Item 2. PROPERTIES

11K characters. Original on sec.gov · Markdown

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Generation Facilities

APS’s portfolio of owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2024 is provided in the table below:

NameNo. of Units% Owned (a)Principal Fuels UsedPrimary Dispatch TypeOwned Capacity (MW)
Nuclear:
Palo Verde (b)329.1%UraniumBase Load1,146
Total Nuclear1,146
Steam:
Four Corners 4, 5 (c)263%CoalBase Load970
Cholla 1,32CoalBase Load380
Total Steam1,350
Combined Cycle:
Redhawk2GasLoad Following1,136
West Phoenix5GasLoad Following874
Total Combined Cycle2,010
Combustion Turbine:
Ocotillo7GasPeaking630
Saguaro3GasPeaking189
Douglas1OilPeaking18
Sundance10GasPeaking430
West Phoenix2GasPeaking114
Yucca 1, 2, 33GasPeaking93
Yucca 41OilPeaking54
Yucca 5, 62GasPeaking90
Total Combustion Turbine1,618
Solar: (d)
Cotton Center1SolarAs Available17
Hyder I1SolarAs Available17
Paloma1SolarAs Available17
Chino Valley1SolarAs Available20
Gila Bend1SolarAs Available36
Hyder II1SolarAs Available14
Foothills1SolarAs Available38
Luke AFB1SolarAs Available11
Desert Star1SolarAs Available10
Red Rock1SolarAs Available44
Agave Solar1SolarAs Available150
APS Owned Distributed EnergySolarAs Available38
Multiple facilitiesSolarAs Available4
Total Solar416
Total Capacity6,540

(a)100% unless otherwise noted.

(b)APS’s 29.1% ownership in Palo Verde includes leased interests and is the largest capacity interest of all the participants. See “Business of Arizona Public Service Company — Energy Sources and Resource Planning — Generation Facilities — Nuclear” in Item 1 for details regarding leased interests in Palo Verde. The other participants are Salt River Project, SCE, El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Southern California Public Power Authority, and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.

(c)The other participants are Salt River Project (10%), Public Service Company of New Mexico (13%), Tucson Electric Power Company (7%) and NTEC (7%). The plant is operated by APS.

(d)See “Business of Arizona Public Service Company — Energy Sources and Resource Planning — Energy Storage” above for details related to APS’s energy storage facilities and agreements.

See “Business of Arizona Public Service Company — Environmental Matters” in Item 1 with respect to matters having a possible impact on the operation of certain of APS’s generating facilities.

See “Business of Arizona Public Service Company” in Item 1 for a map detailing the location of APS’s major power plants and principal transmission lines.

Transmission and Distribution Facilities

Current Facilities**.** As of January 24, 2025, APS’s transmission facilities consist of approximately 5,817 pole miles of overhead lines and approximately 86 miles of underground lines, 5,757 miles of which are located in Arizona. APS’s distribution facilities consist of approximately 11,317 miles of overhead lines and approximately 24,031 miles of underground primary cable (20,893 when excluding abandoned conductor), all of which are located in Arizona. APS also owns and maintains 485 substations, including both transmission and distribution yards. APS shares ownership of some of its transmission facilities with other companies.

The following table shows APS’s jointly-owned interests in those transmission facilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2024:

Percent Owned (Weighted-Average)
Arizona Nuclear Power Project 500kV System33.3%
Navajo Southern System24.7%
Palo Verde — Yuma 500kV System25.5%
Four Corners Switchyards58.0%
Phoenix — Mead System17.1%
Palo Verde — Rudd 500kV System50.0%
Morgan — Pinnacle Peak System63.2%
Round Valley System50.0%
Palo Verde — Morgan System87.5%
Hassayampa — North Gila System80.0%
Cholla 500kV Switchyard85.7%
Saguaro 500kV Switchyard60.0%
Kyrene — Knox System50.0%
Agua Fria Switchyard10.0%

Expansion. Each year, APS prepares and files with the ACC a Ten-Year Transmission Plan. In APS’s 2025 Ten-Year Plan, APS projects it will develop 184 miles of new transmission lines over the next 10 years. Additionally, APS plans to upgrade 687 miles of existing transmission lines over the same

horizon. The 2025 Ten-Year Plan includes a 28-mile 500kV line from the Jojoba substation to the Rudd substation. The purpose of this 500kV line project is to bring in a new source to the west and southwest parts of the Phoenix metropolitan area which is experiencing rapid economic development. This new source will provide customers in the area greater access to a diverse mix of resources from around the region. Additionally, the 2025 Ten-Year Plan includes the rebuild of both Four Corners to Pinnacle Peak 345kV lines which span 289 miles each. This rebuild will replace aging towers to ensure continued reliability and safety, increase important capability to the Metro Phoenix area, and improve access to a diverse mix of resources from the Four Corners region throughout the Southwest. The 2025 Ten-Year Plan includes numerous projects with the purpose to interconnect new renewable energy resources to the transmission system.

Plant and Transmission Line Leases and Rights-of-Way on Indian Lands

The Navajo Plant and Four Corners are located on land held under leases from the Navajo Nation and also under rights-of-way from the federal government. The Navajo Plant ceased operations in November 2019. The co-owners and the Navajo Nation executed a lease extension on November 29, 2017, that allows for decommissioning activities to begin after the plant ceased operations.

APS, on behalf of the Four Corners participants, negotiated amendments to the Four Corners facility lease with the Navajo Nation, which extends the Four Corners leasehold interest from 2016 to 2041. See “Business of Arizona Public Service Company — Energy Sources and Resource Planning — Generation Facilities — Coal-Fueled Generating Facilities — Four Corners” in Item 1 for additional information about the Four Corners right-of-way and lease matters.

Certain portions of our transmission lines are located on Indian lands pursuant to rights-of-way that are effective for specified periods. Some of these rights-of-way have expired and our renewal applications have not yet been acted upon by the appropriate Indian tribes or federal agencies. Other rights expire at various times in the future and renewal action by the applicable tribe or federal agencies will be required at that time. In recent negotiations, certain of the affected Indian tribes have required payments substantially in excess of amounts that we have paid in the past for such rights-of-way. The ultimate cost of renewal of certain of the rights-of-way for our transmission lines is therefore uncertain.

Previous: Item 1C. CYBERSECURITY · Next: Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS