other factors the Board of Directors considers appropriate.

Rewritten

[removed: (1) Our] [added: Pursuant to a stock repurchase plan approved by our] Board of [removed: Directors previously] [added: Directors, we are] authorized [removed: the] [added: to] repurchase [removed: of] up to $500 million of our [added: outstanding shares of] Class A common stock through [removed: and including] December 31, [removed: 2011.][added: 2013.]

New in FY2012

| First Quarter | | $ | 32.18 | | $ | 20.94 | |

New in FY2012

| Second Quarter | | $ | 29.52 | | $ | 25.30 | |

New in FY2012

| Third Quarter | | $ | 30.35 | | $ | 25.65 | |

New in FY2012

| Fourth Quarter | | $ | 34.86 | | $ | 28.40 | |

New in FY2012

_Dividends._ We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock in the past two years.

New in FY2012

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we did not repurchase any common stock under this plan.

New in FY2012

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased 34,000 shares of our Class A common stock for $605,000.

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| First Quarter | | $ | 20.71 | | $ | 18.68 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Second Quarter | | 21.53 | | | 18.05 | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Third Quarter | | 20.33 | | | 18.44 | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Fourth Quarter | | 24.97 | | | 18.77 | | |

Dropped from FY2011

The following table provides information regarding repurchases of our Class A common stock from October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | (In thousands, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| October 1 - October 31, 2011 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | $ | 500,000 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| November 1 - November 30, 2011 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | $ | 500,000 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| December 1 - December 31, 2011 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | $ | 500,000 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Total | | — | | $ | — | | — | | $ | 500,000 | |

Dropped from FY2011

On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors extended the plan, such that we are currently authorized to make such repurchases through and including December 31, 2012.

Dropped from FY2011

Purchases under our repurchase program may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, subject to market conditions and other factors.

Dropped from FY2011

We may elect not to purchase the maximum amount of shares allowable under this program and we may also enter into additional share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

44 rewritten, 17 added, 406 removed, 31 unchanged

Rewritten

The accompanying consolidated financial statements for [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] have been prepared in accordance with [removed: accounting principles generally accepted in] the [removed: U.S.] [added: United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] (“GAAP”).

Rewritten

See Note [removed: 13] [added: 15] in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this [removed: Annual Report on Form 10-K] [added: report] for further discussion of the Hughes Acquisition.

Rewritten

[removed: This] [added: The selected financial] data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto for the three years ended December 31, [removed: 2011,] [added: 2012,] and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

Rewritten

| Statements of Operations Data: | | [added: 2012 | | |] 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | [removed: 2007 | | |]

Rewritten

| | | [removed: (In] [added: (Dollars in] thousands, except per share amounts) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Rewritten

| Revenue | | $ | [removed: 2,761,431] [added: 3,121,704] | | $ | [removed: 2,350,369] [added: 2,761,431] | | $ | [removed: 1,903,559] [added: 2,350,369] | | $ | [removed: 2,150,520] [added: 1,903,559] | | $ | [removed: 1,544,065] [added: 2,150,520] | |

Rewritten

| Total costs and expenses | | [added: 3,021,818 | | |] 2,680,593 | | | 2,208,044 | | | 1,898,667 | | | 2,791,114 | | | [removed: 1,630,444 | | |]

Rewritten

| Operating income (loss) | | $ | [removed: 80,838] [added: 99,886] | | $ | [removed: 142,325] [added: 80,838] | | $ | [removed: 4,892] [added: 142,325] | | $ | [removed: (640,594] [added: 4,892] | [removed: )] | $ | [removed: (86,379] [added: (640,594] | ) |

Rewritten

| Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar | | $ | [removed: 3,639] [added: 211,048] | | $ | [removed: 204,358] [added: 3,639] | | $ | [removed: 364,704] [added: 204,358] | | $ | [removed: (958,188] [added: 364,704] | [removed: )] | $ | [removed: (85,300] [added: (958,188] | ) |

