Item 4. Controls and Procedures
10K characters. Original on sec.gov ·
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under guidelines established by the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company. During the third quarter of 2024, we completed the Equitrans Midstream Merger and began integrating the acquired assets into our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to evaluate and monitor our internal control over financial reporting and will continue to evaluate the operating effectiveness of related key controls.
Except as noted above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the third quarter of 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, various legal and regulatory claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against us. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, we are unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings. We accrue legal and other direct costs related to loss contingencies when actually incurred. We have established reserves in amounts that we believe to be appropriate for pending matters and, after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, we believe that the ultimate outcome of any pending matter involving us will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Environmental Proceedings
Pratt Storage Field Matter, Morgan Township, Pennsylvania. On October 31, 2018, a gas explosion occurred in Morgan Township, Greene County, Pennsylvania (the Pratt Incident). Following the explosion, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration of the Department of Transportation (PHMSA) began investigating the Pratt Incident. In October 2019, the PADEP notified Equitrans Midstream that it was required to submit an investigation report pursuant to the state's gas migration regulations due to the Pratt Incident's proximity to Equitrans, L.P.'s (a subsidiary of Equitrans Midstream) Pratt Storage Field assets. Equitrans Midstream, while disputing the applicability of the regulations, submitted a report to the PADEP in May 2020. In September 2020, the PADEP responded to Equitrans Midstream's investigation report with a request for additional information. Equitrans Midstream responded to the September 2020 request. Over the next several months, Equitrans Midstream provided responses to the PADEP's continuing information requests. The PADEP issued a final report and closed its investigation in August 2022, and we do not expect further inquiry from the PADEP on this matter.
On October 23, 2023, Equitrans, L.P. received permission from the FERC to plug and abandon the well in the Pratt Storage Field that was the subject of the PADEP's investigation of the Pratt Incident. On October 22, 2024, Equitrans, L.P. received from the FERC an extension until January 31, 2025 to complete plugging and abandonment of the well. Additionally, Equitrans Midstream is continuing to defend in a civil litigation related to the Pratt Incident.
On October 30, 2023, Equitrans, L.P. received a criminal complaint from the State Attorney General's Office charging Equitrans, L.P. with violations of the Clean Streams Law (the Pratt Complaint). As a result of the Equitrans Midstream Merger, we indirectly assumed Equitrans Midstream's and Equitrans, L.P.'s defense against the Pratt Complaint and matters related to the Pratt Incident. We intend to fully assert Equitrans Midstream's and Equitrans, L.P.'s rights and defenses to the claims raised in the Pratt Complaint. The Pratt Complaint carries the possibility of a monetary sanction, that if imposed could result in a fine in excess of $300,000; however, we expect that the resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Rager Mountain Storage Field Venting, Jackson Township, Pennsylvania. On November 6, 2022, Equitrans Midstream became aware of natural gas venting from one of the storage wells, well 2244, at Equitrans, L.P.'s Rager Mountain natural gas storage facility (the Rager Mountain Facility), located in Jackson Township, a remote section of Cambria County, Pennsylvania. Venting at the Rager Mountain Facility was halted on November 19, 2022. Since the time of the incident, the PADEP has concluded its investigation and PHMSA and other investigators are continuing to conduct civil and criminal investigations of the incident, and Equitrans Midstream has been cooperating in such investigations. On December 7, 2022, Equitrans Midstream and Equitrans, L.P. each separately received an order from the PADEP alleging, in connection with earth disturbance activities undertaken to halt the venting of natural gas from well 2244, (i) in the case of the order received by Equitrans Midstream, violations of Pennsylvania's Clean Streams Law and requiring certain remedial actions and (ii) in the case of the order received by Equitrans, L.P., violations of Pennsylvania's 2012 Oil and Gas Act, Clean Streams Law and Solid Waste Management Act and requiring certain remedial actions. On December 8, 2022, the PADEP submitted a compliance order to Equitrans, L.P. relating to certain alleged violations of law with respect to wells at the Rager Mountain Facility and the venting of natural gas, including from well 2244. The December 8, 2022 order also prohibited Equitrans, L.P. from injecting natural gas into the storage wells at the Rager Mountain Facility. Equitrans Midstream and Equitrans, L.P. disputed aspects of the applicable orders, and on January 5, 2023, Equitrans Midstream and Equitrans, L.P., as applicable, appealed each of the orders to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board. Equitrans, L.P. and the PADEP entered into a Stipulation of Settlement on April 12, 2023 that, among other things, resulted in the PADEP rescinding its December 8, 2022 order and Equitrans, L.P. withdrawing its appeal of such order.
On October 5, 2023, Equitrans, L.P. received a notice of violation (NOV) from the PADEP's Bureau of Air Quality Management for the release of uncontrolled hydrocarbons to the atmosphere during the Rager Mountain Facility incident. On April 8, 2024, the PADEP's Bureau of Air Quality Management executed a Consent Assessment of Civil Penalty that settled the October 5, 2023 NOV and included an agreed upon civil penalty of $350,000, which was paid in full by Equitrans Midstream on April 15, 2024.
On April 4, 2024, (i) Equitrans, L.P. and the PADEP entered into a Stipulation of Settlement, that, among other things, resulted in the PADEP deeming the December 8, 2022 orders to Equitrans Midstream and Equitrans, L.P. administratively closed and (ii) the PADEP issued a Civil Penalty Assessment (CPA) in the amount of $764,000, of which $549,500 was reimbursement of PADEP's expenses. The CPA closed the outstanding NOVs issued by the PADEP's Office of Oil and Gas Management related to the Rager Mountain Facility incident. Equitrans Midstream paid the civil penalty pursuant to the CPA in full on April 8, 2024.
On December 29, 2022, the PHMSA issued Equitrans Midstream a Notice of Proposed Safety Order that included proposed remedial requirements related to the Rager Mountain Facility incident, including, but not limited to, completing a root cause analysis, and subsequently, on May 26, 2023, the PHMSA issued a consent order to Equitrans Midstream requiring the completion of a root cause analysis and a remedial work plan and providing that Equitrans Midstream may not resume injection operations at the Rager Mountain Facility until authorized by the PHMSA. In August 2023, Equitrans Midstream submitted a root cause analysis to the PHMSA and later submitted a remedial work plan and injection plan seeking authority to resume injections at the Rager Mountain Facility using all wells in the facility except three, which remained disconnected from the storage field. On October 2, 2023, the PHMSA approved Equitrans Midstream's injection plan and Equitrans Midstream restarted injections at the Rager Mountain Facility on October 5, 2023, subject to certain pressure restrictions and other requirements in the PHMSA consent agreement. On November 16, 2023, the PHMSA issued a letter to Equitrans Midstream approving Equitrans Midstream's request to remove all pressure restrictions at the Rager Mountain Facility. On May 30, 2024, the PHMSA approved resuming operations for one of the three remaining wells excluded from the injection plan.
As a result of the Equitrans Midstream Merger, we indirectly assumed Equitrans Midstream's and Equitrans, L.P.'s defense and responses to matters related to the Rager Mountain Facility incident. We plan to continue working with the PHMSA, pursuant to the consent order between PHSMA and Equitrans Midstream, regarding the remaining two disconnected wells at the Rager Mountain Facility. If additional penalties are pursued and ultimately imposed related to the Rager Mountain Facility incident, the penalties, individually and/or in the aggregate, may exceed $300,000; however, we expect that the resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Previous: Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk · Next: Item 1A. Risk Factors