Rewritten

| Basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar | | $ | [removed: 3,639] [added: 211,048] | | $ | [removed: 204,358] [added: 3,639] | | $ | [removed: 364,704] [added: 204,358] | | $ | [removed: (958,188] [added: 364,704] | [removed: )] | $ | [removed: (85,300] [added: (958,188] | ) |

Rewritten

| Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | | [added: 87,150 | | |] 86,223 | | | 85,084 | | | 85,765 | | | 89,324 | | | [removed: 89,712 | | (1) |]

Rewritten

| Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | | [added: 87,959 | | |] 87,089 | | | 85,203 | | | 86,059 | | | 89,324 | | | [removed: 89,712 | | (1) |]

Rewritten

| Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar | | $ | [removed: 0.04] [added: 2.42] | | $ | [removed: 2.40] [added: 0.04] | | $ | [removed: 4.25] [added: 2.40] | | $ | [removed: (10.73] [added: 4.25] | [removed: )] | $ | [removed: (0.95] [added: (10.73] | ) |

Rewritten

| Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar | | $ | [removed: 0.04] [added: 2.40] | | $ | [removed: 2.40] [added: 0.04] | | $ | [removed: 4.24] [added: 2.40] | | $ | [removed: (10.73] [added: 4.24] | [removed: )] | $ | [removed: (0.95] [added: (10.73] | ) |

Rewritten

| Balance Sheet Data: | | [added: 2012 | | |] 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | [removed: 2007 | | |]

Rewritten

| Cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities | | $ | [removed: 1,696,442] [added: 1,547,565] | | $ | [removed: 1,130,900] [added: 1,696,442] | | $ | [removed: 829,162] [added: 1,130,900] | | $ | [removed: 828,661] [added: 829,162] | | $ | [removed: 532,267] [added: 828,661] | |

Rewritten

| Total assets | | $ | [removed: 6,543,737] [added: 6,600,233] | | $ | [removed: 3,842,020] [added: 6,543,737] | | $ | [removed: 3,468,068] [added: 3,842,020] | | $ | [removed: 2,889,799] [added: 3,468,068] | | $ | [removed: 1,260,910] [added: 2,889,799] | |

Rewritten

| Total stockholders’ equity [removed: (deficit)] | | $ | [removed: 3,051,626] [added: 3,150,227] | | $ | [removed: 3,013,190] [added: 3,051,626] | | $ | [removed: 2,664,850] [added: 3,013,190] | | $ | [removed: 2,211,586] [added: 2,664,850] | | $ | [removed: 1,207,518] [added: 2,211,586] | |

Rewritten

| Cash Flow Data: | | [added: 2012 | | |] 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | [removed: 2007 | | |]

Rewritten

| Operating activities | | $ | [removed: 447,018] [added: 505,149] | | $ | [removed: 404,015] [added: 447,018] | | $ | [removed: 196,276] [added: 404,015] | | $ | [removed: 118,048] [added: 196,276] | | $ | [removed: (88,109] [added: 118,048] | [removed: )] |

Rewritten

| Investing activities | | $ | [removed: (1,888,045] [added: (346,781] | ) | $ | [removed: (238,558] [added: (1,888,045] | ) | $ | [removed: (114,278] [added: (238,558] | ) | $ | [removed: (569,742] [added: (114,278] | ) | $ | [removed: (500,767] [added: (569,742] | ) |

Rewritten

| Financing activities | | $ | [added: (43,976 | ) | $ |] 1,913,547 | | $ | (46,973 | ) | $ | (83,135 | ) | $ | 435,079 | | [removed: $ | 600,337 | |]

Rewritten

_You should read the following [added: management’s] discussion_ _and analysis_ _of our financial condition and results of operations together with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Rewritten

This management’s discussion and analysis is intended to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in [added: our] financial condition and [added: our] results of [removed: our] operations and contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Rewritten

Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed [removed: in this report, including] under the caption “Item 1A.

Rewritten

[removed: EchoStar Corporation is a holding company, whose subsidiaries] [added: We currently] operate [added: in] three [removed: primary] [added: business] segments: the EchoStar Technologies segment, the [removed: EchoStar Satellite Services] [added: Hughes] segment, and the [removed: Hughes] [added: EchoStar Satellite Services] segment.

Rewritten

Our EchoStar Technologies segment designs, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products and technology, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and [added: international] cable companies and, with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets.

Rewritten

[removed: Most] [added: A substantial majority] of our digital set-top boxes are sold to DISH [removed: Network,] [added: Network Corporation and its subsidiaries (“DISH Network”),] but we also sell [removed: a significant number of] digital set-top boxes to Bell TV in Canada, Dish [removed: Mexico] [added: Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Dish Mexico”)] in Mexico and other international customers.

Rewritten

Our EchoStar Technologies segment also provides digital broadcast operations including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management and other services [removed: that are provided] primarily to DISH Network.

Rewritten

We depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of [removed: the revenue for] our EchoStar Technologies segment [added: revenue] and we expect that [removed: for the foreseeable future] DISH Network will continue to be the primary source of revenue for our EchoStar Technologies segment.

Rewritten

Therefore, our results of operations are, and will [removed: for the foreseeable future be,] [added: be] closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’s pay-TV service.

Rewritten

[removed: The] [added: In January 2012, we entered into a] receiver agreement [removed: allows] [added: with] DISH Network [added: (the “2012 Receiver Agreement”), expiring on December 31, 2014, pursuant] to [added: which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to] purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from us either: (i) at [removed: a] cost (decreasing as we reduce cost and increasing as [added: our] costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased.

Rewritten

Under the [removed: receiver agreement,] [added: 2012 Receiver Agreement,] our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be [removed: impaired] [added: decreased] if these costs increase.

Rewritten

[removed: In addition, while] [added: While] we [added: also] expect to sell equipment to other customers, the number of potential new customers for our EchoStar Technologies segment is small and may be limited [removed: by] [added: as prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network may continue to view us as a competitor due to] our common ownership [removed: and related management] with DISH [removed: Network, and our current customer concentration is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.][added: Network.]

Rewritten

[removed: _Additional Challenges for our EchoStar Technologies Segment._] We believe that our best opportunities for developing potential new customers for our EchoStar Technologies segment over the near term lie in international markets, [removed: and we therefore expect our performance in international markets to be a significant factor in determining whether we will be able to generate revenue and income growth in future periods.][added: including joint ventures.]

Rewritten

[removed: In particular,] [added: Over the years,] we have noticed an increase in new market entrants that offer low cost set-top boxes, including set-top boxes that are modeled after our products or products of our principal competitors.

Rewritten

If market prices in international markets are substantially reduced by such new entrants, it may be difficult for us to [removed: make profitable sales in international markets.]

Rewritten

If we do not [removed: otherwise] compete effectively, demand for our products could decline, our gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, our revenues and earnings may decline and our growth prospects [removed: would] [added: could] be diminished.

Rewritten

On June 8, 2011, we completed the [removed: Hughes Acquisition, pursuant to the Hughes Agreement by and between us, certain] [added: acquisition] of [removed: our subsidiaries, including EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., and] Hughes Communications, [removed: Inc..][added: Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hughes Communications”).]

Rewritten

[removed: Our] [added: The] Hughes segment [removed: provides] [added: uses its two owned satellites, SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII, and additional] satellite [added: capacity acquired from multiple third-party providers to provide satellite] broadband Internet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the consumer market, and broadband network services and systems to the domestic and international enterprise markets.

New in FY2012

As a result, Hughes became a new segment and our historical financial statements on and after June 9, 2011 give effect to the Hughes Acquisition.

New in FY2012

| Total debt and capital lease obligations | | $ | 2,488,499 | | $ | 2,528,654 | | $ | 406,570 | | $ | 439,399 | | $ | 338,862 | |

New in FY2012

EchoStar Corporation (together with its subsidiaries is referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”) is a global provider of satellite operations, video delivery solutions, and broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments.

New in FY2012

Thus, our efforts in expanding our digital set-top box business are focused on international markets and we are not actively seeking set-top box opportunities with United States cable operators.

New in FY2012

make profitable sales in international markets.

New in FY2012

As a result, our ability to generate revenue and income growth in future periods depends greatly on our success in entering the international markets.

New in FY2012

We continue to focus on building and strengthening our brand recognition by providing unique and technologically advanced features and products, including Internet delivery of video content, whole-home HD DVR receiver and MPEG-4 digital compression technology, to our customers.

New in FY2012

Our success depends heavily on our ability to bring advanced technologies to market to keep pace with our competitors.

New in FY2012

Our Hughes segment is a global provider of broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments.

New in FY2012

Beginning in October 2012, we introduced HughesNet Gen4 broadband Internet services to our customers in North America on EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012.

New in FY2012

In October 2012, we entered into a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C (“dishNET”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, pursuant to which dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute the Hughes satellite Internet service (the “Hughes service”).

New in FY2012

dishNET pays us a monthly per subscriber wholesale service fee for the Hughes service based upon a subscriber’s service level and beginning January 1, 2014, certain volume subscription thresholds.

New in FY2012

The Distribution Agreement also provides that dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase certain broadband equipment from us to support the sale of its service.

New in FY2012

The Distribution Agreement has a five year term with automatic renewal for successive one year terms unless terminated by either party with a written notice at least 180 days before the expiration of the then-current term.

New in FY2012

Upon expiration or termination of the Distribution Agreement, the parties will continue to provide the Hughes service to the then-current dishNET subscribers pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Distribution Agreement.

New in FY2012

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $1.063 billion and $1.036 billion, respectively, of contracted revenue backlog.

New in FY2012

Our revenue backlog as of December 31, 2011 included $252 million related to EchoStar XVII, which was under construction in 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

On January 1, 2008, the Spin-off was completed.

Dropped from FY2011

Within this report, we have included both “combined” financial statements prior to the Spin-off and “consolidated” financial statements following the Spin-off, as discussed below.

Dropped from FY2011

Throughout the remainder of this report, we refer to both as “consolidated.” On June 8, 2011, Hughes became a new segment as a result of the Hughes Acquisition and the results of operations of Hughes Communications are included in this report after the acquisition date.

Dropped from FY2011

_Principles of Consolidation._ We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary.

Dropped from FY2011

Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee.

Dropped from FY2011

When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used.

Dropped from FY2011

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Dropped from FY2011

_Prior to Spin-off - Principles of Combination._ The selected financial data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2007 are presented on a combined basis and principally represent the EchoStar Technologies segment business and certain other net assets.

Dropped from FY2011

The assets and liabilities presented have been reflected on a historical basis, as prior to the Spin-off such assets and liabilities were 100% owned by DISH Network.

Dropped from FY2011

Our historical selected financial data does not include the satellites, digital broadcast operations assets, certain real estate and other assets and related liabilities that were contributed to us by DISH Network in the Spin-off.

Dropped from FY2011

Also, the selected financial data for 2007 does not include all of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had we been a stand-alone entity during the periods presented and do not reflect our combined results of operations, financial position and cash flows had we been a stand-alone company during that year.

Dropped from FY2011

All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

Dropped from FY2011

(1) For the year ended December 31, 2007, basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using our shares outstanding as of January 1, 2008.

Dropped from FY2011

| Total debt and capital lease obligations | | $ | 2,534,262 | | $ | 412,885 | | $ | 446,369 | | $ | 346,439 | | $ | 3,709 | |

Dropped from FY2011

We believe opportunities exist to expand our business by selling equipment and services in both the U.S. and international markets.

Dropped from FY2011

As a result of our extensive experience with digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations, we are able to provide end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and terrestrial backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and related components, and network design and management.

Dropped from FY2011

_Dependence on DISH Network_.

Dropped from FY2011

Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a new receiver agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we are obligated to sell digital set-top boxes and related products to DISH Network until December 31, 2014.

Dropped from FY2011

However, DISH Network is under no obligation to purchase our digital set-top boxes or related products before or after this date.

Dropped from FY2011

During the year ended December 31, 2011, DISH Network purchased fewer digital set-top boxes and related components from us.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition, to the extent that DISH Network’s gross subscriber additions decrease or DISH Network experiences a net loss of subscribers, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a further material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Dropped from FY2011

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued

Dropped from FY2011

The impact to us of any decreases in DISH Network subscriber growth may be offset in the near term by an increase in sales to DISH Network resulting from the upgrade of DISH Network subscribers to advanced products such as HD receivers and HD DVRs, including our recently introduced whole-home HD DVR, as well as by the upgrade of DISH Network digital set-top boxes to new technologies such as MPEG-4 digital compression technology.

Dropped from FY2011

However, there can be no assurance that any of these factors will mitigate any decreases in sales to DISH Network.

Dropped from FY2011

In addition, although we expect DISH Network to continue to purchase products and services from us, there can be no assurance that these purchases will continue in the future.

Dropped from FY2011

We may experience significant pressure on margins we earn on the sale of digital set-top boxes and other equipment, including on sales to DISH Network.

Dropped from FY2011

This pressure may be due to economic conditions, advancements in the technology and functionality of digital set-top boxes and other equipment.

Dropped from FY2011

Our future success may also depend on the extent to which prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network are willing to purchase products and services from us.

Dropped from FY2011

Many of these customers may continue to view us as a competitor as a result of common ownership and related management with DISH Network.

Dropped from FY2011

If we do not develop relationships with new customers, we may not be able to expand our customer base and our ability to increase or maintain our revenue will be impacted.

Dropped from FY2011

However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sustain or grow our international business.

Dropped from FY2011

Furthermore, if we do not continue to distinguish our products through distinctive, technologically advanced features and design, as well as continue to build and strengthen our brand recognition, our business could be harmed as we may not be able to effectively compete on price alone in both domestic and international markets against low cost competitors.

Dropped from FY2011

Our ability to compete in the digital set-top box industry will also depend heavily on our ability to successfully bring advanced technologies, including Internet delivery of video content, to market to keep pace with our competitors.

Dropped from FY2011

Sustained economic weakness and volatile credit markets may cause certain suppliers that we rely on to cease operations, which, in turn, may cause us to suffer disruptions to our supply chain or incur higher production costs.

Dropped from FY2011

EchoStar Satellite Services Segment

Dropped from FY2011

Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment uses ten of our owned and leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC licenses to lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, U.S. government service providers, state agencies, Internet service providers, broadcast news

Dropped from FY2011

organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers.

Dropped from FY2011

Furthermore, we continue to pursue expanding our business offerings by providing value added services such as telemetry, tracking and control services to third parties.

Dropped from FY2011

However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.

Dropped from FY2011

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to satellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.285 billion and $1.054 billion, respectively, and contracted backlog attributable to satellites under construction of $621 million and $1.1 billion, respectively.

An excerpt. Shown here: 40 of 44 rewritten, all 17 added and 40 of 406 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 0 unchanged

Rewritten

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in [added: Item 15 of] this report beginning on page [removed: F-4.][added: F-3.]

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

7 rewritten, 8 added, 5 removed, 11 unchanged

Rewritten

[removed: We are currently integrating] [added: As the Company grows and changes, we continue to integrate accounting and operating systems, as well as] policies, processes, people, technology and operations for the combined company.

Rewritten

[added: | |] (i) [added: |] pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; [added: |]

Rewritten

[added: | |] (ii) [added: |] provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts [removed: and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and][added: |]

Rewritten

[added: | |] (iii) [added: |] provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. [added: |]

Rewritten

Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become [added: inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.]

Rewritten

Based on this evaluation, our management [added: has] concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, [removed: 2011.][added: 2012.]

Rewritten

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

New in FY2012

On June 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries and they are now part of our internal control over financial reporting.

New in FY2012

In 2012, we began performing a number of the corporate functions for ourselves and our subsidiaries that were formerly performed on our behalf by DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries (“DISH Network”), pursuant to the management services agreement and the professional services agreement between us and DISH Network.

New in FY2012

Our management continues to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting as we continue to implement and integrate our own systems and business functions.

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and |

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

New in FY2012

| | | |

Dropped from FY2011

On June 8, 2011, we completed the Hughes Acquisition.

Dropped from FY2011

Management will continue to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting as we execute integration activities.

Dropped from FY2011

inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Dropped from FY2011

Our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal control of Hughes Communications which we acquired on June 8, 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 included $2.709 billion of assets and $676 million of revenue associated with this business.

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 1 unchanged

Rewritten

The information required by this Item with respect to the identity and business experience of our directors will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Election of Directors,” which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 0 unchanged

Rewritten

The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Information,” which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 0 unchanged

Rewritten

The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Equity Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information,” which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 0 unchanged

Rewritten

The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related [added: Party] Transactions,” which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

1 rewritten, 0 added, 0 removed, 1 unchanged

Rewritten

The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the [removed: 2012] [added: 2013] Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Principal [removed: Accounting] [added: Accountant] Fees and Services,” which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

932 rewritten, 716 added, 481 removed, 778 unchanged

Rewritten

[added: |] (1) [added: | _Consolidated_] _Financial Statements_ [added: | |]

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting [removed: Firm](#ReportOfIndependentRegisteredPubl_163334) |] [added: Firm](#ReportOfIndependentRegisteredPubl_162620 "Click to goto ")] | F-2 |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Consolidated Balance Sheets [removed: at] [added: as of] December 31, [removed: 2011] [added: 2012] and [removed: 2010](#ConsolidatedBalanceSheets_163616) |] [added: 2011](#ConsolidatedBalanceSheets_162625 "Click to goto ")] | [removed: F-4] [added: F-3] |

Rewritten

| [Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfOperation_164308) |] [added: 2010](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfOperation_162910)] | [removed: F-5] [added: F-4] |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity [removed: (Deficit)] for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2009, 2010] [added: 2010, 2011] and [removed: 2011](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfChangesIn_161745) |] [added: 2012](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfChangesIn_163208 "Click to goto ")] | [removed: F-6] [added: F-5] |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, [removed: 2011, 2010] [added: 2012, 2011] and [removed: 2009](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfCashFlows_162827) |] [added: 2010](#ConsolidatedStatementsOfCashFlows_163723 "Click to goto ")] | [removed: F-7] [added: F-6] |

Rewritten

[removed: | [Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements](#NotesToConsolidatedFinancialState_161141) | | F-8 |][added: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued]

Rewritten

[added: |] (2) [added: |] _Financial Statement Schedules_ [added: | |]

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Schedule I [removed: -] [added: —] Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent Company [removed: Information):](#ScheduleI_055351) |] [added: Information Only):](#ScheduleI_213245 "Click to goto ")] | |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Condensed [removed: Statement] [added: Statements] of Operations for the [removed: year] [added: years] ended December [removed: 31, 2011 (Parent Company Only)](#CondensedStatementOfOperations_055401] [added: 31,2012 and 2011](#CondensedStatementsOfOperations_213155] "Click to goto ") | [removed: | F-63] [added: F-64] |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Condensed [removed: Statement] [added: Statements] of Cash Flows for the [removed: year] [added: years] ended December [removed: 31, 2011 (Parent Company Only)](#CondensedStatementOfCashFlows_055409] [added: 31,2012 and 2011](#CondensedStatementsOfCashFlows_213205] "Click to goto ") | [removed: | F-64] [added: F-65] |

Rewritten

| [added: |] [Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying [removed: Accounts](#ScheduleIi_055415) |] [added: Accounts](#ScheduleIi_213221 "Click to goto ")] | [removed: F-65] [added: F-66] |

Rewritten

[added: |] (3) [added: |] _Exhibits_ [added: | |]

Rewritten

| [removed: 2.1*] [added: 2] | [added: .1* |] Form of Separation Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 2.2*] [added: 2] | [added: .2* |] Agreement and Plan of Merger between EchoStar Corporation, EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., Broadband Acquisition Corporation and Hughes Communications, Inc. dated as of February 13, 2011 (incorporated by reference [removed: from] [added: to] Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Hughes Communications, Inc. filed February 15, 2011, Commission File No. 1-33040). * |

Rewritten

| [removed: 3.1*] [added: 3] | [removed: Articles of Incorporation] [added: .2* | Bylaws] of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit [removed: 3.1] [added: 3.2] to Amendment No. [removed: 3] [added: 1] of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December [removed: 28,] [added: 12,] 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 3.2*] [added: 4] | [removed: Bylaws] [added: .1* | Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate] of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.1*] [added: 10] | [removed: Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate] [added: .21* | Form] of EchoStar Corporation [added: 2008 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan] (incorporated by reference to Exhibit [removed: 3.2] [added: 10.25] to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. [removed: 001-33807).] [added: 001-33807).] |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.2*] [added: 4] | [added: .4* | Supplemental] Indenture relating to the [added: 6 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 of] EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems [removed: Corporation) 6 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019,] [added: Corporation),] dated as of June [removed: 1,] [added: 8,] 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent and trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit [removed: 4.1] [added: 4.2] to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June [removed: 2,] [added: 9,] 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.3*] [added: 4] | [added: .3* |] Indenture relating to the EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation) 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2021, dated as of June 1, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.4*] [added: 4] | [removed: Supplemental] [added: .2* |] Indenture relating to the [removed: 6 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 of] EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems [removed: Corporation),] [added: Corporation) 6 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019,] dated as of June [removed: 8,] [added: 1,] 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent and trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit [removed: 4.2] [added: 4.1] to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June [removed: 9,] [added: 2,] 2011, Commission File No. [removed: 001-33807).] [added: 001-] |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.5*] [added: 4] | [added: .5* |] Supplemental Indenture relating to the 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2021 of EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.6*] [added: 4] | [added: .6* |] Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2011, among EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 4.7*] [added: 4] | [added: .7* |] Security Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2011, among EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), the guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to EchoStar Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.1*] [added: 10] | [added: .1* |] Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.2*] [added: 10] | [added: .2* |] Form of Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.3*] [added: 10] | [added: .3* |] Form of Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar Corporation, EchoStar Acquisition L.L.C., Echosphere L.L.C., DISH DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.4*] [added: 10] | [added: .4* |] Form of Management Services Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.5*] [added: 10] | [added: .5* |] Manufacturing Agreement, dated as of March 22, 1995, between HTS and SCI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Dish Ltd., Commission File No. 33-81234). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.6*] [added: 10] | [added: .6* |] Agreement between HTS, DISH Network L.L.C. and ExpressVu Inc., dated January 8, 1997, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996, as amended, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.7*] [added: 10] | [added: .7* |] Agreement to Form NagraStar L.L.C., dated as of June 23, 1998, by and between Kudelski S.A., DISH Network Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.8*] [added: 10] | [added: .8* |] Satellite Service Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.9*] [added: 10] | [added: .9* |] Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement dated March 31, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.10*] [added: 10] | [added: .10* |] Satellite Service Agreement dated as of August 13, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.11*] [added: 10] | [added: .11* |] Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.12*] [added: 10] | [added: .12* |] Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated March 10, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.13*] [added: 10] | [added: .13* |] Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.14*] [added: 10] | [added: .14* |] Amendment No. 2 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.15*] [added: 10] | [added: .15* |] Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated October 21, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

Rewritten

| [removed: 10.16*] [added: 10] | [added: .16* |] Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated November 19, 2004 between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 1, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). |

New in FY2012

| | [Index to Consolidated Financial Statements](#IndexToConsolidatedFinancialState_175447 "Click to goto ") | F-1 |

New in FY2012

| | [Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011](#CondensedBalanceSheets_213144 "Click to goto ") | F-63 |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | 33807). |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| | | |

New in FY2012

| --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | Page |

Dropped from FY2011

| [Condensed Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 (Parent Company Only)](#CondensedBalanceSheet_055355) | | F-62 |

Dropped from FY2011

| | |

Dropped from FY2011

| 32.2o | Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| | By: | /s/ _Kenneth G. Carroll_ | |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | Kenneth G. Carroll | |

Dropped from FY2011

Date: March 7, 2012

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| * | | Chairman | | March 7, 2012 |

Dropped from FY2011

| * | | Director | | March 7, 2012 |

Dropped from FY2011

| David K. Moskowitz | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

Management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, excluded Hughes Communications, Inc., which was acquired in 2011.

Dropped from FY2011

Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of this subsidiary.

Dropped from FY2011

The aggregate amount of total assets and revenue of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2.709 billion and $676 million, respectively.

Dropped from FY2011

March 7, 2012

Dropped from FY2011

| Total long-term obligations, net of current portion | | 2,908,389 | | | 470,013 | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Dropped from FY2011

| | | | | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Costs and Expenses: (exclusive of depreciation shown below - Note 6) | | | | | | | | | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Other, net | | (12,828 | | ) | (860 | | ) | (6,120 | | ) |

Dropped from FY2011

| Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar | | $ | 0.04 | | $ | 2.40 | | $ | 4.25 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar | | $ | 0.04 | | $ | 2.40 | | $ | 4.24 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 90 | | $ | 3,248,327 | | $ | (10,598 | ) | $ | (958,188 | ) | $ | (68,045 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 2,211,586 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Capital transaction with DISH Network in connection with the launch service (Note 17) | | — | | | 14,460 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,460 | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Income tax (expense) benefit related to stock awards and other | | — | | | (889 | | ) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (889 | | ) |

Dropped from FY2011

| Impairment of long-lived asset | | 32,964 | | | — | | | — | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Class A common stock repurchases (Note 10) | | — | | | (605 | | ) | (29,512 | | ) |

Dropped from FY2011

| Other | | 2,855 | | | — | | | — | | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Launch service assigned to DISH Network (Note 17) | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 102,913 | |

Dropped from FY2011

| Reduction of capital lease obligations for AMC-16 (Note 6) | | $ | 6,616 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |

Dropped from FY2011

1.

Dropped from FY2011

EchoStar Corporation is a holding company, whose subsidiaries (which together with EchoStar Corporation are referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”).

Dropped from FY2011

On June 8, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Hughes Communications, Inc. (the “Hughes Acquisition”).

Dropped from FY2011

Following the Hughes Acquisition, we operate three segments.

Dropped from FY2011

2.

Dropped from FY2011

The resulting translation adjustment is recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),” a separate component of equity.

Dropped from FY2011

We also have foreign operations where the U.S. dollar has been determined as the functional currency.

An excerpt. Shown here: 40 of 932 rewritten, 40 of 716 added and 40 of 481 removed. The counts are complete. For every sentence, read Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES in the FY2012 filing and the FY2011 filing.